Fiscal Year 1994 ,. . S A i Q , r a ITEM APPROPRIATIONS ($ MILLIONS) Navigation Flood Control Total Flood Control Mississippi River & Tributaries' Multipurpose including power Beach Erosion Control Total New Work' Other Work� TOTAL NAVIGATION (Calendar Year)' Ton(Miles of Commerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports Foreign, Grat Lakes Ports Domestic, Coastal (Intraterritory not compiled) Domestic, Great Lakes Domestic, Inland Domestic, Local TOTAL Tons of Commerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports Foreign, Grat Lakes Ports Domestic, Coastal and Intraterritory Domestic, Great Lakes Domestic, Inland Domestic, Local TOTAL FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED ($ Billion) FLOOD DAMAGES SUFFERED ($ Billion) POWER Installed (Cumulative in millions of kw) Generated (Billions of kwh) RESERVOIR Storate (Millions of acre feet) All Purpose Flood Control (Maximum) Water Supply Irrigation PUBLIC ATTENDANCE AT RESERVOIRS Recreation Days of Use (Millions) Visitor Days (Millions)' FUNDING General Investigation Construction General Operations & Maintenance, General Regulatory Program Flood Control Mississippi River & Tribs. General Expenses Flood Control & Coastal Emergencies Revolving Fund Permanent Appropriation TOTAL 1994 STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 604 451 461 437 439 519 512 443 299 304.0 857 860 914 901 879 856 840 787 673 676 (225) (212) (229) (221) (220) (222) (205) (206) (227) (225) 115 108 70 62 60 73 73 69 93 112 68 70 56 66 43 27 27 23 17 12 1,644 1,489 1,501 1,466 1,421 1,475 1,452 1,221 1,082 1,104 2,405 2,364 2,167 1,848 1,776 1,770 1,826 1,813 1,658 1,797 4,049 3,853 3,668 3,314 3,197 3,245 3,278 3,135 2,730 2,901 70,320.0 74,938.6 76,622.3 77,942.8 68,563.4 56,208.2 50,985.0 47,274.2 44,769.3 26,106.8 21,027.6 17,102.6 24,330.8 27,118.9 24,448.4 22,003.3 24,235.2 27,171.9 448,404.2 502,311.0 502,133.0 479,099.3 483,888.6 561,594.9 686,818.7 580,888.7 610,976.5 56,438.1 55,784.6 55,339. 1 60,929.8 58,307.6 58,159.4 50,076.4 43,198.2 48,184.0 283,898.6 297,638.7 289,959.0 293,393.3 272,157.4 269,035.7 257,336.4 248,116.9 232,707.5 921.9 950.0 968.0 1,087.0 1,196.3 1,183.9 1,197.2 1,102.0 1,157.1 886,085.1 952,650.8 942,123.9 935,817.3 911,232.2 970,685.0 968,403.7 944,910.5 964,911.2 1,016.4 992.0 971.8 991.1 983.1 923.7 845.1 791.4 723.0 43.6 45.5 41.8 50.5 54.8 52.5 45.9 45.7 51.3 271.7* 289.1 299.1 303.2 307.2 330.3 328.2 312.0 313.2 109.8 107.4 103.4 110.2 109.1 109.7 96.5 87.4 92.0 607.3 621.0 600.4 622.5 606.0 588.1 569.8 560.5 534.7 74.4 76.8 75.6 86.4 80.2 83.7 82.0 77.4 74.2 2,123* 2,132.1 2,092.1 2,163.9 2,140.4 2,088.0 1,874.4 1,788.4 1,836.0 17.0 32.1 8.1 17.5 17.6 8.3 2.1 5.2 27.3 10.8 1.1 16.4 0.8 1.7 1.6 1.1 0.2 1.4 6.0 0.5 20.7 20.7 20.0 20.7 20.0 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.3 68.2 73,8 68.2 83.9 81.6 78.5 69.6 74.0 80.7 273.6 273.6 272.1 123.3 123.3 ,123.0 9.5 9.5 9.2 205 199 203 192 190 191 191 181 207,540 146,810 194,427 146,433 129,251 142,405 138,767 136,287 128,272 1,400,875 1,260,184 1,284,142 1,143,073 1,083,811 1,184,735 1,200,175 1,152,150 919,345 1,688,900 1,596,668 1,538,329 1,450,656 1,398,219 1,370,714 1,421,733 1,389,846 1,319,973 92,000 86,000 86,000 71,099 68,455 63,752 55,262 348,875 351,182 356,437 344,602 330,296 332,550 317,704 310,797 314,760 148,500 149,000 141,500 126,598 141,997 120,000 115,000 115,000 107,000 150,000 130,000 55,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 10,000 48,976 0 0 0 0 9,860 0 0 12,000 7,000 12,000 10,499 12,298 11,801 14,700 9,000 9,000 0 8,000 4,049,130 3,730,343 3,668,133 3,314,262 3,196,589 3,245,261 3,278,091 3,135,080 2,830,050 20.1' 88.3 270.6 123.0 9.2 506 502 * Excludes intraterritory traffic ' Included in Flood Control Total ' Advance engineering and design and construction. (Including major rehabilitation projects.) Savings and slippages applied to projects. � Operation and maintenance, surveys, administrative and misc. programs and activities. ' For further information on waterborne commerce, see Waterborne Commerce of the United States, published annually. It may be obtained by writing Commander, U. S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans, ATTN: CELMN-ED-S, Box 60267, New Orleans, Louisiana 70160-0267 � Includes New Melones and Spettishman, built by the Corps and operated by others * All Federal agencies changed to "Visitor Days" at the direction of OMB DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY '5( CIVIL WORKS 108 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Honorable Albert Gore, Jr. President of the Senate Washington, D. C. 20510-0010 Dear Mr. President: I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1994 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1993 and September 30, 1994. Sincerely, John / . Zirschky Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) r ' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY CIVIL WORKS 108 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF 1 3JuL. 195 Honorable Newt Gingrich Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515-6501 Dear Mr. Speaker: I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1994 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1993 and September 30, 1994. Sincerely, /7 John. . Zirschky Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter New England Division .... ..................................... 1-1 North Atlantic Division New York, NY, District ......................................... 2-1 Philadelphia, PA, District ........................... .......... 3-1 Baltimore, MD, District ......................................... 4-1 Norfolk, VA, District ........................................... 5-1 South Atlantic Division Wilmington, NC, District ........................................ 6-1 Charleston, SC, District ......................................... 7-1 Savannah, GA, District ......................................... 8-1 Jacksonville, FL, District ........................................ 9-1 Mobile, AL, District ............................................ 10-1 Lower Mississippi Valley Division New Orleans, LA, District ....................................... 11-1 Vicksburg, MS, District ......................................... 12-1 Memphis, TN, District .......................................... 13-1 St. Louis, MO, District .......................................... 14-1 Ohio River Division Nashville, TN, District .......................................... 15-1 Louisville, KY, District ....................................... 16-1 Huntington, WV, District ....................................... 17-1 Pittsburgh, PA, District ......................................... 18-1 Ohio River ................................................... 19-1 North Central Division Buffalo, NY, District ......................................... 20-1 Detroit, MI, District ............................................ 21-1 Chicago, IL, District ............................................ 22-1 Rock Island, IL, District ........................................ 23-1 St. Paul, MN, District ......................................... 24-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ........................................ 25-1 Missouri River Division Omaha, NE, District ......................................... 26-1 Kansas City, MO, District ................................... 27-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1994 Chapter Southwestern Division Little Rock, AR, District ....................................... 28-1 Tulsa, OK, District .......................................... 29-1 Fort Worth, TX, District ....................................... 30-1 Galveston, TX, District ........................................ 31-1 Albuquerque, NM, District ..................................... 32-1 South Pacific Division Los Angeles, CA District ....................................... 33-1 San Francisco, CA, District .................................... 34-1 Sacramento, CA District ....................................... 35-1 California Debris Commission ................................... 35-1A Pacific Ocean Division ........................................... 36-1 North Pacific Division Portland, OR, District ... ........... ......................... 37-1 Seattle, WA, District ....................................... 38-1 Walla Walla, WA, District . ................................. 39-1 Alaska, AK, District .......................................... 40-1 Mississippi River Commission ................................... 41-1 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory .................. 42-1 Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory .................. 43-1 Waterways Experiment Station .................................. 44-1 Engineer Topographic Laboratories ............................. 45-1 Water Resources Support Center .................................. 46-1 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses ...... 47-1 International Boundary Waters Board ........................... 48-1 Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act ................. 49-1 Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal & National Emergency Preparedness ........ .............................. 50-1 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery Activities ..... 51-1 Appendices Flood Control Reservoirs Operable ............................ A-1 Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps of Engineers but Operated by Others .......................... A-1-A Flood Control Projects Under Construction ...................... B-1 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Appendices (continued) Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction ............... B-1-A Navigation Locks and Dams Operable .......................... C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction ......................... D-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable ............... E-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction ..... F-1 Flood Damages Suffered and Prevented ......................... G-1 Index ......................................... I-1 iii NEW ENGLAND DIVISION * The New England Division, an operating division with both district and division functions, comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Page Navigation 1. Andrews River, MA .................................... 1-3 2. Aquatic Plant Control .................................. 1-3 3. Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA................ 1-3 4. Boston Harbor, MA ..................................... 1-3 5. Cape Cod Canal, MA.....................................1-4 6. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA ................ 1-4 7. Connecticut River below Hartford, CT ........ 1-5 8. Criehaven Harbor, ME ........................... 1-5 9. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA .............................. 1-5 10. Green Harbor, MA ................................. 1-6 11. Guilford Harbor, CT .................................. 1-6 12. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI ............ 1-6 13. Josias River, ME .................................. 1-7 14. Little Harbor, NH ................................. 1-7 15. New Haven Harbor, CT .......................... 1-7 16. Newburyport Harbor, MA.............................1-8 17. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI ..................................... 1-8 18. Saco River, ME ........................................ 1-9 19. Sakonnet Harbor, RI......................... ..... 1-9 20. Seekonk River, Providence, RI .................. 1-9 21. Sesuit Harbor, MA ......................................- 10 22. Stony Creek, Branford, CT ...................... 1-10 23. Wellfleet Harbor, MA............................... 1-10 24. Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, ME ......................................... 1-10 25. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ....1-11 26. Other Authorized Navigation Projects....... 1-11 27. Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) ....................................... 1-11 Alterations of Bridges 28. Authorized Bridge Alteration ..................... 1-11 Beach Erosion Control 29. Cliff Walk, Newport, RI .............................. 1-11 30. Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT.............. 1-11 31. Revere Beach, MA ...................................... 1-12 32. Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT ............. 1-12 33. Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI ..................................................... 1-12 34. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT ............... 1-13 35. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects ........................................ 1-13 36. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ........................................... 1-13 37. Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) .................. 1- 13 38. Mitigation of Shore Damages Pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (Preauthorization) ................................... 1-13 Flood Control 39. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI .......... 1-13 39A. West Hill Dam, MA .................................. 1-14 40. Bluffs Community Center, Swansea, MA.. 1-14 41. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA .................................. 1-14 42. Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT ....................................... 1-14 42A Ball Mountain Lake, VT .......................... 1-15 42B. Barre Falls Dam, MA ..................... ....... 1-16 42C. Birch Hill Dam, MA ................................. 1-16 42D. Colebrook River Lake, CT........................ 1-16 42E. Conant Brook Dam, MA.............................. 1-16 42F. Connecticut River, Middletown, CT ......... 1-16 42G. Farmington River, Simsbury, CT............... 1-17 42H. Knightville Dam, MA ................ 1-17 421. Lancaster, Israel River, NH .................... 1-17 42J. Littleville Lake, MA ................................. 1-18 42K. North Hartland Lake, VT ...........................- 18 Flood Control (Continued) 42L. North Springfield Lake, VT ........................ 1-18 42M. Otter Brook Lake, NH ............................. 1-18 42N. Riverdale, West Springfield, MA.............1-18 420. Surry Mountain Lake, NH ......................... 1-19 1-1 Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 Page 42P. Townshend Lake, VT ................................ 1-19 42Q. Tully Lake, MA................................... 1-19 42R. Union Village Dam, VT .......................... 1-.2..0. 43. Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA.........1-20 43A. Black Rock Lake, CT ................................... 1-20 43B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT ........................... 1-20 43C. Hop Brook Lake, CT............................. 1-20 43D. Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT .................................... 1-21 43E. Northfield Brook Lake, CT .................... 1-21 43F. Thomaston Dam, CT ................................... 1-21 44. Machias River, Machiasport, ME......... 1-21 45. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ........ 1-22 45A Blackwater Dam, NH ................................. 1-22 45B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ................... 1-22 45C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH...................... 1-22 45D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH ............ 1-23 45E. North Nashua River, Leominster, MA.......1-23 45F. North Nashua River, Leominster (Sewer Line), MA ........................................ 1-23 46. Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME ........ 1-24 47. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA ...................................... 1-24 48. Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME..................... 1-24 49. Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA ................ 1-24 50. Quonset Point, Davisville, RI ..................... 1-25 51. Roughans Point, Revere, MA...............1-25 52. Saugus River & Tributaries, MA ............... 1-25 53. Stamford, CT ....................................... 1-26 54. Thames River Basin, CT, RI, and MA ....... 1-26 54A Buffumville Lake, MA.......................... 1-26 54B. East Brimfield Lake, MA ............................ 1-26 54C. Hodges Village Dam, MA .................... 1-26 54D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT ................. 1-26 54E. West Thompson Lake, CT...........................1-27 54F. Westville Lake, MA.....................................1-27 55. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA ... 1-27 56. West River, New Haven, CT ................. 1-27 57. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................. 1-28 58. Flood Control Reservoir Operations........1-28 59. Hurricane Barrier Operations.............. 1-29 60. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 1-29 61. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 1-29 Deauthorized Projects 62. Deauthorized Projects .............................. 1-29 General Investigations 63. Surveys .......................................... 1-29 64. Collection and Study of Basic Data............ 1-29 65. Planning, Engineering and Design ............ 1-30 66. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ....................................... 1-30 Tables Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement ............ 1-31 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation .................. 1-42 Table 1-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 1-50 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............... 1-54 Table 1-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................. 1-..5.5. Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects including Power ... 1-57 Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects.....................1-58 Table 1-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Sec. 107 ........................ 1-60 Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 ........................- 60 Table 1J Mitigation of Shore Damages Pursuant to Sec. 111 ....................... 1-60 Table 1-K Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 ........................ 1-61 Table 1-L Project Modifications for the Improvement of the Environment Pursuant to Sec. 1135 ......................- 61 Table 1-M Blackstone River Basin ................... 1-61 Table 1-N Connecticut River Basin .................. 1-62 Table 1-0 Housatonic River Basin .................... 1-64 Table 1-P Merrimack River Basin ....................- 65 Table 1-Q Thames River Basin........................1-66 Table 1-R Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ......................... 1-67 1-2 Page NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Navigation 1. ANDREWS RIVER, MA Location. On Nantucket Sound within town of Harwich, MA, about 84 miles southeast of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13229.) Existing project. Channel six feet deep, 75 feet wide, extending about 2,900 feet from deep water in Nantucket Sound to a public marina, two jetties on east and west sides of harbor entrance, and three-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. Eastjetty completed in June 1967. Dredging was completed in April 1968. Construction of westjetty was completed in May 1973. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance. Hired labor costs of $2,700 were incurred for plotting an afterdredge survey in association with maintenance dredging performed last fiscal year by the government-owned dredge CURRITUCK. Final adjustments were made to rental costs for Fiscal Year 1993 dredging, resulting in a decrease of $2,652 and bringing the total rental cost to $56,847. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England Division jurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to provide technical assistance in the eradication or control of aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing program.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute at least 50 percent of the cost of planning beyond the reconnaissance stage and at least 50 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations during fiscal year. On request, technical information was provided to local interests on specific aquatic weed problems. These problems included nuisance growth of aquatic vegetation in the Charles River and several lakes. 3. AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA Location. Aunt Lydia's Cove is located in Chatham Harbor, Chatham, Massachusetts. The cove is approximately 90 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts on the "elbow" of Cape Cod. Existing project. Provides for the dredging of an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a length of 900 feet, and dredging of a 9.5 acre anchorage also to a depth of 8 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed on 24 August 1994 between the Corps and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The project sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; provide during the period of construction a cash contribution equal to ten percent of total project costs; repay with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years following completion of construction, an additional 10 percent of total project costs partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas; and provide and maintain all berthing areas and local access channels commensurate with project features. Terminal facilities. The Chatham Municipal Fish Pier is the only terminal facility in Aunt Lydia's Cove. Initially constructed in 1945, the pier is used to off-load catch, access boats, load supplies and perform some repairs. Two independent fish companies lease space at the pier's main packing facility where fish are offloaded, packed in ice and shipped to various distributors. The pier provides diesel fuel, gasoline, parking and restroom facilities. Transient and recreational boaters use the pierfor loading, offloading, and refueling. This facility is adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Costs of $86,342 were incurred for completion of project plans and specifications. 4. BOSTON HARBOR, MA Location. Harbor includes all expanse of tidewater lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley and extending from that line westward to mainland. This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive of the islands. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13270 and 13272.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1915, 1917, 1938. Existing project. Completed work at Boston Harbor, adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor proper and its approaches - Fort Point Channel, Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a more detailed description see page 3 ofAnnual Report for 1974. These improvements were completed in May 1966 1-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 with the construction of Chelsea River 35-foot channel and maneuvering basin. New work involves deepening the Mystic River and Reserved Channels from 35 to 40 feet and the Chelsea River Channel from 35 to 38 feet; along with widening and deepening to 40 feet the Inner Confluence Area which provides access to the Mystic and Chelsea River Channels; and widening at the entrance to the Reserved Channel. The proposed project would increase the navigational efficiency and safety of harbor operations and reduce tidal delays for larger vessels. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Formal assurances for new work have not been requested yet. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, currently estimated at $7,970,000; reimburse an additional ten percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas), currently estimated at $2,305,000; relocate utilities necessary for construction of the project, currently estimated at $980,000; and deepen berthing areas at the terminals of project beneficiaries, currently estimated at $2,450,000. Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and piers in harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth-Fore, and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. For a full description of channel facilities in Chelsea River, refer to House Document 350, 87th Congress, 2nd session. (See Port Series No. 3, Part 2, Port of Boston, MA dated 1967.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued preconstruction engineering and design activities including preparation of the draft Environmental Impact Statement, which was distributed in April 1994 for public review and comment. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $10,000 were incurred for continued work on an Environmental Impact Statement and $23,000 for testing of environmental samples from a potential disposal area in association with the proposed improvement and maintenance dredging project. A contract in the amount of $107,540 was awarded for environmental studies for the Boston Harbor Navigation Improvement, Maintenance, and Berth Dredging Environmental Impact Report/ Statement with earnings this year of $90,000. 5. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from the head of Buzzards Bay, MA, easterly to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13246.) Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965. More recent major rehabilitation of the two highway bridges crossing the canal is completed. Rehabilitation of the Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in 1981. The Sagamore Highway Bridge was completed in 1982. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. Seventh terminal is State pier, owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and on north bank of canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract to paint the Bourne highway bridge was awarded in September 1992. Work began in October 1992 and was completed in December 1993. Contractor earnings were $2,217,328 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. Other FY 1994 maintenance costs were: operation and maintenance of Buzzards Bay railroad bridge $200,891. Other FY 1994 costs for work accomplished by hired labor and contract were: vessel traffic control activities $1,669,502; maintenance of buildings, grounds and utilities $922,650; operation and maintenance of project recreational facilities $455,220; project administration facilities $251,560; project utilities $134,019; maintenance of roads and bridges $145,032; periodic inspections $162,351; engineering and design $102,725; contract supervision and administration $67,491 and $54,946 for real estate activities. 6. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA Location.At northeastern corner ofNantucket Sound about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, MA, and 66 miles south of Providence Harbor, RI, at northern extremity of Cape Cod. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13237.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1942. Existing project. An entrance channel ten feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts autho- 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION rizing existing project.) Construction of existing project was initiated in September and completed in October 1957. By 1961, a break in barrier beach connecting Morris and Monomoy Islands caused Federal Channel to fill in completely. Local interests dredged an emergency channel to obtain eight-foot depth in June 1962 and performed additional dredging in 1963. Minimal maintenance dredging by the Federal Government in April and May 1964 provided access to inner harbor for 1964 boating season. Anew ten-foot channel through Harding Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The town operates a wharf on the north side of the inner harbor which is leased out to commercial users. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $2,300 were incurred for plotting an afterdredge survey in association with maintenance dredging performed last fiscal year by the government-owned dredge CURRITUCK. Final adjustments were made to rental costs for fiscal year 1993 dredging, resulting in a decrease of $6,832 and bringing the total rental cost to $112,168. 7. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT Location. Has its source in Connecticut Lake in northern New Hampshire, flows southerly 380 miles and empties into Long Island Sound at Saybrook, CT, 14 miles west of New London. Hartford, now head of commercial navigation, is 52 statute miles, by channel, from mouth. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12373 and 12377.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Eightmile River, CT, elimination as separate project: Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from deep water in Connecticut River to Hamburg and for turning basin of same depth, 150 feet wide, approximately 300 feet long at Hamburg. Project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1910. Costs and expenditures were $9,000 all for new work. In accordance with River and Harbor Act of 1950, project for Connecticut River below Hartford was modified to include project for Eightmile River. Aforementioned Act also provided for an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and about 6.5 acres in area in upper cove in Hamburg. A channel 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide for a distance of 52 miles upstream to Hartford; two riprap jetties at the mouth of the river; and dikes, training walls, revetments and other regulatory works along the river between Hartford and Gildersleeve Island. The project provides for small-boat improvements at Wethersfield Cove; Eightmile River; Essex; and North Cove, Old Saybrook. For a more detailed description of project see page 7 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing 1-5 project.) Existing project was completed in September 1965 with the construction of channel and anchorage in North Cove, Old Saybrook, CT. For further details, see Annual Report for 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along both Connecticut and Eightmile Rivers there are two or three wharves at each river town, one or more in each town being open to public use. At Hartford and Middletown there is about one-half of wharffrontage along west bank of river. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in December 1993. Dredging began in late December 1993 but was stopped the following month due to ice in the river. Because no dredging was allowed between April 1 and August 15, dredging by commercial hopper dredge resumed on August 16 and was completed on August 28, 1994 The contract amount was increased in August by $40,077 for remobilization and again in September by $36,527 to cover additional dredging quantities for a total contract cost of $354,264. A total of 117,300 cubic yards of material were removed from Pistol Point Bar, Sears Shoal, and Higganum Creek Shoal with disposal in riverine sites located in medium depth areas in the vicinity of the dredging areas. Hired labor costs included $18,800 for supervision and inspection, $85,100 for performing and plotting pre- and afterdredge surveys, and $1,000 for contract processing. Contractor earnings for inspection services to supervise disposal of dredged material were $6,142. 8. CRIEHAVEN HARBOR, ME Location. This harbor is on the northwesterly side of Ragged Island, one of the largest of a group lying about 12 miles off the mouth of Penobscot Bay, Maine. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 225 and 1203.) Existing project. Provides for a rubblestone breakwater extending about 300 feet in a northerly direction from Sunset Point. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) The project was completed in 1935 and repairs were made to the breakwater in May 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are several wharves within the harbor sufficient for existing commerce. Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Hired labor costs in the amount of $6,400 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications for a proposed breakwater repair project. 9. CUTYHUNK HARBOR, MA Location. At eastern end of Cuttyhunk Island, at REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 western entrance to Buzzards Bay, about 14 miles south of New Bedford Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13229.) Existing project. A channel generally 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from outer harbor to westerly terminal in Cuttyhunk Pond, about 3,500 feet; an anchorage in inner harbor 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, and 800 feet wide; and maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. Existing project was completed in 1939. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Disposal areas for maintenance will be furnished when required. Terminal facilities. Two town wharves of timber and pile construction, having total berthing space of 400 feet, are open to public use. Limited mechanical-handling facilities are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel by the Government- owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from August 1 to August 14, 1994 at a rental cost of $115,000. A total of 9,660 cubic yards of sand were removed and placed in a nearshore disposal site off Church's Beach. Hired labor costs of $26,000 were incurred for performing pre- and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. 10. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield, MA, about 30 miles southeast of Boston, MA, and nine miles north of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253.) Existing project. Provides for channel six feet deep (eight feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with small turning basin at upstream limit; five-acre anchorage near Town Pier, six feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in part, and a 200-foot extension of existing west jetty at elevation +12, with dike to beach berm at elevation +14 feet, and raising east jetty to elevation +14. (See Table 1- B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project) Construction was completed in October 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCKwas performed from May 19 to June 10, 1994 at a rental cost of $206,000. A total of 30,101 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at anearshore site offofGreen Harbor Beach. Hired labor costs of $55,800 were incurred for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. Final adjustments were made to rental costs for fiscal year 1993 dredging, resulting in a decrease of $7,870 and bringing the total rental cost for that work to $320,130. 11. GUILFORD HARBOR, CT Location. On north side of Long Island Sound about 13 miles east of New Haven Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12354.) Existing project. An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the harbor from Long Island Sound to an anchorage basin in East River, length 0.8 mile, a channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide up Sluice Creek 880 feet to Whitfield Street; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide in East River, length 1,500 feet. Mean and spring tidal ranges are 5.4 and 6.4 feet, respectively. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in April 1957. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. State wharf about 370 feet long provides adequate facilities for existing commerce. Town wharf on north bank of East River at foot of Whitfield Street is no longer usable. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in September 1992, work commenced in November 1992 and was completed in February 1994. Work could not be completed as scheduled because of adverse weather conditions and equipment failure and was stopped in February 1993 due to enviromental restrictions. The contract was subsequently terminated for default and the contract was taken over by a bonding company. Work was resumed in October 1993 and completed on February 28, 1994. A total of 31,938 cubic yards of material were removed this fiscal year and placed at a nearby upland site. Contractor earnings this fiscal year were $216,421, bringing the total contract cost to date to $453,721 with final payment pending at the end of this fiscal year. A total of 41,938 cubic yards were removed since the start of work in fiscal year 1993. Hired labor costs included $71,400 for supervision and inspection, $47,000 for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys, and $200 for contract processing. 12. HARBOR OF REFUGE BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. On east side of Block Island, near south end of inner curve of shoreline 13 miles south-southwest from Point Judith Harbor, RI, and about 25 miles southeasterly from Stonington Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13217.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see Annual Report for 1976. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Cornpleted in 1916 except for inactive portion. 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Two wharves in harbor, both steel sheet pile bulkhead which comprises southern and eastern limits of basin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical-handling facilities are available. One wharf owned by town and open to public, is considered inadequate for present general needs of boating in harbor. There is limited room for expansion of terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract for repair of the East Breakwater was awarded in August 1994. Contractor earnings were $50,000 through the end of the fiscal year. Hired labor costs included $10,500 for preparation of plans and specifications, $6,100 for supervision and inspection, and $1,200 for contract processing. Hired labor costs in the amount of $24,900 were also incurred for preparation of plans and specifications in association with a maintenance dredging project proposed to take place next fiscal year. 13. JOSIAS RIVER, ME Location. A small river running through Flat Pond to Perkins Cove, which is the harbor for Ogunquit, a village on coast of Maine 30 miles southwest of Portland. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13286.) Existing project. Completed work consists of a channel 5 feet deep and 40 feet wide in Josias River from that depth in Perkins Cove to and including anchorage basins of same depth and about 4.2 acres in area in Flat Pond. Project was completed in March 1960. New work involves deepening the existing 900-foot Federal channel and 2.1 acres of the anchorage area to 7 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for the Section 107 modification was executed on February 8, 1993 between the Corps and the Town of Ogunquit, Maine. The local sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material disposal areas, and perform all utility relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for the construction and later maintenance of the project; pay 10 percent of project costs for commercial navigation during construction, curently estimated at $18,000; pay 50 percent of project costs of recreational navigation during construction; currently estimated at $68,000; reimburse the Federal Government an additional 10 percent of project costs for commercial navigation within the 30- year period following completion of construction currently estimated at $18,000; provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain adequate depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals; and bear all costs for operation and maintenance of project features allocated to recreational navigation. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves in the harbor, all owned by the Ogunquit Village Corporation and open to the public free of charge. Three of these wharves are in Flat Pond and Perkins Cove. The village corporation also erected a pile-and-timber bulkhead backed with earthfill, on the northerly shore of the river. The easterly end of this bulkhead is about 300 feet below the footbridge from which point it extends 490 feet along the northerly bank of the river into Flat Pond. A marine railway capable of handling boats up to 50 feet long is immediately east of the bulkhead. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for improvement dredging along the Josias River was awarded February 10, 1993. Work began in November 1993 and was completed in January 1994. Contractor payments total $334,915, of which $193,916 is for new work, with final payment pending at fiscal year end. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the 5-foot channel and anchorage was performed in conjunction with the contract for improvement dredging. A total of 7,355 cubic yards of maintenance material were removed and disposed of at the Cape Arundel Disposal area. Contractor earnings for the maintenance portion this fiscal year were $140,999. Hired labor costs associated with maintenance dredging included $16,300 for supervision and inspection, $21,700 for performing pre- and after-dredge surveys and $17,200 adjustment from new work. Contractor earnings for inspection services to supervise disposal of dredged material were $2,000. 14. LITTLE HARBOR, NH Location. Little Harbor is located on the west side of Portsmouth Harbor between New Castle Island and the New Hampshire mainland. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1976. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One dock owned by Wentworth Hotel, but not available to public. Tentative State plans include a small boat landing and shore facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging in the 12-foot channel by the Government- owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from May 12 to May 18, 1994 at a rental cost of $61,000. A total of 5,360 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site off of Wallis Sands State Beach. Hired labor costs of $25,500 were incurred for performing pre- and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. 15. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 75 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12371.) Previous project. For details, see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. A main channel 35 feet deep, 400 to 1-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 800 feet wide, from Long Island Sound to Tomlinson Bridge; two anchorage basins below Tomlinson Bridge of 16 and 15-foot depths; apile-and-riprap dike about 4,200 feet long, to contract tidal flow at Fort Hale Bar; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 to 150 feet wide, from southwest corner of 16-foot anchorage basin via City Point and West Haven Wharf front to Kimberly Avenue Bridge; thence 12 feet deep and prevailing width of 75 feet up West River to about 600 feet upstream of Kimberly Avenue Bridge, and an anchorage basin six feet deep in West River oppositeMars Wharf; a channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep from 15-foot anchorage basin toward Brewery Street, about 300 feet; a channel in Quinnipiac River 22 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide to a point about 1,000 feet above Ferry Street, thence 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Grand Avenue, with turning basin 22 feet deep, 200 to 800 feet wide, and 700 feet long at mouth of Mill River; a channel up Mill River 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide to junction of two branches above Chapel Street, thence to Grand Avenue, 100 feet wide in East Branch and generally 125 feet wide in West Branch; and removal of certain obstructive rocks in Morris Cove. Existing project was completed in 1961. The 22-foot channel and turning basin is to be restudied. Estimated cost (1960) of this portion is $980,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Port of New Haven is served by 24 waterfront facilities; most are within city limits of New Haven. Improved waterways within port area along which facilities are located include West River, Main Harbor, West and East Branches of Mill River, and Quinnipiac River channels. Facilities are all privately owned and operated with exception of City Wharf and U.S. Coast Guard Wharf. Depths alongside piers and wharves range from 35 to zero feet at mean low water. Some of the facilities have rail connections and all are accessible by paved streets. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Ports of Southern New England No. 4, revised 1983.) Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dreding of the main ship channel under a continuing contract awarded 7 September 1993 was performed from 1 October 1993 to 31 January 1994 by mechanical dredge. A total of 837,450 cubic yards of material were removed and disposed of at the Central Long Island Sound Disposal Site. Contractor earnings this fiscal year were $1,875,888, bringing the total contract cost to $2,050,888. Hired labor costs included $43,300 for supervision and inspection, $89,700 for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys, $2,300 for preparation of plans and specifications, and $1,000 for contract processing. Contractor earnings for inspection services to supervise disposal of dredged material were $46,200. Earnings this fiscal year on a contract with Science Applications International Corporation for Cap Monitoring through the DAMOS Program were $198,640, and $65,869 for Plume Monitoring during dredging operations. 16. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA Location. On south bank of Merrimack River, about 2.5 miles above mouth, and about 48 miles by water north of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13282.) Existing project. Two jetties, one projecting.4,118 feet from the north shore, the other projecting 2,445 feet from the south shore, converging until 1,000 feet apart, then extending seaward 1,000 feet parallel to axis of channel; partially closing Plum Island Basin by a timber dike; channel 12 feet deep and 400 feet wide through bar, thence nine feet deep and 200 feet wide to and including a widened turning basin in front of wharves. (See Table 1-B at end ofchapterforActs authorizing existingproject.) Existing project was completed in August 1958, with the improvement of 12-foot channel and outer harbor. North jetty was completed in 1914; south jetty was completed, except for a length of about 30 feet at its outer end, in 1905. Required rehabilitation of these jetties completed in September 1970. Plum Island Basin was partially closed in 1883 by construction of a timber dike. North Rock was removed in 1901. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Marinas, a yacht club, public landings, and a commercial fish pier extend along a frontage of the south bank of Merrimack River below highway bridge and one town pier and four marinas on the north side of river. Terminal facilities are adequate for exisiting commerce. Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Final adjustments were made to rental costs for fiscal year 1990 dredging, resulting in a decrease of $684 and bringing the total rental cost for that work to $280,618. 17. POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI Location. Point Judith marks the southwestern entrance to Narragansett Bay. Harbor lies in shallow bight west of point, about 14 miles southwest of Newport Harbor, RI, and 33 miles east ofNew London Harbor, CT. Point Judith Pond is a shallow salt pond, lying inland of the beach, with a length north and south of about four miles. A small artificial opening through the beach and sand dunes connects this pond to the ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13218 and 13219.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1977. (SeeTable 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) All work for project authorized prior to 1949 was completed in 1950. Breakwaters were completed in 1914 and dredging of shoals in project area was done in 1921. Main and east shore arm breakwater had deteriorated and required restoration to project design. In 1962 reconstruction of east arm breakwater and main breakwater dock 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION facilities were completed. Rehabilitation required for remainder of breakwater restoration was completed in October 1963. The extension of the 15-foot channel was completed in April 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of one town wharf of steel sheet pile bulkhead construction which comprises southern and eastern limits ofbasin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical handling facilities are available. Wharf is owned by the town and open to the public. State of Rhode Island maintains two State piers, one in Galilee and one in Jerusalem, each having about 500 feet of berthing space. A facility comprising a bulkhead with 15 finger piers provides berthing space of about 4,000 linear feet. This facility is used for receipt of fish and fish products. Mechanical handling facilities including fish pumps, are available for discharge of cargo. In addition, there are approximately ten small privately owned wharves used in the fishing business and passenger traffic. Facilities are adequate for exisiting commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract for rehabilitation of the East Shore Arm Breakwater was awarded on 19 September 1994. Work is expected to start in November 1994. Hired labor costs included $17,300 for preparation of plans and specifications, and $1,900 for contract processing. 18. SACO RIVER, ME Location. Rises in White Mountain region of New Hampshire at an elevation about 1,900 feet above sea level, flows about 105 miles in a general southeasterly direction, and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 16 miles southwest of Portland, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13287.) Existing project. For description of completed existing portion of project see Annual Report for 1978. For a description of completed improvement of project see Annual Report for 1983. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves of solid fill construction at Saco and Biddeford, none of which has railroad connection; and a small pier near mouth of river used for summer passenger business. Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel under a contract awarded in July 1992 and terminated for default in March 1993, resumed on 2 October 1993 and was completed on 1 December 1993. A total of 19,378 cubic yards of sand were removed this fiscal year by hydraulic dredge and placed on Camp Ellis Beach. Contractor earnings this fiscal year were $210,800 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. Hired labor costs included $17,600 for supervision and inspection, $27,900 for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys, and $400 for contract processing. Overall, 45,842 cubic yards were removed at a total cost of $550,802 since the start of work under the original contract. 19. SAKONNET HARBOR, RI Location. Sakonnet Harbor, originally known as Church Cove, is located in the southwestern part of the town of Little Compton, Newport County, Rhode Island. It is about 30 miles southeast of Providence, and 5 miles east ofNewport. The harbor is located at the eastern side of the entrance to the Sakonnet River, and directly adjoins the Atlantic Ocean at Block Island Sound. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13221). Existing project. Provides for a breakwater 400 feet long in a northerly direction; a 400-foot extension in a northeasterly direction; removal of rock nearest the wharf to a depth of 8 feet and dredging the harbor to a depth of 8 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Original breakwater completed in 1900, extended in 1957. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves in the harbor, none of which are publicly owned. The Sakonnet Yacht Club pier on the east side of the harbor which projects about 300 feet from the shore has a float which makes it readily accessible to small craft. The three other wharves are located on the west side of the harbor. These wharves, for practical purposes, form one structure about 150 feet wide with two piers, 30 and 40 feet wide, projecting 35 and 70 feet therefrom. The piers are open to the public free of charge. The State highway located along two sides of the harbor provides access to the wharves. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract for repairs to the breakwater was awarded 29 August 1994. Contract costs this fiscal year were $15,000. Hired labor costs included $9,900 for preparation of plans and specifications, $2,000 for supervision and inspection, and $700 for contract processing. 20. SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI Location. The India Point Railroad Bridge is located at the mouth of the Seekonk River in Providence, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the removal of the abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge at a currently estimated cost of $1,300,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. Localsponsors must transfer title of the bridge to the United States and provide 50 percent of construction costs. Revenue derived from the sale of scrap from the bridge shall be credited toward the non- Federal share of project costs. 1-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 Operations during fiscal year; New work: Preparation of project plans and specifications continued along with coordination with the Rhode Island State Historic Preservation Office to identify measures to mitigate for the removal of this historic bridge. A Post Authorization Change (PAC) report was completed in February 1994 providing justification for increasing the cost of this project. 21. SESUIT HARBOR, MA Location. Sesuit Harbor is located on the north shore of Dennis in Barnstable County, about 85 miles southeast of Boston, MA. The town of Dennis is bordered on the north by Cape Cod Bay, Brewster and Harwich on the east, Nantucket Sound on the south, and Yarmouth on the west. Land area within the town is 20.66 square miles and has a tidal shoreline of 29.8 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13250.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep below mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water in Cape Cod Bay to a point opposite the Dennis Yacht Club thence reducing in width to 80 feet at the entrance to the inner harbor basin, for a total channel length of 2,400 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in August 1982. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging in the entrance channel by the Government- owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from 11 June to 3 July 1994 at a rental cost of $174,000. Approximately 41,050 cubic yards of sand were removed and placed in a near-shore area east of the entrance channel off Cold Storage Beach. Hired labor costs of $27,500 were incurred for performing pre- and afterdredge surveys and progress surveys. 22. STONY CREEK, BRANFORD, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound about 8 miles east of New Haven near eastern boundary of Town of Branford, CT. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 217 and 1212.) Existing project. Provides for entrance channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water in Long Island Sound to a point 800 feet north of public wharf at Stony Creek and maneuvering basin 6 feet deep totaling 3.5 acres adjacent to channel north of wharf. (See Table 1- B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in January 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are two marinas and a boatyard in the harbor with total storage area for 125 boats, a public dock at Stony Creek equipped with two landing floats, and two landings which are privately operated. Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs in the amount of $2,806 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications for a proposed maintenance dredging project. 23. WELLFLEET HARBOR, MA Location. On Cape Cod Bay, near southern end of the hook of Cape Cod, 12 miles southeast of Provincetown Harbor and 25 miles northeast of entrance to the Cape Cod Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 581 and 1208.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1895. Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep and 125 feet wide from "Deep Hole" to town landing, and an anchorage basin of the same depth 800 feet by 500 feet. The project depths refer to mean low water. The mean range of tide is 10 feet and the spring range is 11.6 feet. The latest published map is contained in H. Doc. 557, 76th Cong., 3d sess. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) The channel was dredged to a depth of 4 feet in 1889. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts dredged the 6-foot channel in 1916. The existing project was completed in June 1958, with the construction of the 10-foot channel and anchorage basin. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven wharves in.the harbor, only one of which is open to the public.. The existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs incurred for a proposed maintenance dredging project to take place in the next fiscal year were $19,700 for preparation ofplans and specifications, $1,200 for an environmental assessment, $10,000 for performing a pre-dredge survey, and $1,000 for contract processing. 24. WOOD ISLAND HARBOR AND THE POOL AT BIDDEFORD ME Location. This harbor is situated at the southern end of Saco Bay, ME, immediately south of the mouth of the Saco River. Itis 20 miles southwest ofPortland, ME, and 30 miles northeast of Portsmouth, NH. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13286.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in the Pool 6 feet deep, approximately 9.7 acres in extent, and three icebreakers south ofFishermen's Wharf. This work was completed in 1956. New work provides for a navigation channel from deep water in Wood Island Harbor to a point just inside the gut at Biddeford Pool. The channel is approximately 4,200 feet long, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. This work was completed in 1992. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for com- 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION pleted work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on February 5, 1992 between the Corps and the city of Biddeford, ME for new work. The local sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; perform all alterations and relocations of facilities and utilities determined by the Government to be necesary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; provide during the period of construction a cash contribution equal to ten percent of total project costs; and repay with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years following completion of construction, an additional ten percent of total project costs, partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves in the harbor. Three are of pile and timber, and the other two are solid-fill construction. One wharf is used for the receipt of seafood, two are used in connection with a yacht club, and the remaining two are private. There is no public-owned wharf but one of the wharves is open to the public free of charge. None of the wharves have railroad connections. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for improvement dredging at Wood Island Harbor was awarded 5 March 1992. Work began in October 1992 and was completed the following month. To date, the contractor has received $241,893 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 25. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 1-R at end of chapter.) 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 1-C at end of chapter.) 27. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-H at end of chapter.) Alterations of Bridges 28. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, MA. Construction was completed in October 1961 with a Federal cost of $138,518. In addition non-Federal contributed funds amounted to $8,062. For details see page 63 of Annual Report for 1962. Beach Erosion Control 29. CLIFF WALK, NEWPORT, RI Location. Cliff Walk is located in Newport, Rhode Island about 25 miles south of Providence. The walkway faces the Atlantic Ocean near the mouth ofNarragansett Bay on the south side of Aquidneck Island, and extends 3.5 miles southward from the west end ofNewport Beach to and around Lands End and thence northward to the east end of Baily Beach. (See Coast Guard and Geodetic Survey Coast Charts 236, 353, and 1210). Existing project. Provides for construction of intermittent shore protection measures at eroded locations along the 3.5 mile walkway. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Initial portion of the project was completed along 9,200 feet of shoreline extending from Newport Beach in September 1972. The entire project could not be completed at that time due to lack of local funds. The City of Newport subsequently performed work along three of the most seriously damaged areas as a deterrent to continued erosion. Work along 110 feet of shoreline between Narragansett Avenue and Webster Street was completed in 1975, and along an 1,100 foot reach of the walkway in the vicinity of Sheep Point and a 300 foot reach between the existing project and Memorial Boulevard in 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed on 15 April 1994 between the Corps and the State of Rhode Island Department of Transportation for the new work. The project sponsor must assume all costs for the operation, maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of the project after completion, and ensure full, open and continued access of the general public along Cliff Walk. Construction of the new work is to be performed by the project sponsor in accordance with the Government approved plans and specifications. The Government shall reimburse the project sponsor for 50 percent of total project costs up to the Federal limit of $750,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract was awarded 20 April 1994 by the project sponsor. Work began in May 1994 and was completed in August 1994. Government reimbursements totalled $653,863 for this work with final reimbursement pending at fiscal year end. 30. PROSPECT BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT Location. The city of West Haven is located in southcentral Connecticut along the northern shore of Long Island Sound about 90 miles northeast of New York City. Prospect Beach is located in West Haven between Seal Bluff Beach and Oyster River Point. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the amount of 30 percent of the first cost of widening 6,000 feet of shoreline to a 100-150 foot width by direct 1-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 placement of sand, starting about 350 feet south of South Street and extendig northerly to Ivy Street; and construction of eight impermeable groins varying from 250 to 330 feet long. This work was completed by the State of Connecticut in May 1957. (For details see Annual Report for 1958). New work provides for beach widening by the direct placement of suitable sandfill along 4,300 feet of shore front between Ivy Street and the groin structure just south of Tyler Avenue to form a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 12.0 feet mean low water and a dry beach width of approximately 137 feet above mean high water. New work also includes periodic beach nourishment as required over the 50-year economic life of the project. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on October 19, 1992 between the Corps and the city of West Haven, Connecticut for the new work. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for initial construction and future nourishment of the project; contribute in cash 35 percent of the cost to construct the project, currently estimated at $785,000; contribute in cash 35 percent of the periodic beach nourishment cost for the 50-year economic life of the project, currently estimated at $623,000; assume all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000, currently estimated at $807,000; assure continued public ownership of the beach and its administration for public use for 50 years; assume all costs for the operation, maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of the project after completion; control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and if necessary provide drainage to divert fresh water runoff away from the beach. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of shore protection and erosion control measures at Prospect Beach was awarded 29 October 1992. Work began in December 1992 and was completed in May 1994. Contractor earnings totaled $2,198,871 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 31. REVERE BEACH, MA Location. In the city of Revere, Suffolk County, MA, approximately seven miles north of the main entrance channel to Boston Harbor, and six miles northeast of the city of Boston, MA. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chart No. 13275 and U.S. Geological Survey Maps, Boston Bay quadrangle.) Existing project. Placement ofsandfill along 13,000 feet of beach. The top of the sandfill will be placed at 18 feet above mean low water, including a 50-foot wide berm, sloping one-foot vertical in 15 feet horizontal to meet the existing beach. The total width of the beach extends approximately 300 feet, of which, about 185 feet is above the mean high water line. Initial fill was completed in June 1992. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances were executed on May 31, 1990 between the Corps and the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), local interests are required to: contribute in cash 35 percent of the cost of construction of the project, actual cost of $2,054,347; contribute in cash 35 percent of the periodic nourishment cost for an initial period of 50 years, currently estimated at $25,100 annually, such contribution to be prior to each nourishment operation; assure the continued performance of the periodic nourishment and repair of the project after the first 50 years and during the economic life as may be required to serve the intended purpose; assure that water pollution that would endanger the health of bathers would not be permitted; hold the United States free from damages due to construction ofthe project; provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way for the initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; assure continued public ownership of the shore and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The Operation and Maintenance Manual was completed and final project costs were apportioned between Federal and non-Federal accounts. 32. SEA BLUFF BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT Location. Sea Bluff Beach is located on the southcentral coast of Connecticut, on Long Island Sound, in the city of West Haven and extends approximately 1,000 feet southwest from the mouth of Cove River to the eastern end of Prospect Beach. Existing project. Beach widening by the direct placement of a suitable sandfill along approximately 1,000 feet of shorefront and providing for a 50-foot wide level beach berm. Also included is the reconstruction of the existing rock groin structure located on the southwestern end of the beach. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Initial sandfill and groin reconstuction were completed in December 1990. New work involves periodic beach nourishment. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. In accordance with the Local Cooperation Agreement signed 27 November 1989 between the Corps and the City of West Haven, the project sponsor must pay 35 percent of the total cost for periodic beach nourishment. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for periodic beach nourishment 33. SOUTHEAST LIGHTHOUSE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. Southeast Lighthouse is located atop a 150-foot bluff on the southeast tip of Block Island in the town of New Shoreham, RI. The lighthouse was first illuminated in 1875 and has been a popular tourist 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION attraction for over a century. It is the highest lighthouse in New England, visible from 35 miles at sea, and its 237,000 candle power is the strongest on the Atlantic coast. Existing project. Provides for all work necessary to relocate Southeast Lighthouse and the attached dwelling some 245 feet away from the eroding bluff. (See Table 1-B at end ofchapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on April 5,1992 between the Corps, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management and the Southeast Lighthouse Foundation. This agreement was modified on 21 January 1993 to reflect amended cost-sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, which limits non- Federal costs to $970,000. Local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide 50 percent of project costs for relocating Southeast Lighthouse up to the non-Federal statutory limit of $970,000; and bear all costs for operation and maintenance of the lighthouse after project completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A competitive services contract for the relocation of Southeast Lighthouse was awarded 12 February 1993. Work began in March 1993 and was completed in August 1994. Contractor earnings total $2,266,699 with final payment and modification for platform work pending at fiscal year end. 34. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT Location. Woodmont Beach is located on the northern shore of Long Island Sound in the borough of Woodmont, city of Milford about five miles southwest of New Haven, CT and some 82 miles northeasterly of New York City. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the amount of one-third of the first cost of protection and improvement of those portions of the shore which are publicly owned by widening to a width of 100 feet by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore in the first pocket beach west of Merwin Point; widening to a width of 100-150 feet, 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street northerly to a point about 400 feet north of Anderson Avenue; and construction of five impermeable groins 300 to 400 feet long. This work was completed by the State of Connecticut in 1959. (For details see Annual Report for 1961.) New work provides for the direct placement of sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet of beach between Clinton and Bonsilene Streets to form a berm 50 feet wide. Reconstruction of the Usher Road/Dunbar Street and Bonsilene Street groins. Mitigation to replace rocky habitat for Blue Mussels lost as a result of sand placement. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on May 18, 1992 between the Corps and the city of Milford, CT for the new work. The local sponsor must provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-ofway for the initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; contribute in cash 35 percent of the cost to construct the project; contribute in cash 35 percent of the periodic beach nourishment cost and 100 percent of the groin maintenance cost for the 50-year economic life of the project; assume all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; assure continued public ownership of the beach and its administration for public use for 50 years; control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and ifnecessary provide a drainage system to divert freshwater runoff away from the beach. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of shore protection and erosion control measures at Woodmont Beach was awarded 21August 1992. Work began in December 1992 and was was completed in February 1994. Contractor payments total $1,270,111 to date with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS An inspection of Sea Bluff Beach in West Haven, Connecticut was conducted in fiscal year 1994, which determined that periodic nourisment was required. 36. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-D at end of chapter.) 37. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-I at end of chapter.) 38. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES PURSUANT TO SECTION 111, PUBLIC LAW 90-483 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-J at end of chapter.) Flood Control 39. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan include a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local 1-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd Session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI, .along the Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the Blackstone River in Millbury, MA, and on the Clear River in Burrillville, RI, were authorized in 1985. (See Table 1-M at end of chapter on Reservoir and Local Protection Projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan.) 39A. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, three miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast ofUxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction ofrecreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 40. BLUFFS COMMUNITY CENTER, SWANSEA, MA Location. The town of Swansea is located in southeastern Massachusetts about 12 miles east of Providence, Rhode Island. The Bluffs Community Center is located on Ocean Grove Beach in the town of Swansea. Existing project. The proposed project involves the construction of 300 feet of rock revetment along the seaward side of the Bluffs Community Center to protect it from wave attack. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 9, 1993 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs during construction; currently estimated at $11,050; pay an additional cash contribution during construction of approximately 20 percent, currently estimated at $43,950, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of emergency shoreline protection measures along Ocean Grove Beach was awarded 18 August 1993. Work was initiated in October 1993 and was substantially complete in March 1994. The Town of Swansea requested additional chinking of the armor stone for public safety purposes and this work was completed in July 1994. Final contract amount was $163,300. 41. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. The project provides for Federal acquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage areas totalling 8,102 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The acquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed is intended as a multiple-purpose project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife management. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Land acquisition is complete. A total of 3,210 acres have been acquired in fee at a cost of $2,152,853 and restrictive easements have been obtained for 4,892 acres at a cost of $591,193. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plain lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances were provided by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs for ordinary maintenance activities, project surveillance and inspection, as well as land use administration, were $335,321. 42. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT, and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction often reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as setforth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course ofinvestigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views andrecommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of Westfield River, MA, and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction ofa reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, VT project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, VT; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH, were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, NH project expired in April 1978 due to lack oflocal cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, West Springfield, MA, Hartford, VT, Wethersfield, CT, and Keene, NH authorized and constructed in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville, VT; Conway, MA; Huntington, MA; Charlestown, NH; North Stratford, NH; Colchester, CT; Middletown, CT; Milford, CT; and Simsbury, CT authorized in accordance with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act were completed. (See Table 1-N at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works for Connecticut River Basin.) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified the comprehensive plan for the control of flood-waters in the Connecticut River Basin, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, authorized by Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1572) by authorizing the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities at Townshend Dam, West River, VT to enable upstream migrant adult Atlantic salmon to bypass that dam and Ball Mountain Dam, VT, and to provide at both Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams facilities as necessary for the downstream passage of juvenile Atlantic salmon. This work was completed in February 1993. 42A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is two miles north of village ofJamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. A rock and earthfill dam, 915 feet long at its crest, 265 feet above riverbed. A chute spillway with a concrete weir 235 feet long was constructed in right abutment. A reinforced concrete-lined tunnel under dam was constructed as an outlet works and is controlled by hydraulically operated gates from a tower at intake end. Reservoir is operated for flood control purposes and has a storage capacity of 54,600 acre-feet, equivalent to 6 inches of runoff from its drainage area of 172 square miles. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Cost of work was $10,448,000 for construction and $350,000 for lands and damages, a total of $10,798,000. Construction of recreation facilities Swas initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Fish passage facility work began in June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. Project is complete. Project 1-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Connecticut River Basin. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of fish passage facilities at Townshend and Ball Mountain Lakes on the West River was awarded in May 1992 and completed in February 1993. Work at Ball Mountain Lake involved automation of the center gate to regulate the spring pool elevation for downstream passage of juvenile salmon. Final contract amont was $637,629, of which $36,100 was for work at Ball Mountain Lake. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to paint the service gates at two projects was awarded in June 1992. Work began in May 1993 and was completed in November 1993. Final contract amount was $58,340. 42B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles, northwest of Worcester, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA and Wachusett Mountain, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repair fire damage to the Environmental Laboratory was awarded 25 February 1994. Work began the following month and was completed in May 1994. Final contract amount was $143,025. 42C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with the Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of city of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-NH and Templeton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 42D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is in town ofColebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace cables to the intake tower was awarded 30 September 1993. Work.was initiated in December 1993 and was completed that month. Final contract amount was $19,060. A contract to paint the Gate Chamber was awarded on 29 March 1994. Work began in August 1994 and was completed in September 1994. Total contractor earnings to date are $23,716 with final payment pending atfiscal year end. A contract to replace fuel storage tanks at Thomaston Dam, Hop Brook Lake, Black Rock Lake and Colebrook Lake was awarded on 23 February 1994. Contract was 55 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor payments totalling $838 for Colebrook. 42E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about two miles southeast of community of Monson, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 42F. CONNECTICUT RIVER, MIDDLETOWN, CT Location. The city of Middletown is located in 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Middlesex County, in the lower Connecticut Valley, in south-central Connecticut. Middletown is approximately 15 miles south of Hartford, CT and 20 miles north of New Haven, CT. Existing project. The project is located along the Connecticut River in the vicinity of River Road at the intersection with Eastern Drive, approximately 6,500 feet downstream of the Arrigoni (Route 66) Bridge. The project consists of 500 linear feet of 6-inch concrete paving block protection underlain by a 1-foot layer of gravel bedding and riprap toe protection along River Road. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on 13 February 1992 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The project sponsor shall provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, railroads, and bridges determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay a cash contribution in the amount necessary to bring the non-Federal share of project costs to 25 percent (a minimun cash contribution of 5 percent is required); assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; and bear all operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work. A contract for construction of emergency streambank protection measures along the Connecticut River was awarded 9 November 1992. Work began in August 1993 and was completed in June 1994. Contractor has received $197,946 to date with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 42G. FARMINGTON RIVER, SIMSBURY, CT Location. The town of Simsbury is located in the central portion of Hartford County in north-central Connecticut, approximately 25 miles east of the New York- Connecticut state line and 14 miles northwest of the city of Hartford, CT. Existing project. The proposed project includes concrete grid block and stone slope protection along 900 feet of eroding Farmington River streambank. The project will protect the river bank and an adjacent three-foot diameter sewer trunk line. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed 19 February 1993 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction, currently estimated at $10,195; provide during the period of construction a minimum cash contribution of five percent of total project costs, currently estimated at $28,500; provide during the period of construction an additional cash contribution of 18.7 percent, presently estimated at $113,800, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of emergency streambank protection measures along the Farmington River was awarded 16 July 1993. Work began in October 1993 but was terminated for convenience of the Government on 20 December 1993. Final settlement was $21,383. 42H. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is four miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 42L LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, NH Location. Lancaster is located in northern New Hampshire along the Vermont State line at the confluence of the Connecticut and Israel Rivers. The Israel River has a length of about 21 miles and a drainage area of 135 square miles. Existing project. The local ice jam flood protection project provides for an earth and rock-filled embankment weir, 160 feet long, protected by layers of gabions, which are rock-filled baskets. Fish passage through the wier is assured by four concrete sluiceways. The sluiceways are four feet wide and are provided with stop-log slots. Stop-logs are inserted each year in the late fall to ensure a winter pool behind the weir and are removed each spring. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1981 at a total cost of $551,605. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Funds of $696 were used to continue preparation of an Embankment Criteria and Performance Report to assess the current condition and past performance of the project to determine if remedial measures are needed to improve its effectiveness and minimize maintenance costs. 1-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 42J. LITTLrEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, one mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract was awarded on 26 April 1994 to stabilize rock in the outlet channel. Work began in August 1994 and by fiscal year end was 57 percent complete with contractor payments of $11,850. 42K. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and one mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace above-ground fuel tank and service bridge was awarded 19 April 1993. Work began in November 1993 and was completed in March 1994. Final contract amount was $25,724. A contract to paint the service bridge was awarded 27 December 1993. Work was initiated in May 1994 and completed that month. Final contract amount was $66,850. A contract to replace an underground fuel tank was awarded on 9 December 1993. Work began in February 1994 and was completed in July 1994. The contractor has received $36,608 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 42L. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and three miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT, and Claremont, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repair spillway bridge deck and miscellaneous concrete was awarded on 5 May 1994. Work began in August 1994 and was completed in September 1994. Total contractor earnings to date are $57,225 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 42M. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene, NH. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to paint the service bridge and remove fuel tank was awarded 4 August 1993. Work began in November 1993 and was completed that month. Final contract amount was $70,725. 42N. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA Location. The town of West Springfield is situated in southwestern Massachusetts on the west bank of the Connecticut River, about 90 miles west of Boston, MA and 135 miles northwest of New York City. Riverdale is in the northern portion of the town of West Springfield, MA. Existing project. The project involved the construction of approximately 12,700 feet of earth levee, two pumping stations and three stop-log structures. The project, with the approved plan of upstream reservoirs, is designed to protect against a flood greater than any of record. The project is a unit of the comprehensive plan of flood control and other purposes in the Connecticut River Basin and was authorized by the Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941. Construction of this work was initiated in April 1949 and completed in December 1950. (For details see Annual Report for 1950.) A plan of improvement authorized in 1987 calls for the expansion of the gravity outflow and pumping capacity of the existing Riverdale Pumping Station. This includes adding a 24-inch diesel powered pump into the existing 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION station. The proposed project also includes jacking a separate 5-foot diameter, reinforced concrete culvert through the dike, running parallel to the existing culvert to increase the gravity outflow capacity. The new gravity conduit will be equipped with an ungated inlet and an outlet structure which includes a 60" x 6" self contained, electronically operated sluice gate. During emergencies, the gate could be operated manually from a new bridge and tower structure on the river side of the dike. An existing nine-foot diameter culvert, about 400 feet downstream on Bagg Brook will be replaced with a realigned eight-foot x 13-foot corrugated metal arch and a 50-foot long transition aligned to tie smoothly into the existing downstream channel. Project cost estimate for the modification is $1,060,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 16, 1992 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management for new work. The local sponsor shall be solely responsible for operating, maintaining, replacing, and rehabilitating the project after construction; provide during the period of construction a minimum cash contribution of five percent of total project costs, currently estimated to be $53,000; provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways and sewers determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project, currently estimated to be $50,000; provide during the period of construction an additional cash contribution of 15 percent, presently estimated at $162,000, so that the total contribution equals 25 percent of total project costs; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords, or that would hinder operation and maintenance; and the local sponsor will assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $5 million. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for improvements to the Riverdale Pumping Station was awarded 24 June 1994. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. 420. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on AshuelotRiver, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and five miles north of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract was awarded on 21 April 1994 to renovate beach restrooms. Work began in May 1994 and was completed in August 1994. Contractor earnings were $37,246 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 42P. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and about two miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream about four miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam, 1,700 feet long at its crest, 133 feet above streambed, and providing a total storage capacity of 33,600 acre-feet for flood control purposes. A side-channel spillway with a concrete weir 438.9 feet long, having a discharge capacity of 201,000 cubic feet per second, in left abutment. A reinforced concrete conduit under dam and on rock comprises outlet works and is controlled by mechanically operated gates from a gate tower at intake end. Drainage area controlled is 278 square miles gross and 106 square miles net. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system for flood control in Connecticut River Basin. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Cost of work was $5,530,000 for construction and $1,870,000 for lands and damages including highway relocations and utilities, a total of $7,400,000. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969 and secondary phase completed in September 1971. Fish passage facility work began in June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. Project is complete. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of fish passage facilities at Ball Mountain and Townshend Lakes on the West River was awarded in May 1992. Work at Townshend Lake was completed during February and involved the construction of a fish trap facility approximately 300 feet downstream of the dam and construction of a plunge pool just downstream of the overflow weir. Final contract amount was $637,629, of which $601,529 was for work at Townshend. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to paint the service gates at two projects was awarded in June 1992. Work began in May 1993 and was completed in November 1993. Final contract amount was $58,340. 42Q. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is one mile 1-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 north of Fryville, MA, and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 42R. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, four miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is onefourth mile north of Union Village, VT, and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 43. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA Seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and three local protection projects have been specifically authorized as part of an overall plan for flood control in the Housatonic River Basin. The Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency bank protection projects at: Alford, Green River, MA; Sheffield, MA; Salisbury, CT; and Squantz Pond, Fairfield, CT were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Projects for local flood protection for: West Branch, Torrington, CT; East Branch, Torrington, CT; Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT; Pittsfield, MA; and Waterbury-Watertown, CT, were authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-0 on dams, reservoirs, and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 43A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook, about two miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to replace emergency generators at Black Rock and Hop Brook Dams was awarded on 23 October 1993. Work began in February 1994 and was 72 percent complete byfiscal year end. Contractor earnings totalled $67,505, of which $28,253 was for work at Black Rock Lake. A contract to replace fuel storage tanks at Colebrook Lake, Thomaston Dam, Hop Brook Lake and Black Rock Lake was awarded on 23 February 1994. Work was 55 percent complete with contractor payments totalling $838 for Black Rock. 43B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook, in town of Plymouth, CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 43C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook, in city of Waterbury and towns ofMiddlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence ofNaugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ' Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace emergency generators at Hop Brook and Black Rock was awarded on 23 October 1993. Work began in February 1994 and was 72 percent complete by fiscal year end. Contractor earnings totaled $67,505 of which $39,252 was for work at Hop Brook Lake. A contract to replace fuel storage tanks at ColebrookLake, Thomaston Dam, Black Rock Lake and Hop Brook Lake was awarded on 23 February 1994. Contract is 55 percent complete with contractor payments totalling $838 for Hop Brook. 43D. MAD RIVER, WATERBURY (WOODTICK AREA), CT Location. The City of Waterbury is located in westcentral Connecticut, about 20 miles north of New Haven, Connecticut and about 25 miles southwest of Hartford, Connecticut. The Woodtick area of Waterbury is located along the Mad River between Sharon and Frost Road Bridges and consists primarily of residential development including several apartment and condominium complexes, some light manufacturing companies, and a large shopping mall. Existing project. Provides for widening and deepening the existing channel along two restricted areas of the Mad River, totaling 1,450 linear feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) The total estimated project cost is $2,100,000. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on 2 June 1993 between the Corps and the State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The project sponsor shall provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of building, utilities, highways, railroads, and bridges determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay a cash contribution in the amount necessary to bring the non-Federal share of project costs to 25 percent (a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent is required); assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; and bear all operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued to assist the project sponsor in acquiring the necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction. 43E. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook, about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town ofThomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract was awarded 17 June 1993 for installation of a septic system for the beach area restroom. Work began in Septemer 1993 and was completed in December 1993. Final contract amount was $68,295. 43F. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River, about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River, and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to replace fuel storage tanks at Colebrook Lake, Hop Brook Lake, Black Rock Lake and Thomaston Dam was awarded on 23 February 1994. Contract is 55 percent complete with contractor payments totalling $838 for Thomaston. A contract to repair the spillway bridge and dam embankment was awarded 25 July 1994. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. 44. MACHIAS RIVER, MACHIASPORT, ME Location. The town of Machiasport is located along the northeast coast of Maine approximately 70 miles southeast of Bangor, Maine. Existing project. The proposed project involves the construction of stone slope protection along 380 feet of eroding streambank adjacent to State Highway Route 92. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement 1-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 (LCA) was signed on June 29, 1993 between the Corps and the Maine Department of Transportation. The project sponsormustprovide all lands, easements, rightsof- way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction, currrently estimated at $3,300; pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs during construction, currently estimated at $8,665; pay an additional cash contribution during construction of approximately 18.1 percent, currently estimated at $31,335, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of emergency streambank protection measures along Machias River was awarded 21 September 1993. Work began in November 1993 and was completed in January 1994. Final contract amount was $107,022. 45. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system offour reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized two of the reservoirs and one of the local protection projects. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction ofSaxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. Emergency streambank protection projects atAmesbury, MA and two in Leominster, MA were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-P at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works for Merrimack River Basin.) 45A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River, and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, NH, just above village of Swetts Mills, NH, 18 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to rehab hydraulic system was awarded 18 August 1993. Work began in 1993 and was completed in March 1994. To date, contractor payments total $38,200 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 45B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, NH, and 14 miles east ofKeene, NH. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract was awarded on 19 November 1993 for wing-wall repairs. Work began in August 1994 and was completed the following month. A total of $58,585 has been paid to the contractor with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 45C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location.Dam is on Pemigewasset River, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2.5 miles upstream of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH.) 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Existing project. For description. of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for deleading and repainting the service bridge awarded 4 April 1992 was terminated on 18 May 1993 for default. Office of Counsel.has contacted the bonding company and negotiations are still ongoing. A contract to repair Lower Mill Brook Bridge was awarded on 21 April 1994. Work began in June 1994 and was completed in August 1994. Contractor earnings totalled $19,587 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 45D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton, NH. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River, and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of EastWeare, NH. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational developmentin accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the sluice gate at the south weir was awarded 20 May 1993. Work was initiated in November 1993 and completed that month. Final contract amount was $40,610. A contract to replace electrical switchboards was awarded 9 February 1994. Work began in June 1994 and was completed that month. Total contractor payments were $25,900 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 45E. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER, MA Location. The city of Leominster is located in north central Massachusetts, approximately 34 miles northwest of Boston. Existing project. The proposed project involves the construction of stone slope revetment along 400 feet of eroding streambank adjacent to the Leominster Connector, an arterial roadway that links the interstate highway network with the city. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 1, 1993 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Highway Department. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs during construction, currently estimated at $10,500; pay an additional cash contribution during construction of20 percent, currently estimated at $42,000, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of emergency streambank protection measures along the North Nashua River was awarded 20 September 1993. Work began in October 1993 and was 97 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor payments of $79,827. 45F. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER (SEWER LINE), MA Location. The City of Leominster is located in the northern portion of Worcester County in north central Massachusetts, approximately 34 miles northwest of Boston. The erosion site is along the North Nashua River in the vicinity of the Leominster Sewage Treatment Plant. Existing project. Provides for the construction of stone slope protection along 480 linear feet of eroding streambank and removal of accumulated snags and debris from the opposite riverbank. The project has an extimated total cost of $300,000 and will protect against continued erosion and possible collapse of an existing 36- inch reinforced concrete sewerline. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs during construction, currently estimated at $15,000; pay an additional cash contribution during construction of 20 percent, currently. estimated at $60,000, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project 1-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of project plans and specifications were completed. 46. NARRAGUAGUS RIVER, MILBRIDGE, ME Location. The town of Milbridge is located along the northeast coast of Maine approximately 50 miles southeast of Bangor, Maine. Existing project. The proposed project involves the construction of stone slope protection along 100 feet of eroding streambank adjacent to U.S. Route LA. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 29, 1993 between the Corps and the Maine Department of Transportation. The project sponsor must proivde all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction, currently estimated at $1,000; pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs during construction, currently estimated at $6,000; pay an additional cash contribution during construction of approximately 19.2 percent, currently estimated at $23,000, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work. A continuing contract for construction of emergency streambank protection measures along Narraguagus River was awarded 21 September 1993. Work began in November 1993 and was completed the following month. Final contract amount was $61,288. 47. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction ofbarrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operating costs included $27,430 for project operations; $19,835 for administration; $30,790 for utilities; $3,000 for Environmental Review Guide for Operations (ERGO) inspection and compliance; $121,132 for maintenance of building, grounds and utilities and $20,830 for water quality control analysis. The cost of maintenance work accomplished by contract included $7,300 for miscellaneous facility repairs. 48. PERLEY BROOK, FORT KENT, ME Location. The town ofFort Kentis located in Aroostook County in northern Maine, about 50 miles northwest of Presque Isle, Maine, and adjacent to the United States/ Canada border. Perley Brook is a tributary of the Fish River. Existing project. The project includes stone revetment along 100 linear feet of eroding embankment adjacent to Route 161, excavation of four river shoals, and placement of gabions around existing highway culverts. Work was completed in August 1989. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on 24 April 1988 between the Corps and the Maine Department of Transportation. The project sponsor provided all lands, easements, rights-ofway, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and performed all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction, at an actual cost of $3,109; payed $20,554 so that total contributions including lands equalled 25 percent of total project costs; and has assumed maintenance of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final project costs were apportioned between the Federal and non-Federal accounts. 49. POINT SHIRLEY, WINTHROP, MA Location. The town of Winthrop is a coastal community in Suffolk County, Massachusetts located along the northern shore of Boston Harbor. Grandview Avenue is a two-lane roadway which runs parallel to Boston Harbor. Existing project. Provides for the construction of approximately 800 linear feet of stone slope revetment along an eroding section of shoreline adjacent to Grandview Avenue. This project has an estimated total cost of $640,000 and will protect the roadway from possible collapse. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed ori 24 August 1994 between the Corps and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor shall provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, includ- 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ing. dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, railroads, and bridges determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; provide during the period of construction a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs, currently estimated at $32,000; provide during the period of construction an additional cash contribution of 20 percent, presently estimated at $128,000, so that the.total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of Federal statutory limitation of $500,000, presently estimated at $20,000; and bear all costs for maintenance and repair of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of emergency shoreline protection measures along Grandview Avenue was awarded 30 September 1994. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. 50. QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI Location. Quonset Point is located in east central Rhode Island along the west shore of Narragansett Bay in the village of Davisville and Town ofNorth Kingstown, about 15 miles south of Providence, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the construction of two elevated water storage towers and the extension, rehabilitation and relocation of 6,000 feet of sewer line at an estimated total cost of $3,100,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. Local sponsors must provide 25 percent of construction costs. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Initiated preparation of project plans and specifications. 51. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA Location. The city of Revere is a coastal community located in Suffolk County about five miles northeast of the city of Boston, MA. Roughans Point is a low-lying, ocean front neighborhood of Revere. The area has 55 acres and about 300 structures, mostly residential homes, which lie below elevation ten feet NGVD. Existing project. Project consists of 3,125 feet of stone revetment to dissipate incoming waves, prevent overtopping and stabilize existing facilities along the shoreline. The revetment would extend from a point about 250 feet south of Eliot Circle southerly to a point 200 feet south of the intersection of Winthrop Parkway and Leverett Avenue. The project also calls for "backwater" protection by constructing an earth berm one foot high and 200 feet long on the existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road and a sluice gate on the 42-inch drain from the Roughans area to Sales Creek. Interior drainage improvements consist of a new intake structure at the existing pump station and a new gravity drain with a sluice gate. The total estimated project cost (October 1994) is $12,000,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations necessary for construction of the structural elements of the project, includingponding areas, borrow areas, and disposal areas for excavated material presently estimated at $920,000; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacements, presently estimated at $27,000 annually; pay an amount in cash, presently estimated at $3,280,000, to bring the total non-Federal share to 35 percent of project costs allocated to storm damage reduction. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of project plans and specifications continued. 52. SAUGUS RIVER & TRIBUTARIES, MA Location. The communities of Revere, Saugus, Malden and Lynn are located along the Massachusetts coastline just north, of Boston. Existing project. The proposed project involves the construction of a 1,300 foot long floodgate structure across the mouth of the Saugus River and construction of 3.5 miles of dikes, walls, revetments, sand dunes and beaches along the Revere and Lynn shorefronts. Included with the proposed project is the acquisition, protection and management of 1,650 acres of salt water estuary along the Saugus and Pines Rivers for flood water storage. A mitigation site is planned at the abandoned I-95 embankment to replace 3 acres of clam flats and tidal habitat lost by project construction. Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations necessary for project construction, currently estimated at $9,500,000; pay approximately 26 percent of the first costs allocated to hurricane and storm damage reduction, currently estimated at $30,225,000; to bring the total non-Federal share of hurricane and storm damage reduction costs to 35 percent; pay 100 percent of the separable costs allocated to recreation, currently estimated at $1,500,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of project facilities after construction, currently estimated at $270,000 annually. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The project sponsor indicated by letter dated 31 August 1993 that they intend to investigate a non-structural ap- 1-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 proach to flood protection as an alternative to the proposed project. Further efforts on the General Design Report were suspended pending the results of the sponsor's investigation. 53. STAMFORD, CT Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City, and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for $662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 54. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. Local flood protection project for West River, New Haven, CT was authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter on reservoirs and local protection projects, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 54A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River, and eight miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to install a septic system for the recreation area restroom was awarded 16 June 1993. Workwas initiated the following month and completed in October 1993. Final contract amount was $29,937. 54B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, and one mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 54C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about five miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract for miscellaneous concrete repairs was awarded 1 February 1994. Work began in July 1994 and was completed the following month. Contractor earnings totalled $16,420 with final contract payment pending at fiscal year end. 54D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with 1-26 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Willimantic River. It is four miles northeast of city of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace underground fuel tanks was awarded 23 March 1993. Work was performed during November 1993 at a final contract cost of $51,469. 54E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, in town of Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, two miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, for Putnam, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 54F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repair Old South Street Bridge was awarded 28 January 1994. Work began in June 1994 and was 25 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor payments of $110,905. 55. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND BRAINTREE, MA Location. The project is located in the city of Quincy and the town of Braintree on the south side ofMassachusetts Bay, along the eastern shore of Massachusetts, seven miles south of Boston in Norfolk County. The watershed is approximately 4.5 square miles. Existing project. Project provides for the construction of a 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below ground, intake and outlet structures, and improvements to the Town River downstream of the outlet shaft. The tunnel and its appurtenances will be supplemented by reconstruction of the Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, located at the headwaters of Town Brook. Reconstruction work includes a new spillway and outlet structure. The estimated total project cost (October 1993) is $40,000,000, and includes $6,100,000 in approved credit for compatible work that has been accomplished by the project sponsor. Total project costs do not include dam safety measures at Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, which are a non- Federal responsibility. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 7, 1992 between the Corps and the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). The MDC is required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, presently estimated at $830,000; reconstruct Old Quincy Dam to insure its structural integrity, presently estimated at $4,600,000; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $3,070,000; so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacements, presently estimated at $40,000 annually. In addition, local interests must do the following: prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on both the improvements and unimproved channels, and manage all project-related channels to preserve capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of Town River improvements was awarded on 30 September 1992. Work began in December 1992 and was 99 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings of $3,295,471. A second continuing contract for construction of the tunnel was awarded 15 September 1993. Work on this contract began in January 1994 and was 22 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings of $3,412,974. 56. WEST RIVER, NEW HAVEN, CT Location. New Haven, CT is located in southern New Haven County, about 35 miles south of Hartford, CT. The project area is located upstream of the intersection of Route 63 and West River in northwestern New Haven. Existing project. The West River was widened for 1,150 feet from its existing 25- to 30-foot width to a 50- to 70-foot width; a 1,150-foot modular wall was built along the right bank and a 600-foot cantilever sheet pile wall was built along the left bank. For Wintergreen Brook the channel has a 20- to 30-foot width, and a 550-foot sheet 1-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 pile wall and 450-foot dike on the right bank. A recreational walkway on top of the modular wall with lighting and fencing to connect two existing city parks is also included. Project was completed in December 1992. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on 17 January 1989 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Local interests provided all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations, ata cost of $554,639; payed a cash contribution of $632,133 for the costs allocated to flood control, so that the total contribution of local interests equalled 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; payed 50 percent of the costs allocated to recreation, which totalled $113,560; and have assumed responsibility for all costs of operation and maintenance of the project. In addition, local interests have agreed to do the following: participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on the project which would reduce the level of protection afforded; notify, not less than once a year, affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract awarded during fiscal year 1990 for construction of the project was completed in December 1992. Final contract amount was $3,569,245. An Operation and Maintenance manual was prepared and final costs were apportioned between Federal and non-Federal accounts. 57. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year: CONNECTICUT: October 93 - Ansonia, Derby, East Hartford, Hartford, New London, Pawcatuck, Stamford; September 94 - Ansonia, Bridgeport, Danbury, Derby, East Branch Dam, Hall Meadows Dam, Mad River Dam, Milford, North Canaan, New Fairfield, New Haven, New London, Norwalk, Pawcatuck, Salisbury, Stamford, Sucker Brook Dam, Torrington, Waterbury, Woodbury. MAINE: September 94 -Beals, Belfast, Blaine, Campobello Island, Castine, Cherryfield, Fort Kent, Gouldsboro, Harpswell, Hartland, Islesboro, Lubec, Machias, Old Town, Perley Brook, Perry, Whiting. MASSACHUSETTI'S: October 93 - Charles River Dam, Chicopee, Fitchburg, Gardner, Haverhill, Holyoke, Lowell, Northampton, Saxonville, Springfield, West Springfield; April 94 - Lancaster; July 94 - Ware, Warren; August 94 -Canton, Haywood Pond, Quincy, Quincy (Island Avenue), Quincy (Town River Bay), Scituate, Weymouth/Braintree; September 94 - Alford, Framingham, Lee, Pittsfield, Sheffield (covered bridge), Sheffield (state maintenance), Worcester. NEW HAMPSHIRE: October 93 - Keene. RHODE ISLAND: October 93 - Woonsocket. VERMONT: June 94 - Weston. 58. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of flood control dams, all of which have flood control as primary storage available with recreation and/or water supply as secondary storages in most of the projects, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of the flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases were made from selected reservoirs. Winter pools are maintained at many projects to submerge the flood control gates and keep them from freezing. During fiscal year 1994 winter was characterized by several snowstorms, resulting in above normal snowpack and water equivalent levels within some New England watersheds. During the beginning of the snowmelt period,.mid to late March, base flows were already high when 1.25 to over 2 inches of rainfall occurred during 14 through 22 April 1994. This combination of rainfall and snowmelt produced flooding along the main stem Connecticut River within the lower basin watersheds. The main stem Connecticut River crested just over flood stage at Montague City, MA, on 17 April, and just below flood stage at Hartford, CT, on 19 April. Storage utilized behind NED dams in the Connecticut River Basin varied from 10 to 40 percent. Other NED river basins, although experiencing high flow conditions, did not experience flooding problems. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN Regulation for canoe activities occurred at Ball Mountain and Townshend - April and September 1994; Otter Brook - March 1994; Birch Hill, Tully, Littleville and Knightville - April 1994; Surry Mountain - May 1994. Non-flood releases from Colebrook Lake were made throughout fiscal year 1994 for hydropower generation, as required by the Hartford MDC. Non-flood releases from North Hartland Lake were controlledby the Vermont Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative for hydropower throughout fiscal year 1994. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN Blackwater was regulated for canoe races in April 1994. 1-28 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION THAMES RIVER BASIN Regulation activities in the basin included releases for. canoe races at Mansfield Hollow in June 1994, East Brimfield and Westville Lakes in April 1994 and Hodges Village in May 1994. East Brimfield and Westville Lakes were also regulated a week for low flow augmentation during late July 1994. 59. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Five hurricane barriers are situated along the southern coast of New England, protecting coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes and severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, CT and New Bedford- Fairhaven, MAbarriers. The Fox Point, RI, the Pawcatuck and New London, CT barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: STAMFORD BARRIER. The barrier gates were operated on 3 occasions for coastal storms during fiscal year 1994. Total benefits associated with gate operations during fiscal year 1994 totalled $200,000. NEW BEDFORD BARRIER. During fiscal year 1994, the New Bedford Barrier was operated on 24 different occasions resulting in a total of $75,000 in benefits. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER. The Fox Point Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1994. PAWCATUCK HURRICANE BARRIER. The Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1994. NEW LONDON HURRICANE BARRIER. The New London Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1994. 60. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-E at end of chapter.) 61. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-K at end of chapter.) Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Spicket River, Salem, NH $18,800 Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Aroostook River, Caribou, ME Sebago Lake, Standish, ME Sandy Point Outfall, West Haven, CT $27,811 2,767 41,819 Project modifications for the improvement of the environment pursuant to Section 1135, PublicLaw 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-L at end of chapter.) Emergency flood control activities--repair,f lood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for fiscal year were $274,311 for disaster preparedness. Deauthorized Projects 62. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 1-G at end of chapter.) General Investigations 63. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds were $967,681 of which $250,964 was for three flood damage prevention studies; $217,703 for two special studies; $128,797 for one comprehensive study; and $370,217 for coordination studies. 64. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on the Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and basic hydrologic information is compiled. A report of operations and development in the basin was prepared in cooperation with Canadian counterparts. Total costs for the fiscal year were $19,852. Total costs to 30 September 1994 are $292,141. Concerns about fluctuating water levels on Spednik and East Grand Lakes and its adverse effects on fisheries and recreation were raised at two public meetings held by the International Joint Commission (IJC) in August 1992. These lakes are currently operated in conjunction with downstream hydropower 1-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 facilities. The IJC has requested that the Saint Croix River Board of Control reexamine the Orders ofApproval for Spednik and East Grand Lakes. Arange of lake levels and minimum flow releases will be studied to assist the IJC in developing new operational procedures for these lakes which increase recreational opportunities, enhance the environment and improve water level and flow regulation. This study was initiated in fiscal year 1994. Total costs to 30 September 1994 are $18,869. The Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment was established in 1989 under an agreement signed by the Governors of Maine, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, and the Premiers of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The Council was tasked under this agreement to develop consistent policies, initiatives and programs designed to protect and conserve the shared natural resources of the GulfofMaine. In April 1993, the Council requested the New England Division Engineer to participate in this international program as an "observer" to the Council. In this capacity, the Division Engineer is expected to attend Council meetings and support their initiatives to the extent possible. In addition to the Division Engineer's direct participation, a representative of the Corps would be a member of the Working Group to the Council, which implements directives of the Council. The Working Group is currently collecting existing information and has requested sediment chemistry data from the Corps, assistance with ocean disposal workshops and coordination of input from other Federal agencies. Total costs for the fiscal year were $14,867. Total costs to 30 September 1994 are $31,816. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon.responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year were $406,644. Total costs to 30 September 1994 are $7,934,831. The April 1987 flood was one of the largest of recent times in New England, resulting in spillway discharge at six Corps flood control reservoirs. A comprehensive hydrologic analysis of this flood event is needed to develop a base of information for use in future planning and design studies, as well as reservoir operation. Fiscal year 1994 funds were used to initiate hydrologic analysis of the 1987 flood within the Merrimack River Basin. Total costs for the fiscal year were $10,112. Total costs to 30 September 1994 are $33,981. The New England Division has initiated a program to consolidate the vast amount of sediment chemistry data it maintains using the Geographic Information System (GIS). This data management system will allow Project Managers, as well as other agencies, to quickly retrieve historical data for specific waterways and help determine the quality of material in that area. Fiscal year 1994 funds were used to continue a joint effort with U.S. Geological Survey to collect existing sediment chemistry data for Boston Harbor and enter this information into GIS. Total costs for the fiscal year were $247. Total costs to 30 September 1994 are $59,938. 65. PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Total costs for Planning, Engineering and Design were $13,963 for local protection studies for Saugus River and Tributaries, Massachusetts. 66. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction Engineering and Design costs were $243,079 for the navigation project at Boston, Massachusetts; $12,627 for the local protection project at Roughans Point, Revere, Massachusetts; $321,778 for the local protection project at Saugus River and Tributaries, Massachusetts; and $16,559 for initiation of six stormwater management projects. 1-30 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 1. Andrews River, MA (Contributed Funds) 2. Aquatic Plant Control 3. Aunt Lydia's Cove Chatham, MA (Contributed Funds) 4. Boston Harbor, MA 5. Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) 6. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 7. Connecticut River below Hartford, CT New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Minor Rehab. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 4 Cost 4 New Work Contrib. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost - 219,042 - 219,042 -25,263 11,237 14,500 14,500 105,338 104,507 5,873 5,956 730,659 729,901 - 187,500 - 187,500 1,000 10,794 1,000 1,014 571,000 599,000 441,041 635,889 14,029 43,836 14,029 43,253 1,000 361 11,004 489,000 511,306 31,000 31,003 5,000 1,293 70,000 86,342 299,496 295,035 81,004 86,342 208,000 25,223,974 6 243,079 24,178,2891 s 154,831 10,387,540 6 137,570 10,369,610 - 21,798,322 1,2 - 21,798,322 1,2 1,785,446 5,078,637 1,725,917 5,113,557 168,240 164,705 17,441 22,421 7,229,031 5,981,000 130,135,114 7,287,200 5,421,313 129,363,285 159,351 158,950 - 115,432 - 115,432 - 390,677 - 390,677 - 26,609,000 - 26,609,000 266,705 12 266,705 1 -3,204 3,886,648 9 -3,720 3,885,204 ' 43,500 43,500 1,541,185 7,8 1,541,185 7,8 839,332 361,156 414,000 601,116 289,131 474,304 444,906 17,279,406 4 444,154 17,277,455 ' 60,000 60,000 1-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (Continued) (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. - Cost Criehaven Harbor,ME New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 1,992 Cost 1,992 9. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 10. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 11. Guilford Harbor, CT (Contributed Funds) 12. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI 13. Josias River, ME (Contributed Funds) 14. Little Harbor, NH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 130,410 - 130,410 - 40,776 - 40,776 7,000 6,436 27,168 - 27,168 16,080 136,680 16,080 136,679 4,080 3,890 143,984 1,362,711 10 141,963 1,360,499 10 - 11,643 - 11,643 " 237,512 - 237,512 323,226 174,938 323,422 127,210 388,400 436,764 261,427 3,524,864 260,318 3,523,140 - 158,341 - 158,341 137,222 137,222 15,049 15,049 78,995 37,855 278,782 316,606 356,630 2,020,841 352,797 2,013,692 25,500 25,500 576,856 576,856 -44,007 -42,288 30,830 2,755 49,547 49,547 3,000 27,007 - 3,400 - 3,400 197,746 197,491 191,000 26,420 169,512 6,315 - 101,000 - - - 12,960 - 12,960 214,877 2,148,414 96,657 2,029,710 18,566 176,026 66,067 213,345 83,177 87,000 86,513 358,961 347,773 361,152 345,233 127,813 109,990 133,227 133,227 366,079 365,592 1-32 8. 17,117 16,553 TABLE 1-A (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 15. New Haven Harbor, CT 16. Newburyport Harbor, MA 17. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI (Contributed Funds) 18. Saco River, ME (Contributed Funds Required) 19. Sakonnet Harbor, RI (Contributed Funds) 20. Seekonk River, Providence, RI 21. Sesuit Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 4,773,246 a 4,773,246 * 148,342 166,296 55,631 55,931 713,949 1,900,549 16,967,911 251,242 2,362,385 16,967,016 565,224 565,224 543,000 567,405 36,820 47,156 21,671 23,081 8,000 8,000 65,044 975,562 65,490 456,051 420,134 421,209 11,527 11,330 115,905 325,315 6,464 5,942,219 5,777 5,941,532 - 1,415,524 - 1,415,524 2,714,510" S 2,714,510" 434,508 6,609,739 33,693 6,208,397 - 1,926,000 1,926,000 - 17,587 - 17,587 - 1,064,983 - 1,064,983 -23,504 2,940,336 286,188 2,939,820 - 74,996 - 74,996 - 764,651 - 746,651 13,448 13,448 1,620 1,620 37,702 37,276 251,174 250,748 - 21,928 - 21,928 50,000 15,769 200,000 24,981 250,000 40,750 - 226,306 - 226,306 16,990 215,785 16,990 159,379 -19,488 36,912 248,835 246,426 740,209 737,794 124,588 124,588 1-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE .1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 22. Stony Creek, Branford,CT (Contributed Funds) 23. Wellfleet Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 24. Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at, Biddeford, ME (Contributed Funds) 29. Cliff Walk, Newport, RI (Contributed Funds) 30. Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT (Contributed Funds) 31. Revere Beach, MA (Contributed Funds) 32. Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT (Contributed Funds) 33. Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 112,487 112,487 - 14,946 - 14,946 9,644 9,644 8,347 8,347 19,539 19,539 23,007 23,007 13,261 361,369 9,567 357,675 - 85,176 85,176 - 157,634 - 157,634 37,657 1,004,723 36,550 1,003,616 - 32,000 - 32,000 27,286 262,700 550 37,049 -10,904 -10,064 5,400 5,400 28,400 72,455 48,549 2,771,316 1,260,000 237,402 158,870 -400,000 135,919 -144,000 747,188 -7,455 2,915 -31,467 -1,337 190,000 780,000 153,914 48,784 207,959 286 286 3,600 19,406 1,410,000 879,506 - 1,170,000 - 449,251 11,748 144,000 23,944 -3,566 40,861 429,532 429,531 - 567,195 - 567,195 44,000 - 31,405 750,000 1,155,491 653,863 1,059,354 - 955,237 - 955,237 - 85,176 - 85,176 210,000 1,797,028 569,659 1,602,287 - 1,410,819 415,688 1,105,758 -43,496 3,815,216 13 -17,045 3,815,216 13 -238,653 2,197,312 23,215 2,197,312 - 20,000 - 15,434 500,000 1,049,602 312,560 307,994 157,533 157,533 187,249 1,657,249 390,206 1,642,506 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 34. 250,000 20,277 708,000 Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI (Continued) (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. - Cost Woodmont Beach, New Work Milford, CT Approp. - Cost 46,386 (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. - Cost West Hill Dam, New Work MA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 495,700 Cost 514,607 Bluffs Community New Work Center, Swansea, MA Approp. 40,000 Cost 18,416 (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. - Cost Charles River New Work (Natural Valley Approp. - Storage Areas), MA Cost - Maint. Approp. 103,900 Cost 114,090 Ball Mountain New Work Lake, VT Approp. 16,985 Cost 10,104 Maint. Approp. 419,200 Cost 420,098 Barre Falls Dam, New Work MA Approp. - Cost Maint. Approp. 401,400 Cost 388,071 Birch Hill Dam, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 538,900 Cost 484,120 (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. - Cost Colebrook River New Work Lake, CT Approp. - Cost Maint. Approp. 192,300 Cost 208,495 - 970,000 - 842,35 464,000 296,069 -150,000 132,133 522,000 564,064 126,000 21,348 127,650 970,000 970,000 266,000 1,089,891 646,102 1,062,672 312,408 312,408 669,679 42 556,220 42 - 2,306,902 14 - 2,306,902 14 506,000 6,657,698 478,288 6,626,958 4,000 119,616 - 55,250 -, -, 205,000 209,982 36,234 34,114 458,000 468,128 438,000 431,956 566,000 658,696 321,000 330,462 250,000 138,040 16,344 17,142 535,000 556,289 408,000 452,098 427,000 485,348 290,000 287,073 216,000 335,321 -6,228 1,226 170,000 163,324 55,250 8,606,000 8,606,000 1,877,343 1,872,737 11,108,295 15 11,106,364 15 571,000 8,960,723 533,197 8,919,647 - 1,967,819 - 1,967,819 325,000 6,927,060 336,807 6,916,470 - 4,815,679 ' - 4,815,679 16 344,000 7,566,429 336,229 7,547,556 - 32,000 17 - 32,000 17 - 14,263,971 - 14,263,971 583,000 4,422,027 570,455 4,386,076 1-35 522,000 533,639 3,944 39A. 40. 41. 42A. 42B. 42C. 42D. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 42E. Conant Brook Dam, MA 42F. Connecticut River, Middletown, CT (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds-Other) 42G. Farmington River, Simsbury, CT (Contributed Funds) 42H. Knightville Dam, MA 421. Lancaster, Israel River, NH 42J. Littleville Lake, MA 42K. North Hartland Lake, VT 42L. North Springfield Lake, VT 4M. Otter Brook Lake, NH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,950,530 2,950,530 109,900 123,252 5,000 5,884 76,000 84,492 10,000 9,446 - 113,000 -= -,, 5,000 3,796 10,000 42,648 2,079 621,500 580,000 620,486 501,874 10,000 5,305 5,272 5,568 260,000 271,000 349,207 242,654 172,000 154,551 162,000 95,785 -17,000 20,831 17,000 10,700 211,000 25,162 86,700 494,000 620,874 25,000 4,297 266,000 319,216 86,000 1,912,197 99,241 1,902,491 - 237,000 65,175 232,564 - 96,000 53,960 74,791 - 22,000 1,522 16,018 -129,000 202,000 55,530 193,630 - 86,700 16,311 16,311 - 3,415,640 1s - 3,415,640 is 350,000 8,627,446 320,558 8,584,220 -25,000 696 601,878 595,146 7,013,412 7,013,412 550,000 6,048,927 507,449 6,006,015 7,312,22519 7,312,22519 346,300 470,000 312,921 528,790 381,000 370,651 680,500 7,090,043 627,478 7,003,586 6,831,52620 6,831,5262 445,500 589,000 410,366 662,997 402,000 409,645 627,700 11,219,149 598,219 11,169,038 - 4,360,44821 - 4,360,44821 421,900 435,000 422,768 455,920 484,000 443,300 441,000 7,078,297 488,129 7,067,021 1-36 TABLE 1-A (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text . Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 42N. Riverdale, West Springfield, MA (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds-Not Required) 420. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 42P. Townshend Lake, VT 42Q. Tully Lake, MA (Contributed Funds) 42R. Union Village Dam, VT 43A. Black Rock Lake, CT 43B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT 43C. Hop Brook Lake, CT 43D. Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,047 25,000 13,279 30,000 37,828 300,000 1,633,000 28,135 1,347,211 - 202,172 - 30,000 503,200 383,000 475,904 475,776 283,015 603,766 168,356 568,428 327,400 415,000 346,364 400,839 421,200 460,000 483,014 456,312 454,700 506,000 520,111 545,910 271,300 280,000 239,230 346,003 - - 129,900 132,000 174,115 136,332 1,768,800 1,067,000 942,275 1,874,473 10,000 3,129 1,413 371,000 356,547 272,332 285,629 583,000 584,868 447,000 464,933 312,000 417,716 239,000 231,062 114,000 106,116 922,000 1,072,911 25,000 37,492 507,000 7,542,491 504,155 7,513,988 -103,772 8,584,092 3 20,420 8,515,907 * 693,000 8,657,418 699,486 8,605,975 - 1,666,752 2 - 1,666,752 2 377,000 6,862,725 365,809 6,843,754 - 40,000 17 - 40,000 17 - 4,095,160 * - 4,095,160 * 405,000 6,680,393 401,565 6,664,727 - 8,182,300 - 8,182,300 361,000 4,213,581 353,859 4,191,648 - 4,178,911 - 4,178,911 147,000 2,012,934 155,490 2,006,363 - 6,151,562 26 - 6,151,562 2 804,500 11,697,825 742,372 11,605,248 15,000 236,978 14,496 235,028 1-37 227,172 25,000 30,000 2,833,610" 2,833,610* REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 43E. Northfield Brook Lake, CT 43F. Thomaston Dam, CT 44. Machias River, Machiasport, ME (Contributed Funds) 45A. Blackwater Dam, NH 45B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH 45C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH 45D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH 45E. North Nashua River, Leominster, MA (Contributed Funds) 45F. North Nashua River, Leominster (Sewer Line), MA 46. Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - 2,850,512 * - 2,850,512 * 410,300 448,000 472,018 466,801 326,000 297,155 258,000 3,891,708 324,999 3,884,331 - 14,282,112 - 14,282,112 445,400 513,000 459,772 519,966 30,095 6,035 - - 220,200 365,000 235,228 372,960 320,900 277,000 354,784 292,138 611,000 945,000 641,213 834,456 1,228,100 1,111,000 1,091,214 1,243,716 40,189 14,547 17,937 396,000 410,791 70,000 37,964 270,000 244,158 373,000 386,074 489,000 532,581 1,084,000 1,132,816 117,810 15,377 52,500 - 60,558 - 51,466 - 30,073 - 3,973 692,000 8,057,342 477,382 7,822,084 301,000 5,040,094 298,715 5,005,258 - 2,014,253 2 - 2,014,253 2 398,000 6,091,569 386,929 7,077,922 - 7,950,487 3 - 7,950,487 3 555,000 9,729,382 492,569 9,581,148 - 21,452,440 31 - 21,452,440 31 949,000 13,584,570 976,206 13,515,267 1-38 30,000 84,740 40,000 37,415 130,000 128,739 40,000 37,415 1,319,746 2 1,319,746 28 83,379 31,931 4,707 9,679 50,000 40,216 29,000 28,597 157,999 131,240 52,500 31,931 65,265 61,145 80,073 44,189 29,000 28,597 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 47. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (Contributed Funds) 48. Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (Contributed Funds) 49. Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA (Contributed Funds) 50. Quonset Point, Davisville, RI 51. Roughans Point, Revere, MA 52. Saugus River & Tributaries, MA 53. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds - Other) 54A. Buffumville Lake, MA 54B. East Brimfield Lake, MA 54C. Hodges Village Dam, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 11,510,088 - 11,510,088 422,200 240,400 380,424 299,281 125 211,000 283,917 -3,456 -1,954 1,954 1,954 2,000 100,000 230,000 113,329 104,779 2,255,000 2,031,258 1,389,000 1,417,907 69,000 181,481 1,488,000 1,539,297 230,000 5,733,821 230,318 5,722,440 - 6,513,763 3 - 6,513,763 3 - 70,990 - 70,990 - 20,554 "4 - 20,554 41 80,000 67,761 82,00C 67,761 1,875,000 1,875,000 28,817 28,817 25,000 1,069,779 12,627 1,043,417 -8,000 5,549,000 335,741 5,477,807 - 9,911,300 - 9,900,640 439,700 446,000 340,563 497,172 195,000 278,240 278,000 4,489,191 264,297 4,454,640 3,367,970 " 3,367,453 " 210,000 209,969 2,998,603 a 2,998,603 3 341,300 553,000 347,133 521,885 - - 374,900 343,000 400,740 435,671 439,500 462,474 348,000 345,135 386,000 5,778,516 397,143 5,762,413 - 7,057,043 " - 7,057,043 36 262,000 5,126,439 264,514 5,117,810 - 4,461,268 " - 4,461,268 3 1-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 Hodges Village Dam, MA 54D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT 54E. West Thompson Lake, CT 54F. Westville Lake, MA 55. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 56. West River, New Haven, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds-Not Required) (Continued) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 390,100 361,000 362,869 387,547 375,500 523,000 388,355 399,276 419,800 563,000 436,725 546,909 327,000 328,000 313,840 359,577 175,000 268,427 979,000 927,418 434,000 552,499 558,000 603,299 332,500 319,290 531,000 8,319,947 583,711 8,306,724 - 6,447,164 " - 6,447,164 " 443,000 6,088,599 421,805 6,033,915 - 7,001,220 * - 7,001,220 * 482,000 6,854,997 431,671 6,815,934 - 5,684,683 4o - 5,684,683 40 585,000 5,986,559 525,875 5,907,783 746,000 2,833,000 9,725,000 15,299,740 198,271 2,543,540 5,015,819 9,733,379 144,000 1,300,000 1,284,991 1,900,000 1,821,672 154,629 317,036 154,629 317,036 100 47,371 161,000 150,916 200,000 172,886 185,000 303,490 54,112 4,164 1,930,000 264,947 2,235,000 415,863 2,000,000 2,200,000 - 172,886 -280,000 3,890,000 -210,686 3,873,850 219,916 10,251 822,000 * 745,693 " 94,400 71,650 SExcludes $ 6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 Code 713 funds. ' Includes $331,626 for previous projects, $290,877 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 Public Works Funds. ' Includes $366,348 for previous projects. s Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Excludes $935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. * Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. ' Includes $287,374 for previous projects and excludes $9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, CT." * Excludes $60,000 expended for major rehabilitation. * Includes $83,276 for maintenance of previous project. 10 Excludes $50,000 Contributed Funds expended for maintenance. 11 Includes $12,000 for previous project. 12 Includes $7,889 for previous project. 13 Excludes $73,800 for previous project. 14 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. " Includes $504,062 Code 711 funds and $67,066 for fish passage facility. " Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 funds. 17 Recreational cost sharing. ' Includes $199,303 Code 711 funds. 1O Includes $229,436 Code 711 funds. o Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 21 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. * Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. 1-40 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds and $1,117,494 for fish passage facility. u Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. * Includes $88,931 Code 711 funds. ' Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 2 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. , Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. " Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. a Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. a" Includes $179,727 Code 711 funds. a Cash for construction only. Excludes $146,020 expended to date for land condemnation. ' Includes $12,000 for previous project. Cash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. * Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. ' Includes $207,700 Code 711 funds. * Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 712 funds. U Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. * Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. o Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 41 Excludes $3,109 for land costs. 4 Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. " Excludes $554,638 for land costs. 1-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 14, 1960 as amended March 2, 1825 June 14, 1880 Aug. 5, 1886 Sept. 19,1890 July 25, 1892 July 13, 1892 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13,1902 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30,1935 ' Do. Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Sept. 7, 1940 July 24,1946 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 28, 1990 ANDREWS RIVER,MA (See Section 1 of Text.) Channel six feet deep, 75 feet wide from deep water in Nantucket Sound to public marina; two jetties; three-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text.) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA (See Section 3 of Text) Entrance channel 100 feet wide by 900 feet long and 9.5 acre anchorage area, both 8 feet deep. BOSTON HARBOR, MA (See Section 4 of Text.) Preservation of islands and seawalls. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 100 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Fort Point Channel.' Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 150 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) from mouth of Wier River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate Shoal (Nixes Mate to Nubble Channel). Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads. Dredge Chelsea River channel to 18 feet. For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 and 40-foot channels. For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard. Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at outer entrance. Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 ft. Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. Present project dimensions of channel from President Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and anchorage area north side of President Roads. Present project dimensions of that part of approach channel to U.S. Navy drydock No.3 at South Boston between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. Chelsea River, channel 30 feet deep. Reserved channel 30 feet deep. Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc.262,76th Cong., 1st sess.) Extension of President Roads anchorage. Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending one mile from 40-foot main channel to L Street. Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. Deepen Mystic River and Reserved Channels to 40 feet; Chelsea River Channel to 38 feet; widen and deepen Inner Confluence Area to 40 feet. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 2, 1966. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 31, 1994. Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 H. Ex.Doc. 206,48th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1885, p. 543. Annual Report, 1890,p. 503 Annual Report, 1893, p. 769 Annual Report, 1887, p.517 Annual Report, 1893, p. 766 H. Ex. Doc. No. 162,53rd Cong., 3rd sess.,Annual Report, 1895, p. 648 H. Doc. 133, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. H. Doc. 119, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1901, p. 1096 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. Mar. 11,1913. H. Doc. 272, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 931, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 244, 72nd Cong., 1st sess.2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 75th Cong., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., 1st sess.2 Public Law 420,78th Cong. H. Doc. 244, 80th Cog., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 349, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 350, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.2 Section 101, Public Law 101-640. 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABTF 1-B (Cnntinued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jan. 21, 1927 (Section 2) Included in Public Works Administration program, Sept. 6, 1933 June 26, 1934 (Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act) Included in Public Works Administration program, Apr. 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 June 10, 1872 Mar. 3, 1881 June 25, 1910 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 May 24, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 as amended Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935 & August 30, 1935 CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 5 of Text.) Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, executed by that company. Construct three bridges and widen canal to 250 feet. Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct a mooring basin. Dredging and bank protection. Existing project for main canal adopted. 15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of eight feet. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA (See Section 6 of Text.) Entrance channel ten feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT (See Section 7 of Text.) Jetties at mouth The Hartford dike Channel and turning basin in Eightmile River. Present project dimensions of channel over Saybrook Bar. Dikes, training walls, and revetments. Present project dimensions of channel and additional dikes, training walls, revetments, and accessory works. Park River declared nonnavigable. Channel and anchorages, North Cove, Old Saybrook. Channel and anchorage in Essex Cove. Channel and anchorage in Wethersfield Cove. CRIEHAVEN HARBOR, ME (See Section 8 of Text) Provides for a 300-foot rubblestone breakwater at Sunset Point. H. Doc. 139, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 795, 71st. Cong., 3rd sess. Do. Do. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 168, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 456, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1942. Present project dimensions approved by Chief of Engineers, December 22, 1887. Present project dimensions authorize by Chief of Engineers in 1889. H. Doc. 327, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1294, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 132, 65th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 49, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Ltr. Sec. War, April 21, 1937. H. Doc. 368 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 18, 1961. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 15, 1960. Do. 1-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960, as amended Mar. 2, 1945 July 11, 1870 Aug. 2, 1882 Aug. 5,1886 June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 as amended August 5, 1886 Aug. 2,1882 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Do. July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Aug. 16,1949 Aug. 9, 1955 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 CUt TYH UNK HARBOR, MA (See Section 9 of Text.) Channel 10 feet deep, 75 feet wide. Anchorage 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, 800 feet wide. Maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 10 of Text.) Channel six feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing, rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. GUILFORD HARBOR, MA (See Section 11 of Text.) Entrance channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep; a channel 60 feet wide, 6 feet deep; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 12 of Text.) The main breakwater. Repairs to basin walls and cliff protection east of harbor. Breakwater enclosing inner harbor. Raising crest of main breakwater and making it sandtight. JOSIAS RIVER, ME (See Section 13 of Text.) Channel 5 feet deep, 40 feet wide from Perkins Cove to and including a 3.2 acre anchorage basin in Flat Pond. Extension of Flat Pond 5 foot anchorage area by 1 acre. Deepen existing 900 foot long Federal Channel and 2.1 acres of anchorage area to 7 feet. LITTLE HARBOR, NH (See Section 14 of Text) Provides for a channel 3,000 feet long, 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep, anchorage basin of like depth 40 acres in area, and construction of two breakwaters at the harbor entrance. NEW HAVEN HARBOR,CT (See Section 15 of Text.) Sandy Point dike. The 16-foot anchorage basin. Present project dimensions of channels in Mill River. Present project dimensions of West River channel and anchorage. 18- and 16-foot channels in Quinnipiac River. 25 foot channel. 30-foot channel and anchorage and present location of 16-foot anchorage. 35-foot main channel, elimination of 30-foot anchorage, present location and extent of 16-foot anchorage. Brewery Street channel declared non-navigable. Abandonment of upper end of West River. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA (See section 16 of Text.) Construction of rubblestone jetties. Dredging the bar at entrance to harbor. H. Doc. 81, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 15, 1965. H. Doc. 149, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual report 1868, p. 785 and S. Misc.Doc. 81, 40th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Ex. Doc. 26, 47th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 27, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1885, p. 610. H. Doc. 83, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 227, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 377, 85th Cong. , 2nd sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, January 14, 1993. H. Doc. 91, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. Plans approved by a board of Engineers, October 2, 1882. H. Doc. 82, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 26, 62nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 535,62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 686, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 479, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 307, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 517, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H.R. 3511, 81st Cong., 1st sess., P.L. 234. Annual Report 1910, p. 59. 1-44 TABLE 1-B (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 16,1890 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960, as amended Mar. 2, 1827 June 23, 1866 Sept. 19, 1890 June 25,1910 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 July 14, 1960, as amended July 4, 1836 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1907 Sept. 4, 1954 July 14, 1960, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 18, 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Infrastructure Act of 1991. July 14, 1960 as amended July 14, 1960 as amended POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, POINT JUDITH ,RI (See Section 17 of Text.) The main breakwater. Present dimensions of eastern shore arm. Western shore arm. Removing three shoals from the harbor arm. Abandons project for entrance to Point Judith Ponds, and authorizes channels and anchorages in lower pond and upper pond. Extension of existing 15-foot channel. SACO RIVER, ME (See Section 18 of Text.) Extension of piers, placing bouys, and removal of obstruction at entrance to harbor. Breakwater on north side of mouth of river. Jetty on north side or mouth of river. Channel improvements and jetty extension on south side of mouth of river. Present project channel dimensions and extensions of north breakwater about 1,600 feet. Extension of north breakwater to Sharps Ledge. Anchorage and maneuvering basin. SAKONNET HARBOR, RI (See Section 19 of Text) Breakwater Prolonging old breakwater and raising it to 8 feet above mean low water, to width of 15 feet. Rock removal near breakwater. Breakwater extension and harbor dredging. A 500-foot rubble-mound breakwater and a 110-foot wide by 100-foot deep navigation channel. SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI (See Section 20 of Text.) Removal of abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge. Extends project authorization. SESUIT HARBOR, MA (See Section 21 of Text.) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. STONY CREEK, BRANFORD, CT (See Section 22 of Text.) 6-foot entrance channel, 100 feet wide and maneuvering basin. H. Doc. 66, 51st Cong., sess. H. Doc. 60, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 911, 60th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 2001, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 15, 80th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 29, 1976. S. Ex. Doc. 44, 48th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1884, p. 482 H. Doc. 752, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 1 H. Doc. 477, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 14, 1967. H. Doc. 154, 20th Cong., 1 sess. H. Doc. 81, 55th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1897, p. 934. H. Doc. 99, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1901, p. 1148. H. Doc. 436, 82nd Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 25, 1981. Section 1166(c), P.L. 99-662. Section 1085, P.L. 102-240. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, February 6, 1980. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 4, 1967. 1-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 May 17,1950 July 14, 1960 as amended October 27, 1965 October 31, 1992 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23,1962 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 October 23, 1962 Nov. 28, 1990 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 WELFLEET HARBOR, MA (See Section 23 of Text.) Channel 10 feet deep, 125 feet wide and anchorage basin. WOOD ISLAND HARBOR and POOL at BIDDEFORD, ME (See Section 24 of Text.) Dredged basin 6 feet deep and construction of three ice breakers. Channel 4,200 feet long, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. CLIFF WALK, NEWPORT, RI (See Section 29 of Text) Improvements for shore protection along the Cliff Walk. Revised cost-sharing requirements. PROSPECT BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT (See Section 30 of Text.) Widening to 100-foot width by direct placement of sand approximately 6,000 feet of shore from about 350 feet south of South Street northerly to Ivy Street, and construction of 8 impermeable groins each 330 feet long. Widening by direct placement of sand along 4,300 feet of shore front between Ivy Street and the groin structure south of Tyler Avenue and periodic beach nourishment as required over the 50-year economic life of the project. REVERE BEACH, MA (See Section 31 of Text.) Placement of sandfill for protection and improvement. Raising and widening of about 13,000 feet of beach by placement of sandfill. SEA BLUFF BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT (See Section 32 of Text.) Beach widening along approximately 1,000 feet of shorefront; 50-feet wide beach berm; reconstruction of existing rock groin structure and a beach monitoring program. SOUTHEAST LIGHTHOUSE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 33 of Text.) Relocate the lighthouse approximately 200 feet north of its present location. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD , CT (See Section 34 of Text.) Widening to 100-foot width by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore west of Merwin Point; widening 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street; and construction of 5 impermeable groins. Placement of suitable sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet of beach and reconstruction of groins. Mitigation to replace rocky habitat for Blue Mussels. Annual Report 1895, H. Doc. 557, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 49, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 18, 1990. H. Doc. 228, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Section 102 (z), P.L. 102-580. H. Doc. 203, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. Section 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, September 12, 1992 H. Doc. 146, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 211, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. December 15, 1970 and S. Res. December 17, 1970 pursuant to Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Section 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, December 14,1989 Section 416, P.L. 101-640. H. Doc. 203, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. Section 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, March 30, 1992. 1-46 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946, as amended Mar. 7. 1974 Dec 22, 1944 Sept. 3, 1954 Nov. 6, 1986 July 24, 1946 as amended July 24, 1946, as amended June 30, 1948 Aug. 18, 1941 June 30, 1948, as amended Dec 22, 1944 Sept. 3, 1954 Nov. 6, 1986 June 30, 1948 BLUFFS COMMUNITY CENTER, SWANSEA, MA (See section 40 of Text.) Construct 300 linear feet or rock revetment along the seaward side of the Bluffs Community Center. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA (See Section 41 of Text.) Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial natural valley storage areas totalling 8,422 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT (See Section 42A of Text.) Construction of dam on West River, Vt. 29 miles above junction with Connecticut River. System of 3 reservoirs on West River,including Ball Mountain. Construct fish passage facilities along the West River in Vermont. CONNECTICUT RIVER, MIDDLETOWN, CT (See Section 42F of Text.) Bank protection of 500 linear feet with 6-inch concrete paving block and riprap toe protection. FARMINGTON RIVER, SIMSBURY, CT (See Section 42G of Text.) Bank protection by clearing and grubbing existing slope and refilling eroded areas with compacted granular fill. LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, NH (See Section 421 of Text.) Construction of a gabion overflow weir for local flood protection. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA (See Section 42N of Text.) Approximately 12,700 feet of earth levee, two pumping stations and three stop-log storage structures. Construct improvements to existing pumping station and gravity outflow channel. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT (See Section 42P of Text.) Construction of dam on West River, Vt. 19 miles above junction with Connecticut River. System of 3 reservoirs on West River,including Townshend. Construct fish passage facilities along the West River in Vermont. MAD RIVER, WATERBURY (WOODTICK AREA), CT (See Section 43D of Text.) Widen and deepen channel along two restricted areas of the Mad River totaling 1,450 linear feet. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, February 26,1993. Chief of Engineers report dated December 6, 1972. PL. 534 78th Cong. 2nd sess. P.L. 780 83rd Cong. 2nd sess. Section 872, P.L. 99-662. Section 14, PL. 79-526. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, December 17, 1991 Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 27, 1988. Section 205, P.L. 80-858, as amende Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 11, 1978. H. Doc. 724, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorize by Chief of Engineers, June 13, 1986. P.L. 534 78th Cong. 2nd sess. P.L. 780 83rd Cong. 2nd sess. Section 872, P.L. 99-662. Section 205,P.L. 80-858, as amendec Authorized by Chief of Engineers December 21,1992 1-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24,1946, as amended July 24,1946, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended July 3, 1958 July 24,1946, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended October 31, 1992 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 31,1992 MACHIAS RIVER, MACHIASPORT, ME (See section 44 of Text.) Construct 380 linear feet of stone slope protection adjacent to State Highway Route 92. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER, MA (See Section 45E of Text.) Construct 400 linear feet of stone slope protection adjacent to the Leominster Connector. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER (SEWER LINE), MA (See Section 45F of Text.) Construct 480 linear feet of stone slope revetment adjacent to an existing 36-inch sewer line. NARRAGUAGUS RIVER, MILLBRIDGE, ME (See Section 46 of Text.) Construct 100 linear feet of stone slope protection adjacent to U.S. Route 1A. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA (See Section 47 of Text.) Hurricane barriers in New Bedford Harbor. PERLEY BROOK, FORT KENT, ME (See Section 48 of Text.) Construct stone revetment along 100 linear feet adjacent to State Highway Route 161 and excavate four river shoals. POINT SHIRLEY, WINTHROP, MA (See Section 49 of Text.) Construct 800 linear feet of stone slope revetment along the shoreline of Boston Harbor adjacent to Grandview Avenue. QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI (See Section 50 of Text.) Construction of two elevated water storage towers and extension, rehabilitation and relocation of 6,000 feet of sewer line. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA (See Section 51 of Text.) Stabilize existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot long armor stone revetment. Construct earth berm one-foot high and 200 feet long on existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. SAUGUS RIVER & TRIBUTARIES, MA (See Section 52 of Text.) Construct tidal floodgates across the mouth of the Saugus River and 18,400 linear feet of dikes, walls, revetments and dune restoration along the shorefront of Lynn and Revere. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, April 8, 1993. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 8, 1993. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 12, 1994. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by the Chief Engineers, March 9, 1993. S. Doc, 59, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 22, 1988. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, May 4, 1994. Section 362, P.L. 102-580. Section 401, P.L. 99-662. Section 101, P.L. 102-580. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 1, 1990. 1-48 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents STAMFORD, CT (See Section 53 of Text.) July 14, 1960 Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong., 1st sess. tidal damage. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY & BRAINTREE, MA (See Section 55 of Text.) Nov. 17, 1986 Construct 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined H. Doc. 39, 99th Cong., 1st sess. tunnel in bedrock approximately 190 feet below ground. August 16, 1990. WEST RIVER, WEST HAVEN, CT (See Section 56 of Text.) June 30, 1948, Widen river for 1,150 feet to 50-70 feet. Widen the Wintergreen Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorize as amended Brook channel to 20-30 feet. Construct recreational walkway by the Chief of Engineers, connecting two existing city parks. September 26, 1988. 1Contains latest maps. 2 Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 (seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual Report, 1903, p. 770 (Fort Point Channel.) 'Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 'A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 624, December 31, 1970. 1-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Apponaug Cove, RI' Bagaduce River, ME '"'. Bar Harbor, ME' Bass Harbor, ME"'s Bass Harbor Bar, ME' Beals Harbor, ME' Belfast Harbor, ME' Bellamy River, NH *3' Beverly Harbor, MA' Black Rock Harbor, CT' Boothbay Harbor, ME' Branford Harbor, CT' Bridgeport Harbor, CT' Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI' Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME"' Bucksport Harbor, ME' Bullocks Point Cove, RI' Bunker Harbor, ME' Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA' Camden Harbor, ME' Canapitsit Channel, MA",' Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME' Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME' Cathance River, ME" Clinton Harbor, CT' Coasters Island Harbor, RI"' Cobscook Bay, ME' "" Cocheco River, NH ' " Cohasset Harbor, MA' Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME' Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA' Damariscotta River, ME"' Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME"'* Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA' Duck Island Harbor, CT' Duxbury Harbor, MA' East Boothbay Harbor, ME' Edgartown Harbor, MA' Essex River, MA' Exeter River, NH"' Fall River Harbor, MA' Falmouth Harbor, MA' Fivemile River Harbor, CT ' Frenchboro Harbor, ME' Georges River, ME' Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA' Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI" Greenwich Bay, RI' Greenwich Harbor, CT ' Hampton Harbor, NH"' Harraseeket River, ME'z Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY' Hendrick's Harbor, ME' Hingham Harbor, MA' Housatonic River, CT ' 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1988 1953 1990 1983 1987 1976 1907 1979 1969 1985 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1985 1911 1866 1913 1979 1984 1954 1906 1916 1968 1953 1978 1953 1978 1948 1913 1984 1978 1969 1978 1978 1983 1989 1893 1969 1988 1896 1931 1957 1954 1983 156,874 2 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,561 " 34,643 246,048 18,000 9,537 4,491,119 " 316,288 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 163,855 102,400 9,113 175,037 147,438 21,000 191,406 5,500 4,173 119,089 267,737 " 795,253 24,200 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,297 a 6,500 65,614 3 21,759 62,454' 6,164,757 40 123,763 35,490 657,345 25,788 1,296,934 " 189,037 2,000 198,758 200,000 30,963 $ 8,401 28,204 28,316 859,691 1-50 42,189 39 2,187 21,995 20,382 132,289 262,112 - 28,427 1,642,493 33,668 1,925,607 2,121,710 bo 27,537 20,833 291,009 32,906 221,569 " 162,293 12,279 361,364 27,827 1,048,614 13,161 53,551 380,640 96,629 54,328 905 5,792 362,224 399,546 911,514 17,238 62,980 114,088 " 3,032 2,064,767 " 333,649 188,802 24,616 266,621 1,638,684 588,737 6,527 204,872 2,201,143 5,309 $ 38,462 6,325 166,800 2,551,872 100,000 147,887 123,757 69,323 20,000 111,289 35,000 30 10,000 62 35,000 25,000 100,000 193,761 222,010 TABLE 1-C (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) _ _ _ . . A A A Hyannis Harbor, MA' Ipswich River, MA1 Island End River, Chelsea, MA' Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME' Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NHS Jonesport Harbor, ME 1 Kennebec River, ME ' Kennebunk River, ME1 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA' Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA1" Lamprey River, NH' 4 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA ."' Lubec Channel, ME1 Lynn Harbor, MA Machias River, ME' Malden River, MA1'* Narragansett Town Beach, RIP' Matinicus Harbor, ME1 Medomak River, ME1 Menemsha Creek, MA1 Merrimack River, MA1 Mianus River, CT' Milford Harbor, CT 1' Moosabec Bar, ME1 Mystic River, CT Mystic River, MA1 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA Narragansett Town Beach, RI's Narraguagus River, ME' New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA' New Harbor, MEt" New Haven Breakwater, CT 1 New London Harbor, CT 1 Newport Harbor, RI ' Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT 1 ." Northeast Harbor, ME 1 Norwalk Harbor, CT 1 Owl's Head Harbor, ME Ls Patchogue River, CT Pa Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT' Pawtuxet Cove, RI' Penobscot River, ME1 Pepperell Cove, ME 1 Pig Island Gut, ME'* Pleasant River, ME1 Plymouth Harbor, MA' Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA1 Portland Harbor, ME' Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME&NH Potowomut River, RI' Providence River and Harbor, RI' Provincetown Harbor, MA 1969 1983 1980 1977 1992 1992 1985 1895 1976 1913 1906 1956 1956 1972 1922 1962 1953 1981 1940 1985 1989 1930 1957 1986 1989 - 1969 1953 1966 1950 1986 1953 1972 1954 1983 1968 1984 1978 1975 1985 1969 1966 1892 1990 1956 1985 1993 1882 1990 1985 5,618 311,850 137,653 80,691 7,489,073 1,599,940 ~' 350,334 8,940 99,098 19,980 18,000 380,322 755,576 32,000 104,853 16,102 14,000 21 17,000 56,926 369,891 132,435 90,506 31 11,400 197,582 3,222,777 502,661 se 16,102 821,144 1,857,618 118,620 2 1,242,246 638,774 1' 733,524 66,464 138,942 531,129 26 124,158 351,181 318,787 2$ 295,356 501,020 171,351 191,753 3,500 2,127,218 52. 1,083,504 9,588,710 n 18,360,800 " 5,000 $ 25,417,022 60 3,548,954 41 new' aid '7C! A 11 103.36a 32,947 180,786 651,644 3,928 3,970,297 1,243,938 37,386 33,563 19,673 23,941 250,814 229,812 45,097 - 8,989 92,359 722,379 526,635 659,390 1,355,190 s" 25,227 143,385 2,008,406 746,700 107,405 708,967 28,611 40,273 1,860,366 146,478 117,468 51,047 3,838,048 42 13,867 745,264 662,713 212,228 953,507 50,276 86,456 217 1,441,348 " 846,590 7,940,340 2,243,086 50 4,577,159 ex 1,053,966 192,336 " 832,119 - 88,917 80,990 62,000 12,500 46,500 11,380 "6 14,000 20,385 7,015 65,139 34,500 4,383 156,694 20,000 295,356 541,611 4,437,665 760,000 1-51 1vvpvvv REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA"' Richmond Harbor, ME"' Richmond's Island Harbor, ME"' Rockland Harbor, ME1 Rockport Harbor, ME"' Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, MA 1 Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA "' Royal River, ME" Rye Harbor,NH' St. Croix River, ME' Sakonnet River, RIp o Salem Harbor, MA"' Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA'* Sasanoa River, ME1"" Scarboro River, ME1 Scituate Harbor, MA' Searsport Harbor, ME1 Seekonk River,RI' South Bristol Harbor, ME' Southport Harbor, CT' Southwest Harbor, ME1 Stamford Harbor, CT' Stockton Harbor, ME1 .' Stonington Harbor, CT' Stonington Harbor, ME1" Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME' Taunton River, MA' Tenants Harbor, ME' Thames River, CT' Union River, ME s '"s Vineyard Haven, MA' Wareham Harbor, MA' Warren River, RI' Warwick Cove, RI' Wells Harbor, ME 1 Westcott Cove, CT' Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT' Weymouth Back River, MA' Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivs., MA" Wickford Harbor, RI' 1 Wilson Point Harbor, CT"' Winnipesaukee Lake, NH' Winter Harbor, ME"' Winthrop Harbor, MA' Woods Hole Channel, MA' York Harbor, ME' 1972 1883 1882 1976 1989 1986 1989 1986 1991 1950 1909 1969 1922 1915 1976 1971 1966 1954 1971 1962 1962 1980 1915 1959 1985 1914 1948 1920 1967 1912 1943 1896 1890 1975 1991 1978 1972 1944 1979 and 1983 1973 1895 1952 1976 1895 1940 1977 38,764 20,000 119,844 1,948,462 32,000 "6 22,000 1,786,754 336,704 130,342 179,550 38,427 1,693,202 1,925,553 35,000 392,635 379,851 572,568 " 672,214 89,593 59,213 7 180,042 892,824 " 33,000 377,328 898,500 19,871 442,895 18,750 1,471,919 146,855 27,186 95,997 5,000 155,430 360,973 55,960 19,308 48,740 30,194,613 233,410 54,177 7,500 162,937 8,992 230,000 239,654 1-52 1,808 478,111 260,516 263,826 12,531 770,108 12 707,592 36,392 13,578 613,551 16,060 124 1,286,589 194,191 74,642 865,181 43,923 388,649 66,540 1,786,154 " 23,216 123,060 16,558 32,917 20,854 1,651,194 168,425 17,926 42,891 - 91,340 1,910,671 347,248 182,224 27,353 1,641,093 " 154,629 29,870 22,538 38,515 55,614 403,807 51,430 49,562 "a 61,338 '' 19,892 10,000 69,976 67,792 2,567 18,285 7,501 169,636 133,985 a' 212,0000 a 21,000 20,000 630,133 49,094 2 32,161 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 1 Completed. 2 Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation requirements, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. a Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. ' No commerce reported. * Completed except for inactive portion. * Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). ' Excludes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. * Inactive. * Includes $53,254 for previous projects. 1o Commerce included under Tiverton Harbor, RI. " Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation and breakwaters repaired in 1961. n' Excludes $20,000 expended from Contributed Funds, Other for maintenance. SRecommendation for abandonment of existing project made in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. 14Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds expended. " Improvement adequate for commerce. " Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. " Includes $40,800 for previous project. " Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. "Includes $509,411 for previous projects. ' Under State maintenance. 2' Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. " Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). "Excludes $10,000 Contributed Funds, Other. ' All assurances of local cooperation have not been fulfilled. Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. " Lack of local sponsor. " Includes $130,390 for previous projects. " Includes $692,435 for previous projects. "Includes $133,357 for previous project. SIncludes $37,000 for new work for previous project. O Excludes local requirements of $65,000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction costs. 3' Includes $42,340 for previous project. " Includes $22,000 for previous project. "Excludes $10,000 Contributed funds, Other. " Includes $81,410 for previous project. " Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. " Includes $21,000 for previous projects. * Includes $135,143 for previous project. " Includes $10,000 for previous project. 3 Includes $162,517 for previous project. 4� Includes $330,204 for previous project. 41 Includes $215,801 for previous project. " Includes $66,120 for previous projects. 4 Includes for previous projects $735,900 (Weymouth, Fore R.) and $25,000(Town R.). " Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore River) and $12,577 (Weymouth, Town River). " Includes $59,420 for previous project. " Includes $35,214 for previous project. ' Excludes $81,548 Contributed Funds, Other. ' Excludes $582,188 Contributed Funds, Other expended. 4 Includes $378,450 for previous project. '� Includes $11,949 for maintenance of previous project. 6i Excludes $18,000 Contributed Funds, Other. " Includes $188,647 for previous project. " Excludes $894,475 major rehabilitation for Long Beach Dike. "Includes $2,013 for previous projects. In addition $400 was expended for maintenance from Contributed Funds. " Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds, Other. , Includes $3,160 for previous project. *' Excludes $173,425 Contributed Funds, Other. 6 Includes $45,835 for new work for previous project; excludes $211,649 expended for minor rehabilitation; jetty repaired in 1963. 5 Excludes $15,000 expended for previous project. 5� Includes $3,761,412 for previous projects. "Includes $650,136 for previous projects. "aExcludes $ 37,200 Contributed Funds, Other. 1-53 . REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sep. 30, 1994 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT 1 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT ' 1964 56,386 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA 1 1982 228,081 228,080 Compo Beach, Westport, CT I 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, CT 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT 1 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH 1 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT 1 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT 1 1961 3,930 7,859 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA ' 1986 50,000 - Middle Beach, CT 1 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI 1963 14,512 29,024 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA' 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI 1 1982 559,200 181,175 Plum Island, MA' 1977 118,882 104,875 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA ' 1962 621,464 1,242,880 Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME ' 1993 233,260 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI 1 1959 40,143 82,000 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT 1 1961 23,759 47,518 Seaside Park, CT 1 1958 150,000 329,921 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT' 1983 1,186,830 889,330 Short Beach, CT 3 1956 - - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1964 62,560 270,695 Southport Beach, CT 1 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA' 1964 5,490 10,981 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH 1 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA' 1971 180,944 200,208 Winthrop Beach, MA' 1960 176,567 353,134 'Completed. 2 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874. 3 Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. (See page 88 of the 1956 Annual Report.) 'Inactive. 1-54 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE I-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alford, Green River, MA"' Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI30 Alley Bay, Beals, ME",o10 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA"' Ansonia - Derby, CT' Bagaduce River, ME ""'4 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH "' Blackstone River, Millbury, MA s,"1 . Bound Brook, Scituate, MA "' Canton, MA .' Charles River Dam, MA' Charlestown, NH "' Cherryfield, ME".' Chicopee, MA' Chicopee Falls, MA ' Clear River, Burrillville, RI "' Cocheco River, NH ,' Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH "' Connecticut River, W. Stewartatown, NH "' Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MAS""O40 Danbury, CT 3 Derby, CT ' East Branch Dam, CT ' East Hartford, CT ' Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT ,' Fort Kent, ME "4' Fox Point Barrier, RI' Gardner, MA "4 Gulf Street, Milford, CT Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT' Hartford, CT' Hartford, White River, VTJ"' Haverhill, MA S Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA "' Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME 3,,10 Holyoke, MA ' Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA ", Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT ,'10. Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA So0 Huntington, MA S,'..o Island Avenue, Quincy, MA "' Islesboro (The Narrows), ME 3,4,10 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME s,.,10 Keene, NH ,4 Lee, Housatonic River, MA " o 1 0 Little River, Belfast,ME 3 ' Lowell, MA' Lower Woonsocket, RI' Machias River, Machias, ME"3 ' Mad River Lake, CT ' Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME"' Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME "'.,o Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 3.,.o0 Nashua, NH S New London, CT Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT" 3.401. 1977 1979 1978 1977 1985 1989 1986 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1987 1963 1982 1976 1988 1978 1977 1973 1951 1979 1979 1976 1970 1991 1970 1960 1973 1940 1979 1980 1953 1985 1982 1981 1960 1983 1985 1985 1955 1976 1990 1945 1977 1987 1973 1987 1980 1988 1950 1992 1985 1-55 $ 41,419 - 190,500 132,113 18,266,040 129,500 2,591,000 249,999 47,300 156,568 a 41,170,921 113,330 191,095 1,433,600 ' 2,183,912 168,000 183,100 180,000 54,703 250,000 13,143,000 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,447 13 220,284 1,997,820 11,112,801 495,691 365,000 2,572,357 6,094,100 ' 332,236 1,743,485 2,325,470 207,390 3,418,000 26 739,003 102,800 202,608 3,900 172,000 165,500 163,082 44,146 37,852 166,682 490,600 n 6,600,681 152,000 4,773,020 243,000 107,682 110,000 270,000 ' 8,504,919 " 222,500 $ 21 - - - 4,576 - 92,981 5,554,088 ' 385 411,292 * - - 180,000 19 7,637 - - 3,616,290 14 15,000 21,000 2,781,100 120,000 24,447 43,000 1,266,638 20 327 2,015,709 9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Northampton, MA s North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT " North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA' North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA s.4.10 Norwalk, CT"4 Norwich, CT' Park River, Hartford, CT ' Pawcatuck, CT' Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI .4 Penobscot River, Old Town, ME S.' Phillips Lake, MA Pleasant Point, Perry, ME "' Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT s4.10 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME 3.4.10 St. John River Basin, ME ' Salmon River, Colchester, CT '4 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME Saxonville, MA' Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME "' Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH x,4.10 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA "' South River, Conway, MA Springdale, MA' Springfield, MA s Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT "' Stony Brook, Wilton, NH .4 Sucker Brook Dam, CT' Three Rivers, MA' Torrington, East Branch, CT "' Torrington, West Branch, CT "4 Town River Bay, Quincy, MA s.o10 Trumbull Lake, CT' Village of Saxtons, VT 44,10 Ware, MA .4, Waterbury-Watertown, CT S' Weston, VT*' West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA3'4 West Springfield, MA *' West Warren, MA"4 Whitmanville Lake, MA Winsted, CT ' Woonsocket, RI S Wnrcester Tivrqsny MA 3 1W J ~ 1977 1981 1979 1952 1960 1986 1966 1986 1986 1982 1987 1986 1980 1983 1984 1980 1985 1977 1978 1987 1952 1950 1983 1973 1976 1970 1963 1963 1993 1983 1985 1963 1963 1957 1983 1992 1964 1979 1954 1962 1 978 680,000 17 73,865 3,235,000 23 81,671 52,150 1,209,000 58,876,919 644,311 3,174,260 178,045 300,000 189,000 227,500 73,674 251,187 247,100 127,500 4,218,700 1,857,475 37,657 1,803,738 133,500 700,000 577,000 i 116,296 19,500 2,227,792 1,577,189 389,237 228,237 55,228 1,498,800 140,500 400,000 265,300 13,079 119,433 1,798,452 TV 389,176 605,023 245,500 4,033,100 5 .0R Rc9 ' Inactive. 2 Excludes $1,146,828 expended from Contributed Funds, Other. ' Completed. ' Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 'Reflects FY1967 settlement of outstanding claims in the amount of $13,295. ' Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. 'Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. 'Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency funds expended. ' Excludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 'o Emergency Bank Protection. " Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 1" Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. ' Includes $380,000 Public Works Administration Funds. 4 Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnation. "s Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. ' Excludes $259,408 Contributed Funds, Other. ' Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. ", Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. " Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 20 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 21 Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 2 Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and 1-56 16 214,106 - - - 5,350 58,800 - - -.12 18,409 - - 14,343 41,000 224,476 Ii -C VT.V1bG.7YG1 1./1VGL AJLL 111x1 171 V V .V JV ! V+1V1 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. "Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. ' Irrigation demonstration project. , Includes $610,000 Public Works Administration funds. T"Portion Authorized by Chief of Engineers. TABLE 1-F "Excludes $245,000 Public Works Administration Funds. "Excludes $852,127 non project cost per 1976 WRDA. 'Excludes $1,629,256 forlands and $303,251 Contributed Funds, Other. 30Unstarted. OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME 1 1935 $ 6,384,394 'Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-57 TABLE 1-E (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir Aug 1977 $ - $ - Andover Lake, CT Aug 1977 - - Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) Oct 1978 - - Baker Brook, MA 1972 Nov 1979 94,000 - Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) 1932 Nov 1986 - - Beards Brook Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 78,000 - Beaver Brook Lake, NH 1973 Apr 1978 378,300 - Bennington Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 205,000 - Big River Reservoir, RI 1987 Nov 1990 - - Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) 1984 Jan 1990 - - Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1980 Nov 1979 - - Brockway Lake, VT 1946 Aug 1977 - - Cambridgeport Lake, VT Aug 1977 - - Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) 1954 Aug 1977 - - Claremont Lake, NH 1968 Dec 1970 242,700 - Clyde, RI 1948 Apr 1951 8,800 - Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT 1932 Jan 1990 132,146 - Connecticut River below Hartford CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Cotuit Harbor, MA 1962 Oct 1978 8,541 - Dickey - Lincoln School Lakes, ME 1984 Nov 1986 26,285,298 - Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted portion) 1968 Jan 1990 - Eastport Harbor, ME 1984 Nov 1983 638,675 141,530 Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1978 Nov 1986 - - Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1930 Act) 1984 Nov 1986 - Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1969 Oct 1978 - - Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Oct 1976 206,600 - Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) 1983 Nov 1986 - Greenwich Point Beach, CT 1959 Oct 1978 - - Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) 1983 Nov 1986 - - Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Honey Hill Lake, NH 1949 Aug 1977 92,000 - Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1986 - - Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - LudlowLake, VT Aug 1977 - - Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1956 Nov 1986 - Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986 Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 - - Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1981 Nov 1986 - Monoosnoc Brook, MA 1967 Nov 1986 - Monoosnoc Lake, MA 1967 Nov 1986 Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 - Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700 - Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - Nantasket Beach, MA 1971 Jan 1990 - - Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion) 1965 Nov 1986 - - Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA (inactive portion) 1989 Jan 1990 - - Napatree Beach, RI Nov 1979 - - 1-58 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Narragansett Pier, RI New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion) Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Nookagee Lake, MA North Andover and Lawrence, MA North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH Norwalk-Wilton, CT Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT (uncompleted portion) Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) Pawtucket, RI Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion). Pleasant Bay, MA Point Judith, RI Pontiac Diversion, RI Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (uncompleted portion) South Coventry Lake, CT South Tunbridge Lake, VT Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Stonington Harbor, ME Stratford, CT Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion) The Island Lake, VT Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) Wareham-Marion, MA Victory Lake, VT West Brookfield Reservoir, MA West Canaan Lake, NH Westerly, RI Westfield, MA Westport, CT Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion) Westport River, MA Williamsville Reservoir, VT Winthrop Beach, MA (uncompleted portion) 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 - 1953 1986 1986 1976 1949 1963 1973 1978 1979 1949 1969 1971 1968 1948 1976 1961 1979 1976 1979 1982 1969 1922 1964 1951 1979 1979 1959 1961 1973 1946 1948 1967 1961 1964 1961 1896 1965 1967 1948 1948 1966 1967 1965 1972 1942. 1949 1960 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Nov 1981 Nov 1979 Nov 1986 Nov 1979 Nov 1977 Nov 1981 Nov 1986 Nov 1977 Apr 1951 Nov 1986 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Oct 1979 Jun 1982 Nov 1986 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Oct Jan Nov Nov Mar Dec - 563,677 20,000 - - 198,477 24,200 - - - - 176,000 96,000 - - 2,543 934,500 1978 1990 1986 1979 1977 1944 Jan 1990 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Nov 1979 Jan 1990 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Jul 1960 Aug 1977 Nov 1986 Sep 1969 Feb 1970 Nov 1979 Jan 1990 Dec 1944 Nov 1986 81,715 168,400 67,000 92,000 507,200 29,634 146,500 1-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA $ 485 Gloucester Harbor, Gloucester, MA 34,933 Hyannis Harbor, Hyannis, MA 220,822 $150,000 Marblehead Harbor, Marblehead, MA 12,291 Provincetown Harbor, Provincetown, MA 28,133 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA 2,226 Vineyard Haven Harbor, Tisbury, MA 12,206 TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Bartlett Pond, Plymouth, MA $12,000 Beach Point, Truro, MA 71,517 Black Rock Beach, Nahant,MA 26,075 Greenwich Cove, Greenwich, CT 55,756 Humarock Beach, Scituate, MA 74,608 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI 95,726 Noroton Bay, Darien, CT 7,011 Rexhame Dunes, Marshfield, MA 9,601 Siasconset Beach, Nantucket,MA 88,066 Silver to Cedar Beach, Milford, CT 104,235 Victoria Beach, East Haven, CT 52,114 Wells and Drakes Island, Wells, ME 20,335 Winthrop Shore Drive, Winthrop, MA 90,805 TABLE 14J MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES PURSUANT TO SECTION 111 PUBLIC LAW 90-483 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costa Expended Camp Ellis Beach, Saco, ME $251,059 1-60 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-K FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH $ 20,274 Point Beach, Milford, CT 49,179 $ 70,000 Ten Mile River, Cheshire, CT 23,214 Shetucket River, Sprague, CT 18,728 TABLE 1-L PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 1135, PUBLIC LAW 99-662, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended French River Restoration, MA $41,712 Galilee Salt Marsh, RI 12,511 Sagamore Marsh, Cape Cod Canal, MA 45,677 TABLE 1-M BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 39 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages1 Total West Hill2 Worcester,MA 25.8 51 Earthfill . 12,400 $1,366,922 $940,000 $2,306,902 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. 1-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-M (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages1 Total Worcester, MA 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,000 2' $6,102,500 Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,733,100 1,069,000 * 4,802,100 Lower Woonsocket, Flood wall, conduits and RI 13 channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 32 Slope protection 256,619 - 256,619 s Clear River, Burrillville, RI 23 Retaining wall 168,000 168,000 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI - Land acquisition 4,125,000 4,125,000 4 1 Includes relocation. ' $3,300,000 Federal; $825,000 non-Federal. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. s $250,000 Federal; $6,619 non-Federal. S $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. TABLE 1-N CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 42 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Reservoir Lands ticut Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village 2 North Hartland 2 North Springfield 2 Ball Mountain Townshend 2 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Otter Brook 2 Massachusetts: Birch Hill 2 Tully 2 Barre Falls 2 Knightville 2 Littleville 1 Conant Brook 2 Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Mad River Sucker Brook White River Jct. White River Jct. Springfield Brattleboro Brattleboro Keene Keene Gardner Athol Worcester Northampton Northampton Springfield Winsted Winsted Winsted 228.4 170 Earthfill 211.7 185 Earthfill 191.3 120 Earthfill 178.2 265 Rockfillearth 168.3 133 Earthfill 38,000 71,400 50,600 54,600 33,200 $3,186,860 6,349,225 4,781,526 10,689,298 $ 908,300 963,000 2,050,000 350,000 $4,095,160 7,312,225 6,831,526 11,039,298 5,520,413 1,878,000 7,398,413 174.4 86 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 171.2 133 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 153.3 148.7 130.2 102.8 102.0 122.0 56 Earthfill 62 Earthfill 62 Rockfillearth 160 Earthfill 150 Earthfill 85 Rockfillearth 116.0 223 Rockfillearth 120.0 178 Earthfill 118.5 68 Earthfill 49,900 22,000 24,000 49,000 32,400 3,740 98,500 1,740,679 1,298,752 1,928,819 2,594,440 5,863,412 1,935,530 3,075,000 368,000 39,000 821,200 1,150,000 1,015,000 4,815,679 1,666,752 1,967,819 3,415,640 7,013,412 2,950,530 8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 9,700 4,773,020 2,210,000 6,983,020 1,480 2,227,792 180,0003 2,407,792 x Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. ' Non-Federal cost. SNon-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. 1-62 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-N (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Lands ticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 170.4 Channel improvement $ 2,591,000 - $ 2,591,000 Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection 113,330 - 113,330 Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,434,000 $ 250,000 1,684,000 Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT 31 Streambank protection 353,000 353,000 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,143,084 271,000 2,414,084 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT 60 Streambank protection 570,000 - 570,000 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel 5 Channel i 220,284 - 220,284 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 510,691 35,000 545,691 Gulf Street, Milford, CT - Slope protection 386,000 386,000 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 9,710,200 ' 1,150,000 10,860,200 Hartford, White River, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,442,447 150,000 3,592,447 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,146 - 44,146 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 200.3 Streambank stabilization 110,000 - 110,000 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,000 * 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 Park River, CT 51 Conduit 58,876,919 1,300,000 60,176,914 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,344,077 50,000 1,394,077 Salmon R., Colchester, CT 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 South River, Conway, MA 107 Slope protection 133,500 - 133,500 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 937,350 2 272,000 1,209,350 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,079 2,000 15,079 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 2,043,452 * 30,000 2,073,452 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 430,176 64,000 494,176 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 'To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests portion of relocation. 2 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 'Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. ' Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. * Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 1-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-0 HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 43 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Nauga- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages s Total Hall Meadow Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,000' $3,862,357 earthfill East Branch Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,959,836 1,290,000 3,249,836 Thomaston Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 earthfill Northfield Brook Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 Black Rock Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Brook Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,593,911 2,585;000 4,178,911 Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. ' Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 1 Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages ' Total Alford, Green River, MA Ansonia-Derby, CT Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA Danbury, CT Derby, CT Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT Pittsfield, MA Salisbury, CT Sheffield, MA Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT Torrington, West Branch, CT Waterbury- Watertown, CT 111.0 13.0 96.0 56.0 12.0 35.0 83.0 133.0 76.0 96.0 43.0 51.0 52.0 32.0 Earth dike and stone slope protection Wall, levee, channel improvement and pumping station Stone slope protection Walls, channel improvement and bridge replacememt Walls, levees and pumping station Channel improvements Snagging and clearing project Stone arch culvert Gabionade with slope protection Stone slope protection Timber Bulkhead Dike and channel improvement Walls, dikes and channel Wall, dike and channel $41,419 $ - $ 41,419 18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 430,000 13,143,000 - 430,000 1,862,000 15,005,000 7,582,642 647,000 8,229,642 2,100,000 73,865 739,003 102,800 202,608 116,296 389,237 228,237 263,300 2,100,000 - 73,865 85,000 824,003 - 102,800 202,608 116,296 389,237 228,237 263,300 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 1-64 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-P MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 45 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages s Total Franklin Falls Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 Blackwater Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 1,319,746 Hopkinton- Everett Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 Edward MacDowell Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,253 306,000 2,014,253 Phillips Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,000 Whitmanville Fitchburg, MA 110.6 76 Earthfill 9,350 11,590,000 6,210,000 17,800,000 1For details, see individual report. SIncludes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS' Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages ' Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and revetment $ 132,113 $ - $ 132,113 Merrimack Rivers, MA Haverhill, MA 21.0 Floodwall, conduit and 1,863,485 - 1,863,485 pumping station Lowell, MA 39.0 Wall and levee 490,600 6 90,000 580,600 Nashua, NH 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,000 ' North Nashua River, 94.0 Stone slope protection 210,000 - 210,000 Leominster, MA North Nashua River, 94.0 Stone slope protection 300,000 - 300,000 Leominster (Sewer Line), MA North Nashua River, MA 100.5 Channel improvement 3,235,000 s - 3,235,000 Saxonville, MA 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 1 For details, see individual report. ' To be borne by local interests. * Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration Funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 4 Excludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. s Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration Funds. 1-65 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 1-Q THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 54 of Text) RESERVOIRS1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Thames Height Capacity Constr. and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages ' Total Hodges Village Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,268 $3,144,000 $4,461,268 Buffumville Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 East Brimfield Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 Westville Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 West Thompson Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,220 1,965,000 7,001,220 Mansfield Hollow Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 SFor details, see individual report. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages i Total Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 West River, New Haven, CT Channel improvements 4,619,543 554,638 5,174,181 i Borne by local interests. 2 Excludes $71,650 Contributed funds not required. 1-66 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-R RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted CONNECTICUT Duck Island Five Mile River Guilford Harbor New Haven Harbor/ Quinnipiac River Sea Bluff Beach Stamford Harbor Stony Creek Thames River MAINE Saco River Scarboro River Searsport Harbor MASSACHUSETTS Boston Harbor/ Nubble Channel Essex River Fall River Gloucester Harbor Green Harbor Hingham Harbor Hyannis Harbor Merrimack River Plymouth Harbor Sesuit Harbor Weymouth Fore and Town River Jan/Feb 1994 Aug 1994 May/Jul 1994 Dec 1993 Mar/Apr 1994 Nov/Dec 1993 Jan 1994 Mar/Apr 1994 Aug 1994 Jul/Aug 1994 Dec 1993 Feb 1994 Jan 1994 Jan/Mar 1994 NEW HAMPSHIRE Cocheco River Little Harbor Portsmouth Harbor & Piscataqua River RHODE ISLAND Block Island/Great Salt Pond Charlestown Breachway Little Narragansett Bay & Watch Hill Cove Sakonnet Harbor Oct/Nov 1993 Aug/Sep 1994 May/Jun 1994 Feb 1994 Apr/May 1994 Jul 1994 Jun/Jul 1994 Jul 1994 Dec 1993 Jan 1994 May 1994 Sep 1994 Mar/Apr/May 1994 Jun 1994 Oct 1993 Jun/Jul/Aug 1994 May/Jun/Jul/Aug Sep 1994 Oct/Nov 1993 Apr/May/Jun Jul 1994 Dec 1993 Jan/Feb/Apr 1994 Major activities under the Dredged Material Management Program under PCS for fiscal year 1994 were (1) monitoring surveys at the Central Long Island Sound, Massachusetts Bay, and Cornfield Shoals disposal sites (2) maintenance, replacement, and repositioning of disposal site buoys. Additionally, 5 monitoring study reports were completed and distributed to the public and regional resource agencies. Total cost of contracts was $730,000. Labor costs of $253,000 for program management, sampling, and testing, and environmental analysis were incurred. 1-67 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT * NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State Line to, but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. In addition it exercises jurisdiction over matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Superviscr of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters of Long Island Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1 Aquatic Plant Control.............. .................................... 2-3 2. East Rockaway Inlet, NY..............................................2-3 3. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY .................................. 2-3 4. Hudson River, NY ..................................................... 2-4 5. Hudson River Channel, NY & NJ...............................2-5 6. Jamaica Bay, NY.................................... ..... 2-5 7. Jones Inlet, NY ..................................... ....... 2-6 8. Kill Van Kull & Newark Bay, NJ & NY ....................2-7 9. Long Island Intracoastal W/W, NY ............................. 2-7 10. Narrows of Lake Champlain, NY ............................. 2-7 11. New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift .......................................................... 2-8 12. New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas....................................................2-8 13. Shinnecock Inlet, NY.............................................. 2-9 14. Tarrytown Harbor, NY...................... 2-10 15. Supervisor of New York Harbor ................................ 2-10 16. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .................... 2-11 17. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .....................2-11 18. Navigation work under special authorization ............ 2-11 Beach Erosion Control 19. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY .................... 2-11 20. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island) NY ................................................. 2-12 21. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, NJ..............................2-13 22. Other Authorized Beach erosion control projects.....................................................2-13 23 Beach erosion control work under Soecial authorization .................................................. 2-13 Page 24. North Ellenville, NY..................................................2-13 25. Passaic River Basin, NJ & NY..................................2-14 26. Inspection of completed flood control projects.........2-15 27. Other authorized flood control projects .................... 2-15 28. Flood control work under special authorization.................................................2-15 29. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection under special authorization ................... 2-15 General Investigations 30. 31. 32. Surveys............ ..................... 2-15 Collection and study of basic data ............................ 2-15 Deauthorized projects ..................................... 2-15 Tables Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement .............................. 2-16 Table 2-B Authorizing legislation.......................... 2-20 Table 2-C Hudson River, NY Features of Lock and Dam Included in Existing Project ...................................... 2-25 Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor Statement of Activities......................................2-25 Table 2-F Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ............ 2-26 Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 2-27 Table 2-H Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................................. 2-29 Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................................... 2-30 Table 2-1 Surveys ...................................................... 2-31 Table 2-L Cost for Flood Plain Management Services ............................................................ 2 -31 Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects ...................................... 2-32 Table 2-N Section 107 Study ............................................ 2-3 Table 2-P Section 205 Studies ................................... 2-34 Table 2-Q Section 14 Studies and Plans and Specs ...................................... 2-34 2-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 2-2 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water chestnut, eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation,, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 changed the local responsibility from 30% to 50%. In FY 87 the States involved in the program were permitted to keep the cost sharing at 30% by order of the Secretary of the Army. Starting FY 88, however, local sponsors contributed 50% of the costs. Operations and results during period. FY 1994 has been the thirteenth year of a control program started in FY 1982 for the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in the Lake Champlain Basin. Recent work continued the removal of water chestnut and eurasian milfoil from portions of the basin. The State of Vermont was able to identify alternative sources to fund the FY 1991 to 1993 programs at no Federal cost. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division areas was completed in August 1967. The General Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this control program to date is $1,900,605. In FY 1994 the New York District cost-shared a FY 1994 program with the State of Vermont which removed nearly 1500 acres of aquatic plants. The total cost of this program was $182,000. In October 1991, Waterways Experiment Station was directed to conduct a 3-year study for $90,000 which would identify and test potential biocontrol agents of water chestnuts. Results are good, as certain organisms have tested successfully as biocontrol agents of water chestnut. This research will be extended to FY 1996. The New York District is currently coordinating with the State of Vermont on cost-sharing the FY 1995 program. The proposed work plan includes various bodies of water in the Lake Champlain Basin. 2. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12353.) Existing project. A channel. 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12 foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmosphere pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including. $100,000 contributed funds (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are numerous terminals in Oceanside. Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway, including oil terminals. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with mechanical handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A contract for the maintenance dredging of the Inlet and repair of riprap jetty was awarded on 30 Sep 93. Dredging of the Inlet was completed in January, 1994 with the removal of approximately 150,000 cubic yards of material. The jetty repair (1800') is expected to be completed by April 1995. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $2,377,520 were expended during FY '94. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4.250 feet tong was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May 1935. 3. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, NY, Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A jetty at Fire Island Inlet extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel 14 feet deep and 450 feet wide along the northern edge of the Inlet's shoaling area connecting the ocean to the deep water in the Inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 feet and 2.4 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements and rights-of-way: Terminal facilities. Great South Bay has extensive public and private facilities for mooring and servicing recreatioial boats. Much of this traffic uses the inlet during the boating season, and some traffic (Coast Guard craft and party and1 head 2-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 fishing boats) continues throughout the year. Operations and results during period. A contract for the dredging of the Inlet and placement of 684,500 cubic yards of sand on Gilgo Beach, NY, was awarded on 9 September 1994 as a continuing contract with options totaling approximately 756,500 cy of dredged material to be awarded within 100 days of initial award. The total of Operations and Maintenance funds expended on the project during FY 1994 was $1,414,734, with New York State contributing an additional $136,456. for beach placement of sand. Condition as of September 30. The jetty, completed in 1941, surpassed its capacity as a sand entrapping agent in a little over a decade. Since then extensive sand bars and shoals continued to form west of the jetty and in the inlet throat. Hydraulic dredging in the inlet was undertaken in 1959 and again in 1964 under a combined beach erosion control and navigation authorization (1958 Act). Since then 3 more hydraulic dredging operations were conducted starting in 1973 and completed in 1977 under provisions of the 1962 Act (see Table 2B). Maintenance dredging using small hopper dredges has also been done from time to time. Due to local concerns about inlet dredging and consequent erosion at Oak Beach, maintenance had been deferred since 1979 which allowed the complete shoaling of the authorized project channel. To facilitate navigation in this period the existing natural channel was dredged in FY 1985 and in FY 1987. In FY 1987 sand was deposited offshore of Gilgo Beach by hopper dredge using operations and maintenance funds. O&M funds were also used during FY 1987 and 1988 to make repairs to the inner portion of the jetty. In March 1988 the District recommended a plan to maintain a realigned channel in the vicinity of the natural channel to a depth of 14 feet (plus 2 feet of allowable overdepth) and a width of 450 feet. The plan also recommended placement of the dredged material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purposes. The recommended plan was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on 2 August 1988. Since FY 1990 the realigned channel was dredged to project depth each year with placement of material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purpose. 4. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery. New York, City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay- Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12341, 12343.12347,12348, and 14786.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 164 and 226, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston, and thence 400 feet wide to Albany. with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, I near Hudson and I near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2.200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of Mall Bridge, thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of NY In the tidal section below the Federal dam at Troy, the assumed"lowest low water plane downstream to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. Mean tidal range is about 5 feet below the dam and about 4.9 feet at Albany. The normal pool level above the dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.3 feet above mean sea level, with the mean range of pool level in seasons of moderate rains being 2.2 feet. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category, and has since been deauthorized. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6 Operations and results during period.Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $75,268 were expended on engineering, design, and supervision and administration for the dredging contract during FY 1994. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing dredging design surveys and project condition surveys at a total cost including supervision and administration of $267,664 for maintenance in FY 1994. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year in the removal of stumps, snags, and other obstructions which constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a cost including supervision and administration of $242,313 for maintenance in FY 1994. 2-4 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT Government plant and hired labor were employed throughout fiscal year 1994 with operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam, including the associated buildings and grounds. Operation of the Lock was suspended for the 1993 navigation season on NOvember 30, 1993 and was resumed for the 1994 navigation season on May 1, 1994. Total funds expended for the operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and the associated buildings and grounds, including performing instrumentation monitoring, supervision and administration was $745,156 for FY 1994. In addition, Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $19,385 were expended performing activities associated with the periodic inspection of the lock and dam. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet. 5. HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY & NJ Location. Hudson River empties into Upper Bay of New York Harbor at the Battery, New York City. Section included under this title extends from deep water in Upper New York Bay about 14.5 miles to just north of Harlem River (Spuyten Duyvil Creek). Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938, pages 1765, and 213 respectively. Existing project. A channel 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, suitably widened at bends from West 59th Street, Manhattan, to West 40th Street thence 45 feet deep of same width to deep water in Upper Bay; a channel 40 feet deep to full width of river extending from northline of 59th Street to south side of Little Basin, and thence a channel of same depth to deep water in Upper New York Bay off Ellis Island, substantially as shown on maps in H. Doc. 309, 72d Cong., Ist sees., subject to provision that no dredging be done under project within 50 feet of pierhead lines; a channel 750 feet wide and 30 feet deep along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront; removal of a shoal on New York side between West 59th and West 61st Streets to a depth of 40 feet; and removal of an obstruction north of mouth of Spuyten Duyvil Creek to depth surrounding river bottom. Channel included in project is about 11 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range at the Battery, 4.4 feet, and West 129th Street, 4.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.3 and 4.9 feet respectively: irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet below mean low water at the Battery up to 6.2 feet above mean high water and at West 129th Street from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 5.3 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5. Operations and results during period. Hudson River Channel (Edgewater to Weehawken) was dredged by Hopper Dredge McFarland on 6 October 1993 to 22 November 1993 for a total of 38.8 working days, with the removal of 212,220 cy of material at a cost of $2,079,000. Then the project was contracted to Weeks Marine .Inc., on 18 May 1993. Edgewater Weehawken Reach was dredged by clam shell fredge with the removal of approximately 807,645 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,835,849. Total Operations and Maintenance funds expended on this project for FY '94 was $4,948,821. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced April 1913 and completed September 1952. Widening and deepening Weehawken-Edgewater Channel to project dimensions was completed in August 1937. Widening 40-foot channel for full width of river from Ellis Island to West 59th Street, Manhattan, was completed in March 1939. Widening 48-foot project to full project width of 2,000 feet from West 40th Street to West 59th Street was completed in November 1950. Deepening 45-foot channel for a width of 2,000 feet from Upper Bay to West 40th Street was completed to project dimensions in September 1952. 6. JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. Location. Inside south shore of Long Island, the entrance being about 17 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12350). Previous projects. For details see page 1770 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 185 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an interior channel extending from vicinity of Marine Parkway Bridge along west and north shores of the bay, 18 feet deep at mean low water and 300 feet wide to Mill Basin, with a swinging basin, 1,000 feet wide and 1,000 feet long at the point - thence 12 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Fresh Creek Basin; and interior channel extending from the same locality along south shore to Head of Bay, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, a channel in Mott Basin, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide extending from the channel along the south shore, 3,000 feet to junction of the two branches, thence 2,200 feet in north branch (Inwood Creek) and 3,200 feet in south branch; and an entrance channel connecting the two interior channels with deep water in Atlantic Ocean, of suitable hydraulic dimen- 2-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 sions to maintain present tidal prism in the bay, but not less than 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from opposite Barren Island to Rockaway Point, thence enlarging to not less than 20 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide to the sea, protected by one riprap jetty. Length of section included in project is 19.7 miles. Mean tidal range, 4.9 feet. at Barren Island, and 5.1 feet at Head of Bay; mean range of spring tides, 5.9 and 6.1 feet, respectively: irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water to 4.9 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project is $4,466,421 (July 1961), excluding amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that in lieu of conditions heretofore prescribed local interest furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged materials for new work and subsequent maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages, City of New York was notified of conditions of local cooperation in letter dated January 25, 1946. In letter dated February 7, 1946, the Mayor of New York advised that disposal areas are available and necessary document "holding the United States free from claim for damages" would be executed. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable areas fro disposal of dredged material during construction and subsequent maintenance, hold the United States free from damages and perform all necessary alterations to existing terminals and bulkheads, and dredge adequate approaches thereto. These conditions have been fulfilled. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5. Operations and results during during period. A contract for the removal and disposal of material lying above the plane of 20 feet below mean low water in Jamaica Bay, NY was awarded on 21 January 1994. Work began on 27 February 1994 and was completed on 4 April 1994. Approximately 198,941 cy of material was removed at a total project cost of $1,500,941 in Operations and Maintenance funds. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced in August 1912 and completed in June 1961. Westerly interior channel from Barren Island to Fresh Creek Basin and swinging basin at Mill Basin were completed in April 1929. Southerly interior channel and channel in Mott Basin, including its two branches were completed in June 1961. No new work dredging of entrance channel, was done, since depths provided under previous project were greater than those required under existing project. East jetty was restored to project dimentions in August 1963. 7. JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. A small inlet on south shore of Long Island connecting Hempstead Bay with Atlantic Ocean, 37 miles by water southeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352). Existing project. An entrance jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from that depth in the ocean through the inlet to Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek. Section included in project is about 2.1 miles long, mean tidal range from 4.2 feet at ocean entrance to 3.1 feet at Loop Causeway Bridge; mean range of spring tide varies from 5 to 3.7 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required, and must maintain a channel 12 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide from Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek to head of navigation in Freeport Creek at Mill Road. Terminal facilities. Within area tributary to Jones Inlet there are a number of privately owned small wharves and numerous boat repair and storage yards. The latter are equipped for repair of pleasure craft and fishing vessels. In addition, there are public wharves open to the public free of charge, with a total dockage of 2,180 feet. Additional terminals would have to be constructed for receipt of commercial freight in any sizable quantity. Operation and Results during period. A contract for the maintenance dredging of the inlet channel with beach placement of the dredged material was awarded on 21 January 1994. Work commenced on 5 March 1994 and was completed on 5 April 1994. A total of 560,000 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited onto the adjoining beach. The total of Operations and Maintenance funds expended on the project during FY 1994 was $3,510,600 with New York State contributing an additional $592,509 for the beach placement of the sand. Condition as of September 30. Construction of the existing project was commenced August 1953 and completed June 1959. Studies made in attempt to minimize required maintenance: JONES INLET - JETTY REHABILITATION. The purpose of this study is to develop a feasible and cost effective design for rehabilitation of the Jones Inlet Jetty to insure structural stability and maximize the sand trapping efficiency of the structure. Inlet hydrographic and existing jetty condition surveys have been performed. Preliminary design and cost estimates for alternative schemes have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. JONES INLET - MAINTENANCE MODIFICATIONS. The purpose of this study is to develop feasible and cost efficient alternatives which would minimize channel maintenance requirements. Existing tidal/inlet hydraulics, inlet/bay stability, jetty impoundment rates, etc., have been evaluated. Several methods of shoaling analysis were reviewed and the most applicable used. Preliminary design layouts and cost estimates for a deposition basin and navigation channel have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. 2-6 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 8. KILL VAN KULL - NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, NJ & NY Location. The project includes Kill Van Kull connecting upper New York Bay with Newark Bay, and channels in lower Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning and maneuvering areas, as well as deepening the Elizabeth and Port Newark channels. The deepening to be done from the existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 44 feet. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $310,000,000 with an additional $194,000,000 to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Government which was executed on 30 May 1986. A supplemental agreement was executed on 21 May 1987. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Stage 1, channel deepening to 40 feet in seven contracts, is underway. Contract No.1l, awarded in June 1987, is completed. Contract No. 2 was awarded in July 1988 and is completed. Contract No. 3 was awarded in Sept. 1988 and is completed. Removal of rock and hard material in the Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay is divided in three contracts, 4A,4B and 4C. Contract 4A was awarded in April 1991 and is completed. Contract 4B was awarded in August 1993 and is scheduled for completion in Sept. 1995. Contract No. 5 was awarded in May 1988 and is complete. Contract 4C was awarded in September 1994 and is scheduled to be completed in July 1995. Sampling & testing of bottom sediments in the Port Elizabeth area of Newark Bay showed some dioxin contamination. 9. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. Location. Extends from East Rockaway Inlet, on the south side of Long Island, to Great Peconic Bay at the eastern end of Long Island. Section included under this project extends from Great South Bay opposite Patchogue to the South end of Shinnecock Canal. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at mean low water from the federally improved channel in Great South Bay, opposite Patchogue to south end of Shinnecock Canal, Section included in project is 34 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 1 foot in Shinnecock bay to 0.7 foot in Patchogue Bay; mean range of spring tides varies from 1.2 feet to 0.8 foot; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low water to 12 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are boat repair and storage yards within the area immediately adjacent to the federal improvement. There is ample room for expansion and development of terminals when future traffic warrants. Operations and results during period. A contract for removal and satisfactory disposal of material lying above the plane of 6 feet below mean low water was awarded on August 14, 1992. Dredging commenced on September 29, 1992 and was completed on June 22 1993. Additional dredging was performed in FY 1994. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $208,428 were expended on Long Island Intracoastal Waterway during FY94. Condition as of September 30. Original work under the existing project was commenced October,1939 and completed September 1940. 10. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NY &VT Location. This waterway. 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point. N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, Vt. (See N.O.S. Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y. at head of Lake Champlain to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and, Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low take level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year 1994 in the removal of stumps and snags that posed a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $26,558. Government 2-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 plant and hired labor were employed in the replacement of deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $4,626. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $12,112 were expended in FY 1994 on project condition surveys. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow, where the width is 110 feet. Fender booms have. been placed at the elbow. (Putts Leap and Putts Rock. 11. NEW YORK HARBOR-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor, East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J. and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1974 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterway and was funded as maintenance activity. The current estimate of first cost is $267,000,000 (October 1993 P.L.) including $62,500,000 cash contribution from local interests plus $80,000,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rightsof- way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results (New work-cumulative to date) A total of five Liberty State Park contracts have been completed at a cost of $10,321,211. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the removal of pier 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a cost of $219,604. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $791,656. The Stapleton, Staten Island contract was completed at a cost of $2,910,400. A contract for the city of Hoboken was completed at a cost of $2,123,404. Working along the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at the cost of $979,580. Contract Number One at Weehawken to Edgewater was completed at a cost of $1,697,487. The Brooklyn Reach One contract was completed at a cost of $5,057,920. Work is completed on the Weehawken to Edgewater contract No. 2 and Jersey City North. Contract No.2. The Bayonne One contract has been completed at a cost of $735,800. Hoboken Pier B was completed at a cost of $973,590, and Jersey City North I was completed at a cost of $2,358,000. Weehawken-Edgewater Contract 2A was awarded in May, 1994 and is scheduled for completion in September, 1995. Engineering and design is in progress for Brooklyn Reach 2A, Brooklyn Reach 2B, the Shooters Island Reach, the Arthur Kill, NY & NJ Reaches, the Bayonne 2 Reach, the Passaic River Reach, and the Kill Van Kull Reach. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to navigation. Removal and disposal of 443,615 cubic feet (3,458 cords) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to large timbers, including pilings, pieces of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated pier was accomplished at a cost of $4,395,000 in FY 1994. Conditions as of September 30. For work authorized by Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park, the City of Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Weekawken and Edgewater. The New York City, work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River, along part of the Brooklyn waterfront, and at Stapleton, Staten Island. 12. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower Bays, New York Harbor is 330. miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor. Mass, and 165 miles northeast of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey charts 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; and southerly entrance channel. Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment 2-8 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage. 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long. extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinbume Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks Flats to depths of 45,40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesand Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol 2. Operations and results during period. The first phase of a two-phase Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) study of New York/New Jersey Harbor Region was initiated. The four DMMP study efforts performed in FY 1994 were the preparation of a draft Phase 1 Assessment report including a plan-ofstudy, coordination of the Phase 1 report, and other related efforts with other agencies and the public, the initiation of twoyear biological baseline data collection, and the initiation of a New York Harbor/New York Bight Apex modeling effort. Both the biological baseline data collection and the Harbor/Apex modeling effort are designed to provide needed support to the Phase 2 Detailed Investigation Study scheduled to be initiated in FY '95. The total cost expended on these studies was $1,637,739. Extensive physical, chemical and biological surveys were performed at the Mud Dump as part of the Dioxin Management and Monitoring Plan. The Regional Ocean Disposal Testing Guidance Manual was updated, and the Waterways Experiment Station in Vicksburg initiated a number of studies funded by the District concerning disposal and capping. The total cost of this work was $2,645,000. A total of $421,995 was spent on Sampling and Testing in preparation fro FY '96 dredging of Arthur Kill. The total Operations and Maintenance funds expended on New York Harbor during FY '94 was $4,704,734. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing projects began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2.000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends nearly southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed to depths of 45, and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay was completed to a 47- foot depth in November 1977. 13. SHINNECOCK INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 95 miles east of the Battery. New York City. It is an opening through the sandy barrier beach, connecting Shinnecock Bay with the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep (mlw) and 200 feet wide with a deposition basin, thence extending through the inlet to Shinnecock Bay for a distance of about 0.7 mile thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of about 1 mile: rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost for work is S22,300.000 of which the Federal share is $16.900,000 and non-Federal share is $5.400.000. Local cooperation. The navigation improvement will accrue both recreational and commercial benefits which result in a first cost allocation of 69 percent Federal and 31 percent non- Federal. The authorizing document also requires that local authorities: provide without cost to the United States, all lands easements, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance, when and as required; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; maintain and operate the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlet 2-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; maintain, for the duration of the economic life of the project, continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration for public use, and continued availability for public use of the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the Federal share of the costs is based. A Local Cooperation Agreement for the dredging element of the project was executed with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on 7 June 90. A Local Cooperation Agreement for the jetty reconstruction phase of work was executed on Dec 10,1991. Terminal facilities. Shinnecock Bay, and adjacent ocean area, constitute an important marine fishery. The public, fishing facility includes three docks, one of which, the Shinnecock Fishermens Cooperative, stores and market the catch for the fishermen. Conditions as of September 30. A contract was awarded on March 31, 1992 for Jetty Repair and maintenance dredging for Shinnecock Inlet. Jetty repair commenced on May 21, 1992 and is continuing. The initial dredging and first maintenance dredging of the channel has been completed. Work is proceeding on the jetty re-construction project with anticipated completion by September 1995. 14. TARRYTOWN HARBOR, NY Location. Extends along east shore of Hudson River for about 1 mile below Kingsland Point, 29 miles above the Battery, New York City. Existing project. A channel along wharf front of the harbor 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide, and northerly and southerly connections with deep water in Hudson River of same depth and 150 feet wide; total length,about 1 mile. Mean tidal range, 3.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 3.7 feet; extreme range due to wind and barometric pressure, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations are infrequent and do not materially affect navigation. New work for completed project cost $69,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminals with a total available dockage of about 3,000 feet of are along the waterfront. Railroad connections are adjacent to the waterfront. Terminals are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during period. Under a continuing contract for maintenance diedging to restore project depth of 12 feet, work commenced on 22 September 1992 and was completed on October 19 1992 with the removal of a total 109,069 cubic yards, place measurement of material. The contract amount was revised in FY '94 due to decrease in the estimated quantities. The contract was revised from $948,328 to $775,311, for a contract savings in the amount of S$173,017. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project commenced in April and was completed in July 1937. Controlling depth mean low water (Oct-Nov. 1965) was 12 feet for 150 feet width in southerly connecting channel, then 12 feet for 250 feet width in the channel along the wharf, then 12 feet for a width varying from 250 to 150 feet in northerly channel. 15. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTION AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, New York District. was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of deep draft traffic; the River and Harbor Act of March 3. 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 407, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the New York District is accomplished by means of a patrol vessel whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the water front for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol is limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios patrol shorefront facilities and property. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit, as well as investigating unauthorized construction activities. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps' role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit application. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 2-10 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 16. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 18. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Pre-authorization). (See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) BEACH EROSION CONTROL 19. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY Location. That portion of Atlantic Coast of Long Island in Suffolk County extending from Fire Island Inlet easterly to Montauk Point, N.Y. about 83 miles long. This frontage comprises about 70 percent of total ocean frontage of Long Island. Fire Island Inlet is about 50 miles by water east of the Battery, New York. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 13209, 12354 and 12353.) Authorized project. Provides for Federal participation in improvement to prevent beach erosion and hurricane damages by: widening beaches along developed areas between Kismet and Mecox Bay, to a minimum width 100 feet at elevation 14 feet above mean sea level; raising dunes to an elevation of 20 feet above mean sea level from Fire Island Inlet to Hither Hills State Park, at Montauk and opposite Lake Montauk Harbor, planting grass on dunes; constructing gated interior drainage structures at Mecox Bay, Sagaponack Lake, and Georgica Pond; constructing not to exceed 50 groins, if needed; and Federal participation in cost of beach nourishment. Local Cooperation. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is the local cooperating agency. The State agreed to provide necessary lands, rights of way and borrow areas, and furnish the non-Federal share of the project costs. The most recent letter of intent received from NYSDEC (4/23/93) is in regard to the proposed Interim Project along the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet reach of the authorized project. Project history. On July 30, 1963, the State reflecting the desires of Suffolk County, requested the inclusion of a minimum of 13 groins in initial construction of Moriches- Shinnecock reach. Chief of Engineers concurred in inclusion of up to 13 groins. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Public Works, State of New York, on August 14, and accepted by the District Engineer August 20, 1963. On February 5, 1964, the State requested consideration of a plan, as proposed by Suffolk County, for initial construction of 13 groins of which 11 would be in the Moriches-Shinnecock reach, and 2 in the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach vicinity of Georgica Pond, and that sandfill and dune construction be withheld for the present except for 1 mile on each side of Shinnecock Inlet. On February 27, 1964, the Chief of Engineers accepted the proposals, in part, and supplemental assurances were executed by State of New York on April 20, 1964, and accepted by District Engineer April 27, 1964, as follows: the State of New York now elects to proceed with authorized combined beach erosion control and hurricane protection project for South Shore of Long Island; that Superintendent of Public Works hereby reaffirms his assurance of August 14, 1963, relative to complete project; that State of New York, as cooperating agency, will now agree that artificial fills will be added when and to extent found necessary by the Chief of Engineers, but not earlier than 3 years after completion of groins unless both the State of New York and the Chief of Engineers mutually agree to an earlier placement; that the superintendent agrees for State of New York to contribute the full amount of any increase in Federal costs resulting from the separate construction of the groins and subsequent fill; and that the State agree that construction of the two groins in the Georgica Pond area will depend on a favorable finding, following a study by the Chief of Engineers. Study was completed July 31, 1964, recommending construction, and approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 22, 1964. By letter dated November 5, 1964, the New York State Department of Public Works confirmed that title to all properties and interests in properties necessary for constructing the 11 groins was fully vested in Suffolk County. By letter dated December 7, 1964, the Department stated that the county had obtained easements or fee title for the parcels necessary for constructing the two groins. New York State Department of Public Works Furnished $884,600 and $830,330 required contributed funds October 30, 1964, and September 7, 1965, respectively, for construction of 11 groins in Moriches- Shinnecock reach and $439,900 on January 22, 1965, for construction of 2 groins in Georgica Pond area of the Southampton- Beach Hampton reach, The completed 2 groins and 11 groins were accepted by the New York State Department of Public Works for maintenance on May 11, 1966 and April 10, 1967 respectively. On March 22, 1965, the State recommended that planning priority be in the order: Southampton-Beach Hampton (Drainage structures first): Shinnecock Inlet-Southampton; Beach Hampton-Montauk Point; and Fire Island-Moriches Inlet. Planning on the drainage structures was initiated but was suspended, based on: meeting of October 28, 1965 with Georgica Pond Association and the Preservation Society of East End wherein concern was indicated regarding the effects of the proposed drainage structure on ecology, salinity, pond level and aesthetic values; meeting with the Congressional representatives, State legislators, Federal agencies and local officials held on May 26, 2-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 1966: and resolution of the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted June 13, 1966 requesting advancement of the planning of the Fire Island-Moriches Inlet reach (Fire Island National Seashore). On June 16, 1967, the New York State Department of Public Works requested the following works undertaken as immediate priority items: in Moriches- Shinnecock reach, beach and dune fill at 11 groin site, construction of four groins west of the completed 11 groins, beach and dune fill east of the 11 groins; in Southampton-Beach Hampton reach (at East Hampton), construction of two additional groins, and the outlet structure at Georgica Pond. On March 18, 1968 the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution supporting construction of 4 groins in Reach 2 (Moriches- Shinnecock) and 2 groins in Reach 4 (Southampton-Beach Hampton). On April 22, 1968 the Board adopted a more inclusive resolution authorizing participation in beach erosion and hurricane protection for the Moriches-Shinnecock reach and in the Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. On December 24, 1968, the Commissioner of the New York State Conservation Department executed the second supplement to the assurances of local cooperation, which was accepted by the District Engineer on January 24, 1969. The reaffirmed previous assurances contained provisions for constructing four additional groins in an area extending 6,000 feet west from the most westerly groin in the existing eleven-groin field in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach, and for placing beach and dune fill in this area to the full design cross section as defined in the authorized project report. A General Design Memo completed in 1980 recommended placement of sand fill in the existing 11 groin field and along 9,500 feet of shore to the west. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design began November 1962 and the project construction commenced in January 1965. Two groins in Reach 4: Southampton-Beach Hampton, Section 3, were initiated in March, and completed in September 1965, at a total cost of $720,950 of which $382,109 were incurred against required contributed funds. Eleven groins in Reach 2: Moriches-Shinnecock, Section 2, were initiated in January 1965, and completed in October 1966 at a total cost of $2,854,565 of which $1,370.191 were incurred against required contributed funds. Initial beach fill placement for 750,000 cubic yards in Reach 2, Section IA was completed on May 23, 1969. On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in Reach 2, Section IA and was completed November 14, 1970. 3,083 tons of stone and 1,111,000 cubic yards of sand was placed. Total cost for all Section lA was $3,663,455 including $1,791,428 required contributed funds. Funds in the amount of $70,000 were allotted on April 14, 1977 for initiation of the Phase I study in Reach I, Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet. Environmental Impact Statement on entire project was prepared and revised. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency on January 28, 1978. On March 7, 1978 Department of the Interior supported by the other agencies referred the Environmental Impact Statement to Council on Environmental Quality as unacceptable. On June 6 1978 the Council agreed and recommended project reformulation. Meetings were held in September 1978, January and July 1979 with Department of Interior, Environmental Protection Agency and other interested Federal agencies. Subsequently, the Federal agencies agreed to a basis for the reformulation of the Fire Island to Montauk Point project including a general agreement on the studies necessary to answer the outstanding concerns. Public meetings were held in October 1979 in order to delineate the full scope and level of effort needed to reformulate the the project. A final scoping session was held January 17, 1980 and agreement reached between the Federal agencies although New York State had strong objections. A plan of study was submitted in July 1980. Reformulation would result in a new General Design Memorandum. However, because of New York State's inability to financially participate in construction at West Hampton Beach, reformulation which was initiated in July 1979, was postponed. Two recent breaches (new inlets) occurred in the vulnerable Westhampton area during periods of storm tides, one in Jan. 1980, just east of Moriches Inlet, and the most recent in Dec 1992, at the eastern end of Moriches Bay. Both breaches were filled in by contract, the last one completed in Sept. 1993. At present coordination is proceeding with the State to construct a project that would provide increased protection for the uncompleted portion of Reach 2 on an interim basis, while the entire project is reformulated. Sand fill would be provided to the existing groin field, and additional sand would be placed west of the groins to nourish the eroded beach and reestablish a dune area. 20. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND AREA), NY Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, in Brooklyn (Kings County), approximately nine miles south of the Battery, N.Y. City. Existing project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized plan provides for beach erosion control by restoring the Coney Island public beach up to 250 feet beyond its historic shoreline; the extension of the westerly terminal groin; construction of a terminal groin at the easterly end of the restored beach, and a fillet of beachfill from the terminal groin at W. 37th St. extending approximately 2300 ft. into the community of Sea Gate. The authorized plan also provides,for restoration of the beach by periodic beach nourishment. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the N.Y. State Dept. of Environmental Conservation. The local agreement has not been finalized, but the customary provisions are that local inter- 2-12 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT ests will; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas necessary for construction of the project, hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from the construction works and subsequent maintenance of the project; provide a cash contribution toward the total first cost; assure that water pollution that would affect the health of bathers will not be permitted; assure continued conditions of public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based, during the economic life of the project; maintain public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms and maintain all improvements after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including periodic nourishment during the economic life of the project as may be required to serve the intended purpose, subject to Federal participation in the cost of periodic nourishment for the economic project life. Operations and results during period, and condition as of September 30. The General Design Memo was approved in '92. The record of decision for the EIS was signed in July '93. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed by the State of New York in Oct. 1993. The construction contract was awarded in March 1994 with completion anticipated in Jan. 1995. 21. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location. The northern portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey extending from Sandy Hook southerly to Bamegat Inlet - length about 48 miles. Erosion has seriously reduced the width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective tributary population. SECTION I - SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Sea Bright southerly to Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (PL 100-670 authorized a plan substantially in accordance with the plan recommended in the General Design Memorandum for the project dated May, 1988. In general the plan provides for beach erosion control along approximately 12 miles of coastline, extending from Sea Bright southward to Ocean Township, New Jersey, by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach berm to 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water with an additional 2 foot high berm cap to provide an extra increment of protection from overtopping. The project also provides for the notching of 15 groins, and periodic nourishment throughout the 50 year economic life of the project. Total estimated Federal cost for Section I is $620,900,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $331,600,000. Local cooperation. Includes reconstruction of sea wall at Sea Bright and all'lands easements, rights of way and drainage outfall extensions. Operations .and results during period and condition as of September 30. The Local Cooperation Agreement has been signed by the State of New Jersey. The State of New Jersey has completed reconstructing the seawall. Contract 1A was initiated in Jan. 1994 (Monmouth Beach area) and is scheduled for completion in Nov. 1995. SECTION II- ASBURY PARK TO MANASQUAN, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Asbury Park southerly to Manasquan - length about 9 miles. Recommended project. Provides for Federal participation in the restoration and protection of the shore from Asbury Park to Manasquan by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 50 years from the year that the total quantity to fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions. Total estimated cost is $263,110,000. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The project is in active planning status. A final General Design Memo was completed in May, 1994. 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter.) 23. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Pubi .Law 826, 84th congress as amended (Propose study of Plumb Beach in the Jamaica Bay, N.Y. area during FY 1995). FLOOD CONTROL 24. NORTH ELLENVILLE, NY Location. In Ellenville, N.Y., on Beer Kill and Fantine Kill, at their confluence with Sandburg Creek, which discharges into 2-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Rondout Creek at Napanoch, N.Y., about 2 miles downstream from Ellenville. (See Geological Survey, Ellenville quadrangle). Existing project. Improvement includes construction of levees and floodwalls along Beer Kill and Fantine Kill-I capping retaining walls along Beer Kill; removing concrete dam, channel improvements and stream diversion on Fantine Kill; providing interior drainage including diversion ditches drainage structures, ponding areas; alteration of 6 bridges: and relocating structures and utilities. The project was completed in 1975. Since that time severe storms in April 1980 and April 1987 caused erosion of the riprap bank protection and significant damage to the project floodwalls and levees, Subsequent repairs to damaged areas were undertaken in 1981-82 and in 1987-88 under PL-84-99 authority. A Design Deficiency Report has been prepared and submitted to Office of Chief of Engineers. The recommended plan for design deficiency correction involves repair, reinforcement, and replacement of undermined floodwalls, placement of riprap protection along the Beer Kill Channel bottom and toes of banks; repair and replacement of riprap along the side slopes and toes of the levees, and possible removal of a rock outcrop to reduce erosive velocities. The current Federal cost estimate is $6,145,000 (Oct. 93-P.L.) Local cooperation. Assurances of Local Cooperation were received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in 1968 and 1970. An additional Local Cooperation Agreement was signed in November 1987 to cover the repairs accomplished through the PL-84-99 effort. In a letter dated 9 November 1990, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation indicated their willingness to participate and act as local sponsor under the terms of Section 414 of the 1990 Water Resources Development Act (the non Federal share of the cost to correct the deficiency will be the same as at the time the project was authorized and constructed). The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is expected to be executed in Jan. 1995. Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. The Plans and Specs. have been approved. A construction contract award is scheduled for March 1995. 25. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ & NY Location. The Passaic Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide - and contains portions or Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Three Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River Basin. A S67,400 desnagging, debris removal, and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, NJ Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, NJ, was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. A $1.5 million basin-wide project to improve the Flood Warning and Preparedness System was completed in 1988. The project was implemented by the Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the National Weather Service and U.S. Geological Survey, the State of New Jersey is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. Project history. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers involvement in Passaic River planning was first authorized in the Flood Control Acts of 1936. Since then, reports recommending plans of action were issued in 1939, 1948, 1962, 1972, and 1973. None of these plans were implemented because they did not receive widespread public support. In 1976, Congress authorized a Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Congressional Guidance on the conduct of the study was provided in House Report 94-1702. Local protection plans were developed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern, N.Y., Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, N.J., the Ramapo River at Oakland, N.J., and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, N.J. These projects were authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated to be the worst in 40 years. In June 1984, the State of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as the preferred Basin-wide alternative for detailed plan formulation. The Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft Environmental Impact Statement, (EIS), recommending the Pompton River/ Passaic Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, were completed during FY 1988. The final EIS was filed with EPA in December 1988. Section 101 (a) 18 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1990 (PL 101-640), as modified by section 102 (p) of WRDA '92 (PL 102-580) authorizes construction of the Passaic River Flood Protection Project for the Passaic River Basin which will address both environmental and engineering objectives of the Act. The Passaic River Flood Protection Project combines diversion tunnels, levees, flood walls, channel modification, and natural flood storage to provide flood protection to about 35 towns in the Passaic River Basin. Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction Engineering and design for the Passaic River Flood Protection Project was 2-14 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT initiated in FY 1989 and is continuing with data gathering and technical analyses to prepare a General Design Memorandum and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement with accompanying project cost estimate. A draft report is scheduled for completion in 1995. Engineering and design for the Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront Park and Historic Area project element, consisting of environmental and streambank restoration measures in the city of Newark, is also ongoing. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of the following completed flood control works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects were performed to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with operation and maintenance requirements. New England Adams, MA - Hoosic River Bennington, VT - Roaring Branch East Barre Dam, VT - Jail Branch Montpelier Dam, VT - Winooski River North Adams, MA - Hoosic River Richford, VT - Missiquoi River Waterbury Dam, VT - Little River Wrightsville Dam, VT - North Branch, Winooski River Inspection Date Sept 94 Sept 94 Sept 94 Sept 94 Sept 94 Sept 94 Sept 94 Sept 94 NY - NJ Areas *E. Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet Oct 93 Elizabeth , NJ - Elizabeth River May 94 * Fire Is. Inlet to Montauk Pt., NY Oct 93 Herkimer, NY - Bellinger Brook & Mohawk River Oct 93 Holland Patent, NY - Thompson Creek Oct 93 Hoosic Falls, NY - Hoosic River Oct 93 Kingston, NY - Esopus Creek Oct 93 North Ellenville, NY - Beer & Fantine Kills & Sandburg Creek Oct 93 Rahway, NJ - Rahway River May 94 * Raritan Bay & Sandy Hook Bay, NJ Old Bridge, Keansburg & Middletown, NJ - Apr 94 Rosendale, NY - Roundout Creek Oct 93 So. Amsterdam, NY - So. Chuctanunda Creek & Mohawk River Oct 93 So. Orange NJ - E. Branch, Rahway River Apr 94 Yonkers, NY - Saw Mill River Nov 93 Chappaqua, NY - Saw Mill River Nov 93 Ardsley, NY Nov 93 * Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection Projects 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-1 at end of chapter.) 28. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong as amended (Pre-authorization) (See Table 2-p at end of chapter). Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation provides for disaster preparedness, emergency operation, rehabilitation, advance measures, emergency water, and drought assistance. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District initiated revisions to emergency response plans to include lessons from Hurricane Andrew, attented meeting and seminars dealing with emergency response plan and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fight and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York District conducted field investigations, provided technical assistance and sandbags to local and county governments in response to flooding events. 29. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION Activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 2-Q at end of chapter.) 30. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $74,128 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 32. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Projects having all, or inactive or uncompleted portions deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Water Resources Development Acts (See-Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY93 FY 94 September 30, 1994 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2 East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. 3. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 4. HudsonRiver,N.Y. 5. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. 6. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. 7. Jones Inlet, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maim. Approp. Cost NewWork Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 132,000 24.310 20,000 14.007 24,000 38,938 55,000 79,583 1,964,806 1 1,927,586 2 83,969 533,334 368,000 370,296 358,003 357,062 3,341,000 125,000 3,299,572 336,775 50,000 51,410 250,000 2,360,000 13,015,560 215,585 2,377,520 12,997,719 5,404,000 5,404,575 -152,678 9,464,360 15 9,482,041 1,420,103 2,710,000 1,420,000 20,910,050 1,414,825 2,715,271 1,414,734 20,971,509 - - - - 44,249,800 - - - - 44,249,865 2,545,000 3,926,911 2,057,000 1,367,000 49,977,450 2,544,978 3,922,485 2,050,837 1,371,344 49,860,810 6,7 8,9 6,771,870 6,771,870 11 640,000 640,060 2,800,002 2,776,000 4,920,000 36,446,640 2,799,533 2,741,486 4,948,821 36,440,474 - - - - 4,545,750 - - - - 4,545,750 2,390,000 1,485,000 115,000 1,504,000 10,264,470 2,390,138 1,485,000 115,000 1,500,491 10,237,523 1,822,530 1,822,530 40,000 44,133 50,000 47,456 70,000 72,996 3,520,000 18,048,500 3,510,600 18,039,215 2-16 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY93 FY 94 September 30, 1994 8 Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J: & N.Y. 9. Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. 10. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. 11. New York Harbor-- Collection and Removal of Drift 12. New York Harbor- Entrance Channels & Anchorage Areas 13. Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. 14. Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Appro. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12,792,000 51,139,000 32,549,000 10,173,000 189,571,000 12,109,869 56,699,017 54,656,202 12,719,100 183,833,700 235,964 235,964 245,002 244,996 40,000 39,999 680,006 669,820 40,002 40,002 2,783,000 210,000 11,867,880 2,793,184 208,428 11,874,014 41,000 37,432 42,000 45,521 681,811 10 681,811 1,425,090 1,365,014 2,400,000 2,200,000 2,800,000 6,400,000 54,860,000 2,339,547 1,236,350 1,721,084 2,817,399 37,312,698 13 3,976,000 4,564,788 4,199,100 4,470,000 84,900,250 3,980,579 4,542,752 4,217,727 4,395,988 85,089,547 - - - - 45,009,710 - - - - 45,009,710 14 4,827,000 3,520,856 6,152,000 4,855,000 72,794,170 4,838,456 3,499,950 6,115,320 4,704,733 75,415,058 - 3,537,000 4,800,000 1,300,000 15,117,000 1,204,480 1,742,111 6,528,484 2,727,479 14,070,293 550,000 545,596 780,000 83,000 784,402 82,155 1,413,000 1,412,148 69,840 69,836 35,000 34,803 220,197 220,195 850,000 850,000 -155,000 1,381,400 -154,998 1,381,199 2-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY93 FY 94 September 30, 1994 15. Supervisor of New York Harbor 19. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY 20. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), N.Y. 21. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J. 24. North Ellenville. N. Y. 25. Passaic River, N.J. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work. Aprop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 605,000 601,729 300,000 83,290 825,000 724,140. 822,457 814,078 145,412 750,000 474,996 760,000 770,000 33,627,960 768,380 769,249 34,106,959 6,284,000 1,000,000 17,315,000 2,923,715 4,035,410 20,671,621 12 - - 113,973 - - 143,753 100,000 6,744,000 10,135,000 304,675 902,836 4,051,217 1,354,000 2,000,000 100,000 29,100,000 42,302,000 1,246,343 1,042,781 1,021,129 12,455,999 24,974,001 176,000 431,670 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 3. Includes $1,040,000 for new work and $1,040,000 expended for the portion under construction general. 4. Excludes $ 1 00,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public work fund. 270,000 197,900 200,000 600,000 286,977 148,433 5,566,450 4,965,630 )0 7,145,000 10,005,000 17,000,000 63,686,700 3 77 7,497,720 5,036,497 9,167,374 49,884,261 5. Includes $39,465 expended for previous project. 6. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $311,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81.373 expended from contributed funds. 8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 2-18 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (CONT'D) 9. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 10. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 11. .Includes $69;629 for new work for previous projects and $668,820 expended from public works funds. 12. Includes $3,788,340 contributed funds. 13. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in 0 & M funds.) 14. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing projects. 15. Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. Additional NY State funds were $200,000 in 1990 and $581,000 in 1991. 2-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 2-B Act River and Harbor Act of 1959 Section 104 and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 302 River and Harbor act of 1965 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17,1950 1958 River & Harbor Act 1962 River & Harbor Act June 25, 19 1 0 March 3, 1925 July 3. 1930 July 1, 1935 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 September 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths Provided that all research and planning cost to be borne fully by the United States Modified project to include control of waterchestnut EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Construction of jetty at Fire Island Inlet Channel 10 feet deep. Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam. Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, NY Channel 27 feet below Hudson. Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project. Relocation of 12 foot channel between Troy and Waterford. Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany & Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities Note: The 12 and 27 foot classification have been deauthorized. Document H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.. H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 350, 68st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 155, 72th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 228, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. 2-20 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document March 4, 1913 March 4, 1915 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1925 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 June 25, 1910 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 March 2, 1945 HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 30 feet deep from Ellis Island to Neward St., 40 feet deep through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point and channel 26 by 550 feet along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Remove shoal east side of river between West 19th and West 32nd Sts.; remove rock near Battery to 40 feet; remove obstruction near Spuyten Duyvil Creek. Additional dredging through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point. Remove shoal between West 32nd and West 6]st Sts. to 40 feet and widen 40 foot channel between the Battery and Canal St. to 2.000 feet. Channel 30 by 750 feet along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Modification of conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 40 feet deep between pierhead lines from 20th St., Manhattan, to a point 1,300 feet below Newark St. Hoboken, thence 2,800 feet wide to deep water off Ellis Island. Channel 30 feet deep between 40 foot channel and channel along Jersey City waterfront. Widen 40 foot channel to full width of river from north line of 59th St. to south side of Little Basin, thence a channel of same depth to deep water off Ellis Island. Waiver all conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 45 and 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) Construction of 1 jetty. Interior channel along west shore of bay, 18 and 12 feet deep; interior channel along south shore, 15 feet deep; entrance channel 20 and 18 feet deep; and I riprap jetty all in lieu of work heretofore authorized. Modified conditions of local cooperation. Channel 15 feet deep in Mott Basin including its 2 branches JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Construction of jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide. H. Doc. 719, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report 1914, pp. 234-235 H. Doc. 1697, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 313, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 450, 70th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 309, 72th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 49, 72 Cong., 2nd sess. Senate Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H Doc. 1488, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 700, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 665, 80th Cong., H. Doc. 409, 77th Cong. 2-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. (PL99-98) August 26, 1937 August 8, 1917 March 14, 1915 July 3, 1930 December 31, 1970 March 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 March 3, 1899 August 8. 1917 KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, NJ. & N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and then 44 feet. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. (Sea Section 9 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. NARROWS OF, LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 11 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore Structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore Structures. NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 12 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet deep for width of 1,000 feet (Dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, December 27, 1886 by authority of Act of August 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel). Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay. H. Doc. 181, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. P.L. 91-611, 91 st Cong., H.R. 1987 P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. Annual Reports 1887 p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc- 159, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc- 518, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. August 8. 1917 August 8, 1917 Removal of Craven Shoal H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., Ist sess. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands H. Doc. 625, 64th Cong. 1st sess. 2-22 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document July 3 , 1930 August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 July 3, 1958 October 27, 1965 March 31, 1982 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3,1905 1986 Water Resources Development Act Section 501 Relocation of southerly section of Anchorage Channel. Dredging south end of Red Hook Flats, Liberty Island Anchorage, and channel along New Jersey pierhead line. Deepen Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet. Rivers and Harbors Committee 'Doc. 18, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 183, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Deepen Ambrose and Anchorage Channels to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet. Senate Commerce Doc. 75 Cong., 1st sess. Dredging South Channel, Elimination of portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel. Deepen and Expand Red Hook Flats Anchorage. Deepen Gravesend Bay Anchorage. Further expansion of Red Hook Flats Anchorage and the relocation of Anchorage channel. SHINNECOCK INLET, N.Y. (See Section 13 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in Inlet, and 6 feet deep and I 00 feet wide in the Bay, and 2 jetties. TARRYTOWN HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide in approach arms, and 150 feet wide along waterfront. Widening channel to 150 feet in approach arms and 250 feet along waterfront. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND) N.Y. (See Section 20 of Text) Provide beach fill to public beach to furnish storm damage protection to the area. Extension of terminal groins at W. 37 St. and Brighton Beach Fillet of beach fill at Sea Gate. S. Doc. 45, 84th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 17, 89th Cong., 1st sess. OCE Letter 31 Mar. 1982 H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., I st sess. FY 83 Supplemental Appropriations Act H. Doc. 283,56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 262 72nd Cong., 1 st sess 2-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document July 3. 1958 1988 Water Resources Development Act 1960 River and Harbor Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ. (See Section 21 of Text) Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of 10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and extension of 14 existing groins. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y. (See Section 19 of Text) Raising dunes, widening beaches, interior drainage structures, groins beach replenishment, annual nourishment. Project modified to provide that non-Federal interest shall contribute 30 percent of the first costs. H. Doc..332, 85th Cong., 2nd sess. modified by Appr. Act for Energy & Water Dev. for FY 85 H. Doc. 425, 86th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H. R. 10203 1986 and 1992 Water Resources Development Acts 1962 Flood Control Act 1990 Water Resources Development Act 1976 and 1990 Water Resourse Development Acts. NORTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (See Section 24 of Text) Levees and floodwalls, removing concrete dam, stream diversion, interior drainage structures. Subsequent damage repairs. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ. (See Section. 25 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. S. Doc. 113, 87th Cong., 2d sess. PL-84-99 H. Rpt .94 - 1902 2-24 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (Section 4 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Complete: 1917 Cost $1,463,014 2.2 miles 152.6 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 13.0 feet SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (Section 15 of Text) STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES - FY 1994 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore b. Vessel c. Air (helicopter) 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities b. Vessels 3. Disposition of Cases a. Voluntary Restoration b. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted c. Permit not required or already under permit d. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney e. Other misc. f. Cases pending as of October 1, 1994 97 180 o 277 164 204 368 32 16 77 0 77 169 371 2-25 TABLE 2-C TABLE 2-E REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1994 NAME OF PROJECT DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED NEW JERSEY Cheesequake Creek ... ............................................................................................................. Apr 94 Keyport Harbor ................................................. Oct 93 Raritan River .................................................................................................................................................... Nov 93 Sandy Hook Channel..........................................................................................................................................Jun 94 Shrewsbury River .............................................................................................................................................. Aug 94 NEW YORK Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels .................................................................................... M ay 94, Aug 94, Sep 94 Bronx River ............................................. ................................. Mar 94 Browns Creek ...................................................................................................................................................... Oct 93 Butterm ilk Channel ............................ ............................................................................................ ... . ..........Nov 93 Eastchester Creek ....................................................................................................... ................................. Nov 93 East Rockaway Inlet ................................................................................................................................ Jan 94 Fire Island Inlet .................................................................................................................................... Oct 93, Aug 94 Glen Cove Creek ............... .............................................................................................................. M ay 94 Hudson River Channel ............................................................................................................ Dec 93, Jun 94, Aug 94 Lake M ontauk ................................................................................................................................................ Feb 94 M attituck Inlet.......................................................................................................................................... . ... Apr 94 M oriches Inlet ................. ....................... ............................................................................ ..... Jan 94 Portchester Harbor .......................................................................................................................................... Oct 94 Shinnecock Inlet. ........................................................................................................................................... Aug 94 Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 1994 was $1,858,643. 2-26 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels, NY Buttermilk Channel, NY Bronx River, NY Browns Creek, NY Burlington Harbor, VT Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT. Cheesequake Creek, NJ Coney Island Channel, NY East Chester Creek, NY East River, NY Echo Bay Harbor, NY Flushing Bay and Creek, NY Glen Cove Creek, NY Gordon's Landing, VT Gowanus Creek Channel, NY Great Chazy River, NY Great Kills Harbor, NY Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, N.Y. Great South Bay, NY Greenport Harbor NY Harlem River, NY Hempstead Harbor, NY Huntington Harbor, NY Keyport Harbor, NJ Lake Montauk Harbor, NY Larchmont Harbor, NY Little Neck Bay, NY Mamaroneck Harbor, NY Mattituck Harbor, NY Matawan Creek, NJ Milton Harbor, NY Moriches Inlet, N.Y. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J. Newtown Creek, N.Y. New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. New York & New Jersey Channels Northport Harbor, N.Y. Peconic River, N.Y. Peekskill Harbor, N.Y. Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. Port Henry Harbor, N.Y. Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. Raritan River, NJ Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-Off Channel, N.J. Rondout Harbor NY 1992 1990 1991 1987 1966 1909 1953 1973 1992 1991 1953 1992 1986 1982 1972 1980 1962 1976 1993 1953 1969 1993 1953 1990 1991 1970 1969 1990 1990 1984 1993 1990 1989 1986 1971 1993 1956 1953 1951 1986 1990 1931 1977 1991 1991 1989 $5,523,297 41,200,035 45,590,201 3 5,332,369 1,149,946 12 3,802,517 33,5976 774,726 706,414 9 303,555 31,000 1,288 40,000 493,304 111,371 423,148 592,056 3,243,014 32,723,662 13 6,095,039 64,584 21,571 2,102,905 7,673,802 29,760 130,760 34,1750 115 346,831 394,004 18,000 292,919 137,301 1 88,029 33,562,640 20 457 266,887 2,903,694 74,681 21,720 3,616,119 493,491 3,687,949 76,497 91,08117 57,527 40,475 1,417,437 791,680 14 1,485,003 76,065 267,768 1,741,210 19 537 513,764 1,351,086 177,925 5 1,552,069 21,000 315,613 151,373 2,167,294 7,730,886 101,840 29,014,500 25,771,367 1,168,354 11,760,74 73,214 8 212,411 73,052,435 49,819,532 78,644 615487 25,000 116,500 19,400 66,037 198,415 256,415 433,479 2,020,295 69,406 25 1,299 221,128 359,294 1,551,470 16,308,839 810,500 3,965,631 142,437 3,185,437 2-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (CONT'D) Cost to Sept 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. Sag Harbor, N.Y. Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. Sandy Hook Bay @ Leonardo, N.J. St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, VT Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. Shark River, N.J. Sheepshead Bay. N.Y. Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, N.J. Shrewsbury River, N.J. Staten lsland.Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur Kill, N.Y. Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. Wallabout Channel, N.Y. Wappinger Creek, N.Y. Washington Canal and South River, NJ Westchester Creek, NY Woodbridge Creek, N.J. 1. Excludes $104,800 for new work expended from contributed funds. 2. Includes $1,836,400 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $285,600 expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $496,250 for new work for previous projects and $122,051 from public works funds. 5. Excludes $34,580 from contributed funds. 6. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 7. Includes. S 17,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes. $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,415,133 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 11. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 12. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $6,197,690 for new work and $37,664 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds 1895 1964 1985 1991 1917 1988 1987 1948 1990 1992 1973 1895 1953 1950 1953 1992 1953 98,468 121,805 26 508,936 56,479 3,125 81,905 18 150,000 33,828 124,572 7 1,145,457 7,730,476 7,000 18,174 13,000 206,116 30 175,933 48,823 249 11,710 4,002,330 679,916 385 429,180 1,304,638 64,078 1,822,938 5,838,966 36,312 44,691 212,827 5,209,343 178,398 15. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,560 expended from public works funds. 16. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and,$31,454 to be contributed. 19. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 20. Included $4,456,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 28. 30. 31. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $10,646 for previous projects. 2-28 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic.Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet 1 1959 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay. N.Y. (Part 1) 1989 $25,736,750 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 2 1981 18,044,667 217,900 1. Reactivated as a modified project in 1985 (Sec 21) 2. Listed since as a navigation and beach nourishment project (Sec 3) 2-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 2.1 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass.1 Ardsley, N.Y. Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. 1,3 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt. 1 Elizabeth, N.J. Herkimer, N.Y. Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin. N.Y.1 Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwich Dams ,5,6 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J. Missisquoi River at Richford, Vt.1 ,3 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. Rahway. NJ. Rahway. South Branch, N.J. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, N.J. Rosendale, N.Y. Sandburg, Creek. Spring Glen, N.Y. Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh. N.Y. South Amsterdam, Mohawk River. N.Y.' South Ellenville. N.Y. South Orange, N.J. Staten Island. N.Y. Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y. 1-3 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, Vt. Winooski River. Vt. Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Yonkers, N.Y. 1. Completed. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended. 4. Inactive. 5. Includes $213.507 emergency relief funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 1964 1990 1959 1963 1985 1973 1956 1939 1990 1965 1968 1971 1979 1981 1975 1976 1987 1967 1984 1981 1983 1959 1976 1940 1970 1984 6,282,307 2 5,447,281 363,515 2,898,334 54,374,070 1,249,530 9 1,064,626 17,888,670 238,169 15,572,988 7 973,142 8 15,863,723 11,061,256 3,684,966 109,702 77,800 1,564,976 289,702 6,857,484 644,998 142,075 1,438,845 6,228,527 1,549,929 113,973,750 10 262 8,200 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized. 10. Includes $622,817 contributed funds. 2-30 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-J SURVEYS Study Class FY 94 Cost Navigation Studies Flood Control Studies Beach Erosion Studies 1 Special Studies 2 TOTAL $821,880 2,997,420 629,720 142,330 4,591,350 1. Includes Sec. 934 studies. 2. Includes review of authorized projects, FERC licensing activities,Intra Army water resources, Nat'l Estuary studies, Marine Fisheries Service, Planning Ass't to States, Community Ass't Programs. COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES Study Class Flood Plain Technical Services Flood Plain Management Unit TOTAL FY 94 Cost $45,033 29,095 74,128 2-31 TABLE 2-L REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Operation See Annual And Funds Funds and Projects Report For Authority Expended Construction Expended Maintenance Bennington. VT (1936 & 41 Acts) 1974 Bronx River, N.Y. 1981 Brown's Creek, N.Y. 1980 Cheesequake Creek, N.J. 4 1953 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. 4-6 1952 East Chester Creek, N.Y. (1950 Act) 1992 East Rockaway (Debs) Inlet, N.Y. 4 1963 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet 1976 and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part 11) Elizabeth, N.J. 1948 Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. 1966 Hempstead Harbor, NY (68-Act) 14 1989 Hudson River, NYC to Albany (12 Ft, 27 Ft) 1 8 1982 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. 1953 Irvington Harbor, N.Y. 1947 Lamoille River, Vt. 1939 Lemon Creek, NY 1937 Manhasset Bay, NY 1948 Matawan Creek, NJ (1881 Act) 1984 N. Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY 1979 Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic 1982 River, N.J. 16 N.Y. & N.J. Channels 4,18 1982 Orowoc Creek, NY. 1949 Otter Creek, Vt. 1937 Perth Amboy, N.J. 1966 Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. 2,3 1967 Port Jefferson Hbr. N.Y. (1890, 1930 & 68 Acts) 1977 Rahway River, N.J. 6.7 1948 Raritan River, N.J.4 "6 1981 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y. 6,7, 1959 Rutland, Otter Creek, VT 1963 Sag Harbor, N.Y. (Channel) 1 1964 Shooters Island, N.J. & N.Y. 9 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (1950 & 1965 Act) 1992 Swanton Harbor, VT6 1888 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. 1-6 1895 Waterbury, VT (1941 Act) 7.8 1951 Waterford. N.Y. 6,7 1939 Waycake Creek, NJ 1949 Westchester Creek, N.Y. 4 1981 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug.1982 Jul 1992 Aug. 1977 1988 Aug.1977 Aug. 1977 Jan 1990 Aug. 1987 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 1988 1988 1988 Jan 1990 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 1988 Jan 1990 Jan 1990 Aug. 1977 Jan. 1990 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 1988 Oct. 1992 Jul 1992 Jan 1990 Aug. 1977 Nov. 1983 Nov. 1981 Aug. 1982 1988 Aug. 1982 2-32 1,149,946 33,976 40,000 69,489 .- 3,503,96913 60 ,481 165,882 49,035 49,837 433,470 1,551,470 7,000 167,760 9,253 175,933 670,000 1,159,946 33,976 8 40,000 69,489 100,000 1,185,365 60,481 165,882 4-11 39,468 68,5814,5 49,837 6,621 21,000 --. , 433,470 4 37,000 4 1,617,47015 7,000 211,015 70,500 4 16,500 9,253 2,781 175,933 12 10,000 1,947,853 505,369 30,675 1,622 829,421 19,546 59,391 2,455 76,497 51,566 1,621 4,636 257,237 4,951 441,656 307 66,000 10,113,903 235 1.260 2,921,311 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-M (Continued) No Commerce reported. Completed. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." Uncomplete portion deauthorized. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed and $31,454 to be contributed. Inactive. Entire project deauthorized. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. Removal for navigation. 10. Deepening 8 foot project to 10 feet. 11. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. 12. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. 14. Deepening project to 13 feet. 15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 16. 1912 authorization. 17. 1935 authorization. 18. 1910 construction dikes. 2-33 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 2-N SECTION 107 Project FY 94 Cost CONTINUE COORDINATING FEASIBILITY REPORT Belford Harbor, NJ TABLE 2-P SECTION 205 Project FY 94 Cost COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Poplar Brook, Monmouth Co. NJ $51,900 Winooski River, Montpelier, VT 331,100 INITIATE FEASIBILITY REPORT Mill Brook,-Highland Park, N.J. CONTINUE COORDINATION FOR CONSTRUCTION Elizabeth River, Hillside, NJ $34,100 INITIATE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, NY $32,700 CONTINUE CONSTRUCTION Yonkers, Nepera Park, NY $339,200 TABLE 2-Q SECTION 14 Project FY 94 Cost INITIATE FEASIBILITY REPORT Oakwood Beach, Staten Island, NY Shelter Island, NY INITIATE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS Asharoken Village, Northport, NY COMPLETE FEASIBILITY REPORT Rikers Island, NY $6,400 32,700 $2,300 39,800 2-34 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southeastern Delaware, and a small Part of northeastern Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control Local Protection 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ ........................................ 3-2 2. Chesapeake and Delaware Canal St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE .................... 3-2 3. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ ................................................ 3-3 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ ............................. 3-3 5. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea ................................ 3-3 6. Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ...................3-4 7. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE ................................. 3-5 8. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay DE, MD.........................3-5 9. Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE ............................................. 3-6 10. Manasquan River, NJ.............................3-7 11. Maurice River, NJ........................................ 3-7 12. Mispillion River,DE .............................. 3-8 13. Murderkill River, DE.................................... 3-8 14. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway ........................... 3-8 15. Raccoon Creek, NJ .................................... ... 3-9 16. Salem River, NJ .................................... ..... 3-9 17. Schuylkill River, PA.................................... .3-10 18. Wilmington Harbor, DE ..................................... 3-10 Beach Erosion Control Page 19. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorizaton ................................... 3-11 20. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ .................... 3-11 21. Delaware Coast Protection, DE............................3-12 22. Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ ...... ............. 3-12 Page 23. Beltzville Lake, PA ................................... 3-13 24. Blue Marsh Lake, PA.................. .. 3-13 25. Emergency Bank Protection ................................ 3-13 26. Flood Control Work Under Special A uthorization........................................................3-13 27. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA..................................3-14 28. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA ....................................................... 3-14 29. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...................................3-14 30. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees..........................3-15 31. Molly Ann's Brook, NJ................................... 3-15 32. National Emergency Preparedness ........................ 3-15 33. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization................... ...... 3-15 34. Prompton Lake, PA.................................3-15 35. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys ............................................... 3-16 General Investigations Page 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data........................3-16 37. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design................3-16 38. Surveys ............................................. 3-16 Tables Page TABLE 3-A Cost and Financial Statement ................. 3-17 TABLE 3-B Authorizing Legislation .......................... 3-21 TABLE 3-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................................3-27 TABLE 3-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ......................... 3-29 TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............................. 3-29 TABLE 3-F Deauthorized Projects..........................3-30 * All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 L BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is main the entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Previous Project: None Existing project: The existing project, adopted as HD 73-19 in 1935 and modified as HD 74-85 in 1937 and HD 79-358 in 1946, provides for a channel eight feet deep through the inlet and ten feet deep through the outer bar, protected by two converging stone jetties and a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from the gorge in the inlet to Oyster Creek channel and through the latter channel to deep water in the bay. The project was modified in 1946 to provide for the maintenance of a channel eight feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat Light Harbor with the main inlet channel. The project length is about 4.5 miles. (For details see page 203, Annual Report 1964.) The Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985 contained language stating that the existing project has not worked as projected and, in fact, has created a hazard to navigation. As a result, the following administratively approved modifications are to be constructed as design deficiency correction measures: a new south jetty 4,270 feet in length along an alignment generally parallel to the existing north jetty, extending from the existing groin located near the Barnegat Lighthouse to the tip of the existing south jetty; a navigation channel 300 feet wide to a depth of 10 feet below mean low water from the outer bar in the Atlantic Ocean to the north end of the existing sand dike in Barnegat Bay; remove the shoal located between the north jetty and the proposed navigation channel; jetty sport fishing facilities on the new jetty. All dredged material from initial construction would be placed on the shores of Barnegat Light between the existing and new south jetties, and would be stabilized by vegetation and sand fence. Dredged material from maintenance operations would be placed on the down draft beaches, the area between the existing and new south jetties, or in other locations as determined by a shoreline monitoring program. Estimated cost for new work (October 1990) Federal share is $31,200,000 and non-Federal is $14,230,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A local cooperation agreement for the approved modification was executed on 19 May 1986 and a modification to the local cooperation agreement was executed on 20 March 1987. Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operation during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included supervision and administration for South Jetty and engineering and design on storm damages. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, surveys, supervision and administration on south jetty, engineering and design on dredging and sport fishing, BCR update and installation of safety signs. Work also included dredging by the US. Government Dredge Currituck was accomplished fromNovember 4, 1994 to December 6, 1994, from March 17, 1994 to May 7, 1994, from July 3, 1994 to July 31, 1994, and from August 15, 1994 to August 25, 1994 removing a total of 318,326 cubic yards of material at a total of $909,563. 2. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL, ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE Location: The new St. Georges Bridge will carry the new Delaware State Route 1 over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in New Castle County, Delaware and will be located approximately 2,200 feet west of the existing St. Georges Bridge. Previous project: None. Existing project: This project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It states that the project for navigation, Inland Waterway from the Delaware River to the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (45 Stat. (030) and modified by the Act entailed an Act authorizing construction of a highway bridge across the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal at Saint Georges, Delaware" approved August 7, 1939 (53 Stat. 1240-1241) is modified to direct the Secretary to replace the highway bridge on United States Route 13 in the vicinity of St. Georges, Delaware, to meet current and projected traffic needs, at a Federal cost of $115,000,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: The state will carry out the bridge replacement and the Secretary will reimburse the State for cost incurred. Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Reimbursement to the State of Delaware for construction of new bridge. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included a supervision and administration on construction of St. Georges Bridge Replacement. 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 3. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ Location: In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project: An entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line .500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942.(For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys and supervision and administration. Dredging by the U.S. Government Side Casting Dredge Schweizer was accomplished from March 7, 1994 to March 17, 1994 and from September 15, 1994 to September 24, 1994 removing a total of 115,374 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $144,000. 4. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous project: For details see page 1778 of annual report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S.Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in the vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included seeding of disposal area. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, general maintenance, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location: See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous project: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938 3-3 5. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details). Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on the waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included surveys, maintenance of disposal area and Pea Patch, arch site. Maintenance dredging was accomplished by Norfolk Dredging Company from December 1, 1993 to December 31, 1993 removing of 1,371,380 cubic yards of material .at a total cost of $1,590,796. Dredging was also accomplished by Weeks Marine Incorporated removing a total of 927,661 cubic yards of material from August 24,1994 to September 30, 1994 at a total cost of $1,178,130. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, general maintenance of disposal areas, pipelines, maintenance of Oldmans Groundwater study, chemical testing, environmental monitoring, preparation of arch site, provisions for long term disposal needs BCR update, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration was also accomplished. There was also maintenance dredging by the Government dredge McFarland from June 14, 1994 to August 11, 1994 removing a total 290,133 cubic yards material at a total cost of $2,222,999. 6. DELAWARE RIVER VICINITY OF CAMDEN, NJ Location: Camden, NJ, on east bank of Delaware River, is directly opposite the city of Philadelphia, PA. It is about 51 miles above mouth of the river and about 101 miles above Harbor of Refuge at the mouth of Delaware Bay. ( See U.S. Coast Guard and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 295 and 280.) Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of June 25, 1910. No work was done on this project, for further details, see page 321, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: The existing project which is a modification to the Delaware River from Philadelphia to the Sea project was adopted as House Document No. 63-1120 in 1919 and modified by House Document No. 70-111 in 1930 and House Document No. 77-353 in 1945. Dredging to project depth of 37 feet in front of the Camden Marine Terminal was completed in March 1988. It also provides for dredging in of Camden to Newton Creek, with the depth increased to 40 feet in front of the Beckett Street Marine Terminal. These depths extend from the ship channel in Delaware River to a line parallel with and 50 feet distant from the established pierhead line. The project length is about four miles. Projects depths are well maintained in 30 foot depth section of channel. Plans and specifications for the 40 ft. approach channel improvements at Beckett 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Street were completed in 1991. The Local Cooperation Agreement for this improvement was executed in December 1991. The dredging contract was awarded in May 1992 and essentially completed in September 1992. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: New Work, hired labor: Work included supervision and administration, engineering and design. Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance dredging by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company from December 17, 1993 to February 28, 1994 removing a total of 94,117 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $2,083,928. 7. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAZ DE Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No.1219.) Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steelsheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing, thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency ofthe channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963.(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included stabilization of south jetties, engineering and design. 8. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAZ DE, AND MD Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through the sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous project: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep;dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch 3-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide. Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 .feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening ofthe Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is federal cost $166,000,000 (October 1992). This portion is deauthorized. Major Rehabilitation of St. Georges and Summit Bridges was completed in fiscal year 1991 at an approximate federal cost of $20,868,000 (90 price level). Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-ofway required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included general maintenance, monitoring, bridge inspection, lease of equipment, maintenance of aerial tower, computer maintenance, maintenance of utility truck, construction of Goose Point, repair of bulkhead and guardrail on bridge and hanger pin, and welding on Reedy Point. There was also maintenance dredging by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company from October 3, 1993 to December 26, 1993 removing a total of 791,071 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $791,071.. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance of rip-rap and bridges, roadways, grounds, museum, disposal area, auxilary works, Worton Point, spot pointing. Also included in work was monitoring of stabilization banks, maintenance night lighting, safety inspections, installation of locks, drainage of disposal areas, lease of equipment, bridge inspections, surveys, environmental monitoring, snagging and clearing, plans and specifications, mosquito control, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 9. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAZ DE Location: A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, DE It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) Previous project: A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of the one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge to Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. The Sheet Pile Jetty at the Delaware Bay entrance was removed during FY 1987. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance hired labor: Work included plans and specifications on Roosevelt Inlet, surveys and rehabilitation ofjetties and supervision and administration. 10. MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ Location: This small stream flows in eastern part of New Jersey, rises near Freehold, flows easterly and empties into the Atlantic Ocean, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 795.) Previous project: For details see Annual report for 1909, page 186, and Annual Report for 1938, page 269. Existing project: A channel 14 feet deep and 250 feet wide, protected by jetties and other works, extending from the Atlantic Ocean to inner end of north jetty, thence 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide to within 700 feet of New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge, thence of same depth and narrowing to 100 feet wide to within 300 feet of bridge; for a widening on northerly side of channel of 200 feet for 3,150 feet to a depth of 8 feet; for a 19-acre anchorage to 10 feet deep on south side of channel and for a 27.5 acre anchorage to 12 feet deep about 0.5 miles west of Route 35 highway bridge. Section included in project is about 1.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.7 feet at inner end of inlet and 4 feet at ocean end; mean range of spring tides, 4.4 and 4.8 feet, respectively, irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 2.7 feet below to 7.5 feet above mean low water at inner end of inlet. Project, excluding 10 and 12-foot anchorages, cost $518,243. Estimated cost (1958) for 10 and 12-foot anchorages portion of project considered inactive is $504,000. Restoration of bulkheads completed 16 August 1965 at a cost of $117,807. Existing project was completed in June 1963. Dredging 19-acre anchorage south of channel and 27.5-acre anchorage west of highway bridge is in the inactive catagory. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances to date have been complied with. Terminal facilities: Five landings with a total wharfage of 700 feet used by commercial fishermen, and 7 landings and boat basins for pleasure craft. Existing facilities are considered adequate for present requirements. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included repair of fence: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included monitoring of dolos on inlet, plans and specification on south jetty and supervision and adminstration on fence repairs. IL MAURICE RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Gloucester County, N.J. flows southerly and southwesterly 33 miles through Cumberland County and empties into Delaware Bay through Maurice Cove about 87 miles below Philadelphia, Pa. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1218.) Previous project: Adopted by the River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882 and modified in 1890 and 1892. For further details see page 1785, Annual Report for the year 1915. Existing project: This provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay across Maurice Cove to the mouth; thence a channel7 feet deep, 100 feet wide to the drawbridge at Millville, 21.5 miles above the mouth and thence 60 feet wide to the mill dam, a further distance of one-half mile, including a turning basin at Millville. The total length of the section included in the project is about 24 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The mean tidal range at the mouth is 5.8 feet and at Millville 6.0 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 1 foot above mean high water. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: The project as modified by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 provides that before the initial or any subsequent maintenance dredging is undertaken, suitable guaranties shall be furnished by responsible local interests that the United States and the contractors will be held and saved free of claims for damages because of the deposit of the evcavated material. It is expected that the conditions of local cooperation will be satisfactorily met during the fiscal year 1949. Terminal facilities: There are numerous wharves and piers at the several towns along the river. Public wharves are located at Millville, Mauricetown, Dorchester, Bivalve. Several boat yards with railways and repair and construction facilities are also located along the river. Most of the wharves at Millville and Bivalve have railroad connections. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included BCR update and plans and specification. 3-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 12. MISPILLTON RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County and Sussex Counties, DE, flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and emties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen .(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218). Previous project: For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 80 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford, with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water; in October 1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Report 1957, (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities: For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor. Work included surveys, breach stabilization, supervision and administration, and engineering and design. Maintenance, contract: Work included breach stabilization, environmental monitoring. 13. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 1218.) Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21,52d Cong., 1st Sess. See page 981 Annual Report for 1892). Latest published map is in House Document 1058,62d Congress 3d Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts .authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys and plans and specifications. 14. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Latest 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525,79th Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240,82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining consists of dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Section 860 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized, for preconstruction engineering and design, a 15 foot depth in the Vicinity of Cape May Harbor, titled as Cold Spring Inlet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvements. Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included fence replacement for Pt. Pleasant. There was maintenance dredging by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company from May 2, 1994 to September 30, 1994 removing 300,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $1,065,000. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, surveys, construction of dikes, repair of bank erosion, maintenance dredging, plans and specifications for bank stabilization and Pt. Pleasant, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 15. RACCOON CREEK, NJ Location: Rises in Gloucester County, N.J. flows northwesterly 16 miles through the county and empties into Delaware River about 20 miles below Philadelphia, Pa (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 295.) Previous project: For details see page 1784 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 344 for Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A Channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide in Delaware River to the mouth and within the creek to Bridgeport, 1 3/4 miles above the mouth; thence 40 feet wide to Swedesboro, 9 miles above the mouth. It also provides for a cutoff at Molonox Shoal, 7 1/2 miles above the mouth, and a stone-filled, pine-and-timber crib south jetty at the mouth, 950 feet long. Section included in the project is about 9 3/4 miles long. Mean tidal range at the mouth is 5.8 feet and at Swedesboro 4.4 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 10 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local Cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are three wharves of pileand- timber construction, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included BCR update. 16. SALEM RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Salem County, NJ, flows through the county westerly 13 miles, thence southerly 7 miles to the City of Salem, and thence westerly 3 miles, emptying into Delaware River about 45 miles below Philadelphia, PA. It is joined at Salem by Little Salem River, or Fenwick Creek, from the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 294.) Previous project: The River and Harbor Act of July 11, 1870, provided for a survey and the original project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1871, and modified in 1878, and a subsequent project adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1907. For further details see page 1784, Annual Report for 1915; page 349 of Annual Report for 1924; and page 346 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware River 3-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 across Salem Cove to the mouth, thence 100 feet wide to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River at Salem, 2 1/4 miles above the mouth. It also provides for a cutoff to eliminate a large horseshoe bend between the mouth and Salem. The total length of the section included in the project is about 4 miles. The mean tidal range is 5.4 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. The estimate of cost for new work 51,825 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $51,825 contributed by local interests. The portion of the project comprising the deepening of Little Salem River to 12 feet is to be restudied and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. The estimated cost of this portion revised in 1953 is $28,000 excluding an equal amount to be contributed by local interests. The existing project is about 64 percent completed. The dredging of the channel from Penns Neck Bridge to project dimensions, including the cutoff, was completed in 1928. The channel from Penns Neck Bridge to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River was dredged to a depth of 9 feet under a previous project. The work remaining to be done is the deepening of the channel in Little Salem River from 9 feet to 12 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) The controlling depths at mean low water were as follows: In January 1961, Delaware River to Penns Neck Highway Bridge 12.0 feet; and thence in December 1956 to the fixed highway bridge at Salem, 0.9 feet. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925 (H.Doc. 110, 68th Cong. 1st Sess.) The latest published map is in this document. Section 859 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized a project depth of 20 feet. Local cooperation: The existing project required local interest contribute 50 percent of the estimated costs of new work and that a right-of-way for the proposed cutoff shall be conveyed to the United States free of cost. The contributions thus far made provided the right of way for the cutoff and 50 percent of the cost of the 12-foot channel up to a point 225 feet above the county (Penns Neck) highway bridge, amounting to $51,825. Terminal facilities: There are 9 wharves on the river all at Salem, NJ. Eight wharves are privately owned and one is owned by the City. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys and plans and specifications. 17. SCHUYIKILL RIVER, PA Location: Rises in Schuylkill County, PA, flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $2,809,007. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 1967, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance dredging by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company from December 3, 1993 to April 3, 1994 removing a total of 203,962 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $1,221,791. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, general maintenance, plans and specifications, BCR update, and supervision and administration. 18. WILM[NGTON HARBOR, DE Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the City of Wilmington, DE, and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Previous project: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River,; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No.4; and thence 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a distance of of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 38 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 320 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962.) Authority from Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 1960 provide for channel and turning basin deepening from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin widened from 200 to 320 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within limits of the improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No.8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included environmental monitoring, lease of equipment, wetland mitigation and lease of equipment. There was maintenance dredging by C.J. Langenfelder from December 11, 1993 to March 11, 1994 removing 624,828 cubic yards of material at a cost of $677,091. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, environmental monitoring, surveys on maintenance dredging, wetland mitigation, monitoring of artificial reefs, construction of dikes and sluices, plans and specificatons, drainage of disposal area, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Beach Erosion Control: 19. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1994 Reconnaissance Reports Seaside Park, NJ $ 8,093 20. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TWP., NJ Location: The proposed project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project: The plan, as presented in HD 94- 641, was authorized for the Phase I Design Memorandum Stage of Advance Engineering and Design by Section 101a of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, proposes the following features: breakwater on the updrift side of Cape May Inlet; beachfill from Cape May Inlet to Cape May Point; provision of a dune with sand fence and grass from Cape May Inlet to Wilmington Avenue; construction of two groins in Cape May City and seven groins in Lower Township; inclusion of all groins comprising the existing project; and periodic nourishment of the beaches and maintenance of the dune and dikes. The Phase I GDM, completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981, determined that only beach erosion control measures in Cape May City are warranted. The plan proposed in that document consists of modifying the existing navigation project for Cape May Inlet to provide; a weir-breakwater at Cape May Inlet with construction being deferred pending demonstration of need; two new groins at Trenton and Baltimore Avenues in Cape May City; placement of beachfill between Cape May Inlet and the terminal groin at Third Avenue in Cape May City; maintenance of two new groins and existing groins in Cape May; periodic beach maintenance with material obtained from deposition basin on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet; and institution of a beach monitoring program in Lower Township area. Work for the initial beachfill was accomplished as follows; USGS feeder beach fiscal year 1989, Cape May City groin fiscal year 1990, and Beachfill Cape May City fiscal year 1991. Project estimate costs (October 1992) is Federal, $161,170,000, which includes $57,170,000 of Coast Guard contributions non-Federal costs are $11,000,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. Continuation of planning and engineering for this proposed project was initiated in October 1977. The Phase I GDM was completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of 3-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 Engineers in December 1981. Phase II AE&D studies were completed in July 1983. The project was authorized for separable elements under Section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: The State of New Jersey furnished a letter of intent on 6 May 1981 regarding their willingness to comply with the above items of local cooperation. In addition, a draft Section 221 local cooperation agreement has been coordinated with letter of intent on May 31, 1983 regarding compliance with the items of local cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included periodic nourishment, monitoring, surveys, aerial photography, rehabilitation of inlet, plans and specification of beachfill groin, and supervision and adminstration on construction. New Work, hired labor: Work included inlet monitoring, supervision and administraton on beachfill groins, and engineering and design. 21. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Previous Project: The previous project, adopted as HD 85-216 in 1958 and modified by P.L. 87-874 in 1962, provided for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, and the initial periodic nourishment was completed in 1957 by local interests. The second increment of beach replenishment by local interest was completed in 1963. Existing project: Provides a plan of improvement which consists of the construction of a sand bypass system and periodic nourishment until 2027. (For details, see S. Doc. 90,90th Cong. 2d Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1992) is $30,000,000 of which $12,300,000 are federal costs and $17,700,000 are required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Section 869 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized the unshceduled portion of the project. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included monitoring. New work, hired labor: Work included monitoring, supervision and administration, and engineering and design. 22. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ Location: The project is located in Cape May and Atlantic Counties, New Jersey. Great Egg Harbor Inlet, an unimproved inlet, is about 1.1 miles wide at its narrowest point and provides a tidal connection between the Atlantic Ocean, Great Egg Harbor Bay, the New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway, and Great Egg Harbor River. Peck Beach is occupied in its entirety by the City of Ocean City and extends from Great Egg Harbor Inlet southward to Corson Inlet. The ocean frontage is about eight miles in length. Existing project: The recommended plan consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. The beachfill will extend from Surf Road southwest to 34th Street with a 1000 foot taper south of 34th Street. This plan will require the initial placement of 4,118,000 cubic yards of material and subsequent periodic nourishment of approximately 1,072,000 cubic yards every three years. The material for the initial construction, and periodic nourishment will be taken from the ebb shoal area located approximately 5,000 feet offshore of the Great Egg Harbor Inlet. Additionally, the construction of the project will require the extension of 38 storm drain pipes. All work is programmed. Estimated cost for new work (October 1992) Federal share is $438,000,000 and non-Federal is $235,000,000. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local Cooperation: Federal participation in the proposed project is recommended and contingent on the local sponsor signing the Local Cooperation Agreement which identifies the required items of cooperation. In a letter dated 28 September 1990, the State of New Jersey identified a funding source for their costs and indicated that they were prepared to proceed with the final negotiations to sign the Local Cooperation Agreement as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611, 42 U.S.C. 196d-5b) and by the Water Resource Development ACT of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).The Local Cooperation agreement was executed in September 1991. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included surveys, beachfill nourishment Phase II, and supervision and administration construction. New work, hired labor: Work included engineering and design, and supervision and adminstration. 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Flood Control: 23. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, PA-1960.) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around the north end of dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware'River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The construction of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1994.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16,1966. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance of stream gauge, water quality testing and monitoring, surveys, computer maintenance, maintenance of dam tower, repair of water control device, replacement of fuel tanks, USGS Storm Gage Program, snow surveys and bridge inspections. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, monitoring of water contral devices, relocation of highway power unit and electrical equipment, periodic inspections, water quality testing and monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 24. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, PA) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control.(For details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Cost of project $63,163,791. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included well maintenance, visitor center maintenance, water control device, replacement of fuel tanks and boat motor, computer maintenance, bridge inspection, surveys by USGS, work on stilling basin, maintenance of collection booth services, snow surveys and NOAA Weather Service Cooperation. Work also included maintenance of boat launch dry brooks and day use area and emergency gate repair. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of resevoir and recreation area, lease of equipment, maintenance of sewage treatment plant, water quality testing, instrumentation and surveillance. There was work on joint use of water facilities, stilling basin, boat launch, day use area, installation of siding on storage barn, engineering and design and supervision and administration. Also incurred were costs for maintenance of visitors center. 25. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Emergency Bank Protection Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1994 Feasibility Reports Stoney East Norriton, PA $20,792 26. FLOOD AND CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1994 Reconnaissance Reports Darby Creek, Darby Borough, PA $2,217 Martins Creek, Tullytown, PA $25,245 Mill Creek, Upper Moreland, PA $2,518 North Branch Rancocas Creek, NJ $9,912 3-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 Feasibility Reports Little Mill Creek, New Castle City, DE $59,642 North Branch Newton Creek, Woodlynne NJ $9,189 Shabakunk Creek, Ewing, NJ $50,834 Construction Delaware River Port Jervis $912 Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $347,373 for disaster preparedness. 27. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA(See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587,79th Cong.,2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.522,87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing height of dam, constructing a new intake tower, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 264 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 181,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Total cost is $182,400,000, Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1992) is $29,800,000 including $152,600,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is completed. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission expressed its support by a resolution dated 23 April 1980 and reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1985, October 1985, and July 1988. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included USGS Stream Gage repair, water quality monitoring, lease of equipment, repair of piezometer, repair access road, services by NOAA Weather Service. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, repair access road, repair of spillway and intake conc, water monitoring, installation leak detection device. There was also, rehabilitation of operations building, maintenance on recreational facility, data collection, water quality testing and monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 28. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, PA. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H.Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Seas.). Project completed in June 1960. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included surveys, USGS Stream Gaging, and NOAA Weather Service, repair of water control device. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of the reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspec. 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT DATES October 1993 October 1993 April 1994 October 1993 June 1994 June 1994 Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $27,650. 30. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection of non-federal levees were conducted at the following sites: Bristol, PA April 1994 Cheltenham, PA April 1994 Jordon Creek, PA April 1994 Morrisville, PA April 1994 Norristown, PA April 1994 Upland, PA April 1994 Weisport, PA April 1994 White Mills, PA 31 MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ Location: Approximately 12 miles northwest of New York City, is located in Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, New Jersey along Molly Ann's Brook from the mouth below Totowa Avenue in Paterson upstream to Church Street in Haledon. Previous project: None. Existing project: The recommended plan is modified channel with a total length of 2.5 miles. The channel includes both trapezoidal channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges will be replaced and one building will be removed. Estimated cost of project (October 1992) is $ 320,000,000 of which $160,000,000 are federal costs and $ 160,000,000 are required non-federal costs. Cost are in accordance with Section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662), dated November 17, 1986. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on December 16, 1993. The State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, the non-federal sponsor, provided their support thru the Intermodal Surface Transportation Act of 1991 and funds appropriated in their FY 1994 State Capitol Budget. Terminal facilities: None. tions were made as follows: PROJECT INSPECTION Allentown, PA Bethlehem, PA Mount Holly, NJ Darby Creek, PA Shellpot Creek, PA 1962 Flood Control Act was preconstruction engineering and design. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts 3-15 Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included plans and specifications, supervision and adminstrations, and engineering and design. 32. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $53,884. 33. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1994 Construction Wilmington Harbor, DE $18,568 34. PROMPTON LAKE, PA. Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, PA, and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, and will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet: 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1992) is $3,300,000 including $48,400,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 authorizing existing project. See table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1994.) Local cooperation: Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated in 1966, suspended in 1968 and again suspended in and resumed in 1986. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, National Weather Service Report Network, and water quality testing. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, dam surveys, installation of leak detection device, instrumentation and surveillance, maintenance of relief well, water quality monitoring and testing, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 35. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition Surveys Broadkill, DE L & R Canal, Maurice River, NJ Mispillion River, DE Murderkill River, DE Oyster Creek, NJ Salem River, NJ Date Survey Conducted March 1994 March 1994 July 1994 March 1994 March 1994 June 1994 January 1994 General Investigations: 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $227,351. 37. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Cost and expenditures during the period totaled $3,565,595 38. SURVEYS Cost for the period were $394,847 for navigation studies: $227,138 for flood control studies, $2,048,019 for shoreline protection studies, $99,775 for special studies: a total of $2,769,779 3-16 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 SEPT. 30,1994 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ New Work (Contributed Funds) 2. Chesapeake & Delaware Canal, St. George's Bridge Replacement 3. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ � (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River, PA, NJ, AND DE Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds) 6. Delaware River Vincinity of Camden (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Regular Funds) 4,344,000 3,236,000 2,938,806 6,718,919 - 727,000 - 721,945 1,400,000 1,500,000 516,571 2,985,298 7,000,000 14,000,000 6,999,999 13,979,822 Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost -34,853 989,000 988,164 -74,417 20,024 1,103,000 1,113,179 6,199 14,000,000 14,000,000 14,010,861 14,008,924 249,000 140,000 247,889 142,029 472,547. 612,000 1,567,000 371,000 472,198 611,586 1,563,786 371,630 31,083,849 31,068,550 16,392,933 16,381,634 13,917,000 13,824,624 49,000,000 48,999,786 879,275 879,275 5,768,651 5,768,025 1,134,346 1,134,346 150,000 10 150,000 72,147,8003 72,147,800 3 43,081,0374 43,077,954 15,000 15,000 14,122,500 15,369,767 17,374,000 12,744,500 11,251,631 14,254,971 15,371,77 12,631,415 57,879,872 5 57,879,872 5 435,013,068 19 434,526,861 19 508,324 508,324 -94,000 3,930,000 -350,000 -300,000 988 3,364,363 161,141 -395,362 - - 2,035,000 - - - 2,030,685 - 1,720,000 - 1,145,122 475,875 475,539 79,000 78,624 -164,299 23,739 1,931 250,000 2,555 243,074 5,166,9061 5,127,997 2,397,962 2,393,484 2,705,000 1,963,817 511,210 18 511,210 18 4,190,974 4,183,327 1,323,775 1,323,775 3-17 469,800 563,000 474,236 561,463 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 3-A (Contined) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 SEPT. 30,1994 (Contributed Funds) 8. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, and MD (Regular Funds) 9. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE and MD (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Manasquan River NJ28 (Regular Funds) 11. Maurice River, NJ (Regular Funds) 12. Mispillion River, DE (Regular Funds) 13. Murderkill River, DE (Regular Funds) 14. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 210,000 210,000 9,671,000 9,641,060 3,933,000 3,918,075 8,913,000 8,809,414 -278,151 -265,000 9,652,000 9,609,681 -20,000 -3,449 12,000 86,000 158,000 12,860 87,828 153,604 - 132,535,5918 - 132,532,598 11,763,000 249,331,3659 11,725,894 249,074,0409 - 17,356,718 -2,652 17,357,915 -- 561,514 -- 561,514 1,897,000 4,375,258 1,903,205 4,373,209 -- 60,000 -- 60,000 - 334,000 -- 72,774 52,600 52,200 100,000 176,000 97,543 151,782 73,000 1,795,000 72,774 1,825,184 8,008,278 8,008,278 4,022,700 4,027,834 110,000 110,000 122,600 122,200 738,83926 738,83926 4,015,80727 4,018,09027 37,630 37,630 328,756 40,000 329,031 33,052 34,000 31,120 45,000 54,712 2,438,000 3,196,000 1,662,000 250,000 2,425,386 3,185,888 1,683,587 243,074 2,112,114 2,111,998 71,549 1 71,549 11 40,118,316 12 40,105,404 12 1,196,581 1,196,581 99,000 99,000 3-18 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 SEPT. 30,1994 15. Raccoon Creek, NJ (Regular Funds) 16. Salem River, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17. Schuylkill River, PA (Regular Funds) 18. Wilmington Harbor, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Delaware Coast Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Beltzville Lake, PA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost NewWork Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 26,500 - 26,267 - 1,800,000 - 409 274,169 390,000 275,000 389,000 80,000 76,781 176 83,66529 83,66529 368,234 368,001 1,907,634 2 108,043 2,847,1736 2,844,090 51,825 51,825 424,536 965,000 155,000 1,533,000 432,769 961,697 142,299 1,538,273 2,204,920 2,611,000 2,375,000 2,575,000 2,188,084 2,610,850 2,281,273 2,569,553 2,648,000 4,014,549 - 3,805,000 136,785 2,276,995 1,335,300 839,258 250,000 1,965,786 107,986 271,795 65,012 31,292 230,000 165,000 158,000 159,000 210,274 96,789 -47,560 149,863 30,000 30,000 14,008 4,339 750,000 8,317,000 12,967,000 451,994 6,352,622 14,024,986 1,500,000 6,000,000 4,850,000 - 4,978,243 7,272,965 -511,375 -461,261 597,000 686,000 661,000 750,000 629,371 676,836 661,568 747,904 3,334,00713 3,334,007 31,695,045 31,684,314 1,954,725 14,7 1,954,725 14,7 77,519,725 77,483,853 60,000 17 60,000 13,024,176 11,697,918 * 2,424,758 2,582,149 4,815,95320 4,094,301 2 215,350 215,350 1,268,67121 1,259,0022 22,193,000 20,458,827 12,350,000 11,789,947 22,931,831 22,931,831 10,257,089 10,233,314 3-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 3-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section 2 in Text Projects Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 SEPT. 30,1994 5 24. Blue Marsh New Work Lake, PA Approp. - - - - 63,180,300 (Regular Cost 974 296 1,053 - 63,180,299 Funds) Maint. Approp. 1,872,000 2,093,800 1,786,600 1,799,100 19,286,294 Cost 1,863,945 2,050,013 1,742,141 1,726,066 19,094,455 27. Francis E. New Work Walter Dam, PA Approp. - -47,000 - - 12,449,682 1 (Regular Cost 13,427 4,625 909 - 12,352,753 Funds) Maint. Approp. 693,000 1,448,000 623,000 680,000 10,482,949 Cost 682,545 1,450,336 602,670 683,032 10,453,275 28. General Edgar New Work Jadwin Dam and Approp. - - - - 4,073,105 Reservoir, PA Cost - - - - 4,073,105 (Regular Maint. Funds) Approp. 228,000 259,000 160,000 308,300 3,126,364 Cost 227,559 235,652 182,404 310,648 3,094,360 31. Molly Ann's Brook, NJ New Work (Regular Approp. 420,000 340,000 568,000 1,432,000 3,344,000 Funds) Cost 415,723 264,137 385,196 130,609 1,841,737 Maint. Approp. - - - - Cost - - - - 34. Prompton Lake New Work Approp. - - - - 4,609,483 16 (Regular Cost - - - - 4,609,483 16 Funds) Maint. Approp. 703,000 730,000 489,000 410,000 7,403,641 Cost 712,166 714,452 493,814 388,534 4,021,516 *Total adjusted to cprrect discrepancies in prior years. 1. Includes $1,950,906 for 30 and 37 foot projects. 2. Includes $55,809 for new work funds expended on previous project. 3. Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment (new work) toDelaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project under1954 modification. 4. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000Jobs Bill Funds. 5. Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 6. Includes $1,285 for reconnaissance and condition surveys in FY 1957, $1,792 Operations and Maintenance cost incurred for preperation of environmental impact statement, and $48,000 expended for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Excludes $412,400 spent for Continueing Authority project. 8. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Job Bill Funds. 10. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds. 11. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 12. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department Funds expended for maintenance. 13. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 14. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $40,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 16. Includes 63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710Recreation Facilities, excluded $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 17. Excludes $213,336 spent on Continuing Authority project. 18. Excluded $10,000 for previous projects. 19. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 20. Includes $704,000 AE&D. 21. Excludes $85,000 cash and $130,000 (services) furnished during preconstruction planning. 22. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 23. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 24. Includes $555,600 for previous project. 25. 10 & 12 foot anchorages are considered deauthorized. 26. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 27. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previouse projects. 28. 9 foot turning basin is considered inactive. 29. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous project. 3-20 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 2, 1985 Oct 27, 1990 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 19352 Aug 26,1937 July 24, 1946 Sept 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. Construction of a parallel, 4270 foot rubble mound south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE (See Section 2 of Text) The replacement of the U.S. Route 13 bridge near St. Georges, DE, and the state may be reimbursed if it carries out the work COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 3 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 4 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, NJ, and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 73d Con.,2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 85. 74th Con.,2d sess. H. Doc.358,79th Cong 2d sess. H. Doc.236,99th Cong 2d sess. WRDA 1990 H. Doc.388,59th Cong 2nd sess. H. Doc.262,77th Cong 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess 1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 733, 61st Cong, 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong. 2d sess.1 Rivers and Harbors 3-21 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Aug 30, 1935" June 20, 19384 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Mar 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Mar 2, 1945 Oct 20, 1988 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 7, 1939 Sept 3, 1954 Aug 30, 1935 An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, 'A A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200,13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. DELAWARE RIVER VICINITY OF CAMDEN, NJ (See Section 6 of Text) A depth of 30 feet from Newton Creek to Kaighn Point, thence 18 feet to Cooper Point. Extending the 30-foot depth upstream to Berkely Street terminal A depth of 37 feet in front of the Camden Marine terminal A depth of 40 feet in front of the Camden Marine terminal INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 7 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD (See Section 8 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Constructed a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay. For an 8-foot depth and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. Committee Doc.5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 3d sess.' H. Doc. 580,76th Cong. 1st sess. 1 H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong. 1st sess. 1 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83rd Cong. 2d sess.' H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong. 1st sess. 74th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 1120, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 111, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 353, 77th Cong., 1st sess. WRDA 1988 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 330,76th Cong., 1st sess. t H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 18 and 24, 736 Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 123, 83d Cong. 2d sess.t H.Doc.275,73d Cong. 2d sess. I . 3-22 Documents i r ~C A - -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 June 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1912 Aug 26, 1937 Sept 3, 1954 July 13, 1982 July 1, 1945 Nov 17, 1986 INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE (See Section 9 of text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties. MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ (See Section 10 of Text) A channel 8 feet deep and provision of works designed to secure channel. Widening channel on northerly side. Deepening channel to 12 and 14 feet, 10 and 12 foot anchorages. 10 the landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, including MAURICE RIVER, NJ (See Section 11 of Text) A 7-foot depth over entire project, with turning basin. An 8 foot depth, and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. MISPILLION RIVER, DE (See Section 12 of Text) A 6-foot depth and extention of south. Extention of north jetty. A channel 9 feet deep, 80 feet wide from like depth in Delaware Bay to the landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, including 3 cutoffs, with a turning basin at Milford. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material on each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. To increase the depth of the 2,000, foot reach of the Waterway in Cape May County to 15 feet. H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 2st sess. H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 482, 70th Cong. 2d sess. Senate Corn. Doc.g. 74th Con., 1st. session. H.Doc 356, 77th Cong., 1st. session. Cong., 2d sess. 11 H. Doc. 664, 59th Cong. 1st sess. H.Doc 275, 73dCong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 678, 62d Cong. 2d sess." Rivers and Harbor Comm., Doc. 83 S.Doc 229, 81st Cong., 2d sess. 11 H.Ex.Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess.)(See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) H.Doc. 133,76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.525 79th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA of 1986 3-23 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized June 13, 1902 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 July 24, 1946 June 3,1896 July 25,1912 Sept 22, 1922 July 3,1930 Aug 30, 19358 Oct 17, 1940 RACCOON CREEK, NJ (See Section 15 of Text) A channel of 7-foot depth to Springers wharf and 5 feet to Swedesboro A cutoff, Molonox Shoal A 7-foot depth extention to Swedesboro and jetty at mouth SALEM RIVER, NJ (See Section 16 of Text) A channel of 10-foot depth from Delaware River Masters Sand Plant Extention of project to Clements Bridge. A channel of 20-foot depth SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA (See Section 17 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel below Passyunk Ave., channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and1 by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 18 of Text) Depths of 21,10 and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Completion of new south jetty by the United States subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion ofjetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. H. Doc. 231, 56th Cong. 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1900, p. 1590. Specified in act. H. Doc. 800, 63d Cong. 2d sess., (contains latest published maps.) H. Doc. 217, 70th Cong. 1st Sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 15 73d Cong., 1st sess. WRDA of 198611 H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2d sessl H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2d Sess' H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1897 p. 12501 H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. 3-24 ff t 1 7 DT ocuments I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 3-B (continued) Acts July 14, 1960 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized f L- 1 . 7 " 7 BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA (See Section 23 of Text) Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply flood control and recreation BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA (See Section 24 of Text) Provides for multiple purpose development for water supply, flood, control, and recreation. Site is located on Tulpehocken Creek about 1 1/2 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about six miles northwest of Reading, PA. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA (See Section 27 of Text) Provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir Provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA (See Section 28 of Text) A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment. MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ (See Section 31 of Text) Modify Channel with a total length of 2.5 miles miles. Channel will include both trapezoidal channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges will be replaced and one building will removed. H. Doc.522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 587, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 522,87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. WRDA of 1986 3-25 Nov 17, 1986 A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ (See Section 20 of Text) Consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; main tenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION (See Section 21 of Text) Provides for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, not to exceed 10 years, of the shore from Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet. Project is modified to authorized the construction of sand bypass facilities and stone revetment erosion control measures at Indian River Inlet, DE. 9 GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ (See Section 22 of Text) Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. Consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. Documents H. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Act of 1968 WRDA of 1986 H. Doc.90, 90th Cong 2nd sess. WRDA of 1986 Sec. 869 River and Harbor Act of 1965. WRDA of 1986. PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PROMPTON LAKE, PA (See Section 34 of Text) Provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Provides for multiple-purpose development for water H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., supply and recreation in addition to present single- 2d sess. purpose flood control project. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works AdministratiOnSeptember 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935 3. Also Public Works Administration 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 5. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide fromPhiladelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. 6. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 8. Also May 28, 1935, under Emergency Relief Administration. 9. Deauthorized the remaining portion of the project. 10. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 11. Contains latest published maps. 3-26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1994 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Absecon Creek, NJ Absecon Inlet, NJ Alloway Creek, NJ Appoquinimink River,DE Big Timber Creek, NJ Broadkill River, DE Cedar Creek, Sussex City, DE Cohansey River, NJ Cooper River, NJ 1 Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ Double Creek, NJ1 Harbor of Refuge Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay Little River, DE Mantua Creek, NJ Maurice River, NJ Delaware Bay to Millville Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project ** Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA Oldmans Creek, NJ ** Pepper Creek, DE St. Jones River, DE Delaware Bay to Lebanon'u Jetties and entrance at mouth Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA Smyrna River, DE Delaware River topWharf at Smyrna Landing Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. Toms River, NJ Channel 5 feet deep 1 2 Channel 12 feet deep 20 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. Tuckerton Creek, NJ Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE Woodbury Creek, NJ1 COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-F COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-F COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-F COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED 1989 1990 1989 1934 1989 1976 1993 1986 1989 1912 1912 1981 1980 1966 1948 1968 1941 1989 1961 1955 1949 11,935 534,2096 21,398 36,973 58,6652 68,228 256,100 146,75613 33,102 256,624 7,800 5,162,23018 168,41211 12,016 169,687 143,98413 128,20314 31,188 138,09415 207,102 4,291,810-- 198,844 - 1993 1986 1991 1940 10,050 65,615 60,242 27,09310 27,09310 3-27 84,186 5,98517317 55,117 41,270 71,925 243,641 310,738 2,263,214 396,528 * 5 1,169,01419 98,36012 288,310 339,340 161,913 54,601 32,125 38,988" 66,093 4 197,327 638,860 328,634 56,474 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1994 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alloway Creek1 INACTIVE 1931 21,398 35,761 Aquatic Plant Control INACTIVE 1975 87,594 - Dennis Creek, NJ1 INACTIVE 1897 4,701 - Goshen Creek, NJ1 INACTIVE 1905 15,359 870 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA1'6 INACTIVE 1928 208,964 14,336 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE" 6 INACTIVE 1898 224,704 - Leipsic River, DE1 INACTIVE 1931 36,956 32,345 Little Egg Harbor, NJ 1'3 INACTIVE -7 15,048 - Maurice River, NJ-Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth INACTIVE 1948 For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1994 See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, DE 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon1'8 - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth 9 DEFERRED - - - 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Abandonment recommended in House Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st Sess. 4. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 5. Harbor not now required by commerce. 6. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 7. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 9. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 10. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 11. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. 12. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous project. 13. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 14. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. 15. Excludes $38,988 non-Federal funds. 16. Includes $116,497 for new work on previous projects. 17. Includes $2,489,173 for maintenance for previous projects. 18. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 19. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys fiscal year 1963. 20. Deferred * Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. ** Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3-28 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-D BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30,1994 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Brigantine Island INACTIVE* - - - Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ INACTIVE* 1978 314,400 - Long Beach Island INACTIVE -- - Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ INACTIVE* - - - 1. Operation and maintenance required under Public Works Extension of five existing groins completed Acceleraion Program for by law to be assumed by local interests. groins completed 11 May 1964. NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1994 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 _ Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 -1 Mt. Holly, NJ COMPLETED 1946 283,655 1 Pottstown, PA ACTIVE 1984 487,366 - Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA INACTIVE 1984 335,299 - Tamaqua, PA ACTIVE 1990 628,467 - 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing project. 2. New project deferred. 3. $1,316,464 expended for preconstruction planning only. 4. Transfer from Baltimore District in Fiscal Year 1989. 3-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1994 TABLE 3-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Appoquinimink River, DE 1931 3 Oct 78 HD 95-351 $ 78,243 - Atlantic City, NJ 1972 HD 538 918 $2,083,289 - Barnegat Light, NJ 1964 HD 208 918 $ 70,908 - Cape May City, NJ 1961 3 Sep 54 HD 206 918 $ 22,9578 - Delaware County, PA 1931 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323 $ 7,139 - Long Beach Island, NJ 1964 14 Jul 60 HD 208 918 $ 40,665 - Ocean City, NJ 1969 HD 184 918 $395,83110 - Rehoboth Beach to Indian River 1965 HD 216 Inlet, DE 918 $326,116 - For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Beach Erosion Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Hereford Inlet 1978 Section 12 PL 93-251 314,400 - Maurice River, NJ 1948 Section 12 PL 93-251 - - Millville fixed2bridge to upper end of project Oldmans Creek, NJ3 1941 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 63,313 - Rancocas River, NJ4 1942 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 57,590 - Smyrna River, DE5 1949 2 Nov 79 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed HD 95-157 $396,169 - bridge. For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Flood Control Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Aquashicola Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Delaware River, Mouth of Neversink Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA7 1917 1966 Chester River, 5 Aug 77 HD 94-192 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 3-30 17 Nov 86 $4,520,995 TABLE 3-F(cont) PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Flood Control Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Tocks Island, PA,NJ,and NY9 1979 23 Oct 62 PL 87-874 $65,106,26010 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. 1979 23 Oct 62 Route 209 only) PA PL 87-874 $195,223 Trexler Lake, PA 1981 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 76 Stat. 1180 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 7. Excludes $58,585 accelerated Public 11 May 1964. Work funds expended for extension. 8. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public 11 May 1964. Work funds expended for extention. 9. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps authority to proceed with project. Legislation would be required to proceed with the project. 10. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Federal participation expended under extention of five existing groins completed 11 May 1964. 3-31 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT * This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA................................. 4-3 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift........................4-4 3. Broad Creek, M D ................................................... 4-4 4. Chester River, MD .................................... ... 4-4 5. Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD..............4-5 6. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD ............................. 4-5 7. Island Creek, M D............................................. 4-5 8. Little Wicomico River, VA................................4-5 9. Monroe Bay and Creek, VA...................................4-6 10. Nanticoke River, MD ..................................... 4-6 11. Nanticoke River, DE and MD ............................... 4-6 12. Northeast River, MD ..................................... 4-7 13. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD................................... 4-7 14. Pocomoke River, MD...............................4-7 15. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift .... ........................... 4-8 16. Potomac River Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, and DC........................4-8 17. Potomac River at Alexandria, VA.........................4-8 18. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, MD .............................. 4-8 19. Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD...............................4-9 20. Slaughter Creek, MD....................................... 4-9 21. Tred Avon River, MD.......................................4-9 22. Washington Harbor, DC ................................... 4-9 23. W icomico River, MD .............................. ........... 4-10 24. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............. 4-10 25. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ...................... ............. 4-10 Beach Erosion Control 26. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization ........................... 4-11 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 33A. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 40A. 40B. 40C. 40D. 40E. 40F. 40G. 40H. 401. 40J. 40K. 40L. 40M. Beach Erosion Control (cont'd) Page Atlantic Coast of Maryland ................................. 4-11 Colonial Beach, VA ...................................... 4-11 Town of North Beach, MD...................................4-11 Flood Control Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD..........................4-12 Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV ............... 4-12 Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV ............ 4-12 Lackawanna River Basin, PA ........................... 4-13 Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA................................4-13 Lock Haven, PA ................................................... 4-13 Moorefield, WV .................... ........... 4-13 Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA..........................4-14 Petersburg, WV................................ ...... 4-14 Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA ............................................ 4-14 South Central Pennsylvania Environmental Restoration...........................4-14 Southern New York Flood Control Projects ..................................... 4-15 Addison, NY ....................................................... 4-15 Almond Lake, NY.............................................4-15 Arkport Dam, NY.......................................4-15 Avoca, NY ........................................................... 4-15 Binghamton, NY ....................................... 4-16 Canisteo, NY ..................................... ...... 4-16 Coming, NY ............................ 4-16 East Sidney Lake, NY ..................................... 4-17 Elmira, NY .................. ....................... 4-17 Hornell, NY .......................................................... 4-17 Lisle, NY................................... ........................4-18 Oxford, NY .................... ..........4-18 Whitney Point Lake, NY ................................... 4-18 4-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Flood Control (cont'd) Page 40N. Whitney Point Village, NY .................................. 4-18 41. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA ....................................................... 4-18 42. Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA ..................................... 4-19 42A. Cowanesque Lake, PA ...................................... 4-19 42B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ................................ 4-19 43. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA ................................... ....... 4-20 43A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA ....................................... 4-20 43B. Curwensville Lake, PA........................................4-20 43C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA...........................4-20 44. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA...............................4-20 45. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................................... 4-21 46. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................................... ...... 4-21 47. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ................................................... 4-21 Water Supply 48. Washington Aqueduct ..................................... 4-21 General Investigations 49. Surveys 50. Collection and Study of Basic Data 51. Preconstruction Engineering and Design Page 4-22 4-22 4-22 Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement .................. 4-23 Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ............................. 4-29 Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................... 4-35 Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects.............................. 4-37 Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.............................. 4-37 Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects.............................4-39 Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys.............................. .4-41 Table 4-I Inspection of Completed Projects ................................ 4-41 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Navigation L BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth-curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 3.0 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.4 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 10.3 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 20.2 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 15.6 miles long from the Cutoff Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Channels; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch; Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.5 miles: and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet .wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.3 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,200 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (3) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $361,581,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $38,411,000 for work completed under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $33,991,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,360,000 is non-Federal; and $314,840,000 (October 1989 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $460,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $314,380,000 is Corps of Engineers and non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The two grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 8 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1991)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, Baltimore District: None. New Work, Norfolk District: None. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channels were made. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the Craighill Channel, Craighill Angle, Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension, and Tolchester Channel commenced on December 7, 1993, and was completed on April 23, 1994. Approximately 2,383,200 cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the Chesapeake Bay at a cost of $11,115,000. A contract in the amount of $9,223,950 was awarded on September 13, 1994, to dredge an estimated $1.9 million cubic yards of material from the Cutoff Angle, Brewerton Channel, Brewerton Angle, Ft. McHenry Channel and Curtis Creek 4-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Channel and deposit the material in the approved Hart- Miller Island containment facility in the Chesapeake Bay. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys of the Cape Henry, York Spit, and Rappahannock Shoal Channels were made. Maintenance dredging, by contract of the Cape Henry Channel and York Spit Channel commenced on April 11, 1994 and was completed on June 28, 1994. A total of 739,642 cubic yards of material was dredged from the Cape Henry Channel and deposited in the approved Dam Neck Ocean Placement Area in the Atlantic Ocean and a total of 141,434 cubic yards of material was dredged from the York Split Channel and deposited in the Wolf Trap Alternate Placement Area in the Chesapeake Bay at a total cost of $1,795,797. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 15,120 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 3. BROAD CREEK, MD Location. This is a tidal waterway, connecting Pocomoke Sound and Little Annemessex River, MD. The north end of Broad Creek is 1.8 miles south of Crisfield. It lies north and south, is about 2 1/2 miles in length, and traverses a low, marshy region, the level of which is only slightly above high water. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1224.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, 100 feet wide in the straight reaches, and 130 feet wide at the bends from the 6-foot contour in Pocomoke Sound through Broad Creek to the 6-foot contour in Little Annemessex River, a distance of about 3 miles. The mean range of tide is 1.9 feet and the extreme tidal range is 3 feet under ordinary conditions. The Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $28,227. The average maintenance cost during the past 5 years was $2,068. Local cooperation. Fully met. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 4. CHESTER RIVER, MD Location. Rises in Kent County, DE, and flows 50 miles generally southwesterly and empties into the Chesapeake Bay. Kent Island Narrows is a passage connecting Chester River and Eastern Bay. Wells Cove is an indentation on the easterly side of Kent Island Narrows about 0.4 mile south of the highway bridge crossing the Narrows. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 12266 and 12270.) Previous project. For details see page 262 of the 1960 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing, section included in project is about 5.5 miles long with the lower end of the section being about 37 miles above mouth of river; for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows; and a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from 7-foot deep curve in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of same depth and 300 feet square at head of channel. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,454, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Widening 7-foot deep channel from 75 to 100 feet from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows was deauthorized and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance of Wells Cove section of the project. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead wharves on Chester River section. Facilities on the Kent Island Narrows section of the existing project consist of about 10,000 linear feet of timber pile bulkheaded wharf. About 1,350 linear feet of the wharf is owned and operated by the Queen Anne's County; the remainder is privately owned. The privately owned bulkheaded wharf is operated mostly by the seven marinas located on the Narrows with the remainder being owned and operated by the seafood packing houses in the area. In addition to the slips of the marinas, there are marine railways, launching ramps, and travel-lifts. All of these facilities are in good condition and are located adjacent to the proposed improvements. In Wells Cove there is a small wharf, a small marine railway, and a public landing. All facilities are privately owned except the public landing on Wells Cove. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 5. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Location.Herring Bay is a wide-mouthed indentation on the west side of Chesapeake Bay about 20 miles below Annapolis, MD. It is about 3 miles long from north to south and penetrates the shore for a depth of about 1 mile. Rockhold Creek, which is about 2.5 miles long, is an estuary which extends northward from the northerly end of Herring Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 7-foot contour in Herring Bay to vicinity of county wharf on Rockhold Creek, with turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 150 feet long at head of channel, and a stone breakwater approximately 900 feet long east of entrance channel. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and extreme tidal range about 4 feet. The Federal cost of new work for completed project was $50,591. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Consists of a public wharf on Rockhold Creek about 600 feet below the county bridge, open to all, together with a few private landing stages. No freight-handling devices are installed on any of the wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was completed in May 1994. A total of 18,404 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited in an upland placement site. 6. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern Shore of Maryland between Hooper Island and the mainland; Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland and Hooper Island. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River extending into Hooper Island; the mouth is about 2 miles south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek with a turning basin of the same depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at the head of channel, about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $66,119. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished spoil placement areas for maintenance dredging in fiscal year 1990. Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, four oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonable prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract was awarded on September 30, 1994 for the placement of offshore segmented geotextile tubes along the western shore of Barren Island. 7. ISLAND CREEK, MD Location. Island Creek in St. Marys County, MD, is a tidal estuary three-fourths of a mile long, flowing in a southeasterly direction and entering the right bank of St. Marys River at its junction with the Potomac River, 11 miles upstream of the Chesapeake Bay and 97 miles downstream from Washington, DC. It lies entirely within the lower half of St. Georges Island. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long from the St. Marys River through the entrance to Island Creek and a turning basin 5 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long within the creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.5 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. Costs of Federal new work for the completed project were $6,230. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On Island Creek there are five small private landings or stagings which are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 8. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Location. A tidal estuary 6 miles long in Northumberland County, VA, flowing southeasterly to Potomac River, which it enters on the right bank one-half mile upstream of its mouth and about 108 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12233.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 4,800 feet long, extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water in the Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties, extending to the 8-foot contour in Potomac River; and bulkhead walls from the inner ends thereof extending sufficiently into Little Wicomico River to stabilize the dredged inner channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges in Potomac River at the entrance are: Mean 1.2 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, about 7 feet. Mean tidal range within the river is 4-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 about 1 foot. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $81,885, exclusive of $5,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully met. Terminal facilities. Two wharves open to the public and numerous small wharves and stagings for private use, an oyster shucking, and packing plant, and a marine railway and boat-building yard. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on August 22, 1994 to remove 17,000 cubic yards of dredged material. The dredged material is being used as beach nourishment. 9. MONROE BAY AND CREEK, VA Location. Monroe Bay is an indentation on the right bank of Potomac River in Westmoreland County, VA, 34 miles upstream of Chesapeake Bay and 75 miles downstream from Washington, DC. Monroe Creek is a tidal stream 5 miles long which flows southerly and discharges into Monroe Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 950 feet long, through the bar at the entrance, and within the creek a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,500 feet long, with turning and anchorage basin 500 feet wide at upper end in vicinity of Colonial Beach waterworks. The mean range of tide is 1.56 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $12,460. Local cooperation. Fully met. Terminal facilities. There are numerous wharves and landings in the creek, of which three are open to the public. There are two marine railways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. Surveys revealed shoaling was not sufficient to warrant dredging. 10. NANTICOKE RIVER, MD Location. The Nanticoke River flows in a southwesterly direction to Tangier Sound, Chesapeake Bay, and is about 50 miles long. The town of Nanticoke, Md., is on the east side of the river, about 3 miles from the mouth, just north of Roaring Point. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 567.) Existing project. Provides for a small-boat harbor 7 feet deep, 120 feet wide, and 400 feet long in the marsh at Nanticoke, with an entrance channel of the same depth and 60 feet wide, protected by twin stone jetties in the river, the north jetty being about 870 feet long and the south jetty being about 770 feet long. The mean range of tide is about 2.6 feet. The cost of new work for the completed project was $73,243. Local cooperation. Fully met except that local interests are to furnish placement sites as required for subsequent maintenance and guarantee the United States and its contractors against claims for damages to oyster beds attributable to subsequent maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are three privately owned wharves open to the general public. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Appeals Board awarded contractor return of liquidated damages plus interest. Most of the remaining claim was dismissed. IL NANTICOKE RIVER ,DE AND MD Location. Headwaters of Nanticoke River consist of numerous branches rising mainly in the northern portion of Sussex County, DE. The river is about 50 miles long and flows southwesterly from its source to Tangier Sound. Northwest Fork is a branch of Nanticoke River which rises in Kent County, DE, and flows past Federalsburg, MD, generally southerly through Dorchester County, MD, to its junction with the main river opposite Riverton, MD. It is about 30 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 77.) Existing project. Nanticoke River: Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to the highway bridge at Seaford, DE, with a turning basin at the upper end. Disjointed sections included in the project is about 4 miles long, extending over 32 miles of river; lower end of the first section of the project is about 8 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 3.4 feet, and the extreme tidal range is 4.3 feet. Northwest Fork: Dredging a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide at mean low water from upper Browns wharf to within one-half mile of the southern boundary of town of Federalsburg, with a turning basin at the upper end. Section included in the project is about 4 miles long, and its lower end is 11.75 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished a spoil disposal area for proposed fiscal year 1990 maintenance dredging. Locals are also required to hold and save the United States free from all damages. Terminal facilities. Waterfront at Seaford consists largely of unconnected pile-and-timber bulkhead wharves with earthfills. One public wharf is used as a launching ramp. Remaining wharves are privately owned. A rail siding extends along a considerable portion of waterfront and offers facilities for interchange of rail and water traffic. Existing terminals are reasonably adequate for present and prospective commerce. Terminal facilities on Northwest Fork are all privately owned and open to general public use. They consist of one solid bulkhead wharf of 80-foot frontage and three landings each with 60-foot frontages. Depths of water are from 2 to 8 feet. Landings are log revetments backed by earthfill and are in poor condition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 12. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Location. A tidal waterway extending southwestward 5.5 miles from the junction of its branches in the town of North East to the head of Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north of entrance to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in river to foot of Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. Mean range of tide is 2.25 feet. Local cooperation. Fully met except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are a few lightly constructed landings for small boats scattered along the waterfront in the town of North East. There are two fish-packing plants, two marine railways, several bulkhead wharves, 11 marinas, and a number of small boathouses along the length of the waterway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 13. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12211.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 200 feet wide and 10 feet deep through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep to the project harbor; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. The modification authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in December 1989. This work included 16 and 14 foot depth channels with widths from 300 to 100 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to the head of the harbor. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging of Isle of Wight Bay. A beneficial use placement site of beach nourishment is being pursued for this project. 14. POCOMOKE RIVER, MD Location. Pocomoke River is a tributary of Pocomoke Sound, a tidal estuary on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles north of Cape Charles, VA. Existing project. Provides for a channel 11 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide from the 11-foot depth in Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and for construction of a dike along the offshore side of channel between Tulls Point and the end of the existing dike; and a channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 to 130 feet wide from Shad Landing to the bridge at Snow Hill. Length of project is about 8.7 miles from Pocomoke Sound to Williams Point, and about 4.5 miles from Shad Landing to Snow Hill, MD. Shad Landing is about 25.7 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet in Pocomoke Sound and 2.5 feet in the river at Snow Hill. Prolonged high winds on Chesapeake Bay frequently cause greater fluctuations. Estimated cost (1969) for new work is $1,071,458 exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Extension of channel above the bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep and widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end was deauthorized and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Complied with for section of project from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke River and from Shad Landing to the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by acts of June 3, 1986, and August 30, 1935, except local interests must furnish releases from damage to oyster beds and spoil disposal areas as required for future maintenance. Terms for the section of the project above the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by act of March 2, 1945, required local interests to furnish all 4-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages resulting from the improvement; and contribute one-half the initial cost of that portion of project, but not to exceed $4,250. This portion was deauthorized. Terms for the 11-foot depth channel from Pocomoke Sound to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, authorized by act of September 3, 1954, and deauthorized in December 1989 required local interests to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for construction and future maintenance of the project; and hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance, including such damages as may occur to the public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Waterfronts at Pocomoke City and Snow Hill are built up principally with earthfilled timber bulkheads, the majority of which are privately owned. A few of the warehouses and factories on the river at these communities have railroad sidings and mechanical freight-handling facilities. Any appreciable increase in commerce at Pocomoke City or Snow Hill would necessitate construction of new facilities and repair of existing structures. Adequate space is available for development of additional terminals. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 15. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC, and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 22 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 217,080 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 16. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, AND DC Location. The project is located in the Potomac River and its tributaries with the northern boundary at Chain Bridge in Washington, DC, extending southward to the U.S. Route 301 Bridge (see U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart 12289). Existing project. On July 2, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under the authority of Section 302 of the 1965 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized the control of hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 6, 1986 between the Corps, MD, VA, DC, and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. The LCA, which must be reexecuted annually, initially expired on September 30, 1991and included the following provisions: 1. Local sponsors share 50 percent of the program cost; 2. Local sponsors provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; and 3. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments is responsible for coordinating local interests and issuing work orders for the program. Terminal facilities. There are 75 marina activities between DC and the U.S. Route 50 Bridge providing approximately 3,400 commercial and recreational boat slips and 50 boat ramps. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Harvesting operations resulted in about 16 acres of nuisance aquatic plants at sites in Virginia and Maryland. There were no harvesting operations conducted in the District of Columbia this fiscal year. 17. POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Location. Alexandria is 3 miles below Washington, DC, on right bank of Potomac River, which flows southeasterly into Chesapeake Bay 105 miles downstream. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing project. Provides for depth of 24 feet in front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. Project area is about 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.8 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.6 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $95,215. Existing project was adopted by 1910 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2d sess.). Map is in the project document. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Alexandria has 12 regular shipping wharves or landings; nine of these are privately owned (of which four are open to the public by special arrangement) and three owned by the United States. Terminal and transfer facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 18. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 75 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks, and fishing appurtenances. There were 37 detailed investigations of obstructions or sunken vessels/wrecks. 19. RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD Location. Rhodes Point and Tylerton are two settlements about 1.5 miles apart on Smith Island, between Chesapeake Bay and Tangier Sound, about 60 miles north of Virginia Capes, and about 110 miles south of Baltimore. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide from that depth in Tyler Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 150 feet wide and 400 feet long at Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Big Thorofare River to Tylerton; and channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from Rhodes Point to Tylerton. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet. On January 22, 1982, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide a distance of about one mile from the anchorage basin at Rhodes Point through Sheep Pen Gut to deep water in the Chesapeake Bay. Local cooperation. Fully met for work authorized by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1982. See section 19 of 1982 Annual report for requirement details. Terminal facilities. There are numerous pile-and-timber wharves along waterfronts at Rhodes Point and Tylerton. Facilities are privately owned, open to the public without charge when not in use by the owners, and are adequate for existing commerce. Sufficient space for construction of additional facilities is available, if required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract was awarded on September 13, 1994 for geotube constructed to form a placement site for future dredging. 20. SLAUGHTER CREEK, MD Location. This is a waterway about 8 miles long and tidal throughout connecting with Little Choptank River 5 miles from its mouth. It lies in Dorchester County, MD, between Taylors Island and the mainland of the eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water through the bar at the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, with the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. The mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and the extreme tidal range is 2.9 feet. The cost for new work, done in 1911, is $4,140. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one solid bulkhead wharf about 300 feet long served by this improvement. It is privately owned, open to general public use, and considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. Surveys indicated that dredging was not required. 21. TRED AVON RIVER, MD Location. This stream, formerly called Treadhaven Creek, rises in Talbot County, MD, flows southerly and empties into Choptank River 10 miles above its mouth. It is about 10 miles long and is a tidal estuary with very little natural flow. Draining area is 36 square miles. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78.) Previous project. For details see page 397 of Annual Report for 1951. Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Tred Avon River from that depth in river near Peach Blossom Creek to Easton Point, thence a channel of same depth and width and about 1,400 feet long in the North Fork, thence a channel of same width and 8 feet deep and about 700 feet long with a turning basin of same depth at upper end. Project also provides for a turning basin in South Fork 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide and 600 feet long on east side of main channel at Easton Point. Section included in project is about 2 miles long, and its lower end is about 7.5 miles above mouth. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-11 of the 1979 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Five large terminals for receiving and distributing petroleum products, and a marina with stalls and ships, marine railway, a launching ramp, and a 6-ton travel-lift at Easton Point. These facilities are in good condition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 22. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within the District of Columbia at junction of the Anacostia River with the Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to the Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot 4-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operation and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers is open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained by hired labor. 23. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is the site of an improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, about 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from the mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet, and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for the completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on the previous project. Local cooperation. Fully met, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pile-andtimber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the Tshaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredged material was placed into three previously used diked upland sites. A total of 158,400 cubic yards of dredged material was removed from the channel. 24. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $55,545 for Coan River, VA; $1,131 for Crisfield Harbor, MD; $55,790 for Neale Sound, MD; $6,725 for Neabsco Creek, VA; $38,524 for Pleasure Island Channel, MD; $60,285 for Island Creek, St. Marys County, MD; $3,612 for Kent Narrows, MD; $15,958 for Shallow Creek Spur, MD; $1,250 for Solomon Island Harbor, MD; $97,869 for Tedious Creek, Dorchester County, MD; and $26,521 for Thorofare Channel, Worchester County, MD. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $1,250 for Solomon Island Harbor, MD; and $94,959 for Tedious Creek, Dorchester County, MD. 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Beach Erosion Control 26. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). None. 27. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Location. The project is located on Fenwick Island at Ocean City, MD, which is about 35 miles south of the entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1220.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a steel sheetpile bulkhead along the oceanward edge of the boardwalk from about 4th Street to 27th Street and a sand dune from 27th Street to about 0.3 mile across the Delaware line. The bulkhead is fronted by a 165-foot wide beach, and the dune is fronted by a 100-foot wide beach. The project also provides for periodic nourishment over the 50-year project life. The current estimated total project cost is $540,000,000 (including a future inflation allowance through the project completion) which includes $46,000,000 for initial construction and $494,000,000 for periodic nourishment. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 30, 1990. The sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges and other facilities; pay 35% of the first costs and 47% of periodic nourishment costs; and bear all costs of operation maintenance, replacement and major rehabilitation of storm damage reduction facilities. To date the sponsor has fully met these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded November 23, 1993 and completed January 27, 1994 to restore areas of the beach and berm (111,000 cubic yards) vulnerable from the December 1992 storm. Another construction contract to fully restore the project (1,300,000 cubic yards) was awarded March 30, 1994 and is expected to be completed by December 1994. 28. COLONIAL BEACH, VA Location. Colonial Beach, Westmoreland County, VA, is located on the right bank of the Potomac River 40 miles upstream from its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 69 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12286.) Existing project. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 103 of the River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: extending the existing Central Beach area and beach at Castlewood Park; off shore breakwaters; and one terminal groin at Castlewood Park. The Central Beach extension begins downstream from Hawthorne Street and continues southward for 1,570 feet, with a maximum width of 120 feet, and provides 107,200 square feet of area, stabilized with vegetation about 200 feet of embankment behind the beachfill. There are four 200-foot breakwaters to stabilize this beach area. At Castlewood Park there are: a 59,300 square foot beach area; three breakwaters; and one 100-foot terminal groin to reduce shoaling to the entrance channel to Monroe Creek. The breakwaters are two each at 200 feet in length and one at 300 feet. The beach will have periodic nourishment when needed. Local cooperation. The May 4, 1981 Local Cooperation Agreement with the Town of Colonial Beach, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold and save U.S. from damages; assure public ownership; assure maintenance and repair of the breakwaters; provide 50 percent of the initial construction cost; provide 50 percent of the cost of periodic beach nourishment. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Nourishment of the existing project at Castlewood Park was completed in the Spring 1994. The Town of Colonial Beach, the contract administrator, is currently coordinating a claim filed by the contractor. 29. TOWN OF NORTH BEACH, MD Location. Town of North Beach, Calvert County, MD, is located 32 miles east of Washington, DC, 52 miles south of Baltimore, MD, and 25 miles south of Annapolis, MD. Existing project. On October 27, 1992 the Chief of Engineers under the authority of Section 103 of the River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of 1,250 feet of stone revetment constructed adjacent to a failing steel bulkhead. The project will provide protection along Bay Avenue between First and Third Streets. The project also provided for construction around timber pilings that were installed by the town for construction of a boardwalk. Local cooperation. The December 14, 1992 Local Cooperation Agreement with the Maryland State Highway Administration, in brief, requires the local sponsor to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold and save the U.S. from damages; assure public ownership; assure maintenance and repair of the breakwaters; and provide 35% of the cost of construction. Operations and result during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the revetment was completed in April 1993. The contract is currently in the process of being closed out. 4-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Flood Control 30. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FLOOD PROTECTION AND NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, DC and MD Location. Project is on the Anacostia River at the confluence the of northeast and northwest branches at Bladensburg, MD, about 9 miles above the mouth at Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 560.) Existing project. Channel improvements of Anacostia River from foot of 15th Street SE in District of Columbia, to junction of Northeast and Northwest Branches at Bladensburg, MD; channel improvement in Northeast Branch from mouth upstream to near Longfellow Street in Riverdale, MD; channel improvement in Northwest Branch from mouth upstream to near 38th Street in Brentwood, MD; levees along both banks of the streams to protect Bladensburg, Edmonston, Riverdale, Cottage City, and Colmar Manor, MD; interior drainage facilities in these communities, including four pumping stations and necessary intercepting sewers and alterations and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. A portion of channel improvement of Anacostia River, from vicinity of 15th Street SE in District of Columbia to near Defense Highway Bridge on U.S. Route 50, provides for navigation channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide with a commercial boat basin, and a recreational boat basin having a capacity of 150 boats, both on the east bank of river near Bladensburg, MD. Federal cost for new work for the completed project was $6,042,325. Estimated cost to local interests for construction, lands, and damages is $6,275,000. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service monitored completed project at Kenilworth Marsh. 31. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On the North Branch of the Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with the South Branch of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements on the North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees along the right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal cost of new work for the completed project is $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD AND WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, Kitzmiller and Westernport, MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Final project cost is $176,325,300. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia was executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Local interests operate a white water access area below the dam. The State of Maryland is building a recreation area on the Maryland side of the lake. 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract to repair deteriorated concrete in the outlet tunnel was completed in May 1994 at a cost of $336,982. 33. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 33A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interests include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34. LOCK HAVEN, PA Location. On the West Branch Susquehanna River in the City of Lock Haven, PA, about 194 miles above the mouth of the Susquehanna River in Clinton County, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Lock Haven and Mile Hall, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, five ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. The current estimated total project cost is $86,400,000. Local cooperation. The Lock Haven Area Flood Protection Authority, a municipal authority created by the City of Lock Haven and Woodward Township, is the sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement was signed March 14, 1991. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities, pay 5% of structural flood control costs during construction; pay 50% of separable recreation costs; and bear all operation maintenance and replacement costs for the project after construction. To date the sponsor has fully met these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed on the Bald Eagle Creek levee and West Branch Susquehanna River levee (below Jay Street) contracts. The third major construction contract (remaining Susquehanna River levees) is essentially completed. The overall project, except for minor fish and wildlife facilities, is about 98% complete and is scheduled for completion in November 1994. 35. MOOREFIELD, WV Location. Moorefield, WV, is located at the junction of the South Fork (Moorefield River) of the South Branch of the Potomac River, 57 miles upstream from the mouth of the South Branch of the Potomac River, and 233 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Moorefield, WV). Existing project. Provides for a flood warning system, 21,600 feet of earth levee, 1,360 linear feet of floodwall, highway bridge replacement of one span of a railroad bridge, environmental mitigation, and appurtenant project features such as ramps, closures, riprap, relocations, and ponding areas for local drainage. The current estimated total project cost is $21,700,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Town of Moorefield is the sponsor for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed May 12, 1994. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal Government.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction began with the initiation of real estate acquisition activities and continuation of engineering and design. The overall project is scheduled for completion in September 1997. 4-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 36. PAXTON CREEK, HARRISBURG, PA Location. Harrisburg is located in Dauphin County, PA, on the eastern bank of the Susquehanna River. Paxton Creek, a tributary of the Susquehanna River, flows southwesterly through the City. Existing project. On June 16, 1993 the Director of Civil Works under continuing authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended, authorized construction of an improved flood warning system for Paxton Creek in Harrisburg, PA. The project included the installation of a base station (comprised of antennae, receiver/decoder, personal computer, and appurtenant equipment) within Dauphin County, the utilization of a flood warning dissemination service, a flood forecast model, the installation of an additional rain gauge, and the installation of solar panels on two existing rain gauges and one existing stream gauge. The improved system provides the City of Harrisburg with greater access to real time precipitation and stream data, a flood forecast capability, improved flood warning dissemination, and greater system reliability. Local cooperation. The July 19, 1993 Local Cooperation Agreement between Baltimore District and the City of Harrisburg, in brief, required the local sponsor to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold and save the U.S. from damages; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the completed project in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; contribute 25% of the total project costs; participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; and develop and adopt a comprehensive, detailed plan for use in conjunction with the flood warning system. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A contractual agreement for a flood warning dissemination service was issued on June 28, 1994. Installation of system equipment was completed on July 8, i994. The National Weather Service installed IFLOWS and ADVIS software, and on July 19, 1994 they trained city and county personnel on use of the system. 37. PETERSBURG, WV Location. On the South Branch of the Potomac River in eastern Grant County, WV. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Petersburg, East, WV; Petersburg, West, WV; Maysville, WV; and Rig, WV.). Existing project. Provides for 18,460 feet of levee and 900 feet of concrete floodwall along the South Branch, raising of U.S. Route 220 highway bridge, 61,000 cubic yards of channel excavation, ramps, closures, slope protection, relocations, ponding areas for interior drainage, and flood warning system improvements. The current estimated total project cost is $24,200,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. Grant County is the sponsor for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed July 13, 1993. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal Government.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design continued including preparation of plans and specifications for project construction. The overall project is scheduled for completion in August 1997. 38. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Dam site is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, hiking, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was .for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Construction of a private hydroelectric plant at Raystown Lake was completed May 1988. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. The Raystown Lake Master Plan was updated at a cost of $543,321. 39. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION Location. The south central Pennsylvania area includes the counties of Blair, Bedford, Cambria, Somerset, Huntingdon and Fulton. The program area within the Baltimore District consists of the Chesapeake Bay watershed portion of south central Pennsylvania including Blair, Bedford, Huntingdon and Fulton Counties. Existing project. A pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. Such assistance may be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development projects, including projects for waste water treatment and related facilities, water supply, storage treatment, distribution facilities, and surface water resource protection and development. Section 313 of the 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT. Water Resources Development Act of 1992 authorized the project at a cost of $17 million including $8.5 million within the Chesapeake Bay watershed area. Local cooperation. The Altoona City Authority is the sponsor for the Mil Run water treatment plant. Other sponsors are being identified for the Chestnut Ridge Municipal Water Authority and Broad Top Township/ Coaldale Borough projects. The local sponsors will be required to provide 25% of project costs including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Initiated planning, engineering and design work for the Mill Run water treatment plant at Altoona and initiated the master plan to identify additional projects. 40. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 40A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscaroroa Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell. NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left. abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10- foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acrefeet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 40C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles Upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 40E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 125 feet of existing flood wall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17, a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bonnets Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bonnets Creek and the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40G. CORNING, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete flood walls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the City; about 200 feet of concrete flood walls, about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Coming against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Construction of N.Y. Route 17 modified some portions of the project and transferred maintenance responsibility of those areas to the State. 40H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acrefeet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 401. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elmira, NY, about 27 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and East Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete flood wall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the 4-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River, realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for Sthe Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5- foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acrefeet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. During a high water event in March-April 1993, a significant seepage condition occurred at a location of the project where it had not been previously observed. A contract to install additional filter drains was awarded for $465,000 on June 30, 1994. 40N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth, levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 41. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and the remainder is used to main- 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT tain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres, and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 42. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 42A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project provides for an earthfill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing day-use recreation facilities, and expanding both dayand overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1991) of the modification is $55,198,000 of which $1,257,000 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $53,941,000 is non-Federal (which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocated to water supply storage, $13,270,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $1,257,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to terrestrial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts were executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission on June 30, 1986. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 42B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Federal cost of completed work was $185,620,000 of which $125,029,000 is for completed construction and $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. 4-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Estimated Federal cost (October 1988) of Mill Creek recreation facilities (inactive) is $7,500,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush (formerly known as Kettle Creek), and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard). In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 43A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Recreation facilities are provided for camping, fishing, boating, picnicking, hiking, winter sports, hunting, and swimming by the State of Pennsylvania at Kettle Creek State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 slide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 square miles, or about 98 percent of the West Branch Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent at Clearfield. Clearfield County provides recreation including boating, fishing, picnicking, and swimming. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, camping, fishing, picnicking, hunting, swimming, hiking, and winter sports by the State of Pennsylvania at Bald Eagle State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. An investigation to alleviate winter lime dust problems in Howard, PA was completed in April 1994. The decision was made to modify the regulation plan to draw the summer lake from elevation 630 to elevation 625 in mid-November and delay drawdown to elevation 620 (winter pool) either until snow conditions in the water shed dictated it, or until late February, whichever is first. This procedure would eliminate almost all of the exposed lakebed which was previously causing the dust problems. This was implemented for the 1994 drawdown. 44. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets for York and Hanover, PA.) 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Existing project. Indian Rock Dam is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of 28,000 acre-feet. The dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment, and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. The reservoir will control the entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 45. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See table 4-1. 46. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $46,832. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $66,538. 47. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Cost for the period was $192,914 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $193,074 for Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD; $9,930 for Bloomsbgurg, PA; $23,949 for Flat Branch, VA; $7,709 for Neabsco Creek, VA. There were no non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $3,611 for Rooster Island, MD. Water Supply 48. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in the Chief of Engineers (see Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to the Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, VA, and Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties, MD. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1994 was 66,950 million gallons; the maximum daily consumption was 184 million gallons. The average amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, VA, was 41.3 million gallons per day. The corps of Engineers was reimbursed in the amount of $7,769,900 for water furnished to the Virginia communities by the Washington Aqueduct. For three days during Decermber 1993, a "Boil Water" alert was in effect throughout the service area. This was due to an operational error in which improperly filtered water was delivered to customers. Subsequent testing revealed no biological contamination. With that exception, 4-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 the treated water delivered to the 1 million consumers served by the Washington Aqueduct met or surpassed all water quality standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.L. 93-523). General Investigations 49. SURVEYS Federal costs for the fiscal year were $2,591,299 of which $720,489 was for navigation studies, $1,200,582 for flood damage prevention studies, $1,713 for shoreline protection studies, $119,346 for special studies, $143,897 for review of completed projects, $180,576 for special investigations, $28,834 for interagency water resource development, $2,380 for North American waterfowl management plan, $7,760 for National Marine Fisheries Service, and $185,722 for coordination with other agencies and non- Federal interests. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $769,757 of which $354,450 was for navigation studies, $238,954 for flood damage prevention studies, $470 for shoreline protection studies, $49,545 for review of completed projects, and $126,338 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests. 50. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $188,222. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 51. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Curwensville Lake, PA--Reallocation-The authorized project includes modification of project features to allow reallocating an estimated 5,360 acre-feet of storage from conservation to water supply. Negotiations for a water supply contract were completed, and the contract was executed September 30, 1994. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $547,000 which is being repaid by the sponsor. Total costs during the fiscal year were $15,021. Lackawanna River at Olyphant, PA-The authorized project includes about 5,200 feet of levees and walls, one closure structure and other minor features to protect against a 100-year design flood. Planning, engineering and design was completed at a cost of $792,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $376,358. Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA-The authorized project includes about 7,500 feet of levees and walls, three closure structures, and other minor features to protect against a 100-year design flood. Planning, engineering and design was completed at a cost of $1,048,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $465,512. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising)-The authorized project provides for raising the existing levees and floodwalls between three and five feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities, and providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the system's integrity. The plan also includes raising one other local protection project, removing an abandoned railroad bridge, and providing non-structural measures to mitigate any significant induced damages and the potential of a catastrophic failure of the existing project. Preparation of plans and specifications for levee construction at Exeter was initiated. The estimated planning and engineering cost is $11,400,000 and costs during the fiscal year were $814,839. Washington, DC & Vicinity-The authorized project would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 23rd Street) regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street and constructing' a removable closure structure across 17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore the design level of protection of the existing project and to reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a flood. Total costs during the fiscal year were $142,973. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,837,000. Broad Top Region, PA-The authorized project provides for a pilot program to develop and carry out watershed reclamation, watershed protection, wetlands creation, and wetland restoration projects in the Broad Top Region of south central Pennsylvania. Work included initiation of a master plan that will identify local sponsors with financial capability to proceed with planning, engineering and design work for construction. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $400,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $215,015. 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift 3. Broad Creek, MD 4. Chester River, MD 5. Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD 6. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD 7. Island Creek, MD 8. Little Wicomico River, MD 9. Monroe Bay and Creek, VA 10. Nanticoke River, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 211,510 13,330,3002 13,277,5893 (318,933) 379,000 377,288 85,000 85,353 (50,818) 15,983,4624 15,993,6005 (94,300) 270,795 329,000 330,551 .-- 60,000 48,284 1,950,000 1,077,138 5,739,0006 5,992,4897 1,338 1,339 348,000 347,778 7,296 957,600 966,339 58,500 58,500 44,600 77,600 83,000 83,398 40,300 40,300 6,635 54,000 54,000 519,000 517,723 8,600 (123) 441,000 144,621,7121 953,709 144,072,9011 13,710,000 138,877,6698 13,826,410 139,066,5988 1,373,000 67,033,938 1,382,751 66,165,818 413,600 402,593 45,000 38,728 .-- . 40,800 43,156 249,000 248,999 43,600 33,600 45,000 33,163 280,000 256,435 42,000 41,100 2,000 10,845 5,823,599 5,812,194 45,000 38,728 70,4959 77,7919 2,802,324 2,801,679 50,591 50,591 1,111,148 1,111,147 66,11910 66,11910 4,236,635 4,259,367 23,836 23,836 523,010 511,172 81,88511 81,88511 2,068,477 2,044,214 12,460 19,095 483,685 482,785 73,243 73,242 579,441 578,286 4-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 11. Nanticoke River, DE and MD 12. Northeast River, MD 13. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 14. Pocomoke River, MD 15. Pocomoke and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection & Removal of Drift 16. Potomac River- Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA and DC 17. Potomac River at Alexandria, VA 18. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, MD 19. Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD 20. Slaughter Creek, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 50,900 50,443 22,003 169,900 169,302 548,100 546,898 375,000 374,830 46,000 43,907 596,000 597,207 130,000 116,331 98,000 47,307 365,000 365,170 58,300 28,300 11,966 71,700 76,879 59,500 59,500 786,000 781,115 158,000 52,442 (33,500) 13,188 510,000 509,960 62,100 62,100 43,000 43,000 55,000 55,000 143,13412 143,13412 1,148,417 1,147,942 28,48913 28,48913 1,018,344 988,344 -- 350,19314 - 362,15914 67,000 10,515,080 65,455 10,512,535 165,000 100,215 810,600 805,998 85,000 89,077 431,000 428,340 171,000 157,603 14,000 14,000 4,335,900 4,335,900 191,72615 191,72615 2,270,973 2,205,107 11,099,375 11,089,632 2,281,065 2,010,229 291,866 291,865 95,214 95,214 658,158 658,157 7,581,045 7,578,345 304,000 304,000 1,215,894 1,202,496 4.140 4,140 648,570 648,570 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 21. Tred Avon River, MD 22. Washington Harbor, DC 23. Wicomico River, MD 27. Atlantic Coast of Maryland 28. Colonial Beach, MD 29. Town of North Beach, MD 30. Anacostia River & Tribs, Flood Prot. & Navigation Improvements, DC and MD 31. Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV 32. Jennings Randolph Lake. MD and WV 33A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 49,000 46,700 68,600 71,262 25,000 24,328 -- 523,310 - 523,310 69,000 914,243 66,813 912,056 - 171,300 - 171,300 - 3,191,07716 - 3,191,07716 30,000 5,080,78317,18 28,672 5,078,78317.18 471,60919 471,60919 79,000 76,295 8,991,000 9,499,409 2,215,100 4,846,249 16,260 12,117 153,000 156,332 3,400,000 5,213,051 3,127,797 3,214,978 1,409 21,810 3,219 56,000 54,164 75,000 72,264 140,000 129,242 82,000 84,735 2,310 609,000 569,013 1,325,000 1,288,040 786,808 832,338 142,000 106,963 114,000 668 287,292 37,892 2,046,324 2,085,918 64,000 64,001 9,539 1,284,900 1,332,000 1,326,000 1,229,746 1,384,577 1,321,568 102,700 107,217 169,000 169,541 146,000 145,164 633,000 9,593,999 617,134 9,538,135 5,389,000 3,262,817 2,515,000 2,699,622 27,190,000 24,753,596 15,062,305 14,459,732 - 677,260 2,118 640,637 - 414,977 - 414,977 330,300 466,110 444,918 448,805 - 287,292 241,999 241,999 6,042,325 6,042,325 - 3,691,97920 - 3,718,97920 - 15,633,970 - 15,633,970 76,000 1,211,413 75,528 1,210,941 - 176,325,300 - 176,333,632 1,678,000 16,107,122 1,644,201 16,057,468 -- 2,320,400 - 2,320,400 172,000 2,102,523 168,871 2,097,408 4-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 34. Lock Haven, PA . 35. Moorefield, WV 36. Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA 37. Petersburg, WV 38. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 39. South Central Pennsylvania Environmental Restoration 40A. Addison, NY 40B. Almond Lake, NY 40C. Arkport Dam, NY 40D. Avoca, NY 40E. Binghamton, NY New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,500,000 16,212,000 20,328,000 4,532,726 15,090,644 22,101,874 12,637,000 1,996,495 - 2,237,274 1,856,505 2,049,826 37,500 370,000 312,699 2,761,000 2,716,846 3,056,000 3,288,600 3,098,539 3,133,998 12,438,000 10,844,124 1,256,975 1,158,201 461,000 410,849 84,900 44,647 11,649 532,000 578,433 55,523,000 53,494,983 17,746,975 5,445,301 461,000 410,849 84,900 44,647 37,500 11,649 902,000 891,132 77,408,770 77,408,770 2,589,000 38,864,415 2,701,398 38,810,601 5,000,000 320,682 24,000 23,801 313,400 318,055 147,000 147,298 .- 4,000 3,840 17,000 18,770 11,100 11,588 351,000 351,775 .- 171,000 170,494 13,200 13,377 38,200 36,542 5,000 5,000 405,000 400,330 182,000 180,621 9,000 9,000 40,000 40,001 27,300 26,616 346,000 338,686 168,000 168,156 44,300 43,731 68,300 54,067 5,000,000 320,682 827,050 827,050 285,055 284,370 5,760,211 5,760,211 5,693,681 5,680,947 1,910,00021 1,910,00021 2,881,712 2,879,491 436,37422 436,37422 509,061 508,491 3,460.00023 3.460,00023 678,281 664,048 4-26 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 40F. Canisteo, NY 40G. Corning, NY 40H. East Sidney Lake,. NY 401. Elmira, NY 40J. Hornell, NY 40K. Lisle, NY 40L. Oxford, NY 40M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 40N. Whitney Point Village, NY 41. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint, Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 18,000 15,218 48,530 49,112 341,700 431,023 8,600 9,200 2,007,150 2,020,870 43,000 43,051 10,000 9,949 1,068,000 1,047,249 10,020 10,422 264,700 266,368 45,900 50,331 53,000 53,189 374,000 372,058 19,000 19,075 578,900 573,242 34,200 34,456 13,000 13,867 =- 3,939 1,166,139 18,000 18,215 292,000 283,740 16,000 15,825 41,000 40,469 387,000 379,282 9,000 9,000 928,000 924,304 29,000 29,000 14,000 14,000 417,000 414,021 14,000 14,000 251,000 253,118 110,000 108,316 61,400 62,019 401,000 394,280 23,300 16,005 150,300 159,773 52,300 51,661 31,700 29,982 993,000 1,007,822 43,100 42,495 295,000 292,202 1,183,11124 1,183,11124 969,135 967,240 3,322,00025 3,322,00025 1,016,288 1,016,288 6,049,504 9,049,504 7,515,771 7,587,560 6,883,305 6,883,305 387,549 380,254 4,558,69826 4,558,69826 9,199,576 9,197,974 661,19927 661,19927 903,022 902,383 131,00028 131,00028 306,632 304,914 5,421,539 5,421,539 8,827,296 8,979,852 424,096 424,096 480,381 479,777 5,725,700 5,725,700 4,335,590 4,325,697 4-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 42A. Cowanesque Lake, New Work PA Approp. (1,114,000) (170,000) - - 107,576,700 Cost 80,532 240 - - 107,574,623 Maint. Approp. 2,009,000 1,425,000 1,471,000 1,437,000 14,475,581 Cost 1,273,953 1,427,617 1,464,262 1,416,542 14,430,192 Contributed Approp. - 190,682 (9,483) - 13,495,276 Cost 568,068 148,389 120 - 13,388,733 42B. Tioga-Hammond New Work Lakes, PA Approp. - - - - 186,244,800 Cost 20,160 8,575 - - 186,244,800 Maint. Approp. 1,574,600 1,786,300 2,062,000 1,657,000 21,101,466 Cost 1,580,952 1,786,628 2,042,697 1,612,447 21,048,297 43A.. Alvin R. Bush New Work Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 7,103,001 Cost - - - - 7,103,001 Maint. Approp. 552,300 436,000 558,000 490,000 9,327,076 Cost 546,086 445,696 544,881 484,650 9,317,974 43B. Curwensville Lake, New Work PA Approp. - - - - 20,396,060 Cost - - - - 20,396,060 Maint. Approp. 479,200 461,000 537,000 497,000 11,348,576 Cost 482,625 459,947 534,874 479,803 11,325,184 43C. Foster Joseph Sayers New Work Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 30,887,06329 Cost - - - 30,887,06329 Maint. Approp. 519,900 563,000 735,000 664,000 11,112,108 Cost 519,084 557,431 734,105 650,934 11,090,915 44. York, Indian Rock New Work Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 5 ,0 6 1 , 1 6 730 Cost - - - - 5,061,16730 Maint. Approp. 1,153,700 525,300 582,000 494,000 11,722,28031 Cost 1,155,730 520,719 571,843 495,471 11,711,08431 1. Includes $8,467,003 for previous projects. 2. Includes $230,660 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 3. Includes $221,674 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 4. Includes $1,955,262 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 5. Includes $1,961,340 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 6. Includes $5,793,000 for sections of project in Nofolk District. 7. Includes $5,992,489 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 8. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 9. Includes $38,041 for previous projects. 10. Excludes $2,200 contributed funds and includes $27,668 emergency relief funds. 11. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 12. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 13. Includes $20,640 for previous projects. 14. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 15. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. Includes $20,500 for previous projects. 16. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 17. Includes $1,831,609 for previous project. 18. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 19. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes $14,000 contributed funds. 20. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 21. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 22. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 23. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 24. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 25. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 26. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes $15,000 contributed funds. 27. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 29. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance with Tri-party Agreement for construction of a sanitary system for public use. 30. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. 4-28 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 8, BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD and VA 1917 Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor.1 Jan. 21, Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Increased anchorage facilities. Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot 1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordinance Depot. Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39 feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Avenue Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. Jul. 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 1970 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch-West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed Report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Jun. 30, 1948 BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters. BROAD CREEK, MD Jul. 25, A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in the straight 1912 reaches and 130 feet wide at the bends from the 6-foot contour in Pocomoke Sound through Broad Creek to the 6-foot contour in Little Annemessex River, a distance of about 3 miles. Mar. 3, 1873 Sep. 19, 1980 Jun. 30, 1948 CHESTER RIVER, MD A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from the 7- foot depth in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of the same depth and 300 feet square at the head of the channel. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Jul. 3, A channel 60 feet wide, 5 feet deep, from the 6-foot contour in Herring Bay to 1930 the 3-foot contour in Rockhold Creek. Jun. 20, For the present project channel dimensions, 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide, the 1938 turning basin 7 feet deep, and a stone breakwater 900 feet long. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD Aug. 30, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay 1935 through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. Jun. 30, Modification provoding for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide 1948 from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. ISLAND CREEK, MD Mar. 2, A channel 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide through the entrance to Island Creek 1945 with an anchorage basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long in the creek. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Aug. 30, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Potomac River to deep water in 1935 Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet long at the entrance; and 1,004 linear feet of timber bulkhead to stabilize the dredged inner channel. MONROE BAY AND CREEK, VA Jul. 3, A channel 8 feet deep, 100 wide, and 950 feet long, through the bar at the 1930 entrance, and within the creek a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,500 feet long, with turning and anchorage basin 500 feet wide at upper end. NANTICOKE RIVER, MD Aug. 26, A small boat harbor 7 feet deep, 120 feet wide, and 400 feet long in the marsh at 1937 Nanticoke with an entrance channel of the same depth and 60 feet wide protected on either side by stone jetties in the river. River and Harbor Act of 1948 H. Doc. 269, 62d Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 381, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 65, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 380, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 595, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. 2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 580, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.2 H. Doc. 99, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 72nd Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 172 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 H. Doc. 242, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 4-30 6. 7. 10. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 NANTICOKE RIVER, DE AND MD A 9-foot channel, 100 feet wide up to Seaford, DE, with a turning basin. Slight widening between bridges in harbor at Seaford, DE. A channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide in Northwest Fork, together with turning basin. A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Tangier Sound to highway bridge at Seaford, DE. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the river to the foot of 1937 Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 10 19353 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the west 19354 side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet above 19455 mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. 14. Jun. 3, 1896 POCOMOKE RIVER, MD A 9-foot channel from Shad Landing to Snow Hill. Aug. 30, A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke 1935 River. Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Extend channel above bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep, widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end. Channel 11 feet deep by 150 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence a channel of the same depth and 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and dike construction along south side of channel from existing dike to Tulls Point. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC, COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers 1965 and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, AND DC Jul. 2, Control of Hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to 1986 clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. H. Doc. 323, 53rd Cong., 3rd Sess., and Annual Report, 1985, p. 1165. H. Doc. 674, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 869, 60th Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Doc. 69, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 248, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72nd Cong., 1st. Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 444, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report for 1895, p. 1167. H. Doc. 227, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 429, 76th Cong., 1st Sess." H. Doc. 486, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 2 H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. State Design memorandum July 2, 1986 4-31 12. 13. 15. 16. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Jun. 25, A channel 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide for depth of 24 feet in 1910 front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 30, .Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its 1935 tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) Jan. 22, 1982 Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 1, 1968 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD A channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide at mean low water from the northern limit of existing Rhodes Point to Tylerton Federal navigation channel, a distance of about one mile, through Sheep Pen Gut to deep water in the Chesapeake Bay. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 50 feet wide from Tylerton to Rhodes Point via Rhodes Point Gut. Modification providing for a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Tyler Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 150 feet wide and 400 feet long at Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Shanks Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 100 feet wide and 400 feet long at Rhodes Point; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Big Thorofare River to Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from Rhodes Point to Tylerton. SLAUGHTER CREEK, MD Jul. 25, A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water through the bar at 1912 the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. TRED AVON RIVER, MD Jul. 25, Restore the channel, formerly dredged from Peach Blossom Creek to Easton 1912 Point, to 8 feet deep at mean low water, and 150 feet wide, widening out at the upper end. Mar. 2, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide up the North Fork, with at turning 1919 basin at the upper end. Oct. 27 A 12-foot channel from a point near Peach Blossom Creek to Easton Point, 1965 thence 1,400 feet in North Fork and a turning basin 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide and 600 feet long in the South Fork. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant, (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street SE Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. River and Harbor Act, June 29, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1959 Detailed Project Report, June 1981 H. Doc. 51, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess. 2 Detailed Project Report, February 1968 H. Doc. 51, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 399, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 H. Doc. 26, 63rd Cong., 1st Sess. 2 H. Doc. 225, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 4-32 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized 23. Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 WICOMICO RIVER, MD Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. Aug. 26, A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south prongs 1937 and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet deep, 1954 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a Tshaped harbor. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Nov. 17, Consists of a dune beginning at 27th Street extending north to the Delaware 1986 line; a steel sheetpile bulkhead from 27th Street south to Fourth Street; and widened and raised beach from Third Street to just beyond the Delaware line. COLONIAL BEACH, VA Sep. 15, Extending and widening the existing Central Beach area, stabilizing the bank 1980. behind the beachfill with vegetation, and constructing four segments of offshore breakwater; and extending and widening of the existing Castle Beach area, constructing three segments of offshore breakwater, removing debris in the beachfill area, and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the southern end of Castlewood Park beachfill. TOWN OF NORTH BEACH, MD Oct. 27, Construction of 1,200 linear feet of stone revetment adjacent to a failing sheet- 1992 pile bulkhead. Project protects the roadway from storm damage. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FLOOD PROTECTION AND NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, DC, AND MD May 17, Channel improvements, levees, pumping stations with connecting storm sewers, 1950 pressure conduit and relocation and reconstruction of 4 highway bridges and 1 railroad bridge. Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD AND WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection 1962 works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947 H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.2 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess.2 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Sept. 29, 1981 Detailed Project Report, May 1980 Detailed Project Report, January 1989 H. Doc. 202, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 4-33 Documents 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. v v REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents LOCK HAVEN, PA Nov. 17, Consists of 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the 1986 West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, seven ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. MOOREFIELD, WV Nov. 28, Levee, floodwall, closures, relocations and improvements to the flood warning 1990 system. Jun 4, 1993 PAXTON CREEK, PA Provides for an improved flood warning system. PETERSBURG, WV Nov. 28, Channel improvements, levee and floodwall, closures, relocations, and improve- 1990 ments to the flood warning system. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Oct. 23, 1962 Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. 34. 35. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL RESORTATION Oct. 31, Pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests 1992 in South Central Pennsylvania. Jun. 22, 1936 modified by Acts of Jun. 28, 1938; Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1959 Aug. 18, 1941 SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Construction of a flood control reservoir. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood pro- 1958 tection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at Cortland, NY. Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to relo- 1976 cate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Mar. 1, Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by Sec- 1983 tion 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. 4-34 H. Doc. 187, 98th Cong. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 23, 1990 Detailed Project Report, March 1991 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1990 H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 43. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Sep. 3, Construction of three flood control reservoirs. H. Doc. 29, 1954 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 44. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Jun. 22, Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus Creek. H. Doc. 702, 1936 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive portion is tember 16, 1993. The site chosen for the inlet under this authorwidening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from Port ization was that opened just south of Ocean City by natural Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This eliminated the 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a chan- necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to Ocean City. nel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway 4. Included in Emergency Relief Program 1935. Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the upper end. 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above 2. Contains latest published maps. mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 3. Included in Public Works Administration program Sep- 1956. TABLE 4-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Accotink Creek, VA1 Anacostia River and Flats 2 Annapolis Harbor, MD Aquia Creek, VA Back Creek, MD Black Walnut Harbor, MD Bonum Creek, VA Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Breton Bay, MD6 Broad Creek River, DE Cambridge Harbor, MD Choptank River, MD9 Claiborne Harbor, MD1 Corsica River, MD Crisfield Harbor, MD Cypress Creek, MD Duck Point Cove, MD Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD12 Fishing Bay, MD Fishing Creek, MD Goose Creek, MD16 Herring Creek, MD Knapps Narrows, MD La Trappe, MD Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Lowes Wharf, MD Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Completed Deferred Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1878 1953 1993 1928 1946 1982 1993 1950 1950 1964 1993 1979 1987 1948 1990 1947 1982 1932 1990 1991 1973 1989 1993 1980 1958 1986 1904 1988 $ 5,000 3,910,582 34,2503 52,4654 23,061 32,631 202,0005 15,755 47,9246 64,5107 195,9748 96,796 42,974 39,07110 349,15411 3,057 25,289 90,12113 33,87415 111,242 75,900 1,506,259 46,12117 8,06418 23,000 2,100 9,916 1,787,15819 51,366 11,770 41,378 431,478 456,576 33,079 12,621 163,482 946,934 94,095 709,047 106,565 1,807,275 14,729 338,038 53,80814 1,580,906 1,859,227 19,072 153,080 2,557,889 40,475 7,327 322,080 25,143 653,864 4-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 4-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Madison Bay, MD16 Manokin River, MD20 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Muddy Hood and Tyler Coves, MD Nan Cove, MD4 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD Neabsco Creek, MD Neale Sound, MD Neavitt Harbor, MD 16 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA25 Occoquan Creek, VA12 Parish Creek, MD Patuxent River, MD12 Potomac River at Mount Vernon, MD29 Potomac River Below Washington, DC Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DC1 Queenstown Harbor, MD Rock Hall Harbor, MD Shad Landing State Park, MD Shallow Creek, MD16 St. Catherines Sound, MD St. Georges Creek, MD St. Jeromes Creek, MD St. Michaels Harbor, MD16 St. Patricks Creek, MD St. Peters Creek, MD 16 Smith Creek, MD Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD Susquehqanna River at Williamsport, PA1 6 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD Town Creek, MD Tuckahoe River, MD Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD Tyaskin Creek, MD Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Upper Thorofare, MD Warwick River, MD 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Project deferred for restudy. 3. Includes $8,476 for previous projects. 4. Includes $31,065 for previous project. 5. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 6. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 7. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 8. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds and includes $61,321 for previous projects. 9. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 10. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 11. Includes $87,740 for previous project. 12. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 13. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes $8,414 contributed funds. 14. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 15. Includes $2,839 for previous project. 16. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 17. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 18. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 19. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 20. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess.) 21. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 4-36 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1919 1947 1990 1965 1983 1978 1991 1968 1946 1971 1988 1905 1993 1993 1977 1920 1956 1985 1982 1966 1989 1989 1985 1991 1964 1987 1963 1936 1985 1974 1983 1950 1980 1992 1923 1971 1987 1984 125,550 34,78821 38,71522 64,001 34,86123 240,817 14,600 12,60024 36,500 78,446 66,25326 19,17027 14,00028 17,000 153,836 10,234 1,744,69230 72,85832 1,072,50033 33,53134 278,100 29,94735 147,650 44,35736 16,72337 15,752 46,74038 5,252 293,57039 57,03140 424,80041 43,220 9,727 193,175 16,29742 20,281 62,446 22,04143 33,353 43,534 61,383 677,362 22,498 142,131 14,800 917,042 34,533 42,063 203,198 525,886 343,465 2,281,294 184,394 6,216 27,46131 321,803 71,059 19,198 659,369 719,788 14,403 151,849 39,964 16,448 849,350 41,437 405,164 41,959 23,489 3,372,892 54,302 34,777 814,657 148,728 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance 22. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and 32. Includes $19,000 for previous project. $52,000 from contributed funds. 33. Excludes $672,880 contributed funds. 23. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 24. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 35. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 25. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 36. Includes $26,500 for previous project. November 6, 1977. 37. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 26. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 38. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 27. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration 39. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized funds. November 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress funds and 28. Includes $10,617 for previous project. $97,390 for previous project. 29. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 40. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. November 2, 1979. 41. Excludes $16,409 contributed funds. 30. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 42. Includes $10,158 for previous project. 31. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds 43. Includes $6,000 for previous project. expended for waterchestnut removal. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH TABLE 4-D EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Oxford, MD' Completed 1978 $ 97,7502 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. TABLE 4-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD Bainbridge, NY2 ,3 Bath, NY4 Bayard, WV3 Black Walnut Point, MD Bridgewater, VA3 Bull Run, PA. Chesapeake Bay at Hoopersville Road, MD Conklin-Kirkwood, NY3 Cortland, NY7 Elkland, PA Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Forest Heights, MD3 Fourmile Run, VA Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1959 1970 1965 1985 1953 1984 1993 1955 1970 1971 1979 1964 1987 $ 1,000,0002 382,000 638,332 55,2185 200,500 136,500 2,742,000 156,4916 71,000 324,486 1,297,850 7,034,5348 430,0009 52,480,000 4-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 4-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD2 Completed 1989 186,077 - Greene, NY3 Completed 1951 37,000 - Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Completed 1979 4,731,39410 - Kitzmiller, MD3 Completed 1965 501,50011 Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD3 Completed 1992 972,988 - Latta Brook Rd., NY Completed 1984 115,500 - McCready's Point Road, MD Completed 1993 75,08512 Middle Hooper Island, MD Completed 1993 319,95713 - Nichols, NY Completed 1974 1,487,800 - Norwich, NY3 Completed 1950 94,500 - Painted Post, NY4 Completed 1970 414,181 - Plymouth, PA Completed 1958 1,911,68914 - Savage River Dam, MD Completed 1954 2,271,93915 33,999 Scranton, PA16 Completed 1971 2,006,800 - Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA Completed 1993 425,96017 - Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne County, PA Completed 1993 70,44118 - Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD Completed 1993 126,04919 - Sunbury, PA Completed 1953 6,063,00020 Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA Completed 1968 2,728,113 - Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA Completed 1991 174,49121 Tyrone, PA22 Deferred 1980 6,401,016 - Unadilla, NY Completed 1970 1,000,00023 Upper Marlboro, MD3 Completed 1965 590,013 - Verona Lake, VA24 Deferred 1978 992,000 - Washington, DC and Vicinity Completed 1953 331,92725 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Completed 1958 3,853,45726 Williamsport, PA Completed 1979 12,964,89327 Wyoming Valley, PA Completed 1987 25,549,098 - 1. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 2. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 4. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 5. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 6. Excludes $67,954 Contributed funds. 7. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 8. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 9. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 10. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 11. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 12. Excludes $41,481 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $136,604 contributed funds. 14. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 16. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 17. Excludes $126,225 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $25,014 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $51,666 contributed funds. 20. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 21. Excludes $53,383 contributed funds. 22. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 23. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 24. Authorized for the design memorandum state of advanced engineering and design. 25. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 26. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 27. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. 4-38 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Almond Village, NY1 ,2 Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD (Ferry Bar & Spring Garden Channel) Betterton Harbor, MD Breton Bay, MD (1902 River & Harbor Act) Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD2 Cambridge Harbor, MD (1948 River & Harbor Act) Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Chester River, MD (1873 River & Harbor Act) Coan River, VA 1970 1920 1960 1950 1949 1949 1989 1940 1988 1937 1970 1978 1977 Copes Corner Lakes, NY2 Cuckold Creek, MD4 Cunninghill Cove, MD4 Curwensville Lake (WaterLine), PA5 Davenport Center Lake, NY2 1970 Endicott, Johnson City, and Vestal (Remedial), NY5 Fall Brook Lake, PA6 Genegantslet Lake, NY Governors Run, MD Harpers Ferry, WV 1970 1954 1950 1937 May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act Nov. 17, 1986 1966 Water Reg. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1914 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Jan 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-39 $ 24,6223 787,710 3,482 10,424 212 112 25,419 106,7003 5,720 11,200 286,4003 46,100 214,5783 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 4-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hellens Creek, MD Lake Ogleton, MD Marsh Creek Bridge, Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA5 Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV Neabsco Creek, VA (1881 River & Harbor Act) Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD & VA (1954 River & Harbor Act) Saint Georges Creek, MD Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA7 South Plymouth Lake, NY Susquehanna River, Sunbury Closure Structure, PA5 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD West Oneonta Lake, NY2 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization expired May 26, 1958. 2: Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers. 5. Project deauthorized by Section 1001(A) of Public Law 99-662. 6. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 7. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 4-40 1950 1950 1949 1941 1978 1989 1989 1989 1971 1974 1953 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Sep. 23, 1986 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 29, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 7,9283 14,600 100,0363 305 189,1003 1939 1970 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Project Completed DELAWARE Broad Creek River MARYLAND Clairborne Harbor Crisfield Harbor Duck Point Cove Fishing Creek Goose Creek Herring Creek Knapps Narrows Lower Thorofare, Deal Island Middle River and Dark Head Creek Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves Neale Sound St. Catherines Sound St. Patricks Creek St. Peters Creek Tilghman Island Harbor VIRGINIA Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River August 1994 March 1994 March 1994 April 1994 May 1994 February 1994 August 1994 March 1994 July 1994 May 1994 July 1994 September 1994 February 1994 August 1994 February 1994 January 1994 September 1994 TABLE 4-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Project Date Inspected MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Cumberland Forest Heights Kitzmiller Upper Marlboro NEW YORK Bainbridge--Newton Creek Bath--Cohocton River Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Corning-Monkey Run Cortland Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal Greene Nichols Norwich Owego Painted Post Port Dickinson Sherburne Unadilla PENNSYLVANIA Elkland Kingston-Edwardsville October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October. 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 4-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 4-I (Continued) Project Milton Plymouth Scranton Sunbury Swoyersville--Forty Fort Tyrone Wilkes-Barre-Hanover Twp.. Williamsport VIRGINIA Bridgewater Fourmile Run District of Columbia & MD Proejcts Anacostia River Washngton, DC & Vicinity WEST VIRGINIA Bayard Ridgeley INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Date Inspected October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 4-42 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT * NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT This district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke, and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, VA, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, VA. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherrin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION 1. Appomattox River, VA .......... 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. PAS VA and St. Johns River, FL ................. Broad Creek, VA .................... Channel to Newport News, VA ............ Chincoteague Inlet, VA ................. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) ........... James River, VA . . . . ................ Lynnhaven Inlet, VA ................... Nansemond River, VA ................. Norfolk Harbor and Channels, VA ........... Pagan River, VA .................... Rudee Inlet, VA ..................... 13. Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) . . 14. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA ............... 15. Waterway on the Coast of VA ............. 16. Whitings Creek,VA .................. 17. Willoughby Channel ........ ......... 18. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization . . . . . . ........... .... GE BEACH EROSION CONTROL 5-2 19. Virginia Beach, VA (Hurricane Protection) ....... 5-6 20. Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement)l ......... 5-7 5-2 FLOOD CONTROL PAGE 5-2 21. James R. Olin Flood Control Project . . . . . . . . . . 5-7 5-3 22. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA .... . . . . 5-7 5-3 23. Richmond Local Flood Protection, VA.. . . . . . . 5-7 24. Richmond Filtration Plant ................ 5-8 5-3 Flood Protection 5-3 25. Emergency Flood Control Activities .......... 5-8 5-4 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 5-4 26. Surveys ......................... 5-8 5-4 27. Collection and Study of Basic Data . . . . . . . . . . 5-8 5-5 TABLES 5-5 TABLE 5-A Cost and Financial Statement ........... 5-9 TABLE 5-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 5-12 TABLE 5-C Data Relative to the Completed Locks 5-6 . . .. 5-15 TABLE 5-D Other Authorized Navigation Projects . . . . 5-16 5-6 TABLE 5-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ..................... 5-17 5-6 TABLE 5-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . . . 5-17 5-6 TABLE 5-G Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys . . . 5-18 5-1 3. 4. 5. 6. Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1994 Navigation 1. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA Location. This river rises in Appomattox County, VA, flows northeasterly 137 miles, and empties into the James River at Hopewell, VA. The portion under improvement extends from its mouth to Petersburg, VA, a distance of 11 miles, which is the length of the tidal and navigable reach. (See U.S. Coast Geodetic Survey Chart No. 531.) Previous projects. For details see page 469 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This provides for a channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep from the mouth of the river to a point 400 feet above Lieutenant Run; thence 80 feet wide and of such depth, not exceeding 10 feet, as can be obtained without rock excavation to the head of navigation at Petersburg; including a basin at the mouth of Poes Run 200 feet long, 150 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; and a turning basin at the mouth of Lieutenant Run 500 feet long, 140 to 160 feet wide, and 12 feet deep in the upper 300 feet, the removal of rock to a depth of 18 feet in the north half of the lower 200 feet, and removal of soft material to rock in the south half of the lower 200 feet of this basin. All depths are referred to mean low water. The project also provides for a dam at Petersburg and the excavation for a width of from 200 to 300 feet of a diversion channel connecting the river above the dam with the river at a point 2.5 miles below; for about 1.7 miles of levees on the low grounds between the navigable and the diversion channels; for a highway bridge and a railway bridge across the diversion channel; and for other work incidental to the diversion channel. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.9 feet and the extremes 2.4 and 2.3 feet. There are no records available of the heights of stage due to ordinary floods. These are estimated at 6 to 8 feet above mean low water at Petersburg, where the extremes are from 15.6 feet to 17.1 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 212 of Annual Report for 1969. Terminal facilities. There are about 2,500 feet of wooden bulkhead and a shore landing in Petersburg Harbor. These facilities are in an abandoned, dilapidated condition and have not been used by commercial traffic on the river since 1950. There are two large recreational facilities now in operation on the Appomattox River. One is located about 2 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA and the other is at Hopewell, VA near the confluence of the Appomattox and the James. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of engineering studies of contaminated dredged material. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA between a point in Southem Branch of Elizabeth River, VA 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Westemrn Railway bridge and Virginia-North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Service Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting curtain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges. Southem Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are nontidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Cost for new work for completed project was $3,396,276. Protection of canal property at Great Bridge portion is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $265,000. For details of previous projects, see page 476 of Annual Report for FY 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for FY 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work consisted of operation and ordinary maintenance of the project consisting of real estate management services, condition and operation studies, operation and care of locks, bridges, spillways, wharves, canal equipment, grounds, roads, buildings, etc. with hired labor and government equipment. BROAD CREEK, VA Location. Broad Creek is a small tidal estuary in Middlesex County, VA, 1 mile long, flowing in a northerly direction into the Rappahannock River, which it enters on the right bank about 1 mile upstream of its mouth at Chesapeake Bay. The creek is 61 miles northerly of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12235.) Existing project. This provides a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 4,100 feet long from deep water in the Rappahannock River to deep water in Broad Creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.2 feet; irregular, 2 feet; and extreme, approximately 7.5 feet. The cost to the Federal Government for new work for the completed project was $27,888. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 381, 76th Cong., 1st sess.). The latest published map is in the project document. Location cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interest shall furnish, free of cost to the United States, suitable spoil-disposal areas when and as required for subsequent maintenance, and hold and save the United States free from claims for damages that may result from dredging. Terminal facilities. There are privately owned wharves and landings on the creek, many of which are open to the public by special arrangements. There is one marine railway on the creek. The terminal facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge the channel was awarded in March and completed in May; 17,039 cubic yards of material was removed. 5-2 3. NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 4. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel, connects deep water in James River with Hampton Roads. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 400.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Dredging a channel 55 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from Norfolk Harbor Channel in Hampton Roads to Newport News, a distance of about 4.5 miles, and two deep-draft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over a 1,200-foot swinging radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 2, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to fumish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of condition surveys of the project. 5. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12211.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal, and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge the entrance channel was awarded in March and completed in April; 123,300 cubic yards of material was removed. 6. HAMPTON ROADS, VIRGINIA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA; Elizabeth River, with its Southem, Eastemrn, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248, 12245 and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or from other available appropriations and that this work shall be carried on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, VA and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using government plant and hired labor. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by the junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows easterly 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the Deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock; a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long alongside the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a tuming basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels are referred to main low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1962. However, the local sponsor (Richmond Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; as amended. Deepening the project from 25 feet to 35 feet, and the widening, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 has not been started. Terminal facilities. River commerce at Richmond is handled by city-owned wharves within or in the immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper Terminal, located on the north bank within the manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 miles downstream from the Upper Terminal which provides about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with about 190,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwater terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide trading. Below the deepwater terminals the improvement is served by 42 wharves. Richmond terminals and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and the river's mouth are adequate to river's commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging contract awarded in FY 93 was completed in Feb. 94. 366,549 cubic 5-3 7. Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1994 yards of dredged material was removed from Richmond Harbor, Deepwater Terminal and Shoals to Hopewell. 8. LYNNHAVEN INLET Location. On the south shore of the Chesapeake Bay, 5 miles west of Cape Henry, and 10 miles east of Norfolk, VA, the inlet connects Lynnhaven Roads, a part.of the Chesapeake Bay, with a network of inland waters in the norther half of the city of VA Beach. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 1222.) Existing project. An entrance channel from Chesapeake Bay through Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide; a mooring and turning basin inside of Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep, 1,100 feet long, and 750 feet wide; a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide to extend from the mooring and tuming basin into Broad Bay via Long Creek-Broad Bay Canal and a channel through the Narrows connecting Broad and Linkhom Bays, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide. Depths are referred to mean low water. Mean ranges of tide in Lynnhaven Inlet is about 2 feet with extreme fluctuations of 1.5 feet below and 9.5 feet above mean low water. Range in Lynnhaven Bay is a little more than 2 feet, in Broad and Linkhom Bays, fluctuations in water level are caused by local winds. (See Table 5-8B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with, except local interest must fumish spoil-disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1970 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge the entrance channel, basin and Long Creek was awarded in Nov. 93 and completed in Mar. 94. A total of 131,681 cubic yards of dredged material was removed. 9. NANSEMOND RIVER, VA. Location. This river, a tidal stream rises in Nansemond County, VA, flows northerly 25 miles, and empties into the James River immediately above the mouth of the latter stream in Hampton Roads. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12248.) Previous project. See Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide between the mouth and a point 0.45 mile above the highway bridge at Suffolk, a distance of about 16 miles, a turning basin 200 feet square at Suffolk and dredging a channel in. the Western Branch between its mouth and Reids Ferry, a distance of about 2 miles, to a depth of 10 feet over a bottom width of 80 feet. depth of channels are referred to mean low water. The mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions at different parts of Nansemond River are as follows: Suffolk Bridge, 3.8 feet; Holiday Point, 3.2 feet; and Crown Point, 3.0 feet and 2.8 feet (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1977. Terminal facilities. There are two wooden wharves and about 950 feet of wooden bulkhead at Suffolk, Virginia. There is also one wooden wharf and about 550 feet of wooden bulkhead located about 9 miles downstream from Suffolk. These facilities are privately owned and are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge the channel was awarded in March and completed in June, a total of 45,883 cubic yards of material was removed. 10. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS, VA. Location. Norfolk, VA is 187 miles south of Baltimore, MD and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cap Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Westem Railway bridge over a Southern Branch of Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 400 and 452.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details see Annual Report for 1993. HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER: A channel 55 feet deep and 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads to a point approximately 6.3 miles upstream from the Hamptopn Roads Bridge-Tunnel; thence 55 feet deep and 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence 45 feet deep and 750 feet wide to the junction of Southern Branch and Eastern Branch. EASTERN BRANCH: A channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the junction of the branches to Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge, from the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Campostella Bridge, channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Norfolk and Westem Railway Bridge (formerly Virginian), including a turning basin 25 feet deep and approximately 5.5 acres in size located at the upstream end of the project. WESTERN BRANCH: A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a point 0.78 mile from the 40-foot channel, thence 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for a distance of 0.38 mile; thence 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 0.57 mile to a point 0.34 mile above the West Norfolk Bridge. SCOTTS CREEK: A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from the 40-foot channel for a distance of 0.73 mile. ANCHORAGE, SEWELLS POINT: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accomodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. SOUTHERN BRANCH: The southern branch of the elizabeth river is generally oriented and flows south to north, and in the vicinity of this project is bordered on the east bank by the City of Chesapeake. The Souther Branch 40 Foot Deepening element will deepen a 2.5 mile section of the Elizabeth River from its current depth of 35 feet to 40 feet between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge at mile 15, upstream to the U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge (also known as Gilmerton Bridge) at mile 17.5. This reach of the channel ranges in width between 250 and 500 feet, with an average width of 300 feet. The channel will be widened at selected points to permit vessels to safely negotiate bends. At mile 17.5, in the vicinity of the Gilmerton Bridge, an 800 foot turning basin with a depth of 40 feet will be constructed. In addition, the possible need for modifying the Gilmerton Bridge will be explored as part of this project. Operations during fiscal year. Planning, engineering and design continued. A draft Limited Re-evaluation Report (LRR) was submitted for approval. Coordination continued with the local sponsor and other agencies regarding scheduling of additiornal deepening. 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Anchorages: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposit Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. Operations during fiscal year. The District forwarded recommendations for pursuing the engineering and design, plans and specifications, and construction of the proposed 50-foot anchorage improvements. Coordination continued with the sponsor and other agencies regarding dredge material management alternatives. Disposal area: A disposal area of about 2,500 acres adjacent to and north of Craney Island, enclosed by stonefaced levee of sand; rehandling basin, approach and exit channels connecting rehandling basin and Norfolk Harbor 55-foot channel and hopper dredge unloading facility. Operations during fiscal year. Lower Bay Benefical Uses Study was completed in August 1994. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth fo 50 feet, which was completed December 15, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended for additional deepening. Terminalfacilities. See Port Series No.11 (revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge the anchorage, Sewells Point was awarded in April and completed in July. A total of 591,166 cubic yards of material was removed. A contract to dredge the Hampton Roads channel was awarded in August 94 and will be completed in FY 95, through the end of FY 94, 400,000 cubic yards was dredged. In addition to maintenance dredging, work also included condition surveys, environmental studies, and engineering and design for FY 95 dredging. 11. PAGAN RIVER, VA Location. This river, a tidal stream rises in Isle of Wight County, Va., flows northeast 10 miles, and empties into the James River. (See US Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 529.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1798 of Annual Report for 1915, page 442 of Annual Report for 1937, and page 526 of Annual Report for 1940. Existing project. This provides for a channel having a width of 80 feet and a depth of 10 feet at mean low water between the wharf of the Smithfield, Newport News & Norfolk Steamship Co. (formeriy the Old Doiminion Steamship Co.) at Smithfield, and the 10-foot contour in James River, a distance of about 6 2/3 miles. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.7 feet. No data for extreme ranges of tides are available. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves or landings on this river, of which 14 are at Smithfield, Va., and 2 at Battery Park, about 1 mile above the river's mouth. The length of dockage available at Smithfield is about 1,100 feet..At Battery Park the length of dockage is about 85 feet. The facilities are considered adequate for present and prospective requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was awarded in Aug. 94 and will be completed during FY 95. 12. Rudee Inlet, VA Location. Rudee Inlet is located on the Atlantic Ocean at Virginia Beach in an area where boating is a major activity. It provides a gateway to a variety of oceanic pursuits varying from pleasure cruising to commercial deep sea fishing. Existing project. An entrance channel 10-ft deep, 110 to 72-ft wide and 1605-ft long; an inner channel 7-ft deep, 72 to 53-ft wide and 2,495-ft long including a safety area 7-ft deep, and approximately 1.9 acres in size and a turning basin 7-ft deep, 175-ft wide and 1,570-ft long; a sand trap 18-ft deep and approximately 3.3 acres in size; and a weir and jetty system at the mouth of the inlet. Local cooperation. Complied with for initial dredging as a Federal project in fiscal year 1991. Local interests are to financially participate in continued annual maintenance at an increasing rate as described in the Local Cooperation Agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge the entrance channel and sand trap was awarded in Jul. and completed in Oct.; 57,202 cubic yards of material was removed. 13. SUPERVISOR OF NORFOLK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451) as amended July 12,1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virgina, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia. The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409) as amended prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision fo Norfolk Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, The Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the Norfolk Districk was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels performing inspections, removing debris and investigating navigational hazards and sunken or abandoned vessels. A derrickboat and crane barge performed removal of sunken vessels and navigational hazards and supported Federal dredging projects. In addition, survellance of the harbor was performed regarding the Corps' regulatory program, using also two small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land and occasional chartered aerial reconnaissance. This regulatory surveillance involved compliance surveys of per- 5-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1994 mitted activities and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed peirs and other structures. 14. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 12 miles from a point 1.25 miles east of Thimble Shoal Lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1222.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 12 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 45 feet deep at mean low water with auxiliary channels 450 feet wide and 32 feet deep at mean low water adjoining each side of 1,000-foot channel. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined wind and tides referred to mean low water, and minus 3 feet and plus 7 feet. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1932. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. "See Norfolk Harbor, Va." "Channel to Newport News, VA.," etc. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Work consisted of condition surveys and monitoring of the ocean dump site required by the EPA. 15. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12210, 12211, and 12221.) Existing projects. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, VA. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are cuased by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized relocation of portions of the waterway and widening of 100 feet. Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to fumish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in Nov. 93 to dredge Magothy Bay, Gull Marsh and Burtons Bay Channels. The contract was completed in Feb. 94; a total of 147,590 cubic yards of material was removed. 16. WHITINGS CREEK, VA Location. Whitings Creek lies entirely within Middlesex County, VA, and is a small tidal estuary 1.5 miles long flowing in a westerly direction and entering the right bank of the Rappannock River about 13 miles upstream of its mouth at Chesapeake Bay. The creek is 73 miles northerly of Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 534.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 4 feet deep, 70 feet wide and 3,100 feet long from the 4-foot contour in the Rappahannock River across the offshore bar into the creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: mean, 1.5 feet; irregular, 2 feet; and extreme approximately 7.8 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 353 of Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There is a public wharf and parking facility of the project. In addition there are a number of privately-owned wharves and landings on the creek. These facilities are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge the channel was awarded in Mar. and completed in Apr.; a total of 25,533 cubic yards of material was removed. 17. WILLOUGHBY CHANNEL, VA Location. This channel is located in Hampton Roads and extends from deep water in Hampton Roads to the entrance to Willoughby Bay. (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 400 and 1222.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 10 feet deep at mean low water, over a bottom width of 300 feet, from deep water in Hampton Roads to a point opposite the extreme tip of Willoughby Spit. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and the extremes -2 and +9.5 feet. Terminal facilities. A ferry wharf owned by the Chesapeake Ferry Co. and used by its ferried operating between Willoughby Spit and Old Point Comfort, is the only commercial wharf located on Willoughby Spit. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was awarded in Aug. 94, work will be completed in FY 95. 18. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The District continued work on four section 107 (navigation) studies: Hunting/Guilford Creeks, VA. (initiation of plans and specs has been delayed until the local sponsor obtains funds to provide their portion of implementation costs); Newport News Creek, VA (Draft Feasibility Report was submitted for review); York and Pamunkey Rivers, VA (study progressed to plans and specifications phase); and Back River, Poquoson, VA (Reconnaissance Rekport was approved and negotiations with the local sponsor for a Federal Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) are underway. One new Section 107 project. Tangier Island, North Channel Breakwater, Accomack Co, VA was initiated. Three Section 1135 (modifications for improvement to the environment) studies were initiated. James River Oyster Restoration, VA (Initial Appraisal Report (IAR) was submitted for approval); Gathright Waterfowl and Bat Habitat, VA and Gathright Fish Habitat, VA were both terminated due to a lack of local support. One section 205 (Flood Control) Study, James River, Buchanan, Botetourt Co, VA was initiated and is currently in the reconniassance phase. 19. VIRGINIA BEACH. VA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on the south eastem coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on the south (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) 5-6 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Existing project. The plan of improvement includes construction of a vertical stell sheet-pile wall with concrete cap extending from Rudee Inlet to 58th Street, enhancement of the existing dune system between 58th Street and 89th Street, construction and periodic renourishment of a widened and raised beach berm between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street, a new boardwalk intergrated with the vertical wall and placed over the existing boardwalk extending from Rudee Inlet to approximately 40th Street, a storm water runoff system consisting of the offshore discharge by pumped flow through submarine pipelines, appropriate beach access structures consisting of ramps and stairs and dune crossoverfacilities. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Virginia Beach) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in The Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design were in progress. The General Re-evaluation Report, which incorporates the locally preferred plan, was approved in Jul 94. 20. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (REIMBURSEMENT) Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on the south eastem coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on the south. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project The periodic nourishment program is a modification of the original project adopted by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, which provided for beach restoration and the deferred construction of a system of groins. Comparative cost studies of groin construction versus periodic nourishment indicate that the latter is the more suitable and economical method for maintaining share stability, protecting property, and insuring maximum recreation benefits from use of the publicly-owned shores. The current project includes periodic nourishment of approximately 31/3 miles of beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street with maintenance of the berm to a minimum width of approximately 100 feet of elevation 7 feet above mean low water. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor is the city of Virginia Beach. The original Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) expired 6 February 1987. Consistent with Section 934 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, a new PCA was required. Ten additional years of Federal participation in periodic nourishment cost sharing were approved on 10 March 1988 by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. A PCA for the extension of periodic nourishment was executed on 9 August 1993. Article VII of the 9 August 1993 PCA states "The Govemment shall not be obligated to budget for appropriations to reimburse the Local Sponsor for, and costs incurred by the Local Sponsor for periodic nourishment after February 6, 1987, and before execution of this agreement. The Government shall reimburse the Local Sponsor for such costs only when specifically directed by Congress in legislation and when appropriations are made available for such purpose." Operations during fiscal year. the Federal shares (65%) of the 1994 renourishment cost was reimbursed to the city of Virginia Beach. Total cost was $759,402. 21. JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, VA. Location. The city of Buena Vista is on the left bank of the Maury River, 40 miles below the river's origin and about 11 miles upstream of its juncture with the main stem of the James River at the community of Glasgow. The Maury River Basin above Buena Vista contains a drainage area of about 840 square miles. Existing projects. The project will provide a system of floodwalls and levees on the left bank and channel modifications to provide flood protection against a flood equal to the August 1969 event which is the maximum flood of recent record. The programmed portion of the project (lower element) consists of a combination levee/floodwall with controlled channelized flow of interior drainage and channel refinement to the Maury River. The unprogrammed portion of the project (upper element) consists of a concrete nringwall around the Georgia Bonded Fibers plant. Local cooperation. The local sponsor( city of Buena Vista) is required to fumish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for project construction, and maintain and operate all works after completion. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) for the programmed portion of the project was executed on February 17, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. The programmed lower element will be constructed in two phases; Phase I consists of channel refinements to the Maury River;, Phase II consists fo the levee, floodwall, closures and interior drainage canal. Plans and specifications were completed for Phase I and the first construction contract was awarded June 8, 1994. 22. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA Location. Gathright Dam is on the Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 in Alleghany County. Gathright Dam site is in the reach of the Jackson River known as the Gorge, about 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA. At the elevation of the top of the conservation pool, the lake extends upstream about 9 miles.(See Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virignia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-foot long, rolled-rock-fill dam with an impervious core, with the top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam: a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel throught the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixed-crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation poot elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. Ther reservior area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Care of service and recreational facilities, water control management, testing and monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering and design. 23. RICHMOND LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION, VA Location. The city of Richmond, the capital of Virginia, is located in the Piedmont Plateau and is bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. The James River flows directly through Richmond separating its business district into two areas, the Shockoe Creek area on the north bank and the industrial-commercial complex on the south bank. 5-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1994 Previous project. None. Existing project The project will provide a system of floodwalls and levees on both sides of the river in the downtown area which would protect against a flood higher than that which occurred in June 1972 which is the maximum flood of recent record. The project to be constructed is that generally described in house Document 98-178, 98th Congress, 2nd Session with modifications recommended by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on February 21, 1984. The present construction cost of the project is now estimated at $140,204,000. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was signed with the City of Richmond on June 16, 1986. For details see Annual Report for 1986. Operations during fiscal year. Construction was initiated November 1988. The final contract to remove contaminated soil and construct the remaining 800 feet of floodwall on the south side of the project area was awarded November 1993. Contract completion and physical completion of the project is scheduled for February 1995. 24. RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA Location: The Richmond Water filtration Plant is located in the City of Richmnond, Virginia bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. Existing project: As a result of Tropical Storm Agnes in June 1972, the water filtration plant was flooded and the estimated 400,000 population served was without potable water supply for over five days and without fire protection for over three days. The project will provide flood protection of the municipal water supply treatment plant from a flood having a recurrence of 360 years. The project will provide flood protection by enclosing three sides of the water filtration plant with a floodwall and tying into high ground. The wall will have an average height of about nine feet with a top elevation of 117 feet MSL the project will be built through one contract over two years. Local cooperation: The city of Richmond, Virginia is the local sponsor, a Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in October 1994. Operation during the fiscal year: In FY 94, Congress added $1,000,000 for construction of the project. The Administration does not support funding for the project because the lack of flood protection at the filtration plant is considered a design deficiency and should be undertaken by local interests. Project plans, specifications and environmental documentation was completed. Award of the construction contract is currently scheduled for April 1995. 25. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES During FY 94, $209,977 was spent on the National Emergency Preparedness Program, and $299,951 on the Disaster Preparedness Program. 26. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $328,022. The work performed consisted of Flood Damaae Prevention Studies, $55,591; a Shoreline Protection Study of the Chesapeake Bay Shoreline, Hampton, VA., $164,076; Special Studies, $23,826; review of the AIWW Bridge Replacement, $19,972; special investigations, $12,437; Intragency Water Resources Development, $8,271; North American Waterfowl Management Plan, $2,311; National Marine Fisheries Services, $6,749; and Coordination with Other Agencies and Cooperation with States, $34,789. 27. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, cost of collection and study of basic data was $186,396 consisting of flood plan management studies including Quick Responses, Management Service Unit, Technical Services, VA Hurricane Evacuation Study and Phase II of the Thalia Creek Study. 5-8 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT ........................................................ ............................................ See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 To 30 Sep 1994 In Text 1. Appommattox River, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp 870,341 Cost ** 870,341 Maint Approp 1,763,859 1,673,600 777,234 213,297 5,799,336 Cost 1,755,304 1,670,788 743,971 255,811 5,793,447 2. Atlantic Intracoastal New Work Waterway, between Approp 3,866,372 1/ Norfolk, VA and the Cost 3,688,372 St. John's River, FL Maint (Norfolk District) Approp 4,707,862 3,562,589 181,168 2,236,223 66,776,151 2/ (Regular Funds) Cost 4,641,338 3,590,029 244,056 2,199,532 66,656,681 Major Rehab Approp *.. 479,947 Cost - 479,947 Recreation Approp 59,871 Cost * * 59,871 3. Broad Creek, VA New Work Approp . 27,888 Cost - 27,888 Maint Approp - - - 276,868 771,147 Cost 276,868 771,147 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp * 500 Cost . 500 4. Channel to New Work Newport News, VA Approp 4,097,117 4/ (Regular Funds) Cost * 4,097,117 Maint Approp 53,000 1,270,326 286,576 48,518 7,501,384 Cost 60,741 1,271,031 286,282 49,216 7,501,384 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp . . 4,918,544 Cost 4,695,108 5. Chincoteague Inlet, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp - 227,000 Cost 227,000 Maint Approp 450,997 1,412,747 906,104 663,017 11,841,705 Cost 457,354 1,412,571 906,950 663,651 11,841,705 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp - 3,850 Cost 3,850 6. Hampton Roads, VA Maint (Collection and Approp 216,000 496,000 615,000 615,000 5,731,384 Removal of Drift) Cost 231,304 485,169 621,892 618,673 5,731,118 7. James River, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp - 7,639,904 3/ Cost * 7,639,904 Maint Approp 1,061,066 1,517,949 960,566 3,074.552 39,538,766 Cost 1,578,387 1,518,707 521,945 3,113,527 39.138,723 (Contributed Funds) Maint Approp - 8,000 504,559 Cost - - 124,767 504,559 8. Lynnhaven River, VA New Work Approp .. 445,354 Cost .445.354 Maint Approp 672,504 4,356,370 Cost 681,842 4,342,205 9. Nansemond River, VA New Work Approp 167,477 Cost 167,477 Maint Approp - - 322,415 579,891 Cost - - * 322,415 579,891 5-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 5- A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT ..............................-.--.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See .Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 To 30 Sep 1994 In Text 10. Norfolk Harbor, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp 53,836 100,000 250.000 1,100,000 8,145,632 4/ Cost 441,441 290,672 247,459 625,810 7,416,585 Maint Approp 5,466,669 3,354,059 5,623,170 6,027,725 108,261,578 Cost 5,444,477 3,360,293 5,614,531 6,064,496 108,260,235 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp - - 1,805,451 4/ Cost 274 1,762,697 11. Pagan River, VA New Work Approp - 30,754 Cost - - - 30,754 Maint Approp 134,230 390,644 Cost 134,229 390,643 12. Ruddee Inlet, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp 584,949 873,489 Cost 579,568 7,866 - 873,489 Maint Approp 70,000 723,243 528,303 514,218 1,835,764 Cost 67,723 725,502 526,725 515,780 1,835,730 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp 138,100 210,000' 47,000 200,000 668,644 Cost 35,631 254,668 47,045 281,768 668,644 13. Supervision of the Maint Harbor of Hampton Approp 494,000 308,000 283,694 250,000 8,314,018 Roads, VA (Prevention Cost 495,662 306,574 282,038 250,919 8,311,588 of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) 14. Thimble Shoal New Work Channel, VA Approp - 13,534,967 (Regular Funds) Cost * * 13,534,967 Maint Approp 1,696,041 153,365 12,710,700 Cost - 1,696,413 153,993 12,487,723 15. Waterway on the New Work Coast of VA Approp 850,498 (Regular Funds) Cost 850,498 Maint Approp 898,584 1,271,274 1,201,589 1,155,605 19,080,027 Cost 921,795 1,218,254 1,256,600 741,148 18,663,789 16. Whitings Creek, VA New Work Approp - 21,630 Cost 21,630 Maint Approp 218,796 584,222 Cost 218,796 583,394 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp . .. 500 Cost . - 500 17. Willoughby Channel, VA New Work Approp .- . 8,500 Cost - - 8,500 Maint Approp - - 351,441 358,811 Cost - 351,440 358,810 18. Navigation Work Cost 76,993 140,830 146,415 163,009 Under Special Authorization 19. Virginia Beach, VA New Work (Hurrican Protection) Approp (14,000) 900,000 850,000 1,990,000 11,588,195 Cost 66,445 716,366 983,318 877,403 10,388,834 20. Virginia Beach, VA New Work (Reimbursement) Approp 732,000 732,000 Cost - - 513,595 513,595 5-10 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5- A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 To 30 Sep 1994 In Text .............................................................................................................. 21. James R. Olin Flood Control Project, VA (Regular Funds) 22. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (Regular Funds) 23. Richmond, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. Richmond Filtration Plant Flood Protection Richmond, VA (Contributed Funds) 25. Emergency Flood Control Activities 26. Surveys 27. Collection and Study of Basic Data New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Cost Cost Cost 1,565,000 1,831,000 300,000 3,500,000 1.415.058 1.244.937 214.006 874.245 989,537 981,540 22,700,000 28,159,456 5,494,337 4,176,021 199,488 712,350 133,214 1,357,721 1,362,875 26,813,000 27,533,293 5,515,000 6,105,961 74,400 74,400 15,742,000 14,810,626 1,816,000 192,607 1,212,897 1,214,660 11,172,000 10,658,497 0 1,327,104 * 950,000 1,000,000 - 318,112 498,252 - - 11,000 S* 11,000 407,392 481,152 439,929 492,259 150,078 609,714 197,956 7,800,644 4,241,649 80,970,527 80,970,527 15,132,455 15,122,610 103,956,000 102,132,212 15,835,326 14,710,403 2,428,224 1,294,588 11,000 11,000 328,022 186,396 1. Includes $292,096 for previous projects. 2. Includes $52,804 for previous projects. 3. Includes $763,000 for previous projects. 4. Excludes previous projects. See Annual Report for FY 1986. 5-11 TABLE 5-B Acts Report of the Secretary of the Army on Clvil Works Activities For FY 1994 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Documents APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep at mean high water and 60 feet wide. Diversion channel and work incidental thereto. Increasing channel to width of 80 feet and maintenance of diversion works. Channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep at mean low water between mouth and Petersburg. Existing project dimensions. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, VA to sounds of North Carolina Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) Jul. 3, 1930 Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 Jun. 26, 1934 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors Mar. 2, 1945 Construct dikes for protection of canal property against floodtides Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Jul. 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) May 17, 1950 Jul. 5, 1884 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) BROAD CREEK, VA (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA. (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40- feet deep, 800 feet wide, two deep-draft anchorage Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA (See Section 5 of Text) Existing Project HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 6 of Text) Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton Roads and specified in Act its tributary waters JAMES RIVER, VA (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 22 feet deep from mouth of Richmond and construct spur and training dikes Extension of improvement to Richmond lock gate Form a tuming basin by widening channel at Richmond Channel 25 feet deep mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Removal of Trigg cofferdam Tuming basin at Richmond Harbor Maintaining tuming basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA (See Section 8 of Test) Existing project. Long Creek, Lynnhaven Inlet modification Annual Report 1874, pt. 11 p. 54 H. Doc. 139, 56 Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1901, p. 1467 H. Doc. 952, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 215, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 223, 76th Cong., 1st sess.(1) H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong., 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 3rd sess. AR 1899 H. Doc. 391, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 589, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 23, 71st Cong., 1st sess.' Not available H. Doc. 117, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 381, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 550, 61st Cong.,2nd sess. H. Doc. 486, 67th Cong., 4th sess. H. Doc. 143, 89th Cong., 2nd sess. Approved in 1972 S. Ex. Doc. 714, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 68 74th Cong., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 580, 87th Cong.,2nd sess. Approved in 1982 5-12 Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1909 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1899 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Documents NANSEMOND RIVER, VA. (See Section 9 of Text) Aug. 11, 1888 Channel 12 feet deep, 400 to 200 feet wide, Town Point to mouth of Western Branch; thence, 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide to Suffolk; turning basin 200 feet square at Suffolk; and spur dikes and training walls at mouth of Western Branch Jul. 3, 1930 Existing project dimensions NORFOLK HARBOR CHANNEL, VA (See Section 10 of Text) HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER Mar. 2, 1907 Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard Jun. 25, 1910 Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard Aug. 8, 1917 Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch Sep. 3, 1954 Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk Intemational Terminal Oct. 27, 1965 45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk International Terminal to Lambert Point Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet deep SOUTHERN BRANCH Jun. 25, 1910 Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet Aug. 8, 1917 Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line RR Bridge Mar. 30, 1925 Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia RR bridge: thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR bridge Aug. 30, 1935 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a tuming basin 500 feet square Jun. 30, 1948 Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard: thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a turning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end Oct. 27, 1965 45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge, 35-foot deep turning basin opposite St. Julians Creek Oct. 22, 1976 Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen existing 40-foot portions to 45-feet deep Deepen portion of the 35-foot, from mile point 15 to Gilmerton Bridge, to 40 feet deep EASTERN BRANCH Mar. 2, 1907 Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet Removal of shoals at mouth Mar. 3, 1925 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RA bridge to Virginia AR bridge Jul. 3, 1930 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley Mar. 2, 1945 Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella bridge WESTERN BRANCH Mar. 4,1913 Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge Jul. 3, 1930 For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge SCOTTS CREEK Jul. 3, 1930 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge Annual report for 1887, p. 1001. H. Doc. 184, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 182, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 373, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71st Cong., 1st sess.3 H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 556, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., 1st sess. 5-13 TABLE 5-B Acts TABLE 5-B Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1994 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 ANCHORAGES 30-foot anchorage at Lambert Point 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1,200-foot swinging radius Construct a 55-foot anchorage and increase the radius to 1500 feet for an existing 45-foot anchorage PAGAN RIVER, VA (See Section 11 of Text) Channel widening at Bends Present project dimensions RUDEE INLET, VA (See Section 12 of Text) Project Authorized Existing Project Approved in 1986 THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide. Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channel on either side 32 feet deep and 450 feet wide. Channel 45 feet deepa nd 1,000 feet wide. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 15 of Text) Existing project adopted Project modified WILLOUGHBY CHANNEL, VA (See Section 17 of Text) Project authorized VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (Hurricane Protection ) (See Section 19 of Text) Project authorized Project modified Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Project Modified Participation after Feb. 6, 1987 Cost Sharing VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. (Reimbursement) (See Section 20 of Text) Project authorized H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, VA (See Section 21 of Text) (Formerly BUENA VISTA, VA) Project authorized Chief of Engineers Report, July 27, 1990 Name of Project Changed GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA (See Section 22 of Text) Project authorized H. Doc. 325, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. RICHMOND LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION, VA (see Section 23 of Text) Existing project H. Doc. 178, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. WHITINGS CREEK (See Section 16 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 Existing Project H. Doc. 582, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. 5-14 H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess.1 S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Docs. 187 & 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 397, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 591, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Unpublished Report H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 957, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 507, 70th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 186, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 382, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 365, 92nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 216, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 5, 1992 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 5, 1992 Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 15, 1985 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-C ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 2 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Length Depth on Width Available Miter Sills Year Miles of for Full Character Opened Construction From Location Chamber Width Lift Upper Lower of to Cost Norfolk, VA feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Navigation 12.4 Albemarle and 75 600 2.7 1 ' Piles in sand 1932 $499,913 Chesapeake Canal and shells (Great Bridge, VA) 10.7 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 12 Natural earth 1940 $348,879 Canal (Deep Creek) with cutoff walls 33.1 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 13 Natural earth 1941 $373,226 Canal with cutoff walls (South Mills, NC) 116 feet at mean low water. 5-15 Report of the Secretary of'the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1994 TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1994 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For 1992 Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Aberdeen Creek, VA2 1975 $109,643 221,827 Appomattox River, VA' 1992 870,341 4,794,436 Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA 1991 608,255 Bennett Creek, VA 1992 442,602 - 104,621 Blackwater River, VA51 Active portion2 1 0 1975 342,118 185,577 19,300 Broad Creek, VA2 1986 27,888 697,108 500 Cape Charles, VA 1989 622,644 2,511,748 Carters Creek, VA Active portion 23 1951 28,398 29,127 Channel to. Newport News, VA 1992 4,097,117 7,105,145 4,965,108 Channel from Phoebus, VA to deepwater in Hampton Roads2 1944 11,500 64,919 1,200 Channel connecting York River, VA Back Creek to Slaights Wharf 2 1950 14,855 38,634 2,500 Chesconessex Creek, VA2 1968 25,516 43,775 Chincoteague Bay, VA 1984 25,126 513,005 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA 1985 49,396 242,237 Chowan River, NC2 1975 107,220 5,700 Cockrells Creek, VA' 1949 Cranes Creek, VA 1992 6,274 653,654 Davis Creek, VA 2 1971 97,612 213,105 4,000 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., VA 1974 83,000 197,259 Deep Creek, Newport News, VA2 1991 288,278 3,307,533 Dymers Creek, VA2 1953 5,582 7,658 Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA 1988 68,656 6,278 7,763 Greenvale Creek, VA2 1991 20,003 633,020 Hampton Creek, VA 1989 186,237 1,270,204 62,969 Horn Harbor, VA2 1990 13,987 348,035 Hoskins Creek, VA2 1990 44,100 1,630,164 500 Jackson Creek, VA2 1971 8,500 50,844 Jarvis Creek, VA4 1979 39,259 Kings Creek, VA4 1957 5,593 Lafayette River, VA2 1982 242,047 371,384 188,962 Little Machipongo River, VA 1990 211,990 534,494 1,211 Little River (Creek),2VA2 12 1966 168,623 566,521 16,955 Locklies Creek, VA' 1928 11,581 68,506 Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 1991 459,612 2,989,668 Mattaponi River, VA 1971 83,836 215,927 Meherrin River, VA 1987 47,734 54,764 Millford Haven VA2 1950 24,568 33,688 Mill Creek, VA 1937 5,445 21,536 Mulberry Creek, VA2 1950 2,393 2,458 Nandua Creek, VA2 1950 6,988 138,700 Nansemond River, VAa 1978 167,477 508,401 Newport News Creek, VA2 1992 181,354 449,516 Nottoway River, VA2 1986 44,295 8,734 43,000 Occohannock Creek, VA Active portion2 1951 13,859 92,044 Onancock River, VA25 1963 187,914 525,952 Oyster Channel, VA2 1991 119,117 788,122 Pagan River, VA26 1950 51,425 339,484 Pamunkey River, VA Active portion 1964 31,376 161,183 Parker Creek, VA 1991 15,530 571,056 Parrotts Creek, VA2 1957 37,045 69,132 Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot2 1947 165,566 66,162 Queens Creek'2 1991 26,949 442,606 Quinby Creek, VA 1991 104,176 1,519,973 Rappahannock River, VA8 911 1983 414,633 1,969,242 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, VA4 1950 Starlings Creek, VA 1991 66,242 1,119,322 Tangier Channels, VA 1992 116,550 3,470,802 Taskinas Creek, VA 1975 7,479 135 Thimble Shoal Channel, VA13 1991 17,934,772 14,789,255 3,459,868 Totuskey Creek, VA 1970 167,869 451,293 2,000 Tylers Beach Harbor, VA2 1982 311,201 804,713 5-16 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-D Project OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report, See Annual Report For 1992 Coat to Sept. 30, 1994 Construction Maintenance Additional Expenditure For New Work Expended From Contributed Funds Urbanna Creek, VA2 7 Whitings Creek, VA Winter Harbor, VA2 Willoughby Channel, VA 2 Wishart Point Channel, VA2 York River, VA Active portion2 'Includes $22,500 for previous projects. 2Completed. 31n addition, $700 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. 4Inactive. Slncludes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for previous projects. Ilncludes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. 7In addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation 81n addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 9includes $197,146 for previous new work projects. 1'lncludes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. "includes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects '2Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work ' 31n addition, $143,000 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. TABLE 5-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1994 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintence Contributed Funds Anderson Park, Newport News, VA 1979 $471,474 632 $176,671 Hampton Institute, VA 1976 $1568,906 1,589 $175,845 Rapidan River, Orange, VA 1984 45,000 - Saxis Island, VA 1987 $273,600 $ 3,145 Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA 1990 $2,478,825 2,008 1,379,371 TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1994 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Newmarket Creek, VA 1970 1,000,000 13,495 $550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, VA 1973 1,851,933 46,930 516,256 Scottsville, VA 1989 3,431,746 12,024 32,954 Virginia Beach Canal No. 2, VA 1990 4,692,063 53,739 216,596 1 Preconstruction planning terminated. 5-17 1963 1990 1981 1953 1975 1986 55,724 21,630 171,334 8,500 118,762 180,904 116,433 431,506 340,837 101,035 151,892 361,616 500 2,973 30,625 - -- --- ---- TABLE 5-G Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY Appomattox River Atlantic Intercoastal Waterway: Dismal Swamp Canal Baltimore Harbor and Channels: " Rappahannock Shoal Channel York Spit Channel Cape Charles City Harbor Channel to Newport News Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge Deep Creek Accomack County Elizabeth River: Southern Branch 40 Foot Channel Southern Branch 35 Foot Channel Western Branch Hoskins Creek Jackson Creek James River: City Point Shoal Dancing Point to Swann Point Goose Hill Channel Jordon Point to Windmill Point Richmond Deepwater Terminal Richmond Deepwater Terminal to Hopewell Rocklanding Shoal Channel Tribell Shoal Hampton Creek Little Machipingo River Nandua Creek Norfolk Harbor: 40 - 50 foot Channel Parker Creek Ramshom Channel Starlings Creek Thimble Shoal Channel Waterway on the Coast of VA Gargathy Inlet Hog Neck Creek Kegotank Bay Metomkin Bay Channel Northam Narrows Wisharts Point Channel York River Entrance Channel Jun 94 Nov 93 Jun 94 Jun 94 May 94 Nov 93 Aug 94 Jun 94 Nov 93 May 94 Nov 93 Jun 94 Jul 94 Feb 94 Dec 93 Dec 93 Jan 94 Jun 94 Aug 94 Dec 93 May 94 Dec 93 Sep 94 Aug 94 Dec 93 Sep 94 Jun 94 Sep 94 Jun 94 Apr 94 Apr 94 Apr 94 Jun 94 Apr 94 May 94 May 94 Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance 5-18 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT * This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those portions oftheYadkin-Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of theAtlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control ................................... 6-2 (R & H Act of 1965) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla, (Wilmington District) .................. 6-2 3. Beaufort Harbor, N.C ....................................... 6-4 4. Cape Fear River, N.C. Above Wilmington ............................................ 6-4 5. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C ........................................ 6-5 6. Drum Inlet, N.C .................................. 6-5 7. Lockwoods Folly River, N.C ........................... 6-5 8. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C......................... 6-6 9. Morehead City Harbor, N.C.............................. 6-7 10. Roanoke River, N.C........................................... 6-7 11. Rollinson Channel, N.C ................................. 6-8 12. Shallotte River, N.C ................................... 6-8 13. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C ............. ................ 6-8 14. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, NC ................................. 6-8 15. Wilmington Harbor, N.C................................... 6-9 Flood Control 16. Blackberry Creek, Henry County, Va............. 6-10 17. Cape Fear River Basin, N.C ........................ 6-10 17-A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C.......... 6-10 17-B. Randleman Lake, N.C ................................. 6-11 18. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C ................ 6-11 19. Neuse River Basin, N.C .................................. 6-12 19-A. Falls Lake, N.C. ...................................... 6-12 20. Hamlet City Lake, N.C ................................ 6-13 21. King (Water Plant), N.C ............................... 6-13 22. Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C ......................... 6-13 23. Oriental (South Avenue), N.C ..................... 6-14. 24 Roanoke River Upper Basin, Va.-Headwaters Area ...................................... 6-14 25. Wrightsville Beach, N.C ................................. 6-15 26. Yadkin River Basin, N.C. and S.C. ....... 6-15 26-A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C. ..................................... 6-15 Page 27. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................................... 6-15 28. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................................. 6-16 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 29. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C................. 6-16 29-A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. ................................... 6-16 29-B. Philpott Lake, Va ......................................... 6-16 30. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................................. 6-17 General Investigations 31. Surveys ..................................... 6-19 32. Collection and Study of Basic Data .............. 6-19 33. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ................................................ 6-19 Tables Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement ............ 6-20 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation ................ 6-25 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 6-28 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................................... 6-29 Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................................... 6-30 Table 6-F Not Applicable Table 6-G Deauthorized Projects ...................... 6-31 Table 6-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................ 6-32 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 6-32 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs ....................... 6-33 Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 6-34 6-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251,89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Congr., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the program. Recon studies are 100 percent Federal. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Operations for FY 94 included chemical control on about 89 river miles of alligator weed (about 28 treatment acres) and 6 acres of hydrilla, biological control ofhydrilla at 3 lakes (41 acres of hydrilla), and monitoring of biological control ofhydrilla at 8 sites stocked with triploid grass carp in previous years. All alligator weed control in FY 94 was by the application of rodeo herbicide. All treatment sites are under maintenance control. Control areas include the Scuppernong River Basin, Little River Basin, Pasquotank River Basin, Alligator River Basin and Lumber River Basin. No new alligatorweed treatment areas were added to the program in FY 93. Three hydrilla biological control sites, Brier Creek and Reedy Creek Reserviors and Big Lake were restocked with triploid grass carp and hydrilla and Lake Crabtree was treated with aquatic herbicide in FY 94. Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp to determine the effectiveness of the stocking and predict future control needs continued in FY 94. Program activities also included investigations of aquatic weed problems, in response to requests by the State of North Carolina, which may result in the addition of new treatment sites and species in future years. The Aquatic Plant Control Program activities were accomplished at a Federal cost of $34,549. State and local governments implemented an ongoing chemical hydrilla control plan at Lake Gaston in 1991. Federal involvement in the implementation of a program to control nuisance vegetation in Lake Gaston, Virginia and North Carolina, was authorized by Section 339 of Public Law 102-580. Funding was provided via the Conference Report for the Energy and Water DevelopmentAppropriationAct, 1994. Funds in the amount of $172,000 were received in 1994. Aquatic weed herbicide treatments of approximately 587 acres at Lake Gaston were accomplished at a Federal cost of $149,834. Condition at end of fiscal year. All alligatorweed treatment sites under maintenance control in FY 94 are expected to remain under maintenance control. A biennial treatment schedule in some maintenance, level alligatorweed control sites implemented in FY 93 will continue in FY 95. Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp indicates that overall our biological control efforts have been effective. Supplemental stocking has been required to achieve control in some sites. Restocking on at least a once every 5-year basis is expected to be required to maintain weed control in these sites. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwater intrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from NewTopsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a 6-2 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville Beach by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Joseph P. Knapp (formerly Coinjock) bridges was authorized in October 1976. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding at Core Creek, Hobucken, and Fairfield Bridges was authorized in November 1986. Estimated Federal cost is $80,000,000 (1994). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut was deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. The 12-foot-deep channel in Peltier Creek was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The 12-foot deep channel modification to New River was deauthorized January 1, 1990, under Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. The jetties at Masonboro Inlet are complete except for the training wall. The training wall has an estimated Federal cost of $3,470,000 (1992). The wall was reclassified to the "inactive" category on August 14,1992. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Acts of 1976 and 1986 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for all five bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of Core Creek Bridge was continued at a cost of $706,073. Design of Hobucken Bridge was continued at a cost of $587,874. Design of Fairfield Bridge was continued at a cost of $741,641. Work in connection with the completion of Joseph P. Knapp Bridge cost $3,917. Work in connection with the completion of Walter B. Jones Bridge cost $8,892. No new work was accomplished on Masonboro Inlet, however, a transfer of funds resulted in a reduction of the work allowance of $7,500. Maintenance: Through Channel - During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $89,800. Between September 15 and 29, 1994, the contract dredge Blue Ridge dredged 20,000 cubic yards from shoals from Norfolk, VA, to SC State Line at a cost of $347,002. Between January 7, and March 24, 1994, contract dredges Richmond and Blue Ridge dredged 441,925 cubic yards from shoals in Inlet Crossings at a cost of $2,144,264. Design cost in connection with future year maintenance dredging cost $4,274. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $46,000. Archeological investigations of sounds and inlets cost $54. Condition and operation studies cost $561,884. Interim inspection of the two remaining bridges cost $3,260. Long-term environmental dredging and monitoring study cost $190,233. Master Plan supplement for Snow's Cut cost $4,761. Two highway bridges and utilities were operated and maintained at a cost of $377,105. Impacts of beach disposal/nourishment on beaches study cost $1,197. Update Colonial Nesting Waterbirds data base inventory cost $14,554. Exploratory drilling of nine disposal sites along the AIWW cost $86,860. Investigation of encroachments, leases and signage at Snows Cut cost $21,090. Seabeach Ameranth, Piping Plover and Sea Turtles studies cost $12,724. Work in connection with prior year pipeline dredging of Inlet Crossings cost $16,346. Bogue Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 32,377 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $89,700. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 27,353 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $139,819. Condition and operation studies cost $13,181. Carolina Beach Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $7,421. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 84,990 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $313,200. During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck 6-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 removed 104,673 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $250,346. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 55,377 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $186,300. Monitoring of Carolina Beach Inlet cost $6,641. Condition and operation studies cost $20,092. Masonboro Inlet - Condition and operation studies cost $1,896. Preparation of the rehabilitation report for the north jetty at Masonboro Inlet was continued at a cost $83,876. Monitoring at Masonboro Inlet cost $24,769. Investigations to determine navigational servitude cost $5,644. Between March 3 and June 15,1994, the contract dredgeAlaska dredged 619,031 cubic yards in conjunction with Wrightsville Beach renourishment at a cost of $970,004 and 362,009 cubic yards in conjunction with Masonboro Island renourishment at a cost of $892,995. New River Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 116,560 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $513,300. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 181,263 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $496,950. Condition and operation studies cost $25,807. New Topsail Inlet - During * intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 53,745 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $443,676. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 93,381 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $285,359. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $7,421. Condition and operation studies cost $21,012. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in November 1986 except for three tie-up dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the three remaining bridges. The construction contract for Core Creek Bridge was awarded September 27, 1991, and completed March 1994. Core Creek Bridge was opened to traffic in October 1993. Design of Hobucken and Fairfield Bridges was continued. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994, was $190,969,935, of which $58,039,523 was for new work including $86,851 in contributed funds and $132,930,412 was for maintenance, including $667,300 in contributed funds. 3. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep atmean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; a channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-foot-long section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 7.3 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully compiled with to date. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between October 19, 1993, and March 27, 1994, the contract dredge California removed 28,266 cubic yards from shoals in the bulkhead channel at a cost of $85,089. Condition and operation studies cost $566. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965 except for the Morgan Creek modification which was completed November 12, 1983. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1994, were $827,040 for new work, including $34,000 contributed funds and $4,141,737 for maintenance, including $326,225 contributed funds, a total of $4,968,777. 4. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 atAcme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared and maintained the buoy systems at the locks at a cost of $224,040. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredgeMerritt removed 17,355 cubic yards from shoals in the inlet at a cost of $132,037. Periodic inspections of locks and dams cost $5,253. Repairs to lock gates of Lock and Dams 1 and 2 cost $95,267. Repairs to miter gates at William O. Huske Lock and Dam cost $457,759. Design and construction of potable water/sewer lines at Lock and Dam 2 cost $17,694. Updating site plans and future development and landscape plan cost $49,123. Condition and operation studies cost $61,060. Operation and Maintenance of three locks and dams cost $326,396. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1994, were $23,753,074 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $20,142,620 for maintenance. 5. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N. C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937, and March 2,1945. For details see Annual Report for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $2,300. There were no other cost in connection with the project, however, a funds adjustment resulted in a negative cost of $636. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 6. DRUM INLET, N.C. Location. Drum Inlet is an opening through the barrier beach which separates Core Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. It is about 1,100 feet wide and is about 35 miles northeast of Beaufort and opposite the village ofAtlantic. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1233 and 419.) Existing project. The project provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from the gorge in the inlet to the Federally improved channel in Core Sound, about 1 mile. The mean range tide is 3.8 feet in the ocean and 0.3 foot in Core Sound at Atlantic. The project also provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 9 feet deep from the gorge in the inlet to deep water in the Atlantic Ocean. The Core Sound portion of the project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of June 20, 1938. (H.D. 414, 75th Cong., 2nd sess.) The channel from the inlet to the Atlantic Ocean was authorized under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for limited reevaluation report cost $140,504. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in February 1972. The Limited Reevaluation Report was completed in September 1994. It determined that resumption of Federal maintenance is economically justified and is environmentally acceptable. The plans and specifications, allowing resumption of maintenance, are scheduled to be completed in August 1995. 7. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and HarborAct. (SeeAnnual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for a distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interests must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in ground water levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, and (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons 6-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $7,421. During ntermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 60,431 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $181,184. During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 80,505 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $229,379. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 37,810 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $243,600. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging was $603. Funds adjustments of archeological investigations in Lockwoods Folly River resulted in negative cost of $19. Condition and operation studies cost $25,932. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 8. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from theAtlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot-deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deep water near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12-foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $80,448,000 (1994). The project was authorized by River and HarborActs of June 25,1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) and establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (i) pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreational navigation presently estimated at $9,200,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreational navigation facilities presently estimated at $1,125,000 annually; (j) pay 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation during construction presently estimated at $8,813,000; (k) pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas presently estimated at $7,800,000. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sand bypassing study cost $11,123. Additional engineering and design work is being accomplished under preconstruction engineering and design. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 846,221 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $1,488,818. Work in connection with prior year dredging in Oregon Inlet by U. S. hopper dredge Currituck cost $4,510. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 55,596 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT of $96,939. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services' studies on impacts of beach disposal of dredged material at Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge in connection with prior year pipeline dredging in the vicinity of Oregon Inlet Bridge was accomplished at a cost of $165,221. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging in Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese was $375. Cost in connection with prior year maintenance hopper dredging of the ocean bar was $1,679. Engineering and design for future year dredging of Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese cost $64,809. Expansion of disposal island cost $27,439. Design and construction of a new sand bag disposal area was accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $239,964. Environmental dredging studies and monitoring activities in connection with sea turtle research cost $4,918. Project monitoring cost $78,382. National OceanTidal Datum Determination cost $9,781. Section 933 study for Pea Island and Highway 12 cost $1,007. Condition and operation studies cost $119,522. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further detail, see Annual Report of 1962.) 9. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. A channel 47 feet deep and 450 feet wide from deep water in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar at Beaufort Inlet with three wideners; a cutoff channel 400 feet wide; and a depth of 45 feet in the east leg of the basin, including a 1,350 foot diameter turning area; construction of turning basin to Sixth Street, Morehead City, then 12 feet deep, 200 to 400 feet wide to Tenth Street; then 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide, to Bogue Sound. Project also includes assumption of maintenance in the northwest leg and the east leg extension. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The jetties were deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.), the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Between October 19, 1993 and March 27, 1994, the contract dredge California removed 1,724,990 cubic yards to construct the inner harbor. Between January 5 and April 4, 1994, the contract dredge Eagle I removed 2,112,584 cubic yards to construct the outer harbor. Cost in connection with these improvements was $6,648,791 in Federal funds; $2,504,151 in contributed funds from the State of N.C.; and $227,845 from the State Ports Authority. Additional engineering and design work was accomplished under preconstruction engineering and design. Maintenance: Between October 19, 1993, and March 7, 1994, the contract dredge California removed 465,699 cubic yards from shoals in the inner harbor at a Federal cost of $780,745 and a non-Federal cost to the State Ports Authority of $300,205. Between January 5 and April 4, 1994, the contract dredge Eagle 1 removed 494,338 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a Federal cost of $825,006. Between October 19, 1993, and March 27, 1994, the contract dredge California removed 2,473,727 cubic yards from the Brandt Island disposal area and deposited it on the beach at a Federal cost of $3,794,727 and a contributed funds cost of $74,277. All of the above maintenance work was accomplished in connection with the deepening of Morehead City Harbor. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $14,929. Engineering and design in connection with future year maintenance dredging of the ocean bar cost $9,316. Cost in connection with prior year maintenance dredging of the inner harbor cost $5,500. Monitoring at Morehead City Harbor cost $27,225. Environmental and permitting activities associated with sea turtle research cost $14,658. Condition and operation studies cost $83,060. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete with the latest modification being physically complete in April 1994. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) Total cost of the project to September 30, 1994, was $75,451,520 of which $15,892,219 was for new work, including $2,731,996 contributed funds (including $553,477 public works funds) and $59,559,301 for maintenance, including $1,747,812 contributed funds. 10. ROANOKE RIVER, N. C. Location. Rises in Blue Ridge Mountains, west of Roanoke, Va., flows southeasterly about 398 miles, and empties into westerly end ofAlbemarle Sound, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1228 and Post Route Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Albemarle Sound to 1 mile above Plymouth, N.C.; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Hamilton; and thence a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide to Palmyra Landing. Project authorized by River and HarborActs of March 3, 1871; July 3, 1930; and June 20, 1938. For further details seeAnnual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Thirty-two waterfront facilities serve the waterway. Facilities appear adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared at a cost of $53,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 6-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 11. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935; March 2,1945; September 3,1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for future year maintenance dredging cost $12,508. Condition and operation studies cost $4,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed August 22, 1966. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 12. SHALLOTE RIVER, N. C. Location. A small stream in Brunswick County, N. C., rising in the large swamp country between Cape Fear and Waccamaw Rivers, known as Green Swamp. Stream is about 30 miles long and flows southerly into Atlantic Ocean and 20 miles west of mouth of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 835.) Previous project. For details see page 1806 ofAnnual Report for 1915. Existing project. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 36 feet wide from the mouth to town of Shallotte. Section under improvement is 9 miles long. River is tidal, range varying from 5 feet at mouth to 3 feet at Shallotte. Hurricane Hazel in 1954 caused a tide about 16 feet above mean sea level in the river at Shallotte Point. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, and January 21, 1927 Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A marine railway and shop at Shallotte Point and another in town of Shallotte with facilities for building and repairing boats up to about 60 feet long. On Shallotte River, there are 17 docks varying from 16 to 321 feet of frontage, providing 1,334 feet of wharf and docking space. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Environmental and archeological investigations for future maintenance dredging of Shallotte River cost $48. Condition and operation studies cost $3,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 1929. 13. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232. Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor, an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet, a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between September 15 and 30, 1994, the contract dredge Enterprise removed 90,000 cubic yards from shoals in the harbor at a cost of $270,408. During intermittent periods, the U.S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared at a cost of $42,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 14. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same 6-8 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel atAtlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully compiled with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S hopper dredge Currituck removed 7,140 cubic yards from shoals in Wainwright Slough at a cost of $35,064. Condition and operation studies cost $6,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 15. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from theAtlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River; a 38-foot deep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17,1950; October 23,1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. A modification to widen the existing anchorage basin by 100 feet was authorized on July 13, 1982, under Sec. 5 of the Cong. Appro. Act of March 4,1915. A modification to widen the 38-foot by 400-foot Fourth East Jetty Channel to 500 feet; deepen the 32-foot by 400-foot channel between Castle Street and the N. C. 133 bridge to 35 feet; widen the 32-foot by 1000-foot by 800-foot turning basin just above the mouth of the Northeast Cape Fear River by 50 feet on the west side and deepen to 35 feet; and environmental improvements to include acquiring, by easements or fee title, about 2,800 acres of wetlands, river bluffs and ecotones and provision for a minimum number of specially designed corridors across the wetlands for industrial access to the river was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of November 17, 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal cost is $26,400,000. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for latest modification. In accordance with the costsharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must (1) provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and dredged material disposal areas including necessary retaining dikes presently estimated at $1,319,000, and bear all operation and maintenance costs for dikes presently estimated at $6,000 annually; (2) modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project, presently estimated at $17,059,000; (3) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction presently estimated at $7,217,000 and reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (which is entirely offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rightsof- way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas; and (4) pay 25 percent of the first costs allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement presently estimated at $1,475,000, and pay 25 percent of the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $15,000 annually. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. (For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Initiation of ocean bar deepening was accomplished at a Federal cost of $1,853,625 and a contributed funds cost of $783,622. Additional engineering and design was accomplished under preconstruction engineering and design. Maintenance: Between November 11, 1993, and March 29, 1994, the contract dredges Hampton Roads and Clinton removed 1,302,959 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a Federal cost of $3,259,922; 77,402 cubic yards at the State Ports at a contributed funds cost of $167,634; and repair of spillways on spoil disposal island was performed at a contributed funds cost of $79,125. Between December 29, 1993 and March 16, 1994, the contract dredge Dodge Island removed 1,040,622 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $1,579,994. Repairs to dikes at Eagle Island were performed at a contributed funds cost of $1,934. Design for future year dredging of the channel cost $12,080. 6-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Design for future year dredging of the anchorage basin cost $15,624. Design and mobilization for future year dredging of the ocean bar was accomplished at a cost of $79,215. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $35,000. National Ocean Survey Tidal Datum Determination cost $1,947. Hilton Wreck damage assessment site documentation cost $12,706. Endangered species study cost $9,150. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $49,597. Environmental and permitting activities for sea turtle research project cost $24,392. Condition and operation studies cost $513,410. Disposal of dredged material (Section 933) study at Bald Head Island cost $2,250. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed October 1982 except for latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1994, was $110,760,250 of which $16,726,859 was for new work, including $783,622 contributed funds and $94,033,391 was for maintenance, including $6,829,956 contributed funds. The remaining uncompleted portion of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945, was deauthorized in accordance with Section 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. Flood Control 16. BLACKBERRY CREEK, HENRY COUNTY, VA. Location. The project, a tributary of Smith River, is near Martinsville in South Central Virginia, approximately 175 miles southwest of Richmond. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Martinsville, Va., West) Existing project. The basin is about 13 miles long and drains southwest Henry County, and southeast Patrick County. The drainage area is 15.2 square miles. Most basin development is along the lower 1.3 miles. The completed project consists of installation of three gages: a rain gage, a combination rain-stream gage and a stream gage. An emergency response plan was prepared and implemented by Henry County, Va. The plan provides for advanced warning to permit relocation of people and damageable properties (household goods, vehicles and inventories) and sand bag diking. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction is $25,886 (1993). The project was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on July 19, 1993, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project construction was completed at a Federal cost of $14,241 and a contributed funds cost of $8,629. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction began November 1993 and was completed March 1994. 17. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. The study was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 64 on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1990, and Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in October 1980 due to the current lack of economic justification. Randleman Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category inApril 1992 due to the current lack of economic justification. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 17A. B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N. C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 753,500 acre-feet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $147,600,000 (1994), consisting of $89,186,000 for construction, and $58,414,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30,1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of 6-10 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,700,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $46,000 annually; and contribute toward the cost of the ranger security buildings, an amount presently estimated at $44,000. A contract between the State of N. C. and the United States for water supply storage space was executed byASA (CW) on April 10, 1988. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish,. wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $806,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Seaforth recreaction area claim was initiated at a cost of $44,589. New Hope Overlook recreation area was completed at a cost $45,419. Robeson Creek recreation area was completed at a cost of $15,392. Total Federal expenditures were $359,712, including above items. Status of plans and specs: Rivers End, 100 percent, Rivers Junction, 100 percent, and Wilderness Island O&M roads, 100 percent. Maintenance: Replacement of waterline for management center cost $8,252. Replacement of management center septic system was continued at a cost of $30,641. Indication and control system for the flood gates cost $737. Normal operation and maintenance cost $971,072. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $67,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. All facilities are basically complete except for recreation facilities, cultural resources and project operations facilities. Impoundment was completed in February 1982 with dedication on May 1, 1982. Project completion is scheduled for September 1995. 17B. RANDLEMAN LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on Deep River, N. C., about 15 miles south of Greensboro and about 2 miles upstream from the town of Randleman. The damsite and about two-thirds of the reservoir would lie in Randolph County. The upper one-third of the reservoir would lie in Guilford County. Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of an earth dam 2,300 feet long with a maximum height of 110 feet above the streambed to create a reservoir with gross storage of 108,000 acre-feet, consisting of 46,000 acre-feet for flood control and a conservation pool of 62,000 acre-feet for water supply, water-quality control and sedimentation. Randleman Lake is the second project of the comprehensive plan of development for the Cape Fear River Basin, providing reservoir storage for flood control, water supply, and recreation. Estimated cost of new work is $124,000,000 (1992), consisting of $62,300,000 for construction and $61,700,000 for lands and damages, including relocations. The existing project was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (H.D. 343, 90th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Based on the termination of Federal interest in the project by the ASA(CW), no local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: No work accomplished on the project. Cost in connection with closing out the project was $37. The remaining $11,500 was transferred from the project Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed in FY 1982. The Piedmont Triad Regional WaterAuthority is building a water supply and possible recreation facility at Randleman. All pertinent data that may be useful in the construction has been provided. The project was reclassified to the deferred category inApril 1992 due to the current lack of economic justification. 18. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast ofWilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from theAtlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of two separable elements, the Carolina Beach Portion and Area South of Carolina Beach and provides for construction of a dune with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 13.5 feet National geodetic vertical datum (NVGD), a berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD for Carolina Beach and 9 feet NGVD for the Area South, a rock revetment at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD along the northern 2,050 feet fronted by a 130 feet wide berm at elevation 6.5 feet NGVD, extending about 32,000 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 50 years from year of initial placement. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the active category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $185,480,000. The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood ControlAct (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for 50 years. Local cooperation. For the Carolina Beach portion, local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. For the Area South portion, local interests must: (a) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including borrow areas; (b) pay 35 percent of the first costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of hurricane and storm 6-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 damage reduction facilities; (c) contribute, in cash, 35 percent of the total project cost; (d) inform affected interests of the limitation of the protection afforded by the project no less than once each year; (e) assure that water pollution which would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted to the extent of its power; (f) assure the continued public ownership of the above shore and its administration for public use during the 50 year economic life of the project; (g) to the extent of its powers, prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords or that would hinder operation or maintenance; and (h) provide and maintain necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications for the Area South cost $383,017. Plans and specifications for renourishment of the Carolina Beach portion cost $131,278. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was completedAugust 12,1982, except for grassing which was completed in September 1983. The second increment of renourishment was completed in May 1988. The third increment of renourishment was completed in July 1991. Next renourishment is scheduled for fiscal year 1995. 19. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1989. 19A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 95 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100 feet wide, is located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 374,450 acre-feet, of which 243,050 acre-feet is for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 61,330 acre-feet for water quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $182,500,000 (1994) consisting of $90,834,000 for construction and $91,666,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $13,637,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $116,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $21,595,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,544,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non-Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of theArmy on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Highway 50 Road modification was initiated at a cost of $55,000. Tailrace Access recreation area modification was initiated at a cost of $21,115. Rollingview recreation area modification was initiated at a cost of $123,125. Sandling Beach modification was continued at a cost of $12,688. Holly Point recreation area was continued at a cost of $1,927,790. B. W. Wells and Shinleaf recreation areas were continued at a cost of $311,201. Rollingview recreation area was completed at a cost of$3,205. Rollingview Swim Beach modification was completed at a cost of $302,896. Wildlife subimpoundments modification was completed at a cost of $5,905. Total Federal expenditures were $4,051,304, including the above items. Status of plans and specs: Miscellaneous Improvements to Subimpoundments, 60 percent; Wildlife Subimpoundments Maintenance Building, 75 percent; Miscellaneous Paving at Highway 50 and Sandling Beach recreation areas, 90 percent and Dam Fix, 100 percent. Maintenance: Flood gate indication and control system cost $110,200. Normal 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT operation and maintenance cost $878,414. Maintenance and operations of dams cost $67,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30,1983. All facilities are basically complete except for fish and wildlife facilities, recreation facilities, 0 & M facilities and project modifications due to the water storage shortage. Project completion is scheduled for September 1995. 20. HAMLET CITY LAKE, HAMLET, N. C. Location. The project is located on Marks Creek within the city limits of Hamlet, N. C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Hamlet, N. C.) Existing project. A small earth dam constructed in the 1930's under the WPA Program impounds the shallow 50-acre lake. Much of the City's storm runoff empties into the lake and has contributed significantly to a sediment problem. Local interests desire removal of accumulated sediment and debris including construction of sediment traps and providing other devices or equipment to prevent and abate the further deposit of sediment. Results from the bottom sampling and testing program show that contaminants are much more widespread than originally estimated. The final scope of the project is being negotiated with the project sponsor. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $3,200,000 (1994). The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Sec. 206, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must pay 25 percent of the total cost of the project estimated at $1,070,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning, engineering, and design was continued at a cost of $90,633. Condition at end of fiscal year. A letter dated October 16, 1992, was received from the sponsor supporting a project smaller in scope than the original project. City began design on disposal area. Work continued on the Design Memorandum. The Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment are scheduled for completion in 1995. 21. KING (WATER PLANT), NC Location. The project is located along theYadkin River, about 10 miles northwest of Winston-Salem, N.C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, King, N.C.) Existing project. The project will consist of approximately 300 linear feet of riprap protection beginning at the north side of the water plant intake and extending 300 feet upstream along the east river bank. The toe of the bank protection will be keyed into the stream bed and extend to the top of the bank, approximately 18 feet. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction is $227,000 (1994). The project was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on September 7, 1994, under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of total project costs, estimated at $75,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000 and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the total project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment were completed at a cost of $19,877. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are scheduled for initiation in October 1994. Contract award is scheduled for 1 July 1995. 22. LOWER CREEK, LENOIR, N. C. Location. The project is located in northwest North Carolina near the city of Lenoir in Caldwell County and is approximately 60 miles northwest of Charlotte and approximately 60 miles northeast ofAsheville. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Lenoir, N. C.) Existing project. The authorized project involves about 1.4 miles of Lower Creek and .4 miles of Zacks Fort Creek of channel widening with a combination of trapezoidal and bench channel design. The improved channel bottom widths range from 50 to 75 feet, roughly doubling the size of the existing channel. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction is $2,010,000 (1994). The project was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on September 4, 1991, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable disposal areas as may be determined by the Chief of Engineers to be necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the process of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of total project cost, estimated at $693,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash. The amount to be provided shall include the value of cost of all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and facility and utility 6-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 alterations and relocations necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable excavated material disposal areas, as may be determined by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the. United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary oftheArmy; at least annually inform affected interests that the channel will not provide complete flood protection and assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $5,000,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate planning was continued at a cost of $33,934. Engineering and design was continued at a cost of $12,945. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are substantially complete. The Local CooperationAgreement (LCA) was executed in November 1991. Construction award is not scheduled pending resolution of local sponsor real estate issues. 23. ORIENTAL(SOUTHAVENUE) N.C. Location. The project is located on the north bank of the Neuse River in Pamlico County, N.C., about 140 miles east of Raleigh (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Oriental, N.C.) Existing project. The recommended project will consist of approximately 990 linear feet of structural sheetpile protection of Neuse River shoreline at South Avenue between Vandermere and Freemason Streets. The sheetpile will be about 8 feet long and driven to the point of resistance. Approved estimated Federal cost for the project is $411,000 (1994). The project was approved by theAssistant Secretary of theArmy on September 23, 1994, under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of total project costs, estimated at $75,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000 and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the total project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment were completed at a cost of $29,539. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are scheduled to be initiated in October 1994. Contract award is scheduled for June 1995. 24. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, VIRGINIA, HEADWATERS AREA Location. The project is located on the Roanoke River in the City of Roanoke, Va. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Roanoke, Va.) Existing project. The authorized plan includes about 6.4 miles of channel widening along the 10-mile project reach through the City of Roanoke, Va. Channel widening will be accomplished with the construction of a benched channel above the elevation of the average streamflow. Other flood damage reduction features include floodproofing at one location, training walls to prevent floodwater intrusion into low areas along the river (total length 7,200 feet), replacement of two low-level bridges with constrict streamflows and a flood warning system. Recreation facilities consist of a 5-mile recreation trail along the project reach and access and parking areas. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $23,600,000. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H.R. 6, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including spoil disposal areas presently estimated at $8,161,000; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project presently estimated at $2,841,000; pay 25 percent of the cost of flood warning system (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations) presently estimated at $11,000; pay 5 percent of the total cost allocated to flood control in cash in addition to all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations presently estimated at $1,620,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $101,000, annually; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation presently estimated at $1,601,000, (partially offset by a credit for land, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities presently estimated at $9,000, annually; and pay 25 percent of the cost of non-structural floodproofing (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) presently estimated at $366,000. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Log perch monitoring was continued at a cost of $3,365. Planning, engineering and design was continued at a cost of $43,221. Condition at end of fiscal year. The contract for the flood warning system was completed in January 1991. 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT The contract for the sewage treatment plant floodproofing was awarded in August 1991 and completed in February 1993. EPA identified two areas requiring HTW removal with clean up to occur in 1995. Construction contract for channel improvements is scheduled for award in January 1997. Project completion is scheduled for January 2000. 25. WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N. C. Location. A small island 10 miles east of Wilmington, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map p.834) Existing project. Construct a dune with a base bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25. feet at elevation 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 14,000 feet from Moores Inlet on the north to Masonboro Inlet on the south. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 511, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). TheWater Resources DevelopmentAct of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for the life of the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Alternate Material Source Study was initiated at a cost of $67,425. Between March 3 and June 15, 1994, the contract dredgeAlaska removed 619,031 cubic yards from shoals to renourishWrightsville Beach at a Federal cost of $605,.042 and a contributed funds cost of $398,545. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work under the initial authorization has been completed. The first renourishment under WRDA 86 was completed in May 1991. The second renourishment was completed in June 1994. The next renourishment is scheduled for 1998. 26. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24,1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the UpperYadkin River Basin, two on theYadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the tworeservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 26A .W. KERR SCOTt DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acre-feet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Installation of underground fuel tanks was completed at a cost $230. Design for replacement of management center was continued at a cost $46,331. Indication and control system/flood gates cost $13,228. Conversion of package plants to septic tile fields cost $5,153. Road paving cost $316,584. Periodic inspection cost $23,516. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,476,777. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $67,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes inAugust 1962. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1994: Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.; Gapway Swamp, Columbus County, N. C.; Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N. C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N. C.; New River, Onslow County, N. C.; Pungo Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; South Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Pungo River, Beaufort County, N. C.; Filberts Creek, Edenton, N.C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N.C.; White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.; Pasquotank Dike, Pasquotank County, N. C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N. C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N. C.; Princeville Dike, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Swift Creek, Pitt County, N. C.; Carolina Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Wrightsville Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N. C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.; Black River, Harnett County, N. C.; Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.; Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, 6-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 N. C.; Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.; Ararat River, Surry County, N. C.; South Mayo River, Stuart, Va; and Leith Creek, Scotland County, N. C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $11,674. Total cost to September 30, 1994, was $509,987, charged to operations. 28. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 6-K) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). National Emergency Preparedness Program cost $119,870. Disaster Preparedness Program cost $212,350. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 29. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries inVirginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Table 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 64 on Dams and Reservoirs.) 29A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Estimated cost is $67,529,000 (1983) for construction and $24,521,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $92,050,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The removal of underground storage tanks at Northbend Park Marina cost $20,242. Periodic inspection of the dam bridge cost $9,035. Periodic inspection and evaluation of the dam cost $2,133. Road paving and repaving cost $3,683. Investigations and repairs to the floating bulkhead cost $3,309. Mapping and land allocation classification for master plan cost $30,760. Adjustments in cost for stripped bass recruitment study resulted in negative cost of $2,500. Replacement and installation of wicket gates cost $51,361. Island Creek Pumping Station Abandonment Study cost $5,850. Acquisition of tracts below the 326- foot contour in South Boston, Va., cost $8,631. Locating the borrow area and initiating the General Design Memorandum for the earth dike modification cost $200,979. Lead paint survey at the powerhouse and Island Creek cost $17,810. North Bend Park waste water treatment plant monitoring wells cost $1,319. Archeological documentation and National Register evaluation of Long Grass Plantation barn cost $198. Adjustments in cost for the renovation of Rudds Creek recreation area resulted in a negative cost of $31,386. Adjustments in cost for archeological survey resulted in a negative cost of $500. Purchase and installation of six line relay panels in the powerhouse cost $331,155. Painting of the gantry crane cost $1,740. Preparation of preliminary assessment for DDT and Dioxin sites cost $32,883. Sampling plans for pesticide mixing areas cost $3,219. Waterfowl impoundments/environmental studies and construction of waterfowl impoundments cost $6,253. Oil purification system for the powerhouse cost $80,159. Normal operation and maintenance cost $5,954,042. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $67,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 29B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. The project is located on Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation ofhydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details seeAnnual Report for 1962.) Federal cost estimate is $13,933,000 (1983) for construction and $1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $15,090,000. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. 6-16 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Periodic inspection and evaluation of structures cost $12,463. Replacing powerhouse roof cost $1,345. Waterfowl subimpoundment archeological and cultural resources investigations cost $1,898. Investigations and repairs of riverbank erosion at the dam/tailrace cost $19,392. Road paving and repaving cost $133,306. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,910,789. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $67,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 30. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began FiscalYear 1994 at elevation 212.93 feet, mean sea level (m.s.l.) or 3.07 feet below guide curve. Below normal rainfall continued from. October through midDecember, causing the lake level to remain below guide curve. The minimum elevation for the fiscal year of 210.80 feet, m. s. 1. occurred on November 26. Jordan Lake returned to guide curve on December 21,1993. Normal rainfall held the lake level near guide curve from January through the end of March. Two days of heavy rainfall caused the lake to rise to the maximum elevation for the year, 222.83 feet,m.s.l., or 6.83 feet above guide curve on March 31. The pool returned to guide curve by April 6 and average rainfall held the level there through the month of August. A minor drawdown occurred late in the year due to below average rainfall. Jordan Lake ended the fiscal year at elevation 215.38 feet, m.s.l. or 0.62 feet below guide curve. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 21 percent and conservation pool storage remaining during the low elevation, was 70 percent. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1994 were $732,000 making a cumulative total since inception of the project in 1981 of $19,159,900. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $141,908. Falls Lake, located in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, began FiscalYear 1994 at elevation 245.17 feet, m.s.l., or 5.83 feet below guide curve. Due to below average inflow, the lake level continued to fall to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year at elevation 242.78 feet, m.s.l. or 7.32 feet below guide curve on November 26. This was the lowest minimum elevation since inception of the project in 1983. From December through January, above normal rainfall steadily brought the lake elevation up to guide curve by January 28. The lake fluctuated slightly above guide curve in February. Heavy rainfall at the beginning of March caused the maximum elevation of the fiscal year at 255.12 feet., m.s.l., or 5.01 feet above guide curve on March 3. Additional heavy rainfall produced one other peak of 253.91 feet, m.s.l. on March 30. Falls Lake returned to near guide curve elevation of 251.0 at the end of April. The lake level remained at or near guide curve during May. Below normal rainfall for the remainder of the fiscal year caused the lake level to fall to 248.16 feet, m.s.l. by the end of September. The maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 30 percent, and the lowest conservation pool storage remaining was 30 percent. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1994 were $10,755,000 making a cumulative total since inception of the project in 1983 of $55,000,000. The total cost of functional operation for the period was $85,767. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, located in the Roanoke River Basin Virginia and North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1994 at elevation 298.02 feet, m.s.l. or 1.48 feet below the guide curve. The guide curve dropped from 299.5 feet, m.s.l., to 295.5 feet, m.s.l., during October and November. The reservoir level was drawn gradually to 296.91 feet, m.s.l., on November 11. Periods of rainfall caused two minor rises in reservoir elevation at the end of November to 300.65 feet, m. s. 1., and the first week of December to 301.93 feet, m. s. 1. The reservoir level was drawn down steadily to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year at 295.72 feet, m.s.1., or 0.22 feet above guide curve on December 31. Above normal rainfall January through March caused the reservoir level to fluctuate several feet above guide curve. Peak elevations of 300.91, 302.65, and 309.30 feet, m.s.l., occurred on January 31, February 27 and March 7, 1994, respectively. After drawing the reserve level down to elevation 303 on March 27 heavy rainfall caused a rise to the maximum elevation of the fiscal year at 312.21 feet, m.s.l., or 11.0 feet above guide curve onApril 3,1994. Kerr Reservoir was steadily drawn down to guide on April 26 and fluctuated near guide curve through the end August 1994. During September, the reservoir level fell below guide curve to the end of the fiscal year at 298.39 feet, m.s.l., or 1.11 feet below guide curve. In cooperation with State and Federal fish and wildlife agencies, the Wilmington District continued the operation of a trial fish flow regime started in FiscalYear 1989 in the lower Roanoke River to enhance the striped bass spawning from April 1 to June 15. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 54 percent. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest elevation during the year was 37 percent. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 514,328,600 kilowatt-hours or 21 percent above normal, and net marketed power revenue was $6,579,727 making a cumulative total of $165,755,414 since inception of the project in 1952. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1994 were $4,328,900 making a cumulative total of $170,916,900. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $374,833. Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan River Basin, Virginia, began FiscalYear 1994 at elevation 969.56 feet, m.s.l. or 1.94 feet below guide curve. The lake level remained below guide curve through the months of October and November. The lake level was gradually drawn down to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year at 968.02 feet, m. s. 1., or 3.48 feet below guide curve on November 5. Periods of heavy rainfall during late November and early December caused the lake level to rise above guide curve on December 8. Below normal inflows at the end of December and early January resulted in a lake level drop, briefly, below guide curve. 6-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Above normal rainfall for the months of January through March maintained lake level above guide curve. Heavy rainfall in the latter part of March resulted in the maximum lake level for the fiscal year. On March 29, the lake level reached 977.71 feet, m.s. 1., or 4.27 feet above guide curve. Above average to near- average inflows betweenApril and mid-June maintained the lake level at or near guide curve. From mid-June to near the end of July, the period was characterized by below normal inflows, which resulted in lake elevations below guide curve for that period. Heavy rainfall amounts in late July caused the lake level to rise above guide curve and peak at 974.52 feet, m.s.l., or 1.02 feet above guide curve on July 31. Another heavy rainfall event occurred in mid- August that produced a rise in lake level of 975.67 feet, m.s.l., or 2.17 feet above guide curve on August 18. The Philpott Lake level, thereafter, remained near guide curve for the remainder of the fiscal year. The lake level ended for the fiscal year at 971.17 feet, m.s. I., or 0.33 feet below guide curve. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 32 percent. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest elevation during the year was 78 percent. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 29,077,140 kilowatt hours or 19 percent above normal and net marketed power revenue was $1,188,462 making a cumulative total since inception of the project in 1953 of $24,195,394. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1994 were $2,211,400 making, a cumulative total of $290,005,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $124,445. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1994 at elevation 1029.86 feet, m.s.l, or 0.14 feet below the guide curve. Below average rainfall during October caused the reservoir level to fall to the lowest level of the fiscal year, 1028.84 feet, m.s.l., or 1.16 feet below guide curve on October 27, 1993. Above normal rainfall through November brought the level up to guide curve by the end of the month. Average rainfall prevailed through December to February and the pool elevation remained near guide curve. A rise to elevation 1035.20 feet, m.s.l. occured on February 24. Heavy rainfall near the end of March caused another rise to 1041.90 feet, m.s.l. on March 29, 1994. W. Kerr Scott then remained near guide curve from the beginning of April, through mid-August. The pool rose to the maximum elevation of the year, 1057.01 feet, m.s.l., or 27.01 feet above guide curve on August 18 due to very heavy rainfall. The reservoir ended the fiscal year at elevation 1030. 11 feet, m.s.l., or 0.11 feet above guide curve. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 49 percent, and the conservation pool storage remaining was 97 percent at the minimum elevation. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1994 were $38,712,800 making a cumulative total since inception of the project in 1963 to $133,105,800. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $96,547. 6-18 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $1,035,785 of which $662,700 was for navigation studies, $2,787was for flood control studies, $195,149 was for beach erosion studies, $48,911 for Environmental Services Partnerships, $50,247 for Special Investigations, $321 for FERC licenses review, $27,090 for interagency water resources development, $8,326 for National Estuary studies, $7,387 for the North American Waterfowl Management Plan, $5,000 for cooperation with other Water ResourceAgencies, $14,776 for National Marine Fisheries Services, and $13,091 for cooperation with states. Contributed funds in the amount of $256,206 were expended for navigation studies, $76,180 for beach erosion studies and $9,285 for cooperation with states. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and nonFederal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $368,812. Total costs to September 30, 1994 were $6,088,545. Contributed funds in the amount of $6,835 were expended for flood plain information studies. 33. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for Wilmington Harbor, Northeast Cape Fear River, N.. C., was continued at a cost of $136,732. PED was continued on Brunswick County Beaches, N. C., at a cost of $393,629. PED was terminated on Sugar Creek, N. C. and S. C., at a cost of $7,040. PED was terminated on West Onslow Beach and New River Inlet, N. C., at a cost of $145. PED was completed on Morehead City Harbor, N. C., at a cost of $7,275. PED was accomplished on Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C., at a cost of $204,432. PED was continued for Wilmington Harbor, Ocean Bar, N. C., at a cost of $321,233. FED was accomplished on Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C., at a cost of $191,601. PED was initiated on Wilmington Harbor channel widening, N.C., at a cost of $309,149. 6-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. John River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Cape Fear River, N.C. above Wilmington 5. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C. 6. Drum Inlet, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Lockwoods Folly River, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 9,000 35,730 2,198,000 1,704,957 5,183,100 4,757,743 77,000 77,000 836,000 704,266 -8,400 -8,400 13,300 12,617 540,600 541,081 20,000 47,230 5,465,000 5,885,226 7,555,800 8,011,687 16,300 16,300 754,900 896,066 126,300 126,300 683 663,000 663,454 24,000 215,000 860,400 31,944 184,383 825,602 - - 31,809 - - 31,8091 5,480,000 1,715,500 58,445,4732 5,042,624 2,038,622 58,151,3792 9,682,140 8,852,694 132,648,4493 9,578,230 8,720,817 132,370,7463 - - 86,851 - - 86,851' - - 667,300 - - 667,300 - - 818,040s S- 818,040s 5,900 85,655 3,828,3666 5,900 85,655 3,828,3666 - - 34,000 - - 34,000 -- 326,225 - - 326,225 - - 3,759,5737 - - 3,759,5737 1,512,616 1,373,000 20,158,8378 1,510,351 1,368,629 20,150,7988 - - 88,328 - - 88,328 3,907 1,664 2,929,895 3,271 2,300 2,929,895 - - 152,619 - - 152,619 92,000 139,200 1,297,779 89,870 140,504 1,296,953 - - 13,500 - - 13,500 241,2729 - 241,27210 2,143,800 688,100 9,228,793 2,143,800 688,100 9,228,793 - - 92,650 - - 92,65011 6-20 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 8. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Morehead City Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Roanoke River, N.C. 11. Rollinson Channel, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Shallotte River, N.C. 13. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Waterway connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost 464,000 614,879 8,411,800 8,339,095 484,000 477,427 - 152,879 6,080,310 6,100,398 -27,781 18,736 6,489,100 6,437,259 181,046 28,338 -- 90,000 - - 9,863 1,040,000 1,973,000 3,502,600 1,040,000 1,971,000 3,362,252 - - 370,000 111,646 98,289 7,000 7,000 416,000 416,000 4,200 4,200 -730 18,355 184,640 184,640 9,800 9,800 681,000 681,000 75,000 11,123 2,012,800 2,063,400 140,000 239,964 6,745,000 6,648,791 55 2 2 398,000 4,244 2,836 13,500 12,926 15,000 10,568 486,500 486,500 8,681,94512 8,610,45212 75,326,816 75,254,450 2,212,480 2,159,736 13,381,05313 13,204,70713 ,413,000 58,096,22814 ,555,166 58,096,04614 ,516,000 2,886,000 ,731,996 2,731,996 34,000 1,807,330 374,482 1,747,812 - 404,584 - 404,584 53,600 626,009 53,600 626,009 - 589,105 - 589,105 15,500 1,921,607 16,908 1,921,607 - 41,142 - 41,142 - 18,181 - 18,181 2,924 556,671 3,548 556,671 - 184,284 - 184,284 308,200 7,689,074 312,408 7,688,850 - 75,000 - 75,000 - 502,567 - 502,567 41,964 3,475,633 41,964 3,475,633 - 2,452 - 2,452 6-21 - - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 15. Wilmington Harbor, N.C. New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost 16. Blackberry Creek, New Work: Henry County, Va. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 17A. B. Everett Jordon New Work: Dam and Lake, N.C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 17B. Randleman Lake, N.C. New Work: Approp. Cost 18. Carolina Beach and New Work: Vicinity, N.C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 19A. Falls Lake, N.C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 20. Hamlet City New Work: Lake, N.C. Approp. Cost 21. King (Waterplant), N.C. New Work: Approp. Cost 22. Lower Creek, New Work: Lenoir, N.C. Aprop. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 23. Oriental (South New Work: Avenue), N.C. Approp. Cost 24. Roanoke River Upper BasinNew Work: Va.- Headwaters Area Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 6,066,000 8,155,000 5,936,134 8,256,978 391,304 534,125 12,000 11,247 928,000 1,936,246 921,000 984,145 67 1,421,000 1,520,178 1,263,000 1,207,696 3,479,000 6,637,146 996,000 974,643 450,000 225,380 119,000 182,981 363,000 256,971 113,300 334,049 895,614 776,142 10,000 10,753 2,300,000 1,902,208 1,047,000 1,066,026 -56,654 5,567 217 678,000 553,602 -12,357 42,947 4,434,000 4,490,985 1,015,700 1,077,207 210,354 30,495 745,000 880,321 17,286 122,389 5,266,000 - 1,853,625 2,614,000 5,854,900 2,683,797 5,595,287 - 2,388,000 - 783,622 522,402 273,839 683,337 248,693 49,800 9,802 2,891,000 3,041,505 1,050,000 1,024,153 -23,914 16,084 8,629 8,629 1,300,000 359,712 1,101,800 1,078,502 - 11,500 - 37 400,000 334,000 338,970 516,295 7,175,000 5,184,215 1,104,000 945,624 52,399 25,000 20,077 15,000 7,138 25,000 15,368 841,000 815,174 26,561 3,700,000 4,051,304 961,200 1,056,414 2,355,000 90,633 20,000 19,877 29,000 46,879 20,000 29,539 23,981,22615 20,568,85115 88,121,96716 87,806,04916 2,388,000 783,622 7,051,98517 7,009,00717 96,38618 96,38619 8,62920 8,62920 146,635,641 145,141,715 12,381,64321 12,299,36022 1,764,735 1,764,735 4,786,088 4,786,088 12,206,533 12,149,646 7,925,097 7,925,097 179,594,996 177,537,638 12,742,56121 12,670,63622 3,155,000 821,690 45,00024 39,95425 544,50026 523,99327 114,00028 114,00028 45,00029 44,90730 - 2,195,000 46,586 2,120,396 - 626,586 - 580,855 6-22 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 25. Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 26A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C. 29A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. & N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 29B. Philpott Lake, Va. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Aprop. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 300,000 897,468 321,096 762,096 - 170,000 - 135,573 850,000 3,635,100 672,467 3,423,140 398,545 2,620,72931 398,545 2,620,72921 - 8,841,326 - 8,841,326 1,576,000 1,774,400 1,423,951 1,961,125 1,785,600 2,023,800 25,261,90432 1,621,288 1,949,634 24,975,48833 - 94,402,927 - 94,402,927 6,353,400 7,116,000 6,270,462 7,161,602 7,732,500 6,608,300 110,467,58934 7,092,732 6,798,175 109,575,67135 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 14,796,384 14,796,384 1,957,000 1,913,300 1,902,895 1,957,479 1,989,000 2,171,800 34,159,49636 1,908,300 2,146,993 33,952,32337 6-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 2. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 3. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 4. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 6. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 7. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 8. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 9. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 10. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 11. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 12. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual costs. 13. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 14. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 15. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 16. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 17. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823; FY 85, $60,000. 18. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 87, $7,500; FY 89, $35,000; FY 90, $6,000; FY 91, $12,000; FY 91, $10,000 and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 93, $49,800 and FY 94, -$23,914. 19. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 87, $7,500; FY 89, $34,970; FY 90, $6,030; FY 91, $11,247; FY 92, $10,753 and preconstruction planning and construction costs: FY 93, $9,802; and FY 94, $16,084. 20. All contributed funds and costs thru FY 94 are for construction. 21. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800. 22. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800. 23. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 83, $400,000; FY 84, $128,345; FY 85, $82,600. 24. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 93, $25,000 and FY 94, $20,000. 25. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 93, $20,077 and FY 94, $19,877. 26. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 84, $42,500; FY 85, $25,000; FY 86, $20,000; FY 87, $85,000; FY 88, $67,000; FY 89, $17,000; and preconstruction planning and construction funds; FY 90, $125,000; FY 91, $119,000; FY 93, $15,000; and FY 94, $29,000. 27. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 84, $32,715; FY 85, $18,492; FY 86, $31,355; FY 87, $67,544; FY 88, $86,581; FY 89, $17,876 and FY 90, $1,937; and preconstruction planning and construction costs: FY 91, $182,981; FY 92, $30,495; FY 93, $7,138; and FY 94, $46,878. 28. All contributed funds and cost thru FY 91 are for preauthorization study. 29. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 93, $25,000 and FY 94, $20,000. 30. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 93, $15,368 and FY 94, $29,539. 31. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 32. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76 T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200; FY 93, $80,300, FY 94, $67,800. 33. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444; FY 85; $2,379; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800. 34. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300, FY 94, $67,800. 35. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $67,850; FY 85, $5,149; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800. 36. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800. 37. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800. 6-24 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4,19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 November 29, 1963, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 November 7, 1966 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 2 of text) Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock. 4 An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins. 5 A 12-foot channel in New River. s, 11 Vicinity of Fairfield - drainage: Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet.7 A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek .8 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. Maintenance of a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. H.D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D.589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 1478,63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H.D. 450,69th Cong., I1st sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H.D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H.D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess.' H.D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report July 1965 H.D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' 6-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 7, 1983, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 March 3, 1881 March 2, 1907 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 May 21, 1965, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 12, 1983, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1930 October 17, 1940 Maintenance of general navigation features of N.C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken and Core Creek. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue Inlet through the ocean bar. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Core Creek, Hobucken and Fairfield Bridges. BEAUJFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 3 of text) A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and shore protection. Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants Channel, and in front of Beaufort. Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, all to 12 feet deep. Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants andTaylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. A channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long, from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 13 of text) Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 Detailed Project Report June 1980 Detailed Project Report May 1983 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1013 Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 776, 69th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 334, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 111, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1965 Detailed Project Report June 1983 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' 6-26 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents February 7. 1967, Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor, channels 12 Detailed Project Report Sec. 107 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot July 9, 1965 July 14, 1960 Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance , channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUNDAND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 16 of text) August 30, 19359 A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to H.D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess.' Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. August 26, 1937 A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide to Atlantic. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' March 2, 1945 Channels, 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends H.D. 99, 77th Cong., 1st sess. ' of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. March 2, 1945 A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by S.D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.' 500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. May 17, 1950 A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by H.D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. July 11, 1963, A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Detailed Project Report Sec. 107 Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet Dec. 12, 1962 July 14, 1960 wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 100 feet. September 22, 1967, An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Detailed Project Report Sec. 107 Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at March 13, 1967 July 14, 1960 west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. February 17, 1969, A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side Detailed Project Report Sec. 107 channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, Dec. 21, 1967 July 14, 1960 with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point. April 3, 1975, Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis Detailed Project Report Sec. 107 to 7 feet. Feb. 8, 1974 July 14, 196010 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River, deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 7. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 8. A 6-foot by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12-foot by 90-foot project deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 9. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, Jan. 3, 1934. 10. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 11. Deauthorized January 1, 1990, under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(1), PL 99-662. 6-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control1 (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664 Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C. 1990 18,501 232,019 Avon Harbor, N. C.1 1986 74,096 444,764 Bay River, N. C.1 1950 44,382 49,627 Belhaven Harbor, N. C.' 1989 126,687 376,401 Black River, N. C. 1969 12,358 124,846 Cashie River, N. C. 1950 40,403 15,905 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.1 1975 69,610 25,615 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N. C.1 1975 42,029 5,685 Chowan River, N. C. 1950 - Contentnea Creek, N. C.1 1941 64,395 32,247 Edenton Harbor, N. C.1 1960 73,750 47,642 Far Creek, N. C.1 1992 164,642 1,774,217 Fishing Creek, N. C.1 1922 22,715 8,633 Knobb's Creek, N. C.1. 19613 80,500 48,969 Mackay Creek, N. C.1 19383 13,375 6,273 Neuse River, N. C.1 1982 477,223s 332,107 Newbegun Creek, N. C. 19283 4,802 247 Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.1 1950 10,688 61,139 Oracoke Inlet, N. C. 1991 346,240 946,110 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C.1 1993 674,651 1,069,205 Pembroke Creek, N. C. 1976 60,000 Perquimans River, N. C.' 19103 13,750 414 Scuppernong River, N. C.1 1950 81,164 87,282 Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), N. C.1 1989 113,273 52,945 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' 1950 8,507 18 South River, N. C.' 1936 12,452 23,686 Stumpy Point Bay, N. C.1 1993 268,381 1,141,266 Swift Creek, N. C.x 1940 1,600 5,422 Trent River, N. C.'.4 1968 115,199 143,579 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. 1965 132,834 85,299 Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,893,812 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C. 1984 911,099 182,725 Wrights Creek, N. C.1 1984 68,325 166,602 1. Completed. 4. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. River, N. C., transferred to Norfolk District. 5. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson 3. Report of Norfolk District. Creek, N. C. 6-28 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Septemmber 30. 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. 1984 490,000 Fort Macon Park, N. C.1 1973 620,000 - 1. Uncompleted portion of project was deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 6-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Ararat River, Mount Airy; N. C.1 Black River, Harnett County, N. C.' Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.' Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line) 0 Conetoe Creek, N. C.' Contentnea Creek, N. C.1 Core Creek, N. C.1 Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, N. C.' Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.1 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.1 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.1 Filberts Creek, N. C.' Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C."'. Gardners Creek, N. C.1 Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.1 Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. Howards Mill Lake, N. C." Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.' Leesville, Va.1 Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C..12 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va. Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.1 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C. 19 Neuse River, Oriental, N. C. New River, N. C.1 New River, Onslow County, N. C.1 Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.1 Old Field Swamp, N. C. '.9 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.1 Pungo Creek, N. C.1 Pungo River, N. C.1 Reddies River Lake, N. C.'2 Roaring River Lake, N. C.12 Simmons Bay, N. C.9 South Creek, N. C.1 Stuart, Va.' Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.' Tar River, N. C. Tar River, N. C.' Tar River and tributaries, N. C.1 Tar River, Princeville, N. C. Trent River, N. C.' Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N. C. & S. C.1,9 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C.1 1987 1984 1972 1976 1960 1939-1943 & 1958 1965 1989 1984 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1985 1984 1980 1984 1989 1982 1974 1978 1979 1992 1950 & 1956 1972 1961 1969 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1980 1978 1963 1971 1989 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1953 1961 1963 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special continuing authority. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 4. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 7. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 8. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 9. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 10. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 11. Reclassified to deferred category October 2, 1980. 12. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1984. 13. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests. 6-30 4,901,854 475,574 283,846 572,114^ 29,867 50,889 236,2238 175,315 394,055 223,413 138,117s 37,7773 374,005 54,5977 167,800 50,430 698,400 606,18913 367,755 430,151 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 370,446 51,896 580,977 95,873 86,600 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,60223 985,800 .370,000 186,435 194,3676 2,220,440 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 64,769 67,821 623,687 61,473 - - - - - - -147 214,286 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Report Date Funds Funds Project For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adkin Branch, N. C. AIWW - Mooring Basins AIWW - New River Onslow County, N. C. AIWW - Peltier Creek, N. C. 12-foot project AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut Bodie Island, N. C. Brunswick County Beaches - Long Beach Portion, N. C. - Berm Cape Lookout, N. C. Conoho Creek, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C. Davis, N. C. Fort Macon State Park, N. C., Remaining Work Harbor of Refuge, N. C. Hominy Swamp, N. C. Hyde County Dike, N. C. MacKay Creek, N.C. Mann's Harbor, N. C. Mill Creek, N. C. Mocassin Swamp, N. C. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet Moyock Creek, N. C. Nahunta Swamp, N. C. Neuse River, N. C. Neuse River Barrier, N. C. Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide channel in front of New Bern, N. C. North River Dike, N. C. Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, N. C. Ocracoke Island, N. C. Roanoke River, 50 mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon, N. C. Rockfish Creek, N. C. Scuppernong River, N. C. Six Runs Creek, N. C. Sweetwater Creek, N. C. Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. Topsail Beach and Surf City, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C. Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. Wilmington Harbor Widening and Deepening, N. C. 1982 None 1990 None None None 1990 None 1974 1972 1982 1973 1934 1973 None 1976 1973 1973 1973 1986 1973 1973 None None None None 1986 1975 1983 1976 1987 1971 1973 1976 None 1974 None 1990 8 Sept. 812 219,477 5 Aug. 771 1 Jan. 906 17 Nov. 865 23 Sept. 861 5 Aug.7 71 1 Jan. 906 5 Aug. 771 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 783 31 Mar. 824 17 Nov. 865 1 Nov. 811 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77 1 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 78 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 5 Aug. 771 5 Aug. 771 5 Aug. 771 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 20 Apr. 882 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 771 11 Jan. 852 5 Aug. 771 1 Jan. 906 79,782 4,250 25,419 1,396,653 107,472 130,900 7,265 116,395 36,680 64,416 65,673 30,911 129,592 157,721 234, 032 64,977 64,584 132,767 139,339 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as amended. 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 6-3 4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H Act of 1960, as amended. 5. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(bX 1), PL 99- 662. 7. Cost-to-date included in remaining authorized portion 1 of project (Engineering and Design only). REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Conducted Avon Harbor, N. C. Scuppernong River, N. C. March 1994 January 1994 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-I Study Identification Albemarle Sound, N. C. Crows Nest Channel, N. C. Harkers Island, Carteret County, N. C. Morehead Harbor, West Turning Basin Expansion, N. C. Moyock Creek, Currituck County, N. C. Styrons Creek, Carteret County, N. C. Whalehead Club, Corolla, N. C. Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Passing Lane 3 Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Turns and Bends3 Fiscal Period Cost 1,696 36,267 1,628 4,838 4,000 4,666 10,000 58,3601 2,7592 1. Includes $1,247 contributed funds. 2. Includes $332 contributed funds. 3. Combined into one project - Wilmington Harbor, Channel Widening, N. C. 6-32 TARTE f.H Prniect LW iiiJ #-ii a av~vv V t r "r r TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construc. Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (Ft) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) tion and Damages' 17. Cape Fear River Basin, N.C. 19. Neuse River Basin, N.C. B. Everett Jordan' IHowards MilPl' " Randleman' Small reservoirs Falls' Wilson Mills Beulahtown Bakers Mills Little Buffalo Buckhorn Wiggins Mill Stantonsburg Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp ilillsboro Orange Moncure, N.C. Carthage, N.C. Randleman, N.C. Falls, N.C. Wilson Mills, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Princeton, NC. Kenly, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Stantonsburg, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Fremont, NC. Durham, N.C. Durham, N.C. Yadkin River W Kerr Scott, N.C. Wilkeaboro, N.C. Basin, N.C.& S.C. Roanoke River John H. Kerr, Vs., and Boydton, Vs. Basin, Vs. and N.C.' N.C. Philpott, Vs.'* Bassett, Vs. Gaston, Va. and NC.' Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Rapids, NC.' Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Smith Mountain, Va.' Altavista, Vs. Leesville, Vs.' Altavista, Vs. Taber, Vs. Altavista, Va. Melrose, Va. Bookneal, Vs. Randolph, Vs. Chase City,Va. Stuart, Vs. and N.C. Spray, NC Schoolfield, Vs. and NC. Danville, Vs. Hlaw Deep Deep Various Neuse Neuse Little Little Little Buffalo Creek Contentnea Creek Contentnea Creek Tisnot Swamp Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Eno Little Yadkin-Pee Dee Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke 4.3 55.0 85.0 404.0 178.7 336.2 144.9 137.0 314.2 293.7 275.0 262.9 227.8 297.2 265.9 112 E 106 E 110 E 20to70+ E 92 E 81 CG,E 60 E 53 E 51 E 63 E 42 E 36 E 39 E 33 E 37 E 136 E 107 E 148 E 753,500 233,000 108,000 923,000 374,450 201,000 81,000 36,000 13,000 119,000 35,000 48,000 18,000 17,000 7,000 123,000 57,000 153,000 144 CG,E 2,808,000 220 CG" 249,800 108 CG,E 432,000 75 CO 59,300 244 CG 825,000 95 CG,E 76,900 54 CO 34,000 110 CG,E 120,000 147 CG,E 350,000 138 E 163,000 126 CG,E 248,000 - 89,186,000 58,414,000 147,600,000P - 18,874,000 14,726,000 33,600,000" - 62,300,000 61,7000,000 124,000,000" S-- 38,454,000 - 90,834,000 91,666,000 182,500,000' - - - 13,000,000 S- - 9,300,000 - - - 6,600,000 - - - 1,100,000 - - - 17,300,000 - - - 6,700,000 - - - 5,100,000 - - - 1,800,000 - - - 1,500,000 -- - 550,000 - - - 8,100,000 - - - 3,500,000 - 5,749,343 3,360.657 9,110,000 204,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 92,050,000 14,000 54,000 83,000 41,000 20,000 12,000 43,000 48,000 15,000 80,000 13,933,000 27,000,000 31,300,000 28,000,000 9,100,000 8,000,000 17,700,000 22,100,000 9,000,000 27,800,000 1,157,000 15,090,000 3,500,000 30,500,000 800,000 32,100,000 3,800,000 31,800,000 1,000,000 10,100,000 1,700,000 9,700,000 6,000,000 23,700,000" 4,700,000 26,800,000 1,100,000 10,100,000 6,400,000 36,000,000 0 z ..12 m~ 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,700,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interets and $44,000 cash contribution for construction of ranger security buildings. 4. Includes $13,637,000 presently allocated to water supply and $21,595,000 recreation and fish and wildlife to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $74,058,000 presently allocated to water supply, $8,646,000 allocated to recreation and $8,296,000 to flood control to be paid by local intersts during construction. 14. Reclassified to the deferred category October 2, 1980. Key E ........................... Earth CG .......................... Concrete-Gravity 26. 4\ 29. w W REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended TABLE 6-K (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Adkin Branch, Kinston, N. C. 414 Batts Chapel, Edgecomb County, N. C. 10,014 Beaverdam Creek, Clinton, N. C. 450 Corolla (Whalehead Center), N. C.2 4,976 Danville, Va. 24,646 Glade Creek, Roanoke County and Vinton, Va. 18,073 Great Coharie Creek, N. C. 26,419 Hominy Swamp, Wilson, N. C. 14,4221 Linville River, Avery County, N. C. 1,876 Little Rockfish Creek, N. C. 3,000 Mill Creek, Catawba River, Old Fort, N. C. 26,605 Mill Creek, Winston-Salem, N. C. 1,159 Moravian Creek, Wilkesboro, N. C. 32,103 Morehead City (Evans Street), N. C.2 6,381 N. C. Aquarium, DareCounty, N. C.2 9,399 Roanoke Island, Dare County, N.C.3 539 Six Runs Creek, Sampson County, N. C. 10,000 Stoney Creek, Goldsboro, N. C. 20,000 Swift Creek, Vanceboro, N. C. 41,026 Thomasville (Walnut Street), N. C.2 24,367 Trent River, Jones County, N. C. 1,967 West River Road Near Wabun, Roanoke County, Va. 4,952 West Roanoke County, Va.2 4,955 1. Includes $7,200 contributed funds. 2. Section 14 project. 3. Section 103 project. 6-34 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackey and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control, SC .............. 7-1 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ....... 7-2 3. Charleston Harbor,- SC ................ 7-2 4. Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC ........................ 7-3 5. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ...... 7-3 6. Folly River, SC ....................... 7-4 7. Georgetown Harbor, SC ................ 7-4 8. Jeremy Creek, SC ..................... 7-5 9. Little River Inlet, NC and SC ............. 7-5 10. Murrells Inlet, SC .................... 7-5 11. Port Royal Harbor, SC ................. 7-6 12. Shipyard River, SC .................... 7-6 13. Town Creek, SC ...................... 7-7 14. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...... 7-7 15. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 7-7 16. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 7-7 Beach Erosion Control 17. Folly Beach, SC ....................... 7-7 18. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ...................... 7-8 19. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization .............. .......... 7-8 Flood Control 20. Socastee Creek, SC .................... 7-8 21. Drayton Hall, SC ...................... 7-8 22. Pinopolis Dam, SC ..................... 7-9 23. Santee Dam, SC ..................... 7-9 24. Inspection of Completed Works ........... 7-9 25. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................ 7-10 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC Location. The project includes all public waters in the State of South Carolina. 26. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... Shore Protection 27. Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization ....................... Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 28. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power .. Miscellaneous 29. Project Modifications For Improvement of Environment ........................ General Investigations 30. Active Investigations ........ .......... Tables Table 7-A Cost and Financial Statement ........ Table 7-B Authorizing Legislation ............ Table 7-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects . . Table 7-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................. Table 7-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ Table 7-F Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ........... Table 7-G Deauthorized Projects.............. Table 7-H Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization ................... Table 7-I Active General Investigations ........ Table 7-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... Table 7-K Inspection of Completed Works ...... 7-10 7-10 7-10 7-10 7-10 7-11 7-15 7-20 7-20 7-21 7-21 7-22 7-22 7-23 7-24 7-24 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. Existing Project. The project provides for the control of noxious aquatic plant growths from public waters in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, and public health. 7-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 50 percent of the total cost. The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Division, is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets local interest requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Aquatic plants now infest approximately 40,000 acres, with the worst infestations occurring in Lake Marion and Lake Moultrie. During FY 94, 19,257 acres of aquatic plants in 30 water bodies were treated with herbicides. Grass carp (100,000) were purchased and stocked in Lake Moultrie to control aquatic plants in approximately 10,000 acres. The total cost of work performed in FY 94 was $1,500,186. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is ongoing. Federal costs for the project to date have been $8,872,878 for new work. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts near Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, .pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by Eastern Dredging Company using a. pipeline dredge in the AIWW from Charleston to St. Helena Sound during June 1994 - August 1994, removing 722,940 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,179,426. The mosquito abatement control contract costs were $54,594. The cost of operating the Snagboat Snell in the Myrtle Beach area was $221,505. Debris removal costs in the vicinity of Myrtle Beach were $67,430. Costs of $952,380 were incurred for contract dike maintenance. Condition and operation studies, project operations management, lands and damages, water control management, bank stabilization, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $594,232. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $7,345,888 for new work and $61,404,951 for maintenance, for a total of $68,750,839. 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, SC, and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 425 of the Annual Report for 1962; page 1808 of the Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of the Annual Report for 1926; and page 562 of the Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for deepening of the 35-foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 27.1 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, and deepening of the Wando River Channel to 40 feet. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. The SC State Ports Authority owns and operates four public terminals and a grain elevator in Charleston Harbor. These terminals offer more than two miles of berthing space, room enough for seventeen vessels at one time. The Ports Authority operates fifteen custombuilt container cranes and a variety of gantry and mobile cranes for breakbulk applications. On the land side, Charleston has extensive interstate and rail connections and is served by over 100 motor carriers. Modern facilities arc 7-2 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The U. S. Navy Department has modern facilities for maintenance of naval vessels including nuclear-powered submarines. Loading docks and storage areas for missile-carrying type vessels have also been constructed and are being operated by the U. S. Navy. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: All new work is cost shared 75/25, Federal/non-Federal respectively. Contract dredging was performed by Weeks Marine using a clamshell dredge in the Wando River during February 1994 - September 1994 for a total contract cost of $2,181,048. Claims costs of $41,135 were paid to Atkinson Dredging Company for work performed in FY 91. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $91,853 and $130,535, respectively. Federal costs for the project were $1,903,437. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed: (a) by The M Operating Company using pipeline dredge in the Lower Harbor and Shem Creek during March 1994 - August 1994, removing 1,164,157 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $2,365,772, (b) by Southern Dredging Company using a pipeline dredge in the Tidewater to Ordnance Reach area during September 1993 - December 1993, removing 528,406 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $217,091. Mobilization costs of $23,755 were paid to Southern Dredging for work to be performed in Charleston Harbor in FY 95. Total contract costs were $2,606,618. Costs to CEWES for sea turtle studies were $44,980. Costs for removal of wrecks and obstructions were $10,977. Condition and operation studies, water control management, natural resource management, project operations management, lands and damages, planning, engineering and design, and construction management costs were $902,121. Condition at end of fiscal year. At the end of FY 94, physical construction of the programmed work on the 40' project was 100% complete. Federal costs through FY 94 for the existing 40' project have been $37,137,523 (including PED) for new work and $117,527,266 for maintenance. 4. CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFT), SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston, SC. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) All works of improvement are in Berkeley County about 45 miles from Charleston, SC. Existing Project. The completed Cooper River, Charleston Harbor project (See Section 5) resulted in significant reduction in the transfer of blueback herring into the Santee Cooper Lakes. The landlocked striped bass fishery, a major tourist attraction, is dependent on these fish for forage. A model study, completed in March 1992 at CEWES, was conducted to determine how the turbine discharge could be prevented from overwhelming the attractant flow through the fish lift, plus testing various operational and structural modifications to determine how best to improve fish passage. Construction of Phase I was 20% complete in FY 94. Phase II design is scheduled for completion in FY 95, with construction expected to be complete in FY 96. Monitoring of the fish lift operation for two years after construction will be required to gather and analyze data to be used to refine the operation of the fish lift and to ensure its effectiveness. Total estimated cost of the project is $4,825,000, all Federal. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Installation of a series of reinforced concrete walls (wing walls) was begun by Brantley Construction Company, Inc., in FY 94. Contract costs were $225,000. Costs for engineering and design, and construction management were $305,527 and $15,848, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. At the end of FY 94, construction of Phase I was 20% complete. Federal costs through FY 94 for the project have been $845,763. 5. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor was the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, which caused density currents which trapped sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem was to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River, as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act, provided that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydroplant be reduced to a flow which would not establish a density current in the 7-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 harbor. This flow was estimated at 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the design phase of the project, but after operational tests this flow is estimated at 4,500 cfs. The excess water impounded in Lake Moultrie is being directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility was constructed on the new canal at the edge of the swamp adjacent to the Santee River. This plant replaces those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 11,000 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the 4,500 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, approximates the historical average flow at Pinopolis. The three generators at the new plant are rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the project includes a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a relocated fish hatchery. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Costs during FY 94 were $10,159 for contract administration. Maintenance: Funds of $4,074,487 were spent for and maintenance of completed work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated March 1977. The power-on-line date was March 1985. The power plant, channels and canals, and attendant work was completed in FY 85. The Corps has an open letter of credit with the SC Highway Department until they exercise option to initiate construction to widen the existing Highway 52 bridge over the tailrace canal or until 28 May 2001. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $196,887,784 for new work and $33,450,459 for maintenance, a total of $230,338,243. 6. FOLLY RIVER, SC Location. The project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel, eleven feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River one mile through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from U. S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with the Folly River. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: The government-owned sidecaster dredge Fry removed 17,745 cubic yards of material at a cost of $219,480 during April 1994 - May 1994. Condition and operations studies, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $39,756. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in FY 79. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $337,736 for new work and $3,453,235 for maintenance, a total of $3,790,971. 7. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U. S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one 500 foot concrete pier with creosote-timber fenders and one 700 foot concrete and steel bulkhead, both of which are backed up by 25 acres of paved area. Since 1984 approximately $8.5 million has been spent on structures and improvements by the SC State Ports Authority and private interests. Other than the 700 foot bulkhead, recent improvements include a 43,000 foot warehouse, salt dome, cement dome, three lumber sheds, plus acquisition of ten additional acres of land. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) by NATCO Limited Partnership in the Entrance Channel by hopper dredge during January 1994 - May 1994, removing 566,552 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $655,521, (b) by Southern Dredging Company in the 7-4 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Upper Winyah Bay by pipeline dredge during May 1994 - September 1994, removing 1,359,270 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,684,064, for total contract costs of $2,339,585. Contract dike maintenance costs were $335,682. Water control management, natural resource management, condition and operation studies, project operations management, easement acquisition, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $580,876. Applied a credit of -$14,706 for funds received for disposal area user fees. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903 - 1904. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $4,615,903 for new work and $64,325,061 for maintenance, a total of $68,940,964. 8. JEREMY CREEK, SC Location. Jeremy Creek is located at McClellanville, SC approximately 40 miles northeast of Charleston and 20 miles southwest of Georgetown. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11531 and 11518.) Existing project. The project provides for a turning basin twelve feet deep and 150 feet in diameter at the head of the previously existing Jeremy Creek navigation channel. The dredging of Jeremy Creek or "Side Channel to McClellanville" was authorized as a part of the channel from Charleston to McClellanville (or part of what is now the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway) by the River and Harbor Act of 2 March 1907. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimping facilities, one oyster packing shed, a crabbing operation, two icehouses, three fuel docks and a public launching ramp located on Jeremy Creek. The commercial facilities are privately owned, but are considered adequate for present and near future commerce. There are areas along the east bluff shore available for the expansion of existing facilities or the construction of new ones. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Planning, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $1,463. Condition at end of fiscal year. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $49,987 for new work and $99,650 for maintenance, a total of $149,637. 9. LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC Location. The project is located near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shallotte, N. C. to Georgetown, S. C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel is stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,284 feet and 3,830 feet long on the east and west sides of the inlet, respectively. The current project was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. It is expected that existing facilities will expand and new ones will be added as demands for services exceed current capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A 5-year monitoring program was initiated in 1981 to provide information for management of the project and to determine the effect of the project on nearby coastal areas. Charleston District (CESAC) collects the data and Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. Following conclusion of the initial 5-year monitoring plan (February 1986), CERC presented results of their preliminary analysis to CESAC and CESAD at a meeting in Charleston on 8 April 1986. The data indicated that coastal processes in the vicinity of the inlet have not reached an equilibrium condition and recommended continued monitoring at a reduced level. This effort is currently underway. Condition and operation studies, water control management, inspection and reports, project operations management, breakwall, jetty and seawall maintenance, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administrative costs were $44,305. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in FY 84. Federal costs for the existing project have been $17,037,428 for new work and $2,878,945 for maintenance, a total of $19,916,373. 10. MURRELLS INLET, SC Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) 7-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel is stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. The current project was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Facilities are expected to be expanded and new ones added as demands for services outstrip capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: A monitoring program was initiated in April 1978 to provide site specific information for proper management of the project and to provide data on coastal response to the project. Charleston District collects most of the data and Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. The monitoring program has been adjusted several times based on CERC recommendations. Currently the program includes annual aerial photography, jetty surveys and site inspections, semi-annual surveys of beaches and the deposition basin. Channel surveys are not scheduled but are conducted on an "as needed" basis. Results of the monitoring program have led to recommendations for dredging the deposition basin, nourishment of a reach of eroded beach at North Litchfield Beach and erosion protection of a section of the south jetty sand dike. Condition and operations studies, water control management costs, project operations management, inspections and reports, planning, engineering and design, breakwater, jetty and seawall maintenance, and supervision and administrative costs were $46,746. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1981. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $15,502,240 for new work and $3,824,800 for maintenance, a total of $19.327,040. 11. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 57 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of the mouth of the Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep aid 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. (See the table at the end of the chapter for acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities include one 565 foot concrete wharf and one 50 ton gantry crane. Since the late 1980's improvements to the port facilities consist of two large cargo tanks for storage of clay, a freezer for exports, additional warehouse space and the dock has been reinforced. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in the Entrance Channel by Gulf Coast Trailing Company by hopper dredge during February 1994, removing 339,361 cubic yards of material at a cost of $571,348. Condition and operation studies, water control management, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $152,184. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1959. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $1,786,100 for new work and $11,765,815 for maintenance, a total of $13,551,915. 12. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U. S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about one and one-half miles and empties into the Cooper River, about three-fourths miles above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to MacAlloy Corporation's plant, including two turning basins, one opposite Chevron USA Products Company and another at the upper end of the project. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) The 1986 Water Resources Development Act authorized deepening to 38 feet and enlarging the lower turning basin to 1000 ft. as part of the Charleston Harbor, SC improvement. 7-6 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Located in the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are wharves operated by the Chevron USA Products Company and the Shipyard River Coal Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products, coal and miscellaneous dry bulk materials. Located mid-channel are Salmons Dredging Corporation, Detyens Shipyard, and Pre-Stress Concrete Company. Situated in the upper channel is MacAlloy Corporation's wharf used for handling ores. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by Southern Dredging Company using a pipeline dredge during September 1993 - December 1993, removing 128,065 cubic yards of material; costs of -$4,568 for this work reflect adjustments made to earnings for work performed in FY 93. Water control management, project operations management, condition and operations studies, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $35,469. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. New work dredging was accomplished in 1989 under the Charleston Harbor, SC improvement. The entrance channel and a portion of the lower turning basin have been deepened to 38 feet. Cost for that work is reflected in the cost for the Charleston Harbor improvement. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $487,824 for new work and $10,161,788 for maintenance for a total of $10,649,612. 13. TOWN CREEK, SC Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, SC. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. (See table at end of the chapter for acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by the government-owned sidecaster dredge Schlweizer during May 1994 - June 1994, removing 172,453 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $462,472. Condition and operations studies, water control management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $36,759. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1975. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $219,521 for new work and $5,837,453 for maintenance, a total of $6,056,974. 14. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs of $13,879 were incurred for a survey of the Ashley River conducted during February 1994 - April 1994; $402 for the Edisto River during August 1994 - September 1994; and $89 for the Salkehatchie River in September 1994, for a total of $14,370. 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 7-C.) 16. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for Beaufort - AIWW, SC, $24,889; Calabash Creek, NC, $23,437. Snagging and Clearing for Navigation (Section 3, Public Law 79-14.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion 17. FOLLY BEACH, SC Location. The municipality of Folly Beach, SC is located along the Atlantic shoreline of Folly Island, approximately 12 miles south of the City of Charleston, SC. Folly Island is the second island south of the Charleston Harbor entrance channel. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for protection from a 5-year storm event and placed about 2.48 million cubic yards of sand over a total project reach of 28,200 feet of beach. The project has an initial berm with a top width of 15 feet at an elevation of 9.0 feet above the national geodetic vertical datum. Nine groins constructed of wooden piles, timbers, and large rocks which extend perpendicular into the surf for an average distance of approximately 250 linear feet were rehabilitated. The 7-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 rehabilitated groins were built of steel sheet pile with a concrete cap and tied into only the wooden sections of existing groins which are deemed salvageable. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet. Periodic nourishment is required approximately every eight years with a total volume of 1.74 million cubic yards each cycle. Estimated cost (October 1992 price levels) of initial construction is $14,290,000 Federal and $2,522,000 non- Federal for a total of $16,812,000. Estimated cost of periodic nourishment is $84,399,000 Federal and $14,893,000 non- Federal for a total project cost of $116,104,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 15 percent of all costs associated with the initial construction and periodic nourishment costs; provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; and maintain all project works after completion. Operations and results during fiscal year. In FY 94, final contract payment of $388,910 was made to T.L. James and Company, Inc., for dredging performed in FY 93. Grassing contract was awarded to Duke's Grassing Company in September 1993. Total FY 94 contract costs for grassing were $156,049; total contract costs paid in FY 94 were $544,959. Federal share of contract costs was $484,799. Review of local sponsor acquisitions, engineering and design and construction management costs were $4,760, $135,549 and $56,310, respectively. Sponsor's credit for LERRD's was $16,812. Federal costs for the project were $681,418. Condition at end of fiscal year. Federal costs through FY 94 have been $10,200,424 (including PED). 18. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-D.) 19. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) consisted of Arcadian Shores, SC; Edisto Beach, SC; and Litchfield Beach, SC. FY 94 costs for these studies were $9,447, $7,012, and $9,961, respectively. Flood Control 20. SOCASTEE CREEK, SC Location. Socastee Creek is a small coastal stream located 5 miles inland and adjacent to Myrtle Beach, Horry County, SC. The creek originates in Big Bay Swamp and flows in a southwesterly direction for approximately eight miles to its confluence with the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW). The total drainage area of the creek above the AIWW is 22.5 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement consisted of clearing and enlarging approximately 2.1 miles of the existing creek channel with the inclusion of two low flow weird to protect the quality of the existing natural environment. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 7-8 of FY 1992 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract was completed by L. White Construction Company, Inc. in June 1993. FY 94 contract payments for work completed in FY 93 were $91,650. Federal share of contract costs was $69,402. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $3,413 and $300, respectively. Federal costs for the project were $73,115. Condition at end of Fiscal Year. Federal costs through FY 94 for the existing project have been $1,093,711 for new work. 21. DRAYTON HALL, SC Location. Drayton Hall Plantation is located on the Ashley River approximately nine miles northwest of the downtown Charleston, SC peninsula. Existing project. The entire Drayton Hall site is a historically significant facility. The remains of an eighteenth century orangerie, or solar greenhouse, adjacent to the Ashley River was being threatened by streambank erosion. The plan of improvement consisted of placing a 21-inch thick layer of graded riprap on a prepared gravel bed and a layer of geotextile filter fabric. Prior to placement of the riprap and bedding material, compacted aggregate fill was placed against the existing eroded bank to provide a sloped surface of 1 foot vertical to 2 feet horizontal. The riprap revetment was to be 410 feet in length and extend from the top of the existing bank at elevation 7.2 feet NGVD to elevation -4.6 feet NGVD. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 7-8 of the FY 1993 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. L-J Inc., of Columbia, SC started construction on 18 February 1993. All work, with the exception of grass stabilization, was completed as of 14 June 1993. Engineering and design and construction management costs in FY 94 were $1,610. Total contract costs were -$7,935, which reflects adjustments made to earnings for work performed in FY 93. Federal costs for the project were -$3,473. 7-8 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Condition at end of Fiscal Year. Federal costs through FY 94 for the existing project have been $187,800 for new work. 22. PINOPOLIS DAM, SC Location. The Pinopolis Dam is on Lake Moultrie, SC, which is located approximately 30 miles north of Charleston, SC. Existing project. The existing embankment erosion protection at the Pinopolis Dam experienced erosion and riprap washout during the winter storm of March 1993, leaving the original porous concrete facing of the embankments exposed at many locations. The facing is generally cracked and has been undermined and broken in some locations. The recommended plan consists of placement of riprap along approximately 2,061 linear feet of dam. Of this amount, 1,976 linear feet will be placed along the East Dam and 85 linear feet will be placed along the West Dam. A 12-inch bedding layer with a maximum stone size of five inches will be placed for a distance of 1,200 linear feet along the East Dam only. No bedding material is required for the West Dam because existing bedding material at this location conforms to required standards. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations, and alterations required for construction, and must provide future maintenance of the project. During the period of construction, they are required to provide an amount equal to, but not less than 25 percent of the total project costs, of which at least five percent is cash; operate and maintain all project works after construction; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the Unites States or its contractors. The non-Federal partner is the South Carolina Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper). Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded on 22 July 1994 to Walco, Inc., of Robbinsville, NC. Contractor mobilized on 4 October 1994. Fish and wildlife studies, economic studies, hydrology and geotechnical studies, and real estate activity costs were $28,965. Costs for plans and specifications and construction management were $30,302. Total Federal costs for FY 94 were $59,267. Condition at end of Fiscal Year. Federal costs through FY 94 for the existing project have been $62,302. 23. SANTEE DAM, SC Location. The Santee Dam is located on Lake Marion, SC, which is approximately 40 miles north-northwest of Charleston, SC. Existing project. The existing embankment erosion protection at the Santee Dam experienced erosion and riprap washout during the winter storm of March 1993, leaving the original porous concrete facing of the embankments exposed at many locations. This facing is generally cracked and shows signs of fatigue. The recommended plan consists of placement of riprap along approximately 2,310 linear feet of dam. Of this amount, 2,140 linear feet will be placed along the Santee North Dam and 170 linear feet will be placed along the Santee South Dam. A 12-inch bedding layer with a maximum stone size of five inches will be placed for a distance of 975 linear feet along the North Dam only. No bedding material is required for the South Dam because existing bedding material at this location conforms to required standards. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations, and alterations required for construction, and must provide future maintenance of the project. During the period of construction, they are required to provide an amount equal to but not less than 25 percent of the total project costs, of which at least five percent is cash; operate and maintain all project works after construction; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. The non-Federal partner is the South Carolina Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper). Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded to Walco, Inc., of Robbinsville, NC, on 22 July 1994. Contractor mobilized on 4 October 1994. Fish and wildlife studies, economic studies, hydrology and geotechnical studies, and real estate activity costs were $31,200. Costs for plans and specifications and construction management were $35,524. Total Federal costs for FY 94 were $66,724. Condition at end of Fiscal Year. Federal costs thru FY 94 for the existing project have been $70,524. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works when appropriate. Cost for the period was $20,000. For project inspection data see Table 7-K. 7-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-J) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 84-99, and Antecedent Legislation). Federal costs for FY 94 were $217,100 for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies and $118,441 for the National Emergency Preparedness Program. Emergency Work for Others. No costs were incurred in FY 94. 27. STREAMBANK EROSION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 as amended (Preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were Charlestowne Landing, SC, $19,287; Middleton Place - Levee, SC, $37,152; Pinopolis Dam, SC, $59,268; Santee Dam, SC, $66,724; Middleton Place, SC, $2,836; Old Dorchester State Park, SC, $137; 39th Avenue North Bridge, Myrtle Beach, SC, $2,304; 48th Avenue South Bridge, Myrtle Beach, SC, $1,143; Battery Pringle, James Island, SC, $39,952; Indian Bluff Park, Eutawville, SC, $14,496; SC DOT Bridges, SC, $16,963; and Shore Drive, Singleton Swash, Myrtle Beach, SC, $20,773. (See Table 7-H for previous projects in this category.) Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. No costs were incurred in FY 94. 28. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER (See Table 7-F.) Miscellaneous 29. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Project modifications accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Fiscal year costs for Murphy Island, Santee Wildlife Refuge, SC were $113,065. General Investigations 30. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-I which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development Activities. 7-10 TABLE 7-A CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC (Contributed Funds) 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, FL 3 Charleston Harbor, SC (Contributed Funds) 4 Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC 5 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC 6 Folly River, SC 7 Georgetown Harbor, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,038,000 1,036,881 0 0 1,060,000 1,078,222 0 0 1,054,000 1,046,144 0 0 1,695,000 1,500,186 0 0 0 0 9,081,605 8,872,878 52,028 52,028 7,455,378 7,455,378 2,855,000 2,764,000 1,976,982 3,167,000 61,625,668 2,650,502 3,059,744 1,967,937 3,069,567 61,474,373 5,378,000 9,051,000 -107,000 2,145,000 47,661,564 6,965,732 9,586,388 326,413 1,903,437 47,303,087 3,138,000 3,984,000 3,511,689 3,291,000 118,050,118 3,762,453 3,990,871 3,251,269 3,564,696 117,929,855 2,190,000 3,215,000 250,000 2,321,912 3,195,463 442,963 Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 250,000 213,182 43,000 1,192 0 163 50,000 86,206 0 3,491 530,000 12,425,000 541,134 12,369,167 575,000 546,375 875,000 845,763 0 198,681,191 10,159 196,887,784 3,846,000 2,692,000 4,112,054 4,072,000 33,685,513 4,020,940 2,455,864 4,214,687 4,074,487 33,450,459 0 0 501,000 668,469 337,736 337,736 266,000 267,158 46,292 47,108 275,000 3,468,999 259,236 3,453,235 7,061,755 7,061,755 1,673,000 2,261,000 3,327,721 1,986,794 2,259,120 3,338,568 3,286,000 64,534,638 3,241,437 64,439,617 7-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 8 Jeremy Creek, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 9 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (Contributed Funds) 10 Murrells Inlet, SC (Contributed Funds) 11 Port Royal Harbor, SC 12 Shipyard River, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 0 0 109,000 128,774 0 0 2,033,000 2,091,736 56,000 81,744 156,893 156,893 71,000 80,840 70,000 76,925 0 0 0 0 42,638 46,268 0 0 0 0 62,554 65,821 0 852 17,037,428 17,037,428 52,000 2,886,640 44,305 2,878,945 1,521,920 1,521,920 15,502,240 15,502,240 56,000 3,901,054 46,746 3,891,800 0 0- 0 0 0 0 242,000 1,625,000 278,022 1,632,268 363,000 430,948 33,000 29,523 1,536,893 1,536,893 1,786,100 1,786,100 55,483 717,000 11,767,143 56,184 723,532 11,765,815 0 0 340,342 347,803 0 0 491,974 491,974 37,000 10,168,554 30,901 10,161,788 7-12 0 0 1,000 6,372 0 0 12,000 12,839 1,000 844 49,987 49,987 99,675 99,650 1,000 1,463 TABLE 7-A CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 13 Town Creek, SC (Contributed Funds) 17 Folly Beach, SC (Contributed Funds) 20 Socastee Creek, SC (Contributed Funds) 21 Drayton Hall, SC (Contributed Funds) 22 Pinopolis Dam, SC (Contributed Funds) 23 Santee Dam, SC (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 219,521 219,521 569,000 622,612 444,000 436,368 528,246 504,000 5,855,297 529,316 499,231 5,837,453 00 300,000 8,744,000 219,709 7,713,298 50,000 43,806 187,000 2,313 0 0 741,000 261,296 0 53,931 38,000 6,539 8,600 8,600 0 10,630,000 681,418 10,200,424 1,300,000 100,000 1,400,000 1,288,750 101,712 1,390,462 150,000 641,755 50,000 176,610 160,500 184,734 65,500 64,000 9 9 10 l0 85,700 1,109,700 73,114 1,093,710 24,600 22,248 -10,700 - 3,473 - 2,926 - 1,426 31,500 30,302 139,000 3,075 62,500 35,524 147,000 4,583 261,600 255,101 187,800 187,800 62,574 62,574 31,500 30,302 139,000 3,075 62,500 35,524 147,000 4,583 7-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1 Includes $109,490 for new work for previous projects. 2 Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 3 Includes $10,165,564 for previous projects and $752,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design. 4 Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects and $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds for the existing project. 5 Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 6 Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects 7 Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L 79-11 incurred through FY 73. 8 Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 9 Includes $1,586,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design. 10 Excludes $375,968 credit for LERRD's. 7-14 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 ' Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 18, 1878 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 18, 1918 Jan..21, 1927 1. H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 89-298 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway eight feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, SC. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of ten feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to twelve feet deep and 90 feet wide. Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, twelve feet deep, near Myrtle Belch, SC. (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC 2 jetties. s Increase in depth to 30 feet with width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572. H.D. 288, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd sess, pt.1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 64-68. H.D. 249, 69th Cong. 1st sess. 7-15 Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1900, p.1 908 Annual Report 1903, p. 1133 H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., 1st. sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 3 H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 3. REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 17, 1991 Aug. 13, 1968 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Aug. 5, 1886 The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and ten feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advanced Engineering and Design. Deepening 35 foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42 foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a distance of 27.1 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintain the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at Federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet if economically justified. CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFT'), SC See Cooper River Charleston Harbor. Modify the fish lift at the Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (Rediversion Project) and monitor operation of the fish lift for two years following such modifications. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC (ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) Redivert most of the Santee River waters Pinopolis Dam into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. FOLLY RIVER, SC Consists of stable all-tide channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and Folly Creek and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and eleven feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong;, 1st sess. S.D. 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 94-436, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 99th Cong. 2nd sess., P.L. 96-662 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 P.L. 102-104 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 23, 1977. H. Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. 7-16 4. 5. 6. 7. CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Mar 2. 1945 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 2, 1945 Auth. by the House Comm. on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971, and the Senate Comm. on Public Works on Nov 18, 1971, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. JEREMY CREEK, SC To provide a turning basin twelve feet deep and 150 feet in diameter at the head of the previously existing Jeremy Creek. LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence ten feet by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. MURRELLS INLET, SC Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. H.D. 398, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, 11 Jan 82. Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H.D. 362, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H.D. 137, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 7-17 8. 9. 10. REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents 11. Sep. 3, 1954 12. Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 2 Mar. 2, 1945 13. Jul. 14, 1960 as amended 17. Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 17, 1991 20. Jun. 30, 1948 21. Jul. 24, 1946 22. Jul. 24, 1946 PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC A channel from the ocean through. Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, SC.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the SC State Ports Authority. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of twelve to twenty feet. 28-feet from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to twenty feet from the depth of twelve feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburgh Metallurgical Co. Plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. TOWN CREEK, SC An entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 6.2 miles. FOLLY BEACH, SC Shoreline protection. Construct hurricane and storm protection measures. SOCASTEE CREEK, SC Clearing and enlarging approximately 2.1 miles of the existing creek channel with the inclusion of two low flow weirs. DRAYTON HALL, SC Control erosion on the west bank of the Ashley River adjacent to, and in the immediate vicinity, of the orangerie site located on Drayton Hall Plantation. PINOPOLIS DAM, SC Prevent streambank erosion at selected locations along the upstream face of the Pinopolis Dam, to include areas on the East Dam and West Dam. H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S.D. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st scss. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 12, 1974. P.L. 99-662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 102-104, 102nd Cong. Sec. 205 P.L. 858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Apr. 26, 1989. Sec. 14, P.L. 526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 3, 1992. Sec. 14, P.L. 526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Jun. 15, 1994. 7-18 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents SANTEE DAM, SC 23. Jul. 24, 1946 Prevent streambank erosion at selected locations Sec. 14, P.L. 526. Authorized along the upstream face of the Santee Dam, to by Chief of Engineers, Jun. 15, include areas on the North Dam and South Dam. 1994. 1/ Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 2/Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. 3/ Contains latest published maps. 4/ Inactive. 5/ Completed under previous projects. 6/ For national defense. 7-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) For Last Full Report See Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Annual Report Operation & Project Status For Construction Maintenance Adams Creek, SC Completed 1978 $125,697 $29,143 Aquatic Plant Control, NC and SC ' Completed 1968 379,680 -- Archers Creek, SC Completed 1914 20,646 -- Ashley River, SC Completed 1955 260,996 589,436 Brookgreen Gardens, SC Completed 1992 94,700 2,000 Edisto River, SC Completed 1938 33,103 2,887 Great Pee Dee River, SC Completed 1950 183,712 271,098 Mingo Creek, SC Completed 1950 29,050 8,575 Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC Completed 1982 9,500 85,595 Salkahatchie River, SC Completed 18% 15,841 1,936 Santee River NC & SC Completed 1950 99,750 182,469 Village Creefk, SC Completed 1985 26,500 111,314 Waccamaw River, NC and SC Completed 1978 262,814 284,347 Wateree River, SC Completed 1940 60,000 154,559 Pilot Program 2 Excludes $7,800 contributed funds OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH TABLE 7-D EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 18 of the Text) For Last Full Report See Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Annual Report Operation & Project Status For Construction Maintenance Hunting Island Beach, SC Completed 1984 $2,872,717 ' -- 1 Excludes 51.249,336 contributed funds 7-20 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 25 of Text) For .Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Buck Creek, NC 7 SC ' Completed 1970 $298,167 -- Cow Castle Creek, SC ' Completed 1985 250,000 -- Cowpen Swamp, SC Completed 1960 18,679 -- Crabtree Swamp, SC ' Completed 1969 97,000 -- Eagle Creek, SC Completed 1986 1,245,063 -- Edisto River, SC ' Discontinued 1947 6,379 -- Edisto River, North Fork, SC ' Completed 1969 127,660 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC ' Completed 1958 3,160 -- Gapway Swamp, SC Completed 1969 339,197 -- Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC ' Completed 1978 247,242 -- Leith's Creek, SC 1 Completed 1982 430,951 -- Reddies River Lalce, NC 2 Transferred 1980 985,800 -- Reedy River, SC Discontinued 1974 4,500 -- Roaring River, Wilkes County, NC ' Phase I Only 1978 370,000 -- Saluda River, SC Completed 1963 99,000 -- Sawmill Branch, SC ' Completed 1971 248,605 -- Scotts Creek, SC Completed 1988 545,000 -- Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter Co., SC ' Completed 1971 77,400 -- Simpson Creek, SC Completed 1957 81,000 -- Todd Swamp, SC Completed. 1964 29,000 -- Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC ' Completed 1974 319,669 -- Wilson Creek, Sumter County, SC ' Comp leted 1985 277,111 -- 1 Authorized by Chief of Engineers 2 Transferred to Wilmington District MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS TABLE 7-F INCLUDING POWER (See Section 27 of the Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC Completed 1992 $29,400,000' -- 1 Excludes ST770.000 for credits to Santee Cooper 7-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 7-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Date Federal 'Contributed Annual Report and Funds Funds Project for Authority Expended Expended Abbapoola Creek, SC -- 5 Aug 77 -- Section 12, P.L. 93-251 Beresford Creek, SC -- 5 Aug 77 -- -- Section 12, P.L. 93-251 Charleston Hbr (Anchorage Basin), SC 1954 17 Nov 86 $1,330,000 -- Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 Congaree River, SC -- 5 Aug 77 -- -- Section 12, P.L. 93-251 Little Pee Dee River, SC -- 5 Aug 77 -- -- Section 12, P.L. 93-251 Lumber River, SC & NC -- 5 Aug 77 ---- Section 12, P.L. 93-251 Myrtle Beach (Anchorage Basin), SC 1954 17 Nov 86 -- -- Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 Reedy River, Greenville, SC 1971 17 Nov 86 4,500 -- Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 Russell Creek, SC -- 5 Aug 77 -- -- Section 12, P.L. 93-251 STEAMBANK EROSION TABLE 7-H UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 26 of the Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC Completed 1987 $185,000 ' -- 1 Previous reports included $26,100 in study costs. Actual construction costs were $185,000. 7-22 TABLE 7-I CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 29 of Text) ITEM SURVEYS (CATEGORY 100) NAVIGATION STUDIES (CATEGORY 110) Charleston Harbor Deepening/Widening FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 120) Charleston Storm Damage Reduction SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 130) South Carolina Shores, North Portion SPECIAL STUDIES (CATEGORY 140) Environmental Services Partnerships Pocotaligo River and Swamp, SC MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES (CATEGORY 170) Special Investigations FERC Licensing Activities Interagency Water Resources Development North American Waterfowl National Marine Fisheries COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Cooperation With Other Water Resource Agencies Planning Assistance to States TOT, COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (CATEGORY 200) FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) Hydrologic Studies ADVANCE ENGINEERING & DESIGN (CATEGORY 600) Myrtle Beach, SC FISCAL YEAR COSTS S 593,034 167,840 270 37,893 254,008 $ 36,601 4,162 24,000 2,253 8,727 6,543 3,000 AL (CATEGORY 100) $ 1,138,331 TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) TOTAL (CATEGORY 600) $ 231,184 5,426 $ 236,610 341,464 $ 341,464 TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 7-23 $1,716,405 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 7-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization Studies (See Section 26 of Test) Study Identification - Section Fiscal Year Costs Eagle Creek, Dorchester County, SC 205 $ 974 Eight Mile Creek, Richland County, SC 205 32 Green Swamp, Sumter County, SC 205 25 Halfway Branch, Spartanburg, SC 205 341 Hanahan Water Treatment Plant, Charleston County, SC 205 13,341 Hillside Drainage, Myrtle Beach, SC 205 3,181 Jeffries Creek, Darlington County, SC 205 3 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, SC 205 26,426 Old Kingstree Canal, Williamsburg County, SC 205 15,019 Plum Island Waste Water Treatment Plant, Charleston County, SC 205 52,472 Pocotaligo River, Manning, SC 205 8 Powder Horn Branch, Sumter County, SC 205 13 Scotts Creek, Newberry, SC 205 28,052 Stoney Branch, Rock Hill, SC 205 10,074 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC 205 30,882 TABLE 7-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS (See Section 24 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Cow Castle Creek, SC April 1994 Eagle Creek, SC April 1994 Kingstree Branch, SC April 1994 Sawmill Branch, SC April 1994 Scotts Creek, SC April 1994 Turkey Creek, SC April 1994 Wilson Branch, SC April 1994 7-24 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT * The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, and includes the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah river in southwestern North Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers ................... 8-2 2. Aquatic Plant Control ........ 8-2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA, and St. Johns River, FL (Savannah District) ... 8-3 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA ....... 8-3 5. Savannah Harbor, GA ........ 8-4 6. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA .............. 8-6 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................. 8-6 8. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 8-6 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .............. 8-6 Beach Erosion Control 10. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ........ 8-7 11. Tybee Island, GA ........... 8-7 Flood Control 12. Oates Creek, Richmond County, Gi8-8 13. Inspection of Completed Rood Control Projects ............ 8-8 14. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 8-8 15. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............. 8-8 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 16. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization .............. 8-8 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 17. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Under Special Authorization .............. 8-8 18. Lower Savannah River ........ 8-9 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 19. Savannah River Basin, GA and SC .................... 8-9 19A. J. Storm Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) ....... 8-9 19B. Hartwell Lake, GA and SC .... 8-10 19C. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) .... 8-10 20. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and FL ...... 8-11 General Investigations 21. Planning Assistance to States 8-11 22. Surveys ................. 8-12 23. Collection and Study of Basic Data 8-12 24. Research and Development .. .8-12 Miscellaneous 25. Flood Control and Coastal Emergency ................ 8-12 26. National Emergency Preparedness .............. 8-12 27. Regulatory Functions...... ... 8-12 Tables Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement ........... 8-13 Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation . .8-15 Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 8-21 Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...... 8-22 Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes . 8-23 8-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. ALTAMAHA, OCONEE. AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Location. These rivers are entirely within the State of Georgia. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Survey Map of Georgia, formerly U.S. Geological Survey Map of Georgia.) For a full description of these rivers, see page 636, Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. Prior projects for the Altamaha River have been adopted, and expenditures made under them, by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1881, and September 19, 1890; for the Oconee River by the River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878, September 19, 1890, and March 3, 1905; for the Ocmulgee River, by the River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876, and September 19, 1890. For Further Details, see page 1815, Annual Report for 1915, and page 589, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This project covers the entire Altamaha River (including a channel between the river and Darien, GA), a length of 137 miles. The lower 139 miles of the Oconee River has a mean tidal range of 6.4 feet at its mouth which gradually decreases to mile 33, where there is no perceptible tidal effect. At Doctortown, mile 59, ordinary floods attain a height of about 10 feet above low water, and at extreme floods, a height of about 15 feet above low water. On the Oconee River at Dublin the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 22 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 32 feet above low water. On the Ocmulgee River at Macon the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 15 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 25 feet above low water. There is no approved estimated cost for improvement or for maintenance. Published maps of these rivers are in the following documents: Altamaha River, HED 282, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Oconee River, HED 211, 51st Cong., 1st sass., Ocmulgee River, HED 215, 51st Cong., 1st sess., and Lower Altamaha River and Darien Harbor, GA, HD 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. (See Table 8-8 for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along these rivers there are numerous natural shore landings which are considered ample for existing commerce. Facilities for recreational boats have been constructed at several points. Operations and results during FY. Maintenance: There were no maintenance costs this FY. Condition at end of FY. The existing project is such that the percentage of completion cannot be stated. Channel depths have been increased by excavating rock shoals and sandbars, by constructing contraction and bank-protection works, and by closing cutoffs. Navigation has been rendered safer by removing obstructions. Many of the closing dams and contractions and bank-protection works need repairs. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 21, 1977. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control of water-hyacinth, lyngbya, alligator weed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary steams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes. The project provides for continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H. S. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. The authorizing act provides that research costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-8 for Authorizing Legislation.) The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with EPA on August 6, 1979, and its notice of availability appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT planning and actual control operations of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during FY. The Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported nuisance aquatic plant infestation in Lakes Juliette, Oliver, Jackson, Blackshear, Worth, and in Ebenezer Creek. Also in Little Ocmulgee and George L Smith State Parks. Total projects cost of the FY-94 program was $106,886 of which the portion contributed by the Federal government was $53,443. FY-94 treatments include introduction of biological control agents and chemical applications. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK. VA, AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-miles section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, SC, with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL. (See NOAA charts 11489-11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL) For details see pages 1814, 1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters between Savannah, GA, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Isle of Hope, GA. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL is from 6 to 8 feet with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive or adequate terminal facilities at port of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during FY. Maintenance: The District prepared plans and specifications only for the FY-95 contract. Due to the late start of the FY-93 contract, there was too little maintenance to be dredged at the planned start date. Condition at end of FY. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the south channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay Rivers near St. Simons Island, GA, was accomplished under Section 107 of the Continuing Authorities Program after construction of a new bridge for the Torras Causeway. The notice on the final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976. Total expenditures for the FY are $423,- 007. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 4. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA, and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Company wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Company; 30 feet deep and 400 feet in South Brunswick River; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of the former Glynn Canning 8-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY .1994 Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the City of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modem docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space (three general cargo berths) on East. River. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1990). Operations and results during FY. Maintenance: The District used Wright Dredging Company to dredge the East River during the first quarter of the FY. Their dredge, the "Enterprise', removed a total of 656,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $962,000. The work for others consisted of dredging in front of three of Georgia Ports Authority's (GPA) docks at the contract price. The GPA then reimbursed the District for the work performed outside of the Navigation channel. The District used Bean Dredging to dredge the Bar Channel in FY-94 using Dredge 'Eagle', during the second quarter. The dredge removed 1,142,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,831,000. The District prepared plans and specifications for the FY-95 Brunswick Entrance Channel contract. Total operation and maintenance cost amounted to $3,718,945 for FY-94. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of FY. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3, 1975. Authorized depths were maintained throughout the FY. Costs for existing completed project thru September 30, 1994, were $86,535,360 of which $6,997,838 was for new work and $79,537,- 522 was for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Feasibility Study: Savannah District is preparing and negotiating a Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) with the Georgia Ports Authority to determine the feasibility of deepening the harbor to 34 feet. 5. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston, SC, and 70 miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA. (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 44 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles long; 42 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal) and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc., about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings island Turning Basin 38 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of the Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet long near Savannah Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near the Continental Can Company terminal; and a 1,200 foot long by 1,050 foot wide by 40 foot deep Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority's LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide; about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. 84 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT The tide gate structure across Back River was taken out of operation as of March 1991 to decrease salinity levels in the wildlife refuge. The drainage canal across Argyle Island, which was part of the original tide gate project, was closed as of April 1992 by the New Cut closure contract done by a Section 1135 program. The cost of this contract was $1,531,847. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable disposal areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 46,930 linear feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depth ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1990. Savannah Harbor Widening. The Savannah Harbor Widening project was awarded on 28 September 1990 for $7,735,512. The scope of work included widening of 5.6 miles of channel from 400-500 feet with 1.8 million cubic yards of material dredged after demolition and removal of structures in the riverbank. Chatham County, the local assurer, completed real estate acquisition prior to award expending $3,688,000 in providing LERRD's as required by the LCA. Construction was completed on April 10, 1992. Significant difficulty was experienced by the contractor in removing debris and obstructions, the quantity of which was only partially quantified before construction. Six additional parcels of real estate had to be acquired during the project due to greater than anticipated amounts of bank sloughing. One parcel required deletion from the contract of 1,000 feet of the widened channel due to impacts to an existing radio tower. This work has been completed under the Savannah Harbor Deepening Contract. A final modification of approximately $2.7 million for excessive dredge downtime was awarded in order to close the contract. The total Federal Cost exclusive of contract claims and additional real estate costs was $8,270,000 and the Non- Federal cost was $6,441,000. Savannah Harbor Deepening. The Savannah Harbor Deepening project was authorized by WRDA 92 on October 31, 1992. The LCA was signed with the local sponsor, the Georgia Ports Authority, on March 2, 1993. Because Federal appropriations would be no earlier than FY-95, the LCA was written and negotiated to allow the local sponsor to up-front the construction funds upon project authorization and the signing of the LCA. The first phase contracts for the Savannah Harbor Deepening project was awarded in March 1993 for the outer bar channel from Station 0 + 000 to -60 + 000 and the lower inner harbor channel from Station 0 + 000 to 70 + 000 for $7,298,876 and $8,748,883, respectively. The second phase, that requiring significant real estate acquisition, was awarded in July 1993 from Station 70 + 000 to 103+000, for $4,675,376. The total project scope entails the deepening of the harbor by 4 feet, from -38 ft mlw to -42 ft mlw in the inner harbor and from - 40 ft mlw to -44 ft mlw in the bar channel, for a total of 31 miles of harbor improvement. Construction was initiated with the Inner Harbor contract (0 +000 to 70 +000) on May 1, 1993, and was completed on April 21, 1994. The authorized cost for the Savannah Harbor Deepening project is $50,050,000. The current estimated cost for the project is $33,000,000. In the FY-95 appropriations bill, Congress provided $11,585,000 as reimbursement to the local sponsor for the Federal share of the NED plan. The appropriations bill also provided the $2,083,000 of those funds be provided for the cost shared Savannah Riverwalk extension. This additional element will be cost shared with the City of Savannah. Maintenance. The District dredged the Sediment Basin during the first quarter of FY-94 using Southern Dredging Company dredge "Cherokee', removing 42,530 cubic yards of material at a cost of $14,035. The District removed 4,968,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $7,158,000 as part of the Savannah Harbor Deepening Project. The District dredged from station 40+000 to station 112+500 using "M" Operating Company dredges "Stuart" 8-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 and "Pullen', removing 1,870,300 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,121,000. Total costs for operation and maintenance for the FY was $7,018,400 which included such items as salinity monitoring, surveying, cultural resources. The Tidegate was taken out of operation in 1991 because of increase in salinity levels in wildlife refuge. In addition to this action a Section 1135 program was executed to close New Cut. $231,000 was provided to continue the Long Term Management Study for dredged material disposal in Savannah Harbor. Condition at the end of the FY. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25, 1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. 6. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 secondfeet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of the Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, above the 13th Street Bridge (R.M. 202.6), a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, over hanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variaton above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at mile 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Due to lack of commercial use, the river has not been dredged since FY-79. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a state port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during FY. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. The total cost for the year was $200,008. There were no dredging projects during this FY. 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Survey Section performed condition surveys on the following active O&M navigation projects: AIWW Brunswick Harbor Savannah Harbor Savannah River Below Augusta 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Under Section 107 of the Continuing Authorities Program for small navigation a Reconnaisance Report was completed with funds received of $15,000, recommending the need for deepening the Port Wentworth channel of upper Savannah Harbor. Negotiating with local sponsor to enter into the Feasibility Phase. 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Beach Erosion Control 10. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 11. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee island is located directly south of the Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, GA. (See NOAA 11512, 11513, and 11509, formerly U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Numbers 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in HD 92-105, 92nd Cong.) The only portion of the island that has developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island,' is occupied by the City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 miles. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225- foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200- foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. In 1981, the plan was modified and now calls for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin and renourishment. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost (including costs for construction, engineering and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rightsof- way and relocation) of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers. The local contribution is presently estimated at 51.0 percent to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide (after the first 10 years of project life) periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal. participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project, and provide further the construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from First Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Condition at the end of the FY. In January 1987, the South Groin contract was completed at a cost of $607,392. In February 1987, the first periodic renourishment contract was awarded, calling for the placement of approximately 1 million cubic yards of sand on two reaches of the island; the south end from the mouth of Tybee Creek to 14th Street, and the north end from the North terminal groin to about 6th Street. The contract was completed in May 1987, at a contract cost of $1,988,843. A Beach monitoring program was performed for three years to monitor the performance of the design. The Local Sponsor has invested over $200,000 in additional funds for the implementation of a dune building program for the North and South ends of the islands. FY costs were $104,291. A reevaluation study under Section 934 WRDA 86 was initiated in 1990 for the Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project. The purpose of the study is to determine if the authorized Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project should be extended to a project life of 50 years, and determine if the Federal Government should continue to participate in the 8-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 project. The study is using current Federal policy and economic guidelines to evaluate the economic and environmental feasibility of additional periodic beach nourishment. The study is scheduled for completion in March 1995. FLOOD CONTROL control projects amounted to $28,638. (See Table 8-A&D.) 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D) 12 SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN AT OATES CREEK, GA Oates Creek is a major drainage outlet for flood water from an urban area of Augusta, GA. A flood control study of Oates Creek was authorized and completed as part of the Savannah River Basin study. The Oates Creek study area is located just south of Augusta, in Richmond County. The recommended plan is a channel and bridge modification flood control plan and has received support from Federal, State, and local governmental agencies with no environmental opposition. In 1987, the local sponsor, Richmond County, expressed support for the project and intent to participate financially. The plan consists of improvements to approximately 12,300 feet of channel and consists of concrete-lined channels, grass-lined channels, a low levee, modifications of bridges and culverts, and relocation of utilities. The CP&E effort began in October 1983 and consisted of the preparation of a General Design Memorandum. Upon the completion and approval of the General Design Memorandum (Sep 1986), negotiations were initiated with the local sponsor to develop a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA). The LCA was signed by Richmond County and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on March 10, 1988. FY expenditures were $157,- 252. Conditions at end of FY-93: During FY- 93, the final audits were completed for both the Federal and non-Federal costs, which revised downward the total project cost from $14,000,- 000 to $12,565,000. The revised FEMA mapping has been prepared in order to reduce the flood insurance costs of the inhabitants of the Oates Creek Basin. The Operation and Maintenance manual was completed in December 1993 and the project was turned over to Richmond County for long term maintenance. Expenditures for FY-94 were $179,344. 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Expenditures for inspections of completed flood 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These Food Damage Reduction activities are accomplished under the authority of Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948 (Public Law 858, 80th Congress) as amended. During FY- 94 a total of $108,036 was spent on preauthorization flood damage reduction studies. Study efforts during the FY were as follows: Cranes Creek, Richmond County, GA, Reconnaissance Phase - $48,036; Ohoopee River, Emanuel County, GA, completed Reconnaissance Phase - $52,500; Swift Creek, Toombs County, GA, Reconnaissance Phase - $7,500. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 16. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHOREUNE PROTECTION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION During FY-94, a Feasibility Study of streambank erosion and protection at Fort Jackson, along the Savannah River in Chatham County, GA, was continued at a cost of $1,400. This study was conducted under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 17. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These project modifications are accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as amended. Environmental modification study efforts during FY-94 were as follows: Savannah Harbor, Chatham County, GA - Jasper County, SC, monitored post construction environmental and cultural effects - cost shared funding, $72,016 (Federal) and $21,982 (non- Federal). Latham River/Jekyll Creek completed Initial Appraisal at a cost of $2,500. 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 18. LOWER SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION STUDY The feasibility phase was initiated June 1993. The cost sharing plan requires a 50% cost share with the non-Federal sponsor (City of Savannah). Of this non-Federal 50%, up to 25% can be from in-kind services. The feasibility study is concentrating on restoring the flow through cutoff bends #3 and #4, and consequentially, restoring flow and water quality to the surrounding wetlands. The alternatives include reopening of Mill Creek and complete and partial closure of Cuts #3 and #4. Cost-shared expenditures for FY-94 were $252,491 (Federal), $156,056 (non-Federal). Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 19. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of eleven dams and lakes on the Savannah River and its tributaries in GA and SC. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River basin for flood control and other purposes (HD/657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of the Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) was authorized for construction by the Flood control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell Lake, and Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes.) Duke Power company has completed construction on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jacassee pumpstorage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee-Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry- Old Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell Lakes follow. Local cooperation. None required. 19A. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) GA AND SC Location. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir is located at mile 237.7 on the Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. The total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. The lake covers 71,100 acres at maximum power pool elevation 330 msl. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydropower 1,045,000 acre-feet; dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000-kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 282,000 kilowatts with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during FY. Net generations of electric energy for the period was 650,739,200 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Cumulative flood damage prevented through FY-94 was $27,319,220. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the FY amounted to $8,206,679. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18, 1981 Federal Register. In FY-94 5,542,193 persons visited the facility. Condition at the end of the FY. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 8-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Major Rehabilitation. The J. Strom Thurmond Powerplant has been identified as a potential project for the Major Rehabilitation Program. An evaluation report has been initiated by the Savannah District in order to identify the reliability problems at the powerplant, to perform the necessary economic evaluations on several engineering solutions to the reliability problem, and to make a recommendation for a project that would restore and/or improve the operability of the powerplant. The project scope includes rewinding all seven generators, the refurbishment of the turbine water passages, the replacement of the turbines with state-ofthe art stainless steel design and the replacement of key electirc/mechanical peripheral equipment. The fully funded cost of the project is $69,700,000. The J. Strom Thurmond Powerplant Major Rehab Project has been approved as a FY-96 new start. 19B. HARTWELL LAKE. GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, GA (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravitytype structure 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 568 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,390 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,880 feet. At maximum conservation pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control - 293,000 acre-feet; hydropower - 1,416,000 acre-feet; dead storage - 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000 kilowatt generators having a generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. A fifth 80,000 kilowatt generating unit has been installed which increased the rated capacity to 344,000 kilowatts. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during the FY. Net generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 416,768,000 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastem Power Administration. Cumulative flood darnmage prevented through FY-94 is $12,181,890. Maintenance. Operation and maintenance costs during the FY amounted to $8,309,056. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register on August 21, 1978. Approximately 14,863,014 persons visited the lake in FY-94. During FY-94 funds were expended for the E&D phase of the major rehabilitation of the four original units at the Hartwell power facility. Major Rehabilitation. The Hartwell Powerplant Major Rehabilitation project was approved by HQUSACE, but was not included in the FY-95 budget. However, the importance of the project is such that the design has been initiated by NPD with a FY-96 award. The project scope includes the rewinding of the first four generators, the refurbishment of the turbine water passageways, and the replacement of key elecrical/mechanical peripheral equipment. The fully funded cost for the recommended plan is $17,700,000. The Hartwell Major Rehab project has been approved as a FY-96 new start. 19C. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is located on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam, and about 37.4 miles above J. Strom Thurmond Dam (formerly Clarks Hill Dam). (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations. The latest approved (FY-95) costs estimate for the project is $576,800,000 of which $441,455,000 is for construction; $28,657,000 for lands and damages; $4,857,- 000 for cultural resources; and $108,299,000 for engineering/design, supervision/administration, and all project studies including environmental. Approval was received in January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A Feasibility Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement to address the installation and operation of four 75 MW reversible pump-turbines were prepared in 1979 with the Record of 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA. DISTRICT Decision signed in August 1980. The Richard B. Russell Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan was completed in 1981, approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in September 1982, and the provisions are being implemented. Since 19886, the District has conducted comprehensive fishery studies in the Russell tailrace and J. Strom Thurmond Lake (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) downstream. In addition, the District conducted water quality studies, hydraulic modeling, and an evaluation of various fish protection measures associated with hydroelectric projects. The results of these study efforts have been used to evaluate the need to develop fish protection at the Richard B. Russell Project associated with pumped storage operations. This evaluation is presented in a supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) on pumped storage. The record-of-decision (ROD) was signed September 1991. Installation of pumped storage is complete; final Phase III environmental testing is scheduled through October 1995. Additional Lake Russell camping being built in the Calhoun Falls, South Carolina cost-shared State Park. The District will also construct additional Georgia cost-shared camping in FY 95/96. Local Cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Public Law 89-72; 79 stat. 213C (for Legislative history of Act see page 1864). Operations and Results During FY. Net generations of electric energy for the period was 434,417,000 kilowatt-hours. Maintenance. The operation and maintenance cost for the FY amounted to $5,775,506. These funds were for management of lake and power activities. Approximately 933,973 persons visited the lake in FY-94. Condition at the end of FY. The project is 97 percent complete. Costs of project to September 30, 1994, were $599,019,481 of which $555,405,621 was used for new work and $43,613,860 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) During FY-94, CG funds were used to complete acquisition of Georgia and South Carolina lands as R.B. Russell mitigation lands to compensate for wildlife habitat lost from construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake. In accordance with the 1982 R.B. Russell mitigation plan as authorized by Section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL. 99-662), approximately 10,100 acres would be acquired in South Carolina and an additional 11,400 acres acquired in Georgia. The District worked closely with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, and the Georgia Department of Natural Resources to locate, study and acquire suitable tracts. Acquisition of land in FY-92 in South Carolina consisted of the 3,408 acre Donnelly Wildlife Management Area in Colleton County. In Georgia, the 1,153 acre R. E. Towns Tract in Screven County was acquired along with the 8,046 acre Di-Lane Plantation :in Burke county. Also in Georgia, the 2,424 acre Spring Lake Tract was purchased from Thompson Oak Flooring Company. Total project funding through FY-94 is $10,856,004. The acquired tracts are being managed for wildlife by the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources and the Georgia Department of Natural Resources respectively. Acquisition of land in FY-94 in South Carolina consisted of the 5,878 acre Palachucola Tract from Westvaco Cooperation in Jasper/Hampton Counties, and 297 acre Manor Tract, and 582 acre Treadwell Tract, both in Hampton County. 20. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER Location. The West Point Lake is located on the Chattahoochee River, 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, GA, and was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 (H.D. 570, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The project was designed and constructed for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and stream flow regulation for downstream navigation. Design and construction was accomplished by the Savannah District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers for the Mobile District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. For more detail, see the Mobile, Alabama District's Report of the Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army 1987. 8-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 General Investigation 21. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES Planning Assistance to States activities are accomplished under the authority of Section 22, Water Resources Development Act of 1974, as amended. During FY-94, a total of $43,277 was expended on the Planning Assistance to States studies, as follows: Traffic study of Georgia Ports for Georgia Ports Authority - cost shared funding, $27,211 (Federal) and $16,066 (non-Funded). 22. SURVEYS During FY-94, costs of $459,904 were incurred as follows: $321,809 for Navigation studies; $26,021 for Shoreline Protection studies; $22,- 413 for Special studies - Partnerships; $62,450 for Miscellaneous activities. 23. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During FY-94, under the Flood Plain Management Services Program, flood hazard related information and assistance were provided to state and local governments on a nonreimbursable basis and to other Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery basis. Total FY-94 expenditures were $35,679 for General Flood Plain Management Services; $99,021 for Technical Services; $27,431 for four Special Studies; $5,657 for National Food Proofing Committee; $7,946 for Quick Responses; and $20,778 for Hydrologic Studies. 24. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development during the fiscal year. Miscellaneous. 25. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCY Disaster Preparedness ......... $262,000 Work performed under Public Law 84-99: Emergency Operations Rood ..... $300,000 Response - Initial Response and Technical Assistance Macon Levee Rehab Investigation... $60,000 Emergency Operations Field ...... $50,000 Investigations Hazard Mitigation............. $4,000 Rehab Macon Levee........... $492,700 Emergency Work for Others: Tropical Storm Alberto......... 28,000,000 Hurricane Hugo............... $25,000 Midwest Flood. ............... $73,000 Northridge Earthquake....... . $1.20,000 Support to CESAD............. $10,000 Total FC&CE............. $29,396,700 26. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (NEPP) National Preparedness. ........ .200,000 27. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluation ........... $1,829,217 Enforcement ............... $577,024 Studies .................... $38,565 Other Navigation Regulations .... $12,028 EIS .... . .............. $0 Total Regulatory ........... $2,456,834 8-12 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project. Funding FY-91 FY-92 FY-93 FY-94 Sep 30, 1994 1. Altamaha. Ocon..., & Ocmiulee Riv* ers, GA 2. Aquatic Plant ControI (1965 R&H Act) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA, and the St. John's River, FL. 4. Bnnewick Harbor, GA 6. Savannah Harbor, GA (Conribtuted Funde) 6. Savannah River belew Augut, GA 11. Tybee Island, GA (Conibut d F-rdd 12. Oate Creek. Rihmond County, GA (Contretd Funde) New Work: Approp. Cost Mamnt. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 821,457(1) - 821.457(1) - 1,917,982(2.3) - 1,917,982(23) 51,000 50,000 77,000 74,873 97,055 27,864 - - �.- - 253,000 2,326,000 284,978 2,286,093 968,096 968,096 1.665,000 1,637,630 70,000 67.282 375,000 423,007 - - - 15,000 - - - 36.137 3.568.oo000 2.260.000 4.012.000 3.690.000 2.968,119 2.234,587 4,013.393 3.718.944 2,500.000 2.741,023 9,5856,000 9,402.238 81,oo000 2,539.625 4,458,000 4.679.913 2,141,000 2.149,835 8,935,000 9,051,556 -825,000 56,312 7,263,000 7,2856,916 - 1,457,460 24,700,350 4,244,267 - 1,677,801 68,207,674 20,108,977 1,008,159 919,370 958,096(4) 958,096(4) 26,104,507(5) 26, 080,155(5) 4,588,608(6) 4,841,858(6) 79,696,928(7) 79,538,414(7) 54,724,721(8) 55,992.262(8) 190,384.693(9) 190,287,230(9) 32,402,077 27,994,452 - 6.790,031(10) - 6,790.031(10) 76,000 86,000 137,000 228,000 85.944 67,028 138,602 200,008 -77,000 30,000 50,000 66.246 53,963 50.641 - 20,430 - 16.100 273,000 2.568.000 3.372,068 2.486.768 - 2968,534 - 227.914 100,000 104,290 18,561,771 18,491,962 4,660,249(11) 4,654,801(11) 20,430 15,100 - 149.000 157.253 179,344 10.932 286.982 9,173,000 9,159,144 296,534 265,828 8-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY-91 FY-92 FY-93 FY-94 Sep 30, 1994 13. Inspeodon of Corntd Flood Contrl Works 17A. J. Strom Thurmond Danm and Reeeror, GA and 8C 173. Hartwel Lake, GA and SC 17C. Richard B. Russe Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formndy Trotere Shoal) (Conributed Fund) 58,000 56,660 43,150 20,648 16,000 19.725 18.596 35.000 35,090 38,000 28,638 --3,500 - 4.-3,500 403,064 392.054 84,880,940(12) 84,876,004(12) 6.796,667 7,256,000 8,067,000 8,254,000 133,787,345(13) 6,855,060 7,319,291 8,113,071 8,206,679 133,347,549(13) -60.000 - 3,000 -114 - 115,874,985(14,15) 1,940 115,876,925(14,15) 7,591,667 7,524,900 8,551,000 8,379,000 124,116,527(16) 7,763,926 7.,372.891 8,918,215 8,309,066 124,493,105(16) 27,950 20,000 21.236 10,284 12.208,000 14,911 ;000 12.988,000 122.596,000 17,067,848 1,.152.291 11,491.484 33,540.566 4,513,666 4,643,900 4.847.000 5,828.,000 4,689,220 4,784,343 4,838.432 5,775.506 New Work: Cost Mai t. Cost New Work: Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1. Includes $760,610 for previous projects. 2. Includes $111,950 for previous projects. 3. Does not nclude $69,356 contributed funds. 4. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 5. Includes $134,789 for previous projects. Does not include $35,000 appropriated but unexpended of contributed funds in FY's 86 and 87. 6. Includes $643,456 for previous projects and $97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Does not Include $10,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $54,414 for previous projects, $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project, and $2,150,000 under 1983 Job Bill Act. Does not nclude contributed funds by Brunswick and Georgia Port Authority. 8. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not Include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels or contributed funds. 9. Includes $298,894 for previous projects and $62,727 . contributed funds. 22.232 60,000 19,496 6,666,960 6,640.538 670,752.509 578,521,126 34,586,891 43,613,860 72.232 69,496 10. Includes $93,480 for previous projects and $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 11. Does not nclude $61,856.45 contributed funds. 12. Does not Include $395,634 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,558,613 appropriated under Code 710. Also Includes $1,000,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 13. Includes $ 576,665 under special recreation use fees and $736,000 under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 14. Includes $17,515,000 appropriated for construction of 5th Unit of which $17,469,002 has been expended. 15. Does not nclude $276,200 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,861,000 appropriated under Code 710 of which $4,851,306 has been expended and $545,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 16. Includes $797,558 expended special recreation use fees. 8-14 Maint. Approp. Cost - 50,000 - - SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July 25, 1912 & March 2. 1945 2. Oct. 27, 1965 Section 302 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 July 13, 1892 Mar. 3, 1905 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2. 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 15, 1981 ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMUL(nE RIVERS. GA Channel 3 feet deep and 60 to 100 feet wide. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT 1962) Provides for control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths. ATLANTIC iTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Section from Beaufort, SC, to Savannah, GA Route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. Section from Savannah, GA, to Femandlna, FL. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Section from Cumberland Sound, GA and FL to St. Johns River, FL. Consolidation of the 3 cectlons shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort SC, and St. Johns River, FL." Section from Beaufort, SC to Cumberland Sound GA and FL. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA. Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA, via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound. A 12-foot channel between Savannah, GA, and Femandina, FL, various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, GA. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, GA, not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Main channel relocated from Frederica River to Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. Navigation Project. HD443, 62D Cong., 2d sess. HD610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. HD251, 89th Cong., 1st seass. HD295, 53d Cong., 3d seass. HD295, 53d, Cong., 3d sess. HD41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. HD450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. HD1236, 60th, Cong., 2d sass. HD581, 63d Cong., 2d seass. HD1391, 62d Cong., 3d seass. SD178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. SD43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Senate committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 6, 75th Cong.,3d seass. HD618, 75th Cong., 3d seass. HD114, 77th Cong., 1st seass. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under the Small Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, PL 86-645 as amended. 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 8-8 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 4. Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2. 1907 Mar 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct. 22, 1976 July 14, 1981 July 13, 1983 Oct. 17, 1986 BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Construction of East River jetty. Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of two spur dikes. Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, If deemed advisable. A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the than existing project. A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Provides for Phase 1 AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. Enlargement of the maneuvering area of the entrance to East River and dredging Brunswick and Turtle Rivers to obtain depths authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of May 17, 1950. Enlargement of the East River Turning Basin to a length of 1,000 feet and a width of 750 feet. Incorporated Georgia Port Authority's 30 foot deep by 300 foot wide by 8000 foot channel in South Brunswick River serving Colonel's island into Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project. Annual Report, 1980, p.959. HD407, 59th Cong., 1st seas. HD393, 64th Cong., 1st seass. SD57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. SD132, 71st Cong., 2d sess. HD690, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD110, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. HD177, 97th Cong., 1st sess. PL 98-360 HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess., Section 846 8-16 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 5. Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1945 July 24, 1946 SAVAMAH HARBOR. GA Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge. Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Bamard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging Drakes Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the inland waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. HD181, 59th Cong., 1st seas. HD563, 62d, Cong., 2d seas. HD1471, 64th Cong., 2d seas. HD261,69th Cong., 1st seas. HD262,69th Cong., 1st sess. SD39, 71st Cong., 1st seas. HD276, 73d Cong., 2d seas. HD283, 76th Cong., 1st ses. HD227, 79th Cong., 1st sess. HD678, 79th Cong., 2d ses. 8-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 8-8 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized |iInI Te-x---t- ---- Act Project a~nd--I Work Authorized Do- cu-m-- ents Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct 27, 1965 SPCW Resolution June 15, 1976 and HPWTC of June 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper and of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American O1 Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed Improvement made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of tumrning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and the Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp., from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. Providing sediment control works consisting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 38 feet. HD110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. SD115, 87th Cong., 1st sess. HD226, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD223, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976. 8-18 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 16,1984 Oct. 17, 1986 Oct. 31, 1992 6. Sep. 13, 1891 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 11. SPWC Resolution June 22, 1971, HPWC of June 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 12. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Oct. 17, 1986 Construction of three new work curve wideners in the inner harbor channel. Curve Widener #1 is between mile 11.1 and 11.9. Curve widener #2 Is between mile 13.2 and 13.8 and curve widener #3 Is between mile 14.0 and 14.8. The Wideners are located on the north side of the channel. Savannah Harbor Widening as described in Report of Chief of Engineers date Dec. 19, 1978. Widen channel from 400 feet to 500 feet between Kings Island turning Basin and Fig Island Turning Basin. Allows planning, engineering and design to remove drift and debris as part of operations and maintenance. Savannah Harbor Deepening deepened harbor from -38 feet to -42 feet miw in inner Harbor and from -40 feet to .44 feet miw in the Bar Channel for a total of 31 miles of harbor improvements. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA For a 5-foot channel Special Improvement by bank protection work of 20 to 25 miles of the river Immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam, GA. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel. TYBE ISLAND, GA Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin nourishment. Extends authority for renourishment with Federal participation from 15 to 50 years. OATES C~EEX. GA Provided for construction of the Oates Creek Project. PL 98-360 HD6, 99th Cong., 2d seas. Dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 201 Section 867 WRDA 1992 HD255, 51st Cong., 2d sass. HD962, 60th Cong., 1st seas. HD101, 70th Cong., 1st aess. Senate Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d seas. Rivers and Harbors Com., Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st seas. SD6, 81st Cong., 1st seas. HD105, 92d Cong. HR6S, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 867 HR6, 99th Cong., 2d seas. dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 401 8-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 8-8 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Ac- t ProjI ect and Work Aut-h- ori-z--Ie----d -I Documen---ts 19A. Flood Control Act of Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 17, 1986 Jan. 1988 198. Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND LAKE, GA&SC Approved the general plan for the comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Project. Recreation and fish and wildlife added as name changed. (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake.) HARTWELL LAKE. GA AND SC Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. Flood Control Act Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Proof July 3, 1958. ject. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. 19C. Flood Control Act of Nov. 7, 1966. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Provides for Installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. Authorized mitigation plan. HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Section 864, HJR 376 HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL516, 82st Cong., 2d sess. PL85-500, 87th Cong., 2d sass. PL94-587, Sec. 182b., 85th Cong. SD52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sass. dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 601 8-20 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 8 in text) Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bellville Point, GA Completed 1986 599,379 Cedar Point, GA Completed 1982 656,233 Darien Harbor, GA Completed 1975 199,723 185,433 Fancy Bluff Creek, GA 1 Completed 1935 8,000 7,200 St. Mary's River, GA and FL, Completed 1951 15,688 69,936 and North River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA 2, 3 Completed 1929 17,906 19,594 Satilla River, GA 1, 5, 6 Completed 1951 9,452 57,172 Savannah River above Augusta, See Notes 1929 69,600 85,944 GA 2, 3, 4 Savannah River at Augusta, GA See Notes 1929 200,556 17,444 2 3, 5 1. Channel adequate for commerce. 2. Project recommended for abandonment in H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st session. 3. No commerce reported. 4. About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction of two power dams which submerged much of the work under the present and former projects, this improvement cannot be completed as originally planned. 5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for construction and $12,849 for operation and maintenance). 6. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized demonstration project on the Umbrella Creek - Dover Creek for the purpose of reducing shoaling. Monitor for 10 years, develop a hydrodynamic model. 8-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 in text) Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA (1) Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, GA Macon., GA Oates Creek. GA (2) Peacock Creek. Liberty County, GA Completed See Note Completed Completed Completed Completed 1941 1974 1977 1955 1993 1976 $ 643,016 132,640 380,043 12.565,000 582,163 1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 2. Authorized by HR 6, Water Resource Development Act of 1986 dated October 17, 1986. First Federal cost of $9,600,000 and non-federal cost of $4,100,000. 8-22 $38,242 5,219 38,243 5,219 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 19 in text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total J.Sto Thrmn Dam II II& J. Strom Thurmond Dam & Reservoir, GA and SC Hartwell, GA and SC Goat Island, GA and SC(5) Middleton Shoals, GA and SC(5) Chattooga Units(4), GA and SC Tallow Hill, GA Anthony Shoals, GA Newry-Old Pickens, SC(6) Savannah Savannah Savannah Savannah Chattooga Broad Broad Keowee $79,156,000(4) 89,240,000 36,400,000 16,500,000 41,700,000 39,000,000 18,100,000 29,500,000 $79,156,000(1,4) 89,240,000(2) 36,400,000(3) 16,500,000(3) 41,700,000(3) 39,000,000(3) 18,100,000(3) 29,500,000(3) 1. Final Cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) 2. Approved August 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) 3. Approved July 1954. 4. Excludes Code 710 funds. 5. Replaced by Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake). 6. Site of Due Power Company, Keowee - Toxaway Project. 8-23 TABLE 8-E JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT * JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT With the exception of a small area in the northeastern section of Florida, this district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular. Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) .. 2 2. Arecibo Harbor, PR ................ 2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ..... 2 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL ............ 2 5. Canaveral Harbor, FL ............... 2 6. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass ... 3 7. Charlotte Harbor, FL ............. ... 3 8. Cross Florida Barge Canal ............ 4 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, FL ................ 4 10. Fernandina Harbor, FL ............... 4 11. Fort Myers Beach, FL ............... 5 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, FL ............... 5 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL ............. 6 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL ....................... 6 15. Jacksonville Harbor, FL ............. 7 16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL ...... 7 17. John's Pass, FL .................. 8 18. Longboat Pass, FL ................. 8 19. Manatee Harbor, FL ................ 8 20. Mayaguez Harbor, PR ............... 9 21. Melbourne Harbor, FL .............. 9 22. Miami Harbor, FL .................. 9 23. New Pass, Sarasota, FL .............. 0 24. Okeechobee Waterway, FL ............ 10 25. Oklawaha River, FL ................ 10 26. Palm Beach Harbor, FL ............. 11 27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL ............. 11 28. Ponce Harbor, PR ................... 11 29. Port Everglades Harbor, FL ........... 12 30. Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida ......... 12 31. St. Augustine Harbor, FL ............ 13 32. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL ........................ 13 33. St. Lucie Inlet, FL .................. 13 34. San Juan Harbor, PR 14 35. Tampa Harbor, FL 14 36. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period .................... 15 37. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 15 38. Navigation Work under Special Authorization 15 Beach Erosion Control Page 39. Brevard County, FL ................ 16 40. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project .. 16 41. Duval County, FL ................. 16 42. Ft. Pierce Beach, FL 17 43. Indian River County, FL ............. 17 44. Lee County, FL .................... 17 45. Manatee County, FL 18 46. Nassau County, FL. ................ 18 47. Palm Beach County, FL ............. 19 48. Palm Beach Island, FL ............... 19 49. Pinellas County, FL ................. 20 50. Sarasota County, FL ............... 20 51. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ........................ 21 52. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization ................ 21 Flood Control 53. Central and Southern Florida .......... 21 54. Dade County, FL .................. 22 55. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL .. 23 56. Four River Basins, FL ............... 23 57. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR ....... 24 58. Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR ................ 24 59. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 24 60. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 24 61. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization .................... 24 General Investigations 62. Surveys, .. ................ . 63. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 64. Continuation of Planning and Engineering . . 65. Advance Engineering and Design ....... 25 25 25 25 General Regulatory 66. Permit Evaluation .................. 25 67. Enforcement ..................... 25 68. Other Navigation Regs .............. 26 Project Modifications 69. Kissimmee River Restoration .......... 26 'All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of the chapter. 9-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H 251/89/1. The Water Resource Development Act of 1986 amended the River and Harbor Act of 1965 requiring the local sponsor to share 50 percent of planning costs and 50 percent of research costs that are local in nature. The cost of research that is regional or national in scope shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Florida Department of Natural Resources holds the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contributes 50 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Opeations and results during fiscal year. New work: There were 10,456 acres of hyacinth and/or water lettuce, 3,399 acres of hydrilla and 202 acres of minor plant controlled during the period. Costs incurred for engineering and design and construction management were $225,122 and $90,498 respectively, and $1,116,682 for operations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress, water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25668.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep by 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area, and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing a deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet, and a 300 by 100 foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused damage. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracoastal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, FL, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, FL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11489.) Previous project. For details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 150 feet wide from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River, about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 8 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (H 898/62/2) and 1938 (H 818/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition, environmental and operation studies costs $14,544. Contract cost for environmental dredging was $501,000. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $200,289 and $15,572 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. 4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FL Location. The inlet connects the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 11 by 200 feet, thence 8 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and a marina basin 8 by 200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in December 1964. 5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11478 and 11484.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 37 foot deep entrance channel and maintenance of the 44 foot deep Navy channel in the 37 foot channel reach; and 35 foot depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; south entrance jetty 1,100 feet long and the entrance jetty 1,150 feet long; a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-1 for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (October 1993 price levels) for Canaveral Harbor Deepening project is $4,138,000 Federal and $5,374,000 non-Federal and project cost for Canaveral Harbor Sand Transfer System is $23,022,000 Federal and $4,885,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must; provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2nd session. Non- Federal contribution for new work is $2,395,500. Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space capacity of 168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 1,413,000 barrels of tank storage. Available warehouse storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Open storage is 189 acres. Three cruise ship berths totaling 1,400 feet long by 34 foot depth and three 8,800 square foot cruise terminals are also located on the south side. The western cruise ship berth is equipped with a roll on/off ramp and is adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. Hoisting facilities consist of one 45 ton floating crane and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services. There are 2 waterfront marine repair facilities with the nearest drydock facilities located at Port Everglades and Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 horsepower are also available. There is no rail service available at the port. The nearest rail service is the Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost was $142,368. Construction costs $2,308,378. Hired labor to contract cost $39,063. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $432,559 and $338,041 respectively. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of lock and dam amounted to $220,1.30 for the fiscal year. Operation of service utilities costs $61,705. District communication cost was $18,337. Condition and operation studies cost $67,622. Real estate management was $8,849. Project operations management cost was $61,638. Lands and damages cost $8,366. Contract for lock maintenance cost .$70,357. Environmental compliance costs were $6,651. Contract for channel and canal maintenance $2,975,535. Engineering and design and construction management cost $331,779 and $171,126 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract for the jetty extension and sand-tightening was awarded in June 1994. This contract also includes the recreation portion of the deepening project and all work is scheduled for completion in September 1995. Sand bypass contract was awarded in November 1994 and is scheduled for completion in May 1995. 6. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1 mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11430.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10 foot depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8 foot depth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood packing houses; 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project and condition studies cost $857. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 7. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11429.) 9-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin at 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water levels about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower water levels about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $20,712. Dredging contract cost was -$110,049. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $145,656 and $34,929 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-J for Locks and Dams.) WRDA 92 authorizes and directs ASA(CW) to offer to enter into a contract to operate and maintain the project at a level necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent deterioration of the structures. (See Table 9-8 for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: (See Table 9-K for work accomplished.) Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway; Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. Project was deauthorized in Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) and $5,000,000 of prior appropriations were withdrawn. 9. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to and including a 300 by 600 foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. The project is about 2,700 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost nontidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of docking space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also 2 marine railways and repair and storage facilities available. The facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey cost was $1,929. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling depth of the channel was 5 feet. 10. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11 503.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 32 foot depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800 foot wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and 2 jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. The project is 7 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range. is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $935,000. Terminal facilities. There are 2 large wharves operated by industrial plants; 12 wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; 3 oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance. Operations of service utilities cost $9,163. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $85,261. Real estate management cost was $-11,325. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $230,605 and $117,304 respectively. Maintenance dredging by contract was $1,337,664. Condition at 6nd of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel has been deepened to 46 feet for the Kings Bay project. Authorized depths were restored as of March 1991. 11. FORT MYERS BEACH, FL Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11427.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are 3 shrimp-packing houses and several fish-packing houses, 2 marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreational craft facilities include 9 marinas, a boat motor testing laboratory which is closed, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition survey cost $5,146. Engineering and design cost was $9,724. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 12. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11475.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27 foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Station 100 +00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30 +00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130 +00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Plan of improvement consists of enlarging the existing entrance channel to 400 feet wide and 30 feet deep , the interior channel to 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep, the existing turning basin to 1,100 feet square and 28 feet deep, and providing an access channel 1,250 feet long, 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep north of the main turning basin. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 feet at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Estimated cost of new work (October 1994 price levels) $6,696,000 Federal and $2,603,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $18,574. A 25% contribution and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals is required. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit packing house. The north pier is served by railway and both piers by highway connections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deepdraft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $512,751. Maintenance: Condition and environmental studies cost $2,037. Lands and damages cost $4,495. Maintenance dredging costs were $683,999. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $88,408 and $114,461 respectively. 9-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CMIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Condition at end of fiscal year. A PCA was executed in October 1994. Plans and specifications are underway and were submitted for approval in December 1994. Construction contract is scheduled for award in March 1995 and completion in May 1996. 13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11411, 11425 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Caseys Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, abdut 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grands and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water levels by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water levels by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and 11 privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are 6 wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use by commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $145,912. Real estate audits and administration costs were $19,304. Lands and damages cost was $9,525. Engineering and design cost was $120,147. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. A contract to maintain the jetties at Caseys Pass was completed in 1983. 14. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL Location. The Waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11489, 11485, 11472 and 11487.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8 foot depth, and operation and maintenance of Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of service facilities was $107,454. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $139,522. Natural Resource management cost was $754. Periodic inspections cost $33,767. Environmental compliance inspection cost was $47,252. Real estate management cost $116,925. Lands and damages cost was $49,570. Maintenance cost of roads, railroads and bridges was $33,088. Contract dredging costs were $2,437,066. Engineering and design and construction management cost $445,453 and $227,779 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete. (Construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, was deauthorized by W.R.D.A. of 1988, P.L. 100-876.) (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 15. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 feet deep by 400-1,200 feet wide from ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the FEC railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30 foot channel in Arlington cut in the old Dames Point- Fulton channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40 foot depth entrance channel; widening of channel by 100 feet near mile 5 and by 200 feet near mile 7; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; construction of training walls and revetments; a navigation and floodway channel 26 by 200 feet along south side of Commodore Point; on approach and mooring basin 20 feet deep, 1,300 feet long at 20 foot depth contour and 600 feet long at pierhead line near Naval Reserve Armory in south Jacksonville; a depth of 24 feet between that depth contour and the pierhead line from Hogan Creek to the foot of Laura Street; and a depth of 28 feet to within 60 feet of pierhead line between foot of Laura Street and St. Elmo W. Acosta (formerly Upper State) bridge. Length of project is about 26.8 miles. In addition the Navy has provided funds for a deeper Jacksonville Harbor entrance channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet long, intersecting with the Navy's Mayport entrance channel to the Mayport turning basin; also an extension of the existing project to provide 38 foot depth for the Navy fuel depot, at Drummond Creek. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and one foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $927,654. Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total storage space of 1,009,800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of tank storage. Warehouse storage at the port includes 3,266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 233 acres. Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tons. Various phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other companies located offwater. Drydock facilities consist of 6 floating drydocks with capacities from 800 to 33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce (See Port Series No. 15, Rev. 1978.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of service facilities cost was $9,163. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $333,957. Real estate management cost $33,414. Lands and damages cost was $13,585. Channel and canal contract maintenance cost was $2,021,174. Engineering and design and construction management cost $181,232 and $295,988 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty was repaired in FY 1985 to prevent further damage to the Mayport Naval Station. Revetments and retaining walls were in poor condition. Authorized project depths were restored as of January 1991. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 16. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL Location. The authorized Mill Cove project comprises a 6 square mile body of shallow water on the St. Johns River approximately 10 miles from the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous project. None. Existing project. The authorized project provides improved flow and circulation through Mill Cove to eliminate further shoaling. This large shallow area averages about 2 to 4 feet deep, is about 5.5 miles long, and varies from 0.5 to 2.0 miles wide. It is situated along the St. Johns River near the Dame Point- Fulton Cutoff portion of the Jacksonville Harbor navigation project. The Mill Cove project includes dredging a 650 foot by 3,600 foot flow channel at the west end to -12 feet MSL; enlarging the weir opening at the eastern end to 1,300 feet wide and -12 feet MSL; and installing flow diversion features at the west and east ends of the cove. Mean tidal range is 4.9 feet at entrance, 4.5 feet at Mayport, 3.0 feet at Dame Point, and 1.2 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville (See Table 9-B for 9-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTMTIES FOR FY 1994 Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. In conformance with Section 221, Public Law 91-611, and prior to commencement of construction, the Jacksonville Port Authority, as local sponsor, must provide written agreement to the following local cooperation requirements: provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages that result due to construction and maintenance other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for construction. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost was $2,202. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1990. 17. JOHNS PASS, FL Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the Gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately 1,000 linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1984 by the Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1968 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft are in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging for navigation cost was -420,121. Engineering and design cost was $80,839. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 18. LONGBOAT PASS, FL Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alignment to the Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contributed funds for new work were $172,324. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging for navigation cost was -$49,196. Engineering and design cost was $126,760. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 19. MANATEE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in Manatee County on the east side of Tampa Bay 10 miles from the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11414.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the existing 40 foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basin which extends from Tampa Bay Channel to berthing facilities at Port Manatee. Also provide initial construction for a widener at the northwest end of the Manatee Harbor Channel and initial construction to deepen approximately 8.6 acres adjacent to the southern berthing area to provide a larger turning basin. All material from the project will be placed on upland sites west and northeast of the port slip. Estimated cost of new work (October 1994 price levels) $17,474,000 Federal and $13,660,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Port Manatee consist of 675 acres of port operational lands, a ship basin 1,500 feet long by 788 feet wide; and an approximately 3 mile access channel, with a design width of 400 feet, which connects with the Federally authorized Tampa Bay Channel. The Manatee project was constructed between August 1968 and February. 1970. The required design depth was 40 feet, and the dredging contractor was allowed a pay overdepth of 2 feet. Port Manatee also operates its own terminal railroad, which is licensed under the Interstate Commerce Commission, and publishes a switching tariff as a Class III railroad. It also maintains and operates 2 switch engines and about 30,000 feet of track which connects with the CSX Railroad. 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $111,841. Condition at end of fiscal year. A PCA was submitted in October 1994 and is scheduled for approval in December 1994. Plans and specifications for Phase I are underway and should be complete in January 1995. Contract award is scheduled for award in April 1995. Phase II construction is scheduled for award in December 1996. 20. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR Location. The Project is on the west coast of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25673.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30 by 1,000 foot approach channel to the deep water terminal, decreasing to a 500 foot width opposite the westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to the easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulkhead wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble a Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 21. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to a 400 by 800 foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north end of the turning basin has a 350 foot steel bulkhead with 11 finger piers, each about 40 feet long. There are also 2 privately owned storage and repair facilities and several privately owned boathouses and docks. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel depths as authorized were available throughout the project. 22. MIAMI HARBOR, FL Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11468.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38 by 500 foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36 foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; 2 rubblestone jetties at the entrance; and a channel 15 feet deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet 5.5 miles inland. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15 foot channel in Miami River where depths are based on flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 13 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. Estimated cost (October 1994 price levels) for Miami Harbor Channel is $51,137,000 Federal cost and $32,398,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,300,710. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 21,373 feet of usable berthing space, 13 transit sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 square feet, and 9 freight stations with a total storage capacity of 270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. Available sharehouse storage includes dry storage of 1,450,500 square feet and cold storage of 11,204,000 cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open storage at the port. Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40 ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons available through local rental. Twelve waterfront repair yards and 2 offwater yards serve the port. Drydock facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat lifts with haulout capacities ranging from 40 to 1,000 tons and lifting capacities ranging from 79 to 500 tons. Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and 13 tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, are also available. Rail Facilities at the port are served by the CSX and the Florida East Coast Railway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract cost was $10,461,153. Engineering and design cost $39,110. Construction management cost was $17,916. 9-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Maintenance: Condition, operation and environmental studies cost $92,319. Real estate management cost was $1,929. Engineering and design cost $33,071. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I construction was completed in August with Federal reimbursement in October 1994. Phase II contract was awarded in September; however, offshore disposal site monitoring will delay the commencement of dredging until the spring of 1995. 23. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with 2 finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging cost was $225,672. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $72,127 and $8,007 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. Authorized project depths were restored as of April 1991. 24. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucia Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11428.) Previous project. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80-100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, near Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200 foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Ft. Myers with a 10 foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80 foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60 foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $503,700. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, one municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120 foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River, St Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations on Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440 foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125 foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150 foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125 foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50 foot wharf at Alva; and a 30 foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-L for work accomplished.) Conditon at end of fisca/ year. The project is complete. (The 8 foot depth basin at Stuart was deauthorized by W.R.D.A. of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) 25. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles upstream from Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles. (See Table 9-8 for 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Roads 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Ocklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate management cost was $9,795. Channel maintenance cost $56,985. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. (A 6 foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs Run was deauthorized.) The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Florida flood control project. 26. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities include 5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds with a total of 118,030 square feet of storage capacity. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable berthing space is not available at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are no floating cranes, repair facilities or drydock facilities located at the port. A 100 ton vertical boat lift is located on the Intracoastal Waterway south of the port for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 1,000 horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No.16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition, operation and environmental studies for the. project totaled $6,448. Real estate management cost $470. Lands and damages cost was $616. Channel maintenance cost $1,660,840. Engineering and design and construction management cost $272,189 and $89,542 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in need of repair. The south jetty was completed in FY 1986. Authorized project depths were restored as of November 1990. 27. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long respectively, and weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet, the project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $2,415,600. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate management and audits cost $633. Lands and damages cost $177. Engineering and design cost $76,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Repair of the north jetty was completed in FY 1986. Authorized project depths were restored as of January 1990. 28. PONCE HARBOR, PR Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25677.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2,400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, 9-1 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 and a 36 foot deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 959 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer" facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from mayor of Ponce, assuring compliance with local requirements and to cost share the project. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $717,304. A 25 percent contribution is required and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 40 ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has 4 steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. South and north jetties are in fair condition. 29. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11470.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 38 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty fishing walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under H 144/93/1, local interests must: provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 13,807 feet of usable berthing space, 7 transit sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 square feet, and 6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 9,564,800 barrels. There is no usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 cubic feet and open storage at 100.3 acres. Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Drydock facilities include 2 drydocks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 tons and a 4,270 ton vertical boat lift. Three tugs with ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port Everglades Belt Line connects with the CSX railroad to serve the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design cost $44,632. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized iS H 144/93/1. 30. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Water hyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-8 for Authorizing Legislation.) 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation and Table 9-M for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 24,556 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinth and/or water lettuce), and 2,136 acres of hydrilla were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinth in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed is under maintenance control. 31. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 by 200 feet along the best natural new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sandtight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coextensive with the groin; future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilties. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 feet in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge. These consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Environmental studies cost $29,267. Engineering and design cost was $78,771. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. 32. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARN EY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Florida, near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11492.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel is 13 by 200 feet from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River end Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H 445/78/2) and July 24, 1946 (SD 208/79/2). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to 1963 Annual Report.) 33. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 7 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year 9-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 maintenance period. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about one foot on the land side of the inlet. (See Table 9-8 for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.1 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each 5 years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required to sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification were signed by the local sponsor on August 24, 1978. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $3,281,804. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies cost $18,092. Maintenance dredging cost was $316,499. Lands and damages cost was $284. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $96,651 and $808 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in HD 294/93/1. Authorized project depths were restored as of July 1991. 34. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico and about 35 miles from the east end of the island and 1,100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25670.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, and 1938. Existing project. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alinement 350 feet west; deepening Anegado and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, the Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing 6 mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500 foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. Estimated cost of new work (October 1994 levels) $39,232,000 Federal and $16,874,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required to sewer, water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, 2 piers and a three-level ramp facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, 9 at the eastern side and 3 at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and 3 on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, 7 are U.S. Government property, and 24 are owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for handling loaded containers. Twentyfour are open to the general public. Pier No. 6 was repaired and improved in 1985. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18 foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance contract cost was $1,155,663. Condition survey cost $12,000. Engineering and design and construction management cost $144,510 and $29,268 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The GRR has been approved by ASA(CW). Plans and specifications for the first contract which includes deepening Puerto Nuevo and Graving Dock Channels is scheduled for completion by September 1995. Project requires reauthorization. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712 (this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in Table 9-A costs). 35. TAMPA HARBOR, FL Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11413 and 11414.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alafia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; a 43 by 200 foot Port Sutton Terminal Channel 3,700 feet long; turning basins at Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, a 43 by 200 feet by 3,700 feet long in Port Sutton Terminal Channel, and 34 by 300 feet in East Bay Channel. (The 46 foot and 44 foot depth portions of the project include a 5 foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that 4 feet underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a one foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, H 401/91/2 and H 1 50/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1 970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. The LCA for branch channels was signed June 20, 1986. An amendment to the LCA reflecting cost sharing requirements of WRDA of 1986 for section 6 was signed August 31, 1987. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,897,612. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years is required from locals. Terminal facilities. There are 102 commercial waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 7,226 feet of usable berthing space and 15 transit sheds with a total of 585,200 square feet of storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities include 18,440 feet of usable berthing space and 3168 storage tanks for a total capacity of 11,610,350 barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,904,750 square feet, cold storage at 14,309,000 cubic feet, and open storage at 59.4 acres. There are 2 wharves available for coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain elevators with a 3,400,000 bushel total capacity. One elevator on Ybor Channel has a 1,000,000 bushel capacity. Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler and mobile cranes available locally. Marine repair yards include 9 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other offwater companies engaged in various phases of marine repair. There are 4 floating and 4 graving docks available at the port with capacities ranging from 548 to 5,400 long tons. Floating equipment includes 24 tugs with up to 3,350 horsepower and 4 companies with tank barges of capacities up to 14,000 barrels. The CSX Railroad serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 17, Rev. 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Communication network cost $13,750. Condition and operation studies cost $348,888. Real estate management cost $8,085. Maintenance dredging cost $1,187,179. Non-maintenance dredging cost was $39,106. Engineering and design and construction management cost $192,330 and $109,712 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Draft feasibility report completed in August 1994 on Big Bend Channel. Report recommendations for improvement under Section 107. Big Bend Channel report is to be converted to Detail Project Report for approval under CAP. Alafia River portion of feasibility study to be started in 1995. SOW completed for that study. Amendment to existing FCSA on Big Bend Channel study submitted for approval in November 1994 to include Alafia River. 36. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. (See Table 9-H.) 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-C.) 38. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigati'on Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Aquadilla Harbor, PR, $2,392,377; Arroyo Harbor, PR, $937; Bayport Harbor, FL, $2,798; Buena Vista, Humacao, PR, $5,969; Canaveral Harbor, Cap Fund $9,250; Cedar Key Back Channel, FI, $35,285; Fernandina Harbor, FL, $1,084,146; Island of Vieques, PR, $1,043; Limetree Bay, St. Croix, VI, $10,731; Playa de Ponce, PR, $12,282; Port 9-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Everglades, FL, $2,328. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Section 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion Control 39. BREVARD COUNTY, FL Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11484 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sand-transfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. (See Table 9- B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indialantic and Melbourne beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,262,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $187. Condition at end of fiscal year. Feasibility effort is on schedule. Anticipate WRDA 1996 authorization. 40. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on the lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in the northern part of Broward County. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a shoreline protection and recreational beach at 4 locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water; a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestlemounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (October 1994 price levels) is $38,106,000 Federal and $37,239,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet; establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand-transfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $3,460,990. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $14,538. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete. 41. DUVAL COUNTY, FL Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11488.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of construction with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work (October 1994 price levels) $85,797,000 Federal and $57,237,000 non- Federal. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 1965 (H 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United states free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $12,931,067. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and construction management cost $175,336 and $56,050 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract to renourish the project was awarded in September 1994. Due to concerns for construction during unfavorable winter conditions, the Contractor will be given a notice to proceed in March 1995 with completion in October 1995. Approximately 1.5 million cubic yards of material from a borrow area 7 miles offshore will be placed along 7.5 miles of shorefront. 42. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL Location. Fort Pierce Beach Erosion Control Project extends 1.3 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet, on the east coast of Florida about 120 miles north of Miami. Existing project. The project fill was initially completed by local interests in 1971, using offshore borrow material. Prior to the nourishment, severe shorefront recession had destroyed a private residence and threatened other residences and a state road. Local interests were reimbursed the federal share of the initial project construction cost. Federal participation in renourishment was authorized for an initial 10-year period and subsequently extended five years under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers until 1985. The project is also periodically nourished with suitable material obtained from operational maintenance of the nearby Fort Pierce Harbor federal navigation project. The project was renourished in the summer of 1980. A Section 111 project authorized in 1982 provides that 60 percent of the cost of material required to nourish 1.2 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet should be reallocated to the navigation project. A reevaluation report is being conducted to determine whether extension of federal participation in cost sharing to 50 years is warranted. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $120,106. Condition at end of fiscal year. A favorable draft Section 934 report is currently undergoing public coordination. The schedule for submittal to SAD is February 1994. Anticipated ASA(CW) approval is June 1994. 43. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL Location. Indian River County is on the east coast of Florida, midway between Jacksonville and Miami. The authorized project comprises 2.65 miles of beach along the ocean shore of Vero Beach and 1.7 miles along the Sebastian Inlet State Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11474 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorized project provides nourishment for 8,870 feet (1.68) miles) of the State Park, south of Sebastian inlet. The initial beach fill would consist of 202,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 202,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment at 5-year intervals would be required. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 65 percent of this segment. The plan also provided for nourishment of 9,180 feet (1.74 miles) of Vero Beach. The initial beach fill consisted of 572,000 cubic yards of material, including advance nourishment. The restored beach would have a 20 foot wide level berm at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water. The beach fill as designed would provide protection against a 10 year return interval storm. An estimated 120,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment would be required at 5 year intervals. In addition to the beach fill a "Sabecon" reef breakwater was recommended. The structure would be placed 500 feet offshore of the new beach and would be 400 feet in length, with a zero mean low water crest elevation. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 43.7 percent for this segment. The project was authorized on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) by the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Local cooperation. The authorization of a beach erosion control project for Indian River County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of way; including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material, and relocations; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore; assure maintenance and repair during the economic life of the project; provide and maintain as necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishments for the life of the project; provide an additional cash contribution for the Sebastian Inlet State Park Beach. The project, as authorized, provides that the work may be accomplished in separate units or features and that the written agreement with non- Federal interests be obtained. The Indian River County Board of Commissioners, by letters dated December 21, 1984 and January 15, 1987, affirmed their support for the project and their willingness and ability to share in project costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. No work is currently scheduled. 44. LEE COUNTY, FL Location. Lee County is on the lower Gulf coast of Florida, about 90 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 130 miles north of Key West. 9-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Existing project. The project provides for the Federal participation in restoration and protection of Lee County, Florida, as follows: On Gasparilla Island, restore beach along 2.7 miles of shore and provide revetment along 2,400 feet of shore and a 500-foot terminal groin; on Captive Island, restore beach along 4.7 miles of shore; and on Estero Island, restore beach along 4.6 and provide a 5-year advance supply of beach nourishment material and periodic nourishment of the restored beaches, as needed, with Federal aid for nourishment limited to the first 10 years of project life after completion of the initial fill placement on each island. Estimated cost (October 1994 price levels) is $8,129,000 Federal cost and $29,631,000 non-Federal cost. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Local interest must: contribute in cash )including contract price, engineering and design, and supervision and administration) 65.8 percent of first cost at Gasparilla Island, 91.3 percent of first cost at Captiva Island, and 87.5 percent of first coast at Estero Island; contribute toward beach nourishment for the first 10 years of project life, 95.5 percent for Gasparilla Island; 91.3 percent for Captive Island, and 96.9 percent for Estero Island; and contribute 50.9 percent of the annual maintenance costs of the terminal groin on Estero Island; provide after 10 years of project life periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; provide. lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations; assure continued public ownership for public use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; save the United States free from damages; and provide an adequate width of beach with acceptable access and other facilities necessary for public use. Operations during the year. New work: Engineering and design cost $1,803,381. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of an economic update for the Estero and Gasparilla elements is underway and scheduled for approval in June 1995. After approval, a GRR will be initiated with the first orders of work being beach surveys and geotechnical investigations. These two elements will be constructed by the Corps. The review of a design memorandum for the local renourishment of Captive in FY 96 is underway. Reimbursement of this work will require the negotiation of another Section 215 agreement for the balance of the $3M ceiling. 45. MANATEE COUNTY, FL Location. Manatee County is on the west coast of Florida, just south of the entrance to Tampa Bay. The county's 14 mile gulf shoreline consists of 2 barrier islands, Anna Maria Key and the northern half of Longboat Key, separated from the mainland by Tampa and Sarasota Bays and from each other by Longboat Pass. Project consists of about 7.5 miles of gulf shoreline. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the shore protection project for Manatee County which includes the entire 7.5 mile gulf shoreline of Anna Maria Key. The project consists of restoration of 3.2 miles of gulf shore beach to an elevation 8 feet above mean low water with a level berm 50 feet wide and a natural slope seaward as would be shaped by wave action. The project also provides for periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be and justified for the project life. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet. Estimated cost (October 1994 price levels) is $24,515,000 Federal and $20,199,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Manatee County, Florida was made with the provision that Federal cost sharing would be in accordance with policy established by existing law, and the percentages based on conditions of shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction: Provided that, prior to construction, local interests furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) Provide a cash contribution equal to 47 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Corps construction line, the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) Provide all costs of construction for nourishment landward of the Corps construction line; (d) Provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 41 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) Hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (f) Assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) Adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) Agree to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitations costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Beach nourishment contract cost was $385,267. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $148,002 and $56,483 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract awarded August 1992 and completed September 1993. 46. NASSAU COUNTY, FL Locadtion. Nassau County is on the east coast of Florida, north of Jacksonville and adjoins the state of Georgia. The authorized project comprises 4.3 miles of beach along the ocean shore of northern Amelia Island, and tightening 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the existing south jetty at the entrance to Fernandina Harbor. 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project would provide initial restoration of 3.6 miles of eroded beach, starting at a point about .7 mile south of the Fernandina Harbor south jetty and extending south to Sadler Road; sand tightening about 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the south jetty; and periodic nourishment of 4.3 miles of shore between the south jetty and Sadler Road. The restored beach would have a 20 foot wide level berm at an elevation of 13 feet above mean low water. The initial beach fill would consist of an estimated 1,100,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 240,000 cubic yards of nourishment at 2- year intervals would be required. Sand tightening would require about 16,700 tons of stone. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 77%. (Sand tightening, accomplished as part of the Navy's effort to deepen and widen the navigation channel, was deleted from the plan.) Estimated cost of new work (October 1994 price levels) $10,725,000 Federal and $2,984,000 non-Federal contributed funds. Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Nassau County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way , including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material and relocations required for construction of the project, including that required for periodic nourishment; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from construction and subsequent maintenance, operation and public use of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during the useful life of the project; assure maintenance and repair during the useful life of the project as required to serve the project's intended purpose; provide and maintain clearly marked beach access, nearby parking areas, and other public use facilities, open to all on equal terms, and as required to realize the benefits upon which Federal participation is based; provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated to this function, exclusive of lands, easements, rights-of-way, alterations, and relocations, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law and based on shore ownership at the time of implementation; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment during the useful life of the project, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment, with the actual amount to be based on existing law and conditions of ownership at the time of each nourishment; and at least annually inform affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $266,107. Condition at end of fiscal year. PED is scheduled for completion in September 1995. 47. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL Location. Palm Beach County is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project authorization, the River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 62.1 percent of the cost for Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 55.8 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 50 percent for south Lake Worth Inlet- Delray Beach; and 53 percent of cost for Delray Beach- Boca Raton inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (October 1994 price levels) for Palm Beach County is $28,193,000 Federal and $46,827,000 non-Federal cash contributions. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project, of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (c) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic life as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals; (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Reimbursable contract cost $2,729,997. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $58,794 and $3,380 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Review is ongoing of locally prepared GDM for Jupiter/Carlin with approval scheduled for April 1994. The contract for the third renourishment of Delray beach was completed in FY 1993. 48. PALM BEACH ISLAND, FL Location. Palm Beach Island is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466). Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorization provides for Federal participation in the costs of a plan for protection of the shore of the Palm Beach Island, comprising restoration of a protective beach with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean high water from Lake Worth Inlet to a point about 1,000 feet south of Southern Boulevard extended, thence with a general width of 100 feet to South Lake Worth Inlet, 9-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 construction and operation of a sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet, and additional periodic nourishment from Lake Worth or other suitable source, substantially in accordance with the plan developed by the district engineer, with such modifications thereof as may be considered advisable by the Chief of Engineers. Federal assistance would entail contribution of funds in the amount of 4.7 percent of the initial construction cost of the beach restoration and appurtenant drainage work, and of the expenditures for periodic nourishment from Lake Worth for a period of 10 years from the year of the initial placement, plus 19.3 percent of the expenditures for construction, and for operation, maintenance, and current replacements of parts of the sand-transfer plant for the same period. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (October 1994 price levels) for Palm Beach Island is $13,066,000 Federal and $93,202,000 non-Federal cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval of the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project (except the sand-transfer plant already under contract), of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) make appropriate modification of the location of the end of the discharge line of the sand-transfer plant to accomplish satisfactory dispersion of bypassed material; (c) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals, including operation of the sand-transfer plant; (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. No work scheduled. 49. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (October 1994 price levels) is $80,074,000 Federal and $861,1 65,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $1,074. Engineering and design and construction management cost $377,956 and $20,294 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. LRR approved by ASA(CW). Sand Key, 1st renourishment DM initiated July 1994 and construction contract award scheduled for September 1996. Treasure Island FDM scheduled for approval by HQUSACE in June 1995. Long Key 3rd renourishment (300,000 cy) scheduled for award in June 1995. Long Key FDM scheduled for for submission to MSC in January 1995. 50. SARASOTA COUNTY, FL Location. Sarasota County is on the Gulf coast of Florida about 30 miles south of Tampa Bay. The northern most portion of the project adjoins the Manatee County Beach Erosion Control Project on Longboat Key. The total project consists of about 5.7 miles of gulf shoreline on Longboat Key and Venice Beach. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in the construction of a protective beach 12,600 feet long at Longboat Key and a protective beach 29,400 feet long at Manasota Key at the City of Venice, Florida. Two borrow areas will be required. The first is located within 2 shoal areas located between 1 to 2 miles offshore of Manasota Key south of the project area. This borrow area will be supplemented by material located within the ebb tidal shoal of Big Sarasota Pass which is about 13 nautical miles north of the project beach at Venice. The project also provides periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be needed and justified for life of the project. The mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. Estimated cost (October 1994 price levels) is $31,291,000 Federal and $18,956,000 non-Federal. 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT The Federal share of each periodic nourishment is 72.55 percent for Venice, and 15.4 percent for Longboat, of applicable nourishment costs. Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b)provide a cash contribution equal to 29.3 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, and rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Erosion Control Line (ECL), the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) provide all costs of construction for nourishment of private lands and share in the costs of construction for public lands landward of the Erosion Control Line (ECL); (d) provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 29.3 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors;(f) assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) agrees to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract cost was $1,212,726. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost was -$315,821 and $98,776 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial contruction began in July 1994 along 1.3 miles long the northern end of the project. A second contract is scheduled for award in August 1995 to complete the remaining 1.9 miles of initial fill at Venice Beach. The project was divided into two contracts due to concerns about the use of borrow area at Big Sarasota Pass by the State of Florida. The sponsor has identified an alternative borrow area. Coordination is underway to secure the Water Quality Permit modification and NEPA documentation. 51. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Key West, FL; Lido Key, FL; Mullet Key, FL; Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, FL were deauthorized January 1, 1990 by the W.R.D.A. of 1988, P.L. 100-676. (See Table 9-0.) 52. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorizetion) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Hwy 187, Pinones, PR -$3,604; Boca De Cangrejos, PR $7; Dunedin Shores, FL $21; Patillas, PR $52. Beach erosion control actvities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-433, Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1074, Public Law 93-251. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Flood Control 53. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is generally located within the southeastern 18 counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section north of the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, FL (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, FL) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports for 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargement of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shores of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent overdrainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and 9-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVL WORKS ACTIVTIES FOR FY 1994 protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around the lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-Q. Also, see Table 9-N for principal features of locks and dams. Estimated cost for new work (October 1994 price levels) is $1,358,000,000 Federal and $702,000,000 Non-Federal, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-R for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9- S for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie Locks; 5 hurricane gates; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 - total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, LD3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S- 11, S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Section 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gaging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. Corps of Engineers - The.Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. The C-111 GRR was approved July 1994 and detailed design is underway. Preparation of DM for C-51/Sta 1 being initiated and scheduled for submittal in March 1996. A Project Modification report for Manatee Protection devices is scheduled for submission in December 1994. (For status of work under construction at the end of the fiscal year see Table 9-P.) 54. DADE COUNTY, FL Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (October 1994 price levels) is $114,612,000 Federal cost and $102,863,000 non-Federal cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (H 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cash for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) assure.maintenance of the groin, and after 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 16, 1973. A supplemental agreement for Bal Harbour portion was approved June 30, 1976. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $31,857,335. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract cost $358,600. Hired labor to the contract cost $12,182. Engineering and design and construction management cost $374,155 and $69,221 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract #1 for renourishment of 2 areas was terminated in FY 94 due to a temporary Federal injunction. Coordination of a NEPA document was reinitiated to comply with the Federal judge's desire to complete the EA process. This will allow readvertisement in the summer of 1995. 55. DADE COUNTY, NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL Location. On the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline extending 2.5 miles north of Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The existing shore protection project for Dade County provides for Federal participation in the cost of construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control and hurricane protection along 9.3 miles of shore between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet and for the construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control along the 1.2 miles of shore fronting Haulover Beach Park and provides for protection and nourishment of 2.5 miles of beach shore north of Haulover Beach Park and for extension of the period of Federal participation from 10 years to the life of the project. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Consistent with the cost-sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the administration and Senate Majority Leadership, local interests will be required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway and relocations; pay 50 percent of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; pay 35 percent of the cost allocated to storm damage prevention; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from local sponsors. Non-federal contribution for new work was $8,082,927. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Continuation of planning and engineering. 56. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins - the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers - and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provided for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provided for: Green Swamp Area - a conservation area and 3 storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River - 4 flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures and levees; Oklawaha River -a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of parts of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River - one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River - Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas- Lake Tarpon; outlet canal and control structure; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-T on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (October 1994 price level) is $177,644,000 Federal and $152,464,000 non- Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction and 50 percent of recreation costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate administration cost $560. Hired labor to recreation was $168. Recreation contract cost was $316,245. Engineering and design and construction management cost $74,822 and $164,033 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and the scheduled work is 98 percent complete. Construction is underway on recreation. The remaining scheduled work is along 9-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTMITIES FOR FY 1994 the Tampa Bypass Canal (C-135). Pending a determination of need, 58% of project is unprogrammed. 57. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Caribbean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for 2 multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement - one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2 mile long tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (October 1994 price levels) is $409,084,000 Federal and $138,231,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been completed, except for Cerrillos Reservoir which was signed March 15, 1982. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,508,912. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $1,480. Contract for Portugues Excavation and Adit Treatment cost $2,099,893. Contract cost for Leaks at Cerrillos Dam Intake Structure was $39,907. Cerrillos Dam Foundation Report cost was $327. Cerrillos Dam Electrical Contract cost was $38,581. Cerrillos Dam Seepage Task Force Contract cost was $92,253. Hired labor cost was $2,053,382. Cerrillos Dam Intake Access Road cost $405,280. Constancia Park Channel cost $32,395. Channel herbicides cost was $50,875. Entrance Channel Debris Basin contract cost was $1,279,095. Hired labor for channels and canals cost -$12,714. Contract cost for Constancia Park recreation was $199,076. Hired labor cost was $2,249. Cultural Resource investigations cost $3,742. Area office equipment cost $157,772. Engineering and design and construction management cost $2,194,927 and $548,421 respectively. Transfer of property cost $38,757. Condition at end of fiscal year. Filling, monitoring, and operation of the Cerrillos Dam continues. The Cerrillos Access Road is underway and is scheduled to complete in August 1995. The Channel Basin #5 contract was awarded in September 1995. Plans & specs are being prepared for the Portugues Shoal Removal Contract #1 and should be awarded in September 1995. 58. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR Location. The Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage basin is located within the San Juan Metropolitan Area along the northern coast of Puerto Rico. The basin joins the southeast side of San Juan Harbor and extends south and up into the foothills of the central mountains of Puerto Rico. The basin is traversed by the Rio Piedras, Rio Puerto Nuevo, Quebrada Margarita, Quebrada Josefina, Quebrada Dona Ana, Quebrada Vista, and Quebrada Guaracanal. Existing project. The authorized project for flood control includes improvements to 11.2 miles of the existing channel of Rio Puerto Nuevo and Rio Piedras and five tributaries of the Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage basin. The 25 square mile drainage basin drains into San Juan Harbor. Estimated cost of the project (October 1994 price levels) is $250,546,000 Federal and $86,706,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide cash contribution equal to five percent of the total project costs; provide LERRD (except railroad bridge alterations);provide an additional cash payment when the sum of cash and LERRD are less than 25 percent of the total project costs; operate and maintain project works after completion; hold and save the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments; participate and comply with Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; provide guidance and leadership to prevent unwise future development in the flood plain; provide one-half of the separable first cost of post authorization planning and construction of recreation facilities; and all costs and full responsibility for operations, maintenance, replacement, and management of the recreation lands and facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $933,799. Condition at end of fiscal year. The sponsor expects to obtain lands required for the first contract by March 1995. The first construction contract is scheduled for award in June 1995. Work on FDM #2 is underway. 59. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $74,191. 60. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-E.) 61. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 9-V.) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $428,216 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. No costs were incurred for Emergency Operations. Rehabilitation cost was $1,287,546. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization). Federal cost for the fiscal year was Bradenton Beach, FL $38,440; Ft. Clinch, Nassau County, FL $8,822; and Juan Mendez Channel, PR $20,510. General Investigations 62. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year were: navigation studies $740,381; flood damage prevention studies $1,185,626; shoreline protection studies $274,557; special studies $106; review of authorized projects $28,137; special investigations $65,430; and coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests $239,695; for a total cost of $2,533,932. 63. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. Cedar Keys Hurricane Evacuation $19,971; Florida Statewide Evacuation $44,439; Florida Peninsula HES $1; FPMS Unit Jacksonville, FL $35,318; HES Palm Beach $25,470; HES National Behavioral Study $1; Hurricane Evacuation Study PR $618; Hurricane Evacuation Study VI $23,912; Puerto Rico East Coast HES $832; Quick Responses $7,923; Southeast Florida HES Reanalysis $18,963 and Technical Services General $98,631; Hydrologic Studies cost $5,474; for a total cost of $281,553. 64. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Navigation costs were Miami Harbor Channel, FL $914, and Palm Valley Bridge $278,707..Beach erosion cost was Monroe County, FL $92,546. Local protection cost was Arecibo River, PR $247,785, Rio De La Plata, PR $682,028 and Rio Grande De Loiza, PR $574,713. Total cost for Continuation of Planning and Engineering was $1,876,694. 65. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation cost was Miami River Sediments, FL $97,539; and San Juan Harbor, PR $778,083. Beach erosion control cost was Martin County, FL $384,999; Nassau County, FL $266,107 and St. Johns County, FL $73,131. Local protection cost for Puerto Nuevo River, PR was $4,099. Total cost for Advance Engineering and Design was $1,603,960. General Regulatory 67. PERMIT EVALUATION (R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MPRSA of 1972) Location. Navigable waters of the United States, including tributary systems, headwaters and isolated waters, and ocean waters to the limits of the territorial seas. Existing Program. The program evaluates permit applications for work in navigable waters (dredging, filling, and other structures) of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material to the oceans for ocean disposal. Geographic coverage includes Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Decision making criteria consist of the public interest review, Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines, and ocean dumping criteria. Local Cooperation. Joint application agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) continues to work smoothly. FDEP delegation to South and Southwest Florida Water Management Districts working smoothly, with possible increased sharing of project review information in the future. Continuing discussions with FDEP on developing a comprehensive programmatic general permit which could move both agencies into joint application review. Discussions are concluding with the USVI Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) to improve the existing joint application process. Booklets describing both joint application processes have been reviewed and extensively revised. The updated Corps/FDEP booklet has been published but will need additional revisions due to changes in state law. The DPNR revised booklet will be published this year. Operations and results during fiscal year. A total of 8,071 applications were received during the fiscal year, up slightly from 7,655 received in FY 1993. Of these, 1,776 were individual or letters of permission (compared to 1,518 in FY 1993), 2,351 were requests for nationwide permit verification (versus 2,508 in FY 1993), and 3,944 were for regional general permits (versus 3,629 in FY 1993). FY 1994 cost for permit evaluation was $4,794,771. Condition at end of fiscal year. A total of 535 individual or letters of permission permit applications were carried forward into FY 1995. 68. ENFORCEMENT (R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MPRSA of 1972) Existing program. The program takes appropriate enforcement action against both unauthorized work requiring a permit and noncompliance findings on issued permits. Operation of the program is continuing to make increased use of alternative dispute resolution processes to remediate violations. Close coordination with and 9-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 cooperation of Department of Justice continues, with development of consent orders and fines as appropriate. Local cooperation. Our enforcement agreement with EPA continues to foster partnering between our two agencies. Negotiations are continuing for a separate agreement with the EPA to cover Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands. A new general permit is being developed for existing works where EPA is issuing administrative orders. In addition, a new agreement on cooperative enforcement procedures is being developed with the State's Department of Environmental Protection and the five Water Management Districts. Operations and results during fiscal year. A total of 154 unauthorized activities were reported during the fiscal year and 51 noncompliance cases were acted on. 144 unauthorized activities and 49 noncompliance cases were resovled. Compliance inspections were performed on 165 permits. Approximately 70 percent were found in compliance. Cost incurred this fiscal year for enforcement was $1,053,577. Condition at end of fiscal year. 17 cases were transferred to the EPA under the enforcement MOAs. Approximate settlement terms for 2 consent orders finalized, with total penalties of $310,000; restoration of 8 acres of wetlands required; and the use of NW- 32 for 4 acres of wetlands. The NW permit required compensatory mitigation. One administrative penalty action was taken. A $15,000 fine was assessed and restoration of 2.5 acres. Cost for enforcement was $1,053,577 for FY 1994. 68. OTHER NAVIGATION REGS (R&H Act of 1899) Location. Navigable waters of the United States in Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Existing program. This program conducts studies to determine geographic extent of navigable waters of the United States, and establishment of danger or restricted zones in these waters. Local cooperation. This program is carried out with informal cooperation with the State of Florida and cooperation of other Department of Defense agencies needing restricted zones in which to conduct their defense related missions. Operations and results during fiscal year. No tributary system navigability studies were conducted during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. The district has conducted 14 navigability studies of State tributary systems. State assumption of the Section 404 program may occur in the next three years. Additional navigability studies will be programmed to help delineate nonassumable waters as funds permit. Project Modification 69. KISSIMMEE RIVER, FLORIDA Location. The Kissimmee River Basin comprises 3,013 square miles, and extends from Orlando southward to Lake Okeechobee, the second largest freshwater lake in the United States. The area is bounded on the north by the lakes of the Orlando area, on the west by the Peace River Basin, on the south by Lake Okeechobee, and in the east by the Upper St. John's and the Taylor Creek- Nuddin Slough Basins. The watershed is about 105 miles long and has a maximum width of 35 miles. Existing Project. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent of Federal participation in the Level II Backfilling Plan, as developed by the South Florida Water Management -District, for restoration of the Kissimmee River and flood plain ecosystem. It is expected that restoration will restore the ecological integrity of the river system. Environmental improvements through modification of operations for Lake Kissimmee, Cypress, and Hatchineha. The project will include canal and/or structure improvements and real estate acquisition. The recommended plan consists of backfilling approximately 29 miles of C-38. This will result in the restoration of almost 29,000 acres in the floodplain. Three structures will be removed and two bridges and associated utilities will be relocated. Real estate interests will be acquired for effected portions of the floodplain. Estimated cost of the project (October 1994 price level) for Kissimmee River (Upper and Lower Basins) $187,051,000 Federal and $391,474,000 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. The South Florida Water Management District, an agency of the State of Florida, is the feasibility study cost sharing partner, and has expressed its intent to be the project sponsor. Local cost for the Headwater Revitalization is to be credited towards the total project cost. The authorization calls for the restoration to be cost-shared 50%-50% and that the lands be credited toward the total cost of the Kissimmee River Restoration. A draft Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) has been reviewed by the sponsor and a letter of intent has been provided for the Headwaters Revitalization. LCA for the River Restoration project is scheduled for execution in May 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: LCA cost was $1,339, study cost was -$89,633 and Engineering and Design cost was $6,889,406. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Engineering and design is underway. Preparation of a Project Modification Report (FDM scope) for the work in the upper basin is ongoing and will contain documentation to justify the project on the basis of environmental benefits. It will be submitted in March 1995. In the lower basin portion, feature designs are underway for the restoration of the Kissimmee River. Test backfilling to verify design criteria and methodology was completed in September 1994. 9-26 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Federal Funds) 2. Arecibo Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St.Johns River, FL (Federal Funds) 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) 5. Canaveral Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 7. Charlotte Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 2,048,000 2,180,000 2,523,000 2,569,000 36,056,500 2,064,140 2,166,960 2,419,492 1,432,302 34,661,551 - 1,128,075 1 1,128,075 - 4,301,431 4,301,431 S 9,700 9,700 195,000 826,300 247,000 744,000 193,967 826,123 247,944 731,405 361,225 361,225 7,313,042 7,300,181 - 243,235 243,235 - 185,688 - 185,688 1,035,000 52,273 1,925,000 2,197,275 15,655 22,713 255,000 261,142 25,000 973,477 3,887,000 3,878,661 4,500 14,530 1,204,000 517,232 3,080,000 3,086,700 235,000 1,795 5,941,000 2,598,377 4,003,000 3,984,095 1,050,000 662,032 69,000 508,000 2,000 60,472 516,417 857 271,000 272,654 2,828,000 2,826,792 93,000 91,248 22,343,910 ' 18,280,207' 62,539,240 62,513,146 2,395,500 1,770,609 305,290 305,290 2,243,535 2,242,269 159,975 159,975 533,169 s 533,169 15,438,644 15,435,646 9-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 8. Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 10. Fernandina Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Fort Myers Beach Channel, FL (Federal Funds) 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (Federal Funds) 14. Intracoastal Waterway Jacksonville to Miami, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: ApCposrotp. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. ost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 28,098 1,689,000 1,701,964 73,036 1,841,000 1,892,291 3,973 1,062,000 991,403 - 442,000 - 278,926 115,000 191,348 105,050 -- - - - 2,000 1,929 5,000 10,833. 769,000 978,529 4,700 25,324 235,000 119,754 1,234,700 1,228,341 - (776) 1,718,150 1,796,000 1,711,069 1,768,672 10,345 - - - 13,000 - 7,893 287,500 194,215 93,770 98,458 468,000 487,934 163,000 159,143 66,750 45,000 63,763 47,568 3,110,500 3,256,940 2,788,500 2,738,650 450,000 356,433 1,114,850 1,087,463 10,000 14,870 470,000 512,751 855,100 893,400 82,000 294,00 79,225 294.88 1,327,000 1,351,314 3,620,00 3,638,63 63,647,473 63,647,442 33,161,176' 33,146,819' 442,000 383,976 9,627 9,627 712,900 712,829 4,639,040 ' 4,639,040' 31,281,438 31,250,395 935,000 934,050 158,140 ' 158,140 1,207,091 1,206,853 1,638,000 1,513,832 7,918,636 7,909,636 18,574 18,574 8,112,557' 8,112,557' ) 8,499,959 10 38 8,497,622 10 19,251,598 " 19,251,598 " 0 43,652,028 1 30 43,639,829 2 - 61,000 - 61,000 9-28 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 15. Jacksonville Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Jacksonville Hbr. (Mill Cove), FL (Federal Funds) 17. Johns Pass, FL (Federal Funds) 18. Long Boat Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Manatee Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 20. Mayaguez Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 21. Melbourne Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 1,169,000 293,200 4,822,000 2,904,000 1,453,730 290,775 4,803,221 2,888,513 112,000 46,859 264,000 265,030 609,000 824,142 53,045 - 2,202 50,000 61,500 - 48,543 60,718 (600) (426) - 47,596,278 " 47,596,278 82,194,068 " 82,156,602" 102,813 102,813 927,654 ' 927,654 U 25,000 25,000 4,104,000 4,093,977 82,098 " 82,098 " 471,275 469,036 1,020,233 -- 1,020,233 32,000 80,000 2,548,191 27,983 77,566 2,541,739 - - 172,324 - - 172,324 - (137,000) 250,000 1,285,000 163,325 33,037 134,126 111,841 2,575,500 1,280,980 168,187 168,187 1,061,561 1,061,561 - . - 8,700 - 8,700 17,696 17,696 634,864 634,863 9-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 22. Miami Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23. New Pass Sarasota, FL (Federal Funds) 24. Okeechobee Waterway, FL (Federal Funds) 25. Oklawaha River, FL (Federal Funds) 26. Palm Beach Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Ponce Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp Cost Maint prop. New Work: NewA Wporrokp:. ost MaWieowrk : Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost aWiNorek : Approp. Cost New Work: Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Maim=: Approp. Cost Maint: New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Cost 235,644' 435,155 448,738 100,000 182,812 ,- 2,062,500 2,174,033 28,000 39,140 341,000 211,015 690,000 683,850 (2,400) 21 4,544,250 4,537,698 40,000 36,431 302,000 251,409 206,000 211,940 60,000 54,406 3,061,550 2,996,492 83,000 86,693 11,110,9 10,518,1' 125,0( 127,3 302,0( 305,8( 5,540,0( 5,451,01 67,0( 66,7E 180,845 1,017,000 423,000 2,039,0( 204,172 1,016,978 417,280 2,030,1( - - 68,189 37,600 65,656 40,134 (320,000) 4,741 - - 1,400 - 1,400 34,000 33,662 (32,198) 81,0 77,51 (15,07 - 10,697 23 44,389,989 ", 79 42,264,670 1 DO 5,370,517 19 5,369,682 - 2,300,710 * 2,274,595 - 45,811 "' - 45,811 , DO 4,780,926 06 4,779,138 - 21,756,418 - 21,756,418 w 00 55,866,521 u 19 55,681,689 " - 315,264 2 - 315,264 a o0 2,491,576 " 80 2,491,103 3 6,924,021 ' - 6,911,204 " 0o 17,335,946 u 05 17,320,294 ' - 1,953,276 - 1,953,276 0O 19,389,938 10 19,386,110 - 2,415,600 - 2,415,600 1,379,000 - 1,379,000 2) 2,259,928 " - 2,227,260 2 - 1,779,270 - 1,779,270 - 717,304 - 717,304 9-30 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 29. Port Everglades Harbor, Fl (Federal Funds) 30. Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 31. St. Augustine Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 32. St. Johns River, FL Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 33. St. Lucie Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. San Juan Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 35. Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35. Tampa Harbor, FL (Cont) (East Bay - Branch Channels) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost (37,000) 1,265 19,864 - - 54,426,773 n - - 54,416,635 " - 45,000 1,849,878 - 44,632 1,849,510 2,946,000 2,692,000 2,654,000 3,289,000 50,913,137 3,082,770 2,721,820 2,642,895 3,292,416 50,900,334 54,000 52,563 1,393 15,000 12,098 107,000 108,038 1,476,434 " 1,476,434 " 5,663,107 5,661,200 1,171,243 * 1,171,243 " 1,300,299 w 1,300,299 w 917 700,500 702,981 110,750 99,767 102,000 102,746 430,000 43,241 - - 836,000 453,000 838,603 450,648 (234,222) 145,161 (18,314) 7,766,689 " 7,766,489" 7,533,485 7,529,908 3,281,804 3,245,106 .- 13,744,968 S- - - 13,744,968 231,500 1,862,000 477,000 1,375,000 20,642,135 " 218,514 1,874,848 473,469 1,341,441 20,604,905" 2,426,000 2,898,514 700,000 946,332 330,000 292,769 4,656,000 4,598,064 1,250 4,557,000 2,158 (100,000) 60,804 16,855 (96) 268 - 173,767,490 " 173,767,440 " 1,910,000 40,210,095 " 1,896,810 40,194,747 " 1,083,162 1,038,711 1,700,000 1,689,190 814,450 718,674 9-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. PROJECT 35. Tampa Harbor, F (Port Sutton) (Federal Funds) 39. Brevard County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 40. "Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control & Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Proj. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 41. Duval County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 42. Ft. Pierce Beach, (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 43. Indian River County, FL (Federal Funds) 44. Lee County, FL (Federal Funds) 45. Manatee County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 46. Nassau County, FL (Federal Funds) 47. Palm Beach County, FL (Federal Funds) 'Z Total Cost To FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 150,000 70,000 139,696 58,849 FUNDING L New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Cst Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Aprop. Neeww WWoorrkk:: Aprop. ost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Aprop. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FL New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 10,574 3,916,000 3,916,000 1,702,149 1,702,149 250,000 219,827 (490,000) 652,615 122,858 6,037 2,86 27,8 443,0( 457,55 52,66 300,0C 197,07 (331,000) 11,762 525,0 645,61 81,23 11 00 2,100,000 86 186,661 - 1,800,000 - 141,766 - 270,000 - 217,713 93,000 32 101,160 3,298,0( 3,467,44 2,000,0( 2,492,60 275,0 294,97 25,00 61,42 350,000 4,493 53 187 (82,000) 4,040,811 (1,254,000) 1,403,906 512,237 250,000 34,904 - 9-32 570,000 204,582 2,346,492 2,327,217 29,001 29,001 2,262,000 2,257,081 19,345,100 19,293,758 26,884 26,884 3,460,990 " 3,460,990" 15,579,900 14,761,628 12,931,067 11,589,711 1,725,448 1,635,492 908,000 904,411 401,000 385,322 1,816,000 1,803,381 4,840,600 4,645,849 3,800,000 3,337,348 828,000 778,790 9,069,834 8,835,001 13,621 13,621 97 14,538 D0 673,000 50 102,303 - 1,321,500 57 129,083 0 - 15 120,106 - - 4 - 1,816,000 - 1,803,381 D0 (1,700,000) 49 (113,223) )7 702,975 )0 283,000 10 266,107 D0 2,972,000 !1 2,792,171 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. PROJECT 48. Palm Beach Island, FL (Federal Funds) 49. Pinellas County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 50. Sarasota County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 53. Central and Southern Florida (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds). 54. Dade County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 55. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 56. Four River Basins, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 57. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 58. Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR (Federal Funds) Total Cost To FUNDING FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: NewA W&porrokp:. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost NewA Wpporrokp:. Cost New Work: New Work: Approp. Cost New AWpporrokp:. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. New WCoosrtk: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 44,409 994,000 3,999,143 8,361,000 5,629,609 200,000 268,548 7,187,000 12,324,984 6,419,000 6,499,045 26,000 115,824 (241,000) 48,291 (129,000) 189,431 103,471 171,000 (9,568) 18,321 25,336,000 31,529,182 3,500 56,847 - 12,620 4,098,000 3,265,479 - 1,501,462 3,623,575 269,000 262,057 - 7,775,000 7,942,357 6,049,750 6,035,778 83,983 489,000 661,611 492,252 523 (59,000) 38,536 202,145 19,380,000 19,558,294 900,000 (11,738) (12,00( 8,93 (300,00( 2,108,52 1,794,10 100,00 182,48 8,806,00 8,830,83 7,987,00 7,926,65 12,25 542,00 568,36 7,00 181,00 210,76 (104,33: 17,001,00 17,478,47 208,91 967,87 0) ;5 0) 837,00 19 399,32 )2 0)O 1,500,0( 33 305,62 - 1,812,72 - 690,05 10 17,850,0( 36 7,130,87 10 10,717,9( 50 10,657,15 263,2C 10 (7: 10 2,413,0( 53 (23,22' -4,000,0( - 837,38 )3 (133,73' 133,73 0 1,723,0( i4 555,82 3) 0 10,356,00 72 8,613,22 2 1,040,00 70 612,47 - 1,292,0( - 933,75 9-33 1,793,000 1,780,180 10 20,222,693 14 19,479,076 5,625 - 5,625 - 20,160,345 19,294,129 D0 2,469,000 12 1,256,758 26 1,812,726 59 690,059 D0 404,156,398" 72 392,126,372" DO 100,819,940 95 100,629,927 D0 57,811,249 2) 57,397,320 DO 41,751,564 " 4) 39,189,135 " DO 31,857,335 " 12 28,331,946" - 6,941,000 7) 6,801,611 8,082,927 17 7,736,208 10 76,237,095 a 18 74,911,921 - 14,109,986 - 13,780,662 10 331,978,568 11 327,547,540 10 2,508,912 77 1,874,574 10 1,292,000 99 933,799 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep.30, 1994 66. General Regulatory New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. 4,863,500 5,240,000 5,508,000 5,960,000 33,659,200 " Cost 4,933,661 5,010,334 5,639,314 5,989,891 33,479,993" 69. Kissimmee River, FL New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. - 600,000 3,000,000 22,179,000 28,079,000 Cost 1,912,699 590,501 2,179,618 6,821,112 11,638,853 Excludes $228,000 for contributed funds for new work. ' Excludes $288,000 for contributed funds for new work. ' Includes $97,566 for previous project. ' Excludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work. ' Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock. ' Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project in Boca Grande entrance channel from contributed funds. * Excludes $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. ' Includes $905,221 expended for recreation facilities. ' Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. * Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. " Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. " Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. Excludes $2,199,842 expended from public works funds for new work. o Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. o Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. " Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. � Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local interests. " Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R&H Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. " Includes $5,502,126 expended from public work funds for new work. Includes costs of $6,777,906 for recreation facilities. " Includes $381,479 work-in-kind and $172,314 in costs for north jetty recreation facility. " Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work. * Includes $21,101,919 for new work under previous project, $626,925 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. ' Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects, $67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement, and $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. a Includes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. a Includes $11,414 for operating and care under provisions for permanent indefinite appropriation. ' Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes $509,506 contributed funds. a Includes $30,000 for maintenance from public works funds. " Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 expended for new work from contributed funds. , Excludes $1,033,069 contributed funds. a Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed funds. : Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status were deauthorized by Public Law 93-251 section 12. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. " Includes $25,838 under previous project. " Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. s Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. s Includes $44,730 for maintenance from public works funds under previous project. " Includes $853,050 for new work from public works funds under previous project & $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds. s Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. ' Excludes work-in-kind. " Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, FL, project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. Includes $175,000 appropriationand $175,000 cost for new work at C&SF St. Johns Water Management District. 3 Includes $2,294,134 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbor. ' Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. * Includes costs of $89,691 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. " Funds appropriated under General Regulatory Functions 96X3126. 9-34 JACKSONVILLr , FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 NAVIGATION PROJECTS August 26, 1937 March 4, 1913 June 20, 1939 July 14, 1960 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 Report of the Chief of Engineers October 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers July 24, 1991 June 20, 1938 July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet. Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cutoffs. BAKERS HAULOVER (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 11 x 200 feet in ocean entrance, thence 8 x 100 feet to Intracoastal Waterway; Marina basin 8 x 200 feet; reconstruction of jetties and protection of inlet shores. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock. Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant. Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at Port Canaveral West Turning Basin Project. Project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, FL, as modified by the letter of the Secretary dated October 10, 1991 CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL (See Section 6 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet. Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance. Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at bend. Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin. H.Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 189, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 102-580, 31 Oct. 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. 9-35 REPORT OF TEE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 26, 1937" May 17, 1950 P.O. 675/77 July 23, 1942 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 W.R.D.A. November 28, 1990 W.R.D.A. October 31, 1992 June 20, 1938 June 14, 1880 July 13, 1892 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 W.R.D.A. November 28, 1990 Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.95, 74thCong. ,2dsess. Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., 1st sess. CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Establishment of the Cross Florida National Conservation Area. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized project purposes in the Act of July 23, 1942, transferred P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, lands and completed facilities to the state, and required state payments to 101st Cong., 2d sess. Citrus, Clay, Duval, Levy, Marion and Putnam counties. During the period November 28, 1992 and September 30, 1993, authorized P.L. 102-580,31 Oct. 1992, and directed to enter into a contract with the St. Johns River Water 102nd Cong., 2d sess. Management District and the Southwest Florida Water Management District of the State of Florida for the continued operation and maintenance of the project. The maintenance shall be performed at a level of service that is necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent deterioration of the structures. No major rehabilitations or renovations shall be performed in such portions of the project during such period. Funding for the continued operation and maintenance of the barge canal project, shall not exceed $300,000 federal and the State of Florida shall pay a non-federal share of $600,000 to fund the continued maintenance. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. H.Doc. 497, 75th Cong., 3d sess. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance jetties. Annual Report 1879 Raising and extending jetties to provide a 19-foot depth. Annual Report 1891 & 1896 Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20 to 24-foot depth and 400 to H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 600-foot channel width. 1st sess. Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor. Provided for a 26-foot channel. H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin. H.Doc. 548, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity 1st sess. vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong., 2d sess. Redesignated location of turning basin until Section 107 (R&H Act of P.L. 101-640, 28 Nov. 1990 1960) study is completed and the resulting project constructed. 101st Cong., ?? sess. 9-36 JACKSONVILE., FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 6, 1968 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act Def. Act of March 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, March 4, 1933 August 30, 1935 Report of the Chief of Engineers December 14, 1987 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 FORT MYERS BEACH, FL (See Section 11 of Text) 12 x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong. Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals. 1st sess. Extension of 11 x 125 foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL (See Section 12 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local Specified in Act interests. Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel. Specified in Act Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging H.Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions. 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Deepening and enlarging channels and turning basin. P.L. 100-676,17 Nov. 1988, Total cost of $6,742,000. 100th Cong., 2d sess. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL (See Section 13 of Text) 9 x 100 foot channel; deepening channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet H.Doc. 371, 76th Cong., and construction of highway bridge at Venice. 1st sess. Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U.S. Specified in Act Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used. Specified in Act Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area. Specified in Act Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong., any other necessary crossing over Route C-i. 1st sess. Auth. March 1, 1962 Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to 9 x 100 feet. by Senate and House Public Works Comm. Auth. by Chief of 6 x 80 foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay. Engineers, March 1, 1963, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami. Channel width of 100 feet. S PARA June 26, 1934 Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge. S H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong., 2d sess. 3.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. ;pecified in Act 9-37 REPORT OF TEE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach. Channel 12 x 125 feet. Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian (deauthorized). Turning basin at Vero Beach. July 3, 1958 Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach. Chief of Engineers Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami. Report of July 22, 1960, Mod. 12-foot channel March 2, 1907 November 17, 1986 Report of the Chief of Engineers 12 Feb. 1982 Auth. by Chief of Engineers Dec. 2, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. JACKSONVILLE BARBOR, FL (See Section 15 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad H.Doc 663, 59th Cong., bridge. 1st sess. Deauthorized the 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast P.L. 99-662, 28 Nov. 1986, Railroad bridge. 99th Cong., 2d sess. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL (See Section 16 of Text) Enlarge weir structure and west opening controlling flow into Mill P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 Cove, to reduce shoaling and improve navigation as well as 99th Cong., 2d sess. circulation. JOHN'S PASS, FL (See Section 17 of Text) Channel 10 x 100 feet in gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW, 2.6 miles long. LONGBOAT PASS, FL (See Section 18 of Text) Auth. by Chief of 12 x 150 foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Engineers, April Bridge; 10 x 100 foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly 20, 1976 under to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge. Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act, as amended Report of the Chief of Engineers 12 May 1980 W.R.D.A. November 28, 1990 MANATEE HARBOR, FL (See Section 19 of Text) Provide for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basin from Tampa Bay to Port Manatee. Initial construction of a widener at Manatee Harbor and deepen area adjacent to berthing area. Modified the project for navigation authorized by the W.R.D.A. of 1986 to construct substantially in accordance with the post authorization change report dated April 1990. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 101st Cong., ?? sess. 9-38 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 JACKSONVI.LLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 July 3, 1930 PWA Program Sept. 6, 1933 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1907 March 4, 1913 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR (See section 20 of Text) Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. MIAMI HARBOR, FL (See Section 22 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth. The channel at Dinner Key Airport. An 18-foot channel in a land cut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty. Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet. Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912. A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties. A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited to $200,000. A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay. Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward. The Virginia Key improvement. For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interests contribute one-third of the cost. Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key approach channel, widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot wide section to 500 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 390, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act S.Doc. 95, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. 9-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TEE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 13, 1968 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 September 1989 Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 Auth. by Chief of Engineers Nov. 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act September 19, 1890 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 PARA June 26, 1934 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing turning basins at Biscayne Boulevard terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet. Deauthorized the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; and the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin, to Government Cut, and to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL (See Section 23 of Text) 10 x 150 foot entrance channel; 8 x 100 foot inner channels; and 8-foot deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 101st Cong, ?? sess. OKEECEOBEE WATERWAY, FL (See Section 24 of Text) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from Specified in Act H appropriations. New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston. 3d sess. Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized basin at Stuart. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Enlarge existing 8 x 90 foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet. OKLAWAEA RIVER, FL (See Section 25 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg. Annual Report 1889, p. 1360 Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run. H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river. Specified in Acts Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of Specified in Act natural river bed. Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from Specified in Act appropriations for rivers and harbors. Deauthorized channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 9-40 JACKXSONVLLR, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 13, 1934 December 10, 1934 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Report of the Chief of Engineers 10 Dec. 1985 October 27, 1965 March 3, 1925 PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL (See Section 26 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests. Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local interests, to 20 feet. Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the inlet, reveting the banks of the inlet, and restoring existing jetties. Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet. H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. Recommended by Chief of Engineers to Public Works Administration October 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 42, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed.not to exceed 2d sess. $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949. An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide aid 0.3 1st sess. (contains mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet latest published map) north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west. Assume maintenance of locally expanded turning basin to a depth of P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 25 feet on north side of existing basin. 99th Cong., 2d sess. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL (See Section 27 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south sides of inlet; H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment basin inside the weir. 1st sess. PONCE HARBOR, PR (See Section 28 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local Cong., 4th sess. interests. August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 H.R. September 23, 1976, S.R. October 1, 1976 Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests. Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero. Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., 2d sess. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL (See Section 29 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests. H.Doc. 357, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 9-41 July 3, 1930 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TEE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 Report of the Chief of Engineers September 23, 1991 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1905 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1919 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square. Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side. Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel. Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alinement and increase turning basin in size and depth. Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed post authorization studies. Project for navigation. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 144, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 102-580, 31 Oct. 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 30 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms Annual Report 1899 for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State. Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, Specified in Act chemical or other means. Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle. Specified in Act ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL (See Section 31 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin. H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of 1st sess. groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 32 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., Palatka. 2d sess. and Annual Report 1899 p. 1343 The improvement of Deep Creek. H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed Annual Report for 1879, under previous project). pp. 795-798 A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a H.Doc. 1111, 60th side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney. Cong., 2d sess. Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., easing bends at other points. 2d sess. 9-42 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1945 November 7, 1966 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 August 8, 1917 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends. (Cutoffs deauthorized) Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, FL, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff). A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL (See Section 33 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet. Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet. Extending north jetty.and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet through bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR (See Section 34 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth. Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel. Modified condition of local cooperation. Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth. Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage area to 329 acres. Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock. Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal. Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32- foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage. H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 9-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 4, 1976 Report of the Chief of Engineers 23 December 1982 March 3, 1899 March 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1899 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 A bar channel 48 x 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 x 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alinement 350 feet to the west; deepening Anegado, and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, and Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area "E" to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500-foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. TAMPA HARBOR, FL (See Section 35 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay. For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa. TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay. For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary. HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12 x 200 foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under title Improving Hillsborough Bay, FL) TAMPA HARBOR Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor. Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1998, pp 1357-1360 Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., Ist sess. 9-44 JACKSONVILL, , FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth S.Doc. 22, 72nd Cong., of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth 1st sess. of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals. For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending 3d sess. the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet. For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Sen. Comm. Print. Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest. 76th Cong., 1st sess. For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 2d sess. 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly; and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly. For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, 1st sess. and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge. For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough S.Doc. 16, 77th Cong., Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River. 1st sess. (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950). For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port 1st sess. Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns. Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests. 2d sess. Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 34 x 400 feet. 2d sess. For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet. 1st sess. Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the H.Doc. 401, 91st Cong., Gulf to Mullet Key. 2d sess. Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet. Do. Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut through Do. Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels. Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction with Do. Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels. Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet. Do. 9-45 REPORT OF TEE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do.. Do. Do. Do. August 15, 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers 28 March 1988 W.R.D.A. November 28, 1990 Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 January 1979 W.R.D.A. 17 Nov. 1986 Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a Do. turning diameter of 1,200 feet. Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet. Do. Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet Do. Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and Do. an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin. Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the Do. junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin. Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing Do. length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet. An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from Do. the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet. A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning Do. diameter of 1,200 feet. An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Do. Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet. Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a Do. distance of 4,000 feet. Maintenance of East Bay channel to 34 x 300 feet for a distance of H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 5,500 feet. 1st sess. Port Sutton Channel deepening to 43 feet for a distance of 3,700 P.L. 100-676, 17 Nov. 1988, feet and a width of 200 fect. 100th Cong., 2d sess. Maintenance of Alafia Channel to a depth of 34 feet, if a Non-Federal Sponsor agrees to reimburse the Secretary TAMPA HARBOR BRANCH CHANNELS Enlarging Hillsborough Bay Cut D, Sparkman Channel, Port Tampa Channel and existing turning basins at the entrance to Ybor Channel and at Port Tampa, all to a depth of 41 feet with varying lengths and widths and deepening Ybor Channel to a depth of 39 feet. This work will be associated with the Main Channel deepening. TAMPA HARBOR EAST BAY CHANNEL Maintenance dredging at an average annual cost of $471,000. BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS BREVARD COUNTY, FL (See Section August 13, 1968 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 39 of Text) H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 9-46 JACKSONVILL.T., FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 W.R.D.A. November 28, 1990 Report of the Chief of Engineers 2 April 1982 August 13, 1968 August 15, 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers 27 December 1983 October 27, 1965 River and Harbor Act of 1965 W.R.D.A. 17 Nov. 1986 December 31, 1970 S.R. 31 May 1974 and H.R. 20 Nov. 1975 W.R.D.A. 1990 November 28, 1990 BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HIILLSBORO INLET, FL, NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 40 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, FL and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades. Deauthorized navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet. Continued authorization for Hillsboro Inlet dredging for 5 years. CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FL Shoreline protection. DADE COUNTY, FL (See Section 54 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. DADE COUNTY-NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL (See Section 55 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. Extending of existing shore protection project for Dade County to provide for protective beach fill and subsequent nourishment along 2.5 miles of shore north of Haulover Beach Park. DUVAL COUNTY, FL (See Section 41 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL (See Section 42 of Text) Project for beach erosion control. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, 28 Nov. 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL (See Section 43 of Text) The plans provide for a 2.65 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, Vero Beach, a 1.7 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Sebastian 99th Cong., 2d sess. Inlet State Park and for periodic nourishment of the new beaches. LEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 44 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. H.Doc. 395, 91st Cong.,2d sess. MANATEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 45 of Text) The plan provides for a level berm 50 feet wide at an elevation 6 feet S.Doc. 37, 93rd Cong., (MLW) along 3.2 miles of shore on Anna Maria Island and nourishment 1st sess. of entire Gulf shore of that island as needed throughout project life. MARTIN COUNTY Periodic nourishment over the 50 year life of the project. P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. 9-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Report of the Chief of Engineers 22 April 1984 Report of the Chief of Engineers May 19, 1986 October 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 November 7, 1966 Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors 23 April 1985 MONROE COUNTY, FL Modification of existing project from 6,200-foot long to 8,770-foot long beach fill stabilized with 2 groins and periodic nourishment. NASSAU COUNTY, FL(See Section 46 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control on Amelia Island. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 47 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sand-transfer plant. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM LAKE WORTH INLET TO SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET, FL (See Section 48 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project on Palm Beach Island. Federal participation in cost of local sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet and shore protection project. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL (See Section 49 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. Restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island, 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key, 92,000 feet of beach at Treasure Island, and construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key. Also, renourishment of each island. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 100-676,17 Nov. 1988, 100th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 772, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 342, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. SARASOTA COUNTY, FL (See Section 50 of Text) Report of the Shoreline protection along 12,600 feet of shoreline on central Chief of Engineers Longboat and 21,100 feet on Manasota Key in the vicinity of 28 February 1986 Venice, Florida and periodic nourishment of these areas. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL Report of the Shoreline protection along 2.5 miles of problem area in the St. Chief of Engineers Augustine Beach and Coquina Gables area and periodic nourishment. 26 February 1980 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (See Section 53 June 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes. September 3, 1954 Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement. July 14, 1960 Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. of Text) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sass. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 9-48 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 23, 1962 Do. Do. Do. Do. October 27, 1965 Do. August 13, 1968 Do. Approved under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 W.R.D.A November 17, 1988 Everglades National Park Protection and Expansion Act of 1989 October 23, 1962 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando. Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami. Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County. Project Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of Reedy Creek Swamp. Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County. Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties. Improvement of supply, distribution and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. December 17, 1970 Deauthorized flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando; primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County; and navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. Extended modified water delivery schedules to Everglades National Park to January 1, 1992. Construct modifications to the Central and Southern Florida Project to improve water deliveries into the park and shall, to the extent practicable, take steps to restore the natural hydrological conditions within the park. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL (See Section 56 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. Deauthorized Anclote River control structure and channel improvement. S.Doc. 125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 100-676, 17 Nov. 1988, P.L. 101-229, 13 Dec. 1989, 101st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 9-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (See Section 57 of Text) December 31, 1970 LAGO de CERRILLOS, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers March 5, 1992 Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 April 1986 Report of the Chief Engineers January 1989 LAGO de PORTUGUES, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. PONCE, PR Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control. RIO GRANDE DE LOIZA, PR Project for flood control. P.L. 102-580, 31 Oct. 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR (See Section 58 of Text) Project for flood control. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. RIO DE LA PLATA, PR Project for flood control. SAVAN GUT, ST. THOMAS, VI Project for flood control. Increased maximum allotment to $100,000. W.R.D.A. Set maximum amount allotted under Section 205 of the Flood November 28, 1990 Control Act of 1948 at $10,000,000. W.R.D.A. October 31, 1992 W.R.D.A. November 28, 1990 Report of the Chief of Engineers March 17, 1992 TURPENTINE RUN, ST. THOMAS, VIRGIN ISLANDS Project for flood control. KISSIMMEE RIVER RESTORATION, FL (See Section 69 Conduct a feasibility study for the purpose of determining modifications of the flood control project for central and southern Florida, authorized by section 203 of Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1176), which are necessary to provide a comprehensive plan for the environmental restoration. Project for the ecosystem restoration, to construct the headwaters revitalization project, and any modifications for the environmental restoration of the Kissimme River Basin, ensuring that implementation of the project to restore the Kissimmee River will maintain the same level of flood protection as is provided by the current flood control project. P.L. 858, 30 Jun. 1948, 80th Cong, 2d sess. P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 102-580, 31 Oct. 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. of Text) P.L. 101-640, 28 Nov 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 102-580, 31 Oct. 1992, 102nd Cong., 2d sess. 9-50 Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, FL 1974 $ 267,427 $ 811,847 Aatic Plant Control, FL Acts of 1958 & 1962) 1968 1,640,997 ' Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL 1939 5,099,153 Bayport, FL' 1972 58,495' - Cedar Island, Keaton Beach, FL - 4,114 Cedar Keys Harbor, FL 1977 168,569 ' 76,023 Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI' 1964 303,317 58,595 Clearwater Pass, FLa 1980 46,349 ' 1,567,901 Courtnay Channel, FL' 1940 22,846 26,779 Crystal River, FL 1941 25,000 150,459 Everglades Harbor, FL' 1964 221,509 ' 51,034 Fajardo Harbor, PR' 1945 Guayanes Harbor, PR' 1945 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, FL' 1974 38,850 Hillsboro Inlet, FL 1965 Homosassa River, FL' 1937 3,999' 26,454 Horseshoe Cove, FL 1977 347,521 201,021 Hudson River, FL' 1974 9,889 Intracoastal Waterway1 Miami to Key West, FL' 1963 243,079 28,046 Key West Harbor, FL 1972 1,548,892 e 534,623 Kissimmee River, FL' 1931 23,479 112,954 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL" 1931 10,276 9,035 Largo Sound Channel, FL"' 1966 117,443 " 51,149 Little Manatee River, FL"" 1949 11,903 " - Manatee River, FLU 1970 123,350 194,516 New River, FL' 1956 36,518 31,296 Orange River, FL' 1962 2,000 24,918 Ozona, FL, channel and turning basin' 1963 105,527 15,089 Palm Beach, FL, side channel and basin' 1946 Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL"" 1966 41,297 " 60,686 Pithlachascotee River, FL 1973 400,000 ' 261,401 Rice Creek, FL' 1957 85,208 18,814 St. Petersburg Harbor, FL 1983 255,608 1,640,325 2 St. Thomas Harbor, VI' 1949 1,989 Steinhatchee River, FL 1940 135,053 59,721 Suwannee River, FL" 1977 76,418 232,038 Withlacoochee River, FL" 1969 614,912 " 460,145 ? Complete. * Excludes $1,640,997 contributed funds. s Inactive. ' Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. s Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. ' Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. 'Excludes $42,783 contributed funds. 'Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. ' In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. * Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. " Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. n Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. " Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 4 Expended on restudy. SInactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. " Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of R&H Act of 1960. n Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. a Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. " Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. a Includes $32,689 under previous project. a Includes $20,532 under previous project. * Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. a Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. " Authorized by Section 301, R&H Act of 1965 and Section 107 of P.L. 101-640. 9-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 51 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park, FL 1969 $34,862 $ - El Tuque Beach, Ponce, PR 1985 1,396,730 Lee County, FL 1971 Punta Salinas, PR 1984 855,511 Palm Beach County, FL, from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,140 6,257 San Juan, PR 1965 TABLE 9-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 60 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, FL 1960 $66,485 ' Biscayne Bay, FL, Hurricane Protection 1966 Hillsborough Bay, FL 2 1969 Philippi Creek Basin, FL = 1966 'Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. 2 Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 9-52 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 36 of Text) Date Survey Cost Incurred Project Conducted During Period AIWW, Norfolk to St. Johns River, FL 5-94 $ 2,577 Charlotte Harbor, FL 4-94 462 Horseshoe Cove, FL 4-94 16 Manatee River, FL 8-94 424 Miami Harbor, FL 8-94 1,213 New Pass, FL 1-94 252 Oklawaha River, FL 6-94 5,404 Palm Beach Harbor, FL 3-94 25 Pas-A-Grille, FL 1-94 28,796 Ponce De Leon Inlet, FL 4-94 40,757 San Juan Harbor, FL 9-94 21 St. Augustine Harbor, FL 4-94 183 St. Petersburg Harbor, FL 12-93 50,927 Steinhatchee River, FL 6-94 804 Suwannee River, FL 6-94 107,354 Withlacoochee River, FL 9-94 3,335 Total $ 242,550 9-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-I CANAVERAL HARBOR, DATA RELATIVE (See Section 5 FL PROJECT TO LOCK of Text) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, FL Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock dimensions 90' wide; 6009 long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of Sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,979,670 ' 56x400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was with increased width. Operation and maintenance of lock is a constructed 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost Federal responsibility. ($700,000). Length increased to 600 feet to be compatible TABLE 9-J CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 8 of Text) R.N. Henry H. Buckman Eureka Lock Bert Dosh Dunellon Inglis Lock Lock and Dam Lock Lock and Dam Nearest town Palatka, Sparr, Ocala, Dunnellon, Inglis, (miles) 11.2 15.8 8.9 2.5 3.2 Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 90.4 111.4 127.7 156.5 168.6 Lock dimensions (ft.)' 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 Normal lift (ft.) 20 20 0-15' 12-272 28 Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) 14 17 16-31' 16-31' 18 Character of Piles in Piles in Piles in Rock Rock foundation sand sand sand Kind of dam Movable" Movable None None Movable Type construction Earth' Earth' - - Earth' Percent complete 100 100 0 0 100 Estimated contract cost $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 Clearwidthant. reatst"avilabl lenth._ . r_ a P Clear width and greatest available length. 2 Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 teet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. 'With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-54 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-K CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 8 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operation and Maintenance: Operations of locks, operations and maintenance of dams, spillways, reservoirs and bypasses, debris removal, performance monitoring system $ -6,001 Buildings and grounds maintenance, trash removal, potable water testing -14,629 Natural Resources Management -3,061 Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, sanitary facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters and contract maintenance of grounds 73,928 Water quality studies, data collection and processing, reimbursement to USGS, water control analysis Lake Oklawaha and Inglis Bypass, and water management control -10,585 OSHA medical exams -501 Construction Management 34,627 Sub-Total $ 73,778 Maintenance: Maintenance of dams and spillways and contract maintenance -986 Maintenance of locks and lock repair contract -13,289 Maintenance of recreational facilities, roads and bridges -451 Maintenance of levees and floodwalls 86,158 Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment -4,174 Bank stabilization-maintenanceof slopes and berms, Rodman and Inglis dams, and bank stabilization contract 39,911 Maintenance of canals, clearing and snagging -77 Construction Management 11,448 Income Credits -970 Sub-Total $ 117,570 Grand Total $ 191,348 9-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TEE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-L OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 24 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operations and Maintenance: Operations: Operations of Locks, and Permanent Monitoring System Contract maintenance buildings, grounds, potable water testing, repair and replacement of project signs, operation and maintenance of District communications network Natural resource management Management of recreation areas and facilities Real estate management and energy conservation reports Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections Construction Management Sub-Total Maintenance: Maintenance of locks and dams Real estate acquisitions, surveys, and encroachments Maintenance of recreational roads Maintenance of recreational facilities Maintenance of permanent operating equipment non-recreational Channel and canal maintenance Engineering and Design Construction Management Income Credits Sub-Total Total $ 1,025,397 371,357 250,276 332,906 65,722 34,382 294,968 2,375,008 1,606,296 50,495 9,677 133,170 386,489 321,991 354,584 216,853 -3,544 3,076,011 $ 5,451,019 9-56 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-M REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 30 of Text) Locality Acres Controlled Cost St. Johns River and tributaries and Withlacoochee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers 15,800 $ 1,690,860 Okeechobee Waterway and tributaries 10,892 951,109 Acquisition and maintenance of airboats, engines and work tools - 81,256 Operation of service facilities Income credits OSHA medical exams - 345 Engineering and Design - 310,972 Construction Management - 257,874 Total 26,692 $ 3,292,416 9-57 TABLE 9-N Nearest Town CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 53 of Text) Miles Elevation From Lock Normal of Normal Depth Character Kind Kind Nearest Dimensions lift Pool of sills of of of Town (ft.) (ft.) surface (ft.) (ft.) foundation Dam Constr Percent Contract uction Complete Cost W.P. Franklin At Olga Lock and Dam ' S-65 Lock Frostproof S-65A Lock Avon Park S-65B Lock Sebring S-65C Lock Sebring S-65D Lock Okeechobee to 1 S-65E Lock Okeechobee tl Co Moore Haven Moore Haven Lock (HGS-1 Mod.) S-310 Clewiston (HGS-2 Mod.) S-193 Okeechobec (HGS-6 Mod.) S-308B Pahokee (Port Mayaca) S-S7 Ashton S-58 Ashton S-59 Kissimmee S-60 Ashton S-61 St. Cloud S-62 Ashton S-63 Ashton S-63A Ashton S-96 Sebastian S-96A Sebastian S-53 Eau Gallic S-55 Christmas S-157 Sebastian S-158 Titusville 0 56 x 400 2.5 3.0 23 30 x 90 26 30 x 90 20 30 x 90 25 30 x 90 14 30 x 90 10 30 x 90 0.5 50 x 250 0.5 50 x 60 0.5 50x60 11 56 x 400 9 20x90 5 20x90 6 20x90 6 20x90 6 20x90 10 20x90 12 20x90 14 20x90 14 20x60 16 20x60 8 20x60 12 20x60 4 20x60 15 20x60 14 Piles in Movable Reinforced clay concrete 48.5 - 52.3 ' 46.3 40.0 34.0 26.8 21.0 15.5 - 17.5' 15.5 - 17.5 ' 15.5 - 17.5' 15.5 - 17.5' 62.0 64.0 58.0 64.0 55.0 61.0 62.0 57.0 24.0 25.0 17.5 14.0 20.0 4.0 6 Earth None foundation, sand 6 Earth None foundation, sand 6 Earth None foundation, sand 6 Earth None foundation, sand 6 Earth None foundation, sand 6 Earth None foundation, sand 11 Piles in None sand lockwalls 12.9 Slab on None sand 7.5 Piles in None sand and slab on sand 18 Slab on Fixed sand 6 Earth None foundation, sand 6 Do. None 6 Do. None 6 Do. None 6 Do. None 6 Do. None 6 Do. None 6 Do. None 6 Do. None 6 Do. None 6 Do. None 6 Do. None 6 Do. None 6 Do. None Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete Steel sheet pile Reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete Concrete and steel sheet Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. 100 "3,8O3,655 100 $1,211,465 100 $1,531,490 100 $1,068,397 100 $1,357,246 100 $1,242,909 100 $1,320,040 0 $433,000 100 $3,448,406 0 $615,000 * 100 $8,308,700 0 $2,355,000 ' 0 $2,355,000 0 $2,349,000 10 $2,355,000 100 $2,355,000 0 $689,217 a 0 $2,355,000 * 0 $2,305,000 0 $2,063,000 * 0 $1,965,000 2 0 $1,908,000 0 $1,955,000 0 $2,486,000 0 $2,247,000 ' Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (S-79) is a Federal responsibility. Estimated (Oct 1990). aO 0O 0 O HH to H H H N 0 I- %0 %0 �H 4.2 6.3 6.0 7.2 5.8 4.6 9.4 5.0 7.5 4.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 7.5 3.5 10.0 20.0 4.5 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 (See Section 53 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Channels and Canals: Upper St. Johns S-254 Flowway October 1991 - September 1993 Levees: Upper St. Johns L-74N (Part) September 1992 - September 1994 - Upper St. Johns Recreation September 1992 - September 1994 - Structures: Upper St. Johns S-250A, S-250B, S-250C & S-250D September 1991 - September 1994 - Upper St. Johns S-256 & S-259 September 1992 - September 1994 - TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1994 (See Section 53 of Text) Construction Approx. % Feature Started Complete Levees: Upper St. Johns L-74N (Part) September 1992 9 Upper St. Johns L-74W September 1991 99 Upper St. Johns L-75 January 1990 99 Upper St. Johns L-75 (Remainder) September 1992 99 9-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TEE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 9-Q CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 53 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gatel Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Conm- Actual No. Name (miles) (feet) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, FL 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, FL 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, FL 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, FL 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, FL 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector gates and have no lift. Gate No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. TABLE 9-R CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 53 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized Cash Contribution' Jun. 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sep. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 Jul. 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 12.8 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Backflow Features 20.0 P.L. 89-72 Recreation Features 50.0 Water Resources - St. Lucie 20.0 Recreation Features 50.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for under provisions of recreational craft 50.0 Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act (Deauthorized Jan. 1, 19"90 by P.L. 99-662) P.L. 99-662 Upper St. Johns River Basin - non-structural flood protection 25.0 Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administation except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. 9-60 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-S CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 53 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Lands and damages Construction of Railroad bridges Channels and canals Levees Recreation Floodway control and diversion structures Pumping plants Buildings, grounds and utilities Permanent Operating Equipment Cultural Resource Preservation Equipment operation Depreciation Engineering and Design Construction Management Total cost $ 0 00 2,601,224 3,596 240,634 00 37,071 000 4,114,226 134,049 $ 7,130,800 943,087 372,607 752,588 154,587 211,675 419,177 1,564,882 3,914 5,183 4,017 309,146 $ 4,740,863 0 1,619,868 9,752 1,657,082 55,132 521,643 0 10,461 150,863 1,516,376 375,155 0 $ 5,916,332 $ 10,657,195 S 0 Operations: Operation of locks, dams, reservoirs and performance system Maintenance, buildings and grounds, operation of District communications network, repair and replacement of project signs Operation of levees and floodwalls Natural resource management Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, dam safety studies Water quality/water control studies, data collection, regulation of Lake Okeechobee and three conservation areas Energy conservation Real estate outgranting OSHA inspections Construction Management Sub-Total Maintenance: Maintenance of natural resources Maintenance of locks and dams Maintenance of non-recreational roads and bridges Maintenance of levees and floodwalls Maintenance of recreational facilities Maintenance of hydrometrological network Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment Bank stabilization Non-dredging channel maintenance and debris removal Engineering and Design Construction Management Income credits Sub-Total Total Special recreation user fees 9-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FT 1994 TABLE 9-T FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1994 (See Section 56 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period for Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 Alteration of Facilities B-195 B-594 Alteration of Facilities B-196 SCL RR Bridge, B-196 Channels and Canals: C-135 C-135, Sec. lA C-135, Sec. IB C-135, Sec. 1C & 2 C-135, Sec. 3A C-135, Seec. 3B C-135, Sec. 4A C-136 C-231, Phase I C-231, Phase II C-331 C-531 C-534 C-135 Structures: S-160 S-161 S-162 S-353 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway S-551 Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 L-212, Sec. 2 L-112 L-112 & Floodway S-155 S-163 S-159 Middle & Lower S-159 Upper Recreation: Morris Bridge & Flint Creek Sites Dead River Sites Jul 1968 - Mar 1970 May 1971 - Jan 1973 Jan 1973 - Jan 1974 Oct 1972 - Jan 1975 Dec 1972 - Jul 1975 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Jul 1966- Aug 1967 May 1968 - Sep 1972 Jan 1971 - Dec 1973 Dec 1972- Apr 1975 Feb 1975 - Aug 1977 Apr 1976 - Jan 1979 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Jul 1973 - Apr 1975 Jul 1973 - Jan 1974 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1966 - Jan 1969 Jun 1979 - Jul 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Apr 1975 - Jun 1977 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1967 - Mar 1969 Jul 1970 - Feb 1972 Jun 1968 - Jul 1970 Jul 1970 - Sep 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 Apr 1979 - Aug 1981 Jun 1979 - Sep 1981 Dec 1982 - Aug 1984 Mar 1985 - Jul 1986 Not transferred Do. Do. Do. Jul 1975 Dec 1968 Oct 1967 Not transferred Not transferred Oct 1977 Not transferred Not transferred Nov 1977 Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Sep 1968 Apr 1969 Nov 1971 Dec 1968 Nov 1977 Apr 1977 Nov 1968 Dec 1975 Not transferred Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Oct 1980 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Oct 1981 Jan 1985 Dec 1986 9-62 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-U FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 56 of Text) Nearest town Name of nearest town Distance above mouth of river Lock dimensions Normal lift Elevation of normal pool surface Depth of sills Character of foundation Kind of dam Type of construction Percent complete Estimated cost (including dam and spillway) 20 miles Ocala, FL 65.5 miles 30 x 125 feet 18.0 feet 58 feet 12 feet Piles in sand None Reinforced concrete 100 $1,990,138 TABLE 9-V FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 61 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Bradenton Beach, FL Cano Cacul, Aguadila, PR Cedar Creek, Jacksonville, FL Codar Hammock, Bradenton, FL Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, VI Fishweir Creek, FL Ft. Clinch State Park, Nassau County, FL Government Center - N. Miami Bch, FL Hw 187, El Terraplen LaGrange Gut,Frederiksted, St. Croix, VI Juan Mendez Channel, PR Ortega River, FL Pablo Creek, FL Pottsburg Creek, Jax, FL Puckett Creek, Jax, FL Quebrada Blasinia, PR Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR Rio Coamo, Parcelas Valezquez, PR Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR Rio Culebras, Aguada, PR Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel, PR Rio Fajardo, PR Rio Guamani, Guayama, PR Rio Jacaguas at Juana Dizz, PR Rio Loco, Guanica, PR Rio Manati, Barceloneta, PR Rio Niqua, Arroyo, PR Sabana Grande, PR Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI Soto Town, St. Thomas, VI Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI W. Maule Lake - N. Miami Bch, FL Wahneta Canal, Polk Co., FL Whitaker Bayou, FL 38,440 155 44,264 5,259 368,763 118,058 25 8,822 2,137 55,153 69,307 20,510 941 13 1,127 16 14,913 327,500 149,812 13,165 2,340 7,503 118,757 74,153 118,636 1,125 70,804 27,287 4,403 16,000 461,518 50,627 301,405 1,448 2,917 49,960 9-63 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT * This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pearl River Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until October 1, 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Water from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA ............ 10-3 1A. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL ...................... 10-3 1 B. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL .............................................. 10-4 2. Apalachicola Bay, FL................................. 10-4 3. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA ........................ 10-4 3A. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA ................................... 10-5 4. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965) ................................ 10-6 5. Bayou Coden, AL ..................................... 10-6 6. Bayou La Batre, AL ................................... 10-7 7. Biloxi Harbor, MS ..................................... 10-7 8. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ................................................. 10-8 8A. Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL..........10-9 8B. Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL .................................... 10-9 9. Bon Secour River, AL ............................. 10-10 10. Dauphin Island, AL ................................. 10-10 11. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL........................ 10-10 12. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL .................. 10-11 13. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL .......................... 10-11 14. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border ... 10-11 15. Gulfport Harbor, MS................................ 10-12 16. Mobile Harbor, AL .................................. 10-13 17. Panama City Harbor, FL .......................... 10-13 18. Pascagoula Harbor, MS ........................... 10-14 19. Pensacola Harbor, FL.................................. 10-15 20. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ....................... 10-15 21. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & MS ............................... 10-15 Page 21A. Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL & MS ................... 10-16 22. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................................... 10-17 23. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project ............................................ 10-17 24. Other Authorized Flood Control Project ............................................ 10-17 25. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .............................. 10-17 26. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .............................. 10-17 27. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ..... 10-17 Flood Control 28. Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL ............................................. 10-17 29. County Road 55 Etowah Co., AL ..................................... 10-18 30. Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL ..................................... 10-18 31. Dauphin Island Shoreline, AL ................. 10-18 32. East End Dauphin Island, AL ................................. 10-18 33. Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL ..................................... 10-19 34. Fort Toulouse, Wetumpka, AL ............................................ 10-19 35. Gadsden-Water Treatment Plant Gadsden, AL ..................................... 10-19 36. Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS ..................................... 10-19 37. Mound State Park, Moundville, AL .......................................... 10-20 38. Murder Creek, Brewton, AL ..................................... 10-20 10-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Flood Control Page 39. Okatibbee Lake, MS ................................ 10-20 40. Portersville Bay-East, Mobile Co., AL ...................1.0-.2.0.................. 41. Portersville Bay-West, Mobile Co., AL........................................ 10-21 42. Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA................................................. 10-21 43. Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA ............................................. 10-21 44. Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS ..................................... 10-21 45. Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS ........................................ 10-22 46. Threemile Creek, Mobile, AL .................................. 10-22 47. Tombigbee River Bridge #6, Monroe Co., MS ......................................... 10-22 48. Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL ..............1.0.-2.3............... 49. Tombigbee River and Tributaries, MS & AL ...............10.-.23............... 50. Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS ..................................... 10-23 51. Village Creek, Birmingham, AL ..................................... 10-24 52. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 10-24 53. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-24 54. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-25 Multiple Purpose Power Projects 55. Allatoona Dam Coosa River Basin, GA ........................... 10-25 56. Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA ............................. 10-25 57. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA ........1.0-.2.6...... 58. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA ........................................... 10-26 59. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL .......1.0.-2.6..... 60. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL......... 10-27 61. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA ....................................... 10-27 Miscellaneous Page 62. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA ...... 10-28 63. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir. Operations ............................... 10-28 64. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC&CE) ............................ 10-28 65. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP) ..................................... 10-28 66. Regulatory Functions Program ................. 10-29 General Investigations 67. Surveys ........................................ 10-29 68. Collection and Study of Basic Data............ 10-29 69. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.... 10-29 70. Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds ............................. 10-30 Tables Table 10-A Table 10-B Table 10-C Table 10-D Table 10-E Table 10-G Table 10-H Table 10-J Table 10-K Table 10-L Table 10-M Table 10-N Table 10-0 Table 10-P Cost & Financial Statement ......... 10-31 Authorizing Legislation .................. 10-38 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 10-49 Other Authorized Beach Control Erosion Control Project ............... 10-49 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... 10-50 Deauthorized Projects ..................... 10-51 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 10-51 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. 10-52 Reconnaisssance and Condition Surveys ..................................... 10-53 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA Development Proposed Under Existing Project............................... 10-53 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, GA, & FL, Locks and Dams and Multiple-Purpose Development Included in Existing Projects..........10-54 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ................................... 10-55 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & MS .................................. 10-56 Completed Flood Insurance Studies And Flood Hazard Information Reports For FY 1984 Thru FY 1994............ 10-57 10-2 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Navigation 1. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junctions of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The plan was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. The present phase of improvement includes the construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and construction of Carters Dam, a multiplepurpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. Wofford Oil Company has a small wharf about 10 miles below Montgomery equipped for handling petroleum products. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging of the river system at a cost of $2,529,045. General charges for water control management, condition surveys, engineering and design, supervision and administration amounted to $935,976. Claiborne Lock and Dam charges were $859,356 with recreation and resource management costs of $541,381. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in March 1966. Carters Dam was completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is complete in Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam is complete. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $92,966,067, including $3,245,400 for new work and $89,720,667 for maintenance. (See Table 10-L.) 1A. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The existing project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60- mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. 10-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the lock and dam totaled $583,010. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $27,997,450. Recreation attendance during FY 1994 totaled 200,421 visits. 1B. COOSA RIVER, MONTGOMERY TO GADSDEN, AL Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Ooostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama-Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress.on January 27, 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $14,986,400 for new work. 2. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth Sin Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and 9 feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River, (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, and a connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound, with twin breakwaters on either side parallel to the shore and having a total length of 5,300 feet; (f) a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-and-timber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $317,814. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $2,033,461 for new work and $4,483,572 for maintenance, a total of $10,682,791. 3. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the Apalachicola from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styz also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters 10-4 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia. Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles to be accomplished by dredging, contract works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River. Three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River were deauthorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project also provides for minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a 9-foot by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane side of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage are provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. The project was originally authorized in section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. A Comprehensive Basin Study is currently being conducted on the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, Flint (ACF), and Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa (ACT) River Systems. Local cooperation. The six Florida Counties that originally served as local sponsors for the Florida portion of the waterway have all informed the District in writing that they no longer wish to serve as local sponsors. The State of Florida has also declined assumption of responsibilities of local sponsorship. At this time no items of local cooperation are being complied with. No local sponsors are required for the Alabama and Georgia portions of the waterway. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10-M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost $3,697,143. George W. Andrews Lake recreational and resource management costs totaled $261,427. Operation and maintenance of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $571,143. All other costs for the project amounted to $2,762,653. Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Walter F. George Lock and Dam and West Point are complete. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $4,452,162 for new work and $104,057,751 for maintenance, a total of $108,509,913. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 3A. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town 10-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama). The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock and dam cost $571,143. Maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963 at a total cost of $13,038,427. (See also Table 10-M). 4. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The existing project provides for management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 50 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state of Alabama by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract cost $54,791; water quality studies and overhead amounted to $22,335. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the exiting project as of September 30, 1994 is $841,772. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 5. BAYOU CODEN, AL Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence 8 feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning basin 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned timber dock piles used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A small ship building facility is located near the upper limits of the channel. The marina which will accommodate about 12 small 10-6 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Water Control Management, survey and other miscellaneous cost amounted to $22,176. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated March 31, 1975 and completed March 26, 1976. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $330,701 for new work and $1,174,276 for maintenance, a total of $1,504,977. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000 and $50,000 for maintenance. 6. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, AL., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 18- foot by 120-foot channel from Pascagoula Ship channel, connecting with the GIWW, along the GIWW alignment, connecting with an extension of the previous 12-foot channel alignment, through Mississippi Sound to the mouth of the bayou, a total distance of approximately 20 miles; then provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, the plan of improvement is to deepen channel to 18-foot by 100-foot from the mouth through the turning basin, a distance of about 1.8 miles; deepen channel from turning basin to 0.29 miles above highway 188 bridge to 14-feet by 75-feet, a distance of about 0.89 miles; extend a 14-foot by 50-foot channel from turning basin into Snake Bayou for about 730 feet and a 12-foot by 50-foot channel within Snake Bayou about 790 feet. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Several boatways for construction of small seagoing vessels are also available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Dredging contract $2,221,419; miscellaneous real estate activities cost $18,195; engineering and design cost $144,564; and supervision and administration amounted to $174,330. A total Federal cost of $2,558,508 for new work. Maintenance: Condition Surveys and miscellaneous cost $1,153. Dredging cost $387,396. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. The contract for deepening the Sound Channel was completed in May 1994. The construction of the Bayou Channel is scheduled for completion in September 1997. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $3,808,317 for new work and $4,049,427 for maintenance, a total of $7,857,744. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $461,230. 7. BILOXI HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The existing project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100- foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12-by 150- foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel authorized by River and Harbor Act of November 7, 1966 10-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in February 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on March 28, 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet, for use by commercial small craft, and an East Harrison County Canal project which provides for a 12-foot project depth, 130- feet wide and about 2,100 feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot project depth. This work was completed in April 1980. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-andtimber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost $350,627 and condition surveys cost $156,951. Water Quality Studies, and miscellaneous costs totaled $78,050. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. The 1966 modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in 1980. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $1,431,919 for new work and $11,519,293 for maintenance, a total of $12,951,212. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $238,640. 8. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to vicinity of Birmingham is about 430 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams and 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new 110-by 600-foot locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Armistead I. Selden replaced locks 8 and 9; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. The Coffeeville Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. A replacement lock for the old Oliver Lock located 2,300 feet downstream has been completed. The replacement lock has dimensions of 110 feet by 600 feet. A fixed crest spillway extends 800 feet across the river. Minimum provision was provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to the old lock 1, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at old lock 1, which is 100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, 10-8 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufacturers, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging of the river system cost $3,897,930. Condition surveys cost $980,393. Engineering and design cost $344,659. Supervision, administration and other general charges for the overall river project totaled $1,134,484. Natural Resources Management and Recreation cost $2,966,954. Recreation attendance FY 1994 totaled 3,524,539 visits. Other O&M costs for the system include: Coffeeville Lock and Dam, $3,033,718; Demopolis Lock and Dam, $1,614,052; Selden Lock and Dam, $1,438,807; Oliver Lock and Dam, $877,764; Bankhead Lock and Dam, $1,033,878; Holt Lock and Dam, $1,184,927. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original lock and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1,2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15 and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed February 6, 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam and Holt Lock and Dam, was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Construction of the new Oliver Lock and Dam is completed with the new lock open to traffic as of July 1991. Project construction began in November 1986 and is scheduled for completion in January 1996. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $88,461,935 for new work and $301,249,748 for maintenance, and $52,292,880 and major rehabilitation, a total of $442,004,563. 8A. JACKSON PORT, JACKSON, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River in Clarke County in southwest Alabama in the city of Jackson, Alabama, approximately 90 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. Existing project. None. The authorized Port would be located on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System, which is a federally authorized 9 by 300 feet navigation project connecting Birmingham, Alabama with the Port of Mobile. In conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation project, the district has been directed to construct a spur canal to serve as a port at Jackson. Local cooperation. Local Cooperation Agreement requirements have not been determined. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate activities, $2,109; Engineering and design $236,344; and supervision and administration $38,067. A total Federal cost of $276,520 for new work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the Design Memorandum is currently underway and is scheduled to be approved in August 1996. Design (P&S) is scheduled for completion in March 1997. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1994 is $903,975. 8B. OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL Location. The project is located at mile 337.7 on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Existing project. The existing navigation facilities on the Black Warrior and Tombigbee include six (6) locks having a total lift of 255 feet. Each of the locks have chamber dimensions of 110 by 600 feet. Original work on the waterway was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1884. The 17 original locks have been replaced by the existing six (6) locks. Prior to this year, Oliver Lock was the only lock in the system with chamber dimensions of 95 by 460 feet. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the plan of improvement was to replace Oliver Lock and Dam at a new location 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock with chamber dimensions by 110 by 600 feet was opened to traffic in July 1991. The fixed crest spillway, extends 800 feet across the river. Minimum provisions are being provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. Land Acquisition is complete. Construction was initiated in November 1986 with the award of the Alabama Power Company relocation contract. The first stage cofferdam and river diversion contract was awarded in February 1987 and the lock and dam construction contract was awarded in March 1988. For other information see description of Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers project. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required. One-half of the total cost of construction of the 10-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 navigation lock and dam will be paid by amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate activities $88,133; construction contracts $1,202,668; engineering and design $199,781; and $152,284 for supervision and administration and miscellaneous expenditures. A total Federal cost of $1,642,866 for new work. Contributed funds expended in FY 1994 totaled $1,687,594. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 97% complete and scheduled completion date for the entire project is January 1996, at an estimated cost of $125,000,000. Total Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost under existing project to September 30, 1994 is $58,777,384 for new work. Contributed funds (Inland Waterways Trust) expended total $59,949,192. 9. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Also a 10 by 80 foot South Fork channel from the intersection with the Bon Secour channel, 1.14 miles to a 150 x 150 foot turning basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal wharves used by the seafood industry and a marine ways are located along the existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $4,420. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $150,615 for new work and $1,377,361 for maintenance, a total of $1,527,976. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 10. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The existing project provides for:. (a) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about 7 acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about 4 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract Dredging cost of $10,001. Condition surveys and miscellaneous cost $6,245. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Construction contract is scheduled for completion in FY 1994. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $292,864 for new work and $2,458,438 for maintenance, a total of $2,751,302. 11. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The Dog River project provides for a 7 by 100-foot channel with a total length of 4.5 miles to provide access to the Mobile ship channel. The Fowl River project provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River 10-10 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River;, two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging cost $237,144; Water Control Management and miscellaneous cost $52,515. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing Fowl River portion of the project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Work on the Dog River channel realignment was initiated and completed during FY 1986. Total Federal cost on the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $3,340,629; $391,354 for new work and $2,949,275 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $195,250. 12. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 12- foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 10-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost amounted to $1,430,018. Condition surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $202,342. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $916,715 for new work and $10,339,070 for maintenance, a total of $11,255,785. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 13. FLY CREEK, AL Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Alabama, 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Fairhope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Alabama. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on the south bank near mouth of creek, consisting of a pile-and-timber service wharves, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a commercial marina on north bank of creek. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost $10,000 and miscellaneous cost $7,933. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30, 1994 amounted to $694,481 of which $29,000 was for new work and $665,481 for maintenance. 14. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, 10-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land cuts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou La Batre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Carrabelle-Apalachicola Bay section: Dredging navigation channel maintenance cost $822,507. Condition surveys, water quality studies, supervision and administration totaled $274,703. Apalachicola Bay - St. Andrew Bay section: Condition surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous cost totaled $88,875. St. Andrew Bay - Choctawhatchee Bay section: Dredging navigation channel maintenance cost $12,287. Water quality studies, condition surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous totaled $315,865. Choctawhatchee Bay - Pensacola Bay section: Condition surveys, dredging studies, and bank stabilization cost $44,521. Pensacola Bay - Mobile Bay section: Condition surveys, dredging studies, supervision and administration and miscellaneous totaled $287,349. Mobile Bay - Rigolets section: Condition surveys and miscellaneous cost totaled $48,773. Condition surveys, water quality studies, real estate activities, and miscellaneous cost pertaining to the waterway in general not site specific totaled $465,204. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is completed except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which has been deauthorized. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1994 is $75,538,895, of which $6,480,299 was for new work and $69,058,596 for maintenance. 15. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 35 miles west of Pascagoula, Mississippi, and 60 miles east of New Orleans. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747. Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The existing project provides for. (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commercial smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straight-approach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a smallboat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is authorized in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1986, and further amended by WRDA 1988 to modify the existing ship channel to 36 by 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 by 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the turning basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. The FY 91 construction appropriation provided for constructing an increment of the authorized project and provide a 36 by 220 feet channel in Mississippi Sound and 38 by 300 feet across the bar. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Channel deepening contract cost $2,610,875; thin-layer monitoring activities cost $500,333; Engineering and design cost $105,858; and supervision and administration cost $121,841. A total Federal cost of $3,338,907. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $991,274. Condition surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $422,773. 10-12 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Awarded thin-layer monitoring contract in June 1991 under the authority of WRDA 1986 and 1988. The channel contract was awarded in April 1992, thin-layer monitoring program is continuing. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $23,800,597 for new work and $47,197,151 for maintenance, a total of $70,997,748. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $8,699,050. 16. MOBILE HARBOR, AL Location. The project is located along the lower 5 miles of Mobile River, and channel extends thru Mobile Bay and into Gulf of Mexico, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The existing project provides for. (a) A 47-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar, (b) a 45-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River, (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Complex ocean terminal, and continuing thence a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel serving the Theodore Industrial Park 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage basin near the shoreline, thence a land - cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6,500 feet and terminating in a 300- by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channel is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. Further authorization provides for future development to deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 feet by 700 feet about 7.4 miles long, deepen and widen bay channel to 55 feet by 550 feet about 27.0 miles long, deepen and widen an additional 3.6 miles of bay channel to 55 feet by 650 feet and provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island. All dredged material will be placed in an approved disposal area in the Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the local sponsor to construct the project for the first increment of work. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Monitoring Gulf Disposal, $7,928; Engineering and Design, $97,357; Supervision and Administration, $8,153. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $14,040,714. Condition surveys cost $903,049. Water quality studies, engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $1,042,864. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I of the project modification was completed in June 1990. Current estimated Federal cost is $218,548,000, and non-Federal cost is $178,452,000. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $96,142,610 for new work and $178,988,161 for maintenance, a total of $275,130,771. Contributed funds expended amounted to $18,452,500 for new work. 17. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) 10-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel about 3.5 miles long, extending from deep water in St. Andrew bay through barrier peninsula, known as Lands End, to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 32 feet deep in the bay through Lands End; and 450 feet wide and 34 feet deep in the gulf, protected by east, west jetties, extending 2,075 feet and 2,896 feet respectively; a channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities; and the maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou, an arm of St. Andrew Bay, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in bay to highway bridge. Authorized modifications includes branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel. Mean tidal range is about normally 1.3 feet and 3.0 feet extreme. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost $232,124 and condition surveys cost $35,696. Engineering and design, water quality studies, and miscellaneous costs totaled $46,186. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $1,638,045 for new work and $9,451,024 for maintenance, a total of $12,413,109. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 18. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), and through Mississippi Sound into the Gulf of Mexico, in southeastern Mississippi, about 38 miles west of Mobile, Alabama, and about 100 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Escatawpa (or Dog) River, then up Escatawpa River to Highway 613 (formerly 63) bridge; (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge; via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Escatawpa River; and (f) a 12-foot by 80-foot channel extending from deep water in the Pascagoula River (about one-half mile north of the railroad bridge) to a turning basin in Krebs Lake a distance of about 1,500 feet, then along the south bank of the lake a channel 10-foot by 60-foot and terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of 2,700 feet from the first. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Further authorization provides for deepening and widening gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) cost $7,301. Engineering and Design cost $220,424; supervision and administration cost $24,756. A total Federal cost of $6,825,466 for new work. 10-14 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $1,786,319. Condition surveys cost $188,374. Water quality studies, supervision and administration, and miscellaneous costs totaled $191,622. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965 and the Krebs Lake project was completed in November 1983. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was approved in June 1992 for deepening and widening channels. Preconstruction Engineering and Design is complete. The channel dredging contract was awarded in September 1994. Total Federal cost of existing project to September 30, 1994 is $6,825,466 for new work and $55,908,696 for maintenance, a total of $62,734,162. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $3,911,757. 19. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for. (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33- foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner harbor channel; (d) an inner harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities, Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, dredging studies and miscellaneous costs totaled $2,753. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except for features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in march and completed in May 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1994 is $1,469,693 for new work and $8,314,363 for maintenance, a total of $9,784,056. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $297,587. 20. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida, and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous costs totaled $35,662. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in May 1969. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1994 is $629,860 for new work and $7,838,878 for maintenance, a total of $8,468,738. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 21. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. 10-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks and consists of three sections as follows: (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile long divide cut in which the bottom width is 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River. The total life of 341 feet is accomplished by 10 locks (See Table. 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have made and are maintaining alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with the United States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of. Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized the formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held December 5, 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 of finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities and handling equipment are still being developed along this new waterway. As of September 30,1994, twelve such facilities were operational, while five were under construction, and five more are planned. The operational facilities are handling grain, wood chips, and logs. When all facilities are complete, about half will be publicly owned and operated. Additional ports and terminals must be completed before the waterway can achieve its full potential. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lock equipment $4,484,720; relocations cost $360,106; recreation facilities $1,879,477; real estate $8,758; engineering and design cost $258,445 and supervision and administration cost $888,609, a total of $7,880,115 for new work. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost $3,456,111. Total cost for operation and maintenance of the project for FY 94 amounted to $21,764,047, which included general charges of $7,709,720; Gainesville Lock and Dam, $548,146; Tom Bevill Lock and Dam, $459,319; Columbus Lock and Dam, $464,050; Aberdeen Lock and Dam, $425,351; Lock A, $338,132; Lock B, $469,364; Lock C, $349,623; Lock D, $349,465; Lock E, $322,756; Bay Springs Lock and Dam, $364,226. Recreation costs totaled $6,507,784. Recreation attendance for FY 1994 totaled 2,161,562 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $1,047,771,503 for new work, and $201,852,378 for maintenance for a total of $1,219,979,720. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is essentially complete. There is currently one (1) recreational contract underway on the project. The waterway was opened for navigation in January 1985. 21A. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION PROJECT, AL AND MS Location. This project is in Alabama and Mississippi at the following locations: (1) Existing Project Lands - Approximately 72,500 acres of Tennessee-Tombigbee Project Lands have been designated for mitigation purposes. An additional 20,100 acres have also been designated at Coffeeville Lake, Demopolis Lake, Claiborne Lake and Dannelly Lakes in Alabama and at Okatibbee Lake in Mississippi. (2) Separable Lands - Acquisition and management of 88,000 separable lands in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta, Alabama (not less than 20,000 acres); the Pascagoula, Pearl, and Mississippi Delta Basins in Mississippi (not less than 25,000 acres); and the balance at any location in the two states. 10-16 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Previous project. None. This project was a new construction start in Fiscal year 1990. It was authorized by Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Existing project. The authorized project calls for the acquisition of separable lands at the above named locations. The Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) will assist in the selection of separable lands. The selected lands will be purchased from willing sellers at fair market value. Emphasis will be placed on forested wetlands, with a minimum of 34,000 acres of bottomland hardwoods being purchased. The separable lands and the existing project lands designated for mitigation purposes will be managed for wildlife. The States will be primarily responsible for managing these lands in accordance with a management plan jointly developed by the States, Corps and the FWS. However, due to operational constraints it will be necessary for the Corps to retain management responsibility for some of the existing project lands included in the mitigation program. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required since the cost of this project is a 100% Federal responsibility. Operation and results during fiscal year. Land acquisition cost $6,484,537. Wildlife facilities $882,105; Equipment and miscellaneous $1,045,732; Engineering and Design $767,668. Supervision and administration, $334,881. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial funding for the project was received in January 1990. At the end of September 1994, 20,696 acres had been acquired in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta; 31,359 acres in the Pascagoula River Basin, and 15,398 acres along the remaining lands increment. Evaluation of tracts offered for consideration in the Mississippi Delta, Pearl River Basin, and other areas in Alabama and Mississippi are nearing completion. A variety of activities were also undertaken to begin managing the 92,600 acres of existing project lands included in the Mitigation Program. Scheduled completion date is September 1997. The total project cost is estimated to be $87,300,000. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1994 is $53,049,298. 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-C.) 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-D.) 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) . 25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $52,700 in FY 1994. (See Table 10-H.) 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 10-J.) 27. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-K.) FLOOD CONTROL 28. BOGGY BAYOU, VALPARAISO, FL Location. The project is located in the city of Valparaiso, Florida in Okaloosa County on the west bank of Boggy Bayou which indents the north shore of Choctawhatchee; about 10 miles northeast of Fort Walton Beach. Existing project. The project provides for shoreline bank protection along 700-feet of shoreline of Boggy Bayou and precludes possible destruction of Bayshore Drive and utilities. The protective works consist of a stone dike having a crest elevation of 3.0 feet NGVD and a 15-foot wide base between +1 and -1 foot NGVD. An 18-inch thick layer of riprap was placed from the top of the dike to elevations 6.0 feet NGVD. The riprap was placed on 6-inches of bedding material and filter cloth. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $1,119. Supervision and administration cost $191. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed in FY 1990. The project was completed in July 1991. Federal cost is $147,200; and the non-Federal portion is $10,509. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $147,200. 10-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 29. COUNTY ROAD 55, ETOWAH CO., AL Location. The project is located in northern Alabama, approximately 65 miles northeast of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. The project consists of excavation of 1,800 cubic yards of loose roadway embankment, cutting the bank back to a stable slope, backfill with 1,600 cubic yards of compacted material, placement of riprap along approximately 130 linear feet of the bank, and installation of a French drain to facilitate drainage down the slope and through the project; and provision of a guardrail to maintain the engineering integrity of the Federal project. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract cost $87,687; engineering and design $39,534; and supervision and administration cost $14,539. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in June 1994, and completed in August 1994. Total Federal cost to date is $232,780 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $1,611. 30. CRIBBS MILL CREEK, TUSCALOOSA, AL Location. Cribbs Mill Creek begins in the northeastern part of the city of Tuscaloosa, AL and flows generally southwestward through the city into the Black Warrior River. Existing project. The project consists of channel modification of about 7,300 feet of the creek. Modification consists of widening the existing channel. The project extends upstream from I-359 to the confluence of Tributary 1 with the creek and involves 600 feet of Tributary 5. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Supervision and administration costs amounted to $390. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded in November 1989 and was completed in July 1991. Total Federal cost to date is $1,848,327 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $144,670. 31. DAUPHIN ISLAND SHORELINE, AL Location. The project protects the public fishing pier in the Main Beach Park, about 3 miles from the east end of Dauphin Island, Alabama, a barrier island on the west side of the mouth of Mobile Bay about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama. Existing project. The project provides about 400 feet of stone protection along the shoreline at the end of the pier and a 30-foot wide by 3-foot thick stone blanket beneath the pier for its full length, about 800 feet, all placed on geotech filter fabric. Protection for the balance of the park was found to be uneconomical. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the Dauphin Island Park and Beach Board was signed on October 4, 1993. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: A total of $287,911 was expended on this project during the fiscal year. Construction contract $207,250. Plans and Specifications cost $28,095 and supervision and administration cost $52,566. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Invitations for bids was issued on September 28, 1993. Construction was completed in March 1994. Total Federal cost to date is $349,979 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $102,000. 32. EAST END DAUPHIN ISLAND, AL Location. The project is on the extreme east end of Dauphin Island, Alabama, a barrier island on the west side of the mouth of Mobile Bay about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama. The project provides erosion protection for historic Fort Gaines, one of the forts which guarded the mouth of Mobile Bay. Existing project. The Corps of Engineers began erosion control works around Fort Gaines late in the 1800's and the existing works were completed around 1909. The project restores the existing shore protection in the immediate vicinity of Fort Gaines to the original 1909 configuration utilizing modem geotech filter fabric and stone in the same size range as the existing structure. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the Dauphin Island Park and Beach Board was signed on September 3, 1993. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: A total of $251,138 was expended on this project during the fiscal year. Construction contract $193,065. Plans and Specifications cost $41,913 and supervision and administration cost $16,160. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Invitation for bids was issued on September 28, 1993. Construction was completed in March 1994. Total Federal cost to date is $318,580 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amountedto $81,200. 10-18 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 33. ESLAVA CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The city of Mobile, Alabama, which is located on the Gulf Coast of Alabama. The project begins at Pine Hill Drive and ends 2.1 miles upstream at Emogene Street. Existing project. None. The plan of improvement consists of channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and increasing the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard by adding an additional barrel. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile was signed on September 14, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate activities, $358; construction contract $350,000; engineering and design $21,219; and supervision and administration $119,257. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in December 1994. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1994 is $3,573,783. Contributed funds expended $330,002. 34. FORT TOULOUSE, WETUMPKA, AL Location. The project is located near the confluence of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers; approximately 20 miles north of Montgomery, Alabama. Existing project. The project provides bank stabilization for the National Historical Landmark and Taskigi Indian Mounds and consists of a 1,140-foot section of riprap revetment on the upper end of the site and 720-feet of stone dike at the lower end of the site. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Predesign investigation cost $418. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completed plans and specifications in FY 1990. Construction initiated in FY 1991 and was completed in March 1992. The project was transferred to the sponsor in August 1992. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $368,000 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $185,215. 35. GADSDEN-WATER TREATMENT PLANT, GADSDEN, AL Location. The project is located in Gadsden, Alabama. Existing project. The project provides riprapped slope protection for 80 feet upstream, and 80 feet downstream of an intake structure. Downstream the project transitions into a trapezoidal riprapped section which constitutes the riverward side of the project. The riprap slope protection extends downstream for an additional 180 feet where it terminates just upstream of an existing 20-inch discharge pipe. The riverbank section is at 1 vertical on 2 horizontal side slope with a flow depth of 47 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract cost $292,373; engineering and design, $34,585; and supervision and administration cost $8,650. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was started in July 1994, and completed in October 1994. Total Federal cost to date is $335,608 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $8,575. 36. MILL CREEK, SUMRALL, MS Location. Mill Creek originates in Lamar County, Mississippi; about 2 miles south of Sumrall. The town of Sumrall is located in southeastern Mississippi; about 16 miles northeast of Hattiesburg. Existing project. The project consists of clearing and snagging 1.0 mile along Mill Creek with overbank clearing for 0.63 miles to provide a 50-foot wide floodway along the left descending banks. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Supervision and administration cost $17. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded in August 1992 and completed in February 1993. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $157,340 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $7,112. 10-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 37. MOUND STATE PARK, MOUNDVILLE, ALABAMA Location. The bank stabilization project is located on the left descending bank of the Black-Warrior River; about 16 miles south of Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Existing project. The project provides bank stabilization for the Mound State Park National Historical Landmark. The plan consists of grading approximately 800-feet of unstable bank to IV:3H and protect with riprap. Steeper upper bank sections around buildings are protected with a 250-feet long gabion wall. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract $23,449; engineering and design cost $2,356; supervision and administration cost $260. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completed plans and specifications in FY 1990. The construction contract was awarded in March 1992 and completed in April 1993. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $789,000 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $159,158. 38. MURDER CREEK, BREWTON, AL Location. The project is located in the city of Brewton, AL near the confluence of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks in the commercial district of downtown Brewton. Existing project. The existing project provides for clearing and snagging in the vicinity of Brewton, Alabama on Murder Creek and on Burnt Corn Creek. Clearing was accomplished by felling and removing trees leaning more than 30 degrees and snagging by removal of snags and debris from bottom and sides of the channel. A limited stream clearing and snagging project was completed in 1980 on portions of both creeks to remove obstructions to flows. This interim measure was undertaken to reduce flooding in Brewton and East Brewton. Further, an evacuation plan for East Brewton was implemented under the Section 205 authority. The project involved removal of damageable structures from the low-lying flood plain of Murder Creek. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $1,980. Supervision and administration cost $372. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of project as of September 30, 1994 is $1,215,000. 39. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and top-of-conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 to 59,500 acre-feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $1,840,500. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during FY 1994 totaled 1,699,545 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $9,739,528 for new work and $18,513,660 for maintenance, a total of $28,253,188. 40. PORTERSVILLE BAY - EAST, MOBILE COUNTY, AL Location. The project is located in the town of Coden, in south Mobile County, Alabama. Portersville Bay, an arm of Mississippi Sound, is about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. Existing project. The project provides shoreline bank protection along 5,600 feet of Shell Belt Road. The protective works consists of a timber bulkhead constructed of 12-inch diameter and 12-foot long vertical piles. Treated timber sheeting penetrates 3 feet below the dredged line to prevent scour at the toe. The sheeting is backed by non-woven filter fabric and backfilled. 10-20 MOBILE, ALABAMA. DISTRICT Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with Mobile County, Alabama was signed on March 24, 1992. The non-Federal sponsor has made all required cash payments, and all other items of local cooperation have been fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract $1,382; engineering and design cost $1,422; and supervision and administration cost $248. A total Federal cost of $516,157. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $327,900. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded on August 11, 1992, and construction of the shoreline protection project was commenced in September 1992. All work on the project was completed in May 1993. 41. PORTERSVILLE BAY - WEST MOBILE COUNTY, AL Location. The project is located in the town of Coden, in south Mobile County, Alabama. Portersville Bay, an arm of Mississippi Sound, is about 7.0 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. Existing project. The project provides shoreline bank. protection along 3,500 feet of Coden Belt Road. The protective works consist of a timber bulkhead constructed of 12-inch diameter and 12-foot long vertical piles. Treated timber sheeting penetrates 3 feet below the dredged line to prevent scour at the toe. The sheeting is backed by non-woven filter fabric and backfilled. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with Mobile County, Alabama was signed on March 24, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract $1,969; and supervision and administration cost $6,647. A total Federal cost of $426,966. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $162,700. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded on August 11, 1992, and construction of the shoreline protection project was commenced in September 1992. All work on the project was completed in May 1993. 42. PROCTOR CREEK, ATLANTA, GA Location. The Anthony Street area south of Bankhead Highway; about a mile west of Georgia Tech in Atlanta, Georgia. Existing project. The project consists of the evacuation of 32 residential structures in the Anthony Street area. These structures were purchased and removed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operating and results during fiscal year. New work: Supervision and administration cost $416. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate acquired 32 residential structures. Construction is completed. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $870,000 for new work. 43. RACCOON CREEK, BACONTON, GA Location. The project is located in the community of Baconton in northwest Mitchell County approximately 20 miles south of Albany and 40 miles northeast of Bainbridge, Georgia. Existing project. The flood control project consists of raising about 1,500 feet of South Jackson Street near the West Daniels Street bridge to elevation 176.0 feet NGVD. The channel and 30 feet on each overbank of Raccoon Creek were cleared and snagged from State Hwy. 3 to U.S. Hwy. 19. Raising South Jackson Street prevents overbank flows from entering downtown Baconton. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Supervision and administration costs amounted to $930. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications were initiated in August 1988. A construction contract was advertised in May 1989, and a contract was awarded on 29 August 1989. The project was completed in May 1990. Total Federal cost to date is $385,300 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $35,000. 44. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS Location. The project is located in East Central Mississippi, Lauderdale County, in the city of Meridian, which is approximately 90 miles east of Jackson, Mississippi. Existing project. In 1955, the Corps of Engineers completed channel improvement on the lower 10.5 miles of Sowashee Creek. This work was accomplished under the authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The plan of improvement consists of a combination of channel enlargement (3.9 miles), and clearing and snagging (6.6 miles) over a reach of 10.5 miles. One (1) railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require modification for the channel improvement. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 10-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the Pat Harrison Waterway District was completed on September 23, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract cost $1,020; engineering and design $595,871; and supervision and administration $39,554. Condition at end of fiscal year. All contracts have been completed except for the recreation contract. Plans and specifications for the expanded recreation were initiated in FY 1993. Construction contract scheduled for award in May 1996. An Operation and Maintenance Manual was provided to the city. Current estimated Federal cost is $19,718,000; and the non-Federal portion is $12,782,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1994 is $15,499,582 for new work. Contributed funds expended $1,146,493. 45. TALLAHALLA CREEK, LAUREL, MS Location. The project is located in the city of Laurel, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin in southeastern Mississippi. Existing project. None. The project along Tallahalla Creek consists of channel clearing and snagging with overbank clearing of brush and trees less than 4 inches diameter for a distance of 30 feet on each bank. The project begins about 1.5 miles below Queensburg Avenue Bridge and extends upstream 7.25 miles to U.S. Highway 84. Also, a flood warning system was installed in the Tallahalla Creek Basin to relay data to a base station. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract $65,763; engineering and design cost $808. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $43,622. Condition at end of fiscal year. The advertisement for bids for clearing and snagging portion of the project was cancelled in August, 1989 due to erosion at two sites along Masonites Lagoon Dikes. A flood warning system for the Tallahala Creek basin was awarded in January 1990 and completed in May 1990. The construction contract was awarded in September 1992 and completed in September 1993. Total Federal cost to date is $549,592 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $40,000. 46. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The project is located near the Gulf of Mexico in the southwest corner of the state of Alabama and in the city of Mobile, approximately 180 miles southwest of Montgomery, Alabama. Threemile Creek originates in the western part of Mobile and flows easterly about 14 miles to enter Mobile River near the Alabama State Docks. The drainage area of the basin consists of 39 square miles of urbanized area. Existing project. None. The authorized flood control project will consist of channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. The plan also includes development of certain recreational facilities of the type associated with urban parks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile, Alabama was completed on September 30, 1987. The local sponsor has agreed to make all payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate acquisitions, $1,047; reimbursement to sponsor, $1,120,096. Construction contracts $-78,242; engineering and design cost $39,418; and supervision and administration cost $10,242. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and has been turned over to the local sponsor. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1994 is $16,830,071 for new work. Contributed funds expended $1,034,516. 47. TOMBIGBEE RIVER BRIDGE #6, MONROE COUNTY, MS Location. The project is located in about 2.4 miles northwest of Amory in Monroe County, Mississippi, 0.2 miles upstream from St. Louis-San Francisco Railway bridge. Existing Project. The project will consist of a rock training dike, riprap revetment blankets, and an overbank drainage structure. The rock training dike will begin at State Highway 6 bridge and extends 300 feet upstream. From that point, the bank will be graded and riprapped to a 1 vertical on 3 horizontal slope for a distance of 220 feet. Included also is an overbank drainage structure to accommodate runoff from the highway. Riprap protection is afforded a pier for a distance of 40 feet upstream and 40 downstream of the centerline of the bridge. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 10-22 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $28,355. Supervision and administration cost $8,239. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The estimated costs of the project is $440,000 of which $330,000 would be Federal and $110,000 would be non-Federal. Construction of the project was started in September 1994, and is scheduled for completion in March 1995. Total Federal cost to date is $76,386 for new work. 48. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of the Browns and Mackeys Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line. Existing project. Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing and snagging and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1963 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance of channels cost $276,521. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $134,801 for new work and $3,312,873 for maintenance, a total of $3,447,674. 49. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Luxapalila Creek project consists of 2.1 miles of completed channel modifications. The remaining effort consists of approximately 26 miles of various channel work. Approved estimate of cost for new work is $42,108,000; consisting of $37,743,000 Federal funds, and $4,365,000 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion, with the exception of Twenty Mile Creek from mile 11.7 to mile 22.0. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost $8,717; Contract cost $189,000; engineering and design $328,085, and supervision and administration cost $105,371. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as funds are made available. Total project is 85% complete. Luxapalila Creek is the only remaining work scheduled to be accomplished. Plans and specifications are complete and main construction contract was awarded in June 1994. All work is scheduled to be completed by September 1996. Total Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $26,113,156 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $114,252. 50. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The proposed project on Gordons Creek is located in Hattiesburg, MS. Existing project. A Federal project on the lower 2.5 miles was constructed in 1979 under the Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consisted of clearing and snagging from the creek's confluence with the Leaf River upstream to Bay Street and channel widening to a 40-foot bottom width between Bay and Broad Streets. The work will consist of real estate acquisition of eight (8) residences and removal from floodplain; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement for 1.1 miles between Broad and Hardy Streets; and flood damages mitigation downstream of Broad Street. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. 10-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 New Work: Relocation cost $311,148; Construction contract $445,989; Engineering and design cost $75,887. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $65,536. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded in April 1994, with completion of construction scheduled for April 1995. Necessary right-of-ways for channel improvement are available and necessary relocations performed by. non-federal sponsors. Also, acquisition of twenty-one (21) residences for mitigation is underway. Estimated Federal cost is $3,238,000; and the non-Federal portion is $1,289,000. Total Federal cost to date is $1,739,762 for new work. 51. VILLAGE CREEK, BIRMINGHAM, AL Location. The project is located in central Alabama, Jefferson County, in the city of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. None. The project is basically.'nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures, in six (6) separate neighborhoods, from the floodplain; enlarging 2 miles of the stream channel in the vicinity of the Municipal Airport which also involves modification of three (3) bridges, demolishing two (2) unused bridges, and relocating two (2) waterlines and other utilities, installing three (3) emergency floodwarning devices; and creating an area of 210 acres which can be utilized for future recreation development. Channel enlargements (2 miles) will reduce annual damages near Municipal Airport by 82 percent and evacuation of 642 structures will reduce annual damages in residential areas by 61 percent. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Birmingham, Alabama was executed on December 14, 1988. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with the project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract, $62,945; Real Estate cost $777,157; engineering and design, $906; and supervision and administration $6,770. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $392,783. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate design memorandum completed February 1988. Real Estate acquisition started January 1989. The project is 98% complete. Acquisition of 623 tracts out of a total of 631 tracts have been completed through September 30, 1994. Project scheduled to be completed September 1995. Current estimated Federal cost is $26,912,000; and the non-Federal portion is $10,388,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1994 is $21,668,919 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $7,008,083. 52. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work under Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistance under Public law 288, 93d Congress. (See Table 10-J) 53. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local. flood protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, Beaver.Creek at Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Little Wills Creek at Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin. Channel rectification projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama and Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donivan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Burketts Creek and Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, Mississippi, and Luxapalila Creek, Lowndes County, Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; Burnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Poley Bridge, Goose Pone and Walnut Creeks, Clanton, Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, and Cahaba River, Trussville, Alabama; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection and erosion control projects include Harrison County, Mississippi; Leaf River, Mahned, Mississippi; Chattahoochee River at La Grange, Troup County, Georgia; Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Georgia; and Chickasawbogue Creek, US Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Alabama. The project at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia and.Collinsville, Alabama include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 91 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the project. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where 10-24 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT appropriate. Followup for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $26,770. Total cost to September 30, 1994 is $705,658 charged to maintenance. 54. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Multiple Purpose Power Projects 55. ALLATOONA DAM, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twentysix feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twentysix feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration totaled $8,452,826. Gross power generation amounted to 150,348,500 kilowatt hours during FY 1994 of which 147,539,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at Allatoona Lake during FY 1994 totaled 4,576,925 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $35,709,085 for new work and $101,851,287 for maintenance, a total of $137,560,372. 56. BUFORD DAM, LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See Table. 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $8,182,544. Gross power generation amounted to 141,389,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1994, of which 139,397,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during FY 1994 totaled 6,683,574 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 10, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $53,030,038 for new work and $125,138,978 for maintenance, a total of $178,169,016. (See also Table 10-M.) 10-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 57. CARTERS DAM AND RESERVOIR, GA Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Oakman, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The existing project consists of a 1,950- foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a powerhouse on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum pool power elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage: For other information see description of Alabama- Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and administration totaled $3,886,696. Gross power generation amounted to 432,647,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1994, of which 105,622,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 1994 totaled 485,333 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 and completed in September 1980. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $171,230,317, including $111,140,340 for new work and $60,089,977 for maintenance. 58. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $6,558,195. Gross power generation, Jim Woodruff Powerhouse, amounted to 217,583,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1994, of which 214,599,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during FY 1994 totaled 1,271,956 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The pool was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first powergenerating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third April 26, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $47,978,858 for new work and $87,302,217 for maintenance, a total of $135,281,075. (See also Table 10-M.) 59. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. 10-26 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains three 25,000 kilowatt units. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration cost $3,638,758. Gross power generation amounted to 329,956,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1994, of which 326,324,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during FY 1994 totaled 1,660,133 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operations in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was completed in 1980. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1994 is $63,125,300 for new work and $56,858,148 for maintenance, a total of $119,983,448. 60. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 281.2 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The existing project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 281.2. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 17,000-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. For other information see description of Alabama- Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs amounted to $4,034,150. Gross power generation amounted to 248,830,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1994, of which 245,236,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 1994 totaled 1,578,781 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 and is complete. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1994 is $122,894,007, including $83,360,800 for new work and $39,533,207 for maintenance. 61. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,000 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. 10-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost for FY 1994 was $8,349,043. Gross power generation amounted to 453,252,000 kilowatt hours, of which 446,521,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 1994 totaled 4,793,895 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed onthe- line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $88,330,669 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $10,618,000 and $119,876,196 for maintenance, a total cost of $218,824,865. (See also Table 10-M.) 62. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The existing project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acre-feet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in operation in March and April, 1975. The current installation is 108,375 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the project totaled $4,776,323. Gross power generation amounted to 198,822,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1994, of which 191,098,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 1994 totaled 2,145,966 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, and completed at the end of FY 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1994 is $131,565,760 for new work and $71,450,112 for maintenance, a total of $203,015,872 (See also Table 10-M.) 63. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior- Tombigbee Rivers System. 64. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Program .......................... $540,261 Emergency Operations .......................................... 102,856 Rehabilitation ................................................. 125,585 Total FC & CE $768,702 65. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Mobilization Preparedness ........................................ $0 Government Preparedness ....................................... 183,964 Total NEPP $183,964 10-28 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 66. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation ............................................ $1,641,109 Enforcement .................................... 446,754 Studies ...................................................... ................... 367 Other Navigational Regulations ............................... 7,406 Total Regulatory $2,095,636 General Investigations 67. SURVEYS During FY 1994, costs of $620,925 were incurred as shown below: Flood Damage Preventive Studies........................ $317,533 Navigation Studies...................................................... 9,429 Supplemental Pre-Authorization Studies ................... 989 Special Studies .............................. 49,613 Coordination with Other Agencies, and non-Federal Interests ....................................... 121,230 Miscellaneous Activities .................. 122,131 Total Surveys $620,925 68. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, Flood Plain Management services were performed at a cost of $218,757. (See Table 10-P for listings of studies completed during FY 1994.) 69. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Gulfport Harbor, MS. The authorized plan of improvement consists of modifying the existing ship channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. Dredged material disposal will be in the Gulf of Mexico. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was completed in August 1989. Preparation of plans and specifications were completed in FY 1991. Fiscal year 1994 expenditures for were $3,012. Pascagoula Harbor, MS. The authorized plan of improvement calls for: Deepening and widening the Gulf entrance channel to 44 x 550 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly, and providing for future realignment as conditions warrant. Deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to 42 feet. Deepening and widening the Bayou Casotte Channel to 42 x 350 feet, and constructing a turning basin at the mouth of Bayou Casotte. Provide for bend widening for navigation and allow for reconfigurating the impoundment basin at the entrance channel. A resurvey of project economics and initial coordination on environmental issues were completed in FY 1991. Indications are that the project is economical. A letter of assurance was received from Jackson County Port Authority. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was approved in June 1992. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) was completed in September 1992. The project construction was initiated in FY 1994. Fiscal year 1994 expenditures were $20,929. Panama City Beaches, FL. The authorized plan consists of the placement of a protective beach to elevation 4', with a storm berm to elevation 7' with an artificial dune system having a top width of 30 feet at elevation 15 and stabilized by vegetation. A comprehensive damage survey was completed during FY 1989 as part of the reevaluation effort. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) is currently 57% complete. A General Reevaluation Report (GRR) is scheduled for ASA (CW) approval in June 1995, and PED in September 1996. Fiscal year 1994 expenditures were $791,550. Panama City Harbor. The authorized plan of improvements are the same as described in existing project (see Section 15 in text). Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) is currently 62% complete. A General Reevaluation Report (GRR) is scheduled for ASA (CW) approval in June 1995 and PED in September 1996. Fiscal year 1994 expenditures were $769,356. Bayou La Batre, AL. The authorized plan for the project consists of an 18-foot deep channel from the turning basin within Bayou La Batre, extending into Mississippi Sound then along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway alignment connecting with the existing Pascagoula ship channel. Extensions of the existing channel to above the Highway 188 bridge at a depth of 14 feet and into Snake Bayou at a depth of 12 feet are also incrementally justified. The Final Feasibility report was completed, and has been through all required Washington level review. The project was authorized in the 1990 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA). 10-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) work completed in September 1991. The contract for deepening the Sound channel was awarded July 1993. Fiscal year 1994 expenditures were $128. Total FY 1994 expenditures for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) were $1,584,975. 70. RIVERS AND HARBORS CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Contributed funds expended for authorized Federal studies included: Jackson County Water Supply .............................. $13,333 Flood Plain Management .......................................... 2,580 Planning Assistance to States ................................. 75,000 Pascagoula River Basin, MS ..................................... 25,022 Total Contributed Funds ................................... $115,935 10-30 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 Navigation 1. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA 1A. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL lB. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL 2. Apalachicola Bay, FL 3. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, AL and GA 3A. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL and GA 4. Aquatic Plant Control (Contributed Funds) 5. Bayou Coden, AL (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Bayou La Batre, AL (Contributed Funds) 7. Biloxi Harbor, MS New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 3,245,400 3,245,400 6,103,000 5,780,640 133,100 123,010 3,829,000 3,635,119 30 310 17,500 40,589 4,000 5,301 2,473 7,427,234 7,568,519 23,000 34,558 5,183,000 5,150,973 30 30 25,000 5,877 10,000 420 326,000 225,523 10,000 10,024 5,890,000 5,748,435 174,000 152,980 3,831,300 3,991,325 3300 38,000 37,059 -5,000 1,532 1,447,000 713,191 20,000 11,141 377,000 15,90 4,808,700 4,865,758 325,000 317,814 7,319,000 7,292,366 90,083,888'24 89,720,66724 27,997,450 27,997,450 14,986,4002 14,986,40023 2,033,461' 2,033,461' 4,5 12,058 2 4,483,5722 4,452,16226 4,452,16226 104,214,26427 104,057,751 27 13,038,42729 13,038,42729 30 30 70,000 77,126 15,000 22,176 1,752,000 2,558,508 380,000 388,549 139,000 450,730 889,187 841,772 21,225 21,225 330,7013 330,7013 1,174,758 1,174,276 100,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 3,836,095 3,808,317 4,049,746 4,049,427 526,500' 461,230' 1,431,9195 1,431,9195 10-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, AL 8A. Jackson Port Jackson, AL 8B. Oliver Lock & Dam (Replacement), AL (Contributed Funds) 9. Bon Secour River, AL (Contributed Funds) 10. Dauphin Island, Bay, AL (Contributed Funds) 11. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (Contributed Funds) 12. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctwhatchee Bay, FL (Contributed Funds) 13. Fly Creek, AL Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 142,000 132,952 ,- 16,575,000 16,648,208 136,000 138,245 5,891,000 7,675,727 5,891,000 7,788,927 40,000 445,000 441,544 4,504 104 669,000 635,698 950,000 930,720 16,430,000 16,229,632 148,000 104,401 4,887,000 4,405,068 4,887,000 4,393,130 -8,000 18,595 1,755 50,000 43,379 43,200 39,235 850 155,000 106,016 81,000 102,676 15,491,000 15,324,273 271,000 179,524 2,302,000 1,395,759 2,302,000 1,187,825 13,405 2,682 100,000 90,686 63,200 295,000 201,890 161,000 236,690 915,000 585,628 18,693,100 18,507,566 165,000 276,520 2,500,000 1,642,866 2,500,000 1,687,594 -4,012 16,246 -63,200 243,000 289,659 1,650,000 1,632,360 11,894,1956 11,519,2936 102,600 102,600 238,640 238,640 88,461,935' 88,461,9357 302,021,094' 301,249,748' 52,292,880 52,292,880 950,000 903,975 61,409,000 58,777,384 62,500,000 59,949,192 150,615 150,615 1,386,258 1,377,361 9,700 9,700 292,864 292,864 2,458,626 2,458,438 43,200 39,235 391,354 391,354 2,996,686 2,949,275 197,450 195,250 916,715 916,715 10,364,111 10,339,070 398,000 398,000 29,000 29,000 10-32 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 14. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border 15. Gulfport Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) 16. Mobile Harbor, AL (Contributed Funds) 17. Panama City Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 18. Pascagoula Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Pensacola Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 20. Perdido Pass Channel, AL Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 3,014,000 2,991,923 90,000 68,125 1,873,000 1,823,602 530,000 236,070 339,755 21,754,000 21,686,655 -421,000 3,451 590,000 558,150 1,728,000 1,716,872 218,000 45,000 24,175 1,149 S 1,000 1,960,000 1,994,862 10,697,000 10,291,666 2,881,000 2,801,508 3,880,000 3,833,647 468,000 629,610 20,497,000 20,425,295 301,000 20,000 67,000 97,885 3,194,000 3,152,528 253,000 458,131 60,000 72,239 1,008,000 988,999 95,000 87,641 3,499,000 3,477,983 9,042,000 9,132,900 3,407,000 3,527,809 5,085,000 3,266,252 -48,028 9,965,000 9,668,584 251,878 73,000 70,905 3,368,000 3,405,837 66,435 11,153 10,000 14,220 10,000 17,933 2,340,000 2,360,084 3,281,000 3,338,907 1,436,000 1,414,047 1,363,082 57,000 113,438 15,565,000 15,986,627 29,762 321,000 314,006 289,000 252,481 2,281,000 2,166,315 840,000 80,623 586,000 57,056 2,753 25,000 35,662 666,721 665,481 6,480,2999 6,480,2999 69,153,24610 69,058,5961 24,079,000" 23,800,597" 47,230,5022 47,197,15112 9,495,000 8,699,050 96,158,935' 96,142,610" 179,076,340"' 178,988,161" 18,452,500 18,452,500 1,638,045'" 1,638,045" 9,462,0136 9,451,02416 80,000 80,000 6,861,985'7 6,825,466'7 56,063,592" 55,908,696"s 840,000 80,623 4,456,884 3,911,757 1,469,693"9 1,469,693" 8,316,35820 8,314,36320 312,350 297,587 629,860 629,860 7,843,217 7,838,878 10-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Tennessee- Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 21A. Tenn-Tom Wildlife Mitigation Flood Control 28. Boggy Bayou Valparaiso, FL (Contributed Funds) 29. County Road 55, Etowah Co., AL (Contributed Funds) 30. Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL (Contributed Funds) 31. Dauphin Island, Shoreline, AL (Contributed Funds) 32. East End, Dauphin Island, AL (Contributed Funds) 33. Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL (Contributed Funds) 34. Fort Toulouse Wetumpka, AL (Contributed Funds) 35. Gadsden Water Treatment Plant Gadsden, AL (Contributed Funds) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 4,081,000 12,976,662 20,660,000 21,229,316 17,319,000 16,342,226 2,726 1,274 8,077 760,711 2,877 1,210,353 39,800 82,504 45,227 1,000 -100,000 32,690 55 25,000 10,213 25,000 12,115 -938,900 72,463 236,000 267,727 193,000 194,000 18,323,000 8,428,941 17,984,000 17,553,985 14,481,000 13,620,228 125,200 113,829 16,900 15,407 10,327,000 9,804,160 19,946,000 19,363,766 8,642,000 8,620,483 -6,000 10,640 -6,391 -6,171 60,000 51,045 -76,000 42,111 -25,330 -8,261 65,000 51,854 65,000 55,327 60,000 93,889 8,785 -8,785 -8,785 6,085,000 7,880,115 21,449,350 21,764,047 17,024,000 9,514,923 1,310 133,000 141,760 40,000 1,611 390 284,000 287,911 102,000 102,000 229,000 251,138 81,200 81,200 475,000 490,834 99,200 133,997 -18,000 418 386,000 335,608 116,000 8,575 10-34 510,000 510,000 10,325 10,325 1,051,614,20021 1,047,771,50321 202,359,18522 201,852,37822 62,666,000 53,049,298 147,200 147,200 10,509 10,509 233,000 232,780 40,000 1,611 1,848,327 1,848,327 144,670 144,670 374,000 349,979 102,000 102,000 319,000 318,580 81,200 81,200 3,575,221 3,573,783 335,000 330,002 368,000 368,000 185,215 185,215 386,000 335,608 116,000 8,575 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project 36. Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS 37. Mound State Park Moundville, AL (Contributed Funds) 38. Murder Creek, Brewton, AL 39. Okatibbee Dam, MS 40. Portersville Bay-East Mobile Co., AL (Contributed Funds) 41. Portersville Bay-West Mobile Co., AL (Contributed Funds) 42. Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA 43. Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA (Contributed Funds) 44. Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS (Contributed Funds) 45. Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS (Contributed Funds) 46. Three Mile Creek, Mobile, AL (Contributed Funds) 47. Tombigbee River Bridge #6 Monroe Co., MS (Contributed Funds) TALE10A(Cntnud COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 " " I,3'A IA 7,167 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost .. . C 2 AR 69,014 8,659 1,327,000 1,182,180 75,000 58,632 -81,000 1,838 7,184 2,455,000 2,634,125 431,000 290,793 24,434 4,224,000 3,418,602 235,000 484,000 17 63,540 17,149 578,000 280,452 106,000 100,044 -25,000 1,356,000 1,397,215 30,000 18,839 327,900 15,000 30,000 9,674 162,700 -40,000 67,622 -37,000 4,432 3,459,000 3,048,651 -116,711 -355,000 52,525 7,808,000 7,271,007 516,000 348,668 40,000 37,894 6,000 53,220 100,000 346,078 74,074 57,896 33,964 1,321,000 1,400,454 404,000 425,658 312,900 421,000 408,676 162,700 19,342 3,725 1,554,000 1,204,838 215,000 205,000 198,034 1,029,000 2,451,626 61,089 1,897 10-35 -39,000 26,065 1,218 2,352 1,806,100 1,840,500 3,052 -� -10,000 8,616 -1,000 416 -1,000 930 3,240,000 636,445 -106,000 110,193 1,150,000 1,092,561 63,000 36,594 109,300 157,340 157,340 789,000 789,000 180,074 159,158 1,215,000 1,215,000 9,739,528 9,739,528 18,580,835 18,513,660 519,000 516,157 327,900 327,900 441,000 426,966 162,700 162,700 870,000 870,000 385,300 385,300 35,000 35,000 19,281,000 15,499,582 1,599,000 1,146,493 563,000 549,592 40,000 40,000 17,085,000 16,830,071 1,216,000 1,034,516 103,000 76,386 109,300 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-A (Continued) S S1 in ee ection iText Project 48. Tombigbee River (East Fork) MS and AL 49. Tombigbee River Tributaries, MS and AL (Contributed Funds) 50. Upper Gordon Creek Hattiesburg, MS (Contributed Funds) 51. Village Creek, Birmingham, AL (Contributed Funds) Multiple Purpose Power Projects 55. Allatoona Dam, Coosa River Basin, GA 56. Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA 57. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA 58. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, GA and FL 59. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL 60. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 l l 1 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 174,000 160,044 496,000 427,592 50,000 27,897 2,897,000 5,184,999 1,420,000 1,593,457 4,673,000 4,375,042 6,415,000 6,386,380 7,003,000 6,950,332 4,521,000 4,361,962 3,825,000 3,552,091 2,945,000 2,944,225 15,000 16,062 331,000 362,221 60,000 75,935 5,933,000 5,558,379 2,045,000 1,902,299 6,305,000 6,281,198 6,933,000 7,053,258 5,430,000 5,412,945 -39,000 4,345,000 4,390,701 3,481,333 3,681,102 3,150,333 2,947,285 82,000 92,467 421,000 371,237 40,000 15,035 40,000 53,444 3,204,000 2,326,287 1,028,000 704,659 8,261,100 8,291,901 1,620 7,216,000 7,124,458 3,526,900 3,643,537 107 5,167,900 5,143,809 4,211,000 4,118,803 3,363,000 3,472,223 10-36 298,000 276,521 4,308,000 631,173 300,000 35,875 950,000 898,560 130,720 130,700 142,000 1,240,561 392,783 8,223,600 8,452,826 8,127,400 8,182,544 3,998,500 3,886,696 6,459,000 6,558,195 3,541,000 3,638,758 4,141,000 4,034,150 134,801 134,801 3,343,201 3,312,873 29,913,825 26,113,156 434,700 114,252 1,817,000 1,739,762 130,720 130,700 22,207,000 21,668,919 7,199,710 7,008,083 35,709,08525 35,709,0852" 102,073,524 101,851,287 53,030,0382* 53,030,038> 125,386,022 125,138,978 111,140,340 111,140,340 60,304,984 60,089,977 47,978,858 ' 47,978,858 ' 87,514,297 87,302,217 63,125,300 63,125,300 56,997,211 56,858,148 83,360,800 83,360,800 39,788,861 39,533,207 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 61. * Walter F. George New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. 47,000 -12,111 - - 88,330,66932 AL and GA Cost 30,907 3,983 - - 88,330,66932 Maint.: Approp. 5,932,000 6,228,000 6,432,800 8,427,000 120,227,397 Cost 5,856,388 6,198,975 6,334,258 8,349,043 119,876,196 Major Rehab.: Approp. 165,000 - - 24,000 10,618,000 Cost 153,643 - - 920 10,618,000 62. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. - - - -3,000 131,565,760" Basin, GA and AL Cost - - - 473 131,565,760" Maint.: Approp. 5,012,000 4,658,200 5,004,000 4,727,000 71,612,908 Cost 4,826,791 4,504,052 5,210,059 4,776,323 71,450,112 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by .1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10.200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $1,243,661 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 11. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M Funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public Work Funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special O and M funds. 15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works Funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $1,993,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $3,347,489 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and $809,553 for Lazer Creek design and $301,310 for Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $8,233,325 for recreational facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers projects. 31. Includes $1,515,822 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,441,029 for recreational facilities. 33. Includes $35,045 for previous project costs. 10-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 1963' Feb. 5, 1975' Aug. 11, 1983' Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 2, 1969' Oct. 27, 1965 APALACHICOLA BAY, FL (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels. 10 feet deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. At Eastpoint, Fl., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fl., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fl., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channel is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 1 mile long, parallel to shore at Two Mile, Fl., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater of about 6,150 feet, includes two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a total length of 5,300 feet. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 4 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fl., Al., Ms., and La. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BAYOU CODEN, AL (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet. Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre channel. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL (See Section 6 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Public law 87-874 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-38 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 28, 1990 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 1979' Aug. 15, 1985 Jul. 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sep. 19, 1890 Sep. 19, 1890 Deepen existing channel to 18 feet to the bridge; to 14 feet above bridge, and into Snake Bayou at a depth of 12 feet. BILOXI HARBOR, MS (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi. Relocation of channel. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou. Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. .A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500 by 2,600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence, a channel 12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500- foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150 foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about I mile to a 400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40- foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150- foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. A channel 12-feet deep; 130-feet wide and 2,100-feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot depth. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL (See Section 8 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887 Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams, 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) H. Doc. 754, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 639, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p. 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., Ist Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293 10-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 21, 1982 Jul. 30, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 18, 1986 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement on Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage, the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Conduct a feasibility study of protection from erosion problems on the southern bank from river mile 253 to river mile 255. MOUND STATE PARK (See Section 33 of Text) Correct erosion problems along the banks of the Warrior River in order to protect Mound State Park, near Moundville, Al. JACKSON PORT, AL (See Section 8A of Text) Construct a spur canal 9 feet deep, 280 feet wide, and 680 feet long in conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation proejct. (Jackson Port) OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL (See Section 8B of Text) Construction and land acquisition for Oliver Lock Replacement Construction of a lock and dam to replace the William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam. 10-40 Public law 317 H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918, P. 876 H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors and Committee Doc. 45 73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26. 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 97, 377 Public Law 98-63 Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1987 (P.L. 99-591) The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 16, 1963' DPR (Sec. 107) BON SECOUR RIVER, AL (See Section 9 of Text) A 10- by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 and 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL (See Section 10 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Deepen existing 4-foot channel to 7-feet and 40-feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay. Provides 400 feet of stone protection along the shoreline near the pier and erosion protection for shoreline in the immediate vicinity of Fort Gaines. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL (See Section 11 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL (See Section 12 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) Modifications to provide a channel length of approximately 3,800 feet in lieu of 2,000 feet from the East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon, with no changes in width and depth. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 14 of Text) APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. 10-41 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 16, 1991 Jun. 23, 1993 May 19, 1969' Jul. 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 1, 1980 May 17, 1950 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 25, 1910 H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. Energy and Water Development Appropriation H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52. 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 23, 1942 Jun. 17, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 23, 1930 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 15, 1985 CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FL, TO MOBILE BAY, AL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, AL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS (See Section 15 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Ms., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 30 feet across Ship Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Ms. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Modify the existing Ship Channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. 10-42 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. Modify of WRDA of 1986 and authorize disposal of dredged material in open waters of the Gulf of Mexico; and by Thin-layer disposal in Mississippi Sound under a demonstration program. MOBILE HARBOR, AL (See Section 16 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point in Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 42 by 600 feet. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basin and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Mazagine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of November 27, 1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307 to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' by 1600'. Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin. Deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 by 700 feet, a distance of about 7.4 miles, deepen and widen Mobile Bay Channel from mouth of bay to south of Mobile River, 55 by 550 feet, a distance of about 27.0 miles, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of Mobile Bay Channel to 55 by 650 feet, provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island, and construct a 1710 acre disposal area adjacent to the Brookley Industrial Complex. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. 10-43 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-676) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Congress, 1st Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control) The Supplemental Appropriations Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 1967' Jun. 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL Shoreline protection to provide a 110-foot wide beach with an artificial dune system and stabilization of vegetation. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL (See Section 17 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS (See Section 18 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River, 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30-by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the same depth 1 mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. 10-44 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 98, 96th Cong., H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Jul. 11, 1983' Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 27, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 Modification to provide for channel dimensions 12 by 80 feet extending abut 2,750 feet from deep waters in the Pascagoula River into Krebs Lake to a turning basin, thence, along the south bank of the lake a channel with dimensions of 10 x 60 feet terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of about 2,750 feet. The project was constructed by hydraulic dredging with the disposal placed in an upland diked area. Deepen and widen gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet, widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL (See Section 19 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvements of Bayou Chico. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL (See Section 20 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemount jetties; from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS (See Section 21 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Ms.; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section, 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. 10-45 Documents DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 May 4, 1990' Mar. 23, 1994' Nov. 17, 19872 Sep. 10, 19872 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 21, 1994' Mar. 14, 19902 Apr. 18, 19862 Oct. 23, 1962 Sep. 27, 1990' Sep. 27, 1990' Jan. 10, 19892 Oct. 13, 19882 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WILDLIFE MITIGATION (See Section 21A of Text) Acquire from willing sellers in a timely manner at fair market value 88,000 acres of land for mitigation of wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the project for the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. BOGGY BAYOU, VALPARAISO, FL (See Section 28 of Text) Provide bank protection along 700-feet of shoreline and preclude possible destruction of Bayshore Drive and utilities. COUNTY ROAD 55, ETOWAH CO., AL (See Section 29 of Text) Excavation of loose roadway embankment, placement of riprap, and installation of a French drain. CRIBBS MILL CREEK, TUSCALOOSA, AL (See Section 30 of Text) Channel modification of about 7,300 feet of the creek. Modification consists of widening the existing channel. ESLAVA CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 33 of Text) Channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and increasing the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard by adding an additional barrel. FORT TOULOUSE (See Section 34 of Text) Preserve and protect the Fort Toulouse National Historic Landmark and Taskigi Indian Mound by instituting bank stabilization measures GADSDEN-WATER TREATMENT PLANT, AL (See Section 35 of Text) Provides riprapped slope protection for 80 feet upstream, and 80 feet downstream of an intake structure. MILL CREEK, SUMRALL, MS (See Section 36 of Text) Clearing and snagging 1.0 mile along Mill Creek with overbank clearing for 0.63 miles. MURDER CREEK, BREWTON, AL (See Section 38 of Text) Non-structural project providing for the alleviation of flood problems at Brewton by the removal of 31 damageable structures from the 10-year flood plains of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS (See Section 39 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation. PORTERSVILLE BAY - EAST, MOBILE CO., AL (See Section 40 of Text) Provide shoreline bank protection along 5,600 feet of Shell Belt Road. PORTERSVILLE BAY - WEST, MOBILE CO., AL (See Section 41 of Text) Provide shoreline bank protection along 3,500 feet of Shell Belt Road. PROCTOR CREEK, ATLANTA, GA (See Section 42 of Text) Purchase and remove residential structures within flood plain. RACCOON CREEK, BACONTON, GA (See Section 43 of Text) Raise about 1500 feet of South Jackson Street Bridge to elevation 176.0 feet NGVE. Clear and snag from Hwy. 3 to U.S. Hwy. 19. Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) 10-46 TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 30, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1994' Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 23, 1958 Jul. 8, 1980 Oct. 13, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 28, 1954 SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS (See Section 44 of Text) Channel enlargement, and clearing and snagging over a reach of 10.5 miles. One railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require modification for the channel improvement. Development of recreation facilities. TALLAHALLA CREEK, LAUREL, MS (See Section 45 of Text) Channel clearing and snagging with overbank clearing of brush and trees less than 4 inches diameter for a distance of 30 feet on each bank. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 46 of Text) Channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. Development of recreational facilities. TOMBIGBEE RIVER BRIDGE #6, MONROE CO., MS (See Section 47 of Text) Provides a rock training dike, riprap revetment blankets, and an overbank drainage structure. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL (See Section 48 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL (See Section 49 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 50 of Text) Real Estate acquisition of nine (9) residences; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement. VILLAGE CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, BIRMINGHAM, AL (See Section 51 of Text) Basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures in six separate neighborhoods from floodplain; enlarge 2 miles of channel and relocate necessary facilities; Install flood warning devices. Authorized the Secretary to acquire private vacant lands within the definite project boundaries established in the Real Estate Design Memorandum as a nonstructural element of the project. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, GA, Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL, Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, AL, and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. 10-47 Documents Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 205) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 14) Special Report on Record in Oct. (P.L. 222) 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Supplemental Appropriations and Recession Act DPR (Sec. 205) 1980 (P.L. 96-304) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 25, 1982 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Jan. 27, 1981' Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 24, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 May 19, 1953 Oct. 23, 1963 WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA (See Section 61 of Text) Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at Columbia site. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL (See Section 62 of Text) Authorized construction for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam Modification to the plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden, AL to carry out planning, engineering, and design in accordance with the Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, AL Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA (See Section 55 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA AND FL (See Section 3 of Text) Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and authorized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Authorized recreation facilities. Modified the existing project to provide for 9- foot deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fl. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT Modified Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945 to restore and maintain access to bendways and interconnecting waterways in the course of routine maintenance dredging; and to acquire lands for and to construct, operate, and maintain water-related public use and access facilities. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA (See Section 56 of Text) Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA (See Section 3A of Text) Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at George W. Andrews site. Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL (See Section 58 of Text) Provided for recreation facilities. H. Comm. on Public Works H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 14 of Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 10-48 S.2034 97th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resources Develoment Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Public Law 228, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76 Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st sess. MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenance Blackwater River, FL 1981 $41,650 $330,356 Bluff Creek, MS' 1963 1,000 6,883 Cadet Bayou, MS 1984 87,921 1,140,118 Cahaba River, AL2 1894 45,000 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL 1979 481,627 422,408 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL 1973 171,885 291,694 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL 1981 208,499 1,137,256 Holmes Creek, FL 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, FL 1972 289,496 150,558 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, MS2 1919 23,090 42,676 Noxubee River, MS' 1902 47,528 14,472 Ochlockonee (Ochlockney) River, GA and FL' 2 1900 5,000 Old Town Creek' 2 1887 3,000 Oostanaula and Coosawattee River, GA' 2 1907 32,656 Panacea Harbor, FL 1979 122,383 102,201 Pascagoula River, MS 1956 15,000 179,535 Pass Christian Harbor, MS 1976 59,313 337,370 Port St. Joe Harbor, FL 1984 1,960,862 2,963,516 Removing Water Hyacinths 1984 - 1,100,471 St. Marks River, FL 1965 1,710,809 87,215 Tallapoosa River, AL2 1893 43,972 Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS 1988 500,500 Upper Chipola River, FL from Marianna to its' mouth' 2 1941 36,781 63,193 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 1979 29,195 481,515 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H. Doc. 96-157, Ist Session. TABLE 10-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenance Harrison County, MS, shore protection' 1953 $1,133,000 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenance= Alabama River at Montgomery, AL' Armuchee Creek, GA Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA Big Brown Creek, Prentiss Co., MS Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS Black Creek, Gadsden, AL Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL Burketts Creek, Amory, MS Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL Clanton, AL Collinsville, AL County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co., FL Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., MS Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS Houston School Rd. Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS Hurricane Creek, Prentiss Co., MS Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL Lake Douglas, Decatur County, GA Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL Magby Creek, Columbus, MS Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS Mill Creek, Dalton, GA Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, GA Rome, Coosa River, GA Sewerline Protection, Valley, AL Silver Creek, Rome, GA Sope Creek, Marietta, GA Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS Tallahala Creek, Pascagoula River, MS Town Creek, Americus, GA Trim Cane Creek, Okibbeha County, MS Trussville, AL Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA Whorton's Bend Road, Etowah Co., AL Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA 1965 14.194- 1966 1958 1987 1985 1953 1986 1987 1984 1988 1985 1964 1940 1992 1988 1985 1991 1990 1991 1982 1988 1992 1987 1970 1990 1986 1991 1991 1988 1992 1980 1986 1988 1987 1985 1946 1985 1955 1989 1992 1990 1956 1984 1988 1988 1965 1984 1965 1986 1955 1991 1985 1986 1966 115,547 149,815 137,500 132,174 125,389 181,500 178,600 1,366,454 206,600 121,718 274,024 71,119 116,800 91,500 802,026 147,432 71,000 268,691 238,219 59,300 52,803 155,200 164,998 1,585,000 231,618 144,047 156,508 78,500 474,065 190,974 903,474 119,500 143,936 250,000 649,280 85,029 384,550 180,937 604,719 1,538,555 142,637 55,569 81,000 3,945,757 340,409 145,519 141,334 215,860 599,637 448,956 114,753 154,641 330,734 1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration (no construction work has been done. Includes $17,000 for pre-authorization studies.) 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-50 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Project Bayou Galere, MS' GIWW; Apalachicola Bay to SL Marks River, FL Lazer Creek Lake, GA Lower Auchumpkee Creek, GA Noxubee River, MS 2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Pensacola Harbor Modification, FL Sipsey River, AL2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Tombigbee River, AL & MS2 (Auth. 1941 Act) Westfork, MS2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Type Navigation Navigation Hydroelectric power Hydroelectric power Flood Control Navigation Flood Control Flood Control Flood Control Year of Last Date Year of Last Full Report 1946 1986 1986 1986 1989 1986 1989 n/a 1989 Deauthorization Document H. Doc. 192, 94th Cong., 1st Sess., as amended. Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress 1. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-C. 2. Deauthorized tributaries of Tombigbee River improvements. TABLE 10-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal year Study Authority 1994 Costs Ocean Springs Harbor, MS 107 0 Ochlockonee Bay, Wakulla Co., FL 107 52,700 Oostanaula and Coosa Rivers, GA 107 0 Total $52,700 10-51 Date Deauthorized Aug. 5, 1977 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1, 1990 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 . REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Study Black Warrior River, North Port, AL Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, AL & FL Fish River, Baldwin County, AL Mill Creek, Dalton, GA Mill Creek, McGee, MS North Shore, Santa Rosa Island, FL Peachtree Creek, Basin, Atlanta, GA Pensacola Beach, FL Round House Bridge, Amory, MS Sweetwater Creek, Austell, GA Atkinson Creek, Green Co., MS Bay St. Louis Seawall, MS Bayview, MS Hancock County, Seawall, MS Kings Creek, MS Leaf River Branch, Green Co., MS Round Island, MS Spring Street, Tupelo, MS Valley, AL Waveland, MS Total Fiscal year Authority 1994 Costs 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 53,675 67,702 4,392 935 27,100 9,641 31,400 9,987 13,365, 4,901 49,874 9,212 7,611 34,799 40,776 61,915 33,515 568 16,018 80,702 $558,088 10-52 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-K RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Apalachicola Bay, FL Bayou Coden, AL Bayou La Batre, AL Biloxi Harbor, MS Blackwater River, FL Bon Secour, AL Cadet Bayou, MS Carrabelle Harbor, FL Dauphin Island, AL Escambia Bay, FL Fly Creek, AL Fowl River, AL La Grange Bayou, FL Pensacola Harbor, FL Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS Total Date of Survey Aug 1994 Aug 1994 Jan 1994 Feb 1994 May 1994 Oct 1993 Jul 1994 Apr 1994 Aug 1994 Apr 1994 Jun 1994 Aug 1994 Jan 1994 Jan 1994 Jul 1994 TABLE 10-L ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 1 of Text) Claiborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam ' Dam Miles above mouth of river 81.1' 42.2' 245.4' 26.82 47.8k Nearest town Claiborne, AL Camden, AL Benton, AL Carters, GA Cartersville, GA Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 840 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13 Upper 15 Upper 15 Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Cost to date:5 $27,997,450 $63,125,300 $83,360,800 $111,140,340 $35,709,085 Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10A. 10-53 Cost During Fiscal Year $24,497 9,418 8,538 815 16,776 7,890 3,115 7,833 8,259 18,174 3,990 7,980 6,990 6,055 8,538 $138,868 1. 2. 3. J REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL, LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 3 of Text) Existing Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Woodruff Andrews George Lake Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier Miles above mouth " 107.6' 46.52 75.02 201.42 348.32 Nearest town Chattahoochee, FL Columbia, AL Ft. Gaines, GA West Point, GA Buford, GA Distance (miles) 1 1 2 2.8 5 Greatest lock length 450 450 450 - and available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) 82 82 82 - Maximum lift (feet) 33 25 88 - Elevation of normal pool 77 102 190(Summer) 635(Summer) 1071(Summer) surface (msl) 185(Winter) 625(Winter) 1070(Winter) Depth over sills at low 14 13 .13 - water (feet) Character of foundation Limestone . Limestone Limestone Rock Rock Kind of spillway Fixed-gated Fixed-gated Gated Gated Fixed Height of dam (feet) 67 . 72 114 95 192 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth Total reservoir capacity 367;300 18,180 934,400 604,500 2,554,000 (acre-feet) Power-development 30,000 - 130,000 73,375 86,000 (kilowatts) Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 Year opened to navigation 1954 1962 1963 - Cost to date:' $47,978,858 $13,038,427 $98,948,669' $131,565,760 $53,030,038 1. Above mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 3. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 4. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge and $10,617,080 for major rehabilitation. 10-54 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-N BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL (See Section 8 of Text) Armistead William John Hollis Coffeeville Demopolis Selden Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock Lock Lock & Dam Lock Lock and Dam and Dam and Dam (Replacement) and Dam and Dam' Miles above Mobile2 116.7 213.2 261.1 337.7 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Distance (miles) 3 (within city) 6 15 (within city) 6 30 Lock: Grestest length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 600 600 600 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 18.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated Type of construction Lock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth-Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1934 1969 1985 Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1991 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam3 $21,597,264 $19,774,583 $13,295,553 $120,000,000 $28,100,000 $52,292,880 i. Single lift lock. 2. 3. 4. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. Scheduled. 10-55 REPORT OF THIlE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 10O-0 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA ANI MISSISSIPPI (See Section 21 of Text) Existing Projects Gainesville Aliceville Columbus Aberdeen Lock A Lock B Lock C Lock D Lock E Bay lock Lock Lock Lock and and and and and and Lock Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway and D Miles above mouth' 266 307 335 358 371 376 39 398 407 412 Nearest town Gainesville, AL Aliceville, AL Columbus, MS Aberdeen, MS Amory, MS Smithville, MS Fulton, MS Fulton, MS Belmont, MS Tupel Greatest lock length 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 available for full width (feet) Width of Chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 84 Elevation of normal 109 136 163 190 220 245 270 300 330 (Sum pool surface (msl) (Wint Depth over sills at 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 low water (feet) Character of foundation Mooreville Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Sands Chalk Sand & Clay Sand & Clay Sand Lam. Sand Sand & Clay Clay Sand Clay and S Kind of spillway Fixed & Fixed & Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated N/A Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 56 57 57 57 46 48 53 52 44.5 103 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concr & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Ear Total reservoir capacity 45,290 655 59,483 31,564 4,400 19,000 13,300 24,900 6,900 (Sum (acre-feet) (Wint Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Yearopenedto 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 navigation Estimated Cost $103,214,000 151,255,000 182,650,000 128,262,000 102,685,000 96,905,000 71,375,000 98,205,000 88,173,000 147,0 Cost to Date $100,010,600 143,190,800 174,620,500 112,620,200 92,190,500 93,106,700 62,197,000 89,610,800 76,917,700 130,3 I. Miles above Mobile, Alabama (Mile 0.00 isa tB ankhead Tunnel on U.S. Highway 90). springs )amn o, MS mer) 414 er) 409 tone hale ete th mer) 180,(X)0 er) 143,000 00,000 98,000 10-56 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-P COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1984 THRU FY 1994' Date Federal Study Requesting Agency Completed Cost Flood Insurance Studies Cave Springs, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 84 22,500 Floyd County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 84 230,000 Columbus, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 85 36,000 Lowndes County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 85 229,000 Aberdeen, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 35,000 Amory, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 50,000 Cherokee County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) July 85 168,000 Monroe County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Oct 85 140,000 Dale County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 86 82,000 Lauderdale County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 87 144,000 Houston County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 87 114,000 St. Clair County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 87 43,000 Marengo County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 87 36,000 Greene County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 88 18,550 Covington County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 35,000 Pickens County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 50,000 Fulton County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 88 180,000 Monroe County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 88 33,000 Colquitt County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 48,000 Murray County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 68,000 Coffee County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 89 48,500 Montgomery County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jul 89 175,000 Clayton County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 89 250,000 Jefferson County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 91 397,000 Calhoun County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 91 200,000 Fayette County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 93 264,000 Tupelo, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 94 157,965 Special Flood Hazard Information Hull Branch, MS East Central Planning and Jun 84 7,000 Development District Percosin Creek & Tribs., GA City of Albany, GA Nov 84 14,000 Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay City of Ellijay, GA Jul 86 22,000 Rivers, Vicinity of Ellijay, GA Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS Ellisville, MS Jan 87 19,000 Springers Branch, MS Starkville, MS May 87 13,000 Dixie Creek, GA La Grange, GA Jun 87 15,000 Little Scooba Creek, MS Scooba, MS Jun 87 18,000 Fishpond Drain & Trib., GA Donalsonville, GA Dec 87 18,000 Dearmenville & Golden Springs, AL Anniston, AL Mar 88 9,000 Chickasawhay River, MS Quitman, MS Jun 89 19,000 Archusa Creek, MS Quitman, MS Jun 89 9,000 Leaf River, MS New Augusta, MS Sep 89 27,000 Shades Creek, AL Jefferson County, AL Sep 90 45,000 Leaf River, MS Taylorsville, MS Sep 91 25,000 Oostanaula River, GA City of Rome, GA Jan 92 10,000 Coosa River, GA City of Rome, GA Jul 92 10,000 Big Wills Creek, AL Fort Payne, AL Aug 93 41,800 Dry Creek, AL Oneonta, AL Dec 93 25,000 Turkey Creek, AL Jefferson County, AL Sep 91 7,000 Big Wills Creek, AL Valley Head, AL Nov 93 34,800 1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY 1965 thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports completed in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-44; and for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports, and see page 10-43 FY 1984 Annual Report for FY 1979 through FY 1984 reports. 10-57 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT * District comprises a portion of Louisiana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes (AHP), drainage area of Ouachita- Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. The New Orleans District territory encompasses 30,000 square miles. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (cont.) 1. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ....... 11-2 2. Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA ............... 11-2 3. Navigation work under special authorization ................. 11-3 Flood Control 4. Comite River, LA (Diversion) .......... 11-3 5. Grand Isle and vicinity, LA............. 11-4 6. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) ............. 11-4 7. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection) ................. 11-5 8. New Orleans to Venice, LA (hurricane protection) ................. 11-5 9. Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (hurricane protection) ................ 11-6 10. Inspection of completed flood control projects ...................... 11. Flood control work under special authorization ....................... Page .11-7 . 11-7 Tables Table 11-A Cost and Financial Statement................. 11-8 Table 11-B Authorizing Legislation...... 11-10 Table 11-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................... 11-13 Table 11-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ 11-15 Table 11-E Deauthorized Projects ....... 11-16 Table 11-F Active General Investigations.............. 11-17 11-1 Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 1. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and the territorial waters of the United States and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing IHNC lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340,11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1989 (57th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000- foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending easterly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of the existing lock to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. Estimated cost for new work (October 1993) is $584,000,000 Federal and $333,000,000 non- Federal. This does not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. The Federal cost excludes $45,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-4 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. A public facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at Mile 63. Two container ship berths are in operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work by hired labor: Engineering and economic studies continued for the new lock and connecting channels feature. Plans and specifications for foreshore protection along the south bank of the MRGO from Bayou Bienvenue to the intersection of the MRGO and GIWW were initiated. Three dredging contracts for removal of 11,520,000 cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of $8,490,000 were awarded in FY 94, and two contracts to maintain rock foreshore protection at a cost of $1,964,000 were awarded in FY 94. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958. The channel unit is 90 percent complete and the shiplock unit is 0 percent complete. The total project is 75 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. Approximately 3 miles of first- and second-lift stone jetties have been constructed on north side of channel and approximately 8.27 miles of first-lift and 7.34 miles of second-lift stone jetties have been constructed on south side of channel in Breton Sound. The foreshore protection, south bank, Chalmette Area, Station 367+00 to Station 1007+00 is complete. Principal work required to complete the new lock, raising and extending jetties as required and foreshore protection. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to the intersection of the MRGO and GIWW is in a deferred status. The portion between station 344+00 and Station 365+00 is scheduled for a Dec. 95 award.The site for the lock remained the major problem. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the Corps to look at both the IHNC and the Violet site. The Corps has established an Open Planning Process working directly with the local affected people at the IHNC site. The aim is to develop a comprehensive solution that will benefit both the neighborhoods and navigation interests. A Site in the Industrial Canal between Claiborne and Florida Avenues, north of the existing lock, has been tentatively identified as the location that could be the only "win-win" solution. All studies are being focused on this site. An Evaluation Report is scheduled for completion in FY 1996. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of Louisiana below Baton Rouge, and consists of the Mississippi River and its major outlet to the Gulf of Mexico, Southwest Pass. Existing project. Provides more efficient deepdraft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a.project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Estimated cost of existing project (Oct. 1, 1994) is $157,000,000 Federal and $377,000,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $1,200,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 11-2 and 11-3 of the FY 92 Annual Report. A third supplement to the LCA addressing the Permanent Saltwater Intrusion Mitigation Plan was executed on May 28, 1993. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the Government and the State of Louisiana was executed on Sep. 3, 1993 which provides for the dredging of a 45-foot channel from Mile 181 AHP to Baton Rouge. Terminal facilities. See Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. A supplemental design memorandum on the permanent saltwater intrusion mitigation plan was approved on Dec. 7, 1992. The permanent mitigation plan consists of the Government constructing an underwater sill, when needed, at Mile 64 AHP to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into water supplies of the metropolitan New Orleans area. The plan also provides for upgrading the Plaquemines Parish water distribution system to provide fresh water to water treatment plants impacted by increased saltwater intrusion caused by the deeper channel. A supplemental LCA for this work was executed on May 28, 1993. Construction of the upgraded Plaquemines Parish water distribution system under the direction of the local sponsor has begun. A Supplemental Design Memorandum covering deepening the navigation channel to 45-feet between Mile 181 AHP and Baton Rouge was approved on Aug. 10, 1993. The design memorandum provides for construction and maintenance of the deeper channel by dredging only. Originally, rock dikes were proposed for construction at four crossings to help reduce maintenance dredging. After being informed of the plan, the navigation industry opposed construction of the rock dikes. Their main concerns were safety and congestion caused by the dikes. Opposition was so great that the local sponsor withdrew support for the rock dike plan. A reanalysis of the project revealed that construction of the project was justified using dredging only and this plan has been approved. A PCA for this work was executed on Sep. 3, 1993. Construction of the 45-foot channel between mile 181 AHP and Baton Rouge began on Aug. 1, 1994, and will be completed by the end of December 1994. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 45-foot channel is completed from the Gulf to Mile 181.0 AHP. Construction of the permanent mitigation plan and the 45-foot dredging from Mile 181 AHP to Baton Rouge is underway. The local sponsor is coordinating with facility owners complete removal of pipelines and cables crossing the river between Mile 181 AHP and Baton Rouge. 3. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies costs as of Sep. 30, 1994, were North Pass Pass Manchac, LA, $111,136; Vermilion River, LA, $39,221; Bayou Teche above Mile 50 for $38,523; GIWW Alternate Route at Bayou Sorrel Lock for $42,259 and the Port of Iberia, $2,583. Flood Control 4. COMITE RIVER (DIVERSION), LA Location. In East Baton Rouge Parish, LA, between the Comite River and the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River, north of the town of Baker, LA, and south of the town of Zachary, LA. Existing project. The project will provide protection for residents of the Comite River Basin by reducing stages in the river below the diversion point for events up to the 100-year flood event,and containing within banks events up to the 10-year flood event. The authorized project consists of construction of an eight-mile diversion channel from the Comite River to an outfall into Lilly Bayou, and then a four-mile diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous to the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River. The project also includes a stage control structure in the Comite River at the diversion point, a diversion structure in the new channel near the diversion point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure near and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and four control structures at the intersections of Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous, the fourth near McHugh Road. A levee will be constructed of disposed material on the lower south bank of the new channel to assure against induced flooding on the south side, and a bike path for recreation is planned on the north side of the channel from U.S. Highway 67 to just west of LA State Highway 19 (about 3.25 miles). Mitigation for the project includes the planting of trees on cleared land near the diversion point and on portions of the disposal area, the protection and management of existing forested lands near the diversion point, and the acquisition of lands in an oxbow area of the Amite River between Denham Springs, LA and Port Vincent, LA, with construction of a weir to retain water on this land. Upgrading two gaging stations and installing six new gaging stations to assist in flood prediction is also included in the project. The current approved cost of the project is $87,600,000, including $43,800,000 Federal cost and $43,800,000 non-Federal cost. Local Cooperation. The cost sharing provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 require that local interests shall: (a) Provide to the Federal Government all lands, easements, rights-of-way, 11-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 and dredged material disposal areas, and perform the necessary relocations required for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project (Current estimate is $39,265,000); (b) Bear 50 percent of the first cost of recreation (Current estimate is $175,000); and (c) Provide to the Federal Government a cash contribution equal to 5 percent of the total cost of the project, excluding recreation (Current estimate is $4,360,000);. The total cost of items (a), (c) and (d) mentioned above is limited to 50 percent of the total cost of the project. Upon completion of the Feasibility Study, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development signed a letter of intent to sponsor the project. Operations and results during the fiscal year. In FY 94 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) efforts continued toward completion of the Design Memorandum. Condition as of Sep. 30. Significant design changes have occurred as a result of field investigations and the hydraulic modeling done at WES. The draft Design Memorandum incorporating those changes is scheduled to be issued in Feb. 1995. Flood Control 5. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of Southwest Pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune has a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet NGVD, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm slopes from an elevation of 8.5 feet NGVD at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet NGVD and, from this point, assumes its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 3,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1991) is $20,933,000 Federal and $12,567,000 non-Federal, including $7,157,484 contributed funds. The repair and restoration of Grand Isle were accomplished by two separate contracts. The jetty extensions and sand bar removal contract (partial fix), was completed in early 1988. The dune repair and structural reinforcement contract was physically completed Sep. 4, 1991. An O&M Manual has been approved. The project has been turned over to the State of Louisiana for operation and maintenance. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-4 of the FY 92 Annual Report. An additional $4,750,000 was deposited in escrow to complete restoration of the dune which was completed on Sep. 4, 1991. Condition as of Sep. 30. Two contracts have been awarded to repair damages caused by Hurricane Andrew. The first contract to restore the beach and dune was completed in March 1994. The second contract which involves construction of offshore breakwaters which reinforces the project at critical locations was awarded on Sept. 21, 1994, for $2,296,040, and is scheduled for completion in early 1995. 6. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the Gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides protection to the greater New Orleans area and other communities bordering Lake Pontchartrain from the effects of hurricanegenerated floods. The project is comprised of two major features: The Chalmette Area Plan and the High Level Plan. The Chalmette Area Plan consists of a levee and floodwall system around the Chalmette area and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, with connections to the Mississippi River levees. The High Level Plan provides for heightening and strengthening the existing hurricane protection levee systems in Orleans Parish and the east bank of Jefferson Parish, repairing and rehabilitating the Mandeville Seawall in St. Tammany Parish; building a new mainline hurricane levee on the east bank of the St. Charles Parish just north of U.S. Highway 61 (Airline Highway); raising and strengthening the existing levee which extends along the Jefferson- St. Charles Parish boundary between Lake Pontchartrain and Airline Highway; and deferring construction of the proposed Seabrook lock until its feasibility as a 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT feature of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet navigation project can be determined. Areas which will be enclosed by the levee and floodwall construction will be provided protection against tidal surge resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The estimated project cost for work (October 1994) is $515,000,000 Federal and $207,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-5 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor. Architect-Engineer Contractors, and the local sponsors. A change from the original Barrier Plan to the current high level plan was approved in February 1985 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. A draft mitigation report with corresponding EIS was prepared and distributed for public review on Mar. 16, 1988, and subsequently approved. The Louisiana Department of Natural Resources has agreed to fund the Local Sponsor's share of mitigation. Construction will start in June 1995. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 80 percent complete. In FY 95, we will initiate award of seven construction contracts, continue two ongoing construction contracts, complete eight construction contracts and initiate and complete one construction contract. In FY 96, we will initiate award for one construction contract, continue ongoing contracts and initiate and complete four construction contracts. 7. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point a la Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage. Estimated cost for new work (October 1994) is $79,100,000 Federal and $33,900,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-6 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract work continued on two contracts in FY 94 and will be completed in FY 95. Two contracts are scheduled for award in FY 1995. Planning, engineering, and design activities will continue in FY 96 for future construction work. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced in February 1972.and is 83 percent complete. 8. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from City Price to Tropical Bend, 15 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Tropical Bend to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and raising the river levee on the west bank (MR&T levee) from City Price to Venice, to a grade high enough to prevent overtopping by tidal surges from the east, generally called the West Bank River Plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Tropical Bend to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1994) is $166,000,000 Federal and $71,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $8,124,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $8,515,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $71,000,000, and cash contribution or equivalent work presently estimated at $54,362,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items. The local sponsor has requested that an area extending from the upstream limits of Reach A at City Price to St. Jude, Louisiana be incorporated into the project. This work involves upgrading 3.3 miles of existing non-Federal levees to project standards. The local sponsor has elected to pay all of the costs of this reach of levee. While the sponsor will not receive credit for these costs, the increased protected area would be eligible for Federally 11-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 subsidized flood insurance. Savings to the project achieved by a portion of levee no longer being required at the upstream end of Reach A, will be creditable to the local sponsor. A Post Authorization Change report was prepared for this reach and was approved by the Lower Mississippi Valley Division on Mar. 6, 1992. Supplemental assurances for the City Price to St. Jude reach were accepted on Feb. 18, 1993. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Government. Assurances for all reaches of the project have been furnished. Requirements are described in full on page 11-7 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction during FY 94 was initiated on one contract and continued on three others. Plans and specifications are underway on three constracts scheduled for award in FY 1995. Revisions began on the mitigation work required for the project. The mitigation plan developed for Reach B consists of the construction of five crevasses in the bank at Main Pass to promote marsh creation. One crevasse has been constructed and the four remaining crevasses are scheduled for construction during FY 95. A supplemental Mitigation Plan is being developed to readdress impacts on Reach A and also determine mitigation requirements for Reach C and the West Bank River levee. Approval of this supplemental plan is expected during FY 95. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 70 percent complete. 9. WESTWEGO TO HARVEY CANAL, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. The project includes the Urban area within Jefferson parish between Westwego and the Harvey Canal on the west bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, Louisiana. The project area is generally bounded by the Harvey Canal to the east, Lakes Cataouatche and Salvador to the west, the Mississippi River to the north, and Barataria Bay to the south. Existing project. The project will provide protection for the area between the City of Westwego and the Harvey Canal within Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, on the west bank of the Mississippi River. The plan of protection consists of about 22 miles of floodwalls and new and enlarged levees designed to protect against tidal floodwaters resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The SPH has a frequency of recurrence of once in about 500 years. The elevation of the SPH floodwalls and levees varies from 9 feet NGVD to 17 feet NGVD. The project plan includes mitigation which consists of the construction of a timber pile and tire breakwater on the west bank of Lake Cataouatche adjacent to the Salvador Wildlife Management Area and the acquisition and management of 1,024 acres of wooded wetlands. The estimated project cost (October 1994) is $95,800,000 ($61,800,000 Federal and $33,200,000 non- Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-8 of the FY 92 Annual Report. (2) Accomplish all necessary alteration and relocations to roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project. (The current estimate is $8,270,000.) (4) Bear 35 percent of the first cost of construction. (The current estimate is $33,200,000.) Funds provided by non-Federal interests for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as a part of the non-Federal contribution of the project pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and subsequent policies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed on the Company Canal Floodwall. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Project construction began in Feb 1991 and is 20 percent complete. Completion is scheduled in 2005. 10. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 1993. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $330,895. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1994 were $4,175,225. 11. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecendent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, fiscal year costs for the period were $191,237. Rehabilitation costs for FY 94 were $2,723,691 for Mandeville Seawall and $2,658,815 for Grand Isle and $300,000 for Wine Island. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies cost as of Sep. 30, 1994, Bayou Chevreuil and Grand Bayou, LA, at a cost of $5,323; 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Choctaw Bayou, LA, $598; Grand Isle, LA, $3,738; W14, Canal Basin, Slidell, LA, $10,634; W15, Canal Basin, Slidell, LA, $13,638; and Jean Lafitte, La (Fisher School Basin) $49,585; Little Chenier, Cameron, LA, 6,541; Vermilion River, Lafayette, LA, 976; and Yellow Bayou, Centerville, LA, $243. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies costs as of Sep. 30, 1994, on Parish Road 218, Mermentau River at Grand Chenier, LA, $2,118. Highway 16, Tangipahoa, $7,887, Highway 3066, Iberville, $7,977; Bayou des Glaises, Moreauville, LA, $11,772; Bayou Barataria, Jean Lafitte, $17,608; and Bayou Road, St. Bernard Parish, LA, $5,780. 11-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 1994 1. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Mississippi River Ship Channel-Gulf to Baton Rouge (Contrib. Funds) Comite River, LA (Diversion) 5. Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (Contrib. Funds) 6. Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 7. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane Protection) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,841,000 1,619,000 2,600,000 2,100,000 100,696,200 1,451,762 1,897,964 2,482,560 2,215,848 100,525,382 9,740,000 13,269,000 11,079,000 12,023,000 9,416,764 11,720,482 12,780,749 12,025,900 172,854,476 172,665,338 -- 1,240,4771 -- 1,196,4771 1,250,000 61,000 1,285,000 8,563,000 21,547,000 1,295,924 331,875 965,449 4,207,897 17,446,548 - 275,000 80,000 1,000,000 - 247,622 143,400 415,241 4,237,000 3,616,578 -- 10,740,776 -- 10,732,538 -- 900,000 1,355,641 2,255,641 - 726,962 1,405,498 2,132,460 3,257,000 3,162,024 3,116,000 2.754,182 0 319,518 0 185,990 0 74,557 0 -2,000 0 18,708,500 149,526 18,357,618 0 7,157,484 166 7,157,484 -4,989,000 9,852,000 19,160,000 28,619,000 8,979,174 11,257,484 13,102,927 22,279,917 302,849,000 289,476,692 505,000 1,200,000 1,214,537 2,179,000 8,314,337 269,246 2,351,488 745,084 6,160,572 2,644,000 747,000 1,455,000 2,565,000 66,003,000 2,991,299 1,102,724 1,299,629 2,302,671 65,550,024 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 1994 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - 500,000 129,000 629,000 Cost -- -- 500,000 129,000 629,000 8. New Orleans to New Work Venice, LA Approp. 17,682,000 14,006,000 2,842,000 1,062,000 133,235,000 (Hurricane Cost 19,822,229 15,250,568 2,775,423 1,719,241 132,706,543 Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 3,086,488 2,791,000 3,009,000 0 13,799,197 Cost 779,422 4,401,640 2,001,663 1,502,052 13,597,486 9. Westwego to New Work Harvey Canal, Approp. 3,341,000 723,000 2,961,000 6,264,000 16,424,000 LA (Hurricane Cost 2,119,975 1,974,712 2,705,253 2,333,189 12,094,129 Protection) 1. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 11-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Approp. Act of 1985, dated Jul. 2, 1986 (PL 99-88) LAKE CHARLES, LA The project for deepening of the project for navigation, Lake Charles, Louisiana, to a depth of 45 feet, at a total cost of $1,070,000. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River.from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, 'Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel, 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 1 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. The Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet feature is modified to provide that the replacement and expansion of the existing industrial canal lock and connecting channels or the construction of an additional lock and connecting channels shall be in the area of the existing lock or at the Violet site. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA (See Sec. 2 of Text) Will provide more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sees. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 11-10 TABLE 11-B (Continued) NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17,- 1986 (PL 99-662) Aug. 30, 1985 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Water Resources Development Act, 1992 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19762 Oct. 27, 1965 Formalizes the cost sharing provisions of the project, permits Water Resources the State of Louisiana to enact user fees to defray their Development Act of portion of the project costs, and implements harbor 1986, 99th Cong., maintenance fees to help pay for the Federal cost of the 2d sess. project. It also provides an option to the local sponsor to defer their initial payment for one year following initiation of construction. In terms of channel depths up to 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal for construction and 100 percent Federal for maintenance. For channels deeper than 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal for both construction and maintenance. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma H. Doc. 206, through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand 72d Cong., 1st sess. Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. BAYOU RIGOLETTE, LA A project to construct six additional floodgates at Bayou Public Law 99-662, Rigolette, LA, adjacent to the existing drainage structure, Nov. 17, 1986 at a total cost of $2,300,000. COMITE RIVER, LA (Diversion) (See Sec. 4 of Text) Construct an eight-mile diversion channel from the Comite H. Doc. 419, River to an outfall into Lilly Bayou, and then a four-mile 84th Cong diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous to the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River. Also included is a stage control structure in the Comite River at the diversion point, a diversion structure in the new channel near the diversion point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure near and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and three control structures at the intersections of Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 5 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and H. Doc. 639, vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf 94th Cong., 2d sess. shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 6 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent H. Doc. 231, units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the 89th Cong., 1st sess. Chalmette Area plan. 11-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994. TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, NORTH SHORE, LA The project for navigation, Lake Pontchartrain North Shore, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 14, 1979, at a total cost of $1,310,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $655,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $655,000. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 7 of Text) A loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee and three gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. The Franklin Area reparable element is currently under review for deauthorization in accordance with WRDA 1990. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 8 of Text) Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. WEST BANK HURRICANE PROTECTION LEVEE, JEFFERSON PARISH, LA, Westwego to Havery Canal (See Sec. 9 of Text) Structural and nonstructural measures to prevent flood damage to those areas identified in the Feb. 1984 draft Environmental Impact Statement for the West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA, at a total cost of $61,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $40,000,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $21,500,000. Funds provided by non-Federal interest for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non- Federal contribution of the project pursuant to Section 104 of this Act. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 167, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Stattus Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge1 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Barataria Bay Waterway, LA Bayou Bonfouca, LA Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA ' 3'4 , Bayou Dupre, LA Bayou Lacombe, LA Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA Bayou Teche, LA Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA Bayou Terrebonne, LA3'7 Bayou Vermilion, LA3 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA Calcasieu River and Pass, LA Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA8 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA9 Cane River, LA2'5 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA10 Freshwater Bayou, LA Grand Bayou Pass, LA Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, & Mexican Border Houma Navigation Canal, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA"'1 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA12 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA3 Leland Bowman Lock, LA Little Caillou Bayou, LA Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Mermentau River, LA Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete 1967 1978 1984 1984 1981 1984 1974 1887 1968 1967 1984 1970 1950 1970 1958 1984 1983 1961 1947 1936 1984 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1984 1950 1985 1984 1960 1956 1950 1987 1973 1977 1985 28,234 16,962,246 30,356,691 501,963 1,572,685 30,997 5,000 38,915 4,716 1,624,424 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 754,330 2,891,822 120,089 34,900 27,830,835 1,015,81410 5,856,200 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,116,224 7,676 69,087 92,126,907 25,245,217 320,758 1914 Nov. 1963 1931 104,187 119,191 2,172,982 223,616 36,780 28,315 654,956 8,438,262 1,777,664 251,691 200,169 37,169 141,016,547 2,000 463,401 452,611 27,047,853 14,48010 May 1956 1915 Mar. 1923 Mar. 1957 1916 1896 2 Oct. 1968 Apr. 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 1959 Dec. 1914 Aug. 1968 1939 63,284,470 467,281,529 -- 26,237,308 249,052 32,200,010 77,761 5,197,97514 4,672,579 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 114,519 29,891,074 -- Mar. 1985 1929 Jul. 1952 Jul. 1952 11-13 1928 1939 1938 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 11-C. (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For. Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Mississippi River Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA - 1991 84,568,12816 802,267,20717 -- Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA Complete 1976 2,499,555 911,252 Nov. 1974 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA Complete 1986 10,014,012 23,560,931 Complete Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA)15 - 1957 - 139,755 - Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1950 79,845 124,681 1912 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Complete 1981 -- 1,453,172 Nov. 1980 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA 1984 -- 36,111,289 Sulphur River, AR and TX2'5 - 1919 45,989 -- - Tangipahoa River, LA - 1985 -- 1,281,054 -- Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA3 Complete 1973 8,115 92,163 1921 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA11 - 1948 10,904 0,742 -- Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 1,514,635 Jun. 1950 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA Complete 1990 641,608 1,766,585 Aug. 1964 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. Includes previous project costs. No commerce reported. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, LA." Not completed; superseded for most of it length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides with or parallels it. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. Work is under continuing authority. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 11-D Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Amite River and Tributaries, LA 1964 3,034,2551 -- Feb. 1964 Bayou Choupique, LA2 1954 129,930 -- Mar. 1954 Bayou Rapides, LA2 1952 95,179 -- Dec. 1951 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA 1979 1,018,005 Morgan City and Vicinity, LA 1992 1,975,628 1. In addition,. the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ...................... $ 430 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA .......... 425,209 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended) 11-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 11-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for Authority Expended Expended Baton Rouge Harbor 1946 Nov. 2, 1979 --.. Segment Between Section 12, Mi 2.5 and 5.0 Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74) Bayou Grosse Tete, 1969 May 6, 1981 -- -- LA DAEN-CWP-A Letter Subj: Completed Action on 5th Deauthorization Rpt, dated Jun. 17, 1981 Lake Borgne and 1942 Nov 1979 -- -- Chef Menteur Bulkheads and Jetties Vinton Waterway, LA 1950 Nov. 2, 1979 Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA of 1974) 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 94 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation(110) Intracoastal Waterway Locks, LA-81289 Bayou Lafourche & Lafourche-Jump Waterway, LA-10009 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, St. Bernard Parish, LA (Bank Erosion)-10241 Lake Charles Ship Channel (By Pass and General Anchorage Area) LA-99298 Flood Control Studies(120) Amite River & Tributaries, LA-50100 Jefferson-Orleans Parishes Urban Flood Control, LA-12863 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Land Loss & Marsh Creation-12348 Mermentau, Vermilion & Calcasieu Rivers & Bayou Teche, LA-34014 West Bank of Mississippi River-Vicinity of New Orleans, LA-59360 Lafayette Parish, LA Flood Control-13251 Orleans Parish, LA-13237 Jefferson Parish, LA-13236 Special Studies(140) Louisiana Coastal Wetlands(140) Environmental Services Partnerships-14190 Miscellaneous Activities(170) Special Investigations-17250 Interagency Water Resources Development-14713 National Estuary Program-53903 National Marine Fisheries Service-53906 North American Waterfowl Management-53904 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies( 180) Planning Assistance to States(186)-14822 Planning Assistance to States, LA Louisiana Flood Damage-22001 Wastewater Facilities Database-22003 Livingston Parish-Emergency Response-22005 Lake Pontchartrain Wetland Demo-22006 E. Baton Rouge Parish Digitized Mapping-22007 St. Benard Parish Digitized Mapping-22008 Groundwater Aquifier Survey & Surface Water Influence Analysis-22009 Multi-Use Transportation Corr-22010 Jefferson Parish Bicycle Transportation Corridor Study-22011 E. Baton Rouge Parish Structural Acquisition & Relocation Study-22012 E. Baton Rouge Parish Drainage Maintenance & Construction Program-22013 Baker Canal & Tributaries Erosion Study-22014 Bayou Lafourche Water Management-22015 DHH Ground/Surface Water Database-22016 Marsh Restoration - Barataria Unit-22017 $ 481,149 36,931 86,084 208,093 812,257 109,861 86,016 1,443 7,190 406,351 179,131 2,971 287,135 1,080,098 0 122,867 122,867 37,174 35,235 5,288 2,742 7,252 87,691 23,405 48 267 547 2,307 23 47 32 811 29,428 17,631 900 54,826 99,801 4,623 12,559 11-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 11-F (Continued) ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 94 Categories Louisiana State Hazard Mitigation Plan-22019 St. Bernard Digitized Mapping-22020 Flood Warning/Preparation Regional Plan-22021 Stephenville Fish and Wildlife-22022 TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services(250) Flood Plain Management-82030 Quick Responses-82045 Flood Plain Management Services-82040 Cankton, LA - 83006 South East Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation - 83001 Special Studies Computer Automation of Flood Hazard Data - 83005 Folsom, LA-83007 Killian, LA-83008 TOTAL (Category 200) PROJECTS NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION (Category 400) Bayou Lafourche and Rafourche Jump Waterway, LA-(421) 10009 Flood Control Projects (450) Comite River, LA-77059 TOTAL (Category 400) ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Flood Control Projects (650) Comite River, LA-77059 TOTAL (Category 600) $ 2,377,083 24,114 7,007 91,264 371 11,468 6,049 39,950 16,583 196,806 $ 5,995 $ 9,148 $ 1,405,498 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $3,988,535 11-18 16,612 5,322 4,419 561 274,169 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT * This district comprises western and central Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi-Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, AR; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas-Arkansas state line. The Vicksburg District territory encompasses 68,000 square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (cont.) 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR........................ 12-2 2. Red River emergency bank protection ........................... 12-2 3. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La................ 12-3 4. Navigation work under special authorization ........................ 12-3 Flood Control 5. Aloha Rigolette, LA................. 12-3 6. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ......................... 12-4 7. Canal 43,AR ....................... 12-5 8. Chauvin Bayou, LA ................... 12-5 9. Ouachita River Levees, LA ............. 12-5 10. Ouachita River and tributaries AR and LA ........................... 12-5 11. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA .......... 12-6 12. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA ......................... 12-7 13. Porter Bayou, MS .................... 12-7 14. Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg Dist.) ..................... 12-7 15. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (Vicksburg District) ... 12-8 16. Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR ................... 12-8 Page 17. Inspection of completed Flood Control Projects ...................... 12-8 18. Flood control work under special authorization ................. 12-9 Tables Table 12-A Table 12-B Table 12-C Table 12-D Table 12-E Table 12-F Table 12-G Table 12-H Table 12-I Table 12-4 Cost and Financial Statement................. Authorizing Legislation...... Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA (9-Foot Project), Locks and Dams............ Other Authorized Navigation Project................... Ouachita River and Tributaries Existing Project...... . Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) New Projects ............. Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) Incorporated Projects........ Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ Deauthorized Projects ....... Active General Investigations.............. 12-10 12-12 12-15 . 12-16 12-18 12-19 12-20 12-21 12-23 12-24 12-1 Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of the old 6.5-foot navigation project. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR. Authorized features for the modified project include four new locks and dams, in-river construction dredging to achieve a 9-foot navigation channel depth, and channel realignment. All 4 locks and dams are complete and in operation and initial channel dredging is complete providing 9-foot navigation depth. Remaining work consists of realignment of 25 restricted bendway sites between river miles 195 at Sterlington, LA, and river mile 335 at Camden, AR, on the Ouachita River. With these improvements in place the river system will be navigable by a four-barge tow (two abreast) to Crossett, AR, river mile 237, and a two-barge tow (abreast) to Camden, AR. Mitigation features include the 65,000-acre Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge in Arkansas, the 18,000-acre D'Arbonne National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana, a series of recreation facilities along the waterway, and improvements to Catahoula Lake to preserve it for migratory waterfowl. Estimated total cost for the nine-foot navigation project is $278,130,000, which includes $261,000,000 Federal costs and $17,130,000 non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to furnish the construction rights-of-way for the realignment work. Seven of the 25 sites are within the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge and are already owned by the Federal Government. However, there have been no indications that the land for the remaining 18 sites will be forthcoming because of strong opposition to the realignment work by local environmental groups. The six remaining recreation facilities are unscheduled at this time due to the lack of required cost sharing agreements. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossett, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR, Two grain-handling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, and a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was performed in FY 94 by the Dredges Armadillo and Butcher. In the Arkansas portion of the project, 1,086,920 cubic yards was removed, and 197,346 cubic yards was removed on the Black River below Jonesville. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 92 percent complete and provides limited navigation as far north as Camden, AR. All four locks and dams associated with the project are complete and in operation. Design and construction of the remaining features is on hold pending a consensus between the states of Arkansas and Louisiana concerning the type of development desired or the additional studies needed to reach a decision. 2. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, AR. Existing project. Provides for realigning the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for this work (October 1994) is $94,262,000 Federal and $2,182,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $7,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and specifications, surveys, and general engineering. Brown Realignment and Flood Damage Repair at various locations in Arkansas were completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 99 percent complete. 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 3. RED RIVER WATERWAY-PROJECT Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA Reach Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. Existing project. Provide a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development will include five locks and dams, realignment and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide and acquisition of wildlife mitigation lands opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development and acquisition of wildlife mitigation lands are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work is $1,726,788,000 Federal and $96,425,000 non-Federal, including $50,237,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost includes $351,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 80. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana. These were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and the Red River Waterway Commission for the acquisition of mitigation lands in the vicinity of Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area was executed on Jun. 16, 1993. Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. The Corps entered into an agreement with the City of Alexandria, LA, whereby material excavated from the Philip Bayou Realignment could be used as fill for port construction at mile 109. Construction of the realignment and port fill are complete. Construction of the Caddo - Bossier port by local interests is underway. Operations and results during fiscal year. The following contracts were initiated in FY 94: Pool 1- Lower 31 miles Flood Damage Repair; Pool 3 - Grappe Ph. II Capout, L&D 3 Channel Repair, L&D 4 D/SACS Ph. I, USS Eastport/Dix; Pool 4 - Piermont, Westdale, & L&D 4 U/S Dikes Howard Capouts; Pool 5 - Sunny Point Capout, L&D 5 D/S ACS; Wells Island Road Revetment, Levee Berms. The following contracts were completed in FY 94: Pool 2 - Boyce Ph. I Recreation, L&A Alexandria Grading & Drainage; Pool 3 - Grappe Ph. II, and Socot Ph. II capouts, Levee Berms St. Maurice Ph. I Recreation, Tow Boat; Pool 4- Howard Capout, Westdale Realignment; Pool 5- McDade, Moss, Cecile, Curtis, Eagle Bend Ph. II, and Wells Island Road Revetments, Sunny Point Dikes, Levee Berms. The following contracts continued in FY 94: Pool 2 - L&A Railroad Bridge Relocation; Pool 4 - Lock and Dam No. 4, Ph. II; Pool 5 - Lock and Dam No. 5, Ph. II, Elm Grove Revetment, Eagle Bend Revetment. In addition, acquisition of mitigation lands in the Loggy Bayou area was continued. Maintenance dredging was performed by the Contract Dredge Butcher, during Fiscal Year 1994. All maintenance dredging was below Alexandria, LA. 1,823,173 cubic yards of material was removed from the channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 87 percent complete. A Reevaluation Study of the Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX, reach was completed in December 1992. Studies did not indicate economic feasibility. Project has been placed in an inactive category. A Reconnaissance Study was initiated in FY 94 to determine the feasibility of extending navigation on the Red River from the vicinity of Shreveport, LA to the vicinity of Index, AR, or to any justifiable interim point. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended. No activity for FY 94. Flood Control 5. Aloha Rigolette, LA Location. The project is located in north-central Louisiana between the towns of Winnfield and Pineville on the left descending bank of the Red River. Authorized Project. The recommended plan consists of a three-barrel floodgate structure installed at the mouth of Bayou Darrow to reopen it to the Red River, 8.2 miles of clearing and snagging of Bayou Darrow from its 12-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 mouth upstream, construction of a closure and low-flow structure on Bayou Rigolette just below its junction with Bayou Darrow, and realignment of Sam's Bayou and appropriate mitigation features. Local Cooperation. The City of Colfax, LA, has agreed to cost share this project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on Sept. 19, 1994. Operations And Results During Fiscal Year. Completed work on plans and specification for the first and second items of work. Initiated work on plans and specifications for Items 3 and 4. Condition as of Sep. 30. continuing. Design work is 6. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. In east bank flood plain of Red River. Bayou Bodcau rises in vicinity of Hope, AR, and flows southerly through Bayou Bodcau Reservoir and Bodcau Lake to join Cypress Bayou and form Red Chute Bayou, continues through Red Chute Bayou, Flat River, and Loggy Bayou to Red River, about 40 miles below Shreveport, LA. Authorized project. Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee: Extend existing levee from about 8 miles southeast of Benton, LA, proceeding southerly to junction of Cross and Red Chute Bayous, and then parallel to Red Chute Bayou on the right descending bank to its junction with CutoffBayou for a total distance of approximately 25 miles; construct landside drainage channel and several culverts with flap gates to Red Chute Bayou; construct approximately 5 miles of levee on left descending bank of Red Chute Bayou extending south from Louisiana Highway 612, and relocate utility lines as needed. Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee: Extend from lower end of existing Red River levee in vicinity of Ninock, LA, along high (left descending) bank of Red River to a point on right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, about 1 mile above its mouth, thence generally along right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, Red Chute, CutoffBayou, and Flat River to Taylortown to tie into existing Red River levee; close Flat River near its junction with Cutoff Bayou and install one 36-inch round corrugated metal pipe with automatic flap gate to drain isolated pockets and provide uninterrupted drainage; construct drainage structures on Flat River near its junction with Red Chute Bayou and along alignment of the Loggy Bayou in the vicinity of Grassy Lake; and make necessary utility relocations. Flat River channel improvement: Enlarge to average bottom width of 50 feet with flat side slopes and deepen by 2 to 6 feet from the confluence with Cutoff Bayou to junction with Cooper Bayou, 11.6 miles, including required relocations and modifications of utilities. The subject project was one of the Water Resources projects reviewed in March 1977 in accordance with the President request. As a result of this review, the President recommended that project construction be halted and the project be deauthorized. Congress subsequently directed the Corps to take the following two actions: Construct levees on Red Chute Bayou below Cutoff Bayou that are required to prevent induced flood damage that would otherwise result from the abandonment of partly completed project. Initiate studies to determine if modifications to the authorized project would permit its completion in a form consistent with the current executive policy. Engineering and design work for the induced flood prevention plan below Cutoff Bayou and project modification studies were being conducted when President Reagan signed, on Dec. 4, 1981, the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill of 1982, which contained language that "reconfirmed without further study and analysis" the plan for flood control for the project as approved by the Flood Control Act of 1965. Resumption of construction was scheduled to begin in 1984. The project sponsor, however, requested that construction be delayed while a reevaluation of the project was made. The reevaluation study has been completed. A summary of study results was submitted in January 1987 which recommended no further Federal action. The Lower Mississippi Valley Division approved the report and a notice of study termination was disseminated in June 1987. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-24 and 11-25, Annual Report for FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Red Chute Bayou Levee crevassed during the May-June 1991 flooding and was repaired under contract with PL 84-99 funding. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1974 and is 17 percent complete. Reconnaissance Studies of Flood Control Alternatives along Red Chute Bayou were initiated in November 1991, as part of the Bossier Parish, LA, study. Reconnaissance phase studies, completed in May 1993, recommended that the study effort not progress into the feasibility phase since none of the alternative plans were found to be economically justified. No further investigations are planned at this time. 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 7. CANAL 43, AR Location. Canal 43 drains into Lake Chicot and is located in Lincoln and Desha Counties, Ar. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for enlarging the channel beginning approximately 1500 feet downstream of State Highway 165 and extending approximately 11.2 miles upstream; and provides a 1-year frequency protection to adjacent agricultural lands. Total estimated Federal cost is $878,000. Local cooperation. The Cummins Drainage District has provided the necessary rights-of-way for project construction plus cash requirements totaling five percent of the total project costs. In addition, the drainage district is accomplishing all required relocations. Operation and maintenance of the channel features have been turned over to Cummins Drainage District. Condition as of Sep 30. The construction contract was awarded Sep. 12, 1989, and construction was essentially completed on Aug. 17, 1990. 8. CHAUVIN BAYOU, LA Location. The Chauvin Bayou area is located immediately north of the city of Monroe, Louisiana. It is bounded on the west by the Ouachita River, on the north by Bayou Bartholomew, and on the east by Bayou DeSiard. Existing Project. The plan of improvement consists of a 250-cfs pumping plant located adjacent to Chauvin Bayou at the Ouachita River levee and a water control structure in Canal L-11. The project will provide the Chauvin Bayou area with improved flood protection. The total estimated Federal cost of the project is $4,248,000. Local cooperation. The city of Monroe, Louisiana, and the Ouachita Parish Police Jury are the local sponsors for the project. They are providing the necessary rights-of-way and relocations for project construction plus cash requirements totaling twenty-five percent of the total project costs. In addition, they will operate and maintain the project upon completion. Condition as of Sep 30. The construction contract for the Canal L-11 control structure was awarded Jun. 29, 1991 and is physically complete. The construction contract for the pumping plant was awarded in November 1991 and is complete. Both structures have been transferred to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance. 9. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA Location. East bank of Ouachita River. between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, .Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project. There are 105.8 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A Summary Report authorized gravel surfacing 117.4 miles of levee, and enlarging 36.6 miles of levee. In addition, Congress added $2,500,000 in FY 94 for design and construction of bank stabilization work to protect the levee around Columbia, LA. Estimated Federal cost if $29,500,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $5,404,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. A supplemental agreement for the Bawcomville segment was executed in FY 90. The 1991 Water and Energy Appropriations Act gave the Federal government responsibility for the repair and/or replacement of the deteriorated drainage structures. The Assurances Agreement for Local Cooperation was supplemented to reflect this change in responsibility. The supplemental agreement covered work performed in Fiscal Years 1992, and 1994. This agreement will be further supplemented to cover the work to be performed in Fiscal Year 1995. Condition as of Sep. 30. Item 1 of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed Jul. 7, 1978. Additional work was deferred pending results of a comprehensive study of the entire Ouachita River Levee System. A summary report indicating that it is economically feasible to raise portions of the existing levee to authorized grade and that complete rehabilitation of the levee system is necessary was approved by LMVD on Oct. 1, 1986. The study results were disseminated to the project sponsor and interested parties in October 1986. The Project was reclassified as an active project on May 7, 1987. The final summary report was sent to the Office of the Chief of Engineers in July 1988 and design was initiated on the Bawcomville segment of the Ouachita River levees. A construction contract for the Bawcomville levee enlargement was awarded in FY 90, and is complete. In FY 93, we lined six deteriorated culverts, replaced four deteriorated drainage structures, and replaced the headwalls and gates at three drainage structures. We also awarded contracts to line 4 deteriorated drainage structures. 10. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and 12-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-E. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to include 10 waterretention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and 6 local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, De- Gray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports in 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-E. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual reports in 1985 report. The Hot Springs, AR, Feasibility Study continues withthe City of Hot Springs (the Local Sponsor) and the National Park Service to investigate flood control improvements in downtown Hot Springs. Reconnaissance studies of flooding problems in Ouachita Parish, LA, were initiated in January 1994. Study efforts are concentrating on the developing urban area around Montor, LA. The reconnaissance phase is scheduled for completion in March 1995. Planning and design for the Youngs Bayou Project are still on hold due to the Sponsor's inability to participate in the project. 11. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA Location. The basin comprises most of the Southcentral portion of Mississippi and a small part of southeast Louisiana. The Pearl River begins in Neshoba County, MS, and flows southwesterly 113 miles to the vicinity of Jackson, MS, then southeasterly 233 miles to the vicinity of Bogalusa, LA. At that point, the Pearl River splits into the East and West Pearl Rivers, and flows southerly 44 and 48 miles, respectively, before entering the Rigolets and Lake Borgne. Existing projects. The Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project provides for improvements of the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project includes two levee systems totaling 13.1 miles in length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, and 5.34 miles of channel rectification including three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the Pearl River. This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of Jul. 14, 1960. Construction began in July 1964 and work was completed in FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was $7,190,200. The FY 83 Jobs Bill authorized extension of the Jackson-East Jackson West Bank levee system along the Fortification Street I-55 exit. This extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. Public Law 98-63, dated Jul. 29, 1983, authorized the vicinity of Jackson project. This authority provided for additional measures to prevent recurring flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson and included 3.3 miles of floodway clearing and enlarging the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge. This work has been completed. Mitigation lands for the clearing were purchased by the local sponsor in May 1985 and the Corps has reimbursed the local sponsor to cover the cost of these lands. Total Federal cost of this project is $1,800,000. Authorized projects. Public Law 99-88, dated Aug. 15,1985, authorized planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system in Slidell, LA, to protect 3,265 residential and commercial structures from floods in the West Pearl. Public Law 99-662, dated Nov. 17, 1986, authorized construction of Shoccoe Dam and various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, MS. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 12-6 of the FY 92 report. Condition as of Sep. 30. An overall basin study is essentially complete, except for alternative studies to Shoccoe Dry Dam as discussed below. Flood control feasibility studies for Jackson, MS, recommending Shoccoe Dam, and for Slidell, LA, recommending a 15-mile levee system, have been completed. Detailed engineering and design studies were on hold for the Slidell levee system, due to the failure of a local funding referendum. The local sponsor is now seeking alternative funding sources. As a result of upstream opposition, Shoccoe Dam is not implementable. In response to a request by the local sponsor, the Pearl River Basin Development District, reconnaissance studies to evaluate alternatives to Shoccoe for flood damage reduction in the Jackson Metropolitan Area have been completed and a potentially feasible levee plan identified. A Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement was signed with the Local Sponsor on Sep. 25, 1991, and feasibility studies are proceeding. The feasibility studies are focusing on a comprehensive levee system and are scheduled for completion in September 1995. Studies of various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, Columbia and Picayune, 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT MS; Bogalusa, LA, and the Bogue Chitto Subbasin have been completed. None were found economically feasible. Navigation studies have been conducted on the East and West Pearl Rivers. Results of these studies indicate that maintenance necessary to reopen the existing West Pearl River navigation project is economically justified. The final EIS was filed with EPA in March 1994. Studies indicate that the West Pearl River Navigation Project is economically justified, engineeringly feasible, and in the overall public interest. Maintenance dredging is scheduled to resume in April 1995. Studies also indicate that the East Pearl River does not have sufficient existing flows to support a 7- to 9-foot-deep navigation channel. The navigation study for Port Bienville, MS, has been terminated due to withdrawal of the Hancock County Port and Harbor Commission as local sponsor. Reconnaissance studies of flow distribution between the West Pearl River and the East Pearl River (boundary between the States of Louisiana and Mississippi) in the Lower Basin have been completed. A water resources development plan for flow redistribution in the Lower Basin was found economically feasible. However, the primary benefit of the plan would accrue to recreation. Reconnaissance studies did not find any problem that would be solved by a Federal project, given the current policies and priorities of the Administration. A Section 1135 study was initiated in FY 94 to investigate low flow conditions in the Walkiah Bluff area. Reconnaissance studies of flood damage prevention and erosion control along Caney Creek in Jackson, MS, have been completed. These studies indicated that flood damages attributable to headwater flooding from Caney Creek are relatively insignificant and will not economically justify a water resource improvement plan under current conditions. Studies also found that most of the more serious streambank erosion problems along the creek have been corrected through actions undertaken by other public entities and agencies. 12. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of the State of Louisiana and consists of the area bounded by the West Pearl River on the east, Interstate 10 on the west, and Lake Pontchartrain on the south. Authorized project. The project is broken into two segments of levees. The segment north of 1-10 will consist of 4.0 miles of levee, a pumping station, a floodgate structure, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area north of I-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River. The segment south of I-10 will consist of 9.0 miles of levees, three pumping stations, floodgates, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area south of I-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River and provides the same level of protection against hurricane surges. These two levee segments total 13 miles of levee and would protect some 3,029 homes. Estimated Federal cost is $29,867,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $9,956,000. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, St. Tammany Levee Board, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), in an agreement consistent with the Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act Public Law 99-88) and Senate Report 1567, signed the Local Cooperation Agreement Jun. 30, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed resolution of comments to the General Design Memorandum for the north levee only. Condition as of Sep. 30. Completed resolution of comments on the General Design Memorandum for north levee only. Preparation of plans and specifications is on hold pending identification of a source of funding for the project by locals. No construction has taken place. 13. PORTER BAYOU, MS Location. Porter Bayou is located in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS. It lies approximately 25 miles east of the Mississippi River, is approximately 5 miles south of Cleveland, MS, and runs through the town of Shaw, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement called for selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3. This plan provides a 0.5-year frequency protection for the Porter Bayou area. All construction was performed from one side of the stream, leaving the other side undisturbed. The total estimated Federal cost of the project is $860,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 2.55-mile reach which contained a growth of aquatic weed was successfully treated in FY 93 and this one remaining portion of the project was turned over to the local sponsor for operation and maintenance on Sep. 30, 1993. 14. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River" - 1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below 12-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. (See Table 12-H for new projects and Table 12-I for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 15. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, AR, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA. on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide ~f flood approximately 20 percent greater than the tlood or 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1994) is $83,069,000 Federal and $5,391,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. Construction of the Twelve-Mile Bayou Revetment Capout was completed and rehabilitation of Levee item No. 1 in Arkansas was initiated. A report on rehabilitation of the levee system within Arkansas was submitted to higher authority for approval. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the levee and bank stabilization are complete with the exception of levee rehabilitation within the state of Arkansas. 16. RED RIVER WATERWAY SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red River between Shreveport, LA, and Index, AR. Existing project. To provide for realigning the channels of Red River from Shreveport, LA, to the levee system near Index, AR, by means of dredging, cutoffs, and training works and for stabilizing its banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1989) is $249,000,000 Federal and $29,073,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on pages 12-10 and 12-11 of Fiscal Year 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. The reevaluation study was completed in January 1991. The study investigated the feasibility of providing bank stabilization and recreation features in the Shreveport to Index reach of the Red River Waterway Project. None of the solutions were found to be economically feasible. No further studies are planned at this time. 17. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $227,329 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1994, is $3,710,005. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) Total FY costs for emergency bank protection work was $446,916. This included work on Highway 119, Derry, LA, $154,403: Highway 495, Natchitoches Parish, LA, $154,307; and Culley-Brashear Ditch, Madison County, MS, $25,121. U.S. Highway 65, East Carroll Parish, LA, $47,217. Hwy 80 Clear Creek, $32,109; and Dillons Bridge Bogue Chitto, $33,759. 12-8 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Boeuf-Tensas Basin, $63,840; Black Pon Slough $28,878; and Cocodrie Bayou, LA, $1,895. Project modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During the FY, $3,863 was expended on initial appraisals; $17,642 on Lake Whittington Weir, MS; and $35,122 on Narrows Dam, Lake Greeson, AR. 18. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) FY 94 costs for the period were $370,513 for disaster preparedness, and $50,455 for emergency operations. Total Public Law 99 cost during FY 94 was $420,967. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) No activity during the period. 12-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 1994 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (6.5-foot navigation project) Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (9-foot navigation project) 2. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 3. Red River Waterway Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) 5. Aloha- Rigolette, LA 6. Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, AR and LA Canal 43, AR (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $ 5,248,6191 5,248,6191 -830,000 100,000 +874,028 195,727 0 27,291 605,000 230,579,251 75,503 229,546,059 4,947,900 5,322,000 4,707,000 6,617,598 110,203,103 5,047,000 5,341,565 4,671,819 6,426,981 109,724,069 4,100,000 7,300,000 2,336,140 4,211,400 0 3,500,000 46,408,000 7,168,247 586,791 42,957,535 6,825 6,825 92,636,000 123,681,000 146,625,000 145,000,000 1,228,731,000 91,320,805 135,607,493 159,131,906 124,656,309 1,201,526,413 4,449,100 6,221,000 5,689,000 6,189,000 45,087,791 8,294,163 5,423,654 5,985,700 6,650,038 44,441,091 414,424 493,480 21,716 406,231 -- 237,736 0 3,802,475 30,558 3,617,686 400,000 399,000 301,000 450,000 2,081,000 565,065 393,637 264,174 342,951 1,930,727 372,000 281,000 317,962 400,856 235,979 351,344 19,191 0O 1,402 .0 348 0 25 -14,000 7,574 0 80 1,038,000 1,037,952 1,601,962 1,360,244 878,000 877,900 32,553 12-10 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 1994 Chauvin Bayou Ouachita River Levees, LA 10. Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson, MS 11. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA 12. Porter Bayou, MS 14. Red River below Denison Dam Levees and Bank Stabilization New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,301,000 700,000 987,000 187,560 1,721,264 1,066,450 0 4,248,000 30,633 4,245,863 388,000 2,429,758 4,400,000 6,300,000 17,568,758 612,070 628,042 1,928,358 3,679,603 10,148,563 2,080,000 215 2,079,999 - 480,000 395,000 231,000 1,203,500 -- 390,516 342,372 333,596 1,066,484 659,000 100,000 150,000 562,336 193,639 40,250 0 555,000 0 3,606,000 77,520 3,566,959 14,000 19,052 1,049,278 1,049,278 3,561,000 2,300,000 1,356,000 3,500,000 71,961,000 89,171 3,408,656 2,821,865 1,250,675 68,790,092 (Vicksburg District) 15. Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR New Work Approp. Cost 1,010,0003 855,4973 1. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,854,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 3. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 12-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 30, 1948 Nov. 17,1986 OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 1 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Section 2 of Text). Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. ALOHA-RIGOLETTE AREA, LA (See Section 5 of Text) BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 6 of Text) Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. CANAL 43, AR (See Section 7 of Text) Channel enlargement CANEY CREEK, MS Authorizes construction of such bank stabilization measures for Caney Creek in the vicinity of Jackson, MS, between McDowell Road and Raymond Road as the Secretary determines necessary for flood damage prevention and erosion control along approximately 3,000 feet of the creek. 12-12 S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st seas. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101- 101 Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st seas. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1988. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 30, 1948 as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 13, 1983 Jul. 29, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 CHAUVIN BAYOU, LA (See Section 8 of Text) Construction of a 250-cfs pumping plant located adjacent to Chauvin Bayou at the Ouachita River levee and a water control structure in Canal L-11. LEAD BAYOU, MS Channel enlargement. MONROE AND WEST MONROE, LA, AND OUACH1TA PARISH, LA Authorizes such structural and nonstructural measures as the Secretary deems feasible to prevent flood damage to the cities of Monroe and West Monroe, LA, and Ouachita . Parish, LA. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 10 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl River, vicinity of Jackson, MS Accomplish the clearing and channel improvements at Hwy 25 bridge on the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS Planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system for Slidell, LA, pending binding cost-sharing arrangements acceptable to the Secretary of the Army or under terms and conditions provided in subsequent legislation when enacted into law. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers Feb. 6, 1990. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 441, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 153, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 98-63, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-88, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 12-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 12-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Authorizes the Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, MS, for the construction of the Shoccoe Dam plus upstream flood control measures at east-central Leake County, south part of Carthage, MS, Highway 35 vicinity, upstream reservoirs on the Pearl River and upstream channels on the Pearl River and elsewhere in Leake County. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA (See Section 12 of Text) Authorizes flood control improvements for Pearl River Basin, St. Tammany, LA, subject to a favorable Chiefs report and approval by the Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. PORTER BAYOU, MS (See Section 13 of Text) Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS, from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3 RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA (See Section 14 of Text) Water Resources Development of 1986 authorized for construction the project for mitigation of wildlife losses, Red River Waterway, LA, which may include all or such portion of any land adjacent to the Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area. Water Resources Development Act of 1990 modified the mitigation project to authorize the Secretary to acquire an additional 12,000 acres adjacent to or close to the Bayou Bodcau Wildlife Management Area. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See Section 15 of Text) Levee and bank stabilization. Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River from Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. Public Law 99-662, 99th. Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101-640, 101st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 12-14 TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Still at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Per- Total from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Estimated Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Project Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Moving Tainter gated dam; 1002 $ 43,400,000 bascule gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Columbia, LA 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 952 45,200,000 fixed crest navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Felsenthal, AR 1 227 84 600 18 701 13 Earth do Tainter gated dam; 882 101,600,000 hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. Calion, AR 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 882 70,800,000 (H. K. hinged crest gated Thatcher) navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. Estimated Federal Cost $261,000,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost 17,130,000 Total Estimated Cost 278,130,000 1. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. Navigation pool elevation 65. 2. The percent complete reflects all work within the pool. o-n 01 rJ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR1,2,3,4 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA1,24 Big Black River, MS1 ,4,' 5 Big Sunflower River, MS 1,4'6',7 Boeuf River, LA1,3,4,7,8,9 Claiborne County Port, MS Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA15 Homochitto River, MS4 Lake Providence Harbor, LA Little Missouri River, AR1 ,4,' 5 Little River, LA1 ,4 ,5,10 Little Tallahatchie River, MS1 '7 Madison Parish Port, LA Mouth of Yazoo River, MS1'7'11 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA, Felsenthal Canal Overton-Red River Waterway, LA Pearl River, MS Red River below Fulton, AR1,16,17 ,18 Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX1, 171 8 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX1 Removings snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers1 1 Rosedale Harbor, MS Saline River, AR 1 '3 4'5 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS1 ,4 ,5 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA1", 8,1 3 Complete -N 1931 1941 1895 1942 1949 1985 1971 1910 1985 1873 1890 1913 1985 1953 193712 1985 1985 1978 1969 1976 1948 1985 1931 1939 1949 $ 45,874 19,000 15,000 560,027 30,000 2,000,000. 202,817 15,482 208,537 19,992 1,500 19,000 656,000 1,179,211 8,562,908 1,963,806 150,800 2,000,000 26,900 43,481 38,367 $ 42,857 37,804 459,328 103,737 279,718 452,611 8,518 4,115,285 -- -- 602,071 650,641 4,387,192 3,345,408 2,147,890 272,500 3,799,220 12,792 173,066 1 1 1 1 Dec. 1983 Dec. 1914 1 Nov. 1963 1 1 1 Dec. 1980 1 1 1 1956 1 1 1 1 Sep. 1978 1 1 85,352 1 12-16 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Yalobusha River, MS 1,4,5,14 -- 1937 7,000 15,936 Yazoo River, MS -- 1987 9,341,826 1,207,895 Yellow Bend Port, AR Complete 1991 3,793,069 213,487 Aug. 1991 1. Status and Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA. (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 17. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 18. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 12-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 12-E OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR 1985 $ 44,100,000 DeGray Lake, AR 1985 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR 1985 20,900,000 Calion, AR 1960 970,9963 Columbia, LA 1941 204,7403 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,1813 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7423 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7003 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,5823 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) 1984 2,561,0003 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $153,904,7434 1. See individual reports herein. 2. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply to be reimbursed by local interests. 3. Actual cost of completed project. 4. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954)was $4,190,000. 12-18 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-F RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 14 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR2 and LA -- 1,158 -- -- $25,100,000 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA - -- -- -- 70,717 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 -- -- -- -- 243,336 Caddo Lake, LA1 Caddo Lake -- -- -- 3,586,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River -- -- -- 1,950,0003 Garland City, AR1'6 -- -- -- 1,450,0003 Maniece Bayou, AR - -- -- -- 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, AR7 , 8 - -- -- 5,610,0003 Posten Bayou, AR and LA2',69 -- -- -- 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA1 ,3 - -- -- -- 66,775,0003 Total 99,191,885 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Details presented in individual report herein. Construction on this project not started. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ................................................... $5,300,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution)..................................... 89,047 Caddo Lake, LA ..... ................................................................. 28,000 Campti-Clarence Areain Natchitoches Parish, LA ............................................. 480,000 East Point ............................................................................ 67,000 Garland City, AR ..................................................................... 6,000 Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ....................................................... 18,000 McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution)..................................................... 508,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TXAR, and LA ........................ 1,560,000 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. Inactive. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. Joint-use pool (sediment). Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 12-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 12.G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 14 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For: Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,2371 1956 Bayou B.odcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,7401 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,2001 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 255,5291 4 Black Bayou Lake, LA5 '6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481,7 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,8091 1941 Hempstead County levee district No.l, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,0061 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and.appurtenances 1936 1,529,9271'8 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,4261 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,0001 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,4351 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,1111 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,3711,3 4 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District, August 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 12-20 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA1 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA1 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA Bayou Pierre, LA Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1,2 Big Black River, MS3 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA 3 ' 4 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA1'5' 6 Blakely Mt. Dam - Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AR Caddo Lake Dam, LA Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Colfax, Grant Parish, LA1 '7 DeGray Lake Caddo River, AR East Point, LA Garland City, AR Grant Parish below Colfax, LA"3 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR1'3 Homochitto River, MS3 Maniece Bayou, AR 1,2 Monroe Floodwall, LA Murfreesboro Dam and Lake4 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AR Natchez Port Area, MS3'4 Natchitoches Parish, LA1" 2 Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS Pineville, Red River, LA3 '4 Lead Bayou, MS 1956 1948 1985 1985 1951 1956 1966 1945 1985 1986 1978 1938 1985 1969 1976 1941 1941 1956 1970 1984 1951 1985 1969 1956 1986 1953 1991 5,064,213 278,255 670,750 75,963,443 1,371,870 $ 1,896,826 319,200 - 243,3362 910,185 248,823 34,023,108 1,655,700 70,348 72,033,992 286,069 1,335,841 38,809 88,006 205,000 970,9322 2,560,000 16,516,689 538,000 1,529,478 290,000 232,426 1,961,089 51,583,312 3,051,536 144,650 53,100,530 Apr. 1955 Jan. 1948 Apr. 1961 FY 1939 Jun. 1939 3 3 Oct. 1955 - Jul. 1978 - Dec. 1971 Aug. 1968 Jul. 1974 3 3 3 Aug. 1969 N May 1950 5 Aug. 1955 Dec. 1951 Nov. 1988 12-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 12-H (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. ' Project Report For. Construction Maintenance Completed Posten Bayou, AR8 1973 -- Poverty Point, LA 1986 250,000 -- Oct. 1985 Red River Parish, LA ' 3 1939 149,435 . 3 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' 1953 3,908,000 -- Mar. 1953 Saline Point, LA"3 1945 124,111 -- - Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 1966 335,433 -- May 1965 Wallace Lake, LA 1985 -- 1,439,005 Dec. 1946 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries .................................. ........................... $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA ..................................................... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA .......................................................... 170,799 HarveyCanal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ..................................................... 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR................ .................................................... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ................................................................... 250,000 3. Completion Date Unavailable. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. Construction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12-22 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Extended Exp Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA 1990 May 17, 1950 974,000 - S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Buffalo River, MS1 1940 Nov 1986 -- - McKinney Bayou, Finn 19632 Aug 1977 -- Bayou Segment, AR 1. Deauthorized by Sec. 1002, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 2. Date Authorized. 12-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 12-J ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 94 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation Studies (110) Natchez Bluff, MS-12675 Subtotal Flood Damage Prevention (120) Bossier Parish, LA -12956 Hot Springs, Garland Co., AR -12737 Jackson Metro Area, MS -12742 Quachita Parish, LA-13263 Subtotal Environmental SVCS/Partnership (140) Environmental SVC Partnership (140)-14190 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Interagency Water Resources (173) -14713 Special Investigations (171) -17250 North American Waterfowl Management Plan (175) -53904 Subtotal Coordination with other Agencies & Non Federal Int (180) Coordination Studies Soil Conservation Service-51840 TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Claiborne Parish -83003 Flood Plain Management Services -82030 Quick Response -82045 Special Studies -83002 Technical Services -82040 Union Parish, LA -83001 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 TOTAL (Category 200) ADVANCE E&D (Category 600) Locks and Dams (622) RRWW Shreveport to Daingerfield (622) -75024 TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 21,554 21,554 $ 111 136,035 402,351 396,234 934,731 4,667 59,489 17,042 5,886 82,417 11 8,152 15,816 6,070 27,853 88,957 8 146,856 63,942 $ 1,263,942 $ 1,267,199 12-24 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Teinessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Navigation work under special authorization ....................... Page Tables 13-1 Flood Control 2. Mayfield Creek, KY .................. 13-1 3. Millington, TN ..................... 13-2 4. Inspection of completed flood control projects.............................. 13-2 5. Flood control work under special authorization ....................... 13-2 Navigation Table 13-A Table 13-B Table 13-C Table 13-D Table 13-E Table 13-F Cost & Financial Statement................ Authorizing Legislation....... Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............. Deauthorized Projects ........ Active General Investigations............... Page 13-4 13-4 13-5 13-6 13-7 13-8 Flood Control 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $33 was expended on reconnaissance studies on Cairo Harbor, IL. 2. MAYFIELD CREEK, KENTUCKY Location. Mayfield Creek is located in West Kentucky in Ballard, Carlisle and McCracken Counties. Project limits extend from the confluence of Mayfield Creek with the Mississippi River upstream 25 miles to near the Graves-McCracken County line. 13-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 Existing project. The project was approved for construction on Sept. 26, 1991, under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of selective clearing and snagging of debris and excavation of sediment deposits according to provisions contained in the "Stream Obstruction Removal Guidelines." The project would provide a level of protection less than 1 year. However, positive drainage would be established and reduction in flood duration is accomplished. The estimated construction cost for the project is $3,366,850. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the Sponsor Chairman for The Mayfield Creek Coalition on Sept. 27, 1991. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, rights-ofway, and relocations required for project construction and cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction is completed up to 13.0 miles. Remaining work is scheduled for completion September 1995. 3. MILLINGTON, TN Location. Millington is located in north Shelby County, TN. Existing project. The project was approved for construction on May 14, 1990, under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of 5,600 feet of levee along the right (north) bank of Big Creek in the reach between U.S. Highway 51 and the I.C. Railroad. The levee is designed to provide a 100-year frequency level of protection to the leveed area from backwater flooding. The estimated construction cost for the project is $809,000. A contract for project construction was awarded in August 1990. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the city of Millington on May 15, 1990. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project flood protection was provided in February 1991. Remaining project related drainage modifications are scheduled to be completed early in calendar year 1995. 4. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost. of $169,444 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1994, was $2,199,570. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 5. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During this period $46,746 was expended on Raft Creek, AR; $69 on Obion, TN; $26 on Bono, AR; $26,734 on Dails Creek, Holly Grove, AR; $49 on Crow Creek Forrest City, AR; and $5,760 on Tar Creek, Chester County, TN. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 1994, $63,393 was expended on Wolf River at U.S. Highway 51, Memphis, TN; $18 on Oakland, TN; $18,834 on Bartlett Road, Harrington Creek, Memphis, TN; $509 on Highway 78 at Obion River, Dyer County, TN; $95 on Royster Creek at Biloxi Street, Millington, TN. Emergency flood control activities, Public Law 99, 84th Cong. Federal cost was $349,080 for disaster preparedness and $110,358 for emergency operations in FY 94. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., as amended. During FY 1994, $19,553 was expended on Hatchie River in Alcorn and Tippah Counties, MS. Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $466 was expended on Ditch 28 Control Structures and Levee, Mississippi County, AR; $786 on Hornersville Swamp Levees and Gates Culverts, Dunklin County, MO; and $24,245 on Simmons Field Control Structure, Mississippi County, AR. 13-2 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 1994 2. Mayfield Creek, New Work TN Approp. $ 120,000 $670,000 497,000 470,000 1,797,000 Cost 32,785 662,814 483,843 445,944 1,664,731 3. Millington, TN New Work Approp. 22,500 0 26,000 0 835,500 Cost 513,840 1,074 21,793 6,112 830,781 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Fletcher Creek, Memphis, TN as amended Streambank protection Approved Apr. 4, 19912 Jul. 24, 1946 Mayfield Creek, KY (See Sec. 2 of Text) Approved Sept. 26, 19911 as amended Jun. 30, 1948 Millington, TN (See Sec. 3 of Text), Levee in City as amended of Millington. Approved May 14, 19901 Jul. 24, 1946 Nonconnah Creek at Perkins Street, Memphis, TN as amended Streambank protection Approved Oct. 28, 19882 Jul. 24, 1946 Quince Road Bridge Memphis, TN as amended Streambank protection Approved May 16, 19912 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 2. Authorized under authority of Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. 13-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Caruthersville Harbor, MO 1984 $768,992 $3,490,392 Dec. 1980 Helena Harbor, AR 1984 90,847 6,524,440 Sep. 1963 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY 1984 149,827 6,302,535 Jan. 1963 New Madrid Harbor, MO6 1984 196,373 806,376 Oct. 1970 Obion River, .TN1 '3 1911 28,716 Osceola Harbor, AR 1984 269,115 7,682,237 Nov. 1974 Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers 4'5 1948 -- 318,833 White River, AR (below Newport) 1984 169,994 32,290,606 Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN 1984 586,500 12,245,931 1959 1. No commerce. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 4. Completion date not available. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries." 6. WRDA 92 (Section 102) modified authorization by directing the Secretary to assume responsibility for maintenance of New Madrid County Harbor constructed by non-Federal interest. 13-4 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For. Construction Maintenance Completed Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN Bradford, TN Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL1 Drinkwater Sewer, MO Dyersburg, TN1 Dyersburg, TN (SW) Fletcher Creek at Memphis, TN Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN Hatchie River, Alcorn Co., MS Humboldt, TN Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL3 Nixon Creek, TN1 Nonconnah Blvd. Nonconnah Creek, TN Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN Nonconnah Creek at Perkins Street, Memphis, TN N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) N. Second St. at Wolf River, Memphis, TN Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN Quince Road Bridge, Memphis, TN Sandy Creek Jackson, TN St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR Treasure Island, MO Turner Creek, Corinth, MS US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY 1977 1984 1964 1984 1962 1981 1993 1985 1987 1989 1960 1955 1952 1983 1987 1993 1983 1991 1991 1993 1985 1985 1981 1987 1984 1983 $ 70,363 95,061 147,000 1,494,828 229,6492 1,820,869 421,898 155,280 85,200 1,141,407 11,141,199 1,132,704 62,821 249,999 259,000 830,781 249,999 367,012 124,954 156,502 238,000 161,000 861,528 100,600 369,200 1,674,180 -- N -- Dec. 1983 -- Feb. 1964 -- Jun. 1980 -- Jun. 1962 -- Oct. 1976 -- Sept. 1991 -- Aug. 1985 -- Feb. 1986 -- Apr. 1988 -- May 1959 -- Oct. 19594 -- Dec. 1951 -- Nov. 1981 -- Dec. 1986 -- Feb. 1992 -- Sep. 1980 -- Jan. 1990 -- Sep. 1990 Jul. 1991 -- Dec. 1984 -- Sep. 1985 -- Mar. 1978 -- Mar. 1987 -- Mar. 1983 -- Oct. 1976 13-5 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 2. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 3. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 4. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 13-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For. Deauthorized Expended Expended Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR 1977 May 6, 81 Clarendon to Laconia Circle White River Basin, AR 1937 May 6, 81 Huntingdon, TN 1983 Sep 80 2,900,281 - Long Lake Area, Helena, AR 1983 Jul 83 61,281 -- 13-6 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 94 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Environmental Services Partnership (140) Environmental Services Partnership $96,736 $96,736 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 $18,108 Intra Agency Water Resources Development-14713 58,146 North American Waterfowl Mgmt (176) - 53904 18,737 94,991 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. of Agriculture (181) - 77067 $5,194 $5,194 TOTAL (Category (100) $196,921 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 167,757 167,757 TOTAL (Category 200) $167,757 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $364,678 13-7 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT * This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. The St. Louis District territory encompasses 27,000 square miles. District also includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. Report on the" Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. Report on the portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.) ...................... 14-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes Melvin Price Locks & Dam)................... 14-2 3. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL ............ 14-2 4. St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL ........... 14-2 5. Navigation work under special authorization ...................... 14-3 Flood Control 6. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO................... 14-3 7. Cape Girardeau-Jackson,MO ........... 14-3 8. Coldwater Creek, MO ................. 14-4 9. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL .......... 14-4 10. Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL.................... 14-5 11. Maline Creek, MO ................... 14-5 12. Meramec River Basin Valley Park, MO............................. 14-5 13. Pine Ford Lake, MO ................. 14-6 Flood Control (cont) Page 14. River des Peres, MO ................. 14-6 15. Inspection of completed flood control projects............................. 14-6 16. Flood control work under special authorization ....................... 14-6 Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 17. Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Salt River, MO ................ 14-7 18. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program................. 14-7 Tables Table 14-A Table 14-B Table 14-C Table 14-D Table 14-E Table 14-F Cost and Financial Statement................. 14-9 Authorizing Legislation...... 14-11 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......... 14-15 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 14-16 Deauthorized Projects ....... 14-18 Active General Investigations (96X3121)................ 14-19 14-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Rock Island District. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN (ST. LOUIS DIST.) (INCLUDES MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO AND IL Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as middle Mississippi, between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN. Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (Oct 1993 price level) of $210,000,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3rd sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: contracts continue on stone dike and revetment construction; as well as engineering bendway weir design, supervision and administration. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 82 percent complete. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. During FY 1988 through FY 1990 low water conditions (drought) increased maintenance dredging. To improve navigation depths a rock removal contract began Oct. 1988 and was completed in July 1991. Maintenance. Work consists of approximately 2,000 feet of dike repair and 5,000 feet of revetment repair yearly. U.S. plant and hired labor plus contract dredging perform channel dredging removing 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 cubic yards of material (average year) from main channel. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. 4. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO AND IL Location. The project area includes both sides of the Mississippi River from miles 138.8 to 208.8 above the Ohio River (generally, the limits of the Port of Metropolitan St. Louis). Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT authorized project includes improvements in two areas: the North Riverfront area in Missouri (which is served by the St. Louis Municipal Docks) and the Tri-City Port area along the east bank of the Chain of Rocks Canal in Illinois. The principal project at the St. Louis Municipal Docks is an L-dike sediment control structure in the river to provide reliable water access to the dock when the river is low. The principal project at the Tri-City Port area is a 210 ft.' wide harbor along 6,900 ft. of the Chain of Rocks Canal. The North Riverfront project and half the Tri-City harbor (3.450 ft.) would be constructed in Phase 1, and the second half of the Tri-City harbor in Phase 2 approximately 10 years later. Estimated cost of the project (1993) is $13,200,000 Federal and $26,135,000 Non-Federal. A March 1986 Reevaluation Report described model tests which showed that the L-dike sediment control structure recommended for the St. Louis Municipal Docks would not be effective but that appropriate configuration of a new outer wall for the docks, referred to as the Prototype River Access Improvement Structure (PRAIS), would divert currents so as to control scour and sedimentation and maintain sufficient water depths for the needs of the harbor. Local cooperation. The District coordinated with the two local sponsors and found that (1) the city of St. Louis Port Authority supports the PRAIS project and (2) the Tri-City Regional Port Authority wants the Corps to consider the possibility of reducing the length of their Phase I harbor to 1,800 ft. and shifting its location so that it is a northern extension of the existing Tri-City harbor (the authorized project length of 6,900 ft. would be maintained by increasing the length of the Phase 2 harbor to 5,100 ft.). Operations and results during the fiscal year. In January 1992 District completed a letter report that documented a preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the PRAIS and the Tri-City harbor projects. Headquarters reviewed the letter report and directed that new economic studies and other work be accomplished and documented in a General Reevaluation Report with an Initial Project Management Plan which will describe how the reevaluation studies will be accomplished. Work on the project in FY 94 was delayed primarily due to district resources being directed to recovery work from the 1993 flood. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During FY 93, $82,462 was expended on Batchtown; $247,430 on Calhoun Point, IL; and $60,518 on Cuivre, IL. Flood Control 6. ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO Location. The levee system is located adjacent to the Mississippi River between Alton and Gale, Illinois. Existing Project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1946. Construction of the Alton to Gale levee system was completed in 1977. Some reaches of this levee system have, for many years, been experiencing a significant number of slides associated with design deficiencies increasing the probability of levee failure during flood events. The recommended plan will correct these slides by a lime stabilization procedure. Estimated cost (1994) is $18,430,000 Federal and $4,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The cost sharing applicable for the Alton to Gale Levee Slide repairs is in accordance with policies established for the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, the Local sponsor is required to operate and maintain all works after completion. Supplemental assurances have been executed for the portion of the remedial work that is 100% federally funded. Operations and results during fiscal year. Repair of levee slides in two cost-shared levee districts was completed. 7. CAPE GIRARDEAU-JACKSON, MO Location. The project is located in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, along the right bank of the Mississippi River between River Miles 50 and 55 above the Ohio River. Existing Project. The project includes a 157 acre dry detention reservoir; approximately one mile of channel improvements on Cape La Croix Creek and two miles of channel improvements on Walker Branch, eight bridge replacements; recreational/environmental features and non structural features which are not going to be implemented at this time. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal project cost (1994) is $32,900,000. Non-Federal cost is $12,200,000. Local Cooperation. The city of Cape Girardeau, MO, local sponsor, is strongly supportive of the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on May 25, 1990 with a modification to the LCA executed on Oct. 27, 1992. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described in the FY 1991 Annual Report. 14-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction continued on the Cape La Croix segment of the project which was awarded in FY 91. Contract was awarded in Aug. 1993 for the Walker Branch #1 channel construction. Design continued on the remainder of the project. 8. COLDWATER CREEK, MO Location. The 47 square mile Coldwater Creek watershed is located in St. Louis County, Missouri, and had a 1980 population of 158,000 residents. The stream flows through Overland, Breckenridge Hills, and St. Ann; under Lambert-St. Louis International Airport; and through Hazelwood, Florissant, and other communities and empties into the Missouri River. Existing Project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 and would afford protection to the area. About 1,400 structures or units would be flooded by a 100-year flood. Significant flood damages occurred in the area in 1957, 1978, 1979, 1982, and 1986. The problems addressed by the Feasibility Study included flood damages, outdoor recreation needs, and environmental degradation. The authorized project includes ten miles of channel widening, five tunnels through a downstream railroad embankment, two small levees, a flood forecasting and warning system, and recreation features along the channel widening project. Estimated cost of the project (1994) is $19,200,000 Federal and $8,365,000 Non- Federal. Because of radioactive material in channel sediments downstream from a Superfund site at Lambert Airport, the Corps of Engineers and the Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD), divided the Coldwater Creek project into two parts and will implement it in two phases. The first phase is channel widening upstream of Lambert Airport in St. Ann and Breckenridge Hills. The St. Louis Airport Authority is studying major expansion plans which could effect the project design. Local cooperation. A letter of intent was received from the Metropolitan Sewer District on Jun. 25, 1987, expressing willingness to be local sponsor of the project. The most recent Schedule and Cost Change Request was signed by the sponsor on Oct. 20, 1992. Operation and results during fiscal year. A design of the channel improvements upstream of Lambert Airport is nearly completed, but work was halted on this design throughout FY 94 due to levee repairs after the 1993 flood. 9. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottom lands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood of about 200-year frequency. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Post authorization studies have indicated that flood plain detention areas, the reservoir on Little Canteen Creek and other related flood control measures in the Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area are not economically feasible. Also, further studies of the channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel have been deferred due to lack of support from the local sponsor of the project. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $33,600,000 (1985), $22,020,000 for Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area, and $11,580,000 for Blue Waters Ditch. Non-Federal cost is $20,770,000. The 1988 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act authorized repair and rehabilitation of pump stations and appurtenant works, channels and bridge structures. The estimated total cost of this work (1994) is $28,700,000 Federal and $12,300,000 Non- Federal. Local cooperation. For work under the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988, PL 100-202, local interests have entered into three Lo- 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT cal Cooperation Agreements (LCA) which cover all of the work in the Flood Protection Rehabilitation project. Construction work under the first LCA is complete, and construction work under the remaining two LCA's is under way. Operations and results during fiscal year. Rehabilitation work has continued on gravity drains, closure structures and several pump stations. Contracts have been awarded for rehabilitation of Cahokia low dam, Phase 1 relief wells and additional pump stations. Contract awards for additional closure structures, floodwall and levee work and other items are scheduled for award in the near future. 10. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between miles 111 and 116 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, scale 1 250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 1375 of Annual Report for 1950. Existing project. Project area contains about 9,460 acres only partially protected against flood stage of 38.5 feet on the Chester, IL, gage. Flooding occurs about once in every 7.3 years with an average duration of 26 days, causing substantial damage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.) provides for enlarging and raising the existing levee about 8 feet to provide protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 50 years. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $14,100,000. Non- Federal cost is $2,100,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances from the Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 23, 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. All construction of gravity drains, levee embankment and installation of wildlife plantings is complete. Project is complete. 11. MALINE CREEK, MO Location. Maline Creek is located in a small northern part of the City of St. Louis, portions of incorporated St. Louis County and all or part of 22 municipalities. The 25 square mile Maline Creek watershed originates near Lambert Airport and flows in an easterly direction through Berkeley, Kinloch, Ferguson, Moline Acres, Bellefontaine Neighbors, and other communities and empties into the Mississippi River. The Maline Creek flood plain encompasses approximately 1600 acres of mostly urban development. This highly urbanized area had a population of 126,000 people in 1980. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99- 662) and would afford protection to the area. The present plan includes approximately 2.95 miles of channel widening, 3.35 miles of clearing, replacement or modification of 7 bridges, 14.4 acres of open space, a flood forecasting and warning plan and 2.64 miles of recreation trails. At October 1994 price levels, including an allowance for inflation, estimated cost of the project is $7,800,000 Federal and $2,766,000 Non-Federal. (Authorized but not funded for construction.) Local cooperation. The Metropolitan Sewer District of St. Louis is the present local sponsor of the project. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funding will be requested to advance Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) when the Metropolitan Sewer District, local sponsor, indicates financial capability to proceed. 12. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN (VALLEY PARK), MISSOURI Location. The project is located in St. Louis County, Missouri, adjacent to the left bank of the Meramec River between miles 20.7 and 22.1 above the confluence with the Mississippi River. Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 2(h), Public Law 97-128, Dec. 29, 1981, and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and would afford partial flood protection to the area. The project provides for construction of 3.2 miles of earthen levee with six gravity drains, three closure structures, interior ponding areas and 33 relief wells required for under-seepage control. Recreational features include standard play equipment, multi-user courts, play field areas, picnic tables, comfort stations, parking areas and hiking/biking trails. Estimated total project cost is $19,000,000; $13,900,000 Federal, and $5,100,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The Board of Alderman for the City of Valley Park, Missouri, authorized the mayor to issue a Letter of Intent to sponsor the project. The letter dated Feb. 18, 1987, acknowledged that city officials were aware of cost sharing requirements and of the items of local cooperation and favored construction of the project. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 12, 1992. 14-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Operations and results during fiscal year. A Plan Formulation Report and General Design Memorandum was issued in March 1987. A feature design memorandum was approved in Dec. 1993. A first construction contract was awarded in Jan. 1994. 13. PINE FORD LAKE, MO Location. Proposed dam is on Big River at mile 43.8, about 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. The Big River is a tributary of the Meramec. Lake would extend about 34 miles up Big River.. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete chute spillway. Dam will be 141 feet high and 2,070 feet long. Construction of new roads, improvements of existing roads, alterations to pipeline, power and telephone lines, and. construction of recreational facilities are included. Maximum storage. capacity will be 285,000 acre-feet. Estimated total project cost (1984) is $147,000,000, of which $8,173,200 and $22,900,000 are local reimbursements for water supply and recreation and fish and wildlife respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocation to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstiuction planning previously funded but not completed. 14. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI Location. The 111 square mile River des Peres watershed includes all or part of 42 municipalities within St. Louis County plus the city of St. Louis, Missouri. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 and would afford protection to the area. The authorized project includes channel modifications in the Deer Creek and University City Branch of River des Peres. The Deer Creek segment of the project would reduce flood damages in the cities of Rock Hill, Brentwood, Webster Groves and Maplewood, Missouri, by providing channel enlargement and stabilization along approximately 2.5 miles of Deer Creek. The University City Branch segment of the project would reduce flood damages in the city of University City, Missouri, by providing channel enlargement and bank stabilization. The authorized project also includes: flood proofing along the Kirkwood Branch of Gravois Creek; a flood forecasting/warning plan; and complementary outdoor recreation features. At October 1993 price levels, the estimated cost of the project is $17,800,000 Federal and $6,229,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) is the local sponsor. Operation and results during fiscal year. The Preconstruction Engineering Design (PED) work was initiated in FY 89 and is scheduled for completion in FY 95. The local sponsor will be able to finance initiation of this project. It is currently unclear as to when. No requests for funding were made for fiscal years 1992 or 1993 due to the MSD's funding shortages. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $429,048 for the Fiscal Year 1994. Total cost as of end of fiscal year is $8,779,647. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization study costs for Fiscal Year 1994 were $244,790 for St. Peters, MO; $24,201 for Boise Brule Levee and Drainage District, MO; $57 on Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL; $129 for Peruque Creek, MO; $34 for Crooked Creek, Central City, IL; $8,064 for Modoc L&D District, Prairie, IL; and $2,464 for Prairie Dupont L&SD. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 19943, $11,498 was expended on Len Small L&DD, Alexandria, IL; $8,846 for Tower Grove Park, St. Louis; $27 for Middle Fork Salt River; $1,730 for North Fork Salt River; and $12,798 for Parkway School District; $23,477 for South Senior High School; $1,293 for Fayette County Highway 23; $1,001 for Lincoln City Road 729; $2,058 for Lincoln County Road 725; and $17,758 for McKelvey School. Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT During this period $3,266 was expended on Lower Cache River; $2,209 on Mississippi River Levees; $4,537 on Habitat Rest. Boise Brule; $2,161 on Illinois River Levees; and $11,638 on Carlyle Lake Wildlife Management. Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $246,107 for Disaster Preparedness, $143,974 for Emergency Operations, and $14,960,661 for Rehabilitation. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 17. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO Location. Salt River rises in Schuyler County, about 12 miles south of Missouri-Iowa State line. It flows southeasterly about 192 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 2 miles above Louisiana, MO, or about 284 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Kansas City and Quincy sheets of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 645 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project provides for construction of a multiple-purpose reservoir, including power, flood control, water supply, navigation storage, pollution abatement, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation. Dam consists of a compacted earth embankment with a concrete spillway controlled by tainter gates. Dam and spillway are about 1,700 feet long. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 50- by 30-foot tainter gates. Reservoir will have a storage capacity of 1,428,000 acrefeet for use of flood control, future domestic and industrial water supply, sediment storage, and power generation. Project plan provides for installation of one 27,000 KW conventional unit and one 31,000 KW reversible unit for pumped storage operations. Total Federal project cost estimate (1984) is $330,000,000 of which $22,420,000 is for lands and damages; $14,300,000 for water supply; $76,000,000 for hydropower. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-13 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances have been received from the state of Missouri and approved by the Chief of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work is complete on all major items. Lands acquired to date are 55,277 acres in fee and 10,068 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. 18. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Location. The portion of the Upper Mississippi River within the boundaries of the St. Louis District extends from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0) to river mile 300, downstream of Lock and Dam 22. Existing project. The project is composed of five elements: Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects, Long-term Resource Monitoring, Recreation Projects, Studies of Recreation Impacts and Navigation Traffic Monitoring. (The St. Louis District's involvement has been limited to Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects and Long Term Resource Monitoring.) The overall program, involving five states, three engineer districts and two Corps of Engineers Divisions, is administered by the North Central Division. In the St. Louis District, three habitat rehabilitation projects have been constructed. These are Clarksville Management Area, Missouri, Dresser Island, Missouri, and Pharrs Island, Missouri. All projects are being operated and maintained by the state of Missouri. Through FY 1994, funds allocated to the St. Louis District have amounted to $12,114,000 for design and construction of Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects (HREP), $738,000 for Long Term Resource Monitoring (LTRM) and $920,000 for Program Management. The authorization limit for the overall program projected over a 10-year period is $191,415,000. Local cooperation. The terms of local cooperation, as established by Public Law 99-662, will vary according to the nature of the project, land ownership and pre-existing management responsibilities. The Local Sponsor for Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement projects is usually the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in coordination with the state of Missouri or the state of Illinois. Operations and results during the fiscal year. During the FY, $861 was expended on Dresser Island, MO; $393 on Osborn; $403 on Pharrs Island; and $339,681 on Swan Lake. The plans and specifications were completed on Stump Lake, IL, at a cost of $264,014 and all three items of construction have been awarded. The Swan Lake Project has four items of construction, with one item advertised and design work continuing on the other items. DPR's have been submitted on three additional HREP projects. 14-7 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE. 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY92 FY 93 FY 94 1994 3. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO 7. Cape Girardeau Jackson, MO (Contrib. Funds) 9. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (Contrib. Funds) 10. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee District, IL 12. Meramee R. Basin Valley Park, MO (Contrib. Funds) 13. Pine Ford Lake, MO New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $ 6,729,000 $5,949,000 8,733,282 4,233,884 5,244,000 4,666,000 $233,110,6001 5,104,933 3,944,585 230,226,6541 15,091,000 10,480,600 8,300,000 9,559,523 327,092,3522 15,405,737 8,932,078 7,042,810 12,287,956 326,813,7522 225,000 76,000 137,000 247,257 225,330 75,777 125,279 244,186 0 5,600 886,660 871,572 -11,045 1,868,060 -6,825 1,868,060 3,170,000 1,235,000 280,000 231,000 8,982,000 3,493,997 1,208,634 117,302 178,757 8,571,980 2,423,000 5,149,000 4,847,000 6,700,000 19,612,000 1,052,621 6,327,460 2,538,776 5,232,639 15,602,347 241,200 831,200 409,700 20,241 774,685 408,111 39,737 1,731,837 259,576 1,653,118 1,547,000 1,999,000 2,349,000 7,660,000 33,279,3263 1,661,279 1,815,004 1,860,154 4,709,554 29,525,3064 0 510,000 1,420,000 2,238,000 4,265,600 85,700 409,999 463,763 2,854,353 3,813,815 0 4,007 16,188,000 16,188,000 456,000 650,000 1,303,000 2,940,000 5,349,000 392,606 664,921 772,718 672,181 2,502,426 274,100 246,399 0 0 274,100 246,399 3,644,000 3,644,000 14-8 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 14-A' (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 1994 17. Clarence Cannon New Work Dam and Approp. 50,000 141,000 300,000 -36,900 313,180,1285 Reservoir, Salt Cost 39,034 129,094 155,335 176,253 313,177,9055 River, MO Maint. Approp. 5,171,750 4,807,600 5,730,600 4,500,778 53,696,506 Cost 4,967,641 4,653,410 4,627,614 5,945,803 53,580,669 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. 0 0 80,403 101,600 182,003 Cost 0 0 0 16,772 16,772 1. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 2. In addition $3,109 was expended for rehabilitation. 3. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 4. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 5. Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. 14-9 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 19071 Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19542 Jul. 3, 19583 Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Aug. 15, 1985 and Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 1960 River and Harbor Act as amended. Section 107 Nov 26, 1986 KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 3 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM (FORMERLY LOCK AND DAM NO. 26 (REPLACEMENT)) Construct new dam and a 1,200-foot lock approximately 2 miles downstream of the existing structure. Change name from 'Lock and Dam No. 26" to 'Melvin Price Lock and Dam" upon termination of service in U.S. Congress. Construct a second lock, 600 feet long at the Lock and Dam No. 26. (Replacement) Project. Modified to provide construction of cost-shared recreation facilities within the state of Illinois S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 95-502, 95th Cong. Public Law 97-118, 97th Cong. Public Law 99-88 and Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Public Law 101-640, 101st Cong. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO Construct harbor channel with adjacent landfill. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO & IL (See Section 4 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Apr. 30, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes navigation improvements. Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. 14-10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 14-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 28, 1938 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO (See Section 6 of Text) Authorized construction of levees to protect area from flooding from the Mississippi River. CAPE GIRARDEAU, JACKSON METROPOLITAN AREA, MO (See Section 7 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Dec. 8, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control and related recreational improvements in the Cape La Croix Creek Watershed. COLDWATER CREEK, MO (See Section 8 of Text) As outlined in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated Aug 9, 1988, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 9 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. Repair and rehabilitate pump stations and appurtenant works, channels, and bridges. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 10 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. MALINE CREEK, MO (See Section 11 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 2, 1982, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control, recreation, and environmental improvements. Special report on record in OCE Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. Public Law 100-202, 100th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 14-11 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1984 Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 Dec. 29, 1981 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 28, 1938 MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 12 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. (See Section 13 of Text) Undertake structural and nonstructural flood control measures. RIVER DES PERES, MO (See Section 14 of Text) As outlined in the report of the Chief Engineers dated May 23, 1989, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Construct dam at Benton, IL, and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO As outlined in the Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors dated Apr. 16, 1985, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes construction of a levee and a pumping plant to protect the city from Mississippi River and Gabouri Creek floods. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. Energy and Water Development Approp. Act of 1985, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 97-128, 97th Cong. Amended Section 1128, Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. H. .Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 14-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 14-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO (See Section 17 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Modified act of Jun. 28, 1938 by deleting the reservoir H. Doc. 507, therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate multiple- 87th Cong., 2d sess. purpose project. Oct. 27, 1965 Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present Public Law 89-298, designation. 89th Cong. 1. 2. 3. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. Inactive. All work completed. 14-13 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO1 1883 $ 12,000 $ - - Moccasin Springs, MO 1969 76,4362 -- Southeast Missouri Port, MO 1993 3,466,522 871,572 Apr. 89 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL 1961 2,653,194 1961 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 23, 1900. 2. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. 14-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 14-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cache River Diversion, IL 1953 2,837,114 -- 1953 Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 1965 5,157,805 -- 1964 Carlyle Lake, IL 1981 42,819,400 67,450,443 Oct. 1976 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 185,700 -- 1955 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL 1981 2,818,000 -- Aug. 1981 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL 1959 5,889,500 -- 1959 Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL 1976 1,720,000 -- 1976 Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944)1 1950 55,415 -- Oct. 1949 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)1 1953 -- -- 1951 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1952 50,000 -- Jan. 1952 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1946 25,000 -- Aug. 1945 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL 1970 1,154,800 -- 1958 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 4,677,900 -- 1959 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, IL 1981 6,829,069 -- Mar. 1981 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 297,460 -- 1949 Kaskaskia River, IL2 1989 147,387,000 22,422,116 1988 Lake Shelbyville, IL 1981 44,000,000 70,444,254 Sep. 1978 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 589,000 -- 1988 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 25,043,300 -- 1989 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1944 249,738 -- 1944 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL 1955 164,183 -- 1955 Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO 1987 2,137,000 .- .. Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO 1980 79,265,166 -- Jan. 1980 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO 1967 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures -- 85,422 -- Oct. 1962 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL 1957 939,569 -- 1957 14-15 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-D (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1994 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 670,000 -- 1984 Perry County Drainage and Levee 3 District Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO 1987 7,968,700 -- 1986 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL4 1970 6,005,127 -- 1970 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL 1959 3,882,600 -- 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 1,866,910 -- 1959 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL5 '6 1989 43,700,900 52,083,409 1988 Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL 1957 2,123,700 -- Aug. 1956 Urban areas at Alton, IL 1960 192,000 --- Village of New Athens, IL 1981 1,983,000 -- Sep. 1981 Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL7 1967 91,952 -- 1967 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL8 1989 17,163,821 -- 1988 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 14-16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 14-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Extended Exp Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO Big Swan D&L District Illinois River, IL Cape Girardeau, MO Reaches Nos 1, 3, and 4 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek D&L District, IL Eldred, IL Fort Chartres & Ivy Landing D&L District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL I-38 Lake, MO Indian Creek Area Illinois River, IL Irondale Lake, MO Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6 and 7 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10 and 13 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL Meramec Park Lake, MO Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL Richland Creek, IL Riverland Levee District, MO Scott County D&L District Illinois River, IL Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Union Lake, MO Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO 1967 1959 1964 1963 1962 1971 19621 1979 1979 1978 1967 19581 1959 1969 1936 19541 19501 1936 1936 1979 1936 1 Year authorized. 14-17 Oct 86 Oct 86 Oct 78 PL100-676 Jan 90 PL100-676 Jan 90 Nov 79 Oct 86 Nov 77 PL100-676 1 Jan 1990 Nov 81 PL100-676 1 Jan 1990 Oct 86 Nov 79 Nov 79 Oct 78 Dec 81 Nov 79 Nov 77 PL100-676 1 Jan 1990 PL100-676 10 Aug 89 Aug 77 Oct 86 Nov 77 Nov 77 Nov 77 Nov 77 Jan 90 Nov 77 -- - $ 22,000 4,984,500 1,920,600 -- 496,000 35,784,122 1,866,910 401,000 4,931,154 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 94 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation Studies (110) Miss. River, Vicinity St. Louis-10400 $323,096 Subtotal 323,096 Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) St. Louis Region, MO-13246 99,520 Alexander and Pulaski Counties, IL-12217 $90,900 Kaskaskia River Basin, IL-99192 3,775 St. Louis Metropolitan Area, MO and IL-55040 2,846 Subtotal 197,041 Special Studies (140) Jefferson County, MO-12865 5 Environmental Ser. Partnership-14190 8,652 Subtotal 8,657 Miscellaneous Activities(170) Dam Safety Criteria Studies-14713 51,885 Review of FERC Licenses-53857 1,267 Special Investigations-17250 13,995 Waterfowl Management Plan-53904 1,431 Subtotal 68,579 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies(180) Madison County-17007 2,325 St. Clarke-17008 2,742 Subtotal 5,066 TOTAL (Category 100) $602,439 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250)-82030, and -82040 90,601 Hydrology Studies (260)-53820 11,086 TOTAL (Category 200) 101,687 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Coldwater Creek, MO-12252 29,470 Maline Creek, MO-12297 658 River Des Peres, MO-12638 88,613 St. Louis Harbor, MO & IL-10184 18,077 Ste. Genevieve, MO-75453 873,455 TOTAL (Category 600) 1,010,272 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1714398 14-18 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT This district comprises portions of southern western portion, and embraces drainage basins of Kentucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tribu- Carolina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern taries. Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY.....................15-2 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY .................. 15-3 3. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and M S ............................................................ 15-3 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 15-4 Alteration of Bridges 5. Authorized Alteration of Bridges ................... 15-4 Flood Control 6. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN..........................154 7. Martins Fork Lake, KY ............... 15-4 ' 8. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY..15-5 9. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, VA and KY..................................... .................. 15-5 10. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.).................5-5 11. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................... ....... 15-5 12. Flood control work under special authorization ........ ...................................... 15-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN ....... 15-6 14. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY ................................. .............. 15-6 15. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN ..................................... 15-6 16. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY.....15-7 17. Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY ........................ .......... 15-7 Dam Safety Program.................................15 Tables Page Table 15-A Cost & Financial Statement..............15-9 Table 15-B Authorizing Legislation...................15-11 Table 15-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................................. ...... 15-13 Table 15-D Not Applicable ........................................... Table 15-E Table 15-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......................................... 15-13 Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power................15-14 Table 15-G Deauthorized Projects .................. 15-14 Table 15-H Cumberland River, TN & KY, Principal Features ........................ 15-15 Table 15-I Tennessee River Lock Dimensions .15-16 Table 15-J Table 15-K Tennessee River Total Cost of Existing Project..............................15-17 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) Local Protection ............. 15-17 Table 15-L Reservoirs ...... ................ 15-17 Table 15-M Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................... 15-18 Table 15-N Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................................... 15-18 General Investigations 19. Surveys .................... ....... 15-7 20. Collection and study of basic data ................. 15-8 21. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .... 15-8 15-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1994 Navigation L CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, KY, about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, KY, from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, KY (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provide for construction of hydroelectric power-generating facilities at Cheatham Dam, rivermile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, TN and KY, to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternatives routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $178,181,406 Federal funds and $102,966 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. (See table 15-H for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, TN, varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 15-B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, TN, has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is $132,140,900. Estimated cost of Celina Dam (1985) is $213,000,000. (See table 15-H at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, TN, (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, TN (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tail water at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville as shown on Table 15-B. Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9- foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 42 terminals on the Cumberland River (5 Municipally owned and open for public use; 5 government owned facilities and 32 privately owned facilities). A total of 18 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sands, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals and grain. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory locks and dams were operated as required. Operation and Maintenance improvements included painting miscellaneous metals at Barkley and Cordell Hull Locks, rewedging generator windings at Barkley Power Plant, dewatering and repair of Cordell Hull Lock. Contracts were awarded at Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory for paving various recreation sites. During Fiscal Year 1994, approximately 16 15-2 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT million tons of commodities were locked through the Cumberland River Locks. Total net energy generated at Barkley Dam (662,243,914kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indiana a Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc, Hosier energy Division. Total net energy generated at Cheatham Dam (155,618,615 kw-hr), Cordell Hull (482,705,216 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (557,242,610 kwhr) was made available for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 2. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902- 1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196- 1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, TN. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 15-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by the TVA of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, TN. (See table 15-I on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 150 terminals on the Tennessee River (13 municipally owned, 15 government owned facilities and 122 privately owned facilities). A total of 79 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, and steel. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $835,715. Maintenance: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major maintenance included dewatering and repairs to Guntersville Main, Guntersville Auxiliary and Fort Loudoun Locks, painting miscellaneous metals at Fort Loudoun, Melton Hill, Watts Bar, Pickwick Auxiliary and Wheeler Auxiliary Locks, purchase of bulkheads and culvert valves for replacement at Chickamauga, Watts Bar and Fort Loudoun Locks, replacement of gate machinery at Wheeler Auxiliary, and construction of a mooring cell at Tennessee River Mile 303.6. During Fiscal Year 1994, approximately 32,000 cubic years of material was removed by hired labor channel maintenance dredging on the Tennessee River and tributaries, and an estimated 46 million tons of commodities and approximately 19,961 recreation craft were locked through the Tennessee River Locks. 3. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110 x 600 feet. Construction for the 15-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1994 divide section, including Bay Springs lock and,.dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $751,000,000. (See 15-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway' bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. The contract for Crow's Neck Environmental Education Center was financially completed. The Mobile District is responsible for operation and maintenance of the entire Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. The project is 100% complete. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During the period $1,468,900 was expended for a construction of an access channel to Port of Florence, Al. Alteration of Bridges 5. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman- Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 6. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATIONAL AREA, KY AND TN Location. The project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area was established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage was not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically established the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The project was authorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1974, 1976 and Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See table 15B for authorizing legislation). The authorized cost (ceiling) for the project was $156,122,000. $112,863,920 was appropriated to The Corp of Engineers for design and construction of park facilities. The first construction contract was awarded in June 1981. 72% of the authorized project is complete. By Memorandum of Agreement dated 1 October 1990 jurisdiction of the area was transferred to The Department of Interior. Local cooperation. None required. Operation during fiscal year. The Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Department of Interior, transferring jurisdiction of the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, itemized activities to be completed by the Army. In accordance with this agreement, miscellaneous minor construction items were completed. 7.MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam is concrete type, 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acre-feet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acrefeet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, is available during the potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project prevents a major portion of average annual flood losses at 15-4 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT Harlan and results in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and to other urban areas downstream. Actual cost of project including $95,000 code 710 funds is $20,479,911. First construction contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed for beneficial use in September 1978. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing contract with Harlan County was approved and certain recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures operated as required. 8. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away form present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. 9. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY Location. The project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $346,000,000. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation requires that non-Federal interests shall hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works and maintain and operate all such works after their completion in accordance with regulations by the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Acquired 167.71 acres fee and 19.59 acres easement. Construction of a levee/floodwall at Harlan continued. Various relocation contracts associated with the flood protection project were awarded. A contract for a cutoff and levee at Loyall/Rio Vista was awarded. Real estate acquisition and design of the final phase of work continued. At Barbourville a contract for construction of the floodwall and closure sturctures continued. Nonstructural evacuations and floodproofings continued at Harland and Barbourville. 10. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 15- B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 15-K. 11 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $18,458. Total cost to September 30, 1994 was $404,346. For project inspection data see table 15-M. An additional $17,705 was expended under authority of Section 216 of 1970 Flood Control Act (PL 91-611) for an Initial Appraisal Report of The Cross Creeks National Wildlife Refuge. 15-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1994 12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal cost for the fiscal year was $164,090 for disaster preparedness. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, TN. It is in DeKalb County, TN., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, TN. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Actual cost of project including $8,940,642 code 710 funds is $53,412,022. Local cooperation. None required on completed project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenance maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (524,634,800 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. Major maintenance included a contract for remedial work. It included drilling and grouting of the right abutment and left reservoir rim to control leakage. A contract was awarded for paving recreation sites. 14. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, TN. It is in Clay County, TN, and about 80 miles northeast of Nashville, TN 28 miles north of Cookeville, TN, and 3 miles east of Celina, TN. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, KY, and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, TN. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use an conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project including $2,195,600 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $28,317,746. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (186,721,700 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, and management and maintenance of public-use facilities. Design and construction of a fish hatchery expansion was completed. This work was funded by the State of Tennessee. 15. J.PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO, RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, TN.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, TN. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Cost of project including $3,260,400 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non- Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $56,914,039. Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 15-6 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (107,010,500 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management,and maintenance of public-use facilities. A contract was awarded for paving recreation sites. 16. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, KY water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Lake for power. The power plant is complete. Recreation was completed in FY 1986. Total cost is $56,741,232. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (111,545,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Major maintenance included construction of an office and warehouse at Laurel Power Plant. 17. WOLF CREEK DAM - LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.0 (above mouth) in Russell County, KY, about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, KY. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, KY. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public-use and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project is $188,267,195. This cost includes $3,259,3472 code 710 funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $104,999,237 for major rehabilitation. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. The major rehab embankment contract was physically completed in September 1982. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (356,980,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of public-use facilities. A contract was awarded for paving of recreation sites. Navigation 18. CENTER HILL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM $2,365,331 was expended in FY 94 to continue remedial measures for the main dam and increased spillway capacity at Center Hill Dam. The work is to prevent sudden failure of the dam as a result of catastrophic flooding on the Caney Fork and Cumberland Rivers. Work will consist of securing six monoliths with tension anchors to raise reservoir elevation 1.4 feet, and construction of a 600 foot wide by 38 foot deep weir in the saddle dam with an erodible fuse plug embankment. This will allow normal operation of the project up to a 75 percent probably maximum flood (PMP). 15-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1994 General Investigations 19. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $988,887 for which $41,479 was for navigation studies $745,338 for flood damage prevention studies, $125,612 for special environmental studies, $46,756 for special investigations, $23,422 for dam safety criteria studies and $4,769 for North American Waterfowl Management Plan, and $1,511 for Planning Assistance to States. 20.COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $69,893 for technical services to others, $21,569 for floodplain management services, $3,111 for quick responses, and $26,634 for services to Jackson County, Sumner County, Cheatham County, Williamson County and Hendersonville, Tennessee. 21. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs this fiscal for the Kentucky Lock Addition were $2,030,415. 15-8 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-A See Section in Text Project 1. Cumberland River TN and KY 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL, and KY 3. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 5. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area, KY and TN 6. Martins Fork Lake, KY 7. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY 8. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 11. Cumberland, KY 12. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN 13. Dale Hollow Lake Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 14. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN 15. Laurel RiverLake, Ohio River Basin, KY COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Approp. Cost 15-9 Total to FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY94 Sep 30, 1994 - - 320,252,240 1,2,3 - - - 320,252,240 1,2,3 21,669,000 23,482,000 20,682,000 20,912,900 352,225,162 4 22,003,257 22,865,774 20,797,222 21,014,184 351,148,660 5 16,251,428 6 - - - . 16,251,428 6 11,843,000 12,110,000 10,415,000 12,132,000 224,296.048 7 11,929,274 11,407,949 10,510,016 12,496,695 223,847,574 8 S- - - 400,000 - - - 400,000 7,838,000 -500,000 -700,000 749,113,050 1,999,758 5,997,359 498,581 39,993 748,933,587 0 0 740,000 0 112,863,920 9 1,322,452 204,073 635,957 19,098 112,399,892 10 -. 20,479,911 - - - - 20,479,911 542,000 575,000 581,000 575,000 7,985,340 560,045 597,510 542,803 613,810 7,331,548 S- - - 817,830 11 - - - - 817,830 11 -30,000 60,000 38,000 42,000 2,179,166 72,515 69,123 44,021 23,237 2,154,311 29,303,500 22,387,000 23,824,000 21,637,000 219,115,500 12 24,997,924 22,129,538 19,695,774 22,688,568 201,691,866 13 - - - - 66,642 - - - - 66,642 - - - - 53,412,022 14 - - - - 53,412,022 15 3,502,000 5,174,000 6,245,000 5,482,900 75,157,876 16 3,446,491 4,570,127 6,759,874 5,539,713 74,990,136 17 - - - - 28,317,746 18 - - - - 28,317,746 19 3,238,000 4,078,000 3,589,000 3,992,400 67,328,027 20 3,251,233 4,017,319 3,749,473 3,974,955 67,191,855 21 - - - - 56,914,039 22 - - - - 56,914,039 23 2,984,000 3,253,000 3,044,000 3,399,400 49,756,651 24 2,865,245 3,241,627 3,017,596 3,207,786 49,363,826 25 - - - - 56,741,232 - - - - 56,741,232 1,079,000 1,210,000 1,214,000 1,266,500 15,175,943 26 1,076,441 1,212,062 1,186,420 1,295,454 15,118,351 26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1994 TABLE 15-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30, 1994 16. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work Lake Cumberland, Approp. - - - - 83,267,958 27 Ohio River Basin, KY Cost - - - - 83,267,958 27 Maint. Approp. 3,582,000 5,268,000 5,615,000 4,709,500 93,555,733 28 Cost 3,703,287 4,910,334 5,788,814 4,783,364 93,347,640 29 Rehab. Approp. - - - - 104,999,237 30 Cost - - - 104,999,237 30 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous project.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contriubted by the State of Kentucky and $6,750 contributed by metropolitan Nashville, TN. 3. Includes $298,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,428,757 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 5. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,428,757 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and $4,005,175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 8. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 9. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 10. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 11. Includes $33,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 12. Includes $19,430,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 13. Includes $18,631,972 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 14. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 16. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $884,178 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 17. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $884,178 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 18. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 8) of 1983. 19. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 8) of 1983. 20. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $884,178 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 8) of 1983. 21. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $884,178 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 8) of 1983. 22. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 24. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $827,478 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 25. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $827,478 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 26. Includes $66,678 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 27. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 28. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 fund provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 29. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 30. Includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction of switchyard. 15-10 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized Project and Work Authorized Documents in Text Act Jul 13, 1892 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 19, 1952 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 Aug. 5, 1886 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 Jun 5, 1920 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 26, 19342 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 1, 1980 Jul 3, 1930 May 18, 1933 CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Provision made for lock A Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Repairing dams A to'F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville, via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. Authorized TVA. to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Does. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1884, p. 1663 Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 15-11 2. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1994 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) See Section Date of in Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Mar 7, 1974 Jul 24, 1946 9. Authorized Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE.TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 761, 75th Cong., 3d sess. OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong. 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 15-12 H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. 3. NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cst ton Spt, 194 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Caney Fork River, TN abandoned 1895 $ 27,828 Clinch River, TN and VA abandoned 1923 53,949 . $ 7,873 Duck River, TN abandoned 1887 13,000 Elk River, AL and TN abandoned 1904 4,000 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN Holston River, TN Little Tennessee River, TN Obey River, TN Red River, TN South Fork of Cumberland River, KY abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned 1931 1911 1888 1887 1884 1892 249,605 5,714 5,510 11,500 5,000 11,967 33,554 TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cost to Sept, 1994 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barbourville, KY completed 1963 $2,088,147 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN completed 1962 460,134 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY completed 1969 567,703 Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY completed 1949 26,309 Paint Rock River, AL completed 1967 544,173 Pineville, KY completed 1963 1,679,126 1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. 15-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1994 OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS (Including Power) For last Full Cost to S Report see ept, 1994 Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barkley Dam and Lake beneficial use - $146,498,644 $112,267,685 1 Barkley, KY and TN Celina Dam, KY inactive 222,575 Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 31,682,762 85,643,559 1 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 79,874,492 56,723,5201 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 52,266,412 96,513,8971 1. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY " See Table 15-H TABLE 15-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For last Full Federal Contributed Report see Funds Funds Project Annual Report Date and Authority Expended Expended Three Islands Reservoir, 1970 Authorized: FC Act 1938, PL 761, $111,855 Ohio River Basin, TN 75 Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. Middlesboro, Yellow Creek - Authorized: FC Act, Dec 22, Bell County, KY 1944, PL 534, 78th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Cumberland River above - Authorized: River & Harbor Act, Nashville, TN Aug 5, 1886. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Hiwassee River, Polk and 1923 Authorized: River & Harbor Act 123,065 Bradley Counties, TN Aug 14, 1876. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Rossview Lake, Tennessee - Authorized: FC Act, Jan 28, 1938, 6,779 and Kentucky PL 76175th Congress. Deauthorized* 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 15-14 TABLE 15-F. NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPAL FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hull Celina ri. t Kttwa KwV A4hlarnr (it l Hikenry Carthager TN Celina TN Miles above mouth of river Lock dimensions (feet)' Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guard-sills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Sp'lway-. Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level): Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet): Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canel: Length (mile) Bottom width (feet) Depth a minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Percent of project completion Year opened to navigation Cost* 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper, 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 60 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,0003,4 259,000 610,000 2,082,00 1.75 400 11 4 32,500 130,000 8 1964 $146,5000,000 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acre-feet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acre-feet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during non-flood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 15-15 TN, 9 miles 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper, 17, lower Rock 5 miles 385.4 Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 TN, 3 miles 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper, 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 98 3,6052 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 4503 385 .382 vvaa.aa.. . , . 5 miles 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper, 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,1382 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 5083 508 501 499 13,920 85,6005,6 20,500 204,800 310,900 3 33,333 100,000 8 1973 $79,874,500 Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 86 2,298 290 250 Tainter 5 50 by 37 5643 560 559 559 16,960 55,9505 14,700 287,300 357,950 3 36,000 108,000 8 1954 $52,266,000 - 7,450 19,8007 84,200 104,000 3 12,000 36,000 $213,000,000 442 27,450 125,0005 63,000 357,000 545,000 4 25,000 100,000 8 1952 $31,700,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY OF CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1994 TABLE 15-I TENNESSEE RIVER (SEE SECTION 2 OF TEXT) Lock Dimension Length Minimum Depth Width Avail- Lift on Guard Sills of able for Year Miles Cham- Full Nor- Maxi- Opened Above Miles from ber Width mal mum Lower Upper Character of Navi- Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation gation 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, KY 110 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Limestone 1942 Pickwick Landing: Auxiliary lock 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN Main lock 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN Wilson: Auxiliary lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL Main lock 259.4 ,2.9 above Florence, AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 110 600 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 1937 110 1000 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 1984 60 292 94 100.0 11.04 11.2 Limestone 1927 300 110 600 94 100.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1959 60 400 48 51.5 13.2 14.7 Limestone 1934 110 600 48 51.5 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 60 360 39 45.0 11.8 13.0 Limestone 1937 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 110 600 39 45.0 12.7 13.0 Limestone 1965 Nickajack: Auxiliary lock 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 110 600 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1967 Main lock 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 110 800 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone Chickamauga 471.0 6.9 above Chattanooga, TN 60 360 49 53.0 13.0 10.0 Limestone 1939 Watts Bar 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, TN 60 360 58 70.0 11.8 12.0 Shale 1941 Kind of Dam Fixed Fixed Fixed Cost of Type of Each Lock Construction and Dam Concrete and 2 earthfill Concrete and 3 earthfill Concrete and 3 earthfill Fixed Concrete and $46,973,5405 earthfill 7 Fixed Concrete and 1,796,2956 earthfill Fixed Concrete and earthfill Fixed - 3&7 Fixed Concrete and 7 earthfill Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Concrete Concrete Concrete and earthfill 77 3&7 3 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, TN 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, TN 60 360 72 80.0 11.8 12.0 Limestone 1943 75 400 54 60.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 Fixed Concrete and earthfill Fixed Concrete 15-16 Project1 Kentucky General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock Main lock Guntersville: Auxiliary lock Main lock Fort Loudon Melton Iill (Clinch R.) I. H. Doc. 328, 71 Cong., 2d seas, contains table, pp. 98 and 99, giving pertinent information concerning low dams contemplated 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, National Defense Act of June 3; 1916,(H . Doc. 1262, 6 under 1930 project. Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low dams in addition to seas.). Actual coat of lock and dam. existing locks and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 6. Actual coat of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams constructed by Tennessee Valey Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. I)Deign for lock prepared with Corpa forces and funds. 4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. 4th Cong., let II NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-J TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEP 30, 1994 (See Section 2 of Text) Channel Operation & Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,236 $12,240,320 $207,590,409 $222,074,965 12 Maintenance 11,665 11,665 Increase of compen- - 5 5 sation, rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,236 $12,240,325 $207,602,074 $222,086,6351,2 1. In addition, surplus property valued at $54,336 was ation and care of works of improvement under provisions of transferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes appropriation for such purposes. $4,005,175 expended betweenl890 and June 30, 1935, on oper- 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. TABLE 15-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Tvie of Estimated Cost Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Cumberland, KY Channel Improvement 520,000 240,000 760,0001 1. Deferred TABLE 15-L RESERVOIRS Total Tributary Basin and Reservoir Center Hill Lake, TN Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Laurel River Lake, KY Martins Fork Lake, KY 1. Details of this project are in individual report. 2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. Federal Steam Cost Caney Fork River $53,412,022 1 Obey River 28,167,7461 Stones River 56,868,03912 Laurel River 56,741,232 3 Martins Fork 20,479,911 3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." 15-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1994 TABLE 15-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, KY Apr 1994 and Sep 1994 Corbin, KY Apr 1994 and Sep 1994 Lake City, TN Apr 1994 and Sep 1994 Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) Apr 1994 and Sep 1994 Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) Apr 1994 and Sep 1994 Pineville, KY Apr 1994 and Sep 1994 Spring City, TN Apr 1994 and Sep 1994 Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) Apr 1994 and Sep 1994 TABLE 15-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L. 858, 80th Congress, as amended Project FY 94 Cost Little Limestone Creek, TN $ 43,003 Dry Creek, Goodlettsbille, TN 1,095 Caney Fork River, Carthage, TN 1,906 Browns Creek, Nashville, TN 4,808 Clark Spring Branch, Decatur, AL 2,262 Hills Creek, Warren County, TN 5,340 Rock Creek, Unicoi County, TN 1,664 Richland Creek, Morgantown, TN 3,469 Sinking Creek, Lebanon, TN 2,315 Sequatchie River, Marion Co, TN 2,078 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526, 79th Congress) Project FY 94 Cost Emory River, Harriman, TN $ 2,577 Sheffield Water Intake, AL 10 Pond Creek,Cheatham Co., TN 89 Cumberland River Metro Nashville Landfill, TN 37,055 Duck River, Hickman Co., TN 1,724 Savannah City Park, TN -4,030 Sequoyah Hills Park, Knoxville, TN 223 Tennessee River, Chattanooga, TN 445,299 McGregor Park, Montgomery Co., TN 12,838 South Holston River, Kingsport, TN 1,363 Tennesse River, Clinton, TN 6,944 Cumberland River Gholson Rd, Montgomery Co, TN 12,500 Lake Guntersville, AL 8,857 Sequoyah Hills Park Phase II, Knoxville, TN 364,123 Tennesse River, Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN 4,682 Clinch River, Kingston, TN 2,417 Ditto Landing, Huntsville, AL 4,661 Tennessee River, UT Experiment Station, Knoxville, TN 47,358 Cumberland River, Ted Rhodes Golf Course, Nashville, TN 41,351 Louisville Point Park, Blount Co, KY 2,757 15418 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southwestern Ohio, west central Kentucky, a small portion of north central Tennessee, Indiana except northern part, and southeastern Illinois except Cairo-Mounds-Mound City area, all included in drainage basin of Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately upstream from Foster, KY., to mouth. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Channels and Habors Page 1. Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY..... 16-2 Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River ......................... .......................... 16-2 3. Green and Barren Rivers, KY ................... 16-2 4. Kentucky River, KY..................................... 16-2 5. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ................. 16-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 16-3 7. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..................................... 16-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 8. Evansville, IN............................... . 16-3 9. Frankfort, South Frankfort, KY ............... 16-4 10. Mill Creek, OH .............................................. 16-4 11. Salyersville, KY .......................................... 16-4 12. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ........... 16-5 Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. Barren River Lake, KY ................................. 16-5 14. Brookville Lake, KY ................................... 16-6 15. Buckhorn Lake, KY ................................ 16-6 16. Caesar Creek Lake, OH ................................ 16-6 17. Cagles Mill Lake, IN ..................................... 16-6 18. Carr Fork Lake, KY ................................... 16-7 19. Cave Run Lake, KY ...................................... 16-7 20. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN ......................... 16-7 21. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH ... 16-8 22. Green River Lake, KY ............................... 16-8 23. Huntington Lake, IN ................................... 16-9 24. Mississinewa Lake, IN .................................. 16-9 25. Monroe Lake, IN ........................................ 16-9 26. Nolin Lake, KY......................................... 16-10 27. Ohio River Basin (Louisville District)........ 16-10 28. Patoka Lake, IN ....................................... 16-10 29. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY ..................................... 16-11 Page 30. Salamonie Lake, IN ................................. 16-11 31. Taylorsville Lake, KY .............................. 16-12 32. Wabash River Basin ................................. 16-12 33. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH ......... 16-12 34. William H. Harsha Lake, OH .................. 16-13 35. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............................. 16-13 36. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 16-13 37. Flood Control Works Under Special Authorization ..................................... 16-13 General Investigations 38. Surveys ..................................... 16-14 39. Precontruction Engineering and Design ... 16-14 40. Coordinattion with other Agencies ........... 16-14 41. Collection and Study of Basic Data ......... 16-14 Tables Table 16-A Cost and Financial Statement.... 16-15 Table 16-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 16-20 Table 16-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................................... 16-23 Table 16-D Not applicable Table 16-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................................... 16-24 Table 16-F Not applicable Table 16-G Deauthorized Projects .............. 16-27 Table 16-H Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and Kentucky River Navigation Systems ........ 16-29 Table 16-I Ohio River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan ............................ 16-30 Table 16-J Wabash River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan .................... 16-34 Table 16-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................... 16-35 Table 16-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................... 16-38 Table 16-M General Investigations ............... 16-40 16-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation - Channels and Harbors 1. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, LICKING RIVER, KY Location. The Licking River originates in southeast ern Kentucky and flows generally northwesterly to its confluence with the Ohio River at Covington, KY, mile 470.2 below Pittsburgh, PA. The Licking River Basin includes the drainage area of the Licking River, and all other left bank tributaries of the Ohio River from Markland Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 531.5) upstream to Meldahl Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 436.2). Existing project. There are no locks and dams on the Licking River. However, a navigable depth of 9 feet is maintained up to mile 7.0 on the Licking River. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities, oil products, and coal are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel. Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see the heading under Ohio River. 3. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to give, with channel work in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY; a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1, Barren River. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16- H for principal features of the locks and dams.) Local cooperation; Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and Rochester, Kentucky, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of Green River to mile 103 Green River. Routine maintenance was performed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, are in good condition. Lock and Dam 3, Green River, and Lock and Dam 1, Barren River are in fair condition, and Lock 4, Green River, is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs were deferred pending completion of survey report for navigation on Green River. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 1981. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Under permit issued by District Engineer on August 20, 1963, private interests dredged channel of Green River to extend 9-foot-depth to coal loading terminal at mile 108.1. Channel of Green River above Lock 3 is no longer maintained. 4. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6-footdepth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45th Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in 16-2 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. (See Table 16-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) On December 19, 1976, the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River System were reduced from continuous 24-hour year-round operation to two-shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10, and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 through 14 have been reduced in several increments. On October 1, 1981, Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. Locks 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 were in operation for 15 weekends during fiscal year 1982 and was again closed at the end of this period. Locks 5 through 14 were leased to the State of Kentucky on May 21, 1985. The State of Kentucky operated these locks on weekends during the summer boating seasons through the Fiscal Year. The lease is expired on October 15, 1989, and Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. During the fiscal year Locks 1 through 4 continued a two-shift, year-round operation. Licenses. Federal Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,400; total collections through September 30, 1994, $315,205. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities and gasoline are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 through 4 and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Dam 5 at mile 82.2 Kentucky River. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of the five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963, 1964, and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to provide for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 5. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 16-C. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 8. EVANSVILLE, IN Location. In Vanderburgh County, IN, on right bank of Ohio River, 792.2 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Evansville-South, IN.) Existing project. Construction of a system of levees and concrete floodwalls, together with pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, at Evansville. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1127. Project will provide protection for City of Evansville, IN, against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood (maximum of record), with a 3-foot freeboard. Estimated total cost ofnewwork(1994)is $44,654,000 Federal, and $5,500,000 non-Federal. Existing project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin 1937 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Section 3 of Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for Howell Unit 1, Knight Township sections, and Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 1 and Unit 2, Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4. Operations during fiscal year. The construction contract for the final phase of the project, PigeonCreek Section, Unit 2 Part 4 was awarded in September 1992. Construction of this phase was completed in May 1994 and turned over to the local sponsor for operation and maintenance in July 1994. During the 1994 flood season estimated damages of $956,000 were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. Howell Unit 1, Knight Township, Pigeon Creek Unit 1, and Pigeon Creek Unit 2, Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 have been completed. Howell Section, Unit 2 was reclassified from the "active" category to the "inactive" category July 7, 1977 based on studies that indicated this part of the project is not economically justified. This part was deauthorized by Congress under authority of Public Law 99-662, effective July 1992. Project is 100 percent complete overall. 9. FRANKFORT, SOUTH FRANKFORT, KY Location. The project area of South Frankfort lies along the south bank of the Kentucky River in Frankfort, KY, Franklin County in the Bluegrass Region of central Kentucky. Existing Project. The project consists of approximately 3,811 feet of concrete floodwall and earthen levee, interior pumping facilities, and bank protection; and, will provide protection to 390 properties in South Frankfort. The Kentucky River drains an area of about 6,966 square miles in the central part of Kentucky and empties into the Ohio River at mile 545.8. Estimated cost of new work (1994) is $11,510,000, of which $8,630,000 is Federal, and $2,880,000 is non-Federal. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1938, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. 16-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Local Cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partner is the City of Frankfort, Kentucky. To meet its financial requirements, the city has received an amount not to exceed one half of the non-Federal cost or $2.4 million, whichever is less, in the form of an allocation contained in the March 30, 1990, Kentucky House Bill No. 799. They have allocated $1,271,000 from the City's General Fund and Public Transit Accounts and have set aside some $$1,225,000 in additional bonding capability with either the Kentucky League of Cities Bond Pool or First Kentucky Securities Corps. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in November 1991; however, the document excluded reference to Federal and non-Federal cost shares due to the lack of an approved technical document and cost estimate. The technical document was subsequently approved on April 22, 1992. The PCA was modified to include the appropriate cost shares prior to initiation of construction. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The first construction contract for bank stabilization was completed in July 1994. The second construction contract for 1,250 feet of floodwall and the 150 cfs pump station was awarded in March 1994. The Project is 40 percent complete. Maintenance: During the 1994 flood season estimated damages of $8,764,000 were prevented. 10. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Fork in Hamilton County, OH. Lower Mill Creek is in the commercial and industrial heart of the Cincinnati metropolitan area in the southwestern portion of the State. Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, two pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for high-density urban oriented recreational use. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all modifications and relocations of buildings, utilities, street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent encroachment on improved channels and on ponding areas which would impair capacities; at least annually inform interests affected as to degree of protection afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical development of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses. Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the project, local interests are required to furnish assurainces that they will, if necessary, pay or contribute in kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would amount to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975, and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of Section 1 is complete. At the direction of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, the Corps has initiated a study to evaluate the consequences of terminating further Federal activity on the project. All further design and construction activities are unprogrammed. Maintenance: During the 1994 flood season no benefits were accomplished. Condition at end of fiscal year. DM #1, Hydrology & Hydraulics; DM #2, Phase 1, Plan Formulation; DM #3, Phase II, General Project; DM #4, Construction Materials; DM #5, Railroad Relocations, and DM #6, Barrier Dam Pumps are complete. DM#7, Public Use was completed in FY 1992. Construction channel and levee-Sections 2,3,4A, and 7A, Phase 1, are complete. Project is about 52 percent complete overall. 11. SALYERSVILLE, KY Location. Project is located along the banks of the Licking River from approximately mile 266 and 271 in Magoffin County, Kentucky along the Mountain Parkway about 75 miles southeast of Lexington, Kentucky. Existing project. The most cost-effective and feasible plan to provide the authorized level of protection (1978 flood protection) is called the "Cut-Thru Plan" and includes two channel cut-thrus, a barrier dam at the upstream cut-thru, and an 0.8 mile reach of channel improvement connecting the two cut-thrus. Estimated total cost of new work (1994) is $10,330,000 of which $9,348,600 is Federal and $981,400 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. The recommended plan is strongly supported by the local sponsor, the City of Salyersville. The local sponsor qualifies for an "ability to pay" reduction pursuant to Section 103(m) of the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Based on current costs and economics, the local sponsor share would be 9.5 percent of the total project cost. It is anticipated that the Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) will be executed in May 1995 with physical construction initiating in FY 1996. Operations during the fiscal year. Engineering studies and the development of the PCA continue. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. Project is about 15 percent complete overall with design approximately 75 percent complete. 12. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. 16-4 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Existing project. Construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project provides protection for 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Estimated cost of new work (1994) is $69,951,183, of which $60,092,183 is Federal, and $9,859,000 is non- Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred until such time as a water quality problem on Pond Creek is corrected. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to' pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirements by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project was executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1,2,3,4,4A,5 and Pond Creek Pump Plant have been furnished. Project was transferred to local interest on September 8, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Trial expenses to settle claims against a contractor to install pumps and motors at the Pond Creek Pumping Station continued. Project is 99 percent complete overall. During the 1994 flood season no benefits were accomplished. Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast of Scottsville, KY. At flood control pool reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,000 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of the completed project is $27,479,717 including $2,335,055 Federal funds and $108,418 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract, with the Common wealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A contract to remove underground storage tanks was completed. Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1994 flood season estimated damages of $10,230,000 were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition is complete. 14. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply, and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum pool of 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Cost of completed new work is $45,402,565 of which $37,905,073 is Federal cost and $7,497,492 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: During 1994 flood season estimated damages of $831,000 were prevented. Routine maintenance was performed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in November 1965 and project was placed in operation January 1974. Construction and land acquisition are complete. 15. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from 16-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacityis 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 is for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 ofAnnual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1994 flood season prevented damages of $443,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 16. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, OH, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, OH, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, OH. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost ofnewwork(1993) is $62,893,882 and $5,037,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1983 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions ofWater SupplyAct of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages estimated at $8,404,000 were prevented during the 1994 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in January 1968 and the project was placed in operation January 1978. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. Project is about 99 percent complete overall. 17. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Estimated project cost of new work (1994) is $4,369,997 including $155,416 Federal funds, $113,094 contributed funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park, under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was signed by the State of Indiana on August 26,1981 and approved by the Deputy Chief of Engineers on March 26, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1994 flood season prevented damages of $6,797,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. Recreation facilities constructed under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program are completed except for administrative action to financially closeout the project. 18. CARR FORK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, KY. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control 16-6 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT gates and 8-foot diameter conduit to stilling'basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Cost of completed work is $50,854,826 including $76,724 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1994 flood season prevented damages of $747,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation January 1976. Construction started in January 1966 is complete. 19. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U.S. Highway 60 near Farmers, KY, and 7 miles southwest of Morehead, KY. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control andallied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,700 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Estimated Federal cost of new work (1994) is $81,162,282 of which $6,900,000 is U.S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: An audit to close out the project continued. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1994 flood season prevented damages of $4,447,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been in operation since February 1974. Construction was started in June 1965 and is about 99 percent complete. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. Administrative procedures to financially closeout the project are in progress. 20. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet area for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Cost of completed new work is $6,987,807 made up of $6,260,134 for the initial project and $373,678 Federal cost and $353,995 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Harden Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has under-. taken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $6,114,000 were prevented during the 1994 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in October 1956 and all major items of work were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been in operation since August 1960. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are completed. 21. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, OH, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acrefeet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Federal cost of completed project is $22,083,660. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $719,000 were prevented during the 1994 flood season. 16-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 22. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rockfill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Cost of completed new work is $33,462,330, consisting of $33,105,184 initial project funds, $40,001 for water supply, and $317,145 Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15, 1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance and operation of 99 percent of the site to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments received through fiscal year 1984 was $21,504. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4,1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A contract to remove underground storage tanks was completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $6,612,000 during 1994 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. Construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site is complete. 23. HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost for new work (1994) is $19,622,258 made up of $19,273,001 Federal cost for the initial project and $193,903 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage, and $155,354 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $4,542,000 during 1994 flood control season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 24. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfil dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gate-controlled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acre-feet are reserved for flood control storage. Cost for completed new work is $24,379,800 made up of $23,791,816 Federal cost for the initial project, $239,200 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage. $174,392 Federal cost and $174,392 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958. 16-8 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category ofthe completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $17,062,000 during 1994 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 25. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles each of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation.) Cost of completed new work is $16,570,774 consisting of $7,032,484 Federal funds, $7,797,604 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow regulation storage and $870,343 Federal cost and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to low-flow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at CecilM. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category ofthe completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $2,093,000 during 1994 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965." Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 26. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-eaith core type with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details of project, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1994) is $17,193,278 including $2,594,274 for construction of recreation facilities. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A contract to remove underground storage tanks was completed. Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1994 flood season estimated damages of $3,062,000 were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 27. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16-I for cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred except for these projects for which individual reports are given. 28. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange, and Crawford Counties. (See Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Estimated cost of new work (1994) is $73,664,159 of which 16-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 $53,095,790 is Federal cost for other construction, and $20,568,369 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to ensure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent of the joint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1994 flood season prevented damage estimated at $3,234,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are complete. Real Estate relocation work is about 99 percent complete. All major features are complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. The project is about 99 percent complete overall. 29. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River, 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acre-feet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details, see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $10,643,001 including $890,008 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances were obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18, 1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1994 flood season prevented damages estimated at $3,415,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 30. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot-diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acre-feet is for flood control storage. Estimatedproject cost fr new work(1994) is $17,046,151 made up of $16,244,356 Federal cost for the initial project and $170,697 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow augmentation storage and $315,549 Federal cost and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 16-10 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1994 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $9,083,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 31. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works will be slide gate controlled and spillway will be uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Estimated cost of new work (1994) is $122,090,000 made up of $92,980,000 Federal cost for the initial project and $17,020,000 non-Federal contributed funds for initial recreation facilities and $6,045,000 Federal cost and $6,045,000 non-Federal contributed funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provided for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to remove debris from Taylorsville Lake was completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1994 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $422,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering and design studies are complete except for design of a comfort station. Land acquisition is 100 percent complete. Construction was started in June 1974. All major construction items are complete except recreation facilities. The dam gates were closed in January 1983 for permanent impoundment. Dedication ceremony was May 28, 1983. The project is about 99 percent complete overall. 32. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio. Existing project. One local protection project and five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin plan. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16-J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) 33. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Health, OH, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details, see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $4,722,463 made up of $3,092,941 Federal cost for the initial project, $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization and $529,361 Federal cost and $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include 16-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 a conservation pool, local interests would contribute one-half additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid one-half cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with the license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1994 flood season prevented damages estimated at $170,000. Preparations are underway by Hamilton County to dredge a portion of West Fork Lake. Environmental actions required for the dredging operation have been completed and a section 404 permit issued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. Cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program is complete. 34. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, OH, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Batavia,OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway, and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acrefeet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost of complete new workis $52,023,157 and a estimated $3,485,840 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981, by Public Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance, and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1994 flood season prevented damages estimated at $2,868,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in May 1970. Project is complete and reservoir was placed in operation in February 1978. 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise interests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 16-K for the latest dates of inspection performed on the local protection projects, channel improvements, and bank revetments). Fiscal year costs were $215,896. Total costs to September 30, 1994, were $3,963,194. 36. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 16-E. 37. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for fiscal year were $327,157 for disaster preparedness. Small navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor and Flood Control Act, Public Law 86-645, 86th Congress, as amended. There was no cost this fiscal year. See Table 16-L. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $310,124 for preparation of sixteen Reconnaissance Studies, $276,222 for six Detailed Project Reports, $161,003 for Plans and Specifications on two projects and $56,745 for one construction projects. See Table 16-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress. Costs for fiscal year were $140 for preparation of three Recon- 16-12 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Reports, $307,666 for Plans and Specifications on nine projects, and $34,269 for construction of five projects. See Table 16-L. General Investigations 38. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs was $1,599,075 for three Navigation Studies; $2,941,176 for eighteen Flood Damage Prevention Studies; $3,768 for one Special Studies; and $124,373 for four Miscellaneous Activities. See Table 16-M. 39. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year costs were $1,616,380 for two Navigation Projects; $1,848,857 for seven Flood Control Projects; and $39 for one Environmental Infrastructure Project. See Table 16-M. 40. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Fiscal year total cost was $16,838 for one Coordination With Other Agencies; and $29,339 for Planning Assistance to States. See Table 16-M. 41. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total cost was $177,658 for six Flood Plain Management Services; and $8,322 for Hydologic Studies. See Table 16-M. 16-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1991 1992 1993 1994 Sep 30,1994 Navigation - Channels and Harbors 1 Open Channel Work, New Work Licking River Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Navigation - Locks and Dams 3 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4 Kentucky River, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Flood Control, Local Protection 8 Evansville, IN 9 Frankfort, South Frankfort, KY Levee Unit 5, Wabash River, IN 10 Mill Creek, OH 11 Salyersville, KY 12 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 13,000 14,700 17,000 19,000 119,011 13,000 14,700 17,000 19,000 119,011 - - - 13,808,222 ' - 13,808,222 1 1,152,000 1,088,367 1,244,000 1,670,500 38,481,250 2,3 1,105,338 1,246,490 1,215,283 1,440,566 38,211,230 - - - 4,176,749 -- - - 4,176,749 931,500 725,500 4,902,000 3,633,000 64,552,341 4,5 800,341 873,149 2,194,906 5,169,130 63,364,745 4.5 -- - 556,956 -- - - 556,956 2,263,000 305,000 319,000 209,204 44,022,247 6 4,938,572 652,605 601,289 136,012 43,806,539 7 - 702,000 2,328,000 3,030,000 8 - 175,595 1,763,555 1,939,150 100,000 - 3,538 4,000 78,205 - 7,544,987 22,234 7,544,964 6,140,000 6,396,000 1,950,000 1,331,000 97,125,742 8,933,891 6,715,773 1,293,951 898,196 95,940,261 400,000 280,000 244,000 1,156,000 2,080,000 197,484 317,890 205,620 226,818 947,812 1,350,000 1,300,000 160,000 15,000 60,092,183 540,274 2,293,877 427,592 49,796 60,009,811 16-14 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1991 1992 1993 1994 Sep 30,1994 Flood Control - Reservoirs 13 Barren River Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14 Brookville Lake, IN 15 Buckhorn Lake, KY . New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 16 Caesar Creek Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 17 Cagles Mill Lake, IN 18 Carr Fork Lake, KY 19 Cave Run Lake, KY 20 Cecil M. Hardin Lake, IN New Work SApprop Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - $ - $27,479,717 9 - - 27,479,717 9 1,295,000 1,284,757 1,485,000 1,871,300 24,980,021 0lo.11,12 1,263,645 1,302,491 1,472,992 1,801,474 24,796,380 o.1,1 ,12 (13,815) 45,402,565 13s - 45,402,565 13 682,000 599,227 606,000 683,700 8,314,224 514,106 815,199 597,583 649,935 8,254,842 - - - - 11,766,206 14 -- - - 11,766,206 14 703,000 972,780 994,000 1,184,900 15,583,223 i' 738,810 966,271 973,391 1,055,918 15,358,514 s1 - 62,893,882 (2,229) - 62,881,010 644,000 736,474 849,600 1,135,900 10,138,908 669,046 713,160 856,955 1,132,741 10,088,501 - - - (6,281) 4,369,997 16 - - - - 4,369,997 17 459,000 400,200 496,800 603,000 8,457,817 421,615 440,382 467,261 589,054 8,407,165 - 50,854,826 18s 15 - 50,854,826 18 859,000 928,118 1,043,500 1,174,200 14,099,485 19 789,973 998,174 1,045,586 1,140,762 14,017,549 19 33,794 - 81,162,282 20 7,885 - 81,159,541 20 507,000 612,188 656,000 816,400 9,022,321 528,062 616,762 642,959 745,670 8,925,290 - - - - 6,987,807 21 - - - - 6,987,807 21 656,000 609,800 777,000 911,500 10,872,340 648,587 633,745 748,549 889,173 10,816,997 16-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1991 1992 1993 1994 Sep 30,1994 21 Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH 22 Green River Lake, KY 23 Huntington Lake, IN 24 Mississinewa Lake, IN 25 Monroe Lake, IN 26 Nolin Lake, KY 27 Ohio River Basin Louisville District 28 Patoka Lake, IN New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ $ 488,000 425,331 567,000 477,582 448,396 554,885 - $ 22,083,660 - 22,083,660 691,000 7,545,645 677,485 7,501,822 - - - - 33,462,330 - - - 33,462,330 " 1,171,000 1,105,383 1,197,500 1,589,000 20,725,794 " 1,127,966 1,161,530 1,218,313 1,414,932 20,480,710 * - - - (251) 19,622,258 24 - - - 19,621,777 " 441,100 445,848 556,000 589,500 9,131,888 435,631 462,027 556,052 590,916 9,115,317 -- - (1,329) 24,379,800 26 -- - - 24,379,800 26 430,000 635,777 825,000 903,800 9,004,093 436,517 644,908 856,845 873,995 8,964,213 -.- - 16,570,774 27 -- - - 16,570,774 27 837,000 688,250 664,000 793,000 10,229,418 " 843,847 662,999 702,023 780,242 10,195,327 28 (103) 17,193,275 2 - - 17,193,278 30 1,466,000 1,614,400 1,507,500 1,820,900 28,957,974 31 1,402,619 1,678,145 1,499,192 1,794,697 28,453,039 3 - 148 - 1,526,142 - 1,526,142 - 73,664,159 32 - 73,316,892 3 436,000 398,861 481,000 506,889 5,938,246 419,228 443,840 479,151 482,217 5,894,297 16-16 1,836 TABLE 16-A LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1991 1992 1993 1994 Sep 30,1994 29 Rough River Lake & New Work Channel Improvment, Approp. $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,643,001 " KY Cost - - - - 10,643,001 34 Maint. Approp. 1,650,000 1,090,955 1,320,800 1,713,500 26,347,967 * Cost 1,489,621 1,284,058 1,289,222 1,435,547 25,988,163 3 30 Salamonie Lake, IN New Work Approp. - - - - 17,046,151 36 Cost - - - - 17,039,321 37 Maint. Approp. 424,000 497,300 522,000 711,000 8,413,320 Cost 414,595 515,770 516,391 688,567 8,365,738 31 Taylorsville Lake, KY New Work Approp. - 160,000 60,000 (13,715) 86,800,594 38 Cost 331,528 634,371 89,737 (624) 86,571,878 39 Maint. Approp. 578,000 664,903 823,500 1,286,750 7,443,124 Cost 606,915 672,843 810,081 1,028,646 7,139,161 33 West Fork of Mill New Work Creek Lake, OH Approp. - - - - 4,722,463 40 Cost - - - - 4,722,463 40 Maint. Approp. 271,000 292,967 380,000 504,500 6,555,903 Cost 289,742 311,550 384,168 475,741 6,512,349 34 William H. Harsha New Work Lake, OH Approp. - - - - 52,023,157 41 Cost - - - - 52,023,157 4 Maint. Approp. 492,000 592,500 656,000 678,350 7,460,787 Cost 473,388 604,544 667,899 659,975 7,410,732 Includes $85,000 public works funds. 2 Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $204,444 "maintenance and operation of dams and improvements of navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to 30 June 1936, for operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 3 Includes $725,715 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. Includes $316,871 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters", and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30, 1937 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. s Includes $149,700 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6 Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds and $63,187 contributed funds. ? Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds and $63,169 contributed funds. 8 Includes $1,070,000 in contributed non-Federal funds. 9 Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds, $110,107 Code 713 Federal funds and $108,418 Code 713 non-Federal funds. to Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. " Includes $326,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 12 Includes $514,125 "maintenance & operation of dams arid other improvements of navigable water". '~ Includes $7,497,492 contributed funds and $100,706 Code 711 funds. 14 Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 712 funds. 16-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED 16 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 7 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 18 Includes $76,724 Code 711 funds. 19 Includes $51,854 Special Recreation Use Fees. 0 Includes $6,900,000 of U.S. Forest Service Funds. 21 Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds, $353,995 Code 713 funds, & 353,995 non-Federal contributions in kind for recreation facilities. 2 Includes $133,413 Code 711 funds, $183,732 Code 713 funds, and $40,001 contributed funds. * Includes $114,280 Special Recreation Use Fees and $514,125 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 2 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,903 contributed funds. 2 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,422 contributed funds. 2 Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 713 funds, $239,200 contributed funds and $174,392 non- Federal" contribution in kind for recreational facilities. * Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds, $869,158 Code 713 funds, $7,797,604 contributed funds and $870,343 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 8 Includes $54,460 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 2 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 3o Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 31 Includes $204,920 Special Recreation Use Fees, $52,000 Supplement Funds, and $373,325 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 3 Includes $20,568,369 contributed funds. * Includes $20,266,598 contributed funds. s' Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $867,396 Code 711 funds, $22,612 Code 713 funds, and $22,612 contributed funds. * Includes $236,640 Special Recreation Use Fees and $514,125 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 36 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $170,697 contributed funds and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 37 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 8 Includes $4,115,116 contributed funds. *' Includes $4,001,726 contributed funds. 4o Includes $529,361 Code 713 funds, $50,000 contributed funds, $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities, and $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam. 4i Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning, engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 16-18 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug 11, 1888 Mar 3, 1893 1 Jul 13, 1892 Jul 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 2 Mar 3, 1909 Jul 3, 1930 2 Jun 26, 1934 3 Aug 30, 1935 2 Sep 3, 1954 Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul 3, 1958 GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Purchase of original improvement H. Doc 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Ann. Rept. 1887, p.1 903 Construction of Lock 2, Green River Annual Report, 1891, p. 2439 Construction of Lock 5, Green River Construction of Lock 6, Green River Annual Report, 1891, p. 2478 Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River." Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Rivers and Harbors Committee Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Sess., widens bends in Bear Creek, KY and H. Doc. 685, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors Improvement of Nolin River H.D. 480, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River revocation of S.D. 82, 83d Congress, 2d Sess. authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 27 of Text) Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection Flood Control Committee of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected Document 1, 75th Congress, by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost 1st Session not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Flood Control Committee in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary Document 1, 75th Congress, of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial 1st Session accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers, subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan H. Doc. 504, 78th Congress, for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control 2d Session and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, KY at an estimated cost of $129,350 S.D. 105, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at an H.D. 535, 78th Congress estimated cost of $360,000 2d Session Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, H.D. 197, 80th Congress including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River 1st Session Basin, Illinois, and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000. H.D. 198, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000. Flood control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for H.D. 192, 85th Congress, Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an 1st Session estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000. 16-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION CONTINUED Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct 23, 1962 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Aug 13, 1968 Dec 29, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1988 Nov 28, 1990 Nov 17, 1986 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on H.D. 423, 87th Congress, Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for 2d Session Ohio River Basin Additional $150 million for further prosecution of Pub. Law 88-253, 88th Cong., comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 1st Session Additional $89 million for further prosecution of Public Law 89-42, 89th Cong., comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 1st Session Additional $38 million for further prosecution of Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 1st Session Additional $35 million for further prosecution of Public Law 90483, 90th Cong., comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 2d Session Additional $69 million for further prosecution of Public Law 91-282, 91st Cong., comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 2d Session Additional $120 million for further prosecution of Public Law 93-251, 93rd comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Congress, 2d Session Fifty-four local protection projects and one reservoir project in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 32 of Text) Construction of five multipurpose reservoirs and one local protection S.D. 96, 90th Congress, project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with provision that construction 2d Session of Big Walnut Lake, IN, project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation of partial accomplishment of project Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River were deauthorized. Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, 2d Session MIAMI RIVER BASIN, PLEASANT RUN, VICINITY FAIRFIELD, OH Three dry bed reservoirs and a channel improvement were authorized Public Law 99-662, 99th in Section 401 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. Congress, 2d Session HAZARD, KENTUCKY Approximately 6 miles of channel improvement were authorized in Public Law 100-676, 100th Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Congress, 2d Session Flood control measures to prevent a January 1957 flood reoccurrance in Public Law 101-640, 101st the vicinity of Hazard, Kentucky at a total cost of $30,000,000 was 2nd Session authorized for design and construction in Section 108 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1990. SALYERSVILLE, KENTUCKY Flood control measures to prevent a December 1978 flood reoccurrence Public Law 99-662, in the vicinity of Salyersville, Kentucky at a total project cost of 99th Congress, 2d Session $7,000,000 wasauthorized for design and construction in section 401(e)(1) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. With respect to the project, Congress has determined that the benefits exceed the cost of such flood control measures. 16-20 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION CONTINUED Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov 5, 1990 Aug 17, 1991 Nov 28, 1990 Provided $400,000 to construct the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 401(e)(1) in accordance with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. Provided $600,000 to continue construction of the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 section 401(e)(1) in accordance with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. FRANKFORT, SOUTH FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY Flood protection in accordance with Plan R-1 of the Louisville District Commander's Re-evaluation Report, dated June 1990 and a executed LCA no later than October 1991 was authorized in Section 102 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1990. Public Law 101-514, 101st Congress, 2d Session Public Law 102-104, 102nd Congress, 1st Session Public Law 101-640, 101th Congress, 2nd Session 'Deficiency act. 2Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by Act of Sep. 3, 1954 3Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 16-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Name of Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Licking River Rough River, KY Tradewater River, KY White River, IN Completed Completed Completed Completed 1901 1951 1858 1909 $ 13,045 105,500 18,568 119,312 101,196 33,331 16-22 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status ' Report Construction Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) Brookport, IL Cannelton, IN Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY 2 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY 2 Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) English, IN (Little Blue River)2 Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort) (Kentucky River) 3 8 Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River)2 Harrisburg, IL Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN 2 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River)2 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Levee Unit No. 8, White River, IN Louisville, KY 4 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River)s Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY 2 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) Muncie, IN (White River) Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) New Albany, IN New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 2 7 Newburgh, IN (Ohio River)6 Newport, KY Paducah, KY Panther Creek, KY (Green River) 2 Portland, IN (Salamonie River)2 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) Rosiclaire, IL Saline River & Tributaries, IL Shawneetown, IL 7 Sturgis, KY Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) Tell City, IN Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) 7 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY 2 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River) 2 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) ' West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1954 1958 1959 1957 1965 1987 1953 1972 1965 1979 1948 1960 1953 1959 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 1953 1967 1987 1952 1975 1944 1987 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1959 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1981 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 1972 1956 1964 1977 $ 392,443 1,240,299 597,493 2,068,391 1,206,852 832,700 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,177,345 144,563 734,498 372,353 2,960,970 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,788,840 300,143 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,414 130,417 7,440,987 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 4,337,617 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 297,624 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,551 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 7,826,219 91,000 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 893,094 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 16-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-E CONTINUED OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status' Report Construction Maintenance Local Protection, Completed (Cont'd) Active: Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort) (Kentucky River) a 9 Hazard, KY' Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio (Great Miami River) 9 Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (White River) Louisville, KY' Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH 9 (Great Miami River) Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River). West Fork Mill Creek, OH (Winton Road) 9 Inactive: Blue River, Salem, IN Cache River, Upper Basin, Ill Columbus, IN Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) Kentucky River National Recreation Area Licking River, KY Mount Vernon, IN - Southwest Ohio Urban Waterfront Development Vincennes, IL (Wabash River) Wabash River, York Township, Clark County, IL West Fork Drakes Creek, TN & KY Westpoint, KY Whitewater River & Tributaries, IN & OH Deferred: Grayville, IL Reservoirs: Active: Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) Eagle Creek Lake, KY Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 'All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1984 Flood Control Act, as amended. s Cost includes $161,098 cash contribution consisting of $105,118 from the City of Frankfort, KY and $55,980 from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. 4 Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contributions from the City of Louisville, KY. SCost shown are for levee and pump plants. s The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. 7 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project inactive. 8 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project are active and inactive. 9 Advance Engineering and Design funded with General Investigations Appropriation. 16-24 1979 1976 1979 1964 1983 1977 1980 1976 1975 1981 1977 1983 1976 $ 1,068,606 491,768 493,846 153,410 415,000 514,964 52,088 477,649 15,000 44,000 283,000 157,935 355,963 30,000 58,000 4,490 112,000 235,615 1,270,590 1,009,188 1,038,595 702,471 944,386 1,200,920 2,355,395 350,474 1,794,308- LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 16-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) - 1978 $ - - Alton, IN - 1977 - - Anderson, IN (White River) 1940 1986 5,724 - Aurora, IN - 1977 35,420 - Bellevue, KY - 1977 19,023 - Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) - 1981 - - Bromley, KY - 1977 - - California (Cincinnati), OH - 1977 16,465 - Carrollton, KY - 1977 9,713 - Caseyville, KY - 1986 - - Cave-in-Rock, IL - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) - 1977 - - Cleves, OH - 1977 6,343 - Clinton, IN - 1977 6,848 - Cloverport, KY - 1986 - - Concordia, KY - 1986 - - Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN - 1977 - - Derby, IN - 1977 - - Downeyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) - 1977 - - Elizabethtown, IL - 1977 - - Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN - 1977 3,361 - Grandview, IN - 1977 8,497 - Honey Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Leavenworth, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN 1938 1977 275 - Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) 1973 1986 60,000 - Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL 1938 1977 216 - Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL - 1977 9,922 - Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, White River, IN - 1977 - Levee Unit 7, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 9, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 10, White River, IN - 1977 - - Lewisport, KY - 1990 - - Louisville, KY (Partial) - 1986 - - Ludlow, KY - 1977 14,503 - Madison, IN - 1977 - - Mauckport, IN - 1977 - - Marion, IN (Wabash River) 1979 1986 209,975 - McGinnis Levee, IN 1950 1977 71,049 - Metropolis, IL - 1986 10,575 - Milton, KY - 1977 - - Moscow, OH - 1977 - - New Amsterdam, IN - 1977 - - New Harmony, IN - 1977 - - 16-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS CONTINUED For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection (Cont'd.) New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 1959 1992 $ - New Richmond, OH 1977 7,104 Newport-Wilder, KY - 1990 - - Orleans, IN 1972 1977 13,158 Owensboro, KY - 1990 - - Patriot, IN - 1977 - - Prestonville, KY - 1977 - - Raccoon Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Rising Sun, IN - 1977 - - Rockport, IN - 1977 - - Rome, IN - 1977 - - Shawneetown, IL - 1986 25,367 Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) 1938 1977 - - Shufflebarger Levee, IN 1950 1977 64,487 Smithland, KY ."- 1990 - Sugar Creek Levee, IN 1961 1977 28,061 Terre Haute, IN - 1977 - - Tolu, KY - 1986 - - Tri Pond Levee, IL 1972 1977 65,510 Troy, IN - 1977 - - Utica, IN - 1978 - - Vevay, IN - 1977 - - Vincennes, IN (Partial) 1964 1986 - - Westport, KY - 1977 - - Flood Control - Reservoirs Big Blue Lake, IN 1980 1981 1,079,867 Clifty Creek Lake, IN 1979 1981 1,016,358 Helm Lake, IL 1976 1981 41,616 Lincoln Lake, IL 1979 1981 1,331,844 Metamora Lake, IN - 1977 - - 16-26 TABLE 16-H NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS Lock Dimensions Miles Greatest Length Lock above Available Upper Depth of Year and Mouth of Distance from Width of For Full Normal Pool Miter Sills Character of Percent Opened to Cost of Dam River Nearest Town Chamber Width Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock and (feet) (feet) (feet msl) (feet) (feet) CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER -For report on this improvement see this heading under Ohio River. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Green River New 1 9.1 Spottsville, KY 84.0 600.0 11.8 349.1. 12.1 11.3 Shale and Coal 100 1956 ' $5,101,978 New 2 63.1 0.3 miles below Calhoun, KY 84.0 600.0 14.3 363.4 15.0 11.7 Shale 100 1956 * 4,799,271 3 108.5 0.3 miles below Rochester, KY 35.8 137.5 17.0 380.4 7.3 5.6 Rock 100 1836 ' 121,377 4 149.0 Woodbury, KY 35.8 138.0 16.4 396.8 7.1 6.5 Rock 100 1839 ' 125,718 5 168.1 0.3 miles below Glenmore, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 ' 12.0 9.3 Piles and Rock 100 1934 * 1,020,868 6 181.7 2.8 miles above Brownsville, KY 36.0 145.0 9.2 421.1 8.0 8.8 Gravel 100 1905 ' 168,415 Barren River 1 15.0 " 0.3 miles above Greencastle, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 12.0 9.3 Gravel 100 1841 n 871,565 KENTUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 4 of Text) Kentucky River 1 4.0 3.8 miles above Carrolton, KY 38.0 145.0 8.2 " 430.0 8.2 4.8 Rock and Clay 100 1839 '" 2 31.0 Lockport, KY 38.0 145.0 13.9 443.9 7.6 6.1 Rock 100 1839 " 3 42.0 Gest, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 457.1 8.6 6.5 Rock 100 1844 " 1,350;385 4 65.0 1.0 mile below Frankfort, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 470.3 6.4 6.3 Rock 100 1844 " 5 82.2 2.8 miles below Tyrone, KY 38.0 145.0 15.0 485.3 10.0 6.4 Rock 100 1844 " " 6 96.2 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY 52.0 147.0 14.0 499.3 9.4 6.4 Rock and Piles 100 1894 n 314,847 7 117.0 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY 52.0 147.0 15.3 514.6 9.1 6.8 Rock 100 1897 'n 290,788 8 139.9 4.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY 52.0 146.0 18.7 533.6 10.6 6.0 Rock 100 1900 '" 275,463 9 157.5 Valley View, KY 52.0 148.0 17.3 550.6 10.0 6.6 Rock 100 1907 " 237,646 10 176.4 1.0 mile below Ford, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 567.6 9.0 6.0 Rock 100 1907 7 221,500 11 201.0 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY 52.0 148.0 18.0 585.6 10.0 6.0 Rock 100 1906 n? 296,593 12 220.0 Ravenna, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 602.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1910 7 425,693 13 239.9 2.2 miles below Willow, KY 52.0 148.0 18.0 620.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1915 '" 461,476 14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 637.6 8.6 6.0 Rock .100 1971 n 392,902 'At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3, Green River datum (Elev. 338.0 Ohio River datum) tN 'New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25, 1956, old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970-71 with O&M funds at cost of $822,000. 'Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. 'New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956. 6 Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. ' Operation discontinued September 30, 1981. ' Breaching of dam on May 24, 1965, stopped through traffic to Bowling Green, KY. ' With moveable A-frame crest 3 feet high. 'Operation discontinued August 1, 1951. 'o Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. " Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. 12 Piles in old gravel dam completed in 1934. ' Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. "At normal pool McAlpine Dam, Ohio River Elev. 421.8 Kentucky River datum (Elev. 420 Ohio River datum). 6 Reconstruction completed by United States in 1882. s Built by State of Kentucky. Cost given is for repairs by United States to Locks and Dams 1 through 5. Original construction costs to State were: L&D 1, $220,300; L&D 2, $151,983; L&D 3, $135,857; L&D 4, $131,607; and L&D 5, $137,436. 1' Lock was closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status in September 1982. Dam 10 13 16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-I OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 27 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River)3 4 Boone County, KY Brookport, IL 5 s Cannelton, IN 5 7 Cincinnati, OH 5 8 Covington, KY 5 9. Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) 5 10 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) i1. Frankfort, KY,North Frankfort (Kentucky River) .. Golconda, IL 12 Harrisburg, IL 5o . . Hawesville, KY s 13 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) s Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN ' Lawrenceburg, IN 5 Louisville, KY 14 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River) '4 New Albany, IN S a New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) s 7 Newport, KY s 7 Paducah, KY s 7. Perryville, KY, Chapin River Reevesville, IL (Cache River) 5 15 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Rough River, KY 3 4 Southwest Jefferson County Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River) 11 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) 5 16 Tell City, IN 5 14 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN 5 17 (Wabash River)(completed portion) s West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Evansville, IN 4 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) South Frankfort s Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) 9 Salyersville, KY Channel improvement Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and barrier dam Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee $ 144,000 392,443 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,117,345 144,563 734,498 Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Cutoff channel Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee and pump plants Wall and levee Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Levee Levee Channel improvement Wall and Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Channel Improvement 2,960,970 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,689 25,005,137 4,337,617 5,375,471 297,624 7,512,987 4,761,551 823,700 600,300 1,079,236 654,000 60,077,183 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 44,654,000 8,630,000 19,400,000 9,348,600 $ 18,000 83,000 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 2,013,000 17,164 107,000 272,100 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 1,716,301 109,200 740,000 298,506 232,000 11,000 40,000 100,000 5,000 9,917,000 93,000 63,309 32,707 72,153 285,000 150,000 $ 162,000 475,443 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,914,039 15,130,345 161,727 841,498 3,233,070 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,758,414 26,721,438 4,446,817 6,115,471 297,624 7,811,493 4,993,551 834,700 640,300 1,179,236 659,000 69,994,183 1,919,778 441,359 964,936 1,143,079 3,593,941 1,245,704 5,500,000 50,154,000 36 2,880,000 11,510,000 36 2,340,000 21,740,000 21 981,400 10,330,000 Inactive: None 16-28 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 27 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total Deauthorized: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) 32 Alton, IN 30 Aurora, IN 31 Bellevue, KY 30 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) s 33 Bromley, KY 30 California (Cincinnati), OH 31 Carrollton, KY 30 Caseyville, KY s 3 Cave-in-Rock, IL 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) 3� Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) 30 Cleves, OH 30 Clinton, IN (Wabash River) 30 Cloverport, KY s 34 Concordia, KY s 34 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Derby, IN 30 Elizabethtown, IL 30 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) Benson Creek s Grandview, IN 30 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) 3so Honey Creek Levee, IN 30 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 5s3 Leavenworth, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River,IL 30 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 17, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 2, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN 3 so Lewisport, KY s 3s Ludlow, KY 30 Madison, IN 30 Mauckport, IN 30 McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Metropolis, IL 53 Milton, KY 3so Moscow, OH 30 New Amsterdam, IN 30 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 5 New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Bank Protection Levee $ 292,000 255,000 4,300,000 1,570,000 1,080,000 1,250,000 1,750,000 2,220,000 396,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000 728,000 590,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 3,340,000 580,000 4,600,000 653,000 4,630,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,850,000 2,180,000 1,580,000 2,090,000 3,410,000 724,000 1,160,000 1,490,000 610,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 3,070,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 664,376 616,000 $ 14,000 40,000 1,190,000 400,000 630,000 925,000 720,000 97,000 35,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 9,000 193,000 55,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 1,150,000 133,000 1,087,000 32,000 528,000 266,000 40,000 164,000 116,000 118,000 715,000 136,000 73,000 56,000 88,000 243,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 431,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 99,000 25,000 $ 306,000 " 295,000 5,490,000 1,970,000 1,710,000 2 2,175,000 2,470,000 2,317,000 431,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 921,000 645,000 223,000 2 620,000 712,000 574,000 24 4,490,000 22 713,000 5,687,000 23 685,000 5,158,000 23 1,736,000 244,000 3,014,000 27 2,296,000 27 1,698,000 28 2,805,000 3,546,000 28 797,000 27 1,216,000 1,578,000 27 853,000 24 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 3,501,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 763,376 2 641,000 16-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 27 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total New Richmond, OH 30 Wall and levee $ 3,200,000 $ 720,000 $ 3,920,000 Owensboro, KY S 3 Wall and levee 886,000 195,000 1,081,000 Patriot, IN s3 Levee 753,000 372,000 1,125,000 Prestonville, KY 30 Wall and levee 1,710,000 55,000 1,765,000 Raccoon Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 426,000 37,000 463,000 a Rising Sun, IN so Wall and levee 896,000 280,000 1,176,000 Rockport, IN � Wall and levee 466,000 133,000 599,000 Rome, IN 3 Levee 359,000 67,000 426,000 Shawneetown, IL 5 * Wall and levee 1,810,000 361,000 2,171,000 Shufflebarger Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,380,000 90,000 2,470,000 Smithland, KY S 3 Wall and levee 864,000 414,000 1,278,000 Sugar Creek Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 418,000 29,000 447,000 ' Tolu, KY s Levee 303,000 35,000 338,000 Tri-Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,050,000 191,000 2,241,000 3 Troy, IN s3 Wall and levee 502,000 133,000 635,000 Utica, IN s 3 Levee 1,570,000 120,000 1,690,000 Vevay, IN 3 Levee 1,170,000 146,000 1,316,000 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) (Uncompleted Portion) 5 4 Wall and levee 3,340,000 3,340,000 3 West Point, KY 5 4 Wall and levee 3,283,000 400,000 3,683,000 u Westport, KY 30o Wall 1,610,000 41,000 1,651,000 Wilders, KY 3 Wall and levee 10,800,000 959,000 11,759,000 3 All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. 3 Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4 Details of this project are in individual report. * Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6 See Annual Report for 1958 for details. 7 See Annual Report for 1959 for details. e See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 9 See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 10 See Annual Report for 1953 for details. 1 See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12 See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 13 See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14 See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 13 Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16 See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 17 See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 1s Latest cost estimate revision 1988. 19 Latest cost estimate revision 1986. 20 Latest cost estimate revision 1984. 21 Latest cost estimate revision 1983. a Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 3 Latest cost estimate revision 1978. u Latest cost estimate revision 1960. a Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 3 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 27 Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 3� Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 9 Latest cost estimate revision 1989. 3� Deauthorized Aug 05, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1971 (P.L. 93-251). 31 Deauthorized Nov 06, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 3 Deauthorized Oct 03, 1978 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 3 Deauthorized May 06, 1981 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 3' Deauthorized Nov 17, 1986 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 3 Deauthorized Jan 01, 1990 under Section 1001 (b)(1), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99- 662). 36 Latest cost estimate revision 1992. 16-30 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 27 of Text) RESERVOIRS Estimated Cost' Tributary Basin Reservoirs Status Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN 2 Metamora Lake, IN Green River: Barren River Lake, KY 2 Green River Lake, KY 2 Mining City Lake, KY Nolin Lake, KY 2 Rough River Kentucky 2 Kentucky River: Booneville Lake, KY Buckhorn Lake, KY 2 Carr Fork Lake, KY 2 Red River Lake, KY Licking River: Cave Run Lake, KY 2 Falmouth Lake, KY Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH 2 William H. Harsha Lake, OH 2 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 2 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake, IN 2 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 2 Monroe Lake, IN 2 Patoka Lake, IN 2 Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete East Fork of Whitewater River $ West Fork of Whitewater River Barren River Green River Green River Nolin River Rough River South Fork of Kentucky River Middle Fork of Kentucky River North Fork of Kentucky River Red River Licking River Licking River Caesar Creek East Fork of Little Miami River 37,905,073 35,300,000 27,371,299 33,238,597 69,100,000 17,193,278 10,620,389 60,700,000 11,766,206 50,854,826 38,551,692 81,162,282 125,000,000 $ 7,497,492 3 $ 45,402,565 35,300,000 4 108,418 5 27,479,717 223,733 13 33,462,330 69,100,000 4 17,193,278 22,612 10,643,001 60,700,000 8 11,766,206 50,854,826 1,794,308 40,346,000 81,162,282 7 125,000,000 8 62,893,882 5,037,000 9 67,930,882 52,023,157 3,485,840 9 55,508,997 West Fork of Mill Creek 3,622,302 Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Salt Creek Patoka River 4,256,903 6,633,812 7,902,827 53,095,790 1,100,161 '10 4,722,463 113,094 353,995 8,667,947 20,568,369 5 5 11 4,369,997 6,987,807 16,570,774 73,664,159 'Latest cost estimate revision 1989 unless otherwise noted. 2Details of this project given in individual report. 3Cash contributions for water supply storage. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 5For Code 713 recreaton development. 6Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 7Includes $6,900,000 United States Forest Service cost. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 9Reimbursement for water supply storage. 10 Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization, and $529,361 for Code 713 recreation development. 11 Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 12 Includes $14,180,677 cash contribution for water supply storage, and $6,387,692 for initial recreation development. '~ For $183,732 Code 713 recreation development and $40,001 contributed funds. 16-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-J WABASH RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 32 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost Construction Project or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total LOCAL PROTECTION Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,000 2 RESERVOIRS Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,836,000 3 141,036,000 4 Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,000 s 126,869,000 4 Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little Flatrock Rivers Inactive 74,200,000 64,448,000 6 138,648,000 1 Helm Lake, IN Skillet Fork Deauthorized 25,171,000 14,829,000 ' 40,000,000 8 Louisville Lake, IL Little Wabash River Inactive 113,000,000 14,435,000 9 127,435,000 to 'Latest cost revision 1984 unless otherwise noted. interests for water supply, $8,749,000 reimbursable for 2Latest cost estimate revision 1977. initial recreation facilities. 3Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 'lncludes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable interests for water supply and $2,133,000 reimbursable for for initial recreation facilities. initial recreation facilities. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 5Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 9Includes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable interests for water supply and $6,033,000 reimbursable for for initial recreation facilities. initial recreation facilities. 'Includes $53,084,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 10 Latest cost estimate revision 1982. TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Local Protection Projects Brevoort Levee, IN Brookport, IL Cache River Levee, IL Cannelton, IN Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN England Pond Levee, IL Evansville, IN Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort Gill Township Levee, IN Golconda, IL Harrisburg, IL Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY Aug 1994 Nov 1993 Nov 1993 Dec 1993 May 1994 Dec 1993 Apr 1994 Mar 1994 Aug 1994 Jun 1993 May 1994 Sep 1993 Nov 1993 Nov 1993 Dec 1993 Feb 1994 Mar 1994 Apr 1994 Mar 1994 16-32 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Oct 1993 Levee Unit No. 8, Wabash River, IN Sep 1993 Louisville, KY Aug 1994 Lyford Levee, IN Mar 1994 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN Aug 1994 Mount Carmel, IL Oct 1993 Muncie, IN Mar 1994 New Albany, IN Mar 1994 Newport, KY Dec 1993 Paducah, KY Nov 1993 Perryville, KY Apr 1994 Reevesville, IL Nov 1993 Rochester-McClearys Bluff Levee, IL Dec 1992 Rosiclare, IL Nov 1993 Shawneetown, IL Nov 1993 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY Aug 1994 Sturgis, KY Jun 1994 Taylorsville, KY Mar 1994 Tell City, IN Dec 1993 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN Sep 1993 Uniontown, KY Jun 1994 Vincennes, IN Aug 1994 West Terre Haute, IN Mar 1994 Channel Improvements Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY Jun 1994 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY Jul 1994 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN Mar 1994 English, IN (Little Blue River) Jun 1994 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN Jul 1994 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) Apr 1994 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN Jun 1994 Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jul 1994 Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County), IN Mar 1994 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1988 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Jul 1990 Neon-Fleming, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jul 1994 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Apr 1994 Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Jul 1994 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Mar 1993 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Mar 1994 Rough River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY Jul 1994 Salamonie River, Wells County, IN Mar 1994 Saline River and Tributaries, IL Nov 1993 Tripplett Creek, Morehead, KY . Jul 1994 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY Jul 1994 Wabash River, Adams County, IN Mar 1994 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jun 1994 Bank Revetments East Fork White River, Brownstown, (Jackson County), IN SeD 1993 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY Jun 1993 Great Miami River, Ice Jam Flooding, Port Jefferson, OH Apr 1994 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH Mar 1994 16-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Green River, Calhoun, KY Jul 1994 Indian Creek, Burton Lane, Morgan County, IN Mar 1994 Licking River, Butler, KY Dec 1993' Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL Nov 1993 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH Apr 1994 Little Miami River, Milford, OH Apr 1994 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY Jun 1993 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY Jul 1994 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY Jul 1994 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL Nov 1993 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY Jul 1994 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY Jul 1994 Ohio River, Madison, IN Aug 1989 Ohio River, Moscow, OH Dec 1993 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN Jun 1994 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN Jul 1994 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN Jul 1994 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY Jun 1993 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY Jul 1994 Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY Jun 1989 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY Apr 1994 Ohio River, Rockport/Rockport Landing, IN Jun 1994 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN Dec 1993 Ohio River, Troy, IN Jun 1994 Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1991 Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN Jul 1994 Patoka River, Jasper, IN Oct 1993 Patoka River, Winslow, IN Aug 1994 South Fork of Wildcat Creek, County Road 7 East, Tippecanoe County, IN Mar 1994 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY Jul 1994 Wabash River, near Merom, IN Sep 1993 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN Sep 1992 Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West Sep 1993 Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road Sep 1993 White River, Morgan County, Blue Bluff Road, IN Mar 1994 White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN Aug 1994 Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN Apr 1994 Wastewater Treatment Plant, Great Miami River, Ross, OH Apr 1994 16-34 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 16-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 37 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Federal Non-Fed Total Flood Control (Section 205) Bailey Creek, Indianapolis, IN 2 Buck Ditch, Ft. Recovery Beech Fork, Bardstown, KY 2 Crooked Creek, Madison, IN 1 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN 2 Flatrock River, Rushville, IN 1 Flatrock River, Rush County, IN 1 Jack's Defeat Creek, IN 1 James Hose Ditch, Linden, IN ' Kentucky River, Frankfort, KY 1 Lancassange Creek, Clark Co., IN s N. Fork, KY River, Jackson, KY 1 Otter Creek, N. Terre Haute, IN' Owl Creek, West Carrolton, OH 1 Penitentiary Jones Run, KY 2 Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN 2 Pleasant Creek, Greenwood, IN i Pogues Run, Indianapolis, IN ' Rolling Fork, Lebanon Junction, KY 2 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH 2 West Fork, Blue River, Salem, IN ' White River, Hagerstown, IN 4 White River, Petersburg, IN' Wildcat Creek, Howard County, IN 1 Wildcat Creek, Kokomo, IN Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN a Crooked Creek, J. Paul Park, Madison, IN 4 Eagle Creek, Indianapolis, IN 3 Embarrass River, St. Marie, IL 2 Green River, Calhoun, KY 2 Jasper County, IN 2 Little Blue River, Shelby County, IN 2 Nameless Creek, County Road 850 N, IN s Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY 3 Ohio River, Carollton, KY 3 Ohio River, City Park, West Point, KY3 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY 3 Ohio River, New Richmond, OH 3 Sugar Creek, Watermelon Hollow Road, Montgomery Co., IN 2 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN' Wabash River, Terre Haute, IN s Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road, IN s White Lick Creek, Bottom Rd., IN 3 White Lick Creek, Henderson 3 White River, Blue Bluff Rd., Morgan, IN 3 White River, Franklin County, IN1 White River, Brookville, IN 2 287 16,973 12,323 24,293 28,935 63,471 5,089 13,657 1,917 3,264 61,502 80,297 15,000 5,526 214,583 8,547 17,808 74 30 99,501 2,113 56,745 1,882 7,249 798 3,902 22,437 11,129 30,887 29,504 3,129 30,262 (922) 144,716 7,529 25,002 1,408 21,022 17 39 (5,144) 33 15,962 15,232 15,339 84 13,750 0 0 50,713 797 10,720 19,393 287 16,973 12,323 24,293 28,935 63,471 5,089 13,657 1,917 3,264 61,502 131,010 15,000 5,526 215,380 19,267 17,808 74 30 99,501 2,113 76,138 1,882 7,249 798 417 4,319 3,668 26,105 - 11,129 0 30,887 0 29,504 - 3,129 - 30,262 3,637 2,715 50,282 194,998 - 7,529 0 25,002 45 1,453 - 21,022 - 17 - 39 6,241 1,097 - 33 - 15,962 - 15,232 - 15,339 - 84 - 13,750 1 Reconnaisance Study 2 Detail Project Report 3 Plans and Specification 4 Construction Funds Received 5 Construction Completed 16-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 16-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 38, 39, 40, & 41 of Text) Fiscal Year 1993 Cost Projects Federal Non-Fed Total SURVEYS Navigation Studies Ohio River Greenway Corridor, IN $ 340,255 $ - $ 340,255 Ohio River Mainstem, Uniontown, KY, IL, IN 1,247,968 - 1,247,968 U. Miss R. Sys. Env. Mgt. Proj. 1 10,852 - 10,852 Flood Damage Prevention Studies Metropolitan Cincinnati, OH 30,318 - 30,318 Metropolitan Louisville Beargrass Creek, KY 195,705 - 195,705 Clinton, Ohio 27,314 - 27,314 Dayton, Miami River Basin, OH 314,773 - 314,773 Green and Barren River, KY 22,886 - 22,886 Indianapolis, IN 314,589 207,545 522,134 Indianapolis, IN 1,978 - 1,978 Metropolitan Region, Cincinnati, Duck Creek, OH 0 513 513 Metropolitan Louisville, Pond Creek, KY 27,515 54,674 82,188 Ohio River Flood Protection 272,336 - 272,336 Orange County, Lost River, IN 351,431 - 351,431 Salt River Basin, KY 189,588 - 189,588 Upper Tippecanoe River Basin 81,109 - 81,109 Wabash River Basin Comprehensive, IN, IL 176,013 75,862 251,875 Wabash River, Brevport Levee 99,462 - 99,462 Wabash Scenic Corridor, IN 111,016 - 111,016 West Liberty, KY 250 - 250 White River, Indianapolis, Central Waterfront, IN 386,299 - 386,299 Special Studies Environmental Services Partnership 3,768 - 3768 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigation, KY 71,971 - 71,971 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 16,093 - 16,093 Intra-Agency Water Resources Development 32,151 - 32,151 North American Waterfowl Management Plan 4,158 - 4,158 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation Project - Lock and Dams McAlpine Locks and Dam, IN & KY 1,616,180 - 1,616,180 Lock & Dam Olmsted 200 - 200 Flood Control Projects -Local Protection Holes Creek, West Carrollton, OH 42,628 - 42,628 Hazard, KY 378,885 - 378,885 Metro Louisville, Pond Creek, KY 289,097 - 289,097 Metro Region, Duck Creek, OH 269,146 - 269,146 Miami River Basin, Pleasand Run, Vic 35 - 35 South Frankfort, KY 5,001 - 5,001 White River, Central Waterfront 864,065 - 864,065 Environmental Infra-Structure Hazard, KY 39 - 39 16-36 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 16-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 38, 39, 40, & 41 of Text) Fiscal Year 1993 Cost Projects Federal Non-Fed Total COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Coordination with other Agencies and Non-Federal Interest Water Resources Agencies $ 16,838 $ - $ 16,838 Planning Assistance to States Planning Assistance to States 9,927 19,412 29,339 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management - Louisville, KY 24,915 - 24,915 Technical Service, General 88,609 - 88,609 Quick Responses 3,934 - 3,934 Special Studies - Patton Lake, Morgan Co, IN 12,935 - 12,935 Special Studies - Tippecanoe River, Carrol Co 42,923 - 42,923 Special Studies - Sweet & Little Sugar Creek, Shelby County, IN 4,342 - 4,342 Hydrologic Studies Hydrologic Studies 8,322 - 8,322 'Funded through Construction General account 16-37 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in the text and also appear at the end of this chapter. The Huntington District includes central and southeastern Ohio, all of West Virginia except the northern panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, PA) to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, KY. The drainage area of the Huntington District is approximately 44,914 square miles. Improvements Page Navigation 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River ..................................... 17-2 2. Kanawha River, WV .......................................... 17-2 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ...................... 17-2 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 17-2 Flood Control 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH ....................................... 17-2 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV ................................... 17-3 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ......... 17-3 8. Bumsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV.............17-3 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .......... 17-3 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH...........17-4 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ............... 17-4 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .................... 17-4 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ............ 17-5 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ............. 17-5 15. Grayson Lake, KY ............................................. 17-5 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA ........................................ 17-5 17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA ............. 17-6 18. Massillon, OH ................................................ 17-6 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH ............................ 17-7 20. Newark, OH ..................................... 17-7 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH ....... 17-7 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA................. 17-8 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) ........... 17-8 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .......... 17-8 25. Paintsville Lake, KY ..................................... 17-8 26. R.D. Bailey Lake, WV .................................... 17-9 27. Roseville, OH ..................................... 17-9 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ....... 17-9 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ................ 17-9 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH ......... 17-10 31. West Columbus, OH ........................................ 17-10 32. Yatesville Lake, KY ..................................... 17-10 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................... 17-11 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................................ 17-11 General Investigations 35. Surveys ......................................................... 17-11 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data................... 17-11 Tables Table 17-A Table 17-8 Table 17-C Table 17-D Table 17-E Table 17-F Table 17-G Table 17-H Cost & Financial Statement ............. 17-12 Authorization Legislation ..................... 17-17 Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 17-20 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................... 17-21 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects...................... 17-22 Inspection of Flood Control Projects ... 17-24 17-1 Page Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on the Ohio River See this heading under Chapter 19 - Ohio River. 2. Kanawha River, WV Location. The Kanawha River is approximately 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers, a short distance above Kanawha Falls, WV, and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, WV. Previous projects. For details of previous projects see the Annual Reports for 1875, 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation structures on the Kanawha River. London Locks and Dam are located approximately 83 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River and approximately two miles downstream from Montgomery, WV. Marmet Locks and Dam are located approximately 68 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Marmet, WV. Winfield Locks and Dam are located approximately 31 miles above the mouth ofthe Kanawha River at Winfield, WV. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. Another structure, Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, is located on the Ohio River at approximate river mile 279 and approximately nine miles below Gallipolis, OH. This structure has two parallel locks, the main lock is 110 feet by 1,200 feet. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of nine feet from the mouth of the Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles upstream. The existing project was completed at a cost of $27,853,699. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completed in 1937. For further cost details see Table 17- B, see also, Appendix C. Public Law 99-88 authorized the initiation of Engineering and Design and Real Estate Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam Replacement. Feasibility studies for modernization have been completed. The plan includes construction of an additional lock chamber (800'x110') adjacent to the existing locks and continued use of the riverward lock chamber and the navigation dam. The contract for Lock Replacement - Phase I was awarded in April 1990 and is complete. The contract for Construction of Additional Lock and Gate Bay, Phase IIA, was awarded in May 1993 and is 92% complete. The full funding estimate for new work is $349,000,000, which is 50 percent Federal cost and 50 percent Inland Water Ways Trust Fund cost. Preconstruction engineering and design workis underway for Marmet Locks and Dam and is scheduled for completion in September 1996. ; ' .,m.'aK ,.'' .? :?a? felf.p' " '?: ',.',"""",?? !'!?� .'?' ^:?;;?a '���A".c - ' NVA I G AT I:O;:::N - ::::-z~:'~:~I~~::~~.;: ~ 2 .1:'1_,1,2;~ ~::::~:: :. 't r. Lr- 1 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, OH, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, OH, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 93 feet in height and 10,000 feet in length with a gate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 123 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1970 and completed in July 1974. The 405 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,267,422. The Sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $27,880,000, exclusive of interest, for cost allocated to water supply. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for the benefit of 17-2 Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are 79 terminals along the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 miles east of Charleston, WV. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steel pile mooring cells. Seventeen of these terminals have railroad connections. One terminal, a paved wharf, is owned by the City of Charleston, WV. The remaining terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. The Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as to the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River See this heading under Chapter 19 - Ohio River. 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects See Table 17-C. Huntington, WV, District flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,197,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $62,594,000 in flood damages. 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV, on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole Creek, approximately four miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 86 feet in height and 1,080 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in December 1972 and completed in February 1977. See also AppendixA A total of 485 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project was $41,987,500. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $820,000. To date the project has prevented an estimated $4,486,000 in flood damages. 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located on the New River in Summers County, WV, approximately three miles above Hinton, WV, and one mile from the confluence of the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, WV, and Giles County, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam 180 feet in height and 2,048 feet in length. Appurtenant structures consist ofa gated spillway 790 feet in length located in the channel section of the dam. The stilling pool is formed by a 23-foot-high weir located 364 feet downstream of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed at the time of construction to permit the future installation of hydropower. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 631,000 acre-feet. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. A total of 338 tracts of land was acquired for the project. The Federal cost of the project was $29,458,652, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. For further details see the 1939 and 1962 Annual Reports. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $10,478,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $665,100,000 in flood damages. 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County, WV, on the Little Kanawha River, approximately two miles above Burnsville, WV, and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha River and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam 80 feet in height and 1,000 feet in length with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one low flow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 65,400 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 165 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1973 and completed in February 1976. See also Appendix A. The 357 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project to date has been $57,166,839. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. The project is completed. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $4,878,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $34,343,000 in flood damage. 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, approximately seven miles south of Mount Sterling, OH, on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. 17-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741-foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works consisting offive gated sluices through a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately four miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1968. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. For further project details see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the project is $20,406,545, including expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $1,227,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $23,192,000 in flood damages. 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Olentangy River, approximately six miles above and north of Delaware, OH, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, OH. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion and Morrow Counties, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled ogee type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and completed in July 1948. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. The Federal cost for the project was $7,631,821. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $2,140,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $66,654,000 in flood damages. 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY Location. The damsite is located on Johns Creek, approximately seven miles southeast of Paintsville, KY, and approximately six miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a channel excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earth-fill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and the Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides a total storage of 93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and completed in July 1949. For further project detail see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements for the project were 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. The Federal cost of the project was $7,845,547, including expenditures for recreation under the completed project program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction activities are complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,600,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $55,222,000 in flood damages. 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, approximately six miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 118 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20-foot conduit in the right abutment, and an ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, and two rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 748 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1959. For further project details see the 1962 Annual Report. See 17-4 Huntington, WV, District also Appendix A. Total real estate required for the project consists of 8,232 acres in fee and 5,380 acres of flowage easements. See also Appendix A. Federal cost of the project was $30,218,135. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $26,490,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $218,213,000 in flood damages. 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV, approximately six miles southeast of Wayne, WV, 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth-fill dam 113 feet in height and 638 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment of the dam, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 133 square miles. The required 552 tracts of land have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs of the project was $85,872,963. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $7,101,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $48,747,000 in flood damages. 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY Location. The damsite is located in Pike County, KY, on the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately 15 miles upstream from Pikeville, KY, approximately three miles above the confluence of Levisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of the Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 195 feet in height and 1,100 feet in length, a controlled spillway containing four tainter gates located in the valley wall adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, the outlet works consists of an intake structure with three conduits controlled by slide gates and discharginginto a horseshoe shaped tunnel. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 395 square miles. The dam was completed in February 1969. The 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $54,753,917, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $4,338,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $278,187,000 in flood damages. 15. Grayson Lake, KY Location. The damsite is located in Carter County, KY, on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River, and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam 120 feet in height and 1,460 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging though a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 196 square miles. The dam was completed in January 1968. The 484 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $19,162,741, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $3,068,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $49,620,000 in flood damages. 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Rerservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA Location. The damsite is located in Dickenson County, VA, approximately four miles northwest ofHaysi, 17-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 VA, on the Pound River approximately two miles above the confluence of the Pound River and Russell Fork and approximately 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 252 feet in height and 970 feet in length, an outlet tunnel located near the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end, a spillway controlled by six tainter gates located in a saddle just upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 222 square miles. The project was modified to include water quality control by adding control gates to the previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acre-feet. The dam was completed in December 1963. The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $20,444,383, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and apputenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,178,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $147,479,000 in flood damages. 17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, WV, VA, and KY Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big Sandy River at Louisa, KY. The Cumberland portion is the Upper Cumberland River Basin above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width above Harlan, KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basin is within the Nashville District. This report covers that portion of the project located in the Huntington District. Existing project. The authorization language directs the Corps of Engineers to design and construct, at full Federal expense, such flood control measures as are determined to be necesssary and advisable for the communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River basins. The authorization further states that such flood control measures would be located at or in the vicinity ofPikeville, KY, and Grundy, VA, on the Levisa Fork; Pineville, KY, on the Cumberland River; and Williamson and Matewan on the Tug Fork, in order to afford the named communities and other flood damaged locations and their immediate environs a level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to prevent any future losses from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in April 1977. The full funding estimate for the project is $1,023,200,000, which includes $55,200,000 non-Federal contributions. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Additional engineering studies are now underway to determine what is necessary and advisable to address the flooding problems in both the Levisa Fork Basin and in the Tug Fork tributary stream areas. The contract for construction of the Pump Station at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in April 1983 and is complete. The contract for construction of the floodwall at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in July 1986 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Area Snagging and Clearing was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Housing Development, Valley View Site, was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Floodwall and Pump Stations for the Williamson Central Business District was awarded in June 1988 and is complete. The contract for South Williamson Housing Development, Pond Creek Site, was awarded in September 1990 and is complete. The contract for Replacement Cafeteria, South Williamson, was awarded in June 1991 and is complete. The contract for Construction of Local Protection Project, South Williamson, Kentucky, was awarded in December 1991 and is complete. The contract for Construction of Local Protection Project, Matewan, West Virginia, was awarded in August 1992 and is 50% complete. 18. Massillon, OH Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, approximately 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with the construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1962 Annual Report for details of local contribution of work beyond the scope of the project. 17-6 Huntington, WV, District Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH Location. The Muskingum River lies in Southeast Ohio and including tributaries, drains approximately 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, OH, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. Construction of the system was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. The system was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further project details, see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The cost of the project was $41,247,815, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed project program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the integrity of the existing 14 structures under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. Underseepage and abutment seepage problems are being corrected through the installation of downstream blankets and/or relief wells and grouting. The estimated full funding cost of the rehabilitation program is $39,100,000 in total, with $25,500,000 from the Construction, General Appropriation and $13,600,000 from the Operations and Maintenance, General Appropriation. A related but separate program entitled Dam Safety Assurance has been initiated. Under current hydrologic design standards, deficiencies exist in the spillways at all the 14 projects in the system. Corrective measures include widening present spillways, constructing new spillways and installing parapet walls on top of the dams. The full funding estimate for the Dam Safety Assurance Program is $60,870,000. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been met. For further details see the 1942 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The Major Rehabilitation is continuing as scheduled. Thus far, twenty-one contracts have been awarded and the program is 65% complete. The Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated during FY 1982. Thus far ten contracts have been awarded and the Dam Safety Assurance program is 53% complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The system prevented an estimated $164,371,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $1,603,430,000 in flood damages. 20. Newark, OH Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking River, approximately 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH. Existing project. For details of the existing project see the 1981 Annual Report. Construction of the existing project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in November 1941. As a result of the 1968 Flood Control Act the existing project was modified to include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion channel and modification of the North Fork Channel. Construction of the Log Pond Run diversion channel was awarded in September 1980 and completed in December 1981. The full funding estimate for the project is $11,100,000 Federal cost and $4,215,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For details of required and completed local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: North Fork Channel - As a result of withdrawal of State support for the Utica Lake project (now inactive) and the interdependency of the operation of Utica with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel portion of the project required re-formulation. A reanalysis is complete. Engineering studies continued. The contract for construction of North Fork Channel (Phase I) was awarded in September 1986 and is complete. The contract for construction of the remaining portion of North Fork Channel was awarded in February 1988 is complete. The contract for Remedial Treatment for Erosion was awarded in September 1991 and is 99% complete. Operations and Maintenance: Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, OH, on the North Branch ofKokosing River, approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and 17-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 North Branch Rivers, and two miles northwest of Fredericktown, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length with an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment, and an uncontrolled, reinforced concrete outlet work located in the right abutment of the dam. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 45 square miles. The 56 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1972. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,665,985, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, VA, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River and approximately three miles upstream from Pound, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, 130 feet in height and 600 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 17 square miles. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in January 1966. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,186,901, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $136,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $5,026,000 in flood damages. 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) Location. The work covered by this project consists of a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. Existing project. The existing project consists of the individual projects considered in the Ohio River Basin comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. Operations during the fiscal year. The completed local protection projects, which are operated and maintained by local interests, except for those local protection projects for which individual reports have been included. To date the project has prevented flood damages of an estimated cumulative total of $707,073,000. 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, OH, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River and approximately four miles east of New Parkersburg, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock and random earth fill dam, 118 feet in height and 700 feet in length, a gate controlled spillway located near the right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfill dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,000 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 576 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1973. The 257 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal cost for the project was $26,969,962, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented an estimated $1,882,000 in flood damages. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $43,158,000. 25. Paintsville Lake, KY Location. The damsite is located in Johnson County, KY, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately eight miles above the 17-8 Huntington, WV, District mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 76,642 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 93 square miles. The 635 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1976 and was completed in September 1980. See also Appendix A. The full funding estimate for new work is $66,478,000, which includes $3,028,000 non-Federal Costs. The local sponsor has reimbursed the Government $377,000 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $127,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $6,103,000. 26. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV Existing project. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, WV, on the Guyandotte River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and one mile east of Justice, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled rockfill dam with a concrete face, 305 feet in height and 1,330 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 203,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 540 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in November 1973 and completed in December 1979. See also Appendix A. A total of 2,109 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project to date has been $261,317,233. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. Duringthe fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $8,152,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $76,438,000. 27. Roseville, OH Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Perry Counties, on Moxahala Creek, approximately six miles the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,291 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargements; and the necessary appurtenances for interior drainage. Total Federal cost of the project was $910,785. Construction was initiated in August 1959 and completed in October 1960. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been completed. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Total costs of local requirements were $62,000. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections of the improved portion ofthe project were conducted to determine that the project was maintained in satisfactory condition. 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New River at Gauley Bridge, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam having a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end, an uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1960 and completed in March 1966. A total of 9,346 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project was $48,375,884, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necesssary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $9,214,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $294,262,000 in flood damages. 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton, WV, and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. 17-9 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised offive gate sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in 1949 and completed in June 1960. The total cost of the project was $34,900,000. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1981 Annual Report for contributed funds. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $9,653,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $210,557,000 in flood damages. 30. Tom Jenkins Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located in Athens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles north of Glouster, OH, and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length, a controlled works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The reservoir, known as Burr Oak Lake, provides for a total storage of 26,900 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 33 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. A total of 100 acres ofland were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project were $2,086,503, which includes expenditure for recreation at completed project. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Contributed funds in the amount of $575,000 have been received from the State of Ohio. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $886,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $12,291,000 in flood damages. 31. West Columbus, OH Location. The project is located in Columbus, OH, along the Scioto River, adjacent to the downtown area in Franklin County, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a 5.2-mile system including levee, floodwall and high ground: Fourteen gate closures, interior drainage facilities and construction of two new pump stations and reworking two existing pump stations. The protected area contains about 1,200 acres and is completely urban with a mix of residential, industrial and commercial development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; to verify or relocate buildings; utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary. Pay a cash contribution of at least 5%, as required by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, of the costs allocated to flood control, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during the fiscal year. Funds to initiate preconstruction engineering and design were appropriated in Fiscal Year 1989 and funds to initiate construction were appropriated in Fiscal Year 1993. The total estimated cost of the project is $107,000,000 of which $28,000,000 is non-Federal. The contract for Construction of Dry Run Levee Phase IA) was awarded in September 1993 and is 30% complete. 32. Yatesville Lake, KY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, KY, and 18 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth and rockfill dam, 104 feet in height and 760 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located one-half mile southeast of the right abutment of the dam. The outlet works consists of a 13-foot diameter tunnel through the left dam abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 86,951 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 208 square miles. The 778 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. ConstructionisscheduledforcompletioninDecember 1994. See alsoAppendix A. The fiull funding estimate for new work is $108,495,000, which includes $7,505,000 non-Federal costs for the cost sharing portion ofrecreation development. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: All contracts for construction have been completed with the exception of the contract for Construction of Buildings, Grounds and Utilities was awarded in November 1992 and is 97% complete. 17-10 Huntington, WV, District Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects The Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interest to furnish assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for the administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during the fiscal year of those completed units transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in accordance with the standards prescribed by regulations. Total costs for fiscal year 1994 were $117,905. Total cost to September 30, 1994, were $1,932,112. The flood control works inspected and the dates of inspection are tabulated in Table H. 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location Cheshire, OH FY 1994 Cost Kanawha River, Rt. 60, South Charleston, WV Kanawha River, Saint Albans, WV Mud River, Barboursville, WV Muskingum River, Marietta Harbor, OH Nimishillen Creek, East Sparta, OH Ohio River, Boat Levee, Marietta, OH Ohio River, Route 2, Near Pt. Pleasant, WV Twelvepole Creek, Wayne County, WV Ohio River, Village of Middleport, OH Riverside Drive, Saint Marys, WV Russell, KY Sewerline, Marietta, OH Sewerline, Sistersville, WV State Route 62, Buffalo, WV Ohio River, Sewage Plant, Mason, WV $ 561 191 50,839 7,669 29,696 5,207 24,129 7,478 2,223 25 92,174 13,936 19,451 3,685 97,852 6,894 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood ControlAct, Public Law 853, 80th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location Blacklick Creek, Franklin Co., OH Buffalo Creek, Lawrence Co., OH Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH Horse Creek, Jackson, OH Muskingum River, Mansfield, OH Spring Creek, Spencer, WV Ward's Run, Parkersburg, WV $ 916 192 7,152 94 1,989 7,542 452 Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress are tabulated as follows: Location NONE FY 1994 Cost Work performed under special legislation pursuant to Water Resources Development Act of 1986 as follows: Location Bridges, Massillon, OH Kanawha River, St. Albans, WV FY 1994 Cost $308,459 5,597 Flood control and coastal emergency activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress were conducted as required during FY 1994 at a cost of $237,431. National emergency management activities were accomplished by the district as required. The costs for these activities during FY 1994 were $108,905: Location Environmental Restoration, WV Piedmont Lake Restoration, OH :: ! :: :". .1 .. O..: FY 1994 Cost $106,468 2,322 35. Surveys Fiscal year 1994 costs were $3,268,973 itemized as follows: Location Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Special Studies Comprehensive Basin Studies Review of Authorized Projects Miscellaneous Activities Coordination Studies Preconstruction Engineering and Design Advance Engineering and Design 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data Fiscal year costs were $103,888. FY 1994 Cost $ 612,467 306,652 140,893 465,679 212,628 105,242 34,225 1,139,602 251,584 17-11 q Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 Table 17-A Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 2. Kanawha River, WV (Existing Project) 2. Winfield L&D 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,981,600 9,277,000 9,051,000 11,021,000 6,310,071 9,265,713 8,836,463 10,447,961 14,634,000 8,214,000 11,770,000 74,768,000 16,683,556 8,014,027 8,614,131 18,973,754 517,800 617,000 557,000 702,000 529,708 630,933 568,610 672,158 758,700 791,200 871,000 1,187,500 766,030 810,092 858,278 1,187,719 971,200 1,189,700 1,244,000 2,338,000 957,153 1,204,816 1,200,143 2,265,346 971,000 951,386 1,298,800 1,339,379 15,913 1,392,700 1,377,257 3,700 1,365,000 1,262,956 1,244,000 1,335,460 493,500 510,100 568,000 732,000 502,821 502,300 561,467 742,055 669,700 921,800 2,025,000 1,550,700 588,469 1,007,063 1,902,903 1,529,360 27,853,6991 27,853,6991 131,944,4682 131,090,8622 130,9843 130,9843 137,320,000' 76,348,616s 56,267,442 56,267,442 8,916,973 8,871,098 41,987,500 41,987,500 11,062,549 11,039,361 29,458,6526 29,458,6526 21,181,716 21,036,148 57,166,839 57,166,839 15,767,947' 15,718,7487 20,406,5458 20,406,5458 9,621,1829 9,606,1289 7,631,821 7,631,821 14,725,95810 14,548,513'o 17-12 Huntington, WV, District Table 17-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 15. Grayson Lake, KY 16. John W. Flannagan Dam & Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA 17. Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV, & VA 18. Massillon, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,615,900 1,242,000 1,442,000 1,301,800 1,605,739 1,277,492 1,441,241 1,305,633 - - - 105,000 S- - 1,185 365,800 404,300 510,000 455,000 358,463 393,360 518,874 470,770 112,140 1,150,800 1,150,555 47,987,000 47,993,348 1,344,800 1,311,440 1,340,000 1,730,000 1,367,742 1,650,770 - 50,000 100,000 -- 83,791 1,109,600 1,201,200 1,422,000 1,100,529 1,202,034 1,399,017 -66,000 209 2,097,000 2,115,933 779,400 894,600 967,000 918,700 768,001 901,028 974,264 926,715 1,198,700 1,419,000 1,217,000 1,483,400 1,210,025 1,413,607 1,191,052 1,469,849 7,845,54711 7,845,54711 21,568,22312 21,567,9661 105,000 1,185 30,218,135 30,218,135 8,168,15513 8,165,928 85,872,963 85,872,963 18,956,55114 18,845,52714 54,754,12615 54,754,12615 15,629,26016 15,575,80516 19,162,74117 19,162,741"17 14,007,142 13,996,300 20,444,38318 20,444,28318 18,422,83219 18,327,87619 22,123,000 17,654,000 40,788,000 37,339,000 292,383,0002 22,808,014 14,736,411 21,717,066 25,986,852 252,633,36820 - - - - 8,139,40621 S- - - 8,139,40621 19,800 19,895 800 2,984 2,278 5,000 1,492 351,248 347,619 17-13 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 Table 17-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 19. Muskingum River Dams & Lakes, OH 20. Newark, OH (Previous Project) (Existing Project) 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Ohio River Basin, VA 23. Ohio River Basin 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. (Rehab.) Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4,380,000 5,003,800 5,249,000 6,740,300 4,365,582 4,925,831 4,980,716 6,857,419 -10,000 2,081 783,000 1,591,722 145 -42,000 11,683 849,000 1,639,648 1,577 10,000 156,035 300,000 -90,000 -10,000 60,599 271,308 31,350 -64,000 9,073 33,450 394,900 265,000 179,000 224,000 171,338 492,144 176,901 220,209 290,400 342,200 251,000 306,000 288,030 338,307 251,485 314,233 505,300 598,100 537,000 638,200 513,638 600,810 536,865 630,010 17-14 41,247,815" 41,247,81522 94,087,703" 93,709,291" 982,300 982,300 22,172,945" 22,172,945' 27,204,000 27,204,000 845,916 845,916 758,673 758,673 10,869,512 10,837,365 6,665,985" 6,665,9852 3,001,042 2,991,822 6,186,90126 6,186,90128 7,087,0462 7,082,941" 355,86128 355,86128 26,969,962 26,969,962" 9,159,98430 9,120,92230 Huntington, WV, District Table 17-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1993 25. P.aintsville Lake, KY 26. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV 27. Roseville, OH 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, OH 31. West Columbus, OH 32. Yatesville Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -500,000 31,793 669,296 679,296 153,504 1,252,900 1,253,244 19,800 20,210 10,000 137,508 763,300 757,973 225,000 1,069 1,289,800 1,310,489 -1,200 4,419 8,013 50,000 781,000 954,000 737,391 989,180 -225,000 6,834 1,428,000 1,428,163 5,000 1,528 1,461,300 1,459,313 -1,700 3,094 1,144,200 1,310,200 1,274,000 1,470,000 1,158,242 1,312,501 1,222,676 1,484,739 1,335,100 1,465,100 1,700,000 2,437,000 1,323,179 1,440,660 1,694,003 2,439,695 247,100 218,000 277,000 368,000 249,453 226,249 264,079 371,280 - 3,340,000 10,000,000 - 1,958,156 3,769,160 2,070,000 1,749,000 4,752,263 1,442,034 623,100 906,300 618,770 898,495 1,395,000 1,944,591 976,000 970,431 1,206,000 1,301,727 1,172,000 1,121,282 60,251,147 60,194,986 8,389,632 8,361,126 261,317,23331 261,317,23331 19,005,307" 18,953,665" 910,785 910,785 239,577 239,500 48,375,884" 48,375,884" 25,008,166" 24,946,027" 37,029,58535 37,029,585" 29,568,145" 29,505,540w 2,086,50337 2,086,50337 5,752,339 5,734,218 13,340,000" 5,727,316" 99,229,500 98,765,784 3,684,450 3,613,717 See page 17-17 for footnotes. 17-15 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 'Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 Emergency Relief funds, $9,004,800 Public Works funds and $686,317 Code 713 funds. 2Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects and $546,090 Maintenance and Operation funds. 3Public Works Acceleration funds. 4Includes $68,660,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. sIncludes $39,428,802 Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 6Includes $543,960 Emergency Relief funds, $9,698 Public Works Acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 Code 713 funds. 'Includes $593,128 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 8Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,000 Code 711 funds. 'Includes $130,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 10Includes $240,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. "Includes $23,087 Public Works Acceleration funds, $1,089,940 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. 'Includes $82,900 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $593,128 Maintenance and Operations Funds. "Includes $100,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983. '"Includes $209,918 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $593,128 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 'Includes $362,649 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. "Includes $38,000 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $593,229 Maintenance and Operations Funds. '"Includes $406,919 Code 711funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. "Includes $422,983 Code 711 funds. 'I9 ncludes $88,710 special recreation use fees. 2 Includes Cost from Ohio River Division of $696,000. 21 ncludes $477,813 contributed funds. "Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery funds and $528,288 Code 711 funds. "Includes $198,578 Maintenance and Operations funds. UIncludes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. aIncludes $45,177 Code 711 funds. Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. "Includes $68,200 special recreation use fees. "Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. ~Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. "Includes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. 31lncludes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. 32Includes $60,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. "Includes $300,062 Code 711 funds. "Includes $214,112 special recreation use fee funds, $300,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and Operation Funds. "Includes $1,837,337 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed funds. 3ncludes $267,634 special recreation use fee funds, $215,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $142,078 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 'Includes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds. Excludes $575,000 contributed funds. "Excludes $788,094 contributed funds. 17-16 Huntington, WV, District Table 17-B Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 15, 1985 5. Oct. 23, 1962 6. Oct. 23, 1962 7. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 8. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 9. Jun. 28, 1938 10. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 11. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 12. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV Construction of three locks and dams on the Kanawha River and one on the Ohio River. Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation Deleted Power BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 88, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 520, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 91, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 17-17 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 Table 17-B (cont'd) Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 14. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 15. Jul. 14, 1960 16. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 1, 1980 18. Jun. 28, 1938 19. Feb. 20, 1934 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 20. Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 13, 1968 21. Oct. 23, 1962 EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV Construction of such Flood Control Measures as deemed Necessary and Advisable. MASSILLON, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. Reimbursement to the Muskingum Conservancy District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures for project construction. Operations and Maintenance assigned to the Corps of Engineers. NEWARK, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Modification to Existing Project and Additional Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sect. 202, P.L. 367, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Works Admin. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 17-18 17. Huntington, WV, District Table 17-B (cont'd) Authorizing Legislation See ' Date Section Authorizing In Text Act � Project and Work Authorized Documents 22. Jul. 14, 1960 24. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 25. Oct. 27, 1965 26. Oct. 23, 1962 27. Jun. 28, 1938 28. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 29. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 30. Dec. 22, 1944 31. Nov. 17, 1986 32. Oct. 27, 1965 33. Jun. 22, 1936 NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. ROSEVILLE, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation TOM JENKINS DAM, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. WEST COLUMBUS, OH Construction of Local Protection Project. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of Local Maintenance of Federally Constructed Local Protection Projects. H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 662, 99th Congr. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 17-19 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 Table 17-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds, Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Big Sandy River WV and KY including Levisa and Tug Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,8111 131,473 Elk River, WV3 1903 30,259 Gauley River, WV4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, WV 5 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River, WV 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, OH' 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 New River, WA and VAS 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH8 1953 10,951 16,593 'In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department ofCommerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, KY. 2Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. 'Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 5Work suspended. 8Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. TCollections from license non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. *Private Law 954, August 31, 1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth Sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full settlement of claims against Government for damages resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. 17-20 Huntington, WV, District Table 17-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Local Protection Projects Ashland, KY 1954 3,718,839 - - Athens, OH 1979 5,313,700 --- --- Cattletsburg, KY 1963 3,854,361 - - Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 2,753,551 - - Chillicothe, OH 1986 20,373,314 - - East Rainelle, WV 1962 614,598 - - Galax, VA 1953 480,536 - - Huntington, WV 1956 7,172,840 - - Ironton, OH 1952 2,604,646 - - Maysville, KY 1959 6,493,747 - - Parkersburg, WV 1955 6,652,827 - - Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 2,919,578 - - Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 9,806,424 - - Princeton, WV 1962 808,750 - - Russell, KY 1953 552,493 - - Williamson, WV 1964 1,056,166 - - Inactive Local Protection Projects Augusta, KY - 11,577 - - Coal River, WV 1979 472,229 - - Vanceburg, KY -.. Deferred Local Protection Projects Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) 1983 Oceana, WV 1981 611,000 - - Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes Haysi, VA 2,656 Deferred Reservoir and Lakes Kehoe Lake, KY 1981 1,272,740 Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. Martin, KY 1983 212,048 17-21 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 Table 17-G Deauthorized Projects All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Aberdeen, OH - May 1981 1,334 - Athalia, OH - Aug 1977 - - Belpre, OH - Nov 1977 - - Brooklyn, WV - Nov 1979 - - Buena Vista, OH - Aug 1977 - - Chambersburg, OH - Aug 1977 - - Chesapeake, OH - Nov 1986 - - Cheshire, OH - Nov 1977 - - Chilo, OH - Aug 1977 - - Clifton, WV - Aug 1977 11,237 - Coal Grove, OH - Jan 1990 3,389 - Columbus, OH - Aug 1977 - - Dover, KY - Jan 1990 - - Friendly, WV - Aug 1977 - - Fullerton, KY - Jan 1990 - - Gallipolis, OH - Aug 1977 - - Greenup, KY - Jan 1990 4,962 - Hanging Rock, OH - Aug 1977 - - Hartford, WV - Aug 1977 - - Henderson, WV - Aug 1977 - - Higginsport, OH - Oct 1978 - - Hockingport, OH - Aug 1977 - - Letart, WV - Aug 1977 - - Letart Falls, OH - Aug 1977 - - Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV - Nov 1986 17,721 - Manchester, OH - May 1981 - - Mapleshade, OH Oct 1978 - - Marietta, OH - Nov 1981 - - Mason, WV - Aug 1977 - - Middleport, OH - May 1981 9,783 - Miller, OH - Aug 1977 - - Millwood, WV - Aug 1977 - - New Martinsville, WV - Nov 1979 - - New Matamoras, OH - Aug 1977 - - Newport, OH -Aug 1977 - - Normal, KY - Jan 1990 - - Pomeroy, OH - Aug 1977 - - Portland, OH - Aug 1977 - - Proctorville, OH - Nov 1986 - - Racine, OH - Aug 1977 - - Ripley, OH - Oct 1978 7,523 - Riverview, WV - Aug 1977 - - St. Mary's, WV - Aug 1977 - - Sardis, OH - Aug 1977 - - Sciotoville, OH - Aug 1977 - - Sistersville, OH - Aug 1977 - - South Point, OH - Nov 1986 - - South Portsmouth, KY - Jan 1990 - - Syracuse, OH - Aug 1977 - - Waverley, WV - Aug 1977 - - Williamstown, WV - Ndv 1979 - - Zanesville, OH - May 1981 - - 17-22 Huntington, WV, District Table 17-G (cont'd) Deauthorized Projects All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Reservoirs and Lakes Big Bend, WV - Aug 1977 - - Big Darby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 - Birch, WV - Nov 1986 - - Frazeysburg, OH - May 1981 5,000 - Leading Creek, WV 1974 Jan 1990 272,880 - Logan, OH - Oct 1985 - - Millersburg, OH - May 1981 - - Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 - Moores Ferry, VA - Nov 1986 22,879 - Mud River, WV - Nov 1979 - - Panther Creek, WV 1976 Nov 1986 - - Poca, WV May 1981 - - Rocy Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 - Salt Creek, OH 1975 Nov 1986 1,089,943 - Utica, OH 1975 Jan 1990 757,550 - West Fork, WV 1974 Jan 1990 663,192 - White Oak Creek, OH - Nov 1981 - - 17-23 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1994 Table 17-H Inspection of Flood Control Projects (See Section 33 of Text) Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, KY Athens, OH Berwind, WV Bramwell, WV Cairo, WV Canton (Nimishillen), OH Catlettsburg, KY Ceredo-Kenova, WV Chillicothe, OH East Rainelle, WV Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Fourpole Creek, WV Galax, VA Grahn, KY Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Hitchins, KY Huntington, WV Inez, KY Ironton, OH Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV Maysville, KY Montcalm, WV Mount Vernon, OH Newark, OH Olive Hill, KY Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Parkersburg, WV Pax, WV Point Pleasant, WV Portsmouth-New Boston, OH Prestonsburg, KY Princeton, WV Richwood and Fenwick, WV Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Ripley, WV Roseville, OH Russel, KY Smithfield, WV South Williamson, KY Utica, OH West Union, Middle Island, WV West Williamson, WV Williamson, WV May 94 Sep 94 May 94 Sep 94 Sep 94 Sep 94 Sep 94 May 94 Sep 94 Apr 94 Sep 94 Apr 94 Nov 94 Sep 94 Sep 94 Dec 94 Sep 94 Sep 94 Dec 88 Dec 88 Apr 94 Aug 94 Oct 94 Apr 94 Aug 94 Sep 94 May 94 Sep 94 Sep 94 Aug 94 Jun 94 Oct 94 Sep 94 Oct 94 Oct 94 May 94 Sep 94 Oct 94 May 94 Sep 94 May 94 Sep 94 Apr 94 Oct 94 Sep 94 Aug 94 NOT INSPECTED Sep 94 Jun 94 Nov 94 Apr 94 Aug 94 Sep 94 May 94 Sep 94 Aug 94 Sep 94 May 94 Sep 94 May 94 Sep 94 17-24 C t C C t PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT * This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and Tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams ......... Page 1. Allegheny River, PA................ . 18-2 2. Construction of locks and dams,Ohio River... . 18-2 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV.......... 18-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River........... 18-3 5. Tygart Lake, WV... .......... . ... . 18-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects. ..... 18-4 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, PA... ........... 8. Elkins, WV... .................... 9. Johnstown, PA... ........ . . ....... 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA....... 11. South Central, PA Environmental Restoration 12. Turtle Creek, PA ................. 18-4 18-4 18-5 18-5 18-5 18-6 Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH....... 18-6 14. Conemaugh River Lake,Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-6 15. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.. . 18-7 16. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA .. . . . ....... 18-7 17. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY .......... 18-7 18. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA..... 18-8 19. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA .............. 18-8 20. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH. ............. 18-8 21. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH . 18-9 22. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) ..... .18-9 23. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH .......... ... ...... . 18-9 24. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV...... . . . . .. . . . 18-9 25. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. . . . . 18-10 26. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA. . . . 18-10 27. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-11 28. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD. . ................... 18-11 29. Inspection of completed flood control projects. 18-12 30. Other authorized flood control projects . . . . 18-12 31. Flood control work under special authorization. ................... 18-12 General Investigations 32. Surveys...................... 33. Collection and study of basic data... ..... 34. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design... 35. Research and development.. ........ 36. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . Tables Table 18-A Table 18-B Table 18-C Table 18-D Table 18-E Table 18-F Table 18-G Table 18-H Table 18-I Table 184- Table 18-K Table 18-L . 18-12 . 18-12 . 18-12 . 18-12 . 18-12 Cost & Financial Statement. .... 18-13 Authorizing Legislation. .. . . . . 18-17 Other Authorized Navigation Projects .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-21 Not Applicable. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.................. 18-22 Not Applicable. Deauthorized Projects. . . . . . . . 18-24 Allegheny River Statistics. . . . . . 18-25 Monongahela River Statistics. .... 18-26 Monongahela River Total Costs. .. 18-28 Ohio River Basin Reservoirs. .... 18-28 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects. .......... . 18-29 18-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Location. The Allegheny River is 321 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-to-rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations during fiscal year. Operations & Maintenance, General: Up until FY 94, the 8 locks on the Allegheny River had no major additions or rehabilitation efforts since being put into service. A major maintenance and repair contract to provide needed repairs for the continuation of safe and reliable navigation has been initiated at Lock and Dam 4. The contract scope of work includes the following: replacing deteriorated horizontal and vertical concrete surfaces; rehabilitation of the electrical and mechanical systems; replacement of antiquated lock gate and valve operating machineries; and installation of a tow haulage and retriever system. Similar major maintenance efforts are planned for locks and dams 2 and 3 during FY's 1996-2000. Major work accomplished by contract during FY 94 included upper guide wall concrete repairs and installation of tow haulage system at LD 5 for $725,164 and concrete repairs and installation of tow haulage system at lID 7 for $3,094,016. Contracts were initiated for construction of mooring cells at U/D's 3 and 4 for $962,000 and electrical and mechanical rehabilitation at LD for $6,754,076. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new. locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the replacement of Lock and Dam 7 with Grays Landing Lock and Dam and the construction of a new lock landward of the existing lock at Lock and Dam 8 (renamed Point Marion Lock and Dam). In accordance with the provisions of this act, 50% of the total cost ofconstruction for the Grays Landing and Point Marion projects will be derived from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number 18-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply. companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. These are also several terminals for rail-to-river and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: The right bank excavation at Grays Landing Lock and Dam was completed in November, 1989 at a cost of $12,400,000. All land for the lock site has been acquired. Work continues on cultural resources and the acquisition of real estate for the remainder of the project. Construction of the lock was completed in May, 1993 at a contract cost of approximately $80,000,000. A contract for the construction of the dam was awarded in April, 1993 for $24,181,600. The estimated total cost of the project, which is scheduled to be complete in March, 1996 is $173,400,000. A contract for the construction of the new lock for the Point Marion Project was completed in December, 1993 for $78,800,000. Land acquired for the project consists of 58 acres of fee land and 77.4 acres of easement. The estimated total cost of the Point Marion project, which is scheduled to be complete in March, 1995 is $107,200,000. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 authorized the District to proceed with navigation improvements on the Lower Monongahela River. The project will include replacement of the fixed crest dam at Locks and Dam 2 with a gated dam; raising the existing pool 2 by 5 feet, construction of twin 84' x 720' locks at Locks and Dam 4, and the elimination of Locks and Dam 3; lowering the existing pool 3 by 3.2 feet. The changes in pool elevations will adversely affect numerous municipallyowned facilities, which the Corps will adjust at project cost. Work accomplished during FY 94 included design efforts on the locks 2 auxiliary chamber floodway bulkhead, lockwall stabilization of locks 2, the new gated dam 2, relocations, project dredging and disposal and bank stabilization. Hydraulic modeling for the new gated dam 2 continued. PED was completed in FY 94; construction will be initiated in FY 95 with the upgrade of the locks 2 auxiliary floodway bulkhead structure and project relocations. The project cost is estimated at $664 million. Operations and Maintenance, General: Major work that was accomplished by contract during the fiscal year included fabrication of 110' lock gates at I/D 2 for $2,349,000 and furnishing and installation of locomotive crane L/D 4 for $366,264. Contracts were initiated for construction of mooring cell at L/D 2 for $228,700, upgrading remote control systems - dam gates at LID 4 and Maxwell LID for $121,702, painting dam tainter gates at Point Marion LID for $469,610, fabrication and installation of floating mooring bitts at Morgantown L/D for PPIATT., SBURGH, DISTRICT 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, WV Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, WV.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Land acquired for project consists of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extent feasible. No local cooperation is required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. Licenses. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission granted a license to the City of Grafton for construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at this project (FERC license 7307). Details of the design and other issues are still being finalized. The Federal Energy 18-3 $367,793, and emergency dredging - upper approach at Hildebrand L/D for $262,791. Work accomplished by hired labor forces included renovation of middle wall filling valve and operating machinery at L/D 2 for $244,832; renovation of gate operating machinery and anchorages at L/D 2 for $228,805; renovation of middle wall filling valve and operating machinery at L/D 4 for $330,617; dewatering the single 84' x 600' lock chamber at Morgantown LID to repair the upstream lock gates, anchorages, sills, quoin and miter blocks and crossovers for $1,569,504; replacement of river wall filling valve and renovation of operating machinery at Hildebrand L/D for $347,204; and dewatering the 110' x 720' lock chamber at L/D 2 to install and align new upstream and downstream lock gates and repair sills, quoin seals and crossovers for $1,031,876. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Regulatory Commission has extended the deadline for the start of project construction to April 15, 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance, General: Contract awards during FY 94 included foundation drilling and piezometer installation for approximately $100,000 and replacement of 24" and 16" water lines and operating valves for $478,240. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 94 were $1,092,000; total benefits through September 30, 1994 were $556,331,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. Tygart Dam is being evaluated as a candidate for the Dam Safety Program. An Evaluation Report was initiated in March 1994 to address spillway capacity and structural stability in relation to the probable maximum flood event. The report will be completed in March 1995 and will recommend whether or not further analysis is required as part of a design memorandum. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-C on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. CHARTIERS CREEK, PA Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, PA) Existing project. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 and provides for channel widening, deepening and realignment, construction of a major channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent reaches. James G. Fulton project in Allegheny County would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg. Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles long. Completed improvements would contain within banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. James G. Fulton Flood Control Project-Construction of Unit 1 was started in July 1968, completed in September 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and turned over to local interests on November 22, 1974. Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was started in June 1972 and was completed in December 1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel improvement was started in July 1978, completed in June 1981 and turned over to local interests on 18 November 1981. A contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, was awarded in Sep 1981 and completed in Dec 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Routine investigations and in- 18-4 Canonsburg-Houston Reach-Construction of Unit 1 was started in December of 1968, completed in March 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 10, 1970. Construction of Unit 2A was started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of the reach, are 99% complete. Remaining work on project has been delayed due to the inability of local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rightsof- way. Major flooding in Houston, PA in September, 1990 has generated renewed interest in completion of the project. Estimated cost for new work (1985) is $41,850,000 of which $32,750,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperating agency (Washington County) has been unable to provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining Unit 2B. Direct non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $4,225,188. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The district re-evaluated the previously designed channel improvement project and determined that the project, as originally designed, was no longer economically feasible. After consideration of alternative plans, the district determined that the erection offloodwalls around the areas most susceptible to damages was an economically feasible option. A General Reevaluation Report is being finalized based on this alternative. Regular inspections were made at completed units. Estimated flood control benefits achieved in FY 94 were $11,834,000; total benefits through September 30, 1994 were $32,241,000. 8. ELKINS, WV Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV). Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started in May 1946 and completed in May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of.channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Land acquired for project consists of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT spections were made. Project was last inspected in September 1992. Flood damages prevented in FY 94 were $1,062,000. Total through FY 94 were $15,373,000. 9. JOHNSTOWN, PA Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, PA.) Existing project Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning.channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed in November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. Land acquired for project consists of easements over 192 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. Local cooperation. The rules of local cooperation for the rehabilitation of the existing project are governed by the FY 91 Energy and Water Resources Appropriations Act. Pursuant to this Act, the City of Johnstown will have a limited role in securing the needed rights of access to non-federal structures included in the line of protection and will hold and save the United States from damages due to construction or operation and maintenance of the work on the non-federal structures, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The FY 1991 Energy and Water Resources Appropriations Act authorized and directed the Corps to undertake a major rehabilitation of the existing project. Work continued on a Rehabilitation Evaluation Report initiated in March 1991 on the rehabilitation measures required to ensure the project's capability of providing flood protection in the future. The Rehabilitation Evaluation Report was submitted to HQUSACE in March of 1994 and approved in August 1994. The major rehabilitation work is to be completed under the Construction, General appropriation at an estimated cost of $35.5 million. The work consists of the repair of 54 existing wall sections, slope paving and replacement of a balustrade (safety) wall. Also included in the major rehabilitation is the acquisition of necessary real estate rights for construction and future operation and maintenance of the non-federally owned walls. A contract for channel maintenance at units 2 and 3 was awarded in September 1994 for $313,224. Estimated flood damages prevented during FY 94 were $4,857,000. Cumulative flood damages prevented by the project were estimated to be $423,220,000 through September 30, 1994. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Municipal Authority in producing an Act 537 Plan update acceptable to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources (PA DER) to be used as the basis for 18-5 10. PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Construction was accomplished by construction of four uriits. Construction started in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. Land acquired for project consists of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: operation activities continued and routine investigations and inspections were made. Flood damages prevented in FY 94 were $425,000; total damages prevented through FY 94 were $29,986,000. 11. SOUTH CENTRAL, PA ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION Location. Project is located at the confluence of the Little Conemaugh and South Fork Rivers in Cambria County approximately 60 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Existing Project. The proposed project was authorized under Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. Section 313 authorizes the Secretary of the Army to establish a pilot program to provide design and construction assistance to non-Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. The Forest Hills Municipal Authority (FHMA) was identified by Congress as a non- Federal interest to receive high priority under the program. The Forest Hills project consists of the fast track planning, design and construction of a wastewater treatment plan, pump stations, interceptor lines and collection systems. The treatment system will provide service to four boroughs and five townships that currently are not serviced. Total project cost is estimated at $33,000,000 ($8,250,000 Federal cost; $24,750,000 non-Federal cost). Local Cooperation. Legislation requires the project to be cost shared at 75% Federal funds and 25% non-Federal funds. Project Cooperation Agreements between the Corps of Engineers and the Forest Hills Municipal Authority are required prior to design and construction efforts. Operation and maintenance of the project will be at 100% non-Federal cost. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: During FY 94, the district worked closely with the Forest Hills REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 design plans and specifications. The district coordinated Federal, State and non-Federal interests, produced a draft Initial Project Management Plan, and a project budget and schedule. The district also began selection efforts for A/E services. 12. TURTLE CREEK, PA Location. In Allegheny and Westmoreland Counties, adjacent to Pittsburgh, PA, along lower reaches of Turtle Creek and Thompson Run, a, tributary of Turtle Creek. (See Geological Survey Chart for Pittsburgh, PA). Existing project. The existing channel improvement project was constructed during the period 1962-1967 and provided for flood protection by widening, deepening, and streamlining channel of lower Turtle Creek for about 6.3 miles and channel of Thompson Run for about 1 mile above its mouth. Appurtenant work consists of channel streambed and side slope protection where required, retaining walls, drop structures, floodgates, alteration, removal or reconstruction of restrictive structures and adjustments of affected utilities. Project was designed to accommodate a design flood corresponding to an estimated 100 year frequency. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Federal cost for completed project was $15,350,000; non-Federal cost was $1,840,000. The Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act specified that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized and directed to repair and restore the Turtle Creek, Pennsylvania, local protection project. Estimated Federal cost for repair and restoration work is $7,050,000; non-federal cost is $2,350,000. Local Cooperation. The Turtle Creek Flood Control Authority was the local sponsor for the existing project. However, they are not financially able to sponsor the project restoration, nor to subsequently perform any required project maintenance. Allegheny County is the local sponsor for the project rehabilitation and all other requirements for local cooperation for the future maintenance of the project. A local cooperation agreement was executed with the county on August 4, 1992. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The proposed project consists of debris and sediment removal from the Turtle Creek and Thompson Run channels and debris basin; clearing trees and brush from channel side slopes, restoration of channel side slopes, repairs to concrete retaining walls, debris dams, trashracks, spalled concrete joints and drainage appurtenances; and removal of vegetative growth from weepholes. During FY 94, acquisition of the necessary real estate interests by Allegheny County, the local sponsor, were certified as sufficient to support construction. The County also identified a satisfactory disposal area. Bids were opened for the project in July 1994; however; a bid protest was filed by the second low bidder. The bid protest is expected to be resolved in December 1994. Construction is scheduled to begin in April 1995. Estimated flood damages prevented by the project in FY 94 were $675,000; total damages prevented through FY 94 were $84,334,000. Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. BERLIN LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started in January 1942 and completed in June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres in easements. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: A contract to updgrade the sewage system at Mill Creek Recreation Area was completed in FY 94 for $117,848.. Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved in FY 94 were $25,870,000; total through FY 94 were $274,592,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 14. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system is designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Land acquired for dam, reservoir and railroad relocation consists of 7608.7 acres in fee and 522.8 acres in easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing Conemaugh Lake was constructed downstream of the dam under FERC Licenses 3207. The 15-megawatt pro- 18-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT ject began commercial operation on February 6, 1989. It is owned by Pennsylvania Renewable Resources, Inc. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $412,000; total flood control benefits through September 30, 1994 were $582,158,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities were continued. 15. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth-fill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed in October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,561.7 acres in fee and 100.22 acres in easements. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $106,000; total benefits achieved through September 30, 1994 were $130,181,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 16. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast ofPittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and low-water regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gate-controlled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started benefits through September 30, 1994 were $351,040,000. Activities under reservoir management program com- 18-7 in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir during this fiscal year were $119,000; total benefits through September 30, 1994 were $33,871,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public-use facilities. Work was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 17. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA AND NY Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA-NY, and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaragus County was completed in June 1978. Land acquired for project consists of 2,646 acres in fee and easements over 22,420.0 acres. For further details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: A contract for replacement of sewage and water lines at Big Bend Overlook was completed in FY 1994 at an estimated cost of $149,000. The lower service gate 6" piston rod at the dam was replaced for approximately $104,000. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 94 were $266,000; total REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 prising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 18. LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburg, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in. operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of. Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Land acquired for project consists of 3,330.8 acres in fee and easements over 86.7 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $103,000; total benefits to September 30, 1994 were $171,073,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 19. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, PA, 22.9 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction offlood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam started in February 1939 and was completed in June 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,519.36 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. Local cooperation. None required at completed project. On November 4, 1977 a contract for Wildlife development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first cost of initial wildlife development. Cost-sharing for construction of fishing access area awarded in September 1980 was completed in July 1981 for $335,405.75. On June 7, 1979, a contract for fishing and boating development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and Pennsylvania Fish Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial fishing and boating development. Each cooperation authority is responsible for operation, maintenance and replacement without cost to the Government of all facilities developed with their support. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood damages prevented by this project for FY 94 were $122,000: total benefits through September 30, 1994 were $163,465,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. 20. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low-water regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled-earth embankment structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. Authorized project is completed and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Land acquired for project consists of 6,298.9 acres fee and easements over 27.9 acres. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal costs of completed project is $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of construction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest, and has paid $697,571.57 toward principal to date. Local interests have now contributed $4,585,627.29 towards total of $5,200,000 non-Federal costs. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures 18-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this FY 94 were $10,810,000. Total benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1994 were $106,504,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as state of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 21. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 12.6 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, OH, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowwater regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 11,180.4 acres in fees and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962,. page 1228. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: A contract for reconstructing Route 305 boat launch was completed in September, 1994 for $346,348. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this fiscal year were $3,543,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1994 were $77,136,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 22. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 18-B, 18-E and 18-K on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated $29,996,000 during this fiscal year. Total flood damages prevented through September 30, 1994 were $791,366,000. 23. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA AND OH Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, PA and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowflow, augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed in May 1965. Land acquired for project consists of 14,420 acres in fee and easements over 198 acres. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: A contract to plug 3 abandoned gas wells was completed for $171,342 Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved in FY 94 were $2,212,000; total benefits achieved through September 30, 1994 were $27,308,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance continued. 24. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam is concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway is uncontrolled. Storage capacity is 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles. Project was authorized by 1966 18-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1991) is $231,000,000 (includes an estimated $24,900,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) Surface land acquired for project consists of 20,451 acres in fee and easements over 398 acres. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,350;000 for construction; and $15,000 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first costs of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $24,810,000, bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $457,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the city of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation cost-sharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The Corps is working with the State of WV to revise the Master Plan to incorporate higher revenue producing recreation facilities, including a lodge, golf course, cabins and camping. The revised Master Plan was approved by the Corps in June 1992, but with the stipulation that a cost-sharing contract amendment must be executed prior to the award of a construction contract for the granting of any cost-sharing credits. The FY 1992 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act allows the State Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) 18-10 cost-sharing credits for all of these facilities except the golf course. In March, 1994, the State and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works ASA(CW) executed an amendment to the 1977 Stonewall Jackson Lake Recreation Cost-Sharing Contract to reflect these credits. The State of West Virginia now must design and build the approved remaining recreation facilities within ten years of the executed amendment, or March 2004, in accordance with the timeframes and conditions set forth in the amended contract. The WV State Supreme Court has ruled that the sale of $6 million in revenue bonds for the design and construction of the lodge, additional camping and golf course may not proceed. During FY 94, a contract was completed for the construction of a station hydropower plant to supply power to the dam and administration building. The Mary Conrad Log House was restored and relocated to the Jackson's Mill 4-H Conference Center. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 94 were $927,000. Total flood control benefits for the reservoir through September 30, 1994 were $46,767,000. 25. TIONESTA LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed in January 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,797.3 acres in fee and easements over 13.1 acres. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for FY 94 were $72,000; total benefits through September 30, 1994 were $179,167,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 26. UNION CITY DAM, PA Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment nongated type with uncontrolled side-channel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5. feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Land acquired for project consists of 161.4 acres in fee and easements over 2,410.29 acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. On November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 94 were $1,359,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1994 were $21,014,000. 27. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast ofMeadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolled-earth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth. Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1,731.5 acres in fee and easements over .56 acres. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for FY 94 were $227,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1994 were $3,292,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 28. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA AND MD Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 and completed in May 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements over 0.62 acre. A license was issued to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania covering fish conservation and management in Pennsylvania portion of reservoir. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational and sanitary facilities as required to serve the public needs. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. Local cooperation. None required. 18-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing releases from Youghiogheny River Lake was constructed in accordance with FERC License 3623. D/R Hydro Company is the authorized representative of the Licensee, Youghiogheny Hydroelectric Authority, and is responsible for operation of the plant. It has a 10-megawatt capacity. The plant began commercial operation on December 7, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance general: A contract to modify launch ramp at Somerfield North was completed in FY 94 at a cost of $187,591. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $806,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1994 were $163,370,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 18-L for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $124,483. Total cost to September 30, 1994 was $1,595,633. 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-E on other authorized flood control projects. 31. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 18-M. Corps Statutory Authorities Activities in Support of Others Facilities Inspections Total Cost for Fiscal Year: General Investigations 32. SURVEYS Navigation Studies Flood Control Studies Special Studies Comprehensive Studies Special Investigations Federal Regulatory Commission Interagency Water Resource Development Coordination Studies with Other Agencies Total cost for fiscal year 33. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs this fiscal year were $129,703 for flood plain management services and $7,394 for related hydrologic studies. 34. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Locks and Dams 2, 3 and 4, Monongahela River Chartiers Creek, PA Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA Total cost for fiscal year 35. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 36 PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Initial Appraisals, General 18-12 $159,337 63,048 11,366 91,251 $325,002 $372,290 - 316 61,465 196,016 101,192 30,818 26,756 18,929 $807,150 $4,449,766 133,122 222,827 $4,805,715 $1,151 For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 18-M. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A C See Section In Text Project Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River PA 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV 5. Tygart Lake, Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, PA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Elkins, WV 9. Johnstown, PA 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA 11. South Central, PA Environmental Restoration 12. Turtle Creek, PA Flood Control- Reservoirs 13. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, OH :OST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. (O&M) Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. (O&M) Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 91 8,827,6 8,778,7 54,996,0 58,104,5 11,638,3 11,711,4 755,9 763,6 FY92 00 7,902,900 97 7,982,512 00 72,408,000 i03 72,331,548 00 12,298,200 X53 12,195,303 00 784,100 i15 777,643 -- 60,000 - 19,820 12,561 -5,221 2,200 3,223 26,000 28,798 900,000 497,516 FY93 9,309,000 9,036,321 33,709,000 32,918,449 13,025,000 12,935,281 866,000 827,514 39,695 - 15,000 10,329 15,081 -- 15,468 4,800 72,000 944 22,907 780,800 741,749 552,000 925,729 FY94 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1994 - 18,157,860i - 18,157,8601 11,254,000 122,545,5232 10,928,523 121,918,509 40,134,000 395,237,0854 26,408,403 380,060,343k 16,228,700 245,969,2575 15,815,627 245,334,4416 - 15,857,000 - 15,857,000 - 19,077,9327 - 19,077,932 1,564,000 15,772,4518 1,133,769 15,293,563 29,000 89,000 28,055 87,570 - 26,598,186 - 26,598,158 - 4,219,967 - 4,219,967 - 1,772,627 - 1,772,627 21,000 362,192 35,376 323,569 - 8,865,388 9 - 8,865,388 144,000 5,888,190 347,023 5,874,041 200,000 3,782,000 135,923 3,700,175 - 3,586,10710 - 3,586,10710 22,000 1,366,59711 22,551 1,352,50311 000,000 5,000,000 248,197 248,197 925,000 17,798,352 184,167 16,859,68238 1,] I,] 5,C( s 304,000 126,330 1,130,000 1,141,007 25,000 209,800 32,000 29,237 203,412 23,858 345,000 344,075 212,000 214,121 347,000 149,901 - - - 8,739,987 12 -- - - 8,739,98712 1,347,400 1,829,500 1,704,000 1,693,800 27,488,91513 1,348,713 1,734,360 1,671,501 1,796,224 27,448,02813 18-13 v REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TAR.T.I 1RA See Section In Text Project 14. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 15. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 16. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 17. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 18. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 19. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 20. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH 21. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 22. Ohio River Basin Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated 23. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 24. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) Funding FY 91 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 92 FY93 FY94 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1994 - - -- 46,012,41114 - - - 46,012,41114 1,147,700 1,027,000 1,044,800 15,247,97639 1,144,476 1,003,805 1,059,766 15,225,83739 - - - 4,482,93315 10,184 - - 4,482,93315 1,621,400 1,341,000 1,367,800 25,207,55816 1,597,259 1,359,677 1,361,958 25,167,684 - - - 9,539,58617 - - - 9,539,58617 860,900 978,000 898,700 14,382,98418 854,531 965,265 914,340 14,353,25118 -4,000 - - 109,305,07619 686 - - 109,305,07619 1,384,500 1,495,000 1,505,800 24,817,943 4 1,397,443 1,489,521 1,476,699 24,760,11840 - - - 2,921,000 - - - 2,921,000 - - - 5,727,53120 - - - 5,727,53120 1,041,700 1,017,000 1,039,900 18,175,29321 1,031,255 974,357 1,078,660 18,150,68521 - - - 7,144,97322 S- - - 7,144,97323 617,100 782,000 845,000 933,000 13,586,962 619,118 775,977 774,938 974,295 13,550,419 - - - - 47,033 - - - - 47,033 - - - - 17,376,09724 - - - - 17,376,09724 807,900 745,700 842,000 1,013,000 12,956,23425 795,169 756,177 802,743 880,297 12,769,194 25 - - - - 4,253,029 26 - - - - 4,253,02926 882,200 1,121,400 1,076,000 1,119,000 13,817,571 887,672 985,943 1,034,842 1,268,968 13,785,817 - - - - 98519727 - - - - 985,19727 5,624 1,811,000 1,812,040 -1,700,000 1,120,438 773,400 805,547 -10,000 1,662 2,163,300 1,999,087 14,000 432,797 909,900 882,370 2,432,000 2,450,107 285,000 409,050 845,000 828,077 2,295,700 2,320,923 1,486,000 1,125,981 858,000 886,640 40,217,20128 40,217,20128 33,030,34729 32,870,94929 210,940,634 210,143,185 5,592,813 5,574,499 18-14 i i Y i w r v . � "W J.J J ru-r 982,600 1,013,042 8,409 41,226 1,167,600 1,190,264 1,010,500 997,041 6,184 1,290,700 1,284,595 0 442 - 832,400 872,197 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TPART. 12.A CAST Al) FThJANWTA TTAT1'M1FNT (nC rrtit 1I See Section In Text Project 25. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 26. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA 27. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 28. Youghiogheny River Lake Ohio River Basin, PA and MD FY 91 FY 92 FY93 FY94 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1994 - - - - 7,792,37830 - - - - 7,792,378' 1,017,500 1,106,900 1,152,000 1,623,100 20,860,02832 1,000,711 1,137,445 1,118,850 1,551,553 20,746,893 -- - 14,559,800 - - - - 14,559,800 213,400 260,000 236,000 331,000 5,240,668 218,242 254,276 227,969 303,173 5,196,372 Funding New Work Ap prop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 754,100 655,100 776,000 903,000 10,966,157 754,720 647,790 757,015 903,892 10,935,75835 - - - - 12,521,16736 - - - 12,521,167 3 6 1,485,300 1,696,700 1,902,000 1,879,000 30,265,163 37 1,484,772 1,671,995 1,838,446 1,944,786 30,220,52837 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $995,000 appropriated and expended for major maintenance at L/Ds 2, 3 and 4. 3. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects, $106,914,400 appropriated to date for Point Marion, L/D 8, PA ($53,314,400 - CG funds, $53,600,000 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund) and $155,119,600 appropriated to date for the Grays Landing, L/D 7, PA ($79,071,600 - CG funds, $76,048,000 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). Also includes AE & D costs for Grays Landing ($803,000) and Point Marion ($618,758). 4. Includes $101,958,162 expended to date on Point Marion, /D 8, PA ($49,189 036 - CG funds, $52,769,126 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund), and $148,899,098 expended to date for Grays Landing, L/D 7 PA ($75,960,332 - CG funds, $72,938,766 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). Also includes AE & D costs for Grays Landing ($803,000) and Point Marion ($618,758). 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 6. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $464,508 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public work funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and $412,088 Code 713 funds; excludes $409,622 contributed by local interest. 8. Includes $89,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations, Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $170,000 appropriated to and $151,275 expended on the Dam Safety Assurance Program. 9. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 10. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $283,988 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 12. Includes $1,542,500 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 13. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes $67,800 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY 94 and $593,128 expended to date on M&O of dams. 14. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $328,000 Code 711 funds. 15. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds. Also includes $278,044 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes $67,800 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY94 and $593,128 expended to date on M&O of dams. 17. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $322,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 19. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 20. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $274,669 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $256,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 22. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $500,086 contributed by local interests. 23. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 contributed by local interests. 24. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,585,627.29 for new work contributed by local interest. 18-15 1 LuJL'LL7!' VV U1 1L\ Lt'it\ � \V rL 17 L .L'lY. A1 I V lN L. i & -8,409 -- 2200,,554455,,006655 33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) 25. Includes $315,500 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 29. Includes $152,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 30. Includes $2,303,076 Code 711 funds ($256,760 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $2,303,077 Code 711 funds, ($256,531 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 32. Includes $203,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 33. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 36. Includes $2,846,263 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 37. Includes $591,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 38. Includes $15,350,352 original construction cost. 39. Includes $67,800 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY 94 and $593,128 expended to date on M&O of dams.. 40. Includes $67,800 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY 94 and $593,238 expended to date on M&O of dams. 18-16 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 19351 Aug 30, 19351 June 26, 19342 Mar 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 4, 1913 Sep 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Jan 31, 19313 June 26, 19342 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a moveable dam.) For locks and dams 2 and 3. For locks and dams 4 to 8 inclusive. For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruction dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. 18-17 Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27,73d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 22, 70th Cong., 2d Sess. 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15 inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. Construct new lock and dam 7 (Grays Landing Lock and Dam) as follows: The Grays Landing Lock and Dam will be located 3.0 miles downriver from existing Lock and Dam 7. It will consist of a single lock chamber, 84 feet wide by 720 feet long, with a fixed crest dam 576 feet in length. The existing Maxwell Pool at elevation 763.0 will be shortened three miles and the existing Pool 7 at elevation 778.0 will be extended downriver to the new dam. There will be no change in pool elevation above existing Dam 7. Upon completion of the new replacement lock and dam, existing Lock and Dam 7 will be removed. Total authorized cost is $123,000,000. Replace existing 56'x360' lock chamber at Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8) with new 84'x720' chamber. Existing movable crest dam to remain; no change in pool elevations. Total authorized cost is $82,900,000. TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for low water regulation and flood control EKITNS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 3. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 18-18 5. 8. 9. 10. 13. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 14. 15. 18-19 CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE S1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) e Date ction Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Oct 22, 1976 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 7, 1966 Se Se in 21 22. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. 18-20 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 90th Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 90-17. 90th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. 2nd Sess. 23. 24. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 25. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Jun 22, 1936 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. amended by water regulation. 1st Sess. Jun 28, 1938 FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. I1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of as amended 1944 26. UNION CITY DAM, PA Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. 27. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recrea- S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. tion and storage for water quality control. 2nd Sess. 28. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Jun 28, 1938 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. augmentation, and pollution abatement, purposes. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of as amended 1944 1. Included in the Emergency Relief program April 8, 1935. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Public Res. 117, 71st. Cong., 3d Sess. TABLE 18-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction lMaintenance Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work Completed 1934 197,000 133,940 Buckhannon River, WV 2 Completed 1893 5,500 - Cheat River, WV 12 Completed 1895 12,997 - Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Completed 1922 110,663 81,613 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2. No Commerce reported. 18-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance Flood Protection Specifically Authorized Projects Completed: Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Butler, PA DuBois, PA Elkins, WV4 Johnsonburg, PA Johnstown, PA4 Kittanning, PA, Part I Latrobe, PA Latrobe, PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Punxsutawney, PA4 Reynoldsville, PA Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) Salamanca, NY Turtle Creek, PA3 Washington, PA Wellsville, OH, Section I Wellsville, OH, Section II Youngstown, OH Active: Saw Mill Run, PA Deferred: Benwood, WV Authorized by Chief of Engineers Completed: Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Burgettstown, PA Friendsville, MD Girty's Run, Millvale, PA Granville, PA Leetonia, OH Oil City, PA Oil City Ice Control Structures Root Creek, Bolivar, NY Slovan, PA Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA Wilmore, PA 1962 1963 1972 1970 1979 1958 1949 1951 1970 1954 1965 1954 1959 1964 1972 1972 1964 1956 1956 1976 7,601,763 964,976 1,568,661 1,556,181 4,464,607 1,772,627 674,664 8,865,388 130,317 207,659 2,556,652 3,217,531 150,386 2,070,484 3,586,107 385,494 628,888 2,880,535 16,859,682 789,093 483,910 157,633 3,621,134 1,895,000 289,000 75,000 534,000 910,000 40,000 130,000 2,000 44,400 698,000 597,000 14,900 353,000 180,485 26,000 72,000 465,000 323,000 113,000 152,200 1954 81,028 1964 1965 1986 1987 1986 1964 1981 183,072 364,208 83,129 41,529 2,655,934 75,908 89,299 43,595 3,927,792 1,591,436 57,811 184,246 136,591 1,554,428 2,021,852 96,853 22,500 35,900 - 2,200 701,722 3,000 17,200 25,000 9,000 24,600 86,200 1,300 18-22 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance Active: Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River)2 1979 132,464 - - Inactive: Black Fork at Hendricks, WV 1972 6,800 - - Oakdale, PA - 14,127 - - Rouseville, PA - 1,642 - - Wallace, WV' -11,035 - - Weston Mills, Olean, NY - 50,100 - - Weston Mills, Portville, NY - 52,100 - - Reservoirs Other: Rowlesburg Lake, WV 1977 2,857,575 - - 1. Lacks local support. 2. No longer economically justified. 3. Includes $15,350,352 original construction cost. 4. Reported in detail in an individual report. 18-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 18-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last. Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adena, OH (Short Creek) Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River) ' Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area)' Bellaire, OH Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA' Brilliant, OH Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Clarington, OH Coraopolis, PA Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH Empire-Stratton, OH Follansbee, WV Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) Industry, PA Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY2 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act Leetsdale PA Martins Ferry, OH' McKees Rocks, PA Mingo Junction, 9H. Moundsville WV Muddy Creek Danq, PA' Neville Island, PA New Cumberland, WY New Kensington and Parnassus, PA' Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) Powhaten Pqint, OH Proctor, WV Redbank Creep Lake, PA Rochester, PA St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Smith Ferry, PA Uniontown, PA Warwood, WV Wellsburg, WV West Bridgewater, PA Wheeling, WV Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)' Wheeling, yV (Wheeling Island) Wilcox, PA Woodlands, WV 1 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization) 4 1975 1965 1972 1941 1977 1956 1954 1971 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 6, 1977 Mar 2, 1970 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 3, 1978 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Nov 17 ,1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17 ,1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 5, 1955 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 1. Deauthorized under Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99-662). 2. Local Interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 4. Includes $47,195 construction costs expended under previous project and $1,700 O&M costs expended under previous project. 18-24 13,452 4,100 64,851 76,487 - 194 16,884 100,000 33,031 -. 190,722 1,342,000 25,164 -, ..- 402,459 - - .- 156,377 13,529 6,387 .- 189,067 21,700 16,761 232,863 ~ TABLE 18-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Depths on Mi- Avail- Normal ter Sills Character of of Width able Lift at Pool Ele- at Normal Character of Type of Year of LengthNormal vation Pool Level Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Com- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level). (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 234567 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 14.5 Cheswick PA 24.2 Natrona, 'A 30.4 Freeport PA 36.3 Clinton, PA 45.7 Kittanning, PA 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 9 62.2 Rimer, PA Total Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 2 Abandoned lock and dam 3 0o Demolishing old dam 1 t Dredging channel Total 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 360 13.5 731.8 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 360 10.5 745.8 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 360 11.8 757.0 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 360 12.2 769.4 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 360 13.1 782.4 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 Piling 360 17.9 800.2 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 360 22.0 822.2 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. $ 1,763,485 $ 1,875,665 1,707,690 1,940,537 1,523,959 1,460,008 2,848,920 2,510,373 $15,630,637 591,187 544,929 310,103 26,001 1,055,003 $18,157,860 a dA H eW) j 0) 9j TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (see Section 3 of Text) Dimensions NPoromolal .... Pool Avail- Eleva- Depths on Miable Lift at tion ter Sills at Width Length Normal (feet, Normal lool Character of Type of Per- Miles of Cham- to Full Pool mean Level. Foundation Construction cent Year Above Nearest ber Width Level sea Lower Upper Kind Com Opened to Actual No Mouth Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete Navigation Cost 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 56 110_ 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 56' 4 41.5 Monessen, PA 563 - 61.2 Maxwelllocks 843 and dam, Maxwell, PA - 82.2 Grays Landing 84 lock and dam, Grays Landing, PA 7 85.0 Greensboro,PA 56 8 90.8 Point Marion PA 84 - 102.0 Morgantown lock 84 and dam, Morgantown, WV - 108.0 Hildebrand lock 84 and dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV - 115.4 Opekiska lock 842 and dam, 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV '-a oo Q 360 8.7 718.7 720 360 8.2 726.9 720 360 16.6 743.5 720 720 19.5 763.0 720 15.0 778.0 360 15.0 778.0 720 19.0 797.0 600 17.0 814.0 600 21.0 835.0 600 22.0 857.0 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 $ 17,872,21257 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 17,538,5365 8 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19322 17,254,0715 6 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19642 30,110,8895 18.0 26.0 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 83 1994 149,702,0989 10.0 10.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19252 2,639,804 17.0 16.5 Rock Rock . Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19932 107,985,415 5 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19502 8,778,0005 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19592 12,506,8295 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19642 25,179,6225 Marine ways, etc Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 4 Abandoned lock and dam 5 Abandoned lock and dam 6 Abandoned lock and dam 7 Abandoned lock and dam 8 Abandoned lock and dam 9 Abandoned lock and dam 10 Abandoned lock and dam 11 Abandoned lock and dam 12 Abandoned lock and dam 13 Abandoned lock and dam 14 Abandoned lock and dam 15 Dredging Total 0 IU) 0P 250,000 1,019,9075 780,816s 1,074,8125 770,4495 213,7765 245,9005 191,0005 210,4455 227,6685 200,5505 190,6916 210,1275 175,8295 587,899 $395,917,3455 n O O z 0 OO TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (see Section 3 of Text) 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depths. 5. Actual cost: may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as 2. Dates shown for locks and dams No. 2 to 8 inclusive, represent reconstruc- necessary. tion. 6. Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,304 3. 2 Chambers for reconstruction of dam (1963-1967). 4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, (1958-9), $2,086,438 for 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. original reconstruction (1923-1926), $618,758 AE&D costs for replacement of 8. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation. lock, and $101,958,162 for replacement of lock ($49,189,036 CG funds; 9. Includes AE&D costs for proposed lock ($803,000) and $72,938,766 ex- $52,769,126 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund).. pended from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. b C1 pdd AI Hj H+O REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 18-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (QS S r ffi T t) \J1 IJ s lL etJ L L l.1I V J Operation and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Total Regular $395,917,343'3 $244,859,2692 $640,776,612 12 3 Maintenance and operation 452,623 452,623 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) -- 22,549 22,549 Total $395,917,343'3 $245,334,4412 $641,251,7841 23 1. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous pro- 3. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation of jects. ULD 3, $148,899,098 for replacement of L/D 7 ($72,938,766 2. Includes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 provided by the Inland Waterways Trust Fund), and and June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improve- $101,958,162 for replacement of lock at Point Marion Lock and ment under provisions of permanent appropriation for such Dam ($52,769,126 provided by the Inland Waterways Trust purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous pro- Fund). jects. TABLE 18-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 22 of Text) Total Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA Conemaugh River $46,012,411 Crooked Creek, PA Crooked Creek 4,482,933 East Branch Clarion River, PA Clarion River 9,539,586 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY Allegheny River 112,226,076' Loyalhanna, PA Loyalhanna Creek 5,727,531 Mahoning Creek, PA Mahoning Creek 7,144,973 Tionesta, PA Tionesta Creek 7,792,378 Union City, PA French Creek 14,559,800 Woodcock Creek, PA Woodcock Creek 20,545,065 Beaver: Berlin, OH Mahoning River 8,739,987 Michael J. Kirwan, OH Mahoning River 17,376,097 Mosquito Creek, OH Mosquito Creek 4,253,029 Shenango River, PA and OH Shenango River 40,217,201 Monongahela: Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV West Fork River $210,143,1852 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD Youghiogheny River 12,521,167 1. Includes $2,921,000 for dam rehabilitation. 2. Actual cost. Latest cost estimate (1991) is $231,000,000. 18-28 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-L INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 29 of Text) Project Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Bolivar, NY Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Burgettstown-Slovan, PA Butler, PA Chartiers Creek, PA Cannonsburg-Houston Reach James G. Fulton Reach Colliers, WV DuBois, PA Eldred, PA Etna, PA Friendsville, MD Granville, PA Johnsonburg, PA Kittaning, PA Latrobe, PA Leetonia, OH Dates of Inspection Aug 1993 Sep 1994 Sep 1993 Jul 1994 Sep 1991 Sep 1994 Sep 1993 Apr 1992 Sep 1993 Mar 1992 Aug 1993 Jul 1993 Apr 1987 Sep 1989 Apr 1994 Jun 1990 May 1992 Jul 1991 Sep 1994 May 1994 18-29 I Project Marianna, PA Millvale, PA Oil City Ice Control Structure, Allegheny River, PA Oil City LPP-(Dike), PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Reynoldsville, PA Ridgway, PA Salamanca, NY Stonewood-Nutter Fort, WV Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Turtle Creek, PA Washington, PA Wellsville, OH Weston, WV Wilmore, PA Youngstown, PA Dates of Inspection Apr 1990 Jul 1990 Sep 1991 Sep 1991 Sep 1993 Oct 1990 Sep 1993 May 1994 Oct 1991 Sep 1993 Jun 1992 May 1994 Nov 1976 Sep 1987 Sep 1993 Sep 1994 Aug 1994 Nov 1991 May 1994 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 18-M FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 31 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Church Run, Titusville, PA (terminated) $5,865 Connellsville, PA (initial appraisal) 3,334 Connoquenessing Creek, Marion Twp., PA (reconnaissance) 1,796 Dunlap Creek, Redstone Twp., PA (reconnaissance) 10,107 Hickman Run, Little Tyrone Twp., PA (terminated) 54 McGary Hollow Run, Weston, WV (terminated) 4,070 Oil Creek, Oil City, Venango County, PA (terminated $9.378 Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year $34,604 Emergency Streambank Protection .Section 14 of the 1846 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Brush Creek, Jeannette, PA (planning & design analysis) $2,191 Buffalo Creek, Freeport, PA (planning & design analysis ) 5,704 Chadakoin River, Jamestown, NY (construction) 13,673 Chubb Run, Franklin, PA (construction) 10,764 Conneaut Lake, PA (planning & design analysis) 17 Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (completed) 2,063 Elk Creek, Nutter Fort, WV (terminated) 20,993 French Creek, Wattsburg, PA (planning & design analysis) 15,107 Mahoning River, Warren, OH (planning & design analysis) 20,316 Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (completed) (4,260) Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (completed) 1,176 Mill Creek, Sinclairville, NY (construction) 16,492 Miller Run, Cecil Twp., PA (construction) 12,505 Nelson Run, Ross Twp., PA (construction) 15,722 Ohio River, Chester, WV (planning & design analysis) 10,147 Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (construction) 14,156 Saw Mill Run Rd., Salamanca, NY (construction) 14,222 Short Creek, Ohio County, WV (terminated) 12,079 Water Works, Park & Pool, Wellsburg, WV (completed) (292) Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year. $182,775 18-30 r OHIO RIVER For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed structures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of District Engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington, and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, WV, and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island, and Hannibal Locks and Dams. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, KY, and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Robert C. Byrd, Greenup, and Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine Locks and Dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal), Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland Locks and Dams, and Locks and Dams 52 and 53. Improvements Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River ....................................... ............ 19-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River ................. 19-3 Tables Table 19-A Table 19-B Table 19-C Table 19-D Table 19-E Cost and Financial Statement..... 19-5 Authorizing Legislation .............. 19-6 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Table 19-F Not Applicable Table 19-G Not Applicable Table 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing Project........................................ 19-7 Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River .............. 19-7 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams Statistics .................................... 19-8 Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, PA, and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, IL. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous Projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, KY. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine Locks and Dams with an auxiliary lock at Robert C. Byrd being 110 by 1,200 feet. Dashields is a fixed dam, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Robert C. Byrd are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movable-type dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine Locks and Dam, a canal (Louisville and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1,200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh, and Uniontown; two locks 110 by 1,200 feet at Smithland; 110- by 1,200-foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at Locks and Dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110- by 1,200-foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two section of movable crest at McAlpine Locks and Dam; widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet at McAlpine Locks and Dam has been inoperative since failure of downstream lock gates in December 1972. Rehabilitation of existing Locks and Dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work (existing project, 1983), is $1,739,921,050; estimated 19-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL.WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 non-Federal cost is $14,999,000. Foregoing estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered .inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968, for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; Locks and Dams 40 and 42 eliminated; Locks and Dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth Locks and Dam; Lock and Dam 3 replaced by Dashields Locks and Dam; and Locks and Dams 4, 5, and 6 replaced by Montgomery Locks and Dam. Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 were replaced by Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam authorized by August 30, 1935, Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and Dams 7, 8, and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 12, 13, and 14 were replaced by Hannibal Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 15, 16, and 17 were replaced by Willow Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 18, 19, and 20 were replaced by Belleville Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 21, 22, and 23 were replaced by Racine Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 27, 28, 29, and 30 were replaced by Greenup Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 31, 32, 33, and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 were replaced by Markland Locks and Dam; the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine Locks and Dam were widened to 500 feet. Locks and Dams 43, 44, and 45 were replaced by Cannelton Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 48 and 49 were replaced by Uniontown Locks and Dam, and Locks and Dams 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland Locks and Dam, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 combined the Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the Newburgh Locks and Dam project. A December 1981 Act established the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks and Dam to protect and preserve existing fossilized coral and a diversity of wildlife. A November 17, 1988 Act authorized a replacement structure for Locks & Dams 52 & 53 at Olmsted, IL. A November 28, 1990 Act authorized an interpretive center at the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks & Dam and a replacement of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks & Dam, IN & KY. Table 19- J contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing project. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 19-I for licenses. Navigation system of 21 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 194 shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For total cost of existing project, see Table 19-H. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Willow Island Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in January 1967. All work is complete. Belleville Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in May 1962. All work is complete. Racine Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete. Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing locks chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I studies for 1,200-foot locks in a bypass canal. These studies are complete. Initial Construction, General funds for the continuation of Engineering activities were received in September 1985. Real estate acquisition is complete. The contract for the Locks was awarded in October 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Dam Rehabilitation was awarded in June 1993 and is 50 percent complete. The total estimated cost of the project is $384 million, which is 50 percent federal cost and 50 percent Inland Waterways Trust Fund cost. Greenup Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in October 1954. All work is complete. Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam: Construction work complete. Markland Locks and Dam: Project is complete including a public highway bridge across the navigation structure, as authorized by the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-606). For details ofbridge see page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1978. Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area was authorized by Public Law 97-137 on December 29, 19-2 OHIO RIVER 1981 and modified by Public Law 101-640 on November 28, 1990 to design and construct an interpretive center. The Conservation Area will protect 1,000 acres which consists of birdlife and other wildlife. Planning consisted of efforts to define facilities to be cost shared with local interests. All Real Estate tracts have been acquired and condemnation trials continue. A construction contract to construct the cost-shared recreation facilities was awarded on 30 September 1993. $206,492. McAlpine Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland Canal which work is presently deferred. A replacement of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock with a new 110 foot x 1,200 foot lock was authorized by Public Law 101-640. Advanced Engineering and Design was continued. $1,616,180. Cannelton Locks and Dam: Project is complete. Newburgh Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in October 1962 is complete except for financially closing out the project. Uniontown Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for financially closing out the project. Smithland Locks and Dam: All major construction features are complete and the project was advanced to 99 percent completion. Real Estate activity is complete except for audit work and Title Opinions. Locks and Dam No. 52 (New Lock): Construction initiated in December 1967 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Temporary Lock): Construction initiated in December 1972 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 52 (Rehabilitation): Construction initiated in June 1979 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Rehabilitation): Construction initiated in June 1979 is complete. Olmsted Locks & Dam: A replacement structure for Locks and Dams 52 & 53 was authorized by the WRDA of 1988 in Public Law 100-676 on 17 November 1988. Advanced Engineering and Design continued. A contract to construct the Access Road, Resident Engineers Office, and Visitor Center was awarded in December 1992 and advanced to 99 percent completion. A contract to begin construction on the Stage 1 Cofferdam and the Slide Repair was awarded in May 1993 and advanced to 60 percent completion. A dam prototype construction contract was awarded 18 March 194 and advanced to 14 percent completion. $39,943,186. Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Costs were $14,825,387 for Huntington District, $24,811,559 for Louisville District, and $12,576,264 for Pittsburgh District. 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, IL). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing Projects. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work; but, in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation, it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of 400-600 feet; also, to permit movement of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, PA, to 80 feet at Cincinnati, OH, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, KY (head of falls, 53.8 feet at Evansville, IN, and 59.5 feet at Cairo, IL (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work (1960) is $16.16 million, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items (1954 is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. See Table 19-B for authorizing legislation. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927, authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvements at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Congr., 2nd Sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Congr., 1st Sess.). 19-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool conditions. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, stream gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $1,672,630. There was no dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River in FY 94. Dredging by contract: Huntington District, 444,000 cubic yards at $1,163,798. Louisville District 1,456,000 cubic yards at $2,996,700." 1/Costs and quantities are lower than previous yeaurs due to a protest to a contract which delayed contract work until August 1993. 19-4 OHIO RIVER Table 19-A Cost and Financial Statement See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30, 1993 (footnotes) 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River New Work Approp. $5 Cost 6 Maint Approp. 3 Cost 3 Rehab. Approp. Cost Rehab. (O&M) Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost i8,847,815 $25,770,000 $42,527,000 i0,229,469 28,822,023 30,089,360 $108,849,000 $1,817,538,592 '3 5 1 21 59,712,979 1,754,110,719 1 3 6 11 12 15 16 18 22 16,184,500 39,641,315 44,200,500 52,090,500 899,091,613 2 4 19 16,584,217 40,201,217 41,352,798 52,213,210 895,277,332 2 13 14 19 20 0 10,522 -3,500 44,807 0 1,801 0 84 0 0 0 0 82,972,138 82,972,138 33,914,252 33,914,252 - 15,962,260 $ - 15,962,260 8 4,990,300 4,826,500 4,715,000 5,055,533 4,898,751 3,228,916 5,328,100 145,688,881 ' 5,833,128 144,560,687 ' - 944,649 - 944,649 Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 2 Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. ' Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. s Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. ' Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. 1 Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation ofsnag boats under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. ' Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. ' Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. 10 Includes $100,000 placed in Fiscal Year 1971 Budget Reserve. " Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. 1 Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. i' Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. " Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to project without reimbursement. " Includes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 1' Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. '~ Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $572,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,759,812 Code 713 funds. " Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $342,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,989,812 Code 713 Funds. " Includes $2,158,073 Funds provided from The Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). *� Includes $920,945 cost for operations and care of previous projects. 21 Includes $213,492,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. n Includes $183,829,440 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 19-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Table 19-B Authorizing Legislation See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River March 3, 1827 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1958 Project adopted by this act originally covered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance df 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. Construct ice piers as a part of allotted from appropriations for general open channel work. Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, and a 200-foot strip along bank and for bank protection, at an estimated cost of $200,000. Act of March 3, 1827, modified to include maintenance of existing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of river slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. Locks and Dams, Ohio River H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. December 29, 1981 November 17, 1988 November 28, 1990 November 28, 1990 October 31, 1992 Act of December 29, 1981, established H.R. 2241, PL97-137, Title II, the 1,000-acre Falls of the Ohio 95 Stat. 1710 National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a cost not to exceed $300,000. Act of November 17, 1988 authorized PL 100-676, 100th Cong., a replacement structure for Locks and 2nd Sess. Dams 52 and 53 at Olmsted, Illinois. Act of November 28, 1990, modified PL 101-640, 101st Cong., PL 97-137 by authorizing an 2nd Sess. interpretive center at Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a estimated total cost of $3,200,000. Act of November 28, 1990 authorized PL 101-640, 101st Cong., a modernization of the existing 110 2nd Sess. foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks and Dam, Indiana and Kentucky at a total cost of $219,600,000 with one-half appropriated from the Treasury and one-half from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Act of October 31, 1992 PL 102-580, 102nd Cong., renamed the Gallipolis Locks and Dam 2nd Sess. to the Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam. 19-6 OHIO RIVER TABLE 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River Total Cost of Existing Project to September 30, 1993 (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular $1,661,713,544 $854,315,615 $116,886,390 $2,632,915,549 Public Works 3,258,368 0 0 3,258,368 Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 1,217,837 Maintenance & Operation 3,039,789 3,039,789 Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 254,578 Executive 1963 0 Total $1,666,386,561 3 $857,413,170 12 $116,886,390 ' $2,640,686,121 'Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under 3Excludes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. permanent indefinite appropriation. 4Includes $33,914,252 cost for 0 & M Rehabilitation. 2Excludes $920,945 cost for operation and care ofprevious projects. Note: All other cost variations are listed in the Footnotes of Table 19-A. Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses At Locks and Dams, Ohio River Markland Dam McAlpine Dam Racine Dam Greenup Dam Hannibal Dam F.E.R.C License 2,211 289:1,000 2,570 2,614 3,206 Public Service Co. of Indiana Annual Charge $ 45,950.00 Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1994 $1,284,711.64 Louisville Gas and Electric Co. $ 95,000.00 $8,815,353.84 Ohio Power Co. $ 64,232.00 $799,529.00 City of Vanceburg, City of New Kentucky Martinsville, WV $ 261,103.00 $3,050,193.00 -0- $197,589.03 19-7 License Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 1 - Replaced - - - - - - - - - 870.034 6.2 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Emsworth, PA 2 - Replaced 3 - Replaced 13.3 Dashields Locks and Dam 1.6 miles below Sewickley, PA 4 - Replaced 5 - Replaced 6 - Replaced 31.7 Montgomery Locks and Dam, 1.4 miles above Industry, PA 7 - Replaced 8 - Replaced 54.4 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, OH 9 - Replaced 10 - Replaced 11 - Replaced 84.3 Pike Island Locks and Dam, 2 miles upstream from Warwood, WV 12 - Replaced 13 - Replaced 14 - Replaced 126.4 llannibal Locks and Dam, 1.6 miles upstream from New Martinsville, WV 15 - Replaced 16 - Replaced 161.7 Willow Island Locks and Dam, 2.7 miles above Waverly, WV 17 - Replaced 600 360 - 600 360 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 18.0 710.0 17.0" 12.9' Rock 15.5" 12.9' 10.0 692.0 17.5 682.0 110 56 110 56 110 56 110 110 110 110 664.5 13.4' 16.0' 17.6' Rock 14.6' Rock and Piles 7.0' 14.8' Rock Rock and Piles Rock Rock and Piles Rock 100 1921 $ 43,347,635 2 " - - 976,767 - - 1,144,588 100 1929 37,447,328 " - - 1,071,472 - - 1,080,132 - - 1,123,442 100 1936 37,754,307 " - - 1,075,000 - - 1,167,456 100 1959 39,099,688 1,177,100 1,138,000 1,162,165 21.0 644.0 17.0' 18.0' Rock Rock 100 1968 56,623,946 1,166,104 1,222,389 1,133,371 21.0 20.0 623.0 602.0 38.0 35.0 17.0 Rock 15.0 Rock and Piles - - Rock Rock 99 1972 87,901,956 - - 1,180,478 - - 1,275,532 100 1972 78,173,881 1,362,591 1- ca 20.5 110 110 110 110 Table 19-J (Continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles and Below Distance From Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town Width of Chamber (feet) Lock Dimensions Greatest Length Available For Full Width (feet) Lift (feet) Upper Normal Pool Elevation (feet. mean sea (level) Depth on Miter illa Actual Cost Character of Year to Date of Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 103.9 Belleville Locks and Dam, 0.3 mile below Reedsville, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 237.6 Racine Locks and Dam, 1.6 miles below Letart Falls, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 279.2 Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, 0.7 mile below' logsett, WV Robert C. Byrd Modernization 27 Rehab Dam and New Lock 27 - Replaced 28 - Replaced 29 - Replaced 30 - Replaced 341.0 Greenup Locks and Dam, 4.9 miles below Greenup, KY - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 436.2 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, 2.2 miles above Foster, KY 110 110 110 111100 1,200 600 1,200 600 22.0 22.0 582.0 660.0 37.0 15.02 Rock and Piles Rock 18.0 15.0 Rock Rock and Piles S - $ 927,091 - - 1,213,848 - - 936,696 100 1968 62,591,255 - - 1,484,562 - - 1,218,798 - - 1,851,488 100 1971 64,922,680 1,187,542 1,925,205 1,307,241 110 1,200 110 1,200 110 600 110 111100 110 110 1,200 600 1,200 600 3,452,066 23.0 538.0 18.0 15.0 Rock Rock 100 1992 287,182,297 " 1,063,133 1,088,802 1,579,618 30.0 515.0 30.0 485.0 18.0' 18.0' 13.0 Rock 15.0 Rock Rock Rock 100 1959 57,464,191 - - 1,359,231 - - 2,951,216 S -- 1,937,166 - - 3,437,057 100 1962 74,188,216 18 19 20 21 22 23 D 24 25 26 O O 31 32 33 34 __ __ Table 19-J (Continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter 18 Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Uft sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 O 0 42 43 44 - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 531.5 Markland Locks and Dam, 1 mile above Markland, IN - Replaced - Eliminated - - Falls of the Ohio, I mile above McAlpine 604.0 McAlpine Locks and Dam (Reconstruction of Locks and Dam 41) - Eliminated - Replaced - Replaced 45 - Replaced 720.7 Cannelton Locks and Dam, 3 miles above Cannelton, IN 46 - Replaced 776.1 Newburgh Locks and Dam, 16 miles above Evansville, IN 47 48 49 - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 846.0 Uniontown Locks and Dam, 3.5 miles below Uniontown, KY - Replaced - $ 1,894,942 - 3,704,535 - 1,297,924 - 2,857,040 110 110 N/A 110 110 56 110 110 110 1.10 110 111100 1,200 600 N/A 200 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 35.0 N/A 37.0 25.0 455.0 N/A 49.0 420.0 383.0 16.0 358.0 50.0 15.0 Rock N/A N/A N/A 12.0 19.0 19.0 38.0 32.0 11.0 Rock 11.0 13.0 Rock 13.0 Rock 16.0 Rock Piles 100 1963 63,019,403 N/A 0 N/A Rock Rock 2,222,448 7,658,134' 2,272,916 100 1961 45,726,189 '' - - 2,592,242 - - 2,819,930 - - 3,202,89Q 100 1972 99,032,866 1o 3,129,028 Pile 99 1975 104,496;840 4,415,526 3,062,710 3,325,964 22.0 342.0 34.0 12.0 Rock Rock 99 1975 100,326,373 50 3,571,762 Table 19-J (Continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 51 - Replaced 918.65 Smithland Locks and Dam, 2 miles above Smithland, KY 52 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, IL 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, IL (New lock) 964.4 Olmsted Locks & Dam at Olmsted, IL 53 962.6 10.8 miles above Mound City, IL 962.6 10.8 miles above Mound City, IL (New lock) 974.2 Mound City Lock and Dam, 1 mile below Mound City, IL TOTAL I-' r N- $ 4,370,566 110 110 1,200 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 22.0 324.0 12.0 302.0 12.0 302.0 21.0 13.4 13.4 300.0 290.0 290.0 34.0 12.0 Rock Rock 99 1980 273,725,471 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1928 13,337,747 " 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1969 10,197,516 18.0 18.0 Pile Pile 8 2006 76,502,521 L 15.4 9.6' Pile Pile 100 1929 10,004,240 u 15.4 9.6 Pile 100 1982 38,570,920 1.539.470 ' $1,864,002,874 I' 'Depths are on emergency dam foundation and recontrolling depths. ' Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938. ' Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. ' Land chamber. 'River chamber. ' Roller-gate dam. Cost not included in total. Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. 'Lock and Dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921. Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock wall in 1928. Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30. Reconstruction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine Locks and Dam in 1960. Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971. ' Existing structures are complete except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge. Construction of the new 110 foot x 1,200 foot lock has not yet begun. * Dam below not yet constructed. Depth on lower miter sill at lower water. "Excludes $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978. " Major rehabilitation ($8,876,000) initiated in FY 79 is complete. " Major rehabilitation ($4,593,572) initiated in FY 79 is complete. "For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer considered authorized. (See Section 1 of Text.) "Includes $37,485,870 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 84 " Includes $33,914,252 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 90 (O&M funds). "Includes $33,016,696 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 89. "Includes $145,367,124 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. "Includes $38,462,316 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. "Exclusive of $7,013,405 details below. Additional Features Entering into Cost of Project Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute (under previous project) Examinations, survey contingencies, plants, and miscellaneous Waterfront Development at Huntington, WV (Greenup Pool). Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis Locks and Dam TOTAL GRAND TOTAL $ 5,359,203 966,232 19,170 668,800 7,013,405 $1,871,016,279 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT * The District comprises Ohio, Northwestern Pennsylvania and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins from western and northern New York, embracing U.S. waters of Lake boundary between the states of Ohio and Michigan to Erie exclusive of small portion of western end, Lake Ontario, and international boundary line east of Frontier, New York. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 3. Buffalo Harbor, NY 4. Buffalo Small Boat Harbor, NY 5. Cattaraugus Harbor, NY 6. Cleveland Harbor, OH 7. Conneaut Harbor, OH 8. Dunkirk Harbor, NY 9. Erie Harbor, PA 10. Fairport Harbor, OH 11. Huron Harbor, OH 12. Irondequoit Bay, NY 13. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 14. Lorain Harbor, OH 15. Olcott Harbor, NY 16. Oswego Harbor, NY 17. Port Clinton, NY 18. Port Ontario Harbor, NY 19. Rochester Harbor, NY 20. Rocky River, OH 21. Sandusky Harbor, OH 22. Toledo Harbor, OH 23. Vermilion Harbor, OH 24. West Harbor, OH 25. Environmental Review Guide for Operations 26. Reconnaissance and condition surveys 27. Other authorized navigation projects 28. Navigation work under special authorization Page Beach Erosion Control 20-2 29. Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio 30. Presque Isle Peninsula, 20-2 Erie, PA 20-2 31. Other authorized beach erosion 20-3 control projects 20-3 32. Beach erosion work under 20-3 special authorization 20-4 20-5 20-5 20-5 20-6 20-6 20-6 20-6 20-7 20-7 20-7 20-7 20-8 20-8 20-8 20-8 20-9 20-9 20-9 20-9 Flood Control 33. Mount Morris Lake, NY Genesee River 34. Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, OH 35. Inspection of completed flood 'control projects 36. National Emergency Preparedness 37. Other authorized flood control projects 38. Flood control work under special authorization Urban Storm Water Management 39. Onondaga Storm Water Discharge Deauthorized projects 40. Deauthorized Projects General Investigations 20-9 41. Surveys 20-9 42. Collection and study of basic data 43. Advance Engineering & Design 20-1 Page 20-10 20-10 20-10 20-11 20-11 20-11 20-11 20-11 20-11 20-11 20-12 20-12 20-12 20-12 20-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1297- 99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal facilities. There are 16 piers and wharves. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on southside of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys, engineering and design, and construction management for contract dredging in the upper River, involvement with Ashtabula River Partnership, comprised of local, private and government agencies to address remediation of contaminated sediments in the lower river and Ashtabula River system, and continuing investigation for Letter Report regarding construction of a new Confined Disposal Facility for outer harbor sediment cost $501,720. Contract dredging of the upper River was completed at a cost of $137,146. Contract dredging downstream of the 5th Street bridge was partially completed at a cost of $116,680. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $20,238. U.S. derrickboat McCauley repaired a portion of the outer west breakwater at a cost of $101,004. 2. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, NY, to and including Tonawanda Harbor, NY. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, NY, Black Rock Harbor and Channel, NY and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832 .) Previous projects, For details see item 5 and 7, page 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see page 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda Inner Harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by New York State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interest for relocation of utilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Contract for cost-shared recreation development at completed projects (Code 713 program) was executed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY on April 16, 1985, and was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers on May 3, 1985. Terminal facilities. Two facilities are along upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock Lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two State-owned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, NY, and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small crag. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock which is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers .) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 283 days and closed for annual winter maintenance from January 10, 1994 through April 17, 1994. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds was accomplished throughout the year by Government plant and hired labor. Total costs of $1,432,794 were distributed as follows: Operation and care of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair and environmental compliance cost $981,994. Maintenance of grounds $41,100, real estate activities, project condition sediment surveys, and support of Water Control Center $92,600. $176,600 was expended for repairs to the underwater operating equipment and dewatering the lock. $102,800 was expended for snagging and clearing. $37,700 was expended for supervision and administration. 3. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous projects. For details see page 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on December 15, 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dock-side dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. 20-2 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 27 piers, wharves and docks of which five are on the Outer Harbor, nine are on the Lackawanna, Union, and Buffalo Ship Canals, and thirteen are located along the deep-draft section of the Buffalo River. Gateway Metroport, Division of Gateway Trade Center, Inc., owns and operates for the former Bethlehem Steel Corp. wharves at Lackawanna for the receipt and shipment of general cargo and bulk commodities. Buildings of the former steel plant are utilized for transit and long-term storage of cargo as required. The Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority owns Terminals A and B in the Outer Harbor used for handling general cargo. Twenty terminals have railroad connections. The city of Buffalo owns a slip on the right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring the city fireboat Coast Guard facilities are at the mouth of Buffalo River along the left bank. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1991, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Minor repairs to the CDF, No 4, was accomplished by the U.S. derrickboat McCauley at a cost of $74,400 and approximately 50 ft. of South Breakwater was repaired at a total cost of $91,600. Project soundings, before and after dredging soundings, supervision and administration of the various contracts and real estate cost $149,500. Snagging and clearing cost $45,300. Water control management costs were $53,100. $188,132 was expended for environmental activities and finalizing the FY 93 dredging project. FY 94 contractual dredging costs were $499,780 to remove 104,121 cubic yards of material. 4. BUFFALO SMALL BOAT HARBOR, NY Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833). Existing project. For details of the existing project, see page 20- 3 of Annual Report for 1991. Construction was completed in May 1992. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Federal Government and the local sponsor, the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, was executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on July 11, 1991. The local sponsor will provide 50% of project costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Balancing of the accounts resulted in Federal costs of $43,951 and a credit to the non-Federal account of $41,363. 5. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, NY Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, NY and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project, For details of the existing project, see page 32-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in January 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $4,804,060. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $2,566,529, excluding $20,000 for lands. Existing project was authorized by 1968 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., Ist sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. The cash contribution paid was $2,566,529. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Preparation of plans and specifications for proposed FY 94 dredging cost $18,800. Environmental testing, real estate activities, water control management, project condition surveys and miscellaneous structure repairs costs $17,466. $9,000 was expended for debris removal. 6. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839). Previous projects. For details see page 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1585, Annual Report for 1938 Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized through the 1966 modification, see page 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements in the interest of commercial navigation and recreational navigation were authorized in the 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88), at a cost not to exceed $36,000,000. The commercial navigation portion of the overall project consists of: (a) enlarging and deepening to 31 feet LWD the east entrance channel; (b) deepening the east basin channel to 27 feet LWD; and (c) expanding the capacity of Dike Site 14 to contain the polluted dredged material resulting from the project. This portion of the project is currently on hold as the local sponsor has assigned this aspect a lower priority. The recreational navigation portion of the overall project consists of: an entrance channel 100 feet by 540 feet in length with a depth 8.0 feet below Low Water Datum (LWD) and the associated 360 feet of rubble mound revetment along the west side of Pier 34; removal of a portion of the east and west dock walls of Pier 34; removal of the south dock wall of Slip 32; construction of a 386 foot breakwater with a 20-foot top width and shore arm connection to Pier 32 and 406 feet of associated bulkheading; construction of a 455 foot breakwater and 640 feet of associated bulkheading along the north end of Pier 34 extending to and along the west end of Pier 36, and 1.8 acres of fill between Pier 34 and Pier 36; a 6.4 acre turning basin, anchorage area, and harbor-of-refuge with a dredged depth varying between 7.0 and 8.0 feet below LWD and the 1,223 feet of associated bulkheading; 2,098 feet of walkway 10.0 feet wide along the anchorage area and the west and north face of Pier 34 to include along the north face of the filled portion of the former Slip 34; 1,733 linear feet of suitable handrail along the breakwater and anchorage area; and 875 linear feet of bollards and chain along the north and west face of Pier 34 as generally described in a report entitled "Technical Report, North Coast Harbor/Pier 34, Cleveland Harbor, Ohio" prepared by the District Commander, U.S. Army Engineer District, Buffalo, New York, dated February 1992. A portion of the recreational navigation project was completed by the Ohio Department of Natural 20-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Resources. The recreational navigation project was also authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and the FY 88 Energy and Water Appropriations Act (PL 100-202). These acts also authorized additional undefined improvements to Cleveland Harbor. A portion of the project was deauthorized by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Estimated total Federal cost of the existing project is S33,852,100 (Oct.1991) exclusive of undefined, inactive and deferred'portions of the project. The amount of $29,315,100 is for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is for new work. Estimated non-Federal cost is S13,740,000 (Oct. 1991) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is required for work authorized by PL 99-88, PL 99-662, and PL 100-202. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act, consisting of widening and deepening the right bank of Cuyahoga River at the downstream end of Cut 4, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R&H Act, consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.RR) and 32 (B. & O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels, and remaining work authorized by the 1960 R&H Act, consisting of deepening the remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including the Old River to a depth of 27 feet, has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) is $21,251,000. The 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 101-101) authorized the Corps to begin a Reconnaissance study of the Cuyahoga River, to address the concerns of boat traffic congestion and related risks, accidents and safety of the public. Preliminary plans were studied to alleviate the commercial navigation problem and inadequate width and depth, in the Old and Cuyahoga Rivers. The cost of this Reconnaissance study was $250,000. The Reconnaissance Report recommended a feasibility study for one plan which has three structural features and the potential for yielding commercial (priority) outputs. The non- Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its total share of the cost of the feasibility phase of the study. Therefore, the study was reclassified as "inactive". See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. The city of Cleveland has been requested to provide assurances regarding items of local cooperation required for the construction of the new CDF. For details of local cooperation, see page 32-4 of FY 87 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Fifty-one piers, wharves, and docks are situated in the Port of Cleveland. Eleven are located in the east and west basins of the outer harbor, 7 along the banks of the Old River and 17 and 16 along the right and left banks of the Cuyahoga river, respectively. Twenty-two terminals have both railroad connections and mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at the foot of East 9th Street. The city of Cleveland owns and operates a wharf for mooring the city fireboat. U.S. Coast Guard vessels are moored east of the foot of 9th Street in the east basin. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1989, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 94 engineering and design and construction management costs for North Coast Harbor/Pier 34 were $22,342. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, letter report, design analysis and environmental impact statement for the plans and specifications for raising Dike 14, economics report, and real estate activities cost $919,595. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $3,857. Repairs by U.S. derrickboat Simonsen to 275 L.f. of east breakwater, snagging and clearing, and approximately 50 l.f. of CDF maintenance cost $707,800. Removal of approximately 253,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from the Cuyahoga River, by contract, cost $708,995. Engineering and design costs for the new CDF and raising Dike 14 were $88,770. 7. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous projects. For details see page 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. For description see page 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. See page 1274, Annual Report for 1967, for complete description of project modification authorized by 1966 R&H Act. Authorization of this modification was continued by the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. Estimated cost (1970) for this modification is $717,000. For completed work, non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. Estimated non-Federal cost of $2,877,000 (1970) includes cash contribution of $717,000 and the remainder is for construction of service facilities for the 1966 project modification. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-6 of Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of local cooperation for project modification as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1966. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: $51,454 was expended for project condition sediment surveys real estate activities and supervision and administration. S10,600 was expended to finalize the FY 93 dredging contract. $850,600 was expended for miscellaneous repairs, including stone and inspection services, to 300 I.f. of the East Breakwater by the U.S. derrickboat McCauley. 20-4 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 8. DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. For details see page 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see. page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys cost $11,300. $5,700 was expended for supervision and administration and real estate activities. $168,182 was expended by the U.S. derrickboat McCauley to repair 55 1.f. of the U.S. breakwater and for emergency removal of approximately 3,000 cubic yards of material out of the Federal channel at a total cost of $9,500. 9. ERIE HARBOR, PA Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous projects. For details see page 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing projects. For description see pages 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. The FY 93 Appropriations Act (PL102-377) authorized the planning, design and dredging of an access channel and berthing area. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion, authorized by 1899 Act was deauthorized in November 1981. A portion of work authorized by 1960 Act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was deauthorized in August 1982. Non- Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which 12 are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. I owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on southside of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two offshore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and result during fiscal year. Maintenance: Completion of a Brief Letter Report and continuing investigation for a Letter Report regarding construction of an access channel and berthing area for the Vessel Niagara cost $74,600. Miscellaneous operations services, project condition sediment surveys, and real estate activities cost $1,615. 10. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized through the 1960 modifications, see page 1526 of Annual Report for 1962; for description of small boat harbor as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1977. Authorization of this modification was continued by the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $4,931,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project and the balance of $2,340,000 is for proposed work authorized by See. 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act, which is deferred. Entire project modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, is classified inactive and is excluded from foregoing cost. This authorization was also continued by the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. Estimated Federal cost of this modification is $7,870,000 (Mar. 1991). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,991,000, of which $101,000 was for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project and $2,560,000 which includes cash contribution of $2,330,000, is for work authorized by Sec. 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act. For the inactive 1960 project modification, estimated non-Federal cost of $26,400,000 (Mar. 1991) is for lands, relocations, utility changes, dock dredging and bulkhead modifications. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Acts of 1927 and 1960 and page 32-11 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous operations services, real estate activities, and project condition sediment surveys cost $85,448. Removed 186,200 cubic yards of dredged material at a cost of S717,800. 20-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 11. HURON HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous project. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H Act was deauthorized January 1, 1990. Non-Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous operations services, project condition sediment surveys, and real estate activities cost $28,588. The FY 94 dredging contract cost $944,800. Approximately 313,400 cubic yards of material were removed. The dredging will be completed in FY 95. Supervision and administration cost $82,100. 12. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, NY at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, NY (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815). Existing project. For details of existing project, see page 32-7 of Annual Report for FY 87. Total estimated project cost is $15,363,000 (Oct. 1984) including $3,582,000 Federal (which includes the COE $3,536,000 and the USCG $46,000) and $11,781,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $2,661,000, lands and damages $290,000 and the cost of a movable highway bridge $8,830,000. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a Local Cooperation Agreement with New York State, executed April 20, 1983. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition surveys cost $307. 13. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1628 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work for completed project cost $69,066. Non-Federal costs of $6,000 were incurred for channel dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Not required. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work continues for consideration of a repair to the East Breakwater at a cost of $29,050. The FY 94 dredging contract to remove approximately 8,000 cubic yards of material cost $75,500. Dredging will be finalized in FY 95. $39,092 was expended for project condition surveys, real estate activities, and supervision and administration. 14. LORAIN HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of new work is $20,475,000. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut I and construction of bank stabilization, authorized by 1960 Act and modified by 1965 Act was deauthorized January 1, 1990. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15-to-25 foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers were also deauthorized January 1, 1990. Total non-Federal cost is $3,000 contributed by local interests towards construction of west shorearm. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorized construction of commercial navigation improvements consisting of two bend cuts on the Black River to widen and straighten the channel between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and the 21st Street Bridge. These cuts are to be excavated to the existing channel depth of 27 feet. The authorized plan also includes widening the Upper Turning Basin at the existing depth of 21 feet. Estimated costs for this work are $2,290,000 Federal and $1,510,000 non-Federal (Oct. 1989). This portion of the project has been classified deferred. On March 12, 1986, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, authorized construction of a small boat harbor which was completed in July 1987. The project consists of a 225-foot detached rubblemound breakwater and an 800-foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Construction costs for this project, including supervision and administration, were $775,025 Federal and $775,025 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed S3,000. Work authorized by 1960 Act (and modified by 1965 Act) is deauthorized. All other conditions fully complied with. On March 25, 1986, the city of Lorain, Ohio signed the Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA), for the Section 107 20-6 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT project. For details see page 32-7 of Annual Report for 1986. For details of LCA for deferred project authorized by the 1986 WRDA, see page 32-9 of Annual Report for FY 87. Terminal facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers .) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Finalization of the Ship Simulation Study resulted in a $4,000 credit. Maintenance: $175,794 was expended for miscellaneous inspection services, environmental studies in support of dredging, real estate activities and project condition sediment surveys. Repairs to 225 l.f. of east breakwater by U.S. derrickboat Simonsen cost $540,600. Contract costs for repairs to the lighthouse foundation cost $383,035. Engineering and design effort regarding the foundation repair for the lighthouse cost $198,895. 15. OLCOTT HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek, about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous project. For details see page 1971 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1621 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1555 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,500 exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The authorized modification to the existing project consists of breakwaters to provide optimum harbor protection, a stone jetty and recreational fishing facilities including a foot bridge, walkways and guardrail, access facilities, sanitary facilities and parking areas. The estimated cost of the authorized modification is $17,300,000 (Oct. 1991) of which $8,860,000 is Federal and $8,440,000 is non-Federal. Modification of the existing project was authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) (PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project. Local interests contributed $1,500. Modifications authorized by the 1986 WRDA will require local interests to pay 50% of project cost including lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas. They are also responsible for construction of necessary docks and berthing spaces, construction of launching ramp, parking areas, sanitary facilities, and necessary access roads. After construction, non-Federal responsibilities would include fishing facility maintenance, except for the aids to navigation. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction Engineering and Design for the authorized modification, by Government plant and hired labor, cost $22,067. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys were $15,465. 16. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY Locations. On South shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego river, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal wharves, and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 Act, was deauthorized January 1, 1990. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 Act, was deauthorized in May 1981. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and wharves in the harbor and along the river channel. The Port of Oswego owns and operates a general cargo terminal at the mouth of the Oswego River. The Port Authority also operates a grain elevator west of the mouth of the river. The U.S. Coast Guard moors patrol and environmental research vessels west of the mouth of the river. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition surveys cost $8,454. $17,007 was expended to finalize the FY 93 dredging contract which included environmental activities and supervision and administration. 17. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OH Location. Comprises lower half-mile of Portage River. River empties into Lake Erie 72 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14820). Existing Project. Provides for parallel jetties at river mouth and a channel in Lake Erie and Portage River with a project depth of 10 feet. For additional details, see page 1899 of Annual Report for 1951. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. There is one public fish dock, one private sand dock, one private fuel, lumber and coal dock and five additional private docks. A dock at foot of Madison Avenue is owned by the village of Port Clinton and open to the public. A shipyard builds small boats. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys cost $25,257. $37,202 was expended for hired labor and contract stone to repair the east pier. Work was performed by the Derrickboat Simonsen. 18. PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, NY Location. On southeasterly end of Lake Ontario, 19 miles northeasterly of Oswego, NY and 32 miles southerly of Sackets Harbor, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. Adopted by the River and Harbor Act July 4, 1836. Only information available is the index to the report of the Chief of Engineers. 20-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Existing project. For description see page 32-17 of Annual Report for 1978 and page 32-16 of Annual Report for 1976. Non-Federal cost for new work was $1,467,132 including cash contribution of $1,431,507. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Assurances were received from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. The LCA was executed on June 24, 1986. Terminal facilities. The only commercial navigation at Port Ontario is charter boat fishing. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Actual construction of the project was completed in October 1987. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: $2,979 was expended for real estate activities. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys cost $7,138. 19. ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous project. For details see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $2,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 Act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio coal loader. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Terminal facilities. There are 3 docks at Rochester Harbor. The city of Rochester owns an 830-foot long wharf at the entrance to the Genesee River. Three storage buildings at the terminal, formerly used as transit sheds, have approximately 100,000 square feet of storage space. Approximately 3 acres of open storage area is located at the upper end of the facility. The facility has not been used for handling cargo for over 10 years. The U.S. Coast Guard moors search and rescue vessels at the mouth of the Genesee River. Another private facility is located 1.6 miles above the Stutson Street Bridge. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous operations services, real estate activities, environmental activities, and project condition sediment surveys cost $72,999. 186,000 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, were removed from the Genesee River and entrance channel. The cost to finalize this FY 93 contract and related supervision and administration was $141,150. 20. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description see page 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343,494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately-owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: S14,952 was expended for project condition sediment surveys. Miscellaneous environmental and inspection services cost $22,195. 21. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeastern portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous project, For description see pages 1511-12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000, including $325,000 cash contribution and the remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepening channels authorized by 1960 Act. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, project condition sediment surveys, and real estate activity costs were $33,599. Finalization of the FY 93 dredging contract cost $70,900. 22. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at the westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous projects. For details see page 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed 20-8 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT existing project was $15,567,147. See table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Thirty-five piers, wharves and docks are located in the Port of Toledo. Seven are located on Maumee river, and 28 are equally divided along the right and left banks of the lower 7 miles of the Maumee river. The Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority Facility No. 1 Wharf handles conventional and containerized general cargo as well as an increasing amount of miscellaneous bulk materials. Fifteen of the terminals have railroad connections and mechanical handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 44, revised 1989, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: $529,026 ws expended for project condition sediment surveys, real estate activities, and various operations studies. Costs to continue the Long-Term Dredged Material Management Plan were $442,900. Repairs to existing CDF, pipeline, and pump-out platform, including engineering and design, cost $253,727. Construction of the new CDF was completed in June 1994. Contract costs for the new CDF were $229,573. Removal of 832,000 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, and related dredging costs were $1,484,900. 23. VERMILION HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of $740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. A reconnaissance study to alleviate the ice-jam and free-flow flooding of the river was completed in 1986 at a cost of $180,000. The proposed project was an ice-retention structure. The non- Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its total share of the cost of the feasibility study; the project was therefore reclassified as "inactive". Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys cost $5,993. Miscellaneous costs were $735. 24. WEST HARBOR, OH Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles northwest of Port Clinton, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $3,303,898. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $3,922,000 including cash contribution of $3,795,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. See pages 32-20 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated January 31, 1978, State of Ohio stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation, and executed LCA was received on March 9, 1981. Terminal facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently consists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys cost $780. S272,254 vas expended for miscellaneous inspection services, contract supervision and administration, real estate, environmental activities and finalization of the FY 93 dredging contract. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW GUIDE FOR OPERATIONS $82,342 was expended to complete environmental compliance assessments and associated corrective action plans for the Buffalo District reservation, Cleveland Navigation/Area Office, Toledo Area Office, and to perform a preliminary environmental audit of floating plant operations. 26. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed by the Buffalo District at a cost of $64,809. Miscellaneous costs and real estate costs were $12,590. Remaining costs for reconnaissance and condition surveys are reported in individual project writeups. Date of Survey Barcelona, NY Aug 1994 Great Sodus Bay, NY Jun 1994 Iron Bay, NY Jun 1994 Niagara River, NYOct-Dec 1994 Oak Orchard, NY Aug 1994 Ogdensburg, NY Aug 1994 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 20-C. 28. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 20-G. Investigation and removal of sunken vessels and other obstructions to navigation under authority of Section 19 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899. Balancing of the account for the removal of sunken Barge No. 45, pinned against the upstream face of the Peace Bridge Pier 4, on the Niagara River resulted in a credit of $40,000. 20-9 Project REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 $34,817 was expended to investigate the Barge Cleveco raised and resunk in Lake Erie in 1962 during an aborted attempt to remove and salvage the barge. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 17 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 22 miles northeast of Dunkirk, NY (See Geological Survey map of Angola, NY.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 20-11 of Annual Report for FY 91. Federal project cost is. $1,460,000. Non-Federal project cost is $1,475,000. In addition, the local sponsor provided associated costs for upland development of $1,000,000. Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with the Town of Evans, NY, signed October 26, 1987. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Miscellaneous expenses totaled $1,763. Maintenance: Cost of study on sand by-passing procedures was $4,357. Reimbursement to the Town of Evans, NY, for Federal share of maintenance dredging cost $7,080. Beach Erosion Control 29. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK, OH Location. Maumee Bay State Park is located in Lucas County, OH approximately 5 miles east of Toledo. The 1,855 acre park has 11,000 feet of shoreline along the southerly end of Maumee Bay (Lake Erie). (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Oregon, OH.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 20-12 of Annual Report for FY 1991 and page 20-1 1 of Annual Report for FY 92. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see page 32- 14 of FY 87 Annual Report. A Local Cooperation Agreement was negotiated with the local sponsor (ONDR) and executed August 8, 1990 by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The plan described in the General Design memorandum was completed September 1991. FY 94 costs were $6,816 Federal and $1,125 non-Federal for project monitoring. 30. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Location. At Erie, Pa., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 102 miles east-northeast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835.) Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. For details of project authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), 1976 WRDA and 1986 WRDA, see page 32-14 of Annual Report for FY 87. Actual Federal cost fotbr the authorized beach nourishment project modifications through FY 92 is $16,879,000 which includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $I 1,233,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. Actual non-Federal cost for the authorized project and modifications through FY 92 is $8,798,000 which includes $3,983,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $4,815,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRDA was completed in FY 91. The estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1993) for the 55 breakwater project is $65,250,000. This estimate includes $13,750,000 for the initial construction and $51,5000,000 for 50 years of post-construction beach nourishment. The estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1993) for the breakwater project is also $62,500,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources was entered into on February 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 WRD Act. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the United Stated of America and the local sponsor for construction of the 58 breakwater project was executed by the Secretary of the Army on June 22, 1989. See page 20-10 of Annual Report for FY 89 for details of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction of the permanent protection, i.e., breakwaters, initial nourishment and clearing antiquated structures completed in FY 93 was fiscally analyzed and accounts balanced in FY 94. The results of this fiscal effort resulted in negative obligations and expenditures of $59,176 and $57,083 respectively in the Federal cost of this project and net increases in non-Federal obligations of $150,420 and $151,954 in non-Federal expenditures. No additional funds, either Federal or non-Federal were appropriated to this feature of the project during FY 94. Final fiscal close-out of this feature of the project is projected for January 1995 upon transfer/reimbursement of excess funds. The final cost of this feature of the project will be reported in the FY 95 report. Annual nourishment for a fifty-year period, beginning in FY 93, continued in FY 94 for the second year of this fifty-year period. Federal obligations and expenditures of $399,363 and $393,663 respectively occurred in FY 94. Companion non-Federal obligations and expenditures of $402,858 and $396,178 respectively occurred in FY 94. This work involved supplying 53,069 tons of new sand obtained from an off-shore borrow area and relocation of 18,996 cubic yards of sand that had accumulated in excess behind several of the protective breakwaters. The total cost of the FY 94 nourishment work including engineering and design and construction management amounted to $789,841. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 20-D. 20-10 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 32. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION CENTURY PARK, LORAIN, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Existing project. For description of existing project see page 20-13 of Annual Report for 1991. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the city of Lorain, OH, in July 1989. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A credit of $45,386 was realized in FY 94 for lands, easements and rights of way. LAKESHORE PARK, ASHTABULA, OH Location. Lakeshore Park is located in Ashtabula, Ashtabula County, Ohio about 40 miles southwest of Erie, Pennsylvania, and about 50 miles northeast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Ashtabula north, OH.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in July 1983. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 94 Federal cost was $249 for miscellaneous in-house expenses. Flood Control 33. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, NY. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, NY (See Geological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, NY). Existing project. For description of existing project, as authorized by 1944 Flood control Act, see page 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition, $5,000 contributed funds were expended for new work. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of dam, reservoir and service facilities, condition and operation studies, real estate activities and miscellaneous reports, were accomplished by hired labor at a cost of $585,972. $119,279 was expended for the U.S. Geological Survey and National Weather Service reporting and hydroclimatic network. Operation of the Water Control Center cost S312,687. $65,600 was expended to continue converting an existing building to a Visitor Center. Environmental review aand compliance assessments cost $52,353. Contract costs to repair the electrical system cost $104,883. Associated engineering and design effort cost $32,099. Engineering and design effort for all other maintenance and repair work cost $379,178. $181,243 was expended for supervision and administration.. 34. RENO BEACH-HOWARD FARMS AREA, OH Location. Area is located in Lucas County, on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of Toledo, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map for 'Reno Beach and Metzger Marsh, OR) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 20-14 of Annual Report for 1991. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed with the local Sponsor on July 22, 1988 and by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on September 30, 1988. Availability of lands, easements, and rights-of-way was received on June 5, 1990 from the local sponsors. Discussions continue with the local sponsors on credit for LERRD's based on independent appraisals and the amount of cash contribution. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction is 100% complete. $13,292 was expended for the development of the operation and maintenance manual. Non- Federal costs were $3,948 for continued investigation regarding resolution of real estate and associated costs. 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of $171,577. This includes updating the hydraulics and hydrology of various local flood control projects. Total cost to September 30, 1994 is $2,226,160. 36. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FY 94 costs were $125,636. 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 20-E. 38. FLOOD CONTROL WORK SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION UNDER KEUKA LAKE, PENN YAN, NY Location. Keuka Lake is located in the southwestern part of New York State in the Oswego River Basin between Canandaigua Lake and Seneca Lake in the village of Penn Yan in Yates County. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Penn Yan, NY.) Existing Project. Project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, on January 25, 1991. The recommended plan of improvement consists of removal of an existing earthen and masonry dam located just upstream of the Main Street Bridge. In order to provide additional capacity and 20-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 to aid in regulating lake levels, additional slide gates will be constructed in its place. The project will consist of a sheetpile structure with three slide gates, each 7 feet high and 6 feet wide. The new control structure will tie into the existing races located on each side of the stream. The operational policy will be to make releases through the dam to 1,000 CFS or the control structure's capacity, whichever is less. This policy will not induce additional adverse downstream flood impacts. Total Federal cost of the project is $369,800. Total non-Federal cost is $123,200. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, on October 11, 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 94 Federal costs were $186,798 for the construction contract including supervision and administration and in-house engineering effort. Non-Federal costs were $55,407 for the construction contract including supervision and administration and in-house engineering effort. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Law 89, 84th Congress, as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood Control Act of 1962). FY 94 costs for the Disaster Preparedness Program were $281,901. Costs to support Emergency Operations totaled S407,359 during Spring flood fighting in Central and Northern New York. These activities included flood reconnaissance, liaison activities and providing technical advice to local response agencies in flood flight operations. FY 94 costs for the Emergency Rehabilitation Program totaled $13,448. The FY 94 costs for providing an Advance Measures Self-help Assistance program to flood threatened communities in eight New York counties along Lake Ontario totaled $304,366. Program activities included in-house program administration, project inspection activities and the purchase and transportation of flood-protection materials. URBAN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT 39. ONONDAGA STORM WATER DISCHARGE, NY Ication. Onondaga Lake is located in Central New York State, northwest of the city of Syracuse. Onondage Lake is located within the Oswego River Basin, which is tributary to Lake Ontario. Onondaga Lake is also part of the New York State Barge Canal System. Onondaga Creek flows into the southeast end of Onondaga Lake. (See Geological Survey map of Syracuse, NY.) Existing Project. Congress has authorized, under Section 401 (Public Law 101-596), the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, acting jointly with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Governor of the State of New York to convene a management conference for the restoration, conservation and management of Onondaga Lake. Subsequently, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works approved the expenditure of a protion of the fiscal year 1992 Onondaga Lake appropriation ($350,000) for the planning and design of a dredging project at the Onondaga Lake - Onondaga Creek Inner Harbor. The design of the dredging project will provide for a channel 12 feet below LWD, 100 feet wide and 4,900 feet long from the terminal area to the open lake. The terminal area will be deepened to a depth of 12 feet below LWD. It is estimated that 210,000 cubic yards of dredged material will need to be removed. A suitable confined disposal facility site for placement of the dredged material will be identified and designed as part of this project. Local cooperation. The Inner Harbor project is sponsored by the New York State Thruway authority - Office of Canals. The local sponsor provided 30% of the design cost of the project ($150,000). The local sponsor is also required to provide 100% funding for construction of the project. Terminal facilities. The New York State Thruway Authority - Office of Canals maintains and operates a terminal on Onondaga Creek. This terminal contains three slips for docking tugs, derrick boats, and barges that are used for maintenance of the New York State Barge Canal System. Ther terminal property also contains several buildings for storage, maintenance, and administration. The City of Syracuse has future plans to develop marinas along Onondaga Creek for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: $45,587 was expended for hydrographic surveys, sediment sampling and testing, and miscellaneous in-house costs. 40. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Table 20-I. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 41. SURVEYS During FY 94, $324,813 was expended for surveys. These costs are shown below: Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection Studies Special Studies Miscellaneous Investigations Coordination Studies Phase I, GDM Studies Comprehensive Studies Review of Authorized Project 990 106,708 27,545 106,430 74,869 8,271 000 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the period, costs of $162,787 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $776,103 incurred under the 20-12 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Operations and Maintenance appropriation for a total cost of $938,890. Flood plain management services were performed during the year at a cost of $180,555. During the year, flood hazard elevation studies were essentially completed for the Village of Williamsville, NY and for Nettle Lake, Northwest Township, Williams County, and City of Upper Sandusky. The results of these studies will enable local officials to encouiage and enforce prudent use of the identified flood plains. Also hundreds of technical assistance requests regarding flood plain matters were completed during the year responding to individuals, corporations, real estate companies, insurance agents, engineering firms and local agencies. Costs for General Hydrologic Studies were $3,139. 43. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ERIE COUNTY SEWER DISTRICT NO. 5, SLUDGE TREATMENT FACILITY, AMHERST, NY Section 219 of WRDA 1992 authorized the Corps to provide technical and engineering services to Erie County Sewer District No. 5 for the installation/integration of a sludge treatment process into the existing wastewater treatment facility located in Amherst, NY. The cost sharing required under this Section is 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal and will be accomplished by an A/E contract as required in Section 219. The A/E and installation contracts are scheduled to begin in April 1995 and take approximately one year to complete. $3,559 has been expended during FY 94 for coordinating the agreement with the locals. All other costs during the period were $63,654 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, and Advance Engineering and Design projects. For details of individual projects, see sections 14, 15, and 39 in text. 20-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Funding . FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept 30, 1994 Project 1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) 3. Buffalo Harbor, NY 4. Buffalo Small Boat Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 247,000 256,262 542,500 1,082,762 599,355 987,569 981,946 876,788 1,638,600 3,567,500 1,382,503 1,450,400 1,538,005 3,664,062 1,348,051 1,432,794 502,000 2,089,000 619,756 1,900,758 350,000 245,000 198,457 226,674 500,000 212,500 178,386 455,704 505,178 1,095,750 645,803 1,101,812 - -117,984 8,650 43,952 - -119,284 489 -41,363 12,805,339' 12,805,339' 15,760,037 15,543,582 6,077,000 6,077,000 11,135,1202 11,135,1202 47,406,3883 47,323,3323 23,115,1874 23,115,1874 61,128,693 s 61,047,369' 295,457 295,457 602,016 602,016 593,216 583,216 20-14 620,000 620,000 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept 30, 1994 Project 5. Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 23,090 31,121 9,707 10,424 47,014 48,238 47,178 47,894 4,804,060 4,804,060 277,912 277,892 2,566,529 2,566,529 6. Cleveland Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Conneaut Harbor, OH 8. Dunkirk Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 3,316,000 3,208,526 250,000 42,185 484,000 728,664 -81,000 22,342 4,272,000 5,678,500 3,201,274 3,280,250 3,961,820 5,732,808 3,359,135 3,429,017 - 1,351,000 - 325,676 336,000 323,633 - -267,882 735,179 22,323 375,000 1,155,000 386,734 1,077,377 864,374 912,654 36,300,2996 36,300,049' 172,159,583' 172,156,522' 16,404,903 16,404,903 1,083,178 1,083,178 8,346,641 ' 8,346,6418 12,506,8579 12,506,8579 651,850 651,850 244,500 283,052 125,793 132,617 538,804 491,799 149,877 197,839 3,010,0240 3,010,02410 3,460,546 3,460,167 1,950,000" 1,950,000" 20-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept 30, 1994 Project 9. Erie Harbor, PA 10. Fairport Harbor, NY 11. Huron Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 12. Irondequoit Bay, NY (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 82,000 77,754 99,000 94,679 455,819 459,659 157,840 76,216 3,597,8531'2 3,597,87312 17,677,062" 17,590,7011 1,154 1,154 1,032,000 948,917 999,660 805,990 84,000 1,070,000 92,099 1,059,587 -100,957 -75,159 803,200 803,248 -18,045 1,097,100 -2,321 1,055,488 2,959,611" 2,959,611" 17,529,879 17,529,354 5,103,795"5 5,103,795" 19,260,404 19,218,594 247,030 247,030 63,079 63,079 -149 -61 27,000 26,209 35,271 37,111 159,783 160,937 3,535,651 3,535,652 625,164 624,910 2,718,077 2,718,077 307 - -2,109 - -1,962 20-16 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept 30, 1994 Project 13. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 14. Lorain Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Olcott Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) 16. Oswego Harbor, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 200,842 204,220 254 11,500 11,860 33,001 34,524 310,362 143,642 92 909,000 1,481,500 1,426,900 970,100 1,433,251 1,487,178 1,096,934 1,298,324 334,000 354,780 23,686 23,577 590,447 562,665 425,000 101,882 7,755 7,861 17,196 56,086 28,669 14,270 14,270 298,459 187,197 22,067 15,465 15,465 -77,746 33,915 20-17 301,39416 301,39416 3,693,860 3,527,131 742,822 742,822 22,240,073" 22,239,770" 31,486,893 31,433,558 845,551 845,551 2,025,2101" 1,750,7641" 655,69319 655,69019 14,47720 14,47720 8,430,01621 8,430,01621 7,808,950" 7,808,900" 307,590 307,590 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept 30, 1994 Project 17. Port Clinton Harbor, OH 18. Port Ontario Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Rochester Harbor, NY 20. Rocky River Harbor, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 71,950 71,950 9,970 9,970 800 9,481 9,481 941,000 923,684 275,03 8 275,400 -9,379 4,656 5,607 5,607 663,500 678,609 41,942 43,690 6,577 855 855 647,725 596,891 33,000 32,844 62,467 62,459 2,979 7,138 7,138 11,335 4,930 165,189 214,149 22,020 22,195 1,014,969 1,014,961 2,390,621 i 2,389,803" 31,859 31,859 1,361,335 1,340,521 2,439,308" 2,439,308 22,029,439" 22,024,283" 343,494 343,494 2,654,910 2,654,907 20-18 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept 30, 1994 Project 21. Sandusky Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 22. Toledo Harbor, OH 23. Vermilion Harbor, OH 24. West Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,015,000 973,200 1,280,209 958,069 794,833 837,862 307,500 104,499 6,727,270 6,727,270' 19,343,817 19,140,540 675,606 675,606 15,445 15,445 3,495,000 4,581,000 7,683,000 2,797,617 4,116,988 3,591,797 8,427,973 2,940,126 323,484 309,863 70,771 66,826 78,052 89,841 98,417 100,445 4,942 6,739 135,443 127,230 17,191,842" 17,191,842" 105,752,276" 105,649,377" 1,156,118 1,156,118" 6.993 6,728 2,449,549 2,449,249 139,775 139,775 3,303,898 3,303,898 1,643,397 1,643,394 3,795,000 3,795,000 263,640 273,814 20-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept 30, 1994 Project 28. Lake Erie Sturgeon Pt., NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29. Maumee Bay State Park, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. Century Park, Lorain, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 425 5,000 5,412 2,269,000 2,255,609 183,621 169,527 13,500 12,590 39,379 26,388 -34,000 22,608 7,754 9,162 19,721 2,174 2,522,000 4,177,000 1,561,000 4,914,497 4,794,605 1,455,003 11,250 11;437 -1,763 20,000 6,816 55 1,125 320,000 336,580 1,686,90030 I,662,82230 40,504 40,502 1,356,858 1,352,963 2,806,379 2,785,387 149,676 195,434 31,164,562 31,036,675 4,978 4,978 3,305,571 3,952,000 1,561,000 410,000 4,824,766 4,789,383 1,433,422 548,132 120,000 274,921 189,831 30,000 25,893 2,378 -848 2,105 2,105 -- 3 -45,386 - 44,467 - 45,383 475 249 21,860,284 21,841,330 418,500 372,872 246,717 247,565 951,844 948,067 249,707 249,707 20-20 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept 30, 1994 Project 33. Mt. Morris Lake, NY Genesee River 34. Reno Beach- Howard Farms Area, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 38. Keuka Lake, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 39. Onondaga Storm Water Discharge, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,209,000 1,177,283 1,160,980 1,938,961 1,205,414 1,048,530 1,244,168 1,833,294 2,260,000 1,864,000 2,531,449 1,769,880 125,000 292,079 1,034 92,031 57,500 432,500 105,272 410,321 90 -15,288 20,000 - 17,493 299,036 117,196 90,000 36,964 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 13,292 - 3,948 186,798 55,407 1,723,000 11,462 30,000 18,074 1. Includes $565,192 for previous projects. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2. Includes $58,027 for previous projects. 3. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred for new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96X3123 Operations and Maintenance and 96X5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 4. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projects. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized by Section 107. 5. Includes $1,883,647 for previous projects. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 6. Includes $1,564,154 for previous project and appropriations and costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act. 7. Includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operations and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operations of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 8. Includes $805,272 for previous projects. 9. Includes $39,784 for previous projects. 10. Includes $811,250 for previous projects. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. 11. Includes $176,520 for previous projects. 12. Includes $736,967 for previous projects. 13. Includes $104,900 for previous projects. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 14. Includes $368,940 for previous projects. 20-21 23,365,559" 23,365,5593" 20,814,871 20,607,618 5,532,594 5,532,551 432,500 414,269 486,03432 475,62732 110,000 109,864 1,723,000 11,462 30,000 18,074 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 15. Includes $269,789 for previous projects. 16. Includes $232,328 for previous projects. 17. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and c.st of $29,570 under authority of Section 107, 1960 R&H Act. 18. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 18. Includes $140,210 for previous projects. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 19. Includes $38,959 for previous projects. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 20. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act. 21. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projects. 22. Includes $945,684 for previous projects. 23. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 24. Includes $247,794 for previous projects. 25. Includes $617,529 for previous projects and $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 26. Includes $477,149 for previous projects. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 27. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projects. 28. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 29. Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 30. Includes $341,900 study funds under authority Section 107, 1960 R&H Act. 31. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 32. Includes study costs of $117,000 under authority Sect 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. Excludes $17,493 in contributed costs. 20-22 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH (See Section 1 of Text) Construction of breakwater. Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and constructing new east breakwater pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; and remove part of old east breakwater. Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Aug. 30, 1935 Remove portion of east breakwater to, extend breakwaters to present dimensions and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Aug. 26, 1937 Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater and maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Mar. 2, 1945 Extend river channel to present project limit. Sept. 3, 1954 Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor 25-foot depth. July 14, 1960 A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters, thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater, thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard materials in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River, 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Oct. 27, 1965 Dredging approach, channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. Annual Report,1895, p.2132 H. Doc. 654. 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 486, ses. H. Doc. 148, sess. 83rd Cong., 2d 86th Cong., 1st H. Doc. 269, 89th cong., 1st sess. 4 20-23 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY (See Section 2 of Text). Dredging channel through horseshoe reef at outlet of Lake Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor to 16 feet. Aug 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. June 13, 1902 Aug 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1905 July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 June 26, 193 4 3 Aug. 30, 1935' Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deepwater pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier towpath wall. Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance channel. Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island Pier improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project.' Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1888, p.2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116-3120. H. Doc. 143, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1900 p.4 1 5 2 . H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report .1901, p.3 3 4 3 . H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2d sess. and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.289,68th Cong.,lst sess. H. Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 423, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. 20-24 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents BUFFALO HARBOR, NY (See Section 3 of Text) Construction of south pier (extended in 1868)9. May 20, 1826 June 23, 1866 June 23, 1874 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1909 June 6, 1900 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 190710 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945" July 14, 1960 Construction of old breakwater.9 Extension of old breakwater.' Stony Point and south breakwater.' North breakwater.' Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock shoal therein. Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' South entrance breakwater.' Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site.' Deepening areas A, B, D, in outer harbor to 21 feet, C in north entrance to 23 feet. Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor 21 feet. Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to 21 feet in cooperation with city of Buffalo. Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions. Deepening approach to south entrance channels, and deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of southerly part of outer harbor. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 and 232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232 and 236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. Specified in acts. Specified in act. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 550, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong. 1st sess. H.Doc. 481,68th Cong.,2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 20-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Saote hU-D amuLuuruzmgL .gsLralonUU Acts Work Authorized Documents Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act, combined within this act as a single improvement. July 14, 1960 Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan bridge. as amended BUFFALO SMALL BOAT HARBOR, N Y (See Section 4 of Text). Nov. 17, 1988 Repair dike at small boat harbor. CATIARAUGUS HARBOR, N Y (See Section 5 of Text). Aug. 13, 1968 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters at mouth of Creek entrance channel 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep from that depth in lake to point 1,575 feet upstream; channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and recreational fishing facilities at mouth. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH (See Section 6 of Text). Mar. 3, 1875 West breakwater. Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 Part of east breakwater. 9 Extension of east breakwater. Reconstruction of piers. 9 Oct. 23, 1962 20-26 H. Doc. 451, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 15, 1980. Sec. 18, PL 100-676. H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report,1876, p.558. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d sess, and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865.H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. T. L1w A A .. *i.....:.,5....c, , BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 29, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935'2 Aug. 30, 1935" Mar. 2, 1945'4 Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor in discretion of Secretary of War. Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater, removal of easterly 150 feet of west breakwater, elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension on west pier, and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit."5"6 H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1899, p. 3 0 7 5 and 3078. H. Doc. 118, 56th Cong., 2d sess. No printed report. H. Doc. 891, 63d cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 63d Cong., 2d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 477, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges. 2 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie-Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower, 2,000 feet of river.3 H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 20-27 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin.Y Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater, construction of breakwater extension of east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and, installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. Deepening and widening east entrance and approach channels, channels, deepening the east basin channel and disposing of dredge material in an existing disposal site, as described in the Report to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors January 22, 1985, including bulkheading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient vessels in the area south of Pier 34 and including such modifications as may be recommended by the Chief of Engineers at a cost not to exceed $36,000,000. Aug. 15, 1985 July 14, 1960 Sec. 175, PL 94-587 PL 99-88 20-28 H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 6, 1966. BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizin2 Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966' Nov. 28, 1990 Sec. 202, PL 99-662. Dec. 21, 1987 PL 100-202. Bulkheading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient veils in the area south of Pier 34. Appropriates and directs the Secretary of the Army to use the sum of $11,000,000 which is to remain available until expended to carry out the provisions for the harbor modifications contained in PL 99-662. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH (See Section 7 of Text) Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater, removal of portion of old west breakwater, and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Realignment of west breakwater, removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal of Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier.' 7 Removal of portion of west breakwater, extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions, construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier, extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized, but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Recreational small boat harbor provided by: a stone dike about 2,200 feet long; access channels 6 feet deep, 2,800 feet long and 100 feet wide; closing of 100-foot gap in existing west breakwater, and personnel guardrail on west breakwater. Continuation of 1966 authorization. 20-29 Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 48, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' Sec. 107, PL 101-640. June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 17 Aug. 30, 19351" REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY (See Section 8 of Text). Construction of west pier.9,t ' Breakwater and evacuation of entrance channel to 13 feet.' Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth of suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Public Works Committee) June 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Committee) Sec. 201 of F.C.Act of 1965 May 26, 1824 Mar. 3, 1899 June 15, 1910 Nov. 28, 1920� Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Construction of small-boat harbor. ERIE HARBOR, PA (See Section 9 of Text). Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle peninsula. 9 Deepening channel and harbor basin too 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection of work on peninsula. Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. S.Ex.Doc.42, 35th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1866 pt. IV, p.155 Annual Report,1871,p. 214 H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 720,. 61st Cong. 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H.Doc.70,55th Cong.,1st sess. and Annual Report, 1896, p. 3 2 3 7 .19 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 52, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83d Cong., 2d sess. 20-30 Mar. 2, 1827 Mar. 2, 1867 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 30, 1948 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT LA5Jl bU-A.P CmULUU. I LUA*I rc L rI LULI Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 182521 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193522 H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier, thence 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over 300- foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin." Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH (See Section 10 of Text). Construction of piers. Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier, and deepening of to 19 feet. 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the United States of $715,000. Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier, and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. 20-31 Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153. H .Doc. 347, 54th Cong.,lst sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p.2956; 1903, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. H. Doc. 206, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2d sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Tahle 2-R d tnrpi ac n REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Ats Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 14, 1960 n May 10, 1977 (House Public Works Comm.) Oct. 1, 1976 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Nov. 28, 1990 Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Dredging of 8-foot river channel. Depth of 29 feet in the approach channel from the lake; a depth of 28 feet over a width of 800 feet in outer harbor; a depth of 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in Grand River, over a width of 200 feet to upstream limit of the turning basin, with suitable widening at the bends, thence over widths reducing from 200 to 100 feet to the upstream limit of the existing Federal project, except in the 8-foot channel; enlargement of the turning basin, including deepening of the entire basin to 21 feet; and minor modification of the existing project limits in the outer harbor. Construction of a small boat harbor. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 347, 86th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 627, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, PL 101-640 Continuation of 1960 and 1965 authorizations. HURON HARBOR, OH (See Section 11 of Text). Extension of west pier, construction of east breakwater, removal of part of old east pier;, deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier, construction of new spur pier, enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of beach at shore end of west pier. Extension of west pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and construction pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier, and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin and abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel. H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. sess. 122, 58th Cong., 2d 5, 63d Cong., 1st 478, 72d Cong., 2d H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess. 4 20-32 Mar 2, 1905 Mar 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935" Oct. 23, 1962 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2d sess. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY (See Section 12 of Text). Construction of entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels, a distance of about 1,300 feet; inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet, access channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the west; two stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 750 in length at the natural entrance; and recreational facilities. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY (See Section 13 of Text). West entrance pier.9 Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel to 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide. 9 East pier and east breakwater.' Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. LORAIN HARBOR, OH (See Section 14 of Text). Breakwaters and extension of piers to present dimensions. Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. Extend breakwaters to present dimensions. Deepen outer harbor and river channel of Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock. Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock.' Approach channel to municipal pier. H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. sess. 560, 60th Cong., 1st 644, 61st Cong., 2d 980, 64th Cong., 1st 985, 64th Cong., 1st 587, 69th Cong., 2d H. Doc. 469, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. 20-33 Annual Report,1874, p.256 Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report,1871, p.234 Annual Report, 1881, pp. 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364. H. Doc. 131,55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. Aug. 30, 1852 June 23, 1866 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 3, 1881 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1899 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr. 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to present project dimensions. Mar. 2, 1945 Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. July 14, 1960 Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater, to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater, remove outer 1,100 feet east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project." Construction of a 225 foot detached rubblemound breakwater and an 800 foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Two bed cuts on Black River between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and 21st Street Bridge, excavated to existing channel depth of 27 feet. Widening Upper Turning Basin at existing authorized depth of 21 feet.8 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st. sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Mar 12, 1986 H. Doc. 124, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 20-34 Aug. 30, 1935 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov 16, 1990 Nov 28, 1990 Oct 31, 1992 ONONDAGA LAKE, NY (See Section 39 of Text) The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Governor of the State of New York, acting jointly, shall convene a management conference for the restoration and management of Onondaga Lake. The purpose of the conference shall include the development, in the2-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this fact, for a comprehensive restoration, conservation, and management plan for Onondaga Lake that recommends priority corrective actions and compliance scheduled for the cleanup of the Lake and the coordination of the implementation of the plan by the State of New York, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency and all local agencies, governments and other groups participating in the management conference. Not later than 120 days after the completion of the plan, and after providing for public review and comment, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall approve the plan if it meets the requirements of this section and if the Governor of the State of New York concurs in such approval. Upon approval of the plan, the plan shall be implemented. The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and the Administrator of the environmental Protection Agency are authorized to make grants to the State of New York to perform activities authorized under this section or to contract for such performance, provided that such grants shall not exceed 70% of the costs of such activities and that the non-Federal share of such costs are provided from non-Federal sources. The Governor of the State of New York may, using funds provided above, make grants for research, surveys, administrative services and studies approved by the management conference, and gathering data and retaining expert consultants in support of litigation undertaken by the State of New York to compel cleanup or obtain cleanup and damage costs from parties responsible for the pollution of Onondaga Lake, including administrative services. Reaffirmation of PL 101-596. The Secretary is authorized to design and construct projects for address water quality problems associated with storm water discharges from large storm events for...the watershed areas of Onondaga County and Syracuse, New York, from which waters discharge into Onondaga Lake, New York... 20-35 PL 101-596 PL 101-640 PL 102-580 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Total project costs shall be shared at 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. Operation and maintenance cost shall be 100% non-Federal Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 4, 1913 Nov. 17, 1986 July 11, 1870 Mar. 2, 1907 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct 17, 1940 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 OLCOTT HARBOR, NY (See Section 15 of Text). Dredging a channel 11 feed deep between parallel piers. 9 Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. Construct the project for Navigation, Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 11, 1980. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY (See Section 16 of Text) Construction of outer west breakwater.9 Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A). 3 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer harbor between arrowhead breakwaters; west outer harbor east of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet.? Widening channel to harbor line in Oswego River north of Seneca Street. Closing gap in west breakwater; deepening west outer harbor, west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth.? Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of the inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and basin in east outer harbor.3' Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 24- foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater and elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater and elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. Annual Report, 1866,pt. III, p. 15 pt. IV, p. 158. H. Doc. 780, 62d Cong., 2d sess.' Sec. 601, PL 99-662 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220 and 221. H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 722, sess. H. Doc. 487, seas. 80th Cong., 2d 81st Cong., 2d H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 20-36 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 17 of Text) Parallel stone and pile jetties at mouth of river, east jetty 2,200 feet long and west jetty 1,980 feet long extending to 10-foot contour in lake Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide for outer 4,200 foot length and 200 feet wide for inner 800 foot length to Highway Bridge. PORT ONTARIO, NY (See Section 18 of Text). Mar. 2, 1945 Construct harbor of refuge. Nov. 17, 1986 Maintain harbor of refuge. ROCHESTER, HARBOR, NY (See Section 19 of Text) Mar. 2, 1829 Construction of piers.9 Aug. 2, 1882 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers.9 Deepening channel to 20 feet. Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Maintenance of existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. bridge. Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier, a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier, a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. Annual Report, 1875, p. 2 9 5 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 615, PL 99-662. Annual Report, 1874, p. 247 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437 Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383. H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 139, sess. H. Doc. 409, sess. 4 76th cong., 1st 86th Cong., 2d H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2d sess.4 20-37 June 10, 1872 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH (See Section 20 of Text). June 10, 1872 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935" Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 East pier and dredging of channel. Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH (See Section 21 of Text). Construction of channel protection works. Widening of Straight and Dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of Dock channel to 20 feet. Deepening of Dock Channel to 22 feet. Enlargement of turning basin and construction of rock dike. Maintenance of Bay Channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Extending Moseley Channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to junction Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from the junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania Coal dock No. 3 to 24 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH (See Section 22 of Text). A channel 400 feet wide and 21 feet deep from 25-foot contour in Maumee Bay to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide and 19 feet deep above that point and a 500 -foot turning basin at Upper End. A stone revetted earth dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Act 1899 modified to insure a navigable channel to 21 feet from Fassett Street Bridge to Lake. Annual Report 1871, p.2 1 1 H. Doc. 70, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2708. H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73d Cong, 1st sess. 328, 76th Cong., 1st 144, 86th Cong., 1st H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. sess. 4 H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. 20-38 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 27, 1965 July 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 25-foot contour to mouth of Maumee River (300 feet wide on each side of center dike in Bay Channel), thence 400 feet wide to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide above that point and a turning basin at Upper end 18 feet deep. Widening at bend of mouth of River opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Removal of center dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Enlarge widening at bend opposite Chesapeake and Ohio dock and turning basin opposite American Shipbuilding Co. dock. Deepening Bay Channel including widening to 28 feet, deepen River channels to New York Central Railroad Bridge to 27 feet and construct new turning basin below Anthony Wayne Bridge." VERMILION HARBOR, OH (See Section 23 of Text). Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Reconstruction of piers. New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. WEST HARBOR, OH (See Section 24 of Text). Construction of arrowhead breakwaters, entrance channel and access channel. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY (See Section 28 of Text). Rehabilitate existing breakwater, construct rubblemound west breakwater extension, construct rubblemound east breakwater, a shore revetment and dredging. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK BAY, OH (See Section 28 of Text). Protective sand beach stabilized by rubblemound offshore breakwaters and jetties along the west half of park shoreline and rubblemound revetment at the east end of the park. H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, PL86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 21, 1987 Sec. 501, PL 99-662. 20-39 River and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1880. Annual Report, 1874,p.219 H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 4, 1836 Mar. 3, 1875 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1958 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 3, 1954 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 as amended MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY See Section 33 of Text). Dec 22, 1944 Construction of a concrete gravity dam and reservoir. Construct a visitor center at Mt. Morris Dam to be known as the "William B. Hoyt II Visitor Center". RENO BEACH - HOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO (See Section 34 of Text). June 30, 1948 Construction of dike and levees. June 30, 1948 as amended KEUKA LAKE, PENN YAN, NY (See Section 38 of Text). Removal of an existing earthen and masonry dam located just upstream of the Main Street Bridge and replace with additional slide gates tied into existing races located on each side of the stream. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA (See Section 30 of Text). Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Periodic nourishment of shores for a 10-year period. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced offshore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sand fill. Construct offshore breakwaters and restore beaches. CENTURY PARK, LORAIN, OH (See Section 32 of Text). Construction of two stone groins, removal of a stone deflection wall and placement of clean beach fill material. LAKESHORE PARK, ASHTABULA, OH (See Section 32 of Text). Construction of offshore breakwaters, restoration of an 800-foot long beach, and subsequent periodic nourishment as necessary. 20-40 H. Doc. 231, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 397,86th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 796, 93d Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 101, PL 94-587 Sec. 501, PL 99-662. Sec. 103, PL 87-874, Authorized by Chief of Engineer July 11, 1989. Sec. 103, PL 87-874. Authorized by Chief of Engineers April 26, 1982. H. Doc 615, 78th Cong.,2d sess. Sec. 103, PL 102-580 H. Doc 554, 80th Cong., 2d ses. Sec 205, PL 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jan. 25, 1991. July 14, 1960 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933.. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River downstream at end of Cut 4 classified inactive. 3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 4. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar. 3, 1905. 11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriations Act approved April 1, 1944. 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug. 5, 1927. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification was deauthorized Nov. 1981. 20. Public Law 366. 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 23. First Supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 1944 approved Dec. 23, 1943. 24. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 to and including Old River, classified deferred. 25. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 26. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Aug. 1982. 27. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel at Cut 1 has been deauthorized. 28. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet an turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 29. Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is deauthorized. 30. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor deauthorized in May 1981. 31. Modification eliminated by River and Harbor Act of Oct. 26, 1962. 32. Modification classified inactive. 20-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 20-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 29 of Text) For Last Cost to Full Report September 30,1994 See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Barcelona Harbor, NY Completed 1989 $ 1,185,85316 $ 1,938,409 Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH' Completed - 2 19,7633 Black River Harbor, NY - - 2 42,401 - Cape Vincent Harbor, NY Completed 1962 275,082 1,566,059 Cattaraugus Creek, NYs - - 57,410 - Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH Completed 1990 3,145,176" 9,627 Grasse River (Massena),NY - 1891 9,0003 - Great Sodus Bay, NY - 1992 1,324,503 2,626,541"8 Kelleys Island, OH Active 197412 129,874 - Little River at Cayuga Island, NY Completed 1969 46,8047 6,580 Morristown Harbor, NY Completed 1949 6,221 12,671 Niagara Remedial Works, NY' Completed 1966 6,069,395 510,819 Niagara River, NY'3 Completed 1964 559,4579 283,733 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY Completed 1987 1,720,466" 1,400,782's Pultneyville Harbor, NY" - 1934 68,219 20,087 Put in Bay, OH Completed 1951"2 51,609 14,357 Sackets Harbor, OH Completed 1982 25,010 28,477 Sandusky River, OH4 - 1894 58,0003 557 1. No commerce reported. 2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Channel improved by local interests. 7. Includes local interests contribution of $25,742. 8. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. 9. Includes local interest contribution of $27,563. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 11. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 12. Annual Report for Detroit District. 13. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H Act was authorized by Congress in August 1977. 14. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. Excludes $57,000 contributed funds. 15. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 16. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $181,500 contributed funds. 17. Excludes $3,261,375 contributed funds. 18. Includes $361,772 for previous projects. 20-42 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Cost to Full Report September 30, 1994 See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hamlin Beach State Park, NY Completed 1976 $ 1,769,600 - Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH Completed 1987 1,741,1252 - Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, NY' Completed 1963 58,978 $ 307 1. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when 2. Does not include $739,700 contributed funds. project was authorized by 1954 River and harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. 20-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 20-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) For Last Cost to Full Report September 30, 1994 See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Auburn, NY, Owasco Outlet Completed 1962 $ 371,9853 Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, NY Completed 1957 335,385 - Camp Perry, OH Completed 1967' 275,000' Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY2 Completed 1984 1,404,500 - Cuyahoga River Basin, OH Active 1985 1,117,000 - Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, NY Active 1985 490,300 - Fremont, OH, Sandusky River Completed 1976 8,589,8246 - Ithaca, Cayuga Inlet, NY Completed 1978 3,929,3009 - Lackawanna, NY, Smokes Creek Completed 1971 3,542,0684 Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY Completed 1954 797,300 Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY Completed - 226,429 - Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, NY Completed 1954 1,681,785 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY2 Completed 1964 330,231 - Ottawa, OH Deferred 1989 374,000 - Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Inactive Brook, NY' Deferred 1950 281,559 - Point Place, Toledo, OH Completed 1990 9,885,733" - Scajaquada Creek, NY Completed 1985 4,944,852 Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, NY Completed 1954 3,349,248 - Warsaw, NY, Oatka Creek2 Completed 1969 558,317' Wellsville, NY, Genesee River Completed 1978 3,145,30310 1. In-active portion of work for State Ditch has been done by local interest and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request of local interests. 2. Project authorized by Chief of Ensgineers. 3. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 88-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 4. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. 5. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 6. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes cost of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 7. Includes local interest contribution of $125,000. 8. Annual Report for Detroit District. 9. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. Excludes costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. 11. Excludes $1,871,631 in contributed funds. 20-44 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 30 of Text) Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal Year Study Identification Cost $ Lake Erie, Cooley Canal, Lucas, OH 31,644 Rochester Harbor, NY 158,120 TABLE 20-H FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 41 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Sec. 205 Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Fiscal Year Study Identification Cost $ Avon, OH 35 Cross Lake, NY 148,225' Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY 101,916 Oneida Creek, NY 3,557 Scajaquada Creek, Depew, NY 58 Swan Creek, OH 40,2602 West Branch, Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY 74,717 1. Does not include $136,184 in contributed funds. 2. Does not include $49,078 in contributed funds. 20-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 20-H(Cont.)FLOODCONTROLWORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 41 of Text) Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1986 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Fiscal Year Study Identification Cost $ Auburn Water Pump Facility, Auburn, NY 161 Auglaize River, Paulding County, OH 9,731 Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY 12,450' Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY 5,973 Canaseraga Creek, Dansville, NY 4,582 Cattaraugus Creek, Village of Arcade, NY 244,5302 Chagrin River, East Branch, Sperry Rd., OH. . 16,4753 Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Rd. OH 35,098^ Domonkas Library, Sheffield, OH 255,838 s Eighteenmile Creek, Boston, NY 7,237 Ganargua Creek, Plasermill Rd., NY 6,021 Genesee River., Back River Rd., Amity, NY 4,592 Genesee River, Caneadea, NY 14,723 Honeoye Creek, Mendon, NY 5,764 L. Sawyer, Camp Miakonda, Toledo, OH 4,604 Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY 20,8406 Lake Erie, Hamburg, NY 6,681 Lake Erie, Geneva Park, OH 9,066 Linwood Park, Vermilion, OH 122 Lake Ontario, Sodus Point, Wayne County, NY 18,824 Maumee River, Toledo, Oh 8,814 Niagara Riverwalk, Buffalo, NY 6,452 Osborne Park Inlet, Willoughby, OH 63 Route 531, Lake Erie, Ashtabula, City, OH 141 Seneca Falls, NY 37,6777 Tonawanda Creek, Niagara Co., NY 23,826 Tonawanda Creek Road, Minnick, NY 16,181 Tonawanda Creek , Niagara County, NY 2,594 1. Does not include $3,971 in contributed funds. 5. Does not include $86,879 in contributed funds. 2. Does not include $78,222 in contributed funds. 6. Does not include a credit of ($10,840) in 3. Does not include $7,419 in contributed funds. contributed funds. 4. Does not include $34,743 in contributed funds. 7. Does not include $1,766 in contributed funds. 20-46 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 42 of Text) For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act' 1962 Aug 1977 - - Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1954 R&H Act 1962 May 1981 - - Buffalo Harbor Drift Removal, NY - Dec 1992 - - Buffalo Ship Canal, Buffalo, NY - Dec 1992 - Caledonia, Genesee River, NY 1950 FC Act 1950 Jan 1990 - - Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1962 Nov 1986 - - Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 FC Act 1948 Jan 1990 $ 12,464 - Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act 1968' Nov 1979 - - Dunkirk Harbor, NY WRDA 1986 Dec 1992 - Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act 1976 Jan 1990 506,344 - Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act - Jan 1990 - - Elk Creek Harbor, PA 1966 R&H Act 1978 Dec 1992 101,500 - Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act 1963 Nov 1981 - - Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 - - Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1982 - - Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act - Jan 1990 - - Fort Niagara State Park, NY, Sec. 201 1965 FC Act - Jan 1990 - - Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 Aug 1977 1,524 - Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1941 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 - - Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act 1973 Jan 1990 72,052 - Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC Act 1951 Nov 1983 29,000 - Huron Harbor, OH 1962 R&H Act' 1963 Jan 1990 - Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 8,159 - Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 12,300 - Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act, modified by 1966 Jan 1990 - - 1965 R&H Act4 Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act 19713 Nov 1977 12,000 - Niagara River, Compensating Works, 1930 R&H Act 1964 Aug 1977 - - Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act 1986 Nov 1986 - - Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act 1963 Jan 1990 - - Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act4 1963 May 1981 - - Port Bay, NY 1950 R&H Act - Jan 1990 - - Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act 1975 Nov 1986 361,241 - Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 May 1981 19,010 - Selkirk Shores State Park, OH 1954 R&H Act 1963 Jan 1990 - - Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act - Aug 1977 - - Watkins Glenn, NY 1941 FC Act 1958 Aug 1977 43,182 - White City Park, OH 1954 R&H Act - Jan 1990 - - 20-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 1. Extension of guide pier only; other improvements completed. 2. Deepening of west outer harbor, other improvements completed. 3. Annual Report for Detroit District. 4. Uncompleted portion. 5. Breakwater. 20-48 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT * The district is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U.S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 601.1 feet; Lake Michigan- Huron, 577.5 feet; Lake Erie, 569.2 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 572.3 feet. These elevations are in feet above the mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec - International IMPRC Navigation 1. Algoma Harbor, WI ............... 2. Alpena Harbor, MI ................ 3. Arcadia Harbor, MI ............... 4. Ashland Harbor, WI .......... ..... 5. AuSable Harbor, MI ............... 6. Bayport Harbor, MI ............... 7. Big Bay Harbor, MI ............... 8. Big Suamico River, WI ............. 9. Black River, (Port Huron) MI ......... 10. Black River Harbor, (U.P.) MI ........ 11. Bolles Harbor, MI . ............... 12. Caseville Harbor, MI .............. 13. Charlevoix Harbor, MI .............. 14. Clinton River, MI ................ 15. Cornucopia Harbor, WI ............. 16. Detroit River, MI ................ 17. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI .... 18. Fox River, WI .................. 19. Frankfort Harbor, MI .............. 20. Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI 21. Grand Marais Harbor, MI ............ 22. Grand Marais Harbor, MN ........ .. 23. Green Bay Harbor, WI ............. 24. Greilickville Harbor, MI ............ 25. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI .......... 26. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI ........... 27. Harrisville Harbor, MI ............. 28. Holland Harbor, MI ............... 29. The Inland Route, MI .............. 30. Kenosha Harbor, WI .............. 31. Kewaunee Harbor, WI .............. 32. Keweenaw Waterway, MI ........... 33. LaPointe Harbor, WI ............... 34. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI ............ Page . 21-2 . 21-3 . 21-3 . 21-4 . 21-4 . 21-4 . 21-5 . 21-5 . 21-5 . 21-6 . 21-6 . 21-7 . 21-7 . 21-8 . 21-8 . 21-9 . 21-9 21-10 21-11 21-12 21-13 21-13 21-14 21-15 21-15 21-15 21-16 21-16 21-17 21-17 21-18 21-18 21-19 21-19 Great Lakes Datum, 1985 (IGLD 1985). The IGLD 1985 is a datum or reference system used to define water levels within the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River system. This datum was implemented in January 1992, officially replacing IGLD 1955. At the time IGLD 1955 was established, it was recognized that this datum would have to be periodically revised due to isostatic rebound. Isostatic rebound is the gradual rising or bouncing back of the earth's crust from the weight of the glaciers that covered the Great Lakes region during the last ice age. )VEMENTS Navigation (Continued) 35. Lake St. Clair, Channels in 36. Leland Harbor, MI ............... 37. Lexington Harbor, MI .............. 38. Little Lake Harbor, MI ............ . 39. Ludington Harbor, MI ............. 40. Manistee Harbor, MI .............. 41. Manistique Harbor, MI ..... ........ 42. Manitowoc Harbor, WI ............. 43. Marquette Harbor, MI ... ........... 44. Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI . 45. Milwaukee Harbor, WI ............. 46. Monroe Harbor, MI ............... 47. Muskegon Harbor, MI ............. 48. New Buffalo Harbor, MI ............ 49. Oconto Harbor, WI ............... 50. Ontonagon Harbor, MI ............. 51. Pensaukee Harbor, WI ............. 52. Pentwater Harbor, MI .............. 53. Point Lookout Harbor, MI ........... 54. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI ............ 55. Port Washington Harbor, WI ......... 56. Port Wing Harbor, WI ............. 57. Portage Lake Harbor, MI ........... 58. Presque Isle Harbor, MI ............ 59. Rouge River, MI ................. 60. Saginaw River, MI ................ 61. St. Clair River, MI ................ 62. St. Joseph Harbor, MI ............. 63. St. Marys River, MI ............... 64. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI .............. 65. Saxon Harbor, WI ................ 66. Sebewaing River, MI .............. 67. Sheboygan Harbor, WI .............. Page 21-20 21-20 21-21 21-21 21-21 21-22 21-23 21-23 21-24 21-24 21-25 21-26 21-27 21-27 21-28 21-28 21-29 21-29 21-30 21-30 21-30 21-31 21-31 21-32 21-32 21-33 21-33 21-34 21-35 21-37 21-37 21-38 21-38 21-1 . . . . . . . REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation (Continued) 68. Silver Bay Harbor, MN.. 69. South Haven Harbor, MI . 70. Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI 71. Tawas Bay Harbor, MI .. 72. Two Harbors, MN ..... 73. Two Rivers Harbor, WI 74. 75. 76. 77. White Lake Harbor, MI ............ Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ... Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................... Page 21-39 21-39 21-40 21-40 21-40 21-41 21-41 21-42 21-42 21-42 Beach Erosion Control 78. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects 21-42 79. Emergency Shore Protection ......... 21-42 80. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization .................. 21-43 81. Mitigation of Shore Damages ......... 21-43 82. Project Modification for Improving the Quality of the Environment .......... 21-43 Flood Control 83. Clinton River Spillway, MI .......... 21-43 84. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN .......... 21-44 85. Saginaw River, MI ................ 21-45 86. Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI ...... 21-46 87. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................. 21-47 Navigation 1. ALGOMA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 68 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal and about 115 miles northerly from Milwaukee (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910). Previous project. For details see page 1199 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. Provides for (a) a north pier 1,102 feet long; (b) a south breakwater 1,530 feet long; (c) an entrance channel 14 feet deep and 200 feet wide from that depth in Lake Michigan and extending 800 feet landward; (d) a channel 14 feet deep in the Ahnapee River 80 to 175 feet wide for 1,200 feet up to the Second Street Bridge; Flood Control (Continued) Page 88. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 21-47 89. Flood Control Under Special Authorization .................. 21-47 90. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters and International Water Studies ........ 21-47 General Investigations 91. Surveys ........................ 92. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .. 93. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 21-51 21-52 21-53 Tables Table 21-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... 21-54 Table 21-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 21-79 Table 21-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 21-95 Table 21-D Not Applicable ................ Table 21-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 21-96 Table 21-F Multiple Purpose Projects, including Power, St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project ............ 21-96 Table 21-0 Deauthorized Projects ......... 21-97 Table 21-H Features of Existing Project ..... 21-99 Table 21-I Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams . . 21-100 Table 21-J Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ................. 21-101 (e) an outer basin 14 feet deep, 600 feet long and 100 to 500 feet wide. For a more detailed description see page 1200 of Annual Report for 1958. Section 52(c) of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1988 deauthorized the outer harbor basin feature of the navigation project. (See Table 21-B for legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Consists of several fishing wharves. This harbor has one of the largest charter fishing fleets on the Great Lakes. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government 21-2 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT forces and contract at a cost of $20,662. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $9,541. Maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed with an adjustment of -$5,533 in contract cost and 100 cubic yards for removal of shoal material. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $13,980. Existing project was completed in 1909. Ahnapee River is navigable for about two miles from the mouth at a depth of four feet. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,648,227, of which $292,010 was for new work and $1,356,217 for maintenance. 2. ALPENA HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Thunder Bay River which empties into Thunder Bay, Lake Huron. Harbor is 100 miles southeast of Cheboygan Harbor, MI. River has its source in Montmorency and Alpena Counties, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Previous project. For details see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1548 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a bay channel 200 feet wide and 25 feet deep from deep water in Thunder Bay to a point 300 feet lakeward of the Alpena Light; thence an entrance channel 24 feet deep, narrowing to a width of 100 feet at a point 700 feet upstream from the light; a river channel 100 feet wide, 23 feet deep to Second Avenue Bridge; thence 18.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide for 1,600 feet to upper limit of Federal project; a turning basin at upstream end of project, basin at river mouth 19 feet deep, trapezoidal in shape, with a maximum width of 700 feet including the channel width and a maximum length of 900 feet along the channel line, including removal of existing rubble breakwater; and a breakwater about 550 feet long paralleling lakeward side of new turning basin. Work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, which consists of the proposed turning basin and breakwater reconfiguration, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986; Public Law (PL) 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several commercial docks along Thunder Bay River used primarily for receipt of coal and petroleum products. Also a municipal marina basin about 0.25 mile southwest of river mouth. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $24,979. Existing project was completed in 1939. The modification of existing project at Alpena Harbor, as authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, was reclassified into an inactive status May 22, 1969 based on an unfavorable benefit-cost ratio. In 1975 the modification was recommended and reviewed for deauthorization, which was withdrawn by Congressional Resolution the same year. Subsequently, the work authorized by the 1965 Act was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986. Project features are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,364,416, of which $337,394 was for new work and $1,027,022 for maintenance. 3. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests, for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,959. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $1,323. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $42,670, removing approximately 3,500 cubic yards of shoal material by 21-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 hydraulic dredge. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $47,184. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Maintenance of the harbor is based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in excellent condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,532,764. 4. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,065. Repairs to the Off Shore Breakwater were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $157,977. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed, removing 10,602 cubic yards of material at a cost of $144,948. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $24,904. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,753,550, of which $1,695,645 was for new work and $4,057,905 was for maintenance. 5. AUSABLE HARBOR AT AUSABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI Location. The AuSable River and village of Oscoda, MI, are on the west shore of Lake Huron, 8 miles north of AuSable Point, northeast limit of Saginaw Bay. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see pages 336 and 2453 of Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. Riprapping outer 200 feet of north pier at mouth of AuSable River, dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and dredging between piers and upstream to State highway bridge 10 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small timber pile wharves used primarily by commercial fishermen and pleasure craft operators; also a private marina basin east of Highway 23 Bridge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,765. Existing project was completed in 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,039,368, of which $209,776 was for new work (includes $16,400 contributed funds) and $2,829,592 for maintenance. 6. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI Location. On Wild Fowl Bay on east shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Caseville, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide extending 5,750 feet from 6-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to intersection of private service channels to be dredged by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21-4 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small wharves used primarily by commercial fishermen. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $8,476. Existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $648,212, of which $93,597 was for new work and $554,615 for maintenance (which includes $137,399 contributed funds). 7. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 33 miles northwesterly from Marquette, MI, and 38 miles easterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for two converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. For details see page 1009 of Annual Report for 1965 and page 1261 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A State-owned launching ramp and dock for small craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $18,267. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next fiscal year cost $3,162. The project was completed in June 1961 except for protection at inner end of east breakwater, completed in November 1961. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,780,722, of which $390,433 was for new work and $1,390,289 for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $56,500 contributed funds. 8. BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI Location. A small stream which flows easterly into Green Bay, an arm of Lake Michigan. Mouth of the river is about 8 miles north of Green Bay Harbor, and about 44 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Existing project. An entrance channel 8 feet deep which extends from that depth in Green Bay to 1,800 feet above the river mouth, with widths of 100 feet in bay and 60 feet in river; total length of channel is about 3,700 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Small private wharves along lower 1.5 miles of river, used by local fishing interests. Ample space is available for additional fishing wharves when required. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $6,249. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed, removing approximately 23,140 cubic yards of material at a cost of $195,691. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $23,682. Existing project was completed in 1938. Dredging channel was started in September 1938 and completed in November 1938. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,210,343, of which $20,243 was for new work and $1,190,100 for maintenance. 9. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI Location. This river has its source in the northern part of Sanilac County, MI, is about 60 miles long, and flows in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See NOAA Nautical chart 14852.) Previous project. For details see page 1441 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 1554 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 20 feet deep from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the mouth, 21-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 decreasing to 100 feet, about .800 feet from the mouth, thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet for a distance of 4,800 feet; widening two bends to 100 feet, one at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet; and then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river channel, 8 feet deep to the I-94 bridge where it decreases to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. The project modification authorized by the Act of Aug. 30, 1935, is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost for new work. The cost of this modification was last revised in 1954 and was estimated to be $194,000 exclusive of $194,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are docks on both sides of Black River near its mouth, and between these docks and the upper limit of improvement there are 5 other docks varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are privately owned and are restricted to the use of the owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available, as are privately owned and operated marinas. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys performed by Government forces and contract cost $36,718. All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 1935, and the latest modification, has been completed. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,188,529, of which $830,165 was for new work (includes $349,921 contributed funds) and $1,358,364 for maintenance. 10. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (UPPER PENINSULA), MI Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, MI, and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Existing project. Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. Terminal facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet; on west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $23,375. Obstruction removal performed by hired labor cost $9,709. An equitable adjustment in the amount of $5,001 was made in contract costs for FY 92 maintenance dredging completed last FY. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $1,926. Project was completed in June 1958. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,241,176, of which $383,350 was for new work and $857,826 was for maintenance. 11. BOLLES HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Erie at mouth of La Plaisance Creek 7 miles southwest of Monroe, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14846.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel in Lake Erie, 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water to a point opposite the outer end of existing jetty, thence widening to 100 feet at creek mouth; an access channel in La Plaisance Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the mouth widening to 120 feet and extending to the first bend, thence narrowing to 50 feet wide and continuing at that width to the La Plaisance Road bridge; a steel sheet pile revetment, about 200 feet long, located along Michigan State Conservation Department property on west side of channel at creek mouth. Project also provides for inclusion of existing 400-foot long steel sheet pile jetty constructed by Michigan State Waterways Commission at the mouth of La Plaisance Creek. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21-6 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Monroe Boat Club and three marinas provide facilities adequate for existing recreational boat traffic. There is also a public launching ramp and parking area at the Conservation Department fishing site at creek mouth. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $54,110. Engineering and design for a maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY began at a cost of $15. The existing project was completed in 1970. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,691,406, of which $426,413 was for new work (includes $255,000 contributed funds) and $3,264,993 for maintenance. 12. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Pigeon River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 17 miles southwest of Port Austin, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14860.) Existing project. A small craft harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater protected channel extending from the 10-foot contour in Saginaw Bay into Pigeon River. Project depths are 10 and 8 feet. For additional details see page 1320 of Annual Report for 1963. Widening river channel from 50 to 60 feet for about 1,000 feet, with widening to 80 feet in upper 300-foot reach, is considered inactive. Estimated (1963) cost of this portion of project is $30,000 (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Complete public boating facilities constructed by State and local agencies are available in addition to privately owned and operated marinas. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $12,156. The existing project was completed in 1964 except for the inactive portion of the project. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,937,262, of which $587,314 was for new work (including $293,657 contributed funds) and $1,349,948 for maintenance. 13. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Section 25 of the WRDA of 1988 provides authorization pertaining to the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor. It states, "The Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to restore recreational uses established prior to May 1, 1988, or provide comparable recreation uses at the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor project, Charlevoix, Michigan in order to mitigate any adverse impact on recreational uses resulting from reconstruction of the South Pier..." Local cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-ways required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the constructing and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminal commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; if acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-ways for construction of the 21-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1971; PL 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction (1975) is estimated at $625,000. Terminal facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $51,985. An adjustment of -$1,509 was made in costs for Pile Cluster repairs performed last FY. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $8,544. Entrance channel obstruction removal was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $42,806. Supervision and administration cost $5,112. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $10,574,218, of which $180,623 was for new work, $9,264,199 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization $46,352), and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 14. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its sources in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private wharves along the river below the city. They are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $23,410. Clay liner repair awarded last FY was completed with an adjustment of $10,675 in contract cost. Maintenance of the disposal area performed by hired labor cost $9,498. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $4,188. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,809,506, of which $549,798 was for new work (includes $289,752 contributed funds) and $7,259,708 for maintenance. 15. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Siskiwit River on south shore of Lake Superior, 49 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel between piers; an irregular-shaped turning basin; two inner channels, and reconstruction and Federal maintenance of deflection dike and entrance piers constructed by local interests. Project depths are 10 feet between piers and 8 feet in turning basin and inner channels. For additional details see page 1010 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. About 1,000 linear feet of privately owned docking space is available. 21-8 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Condition surveys and safety repairs were Government forces at a cost of $22,350. Maintenance: performed by Work authorized by earlier Act was completed in 1939. Work authorized in 1954 was completed in 1963. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,470,542, of which $462,653 was for new work and $1,007,889 for maintenance. 16. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long, flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 21-H. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 572.3 and 569.2 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1946 and the 1956 R & H Acts, construction of the Compensating Works, with the uncompleted portion of the Trenton Channel modification approved Aug. 13, 1968, were deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Terminal facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $1,219,533. Removal of underground storage tanks cost $968. Location and removal of obstructions was performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge HURON and the U.S. Cranebarge VELER at a cost of $1,607,406. Maintenance of disposal area performed by hired labor cost $117,989. Engineering and design for expansion of the confined disposal facility, cell #3, was initiated at a cost of $4,821. An adjustment of -$9,965 was made in contract cost for the FY 92 dredging of the turning basin at Pointe Mouillee channel completed last FY. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed, removing 74,568 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $300,102. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $180,244. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY are set forth in Table 21-H. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $225,710,076, of which $76,877,357 was for new work ($75,346,669 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Works Funds) and $148,832,719 (includes $361,235 Section 150 contributed funds) for maintenance. 17. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet deep in inner channels. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report 21-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West channel was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to the project to deepen the western portions of North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and the Minnesota Channel to 27 feet LWD; widen the Cross Channel to provide a minimum turning basin of 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet; and construct an upland confined disposal facility. The current recommended plan involves only the mechanical dredging of the Cross Channel Turning Basin with disposal at the Erie Pier CDF. The remainder of the project is now unscheduled. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 150, 86th Congress, 1st Session and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing. Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The contract awarded last FY for widening the Cross Channel was completed, removing 88,847 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $373,988. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $77,330. Of the funds expended, $113,328 was contributed by the Seaway Port Authority of Duluth. Maintenance: Duluth-Superior Harbor's 8-acre Canal Park and the Canal Park Visitors Center were maintained and operated during FY 94 by Government forces and contract at a cost of $401,776. A total of 1,092,668 people used the Park for sightseeing, picnicking, and boatwatching, including 423,265 attracted by the Visitors Center facilities. An additional 130,000 used local tour boats in the adjacent Duluth Ship Canal. Visitors Center services included short- and long-term exhibits, demonstrations, information services, educational programs, and publications. Operation and maintenance of service facilities and park pier performed by hired labor cost $151,434. Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $451,952. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $178,385. Duluth and Superior Entry Breakwater repairs were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $444,419. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $119,514. Obstruction removal performed by hired labor cost $3,867. Maintenance of the disposal area cost $22,671. Engineering and design for expansion of the existing confined disposal facility continued at a cost of $8,130. Maintenance dredging awarded in FY 91 was completed with an adjustment of $25,001 made in contract cost. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging and widening of the navigation channel, removing approximately 213,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $714,488. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $314,092. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work in the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for 21st Avenue West channel portion which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. Of the new work authorized in WRDA 1986, only the Cross Channel dredging has been completed (September 1994). All other authorized improvements are unscheduled. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $89,114,128, of which $16,922,561 was for new work, $60,636,157 for maintenance, and $11,555,410 for rehabilitation. 18. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. 21-10 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513, 424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. The uncompleted portion of theproject authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1925, was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Section 332 of the WRDA of 1992 authorized the transfer of the navigation system to the State of WI subject to agreement; however, water regulation and dam operation will be continued by the Federal government. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 21-I on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An archeological study for disposal was completed at a cost of $21,445. Condition surveys, environmental activities, miscellaneous inspections and reports, safety training, and plans for flood emergencies were performed at a cost of $418,443. Water control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $273,574. Real Estate activities were performed at a cost of $18,877. Removal of underground storage tank cost $15,219. Federal canal banks at various locations were repaired at a cost of $119,188. The operation and maintenance of nine (9) dams and ten (10) overflow weirs and caretaker status maintenance of seventeen (17) locks and two (2) guard locks totaled $714,384. Major miscellaneous items of supply totaled $9,466. Engineering and design for new gate hoist and electrical rehabilitation at 9 dams continued at a cost of $100,789. Supervision and adminiStration costs were $101,509. Existing project is complete except for the inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 21-I for year of completion of each). Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. Existing dams are generally fair to good; but many of the locks are in extremely poor condition. Repairs are not scheduled because the project is in caretaker status. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $53,007,566, of which $3,753,334 was for new work and $49,254,232 for operation and maintenance. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 19. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north pier and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters; thence to maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters and to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north 21-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $62,553. Repairs to the North and South Breakwater, Sections A, B, and C, North Pier, Sections K1-M1, and South Pier, Sections P and C were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $140,099. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $3,053. A contract was awarded for repair of the South Connector, Sections C, and F-I in the amount of $1,318,196. The contract was 62% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $809,999. Engineering and design for repair of the South Connector, Sections C, F-I, cost $87,395. An adjustment of negative five cubic yards and -$54,894 was made in contract costs for the maintenance dredging completed last FY. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 24,777 cubic yards of material at a cost of $125,550. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $77,880. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. Navigation structures are in poor to good condition and programmed for major repair on an as needed basis. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $12,410,821, of which $1,955,159 (includes $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $10,180,886 for maintenance, and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 20. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the harbor entrance and river channels to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; and provides for a new and larger turning basin. Estimated cost (Oct 90) is $20,400,000, which includes $11,754,000 Federal and $8,646,000 non- Federal. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 661, 76th Congress, 3d Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing requirements as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $4,246,000. The estimated cash contribution of $4,246,000 to be paid in lump sum, prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by 21-12 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $2,040,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution of lands, easements, rights-of-ways, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish, and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, confined disposal facility monitoring, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $333,969. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $45,602. Engineering and design was initiated for North Revetment, Section F, repairs at a cost of $26,200. Repairs to the South Pier, Sections I, J, J1 and North Pier, Section B were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $149,467. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $10,747. Maintenance of the disposal area by hired labor cost $3,567. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor, removing 21,212 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $121,939. This contract was also for Section 111 beach nourishment. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $145,315. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $40,004. Miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $1,047. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging outer harbor contract cost $32,602. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $222. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1982. Structures are in a general state of deteriorating condition and are scheduled for repairs. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $32,261,255, of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $29,989,173 for maintenance (includes $15,585 contributed funds), and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 21. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior, 93 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a channel protected by parallel piers and for closing natural entrance channel with a pile dike. Project depths are 18 feet between piers and 20 feet in lake approach. For additional details see page 1449 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small piers, a Coast Guard Station, and a small boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan provide facilities adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $2,955. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $8,883. Existing project is complete except for widening a portion of channel from 250 to 300 feet. Project IS now being maintained to 19 and 15 feet below I.G.L.D., in lieu of 20 and 18 feet, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,642,182, of which $1,055,871 was for new work and $2,586,311 for maintenance. 22. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN Location. On north shore of Lake Superior, 106 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14967.) 21-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Existing project. Provides breakwater piers to narrow the entrance; concrete seawalls across ledge at southeast corner of harbor; an anchorage area and a small-boat basin protected by a rubblemound breakwater. Project depths are 16 feet in anchorage area increasing to 20 feet near entrance and 8 feet in small-boat basin. For additional details see page 1014 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two inactive pulpwood wharves and several fish wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $15,848. Repairs to West Breakwater, Section D, and East Breakwater, Section E, were performed by U.S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN cost $88,176. Supervision and administration of the project cost $1,598. Existing project is complete. Total costs of the existing project to end of FY was $2,754,499, of which $450,972 was for new work and $2,303,527 for maintenance. 23. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, page 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000 Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this portion (1990) is $6,130,000; $4,030,000 Federal and $2,100,000 non-Federal which includes $1,970,000 local contribution. Section 601c of the WRDA of 1986 authorized deepening the Fox River Channel, Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $327,860. Maintenance of the disposal area performed by hired labor cost $7,269. An adjustment of $2,859 was made iii contract cost to the FY 92 maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. The contract awarded last FY for dredging the outer harbor was completed, removing 159,789 cubic yards of material at a cost of $764,036. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor, removing approximately 150,858 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,146,757. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $189,028. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility continued at a cost of $47,686. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973, except for dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge. Dredging of the turning basin above C & N.W. Railway Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was 21-14 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT completed in September 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $50,239,284 ($49,298,484 regular funds and $940,800 Public Works Funds), $9,946,395 for new work and $40,292,889 for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $100,000 contributed funds. 24. GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI (formerly Traverse City Harbor) Location. On Lake Michigan at the south end of the West Arm of Grand Traverse Bay, about 45 miles southwesterly from Charlevoix and 29 miles northeasterly from Frankfort. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14913.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a basin 600 feet wide and about 850 feet long with a depth of 14 feet in outer 350 feet of the area and a 10-foot depth in remainder, protected by a steel sheet pile breakwater about 1,300 feet long with a 300-foot long rubblemound extension along a line bearing south 60 degrees west from outer end of steel structure and a detached rubblemound breakwater 420 feet long along south side of the basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. An existing public wharf (built in connection with the 1948 authorization), a boat launching ramp, and a small privately operated yacht harbor located beyond the limits of the existing project. The existing public wharf deteriorated from lack of maintenance and must be rebuilt. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $7,114. Repairs to the East and West Breakwaters, Section A, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $83,534. Supervision and administration cost $2,219. Existing project was completed in August 1951. The last modification was completed during FY 1967. Controlling depths are 14 feet in the outer basin and 10 feet in the inner basin. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $622,535, of which $366,579 was for new work and $255,956 for maintenance. 25. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On northwest shore of Lake Huron, 35 miles southeast of Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge, protected by breakwater structures, extending to 12-foot depth contour in the lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; and for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public facilities being planned by State and local agencies. Plans and specifications are complete, but construction has not started. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Confined disposal facility monitoring and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,963. Repairs to the West Breakwater, Section A, were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $116,269. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed, removing 16,632 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $91,668. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $94,387. The existing project was completed in 1965. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,091,936, of which $1,092,366 was for new work, and $999,570 for maintenance. 26. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. 21-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition, there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $33,821. An adjustment of -$14,446 was made in contract cost for the Main Breakwater, Phase III, repair completed last FY. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration of the project cost $10,188. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $16,328,800, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $14,933,698 for maintenance, and $194,504 for rehabilitation. 27. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the west shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Oscoda and 30 miles south of Alpena. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures, and dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and a harbor basin 10 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Dockage facilities built by State and local agencies for recreational craft; considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $4,859. Minor safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $486. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed, removing 5,897 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $41,244. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $41,492. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,973,690, of which $2,639,392 was for new work (includes $287,454 contributed funds) and $1,334,298 for maintenance. 28. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14932.) Previous project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. The uncompleted portion of the project, widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa, was deauthorized Dec, 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed Sportions of project. Terminal facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $114,453. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $141,852. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $12,692. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging the outer harbor, removing approximately 17,849 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $70,189. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, 21-16 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $87,488. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $41,563. Miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $2,896. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging outer harbor contract cost $44,385. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $470. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $27,639,565, of which $1,392,827 was for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $25,744,286 for maintenance, and $502,452 for rehabilitation. 29. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on Sep. 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None exist for commercial cargohandling along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was operated and maintained by the State of Michigan at no cost to the Government. In FY 94, the lock was operated from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. April 29 & 30, May 1, 7, 8, 14, 15, 21 & 22, September 16-30. The lock was operated 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. May 28- 30, June 1-30, September 1-15. The lock was operated from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. July 1 - August 31. In October, the lock was open on weekends only from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The lock closed at 5:00 p.m. on October 16. Water control activities at the lock and weir performed under contract by the State of Michigan cost $7,000. Negotiations to turn over navigation portion of Crooked River Lock and Weir to the State of Michigan cost $8,521. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging of Inland Route, Mullet Lake Entrance, Cheboygan Channel, Cheboygan, MI, cost $17,813. A contract in the amount of $24,999 was awarded for this work. Dredging will begin next FY. Condition surveys, real estate, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $24,550. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,920,149, of which $918,222 was for new work (includes $148,000 contributed funds) and $3,001,927 for maintenance. 30. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1986) Federal cost is $455,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, and $195,000 non-Federal which includes $155,000 local contribution. (See Table 21-B for authorization legislation.) 21-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act, dredging of 25-foot wide strips adjacent to the north and south piers, was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fish wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $46,970. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25-foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $13,073,057 ($13,045,399 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief Funds), of which $988,969 was for new work, $10,813,813 for maintenance, and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new work cost does not include $3,000 contributed funds. 31. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, page 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021 Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000, July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, confined disposal facility monitoring, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $83,938. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Section H and North Stub Pier, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $43,447. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $3,701. Dike disposal facility maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $629. Real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $6,327. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24-foot section at outlet end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $10,961,657, of which $758,333 was for new work ($338,333 regular and $420,000 Emergency Relief Funds) $9,586,024 regular funds for maintenance and $617,300 regular funds for rehabilitation. 32. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 21-18 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project for navigation at Keweenaw Waterway, Houghton County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Aug. 30, 1935, PL 409, 73rd Congress, which consists of extending the lower entrance breakwater by 2,000 feet, including the necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to channel deepening, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, confined disposal facility monitoring, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by GoVernment forces and contract at a cost of $94,615. Engineering and design for major repair of the East Breakwater, Lower Entry, continued at a cost of $34,627. An adjustment of -$37,318 was made in cost to structure repairs completed last FY. Replacement of wood fenders at the Upper Entry Breakwater was performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $286,616. Repairs to the Lower Entry Breakwater performed by hired labor cost $142,217. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $4,881. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed, removing 85,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $603,999. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $111,107. Active portion of the project is complete. Breakwaters are in generally good condition except for a weakness occurring in about 300 feet of substructure of breakwater at the lower entrance. The flared revetment at the upper entry should be modified to restrict wave action from the stilling basin entrance. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $32,683,818, of which $5,974,141 was for new work, and $26,709,677 for maintenance. 33. LaPOINTE HARBOR, WI Location. At westerly end of Madeline Island in the Apostle Island group off the south shore of Lake Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing project. Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. Project was authorized by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act (PL 645, 86th Congress), as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A 400-foot L-shaped dock was constructed and rehabilitated by local interests, not as a part of the Federal project. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An adjustment of -$15 was made in cost to condition surveys performed last FY. The existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $272,171, of which $139,874 was for new work and $132,297 for maintenance. 34. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior on the eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula, 41 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. Lac La Belle, Bete Grise Bay, and Mendota Ship Canal combine to form the harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for construction of two parallel piers at the entrance having lengths of 484 and 682 feet for north and south piers, respectively; for an entrance channel between the piers to feet wide and 12 feet deep, about 820 feet long with a flared approach; and for an inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep, about 730 feet long. For additional details see page 1039, Annual Report for 1964. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small, privately owned wharves are available in the harbor for use of small craft engaged in fishing and recreational activities. A State owned dock for small craft is located at the northwest corner of Lac La Belle Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $2,567. A contract was awarded and completed, removing 5,500 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $33,499. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $57,632. The existing project was completed in 1960. Controlling depths are about 11 feet in the approach channel and 10 feet in the inner channel. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $925,756, of which $269,270 was for new work and $656,486 for maintenance. 35. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS IN Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River Channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $111,094. Maintenance of the disposal area performed by hired labor cost $18,184. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $28,560. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $21,133,795, of which $7,675,357 was for new work ($6,666,762 regular funds and $1,008,595 Public Works Funds) and $13,458,438 for maintenance. 36. LELAND HARBOR, MI Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,492. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $142. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging, removing 9,441 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $47,120. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $55,594. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 authorization which was completed in 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,650,226, of which $1,027,089 was for new work 21-20 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT (includes $354,139 contributed funds), $2,552,459 for maintenance and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 37. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to. 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost of new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $5,479. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $13,876. A contract for beach nourishment (trucking) was awarded and completed at a cost of $418,700. Engineering, design, real estate, and supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $86,388. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,456,398, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) was for new work and $2,349,206 for maintenance. 38. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project consists of a public dock built by the State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,189. Minor structure repairs performed by hired labor cost $725. An adjustment of $5,001 was made in contract cost to FY 92 maintenance dredging completed last FY. Another adjustment of $1,542 was made in contract cost to maintenance dredging awarded and completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 12,596 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $72,700. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $52,984. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,707,256, of which $600,478 was for new work (includes $57,670 contributed funds) and $4,106,778 for maintenance. 39. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) 21-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwaters, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments, 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total cost for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $99,842. Concrete work to stabilize the lighthouse structure was added to the FY 93 contract for repair of the North Breakwater, Section A. The contract was 95% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $1,068,100. A contract was awarded for repair of the South Connector and Breakwater, Sections D & E, in the amount of $1,677,000. The contract was 42% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $708,199. Engineering and design for repair of the North & South Breakwater and Connector cost $112,836. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $4,962. Maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed with an adjustment of -$28,093 in contract cost and -2,010 cubic yards for removal of shoal material. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $124,276. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures range from generally poor to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $24,832,540, of which $8,532,202 was for new work, $15,942,425 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. The maintenance cost does not include $136,286 contributed funds. 40. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetment; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $70,656. Engineering and design for repairs to the South Connector and South Pier continued at a cost of $66,189. Inspection of the South Pier, Section K, steel sheet piling earth anchors was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $11,666. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $5,971. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed, removing 4,420 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $30,311. A contract for bank stabilization and 21-22 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT maintenance dredging was awarded and completed. Bank stabilization cost $531,201. Maintenance dredging cost $166,500, removing 34,705 cubic yards of.shoal material. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $208,109. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project seepage 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures range from generally poor to good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $13,413,043, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, $9,342,357 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 41. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI Location. On the north shore of Lake Michigan, 135 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous project. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected entrance channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, and a pier at river mouth. Project depths are 19 feet in outer portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1451 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and building material wharves, two fishing wharves, and numerous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $11,345. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,872,671, of which $1,299,355 was for new work, $2,256,983 for maintenance and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 42. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 106 miles from Green Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The total estimated (Oct. 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal cost is $1,085,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension affirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $9,206; additional assurances require that the sponsor provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to 21-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent" to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the city should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $82,320. A contract was awarded and completed for repair of the South Breakwater, Section B, at a cost of $296,576. Engineering and design for repair of the South Breakwater, Section B, cost $52,059. Extension Channel and South Breakwater, Section B, obstruction and stone removal was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $53,564. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $9,379. Confined disposal facility maintenance performed by hired labor cost $461. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $68,770. Of the funds expended, $21,572 was contributed by The City of Manitowoc. Existing project is complete except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification was deauthorized December 31, 1990. Work on the 1968 modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The Federal modification, adopted July 15, 1985, included the expansion of the new entrance channel to the Section 107 project and extension of the rubblemound breakwater. Dredging a channel through the outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $14,534,566, of which $3,960,044 was for new work (includes $1,911,130 contributed funds) and $10,574,522 for maintenance (includes $21,572 contributed funds). 43. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 265 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. Provides for a breakwater, and a harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27-foot depth in harbor area. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. Terminal facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves without railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $2,677. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,375,047, of which $1,282,893 was for new work, $2,626,397 for maintenance and $465,757 for rehabilitation. 44. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On Lake Michigan at the mouth of Menominee River on the western shore of Green Bay, 16 miles northwest of the mouth of Sturgeon Bay, and 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. The river forms the boundary between the commercial harbors at Marinette, WI, and Menominee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. 21-24 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work, exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects, are $221,053 Federal and $40,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City of Marinette, WI, provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by city of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $46,011. Repairs to the South Pier, Section D, Cell Caps, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $80,061. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $5,846. Supervision and administration cost $3,626. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945, was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945, to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club, as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968, and completed in October 1968. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,216,932, of which $570,238 was for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), $3,294,842 for maintenance and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation. 45. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,934,804 Federal and $478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Uncompleted portion of 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except deauthorized portion of 1945 Act. Act of Aug. 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by city of Milwaukee and city of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, Feb. 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal facilities. There are 4 car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government 21-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 forces and contract at a cost of $361,560. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $68,688. Engineering and design for repairs to the North Breakwater, Section D, was initiated at a cost of $500. Engineering and design for repair of Spalling, South Breakwater, Section E, cost $121,185. A contract was awarded for this work in the amount of $3,357,000. Repairs will begin next FY. Repairs to the South Detached Breakwater, Section E, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $101,439. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $48,512. Confined disposal facility maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $34,491. An adjustment of 22,067 cubic yards and -$7,435 was made in contract cost to maintenance dredging completed last FY. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $59,757. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Clybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for the uncompleted portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humboldt Avenue. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1945 Rivers and Harbors Act was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $61,485,906, of which $8,231,024 was for new work, $40,539,322 for maintenance (includes $322,471 contributed funds), and $12,715,560 for rehabilitation. 46. MONROE HARBOR, MI Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to city of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the River Raisin portion of the existing 200-foot navigation channel from 21 to 27 feet between existing turning basin and the river's mouth; deepen the lake channel from 21 to 28 feet, and widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet, for a distance of approximately 47,000 feet from the river's mouth to the Maumee Bay Entrance Channel; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, with a diameter of at least 1,600 feet, at the river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre confined disposal area in Plum Creek Bay behind which would enable the creation of a 700 acre marsh. Estimated total cost (Oct. 88) is $150,200,000; $59,000,000 Federal and $91,200,000 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $19,650,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in the Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 22, 71st Congress, 1st Session; R & H Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Congress, 1st Session, and 45, 75th Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $19,650,000. The estimated cash contribution of $19,650,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost 21-26 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $7,860,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, arid in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and c. The confined dike area construction is a non-Federal responsibility and is estimated to cost $70,156,000. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $123,487. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed, removing 110,877 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $531,227. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $145,168. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $59,115,862, of which $987,340 was for new work (includes $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe) and $58,128,522 for maintenance (includes $166,667 contributed funds: $125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company). 47. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical chart 19434.) Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1981) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $140,393. Engineering and design for repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections A and B, continued at a cost of $69,993. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $21,076. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed, removing 103,168 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $598,281. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $42,938. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $10,219. An emergency contract for beach nourishment (trucking) was awarded and completed at a cost of $41,589. Another contract for beach nourishment (trucking) was awarded in the amount of $387,750. The contract was 45% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $174,999. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $42,529. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $28,022,537, of which $3,017,110 was for new work, $11,181,127 for maintenance, and $13,824,300 for rehabilitation. 48. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of 21-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club facility. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $42,335. Engineering and design for repairs to the North and South Breakwater, Sections B through E, was initiated at a cost of $18,258. Repairs to safety features cost $531. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed, removing 60,393 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $392,089. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $80,809. Existing project is complete. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,195,573, of which $2,472,183 was for new work (includes $1,186,467 contributed funds) and $4,723,390 for maintenance. 49. OCONTO HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Green Bay, about 31 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and about 25 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI, at mouth of Oconto River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Previous project. For details see page 1187 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1187, Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two municipally owned wharves of 400 and 100 feet frontage, respectively, for miscellaneous freight, open to general public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $13,212. Repairs to the South Pier, Sections D and E, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $47,964. An adjustment of -$235 was made in supervision and administration cost. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,283,467, of which $130,754 was for new work and $2,152,713 for maintenance. 50. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. About 140 miles east of Duluth, MN, on south shore of Lake Superior, at mouth of Ontonagon River; provides the only refuge for small craft between the Keweenaw Waterway upper entrance and Black River Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17- and 15-foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. (See Table 21-B for authorized legislation.) The turning basin feature of the project for navigation at Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 (Section 1002) Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. The channel modification project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 21-28 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $60,209. Repairs to the East and West Piers, Section A, continued at a cost of $1,655,609. The contract was approximately 62% complete at the end of the FY. Engineering and design during construction for this work cost $13,846. Repairs to the East Breakwater, Section A, were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $92,920. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed, removing 27,115 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $277,230. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $146,220. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $17,967,022, of which $953,903 was for new work and $17,013,119 for maintenance. 51. PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Green Bay, about 22 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, and about 33 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1899, page 2734, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1429. Existing project. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep at low water datum from the depth in Green Bay about 4,300 feet to mouth of Pensaukee River. Fluctuations of water level are seasonal changes of about one-half foot above or below the annual mean stage, and extreme fluctuations of a temporary nature, due to wind and barometric pressure, of about 2 feet above or below mean lake level prevailing at the time. New work for completed project cost $24,851, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Small private wharves along lower half mile of river, used by the local fishing interests. Ample space is available for additional fishing wharves when required. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $667. The existing project was complete in 1938. Total cost of the existing project to the end of FY was $686,282 of which $34,035 was for new work and $652,247 was for maintenance. 52. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stone filled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $37,555. Engineering and design for repair of the South Pier and South Revetment, Sections B, F-H, and J, was initiated at a cost of $70,540. Repairs to the North and South Revetment, Various Sinkholes, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $59,774. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $2,375. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed, removing 11,062 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $62,358. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $61,258. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200-foot extension to the south pier which is not 21-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are scheduled for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,793,958, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $4,614,059 for maintenance. 53. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI. Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a .12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2,800- foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600-foot long, 100- foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; an 8,270-foot long, 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $36,983. Supervision and administration to close-out maintenance dredging contract completed last FY cost $563. Existing project was completed in 1974. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $6,609,025, of which $2,642,584 was for new work and $3,966,441 for maintenance (includes $9,257 contributed funds). 54. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12-foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70- foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater addition. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $6,959. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P. L. 90-483 cost $838. The project was completed in 1951 except for latest modification which was completed in FY 76. The breakwaters are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,086,160, of which $1,733,071 was for new work (includes $487,108 contributed funds) and $3,353,089 for maintenance (includes $115,000 contributed funds). 55. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City 21-30 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $20,393. Repairs for the North Breakwater, Sections A,B,C and Small Boat Harbor Wave Attenuator, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $29,715. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $10,445. Supervision and administration cost $1,335. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,150,485, of which $4,206,204 was for new work (includes $1,624,000 contributed funds) and $2,944,281 for maintenance. 56. PORT WING HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 34 miles easterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for two parallel piers at entrance, 835 and 1,017 feet long, respectively, 200 feet apart; an entrance channel between piers 150 feet wide with 15-foot depth; an irregular-shaped turning basin 15 feet deep at inner end of piers from which two inner channels with 8-foot depth extend. One of these is 60 feet wide extending southerly for 340 feet and one 70 feet wide extending easterly 1,170 feet. Portion of dredging of entrance channel to complete project width and depth is considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four privately owned fishing wharves which are considered adequate for existing conditions. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous and inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,808. Obstruction removal performed by hired labor cost $7,076. Existing project is complete, except channel between piers, and has been dredged to only a 100-foot width. Widening the channel an additional 50 feet was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. That work was classified inactive and deauthorized on August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Land owned by the United States totals 7.80 acres. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,189,616, of which $63,393 was for new work and $1,126,223 for maintenance. 57. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $3,613. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $1,408. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed, removing 28,695 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $123,321. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $28,960. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are scheduled for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,503,963 of which $256,129 was for new work and $2,247,834 for maintenance. 21-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 58. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior at Marquette, MI. It is an indentation about 1.5 miles long and one-half mile wide in shore behind Presque Isle Point. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. A breakwater off Presque Isle Point and dredging harbor to depth of 28 feet at inner portion with 30 feet at entrance. For details see page 1021 of 1965 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One merchandise and petroleum receiving wharf and one ore dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $3,082. An adjustment of -$2,319 was made in contract cost for repair of Breakwater, Section B, completed last FY. Engineering and design during construction cost $6,448. Supervision and administration cost $16,802. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,070,777, of which $1,252,192 was for new work, $1,742,085 for maintenance and $76,500 for rehabilitation. 59. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of city of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old Channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of Aug. 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of Oct. 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on Jan. 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $132,104. Engineering and design for expansion of the confined disposal facility, cell #3, was initiated at a cost of $1,832. An adjustment of -$2,910 was made in contract cost for the FY 92 dredging of the turning basin at Pointe Mouillee channel completed last FY. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed at a cost of $29,310. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $35,780. 21-32 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $36,807,541, of which $675,251 was for new work ($29,563 was expended from Emergency Relief Act Funds) and $36,132,290 for maintenance. 60. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915; and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $443,954. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $100,388. Obstruction removal cost $406. Confined disposal facility repairs were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge VELER at a cost of $82,191. Maintenance of the disposal area by hired labor and contract cost $10,929. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging of the Bay and River Section was completed this FY, removing 185,833 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $169,334. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging of the Bay and River, removing 175,786 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $586,146. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $135,975. Engineering, design, and real estate for construction of a diked disposal area for Upper Saginaw continued at a cost of $236,413. Existing project is complete except for small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $85,581,275, of which $14,930,727 was for new work and $70,650,548 for maintenance. 61. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair; 577.5 and 572.3 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Tables 21-B and 21-H for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946, provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel at an estimated cost (1986) of $870,000; $435,000 Federal and $435,000 non-Federal. On June 16, 1969, the Director of Civil Works approved substitution of the middle channel of the St. Clair River for the authorized north channel. Subsequently, however, the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 21-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 24, 1946, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce, between the upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, wood-pulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $262,538. Location and removal of obstructions were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge HURON at a cost of $570,323. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $33,408. Existing project is complete. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $43,124,745, of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $23,911,499 for maintenance. 62. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor Canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88 declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a non-navigable stream. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several commercial wharves for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $107,484. Repairs to the North Pier, Sections A, C, D, E, and South Pier, Sections F, G, H were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $162,506. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $25,708. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging the outer channel was completed, removing 2,360 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $8,607. This contract was also for beach nourishment. A contract for maintenance dredging the outer channel was awarded and completed this FY, removing 31,469 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $311,812. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $95,380. Environmental activities for a disposal area and polluted dredged material continued at a cost of $41,972. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 cost $38,090. Miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $551. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging outer channel contract completed last FY cost $10,381. The contract for beach nourishment (trucking) awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $142,323. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging outer channel contract awarded and completed this FY cost $44,178. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $29,053 under Section 111. Existing project was completed in 1956. The structures are in generally good condition. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end 21-34 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT of FY was $25,419,761, of which $1,804,485 was for new work, $22,653,060 for maintenance and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 63. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Providence of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State Locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from Jun. 9, 1881, to Nov. 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for the MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from Sep. 1, 1881, to Jun. 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from Aug. 3, 1896, Davis Lock from Oct. 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from Sep. 18, 1919, to end of FY 1935. The 1,200-foot by 110-foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 21-F. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 601.1 feet and at upstream side of locks is 600.6 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. Below locks: When water surface at downstream side of locks is at elevation 578.4 feet and Lake Huron is 577.5 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. Estimated (1974) cost for new work is $163,087,000. legislation.) (See Table 21-B for authorizing The WRDA of 1986 authorized construction of a second lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Material removed during construction of the replacement lock will be placed on the Northwest Pier to serve as a windbreak for downbound vessels approaching the lock. Estimated cost (Oct. 90) is $174,200,000 Federal and $93,800,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as follows: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the proposed project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged/demolition material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the implementation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations and relocations of pipelines, powerlines, cables, sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities, structures, and improvements made necessary by the project. (Any such costs of the items on Federal property at the locks, would be part of the total construction cost and not separable local sponsor cost.); (d) Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $67,000,000. The estimated cash contribution of $67,000,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by 21-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after. actual costs have been determined; (e) Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $26,800,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and (f) Any construction needed to prevent/mitigate for erosion or shoaling attributed to the lock would be cost shared in the same proportion as the project. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and village of DeTour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Operations, maintenance, and care of locks: Two canals and three locks were operated (the fourth lock, Sabin, was out of service) as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were open to navigation 301 days during the period Oct. 1, 1993 through Sep. 30, 1994. A total of 11,108 vessels, aggregating 80,339,365 short tons of freight and 248,200 passengers passed through the MacArthur, Poe and Davis Locks. Total cost for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks during the FY was $7,240,045, which includes $2,217 to construct a building to house the generator; $2,043 for continued preparation of a reconnaissance report for major rehabilitation of the Davis Lock; $122,968 for continuation of a Poe Lock disruption study; $262,808 for extended season operation and maintenance, and $38,241 for operation and maintenance of the Gatelifter PAUL BUNYAN. Powerhouse and equipment: A total of 147,520,821 kilowatt-hours of power was generated this FY. Income from the sale of power, sent to the U.S. Treasury, amounted to $1,857,287. Total cost of operation and maintenance for two hydroelectric powerhouses during the FY was $1,657,071, which includes a deduction of $66,836 for interdepartmental electricity sold but not paid for. Total cost also includes assistance from the Hydroelectric Design Center for continued benchmark testing of the generators and turbines, preparation of plans and specifications for generator rewind of Units 1,2,3 & 3A, and a powerhouse rehabilitation report all at a cost of $185,402; contract awarded last FY for generator rewind of Units 1 through 3 at a cost of $759,499 (42% complete) with supervision and administration of the contract at a cost of $19,213; and a contract awarded for rehabilitation of hydroelectric Unit 3A in the amount of $2,114,727 (rehabilitation to begin next FY) with supervision and administration of the contract at a cost of $4,892. Other operation and care items: Buildings and grounds were operated and maintained, condition surveys, operations studies, real estate, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $2,646,233, which includes a custodial, snow removal and grounds upkeep contract for $328,100 and a service contract for security measures for $466,939. Final close-out cost for construction of a flammable liquid storage building was $4,746. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for rewiring and relighting the administration building at a cost of $271,222. Engineering, design, supervision and administration of the contract cost $98,389. Winter and extended navigation season studies, ice measurements, and weather monitoring cost $192,927. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approach depths were surveyed by sweeping. Removal of shoals in the St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was performed by hired labor using the U.S. Derrickbarge NICOLET and the U.S. Cranebarge HARVEY at a cost of $1,615,008. Work performed by hired labor on the Compensating Gates cost $7,881. Supervision and administration cost $221,949. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging of courses 5, 6 and 8 of the West Neebish Channel, removing 99,219 square yards of shoal material at a cost of $1,654,999. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration of this contract cost $131,512. 21-36 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Other miscellaneous items: A contract awarded last FY for the switch gear assembly "A" replacement was completed at a cost of $401,153. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $23,107. Another contract awarded last FY for underwater repairs of the Southeast Pier was completed in the amount of $233,055. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $41,263. A contract was awarded this FY for repair of the Southwest Pier and West Center Pier Hole in the amount of $572,830. The contract was 84% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $480,016. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $176,288. Engineering and design for the master plans of the facility were performed by hired labor and contract at a cost of $200,078. Plans and specifications for various repair contracts to be awarded next FY cost $313,774. Recreational facilities: Information center, visitors center, comfort stations, park fountain, observation and overlook platforms were operated and maintained at a cost of $106,305 which includes a custodial contract for the Information Center at a cost of $28,029. A contract in the amount of $549,969 was awarded in September 1994 for the enlargement of the visitors center. Expansion and renovation will begin next FY. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $92,388. Visitors entering the Soo Locks Visitors Center numbered 479,206. Visitors to the observation platforms overlooking the locks numbered 433,869. Total visitors to the Soo Locks park numbered 589,397. A grand total of 696,551 people (includes tour boat visitors of 107,154) visited the Soo Locks. Total project costs in FY 94 amounted to $17,809,409. Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956, is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $439,503,764, of which $160,657,070 was for new work and $278,846,694 for maintenance. 64. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At village of Saugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At village of Douglas, MI, there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $19,397. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $3,018. Engineering and design was initiated for repair of the North and South Piers, Sections A through G at a cost of $43,218. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $4,149. Existing project was completed in 1903. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are scheduled for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,093,916, of which $364,527 was for new work and $3,729,389 for maintenance. 65. SAXON HARBOR, WI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin at the mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles southeast of the harbor at Bayfield, WI, and 21 miles westerly of the harbor at Black River, MI; 99 miles east of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of Ontonagon Harbor, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1254 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel 21-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of features see pate 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One wharf 300 feet long on the east side of present harbor basin constructed by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $18,618. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $59,978. The project was completed in March 1968. A reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 concerning erosion of the shoreline west of the harbor. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,532,777, of which $711,777 was for new work and $821,000 for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $50,193 contributed funds. 66. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other light-draft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,039. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,545,619, of which $35,573 was for new work and $3,510,046 for maintenance. 67. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230 of Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $67,619. Minor structure and safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $6,581. Engineering and design continued for repair of the North Pier, Sections A and B, at a cost of $39,311. The contract awarded last FY for South Pier, Section N, repairs was completed at a cost of $145,543. Engineering and design during construction cost $26,176. Real estate, supervision and administration cost $29,403. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Piers and breakwaters range from generally poor to fair condition and are scheduled for major repairs on an as needed basis. Inner 260 feet of south pier was replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is 21-38 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was. $10,141,723, of which $1,136,088 was for new work, $8,396,607 for maintenance and $609,028 for rehabilitation. 68. SILVER BAY HARBOR, MN Location. The city of Silver Bay, MN is situated on the north shore of Lake Superior about 50 miles northeast of Duluth, MN. The proposed harbor of refuge is located between the Northshore Mining taconite processing facility and the city's water intake plant. The project site includes approximately 21.5 acres and includes over 2,000 feet of shoreline. Existing Project. The project was authorized under the River & Harbor Act of 1945, House Document 446-78-2. The project is a Harbor of Refuge for small boats navigating the north shore of Lake Superior. This harbor will be part of a system of small craft harbors of refuge at 30 to 40 mile intervals between Duluth and Grand Marais, Minnesota. The 1994 Appropriations Act for Energy and Water Development provided $2.6 Million Federal funds for the project: $100,000 for review of the non-Federal harbor design and $2.5 Million for the Federal share of harbor construction. The State of Minnesota has provided the funds for the non-Federal share. The project will repair/improve an existing breakwater and construct and additional adjacent breakwater. Local cooperation. The State of Minnesota is the non- Federal sponsor, acting through the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The state will provide all the required documentation and plans and specifications to the Detroit District for review, and the district will award and manage the construction. The construction contract is scheduled for award in FY 96. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: In FY 94 the Corps coordinated the Project Cooperation Agreement, required technical documentation and real estate requirements with the sponsor. The state finalized the project location initiated real estate acquisition from the mining company. Total cost to end of FY was $43,780. 69. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. The turning basin feature was subsequently deauthorized by Section 116 of the WRDA of 1992 (PL 102-580). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, wood-pulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities; two have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $51,305. A contract was awarded for repairs to the South Pier and Revetment, Sections A, L, N & G in the amount of $893,759. The contract was 92% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $819,999. Engineering and design during construction cost $117,602. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $6,499. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging, removing 22,247 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $121,685. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $109,580. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $7,949. Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $1,981. A contract for beach nourishment (trucking) was awarded in the amount of $387,000. The contract was 33% at the end of FY at a cost of $125,999. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $43,040. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively (in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized), which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $9,385,748, of which $984,426 was for new 21-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 work, $6,769,246 for maintenance and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 70. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous project. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in city of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities, and four shipbuilding yards. City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from city of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $65,440. Repairs to the South Revetment, Sections H and North Detached Breakwater, Sections D & F, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $57,412. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $9,299. Engineering and design continued for repair of the South Detached Breakwater, Sections D & E and South Revetment, Section N, at a cost of $63,996. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $64,863. Supervision and administration cost $15,223. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $11,287,291, of which $1,059,722 was for new work, $9,342,670 for maintenance and $884,899 for rehabilitation. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 71. TAWAS BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On the northeasterly portion of Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, adjacent to Tawas, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for a breakwater with four interconnected sections with an aggregate length of 1,750 feet with provisions for recreational fishing. A defined entrance channel and anchorage area are provided for, even though no dredging is required. Depths to 12 feet in the entrance and 10 feet in the anchorage area are presently available. (See Table 21-b for authorizing legislation.) Federal cost was $1,120,980, excluding $1,120,980 contributed by local interests for a total of $2,241,960. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army on May 18, 1976, and have been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,410. A contract for minor breakwater repairs was awarded and completed in the amount of $9,775. The existing project is complete. Construction of breakwaters was initiated on April 21, 1977, and was completed on November 6, 1977. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,173,341, of which $2,110,745 was for new work (includes $989,677 contributed funds), and $62,596 for maintenance. 72. TWO HARBORS, MN Location. Harbor is on north shore of Lake Superior, 27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Narrowing natural entrance by construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is 21-40 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT provided for public recreational use. For details see page 1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was completed in 1980. This portion of project was reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 1973. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 221 Local Cooperation Agreement was entered into with the city of Two Harbors on Aug. 14, 1978. Terminal facilities. No publicly owned wharves. Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $13,789. Supervision and administration to close-out structure repair contract completed last FY cost $1,112. The existing project is complete. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $9,337,071, of which $4,170,710 was for new work and $5,166,361 for maintenance. 73. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous project. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is essentially complete, except for dredging a 10-foot width along each side of the entrance channel between the piers. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 R & H Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,889. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $916. Engineering and design continued for repair of the South Pier and Revetment, Sections E and F, at a cost of $23,524. Supervision and administration cost $873. Existing project is complete except for portion deauthorized in December 1989. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. South Pier was completed in 1883 and is in poor condition. The South Pier and South Revetment are scheduled for repairs. North Pier was completed in 1908. North Revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,718,135, of which $360,320 was for new work, $7,299,758 for maintenance, and $58,057 for minor rehabilitation. 74. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On the east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on the north side of the lake about 3 miles from the inner end of revetted entrance channel. Across the lake, at village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals 21-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were perform by Government forces and contract at a cost of $16,224. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $2,533. Engineering and design for repair of the North & South Pier and Revetment, Sections C-H & J, was initiated at a cost of $43,359. Engineering and design for repair of the North & South Piers, Sections A-D, was initiated at a cost of $36,100. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. The structures are in generally poor condition and are scheduled for repairs. Project now being maintained to 14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,086,851, of which $457,562 was for new work and $3,629,289 for maintenance. 75. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 21-J. 76. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 21-C. 77. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to section 107. Public Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) None. Beach Erosion Control 78. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS A beach erosion control project for 9,550 feet of publicly owned shore of Lake Michigan in Manitowoc County, WI, from Two Rivers to Manitowoc, was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1958. The Act authorized Federal participation in the project, which was completed by the Wisconsin State Highway Department in 1963. The total cost of the project was $182,500, of which $60,500 was contributed by the Federal government, including $56,000 in reimbursement to the State of WI in 1964. 79. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit services (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended). Bay View, Bear Creek Township, MI - Funds in the amount of $2,508 were used in FY 93 to complete a feasibility study to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection to approximately 2,200 feet of sanitary sewer adjacent to Lake Michigan. The study was initiated in FY 91. The study was terminated in December 1994 due to the sponsor's withdrawal from the study. A total of $37,000 was expended between FY 91 - FY 94. Funds expended in FY 94 were $47. Fair Haven, MI - Due to real estate problems, the project was divided into two contracts. The first contract provided for construction of a stone revetment to protect 222 feet of shoreline adjacent to State Highway M-29. The project was completed and its facilities turned over to the State on April 17, 1992. The second construction contract was awarded in July 1994. The second contract provides for 571 feet of protection of shoreline westward of State Highway M-29. Work was completed on September 19, 1994. Financial close-out is underway. Funds in the amount of $38,269 were expended in FY 94. Memorial Drive, McKinley Park, WI - Funds in the amount of $99,287 were used in FY 93 to award and construct a project. The project involves the construction of a stone revetment to protect 900 feet of the Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to Lincoln Memorial Drive. The work was physically completed in July 1993, and financial close-out was completed in March 1994 at a non- Federal cost of $42,239 and a Federal cost of $137,680. FY 94 costs were $418. Memorial Drive, Muskegon, MI - In FY 93, funds in the amount of $34,807 were used to complete the plans and specifications for the project. A construction contract to provide shoreline erosion protection along the eastern shoreline of Lake Michigan for 1,100 feet of erosion of Scenic Drive at Memorial Drive, was awarded in 21-42 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT February 1994. Work was physically completed in July 1994 and the project was transferred to the local sponsor in November 1994. Financial close-out is underway. Funds in the amount of $264,422 were expended in FY 94. Oconto River, Oconto, WI - Planning and design activities are on-going to determine the Federal interest in protecting streambank erosion (400 feet) along the Oconto River on U.S.-41 and U.S.-22, in the city of Oconto. Request for project approval is underway. Funds in the amount of $38,871 were expended in FY 94. River Raisin, Monroe County, East Lloyd Road, MI - Planning and design activities are underway to determine the Federal interest in protecting streambank erosion (400 feet) along the River Raisin adjacent to East Lloyd Road, in Monroe County, MI. Request for project approval is underway. Funds in the amount of $34,662 were expended in FY 94. River Raisin, Monroe County, Pumpkinhook Road, MI - Planning and design activities to determine the Federal interest in protecting streambank erosion along the River Raisin adjacent to Pumpkinhook Road, in Monroe County, MI, resulted in a recommendation to terminate the study due to lack of economic justification. Funds in the amount of $22,197 were expended in FY 94. Shiawassee River, Chipman Road, Rush Township, MI - Planning and design activities to determine the Federal interest in protecting streambank erosion along the Shiawassee River undermining Chipman Road, resulted in termination of the study on Mar. 2, 1994, due to lack of economic justification. FY 94 funds expended were $300. Sheboygan, WI - The plans and specifications for protection of 7,400 feet of Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to the city's sanitary pump station and a 60-inch Sanitary Interceptor Sewer and related manholes were completed in FY 92. The project was terminated in February 1994 due to the sponsor's inability to provide its share of the total project cost. No funds were expended in FY 94. St. Joseph River, Buchanan Township, MI - A construction contract to provide streambank erosion protection to 1,600 feet of Red Bud Trail, is scheduled to be awarded in FY 95. Construction will be initiated in April 1995. Funds in the amount of $14,933 were expended in FY 94. 80. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. None. 81. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. None. 82. PROJECT MODIFICATION FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT Project modification activities pursuant to Section 1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Funds in the amount of $2,479 were expended in FY 94 for initial appraisal, coordination, and preparation of a fact sheet to initiate a feasibility study to control sea lamprey in the St. Marys River, at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, near the Unit 10 powerhouse. Flood Control 83. CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI Location. Clinton River Basin including its tributaries drains an area of 760 square miles in southeastern Michigan and empties into Lake St. Clair. Existing Project. The project consists of a two-mile long spillway channel connecting the Clinton River with Lake St. Clair and a fixed crest weir at the upstream end of the project, about 9 miles upstream of the river's mouth, in Mount Clemens, MI. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Clinton River Spillway Inter- County Drainage Board operates and maintains the project. Operations during fiscal year. The Corps initiated PED to correct a Congressionally determined design deficiency at the fixed crest weir. The purpose of this project modification is to improve the overall environment and associated beneficial uses of the lower Clinton River. 21-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Expenditures during FY 94 totaled $229,978 and resulted in a completed Concept Design Report. 84. FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN Location. Fort Wayne, which is located in northeastern Indiana in Allen County, is in the Maumee River drainage basin. In all, the Maumee basin covers an area of 6,586 square miles. Of this area, 4,856 square miles are in northwest Ohio, 1,260 are in northeast Indiana and 470 are in southeast Michigan. This basin is one of the largest and most important tributaries in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River system. There are four main tributary streams to the Maumee River: the Auglaize, Tiffin, St. Joseph and St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph and Tiffin Rivers originate in the hills of southern Michigan and flow southerly to the Maumee. The St. Marys and Auglaize originate in Ohio and flow northward. In the city of Fort Wayne, the St. Joseph and St. Marys Rivers join to form the headwaters of the Maumee River. From this point, the Maumee flows northeasterly and empties into Lake Erie at Toledo, Ohio. The central business district is located immediately on the south side of the Maumee and the St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph River bisects primarily residential areas on the north side of the central business district. While some portions of the central business district are prone to flooding in the immediate vicinity of the St. Marys River, the majority of the business district is sufficiently elevated to avoid flood damages. The residential areas, however, are generally low lying and are prone to frequent flooding. Existing Project. The Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana, Flood Control Study was authorized by resolution of the Committee on Public Works, House of Representatives on October 12, 1972. The authorization requested that the Corps determine the advisability of providing improvements for flood control and allied purposes at and in the vicinity of Fort Wayne, Indiana. The study authorization resulted in completion of a Final Feasibility Report entitled Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana Flood Control Study, dated September 1987, and revised in April 1988, which identified and evaluated a number of different alternatives to flood control in the Fort Wayne area. The Final Feasibility Report also contained the "Final Environmental Impact Statement" for this project. Preparation of the General Design Memorandum began in August 1989 and was approved in December 1993. Construction was authorized in Section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Title 1 Public Law 101-640). This project was a Congressionally added new construction start in FY 1994. The Project Cooperative Agreement (PCA) was executed in August 1994 and construction will be initiated in FY 1995. The project will provide a 100-year level of flood protection to a large part of the central area of the city of Fort Wayne, Indiana, which has experienced numerous flooding events in the past. The project is located along the north side of the St. Marys River, the east and west banks of the St. Joseph River, and the north bank of the Maumee River. Junk Ditch and Spy Run Creek which are tributary to the St. Marys River will also have protection installed or improved along their north and east banks, respectively. The project area has been broken into three (3) segments which provide flood protection to various areas within the project limits. The West Segment is located along the St. Marys River and the Junk Ditch Tributary. The Central Segment is located along the Spy Run Tributary to the St. Marys River, a short section of the St. Marys River itself (at the confluence with the St. Joseph River), and along the west bank of the St. Joseph River. The East Segment is located along the east bank of the St. Joseph River and the north bank of the Maumee River. The total project length is approximately 54,000 feet. The project consists of several types of flood protection improvements. The most common type of flood protection improvements proposed are earth levees. The levees proposed are to have turf or rock protected slopes depending on the available space for their construction. Levees account for approximately 63 percent of the total project length. Concrete floodwalls are proposed in those areas where insufficient space exists to construct levees due to site constraints. Concrete flood walls account for 20 percent of the project length. An additional eight percent of the project length consists of a combination of a 1/2 Reduced levee and concrete L-Wall. The remaining length is composed of various types of road closures (stoplogs, clay dikes and high curbs), and 3,000 feet in several areas which do not require improvements due to adequate existing surface grades. The fully funded total project cost estimate is $44,738,000. The Federal cost is $33,859,000 and the non-Federal cost is $10,879,000. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors for this project are the city of Fort Wayne and Allen County. An updated letter of intent to serve as non-Federal sponsors, signed by the Mayor of Fort Wayne and the Allen County Commissioners, was provided on January 15, 1993 and the Project Cooperative Agreement was executed in August 1994. Significant coordination by the non-Federal sponsors will also be required to obtain the necessary 21-44 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT property and easement rights. In addition, the sponsors will need to coordinate with the contractors for traffic control during construction. Due to the location of many of the project features, it is anticipated that a number of major routes through the City will be partially or totally obstructed at some point during construction. Coordination of traffic control with the City, in order to provide acceptable traffic flow patterns through the City, will be required prior to and during construction. Substantial coordination will also be required with the various affected utilities for this project in the plans and specifications, and construction phases. Accurate field locations of existing utilities, and assessing the need for and preparing the designs for utility relocation, is expected to be an important part of this project; and therefore, coordination with both public and private utilities is expected to be significant. Utilities which are affected by this project include water and sewer, cable TV, telephone, electric, gas, and possibly railroad communication or signal lines. Coordination with these utilities far in advance of construction activities will be required for accurate plan representation and in order to maintain their services or provide alternatives for service or temporary outages should their facilities be required to be removed from service. Operations during fiscal year. Expenditures of $338,339 were made to complete the General Design Memorandum, execute the Project Cooperation Agreement and initiate the preparation of a Design Memorandum for the first construction segment. The first construction contract is scheduled to be awarded in FY 95. 85. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River Basin including its tributaries, Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867). Existing project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Sanilac Flats, MI, Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction floodwalls, modifications of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $8,620,000 and non-Federal cost of $579,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $18,251,600 and non-Federal cost of $2,580,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of cost of rights-of-ways; (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99- 662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986, PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Apr. 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was reclassified to the "inactive" category on Dec.15, 1982; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $23,417,500 Federal and non-Federal cost of $2,705,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,237,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed 21-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting work for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1984) is $50,700,000 Federal and $1,421,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1984) to local interests is $5,870,000. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completion; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by city of Flint and accepted by the United States on Nov. 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished Feb. 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on Sep. 8, 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on Jun. 7, 1982, declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated Jan. 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated Aug. 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An adjustment of -$2,314 was made in contract cost for FY 92 concrete repairs. Another adjustment of -$2,351 was made in contract cost for repairs to Joints-Waterline, Section C-l, completed last FY. The contract awarded last FY for South Bank, Section A repairs, was completed at a cost of $36,560. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $54,702. Engineering, design, and real estate for contracts to be awarded next FY for maintenance dredging at Hamilton Dam, repair of heaved concrete slabs near the Stevenson Bridge and in Section A, and all remaining repairs cost $438,284. The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are complete. The Flint River Segment at Flint, MI, was originally authorized under the Flood Control Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). The flood protection project was completed September 5, 1979. In accordance with the 1962 Local Cooperation Agreement, the city of Flint is responsible to operate and maintain the project. Due to the lack of maintenance, the project requires extensive repairs. Revised total cost of repairs is estimated at $4.6 million. A total of $5.5 million has been authorized under the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Acts of 1992, 1993 & 1994 ($1 million, $2 million and $2.5 million, respectively). These authorizations were intended to provide funds for a one-time repair and rehabilitation of this project to restore the project to original design dimensions, Total cost of the existing project to the end of FY was $26,780,330, of which $24,928,359 was for new work (includes $173,000 contributed funds) and $1,851,971 for maintenance. 86. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through village of Sebewaing, MI, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude 21-46 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,894. Total costs to the end of FY were $802,999. 87. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NAME OF PROJECT Battle Creek, Kalamazoo River, MI Burr Oak, Prairie River, MI Fort Wayne, IN Kawkawlin River, MI Mt. Clemens, MI, Clinton River Spillway Red Run, Clinton River, MI River Rouge, MI Saginaw River & Tributaries Frankenmuth Flint River Paw Paw Lake & River, Watervliet, MI Sebewaing River, MI DATE OF INSPECTION Jul. Sep. Aug. Dec. May May Sep. Jun. Jan. Sep. Jun. 1992 1994 1992 1993 1994 1994 1994 1992 1990 1992 1992 88. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 21-E. 89. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting (Public Law 84-99 and PL 93-288 and Antecedent Legislation). Project and Location FY Costs Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Advance Measures Advance Measures (Contributed Funds) to Sep. 30, 1994 $ 303,604 $ 42,640 $ -0- $ -0- $ -0- Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Kawkawlin River, MI - Further work to upgrade the completed abbreviated reconnaissance report to a full scale reconnaissance report was delayed pending receipt of additional funds. The study was terminated in February 1994 due to lack of sponsors' commitment in addition to lack of justification under Section 205. No funds were expended in FY 94. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. None. Aquatic plant control activities pursuant to Section 302 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (PL 89-298). None. 90. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS AND INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES Field Operations. As a continuing and ongoing mission, the Detroit District conducts hydraulic flow measurement surveys throughout the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River system. These capabilities are unique within the Corps Districts (and other U.S. Federal agencies) on the Great Lakes. During FY 94, the Detroit District conducted current velocity and discharge measurements on the St. Lawrence and Detroit Rivers. In November 1993, the District conducted current velocity and discharge measurements at selected locations in the International Section of the St. Lawrence River. These measurements were made to augment earlier measurements which were conducted in 1993 at the time of record high discharge rates through the river. These series of measurements were conducted to evaluate potential hazardous impacts of high river velocities on commercial navigation during emergency conditions. The data collected are being used to develop two-dimensional mathematical models for selected reaches of the river and to develop a ship-simulator study for one selected reach. During FY 1994, the District purchased two Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs). These instruments were acquired to augment, or in some instances replace, conventional hydraulic flow measuring instruments (current meters) or moving-boat instrumentation. The ADCP instruments were used to collect velocity and 21-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 discharge information on the St. Lawrence River in late 1993. During the spring of 1994, the District conducted a series of simultaneous head-to-head comparisons between the three available measurement systems (ADCP, moving-boat, and conventional) in the upper Detroit River. This comparative analysis was conducted to learn each system's capabilities, limitations, and recommended use. Results of this work helped the District to design and implement a regular ADCP measurement program in 1994 for the Detroit River. Between August and November 1994, the District conducted near weekly discharge measurements in the upper Detroit River using the ADCP instrumentation. These measurements were coupled with detailed hydrographic surveys to determine the geometry of the river channel. The hydrographic and hydraulic flow datasets are currently being used to develop a onedimensional model of the upper Detroit River and are planned to be further used in FY 95 to develop and calibrate a two-dimensional flow model for the entire river. A portion of this work will likely involve support from the Waterways Experiment Station's Hydraulics Laboratory. Besides performing an extensive flow measuring program in the Niagara River in FY 95, the District plans to also collect additional discharge measurements and hydrographic surveys in the lower Detroit River. This is where most of the maintained navigation channels exist. Also, the measurements will help to refine flow retardation estimates for weed conditions throughout the growing season. As an ongoing mission, during the winter months the District monitors the extent of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers. Water levels are monitored continuously at key gages in these rivers to detect possible ice jams and potential flooding. This information can be used to provide advance warning to area residents and to trigger emergency actions by the Corps and other governmental agencies, including the National Weather Service and the Coast Guard. Currently, data are obtained through phone line interrogation of these gages or from a satellite downlink station using portable lap-top personal computers. These systems provide water level information to the District office within minutes of data collection. During FY 94, the District completed conversion of all of its water level gages to the new International Great Lakes Datum 1985. Recorded data are now also in metric units. International Activities. The Detroit District has successfully supported the International Joint Commission (IJC) for many years. This has included numerous engineering and scientific assignments supporting the Commission's boards of control, working committees, and study boards. The following activities were conducted by the Detroit District, specifically for the IJC Boards and Committees: a. Members of the Detroit District staff attended the semi-annual meetings of the three Great Lakes Boards of Control. They also attended the spring appearances of the Boards before the UC, in Washington, D.C., in April 1994, and the fall appearances, in Ottawa, Ontario, in September 1994. b. IJC Levels Reference Study. As a result of record high Great Lakes water levels in 1985-86, the governments of the United States and Canada issued a Reference to the IJC, on August 1, 1986, to initiate a new study to examine various methods of alleviating the adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. The IUC released an interim report, in October 1988, which addressed crisis intervention, and also intermediate measures which could be taken to aid interests threatened by high water levels. Detroit District personnel were involved in preparing many of the findings and recommendations. The study was conducted in two phases, with all work finalized by early 1993. The Detroit District played a crucial role throughout both phases of the study, particularly in Phase II. The District's contribution to these efforts included: identifying possible crises measures for alleviating adverse impacts of water level extremes; reviewing and proposing improvements to the existing operating plan for the regulation of Lake Superior; developing and testing hypothetical regulation plans to manage all or additional parts of the Great Lakes system; assessing and improving water level forecasts and statistics; preparing an inventory of coastal land uses and trends; identifying existing land use management practices and assessing their relative effectiveness to problem resolution; mapping shoreline geomorphology and offshore conditions, as well as the existing extent of structural protection; cataloging long-term coastal erosion and recession measurements; and estimating potential 21-48 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT damages caused by existing lake levels and potential future extremes. The Levels Reference Study Board sent their report to the IJC in March 1993. The report contained a set of 42 recommendations. Most of these recommendations were endorsed by the IJC, with slight modification, and forwarded to the governments of the United States and Canada for review and action. Many of these recommendations, if carried out to the extent outlined, would affect the way the Detroit District provides support to the nation under the Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters and International Water Studies appropriations. c. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative of this Board. In support of the U.S. section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based upon the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes using the approved operating rule, Plan 1977-A. Plan 1977-A was accepted by the IJC on a test basis and has been in operational use since June 1990. Further proposed modifications of the regulation plan were explored by the Detroit District under the IJC Levels Reference Study, leading to a recommendation by the Study Board for future improvements. From June to October 1994, outflow recommendations to the Board took into consideration the reduced capacity, due to ongoing repair work, of U.S. hydropower plants on the St. Marys River. During this period, minor deviations from the Plan 1977-A prescribed outflows were authorized by the IJC. The District's continuing program to evaluate the hydraulic rating of the Compensating Works in the St. Marys River has been temporarily postponed, pending completion of work to rehabilitate the gates of this structure. Work began in FY 94 and is expected to take two to five years to complete. d. International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee. The District provides direct technical support and consulting engineering services to this Board and Committee. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is a member of the Committee. Under the auspices of the Committee, the Detroit District, with Canada, computes, coordinates, and publishes the monthly flows in the Niagara River. During FY 92, the Detroit District and the Water Survey of Canada conducted a series of discharge measurements in the upper Niagara River at the International Railway Bridge Section for verification of Lake Erie outflow equations. Information to date indicates that the existing equations are adequate during average flow ranges, but still require verification at the very high and very low extremes. Future measurements are scheduled for this section in FY 95, in accordance with the Board's recommendation to continue making them every three years. Based upon the results of the FY 95 measurements, the equations may be reevaluated. Due to the dynamic nature of the Niagara River at the Falls, the District is involved with periodic verification of the rating curves for the Ashland Avenue and American Falls gages. The Ashland Avenue relationship measures the total flow over the American and Canadian Falls to ensure that the Board operates within the terms of the Niagara Treaty. Discharge measurements for the Ashland Avenue rating curve are scheduled every three years. The next series is scheduled for FY 95. Based upon the analysis of these data, the 1981 relationship will be reviewed. The American Falls Channel relationship provides a measure of the flow over the American Falls. Measurements are taken in the American Falls Channel every five years. The last measurements were made in FY 90 with the next series scheduled for FY 95. Beginning with FY 93, all measurement series in the Niagara River were based upon IGLD 1985 and are currently reported in metric units. In January 1993, the Board began total operation in both the metric system and the new IGLD 1985 datum. e. International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. In May, June, and November 1993, the Detroit District conducted current velocity measurements in the St. Lawrence River for this Board and the St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation. The May/June measurements were made when flows in the river were at record highs. Measurements were conducted at several critical locations in the river, using conventional techniques and also with new acoustic doppler current profilers. Additional measurements were made, in 21-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 November 1993, at a much lower flow rate. The data gathered are being used to calibrate computer models being developed for critical sections of the river. In FY 96, and possibly as early as FY 95, further flow distribution measurements are scheduled, to recalibrate the mathematical model of the river. This Board completed both metric and IGLD 1985 conversions in January 1993. f. International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board. The IJC submitted its recommendations in 1985, to the governments of the United States and Canada, based upon the Board's 1981 report and subsequent public hearings. The District expects to continue to provide support to the IJC relative to the evaluation of consumptive uses. g. International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board. Although the Board remains inactive at this time, the chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is the Secretary to the U.S. Section, as well as a member of both the Hydraulics and Hydrology Committees. The Board completed its study and in 1984 provided a report of its findings and recommendations to the IJC. In 1985, the IJC subsequently informed the governments of the United States and Canada of the findings of the Board. One of the recommendations of this Board, to create a modeling group, has since been adopted by the Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is the U.S. Secretary to this Committee, as well as a member of several subcommittees. Other Branch personnel also hold membership on various subcommittees. The District continued its support of Committee operations pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. An update of the International Great Lakes Datum (IGLD) was completed in FY 92. The new IGLD was instituted in January 1992 and evolves around the epochal year 1985. Since January 1993, the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch regulation and forecast products have been on the new datum. District efforts have also continued toward more closely coordinating the format of the U.S. and Canadian water level bulletins, in order to avoid confusion and to better inform the public. To this end, District personnel were involved in the determination and coordination of historic lake-wide average water level statistics (monthly long-term averages, maxima, and minima), based on a network of water level gages. These are given in the U. S. and Canadian bulletins, beginning in January 1994, and replace the use of a single water level gage for each lake. The range of predicted levels given in the bulletins has also been coordinated, and a coordinated "Users Guide" is being developed. In FY 94, District personnel finalized a Coordinating Committee report which documents all U.S. and Canadian discharge measurements made on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during the period 1860 to 1993; Appendix B, "Chronologic Summaries of Construction and Dredging," to the report is pending, and is expected to be completed in FY 95. During FY 94, work was completed on a program to analyze the current configuration of the hydrometeorological data collection program over the Lake Ontario basin and to design future modifications. A similar study was initiated for the Lake Superior basin, in FY 94. The Coordinating Committee is currently reviewing its original mandates and recommending changes to the Terms of Reference and membership of its subcommittees. NCD Master Plan for the Water Control Data System. In FY 93, the Detroit District converted its Water Control Data System operations from a mainframe environment to a networked workstation and personal computers (PC) environment. The system currently consists of several engineering workstations, PCs, and associated peripherals. Presently, a PC collects data from the District's data collection platforms (DCPs) and from the NOAA/NOS and Canadian water level computer systems. Also, data have begun to be collected and distributed through Internet, with future development in this area expected in FY 95. Weather data are being obtained through an outside contractor; a satellite dish has been installed near the District's office and data are being received via a dedicated PC. A contract will be procured in FY 95, to take advantage of further new technologies and to acquire doppler radar data. The system, known as NEXRAD, is being developed by the National Weather Service. It should provide for significant improvements in estimating 21-50 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT precipitation rates over the Great Lakes surface and their drainage basins. The District has 30 active DCPs and plans to upgrade and expand the network, based upon an on-going thorough review of its water level gaging program. Great Lakes Information Management. The District has continued the development of a Geographic Information System (GIS) for the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes. The GIS is being generated to contain multiple information layers on the physiographic, economic, sociologic, environmental, and hydrologic characteristics of the Great Lakes region. The GIS is designed to create a "corporate data base" to support various District operations and studies. The District has completed a comprehensive assessment of current U.S. shoreline land uses, under the UIC Levels Reference Study. Historical recession rate data, shore-type classification, shore protection and sub-aqueous material profiles were generated to support shoreline stage damage estimates and erosion loss modeling. In support of the EPA/USACE Interagency Agreement for the Southeast Michigan Initiative (SEMI), the District is developing a relational database model and desktop GIS query system to provide a multi-agency decision support system for environmental planning and restoration. Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Water supply forecasts are used routinely by the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch in forecasting water levels and regulating the outflows from Lakes Superior and Ontario. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e., runoff, over-water precipitation, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by the staff of the Branch. Some of these activities were carried out in association with the UC Levels Reference Study. In FY 94, District personnel, in cooperation with National Weather Service personnel, continued to assess water supply conditions over both Lakes Superior and Ontario, through the use of airborne snow and soil moisture surveys. Levels of the Great Lakes. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch continued to make routine short-term (15 days to one month) and long-term (six months) Great Lakes still water level forecasts. These forecasts are distributed in the form of weekly, bimonthly and monthly news releases and bulletins. The Monthly Bulletin of Lake Levels for the Great Lakes, containing a six month projection of Great Lakes water levels, has a circulation of about 12,000 copies per month. Included with the monthly bulletin is an informational enclosure titled "Great Lakes Update," which consists of various topics of interest pertaining to the Great Lakes, information on possible storm induced water level rises at key locations on the Great Lakes, and incidental information on Great Lakes hydrology. Branch personnel provided technical information and expertise regarding recorded lake levels and still water lake level forecasts to many interested parties, such as, members of Congress, State and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, concerned property owners, and recreational boaters. Upon request, water level information was supplied to the public in the form of telephonic and written responses to inquiries, personal addresses to various civic groups, and interviews with the news media. Daily reports on present water levels, precipitation and significant events on the Great Lakes basin, are currently being made available on the District's water control data system. Forecasted and historical water level data are also available on this system. Interested agencies and individuals can retrieve this information at any time via communication devices, such as a computer modem or a network board. The total cost for FY 94 under the Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters was $2,370,663, and under the International Water Studies, $225,401. General Investigations 91. SURVEYS Federal funds in the amount of $70,935 were used to initiate a Reconnaissance Study in the interest of commercial navigation at Lower Kinnickinnic River in Milwaukee, WI. FY 94 funds in the amount of $98,854 were used for the study of contaminated sediments in Milwaukee Harbor, WI, in cooperation with non-Federal interests. In FY 94, Flood Damage Prevention investigations for Milwaukee Metropolitan Area, WI, cost $402 to terminate the cost-shared Feasibility phase study. Federal funds in the amount of $192,711 were expended to complete a reconnaissance study for flood control for St. Joseph, South Bend, IN, and develop a Master Plan that integrates flood control and bank stabilization with 21-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 campus improvements at Indiana University - South Bend. Environmental Services were also provided at a cost of $4,102. Coordination Studies with other Agencies include: Special Investigations, $50,332, which includes engineering and technical assistance given to local citizens because of fluctuating lake levels of the Great Lakes; FERC, $4,987; and Interagency Water Resources Development, $15,479; North American Water Fowl Management Planning, $2,986; National Estuary Studies, $5,041; Cooperation with other Water Resource agencies, $5,000; and Section 22, Planning Assistance to States and Tribes (PAS) $70,389. Studies under the PAS included: Auburn, IN - $1,633; New Haven, IN - $187; Northport Harbor, Door County, WI - $4,500; Allen County, IN - $635; Mole Lake Tribe, WI - $42,813; Potawatomi Tribe, WI - $7,763; Montello Dam, WI - $507; PAS General, IN - $5,629; PAS General, MI - $5; and PAS General - $6,721. Funds in the amount of $23,870 were expended to continue the Section 216 restudy of Federal interest for Fox River, WI. 92. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ECORSE CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN, MI The FY 1994 costs were $215 for administrative closeout of activities related to the project. The project, as authorized in the WRDA of 1990, calls for construction of a storm water retention basin along the North Branch of Ecorse Creek. This basin would have a storage capacity of approximately 275 acre-feet and would collect flood waters in excess of the bank capacity. This plan would generally provide 2- to 7-year frequency flood protection upstream of Interstate Highway 94 for the communities of Dearborn Heights, Taylor, and Allen Park. Due to concerns with the original retention basin site and the lack of an acceptable alternate site, the non- Federal sponsor requested that further work be suspended. FORT WAYNE, IN Funds in the amount of $1,313 were expended in FY 94, to close out the Preconstruction Engineering and Design costs, since this project has entered the construction phase. The project will provide a 100-year level of protection utilizing approximately 54,000 linear feet of floodwall and levee along the St. Marys, St. Joseph, and Maumee Rivers, and Spy Run Creek. In addition, slope protection and interior flood control improvements will be made as necessary. An existing 1.3 miles of hiking/biking trails will be expanded to 4.8 miles. The total fully funded project cost is estimated (1993) to be $44,738,000; $34,025,000 Federal and $10,713,000 non-Federal. GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS AND HARBORS Funds in the amount of $673 were expended in FY 94 to continue the Preconstruction Engineering and Design work activities. This project has been placed on hold at the request of the non-Federal sponsor, the State of Michigan. The recommended plan involves the deepening of navigation channels in the Upper St. Marys River and in Duluth Harbor to: (a) permit a maximum safe vessel draft of 26.5 feet below LWD for downbound vessels; (b) dispose of an estimated 341,000 cubic yards of dredged material from the Upper St. Marys River in an environmentally-acceptable manner by creating an island in Izaak Walton Bay to provide habitat for the Federally endangered species, the Piping Plover; (c) deepening in the Cross and South Channels, West and East Gate Basins, Duluth Harbor Basin (North and South Sections) and Duluth Ship Canal; (d) construction of an upland disposal area in the Lakehead area, and (e) dispose of an estimated 286,500 cubic yards of dredged material in the Lakehead upland site. The Superior Harbor portion of the project has not been authorized, since a local sponsor has not been determined. 21-52 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT The total fully funded cost of the project is estimated (1993) at $15,370,000, with $10,285,000 and $5,085,000 being the Federal and non-Federal shares, respectively. 93. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services. Fiscal year 94 costs in the amount of $201,154 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program; Unit - $44,436; Technical Services - $35,888; National Flood Proofing Committee - $6,949; Quick Responses - $10,000; and Special Studies for Little Rice Lake, WI, Dam Break Analysis - $14,707; Germania Marsh, WI, Dam Break Analysis - $23,803; HEC I Advanced Workshop, MI - $14,999; Boardman River, MI, Flood Profile Study - $645; HEC II Basic Workshop in Michigan - $15,000; HEC II Advanced Workshop in Indiana - $19,999; and the continuation of the Flood Plain Geographical Information System Data Base for Michigan - $14,728. Flood Insurance Studies. Three Flood Insurance Studies were completed in FY 94 for Sheboygan County, Wisconsin; and the Michigan entities of Farmington Hills, Oakland County; and Isabella County. The FY 94 costs for the three studies were $27,627, $644, and $24,119, respectively. A Wave Runup Sensitivity Special Study for $43,680 was also completed in FY 94. One Flood Insurance Study for Delta County MI was initiated in FY 94. The FY 94 costs associated with this study were $81,404. FY 94 ongoing coordination costs for Noble County, IN were $814. Final coordination meetings were held on two completed Michigan Flood Insurance Studies for the entities of Allen Park, Wayne County, and Saginaw River Basin in Bay and Saginaw Counties. The FY 94 costs for these activities were $1,229, and $1,123, respectively. Costs in FY 94 in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Community Assistance and Limited Map Maintenance Programs, were $35,455, and $9,036, respectively. In FY 94, Hydrologic Studies cost $84, and International Water Studies, $48,116. 21-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 1. Algoma Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 S20,006 20,006 34,981 305,526 34,981 299,839 0 0 292,010' 292,010' 38,582 1,361,836 38,650 1,356,217 2. Alpena Harbor, MI 3. Arcadia Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 12,057 12,057 0 0 123,500 121,443 0 0 30,613 28,407 0 0 31,053 12,741 0 0 62,000 64,063 337,3942 337,3942 4,461 1,027,022 24,979 1,027,022 0 0 78,000 78,576 98,000 4,535,031 101,136 4,532,764 4. Ashland Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 600 3,301 0 0 1,695,645 1,695,645 42,000 411,000 320,000 4,057,905 33,788 400,391 338,894 4,057,905 5. Au Sable Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 247,241 (10,000) 249,407 (8,863) 193,376' 193,376' 16,400 16,400 1,044 982 4,703 2,829,592 4,765 2,829,592 21-54 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 6. Bayport Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Contribution Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 .0 76,000 201,000 61,232 213,620 125,000 23,169 20,000 97,117 7. Big Bay Harbor, MI 8. Big Suamico River, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 390,4334 390,433' 152,000 143,424 0 5,103 (901) 2,200 23,574 1,392,807 21,429 1,390,289 20,243 20,243 20,704 20,704 9,030 167,667 227,446 1,195,033 9,030 164,558 225,622 1,190,100 9. Black River Harbor, MI (P.H.) Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost '0 0 0 0 562,996 626,892 0 0 15,000 11,641 (3,122) 2,662 480,244s 48O,244s 0 349,921 0 349,921 45,972 1,368,0946 36,718 1,358,364' 21-55 0 0 6,954 8,476 (28,769) (16,882) (7,601) 17,113 93,597 93,597 416,878 416,424 137,399 137,399 792 792 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 ^ "--- " - - t-"-. .-- '. T I.. NeCw work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 2,310 2,310 106,759 89,398 1,117 13,251 39,000 40,011 383,350 383,350 862,042 857,826 11. Bolles Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 12. Caseville Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 305,620 301,551 0 0 0 0 5,447 7,561 0 0 0 0 0 0 236,000 235,344 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,000 5,716 0 0 66,079 35,847 171,413 171,413 255,000 255,000 25,957 2,078,462 54,125 2,074,443 0 0 0 0 314 5,435 1,190,550 1,190,550 293,657 293,657 293,657 293,657 11,608 1,350,219 12,156 1,349,948 13. Charlevoix Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 0 230,000 436,000 497,000 230,972 394,739 512,180 180,623 180,623 82,000 9,266,568 106,938 9,264,199 0 0 1,129,396 1,129,396 21-56 LU. 1iacL zuvr ZrtiarDor, l (U.P.) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 14. Clinton River, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 260,046' 260,046' 289,752 289,752 0 0 493,000 1,208,000 335,000 491,436 1,118,347 448,770 (13,000) (7,571) 48,000 3,468,381 47,771 3,463,528 0 0 3,796,180 3,796,180 15. Cornucopia Harbor, WI 16. Detroit River, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Contribution Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 0 56,500 50,036 60,458 63,196 462,653 462,653 (871) 2,810 0 0 22,305 1,007,889 22,350 1,007,889 76,877,357' 76,877,357' 4,239,000 6,118,390 4,796,000 3,227,000 106,053,899 4,191,494 5,940,222 4,808,815 3,421,098 106,000,899 0 0 0 0 361,235 361,235 42,470,585 42,470,585 17. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN & WI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost 150,000 140,061 60,000 152,000 340,000 16,811,2589 69,902 152,022 337,990 16,809,2339 0 298,000 0 113,328 298,000 113,328 21-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to InText Project Funding FY91 FY 92 FY93 FY94 Sep.30, 1994 17. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN & WI (Continued) Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 2,340,200 3,188,000 2,753,000 2,936,000 59,232,942 2,394,153 3,227,459 2,722,490 2,835,586 59,079,908 0 0 535,000 546,706 0 8,235 (1,000) (94) 1,556,249 1,556,249 0 11,555,410 143 11,555,410 18. Fox River, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0oj 3,753,33410 3,753,33410 1,694,500 1,655,000 1,684,000 1,772,000 49,360,72611 1,708,128 1,681,004 1,583,242 1,792,894 49,254,23211 19. Frankfort Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 1,923,450 0 1,923,450 0 0 31,709 31,709 205,000 401,000 436,000 1,278,000 9,025,832 203,471 352,122 465,215 1,251,635 8,976,386 0 0 0 0 1,204,500 1,204,500 274,776 274,776 20. Grand Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost 0 1,283,46912 0 1,283,46912 175,000 175,000 21-58 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text . Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 20. Grand Haven Harbor, MI (Continued) Contributed Funds Section 111 Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Contribution Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 626,000 1,071,000 1,137,000 907,000 26,992,9091 623,863 996,141 1,202,282 836,806 26,906,556' 3 (11,615) 0 0 0 59,000 63,472 0 0 0 0 87,000 82,125 58,000 60,150 0 0 0 15,585 0 15,585 0 0 780,400 780,400 72,000 2,290,861 73,875 2,286,632 0 0 813,613 813,613 21. Grand Marais Harbor, MI 22. Grand Marais Harbor, MN New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 657,000 663,290 5,384 6,430 11,073 11,073 1,055,871 1,055,871 10,898 2,586,311 11,838 2,586,311 450,972 450,972 179 179 209,274 204,118 (3,347) 150,227 2,348,959 982 105,622 2,303,527 23. Green Bay Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 9 , 9 4 6 , 3 9 5 14.'5.16 9,946,39514.15"16 1,621,600 1,485,000 3,351,000 2,429,000 32,689,692"7 1,670,116 1,474,891 3,319,926 2,437,809 32,650,24717 395,000 187,000 125,000 351,405 233,418 135,987 47,000 7,644,747 47,686 7,642,642 21-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to .In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 199 4 24. Greilickville Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 25. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 26. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost New Work: Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 11,577 11,577 0 0 0 0 50,572 141,520 307,750 48,420 137,699 307,287 0 0 0 0 0 1,015,366 0 1,015,366 77,000 77,000 956,006 949,570 50,000 50,000 1,200,598 1,200,598 0 0 0 0 289,000 2,360,610 400,000 293,271 2,355,758 397,234 0 0 15,000 14,693,239 29,563 14,690,598 243,100 243,100 194,504 194,504 27. Harrisville Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,456 10,456 3,249 3,249 3,450 3,450 366,579 366,579 259,328 255,956 96,239 92,867 0 0 0 0 0 0 21-60 1,849,938 1,849,938 287,454 287,454 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 27. Harrisville Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 2,680 2,680 0 0 5,026 188,000 5,026 174,683 502,000 502,000 78,861 1,250,395 88,081 1,246,298 88,000 88,000 28. Holland Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 736,122" 0 736,122" 35,705 35,705 621,000 621,000 1,469,300 898,000 463,000 426,000 22,142,1041" 1,439,060 863,373 521,865 426,674 22,133,244" 0 0 70,000 74,158 61,000 58,048 53,000 52,855 1,663,300 1,663,300 91,000 1,954,916 89,314 1,947,742 0 0 502,452 502,452 29. Inland Routc, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost 0 0 0 0 770,222 770,222 148,000 148,000 21-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 29. Inland Route, MI (Continued) 30. Kenosha Harbor, WI Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 31,500 29,210 0 0 0 0 931,300 934,272 42,000 45,196 31,000 24,207 0 0 0 0 77,000 2,625,116 57,884 2,597,627 404,300 404,300 0 0 38,000 31,462 2,362 11,688 988,969.21 988,9692 46,723 6,435,213" 46,970 6,435,213" 0 0 0 0 4,378,600 4,378,600 1,270,275 1,270,275 31. Kewaunce Harbor, WI 32. Keweenaw Waterway, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 204,000 651,000 171,000 126,000 6,627,168k 199,753 659,256 157,210 138,042 6,624,56324 0 0 0 0 2,961,461 2,961,461 617,300 617,300 5,974,141 5,974,141 731,000 531,000 889,000 1,243,000 25,213,215" 686,394 556,970 922,122 1,240,744 25,186,177" 21-62 758 ,333" 758 ,3330 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 32. Keweenaw Waterway, MI (Continued) 33. La Pointe Harbor, WI Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 1,523,500 1,523,500 139,874 139,874 0 0 50,000 41,238 64,254 69,232 8,644 12,387 (56) 132,297 (15) 132,297 34. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 35. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 0 7,675,357" 7,675,357" 43,000 250,000 239,000 161,000 8 ,34 1,870 50,075 251,463 239,225 157,838 8,338,638" 0 0 0 0 5,119,800 5,119,800 36. Leland Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost 0 0 1,110 1,110 1,355 1,355 3,762 3,762 269,270 269,270 658,074 656,486 95,286 93,698 00 0 0 672,950 672,950 354,139 354,139 21-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 36. Leland Harbor, MI (Continued) Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 191,500 127,000 120,000 108,000 2,556,522 193,978 133,719 114,690 109,348 2,552,459 0 0 70,678 70,678 37. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 174,509 171,966 20,165 12,747 (3,000) 27,000 1,388 19,605 (6,181) 3,453 5,152 5,479 1,646,304 1,646,304 1,088,888 1,088,888 372,000 372,000 576,311 576,311 (6,000) 526,000 1,779,986 2,079 518,964 1,772,895 38. Little Lake Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 542,808 542,808 0 57,670 0 57,670 154,000 259,000 154,957 232,309 88,000 141,000 4,112,972 112,629 141,141 4,106,778 39. Ludington Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost 7,912,202 7,912,202~ 21-64 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 39. Ludington Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 00 838,000 237,000 651,000 832,555 172,589 720,717 620,000 620,000 2,093,000 15,229,748" 2,090,122 15,225,085w 00 00 717,340 717,340 40. Manistee Harbor, MI 41. Manistique Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 00 00 2,696,52230 2,696,52230 286,000 746,000 552,000 1,051,000 9,345,6913' 282,675 699,314 559,317 1,090,603 9,342,3573' 00 00 00 27,000 65,935 27,000 23,068 14,133 18,127 00 00 1,374,164 1,374,164 1,299,355n 1,299,35532 9,400 2,256,983 11,345 2,256,983 0 0 316,333 316,333 42. Manitowoc Harbor, WI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost 21-65 2,048,9143 2,048,9143 1,911,130 1,9.11,130 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 Contributed Funds Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Contribution Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 637,000 335,000 198,000 546,000 7,473,664' 640,472 292,048 224,532 563,129 7,471,194 3,700 0 0 0 3,700 0 3,700 0 3,700 21,572 44,395 21,572 3,081,756 3,081,756 43. Marquette Harbor, MI 44. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 0 1,282,893"s 1,282,893" 14,000 415,000 13,779 393,520 (9,962) 14,178 2,602 2,626,397' 2,677 2,626,397" 0 0 465,757 465,757 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 208,800 125,000 235,258 126,922 533,476" 533,476 36,762 36,762 27,049 130,000 2,701,718" 21,633 135,544 2,701,182" 0 2,646 0 0 0 0 0 0 593,660 593,660 1,351,852 1,351,852 21-66 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 45. Milwaukee Harbor, WI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Contribution Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 8,231,0243' 8,231,0244' S1,531,800 1,531,795 50,000 271,809 0 0 0 0 664,000 1,666,000 772,000 33,874,313" 628,124 1,657,587 788,697 33,835,926 0 2,486 (2,549) 48,176 0 322,471 0 322,471 6,380,925 6,380,925 12,715,560 12,715,560 46. Monroe Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Contributed Funds Contributed Funds 47. Muskegon Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Contribution Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Contribution Cost New Work Appropriation Cost 687,340 687,340 300,000 300,000 60,000 1,177,000 67,155 1,179,928 218,000 783,000 19,301,151 176,576 799,882 19,272,273 166,667 166,667 (8,000) (8,027) 0 27 38,606,400 38,606,400 83,182 83,182 2,912,1104 2,912,11041 0 0 0 0 21-67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 47. Muskegon Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 105,000 105,000 828,000 112,000 257,000 869,000 8,581,441< 814,046 124,105 252,329 872,681 8,577,0910 10,000 10,573 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 200,000 2,614,700 0 269,336 2,604,036 0 0 13,824,300 13,824,300 48. New Buffalo Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 49. Oconto Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 359,000 180,000 357,202 182,350 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 14,757 537,000 4,544,894 19,209 534,022 4,541,890 181,500 181,500 0 0 23,000 308,000 563,000 22,180 282,570 583,877 130,754 130,7540 58,000 2,155,180" 60,941 2,152,713" 50. Ontonagon Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 953,903" 953, 9034s 697,000 2,119,000 1,756,000 2,510,000 17,265,884" 633,707 2,100,709 1,846,577 2,246,034 16,992,119" 21-68 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 50. Ontonagon Harbor, MI (Continued) 51. Pensaukee Harbor, WI 52. Pentwater Harbor, MI Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33,267 147,227 253,880 33,267 134,528 261,399 246 667 0 0 21,000 21,000 34,035 34,035 657,006 652,247 179,899 179,899 146,000 155,000 111,000 299,000 .4,622,268 149,337 157,522 108,522 293,860 4,614,059 53. Point Lookout Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Contribution Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 0 16,612 16,648 0 0 2,642,584 2,642,584 26,962 488,016 26,962 459,310 0 0 0 0 13,000 3,839,744 37,546 3,835,584 0 9,257 0 9,257 121,600 121,600 54. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost 0 0 21-69 909,963 909,963 487,108 487,108 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 54. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 Contributed Funds Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Contribution Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 .0 163,000 161,521 0 0 5,000 (1,058) 8,241 16,399 336,000 336,000 6,949 2,154,680 6,959 2,154,680 0 0 0 0 11,000 12,696 28,000 22,216 0 5,643 115,000 115,000 9,158 9,158 0 1,074,251 838 1,074,251 55. Port Washington Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 56. Port Wing Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 23,460 211,945 27,191 207,152 15,844 20,166 2,582,204# 2,582,204 1,624,000 1,624,000 73,789 2,946,103w 61,888 2,933,660w 10,621 10,621 0 0 61,500 61,677 5,298 122,057 6,428 120,191 0 63,393 0 63,393 13,000 1,130,977 14,884 1,126,223 21-70 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92. FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 57. Poitage Lake Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 256,129 256,129 25,047 25,047 38,127 38,127 107,171 140,749 2,248,985 89,467 157,302 2,247,834 58. Presque Isle Harbor, MI Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0. 0" 77,000 126,000 76,968 120,845 0 0 0 0 1,190,492 1,190,492 0 0 612,000 599,877 61,700 61,700 14,000 1,732,997 24,013 1,725,585 16,500 16,500 76,500 76,500 59. Rouge River, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 675,251' 675,251w' 870,000 214,000 664,000 191,000 21,252,941x0 868,088 175,858 675,007 196,116 21,224,9725 0 0 0 0 14,907,318 14,907,318 60. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost 0 0 0 0 21-71 14 ,9 17 ,1 27" 14 ,9 17 ,1 27" 13,600 13,600 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to InText Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 60. Saginaw River, MI (Continued) 61. St. Clair River, MI Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 3,007,000 1,142,000 3,300,000 1,474,000 49,910,363 2,999,291 1,097,782 3,291,316 1,529,323 49,894,486 180,000 283,000 281,000 227,000 2 0,7 56 ,89 0n 181,910 292,307 282,813 236,413 2 0,75 6 ,0 62 n 0 0 19,213,246 19,213,246 718,000 1,438,000 1,103,000 866,000 23,953,109 720,792 1,424,512 1,092,663 866,269 23,911,499 62. St. Joseph Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 976,485n 976,485" 828,000 828,000 953,500 865,000 435,000 720,000 16,421,738 943,981 839,689 447,859 753,469 16,417,774 0 0 613,000 583,781 0 0 0 0 638,076 638,076 55,000 241,000 268,000 5,611,450 84,028 233,928 264,576 5,597,210 0 0 962,216 962,216 63. St. Marys River, MI New Work Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 160,657,071" 160,657,071" 21-72 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 63. St. Marys River, MI (Continued) Contributed Funds Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Contribution Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 12,062,000 13,402,000 13,398,000 17,837,000 279,281,421 12,024,075 13,358,322 13,803,035 17,809,409 278,833,593 0 0 0 0 340,000 0 0 0 340,000 0 13,100 13,100 64. Saugatuck Harbor & Kalamazoo River, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 28,412 156,950 118,000 32,729 156,641 111,879 0 0 364,527' 364,S27s" 67,000 3,733,178" 69,782 3,729,389" 65. Saxon Harbor, WI Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 66. Sebewaing River, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 55,754 55,754 17,151 12,472 3,228 7,824 0 35,573# 0 35,573 6,955 3,510,046 7,039 3,510,046 21-73 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,306 5,069 1,717 1,717 507,507" 507,507n 204,270 204,270 825,700 821,000 14,539 14,539 83,296 78,596 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 67. Sheboygan Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 0 668,900 222,000 709,000 289,000 7,499,878" 663,412 228,238 676,445 314,633 7,488,815 e 0 0 0 0 907,792 907,792 609,028 609,028 68. Silver Bay Harbor, MN New Work Appropriation Cost 69. South Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 452,42661 0 452,42661 0 0 532,000 532,000 12,107 154,556 152,759 1,199,000 5,393,2266 12,107 142,608 132,774 1,226,670 5,388,963* 0 0 0 1,409 0 404 0 0 0 0 0 0 42,381 42,381 185,000 1,343,933 178,969 1,337,902 1,632,076 1,632,076 21-74 2,600,000 43,780 2,600,000 43,780 1,136,088J 1,136,088" DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 70. Sturgeon Bay, WI, and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 0 1,059,722� 1,059,722" 149,000 436,000 198,000 272,000 9,067,451" 151,308 394,906 204,130 276,233 9,031,551" 0 0 0 0 311,119 311,119 884,899 884,899 0 0 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 72. Two Harbors, MN 73. Two Rivers Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 0 1,361,000 1,371,000 100,000 1,357,434 1,373,352 101,884 4,170,710" 4,170,710 e 11,479 5,166,361 14,901 5,166,361 0 0 16,888 164,000 16,888 161,622 45,457 41,162 0 0 0 0 360,320" 360,320" 27,000 6,113,7576 32,202 6,112,286' 1,187,472 1,187,472 21-75 71. 0 0 0 0 1,556 1,556 2,487 2,487 1,121,068 1,121,068 989,677 989,677 63,496 62,596 8,264 8,264 18,085 17,185 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to InText Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 73. Two Rivers Harbor, WI (Continued) 74. White Lake Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,130 5,130 159,000 157,962 0 0 58,057 58,057 207,862 207,862 249,700 249,700 0 0 0 0 17,567 17,567 1,000 4,827 13,372 13,372 0 0 139,863 2,744,521 98,016 2,702,674 0 200 926,615 926,615 83. Clinton River Spillway, MI New Work Appropriation Cost 84. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN New Work Appropriation Cost 695,000 666,000 640,000 764,916 483,054 822,108 0 3,316,000 1,313 3,315,997 85. Saginaw River-1958 Act Flint, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Contribution Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 24,755,359 24,755,359 173,000 173,000 1,000,000 420,000 474,000 1,894,000 505,883 821,207 524,881 1,851,971 21-76 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 229,978 2,000,000 229,978 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 86. Sebewaing River, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 90. Surveillance of North Boundary Waters New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 1,848,000 1,988,000 2,280,000 2,505,000 54,433,834a 1,853,588 2,025,027 2,139,231 2,596,064 54,306,804 a 21-77 0 .0 15,000 13,872 (2,000) (266) 6,000 4,079 365,642 365,642 437,455 437,357 5,000 6,894 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 'Includes $92,774 for previous projects. lncludes $18,889 for previous projects. 'Sncludes $114,786 for previous projects. 'Excludes $56,500 contributed funds. sIncludes $85,849 for previous projects. 'Includes $12,008 for maintenance of previous projects. 7includes $25,500 for previous projects. 'Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. 'Includes $1,547,195 for new work for previous projects. 'Olncludes $3,239,910 for previous projects. "Includes $89,309 for previous projects. 'Includes $311,329 for previous projects. "'Includes $13,437 for previous projects. 'Includes $396,974 for previous projects. 'Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 16Excludes $100,000 contributed funds. 'Includes $8,918 for previous projects. "Includes $176,620 for previous projects. qIncludes $127,598 for previous projects. I2ncludes $453,839 for previous projects. 1'Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Includes $21,818 for previous projects. nlncludes $149,312 for previous projects. Includes $88,364 for previous projects. 'Includes $402,242 for previous projects. "Includes $656,000 for previous projects. "Includes $235,346 for previous projects. "Includes $491,416 for previous projects. "Excludes $136,286 contributed funds. "'Includes $354,999 for previous projects. "Includes $150,910 for previous projects. nIncludes $3,955 for previous projects. "Includes $400,126 for previous projects. "Includes $54,288 for previous projects. "Includes $312,423 for previous projects. 6lncludes $36,194 for previous projects. 'Includes $312,423 for previous projects. Includes $36,194 for previous projects. "Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. 40Includes $459,305 for previous projects. "Includes $613,408 for previous projects. Includes $446,183 for previous projects. "Includes $84,569 for previous projects. *Includes $8,161 for previous projects. "Includes $284,802 for previous projects. "Includes $113,326 for previous projects. "Includes $188,495 for previous projects. 'includes $15,123 for previous projects. "Includes $50,084 for previous projects. "Includes $56,608 for previous projects. 5"Includes $962,556 for previous projects. 2includes $1,671,660 public works funds and $49,419 emergency relief funds. "Includes $503,113 for previous projects. "Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. "Includes $90,232 for previous projects. "Includes $117,554 for previous projects. nExcludes $50,193 contributed funds. "Includes $15,000 for previous projects. "Includes $487,817 for previous projects. "ncludes $87,131 for previous projects. lIncludes $187,233 for previous projects. Includes $131,239 for previous projects. "Includes $323,419 for previous projects. "Includes $219,730 for previous projects. "Includes $48,404 National Recovery Act for new work funds. "Includes $212,857 for previous projects. eIncludes $33,113 for previous projects. aIncludes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 21-78 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1871 Nov. 17, 1988 Sep. 19,1890 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1990 Aug. 8, 1917 JuL 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 May 20, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 ALGOMA HARBOR, WI (See Section 1 of Text) Outer basin enclosed by a north pier 1,102 feet long and a south breakwater 1,530 feet long, a 2,100 foot entrance channel and outer basin. Deauthorization of the outer harbor basin feature of the navigation project. ALPENA HARBOR, MI (See Section 2 of Text) Channel depth of 16 1/2 feet. Rubblemound breakwater for protecting channel on south side and widening entrance channel. 21 and 18 1/2 foot channel depths and turning basin. Present project dimensions. New turning basin. Removal of old breakwater and construction of new breakwater. Deauthorization of the feature authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 3 of Text) Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 4 of Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvements on enlarged project' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extent of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West, extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end. Deepening portions of east basin and west channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. AU SABLE HARBOR AT AU SABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI (See Section 5 of Text) Dredging channels 12 and 10 feet deep and riprapping North Pier. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 7 of Text) Provides for converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and a rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. River and Harbor Act H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong. 2d Sess., Sec. 52(c) of the WRDA of 1988. Annual Report, 1889, p. 2288. H. Doc. 830, 65th Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 1, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 42, 72d Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doec. 151, 88th Cong., 1st. Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-79 TABLE 21-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 23, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 6, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2. 1882 Jun 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 Nov. 17, 1988 Mar. 29, 1977 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 19, 1963 BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI (See Section 8 of Text) Channel from Green Bay to 1,800 feet above the river mouth BLACK RIVER (PORT IIURON), MI (See Section 9 of Text) Channel from mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. Consolidation of projects for Black River at Port Huron and Mouth of Black River. Settling Basin. Deepening channel and settling basin to 20 feet, and widening to 100 feet 2 bends; 1 at the foot of 12th St., the other below the Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Extension of existing channel. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (UPPER PENINSULA) (See Section 10 of Text) Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. BOLLES HARBOR, MI (See Section 11 of Text) Entrance channel in Lake Erie, Access channel in LaPlaisance Creek, Steel sheet pile revetment. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 12 of Text) Channel 10 to 8 feet deep protected by Breakwater. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 13 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed by piers and revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project depth increased to 15 feet. Project depth increased to 18 feet. Restore recreational uses or provide comparable recreational uses at the South Pier. Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment upstream of Highway Bridge. CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 14 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin. H. Doc. 498, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1889, p. 2291. No Printed Report. H. Doc. 436, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 162, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Doc. 64, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report 1876, p. 523. No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doe. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess., Sec. 25 of the WRDA of 1988. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. S. Doe. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1880, p. 2062, and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 219. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. 21-80 TABLE 21-B (Continued) TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 JuL 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 3 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 * May 17, 1950 Mar. 21, 1956 * Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 " CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI (See Section 15 of Text) Entrance channel 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep between existing piers from bay to a turning basin 200 feet long, 8 feet deep, with maximum width of 180 feet, with 150- and 300-foot inner channels each 50 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Reconstruction and Federal maintenance of east and west entrance piers, a 25-foot extension of west pier and a 300-foot extension of existing westerly inner channel at a depth of 8 feet and a width of 50 feet. DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 16 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and removal of Grosse Ile Shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide through Middle Ground opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel below Livingstone Channel to 27 feet to provide depths adequate for 24-foot draft navigation when governing Lakes are at Datum, with necessary widening at approaches and bends and construction of necessary compensating works, Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 feet. Dredge through East Draw of lower Grosse lie Bridge and extend 300-foot width of Channel North of lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 feet throughout downbound and Two-Way Channels, except in upper (27.7-foot depth) and lower (29-foot depth), Livingstone Channel, and in upbound Channel; 27-foot depth in Ballards Reef Channel below junction with Livingstone Channel, 27.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Hackett Beach, with necessary compensation works. Also 28.5-foot depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal, inclusive. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 25 feet, where necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse lie Bridge, about 5.5 miles, deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet below Upper Grosse lie Bridge to and including a Turning Basin 28 feet deep and 15 feet across in area outside project limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet from Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 feet from downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a depth of 28 feet, width of 830 feet, and length of 1,500 feet: Build compensating works to maintain water levels. S. Committee, 75th Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 434, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. l H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st. Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess.; and 322, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 253, 70th Cong., 1st. Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 338, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 1908 s Jul. 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 JuL 30, 1930 Aug. 30, 1930 3 Jul. 16, 1952 4" Jul. 14, 1960 .s Oct. 4, 1961 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 ,.2 Jun. 26, 1934 9 Jul. 3, 1958 to Oct. 31, 1992 Jun. 23, 1866 " Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI (See Section 17 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge.. Dredging additional area of basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. Deepen portions of the North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and Minnesota Channel to 27 feet; widen the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet, and construct an upland CDF. FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 18 of Text) Improvement of Fox River. Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River. Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108, that Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. Sec. 332 authorized transfer of navigation system to Wisconsin subject to agreement, Federal government to continue water regulation/dam operation. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 19 of Text) A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, removal of portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the area in Lake Betsic. Deepen approach and entrance channels. Extend Inner Basin and Dredge recreational anchorage area. H.Ex. Doe. 59, 53d Cong., 3rd Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sees. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sees. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sees. H. Doe. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sees., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Ses. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Ses. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.; H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 (plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886). H. Ex. Doec. 24, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sees.' S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 102-580 (WRDA of 1992). H. Doc. 482, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Ses. H. Doe. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess., S. Doc 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' 21-82 TABLE 21-B (Continued) TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 23, 1866 Jun. 14, 1880 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1.937 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 14, 1880 May 17, 1950 Mar. 3, 1879 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Jun. 23, 1866 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 20 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project dimensions of Harbor channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel. Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. Channel to Spring Lake. Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin. Deepen the harbor entrance channel and harbor river channel to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; provide a new and larger turning basin, trapezoidal in shape, 1,200 feet long at the channel, 300 feet long at the shore, 800 feet at a right angle to the channel, and 18 feet deep. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI (See Section 21 of Text) Existing project, except for pile dike. For pile dike. 800-foot extension of West Pier. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN (See Section 22 of Text) Breakwaters and dredging of anchorage area of 26 acres to 16 feet. Seawalls across ledge in southeast corner of harbor, enlarging anchorage basin and deepening of entrance. Small-boat basin with breakwater. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI (See Section 23 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Island.'2 Inner channel. 13 Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western R.R. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. Deepen the Fox River channel at Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Seas. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Seass. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 227, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. Specified in Act. Annual Report 1881, p. 2050. Annual Report, 1895, p. 351. H. Doc. 751, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 75, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1875, p.18 4 . Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 187, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986, Sec. 601c). 21-83 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 1948 Jun. 26, 1964 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1871 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 16, 1984 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 2 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 2 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 22 GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 24 of Text) Basin 600-foot wide, 850-foot long with a depth of 14 feet in outer 350 feet of the area and a 10-foot depth in remainder. Breakwater 1,300 feet long. Attached Rubblemound Breakwater and Breakwater extension. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 25 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, breakwaters, 10-foot depth in harbor basin, 12-foot depth in entrance channel. HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 26 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 27 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, Breakwaters; 12-foot depth entrance channel 10-foot depth in harbor basin. Extend north end of south breakwater 100 feet; extend southeast end of north breakwater 145 feet; install two navigation light structures. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 28 of Text) Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan.'2 Piers and Revetments."' Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels at Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Revetted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 29 of Text) Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with suitable jetties. Lock and Dam. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 30 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater.'2 Extending Breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 546, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1873, p. 282; H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess.; P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Ex. Doc. 41, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2176; H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82d Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772; H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3rd Sess.; Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-84 TABLE 21-B (Continued) TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1881 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 2.14 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 0' Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1933 ' Mar. 21, 1956 KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 31 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 32 of Text) Acquision of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved May 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. Deauthorization of the uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 Rivers and Harbors Act. LA POINTE HARBOR, WI (See Section 33 of Text) Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 34 of Text) Two parallel piers at the entrance, 584 and 682 feet; an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, 820 feet long with a flared approach and inner canal 50 feet wide, 10 feet deep, and 730 feet long. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS (See Section 35 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and dredging Channel at Grosse Pointe. Second Canal for downbound vessels. 21-foot depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for about 5.25 miles. 25-foot depth through Canals and Channel through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and widening Channel to 700 feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 feet and abandonment of Channel above mouth of Southeast bend cutoff Channel. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Ex. Doc. 105, 49th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act; P.L. 645, 86th Cong., as amended. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1961, p. 1039. Annual Report, 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' 21-85 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1867 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 25, 1912 JuL 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 '" Aug. 26, 1937 LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 36 of Text) Entrance Channel protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Approach Channel and removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 37 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 38 of Text) 12-foot deep Channel from Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 39 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension, Reconstruction and repairs to existing structures and present project dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of outer ends of the two inner piers. Deepen Channels and widen opening between breakwaters. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 40 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 feet to connect with Manistee Lake, and further Pier extension. Depth of 20 feet in Outer Harbor 570 feet wide to Outer end of South Pier 18 feet deep in river, South Breakwater with shore connection, and extend North Pier if required. 23-foot depths in entrance channel and 21-foot depths in River Channel. Remove old South Revetment, Construct new South Pier and Revetment, and widen river entrance Channel. Present project dimensions of Channel through Outer Basin and River, and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI (See Section 41 of Text) Breakwaters and Outer Harbor. Present location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Section 42 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Seas.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 114." H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1897, p. 2951. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess."6 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.1 Annual Report, 1867, p. 115. Annual Report, 1891, P. 2678. H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1908, p. 648, and Unpublished Report of Mar. 13, 1908; Approved by Secretary of War, Apr. 3, 1908. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committe Doc. 39, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. 21-86 TABLE 21-B (Continued) TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 * Dec. 31, 1968 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R & H) Jun. 26, 1979 Mar. 2, 1867 Aug. 11, 1888 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 ' Jul. 11, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 (Sec. 107) Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 n Mar. 2, 1945 ' Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th Street, and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. Construct 765-foot long stone Breakwater, and rubblemound bulkhead; construct 360-foot long entrance Breakwater; dredge 16,500 cubic yards for entrance channel. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI (See Section 43 of Text) Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and removing a shoal in northerly part of harbor. Deepening harbor to 25 feet. Deepening harbor to 27 feet. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI (See Section 44 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by Act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 45 of Text) North Pier."' Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater.' 2 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo Street, and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western R.R. bridges. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun. 1967 Detailed Project Report Apr. 1982 Supplement.' Sec. 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d Sess., pts. 1 and 2; and Annual Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. Annual Report, 1889, pp. 272 and 2021. H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 113, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report, Dec. 1966.' S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report, 1906, p. 1752 (No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions). H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doec. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Seas. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' 21-87 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Feb. 24, 1835 1" Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 14, 1932 *2 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 a Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 2, 1882 1883 Aug. 30, 1935 MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 46 of Text) 9-foot channel, protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-foot channel, dikes and turning basin.? Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation imposed by Act of Jul. 3, 1930. Deepen portion of existing navigation channel to 27 feet; deepen lake channel to 28 feet; widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, 1,600 feet wide at river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre CDF in Plum Creek Bay to enable creation of a 700 acre marsh behind the CDF. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 47 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 48 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. OCONTO HARBOR, WI (See Section 49 of Text) Piers, except for inner 300 feet of south pier and 250 feet north pier built by city.2 Present project dimensions of channel and turning basin. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 50 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. Enlarging and deepening the existing harbor basin. Deauthorization of the turning basin feature of the project authorized by the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act. PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 51 of Text) Construction of slab pier 2,500 feet long on the north side of the channel and dredging a channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. Extending pier to 10-foot contour (2,700 feet) and dredging to 10 feet below Datum. Dredging entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Annual Report, 1872, p. 237. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Ses. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.; 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Seas. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Ses. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Seas.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Seas.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Ses. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2066. H. Doc. 538, 61st Cong., 2d Ses., Plan C.' H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Ses. H. Doc. 287, 87th Cong., 2d Ses. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Seas. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 153, 42d Cong., 3rd Seas. R & H Act, Aug. 2, 1882 Modified. H. Doc. 478, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-88 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 Sec. 107 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 1935 27 Jul. 3, 1958 a Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 30, 1948 Aug. 5, 1977 Mar. 3, 1879 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 193522"2 Jul. 3, 1958 2 Oct. 23, 1962 2 PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 52 of Text) Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Present project depth of channel. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, (AU GRES RIVER), MI (See Section 53 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 54 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 feet deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI (See Section 55 of Text) North pier and south basin.'2 North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. PORT WING HARBOR, WI (See Section 56 of Text) Construction of parallel piers and dredging. Dredging inner channels and abandonment of certain revetments and channels. Deauthorization of 50 feet of entrance channel widening. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 57 of Text) Entrance channel 18 feet deep protected by piers and revetments. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 58 of Text) Breakwater, 1,000 feet long. Shore extension, 216 feet long. For dredging and rubblemound extension to breakwater 1,600 feet long; Changed designation of project. Deepening harbor from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. ROUGE RIVER, MI (See Section 59 of Text) 21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal. 25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent to latter, 21-foot channel extending from junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet at 2 bends. 25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Avenue (via Shortcut Canal). H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Seass. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379. H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 114, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 668, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 1634 30 H. Doc. 318, 54th Cong., 1st. Sess.; Annual Report, 1903, pp. 474, 1823 H. Doc. 473, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong., 2d Sess." H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-89 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 " Mar. 21, 1956 * Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 60 of Text) Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 feet in Bay and 16.5 feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 feet extended up River to Saginaw. Turning Basin. Present project channel dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 feet wide and 24 feet deep from 24-foot contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 feet in River Channel up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 feet in River Channel up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and elimination of present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-foot project above Sixth Street Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 new Turning Basins.' Deepen River Channel to 25 feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 61 of Text) 20-foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 feet. Widen and deepen Southeast Bend and improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and further improve Channels in St. Clair River between limits of 27.1 to 30 feet to provide safe navigation by vessels with drafts of 25.5 feet. A cutoff Channel in Canada at Southeast Bend and abandon old Southeast Bend Channels. Deauthorization of the work authorized by the Rivers and harbors Act of Jul. 24, 1946. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI (See Section 62 of Text) Interior Revetments."2 Benton Harbor Canal." Present project dimensions of piers and a turning basin. Present project dimensions of the channel and turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Abandon easterly 1,000 feet of canal above west line of 9th Street. Turning basin above mouth of Morrison Channel and eliminate turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1875, pt. 1, p. 162. Annual Report, 1880, pp. 2030, 2031, 2049, and 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sees. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-90 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 JuL 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 1934 9 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Nov. 17, 1986 ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 63 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by MacArthur Lock), widen and deepen existing State Channel.? Poe Lock.' Dredging through shoals above falls and shoals below falls between lower end of Canal and upper entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels work in that section of River below Locks. Davis Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls, Lease entered into with Michigan Northern Power Company provided for construction of remedial and compensating works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen upper approach to Canals through Vidal Shoals, extend anchorage and maneuver area below locks. Remove Round Island, middle ground extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels throughout downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct new (MacArthur) Lock on site of former Weitzel Lock, deepen approach Channels to 27 feet, and reconstruct approach Piers. Name 'MacArthur' Lock and changed name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and construct new Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a new structure 800 feet long, 100 feet wide and 32 feet deep with necessary construction of Nose and Center Piers, and widen and deepen Channel across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to provide wider anchorage and maneuver areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 feet over full width to downbound and 2-way Channels (including anchorage areas) and over Westerly 300-foot width of upbound Middle Neebish Channel, when levels of Lakes Superior and Huron are at their respective LWD's. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a part of Project, authorize alteration with cost to be apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, Jun. 21, 1940. Construct a second large lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Report by Maj. O.M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, not published. H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1891, p. 2810. H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H.Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3). H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess., and 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' None. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). 21-91 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 28, 1993 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 31, 1992 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI (See Section 64 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening entrance to 16 feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. SAXON HARBOR, WI (See Section 65 of Text) Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by 3 short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 66 of Text) Entrance Channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 67 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Avenue. SILVER BAY HARBOR, MN (See Section 68 Text) Provides for a Harbor of Refuge for small craft. Provided Federal funds for the project. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 69 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge.' 2 Present dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present project dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin. Turning Basin deauthorized. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI (See Section 70 of Text) Breakwaters.'2 Acquision of the canal. Canal revetments and consolidation of canal and harbor works. Present project dimensions of channels and elimination of turning basin immediately west of revetted canal. Turning basin between city and Bushman wharves. H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess.; Annual Report, 1896, Vol. 2, Pt. 5, p. 2739. Annual Report, 1907, p. 6416. H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbors Act, H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.,' Annual Report for 1965, p. 1025. H. Doc. 71, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 1994 Appropriations Act for Energy and Water Development. No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. t and Unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 21, 1934. Public Law 102-580 (Section 116 of WRDA of 1992). H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 117, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 421, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-92 TABLE 21-B (Continued) TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 * Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Jul. 24, 1946 Nov. 5, 1990 Oct. 30, 1990 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 17, 1991 Oct. 8, 1992 TAWAS BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 71 of Text) 1,750-foot breakwater, 12-foot deep entrance channel, 10-foot deep north revetment. TWO HARBORS, MN (See Section 72 of Text) Breakwater and dredging. Construction of two breakwater piers. Shore connection to east breakwater and dredging maneuvering area. Construct new east breakwater and enlargement of maneuvering basin. Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 73 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment. 2 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22nd Street Bridge. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 74 of Text) New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Present project depth of Channel. CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI (See Section 83 of Text) Construction of a cutoff canal with control weirs. Completed project review due to significantly changed physical conditions. FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN (See Section 84 of Text) Provides 100-year level of flood protection to part of central area of city of Fort Wayne, IN. SAGINAW RIVER, MI, FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 85 of Text) Flood control improvements to Saginaw River and its tributaries including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. One-time O&M repairs at Flint Unit to restore project to original dimensions. Provides funding for continuing O&M repairs at Flint Unit. H. Doc. 189, 90th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Ex. Doc. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1887, p. 1952. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 805, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 146, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 (as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897). H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. No Prior Survey or Estimate.3' H. Doc. 694, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 216 Reconnaissance Report, September 1991. Public Law 101-640 (Section 101 of WRDA of 1990) H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1992, (P.L. 102-104). Energy and Water Resources Appropriation Act of 1993, H.R. 5373, (P.L. 102-377). 21-93 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 86 of Text) Aug. 18, 1941 Enlarging present Channel of Sebewaing River, altering Railroad and H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' Highway Bridges, removal of Dike. 'Contains latest published map. 2lncluding Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 'Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. SAdministrative Act, Section 4. 6Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 7Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 'This portion inactive. 'Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. '"Transfer completed June 1962. "Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. Completed under previous project. "Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. 4"Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. ULatest published map is in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2974. 'Latest published map in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2914. Superseded by Act of October 23, 1962. "Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street Bridge to North Humboldt Avenue Bridge). 9"Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 5"Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. "War Department Appropriations Act. Uncompleted portion deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. "Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. "Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth of old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. "This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. "Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 7 Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Seas. "Deauthorized in 1977. "This modification deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. "Latest published map is in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Seass. "Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Seass. 21-94 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bayfield Harbor, WI Completed 1979 183,855 123,310 Belle River, MI Completed 1980 24,301 116,546 Beaver Bay, MN Active 1982 293,000 2,818 Black River (Alcona Co), MI Inactive 1907 0 878 Cedar River Harbor, MI Active 1982 215,000 0 Channels in Straits of Mackinac, MI Completed 1991 2,832,629 237,339 Cheboygan Harbor, MI Completed 1988 504,236 931,181 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI Completed 1959 125,629 13,528 Cross Village, MI Active 1983 364,000 0 DeTour Harbor, MI Completed 1989 2,559,346 148,998 Eagle Harbor, MI Completed 1990 205,1641 96,379 Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1992 266,037 1,896,544 Grays Reef Passage, MI Completed 1970 190,521 824,410 Knife River Harbor, MN Active 1986 412,945 295,129 Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI Completed 1980 399,478 336,352 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Completed 1966 332,832 105,634 Lutsen Harbor, MN Active 1982 357,000 0 Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Completed 1989 334,089 1,815,944 Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Completed 1986 136,2862 89,868 Northport Harbor, WI Inactive - 0 0 Petoskey Harbor, MI Completed 1986 123,839 567,711 Pine River, MI Completed 1980 13,649 79,342 Port Austin Harbor, MI Completed 1992 3,363,334 1,945,742 St. James, Beaver Island, MI Completed 1957 49,171' 110,359 St. Joseph River, MI Completed 1975 54,555 19,185 Washington Island, WI Completed 1950 62,838 77,792 Whitefish Point Harbor, MI Completed 1991 771,639 411,008 'Excludes $27,800 for previous projects. 2Excludes $136,286 Contributed Funds. 'Excludes $7,500 Contributed Funds. 21-95 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI'' Deferred 1975 4,471,235 Kawkawlin River, MI Completed 1991 469,663' - Paw Paw Lake, MI Completed 1989 3,589,000 - Upper River Rouge, MI* Inactive 1968 7,935 - River Rouge, MI Completed 1981 31.960,332 - 'Includes $108,335 Contributed Funds. 'Includes $113,963 Contributed Funds. 'Uncompleted portion deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with 'Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (PL 99-662). local cooperation. TABLE 21-F MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (SEE SECTION 63 OF TEXT) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quoins Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6,200,000' $3,275,000' $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,000' $1,750,000' $12,718,806'' $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sep. 18, 1919 Jul. 11, 1943 Jun. 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost ' $300,000 Type St el S Rescoepskselgds Steel S.opl gsRecessed Into Ld Masonry Into LdclMasonry Cost Completed -' $169,224' Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 600.6 above and 578.4 below. =Includes cost of North Canal. 'Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 'Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 'Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 'Excludes cost of canal excavation to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 'Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. Including engineering office, and inspection. 'Not separate from cost of locks. 21-96 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Berrien County, MI 1963 Nov 1986 0 0 (St. Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, Alcona County, MI (Authorized Dec. 17, 1979, under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, MI (Aug. 30, 1936 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI (May 17, 1950 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 13, 1968 R&H Act) Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, MN and WI (Jul. 14, 1960 R&H Act) Forestville Harbor, MI (1968 R&H Act) Grand Haven Harbor, MI (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI (Oct. 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI' (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Acts of 1946 and 1956) Harbors of Washington Island, WI (R&H Act of 1937) Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI (Uncompleted portion) (Sep. 3, 1954 R&H Act) Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI (Uncompleted portion) (1954 Flood Control Act) Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Kenosha Harbor, WI (Uncompleted portion) (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Kewaunee River, WI (1960 R&H Act) Lansing (Grand River), MI (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) 1971 1976 1976 1976 1990 1969 1976 1966 1990 1950 1962 1975 1975 1990 1976 1971 0 0 0 0 Dec 1989 Nov 1977 Aug 1977 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Nov 1986 Nov 1977 Nov 1977 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Aug 1977 Jun 1981 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108,332 0 43,000 0 0 21-97 159,300,000 14,562,100 0 0 0 93,993,349 62,838 0 6,656,668 416,822 552,000 0 7,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Lower Fox River, WI 1990 Dec 1989 3,753,334 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act) Manitowoc Harbor, WI 990 Dec 1989 0 0 (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 6,937,804 478,000 (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Act of 1935) Northport Harbor, WI - Dec 1989 132,000 0 (Authorized in 1972 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Ontonagon Harbor, MI 1990 Dec 1989 27,482 0 (R&H Act of 1962) Pentwater Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Jul. 13, 1892 R&H Act) Racine Harbor, WI 1963 May 1986 9,441,554 0 (Mar. 2, 1907; Aug. 26, 1937; and Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Acts, and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI 1983 Nov 1986 3,823,000 0 (1970 Flood Control Act) Rogers City Harbor, MI 1926 Aug 1977 5,892 0 (Jun. 25, 1910 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 22,000 0 (Oct 23, 1962 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 12,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (Jul. 3, 1930 R&H Act) South Milwaukee Harbor, WI 1906 Aug 1977 0 0 (1836 Flood Control Act) St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard 1977 Oct 1978 0 0 Gates), MI (Mar. 7, 1942 R&H Act) Two Rivers Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 147,463 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) 21-98 'Includes Detroit and St. Clair Rivers. DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-H FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Length Miles Upbound Project of from or Down- Project Project Datum Planes Year Channel River bound Width Depth IGLD 1985 Corn- Name of Channel (Feet) Mouth Vessels (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) plete DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 16 OF TEXT) Channel north of Belle Isle' Channel at head of Detroit River Misc. shoals and obstructions Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel north of junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368 +87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc. shoals and obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstberg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Channel (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal -- 30 38,800 32 44,500 25 Both 200 Both 800 Both - 24,800 17 Both 800 12,200 12 Both 600 26,000 10 Down 450 10,887 12,313 42,000 S -== -.== Down Both Both Both 450-800 800-1,200 1,200 -=. -- Both - 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 10 17 14 Up Up Up Down Local Local Local Local 600 600 600 800 300 300 250-300 =-. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 61 OF TEXT) Channel at foot of Lake Huron Channel north of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island: Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stag Island St. Clair to Russell Island Russell Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend: CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel Outlet 26,500 44 4,100 39 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8,000 38 31 24 11 5 -. 'This is a side channel. 2Extends from deep water near Windmill Point to a point opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 feet. 3Project depth 29.5 feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 feet over other than Rock Shoals. Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 27.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 5Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 28.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 'Project complete except for work authorized by Rivers and Harbors Act of 1950. 21-99 21.0 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 27.7 29.0 29.0 28.5 28.5-29.53 571.9 572.1-571.5 571.5-570.9 570.4 570.4 570.4-569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 570.4-570.1 570.1-569.5 569.5-569.2 569.2 570.3-570.2 570.2-569.4 570.4 29.5 1964 1964 1964 1962 1964 1964 1961 1961 1964 1964 1960 1960 1960 1929 19646 1964 1941 1904 27.5 21-27.5' 21-28.5' 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 Both 800 Both 800 Both Both Both Both Both Both Small Craft 30.0 30.0 27.4 27.3 27.3 27.2 27.1 27.1 10.0 1,000-1,400 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 577.5-577.1 577.1-576.5 577.1-575.3 575.3-574.3 574.3-572.6 572.6-572.3 572.3-572.2 572.2 572.2 1961 1962 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 21-I FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS (SEE SECTION 18 OF TEXT) Depth at Normal Pool Miles Avail- Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Ye Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall' Sill Character of Kind of Type of Co Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction pie DePere lock2 7.1 DePere - 36.0 146.0 8.9 10.3 12.0 Rock - Concrete 193 DePere dam' 7.2 DePere - - - - - - Rock Fixed'4 Concrete 192 Little Kaukauna lock' 13.0 DePere 6 36.0 146.0 7.2 8.0 9.5 Clay - Concrete 193 Little Kaukauna dam' 13.1 DePere 6 - - - - - Clay and gravel Fixed' Piers and concrete 192 Rapide Croche lock 19.2 Wrightstown 2 36.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 9.3 Rock - Concrete 193 Rapide Croche dam' 19.3 Wrightstown 2 - - - - - Rock Fixed' 4 Concrete 193 Kaukauna fifth lock' 22.8 Kaukauna - 35.6 144.0 9.1 6.7 9.3 Rock - Composite 189 Kaukauna fourth lock' 23.1 Kaukauna - 36.6 144.1 10.2 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 187 Kaukauna third lock' 23.3 Kaukauna - 30.6 144.0 10.2 6.9 6.3 Rock - Stone masonry 187 Kaukauna second lock' 23.4 Kaukauna - 35.0 144.0 9.6 6.0 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 190 Kaukauna first lock' 23.6 Kaukauna - 35.1 144.4 11.0 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 188 Kaukauna dam' 24.0 Kaukauna - - - - - -- Rock Fixed' Concrete 193 Kaukauna guard lock 24.0 Kaukauna - 40.0 - - 9.4 - Rock - Stone masonry 189 Little Chute combined lock: Lower 24.4 Little Chute 1 35.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 8.6 Rock - Stone masonry 187 Upper 25.4 Little Chute 1 36.3 144.1 10.6 7.6 6.0 Hardpan - Stone masonry 187 Little Chute second lock' 26.4 Little Chute -- 35.0 144.2 13.8 8.0 6.1 Rock - Stone masonry 188 Luttle Chute first (guard) lock' 26.5 Little Chute - 35.4 - - 6.6 - Rock - Stone masonry 190 Little Chute dam' 26.6 Little Chute - - - - - - Rock Fixed'4 Concrete 193 Cedars lock' 27.3 Little Chute 1 35.0 144.0 9.8 6.8 7.3 Rock - Stone masonry 188 Cedars dam' 27.4 Little Chute 1 -- - - - - Rock Fixeds Concrete 193 Appleton fourth lock' 30.7 Appelton 1 35.0 144.0 7.6 8.1 7.9 Rock - Stone masonry 190 Appleton lower dan 30.9 Appleton 1 - - - - - Rock Fixed Concrete 193 Appleton third lock' 31.3 Appleton - 35.0 144.0 8.7 6.0 8.6 Rock - Stone masonry 190 Appleton second lock' 31.6 Appleton - 35.1 144.6 9.6 6.9 6.0 Clay - Stone masonry 190 Appelton first lock' 31.9 Appleton - 35.0 144.7 10.0 6.6 6.0 Rock - Stone maonry 188 Appleton upper dam 32.2 Appleton - - - - - - Rock Fixed Concrete 194 Menasha lock' 37.0 Menasha --- 35.4 144.0 8.5 7.2 8.0 Clay - Composite 189 Menasha dam, 37.8 Menasha - - - - - - Hardpan Fixed' Concrete 193 ,ar m- Actual te Cost 6 $229,308 9 209,536 8 362,427 !6 179,398 4 228,738 0 118,975 8 13,310' 9 37,536 9 39,948 3 24,313 3 38,704 1 123,763 1 12,630 r9 102,304 9 -- 1 48,555 14 7,817' 2 82,554 8 34,972 3 84,973 7 40,893 4 73,903 0 32,238 11 22,940 4 36,004 0 151,558 9 19,326' 84,686 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. 'Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 'Provided with sluices. 'Flash boards used. 'Partially rebuilt. 21-100 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-J RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Conducted BELLE RIVER, MI CHANNELS IN STRAITS OF MACKINAC, MI DETOUR HARBOR, MI GRAYS REEF PASSAGE, MI KNIFE RIVER, MN LES CHENEAUX HARBOR, MI MACKINAW CITY HARBOR, MI PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI PINE RIVER, MI PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI WASHINGTON ISLAND, WI WHITEFISH POINTE HARBOR MI SEPTEMBER 1994 SEPTEMBER 1994 AUGUST 1994 SEPTEMBER 1994 MAY 1994 MAY 1994 AUGUST 1994 AUGUST 1994 SEPTEMBER 1994 NOVEMBER 1993 SEPTEMBER 1994 AUGUST 1994 21-101 Name of Project -- CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT The district comprises Cook, Mc Henry, Lake, Kane, Du Page, and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana, including a portion of La Porte County along Lake Michigan in Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 4. Chicago Harbor, IL 5. Chicago River, IL 6. Indiana Harbor, IN 7. Lake Michigan Diversion 8. Michigan City Harbor, IN 9. Waukegan Harbor, IL 10. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 11. National Emergency Preparedness Alterations of Bridges 12. Other Authorized Bridge Alterations Beach Erosion Control 13. Casino Beach, IL 14. Chicago Shoreline, IL 15. Illinois Beach State Park, IL 16. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, IN 17. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN 18. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects 19. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization Page 22-2 22-2 22-2 22-3 22-4 22-4 22-5 22-5 22-5 22-6 22-6 22-6 22-6 22-6 22-7 22-7 22-7 22-8 22-8 Flood Control 20. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) 21. Kankakee River Ice Management, IL 22. Lake George, Hobart, IN 23. Little Calumet River, IN 24. Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN 25. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 26. North Branch, Chicago River, IL 27. O'Hare Reservoir, IL 28. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 29. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization General Investigations 30. Surveys 31. Collection and Study of Basic Data Title Cost and Financial Statement Authorizing Legislation Existing Projects Other Authorized Bridge Alterations Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Deauthorized Projects TABLES Table Numbers 22-A 22-B 22-C 22-D 22-E 22-F 22-G Pages 22-13 Thru 16 22-17 Thru 20 22-21 22-22 22-22 22-22 22-23 22-1 Page 22-8 22-8 22-8 22-9 22-9 22-10 22-10 22-11 22-11 22-12 22-12 22-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound north breakwater 4,630 feet long and a rubblemound breakwater west arm 1,200 feet long, for a total breakwater length of 5,830 feet; (b) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (d) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide; and (e) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965 (Public Law 89-298; House Document Number 160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing act also provided the Secretary of the Army with the authority to reimburse the State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of the project as approved by the Chief of Engineers and constructed under supervision of the Chief of Engineers (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Eleven berths are available at the facilities owned and administered by the Indiana Port Commission. One berth, committed to grain, is located on the outer harbor. Four berths on the East Harbor Arm are dedicated to handling dry and liquid bulk commodities. The East Harbor Arm also includes a small-boat harbor designed to accommodate working tugs for vessel assistance and barge movement. On the West Arm there are six berths. Although one berth is available for dry bulk cargoes, these berths are primarily used for the shipment and receipt of general cargo. Additionally, the Indiana Port Commission, through a lease, administers the west side of the West Harbor Arm for barge fleeting. The remaining available harbor berthing on the east side of the East Harbor Arm is privately owned. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Surveys and studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $84,764, by other federal agency at a cost of $40,761, by contract at a cost of $29,783, and by other COE at a cost of $53,500. Major Rehabilitation reports were continued by hired labor at a cost of $44,115, and by other COE at a cost of $126,963, and by contract at a cost of $132,295. Engineering and design costs associated with the north breakwater were $92,952. Engineering and design costs associated with dredging were $9,614. Construction cost was $75,000 and contract administration cost was $13,787. Project administration and real estate costs were $106,687 and $8,835, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 1994 were $21,136,669 of which $13,599,900 was for new work ($13,584,000 federal and $15,900 nonfederal) and $7,536,769 for maintenance. 2. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, at the mouth of the Burns Waterway, approximately 35 miles southeast of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. None Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound west breakwater 1,003 feet long; (b) a rubblemound north breakwater 678 feet long; and (c) channel improvements of 5,200 linear feet with 145,000 cubic yards of dredged material used for beach nourishment (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas located along Burns Waterway and Burns Ditch. The commodities handled at this harbor are fresh fish caught as a result of charter boat fishing. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Beach monitoring analysis and surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $66,690 and by contract at a cost of $12,574. Purchase of stone for breakwater repair was $90,000. Stones were placed by other COE at a cost of $22,000. Project management and real estate costs were $27,540 and $2,899, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1994 were $4,818,891 of which $3,770,558 was for new work ($2,000,000 federal and $1,770,558 non-federal), and $1,048,332 for maintenance. 3. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 miles south of Chicago Harbor, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago, except for breakwaters, 22-2 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT * and approach channel and an anchorage area which are in Illinois and Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stonefilled double-row steel sheet pile detached breakwater 5,007 feet long; (c) a north pier 3,460 feet long; (d) a south pier 2,961 feet long; (e) an approach channel 29 feet deep and 3,200 feet wide; (f) an outer harbor anchorage area 28 feet deep and 3,000 feet wide; (g) an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 feet wide; (h) a channel in the Calumet River 27 feet deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 130th Street; (i) three turning basins designated as numbers, 1, 3, and 5; and (j) a channel extending into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, August 30, 1935, July 14, 1960, October 23, 1962, and October 27, 1965 (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves, and terminals are available. The Illinois International Port District owns four wharves, two grain elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United States Government owns one stone dock. The most important cargoes handled are iron ore and concentrates, coal, and lignite. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Garage repairs were performed by contract at a cost of $11,063. Sediment surveys and studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $41,834, by other COE at a cost of $98,070, and by contract at a cost of $124,451. Water quality studies were continued at a cost of $152,259. Stone purchased for Reach C breakwater was $117,969. Other cost associated with the breakwater were $60,951. Plans and specifications for dredging were performed by hired labor at a cost of $67,930. Dredging was performed by contract at a cost of $86,115. Keno claim was credited for -$5,276. Maintenance cost for the CDF was $10,753. Project management and real estate costs were $234,577 and $4,903, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 100 percent complete pursuant to Section 100 (b), Public Law 99-662, approved January 1990. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1994, were $58,821,575 of which $22,578,567 was for new work ($19,541,964 regular funds and $3,036,603 public works funds), $29,978,340 regular funds for maintenance, $836,667 non-federal funds for maintenance, and $5,428,001 regular funds for rehabilitation. 4. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. Report for 1962. See page 1396 of Annual Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib shore and extension breakwater 2,250 feet long; (b) a stone-filled timber crib exterior breakwater 5,421 feet long; (c) a rubblemound and stone-filled concrete caisson southerly extension to the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive of a 582 foot entrance gap enclosing an outer basin of about 970 acres; (d) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north inner breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 304- foot shore return and a 754-foot gap; (f) a stonefilled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 feet long, enclosing an inner basin of approximately 224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and maneuver area inside the exterior breakwater and southerly extension breakwater 28 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,300 feet; and (i) an entrance channel 21 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of July 11, 1870, June 14, 1880, March 3, 1899, July 25, 1912, March 2, 1919 and October 23, 1962 (See table 22-C). The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The deep-draft lock is 600 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 23 feet deep over the sill and is of steel cellular design. Operation and maintenance responsibilities in the interest of navigation were transferred to the Federal Government pursuant to Public Law 98-63 approved July 30, 1983, Section 107 of the Public 97-88, and Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are three docks, two for passenger excursion boats and one for cargo. The most important cargoes handled are sugar and non-metallic minerals. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: The lock operations contract was continued with International Research and Development, Inc. at a cost of $769,649. Other costs associated with the lock operation were $215,804. Surveys and studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $259,565, by other COE at a cost of $136,728, by 22-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 other federal agency at a cost of $30,000 and by contract at a cost of $2,395. Engineering and design for the Southerly breakwater were performed by hired labor at a cost of $24,108, and by contract at a cost of $170,991. Other costs associated with the breakwater were $45,615. The lock electrical system contract was completed at a cost $55,018. Other costs related to the electrical system were $33,384. Supervision and administration costs were $99,602. Project management and real estate costs were $209,864, and $22,395, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 1994 were $29,079,832 of which $4,788,827 was for new work, $22,974,664 was for maintenance and $1,326,600 for rehabilitation. 5. CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927 and 14928.) Previous Projects. Report for 1962. See page 1394 of Annual Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of the North and South Branches (0.7 miles); (b) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles); (c) a channel 21 feet deep on the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles); (d) a 21-foot deep North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; and (e) a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, March 2, 1907, and July 24, 1946 (See table 22-C). The portion of project authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1946 is presently being restudied to confirm economic feasibility. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, which provided the improvement of the channel, is subject to condition that local interests furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of the improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel and crushed rock. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and other studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $5,569. Water control activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $127,026, by other COE at a cost of $26,000, by other federal agencies at a cost of $100,603, and by contracts at a cost of $4,442. Program management and real estate costs were $34,314 and $976, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act. Head of navigation for deep-draft vessels is North Avenue, 5.97 miles from the Michigan Avenue bridge. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1994 were $15,951,538 of which $1,500,565 was for new work and $14,450,973 was for maintenance. 6. INDIANA HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly rubblemound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an easterly concrete capped caisson breakwater 201 feet long with a rubblemound extension 2,324 feet long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 28 feet deep; (e) a main canal entrance channel 27 feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George Branch 22 feet deep; and (j) the Calumet River Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, March 2, 1919, March 20, 1922, July 3, 1930, August 30, 1935, August 28, 1937, and July 14, 1960 (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Substantially complied with. See FY 1986 Annual Report for full requirements. Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves are available. Six docks handle iron ore and limestone. Six docks are for handling petroleum products and three docks for handling gypsum, scrap metal and steel, and bulk products. However, not all docks are presently being used for the shipment or receipt of waterborne commodities. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Environmental studies and surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $181,527, by contract at a cost of $34,334, and by other COE at a 22-4 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT cost of $65,500 and by other federal agency at a cost of $35,000. Stone purchased for repair of the breakwater was $22,000. Project management and real estate costs were $17,449 and $2,121, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1994 were $16,228,919 of which $4,909,648 ($4,897,148 federal and $12,500 non-federal) was for new work and $11,319,271 was for maintenance. 7. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928. ) Previous Projects. Report for 1988. See page 22-3 of Annual Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Studies and preparation of reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $367,870, by other COE at a cost of $30,000, and by contract at a cost of $44,969. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Under Section 1142, PL 99-662, the Corps of Engineers assumed responsibility for monitoring the Diversion of Lake Michigan water into the Illinois Waterway. The Corps of Engineers assumed full water diversion accounting responsibility in FY 1988. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1994 were $1,726,012 for maintenance. 8. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in La Porte County, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926. ) Previous Projects. Report for 1992. See page 1407 of Annual Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) a stone-filled timber crib, pile and steel sheeting east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stone-filled timber crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a turning basin No. 1, 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) an outer basin 12 feet deep in the northerly portion and 8 feet deep in the southerly portion; and (i) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from turning basin No. 2 to the E Street bridge. The project was authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Acts of March 3, 1899, March 3, 1905, January 21, 1927, August 30, 1935, and Section 107 of July 14, 1960, Rivers and Harbors Acts approved on September 30, 1966 (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were continued by hired labor at a cost of $108,174, by other COE at a cost of $7,382 and by contract at a cost of $38,279. East Pier construction was completed by contract at a cost of $111,332. Supervision and administration cost were $15,243. Other costs associated with the breakwater were $42,778. Engineering and design cost for dredging Trail Creek was $86,258. Contract placement cost was $236,010 and supervision and administration costs were $53,623. Program management and real estate costs were $68,530 and $16,612, respectively. Nonfederal portion for dredging Trail Creek was $55,000. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1994 were $14,097,355 of which $1,574,446 was for new work ($1,543,646 federal and $30,800 non-federal funds), $10,904,239 for maintenance (10,849,239 federal and $55,000 non-federal) and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation. 9. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14904 and 14905.) Previous Projects. Report for 1962. See page 1392 of Annual Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly stone-filled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; (b) a stone-filled reinforced concrete caisson shore connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone-filled doublerow steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; (d) a single-row steel sheeting shore connection 398 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 998 feet long; (f) a single-row steel sheet piling north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 632 feet long; (h) a stone-filled timber crib pier 1,399 feet long; (i) a stone-filled double-row pile and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide; (1) an inner basin 13 feet deep; and (m) an anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner basin 8 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of June 3, 1902, July 13, 1990, and March 2, 1945 (See table 22 -C). 22-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum and building cement. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Environmental studies and monitoring activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $55,072, by contract at a cost of $1,500 and by other COE at a cost of $36,789. Water quality costs were $99,600, and real estate costs were $4,110. Engineering and design costs associated with resurfacing the South Pier were $10,985. Construction cost was $1,248,458. Engineering and design costs associated with dredging the outer harbor were $133,568; construction cost was $150,000. Contract administration costs associated with dredging of outer harbor and resurfacing the South Pier were $13,167 and $42,624, respectively. Program management costs were $96,704. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification which is being restudied. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1994 were $12,691,867 of which $823,026 was for new work and $11,868,841 was for maintenance. 10. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Work on the Illinois and Michigan Canal reconnaissance report was performed at a cost of $25,786. Condition surveys were performed at a cost of $117,408. 11. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Fiscal Year 1994 costs of $139,064 were for: Training and Exercises $ 7,761 Management and Mobilization Planning 131,303 Alteration of Bridges 12. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATIONS See table 22-D. Beach Erosion Control 13. CASINO BEACH, IL Location. Casino Beach is located along the Lake Michigan shoreline at Jackson Park in Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The Casino Beach project was authorized by Section 501 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project consists of rehabilitating 1,800 feet of the Casino jetty by encasing the existing timber pile and stone structure in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap. The estimated cost (1994) for new work is $7,810,000 of which $3,830,000 is federal and $3,980,000 is nonfederal. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Chicago Park District. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; operate and maintain the completed project; and make cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design activities were completed for a cost of $291,476. Condition at the End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is complete. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1994 was $736,932. 14. CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL Location. The project area includes 24 miles of publicly owned shoreline along Lake Michigan in Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The Chicago Shoreline project is not authorized. The Federally supportable plan consists of constructing rubblemound revetments along 16,500 and 21,500 feet of the shoreline in the Lincoln Park and Burnham Park areas, respectively. Other project features include: revetments near the Adler Planetarium and at Meigs Field; a low concrete floodwall with -detachable flashboards along Lake Shore Drive in the Oak Street Beach area; a breakwater to protect the South Filtration Plant near 78th Street; and nourishment of a short reach of shoreline near Fullerton Avenue and 31st Street. The estimated fully funded project cost for this plan (1994) is $213,000,000. The local sponsor prefers to substitute steel sheet pile step stone revetments for the rubblemound revetments in the Lincoln and Burnham Park areas. They have agreed to pay the incremental cost above the federally supportable plan. The estimated fully funded project cost of the locally preferred plan is $259,000,000 (1994). Local Cooperation. By letters dated February 2, 1993 and March 1, 1993, the Chicago Park District and the City of Chicago, respectively indicated their willingness to be the local project sponsors. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; operate and maintain the com- 22-6 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT pleted project; and make cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design activities were continued at a cost of $616,743. Condition at the End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1994 was $659,385. 15. ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan along the 9-mile reach of shoreline immediately south of the Illinois-Wisconsin State line. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14901 and 14904.) Previous Projects. None. Existing Project. Provides for (a) construction of 46 rubblemound, offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long and spaced about 300 feet apart; (b) initial beach nourishment consisting of placement of 100,000 cubic yards of coarse graded beach material; and (c) periodic renourishment of 100,000 cubic yards approximately every five years. The project was conditionally authorized in Section 501 (b) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act subject to a report by the Corps of Engineers and approval by the Secretary of the Army. A Feasibility Review Conference was held in April 1991. As a result, the District Engineer was directed to terminate work on this project and to submit a letter report to the Congress summarizing the feasibility study and the results of the Washington level review. Preconstruction engineering and design funds in the amount of $10,548 were expended in connection with the Feasibility Review Conference. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor would be required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; accomplish all required relocations; hold and save the United State free from damages; and provide a cash contribution. Operations and Results During Period. Work on the feasibility report was resumed as directed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works in response to a letter from Congressman John Porter, 10th Congressional District of Illinois, at a cost of $548. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1994 was $11,096. 16. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE BANK PROTECTION, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, approximately 35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926. ) Existing Project. Provides for placement of 13,000 feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of riprap to maintain the full length of beach front at Beverly Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized by Public Law 97-88 and Public Law 98- 63. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Topographic survey of the revetment was performed by hired labor at a cost of $12,354. Project management cost was $20,875 Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1994 were $1,168,229 of which $660,000 was for new work and $508,229 was for maintenance. 17. INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan along a two mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. The project consists of beach nourishment along approximately two miles of beach between Michigan City Harbor and Beverly Shores, Indiana, requiring an initial placement of 264,500 cubic yards of sand. Periodic replenishment of about 264,500 cubic yards of sand at five year intervals would be required throughout the life of the project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 501 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Estimated federal cost (1994) for new work is $196,000,000, including future beach nourishments. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Advance engineering and design was continued at a cost of $10,665. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction planning and engineering was initiated in fiscal year 1984. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1994 is $366,842. 22-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 18. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-E. 19. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1962, as amended. None. Flood Control 20. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (NORTH BRANCH) Location. Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. The project extends from Wolf Point in Chicago, Illinois, to its source just south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 (Section 116) and amended by the River and Harbor Act of March 7, 1974 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction; maintain and operate all works after completion without cost to the United States; and agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for completing construction. The 1974 Act provided that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non-federal interests paying 25 percent of the cost of maintenance. The 1986 Water Resources Development Act changed the cost sharing to require that non-federal interests pay 50 percent of the cost of maintenance plus cost of disposal. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: FY 93-94 contract costs were $146,554. Supervision and administration costs were $18,848. Real estate and engineering and design costs were $1,215, and $13,030, respectively. The total FY94 federal and non-federal expenditures were $179,647 and $180,196, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994 was $4,077,425 of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed funds), and $3,845,541 was for maintenance ($2,505,859 federal funds and $1,339,682 non-federal contributed funds). 21. KANKAKEE RIVER ICE MANAGEMENT Location: Northern Illinois in Will County about 3 miles downstream of the City of Wilmington. Existing Project. The project consists of over 1000 lineal feet of triple pipeline running from a cooling pond at the Dresden Island Nuclear Power Station to the Kankakee River; a trailer mounted siphon system consisting of a gas engine and a vacuum pump; a fish screen support structure at the location of the pipe inlets within the cooling pond; and a fish screen. The siphon system is designed to withdraw warm water from the cooling pond and discharge it into the Kankakee River to prevent the build up of ice which results in ice jams that cause flooding of residential property. The demonstration project construction was completed in October 1987 at a construction cost of $517,000. These funds were provided by CRREL from the River Ice Management Demonstration Research and Development funds. Construction of a permanent fish screen converted the RIM demonstration project into a permanent project. Local Cooperation. Will County is the local sponsor, having signed the Project Cooperation Agreement in FY 1993. The local sponsor is required to pay twenty-five percent of the cost of the installation of the permanent fish screen. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Project management cost was $1,322. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1994 were $59,679 ($45,000 federal funds and $14,679 non-federal) for maintenance. 22. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN Location. Lake George in Hobart, Indiana and Deep River watershed upstream of the lake through Lake Station, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of the removal of silt, aquatic growth and other material and the construction of silt traps or other devices to prevent and abate the deposition of sediment. Estimated cost (1994) for new work is $7,440,000 ($5,580,000 federal and $1,860,000 to be contributed by local interests). Project was authorized by Section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 22-8 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT Local Cooperation. Section 602 (b), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By letter dated March 9, 1987 the City of Hobart, Indiana indicated that it was a potential local project sponsor and applied for credit for previous work applicable to the project under the provisions of Section 104 (d) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $148,425. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1994 is $474,255. 23. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN Location. Little Calumet River is located in northwest Indiana between the Illinois-Indiana State line and the Conrail Railroad in east Gary, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists ofreplacing 9.5 miles of existing spoil bank levees with 12.2 miles of new levees, floodwalls, closure and appurtenant structures between the Illinois-Indiana State line and Cline Avenue; construction of 9.7 miles of set-back levees in Gary; a diversion structure at Hart Ditch; permanent evacuation of 29 structures in the Black Oak area of Gary; flood proofing 38 residential structures in Gary; modifying 7 miles of channel and 3 accompanying bridge culvert modifications; modifying one highway bridge; construction of 16.8 miles of hiking trails and accompanying recreation support facilities; and preservation of 788 acres of wetlands with wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated federal cost (1994) for new work is $145,000,000; $104,000,000 federal and $41,000,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission. The local cooperation agreement was signed on August 16, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-ways; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a five percent cash contribution for structural flood control measures, fifty percent for recreation features and twenty-five percent for fish and wildlife enhancements. A memorandum of agreement with the local sponsor to design non-federal improvements was signed on May 20, 1992. Operations and Results During Period. The flood warning system was installed. Construction of the Stage II-2 levee segment from Grant to Harrison Streets (North) was completed in May 1994. Construction of the Stage II-3A levee segment from Georgia Street to Martin Luther King Blvd., was awarded in June 1994. The construction contract for the Stage V-1 levee segment at Wicker Park was continued. Construction of the Stage III levee segment from Chase to Grant Streets was continued. Real estate management costs were $217,803 ($200,109 federal and $17,694 non-federal). Engineering and design costs were $3,086,323 ($2,931,148 federal and $155,175 non-federal) which includes $2,290,466 hired labor, $39,763 performed by other COE, and $756,094 by contract. Construction contract costs were $3,026,695 ($2,881,720 federal including $61,278 for other federal agency, US Geologoical Survey, and $144,975 non-federal). Construction management costs were $314,294 ($301,110 federal and $13,184 non-federal). Operations and maintenance cost during constuction was $500. Total federal and non-federal costs were $6,314,587 and $331,028, respectively. The design work for the non-federal improvements was continued at a cost of $84,433. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is in progress. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994 was $27,783,988 for new work. Federal costs total $25,897,103; required non-federal costs total $1,791,693; non-federal improvements costs total $95,192. 24. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN Location. Cady Marsh is located in Lake County, Indiana. The Ditch is a tributary of the Little Calumet River system in northwest Indiana and flows through the Towns of Griffith and Highland. Existing Project. The Cady Marsh Ditch flood control project was authorized by Section 401 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project provides for diverting flood flows from Cady Marsh Ditch to the Little Calumet River through a diversion system under Arbogast Avenue in Griffith. Specifically, the project consists of improving 1,290 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch between Colfax and Arbogast Avenues in Griffith, constructing approximately 5,000 feet of large conduct pipes under Arbogast Avenue, excavating an open channel approximately 2,850 feet long from the north end of Arbogast Avenue to the Little Calumet River, and constructing interior drainage improvements. The estimated cost (1994) for new work is $10,200,000 of which $6,770,000 is federal and $3,430,000 is non-federal. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Town of Griffith, IN. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; complete all required utility relocations; 22-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; provide the required interior drainage improvements; operate and maintain the completed project; and make a cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $43,575. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1994 was $343,957. 25. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL Location. The McCook Reservoir will be located within the communities of McCook and Hodgkins, Illinois at the existing McCook Quarry. The Thornton Reservoir will be located in the community of Thornton, Illinois at the existing Thornton Quarry. Existing Project. The project consists of converting two quarries into flood storage reservoirs. The McCook Reservoir will have a storage volume of 32,100 acre-feet (9.8 billion gallons); the Thornton Reservoir will have a volume of 14,600 acre-feet (4.8 billion gallons). The reservoirs will store floodwater from tunnels constructed or under construction by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago as part of the Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1994) is $537,000,000, including a federal cost for new work of $404,000,000, and $133,000,000 to be contributed by non-federal interests. Project was authorized by Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Local Cooperation. The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago will be the local sponsor and provide the required local cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-ways; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share of the flood control improvements to twenty-five percent of the total project cost. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $3,659,467, including $75,719 for hired labor real estate activities, $4,595 for an appraisal contract, $917,549 for A-E contracts, $716,516 performed by other COE and $1,942,625 for hired labor and $2,463 performed by other federal agency. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction planning, engineering and design was in progress. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1994 were $12,310,657. 26. NORTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. The North Branch Chicago River Basin is located north of the City of Chicago in suburban Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and consists of constructing two excavated floodwater storage reservoirs on the West Fork and one excavated reservoir on the Middle Fork. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 401, also includes authorization to reimburse non-federal interests 50 percent of the costs of planning and construction for three existing reservoirs on the West Fork, known as Techny Reservoirs, and the existing Mid Fork Reservoir on the Middle Fork. In July 1990, the federal government reimbursed the nonfederal intersts $4,467,298 for the Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. The total federal cost was $4,537,435 for these reservoirs. Reservoir 27 in the Village of Bannockburn, is located on the West Fork, 12.7 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. It has a floodwater storage capacity of 525 acre-feet. Reservoir 29A is located 9.6 miles above the mouth of the West Fork and 3.1 miles south of Reservoir 27. The floodwater storage capacity is 575 acre-feet. Two project features, channel relocation and construction of two bridges, are non-federal responsibility. Reservoir 15 is located near the City of Green Oaks on the Middle Fork, 22.1 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. The floodwater storage capacity is 500 acre-feet. The reservoir is approximately 42 feet deep except in the sedimentation pool area which is about 15 feet deeper. Estimated federal cost (1994) for new work is $20,774,000. An additional $14,026,000 will be the required contribution by local interests. The local sponsor has contributed $550,100 for the non-federal improvements for Reservoir 29A. The non-federal clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets at Reservoir 29A may cost between $5.0 and $8.0 million. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share of the flood control improvements to twenty-five percent of the total project cost. 22-10 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Construction of Reservoir 15 was completed in May 1992. FY 94 cost for Reservoir 15 was $6,772 (-$202,975 federal and $209,747 nonfederal) for construction management. Total FY 94 costs for Reservoir 27, completed in June 1990, were $1,784 ($1,782 federal; $2 non-federal). Costs included $30 for construction management and $1,754 for engineering and design. Total FY 94 costs for Reservoir 29A, which was completed in September 1994, were $6,149,696 ($401,643 federal; $42,030 non-federal cash; $7,320 non-federal improvements; and $5,698,703 for non-federal cleanup of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets). The authorized project costs for Reservoir 29A were $443,673 which included $394,839 for the construction contract; $46,444 for construction management; $2,165 for real estate management and $225 for engineering and design. Non-federal bridge and channel improvements costs were $7,320 for construction. The lead shot clean-up costs totalled $2,622,451 which included $2,337,457 for the construction, $114,676 for construction management and $170,318 for engineering and design of which $121,722 was performed by A-E contract, $4,398 was performed by other COE and $44,198 was for hired labor. A Post Authorization Change report was completed for submittal to Congress because the new cost estimate exceeds the maximum cost set by Section 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 98 percent complete. Construction of Reservoir 27 is complete, except for some limited reservoir side slope stabilization which will be completed once the Post Authorization Change report is approved by the Congress. Reservoir 15 is complete. Reservoir 29A construction is complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1994 were $22,430,901, of which $20,139,189 was federal and $2,291,712 was non- federal, excluding the $4,493,298 non-federal cost for the Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. A total $540,826 in nonfederal funds have been expended on bridge and channel betterments at Reservoir 29A. An additional $5,698,703 in non-federal funds have been expended on investigations in connection with the clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets at Reservoir 29A. 27. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL Location. The reservoir will be located in an unincorporated portion of Elk Grove Township in northwestern Cook County, Illinois about 1 mile northwest of Chicago O'Hare International Airport. Existing Project. The project consists of a 1,050 acre-foot capacity reservoir, excavated to a depth of 80 feet. The reservoir would be constructed at the terminus of the existing system of 6.6 miles of deep tunnels, constructed under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1994) is $32,800,000 including a federal cost for new work of $24,100,000 and $8,700,000 to be contributed by local interests. The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The local cooperation agreement for the first construction contract, creek relocation, was signed on July 31, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a cash contribution of five percent of the total project costs. The local cooperation agreement for the second construction contract, reservoir excavation and lining, was signed July 29, 1991. Operations and Results During Period. Construction was continued at a cost of $2,288,466 ($2,217,030 federal and $71,436 non-federal). The utility relocations were continued at a non-federal cost of $210,858. Real estate management activities costs were $4,254 ($3,964 federal and $290 nonfederal). Engineering and design costs were $852,984 ($815,074 federal and $37,910 non-federal) which included $172,644 and $263,902 performed by other COE and A-E contract, respectively, and $416,438 for hired labor. Construction management costs were $306,774 ($274,879 federal and $32,195 nonfederal) of which $33,655 was performed by other COE and $273,119 for hired labor. Total federal and non-federal costs were $3,310,947 and $352,689, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction planning and engineering is completed. Construction is in progress. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1994 were $15,652,244 for new work. Federal costs total $11,768,911; non-federal costs total $3,883,333. 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-F. 22-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 29. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities, repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congressional antecedent legislation) . Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1994 Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Disaster Assistance (FEMA) $ 190,320 42,860 119,364 Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, Public Law 526, 79th Congress. Fiscal year 1994 costs were $33,278 federal and $0 non-federal. Work on the Project Development Analysis was initiated for the Kankakee River Ramsey's Landing, IN project ($9,840). The reconnaissance report for Pasterick Marina, IN was completed at a cost of ($23,438) but the project was terminated for lack of a local sponsor. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1965, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $165,647 Federal and $7,040 non-federal for flood control activities. The Kankakee River, Lake and Newton Counties, IN reconnaissance report has been completed; preparation of the Initial Project Management Plan and Project Cooperation Agreement was initiated at a cost of $21,781. The reconnaissance reports were continued for Little Calumet River South Holland, IL ($19,018), City of Oak Forest, Cook County, IL ($13,457) and for the Village of Palos Park, Cook County, IL ($19,238). The reconnaissance report for Tinley Creek, IL was completed at a cost of $24,456; the project has been terminated for lack of a local sponsor. The work in developing the Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement was continued for Monticello Avenue ($780). The feasibility phase was continued for North Libertyville Estates at a cost of $37,151 federal and $7,114 non-federal, for Valley View, IL at a cost of $27,964 federal and -$74 nonfederal, and for McCook Levee, IL at a cost of $1,802. Flood control activities specifically directed in FY 1990 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (Public Lase 101-101). Kankakee River Icebreaker, Wilmington, IL $80. 30. SURVEYS Fiscal Year 1994 costs were $508,495 federal and $140,836 non-federal itemized as follows: Flood Damage Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection Studies Special Studies Review of Authorized Projects Miscellaneous Activities Coordination Studies Federal Non-federal 182,802 65,379 38,191 42,125 72,366 107,632 $ 84,791 0 0 56,045 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal Year 1994 costs of $80,628 federal and $1,493 non-federal itemized as follows: Federal Non-federal Flood Plain Management Services Hydrologic Studies $ 77,628 3,000 $1,493 0 22-12 Program TABLE 22-A CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Burns Waterway Small Boat Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Chicago Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) 5. Chicago River, IL 6. Indiana Harbor, IN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 163,000 310,000 868,000 797,000 160,792 272,584 846,233 819,056 0 0 00 168,500 118,000 125,000 205,000 175,244 112,614 114,400 221,703 0 0 0 0 665,000 710,500 734,000 1,015,562 737,628 559,663 881,444 1,005,599 0 139,973 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,814,600 1,506,500 2,481,000 2,035,000 1,661,435 1,573,400 2,597,340 2,075,118 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 909,000 480,000 405,000 287,000 1,929,254 457,511 442,969 298,930 322,000 408,000 302,000 359,000 334,762 393,599 305,158 357,931 22-13 13,584,000 13,584,000 7,576,104 7,536,769 15,900 15,900 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,050,935 1,048,332 1,770,558 1,770,558 22,578,5671 22,578,5671 30,025,799 2 29,978,340 2 5,428,001 3 5,428,0013 836,667 836,667 4,788,827 4,788,827 * 23,046,546 22,974,405 1,326,600 1,326,600 1,500,565 5 1,500,565 5 14,458,394 6 14,450,973 6 4,897,148 ' 4,897,148 ' 11,336,988 8 11,319,2718 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 22-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 (Contributed Funds) 7. Lake Michigan Diversion 8. Michigan City Harbor, IN (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Waukegan Harbor, IL 13. Casino Beach, IL 14. Chicago Shoreline, IL 15. Illinois Beach State Park, IL 16. Indiana Dunes Nat'l Lakeshore Beverly Shores, IN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 530,000 771,000 434,000 489,502 793,671 442,839 0 0 0 0 752,000 1,749,000 395,000 792,000 623,165 1,481,169 779,824 784,221 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 826,000 456,000 889,000 2,030,000 836,025 483,245 923,906 1,892,577 220,000 375,000 110,000 820,000 94,158 152,230 199,068 291,476 0 0 0 0 50,000 10,548 18,500 21,000 18,307 21,193 750,000 291,000 42,642 616,743 -15,000 0 8,000 8,000 0 548 0 0 43,000 33,229 22-14 12,500 12,500 1,735,000 1,726,012 1,543,646 9 1,543,646 9 10,872,054 10,849,239 55,000 55,000 1,618,670 1,618,670 30,800 30,800 823,026 10 823,026 10 12,042,768 11 11,868,841 11 1,525,000 736,932 1,041,000 659,385 35,000 11,096 660,000 660,000 518,000 508,229 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 17. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN 20. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Kankakee River Ice Management (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Lake George, Hobart, IN 23. Little Calumet River, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Non-Federal Improvements) 24. Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN 25. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 26. North Branch Chicago River, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 79,000 32,114 0 1,160 20,000 2,903 0 10,665 150,000 145,000 145,000 147,000 190,755 113,243 176,173 179,647 0 0 171,681 175,000 175,000 175,000 265,626 118,720 246,753 180,196 0 0 0 0 45,000 43,675 15,000 14,996 0 1,322 -321 -317 125,000 330,000 260,000 200,000 72,318 98,645 131,333 148,425 2,703,000 3,013,000 10,146,000 13,842,700 2,709,311 2,911,261 9,776,804 6,314,587 344,000 304,000 750,000 380,000 91,106 684,794 684,765 331,028 220,000 170,000 52,939 160,368 50,000 140,000 10,759 84,443 170,000 310,000 87,075 43,575 2,000,000 2,000,000 3,500,000 13,000,000 1,179,226 2,227,749 3,523,779 3,659,467 6,497,000 4,884,474 0 0 199,000 1,321,052 595,862 200,450 1,118,250 159,017 921,287 545,125 0 207,987 150,244 251,779 419,00012 366,84212 191,884 191,884 2,512,350 2,505,859 40,000 40,000 1,572,079 1,339,682 45,000 45,000 14,679 14,679 1,004,000 474,255 34,082,70013 25,897,10313 1,938,000 1,791,693 190,000 95,192 870,000 343,957 22,374,000 12,310,657 20,252,50014 20,139,18914 2,297,254 2,291,712 22-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 22-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 (Non-Federal New Work: Improvements) Contrib. 327,000 0 49,348 0 550,100 Cost 388,300 59,491 63,926 7,320 540,826 (Non-Federal New Work: Lead shot Contrib. 458,900 1,071,967 2,250,000 2,354,303 6,135,170 Clean-up) Cost 413,456 275,044 2,387,752 2,622,451 5,698,703 27. O'Hare Reservoir, New Work: Chicago, IL Approp. 4,300,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 5,000,000 18,882,000 Cost 1,024,652 1,474,354 3,907,338 3,310,947 11,768,911 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Contrib. 220,000 3,640,700 0 100,000 4,041,200 Cost 58,666 1,267,885 2,204,093 352,689 3,883,333 1 Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2 Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to decree (No. 54-C-1608) regarding removal of flue dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3 Includes $689,001 in settlement pursuant to decree regarding removal of flue dust. 4 Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5 Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 6 Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 7 Includes $60,668 for previous projects. 8 Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 9 Includes $287,389 for previous projects. to Includes $218,233 for previous projects. 11 Includes $15,711 for previous projects. 12 Includes $107,000 for CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159 dated 25 Sept. 1985. '3 Includes $670,529 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs LAW EC 1105-2-159 dated 25 Sept. 1985. " Includes $489,310 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs LAW EC 1105-2-159 dated 25 Sept. 1985. 22-16 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 14, 1960 Section 107 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 19351.2 Aug. 30, 19351.2 Mar. 2, 19453 Jul. 14, 196013 Oct. 23, 1962s3 Oct. 27, 196513 Jul. 11, 1870 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1931 BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and depths, a north breakwater, west bulkhead, approach channel and outer harbor, east and west harbor arms. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN (See Section 2 of Text) Provides for a 700-foot north breakwater, a 950-foot west breakwater, an entrance channel 11-feet deep, a harbor-of-refuge area 10 feet deep, and a channel in Burns Waterway 6 feet deep. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN (See Section 3 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins. Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. Consolidated the 2 projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river-entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; 5 turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance channel 300 feet wide and 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge Deepen, widen, and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J. and E. Ry. Bridge, to and including turning basins 1, 3, and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; a channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct. 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad Bridge (Nickle Plate) to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL (See Section 4 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior Breakwater. Present project depth in basin, and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Public Law, 89-298, H Doc. 160. 88th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report dated February 1983. Annual Report, 1896, pp. 2584 et Seq. and H. Doc 277, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 172. 54th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 346, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc.494, 72d Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc., 180. 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc.,149, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.8 H. Doc., 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 H. Report No. 973, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong.,2d Sess. and Annual Report 1879, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report, 1870 pp 1562-1567 Annual Report, 1897, pp 2790-2791 H. Doc. 710, Cong., 2d Sess. H.Doc.1303, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong. 22-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 22-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 4, 1981 Jul. 30, 1983 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 19301� Jul. 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 28, 1937 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965'2 Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; and deepen a channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. Provides for lock operations and maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 5 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of June 3, 1896. Turning basins. Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908 as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION (See Section 7 of Text) Responsible for monitoring of Lake Michigan Diversion INDIANA HARBOR, IN (See Section 6 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly breakwaters. Reduce length of channel to be maintained in extension to Lake George. Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Steel and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks. Authorized Secretary of War to sell Inland Steel Co., about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths of 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel; 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E.J. & E. Ry, Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. 22-18 Public Law 14, 79th Cong. H. Doc. 485, 87th Cong., 2d Sess* Section 107 of Public Law 97-88 Public Law 98-63. Specified in act. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 56th Cong. 1st Sess. (Annual Report, 1900 p. 3863 and Annual Report 1909, p. 709) H.Doc.,1294, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 767, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. s,7 Section 1142, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 690, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 176, 67th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 219, 72d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc., 195, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 227, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN (See Section 8 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier inclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Mar. 3, 1889 Mar. 3, 1905 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Sec. 107 Jun. 14, 1880 Aug. 3, 1882 Jun. 13, 1902 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 17, 1970 Sec. 201 Oct. 27, 1965 Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present located. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier inclosing outer basin. Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin, and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Recommendations of a Board of Engineers. Annual Report 1870. p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers. Annual Report 1851, pp 218 7-2189; Annual Report 1882. p. 2264-2266. Annual Report 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint Resolution of Congress approved May 13, 1908. Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning basin Detailed Project Report dated to E. Street Bridge. June 19658 WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL (See Section 9 of Text) Parallel piers and basins. Modified location of harbor entrance. Annual Report 1880, p. 142 Annual Report,1882, pp. 277, 2162. Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end H. Doc. 343, 56th Cong., of north pier, and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. 1st Sess. Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north piers Rivers and Harbors Corn and enlarging inner basin. Doc. 27, 71st Cong., 2d Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer end H. Doc. 116, 77th Cong., of north pier to project depth in lake, and dredge an anchorage area in 1st Sess. southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to H. Doc. 368, 90th Cong., 25 feet and extending to the depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying 2d Sess. from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth to 23 feet at a width of 180 feet, and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. mittee Sess. CASINO BEACH, IL (See Section 13 of Text) Provides for encasing approximately 1,800 feet of the existing Casino Beach jetty in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap, and replacing beach fill. ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL (See Section 15 of Text) Provides for 46 offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long, initial beach nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards, and periodic nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards at 5-year intervals. Feasibility Report dated February 1983. Draft Feasibility Report dated June 1982. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, BEVERLY SHORES, IN (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially Public Law 97-88 constructed in 1973. 22-19 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 4, 1981 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 22-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul, 30, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Provides for operations and maintenance of the shore protection measures. INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN (See Section 17 of Text) Provides for beach nourishment along a two-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN (See Section 22 of Text) Provides for removal of silt, aquatic growth and construction of silt traps. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN (See Section 23 of Text) Provides for levee construction, a diversion control structure at the mouth of Hart Ditch. Permanent evacuation of a portion of the Black Oak area of Gary and non-structural flood proofing measures in Gary. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN (See Section 24 of Text) Provides for widening and deepening 1,250 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch, installing 4,880 feet of pipe, and excavating 2,850 feet of open channel. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL (See Section 25 of Text) Provides for construction of two floodwater storage reservoirs in the quarries of the same name. NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 20 and 26 of Text) Construction of three reservoirs and reimbursement to locals for 50 percent of the costs of Techny and Mid-Fork Reservoirs. Clearing fallen trees, roots and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL (See Section 27 of Text) Provides for a 1,050 acre-foot excavated reservoir. Public Law 98-63 Sec. 501, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Sec. 602. Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Sec. 401. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Feasibility Report dated April 1984. Sec. 3 Water Resources Development Act of 1988. H. Doc. 100-72, 100th Cong. 1st Sess., Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. River and Harbor Act.(Sec.116) Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 1. Included in Public Works Administrative Program September 6, 1943, and Dec. 16, 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.) 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (breakwater closure). 4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uncompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is an Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10to. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen Lake George Branch). 11. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1933, and July 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen main canal and the Calumet River Branch). 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 13. Project deauthorized in 1989. 22-20 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-C EXISTING NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth in Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 4. Chicago Harbor, IL 5. Chicago River, IL 6. Indiana Harbor, IN 8. Michigan City Harbor, IN 9. Waukegan Harbor, IL North Breakwater West Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor East Harbor Arm West Harbor Arm North Breakwater West Breakwater Approach Channel Burns Waterway Northerly Crib Breakwater Southerly Steel Breakwater North Pier Chicago Confined Disposal Facility Approach Channel Outer Harbor River Entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning Basin No. 3 to Turning Basin No. 5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension in Lake Calumet Turning Basins 1, 3, and 5 Shore arm extension Exterior breakwater Exterior breakwater southerly ext. North inner breakwater South inner breakwater North Pier Approach Channel Channel and maneuver Lock Inner Basin Entrance Channel Main Branch of Chicago River North Branch of Chicago River North Branch Canal North Branch Turning Basin Northerly Breakwater Easterly Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor Entrance Channel Main Channel Turning Basin Lake George Branch Calumet River Branch Detached Breakwater West Pier East Pier East Breakwater Entrance Channel Main Channel Outer Basin Trail Creek Trail Creek North Breakwater and Shore Connection North Pier and North Revetment South Pier Entrance Channel Channel to Inner Basin Inner Basin Anchorage Area 1Area of about 6 acres. 22-21 4,630 1,200 2,200 3,700 2,100 3,800 678 1,043 1,200 5,593 400 Varies 620 620 200 100 3,200 2,000 290 200 and variable ) Variable 400 1,000 30' 28 27 27 11 9 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 6,714 5,007 2,450 2,979 9,700 10,50C 3,00C 21,10C 8,00C 4,00C 3,000 29 28 23 21 21 21 21 21 21 29 28 27 22 22 22 22 2,250 5,421 4,944 4,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 600 1,270 7,300 3,800 11,100 5,500 1,120 2,525 7,200 4,200 3,600 7,400 3,700 2,500 1,304 835 1,276 1,000 1,900 2,400 900 3,000 2,300 1,896 2,074 3,111 3,250 1,700 1,650 800 1,300 80 740 190-470 190-390 91-390 56-210 800 Varies 65-280 61-210 64-160 160-260 150-425 120-150 900 50-100 50 390 200 375-500 18 18 8-12 86 22 18 18 8 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 22-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION (See Section 12 of Text) Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges' 1967 $ 1,625,068 'Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6(g) of the Act of October 16, 1966, P.L. 89-670 TABLE 22-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN 1984 $1,500,000 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL 1982 237,271 Evanston, IL 1979 766,052 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL 1976 244,889 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL' 1975 65,611 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL2 1975 5,200 'Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. 2Uncompleted portion deauthorized in 1977. TABLE 22-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL 1989 $2,062,347 Little Calumet River, IL 1984 583,000 22-22 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL 1975 1977 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL 1975 1977 Kankakee River, IL and IN Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 Little Calumet River, IL and IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 53,136 Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN Widening and straightening the Calumet River in the vicinity of 106th Street and closing the gap between breakwaters, and dredging minor shoals in the outer harbor. 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Wilmington Ice Control Demonstration Nov. 18, 1991 - Des Plaines River Wetlands Demonstration Nov. 18, 1993 22-23 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL.............. 23-2 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN .................. 23-2 3. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ........................ 23-3 4. Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study ........................... 23-3 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI ................... . 23-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects......... 23-4 Flood Control 7. Coralville Lake, IA..........................23-4 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA ................................ 23-4 9. Farm Creek, IL .......................... .23-4 10. Loves Park, IL ....................... 23-4 11. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA........ 23-5 12. Saylorville Lake, IA .................... 23-5 13. West Des Moines, IA .................... ..23-5 14 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................. 23-6 15. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects........23-6 16. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 23-6 General Investigations 17. Surveys ................... .................. 23-6 18. Collection and Study of Basic Data............ 23-6 19. Preconstruction Engineering and Design....... 23-6 Tables Page Table 23-A Cost and Financial Statement......... 23-7 Table 23-B Authorizing Legislation............... 23-8 Table 23-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 23-11 Table 23-D Not Applicable Table 23-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects....................23-11 Table 23-F Not Applicable Table 23-G Deauthorized Projects............. 23-13 Table 23-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects....................23-14 Table 23-I Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 23-15 Table 23-J Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and Dams ................... 23-17 Table 23-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost..... 23-17 Table 23-L Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost.......... 23-18 Table 23-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project... 23-19 Table 23-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project ................... .23-20 23-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modification program was initiated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title to 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. The repair and modification work was underway until a suit was filed by three Illinois counties and their Commissioners of Highway against the Federal Government and the State in 1974 over maintenance of highway bridges crossing the canal. After the lawsuit was filed, further rehabilitation work by the Federal Government on the canal was suspended. On November 4, 1981, the Corp of Engineers deposited $3,722,572 with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Chicago in full satisfaction of the Court's judgment. These funds were used by the counties to complete bridge rehabilitation work as directed in the court order. Rehabilitation work by the Federal Government in coordination with the state was resumed in 1984 with the remaining authorization expended in 1987. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized an additional appropriation of $8,472,000 to accomplish the work described in the 1970 River and Harbor Act. The State of Illinois filed an additional lawsuit against the United States on July 6, 1987 in the U.S. Claims Court in the amount of $8,472,572. In a preliminary decision on September 22, 1988, the court dismissed the claim for $3,722,572. A settlement agreement between the State of Illinois and the United States was signed on November 14, 1991. The agreement provided that Illinois release all claims against the United States as stipulated in the claims court and that the United States provide $4,750,000 to Illinois as reimbursement for previous repair work performed upon the canal bridges by Illinois. On December 16, 1991, the U. S. Claims Court entered a judgment for $4,750,000 in favor of the State of Illinois. This judgment was paid in FY92. Once funds are received, principal work features to restore the canal to acceptable conditions consist of the repair or resonstruction of retaining walls, embankmenets, protions of the lock and dam structures, culverts, drainage ditches, and other related work features which the United States has maintained or has been obligated to maintain under previous agreements. These features are consistent with a Master Management Plan prepared by the Illinois Department of Conservation. NEPA documentation to assess remaining work items must be completed prior to initiation of construction. Local cooperation. A revised Supplemental Agreement with all work items remaining was coordinated in FY 93. Additional funding is needed prior to the District continuing design and construction on the canal. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design work was performed for a total cost of $15,807. 2. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles), Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, II, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). Previous projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See table 23-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of new work was $124,041,436 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferredfor- restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non Federal; is excluded from present cost estimate. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. (See Table 23-J through 23-N on existing locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost; additional features entering into cost of project; existing project and total cost of existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Channel dredging by the contract cutterhead pipeline dredge was performed in LaGrange Pools at various locations at a cost of $1,830,600 with a total of 518,650 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and 23-2 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT reports were completed at a cost of $126,000. Strike removal and snagging and clearing was accomplished in various locations by hired labor at a cost of $605,900. Maintenance of the Lucas-Berg Disposal Facility cost $10,600. Structural repairs to locks and dams were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,693,900. Resurfacing of O'Brien Lock access road and paving of Peoria Lock and Dam parking lot was completed at a cost of $7,800. Replating Maneuver Boat Peoria was completed at a cost of $8,700. Continued work on the O'Brien electric feeder line at a cost of $8,500. Dredged material disposal activity cost $900. Real Estate support of maintenance activities cost $49,600. Buildings, grounds, and utility maintenance at the locks and dams and Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria totaled $9,100. Permanent operating equipment costs were $169,800. Environmental compliance work was performed at a cost of $5,700. Repairs to the lower long wall at Starved Rock Lock were initiated at a cost of $50,000. Replacement of the steamboiler at Starved Rock Lock were initiated at a cost of $118,400. Installation of a fire/smoke detection system at Marseilles Lock was performed at a cost of $22,700. Engineering and design work cost $215,400 and supervision, administration, and inspection for the maintenance features totaled $377,000. Total maintenance costs were $5,310,600. Net credits to the project were $3,100. Operation and Care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at a cost of $7,358,177. Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria was continued at a cost of $759,900. Real Estate management services were provided at a cost of $53,600. Visitors' Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated at a cost of $222,000. OSHA inspections and medical examinations were accomplished at a cost of $16,800. Surveys, studies, and other inspections were performed at a cost of $573,400; natural and cultural resource costs were $36,700; and water control management costs were $589,900. Supervision and administration for the operation features totaled $300,100. Total operation costs were $9,910,577. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation work continued at LaGrange Lock and Dam at a cost of $977. Rehabilitation was continued on the Illinois Waterway for a cost of $257,136. Total costs incurred were $258,113. Illinois Waterway Pool Operation: Costs for the year were $21,134 for natural resource management; $9,662 for recreation management; $73,574 for condition and operation studies; $108,536 for water control management, and $139,484 for supervision and administration. Total costs were $352,390. Illinois Waterway Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $616,842 for dredging. Boundary monumentation was placed at a cost of $4,250. Supervision and administration costs were $14,418. Total maintenance cost were $635,510. Total operation and maintenance costs for all pools above Alton Pool were $15,218,077. Rehabilitation costs were $258,113. Alton Pool operation and maintenance costs were S987,900. Total costs incurred $16,464,090. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement, see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 4. UPPER MISSISSIPPI - ILLINOIS NAVIGATION STUDY Location. The study includes both the Upper Mississippi River and the Illinois Waterway. The study area covers over 850 miles of navigable waterways and 29 locks and dams of the Upper Mississippi River from the headwaters at St. Anthony Falls near Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota; downstream to the mouth of the Ohio River at Cairo; and the Illinois Waterway (eight locks and dams) from Lake Michigan in Chicago, Illinois, southwest to where the waterway joins with the Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, 348 miles long. The Upper Mississippi River system meanders through the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri, and over 40 counties. The Illinois Waterway is located entirely within the State of Illinois. Existing project. The project consists of addressing the need for navigation improvement on the river system. Undertaken by three Corps Districts (St. Paul, Rock Island, and St. Louis), the purpose of the study is to examine information related to the existing condition of the structures and investigate system congestion (lockage delays, inadequate capacity, and recreation/commercial locking conflicts). The review of this completed project is authorized by Section 2165, Flood Control Act of 1970, PL 91-611. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. The Feasibility Phase was continued during FY 1994 at a cost of $7,180,365. 5. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Location. The Program is authorized for those river reaches having commercial navigation channels on the Upper Mississippi River, Illinois River, Minnesota River, St. Croix River, and Kaskaskia River in the states of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin. Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River system, recognizing its several purposes. The program includes habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects to counteract the effects of backwater sedimentation. Long Term Resource Monitoring will provide the means for more informed management of the UMRS. Also authorized are a study of the economic impacts of recreation, navigation traffic monitoring, and recreation projects (currently unfunded). The program was initiated in 1986 utilizing funds provided by PL 99-88, FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act. PL 99-662, 23-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Water Resources Development Act of 1986, further defined the program and provided for a 10 year implementiation period. The implementation period was extended to 15 years by PL 101-640, Water Resources Development Act of 1990. Local Cooperation: Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects for such projects not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, within the meaning of Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations During Fiscal Year. Costs during the year totaled $14,914,800. The majority of funds were expended on two primary program elements: habitat projects and long term resource monitoring. General design was initiated on four projects and continued on 15 projects; construction was initiated on six projects, continued on four projects, and completed on two projects. Construction has essentially been completed on a total of 17 projects since the program was initiated. Data analysis and production of technical and special reports continued by the Environmental Management Technical Center in Lake Onalaska, WI. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 23-C Flood Control 7. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and the project has been in operation since February 1958. About 24,406 acres of land were acquired in fee and flowage easements obtained for 24,427 acres. The project was modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required, except in connection with the Mehaffey Bridge which has been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. No new work was performed during FY 94. Operation and Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $2,805,186. Reservoir maintenance and operation cost $62,800. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees were $62,900. 8. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Location. The greenbelt area is located along both banks of the Des Moines River in central IA and extends from a point at which relocated U.S. Highway 92 crosses the Des Moines River near Harvey, upstream approximately 169 river miles to U.S. Highway 20, and includes portions of Fort Dodge, IA. It also includes the Corps' operated lake Red Rock and Saylorville Lake projects.. Existing project. The project will include, but not be limited to: (1) the construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational facilities and streambank stabilization structures; (2) maintenance of all structures constructed before the date of authorization of this project (other than any such structure operated and maintained by any person under a permit or agreement with the Secretary); (3) such tree plantings, trails, vegetation, and wildlife protection and development for recreational purposes; and (4) the prohibition or limitation by the Secretary of the killing, wounding, or capturing at any time of any wild bird or animal in such areas as may be directed by the Secretary. In carrying out the project the Secretary may acquire by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise, land and interests therein, as the Secretary determines are necessary to complete the project. The authorization requires that an Advisory Committee be established for consultation with the Department of the Army consisting of 47 members: three Corps of Engineers appointees, one person from the city of Des Moines, and one from each other incorporated municipality within the greenbelt, two from each of the nine counties in the greenbelt, and five from the State of Iowa. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Letters of assurance have been received for 14 separable elements. Local cooperation Agreements have been executed for five separable elements. Operations during fiscal year. Coordination was maintained with the Advisory Committee in accordance with Public Law 99-88. Construction continued on the Red Rock Trails Segment IIB and III. A construction contract was awarded for Red Rock Trails Segment IIIB. Work continued on the Feature Design Memoranda for Red Rock Trails Segment IV; Polk City-Big Creek Trail; Webster City-Briggs Woods Trail; Raccoon River Trails; Botanical Center Park; Johnston Trails/Access; and the Raccoon River Regional Park. Costs incurred were $1,549,024. 9. FARM CREEK, IL Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, IL, is 60 square miles in extent. Stream empties into Illinois Waterway at mile 162 above mouth. Existing project. See page 28-5, Annual Report for 1983 for description of project. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $299,978. 10. LOVES PARK, IL Location. The Loves Park project is located in Winnebago County, IL on the northeast boundary of the city of Rockford, IL. Loves Park is 17 miles south of the Illinois- Wisconsin state line. Existing project. The project provides 100-year level of protection against flooding along Loves Park Creek. Protection 23-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT measures consist of 17,900 feet of channel improvements, a 16,300 GPM pump plant, and ponding. The estimated project cost is $30,500,000 including $9,400,000 non-federal costs. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was executed on March 26, 1991. Operation during fiscal year. Planning, Engineering, and Design was continued to develop Plans and Specifications relative to Stages I, IIA2, and IIB. Construction was completed on Stage IIA-i. Total costs incurred were $1,097,338. 11. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 50,326 acres in fee and 26,706 acres in flowage easement. Landowner complaints, that lake operation have flooded their lands more frequently than what they were told to expect when flowage easements were initially acquired, led Congress to modify the project authorization. Language in PL 99-190 authorizes acquisition from willing sellers fee simple title in real property, which is subject to periodic flooding in connection with the operation of the project. Potentially there are approximately 1,000 tracts consisting of about 30,000 acres. Estimated Federal cost is $43,500,000. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Land Acquisition costs were $1,029,347. The last REDM SB was approved December 1992. Operation and maintenance activities were continued at a cost $3,647,661. Flood control reservoir maintenance and operation cost $62,800. Expenditures from the return of recreation use fees were $72,500. 12. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and uses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment secton, and flow over weir is uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des- Moines River Valley. Reaches along the Mississippi Tiver downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefited. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification included relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Improvements to Highway 415, the main accross road to existing facilities on the east side of the reservoir, were added to the project by Congress in 1984. Segments A and B of Highway 415 have been completed. Segment C of Highway 415 is scheduled to be completed in 1993. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam was placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The land acquisition program involved 26,626 acres acquired in fee and flowage easements for 1,950 acres. The estimated project cost is $116,470,000 including $2,820,000 in non-Federal costs from the State of Iowa and the City of Des Moines, for recreational development. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Segment C of Highway 415 was opened to traffic on December 1993. Work continued on real estate acquisition of Segment C. Engineering, environmental and real estate efforts were initiated on the 86th Street improvements and extension project. This project will provide improved access to the western portion of Saylorville Lake. Costs incurred were $339,070. Operation and Maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $3,952,495. Reservoir maintenance and operation cost $62,800. There were no expenitures from return of recreation use fees during FY 94. The project is about 97 percent completed, excluding deferred work. 13. WEST DES MOINES, IA Location. The city is located in Polk County in central Iowa. Existing project. The project will provide flood protection from the Raccoon River and Walnut Creek. The project consists of four stages: Stage I, 3,100 feet of levees and floodwalls along Walnut Creek north of Ashworth Road; Stage 23-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 II, 9,000 feet of levees along the Raccoon River from Jordan Creek to 63rd Street, with pump station; Stage IIIA, 4,500 feet of levees along the lower end of Walnut Creek; and Stage IIIB, 5,800 feet of levees and flood walls tieing Stages I and IIIA together along Walnut Creek with pump station and Stages II and IIIA along the Raccoon river. The project will provide 100-year protection and will prevent 4.387 million dollars in average annual damages. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. The Stage I contract was completed. Stage IIIA contract was awarded for $1,073,606. Work continued on Plans and Specifications for Stage II and Stage III-B. Total costs incurred during FY 94 were $1,917,397. 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $133,989. (See Table 23-H for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 23-E. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities, Section 205, Public Law 84-685. See Table 23-I Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. See Table 23-I. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526.) See Table 23-I. Emergency Flood Control Activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress. See Table 23-I. General Investigations 17. SURVEYS There were two flood prevention studies in progress during FY 94 at a cost of $184,768. There was one restudy of deferred projects in progress in FY 94 at a cost of $77,893. Environmental Services Partnerships, Special Investigations, FERC, Dam Safety Criteria Studies, North American Water Fowl Management, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, and Planning Assistance to States efforts totaled $181,596. Total cost of surveys was $444,257. 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services cost $232,066. Sedimentation and streamgaging studies were completed during FY 94 at a cost of $8,838. Total cost for collection and study of basic data was $240,904. 19. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Located in Muscatine and Louisa Counties, the Muscatine Island Levee District and the Muscatine-Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, together with the city of Muscatine, Iowa form a joint drainage and flood protection area for 30,700 acres of bottom land. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project will provide additional flood protection by increasing the height of the existing main stem levee and flank levee. Work continued on the General Design Memorandum. The project is scheduled for construction in FY 95. Through EY 94, a total of $688,853 has been spent on Preconstruction, Engineering, and Design. The total cost of the project is estimated to be $8,850,000. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. The Green Bay Levee and Drainage District flood protection project was authorized by the Water Resources Development of 1986, deauthorized in November 1991, and reauthorized in Water Resources Development of 1992. The Levee and Drainage District is located along the Mississippi River downstream from the City of Burlington in Lee County, Iowa. The mainstream levee is located between approximate river miles 386 and 397. The 17.2 miles of existing levee was originally constructed by local interests and improved by the Corps of Engineers in 1948 and 1966. The existing levee provides an approximate 50-year level of protection with a 2-feet-6 freeboard. Work was initiated on hte General Reevaluation Report (GRR). The GRR was the last document containing project formulation and economic justification in October 1979 feasibility report. The current estimated cost of PED $1,000,000. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Total costs incurred during FY 94 for Muscatine Island ($34,309) and Green Bay Levee and Drainage District ($176,113) were $210,422. 23-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL 2. Illinois Waterway IL and IN 4. Upper Mississippi -Illinois Navigation Study 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 7. Coralville Lake, IA 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 9. Farm Creek, IL 10. Loves Park, IL 11. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA 12. Saylorville Lake IA Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 September 1994 2,540 108,000 15,807 384,000 16,045,664 )46,615 15,218,077 653,000 1,240,000 391,167 258,113 - 1,240,000 - 257,136 340,000 7,563,000 339,577 7,180,365 590,000 20,501,000 144,000 14,914,000 - 686,000 - 593,905 16,760,000 16,453,396 272,000 291,441. 939,000 966,028 15,334,000 12,685,543 28,395 2,305,000 2,497,808 550,000 841,766 137,342 26,619 252,000 233,382 319,000 289,510 2,189,000 240,758 3,097,000 2,948,753 11,968,000 2,794,528 3,187,000 3,121,475 169,269 46,231 - 3,000,000 7,884 2,979,556 17,226,000 16,749,997 (30,000) 106,434 1,962,000 1,596,549 13,672,000 15,476,800 5,293 2,727,600 2,665,670 750,000 1,533,701 20,025 148,364 214,000 218,992 370,307 420,609 698,111 3,527,800 3,388,964 19,850 18,422 900,000 6,866,504 3,580,800 3,458,691 168,033 39,426 2,953,100 2,867,986 3,050,000 1,549,024 8,046 279,000 299,978 1,447,048 1,097,338 91,666 671,000 1,029,347 4,183,300 3,710,461 50,000 339,070 4,316,800 4,015,295 139,956 238,592 14,3 15,0 3,3 2,3 17,5 8, - 2,549 2,711,000 2,594,568 2,150,000 1,187,262 19,287 206,000 206,070 1,408,000 759,146 279,000 180,101 811,000 1,270,023 3,090,000 3,160,803 450 300,000 3,015,678 4,029,000 4,029,262 168,033 275,612 23-7 7,605,143' 7,605,143' 21,310,2482 21,182,152 126,707,751' 126,706,419' 345,855,237' 341,976,730' 140,132,925 137,638,976 1,240,000 257,136 14,780,000 12,931,736 98,076,000 83,495,000 686,000 593,905 30,179,488' 30,173,702' 43,739,774 41,374,170 9,646,000 6,924,909 392,812 383,901 9,859,020' 9,859,020' 4,118,541 4,009,353 3,841,355 3,469,117 279,000 271,767 99,720,484 98,007,452 45,706,987 42,585,636 19,850 18,422 127,577,887 126,658,739' 48,369,241 44,795,563 3,398,097 2,904,756 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 23-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 September 1994 13. West Des Moines, IA New Work: Approp. 249,000 286,000 473,000 2,804,000 4,763,000 Cost 190,610 315,473 383,472 1,917,397 3,744,920 Contributed Funds: Approp. - - - 779,000 779,000 Cost - - - 568,543 568,543 19. Muscatine Island, IA New Work: Approp. - 55,000 85,000 2,000 689,000 Cost 51,923 69,159 52,731 34,309 688,853 19. Green Bay L&DD, IA New Work: Approp. - - 245,000 245,000 Cost - - - 176,113 176,113 1. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 5. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 con 2. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent tributed funds). Indefinite Appropriation." 6. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 3. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 7. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 4. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. TABLE 23-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 1934' August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935" June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 October 23, 1943 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL, to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of State for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. = H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and I larbors Conmittce Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. 23-8 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in 'Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 (Continued) July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 August 18, 1968 November 17, 1986 Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funds shall be expended for removal or alteration of Illinois Central RR bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. Substitute following work for that authorized by act of March 2, 1945; replace emergency clam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement oof Ihat canal thence to Sag Junction and ofi Calumet-Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana Harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, by construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in October 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Illinois River at Peoria, IL modification of navigation project to include an adjacent downstream water area. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 23-9 H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 1H. Doc. 677, 79th Cong.. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess.J Specified in Act. Also HI. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 857, II.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 6. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) November 17, 1986 7. June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 8. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) November 17, 1986 9. 1944 Flood Control Act 10. November 17, 1986 11. June 28, 1938 December 19, 1985 12. July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 13. November 17, 1986 19. November 17, 1986 October 31, 1992 Provide for a 10-year environmental program to include habitat rehabilitation and enhancement; longterm resource monitoring with computerized inventory and analysis; recreational development; assessment of economic benefits from recreational activities; and navigation system traffic monitoriig. Approves 1982 Upper Mississippi River Master Plan, authorizes interstate agreements between Upper Mississippi River states, directs Secretary to implement GREAT II recommendations for disposal of dredged material and facilitate the productive use of dredge material, directs and interagency agreement with the Department of Interior for its participation in the plan, authorizes second lock at Lock and Dam No. 6. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Recreational development; environmental enhancement; and related streambank stabilization. Defines area of work. FARM CREEK, IL Two flood detention dams and channel improvements. LOVES PARK, IL Improved channel, pumping plant and pond storage. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Land Acquisition SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Modification to minimize adverse project impact on Ledges State Park. WEST DES MOINES, IA Construct levees and floodwall. MUSCATINE ISLAND LEVEE DISTRICT AND MUSCATINE-LOUISA COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, NO.13, IA Raise existing levees GREEN BAY LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, IA Raise existing levees H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 1103, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 604, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. PL 99-190 S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Sec. 200(j) Water Resources Development Act of 1992. 23-10 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines Rivers. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administratiove Program October 31, 1934, and February 28, 1935. 4. Contains lataest published maps of Calumet - Sy portion. ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hannibal SBH, MO Completed 1958 $ 108,700' $129,813 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,979' 9,345 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL Completed 1985 265,499 " 171,000 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel Completed 1970 35,477' 37,700 Muscatine Harbor, IA Completed 1964 353,000 250,521 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $137,869 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $20,300 contributed funds. TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Canton, MO' Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL l)cs Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Des Moines, IA Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 1962 1987 1943 1964 1991 1954 1941 1969 1972 1964 1974 1941 $ 247,822 1,679,056 14,930,085 144,910 1,496,555 26,237,690 1,923,145 68,898 1,492,016 4,993,224 1,144,875 10,861,170 207,826 $ 228,073 839,615 23,323 145,415 23-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects East Moline, IL 1984 9,692,097 - - East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 - - Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 - - Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 - - Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 - - Fulton, IL 1984 18,017,200 - - Galena, IL 1952 844,100 - 118,000 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 - - Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 - 20,626 Hannibal, MO 1993 6,013,670 - 600,000 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 - - Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 - - Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 1972 4,772,498 - - Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 - - Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 - - Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL' 1957 123,300 - - Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 - - Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 - - Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 - - Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 - - Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 - - Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 - 252,136 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 - - Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' 1977 1,995,322 - 269,739 Milan, IL 1988 13,437,663 - 213,554 Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA' 1983 1,129,800 - - Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 - 220,000 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 - - - Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 - - Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN' 1957 72,432 - - Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 - - Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 158,383 - - Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 - - Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 - - Rockford, IL 1989 10,032,496 - 514,188 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 - - Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 - - Sangamon River (Mouth), IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 - - Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 - - Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 - - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 - - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 - - 23-12 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1994 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 220,729 - - South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1991 7,204,952 - 2,056,960 South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 - - South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 - - Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 - - Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 1967 3,306,695 - - Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 - - Van Meter, IA' 1965 113,842 - - Waterloo, IA 1987 48,620,099 - 83,300 Waterloo Bridges, IA 1991 1,125,000 - 1,108,787 Authorized Projects Not Constructed Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA 1987 1,400,800 - - Davenport, IA 1987 - - - Moline, IL 1987 - - - Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 - - Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 1984 858,000 - - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act). 2. FY 89 funds of $5,639 were expended to close out project. TABLE 23-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Campbells Island Mississippi River, IL Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA Henderson River, IL Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks Illinois Waterway Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1986 1969 1938 1970 1942 1938 1964 1982 1986 1938 1986 1979 1977 1977 1986 1977 1977 1981 1986 1977 $ 76,664 55,664 102,310 23-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 23-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 - - Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI - 1977 - - Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA - 1977 - - South Beloit, IL 1979 1986 270,000 - William L. Springer Lake Decatur, IL 1979 1986 - - Illinois Waterway, Marseilles Canal, IL 1989 1990 - - Peoria Levees, IL - 1990 - - TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Burlington, IA Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Moline, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Evansdale, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL Fulton, IL Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Hannibal, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL Herget Drainage and Levee District, IL Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL September 1993 March 1994 April 1994 October 1993 January 1993 November 1993 October 1993 October 1993 March 1994 March 1994 September 1993 September 1993 February 1993 December 1992 October 1993 March 1994 September 1993 March 1994 May 1994 September 1993 October 1993 February 1993 July 1994 September 1993 September 1993 February 1993 February 1993 November 1993 February 1993 February 1993 March 1994 May 1994 February 1993 February 1993 23-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED (Continued) (See Section Project Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Marengo, IA Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL Milan, IL Muscatine Island, L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL Rock Island, IL Sabula, IA Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL South River Drainage District, MO Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage District Union No. 1 and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL The Sny Basin, IL Valley Drainage and Levee District IL Van Meter, IA Volga, IA Waterloo, IA West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL Worthington, MN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 14 of Text) Date Inspected December 1992 February 1994 February 1994 February 1994 March 1994 March 1994 November 1993 October 1993 February 1993 October 1993 March 1994 October 1993 September 1993 November 1993 March 1994 March 1994 November 1993 September 1993 October 1993 March 1994 February 1994 June 1993 February 1993 October 1993 February 1993 March 1994 December 1992 June 1993 April 1994 October 1993 September 1993 October 1993 February 1994 September 1992 TABLE 23-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 16 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Cedar River, Cedar River City, IA Cedar Falls, Cedar River, IA Des Moines River, Wapello, IA East Peoria, IL Illinois River, Liverpool, IL $ 8,658 34,692 10,000 107 42,623 23-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 23-I (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 16 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Kishwaukee River, Belvidere, IL S 27 Minnow Branch, Hannibal, MO 9,523 Oelwein, Fayette County, IA 128,332 Ottawa, IL 9,854 Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, IL 3,062 Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA 221,972 Stevens Creek, Village of Forsyth, IL 10,675 Tama, IA 524,554 Wolf Creek, LaPorte City, IA 1,852 TABLE 23-I Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (Preauthorization) (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) (See Section 16 of Text) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Henderson Creek, Warren County, IL $ 1,679 TABLE 23-I Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) (See Section 16 of Text) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Clayton County Bridge, Osterdock, IA $ 31,251 Clayton County, Elkport, Osterdock, IA 50,108 Clayton County Road Creek, Site 2, IA 23,820 Clayton County Road, NW, Osterdock, IA 41,178 Fox River, Bridge Site #7, Davis Co., IA 73 Highway 23/14, Jackson County, MN 11,166 Highway 23/8, Jackson County, MN 15,624 Mazon River, Goose Lake, Grundy County, IL 3,598 MS Riverview St., Bellevue, IA 28,735 Reddick Run, Essex Township, IA 11,000 South Raccoon River, Dexter, IA 6,167 Turkey River, Elgin Sewage Treatment, IA 14,815 Turkey River, Fayette County Road B64, IA 13,492 West Fork, Des Moines River, MN 7,591 23-16 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (Continued) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation) (See Section 16 of Text) Project and Location Federal Cost Advance Preparation: $ 176,690 Emergency Operations: 575,970 Rehabilitation: 9,247,669 Flood Control of '93 Emergency Operations Flood: 1,424,806 Rehabilitation: 25,999,950 O&M Emergency Supplement: 2,114,904 TABLE 23-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth on Dimensions Miter Sills at Low Water Available Lift at Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water' Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) IaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 below 13eardstown, IL 110 600 10.0 13.() 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.02 T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at flat pools. Lockport is due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. TABLE 23-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Illinois River, mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. 23-17 $ 2,733,499' REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 23-K (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project LaGrange Concrete Piles in sand Movable Concrete Piles in sand 1939 $ 2,744,592' (wicket and timber with Aframe- crest) Peoria Concrete Piles in sand Movable Concrete Piles in sand 1939 3,381,030' (wicket and timber type) Starved Rock Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 885,315' (tainter and gates) structural steel Marseilles Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 1,853,725' (tainter and gates) structural steel Dresden Island Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 2,503,376' (tainter and gates) structural steel Brandon Road Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 2,0:31,683' (tainter and gates) structural steel Lock port Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 133,608' (Bear trap) and (Bear trap) structural steel T.J. O'Brien Concrete Piles in clay Fixed Concrete Piles in clay 1960 6,954,700' and sheet and sheet piling piling Lock and dam - - - - - - 1,250,304' equipment Total ocks - - - - - - $ 24,471,832 and dams 1. Actual cost. TABLE 23-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places Starved Rock to Lockport Starved Rock to Grafton Calumet-Sag Channel Peoria small boat harbor $ 2,135,358' 813,318' 6,007,335 2,917,607 19,238,200 24,937' 23-18 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 'ITABLE 23-L (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Protection piers at all locks Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration Rebuild highway bridges Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Recreation Facilities, Code 711 Removal of Blue Island lock Grand Calumet River controlling works' St. Louis District Total additional features Total existing project 77,613' 5,141,474 5,466,804 19,327,850 20,828,435' 18,362,041' 445,000 288,600' 1,081,600' $100,442,142 $124,913,974 1. Actual cost. 2. Placed in inactive status November 19, 1974. TABLE 23-M EXISTING PROJECT See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 2. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams - - - IL and IN Grafton to Lockport, IL 291.1 miles 300 9 Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9 - junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel 4.2 miles 160 9 from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and 22.1 miles 175-300 9 Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL 23-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 23-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 (See Section 2 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $120,886,748 $343,460,698 $137,251,856 $601,599,302 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 - - 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 - - 1,858,936 Total $126,706,419 $343,460,698 $137,251,856 $607,418,973' 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on the of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. operation and care of the works of improvement under the provisions 23-20 ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT * District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River, Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Minnesota River, MN ................ 24-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ................. 24-2 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN ........................ 24-2 4. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP) ........ 24-3 5. Warroad Harbor and River, MN ........... 24-3 Beach Erosion Control 6. St. Croix River, Stillwater, MN ........... 24-4 Flood Control 7. Bassett Creek, MN ................... 24-4 8. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD ........................... 24-5 9. Chaska, MN ....................... 24-5 10. Eau Galle River, WI ................... 24-5 11. Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN ............ 24-6 12. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ............. 24-7 13. Houston, MN ...................... 24-7 14. Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN .... 24-7 15. La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI .. 24-8 16. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND .................. 24-8 17. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN ....................... 24-9 18. Mankato and North Mankato, MN .......... 24-9 19. Marshall, MN ........................... 24-9 20. Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN ... 24-10 21. Minnesota River at Henderson, MN ....... 24-10 22. Portage, WI ...................... 24-11 23. Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater River, MN ....................... 24-11 24. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD, and ND .................. 24-11 25. Rochester, MN .................. . 24-12 26. Roseau River, MN ................... 24-12 27. Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI ........... 24-13 28. Sheyenne River, ND ................. 24-13 29. Snake River at Alvarado, MN ............ 24-14 30. Souris River Basin, ND ............... 24-14 Page 31. State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI ......... 24-15 32. Sterling Center, Maple River, MN .......... 24-15 33. St. Hilaire, Riverside Cemetery, MN ........ 24-16 34. St. Paul, MN ......................... 24-17 35. Wabasha County, County Hwy 11, MN ...... 24-17 36. Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee Townships, Norman County, MN .................... 24-17 37. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects . 24-18 Miscellaneous 38. Other Work Under Special Authority .. . 39. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC & CE) ................... 40. National Emergency Preparedness (NEPP) 41. Regulatory Functions Program ....... General Investigations 42. Surveys ................... 43. Collection and Study of Basic Data .... 44. Advance Engineering and Design ..... ..... 24-18 ..... 24-18 ..... 24-18 ..... 24-18 ..... 24-19 ..... 24-19 .... 24-19 Tables Table 24-A Cost and Financial Statement ........ 24-20 Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 24-24 Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .. 24-25 Table 24-D Not Applicable Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............... 24-26 Table 24-F Not Applicable Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 24-28 Table 24-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River ............... 24-29 Table 24-I Red River of the North Drainage Basin: Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan ......... 24-30 Table 24-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... 24-31 Table 24-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............ 24-32 Table 24-L Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment ................ 24-33 Table 24-M General Investigations ............ 24-34 24-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Rises in Big Stone Lake, MN and SD, and flows southeasterly about 224 miles to Mankato, MN, thence northeasterly about 106 miles to join the Mississippi River opposite St. Paul, MN. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous projects. For details see page 1890 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1105 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides 9-foot depth below flat pool level of Mississippi River lock and dam 2 from mouth to mile 14.7, one-half mile above the railway bridge at Savage, MN, and 4-foot depth from mile 14.7 to 25.6 at Shakopee, MN. For details see page 1018 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See also page 1074 of Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. There are privately-owned terminals at miles 9, 13.1, 14.5, and two at mile 14.7. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hydrographic surveys cost $17,676. Snagging and clearing cost $3,150 by contract. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on project for 4-foot depth was completed in 1931. The United States owns 10 acres of land in fee 2 miles east of Savage, MN, and easements on 123.08 acres of land. 46.20 acres have been transferred from the Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force to the project. Navigation from mouth to Shakopee was practicable for drafts not in excess of 3 feet. A contract for work under 1958 authorization for a 9-foot channel started in May 1966 and was terminated in January 1967 when 56 percent complete. A channel dredging contract awarded in June 1967 was completed in August 1968. Dredging of 15,900 cubic yards was accomplished in FY 1994 to maintain the channel. Total costs for existing project to September 30, 1994, were $4,740,218, of which $1,940,180 was for new work and $2,800,038 for maintenance. In addition, cost from contributed funds was $139,671 for dredging to 9-foot depth under provisions of Section 4, River and Harbor Act of 1915, and $219,531 for work done for the State of Minnesota relative to modification of the project. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See Table 24-H on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities and equipment maintained, and surveys, repairs, and reports were made by hired labor at a cost of $1,208,090 and $200 by other Corps. Reservoirs were operated by contract at a cost of $812,193. Periodic inspection and dam safety costs were $268,749 by hired labor, $9,461 by contract and $13,998 by other Corps. A dike at Sandy Lake cost $135,000 by contract. Geographical information system resource inventory cost $1,240 by contract and $110 by hired labor. Cultural resource management cost $19,763 by hired labor and $531 by contract. Environmental review and survey analysis cost $9,077 by hired labor. Data collection and water analysis cost $93,743 by hired labor, $4,539 by contract, and $31,225 by U.S. Geological Survey. Real estate was 24-2 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT managed at a cost of $70,383. Lands and damages cost $46,976 by hired labor and $5,296 by contract. Miscellaneous engineering and design cost $259,460 by hired labor and $29,126 by contract. Supervision and inspection costs were $307,278 by hired labor and $6,263 by contract. Other miscellaneous costs were $-87. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, .maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by the United States. The United States has easements, flowage rights, and other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See Table 24-H for capacities and costs by reservoir.) 4. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP) Location. The program is authorized for the commercially navigable portions of the Upper Mississippi River System. In the St. Paul District, this includes the Mississippi, Minnesota, Black, and St. Croix Rivers in the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River System, recognizing its several purposes. It is intended to protect and/or enhance the river resources and guide future river management. The primary emphasis of the program is on habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects. Long term resource monitoring will provide the means for more informed management of the UMRS. Also authorized, are a study of the economic impacts of recreation, navigation traffic monitoring, and recreation projects (currently unfunded). The program was initiated in FY 1986 utilizing funds provided by the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. The execution of the program is being closely coordinated with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the three affected states in the St. Paul District. See Rock Island District Tables 23-A and 23-B for total program costs and authorizing legislation. In the St. Paul District, nine habitat projects have been completed. These are the Guttenberg Waterfowl Ponds (IA), Island 42 (MN), Lake Onalaska (WI), Blackhawk Park (WI), Pool 8 Islands (WI), Indian Slough (WI), Finger Lakes (MN), Lansing Big Lake (IA), and Cold Springs (WI). The projects are being operated and maintained by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, except for Blackhawk Park which is managed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Through FY 1994, funds allocated to the St. Paul District have amounted to $16,210,000 for design, construction and monitoring of habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects, $518,000 for long term resource monitoring, $750,000 for economic impacts of recreation study, and $969,000 for program management. Baseline monitoring, project evaluation and biological monitoring have been allocated $308,000, $252,000, and $713,000, respectively. The allocations for the overall program projected over a 15-year period for the St. Paul District are almost $60 million. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects for such projects not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, within the meaning of Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations during fiscal year. Costs during the year totaled $4,089,214. The majority of funds were expended on the planning, design, construction and monitoring of habitat projects. Design was initiated on five projects and continued on four; construction was initiated on three projects, continued on three, and completed on one project. Funds were also used for the economic impacts of recreation study, program management, and long term resource monitoring elements. 5. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN Location. At Southwestern extremity of Lake of the Woods, 36 miles west of mouth of Rainy River. (See NOAA Nautical chart 14999.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep from landing at Warroad to deep water in lake, channel being 9,200 feet long, 200 feet wide within harbor, and 300 feet wide out in lake; for a turning basin 500 by 900 feet to a depth of 8 feet; and for a pile-brush stone jetty on north side of channel extending from shore 700 feet into the lake. For additional details see page 1027 of Annual Report of 1965. Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements, and classified inactive was deauthorized on August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. (See Table 24-B for authorization legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one publicly owned wharf. There are two commercial fish wharves, one of which is served by a spur track, and a number of minor wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. 24-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A wall repair contract cost $256,452. Engineering and design cost $11,706. Supervision and inspection costs were $13,380. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Prospective jetty completed in 1910 and reconstructed as a rubble mound in 1929 is in good condition. Turning basin at Warroad wharves was completed in 1911, and a channel 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep in 1915. Controlling depth in river channel and lake approach channel was 6 feet below low-water datum for a minimum width of 100 feet. A walkway on the jetty is provided for public use. Portions of a revetment wall, constructed under Section 2 of Public Law 269, 69th Congress, in accordance with Article VIII of the Lake of the Woods Treaty, were repaired in 1994. Beach Erosion Control 6. ST. CROIX RIVER, STILLWATER, MN Location. In Washington County in eastern Minnesota along the St. Croix River about 18 miles northeast of St. Paul, Minnesota. (For general location, see Geological survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The proposed plan provides for repair of the existing 1000-foot retaining wall system, construction of a 1300-foot extension to the wall and expansion of the wall system to include a new secondary landward seepage wall to aid in flood protection for the downtown area. Estimated Federal cost (1993) for new work is $2,400,000 and $800,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide the entire costs of lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project and make a cash contribution to increase their share to 25 percent of total project costs for flood control. By letter dated March 23, 1993, the city of Stillwater indicated a willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation for flood control. Formal assurances will be requested prior to initiation of construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated at a cost of $285,152. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. Flood Control 7. BASSETT CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The proposed project consists of nonstructural and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural measures include continuation of existing floodplain regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily impound floodwaters and a new tunnel (part of which is being constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the plan are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, and a railroad bridge replacement. Estimated Federal cost (1993) for new work is $29,000,000 and $11,600,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. Under current cost sharing policies, when the costs of lands, easements, rights- of-way, relocations and disposal areas (LERRD) are less than 20 percent of total project costs, local interests are required to furnish the standard local cooperation requirements plus a cash contribution, the total of the two to amount to a minimum of 25 percent of the total project costs. On June 27, 1986, the City of Minneapolis entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Department of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Miscellaneous real estate costs were $40,561. Stage 2C1, Stage 2C2, Stage 4, and other miscellaneous construction contracts cost $19,429, $430,550, $230,053 and $43, respectively. Engineering and design cost $226,334 by contract, and $168,036 by hired labor. Construction management cost $32,225 by hired labor and $374 by contract. Total Federal costs were $1,120,823 and non- Federal, $26,782. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has been completed on all but three components. Of the three remaining components, one, the Medicine Lake Outlet Structure, is scheduled to be done by the local sponsor; another, the Highway 100 embankment and control structure, 24-4 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT will be completed by the Corps of Engineers, and the third, the Fruen Mill channel work and railroad bridge replacement, is being deleted from the project. 8. BIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN AND SD Location. On Minnesota River near Ortonville and Odessa, MN, and Big Stone City, SD, at the outlet of Big Stone Lake and in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle Counties, MN, and Grant County, SD. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and reservoir on Minnesota River above U.S. Highway 75, modification of Big Stone Lake outlet dam and silt barrier, bank stabilization along lower reach of Whetstone River, channel improvement on Minnesota River for 3 miles below outlet control dam at Big Stone Lake along with necessary relocations and acquisition of lands. These improvements would be made for wildlife conservation and development, flood control, and recreation. For additional details see Annual Report for 1970. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 579, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest map; and H. Doc. 193, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $87,575 by hired labor and $7,203 by contract. Data collection, water control and water quality analysis cost $57,655 by hired labor and $-9,996 by contract. Data collection by other government agencies cost $25,900. Real estate management cost $2,747 by hired labor and $19 by contract. Engineering and design costs were $43,121 by hired labor and $36,223 by contract. Supervision and inspection costs were $9,614. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. A general plan between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior for administrating the use of waters, land, or interests therein has been consummated, and a cooperative agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was approved. On March 31, 1975, the Secretary of the Army transferred lands in the project not required for Corps of Engineers operation and maintenance to the Department of Interior. The transfer of property was accepted by the Department of the Interior on May 21, 1975. The project was transferred to the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District for operation and maintenance. 9. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River, flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek, and appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 1.5 miles of new levee, and one pumping station on the Minnesota River; 1.1 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek; and 1.0 mile of diversion channel on East Creek. Approximately 2.9 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost (1994) for new work is $29,700,000 and $10,100,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on September 12, 1988. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real estate activities cost $64,336 by hired labor. A moist soil construction contract cost $220,000. Stage 4 construction levee contract cost $2,544,364. Cultural resources by hired labor cost $195. Engineering and design cost $465,886 by contract and $536,196 by hired labor. Supervision and inspection cost $229,183 by hired labor and $898 by contract. An adjustment was made for contributions in lieu of cash for $-119,880. Total Federal costs were $3,575,644 and non-Federal, $365,534. Condition at end of fiscal year. Stage 1 and Stage 2 construction is complete. Stage 4 construction contract is underway. Engineering work for the remaining stage is underway. 10. EAU GALLE RIVER, WI Location. At and in vicinity of Spring Valley, WI, on Eau Galle River 30 miles above its mouth at Chippewa River, and its tributary, Mines Creek, which flows through the village. Spring Valley is about 45 miles east of St. Paul, MN, and 36 miles west of Eau Claire, WI. (See Geological Survey map for Wisconsin for general location.) 24-5. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by further studies includes a retarding dam and reservoir on Eau Galle River immediately upstream from Spring Valley, and remedial works on Mines Creek including channel enlargement, a low levee, and a drop structure. Project provides for earth and rock-fill dam, an uncontrolled outlet and an uncontrolled spillway emerging above Mines Creek. See page 1030 of Annual Report for 1965 for further details. Proposed improvements on Burghardt Creek were eliminated. Improvements provide complete protection near Spring Valley for standard project flood, and below that point in decreasing value in proportion to distance from reservoir. Permanent conservation pool will serve a local need for a recreational area. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 52, 84th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 1083 of Annual Report for 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure and recreation facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations and evaluations were performed at a cost of $300,789 by hired labor and $110,089 by contract. Real estate management cost $9,082. Data collection cost $19,912 by hired labor and $7,790 by other government agencies. Water control cost $7,314. Water quality analysis by hired labor, contract, and water quality by other Corps of Engineer districts cost $1,251, $3,984, and $3,541, respectively. Equipment replacement cost $4,268 by hired labor and $169 by contract. Supervision and inspection costs were $31,545. Condition at end of fiscal year. Mines Creek improvements were substantially completed in 1964; minor work was accomplished in 1966. A contract for dam, spillway, and discharge channel, started July 1, 1965, was completed in October 1968. Recreational facilities have been provided. Remedial work to repair eroded gutters and road ditches was completed in September 1973. Repair of failing discharge conduit by installing a steel liner was completed in April 1982. 11. GILMORE CREEK, WINONA, MN Location. Gilmore Creek is located in southwestern portion of the city of Winona, Minnesota. Winona is the County Seat of Winona County and is located along the west bank of the Mississippi River about 120 miles south of St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project at Gilmore Creek is designed to provide protection from an estimated Gilmore Creek flood having a 1 percent chance of occurring during any one year (100-year flood.) The project involves raising the right bank levee along Gilmore Creek from Boilers Lake upstream to high ground, removing the Gilmore Avenue bridge and left bank approach and an existing left bank levee, reconstructing an existing earth levee along Ditch No. 3 between U.S. Highway 14 and 44th Avenue in Goodview, and constructing a continuous flood barrier from near 44th Avenue westerly to high ground west of Boilers Lake. The flood barrier would consist of a raise of the southbound lanes of Highway 61 east of 54th Avenue and an earth levee adjacent to Highway 61 west of 54th Avenue. Also, the project would involve modifications to the Boilers Lake outlet including replacement of the existing box culvert and construction of a weir at the head of the new box culvert. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction 13 July 1993 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement executed between the Federal Government and the city of Winona on 20 July 1993 required the city to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of buildings utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91- 646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection, and if necessary, for the purpose of completing operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including Section 601 24-6 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88- 352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army" as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." Operations and results during the fiscal year. Miscellaneous Real Estate costs were $29,850. Engineering and Design cost was $139,325. Federal costs were $167,204 and non-Federal $1,971. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the flood damage reduction project at Gilmore Creek was awarded in September 1994. Construction of the project was underway at the end of the fiscal year. 12. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Project restoration of wetland habitat conditions is taking place under the authority contained in Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, as amended. Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. The North Dakota Game and Fish Department has agreed to serve as the non- Federal sponsor for the environment improvement to the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contact cost $12,500. Engineering and design cost $816. Federal costs were $5,863 while non-Federal were $7,453. Maintenance: Structure was operated, maintained, inspected and evaluations were performed at a cost of $351,592. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. Construction of a habitat improvement project (under Section 1135 authority) was completed and the project was turned over to the local sponsor, the North Dakota Fish and Game Department. 13. HOUSTON, MN Location. In Houston County in southeastern Minnesota on the Root River in the city of Houston, Minnesota. Existing project. The plan of protection provides levee flood protection together with appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Main features of the project include 3.1 miles of levee, one-half mile of road raises, channel excavation, interior drainage facilities, a flood warning system, utility modifications and a recreational trail. Estimated Federal cost (1994) for new work is $4,590,000 and $1,610,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The project was approved for construction by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662) and has been reevaluated based on changes since the 1975 Feasibility Report. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. By a resolution dated April 8, 1991, the city of Houston expressed its commitment to the financial requirements of the project. The city reaffirmed its commitment by letter dated May 6, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design continued at a cost of $13,029. Condition at end of fiscal year. engineering and design is in progress. Preconstruction 14. LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Marsh Lake and Lac qui Parle and the Minnesota River between 24-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 head of Marsh Lake and Granite Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated, maintained, inspected and evaluations were performed at a cost of $262,159 by hired labor and $60,421 by contract. Data collection cost $33,359 by hired labor, $325 by contract, and $56,700 by U.S. Geological Survey. Water control analysis cost $130,169 and $47,800 by other Corps offices. Water quality analysis cost $12,426 by hired labor, $494 by other Corps offices and $10,064 by contract. Real estate cost $3,555. Clearing and snagging along the Minnesota River cost $22,142 and $36 by contract. Supervision and inspection cost $41,798. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been operated by the Government since transfer from State of Minnesota to the United States in September 1950. The United States owns fee title to 517.62 acres of land and easements on 19,859.47 acres of land. In 1957, 60.1 acres were withdrawn from public lands for use by the Department of the Army. Land acquisition is complete. Construction under present plan of improvement was started in September 1941 and completed in December 1951 except for recreational facilities. All structures are in good condition. 15. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. On the Kickapoo River which rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and impoundment of the Kickapoo River about 1 mile upstream from village of La Farge, operated for flood control, fish and wildlife conservation, general recreation, and a reduction of aggradation downstream from the dam, and supplemental protection at Soldiers Grove and at Gays Mills by means of levees, supplementary channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. See Annual Report for 1975 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1976) for new work is $55,400,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 557, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of $116,079. Condition at end of fiscal year. General and Real Estate design memorandums and detailed plans for the La Farge Dam and spillway and for relocations have been completed. Land acquisition negotiations began in December 1968. The first land payment was made on January 15, 1969, and the land acquisition program is 80 percent complete. Contracts for excavation of the left abutment, for test wells, and for construction of the outlet works and right abutment have been completed. A study of alternatives has been completed. All further construction has been indefinitely suspended. Work has been accomplished to provide for completion of relocation work left partially completed when construction was suspended. Soldiers Grove has relocated out of the floodplain area after receiving funds from other agencies. A study of a modified dry dam was completed in early FY 1985. On the basis of the study results, it was recommended that no further work be done to establish the economic feasibility of a dry or wet dam at La Farge and that the La Farge Lake and channel improvement project be deauthorized. 16. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Estimated cost (1994) to the United States for Major Rehabilitation is $5,700,000. Estimated cost (1994) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work is $17,380,000 and $309,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1962. Complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major Rehabilitation: A construction contract cost $60,000. Engineering and design by hired labor cost $272,993 and $228,521 by contract. Supervision and inspection cost 24-8 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT $27,795. Total Federal costs were $589,309. Dam Safety: A Dam Safety construction contract cost $100,000. Engineering and design cost $250,394 by hired labor and $365,715 by contract. Supervision and inspection cost $14,237. Total Federal costs were $661,346 and non- Federal costs, $69,000. Maintenance: Project was operated, maintained, inspected, investigated, monitored and evaluations were performed at a cost of $557,491 by hired labor and $30,916 by contract. Real estate management cost $37,599. Data collection cost $7,993 by hired labor, and $84,520 by other government agencies. A law enforcement contract cost $6,800. Water quality and water control analysis by hired labor cost $12,244 and $1,187, respectively. Spurge control cost $11,810 by contract and $10,481 by hired labor. Engineering and design cost $59,094 by hired labor, $39,256 by contract and an adjustment of $661 by other Corps offices. Supervision and inspection and other costs were $85,268. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. Baldhill Dam has been classified as a large, high hazard dam under the National Program for the inspection of dams. A risk assessment report prepared in June 1986 indicated a serious spillway discharge capacity deficiency. In July 1994, the first stage of construction of the Dam Safety modifications was started. Construction is currently underway. 17. LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SIOUX RIVER, SD AND MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River between upper end of Lake Traverse at Browns Valley, MN, and the mouth of Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge, MN. Lake drains through river to Red River of the North, and two waters form a portion of boundary between State of Minnesota and States of North and South Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Existing project was authorized by Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project and related facilities were operated and maintained, and inspected and evaluations were performed at a cost of $444,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in June 1948, except for minor recreational facilities. Fee title to 1,144.13 acres and easements on 6,172.25 acres of land have been acquired. White Rock Dam and Reservation control structures are in operation, the structures and appurtenances are in good condition. Remedial work for repair of apron at White Rock Dam was completed in November 1968. Roadways across structure are open to public travel. 18. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, MN Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in south-central Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. As modified as a result of severe 1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, pumping, and interior drainage features have been included in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek improvements were made during detailed studies as a result of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations made necessary by the project have been authorized at Federal expense. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Miscellaneous contract adjustments were made for $1,767. Administration, audit and other miscellaneous costs were $3,960. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 19. MARSHALL, MN Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its confluence with the Minnesota River at the city of Marshall, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1059 of Annual Report for 1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs amounted to 24-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 $1,802,866. The existing flood control project was completed in 1963. In response to a need for additional flood control, a feasibility study was completed in 1979. The project recommended in the feasibility report was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Section 401(a) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676. Improvements include 4.7 miles of additional levees, 3.8 miles of bank protection, 0.3 mile of new high-flow diversion channel, an interbasin overflow structure, modifications to the existing diversion and drop structures, and a recreation plan. The recreation plan consists of 2.5 miles of biking/walking trail, five miles of cross-country skiing/hiking trail, and related picnic and rest area facilities. The project would provide protection against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 115 years. Estimated Federal cost (1994) for new work is $6,340,000 and $2,460,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Project was transferred to local interests on December 23, 1963. For new work, see Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. By letter dated June 26, 1989, the city of Marshall indicated its willingness to participate financially in construction of a project consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $21,612. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of completed work was initiated August 1962 and completed December 1963. Preconstruction engineering and design is complete. Plans and specifications for the first stage of construction are complete. 20. MINNESOTA RIVER, BELGRADE TOWNSHIP, MN Location. Along the left bank of the Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, Nicollet County, about 85 miles southwest of St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. Provide for erosion control along the north bank of the Minnesota River to protect County State Aid Highway 41. The project involves clearing and placement of rock protection along 700 feet of riverbank. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in July 1993 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Nicollet County Minnesota has agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for this project. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and Nicollet County was fully executed on 6 August 1993. See Annual Report for 1993 for requirements. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $205,891. Engineering and Design costs were $12,556. Real Estate costs were $240. Miscellaneous project management costs were $5,349 by hired labor and $154 by contract. Supervision and inspection cost $12,535. Federal costs were $181,472 while non- Federal were $55,253. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications and real estate acquisition were complete and the project was advertised for construction. 21. MINNESOTA RIVER AT HENDERSON, MN Location. In Sibley County in southeastern Minnesota about 50 miles southwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project at Henderson involves a system of levees to protect the flood prone areas of the city from floods on the Minnesota River. The proposed levee is about 1.6 miles long and has an average height of 12 feet. Appurtenant interior flood control facilities include a system of interceptor storm sewers and ditches, and two ponding areas each with a gravity outlet and a pumping station designed to discharge impounded storm water during flood periods when exterior flood levels would require the gravity outlets to be closed. Provisions for the temporary closure of two state highways and a county highway are also included as project features. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction June 26, 1987, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the City of Henderson, the local sponsor, in May 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A pump and a transfer switch cost $2,714 and $9,582, respectively. Engineering and design cost $14,299 by hired labor. Construction management cost $9,603. Federal costs were $9,754 while non-Federal were $26,444. 24-10 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was substantially complete at the end of the fiscal year. 22. PORTAGE, WI Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 345, 78th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Location. In Columbia County in central Wisconsin along the Wisconsin River about 35 miles north of Madison, Wisconsin. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Wisconsin.) Existing project. The recommended plan provides for improvement to the existing levee system along the left bank of the Wisconsin River at Portage. The plan includes 1.2 miles of existing levee improvement; 1.6 miles of new levee; one highway and one railroad closure; cultural mitigation; and recreation features. The project would protect against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 500 years. Estimated Federal cost (1994) for new work is $6,040,000 and $2,220,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1989 for requirements. By Council Resolution dated June 25, 1992, the city of Portage indicated a willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation for flood control and recreation, subject to reaching agreement with the state of Wisconsin on cost-sharing responsibilities. A draft project cooperation agreement will be prepared during preconstruction planning and will be negotiated and finalized prior to initiation of construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $254,928. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. 23. RED LAKE RIVER, MN, INCLUDING CLEARWATER RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along upper reach of Red Lake River and also along Clearwater River, a tributary of Red Lake River, between a point near Plummer, MN, and a point just above the mouth of Ruffy Brook. Red Lake River, principal tributary of the Red River of the North, has its source at the outlet of Lower Red Lake in northwestern portion of Minnesota and flows westerly about 196 miles to its junction with Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, MN. Clearwater River has a general westerly course from its source near Ebro, MN, about 205 miles to its junction with Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structures were operated and maintained and inspections, evaluations and engineering and design was performed at a cost of $235,336. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of major improvements on Red Lake River and the Clearwater River was completed in June 1956. Replacement of rock and brush dam on Red Lake River at Indian boundary with a concrete structure and appurtenant work was completed in June 1959 to restore marshes in the area to better wildlife conditions. Construction of a bridge on Clearwater Road was completed by the Indian Service in July 1965. A contract for improvements on Red Lake River was completed in November 1966, and a contract for restoration of water levels in Red Lake River marshes was completed in November 1968. Operation of Red Lake Dam was assumed by the Corps on April 1, 1951. Channels are in good condition and indicate effectiveness of project as a flood control measure. 24. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MN, SD & ND Location. Red River of the North Basin, within the United States, includes northeastern corner of South Dakota and much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Red River of the North, formed by confluence of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) Previous project. See Annual Report for 1962 for navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of this project. Existing project. Project includes improvements for local protection in interests of flood control and major drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with previously authorized Federal reservoir project at Baldhill site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See Table 24-I for active units in comprehensive basin plan and Table 24-E for projects completed under separate authorities.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, authorized 24-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were beyond legal authority of the city of Grand Forks to acquire. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks project. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1965. Following the flood of 1965, the city of East Grand Forks requestbd reactivation of the project and furnished a resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April 17, 1975, permitting local interests additional time to furnish assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was passed by the city on March 27, 1975, and accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. In a July 9, 1986 letter, the city of East Grand Forks withdrew support for the project presented in the General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $88,236. Engineering and design cost $30,125 by hired labor. Supervision and inspection cost $16,180. Federal costs were $92,853 while non-Federal were $41,688. Maintenance: Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at a cost of $86,231 by hired labor and $7,165 by contract. Real estate management cost $5,652. Data collection cost $21,212 by hired labor and $20,280 by U.S. Geological Survey. Water control cost $20,893. Water quality analysis cost $4,931 by hired labor. Engineering and design cost $243,079 by hired labor and $18,641 by contract. Supervision and inspection costs were $17,043. Condition at end of fiscal year. Major construction for all active units except for East Grand Forks, MN, is complete. The East Grand Forks project was reclassified from active to inactive status on August 19, 1988. A total of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, ND, started in May 1959, was completed in July 1963. Construction of a habitat improvement project (under Section 1135 authority) was completed at OrweUll Lake and Dam and plans and specifications for another habitat improvement project were completed. The local sponsor is the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. (See Table 24-I at end of chapter for total costs of new work to date.) 25. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmsted County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for stream channel modifications and levees functioning in combination with a system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, in addition to the reservoirs, include 5.7 miles of riprapped or gabion-lined channels, 0.7 mile of architecturally-treated concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, three drop structures, 1.8 miles of levee, and 6.5 miles of hiking and biking trails. Estimated cost (1994) to the United States for new work is $70,300,000 and $26,400,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed August 27, 1987 by the city of Rochester. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts for Stage 1A2B, 1B2, 1B3, 2A, 2B, 3A and 4 cost $-18,435, $11,481, $-96,015, $3,001,899, $92,165, $2,300,010 and $5,145,431, respectively. Engineering and design cost $760,546. Construction management cost $839,201. Real estate costs totalled $92,272. Audit costs were $6,765. Total Federal costs were $13,652,648 and non-Federal costs were $-1,517,328. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of lower Zumbro River (Stages 1A1, 1A2A, 1A2B, 1B3), Silver Lake Dam (Stages 1B1 and 1B2), and upper Zumbro River (Stage 2B) is complete. Construction of Upper Zumbro River (Stage 2A) Cascade Creek (Stage 3), and Bear Creek (Stage 4) is underway. 26. ROSEAU RIVER, MN Location. In Roseau County on the Roseau River in northwestern Minnesota near the city of Duxby. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1988 for description of project as authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965. The project, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, provided for construction of about 24-12 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 6 miles of flood control levee approximately 3 feet high in the vicinity of Duxby, Minnesota. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements of project as authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965. See Annual Report for 1991 for requirements of modified project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering costs for a reevaluation of flood control alternatives at Roseau totaled $30,935. Total Federal costs were $2,491 and non-Federal costs were $28,444. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract for the Duxby levee project was awarded in July 1991. Construction is complete. 27. SANDERS CREEK, BOSCOBEL, WI Location. Boscobel is located in north central Grant County in southwestern Wisconsin, approximately 70 miles west of Madison, Wisconsin. This project addresses flooding problems from Sanders Creek, which flows through the center of Boscobel and enters the Wisconsin River about one mile west of the city. Existing project. The project is designed to increase flow capacity to protect against a one percent flood event on Sanders Creek. Major features of the project include regrading about 1/2 mile of the existing overflow channel, replacement of the Kansas Street bridge, demolition of the Bluff Street bridge, with a drop structure constructed at the old Bluff Street bridge site, and replacement of the railroad bridge timber piers with concrete monoliths. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in October 1991 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. In addition, at 100 percent non-Federal expense, a new bridge deck and approaches were added to the Bluff Street drop structure design. Local cooperation. See Annual Report of 1993 for requirements. The City of Boscobel agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for this project. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and City of Boscobel was fully executed on 19 December 1991. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $347,790. Engineering and design cost $12,137 by hired labor. Construction management cost $33,075 by hired labor. Total Federal costs were $232,742, non-Federal costs $160,260. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for construction of the project was awarded in December 1992. Construction of the project is essentially complete. 28. SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. The Sheyenne River Basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the city of West Fargo. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act consists of three major components for Federal implementation: 1) 11.9 miles of levee and a 6.7 mile flood diversion channel at West Fargo; 2) 7.5 miles of flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo; and 3) a five-foot raise of the Baldhill Dam flood control pool. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 stipulated that the project shall also include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection on the Maple River. There are several items of local cooperation required to implement the plan, and several components identified for non-Federal implementation which would supplement the recommended plan. Estimated cost (1993) to the United States for new work is $29,990,000 and $16,110,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. Project consists of three separable components each requiring a local cooperation agreement. The Southeast Cass Water Resource District is the local sponsor for the West Fargo Unit and the Horace to West Fargo Unit. The local cooperation agreement for the West Fargo Unit was executed on July 25, 1988, and for the Horace to West Fargo unit on March 6, 1990. The Sheyenne River Joint Water Resource District has been formed to serve as the sponsor for the Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise unit. The Maple River Reservoir Unit has been deleted from the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract at West Fargo for channels cost $93,694. Engineering and design cost $177,172 by hired labor. Construction management cost $550 by contract and $21,881 by hired labor. Engineering and design at Horace cost $34,409. For Baldhill Dam, engineering and design cost $67,530, while real estate planning costs were $48,567. Total Federal costs were $443,253 and non-Federal costs were $550. 24-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of both the West Fargo and Horace to West Fargo Units are essentially complete. Both of these units were operated during both the spring and summer floods of 1993 and performed very well. Evaluation of real estate needs, design of the structural modifications and coordination with the Sheyenne River Joint Water Resource District, for the raise of the flood pool at Baldhill Dam, has been initiated. The Maple River Reservoir unit has been deleted from the project due to lack of economic justification. 29. SNAKE RIVER AT ALVARADO, MN Location. Alvarado is located in Marshall County in northwestern Minnesota approximately 20 miles north of Grand Forks, North Dakota. For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota. Existing project. The flood control project at Alvarado is designed to protect the city from a Snake River flood having an estimated one percent chance of occurring during any one year (100-year flood). The project involves the construction of about 1.4 miles of earth levees and 600 feet of concrete floodwall, and interior flood control facilities involving four ponding areas with gated outlet pipes, a pumping station and interceptor ditches and conduits. With the project the city would be required to provide temporary sandbag closures of two roadway locations and two railroad relocations during extreme flood events. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction 21 April 1992 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1993 for requirements. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Alvarado on 27 April 1992. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $265,558. Engineering and design by hired labor cost $28,150. Construction management cost $38,028 by hired labor and $2,588 by contract. Other miscellaneous costs were $292. Total costs, all Federal, were $334,616. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the flood control project at Alvarado was awarded in May 1993. Construction of the project was 75 percent complete at the end of the fiscal year. 30. SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam is located about 20 miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The current plan of improvement authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 is the one-time purchase of 377,800 acre-feet of flood storage in Rafferty and Alameda Dams in Saskatchewan, Canada and the operation of these dams with the existing Boundary Dam and Lake Darling Dam to provide 100-year flood protection at Minot, North Dakota. The Act also authorizes those flood control measures upstream and downstream of the dam which are necessary for effective operation of the project. The 4-foot raise of the Lake Darling design pool (authorized by Section II of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1982, PL 97- 88) and the construction of Burlington Dam (authorized by PL 91-611) will no longer be authorized upon completion of the structure(s) in Canada. An International Agreement between Canada and the United States was signed in October 1989. The work under the current plan authorized by PL 99-662, consists of either one or two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada (known as the Rafferty and Alameda projects); a modified outflow structure at Lake Darling Dam; a flood warning system for Minot; levee and channel improvements at Sawyer and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot; levee and diversion channel at Renville County Park; flood proofing of about 90 rural homes in the basin and the purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; and modifications to dams 320, 326, 332, 341 and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. Estimated Federal cost (1994) for new work is $113,100,000 and $8,180,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. Representatives of the water resource districts from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties area agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at Velva was signed in November 1984. A local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project as authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was signed in October 1989. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design of project features continued. Respective costs for the applicable sub-projects are as follows: Miscellaneous contracts and work by others adjustments were $-174,992. Burlington to Minot stages 2, 3, and 4, costs were $65,729 by hired labor and $289,522 by 24-14 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT contract. Sawyer improvement costs were $1,650 by hired labor and $47,000 by contract. Flood insurance study costs were $3,552 by hired labor. Rural improvement costs were $38,303 by hired labor and $93,574 by contract. Refuge structures costs were $223,041 by hired labor and an adjusted decrease of $-35,548 by contract. Renville County Park improvement costs were $16,829 by hired labor and $58,222 by contract. Cash contributions for the Alameda Dam was an adjusted decrease of $16,311. Canadian dams construction review costs were $930. Lake Darling Dam improvement costs included an adjusted decrease of $-1,156,586 by hired labor and costs of $2,982,026 by contract. Flood warning systems costs were $126,455 by hired labor and $822 by contract. Study management costs were $31,874 by hired labor. Rural flowage easements costs were $8,938 by hired labor. Total Federal costs were $2,581,107, non-Federal costs $23,923. Maintenance: Water quality analysis cost $81,725 by other government agency. Water quality data collection and analysis by hired labor cost $10,254 and $15, respectively. Supervision and inspection cost $5,448. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the channel and levee improvement work at Velva, Sawyer, Renville County Park and Burlington to Minot Stages 1, 2, and 3 is complete. Construction at Rafferty Dam is complete. Construction at Alameda Dam is nearly complete. Construction on rural improvements Stage 1, road raises and acquisitions, is complete. Construction on improvements to Fish and Wildlife Service refuge dams is complete. Lake Darling Dam Stage 1 construction is complete. Lake Darling Dam Stage 2 construction is underway. 31. STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, WI Location. In La Crosse County in west-central Wisconsin, on the south side of the City of La Crosse. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvement for local protection (flood control) consists of channel deepening and enlarging downstream from Hagen Bridge to the mouth of Pammel Creek and includes 13,600 feet of concrete-lined rectangular channel, a drop chute inlet structure, a side channel inlet structure, a stilling basin, a terminus structure, and three new street bridges. The upper 4,000 feet of rectangular channel is designed for supercritical flow and the remaining 9,600 feet of channel is designed for subcritical flow. The project provides Standard Project Flood (SPF) protection. The city replaced a fourth bridge in 1980 that was previously included in the authorized plan. The city also replaced a railroad bridge in 1985 that was also included in the authorized plan. In 1986, the city constructed 450 feet of rectangular channel in the downstream reach to SPF protection. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 360, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) The 1992 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) authorized a $1,467,000 reimbursement to the City of LaCrosse, Wisconsin for prior work. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1969 for requirements. The local sponsor withdrew support for the project in 1976 citing increased non-Federal costs and lack of agreement on local cost sharing between three local units of government located within the project area. The project was reclassified as inactive on April 7, 1977, but was reactivated on November 8, 1978, after the La Crosse County Board of Supervisors, the La Crosse City Council, and the Town of Shelby passed separate resolutions on September 17, 1978, July 13, 1978, and July 10, 1978, respectively, which requested continuance of the project. A local cooperation agreement between the Department of the Army and the City of La Crosse, Wisconsin, for the construction of the State Road flood control project was entered into August 11, 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real estate costs were $3,597. The local sponsor was reimbursed $1,467,000 under Section 102(gg) of the 1992 WRDA. A Stage 3 construction contract and miscellaneous contracts cost $333,539 and $6,407, respectively. Cultural resources cost $4,227 by hired labor. Engineering and design cost $93,485 by hired labor and $8,294 by contract. Construction and management costs were $58,780 by hired labor and $2,609 by contract. Total Federal costs were $1,797,678, non-Federal $180,260. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. 32. STERLING CENTER, MAPLE RIVER, MN Location. Along the left bank of the Maple River, Blue Earth County, about 85 miles southwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Existing project. Provide for erosion control along the west bank of the Maple River to protect County State Aid Highway No. 1. The project involves constructing a steepened slope and placing riprap along 160 feet of riverbank. the project was approved for construction in July 1994, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Blue Earth County agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for this project. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and Blue Earth County, executed on 4 August 1994, required the local interests to provide during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of the 24-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of buildings utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and special facilities determined by the government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate, the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government the right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection, and if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with applicable Federal and state laws and regulations, including Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real estate cost $423. Miscellaneous studies cost $31,642. Engineering and design cost $18,775. Total Federal costs were $50,840. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for construction of the erosion control was advertised in August 1994. 33. ST. HILAIRE, RIVERSIDE CEMETERY, Location. Riverside Cemetery is located along the right bankline of the Red Lake River in Pennington County, Minnesota, approximately 2 miles north of St. Hilaire, Minnesota. St. Hilaire is approximately 40 miles east of East Grand Forks, Minnesota, and 315 miles northwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project at Riverside Cemetery involves placing approximately 1,600 cubic yards of rock fill along a 450-foot reach of the right bankline of the Red Lake River. The rock fill cross section would have a minimum thickness of 2.5 feet and would include a bench. There would be a 1 vertical to 2 horizontal slope above the bench and a 1 vertical to 1.25 horizontal slope below the bench to existing ground. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction 23 April 1993 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement executed between the Federal Government and the Red Lake Watershed District on 10 June 1993 required the watershed district to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of buildings utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection and if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." 24-16 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Miscellaneous real estate costs were $445. A construction contract cost $74,705. Miscellaneous project management costs were $6,018. Engineering and design cost $8,012 by hired labor and $123 by contract. Supervision and inspection cost $4,503. Federal costs were $71,395 and non-Federal, $22,411. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the emergency streambank protection project at Riverside Cemetery on the Red Lake River near St. Hilaire, Minnesota was awarded in February 1994. Construction of the project was 95% complete at the end of the fiscal year. 34. ST. PAUL, MN Location. In Ramsey County at St. Paul, Minnesota, on the Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous project. For details see page 27-20 of Annual Report for 1974. Existing project. Since completion of the St. Paul and South St. Paul flood control project in 1964, the protected area has experienced two floods greater than the previous flood of record. The plan of protection provides for a nominal 4-foot barrier raise along the existing project alignment. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. The local cooperation agreement was executed on August 22, 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real estate activities cost $12,127. Construction contract costs were $5,043,832. Engineering and construction management costs were $193,419 and $493,140 respectively. Construction management by contract cost $4,554. Total Federal costs were $4,686,200 and non-Federal costs were $1,060,872. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Stage 1 and Stage 2 is complete. Stage 3 is under construction. 35. WABASHA COUNTY, COUNTY HIGHWAY 11, MN Location. Along the left bank of the Zumbro River, Wabasha County, about 65 miles southeast of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Existing project. Provide for erosion control along the north bank of the Zumbro River to protect County State Aid Highway 11. The project involves clearing and shaping the bank and placement of rock protection along 2,750 feet of riverbank. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in April 1993 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1993 for requirements. Wabasha County, Minnesota has agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for this project. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and the city of Wabasha was fully executed on 12 May 1993. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real estate costs were $742. A construction contract cost $275,095. Construction management cost $36,281 by hired labor and $51 by contract. Engineering and design costs were $1,894. Total Federal costs were $234,602, non- Federal, $79,461. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications and real estate acquisition were complete and the project was advertised for construction. 36. WILD RICE RIVER, HENDRUM / LEE TOWNSHIPS, NORMAN COUNTY, MN Location. Along a 16-mile reach of the Wild Rice River in Norman County, Minnesota, about 200 miles northwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Existing project. Provide for flood damage reduction along the Wild Rice River. The project involves snagging and clearing the Wild Rice River from its confluence with the Red River of the North to a point 16 miles upstream. The project was approved for construction in April 1993, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. The Wild Rice Watershed District agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for this project. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and Wild Rice Watershed District was executed on 3 August 1993. Local interests are required to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; 24-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 perform all relocations and alterations of buildings utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91- 646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection, and if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations, including Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88- 352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost $2,857. A construction contract cost $180,184. Engineering and design cost $8,164 by hired labor and $5,431 by contract. Construction management cost $24,888 by hired labor and $55 by contract. Total Federal costs were $176,579, non-Federal, $45,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the flood control project at Hendrum and Lee Townships was awarded in December, 1993. The project was 80 percent complete at the end of the fiscal year. 37. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See Table 24-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $118,612. Total cost to September 30, 1994, is $1,500,500. Miscellaneous 38. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Aquatic Plant Control program (Section 302, Public Law 298, 89th Congress) study and program management cost $43,915 by hired labor. Contract for aquatic plant control operations at Buffalo Lake, Wisconsin cost $28,477. Engineering and design by hired labor cost $844. Condition and operation studies for removal of silt and aquatic growth in Sauk Lake, Minnesota (Section 602, Water Resources Development Act of 1986) cost $3,564 by hired labor. Supervision and inspection and other miscellaneous costs were $55,324. Total Federal costs for the Sauk Lake project were $58,888. Emergency work performed in response to the 1993 Midwest flooding (FY 1993 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 103-75) included riprap repair at Mississippi River locks and dams and bank erosion repair at the Lake City small boat harbor. Total cost for work carried out under this authority amounted to $166,762. 39. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Total FC & CE $230,715 289,523 456,785' $977,023 'Excludes $4,350 contributed funds for maintenance. 40. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Mobilization Preparedness Continuity of Government Preparedness Total NEPP $ 1,490 60,025 $61,515 41. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation Enforcement Studies Environmental Impact Statements Total Regulatory $2,059,889 1,009,347 19,336 293,287 $3,381,859 24-18 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $2,656,590 which included four flood damage prevention studies, two special studies, miscellaneous activities, and coordination with both Federal and non-Federal agencies. Table 24-M provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year cost was $229,859 which included the items concerning international water studies, flood plain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 24-M provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 44. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year cost was $289,569 which included three local protection projects. Table 24-M provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. For details of the individual projects see Sections 13, 19, and 22. 24-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 1994 1. Minnesota River, MN 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN 5. Warroad Harbor and River, MN 6. St. Croix River, Stillwater, MN 7. Bassett Creek, MN 8. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD 9. Chaska, MN 10. Eau Galle River, WI 11. Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN 12. Homme Lake and Dam, ND 13. Houston, MN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost $2,057,722 2,057,722' 24,000 24,312 11,000 10,841 28,000 21,669 13,941 2,800,038 20,826 2,800,038 - - - - 4,398,628 - - - - 4,398,6282 2,358,500 2,536,000 2,771,000 3,529,305 43,785,660 2,355,190 2,576,153 2,586,893 3,332,614 43,346,3993 - - - - 425,000 -- - - 425,000 - - - - 86,105 - - - - 86,105 323,000 70,421 36,330 1,580,779 281,538 1,573,409 - 2,400,000 2,400,000 - 285,152 285,152 7,460,000 1,654,000 1,321,000 9,288,845 1,841,549 711,848 905,000 28,722,000 1,120,823 28,321,9774 S- - - 12,175,000 - - - 12,174,915S 131,000 157,000 189,000 274,000 3,541,954 130,722 144,152 204,986 260,061 3,520,865 3,179,000 916,000 3,898,000 4,785,000 21,957,000 3,916,715 950,558 1,436,192 3,575,644 18,283,9466 - - - - 9,039,250 - - - - 9,039,250 575,000 627,000 433,000 485,150 9,180,740 568,633 567,097 491,360 499,734 9,171,741 189,000 66,985 8,000 7,163 - 280,000 102,000 1,027,000 158,742 176,079 167,204 988,241' 25,000 8,939 - - 1,429,097 394 5,863 1,418,4551 86,000 105,000 188,000 350,000 3,258,556 91,107 106,578 175,989 351,592 3,239,413 367,000 340,000 217,000 411,012 338,239 199,752 - 1,800,000 13,029 1,794,013 24-20 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 1994 14. Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN 15. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 16. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND 17. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN 18. Mankato and North Mankato, MN 19. Marshall, MN 20. Minnesota River, at Belgrade, MN 21. Minnesota River at Henderson, MN 22. Portage, WI 23. Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater River, MN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - - - - 964,873 - - - - 964,873 497,000 443,000 526,000 667,000 8,929,908 485,733 474,521 503,419 681,448 8,912,312 - - - - 18,642,000 - - - - 18,642,000 33,000 34,036 79,000 81,092 35,000 114,000 567,457 30,781 116,079 562,086 - - - - 3,325,638 - - - - 3,325,638 9 927,000 1,151,000 1,184,000 771,000 20,460,531 886,109 1,171,241 1,029,052 945,320 20,437,057 - - - 689,000 689,000 - - - 589,309 589,309 -400,000 56,666 100,000 500,000 1,145,000 4,026,000 -9,424 509,201 661,346 3,439,34110 - - - - 1,339,727 - - - - 1,339,727 270,400 413,000 489,000 378,000 6,245,032 284,753 399,599 402,936 444,600 6,208,584 -108,000 223,521 25,000 25,652 10,000 1,298 44,136 -321,510 -15,000 -290,000 96,965,500 93,741 5,727 96,951,10511 25,000 182,000 24,292 179,450 30,000 25,216 10,248 25,000 2,777,866 21,612 2,771,18612 53,000 228,000 321,000 63,803 181,472 271,79013 - 60,000 1,907,500 933 9,754 1,857,146' 168,000 481,000 506,000 162,000 1,928,000 185,772 480,801 388,629 254,928 1,902,260 - - - - 3,120,079 - - - - 3,120,07915 54,000 58,603 93,000 85,482 100,000 417,000 1,954,627 70,610 235,336 1,732,388 24-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 1994 24. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND 25. Rochester, MN 26. Roseau River, MN 27. Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI 28. Sheyenne River, ND 29. Snake River, Alvarado, MN 30. Souris River Basin, ND 31. State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI 32. Sterling Center, MN 33. St. Hilaire, MN 34. St. Paul, MN 35. Wabasha, County Hwy 11, MN 36. Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee, MN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 30,000 19,219 3,000 6,006 55,000 37,334 69,000 8,295,984 92,853 8,294,39716 252,000 433,000 457,000 580,000 6,748,386 259,272 426,183 458,237 445,127 6,595,089 8,221,000 9,445,000 11,153,000 22,709,000 72,180,000 8,236,115 9,426,457 11,070,197 13,652,648 63,019,2881" 172,000 102,743 21,732 61,799 15,000 24,084 - 1,004,000 41,546 770,281 8,021,000 3,018,000 8,889,031 3,050,300 295,000 51,420 - 2,340,000 2,491 2,336,58318 35,000 1,411,500 232,742 1,375,36319 676,000 345,000 21,228,000 494,219 443,253 21,075,6140 - 888,000 280,000 1,773,000 265,130 761,453 334,616 1,697,82721 25,432,000 22,500,000 6,225,000 13,212,000 100,941,000 26,102,157 22,613,290 5,018,050 2,581,107 88,921,209" - 67,000 - 59,896 70,000 74,358 96,000 233,000 97,412 231,666 4,322,000 4,608,000 2,698,000 1,467,000 21,817,000 4,624,720 4,630,130 2,132,653 1,797,678 21,515,727" 30,000 8,753 25,828 20,000 10,339 38,000 27,963 46,000 50,840 66,000 61,179 73,000 146,000 71,395 133,93924 750,000 1,714,000 3,797,000 4,985,000 12,634,000 667,125 1,740,367 3,304,632 4,686,200 11,778,359" 15,000 12,640 12,000 9,223 20,000 20,986 2,678 40,000 274,000 349,000 37,397 234,602 305,625" 37,200 269,000 318,200 26,758 176,579 215,2387 'Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. Excludes $359,202 contributed funds. 2includes $681,805 for new work for previous projects. 3Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 4Excludes $1,939,202 contributed funds. In addition, $413,689 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. SExcludes $152,247 contributed funds. In addition, $486,313 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by the Ottertail Power Company. 'Excludes $2,709,074 contributed funds. In addition, $49,547 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 'Excludes $1,971 contributed funds. 'Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. Includes $22,358 expended during FY 91-FY94 under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 authority. Excludes also $7,453 contributed funds under Section 24-22 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1135 authority. 9Excludes $208,000 contributed funds. '�Excludes $69,000 contributed funds. "Excludes $79,537 contributed funds. 12Includes $1,802,866 for new work for previous project. '3Excludes $55,253 contributed funds. "Excludes $284,726 contributed funds. "SExcludes $30,020 contributed funds. '6Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit $11,239, which is classed as "deferred" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. Excludes $43,852 contributed funds for work under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 authority. "Excludes $4,999,767 contributed funds. In addition, $637,258 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments and 3,649,555 for relocations accomplished under a government contract but which are a non-Federal responsibility. "Excludes $60,429 contributed funds. 19Excludes $171,564 contributed funds. In addition, $52,643 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. "Excludes $1,150,000 sunk costs for deauthorized Kindred Lake unit (see Table 24-G.) Excludes $419,318 contributed funds for Horace to West Fargo unit and $1,002,857 for West Fargo unit. 2 tExcludes $93,891 contributed funds. "Excludes $4,919,000 sunk costs for deferred Lake Darling Dam unit (see Table 24-E) and $5,679,113 contributed funds. nExcludes $225,000 sunk costs for inactive Ebner Coulee unit (see Table 24-E) and $4,128,396 contributed funds. "Excludes $22,411 contributed funds. "Excludes $2,693,370 contributed funds. In addition, $15,000 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. ~Excludes $79,461 contributed funds. 7Excludes $45,000 contributed funds. 24-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN July 13, 1892 Open-channel improvement from mouth to Shakopee to obtain a Annual Report 1891. channel of 4-foot depth to accommodate vessels with 3-foot draft. P. 2209 July 3, 1958 Dredging to provide channel of 9-foot depth from mouth to S. Doc. 144. 84th. mile 14.7 Cong., 2nd sess.' 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN March 3, 1899 Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. March 2, 1907 Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. June 25, 1910 Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech H. Doc. 363, 61st Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project Cong., 2nd sess. abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) July 27, 1916 Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and H Doc. 413, 64th Gull Lake. Cong., 1 sess.' June 26, 19342 Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. 5. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN March 3, 1899 Dredging bar at mouth of Warroad River. Specified in Act. June 6, 1900 Entrance channel 300 feet wide and 7 feet deep. H. Doc. 92, 56th Cong., 2d sess.' June 13, 19023 March 3, 1905 Enlarging turning basin. H. Doc. 703, 61st Cong., 2d sess.' June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Deepening to 8 feet August 5, 1977 Deauthorized portion of entrance channel and turning basin to Public Law 93-251 complete project width and depth. 'Contains latest published map. 2Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3Appropriation Latest published map is opposite p. 1984 in Annual Report for 1911. 24-24 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-C, OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $57,768 Black River, WI 1 1950 67,585 Lake Traverse, MN and SD 4 1921 92 - Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MN s 1925 47,794 3,891 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed' 1923 9,070 - Red River of the North, MN and ND ," 1921 293,344 76,209 St. Croix River, MN and WI Completed 1991 150,410 1,183,355 Wisconsin River, WI .33 1888 - - Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive7 1928 27,941 11,139 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN Completed 1993 515,000' 35,941 'Existing channel adequate for commerce (see Table 24-G for deauthorized portion of project.) Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin River, WI'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2nd sees.) Expenditures included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. 3No commerce reported. 'Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong 1st sess.) SAbandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 1st sess.) 'Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d sess.) 'Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc., 69th Cong. 1st Sess.) 'Excludes $307,556 contributed funds. 24-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Crow Wing Cty, MNZ Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND' Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND Cannon River at Faribault, MN' Devils Lake, ND 2 Dry Run, IA Elk River, MN Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN2 Enderlin, Maple River, ND2 Grafton Pumping Station, ND' Grand Mound, State Historic Site, MN' Guttenberg, IA Hanover, Hennepin County, MN' Irving Township, Jackson County, WI' Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI' Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI' Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN' Lake Darling Dam, ND Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN2 Lost River, MN Lower Branch Rush River, ND2 Middle River at Argyle, MN2 Minnesota River at LeSucur, MN' Minneota, MN2 Minot, ND Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Pembina River, ND Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI' Prairie du Chien, WI Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN Red Lake River at Huot, MN' Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN' Red Lake River, State Hwy 32, MN' Red River of the North at Argusville, ND2 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN' Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN' Red River of the North at Fargo, ND-Moorhead, MN' Red River of the North at Halstad, MN2 Red River of the North at Oslo, MN2 Red River of the North at Pembina, ND2 Redwood River below Marshall, MN2 Root River at Hokah, MN' Rushford, MN Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN' Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND' Souris River, Velva, ND' St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI (Ebner Coulee Unit) Twin Valley Lake, MN Upper Iowa River, IA Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active' Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed 1988 1985 1983 1991 1992 1966 1970 1992 1990 1990 1992 1974 1988 1984 1986 1987 1989 1987 1991 1967 1974 1993 1986 1963 1983 1957 1983 1989 1991 1991 1984 1984 1993 1990 1990 1992 1986 1984 1979 1960 1992 1980 1985 1988 1988 1974 1987 1988 1964 $471,000 58,500 5,568,600 s 62,585 6 2,732,000 1,790,759 7 259,700 ' 343,000 9 4,000,00010 92,865 " 242,000 '2 2,361,915 259,500 189,600 158,500 33,000 61,326 " 4,919,0001' 1,353,478 " 517,51916 1,000,000 " 2,360,000 250,000 '" 161,545 21,479,500'9 1,675,835 62,762w 3,529,000 311,00021 64,500 131,000 151,665" 1,534,000 85,66523 27,500 226,5002' 2,012,000 1,960,200 2,000,000 202,400 239,6272 3,192,333 250,000 2 111,000 137,500 8,476,012"27 225,000 2,115,700 888,445 24-26 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance Velva, ND 2 Completed 1970 334,628 - Vermillion River, Hastings, MN2 Completed 1980 999,900 - Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Completed 1985 182,000 - Hastings, MN' Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN' Completed 1993 113,700 - Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN' Completed 1987 250,000 - Warner Road, Sibley Street, Mississippi River, Completed 1992 500,0002 - St. Paul, MN Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN Completed 1989 5,620,700 - Winona, MN Completed 1989 32,741,131 - Zumbro River at Genoa, MN' Completed 1992 34,500" Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 - Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN' Completed 1990 141,44032 - 'Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 2Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 'Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 4Preconstruction planning has not started. Phase I completed under General Investigations. SAdvance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Lake Darling project. Additional authorization required for implementation of recommended plan. The Senate Report 97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 'Excludes $18,362 contributed funds. 'Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 'In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. 'Excludes $201,544 contributed funds. OExcludes $150,191 contributed funds. "Excludes $27,583 contributed funds. "Excludes $77,290 contributed funds. "Excludes $20,441 contributed funds. "4 Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Souris River Basin Project (see Section 31 and Table 24-A for costs for active project). 15 Excludes $74,225 contributed funds. 1"Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see Table 24-G). Excludes $246,911 contributed funds. "7 Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. "Excludes $130,300 contributed funds. "9Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. 2 Excludes $20,920 contributed funds. 21Excludes $92,402 contributed funds. "2Excludes $35,430 contributed funds. 'Excludes $26,055 contributed funds. 24Excludes $61,895 contributed funds. "Excludes $67,014 contributed funds. MExcludes $62,620 contributed funds. "Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 expended for work done at request of local interests. aExcludes $37,631 contributed funds. 29Excludes $184,709 contributed funds. 30Excludes $589,316 contributed funds. In addition, $717,809 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 3"Excludes $11,066 contributed funds. nExcludes $38,173 contributed funds. 24-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WI' 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5 1977 - - Grafton, ND 1983 Nov. 18, 1991 - - Hudson Harbor, WI2 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 - - Kindred Lake, ND3 1987 Nov. 17, 1986 $1,150,000 - La Crosse, WI' 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 - Maple River, NDs 1981 Oct. 6, 1961 1,241 - Moorhead, MN5 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700 Pembina River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 50,000 - Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034 - Sheyenne River, ND5 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956 - Tongue River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 23,695 Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN 1974 Nov. 17, 1986 182,000 - Warroad Harbor and River, MN' 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 - - 'Portion of project for removal of obstructions at various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to full project width (see Table 24-C for costs for completed portion of the project). Part of the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin project. 3Previously part of Sheyenne River, ND project (see Section 28 and Table 24-A for costs for active project). Authorized for further study by a House Committee on Public Works Resolution dated March 15, 1988. 5Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see Section 24 in text and Table 24-I for costs for active units of project). 'Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth (see Table 24-C for costs for completed portion of project). 24-28 TABLE 24-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 3 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area (Square miles) Capacity Previus Prich Existing Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (Square Original Stage Total Reservoir (feet)' River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) Completed Cost Completed Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1163 173 205.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256,185 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 - - 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights - - - 160,939 160,939 Recreational facilities - - - 2,834,838 2,834,838 Total new work _ - - 681,805 - 3,716,823 4,398,628 Total operating and care - - 100,857 - 42,278,345 42,379,202 Permanent indefinite - - - 967,197 967,197 appropriation for operation and care, Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 Rehabilitation - - - 425,000 425,000 Total 2,152,840 - $782,662 - $47,387,365 $48,170,027 'Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. tO REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 24-I RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 24 of Text) Cost to Total September 30, Estimated State Type 1994 Federal Cost Orwell River (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,700' Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,700 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, 1,698,200 17,500,0002 pumping plants Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement 1,639,924 1,639,9003 Total Cost to Date $8,060,848' Total Estimate Cost $23, 86 2 ,7 0 0S 'Includes $181,713 for lands and $25,045 for recreation facilities. Ihe East Grand Forks unit was reclassified from active to inactive on August 19, 1988. The cost of this unit was last revised in 1987. 'Includes $67,900 for lands. 'Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridgedeferred unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. sThe Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'deferred' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $666,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated in Table 24-G. In FY 89, the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit was included as part of the General Investigation program under Restudy of Deferred projects. 24-30 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Table 24-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) Project Date Inspected Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD ......................................... October 1993 Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, MN ..................................... September 1994 Black River, (North Bend), WI .................................................... September 1994 Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND ........................................................ November 1993 Cannon River at Faribault, MN .................... .................................. September 1994 Eau Galle River, WI (Mines Creek, Spring Valley) .......................................... August 1994 Elk River, M N ................................................................ August 1994 Emerson, Manitoba - Noyes, MN ................................................... October 1993 Grafton, ND ................................................................ October 1993 Grand Mound, State Historic Site, MN ................................................ October 1993 Guttenberg, IA ................................................................. October 1993 Hanover, Hernepin County, MN ................................................... September 1994 Irving Township, Jackson County, WI ................................................ September 1994 Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI ...................................... September 1994 Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI .................................................... October 1993 Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN ................................................. August 1994 Mankato and North Mankato, MN (Lehillier) ........................................... November 1993 Middle River at Argyle, MN ...................................................... October 1993 M inneota, M N . .............................................................. October 1993 Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN . ................................................. September 1994 Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN .................................................... August 1994 Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI ..................................................... October 1993 Red Lake River, Gentilly, MN ..................................................... October 1993 Red Lake River at Hout, MN ...................................................... October 1993 Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN ................................................ October 1993 Red River of the North at Grand Forks, ND ............................................. October 1993 Red River of the North at Oslo, MN ................................................. October 1993 Red River of the North at Pembina, ND ............................................... October 1993 Redwood River below Marshall, MN ................................................. October 1993 Shepard Road, Mississippi River, MN ................................................ September 1994 Souris River, Velva, ND ........................................................ November 1993 St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN ................................................... November 1993 Velva, ND ................................................................ November 1993 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN .................................. September 1994 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN ................................................... September 1994 Wabasha County, County Hwy 11, MN............................................... September 1994 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN .......................................... September 1994 Warner Road, Sibley Street, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN .................................... September 1994 Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN ............................................. September 1994 24-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 24-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Avoca,W I................................................................... $11,746 Crow River, Rockford, M N ......................................................... 6,877 Duncan Creek, Bloomer, W I ........................................................ 1,579 Elk River, Lake Orono, MN ........................................................ 7,603 Garvin Brook, Stockton, MN ........................................................ 19,385 Grand Rapids, W I ................................................................ 3,310 Lake Pulaski, Buffalo, Wright County, MN .............................................. 165,978 M orais River, ND................................................................ 1,305 Perley,M N..................................................................... 751 Red River of the North, Grand Marais Outlet, MN .......................................... 21,937 Wild Rice, Marsh Rivers, MN ...................................................... 10,993 Wild RiceRiver, LakelIda, MN ........................................... ........... 2,114 Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Big Fork River, M N ............................................................ $7,369 Black River, Amsterdam Road, WI .................................................... 4,304 Cannon River near Welch, MN........................................................ 6,039 Clayton, IA ................................................................... 3,257 French Lake Township, MN......................................................... 13,226 Hennepin County, CSAH 116, MN . .................................................. 20,374 Kingston Township, M N ............................................................ 4,844 Mankato Township, MN .......................................................... 22,943 M anvel,ND ................................................................... 679 M elrose,W I. ................................................................. 11,228 Orwell Lake and Vernon Center, MN .................................................. 23,542 Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN ............................................ 21,644 Red River of the North, Oxbow, ND ...... ............................................. 14,362 Red River of the North, Grand Forks, ND ............................................... 10,630 Roseau River, M N ............................................................... 435 Shelby Township, M N ............................................................ 5,000 Sogn, M N.................................................................... 28,766 St. Clair, M N ................................................................. 5,935 24-32 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-K (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs SouthTwo River, M N .......................................................... $11,014 Snake River, Vega / Sandsville, MN ................................................... 1,464 Snake River, W arren, MN............................................................ 507 TABLE 24-L PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Modifications of projects for the purpose of improving the quality of the environment in the public interest (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Homme Lake, ND .................................................. ............ $5,863 Reservoirs at Headwaters, Mississippi River, MN Leech Lake ................................................................... 772 Lake W innibigoshish ............................................................ 5,232 Orwell Lake, M N .............................................................. 92,853 24-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 24-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 42, 43 and 44 of Text) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Crookston,M N............ .............................................. $101,826' Grand Forks, ND ........................................................ 254,3422 La Crosse, W I ............................................................. 293 Flood Plain Management Assessment, Upper Mississippi and Lower Missouri Rivers, IL, IA, KS, MN, MO, NE and WI............................................. 1,870,347 Special Studies Devils Lake, ND ......................................................... 119,910 Environmental Services Partners ................................................ 35,531 Miscellaneous Activities Special nvestigations ....................................................... 49,772 FERC Licensing Activities ..................................................... 7,742 Intra Agency Water Resources Development ......................................... 13,163 North American Waterfowl Management Plan ......................................... 6,757 Coordination with Other Agencies Cooperation with Other Water Resource Agencies ...................................... 15,458 Planning Assistance to States': M innesota........................................................... 133,350 North Dakota.......................................................... 17,008 Wisconsin......... ....................................................... 31,091 TOTAL SURVEYS .......................................................... $2,656,590 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International W ater Studies ..................................................... $68,3494 Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services Unit ............................................ 35,908 Technical Services, General ................................................... 60,890 Quick Responses ........................................................... 7,096 Special Studies ........................................................... 103,894 Hydrologic Studies Stream Flow Data .......................................................... 8,253 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA ................................... $229,859 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Houston, M N ............................................ ..... ........ S13,029 M arshall, M N .............................................................. 21,612 Portage, W I .............................................................. 254,928 TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ...................................... $289,569 IExcludes $83,309 contributed funds. 'Includes $54,530 for International Water Studies under O&M 'Excludes $96,000 contributed funds. Appropriation. 'Excludes $135,499 contributed funds 'Excludes $55 contributed funds for FPMS receipts. 24-34 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to Location. Mississippi River rises in northern Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. The latest map and profile showing this section of river are in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in River and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, Ist session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a 2.7 mile basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 25-C, 25-D, 25-E and 25-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. See House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth and development of the harbors. Rectification of in the Sny seepage damages to privately owned lands Island Levee Drainage District, IL, was contingent upon the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and Upper Mississippi River mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements have been complied with for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See Table 25-F for license fees collected through the end of the fiscal year.) St. Paul District. New Work: Studies were continued under Section 107, small navigation project authority for establishment of a small boat harbor at Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin at a cost of $938. Maintenance: Channel dredging to remove shoal areas was performed. Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON removed 606,941 cubic yards of material at 20 locations at a cost of $1,879,262. Government derrick barge HAUSER/WADE removed 46,635 cubic yards of material at three locations at a cost of $260,590. Mechanical dredging contractors removed 264,669 cubic yards of material at 23 locations at a cost of $1,457,912. Hydraulic dredging contractors removed 159,271 cubic yards of material at one location at a cost of $293,371. Dredging surveys cost $629,527. A rock supply contract cost $115,826. Dredging work at Weaver Bottoms cost $39,373 by contract and $50,921 by hired labor. Dredge material relocation at Blackhawk Park and Indian Slough cost $6,052 by contract and $281,275, respectively. Dredging at St. Paul Small Boat Harbor cost $78,516. Other dredging and snagging cost $138,747. A modification to the channel control structure at Dakota cost $500,000. Dam maintenance contracts totaled $77,604 25-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 and lock maintenance contracts cost $117,533. Contract costs for dewatering of locks totaled $388,082. Contracts for scour protection at Lock and Dam 8, installation of dam machinery at Lock and Dam 2 and for level gauges for locks and dams cost $104,440, $212,241, and $443,430, respectively. A herbicide service contract cost $32,931. Contracts for aeration culverts at French Lake and Finger Lakes totaled $39,995. Contracts for installation of tainter gate machinery at Lock and Dam 4, structural repair of the dam at Lock and Dam 3 and structural rehabilitation of the dam at Lock and Dam 5A cost $816,700, $129,695, and $160,390, respectively. A contract for crane carriers cost $432,999 and a spillway repair contract at Lock and Dam 7 cost $891,409. An engineering contract for the fixed crest spillway at Lock and Dam 10 cost $299,999. Supply contracts for bubbler piping and for valve machinery at Lock and Dam 1 cost $40,461 and $465,964, respectively. Contracts for lock work at Lock and Dam 2 and at Lock and Dam 4 cost $4,285,301 and $1,796,161, respectively. Contracts for rebuilding and repairing roads at Lock and Dam 5 totaled $1,237,434. Other road repair contracts totaled $52,045. Contracts to renovate visitor facilities at Lock and Dam 3 and to rehabilitate Blackhawk Park cost $66,315 and $55,730, respectively. Miscellaneous recreation maintenance contracts totaled $94,010. A contract for equipment replacement cost $57,044. Engineering work and miscellaneous surveys, reports, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $2,999,444 and by contract for $334,381. Project condition surveys cost $5,239. Other miscellaneous hired labor, payments, supplies and equipment cost $6,896,247. The total cost of maintenance was $28,264,596. Rehabilitation: Contracts for lock machinery installation at Lock and Dam 8, electrical rehabilitation for Lock and Dam 3, electrical rehabilitation for Lock and Dam SA, and construction at Lock and Dam 7 cost $200,000, $260,991, $359,090, and $1,196,341 respectively. Supply contracts for valve machinery at Lock and Dam 1, and for crane carriers cost $2,265,114 and $514,999, respectively. Engineering, administration and other work were accomplished by hired labor for $528,540 and by contract for $84,283. Total rehabilitation costs were $5,409,358. Operating and care: Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made thereto. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Total cost of operating and care was $11,355,248. Costs to St. Paul were $938 for new work; $39,619,844 for operation and maintenance; and $5,409,358 for rehabilitation; for a total cost of $45,030,140. Rock Island District. New Work: None. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in Pools 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, and 24 at a cost of $2,965,500 with 559,557 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $98,800. Snagging, clearing, and excavation was performed by hired labor at various locations at a cost of $124,600. Dredge material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging and channel maintenance activities cost $31,200. Repair of channel regulating works structures was performed at a cost of $2,953,900. Structural repairs, including sandblasting and painting were performed by hired labor at locks and dams at a cost of $3,558,500. Repairs to spillways and dikes cost $36,900. The Stage I contract for major maintenance to the dams at Locks and Dams 17 and 18 continued at a cost of $906,600. The work includes repairs to the structural components of the dams, placement of additional rock fill upstream and downstream of the gated sections of the dams, repairs to the spillways and removal of silt from the auxiliary lock bays. The Stage II major maintenance contract to the dam at Lock and Dam 16 was continued at a cost of $3,306,800. The Stage III major maintenance contract for the electrical/mechanical system replacement at Lock and Dam 18 was continued at a cost of $26,900. The Stage III major maintenance contract for electrical/mechanical system replacement at Lock and Dam 16 was continued at a cost of $354,700. Replacement of tow haulage units was continued at a cost of $489,700. Resurfacing of the access road at Lock and Dam 14 were completed at a cost of $46,900. Visitor Center roof repair was continued at a cost of $33,700. The replacement of maintencance building roofs was continued at a cost of $2,300. Removal and disposal of diesel fuel tanks were continued at a cost of $1,000. Replacement of septic/absorption field at Lock and Dam 22 was completed at a cost of $48,700. The replacement of transformers at Lock 19 was completed at a cost of $9,200. Construction of restroom facilities at Lock and Dam 21 was continued at a cost of $87,700. The replace of bulkhead lifter crane controls at Locks 11, 18, and 21 were initiated at a cost of $16,500. The replacement of dam gate chains at Locks 21 and 22 were initiated at a cost of $125,000. The reconditioning of miter gate motors was initiated at a cost of $8,200. The replacement of snap switches at Locks 16, 21, and 22 were performed at a cost of $5,700. The electrical cable replacement at Lock 22 was initiated at a cost of $24,800. The replacement of standby generators at Locks 17, 18, 20, 21, and 22 were performed at a cost of $256,500. Electrical service repairs were performed at Lock 12 at a cost of $19,200. Fencing and water well replacement at Lock 13 was performed at a cost of $17,300. Lawn sprinkler replacement was initiated at a cost of $14,000. Stabilization of former dump sites cost $25,100. Rehabilitation of Fisherman's Corner public use area was performed at a cost of $611,700. The maintenance of roads and bridges cost $2,400. The repairs to the Gatelifter Quad Cities cost $93,600. Maintenance of roads and bridges, buildings; grounds and utilities cost $33,400. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $621,100. Maintenance and purchase of permanent operating equipment cost $214,300. Maintenance of levees cost $23,600. Real Estate activities relating to maintenance were performed at a cost of $76,200. Engineering and design work was performed at a cost of $738,300. Supervision, administration, and inspection for the maintenance features cost $1,214,748. Total maintenance costs were $19,225,248. Net credits to the project were $378,900, primarily as a result of collection from towboat companies for damages to lock and dam structures. Operation and care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $11,680,700. Real Estate management services were performed at a cost of $181,700. Natural and cultural resource activities were performed at a cost of $475,100. Public use areas and Mississippi River Visitors' Center were 25-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN * operated at a cost of $1,596,400, with contract law enforcement provided at a cost of $42,600. OSHA inspections and medical examinations were accomplished at a cost of $9,000. Surveys, various condition and operation studies and structural inspections cost $1,173,400. Water control management costs were $930,200. Supervision and administration for operations features cost $421,900. Total operation costs were $16,511,000. Total Operation and maintenance costs were $35,357,348. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation was completed at Lock and Dam 20 at a cost of $3,385,000. Rehabilitation initiated at Locks and Dams 13 and 15 for a cost of $3,675,006 and $5,481,987, respectively. Total rehabilitation costs were $12,541,993. Costs to the Rock Island District were $35,357,348 for operations and maintenance and $12,541,993 for major rehabilitation for a total cost of $47,899,341. St. Louis District. New Work: Costs incurred for Melvin Price Locks and Dam, formerly Lock and Dam 26 Replacement, were $70,140 for real estate acquistion, $33,636 for relocations, $76,360 for reservoirs, $668,333 for the dam, $1,178,777 for the lock, $64,838 for channels, $625,750 for buildings, grounds and utilities, $53,160 for permanent operating equipment, $1,085,211 for engineering and $385,446 for supervision and administration. Costs incurred for the 2nd lock were $5,293,677 for the lock, $63 for permanent operating equipment, $766,135 for engineering and $1,308,644 for supervision and administration. Total cost of new work was $11,610,170. Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation was initiated for Lock and Dam 25 with the preparation of engineering reports at a cost of $24,450 for the lock, $416,806 for engineering. Total rehabilitation cost $441,256. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made thereto. Other work accomplished was management of natural resources, operation of recreation areas, condition and operation studies, water control management, other studies and reports for a total cost of $5,429,152. Maintenance: Total maintenance cost were $10,104,912. Costs to the St. Louis District were $11,610,170 for new work on the Melvin Price Locks and Dam; $5,429,152 for operation and care; $10,104,912 for maintenance for a total cost of $27,144,234. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, Lake City and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; and Bay City, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, WI; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition; Approximately 50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,549.63 acres of land are owned or controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by the Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: None. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: construction of small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, IA; and Hanibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of old auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pools 15 and 16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction of visitor center at Lock and Dam 15. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive consisting of 93,601 acres in fee and 10,541 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: None. St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams 24, 25, and Melvin Price Locks and Dam, except for guidewall extensions at Locks 24 and 25, have been completed as have recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification of damages have been completed. Other work remaining consists of construction guidewall extensions at Locks 24 and 25. Melvin Price Locks and Dam are under construction. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of lands in Pools 24, 25, and 26, involving 4,448 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 4,201 acres has been acquired for the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were main 25-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 tained in all pools and between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Louis District: Work remaining on the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project includes completion of the third stage, (600 foot lock and 1 2 gatebays of the dam). Other work includes construction of miscellaneous alterations to the lock and administration/ maintenance building, a visitor center, minimum facilities for public health and safety and West Alton Access TABLE 25-A Area rehabilitation, removal of a lockwall at old Locks and Dam No. 26 and construction of recreation facilities at Alton, IL. Approximately 3 acres remain to be acquired for project navigation purposes. Total Federal Costs of existing project to the end of fiscal year for the three Districts were $120,514,971; $11,611,108 for new work; $90,511,256 regular funds for operation and maintenance; and $18,392,607 regular funds for rehabilitation. Total Cost to Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 September 1994 Mississippi River New Work' between Missouri River Approp.' $90,959,000 $62,790,000 $43,010,000 $21,611,108 $1,169,532,629 and Minneapolis, Cost s 96,348,541 62,789,022 2,780,487 11,611,108 1,119,281,064 Minnesota (Federal Maint.' Funds) Approp. 80,693,444 88,146,700 79,249,243 86,092,674 1,304,355,599 Cost 81,122,738 86,711,806 79,636,104 90,511,256 1,286,913,974 Rehab. Approp. 7,332,400 4,981,000 7,604,000 19,140,256 169,932,313 Cost 6,701,105 5,453,847 7,791,302 18,392,607 168,824,278 (Contributed Funds) New Work:' Approp. 0 0 2,665,000 1,240,000 5,946,140 Cost 0 0 1,847,795 257,136 3,146,071 1. Includes $87,953,456 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $914,722,000. 3. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $897,758,208. 4. Includes $14,351,929 for maintenance on previous project. 5. Funding from Inland Waterways Trust Fund. TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 25-B TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $ 60,184,222 24,210,071 $9,071,214 593,465,507 Maintenance' 570,259,833 - - 570,259,833 Rehabilitation 69,860,962 - - 69,860,962 Total 700,305,017 24,210,071 9,071,214 733,586,302 Rock Island New Work' 71,307,945' 17,403,322 11,338,865 100,050,132 Maintenance' 502,003,786 - - 502,003,786 Rehabilitation 98,522,060 - - 98,522,060 Total 671,833,791 17,403,322 11,338,865 700,575,978 St. Louis New Work* 928,473,195' 10,282,566 2,440,266 941,196,027 Maintenance 250,883,184 - - 250,883,184 Rehabilitation 441,256 - - 441,256 Total 1,179,797,635 10,282,566 2,440,266 1,192,520,467 1. Excludes $2,041,140 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expended in pool No. 11. 2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. Excludes $797,670 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts covering their pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 6. Costs subsequent to FY 1953 included with operating and care. Includes the sum of $395,442, expended between 1930 and 1934 on the operating and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 7. Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 8. Includes $897,758,208 for Melvin Price Locks and Dam. 25-4 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT TABLE 25-C LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham. for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool S t Anthony 853.9 In city of 56 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 100' - $ 18,203,000 vi. ss vs Falls, upper Lock St. Anthony Falls, lower Lock and dam Lock and dam 1 Lock and dam 2 Lock and dam 3 Lock and dam 4 Lock and dam 5 Lock and dam tJ 5A Lo6ck and dam Lock and dam 7 Lock and dam 8 Lock and dam 9 Lock and dam 10 Lock and dam 11 Lock and dam 12 Lock and dam 13 Lock and dam 14 Le Claire Lock (Canal) Lock and dam 15 Lock and dam 16 Minneapolis, MN 853.3 In city of Minneapolis, MN 847.6 Minneapolis- St. Paul, MN 815.2 1.3 above Hastings, MN 796.9 6.1 above Red Wing, MN 752.8 Alma, WI 738.1 Minneiska, MN 728.5 3 above Winona, MN 714.3 Trempealeau, WI 702.5 Dresbach, MN 679.2 Genoa, WI 647.9 3.3 below Lynxville, WI 615.1 Guttenberg, IA 583.0 3.7 above Dubuque, IA 556.7 Bellevue, IA 522.5 4.3 above Clinton, IA 493.3 3.7 below Le Claire, IA 493.1 3.9 below Le Claire, IA 482.9 Foot of Arsenal Island, Rock Island, IL 457.2 1.8 above Muscatine, IA stone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 56 400 26.9' 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone. piles. 56 400 35.9' 725.1 13.5' 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel. 56 400 35.9 - 12.5? 7.6 in gravel. 110 500 12.2 - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 110' 600' 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. silt and clay. 110 600 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. silt and clay. 110 600 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 110 600 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and and clay. silt. 110 600 8.0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 110 600 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and and gravel. broken rock. 110 600 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 8.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. gravel and silt. 110 600 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand clay and and gravel. gravel. 110 600 11.0 527.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. Rock. 80 320 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. Rock. 110 600 16.0 561.0 24.0" 11.0 Rock. Rock. 110 360 16.0 - 17.0" 11.0 110 600 9.0 545.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 100 1959 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 100 92 100 100 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1938 .1939 1922 1934 98 1937 12,382,000' C,) 2,358,000' 6,492,000' 5,596,000 4,865,000 5.081,000 ti 4,549,000 4,874,000 C,) 0 5,574,000 6,061,000 6,539,000 4,750,000 7,428,000 0 Ul) 5,580,000 7,502,000 6,284,000 14,201,000 9,788,000 1 1 1 l l l l l TABLE 25-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from her Width Lift Eleva. Upper Lower Work in to Navi. Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Lock and dam 437.1 4.2 above New 110 600 8.0 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 99 1939 $ 5,843,000 17 Boston, IL and gravel. Lock and dam 410.5 6.5 above 110 600 9.8 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 90 1937 10,308,000 18 Burlington, IA Lock and dam 364.2 Keokuk, IA 110 358 38.2 518.2 4.5 9.2 Rock. Rock. 100 1913 19 110 1,200 5.0 13.0 99 1957 14,813,000" Lock and dam 343.2 0.9 above 110 600 10.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. Rock and 97 1936 6,281,000 20 Canton, MO piles in sand and gravel. Lock and dam 324.9 2.1 below 110 600 10.5 470.0 16.5 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 95 1938 8,065,000 21 Quincy, IL and gravel, and gravel. Lock and dam 301.2 1.5 below 110 600 10.2 459.5 18.0 13.8 Rock. Rock. 99 1938 5,275,000 22 Saverton, MO Lock and dam 273.4 Clarksville, MO 110 600 15.0 449.0 19.0 12.0 Rock and piles. Piles in sand. 99" 1940 10,337,000 24 Lock and dam 241.4 Cap Au Gris, 110 600 15.0 434.0 19.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 99" .1939 13,694.000 25 MO and gravel. and gravel. Lock and dam 202.9 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 19.0 10.0 Piles in sand. Piles and 100 1938 12,824,000 26 (Henry T. 110 360 24.0 - 16.0 10.0 sand. Rainey Dam)'" Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to 93 1990 751,500,000 Locks and Dam bedrock. bedrock. Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 42.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to 94 - 212,600,000 Locks and Dam bedrock. bedrock. (2nd Lock) Total, Locks and dams $ 1,189,647,000 N O\ I. Elevation of pools I to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea level 1912 adjustment: pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 2. Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. 3. Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 4. Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool I which is crest of dam. Pool is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 5. Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower rock. (Federal cost only.) 6. In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and $1,349,600 from O & M appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam rehabilitation program. 7. Old upper guard sill. 8. Landward lock. 9. In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. 10. Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; previous project cost $540,000. 11. Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, at lock 15. 12. $640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Company, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. (Annual Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate includes $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. 13. Includes cash contribution of $4,900,000. 14. Complete except for guidewall extensions. 15. Lock and Dam 26 has been replaced by the Melvin Price Locks and Dam at which full pool was raised I February 1990. Lock and Dam 26 has been removed. O1 0 x 0 0 yu OT TABLE 25-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Miles above Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name Ohio River Location Type depth Percent Estimated (feet) Width Length Complete Cost St. Paul Harbor, MN Hastings Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Bay City Harbor, WI Lake City Harbor, MN Pepin Harbor, WI Wabasha Harbor, MN Alma Harbor, WI Winona Harbors. MN Lansing Harbor, IA Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI Dubuque Harbor, IA Savanna Harbor, IL Clinton Harbor, IA Moline Harbor, IL Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, IL Andalusia Harbor, IL Muscatine Harbor, IA Fort Madison Harbor, IA L,J's 836.55-839.2 In city of St. Paul, MN 839.7 Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. 813.2 Lower end of city of Hastings, MN 791.4 In city of Red Wing, MN 791.1 In city of Red Wing, MN 785.9 Upper end of Bay City, WI 773.0 In city of Lake City, MN 767.1 In city of Pepin, WI 760.0 Upper end of city of Wabasha, MN 751.3 Upper end of Alma, WI 726.0 In city of Winona, MN Latach Island 726.2 Crooked Slough 663.3 Upper end of city of Lansing, IA 635.5 Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, WI 635.0 In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. 579.4 537.3 519.0 488.0 484.2 479.8 473.0 455.5 455.6 At Dubuque, IA At Savanna, IL At Clinton, IA At Moline, IL At Lindsay Park At Rock Island, IL Andalusia Slough At Muscatine, IA 383.7 At Fort Madison, IA Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial' Small-boat' Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat 400-1,000 300 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 170 400 2.7(mile) 100 400 100 500 100 1,200 800 5,990 600 1,000 850 600 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 500 100 1,000 100 6,000 100 500 100 800 100 1,000 frontage 12 5555 Entrance channel small-boat harbor Small-boat Small-boat Freight terminal approach channel Small-boat 340 280 400 230 200 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 100 100 0 78 100 100 1,100 100 40 150 200 250 435 100 950 100 1,890 100 900 100 $ 217,100 230,200 74,300 146,800' 8,700 39,400' 93,500 1,077,000' 205,500' 41,700 Cl C(n Cl) Cl) 56,300 89,800 84,700 r 95,300 85,500 93,100 55,200 310,000 v 101,912 110,328 262,100 Z 31,000 O 21,000 353,000 184,200 TABLE 25-D (Cont'd) HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name Miles above Location Type Depth Percent Estimated Ohio River (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Warsaw Harbor, IL 359.1 At Warsaw, IL Small-boat 5 100 600 100 $ 73,000 Quincy Harbor, IL 327.3 In Quincy Bay, IL Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 --' Hannibal Harbor, MO 308.8 At Hannibal, MO Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129,000 Total $4,269,640 1. In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 2. In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 3. Commercial harbor converted to small-boat harbor under authority of Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Primary use is small-boat, although some commercial activity exists. 4. In addition, local interests contributed $812,599. 5. In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. 6. Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. O -4 0 -4 O H x t l 0 r'E 0 C 0 rE TABLE 25-E MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater Regulating works between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation Miscellaneous Total additional features Total existing project (new worik) $ 14,974,400 8,686,800' 545,000 193,600 7,092,9002 18,705,900' $ 516,183,512 1. Includes a lump-sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch Bridge, Minneapolis, MN. (FY 1969) 3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, MO. LICENSE FEES COLLECTED TABLE 25-F THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1994 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1994 St. Anthony Falls Lower Nothern States Power $ 3,300 $ 106,477 Lock and Dam Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 6,584,640 Lock and Dam No. 2 City of Hastings, MN. 24,163 156,699 TOTAL $ 6,847,816 25-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 25-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized l)ocuments Sep. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 )ec. 22, 19.44 MIar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Miar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 21, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 19146 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable.' Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN harbor. Determine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, MN hrlbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, WI Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doec. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, MN channel enlargements, small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s. Winona, MN basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development. Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, MN harbor. Wabasha, MN harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, MN harbor. Lansing, IA harbor. Fort Madison, IA harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA. Davenport, IA harbor. Muscatine, IA harbor. Alma, WI harbor. Hannibal, MO harbor. Prairie du Chien, WI harbors. Opposite lamburg, II, harbor.' Permits such change in location of Winona, MN small boat basin authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1915 (11. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., Ist sess.). as Chief of Engineers deems adv isable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL.' 25-10 None H. Doec. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doec1.3 7, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and llarbors Committee Doec. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None II. I)oc. 103, 7ith ('tmg.. 1st sess. H. Doec1.3 7, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doec5.4 7, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doec5.4 , 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doec2.6 3, 77th Cong., 1st seas. II. DI)oc. 4324797, th Cong., 1st H. Doec4.4 9, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doec5.1 1, 79th Cong., 2(1s ess. H. Doec5.1 4, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doec5.1 5, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doe. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doe. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 661, 80th Cong. 2d sess. S. Doe. 197, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doec6.4 2, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doe. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doec6.6 , 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doec6.7 , 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 71, 81st Cong., ist sess. 1. Doe. 254, 81st Cong., 1st se s. None H. Doec3.4 7, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doe. 251, 82nd Cong., Ist ses. H. Doe. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 136, 84th Cong., 1st sess. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 25-G (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., Ist sess. districts caused by operation of navigation pools. July 3, 1958 Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 3, 1959 Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide None adequate facilities for existing navigation. July 14, 1960 Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, MN. H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna2, Moline, H. Doc. 513., 87th Cong., 2d sess. Andalusia, New Boston', Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; Bellevue', Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk', IA; St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN'; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville5, WI. Oct. 23, 1962 Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Nov. 7, 1966 Repair of Stone Arch Bridge at Minneapolis, MN. None Oct. 21, 1978 Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Public Law 95-502 Dec. 29, 1981 Change name of Lock and Dam 26 to Melvin Price Locks and Dam Public Law 97-118 effective on the date of Melvin Price's death. (Apr. 22, 1988 - date of death) 1. Deauthorized FY 75. 2. Inactive. 3. Deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 4. Guidewalls at Locks 3, 4, 5, SA, 7, 8, 9, and 10 deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 5. Deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 6. Guidewall extensions at Locks 16, 18, and 21; construction of mooring facilities at Locks and Dams 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18; upper approach improvement at Lock 19 and Lock and Dam 20; and rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools 14, 18, and 21 deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 25-11 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, all embraced in drainage basin of Missouri River along main stem and tributaries to Rub, NE. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 2. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Page 26-2 26-2 Flood Control 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 5. Chatfield Lake, CO 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 7. Fall River Basin, SD 8. Lost Creek at Columbus, NE 9. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD 10. Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam, MT and Gavins Point Dam, SD & NE 11. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, & ND 12. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA 13. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE 14. Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE 15. Perry Creek, IA 16. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha District) 17. Pipestem Lake, ND 18. Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE 19. South Platte River Basin, CO 20. Thurman to Hamburg, IA 21. Westerly Creek, CO 22. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 23. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 26-2 26-2 26-3 26-3 26-3 26-4 26-4 26-4 26-5 26-5 26-5 26-6 26-6 26-6 26-6 26-7 26-7 26-7 26-7 '26-8 26-8 24. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 25. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Under Special Authorization 26. Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation, NE Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 27. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 28. Fort Peck Lake, MT 29. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 30. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND 31. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD 32. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND 33. Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update Miscellaneous 34. National Emergency Preparedness General Investigations 35. See Table 26-K 26-1 Page 26-8 26-8 26-9 26-9 26-9 26-10 26-10 26-10 26-11 26-11 26-12 26-12 Tables 26-A Cost and Financial Statement 26-13 26-B Authorizing Legislation 26-17 26-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 26-21 26-D Not Applicable 26-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 26-21 26-F 'Other Multiple Purpose Projects .Including Power 26-22 26-G Deathorized Projects 26-23 26-H Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 26-24 26-I Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program 26-24 26-J Inspection of Completed Local. Protection Projects 26-24 26-K Active General Investigations 26-28 26-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization 26-30 26-M Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 26-32 26-la Page OMAHA, NE DISTRICT NAVIGATION 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in FY 1928, the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979, and the navigation feature was completed in September 1980. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. A complete list of terminal facilities is included in the Missouri River navigation Maps and can be obtained from the Omaha District for a small fee. Operations during FY. Two structural maintenance contracts were completed on the dikes and revetments damaged by the 1993 flood from the mouth of the Platte River to Rulo, NE. A total of 121,000 tons of rock was placed by the contractor and government forces. District personnel accomplished other work items: channel reconnaissance, surveys and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and layouts of construction, and supervision and administration. Local interests operate and maintain the recreation sites. 2. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). No work during the period. FLOOD CONTROL 3. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO, about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,300 feet; and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam; and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake provides storage capacity of 28,831 acre-feet for flood control and 1,979 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 4. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. Damsite is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. 26-2 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT Existing project. An earth-fill dam 79 feet high, with a crest length of 5,730 feet; and reservoir with a flood storage capacity of about 72,700 acre-feet, plus 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 5. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. On the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet and a crest length of 12,500 feet; a reservoir with flood control capacity of 204,737 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 26,692 acre-feet, which will be used for recreation; and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. The Corps participated with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and was physically completed in 1992. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1993 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 6. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO, just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver, Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and a crest length of 14,300 feet. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiplepurpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. Construction began in FY 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 7. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook; and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing project. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during FY 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed 26-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 in FY 1953 with the exception of a road and parking area, which were completed in FY 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs Dam was completed in FY 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities, which were completed in FY 1972. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation requirements have been fully complied with. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. 8. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Location. On Lost Creek just north of the city of Columbus in Platte County, NE. Existing project. This project provides levee and channel improvements on the north side of Columbus and provides protection to commercial and residential areas. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Columbus to sponsor the project was approved on February 18, 1982. Operations during FY. A contractor's claim was denied in July 1990 by the contracting officer. Subsequently, the contractor appealed this decision to the U.S. Claims Court. On July 29, 1994, a meeting was held with the contractor in which a settlement in the amount of $1,284,331 plus interest was agreed upon. 9. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Location. NE and SD. The Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing project. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. Erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, will at the same time preserve high bank flood plain lands. Estimated total cost of construction is $21,640,000 (1994) of which $21,000,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $640,000 is the non-Federal contributed funds - other costs. Local cooperation. All construction on this project will be done in accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. A cost-sharing contract with the state of South Dakota for the Myron Grove access site was signed on June 24, 1986 and the Yankton- Riverside Park Section 215 Agreement was signed on April 24, 1989. Construction was completed in June 1987 and June 1991, respectively. Operations during FY. Efforts to protect Federally listed threatened and endangered species continued. 10. MISSOURI RIVER, BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM, MT AND GAVINS POINT DAM, SD, NE Location. The project is located along the Missouri River between Fort Peck Dam, MT, and a point 58 miles downstream of Gavins Point Dam, SD and NE. Existing project. Undertake measures, including maintenance and rehabilitation of existing structures, to alleviate bank erosion and related problems associated with releases from the six Missouri River main stem dams that the Secretary determines are needed. In lieu of structural measures, lands may be acquired in affected areas from willing sellers. The costs of the measures shall be apportioned among project purposes as a jointuse operation and maintenance expense. Estimated Federal cost of the project is between $70 and $110 million for construction or $10 million for the land requisition alternative. Cost is limited to no more than $3 million per FY. Local cooperation. Non-federal funds are not required for this project. One reach, the Missouri National Recreational River downstream from Gavins Point Dam, requires, under its separate authorization, that the landowners make available appropriate land 26-4 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT nterests to maintain the recreational and scenic Iualities of the river and adjacent lands. In the other fiver reaches, lands can be acquired on a willing- ;eller basis if land acquisition is the recommended mneasure for erosion control at a given river site. Operations during FY. Initiated work on the Real Estate Design Memorandum. Maintenance of existing structures consisted of rock placement at one site in the reach below Garrison Dam and at one site in the reach below Fort Randall Dam. Continued :oordination with affected landowners and other interested parties. 11. MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, & MO Location. The project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to the mouth near St. Louis, Mo. Existing project. To mitigate a portion of the fish and wildlife losses resulting from the construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project. Local cooperation. This project has no costsharing sponsor. The entire project is being borne by the Federal government with no cost to either local governments or the affected states. Therefore, there is no Local Cooperation Agreement for this project. However, modifications are at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers and may be advisable and subject to cost-sharing and financing arrangements which are satisfactory to the President and the Congress. Although the four affected states are not participating financially in the project, the states are very actively involved in the planning and design of the project. The states also are participating in the project by furnishing perpetual easements for construction and operation on existing state-owned lands. The states of Missouri and Iowa are the primary donors of such easements. Operations during FY. Efforts continued on acquiring land rights on 29,900 acres of land and agreements with the states for development on 18,200 acres of state-owned land. 12. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing project. Construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. (See Table 26-A for total costs.) Operations during FY. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 13. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair and flows southeasterly through metropolitan Omaha. It is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creek flows along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing project. The active project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs, channel improvement, an effluent storage facility, and a flood warning system on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction was initiated in FY 1972. Completed projects include Standing Bear Lake (Site 16), Glenn Cunningham Lake (Site 11), and Wehrspann Lake (Site 20). Remaining work includes construction of recreational facilities, fish and wildlife facilities and channel improvement on the Big Papio Channel and recreational facilities on Ed Zorinsky Lake (Site 18). Estimated total costs for the project are $68,659,000 consisting of $64,334,000 in Federal funds ($1,367,000 to be reimbursed by the non-Federal sponsor) and $2,958,000 non-Federal other costs and cash contributions. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-6 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Continued construction of Phase III recreation facilities at Ed Zorinsky Lake (Site 26-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 18) and Phase II A for the Big Papio Channel. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance activities continued at all four dam sites. 14. PEBBLE CREEK SCRIBNER, NE Location. Scribner, NE, is located in Dodge County about 47 miles northwest of Omaha. Pebble Creek is a right-bank tributary to the Elkhorn River. Existing project. The project includes a 3.6 milelong levee with an average height of about eight feet providing 100-year flood protection plus 3 feet of freeboard from Pebble Creek; a closure structure at U.S. Highway 275 at the northern edge of Scribner; four road ramps over the levee; an automated flood warning system; and appropriate land use zoning and continued flood insurance for unprotected areas. Construction on the Pebble Creek levee was completed in October 1989. In the process of providing FEMA the necessary data to revise the flood insurance rate maps to reflect the Pebble Creek levee, it was determined that Scribner is subject to greater residual flooding from the Elkhorn River than was previously determined. Additional studies concluded that it would be feasible to construct the Elkhorn River levee, which will be 2.1 miles long with an average height of 4 feet and will provide 100-year level of protection with 3 feet of freeboard. Local cooperation. The city of Scribner is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. The city obtained cost-sharing assistance from the Nebraska Natural Resources Commission and the Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District. Operations during FY. Construction was initiated in March 1994 with project completion March 1996. The total estimated cost of the project is $3,018,000. The non-Federal portion of this estimate is $754,000, which includes $363,000 for lands, easements and rights-of-way 15. PERRY CREEK IA Location. The Perry Creek basin is located in Woodbury and Plymouth Counties in northwestern Iowa. The downstream five miles of the basin lie within the corporate limits of Sioux City, IA, and drain the central portion of the city. Existing project. The project consists of 14,800 linear feet of grass and rock lined channel, 1,500 linear feet of new conduit, modification of 710 linear feet of existing conduit, and a concrete stilling basin, to provide capacity for the 100-year event. Also included are 4.25 miles of hiking/biking trail and a basin-wide flood warning system. Estimated project cost is $65,600,000, of which $40,603,000 is Federal cost and $24,997,000 is non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. The project is authorized under the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The City of Sioux City, IA, is the local sponsor. Operations during FY. The Phase I Plans and Specifications were completed, and work started on the Phase II feature design memorandum. 16. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on the Missouri River main stem and tributaries. See individual reports and Table 26-I for projects in the Omaha District included in the program. 17. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, 3 miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The multipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 26-6 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT 1977. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 18. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alternations. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of the Salt Creek survey report, additional units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were used to determine an effective method of correction for the dispersive clay problem in the completed downstream levees through Lincoln. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 19. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing project. General plan for flood control and other purposes provides for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 26-B for authorizing legislation). 20. THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA Location. Project area is approximately 110 square miles. It extends from Thurman, IA, on the north to the mouth of the Nishnabotna River on the south and from the Missouri River on the west to the bluffs on the east. Existing project. The flood problem is caused by flood waters backing up behind the existing levees when drainage structures are closed during high flows on these rivers. The feasibility study recommended plan consists of two pump stations in the southern half of the study area. Estimated cost through construction is $825,000 Federal and $275,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fremont County, IA is the costsharing sponsor. Operations during FY. The preconstruction engineering and design (PED) phase was completed in July 1994. The sponsor has been asked to submit a financial plan as soon as "interim" financing is determined. A draft eminent domain subagreement has been prepared and is being reviewed locally. 21. WESTERLY CREEK, CO Location. Westerly Creek Dam impounds the Westerly Creek on Lowry Air Force Base, CO. Lowry Air Force Base is just east of Denver, CO. Existing project. The project consists of 2 major Phases and a minor follow-on contract. Phase I involved construction of four new buildings and associated utilities. Phase II is the embankment and spillway contract, which included demolishing existing buildings, utility relocations, construction of an embankment and spillway, relocation of four golf course greens, relocation of one tee box, construction of channels adjacent to the golf course, and repair of an existing 48 inch conduit. A follow-on contract corrected some erosion to the collector channel system. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor is the 26-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) of the Metropolitan Denver area. UDFCD requested credit for $6,353,000 in downstream channel improvements, which were constructed between January 1, 1978 and August 6, 1984. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on March 14, 1988 approved credit for the construction accomplished by the local sponsor in an amount equivalent to the cost of the relocations and collector channels. Appropriate adjustments have been made to the Federal and non-Federal costs. The local cooperation agreement was executed on August 2, 1988. Operations during FY. Project is financially complete. 22. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the FY are set forth in Table 26-J, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. FY costs were $237,014. 23. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations involving storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1994 were $408,698; and total costs to September 30, 1994 were $7,478,916. 24. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for FY 1994 were $398,445 for disaster preparedness, $419,728 for emergency operations, $421,113 for rehabilitation and $164,853 for advance measures. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948). Federal costs for FY 1994 were $177,747 for reconnaissance studies, $241,570 for feasibility studies, $1,236,868 for plans and specifications and construction measures, and $16,986 for litigation on a completed project. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946.) Operations under this heading were as follows: Federal costs for FY 1994 were $41,974 for projects in the feasibility phase and $211,158 for projects in the plans and specifications and construction phase. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT 25. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These project modifications are accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as amended. Environmental modification study efforts during FY 1994 were as follows: Bullard Bend Restoration, project cost (Feasibility Phase) $62,000. California Bend, NE, project cost (Feasibility Phase) $2,300. Hidden Lake, NE, project cost (Feasibility Phase) $179,000. Boyer Chute, 26-8 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT NE, project cost (Construction) $1,639,000. Deroin Bend project cost (Feasibility Phase) $2,500. Lower Decatur Bend, NE, IA project cost (Feasibility Phase) $2,200 project terminated. Missouri River Dike Lowering, NE project cost (Feasibility Phase) $800 project terminated. 26. MISSOURI RIVER BANK STABILIZATION AND NAVIGATION, NE Location. The side channel connecting river mile 633.5 to 637.7 on the Missouri River in Washington County, NE, about 7 miles north of Omaha, NE. Existing project. The project was constructed from October 1992 to April 1993. Its purpose is to restore flows from the Missouri River into an old river channel, Boyer Chute. This will restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and will benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. The part of the old channel that was filled with sediment and grown up in young trees was cleared of vegetation, and a pilot channel for new inflows was excavated through it. Soil excavated from the pilot channel was placed along the channel, and will be washed away by restored chute flows over time. A 180-foot wide notch in the upstream river bank was constructed for new inflows, and the chute's old outlet at the downstream end was widened. The culvert crossing on a township road which transected the chute was replaced by a bridge which passes adequate flows to prevent backwater effects and sedimentation. The total cost of about $2.3 million was 25 percent cost-shared by a non-Federal sponsor. Local cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District provided all needed cost-sharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $527K and cash of about $73K. Operations during FY. Three construction activities were completed in the spring and summer, completing all planned construction efforts to accomplish turnover to the sponsor. The channel restoration restored 3 miles and 50 acres of flowing water area for river fish spawning, rearing, feeding, and resting. The restored chute is providing restored waterfowl and wading bird habitat as well as turtle and furbearer habitat. The adjacent lands are being restored into forest and prairie. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 27. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On the Missouri River, 987.4 miles above the mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall reservoir (Lake Francis Case). Big Bend reservoir (Lake Sharpe) extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 95 feet high, with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of five 58,500 kilowatt units, three 67,276 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,859,000 acre-feet. Federal cost of the project was $107,498,000. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operation during FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. During the period, 842,201,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity were produced. 28. FORT PECK DAM AND LAKE,MT Location. Reservoir is in the Missouri River Valley in McCone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.6 miles above the mouth of the Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest; and Nashua, 9 miles north. Existing project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 21,026 26-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,688,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started on the original project in October 1933 and on the second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The 5 generators have a total output of 185,250 KW: 2 generators at 40,000 KW each, 2 generators at 43,500 KW each and 1 generator at 18,250 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Federal cost of the project was $158,428,000, Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project, was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 823,863,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 29. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On the Missouri River in Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above the mouth of the Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 165 feet; a crest length of 10,700 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,494,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $199,066,000. Non- Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 1,590,246,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. 30. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On the Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,389.9 miles above the mouth and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,821,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units (three units rated at 109,250 kilowatts each and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each), three flood control tunnels, and a gated spillway. Federal cost of the project was $299,938,000, including $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development using Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required except costsharing with the state of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment and recreation cost-sharing. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 1,763,826,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. 31. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD 26-10 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT Location. On the Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about 4 miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above the mouth. Existing project. A concrete and rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 492,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 44,099 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $49,617,000. Construction of the original project was initiated in March 1952 and completed in 1964. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 731,313,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity during FY. 32. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on the Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about 6 miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above the mouth. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 245 feet; a crest length of 9,300 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,137,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 112,290 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $346,521,000. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and the project was placed in operation in June 1963. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purposes uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 2,361,763,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. 33. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE Location. The area being studied is the Missouri River basin, to include the Missouri River main stem system. States included in the study area include Nebraska, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri. Existing project. During 1987 through 1992, the Missouri River basin experienced a moderate to severe drought, impacting upon the Missouri River main stem projects for the first time since filled in 1967. The drought has had severe impacts on people and industries who use the Missouri River and the main stem reservoirs for navigation, hydropower, water supply, and recreation. Some of the people impacted by the drought have stated that the current Master Water Control Manual for the Missouri River main stem system of reservoirs does not adequately take into consideration the contemporary needs of the basin. The purpose of the Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update study is to determine the water control plan that best meets the needs of the Missouri River basin. Local cooperation. None required. Operations/Activities during FY. During FY 1994, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update was released for public review on September 2, 1994. The Draft EIS contains a preferred alternative water control plan that represents the product of extensive review of alternative reservoir system operations from the hydrologic, economic, and environmental perspectives. A public comment period was initiated with the release of the Draft EIS and will be completed on March 1, 1995. There were 24 public hearings and workshops held in the Missouri River basin, Memphis, TN, New Orleans, LA and Quincy, IL. 26-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 MISCELLANEOUS 34. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total FY cost for this category amounted to $168,447. 35. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS FY 1994 costs totaled $2,252,432 for all General Investigation activities. See Table 26-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Research and Development, Preconstruction Engineering and Design (projects not fully authorized), Planning and Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and Preconstruction Engineering and Design (fully authorized projects). 26-12 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30,1994 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 5. Chatfield Lake, CO (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 7. Fall River Basin, SD 8. Lost Creek, Columbus, NE (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work:ic Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,455,000 1,489,134 -9,992 394,000 356,429 191,000 162,001 300,000 386,780 80,302 76,706 380,302 463,486 1,600,000 1,590,008 272,000 313,839 142,000 169,372 15,000 87,021 15,000 87,021 649,000 1,358,000 711,930 1,360,634 583,000 731,638 403,000 342,799 18,421 477,000 472,666 308,200 377,049 -40,000 15,475 1,755,000 1,505,651 322,000 277,154 187,000 193,200 10,382 10,382 1,384,000 1,271,198 502,000 395,177 561,000 490,675 10,000 10,207 -- 189,225,9911 -- 189,225,9911 1,288,000 118,361,450 1,376,494 118,150,631 -- 62,018,608 -- 62,018,608 293,000 342,890 221,000 231,368 -28,690 -9,927 -3,596 12,729 -32,286 2,802 990,000 915,234 506,000 602,318 468,000 510,420 15,000 16,986 4,615 4,615 18,421 -35,385 20,090 10,000 10,207 15,000 16,986 3,878,609 3,863,304 4,372,174 4,372,174 3,200,270 3,187,991 95,444,010 95,444,010 1,315,328 1,315,328 96,759,338 96,759,338 9,552,230 9,361,431 15,220,364 15,220,364 10,074,474 10,041,092 5,538,432 5,538,432 6,003,201 5,957,536 3,604,518 3,588,844 151,915 151,915 3,756,433 3,740,759 26-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30,1994 9. Missouri National N Recreational River NE & SD lM 10. Missouri River M Between Ft. Peck Dam MT & Gavins Point Dam, SD and NE 11. Missouri River N Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, MO 12. Missouri River N Kenslers Bend, NE, to Sioux City, IA N 13. Papillion Creek N and Tributaries Lakes, NE (Required N Contributed Funds) (Consolidated N Summary) IM 14. Pebble Creek N Scribner, NE (Required N Contributed Funds) (Consolidated N Summary) 15. Perry Creek, IA N 17. Pipestem Lake, N ND NM few Work: Approp. Cost faint. 183,000 173,812 Approp. 216,000 Cost 67,505 4aint. Approp. Cost few Work Approp. Cost lew Work: Approp. Cost faint. Approp. Cost few Work: Approp. Cost few Work: Approp. Cost few Work: Approp. Cost 'aint: Approp. Cost lew Work: Approp. Cost lew Work: Approp. Cost lew Work: Approp. Cost few Work: Approp. Cost ew Work: Approp. Cost 'aint: Approp. Cost 47,000 44,167 2,323,000 1,591,309 185,000 2,508,000 1,591,309 498,000 527,621 70,244 110,886 -40,244 -37,644 30,000 73,242 309,000 311,015 52,123 193,000 261,733 ---- 150,000 71,546 ---- 455,000 ---- 239,970 49,000 51,378 1,802,000 1,716,285 120,000 1,802,000 1,836,285 598,000 619,452 30,000 55,408 30,000 55,408 -- M 429,000 416,390 51,000 36,577 193,000 160,055 55,000 113,026 2,100,000 1,927,838 51,000 53,917 3,654,000 1,822,792 400,000 53,350 4,054,000 1,876,142 743,000 734,595 45,000 38,891 42 45,000 38,933 564,000 445,823 354,000 327,755 107,000 84,626 45,000 172,845 350,000 202,702 6,133,000 4,008,041 54,000 46,829 5,351,453 5,876,663 250,000 446,198 5,601,453 6,322,861 612,000 628,210 534,000 486,314 144,500 136,135 678,500 622,449 905,547 573,904 324,000 333,125 1,871,800 1,827,436 1,699,000 1,673,958 555,000 387,274 8,688,000 6,175,849 11,294,414 11,294,414 4,776,419 4,766,263 66,612,2154 63,745,359 835,000 619,548 67,447,215 64,364,907 6,799,444 6,754,512 2,517,728 2,461,808 309,256 298,937 2,826,984 2,760,745 1,469,547 1,019,727 9,277,545 9,277,545 5,491,404 5,446,514 26-14 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30,1994 18. Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE 20. Thurman to Hamburg, IA 21. Westerly Creek, CO (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 22. Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects 23. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 26. Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation, NE (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 27. Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 28. Fort Peck Lake, MT New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 600,000 574,536 1,652,458 1,887,644 96,000 1,849,459 1,887,644 209,000 219,953 386,000 375,595 95,500 81,845 426,000 568,760 183,000 647,106 189,890 100,059 372,890 747,165 218,000 223,432 353,000 350,362 1,345,000 147,623 - 50,400 95,500 1,395,400 81,845 147,623 6,605,000 6,616,064 5,822,400 6,051,036 3,135,000 3,458,000 3,342,107 3,136,266 26-15 644,000 564,354 10,184 87,465 97,649 223,000 200,224 369,000 357,059 231,000 1,296,297 15,600 48,033 246,600 1,344,330 5,601,000 5,452,454 3,209,000 3,461,889 743,000 782,635 711,000 171,076 12,586 5,690 18,276 216,000 237,014 390,000 408,698 -33,000 109,500 16,000 22,123 -17,000 131,623 5,818,169 5,183,660 3,722,411 3,807,697 12,197,6212 12,197,6212 12,338,276 12,288,438 711,000 171,076 8,642,458 8,642,417 799,890 706,596 9,442,348 9,349,013 4,190,476 4,187,711 7,498,684 7,478,916 1,638,500 1,635,265 82,000 70,156 1,720,500 1,705,421 107,497,597 107,497,597 85,508,2733 84,591,9053 158,428,080 158,428,080 80,300,8343 79,956,7013 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep 30,1994 29. Fort Randall New Work: Dam-Lake Francis Approp. - -- --- -- 199,065,883 Case, Missouri Cost - - - - 199,065,883 River Basin, SD Maint. Approp. 6,416,000 6,822,500 7,945,000 7,591,035 136,689,6343 Cost 6,206,030 6,723,347 7,255,826 7,892,167 135,704,270 30. Garrison Dam- New Work: Lake Sakakawea, Approp. -- -- -- --- 295,729,613 Missouri River Cost - - - - 295,729,613 Basin, ND Maint. (Federal Funds) Approp. 6,221,788 7,466,725 8,217,000 8,226,915 151,815,8853 Cost 6,376,807 7,519,345 7,835,759 8,401,057 151,209,4093 Major Rehab. Approp. - -- -- - 4,208,310 Cost - - - - 4,208,310 (Contributed Major Rehab. Funds) Approp. - -- - -- 686,961 Cost - - - - 686,961 31. Gavins Point New Work: Dam-Lewis & Approp. - - -- - 49,617,239 Clark Lake, Cost - - - - 49,617,239 Missouri River Maint. Basin, SD Approp. 5,066,000 5,204,000 4,404,000 5,070,657 97,926,9123 and NE Cost 4,882,599 5,337,876 4,359,645 4,754,001 97,311,5953 32. Oahe Dam-Lake New Work: Oahe, Missouri Approp. --- - ---- --- 346,520,603 River Basin, Cost - - - - 346,520,603 SD & ND Maint. Approp. 7,440,000 8,365,000 9,348,000 10,033,904 149,400,5003 Cost 7,642,307 8,369,210 8,569,562 10,275,626 148,647,3323 33. Missouri River Maint. Master Manual Approp. 4,900,000 2,939,000 1,967,000 979,000 11,845,000 Review & Update Cost 4,721,045 2,946,307 1,684,704 1,406,113 11,535,153 1. 2. 3. 4. Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery Act funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and $1,181,125 for previous project. Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that portion of the project which is currently being carried in a deferred status. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. 26-16 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Jan 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 13, 1968 Flood Control Act of 1962 Flood control Act of 1950 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 National parks and Recreation Act of 1978 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6 foot depth from Quindaro Bend (Kansas City, MO to Sioux City, IA). Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 alloted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. For completion of project from mouth to Sioux City, IA. For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO A flood control reservoir for protection of metropolitan Denver, CO. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Flood Control reservoir and water supply. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Flood control reservoir and channel improvements to provide downstream protection for Denver, CO. Modified 1950 Flood Control Act to operate dam and other Federal improvements to achieve authorized level of protection, beginning at dam and ending 82 miles downstream. Reassigns a portion of the storage space in the lake project to joint flood control-conservation purposes. Modified 1974 WRDA to exempt prohibition of encroachment for Mineral Ave/ Ken Caryl Rd. ext & transmission line. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Provide flood control to the town of Hot Springs, SD. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri River between the reaches from Gavins Point Dam, NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. 26-17 H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong. PL 71-520 PL 73-67 H. Doc 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong. PL 79-14 S. Doc. 87, 90th Cong. PL 90-483 H. Doc. 574, 87th Cong. PL 87-874 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 655, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 858, 80th Cong. PL 95-625 3. 7. & 9. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 11. 12. 13. 10. 26-18 Water Resources Development Act of 1988 Water Resources Development Act Of 1986 Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 Flood Control Act of 1968 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 June 30, 1948 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 June 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 MISSOURI RIVER BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM MT & GAVINS POINT DAM, SD & NE Undertake measures to alleviate bank erosion and related Section 33, problems associated with releases along the Missouri PL 100-676 River from the six main stem dams. MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, MO Mitigate fish and wildlife losses resulting from the con- Section 601, struction and operation of the Missouri River Bank PL 99-662 Stabilization and Navigation project. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA Construction of dike, revetments. H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 80-858 PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Series of flood control reservoirs, providing protection H. Doc. 349, 90th Cong. for the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. PL 90-485 Authorized additional $4.8 million for channel H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. improvement on Big Pipillion Creek, and to PL 99-662 Union Pacific RR bridge, rec trail and flood warning system. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Levee and channel improvement for local PL 858, 80th Cong. protection - Section 205. PERRY CREEK, IA Provide flood protection for Perry Creek, Iowa. Section 401, PL 99-662 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Flood Control Committee River basin and authorized $9 million for Doc. 1, 75th Cong. initiation and partial accomplishment. PL 75-761 Modified general comprehensive plan to include H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican PL 77-228 River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 Basin and authorized additional $200 million, and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution PL 79-526 of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution PL 81.516 of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Does. 549 and 642, 81st River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000. Cong. PL 83-780 Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for PL 83-776 reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri PL 84-505 River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. 14. 15. 16. OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 31, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Flood Control Act of 27 Oct 1965 July 3, 1958 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam. Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Changed comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Oahe Dam and Reservoir, ND. Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Provide flood control for Jamestown, ND and downstream areas. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Series of dams and channel improvements for flood control around Lincoln, NE. SOUTII PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA Install pumping facilities to prevent flooding in the Thurman to Hamburg area of the Missouri River in western Fremont County, IA. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. PL 85-500 PL 86-645 PL 88-253 PL 89-042 PL 90-483 H. Doc. 91-748 and S. Doc. 91-895 PL 91-282 S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. PL 91-576 H. Doc. 91-23 and PL 91-611 PL 92-222 PL 93-251 PL 94-347 PL 95-189 H. Doc. 266, 89th Cong. PL 89-298 H. Doc. 396, 84th Cong. PL 85-500 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 PL 90-17 PL 90-843 PL 91-282 PL 92-222 PL 93-251 PL 94-347 PL 95-189 Section 1152, PL 99-662 26-19 Documents 17. 18. 19. 20. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 21. 26. 27. 28. Dec 22, 1944 Nov 17, 1986 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Dec. 22, 1944 June 16, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 May 18, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 June 3, 1948 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Dec 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 PWA 1968 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 26-20 WESTERLY CREEK, CO Provide flood control for metropolitan Denver, CO PL 99-662 MISSOURI RIVER BANK STABILIZATION AND NAVIGATION, NE Project modification for the restoration of the Section 1135, environment. PL 99-662 BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 78th Cong. PL 78-534 FORT PECK LAKE, MT Construction of earth dam, as recommended by Chief of H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong. Engineers Sep 30, 1933, was approved by Executive Order PL 74-409 by the President and included in Public Works Administration program, Oct 14, 1933 as authorized by the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 and adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 (PL 74-409). Completion, maintenance, and operation of a hydroelectric PL 75-529 power plant, subject to certain provisions in act respecting transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes installation of additional power-generating facilities by Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of Bureau of Reclamation. Modified authorization to provide for full multiple purpose H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 operation. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 Payments to be made to school districts serving project as PL 80-586 reimbursement for educational facilities (including transportation to and from school) for pupils who are dependents of persons engaged in construction, operation, and maintenance of projects Modified authorization to include recreation as a H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. project purpose. PL 99-662 FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Doe. 247, and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 78th Cong. PL 78-534 GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE & SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 78th Cong. PL 78-534 OAHE DAM - LAKE OAHE, SD & ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIIEW AND UPDATE Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doe. 475 and S. Does. 191 and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30,1994 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582 88,716 TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1994 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD 11 Complete 1940 37,410 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA Complete 1982 7,458,934 Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE2 ' Complete 1970 262,479 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE2' Complete 1974 293,016 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND 2' Complete 1960 102,980 Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO Complete 1955 150,000 Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Complete 1967 191,282 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Complete 1939 - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Complete 1954 2,557,680 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD' Complete 1981 3,000,000 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Complete 1964 400,000 East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA2 / Complete 1986 2,154,016 Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 11,556,667 Forsyth, MT Complete 1950 255,177 Frazer-Wolf Point, MT Complete 1982 435,000 Gering Valley, NE Complete 1971 5,989,663 Glasgow, MT Complete 1939 16,832 Great Falls, MT Complete 1991 11,905,000 Greybull, WY Complete 1960 248,507 Havre, MT Complete 1958 1,825,881 Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Complete 1954 50,216 Hooper, NE2' Complete 1968 326,667 Ida Grove, IA2 Complete 1972 522,344 Indian Creek at Emerson, IA2' Complete 1986 333,000 Jamestown Reservoir, ND Complete 1950 Linton, ND2' Inactive 1973 Little Papillion Creek, NE Complete 1976 3,643,111 Little Sioux River, IA Complete 1992 20,630,000 Loup River, Columbus, NE2/ Complete 1973 1,000,000 Lower Heart River, ND Complete 1964 1,961,173 - Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND2 Complete 1991 1,153,430 Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks2 Complete 1967 234,839 Mandan, Heart River, ND Complete 1960 676,916 Marmarth, ND Complete 1960 169,498 McCook Lake, SD Complete 1958 147,627 Miles City, MT Inactive 1956 Missouri River, Aten, NE Complete 1951 578,791 26-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 26-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1994 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO Complete 1993 37,964,177 Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Complete 1945 99,370 Mott, ND Deferred - - - Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE2 Complete 1976 1,000,000 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA Complete 1948 236,000 Norfolk, NE Complete 1971 3,400,504 Omaha, NE Complete 1954 5,903,640 Pierce, NE Complete 1967 296,597 Platte River Near Schuyler, NE / Complete 1948 74,940 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE Complete 1971 257,398 Platte River and Tributaries, NE Inactive - 1,538,269 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD Complete 1980 1,004,000 Saco, MT Complete 1958 67,793 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD Complete 1978 184,380 Sheridan, WYE Complete 1976 2,618,809 Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MTV Complete 1951 25,747 Sioux Falls, SD Complete 1966 5,288,707 Vaughn, MT, Sun Rivers Complete 1971 457,582 Waterloo, NE Complete 1970 237,883 West Point, NE Complete 1966 149,596 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT Complete 1960 230,294 1/ Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. / Includes inactive segment. TABLE 26-F OTHER MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1994 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Gavins Point Dam - Lewis and Clark Lake, Relocation of Niobrara, NE Complete 1980 13,516,459 Modification of Land Purchase Plan for Oahe Dam and Reservoir, Missouri River, ND 2 Active Springfield, SD Water Intake 1/ Active - Williston, ND Water Intake Complete 1981 988,583 1/ Project was reported to the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate by ASA(CW) on 8 Jan 1993 as meeting the deauthorization eligibility criteria of Sec 1001(b)(2) as of 30 Sep 91. Project will be deauthorized 9 July 1995 unless federal funds are obligated for planning, design, or construction. 2/ Reported to Congress October 31, 1994. Project will be deauthorized 1 May 1997 unless federal funds are obligated for planning, design, or construction. 26-22 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds Project Report For Document Expended Expended Billings, MT (Western Unit) Boulder, CO Buffalo, Johnson County Diversion Channel, WY Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO Davids Creek Lake, IA Dayton, WY Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE Indian Creek Lake, IA Lake Herman (Dredging), SD Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE Milk River, Havre, MT Morrison, Bear Creek, CO Redwater River and Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD Shell Creek, NE 1976 1976 1961 1943 1972 1956 1952 1969 N/A 1973 N/A 1950 1966 1962 Upper Missouri River, SD N/A Streambank Erosion Control Project Vermillion River and Tribs, SD 1968 Sec. 201, FC Act 1950 23 Mar 81 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 PL 77-228 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 203, PL 90-483 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 6 Nov 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 204, PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 3 Oct 78 Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12 PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 2i-23 75,000 142,666 135,000 30,000 1,000 71,000 208,000 The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthoyized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86; Aowa & South Creek. NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND; James River, ND & SD;,Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE; South Dakota Lakes, SD; Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT; South Platte River, Denver-Ft. Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; Lower Big Sioux River IA & SD; Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Missouri River Basin, ND; Sheridan, WY (Stage III); Missouri River Levee System Units: R531, R540, R553, R555, RS77, R589, R603, R610, R623, R644, R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703, R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TABLE 26-H Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 Mosquito Creek Levee 14.2 Complete 1950 L601 Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees 15.0 Complete 1966 L594 Pleasant Valley Levee 11.4 Complete 1964 R580 Nebraska City Levee 0.2 Complete 1950 L575 Thurman-Hamburg Levee 45.8 Complete 1950 R573 Otto County Drainage District No. 2 5.9 Complete 1950 R562 Peru Dike 7.6 Complete 1950 L561-550 Atchison County Levee District No. 1 41.3 Complete 1952 R548 Brownville-Nemaha Levee 19.5 Complete 1952 L536 Mill Creek Levee 13.6 Complete 1952 R520 Richardson County Drainage District No. 8 6.3 Complete 1960 R613 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee 14.0 Complete 1971 R616 Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees 4.5 Complete 1987 L611-614 Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees 22.0 Complete 1988 L627, L624, 1561-550 Remedial Studies on Completed Units Studies Complete Comprehensive Restudy of Levee System Studies Complete PICK-SLOAN MISSOUIRI BASIN PROGRAM TABLE 26-I (See Section 16 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Fort Peck Lake, MT1'2 158,428,000 1,103,000 Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND1'2 299,938,000 1,516,000 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rule, NE)"3 37,931,000 4,618,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, SD and ND1'2 346,521,000 2,320,000 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD 1'2 107,498,000 302,000 Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD1,2 199,066,000 1,609,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE1,2 49,617,000 137,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE2 13,516,000 Omaha, NE2 5,904,000 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA2 2,558,000 146,000 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND2 9,413,000 270,000 Cherry Creek Lake, CO1'2 15,220,000 285,000 1Details presented on individual report. 2Completed. 3Active portion of project. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (See Section 22 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Glasgow, Milk River Saco, Beaver Creek Havre, Milk River Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Clyde Park, Shields River Sep 92 Sep 92 Jun 92 Jun 92 Aug 92 26-24 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 22 of Text) Location Month Inspected Three Forks, Lower Madison River Sep 92 Forsythe, Yellowstone River Aug 92 West Glendive, Yellowstone River Sep 92 Vaughn, Sun River Jun 94 * Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston Aug 92 Sun River, Great Falls Jun 94 * Yellowstone River, Near Miles City Water Intake & Sewage Lagoon Inactive * Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings Inactive * Yellowstone River, Livingston (Interstate Bridge) Aug 92 * Milk River, Chinook Sep 94 * Battle Creek, Chinook Sep 94 * East Gallatin, Near Bozeman Jun 94 * Yellowstone River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89 -7 Miles East of Livingston) Jun 92 * Shields River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89) Jun 92 * Teton River, Near Choteau (Hwy 89) Sep 94 * Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin Inactive * Yellowstone River, Glendive Sep 92 Madison River, Quake Lake Sep 94 Milk River, Malta Sep 94 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization Project, Frazer Sep 94 Dearborn River - Hwy 287, Wolf Creek Jun 94 Muddy Creek -Int Hwy 15 -Frontage Road, Vaughn Jun 94 Badger Creek -Hwy 89, Browning Jun 94 Wyoming * Baldwin Creek, Leader Aug 92 Greybull, Big Horn River Aug 92 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks Aug 92 * Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell Aug 92 * Shoshone River, Byron Aug 92 * Powder River, Arvada Aug 92 * Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain Dec 91 North Dakota Mandan, Lower Heart River Sep 93 Marmarth, Little Missouri River Sep 92 Scranton, Buffalo Sep 92 South Dakota Big Sioux River, Union County Jun 93 Big Sioux River, North Sioux City Jun 93 Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Aug 93 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River Sep 93 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Sep 91 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Sep 92 Herreid, Spring Creek Sep 93 * Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Sep 93 * Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre Sep 92 * Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 93 * Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreauun 93 Rapid Creek, Rapid City Sep 91 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton Jun 93 * Vermillion River, Vermillion Jun 93 26-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 22 of Text) Location Month Inspected * Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh Jun 93 * Big Sioux River, Jefferson Jul 92 Deadman Gulch, Sturgis Sep 93 * Marne Creek, Yankton Jun 93 * White River, Winner Sep 93 * James River, Yankton Jun 93 Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam Jun 93 * Plum Creek, Bank Sabilization, Aurora Sep 92 * Cache La Poudre River, Windsor Sep 92 * South Platte River, Kersey Sep 92 * South Platte River, Merino Sep 93 * South Platte River, Iliff Sep 93 * South Platte River, Platteville Sep 93 * Big Thompson River, Johnstown Sep 92 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant) Sep 92 South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington St. Water and Sanitary District Sep 92 * South Platte River, Fort Lupton Hwy 85 Sep 93 * South Platte River, Logan County (Bridges 175A & 173) Sep 93 Nebraska * Blackbird Creek, Decatur May 92 Omaha, Missouri River Jul 92 Waterloo, Elkhorn River Jun 93 West Point, Elkhorn River Jun 92 Pierce, Elkhorn River Sep 93 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Jan 92 Hooper, Elkhorn River Aug 92 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River Sep 93 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Sep 93 * Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island Feb 92 * Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville Feb 92 * Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna Aug 92 * Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk Mar 92 * North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare Oct 92 * Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft Mar 92 * Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek Feb 92 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Aug 93 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Jun 92 Gering Valley, Gering Drain & Tributaries Sep 93 Macy, Blackbird Creek May 92 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Sep 93 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek Sep 93 Columbus, Loup River Aug 93 Broken Bow, Mud Creek Sep 93 * Little Nemaha River, Tangeman Mar 92 * Julian, Rock Creek Inactive * Muddy Creek Near Syracuse Mar 92 * Platte River, Hansen-Chris Lakes, Bellevue Feb 92 * Platte River, Brady Apr 92 * Elm Creek, Decatur Mar 92 * Wiggle Creek, Homer Mar 92 26-26 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 22 of Text) Location Month Inspected * Elk Creek, Jackson Mar 92 * South Creek, Martinburg Apr 92 * Elk Creek, Willis Mar 92 Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus Aug 93 * Shell Creek, County Road Near Columbus Mar 92 * Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder Apr 92 * .Elm Creek, Burt County Mar 92 * Redbird Creek, O'Neill Sep 93 * Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln Jan 92 * Platte River, Ashland Mar 92 * West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE Aug 92 * Niobrara River, Bassett, NE Sep 92 * Niobrara River-Carns Bridge, Bassett, NE Sep 93 * Elkhorn River Bridge, Norfolk Jun 92 * West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha Aug 92 * Logan Creek, Near Bancroft Mar 92 * Platte River, Near North Bend Apr 92 * Platte River, Ginger Cove Near Valley Sep 92 * Elkhorn River, Near Beemer Mar 92 * Elkhorn River, Ewing, Holt County Sep 91 Lodgepole Creek, Sidney, NE Sep 94 Pebble Creek, Scribner Sep 92 * East Bow Creek, Wynot Jun 93 Nine Mile Drain, Scotts Bluff County Sep 93 * Plum Creek, Johnstown Sep 93 Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Sep 92 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek May 93 Sioux City, Floyd River May 93 Hawarden, Dry Creek May 93 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River May 92 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Aug 92 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 93 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Aug 93 * West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern Mar 92 * West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Hastings Mar 92 * East Nisbnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex Feb 92 * Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City Sep 92 * West Nisbnabotna River, Near Hancock Jan 92 * East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold Jan 92 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak Apr 93 Big Sioux River, Sioux City Jul 93 * Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA Apr 92 Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County Apr 93 * East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail Feb 92 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County Aug 92 * Little Sioux River, Anthon Feb 92 * Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Jun 93 * Keg Creek, Minden Feb 92 * Waterman Creek, Near Sutherland Mar 92 * Soldier River, Near Ute Mar 92 * West Nishnabotna River, Near Oakland Jan 92 * R.B. West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern Mar 92 26-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 22 of Text) Location Month Inspected Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees Aug 92 L601, Watkins Levee District May 92 L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District Jun 92 L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 Jun 92 L594, Waubansie Drainage District Jun 92 L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District Jun 92 L575, Benton-Washington Levee District Jun 92 L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District Jul 92 L575, McMssock Island Levee District Jul 92 L575, Bucbannan Levee District Jul 92 L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District Apr 92 L611-614, & P Missouri River Levee District May 92 R613, Papio Natural Resources District Aug 92 R562, Peru Levee District May 92 RS548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District May 92 R548, Little Nemaha Levee District May 92 R520, Richardson Co, Levee Dist. #8 Apr 92 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 Apr 92 R616, Sarpy County Papio Natural Resources District Aug 92 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (See Section 35 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item FY 94 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE 50,915 Big Sioux River, Sioux Falls, SD 217 Thurman to Hamburg, IA 26,049 Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD 137,076 Vermillion River Basin, SD 279 Ft. Collins, CO 7,842 Ralston & Leydon Creeks, CO 5,841 Burt-Washington Counties, NE 90,857 Watertown and Vicinity, SD 32,551 Subtotal 351,627 Special Studies (140) Big Bend Wildlife Restoration, SD 1,189 James River Environmental, SD 3,916 Oahe Wildlife Restoration, SD 1,724 Lewis & Clark, NE & Lake Sakakawea, ND 140,605 Environmental Service Partner 7,590 Subtotal 155,024 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, SD 49,501 Subtotal 49,501 26-28 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (Continued) (See Section 35 of Text) Federal Cost otals By Item FY 94 Categories Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) 194,154 FERC Licensing(172) 2,768 Interagency Water Resources Development(173) 30,820 North American Waterfowl Management Plan(176) 5,606 Subtotal 233,348 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Cooperation With Other Water Resources Agencies (181) 39,212 Cooperation with States (186) 268,887 Subtotal 308,099 TOTAL (Category 100) 1,097,599 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) 51,678 SS - Simons Creek, NE 90 SS -Snyder, CO 90 Newcastle, WY (250) 13,038 NFPC (250) 5,799 Quick Responses (250) 9,947 Risk Canyon, CO (250) 1,457 SS - Yankton, SD (250) 3,004 SS - Dry Creek, CO (250) 15,745 White Earth, ND (250) 6,890 Technical Services, General (250) 74,099 Hydrologic Studies (260) 46,152 SS - White River, Crawford, NE 424 SS - Columbus, NE 5,998 SS - Council Bluffs, IA 43 SS - Denison, IA 2,993 SS - Jefferson, CO above Bear Creek 5 TOTAL (Category 200) 237,452 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) None PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - PROJECTS NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED (Category 400) Wood River, Grand Island, NE (451) 331,146 Big Sioux River, Sioux Falls, SD (451) 538,572 Watertown and Vicinity, SD (451) 10,401 TOTAL (Category 400) 880,119 PLANNING AND ENGINEERING UNDER PROPOSED LEGISLATION (Category 500) None 26-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (Continued) (See Section 35 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item FY 94 Categories PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - FULLY AUTHORIZED PROJECTS (Category 600) Perry Creek, IA (650) 37,262 TOTAL (Category 600) 37,262 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 2,252,432 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (See Section 24 of Text) NYSCatPamorgsoeet j ect Project Name Stage Cost Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Emergency Water Supply & Drought Assistance Advance Measures Total (FCCE) Section 205: Beal Slough, NE Cache La Poudre River, Greeley, CO Deadman's Run, NE Elkhorn River, Logan Creek, NE Frazier Creek, Beemer, NE Humbug Creek, Pilger, NE Lodgepole Creek, Sidney, NE Logan Creek, Pender, NE Lost Creek at Columbus, NE Maple Creek East Fork, Howells, NE Milk River, Malta, MT Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA Oak Creek at Wakpala, SD Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE Pipestone Creek at Pipestone, MN Powder River, Broadus, MT Rock River at Rock Rapids, IA Salt Creek, Levees, Lincoln, NE Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO Total (Section 205's) 398,445 419,728 421,113 164,853 1,404,139 19 1,438 27,136 31,879 21,107 7,761 585,398 121,242 16,986 145,403 19,753 78,046 22,979 486,314 26,326 13,707 25,395 26,921 15,3673,171 1,673,171 26-30 R R R R R R C F L P P F R C R R R F F OMAHA, NE DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (Continued) (See Section 24 of Text) FY Project Name. Stage Cost Section 14: Badger Creek, Glacier City, MT C 49,720 Beaver Creek, Platte County, NE C 280 Cannonball River, Shields, ND - -11 Dearborn River, Lewis-Clark County, MT C 20,717 East Bow Creek, Cedar County Bridge, WY C 45 East Nishnabotna River, Page Bny Brdg, IA C 3,993 Elkhorn River, Ewing Sewage Lagoon, NE F 1,648 Elkhorn River, Holt County, Inman, NE F 4,807 Four-Mile Creek, Cass County, NE F 1,942 Gallatin River, Gallatin County, MT C 4,586 Heart River, Morton County, Mandan, ND F 5,655 James River, Sewage Lagoon, Brown County, NE F 3,072 Maple Creek, Dodge County, Site 1, NE F 2,182 Maple Creek, Dodge County, Site 2, NE F 2,417 Muddy Creek, Cascade, Vaughn, MT C 93,545 Nine Mile Drain, Scottsbluff, NE C 145 Niobrara River (Carns Bridge), NE C 71 North Platte River at Casper, WY F 1,023 North Turkey Creek, Jefferson County, CO F 29 Shields River Park, CO U.S. 89 C 23 South Platte River, Logan County Bridge, NE P 18 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 28, CO - -1,140 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 61, CO C 108 Teton River, Hwy Bridge 89, Chateau, MT C 6,973 Teton River, Hwy Bridge 223, Chateau, MT F 13,908 Tongue River, WY C 27,642 West Nishnobotna River, Oakland, IA F 6,334 Yellowstone River, Route 11, Livingstone, MT C 3,047 Yellowstone River, Hwy Bridge 89, MT P 245 Yellowstone River, MT F 108 Total (Section 14's) 253,132 Total Flood Control Activities 3,330,442 L = Litigation R = Recon P = Plans & Specs C = Construction F = Feasibility - = Does Not Apply 26-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 26-M PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Modifications of projects for the purpose of improving the quality of the environment in the public interest. (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended.) Study/Project and Location Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended Bullard Bend Chute Restoration, NE 61,969 California Bend, NE 2,256 Hidden Lake Restoration, NE 178,952 Lower Decatur Bend, NE 2,188 Missouri River Dike Lowering, NE 772 Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation 1,635,265 70,156 Missouri River Levee Unit L536 Deroin Bend, MO 2,491 Garrison Dam - Lake Sakakawea 61,400 Carlson Bottoms Wetland Restoration 2,600 26-32 1994 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central, and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri Navigation Page 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) ................. 27-2 2. Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, and MO ............ 27-2 Flood Control 3. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO ........ 27-2 4. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO .............. 27-3 5. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS ........... 27-3 6. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE ............................... 27-3 7. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS ........... 27-3 8. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS ........ 274 9. Little Blue River Lakes, MO ................ 27-4 10. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO ............................. 27-4 11. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS ...................... 27-5 12. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS .......... 27-5 13. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) ........... 27-5 14. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS ........... 27-5 15. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.)........................27-6 16. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO ............................. 27-6 17. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS .................................. 27-6 18. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA............ 27-6 19. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO ...... 27-6 20. Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS ........ 27-7 21. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS ............... 27-7 River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. Flood Control (cont.) 22. Scheduling of Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................... . 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................... Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 24. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ....................... 25. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO .............. Work Under Special Authorities 26. Continuing Authorities ................ 27. Emergency Response Activities ............ General Investigations 28. General Investigations ................... Page .. 27-7 .. 27-7 S.27-7 . .27-8 ..27-8 .. 27-9 .27-9 Tables Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement .......... 27-10 Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 27-13 Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... 27-16 Table 27-D Not Applicable Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 27-17 Table 27-F Not Applicable Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects .............. 27-18 Table 27-H Missouri River Levee System ......... 27-19 Table 27-I Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program ..................... 27-20 Table 27-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 27-20 Table 27-K Active General Investigations ........ 27-21 Table 27-L Work Under Special Authorities ....... 27-22 27-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH). Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Montana, to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous Projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize the waterways, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. The improved reach within the Kansas City District extends from the mouth to Rulo, Nebraska, a distance of 498.4 miles. The Bank Stabilization and Navigation features of the project were completed in September 1980. For the reach from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, the total construction cost was $237,942,190 including $8,665,594 for previous project. River access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary and extreme stage fluctuations are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities may be required where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $171,816 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. A listing of terminal facilities are included in Missouri River Navigation Charts and can be obtained from Kansas City District Engineer for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance of the 1993 flood damage to the dikes and revetments was the principle item of work accomplished by contract. Field hired labor accomplished construction of environmental gaps and emergency structure repair of dikes and revetments. District personnel also accomplished other work items: channel reconnaissance, stream gauging condition studies, surveys and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and layouts of construction, and supervision and administration. Project tonnage on the river for CY 1994 is estimated at 1.5 million tons, excluding sand, gravel, and waterway improvement materials. District estimates the recreation use on the Missouri River (MRK) at 1.2 million recreation days annually. 2. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, and MO Location. This project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the Mouth near St. Louis, a river distance of 732 miles. This location is coincident with the Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project on the river. Existing project. The project is to mitigate losses of fish and wildlife habitat resulting from construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project. The four major components of the plan are restoration of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands (2,500 acres), preservation of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands subject to the effects of riverbed degradation (700 acres), acquisition and development of existing undeveloped habitat on private lands (28,000 acres), and development of terrestrial wildlife habitat on existing undeveloped public lands (16,900 acres). Estimated fully funded cost of the project (1994) is $69,900,000, all Federal. Both the Kansas City and Omaha Districts are involved in the implementation of the project, with Kansas City District involvement directed mainly to sites in Kansas and Missouri. Local cooperation. There is no non-Federal sponsor for the project. The states of Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri are voluntarily serving on a coordinating team which is actively involved in ongoing project activities. Operations during fiscal yean Funding was continued for land acquisition and construction of mitigation features. Land was purchased at the following sites: Louisville Bend, Iowa; Hamburg Bend, Langdon Bend, Kansas Bend, and Tbacco Island, Nebraska; Benedictine Bottoms, Kansas; and Overton Bottoms, Missouri. Negotiations took place with landowners preparatory to the purchase of lands in all four states. A contract was awarded for mitigation development at the Louisville Bend Wildlife Area, Iowa. Design activities were also carried out at Hamburg Bend, Nebraska; Winnebago Bend, Iowa; and Benedictine Bottoms, Kansas. Flood Control 3. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1994) is $185,000,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $31,900,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. The City of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on December 9, 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. The Section 221 agreement was signed by the Kansas City District Engineer on September 8, 1983. 27-2 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT * Operations during fiscal year Preconstruction planning is complete and final designs are underway. The first and second channel contracts are complete. The pile stabilization, contaminated sediments, and the paved reach contracts are complete. Railroad relocations are completed in the reach of Stages 1 and 2. The Stage 3 Features Design Memorandum was approved, and preparations for the plans and specifications for the 12th-23rd Street contract are underway. Preparation of plans and specifications for the 23rd-Stadium contract has been initiated. The railroad relocation contract with the Kansas City Southern and the Missouri Pacific has been awarded. Negotiations with the Burlington Northern Railroad Companies are being finalized. 4. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. A major tributary of the Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, and Johnson County, Kansas, draining a highly urbanized 29-square-mile area in the two states. Existing project. The authorized project consists of improving about 7,500 feet of the channel from near Roanoke Parkway downstream to near Troost Avenue in Kansas City. At the request of the sponsor, Kansas City, Missouri, a modified project will be built which provides identical flood protection, but which also accommodates park and recreation development in the authorized reach. Estimated fully funded Federal cost of the modified project (1994) is $14,464,000; and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, relocations, and cash is $19,526,000. Local cooperation. The City of Kansas City and the Corps of Engineers entered into a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) on the project in March 1991. Operations during fiscal year The Stage 2 contract was awarded and notice to proceed issued in November 1992. This contract will complete all remaining structural features. Despite bad weather in 1993 the contractor is ahead of schedule. Procurement of equipment for the Flood Warning System began, and installation of the system should be complete by December 1994. Oak Street bridge was opened to traffic in June 1993. Construction of the new Main-Brookside bridge and roadways was started in March 1993 with completion currently forecast to be November 1994. Completion of the Main-Brookside project was delayed by bad weather during 1993, as well as the contractor defaulting. Heavy rains in July 1993 resulted in water levels as high as those in 1977 upstream of the Plaza. The partially completed project reduced the flood crest through the Plaza significantly and kept water out of the commercial areas. Flood damages prevented by the partially completed project during the July 1993 flood are estimated to be as much as $50 million, which exceeds the total estimated cost of the project. 5. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, in Douglas County, Kansas. The lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a height of about 114 feet with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial waste supply and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $57,415,433. Construction was initiated in January 1972, and the project was placed in operation in November 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $6,768,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1994 was 7,479,546 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 6. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, 11/2 miles south of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gatecontrolled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near the center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $1,832,394 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $48,129,549. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1946. The project was placed in operation in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1994 was 7,455,132 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Study of future operation. The Study of Future Operation at Harlan County Lake continued in FY 1994. The purpose of the study is to develop an operating plan to serve the best public interest for Harlan County Lake under depleted inflow conditions. Data have been collected to determine the rate of inflow depletion, and to determine the economic, social, and fish and wildlife impacts of various potential operating plans. 7. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 2V2 miles west of Hillsdale, in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 27-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Construction was initiated in December 1974, and the project was placed in operation in October 1981. Federal cost of construction was $64,161,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $21,145,338 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. The Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks has a 50-year lease on 12,880 acres for management of land and water areas for public park, recreational, and fish and wildlife purposes. Operations during fiscal yean Visitation for FY 1994 was 605,800 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 8. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the Smoky Hill River about 184 river miles above the mouth of the stream, and about 11 miles northwest of Marquette, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on the left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. 'Ibtal Federal cost of project, including $249,492, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $12,577,227. Construction was initiated in June 1940, and project was placed in operation in May 1948. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year Visitation for FY 1994 was 1,801,928 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and payment of contactor claim on construction of collector system and channel stabilization. 9. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about 1 mile south of U.S. Highway 40, and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109th Street. Existing project. The Blue Springs dam is an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam is an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 46,900 acrefeet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 2,000 for sedimentation). Federal cost (1992) for both lakes through construction of the project was $140,809,200. Construction was initiated in September 1977, and the project became operational in September 1988. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on July 5, 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Reimbursement for recreation was $15,047,000 of which $450,000 was accomplished during construction by local interests. Operations during fiscal yean Project is complete. Land acquisition is complete. Visitation for FY 1994 was 4,619,871 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 10. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the East Fork Little Chariton River in north-central Missouri about 2 miles west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in the right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1994) is $20,111,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,458,000. Construction was initiated in March 1973. The project was placed in useful operation for flood control on September 1, 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,567,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,589,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the City of Macon, Missouri, for water supply and recreation development. Missouri state agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of the City of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979, and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 18, 1980. Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to this contract was approved December 28, 1993 and will provide for additional recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1994 was 1,137,673 visitor hours. Project is 100 percent complete on scheduled work. The remaining unscheduled work is 27-4 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT construction of recreation facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 11. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 4 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Construction was initiated in July 1967, and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1994 was 7,084,628 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 12. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Location. The damsite is on the Republican River near the village of Alida about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River; and about 4 miles northwest of Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in the project at the request of the Governor of Kansas under provisions of the Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,297,649 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $49,566,492. Construction was initiated in July 1961. The project was placed in operation in June 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $12,162,134 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in October 1984. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations during fiscal year. The lake project experienced record flooding during 1993 that required large flood releases through the outlet works and several days of uncontrolled flows over the spillway. Repairs to the damaged outlet channel and spillway will be accomplished with Emergency Supplemental funds. Visitation for FY 1994 was 5,661,394 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 13. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to the mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. The portion of the project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated fully funded cost (1994) for the active portion of the project from Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $125,459,000, including $90,453,000 Federal and $24,017,000 non-Federal contributions. Costs of $10,989,000 for lands and damages are to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending completion of restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Current cost estimate for deferred, inactive, and deauthorized portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $255,259,000 (1964, 1986, and 1987 price levels), of which $231,233,000 is Federal cost for construction and $24,026,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1948. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Local sponsors provide all operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal yeah Status of individual units of active portion of project at end of fiscal year is shown in Table 27-H on Missouri River Levee System. Unit L385 was approved for construction, and planning on Unit L142 continued. 14. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Location. The damsite is on the Delaware River about 5 miles above the mouth in Jefferson County, and about 3 miles northwest of Perry, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acrefeet (480,000 for flood control, including 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in the project plan at the request of the State of Kansas under provisions of the Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $724,212 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,095,918. Construction was initiated in March 1964, and the project was placed in operation in January 1969. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $9,208,342 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. 27-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1994 was 6,099,507 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 15. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 27-B for authorizing legislation and Table 27-I on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) See individual project reports. 16. POMME DE TERRE LAKE POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Location. The dam is on the main stem Pomme de 'Irre River, about 44 miles above the mouth in Hickory County, Missouri. The lake extends upstream into Polk County, Missouri. The site is about 4 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multi-purpose). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $14,946,784. Total Federal cost of project, including $329,140 area redevelopment and $2,089,529 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $17,365,453. Construction was initiated in January 1957, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1961. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1994 was 12,345,950 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 17. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Location. The dam is on One Hundred Thn Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 8 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet works and an ungated chutetype spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Tbtal Federal cost of project, including supplemental recreational development $731,130 (Code 710), was $14,003,238. Construction began in July 1959, and the project was placed in operation in October 1963. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Pomona has water supply reimbursement under Water Supply Act of 1958 totaling $862,923. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1994 was 3,399,533 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 18. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Location. The damsite is on the Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Ibtal reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acre-feet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Tbtal Federal cost of project, including $588,948 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), was $27,622,158. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished; and a supplement to the master plan was approved, which resulted in relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization work to compensate for the higher lake levels. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1994 was 6,110,900 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance, repair of FY 93 flood damage, replacement of relief wells and collector system, and resurfacing roads and intersections. 19. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,400 feet long crosses a saddle in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the project was $87,685,314. Construction was initiated in November 1973, and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. 27-6 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958, and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non- Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $737,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on November 27, 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1994 was 7,015,217 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 20. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the main stem of the Big Blue River, about 12 miles above the stream mouth in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 5 miles north of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low-flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total Federal cost of project, including $533,048 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $80,584,079. Construction began in October 1952. Project was placed in operation in July 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Tuttle Creek Lake experienced record flooding in 1993 at the same time as Milford Lake. Prolonged flows (for the first time in the project's history) through the spillway produced a new project visitor attraction, the Tuttle Creek "Grand Canyon. An analysis of damages to the spillway area was initiated with Emergency Supplemental funds. Visitation for FY 1994 was 2,786,769 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 21. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near the eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low-flow regulation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total Federal cost of project, including $448,344 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $20,463,367. Construction began in April 1961, and the project was placed in operation in December 1964. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1994 was 2,122,530 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activity included ordinary operation and maintenance and repair of FY 93 flood damage. 22. SCHEDULING OF FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See Table 27-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 24. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the main stem of the Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet above streambed, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway and a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating units with a combined generating capability of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). Public Law 91- 267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri, to the Harry S Truman Dam and Reservoir. Estimated cost (1994) through construction of the project is $550,910,000. Construction of relocated Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964. The embankment has been completed including the paved roadway on top of the dam. The spillway was completed in October 1979. The Southwestern Power Administration powerline needed for final testing and commercial operation of the generators was completed in December 1979. The first power unit was placed on line 27-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 on December 22, 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearings required remedial design on the bearings. Restricted commercial power production began in April 1982. Through September 1994, power generation totaled 3,847,323,800 kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $81,560,062 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project power operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operation during fiscal year Visitation for FY 1994 was 12,765,458 visitor hours. Work was continued on real estate activities and construction of powerplant features. Project is 99 percent complete. During FY 1994, 229,434,000 kilowatt- hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance, painting 15 bulkheads, and replacement of bridge crane controls. 25. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with the Osage River, and about 1 mile east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri. The lake extends into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200- kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,715,300. Cost of the project, including $3,758,000 for downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $79,975,357. Construction was initiated in October 1963, and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000 kilowatt level. Right-of-way for construction of a channel cutoff and bridge at Horseshoe Bend were acquired, and construction completed. Sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills were acquired. Completion assured downstream channel capacity to Caplinger Mills of 8,000 cf.s. for powerplant operation. Discharge in this range will accommodate power operations at a 39,500- kilowatt level. Through September 1994, power generation totaled 1,368,363,000 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $25,333,025 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1994 was 9,081,683 visitor hours. The project is complete and in operational status. During FY 1994, 112,634,000 kilowatt-. hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance, initiation of cavitation inlay, and upgrade of Orleans Trail Access Road. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES 26. CONTINUING AUTHORITIES Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948, as amended). Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $5 million. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit; and prevent future encroachments on improved channels. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 requires the non-Federal sponsors of Section 205 projects to pay 50 percent of the cost of the feasibility study. For structural flood control projects, the sponsor must pay in cash during the construction at least 5 percent of the construction cost. The sponsor's cash and other contributions must equal 25 percent of the total construction cost, but will not be required to exceed 50 percent. There was one Section 205 project under construction in Fiscal Year 1994. Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS, Indian Creek Channel Modification - Construction was completed in May 1994 on approximately 1 mile of channel widening on Indian Creek, a tributary of the Blue River in Overland Park. As agreed in the May 1991 Local Cooperation Agreement, the project has been transferred to the local sponsor, the City of Overland Park, Kansas, for operation and maintenance. See Table L for expenditures under Section 205 during Fiscal Year 1994. Emergency Streambank Protection (Section 14,1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Each project selected must be complete in itself, engineering feasible, economically justifiable, environmentally acceptable, and limited to a Federal statutory cost of not more than $500,000. The local sponsoring entity must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; provide over the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limit. One project was physicially and financially completed in FY 1994, as follows: West Fork Grand River, MO Highway and Transportation Dept., Route 46A, Missouri - Construction was completed in April 1994 to protect a state road. The project consists of 500 feet of left bank revetment with a reinforced toe. 27-8 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Construction was completed on one project in FY 1994 that will be financially completed in FY 1995, as follows: Hinkson Creek, Columbia, MO, Sewerline - Construction was completed in September 1994 to protect a sewerline and was turned over to the sponsor in January 1995. The project consists of 300 feet of stone fill on the left streambank. See Table 27-L for Emergency Streambank Protection expenditures during FY 1994. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 662, 99th Cong., November 17,1986). Section 1135 authorizes review of the operation of completed water resources projects to determine need for modifications for the purpose of improving environmental quality. No projects were completed in FY 1994. See Table 27-L for Section 1135 studies status and expenditures for FY 1994. 27. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES PROGRAM A. Disaster Preparedness Program. The Disaster Preparedness Program (DPP) involves planning, training inspection, supplies and equipment, and personnel. Planning activities involve development of district response and recovery plans in support of natural disasters. During the 1993 midwest flood event, the district implemented CEMRK OPLAN 500-1-1. This plan was developed to support our levee rehabilitation program. This plan supplements our other current plans including the district's Response Plan, Emergency Operations Center Plan, Emergency Operations and Disaster Assistance-Deployment Plan, as well as our district Corrective Action Plan. Training activities to support disaster preparedness included both internal district employee training on maintaining our flood fighting expertise and the Corps' role under the Federal Response Plan, as well as training and conferences with state and local officials. During this fiscal year we conducted in-house district training in preparation for potential flood fighting efforts during the spring 1995. We also conducted flood fight training at the Mid-America Regional Emergency Preparedness Conference in July 1994 to over 80 state and local officials from Nebraska, Iowa, Missouri, and Kansas. Disaster preparedness includes maintaining the necessary supplies and equipment to support disaster response. To support flood fighting preparedness efforts, we provided technical assistance to the state and local officials and maintained an inventory of over 1.5 million sandbags and over 40 flood fighting pumps. B. Public Law 84-99. Rehabilitation of Flood Control Works. The bulk of the district's efforts during this FY have focused on levee rehabilitation as a result of the 1993 midwest flood event. The Kansas City District experienced a tremendous amount of damage to flood control projects along the Missouri River. Of the 152 levees that were active within the PL 84-99 program prior to the 1993 midwest flood event, 107 of these levees sustained damage and were eligible for rehabilitation assistance. During the first quarter of the FY, our emphasis was on conducting investigations of damaged levees and performing initial repairs to levees that met the stringent eligibility criteria for initial repairs. Only three levees (two federal levees and one non-federal unit) were eligible for initial repairs. Initial repairs cost approximately $2.0 million. The remaining 104 levee units were only eligible for final repairs. The total estimated current cost for final repairs to the 104 levees damaged by the 1993 flood event is $52.4 million. Emergency Operations: To compound our challenge to the ongoing levee rehabilitation'program, we suffered two relatively minor flood events during April and May of 1994 on the lower end of the Missouri River downstream of Jefferson City, Missouri to St. Louis, Missouri. Flood fighting costs for these two events exceeded $129,200. Unfortunately, many of the levees along this stretch of the river were either not repaired or in the middle of being repaired and sustained additional damages as a result of these spring floods. TDY Support: During 1994,126 persons from other Corps Districts, as well as from the Bureau of Reclamation, were brought into the district to supplement the levee rehabilitation program. Funds in the amount of $2,068,835 were issued by this office to pay for the services of these people. FEMA Missions: Completion of the 10 FEMA missions assigned to this district during the last quarter of FY 93 and into FY 94 was accomplished at a cost of $775,700. All FEMA missions and revocation of any excess funds were 100 percent completed in May 1994. Assistance to Economic Development Administration (EDA) Levee Rehabilitation Program: In April 1994, $310,000 was received from EDA to prepare investigation reports on 23 EDA levees to determine eligibility for repair and subsequent admittance to the Corps' non-Federal levee program. All reports were completed and delivered to EDA headquarters by May 23, 1994. Assistance to Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Levee Rehabilitation Program: Additional funding was also received during the third quarter of the fiscal year to prepare investigation reports on SCS levees to determine their eligibility for repair. A total of seven reports were submitted to SCS. General Investigations 28. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal year 1994 costs totaled $621,063 for all General Investigations activities. See Table 27-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, and Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 27-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section i Total Cost to n Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 1. Missouri River, New Work: Sioux City, IA Approp. to Mouth (Rulo, Cost NE, to Mouth) Maint. (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Contributed Funds New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Consolidated New Work: Summary Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2. Missouri River Fish New Work: & Wildlife Mitigation, Approp. IA, NE, KS & MO Cost 3. Blue River Channel New Work: Kansas City, MO Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Contributed Funds New Work: Approp. Cost Consolidated New Work: Summary Approp. Cost 4. Brush Creek, New Work: Kansas City, MO Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Contributed Funds New Work: Authorized Project Approp. Cost Expanded Project" New Work: Approp. Cost Consolidated New Work: Summary Approp. Cost 5. Clinton Lake, New Work: Wakarusa Approp. River, KS Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Harlan County New Work: Lake, Republican Approp. River, NE Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 7. Hillsdale Lake, New Work: Big Bull Approp. Creek, KS Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3,954,000 3,955,698 3,954,000 3,955,698 219,000 263,858 8,154,000 8,158,558 32,400 20,000 8,186,400 8,178,558 695,000 777,092 342,000 11,721 3,445,000 130,800 4,482,000 919,613 4,355,000 4,355,000 4,355,000 4,355,000 572,000 580,300 14,703,000 14,703,356 - 12,381 14,703,000 14,715,737 1,078,000 1,077,856 328,936 2,867,000 536,721 3,945,000 1,943,513 1,557,000 1,342,000 1,401,000 1,524,937 1,374,063 1,401,000 1,553,000 1,565,597 1,810,000 1,810,000 - - 829,000 1,310,500 845,931 1,310,500 1,474,000 1,474,000 702,000 688,071 4,121,000 2,648,025 4,121,000 2,648,025 4,140,000 2,285,844 4,711,000 4,295,997 339,750 116,105 5,050,750 4,412,102 4,100,000 4,095,991 1,000,000 124,923 S1,000,000 1,150,344 4,100,000 5,371,258 27-10 - 237,942,190' - 237,942,1901 9,891,000 311,787,7742 3 10,419,287 310,843,0862 4 - 816,190 - 816,190 - 22,642 - 22,642 - 238,758,3801 - 238,758,3801 9,891,00 311,810,4162 3 10,419,287 310,865,7282 4 1,159,000 6,313,000 2,894,174 6,191,572 4,155,000 71,815,171 1,446,862 68,691,032 - 372,150 121,085 269,571 " 4,155,000 72,187,321 1,567,947 68,960,6035 4,480,000 12,553,000 4,016,538 12,085,343 - 1,342,000 684,077 1,149,657 1,350,000 6,662,000 3,350,444 5,168,3096 5,830,000 20,557,000 8,051,059 18,403,3096 - 57,415,433 - 57,415,4337 1,347,400 18,469,000 1,347,400 18,469,000 - 47,111,926 - 47,111,9268 1,423,300 28,042,984 1,377,918 27,997,602 - 1,017,623 - 1,017,623 - 64,161,400 - 64,161,400 628,000 8,756,870 641,929 8,756,870 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 8. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS. 9. Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, MO 10. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, MO Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 11. Melvern Lake Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 12. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 13. Missouri River Levee System IA, NE, KS and MO 14. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 16. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 17. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS New Work: Approp., Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12,577,227 12,577,2279 1,205,000 1,242,097 185,000 160,008 951,000 968,787 1,239,300 1,206,465 -26,000 88,066 793,000 793,000 1,248,000 1,612,4003 27,390,6123 1,263,445 1,587,8014 27,348,6234 836,000 739,000 836,000 739,000 161 - 603,000 623,000 604,302 623,000 602,000 859,000 602,000 720,321 18,655 602,000 859,000 161 620,655 720,321 1,462,000 1,682,000 1,780,000 1,495,100 1,465,275 1,582,000 1,873,400 1,482,197 140,809,200 140,809,2001' 5,835,784 5,835,784 18,216,177 18,216,177 8,079,112 7,940,433 1,108,075 1,051,37211 20,785,252 20,589,870 37,436,530 37,436,530 23,006,154 22,986,651 - - - - 49,566,492 - - - - 49,566,492 1,660,000 1,517,800 1,771,000 2,363,500' 29,811,4403 1,670,708 1,517,800 1,747,547 1,939,7754 29,364,262 400,000 1,270,000 1,639,000 275,000 402,316 1,260,993 1,526,995 291,109 1,915,000 2,178,000 1,495,000 1,493,170 1,917,824 1,789,990 1,829,124 1,513,056 1,537,000 1,710,000 1,502,000 1,602,360 1,548,631 1,684,494 1,522,059 1,561,307 64,544,851 64,439,664 49,095,918 49,095,918 30,871,343 30,837,343 17,365,452 17,365,452 28,362,461 28,315,961 14,003,238 14,003,238 1,336,000 1,540,000 1,513,000 1,523,1503 24,717,5703 1,355,418 1,542,407 1,498,975 1,509,7514 24,690,1464 27-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 18. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA 19. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO 20. Tuttle Creek Lake Blg Blue River, KS 21. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS 22. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 24. Harry S. Truman Dam & Reservoir Osage River, MO 25. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO 27A. Disaster Preparedness Program- Inspections New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 27,622,159 - - - - 27,622,159 1,811,000 1,923,000 2,386,000 5,306,0003 33,424,7113 1,852,047 1,923,000 2,354,982 4,787,486' 32,875,1794 - - - - 87,685,314 - - - - 87,685,314 1,073,000 983,000 1,077,386 950,500 952,000 984,0003 12,935,4483 984,500 951,051 12,902,4994 - - 80,584,079 - - 80,584,079 2,240,000 1,527,000 1,774,000 1,866,0003 31,304,4323 2,264,782 1,527,000 1,761,517 1,662,050" 31,087,999' - - - - 20,463,367 - - - - 20,463,367 1,450,000 2,034,000 1,467,690 1,838,084 243,000 242,000 243,000 242,000 375,000 375,000 3,552,000 4,278,405 6,172,000 6,329,552 6,737 427,000 427,000 2,526,000 2,724,080 7,810,800 7,464,704 1,907,000 1,490,5003 1,714,621 1,867,3554 255,000 247,000 255,000 247,000 456,000 397,000 456,000 397,000 3,268,000 1,928,058 7,987,000 7,884,859 23,839,0043 23,827,564 55,748,452 55,748,452 6,964,431 6,964,431 300,000 548,009,900 1,485,853 547,845,652 9,236,000 84,336,162 9,572,781 84,218,586 - 79,975,357 - 79,975,357 2,919,000 3,666,800 3,593,000 3,336,488 45,104,159 2,938,376 3,639,973 2,598,785 3,818,636 44,565,092 180,913 182,000 200,000 181,955 106,955 135,000 106,911 135,089 1,635,1181'2 1,635,118 1. Includes $8,665,595 costs of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Includes funds appropriated under FY 1993 Emergency Flood Supplemental Appropriation, 963/73123: Missouri River, Rulo, NE to Mouth, $6,360,000; Kanopolis Lake, KS, $126,500; Milford Lake, KS, $635,000; Pomona Lake, KS, $14,000; Rathbun Lake, IA, $109,000; Smithville Lake. MO, $45,000; Tuttle Creek Lake, KS, $445,000; and Wilson Lake, KS, $16,000. 4. Includes funds expended under FY 1993 Emergency Flood Supplemental Appropriation, 963/73123: Missouri River, Rulo, NE to Mouth, $5,400,312; Kanopolis Lake, KS, $95,511; Milford Lake, KS, $215,200; Pomona Lake, KS, $10,754: Rathbun Lake, IA, $16,456; Smithville Lake, MO, $12,051; Tuttle Creek Lake, KS, $239,567; ;and Wilson Lake. KS, $13,560. 5. Excludes $35,296 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized Blue River Channel project (Blue River Channel Mobay Chemical 1984-1987). 6. Corps is building Brush Creek Expanded Project requested by sponsor. City of Kansas City, MO, with all costs of betterments and enhancements not required by Authorized Project funded by sponsor. Excludes sponsor's contributions of $1,849,176 during Preconstruction Engineering and Design; $1,477,156 for Park Features Design; $1,090,885 for Water Polution Control during construction; and $766,499 for Public Works Department. 7. Excludes $118,805 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized Clinton Lake project (1973-1979). 8. Excludes cost of materials furnished Harlan County project without charge in the amount of $24,198. 9. Excludes cost of materials furnished Kanopolis Lake project without charge in the amount of $7,885. 10. Excludes $2,732,554 thru FY 1990 non-Federal contributions not required for authorized Little Blue River Lakes project. 11. Corrected total. Excludes $42,149 interest during construction at Long Branch Lake project, and $500,000 work-in-kind. 12. After FY 1988 inspections of non-Federal levees previously funded under O&M are funded under FC&CE, 96X3125 (910-140) Disaster Preparedness Program-Inspections which had a carryover into FY 1989 of $250. 27-12 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 12, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to mouth. Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (374.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. For a mimimum width of 200 feet and depth of 6 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends, mouth to upper end of Quindaro Bend, Kansas City, MO. Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6-foot channel depth between Kansas City, MO, Quindaro bend, and Sioux City, IA. Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, IA. Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION MO, KS, IA, & NE Project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project, MO, KS, IA, & NE: April 24, 1984, Report of Chief of Engineers, authorized at estimated cost of $51,900,000. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Project for flood control on Brush Creek, a tributary of the Blue River, Kansas City, MO, authorized at estimated total cost of $16,100,000. Modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct the project substantially in accordance with the Post Authorization Change Report, dated April 1989 (revised January 1990), at a total cost of $26,200,000. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS The project for the Kansas River, KS, NE, and CO is authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 241-62. H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 585-68. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., P.L. 560-70. P.L. 67-73 H.R.11781 P.L. 520-71 H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 409-73 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 14-79. Title VI, Section 601(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong. Sec. 401(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662 Water Resources Development Act of 1990, P.L. 101-640. 1962 Flood Control Act S. Doc 122, H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. 27-13 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 8. Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin, approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as amended and supplemented is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Kansas River and tributaries. It is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Osage River and tributaries. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Chariton and Little Chariton Rivers and tributaries, IA and MO, is authorized at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to Kansas City. Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth and provided for increased protection. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 27-14 P.L. 780, 83rd Cong., H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 90483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong. H. Does. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 5491, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Does. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. TABLE 27-B (Continued) KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 30, 1963 Jun. 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 24, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Additional $116 million for prosecution on general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program. Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,000,000 additional expenditure. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Expanded general comprehenssive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Platte River and tributaries, MO and IA, is authorized at an estimated cost of $26,889,000. H. Does. 642 and 5491, 83rd Cong. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. H. Does. 642, 549'. and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 5491, 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, 89th Cong.) 27-15 16. 17. 18. 19. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS 20. Jun. 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Flood Control Committee River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiatiion Doc. 1, 75th Cong., and partial accomplishment. P.L. 761. Aug. 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican P.L. 77-228. River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure. P.L. 534. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS 21. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure. P.L. 534. Jul. 14, 19602 Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecu- S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong., tion of general comprehensive plan for Missouri P.L. 645. River Basin. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO 24. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 5491, 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional P.L. 780. expenditure. 1962 Flood Control Act, Oct. 23, 1962 The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby modified in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., accordance with recommendations of the Chief of En- P.L. 87-874. gineers in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., at an estimated additional cost of $43,245,000; provided, that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition of additional lands for the establishment of a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO 25. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 5491, 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional P.L. 780. expenditure. 1. Contains latest published maps of Missouri River. 2. Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 Gasconade River, MO 1, Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 Osage River, MO, lock and dam3 Complete 1952 658,076 850,495 1. Improvement adequate for existing needs. Project for maintenance only. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2. Inactive portion of project deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(b)1) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 3. Operation of lock and dam placed in standby status in July 1952; deauthorized on Jan. 1, 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(bX1) of WRDA (P.L. 99-662). 27-16 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD Project Abilene, KS Atchison, KS Barnard, KS' Bartley, NE Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA' Big Blue River, Seward, NE' Big Stranger Creek, KS' Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO2 Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO2 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)3 Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) East Muddy Creek, MO2 Elk Creek, Clyde, KS' Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS' Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) Indianola, NE Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS4 Lawrence, Kansas River, KS5 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO Lower Grand River, MO2 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO2 Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 Act) Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO2, " Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Seward, NE' Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS' Topeka, Kansas River, KS Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO2 Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO Upper Grand River, MO z CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1994 Operation and Maintenance 1. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2. Grand River Basin reconnaissance study (authorized by resolution of Committee on Public Works and Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives on July 3, 1987) reviewed and updated costs for these projects authorized in the Flood Control Act of 1965, and found no economically feasible plan. 3. Inactive units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork were deauthorized 1 Jan. 1990 by Section 1001(bX1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Construction cost includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek Unit and $211,600 cost of deauthorized Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork units. 4. Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. 5. Includes $153,377 non-Federal contributions. 6. Pattonsburg Lake Highway Relocation and Town Relocation portions of the project were deauthorized 1 Jan. 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(bX1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 27-17 Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1965 1973 1953 1974 1966 1976 1977 1973 1966 1984 1973 1976 1966 1984 1950 1984 1980 1985 1989 1966 1967 1976 1973 1966 1976 1982 1973 1975 1967 1973 1972 1974 1966 1990 1966 Construction 1,099,350 4,099,590 127,860 118,269 652,414 126,887 337,131 451,400 692,706" 8,052,990 989,015 726,966 757,500 1,271,025 2,782,793 67,275 25,010,500 42,434,197 8,773,488 25,530,083 2,488,585 432,245 139,883 2,036,624 4,462,661 5,315,168 222,193 700,000 3,878,668 126,887 6,896 246,995 21,174,593 1,570,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Arlington Lake, MO Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965.Act) - Inactive Units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork Units only' Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO Hays, Big Creek, KS2 Indian Lake, Blue River, KS Kansas River Navigation Marysville, KS Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvements) KS (1974 Act) Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS Mill Lake, Blue River, MO Missouri River Levee System, IA, KS, MO, and NE Deauthorized by Section 1002 Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662, Section 1002: Units R402; R393-395; and R414 Deauthorized in accordance with WRDA Section 1001(bX 1): Units L36; R42; L51; R55-59-61; L68-92; R70; L78; R87; L94; L99; L103; R104; R107; R112; L117; L121; L124; L129; L134; L137-139; L145; R150; L154; L157; R161; L164; R169; L175; R179-184; L191-196; L205; L217; R226; R240; R251; L256; R259; R263-270; R272; R284; R302; R336; L353; L357; R361; L362; L392; L419-426; L435; R512-513, Section III Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO' I-35 Highway Relocation Town Relocation Pioneer Lake, KS 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 1965 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1977 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1974 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 281, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1973 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1977 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong. 2d sess.) - Authorized by Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1974 Flood Control Act of 1965 approved October 27, 1965 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1980 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, Sec. 201 -- Flood Control Act of September 3, 1954 - Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Section 17 1970 1971 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) - Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. - Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. Flood Control Act of 1962, October 23, 1962 (P.L. 87-874) 1976 1976 1952 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 241, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 $8,651 - Aug. 5, 1977 16,317 211,600 51,989 71,466 1,754,019 499,200 127,297 259,900 133,682 39,708 57,500 1,631,700 2,178,261 - May 6, 1981 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Aug. 5, 1977 - Jan. 18, 1978 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Jan. 1967 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Nov. 27, 1973 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Nov. 17, 1986 393,623 91,929 95,692 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Aug. 5, 1977 27-18 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Pomme de Terre Lake 1954 Flood Control Act of 1954 - - Nov. 17, 1986 (Power Addition), MO 1974 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.) Richland Lake, MO 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 8,548 - Aug. 5, 1977 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 2, 1944 Tomahawk Lake, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 77,189 - Nov. 17, 1986 Blue River, KS 91st Cong., 2d sess.) Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road 1977 Sec. 18 of Water Resources 3,000 - Nov. 17, 1986 Improvement - 1974 Mod.) Development Act of 1974 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS - Water Resources Development Act of - - Jan. 1, 1990 Road and Bridge (1976 Act) 1976, Section 189, P.L. 94-587 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 1,095,020 - Nov. 17, 1986 KS 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1. For completed Shoal Creek unit of Chariton-Little 3. Pattonsburg Lake portion of project is inactive. See Ta- Chariton Basin, MO, see Table 27-E. ble 27-E. 2. Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS, Section 205 feasibility study terminated in March 1991 due to lack of identifiable project that would meet dam safety concerns. TABLE 27-H MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 13 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R512-513 Richardson Co. Drainage Dist #7' 19.1 Complete-1958 R500 Iowa Point Drainage Dist #4 4.1 Complete-1954 Kimsey Holly Creek 4.4 Complete-1970 L497 Forest City Levee Dist 16.0 Complete-1962 L488 Holt Co. Drainage Dist #7 11.5 Complete-1955 R482 Burr Oak Drainage Dist #3 8.2 Complete-1954 L476 Amazonia Levee Dist 10.8 Complete-1956 R460-471 Elwood-Gladden Levee Dist 13.8 Complete-1968 L455 S. St. Joseph Levee Dist 15.6 Complete-1967 L443-448 Halls Levee Dist 17.3 Complete-1957 R440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. Drainage Dist 10.7 Complete-1959 L408 Farley-Beverly Drainage Dist 12.2 Complete (Levee raise modification)-1972 L400 Waldron Levee Dist 7.6 Complete-1957 R351 Atherton Levee Dist 15.9 Complete-1966 L246 Brunswick-Dalton Drainage Dist 20.0 Complete-1983 (Restudy initiated Feb 92) 434.5 Atchison, KS, Railroad Bridge Inactive 408.2 Leavenworth, KS, Railroad Bridge Inactive R331 Inactive L330-345 Orrick Levee Dist 43.4 Inactive R328 Inactive L319-325 Henrietta-Crooked River Drainage Dist 35.0 Inactive L100 Inactive R30 Inactive L15 North County Levee Dist 40.0 Inactive L504-512-519 Deferred L294 Wakenda Creek Area Deferred L385 Riverside-Quindaro Drainage Dist 6.5 Approved for construction start in FY 94 L142 Jefferson City, MO Reclassified to Active May 91, planning continues Remaining units Detailed planning not initiated 1. Section III of R512-513 was not constructed and was deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990. 27-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 27-I KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 15 of Text) Federal Non-Federal Non-Federal Project Status' Cost 2 Costa Reimbursable4 Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS C $1,099,350 $287,000 Bartley, Republican River, NE C 118,269 9,500 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS I 71,186,000 19,314,000 $44,800,005 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS D 71,466 - Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE C 48,129,549 - Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO A 550,910,000 - 138,385,0006 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS C 64,161,400 - 21,145,3385 Indianola, Republican River, NE C 67,275 7,592 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS C 12,577,227 - Lawrence, Kansas River, KS C 8,620,111 2,130,000 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS C 2,488,585 265,000 Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 37,436,530 - 4,460,1065 Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Authorization) D - - Milford Lake, Republican River, KS C 49,566,492 - 12,162,1345 Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth7 A 90,453,000 35,006,000 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 2,036,624 348,300 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 4,462,661 876,000 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS C 49,095,918 - 8,551,8055 Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO C 17,365,453 - Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS C 14,003,238 - 862,9235 Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS C 3,878,668 1,960,000 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO C 79,975,357 - 24,206,5938 Topeka, Kansas River, KS C 21,174,593 10,383,492 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS C 80,584,079 - 2,333,9165 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS-Road and Bridge (1976 Act) D - - Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Modification) D 3,000 - Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS C 20,463,367 - 1. Status: A - Active; C - Completed; D = Deauthorized; I - 5. Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to water supply. Inactive. 6. Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to power. 2. Actual appropriations for completed and deauthorized projects; 7. Active portion of project. Currently estimated cost (1994): Deferred estimated appropriation requirements for active and inactive projects. portion of project - $46,753,000 Federal and $4,336,000 non-Federal; 3. Estimated cost during construction. Inactive portion of project - $182,791,000 Federal and $19,690,000 non- 4. Future reimbursement of initial Federal cost. Federal. Actual cost of deauthorized units (1990) is $1,689,200 Federal. 8. Includes $22,116,864 estimated reimbursement costs allocated to power, and $2,089,729 estimated reimbursement costs allocated to water supply. TABLE 27-J4 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Location Month Inspected Missouri River Main Stem Missouri River Levees: R512-513, R500, Kimsey Holly Creek, L497, L488, R482, L476, R460-471, L455, L443-448, R440, L408, L400 and R351, L246 Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas: Argentine, Armourdale, Birmingham, CID (Mo & Kans), East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, North Kansas City Units, and GSA Federal Complex Osage River, Kansas and Missouri Ottawa, Kansas Osawatomie, Kansas Kansas River and Minor Tributaries Topeka, Kansas; Auburndale, North Topeka, Oakland, Soldier Creek, South Topeka, and Waterworks Units Republican River, Nebraska and Kansas Bartley, Nebraska Smoky Hill. Saline, and Solomon Rivers Abilene, Kansas Mar/Sep 94 Apr/Oct 94 Mar/Sep 93 Mar/Sep 93 Mar/Sep 94 Mar/Oct 93 Apr/Sep 94 27-20 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-K ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 28 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item and CWIS Number FY 94 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO - 12563 $49,704 Marysville, KS - 12820 55,217 Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO - 12381 144,942 Subtotal $249,863 Special Studies (140) Environmental Services Partnership - 14190 $3,934 Review of Authorized Projects (160) MRLS, Unit L246, Cutoff Lake, MO - 53899 $23,028 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations - 17250 $104,939 Interagency Water Resources Development - 14713 14,624 North American Waterfowl Mgmt - 53904 6,336 Subtotal $125,899 Coordinate Studies with Other Agencies (180) Coordination with other Water Resource Agencies (181) - 53907 $30,869 Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) - 51840 46 Cooperation with States (186) Marmaton MDL/Corps Lakes Sediment Study - 20001 -1,370 Negotiation Funds, MO - 14880 2,286 Planning Assistance to States KS State Historical Water Mgmt - 20002 19,800 KS Water Quality Plan - 20003 600 MO Perche Creek Water Quality - 29003 29,673 MO Water Use Database Mgmt - 29002 102 MO Wetlands Inventory - 29001 -669 Subtotal $81,337 TOTAL (Category 100) $484,061 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Special Studies - Bartley, NE - 83030 $4,811 Flood Plain Management Service Unit - 82030 31,927 Overland Park, KS - 83020 12,437 Quick Responses - 82045 5,994 Special Studies Jefferson City, MO - 83015 -37 Kansas City, MO - 83010 11,991 Tri-County Levee District - 83025 7,948 Technical Services, General - 82040 37,117 Subtotal $112,188 Hydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrology Studies - 53820 24,814 TOTAL (Category 200) $137,002 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $621,063 27-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 27-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES CONTINUING AUTHORITIES (See Section 26 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Status' Cost Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, June 30, 1948, as Amended Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS 0 $32,029 Cross Creek, Rossville, KS P 70,637 Mill Creek, Olathe, KS F 17,015 Eureka Valley Tributary of Seven-Mile Creek, Riley County, Manhattan, KS R 20,209 Mill Creek, Claycomo, MO R 30,766 Mitchell and Pearson Creeks, Waynesville, MO R 9,859 No Section 205 studies were terminated in FY 1994 TOTAL FOR 6 ACTIVE PROJECTS: $180,515 Emergency Streambank Protection - Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress July 24, 1946, as Amended West Nodaway River, Page 1 Rural Water District, Clarinda, IA 0 $-400 West Fork Grand River, MO Highway and Transportation Dept., Route 46A 0 106,615 Hinkson Creek, Columbia, MO, Sewerline C 18,154 Blue River, Gregory Boulevard, Kansas City, MO P 92,027 Bear Creek, Warrensburg, MO, 24-Inch Sewerline P 11,693 Bear Creek, Warrensburg, MO, 27-Inch Sewerline P 9,348 Delaware River Water Intake, Kickapool Reservation, KS P 17,921 Marmaton River, Vernon County, MO P 14,565 One Hundred Two River, Nodaway County, MO, Hopkins Bridge P 17,988 West Fork 102 River, Taylor County, IA, J55 Bridge P 11,983 Grand River, Chariton County, MO, Salt Creek Bridge D 5,874 One Hundred Two River, Pickering, MO, Nodaway County Bridge D 9,954 Osage River, City of Lake Ozark, MO, Sewermain D 20,909 TOTAL FOR 13 ACTIVE PROJECTS: $336,631 11 Section 14 studies were terminated in FY 1994, total 40,056 TOTAL ALL SECTION 14 PROJECTS $376,687 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment, Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Public Law 662, 99th Congress, November 17, 1986 River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project - Post Flood Restoration, MO I $2,500 Missouri River Levee System, Unit L246, Chariton County, MO F 36,502 Initial Appraisals Milford Lake Habitat Restoration, KS I 2,500 Rathbun Lake Habitat Restoration, IA I 2,403 TOTAL ALL ACTIVITIES $43,905 1. Status: R = Recon; F = Feasibility; P = P&S; C = Construction; O = Operational; I = Initial D = Planning and Design Analysis 27-22 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES Emergency Respose Activities (See Section 27 of Text) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work - Public Law 99 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Disaster Preparedness Program- 100 Corps Statutory Activities Activities in Support of Others Facilities Inspections Total Disaster Preparedness Program Emergency Operations - 200 Flood Response - 210 Missouri River and Tributaries - Jul 93 Flood Major Sanders - Midwest Flood FY 93 September 1993 Flood Setting High Markers Total Emergency Operations Rehabilitation - 300 Federal Flood Control Works Non-Federal Flood Control Works Field Investigation Total Rehabilitation Total Federal Non-Reimbursable Activities Reimbursement Activitiy - 999 FEMA MISSIONS Disaster Assistance - Pumps Disaster Assistance - Generators Disaster Assistance - Porta-Potties Maintenance - Generators, KS Maintenance - Pumps, KS Repairs - Critical Access Roads DSR Mission - KS Debris Removal - Elwood, KS DSR Mission - Missouri Total Reimbursement Activity Appropriation 96X3125 $150,268 114,437 115,969 135,089 $515,763 $1,151,264 000 $1,151,264 $2,913,612 4,316,155 1,348,812 $8,578,579 $10,245,606 Emergency Supplemental for 93 Flood Repair Appropriation 963/73125 $0 0 0 0 $0 $2,071,252 25,000 756,950 76,235 $2,929,437 $8,100,664 13,760,944 1,766,818 $23,628,426 $26,557,863 $216,890 16,171 11,800 979 5,769 325,030 20,711 44,274 134,055 $775,679 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES $11,021,285 SPONSOR'S CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Maintenance - 300 Non-Federal Flood Control Works - 320 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION EDA Levee Restoration Program - GT101 Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds Appropriation 96X8862 $825,835 Appropriation 96-133/52055 $199,741 TOTAL ALL EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTITIES EXPENDITURES 27-23 TABLE 27-L (Continued) $26,557,863 $38,604.724 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS DISTRICT * The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri within the Arkansas River, Little River, and White River basins. In Arkansas River Basin, the District is responsible for those areas embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above and exclusive of Pine Bluff, AR, and below the mouth of the Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. The District has responsibility for planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance of the navigation portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System in the State of Arkansas (including that portion below Pine Bluff). In Little River Basin, the District is responsible for those portions of the drainage basin of the Arkansas portion of Little River and its tributaries above its mouth near Fulton, AR. In White River Basin, the District is responsible for those portions in southern Missouri and northern and eastern Arkansas embraced in the White River drainage basin and its tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on the White River below Newport, AR, to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. The White River downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is part of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. IMPROVEMENTS Naviaation 1. AR River Basin, AR, OK, and KS ....................2 8-2 2. Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No.9), AR ....2.8.-.2. 3. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, AR ...2.8.-3 4. David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No.6), AR ............. 28-3 5. Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No.4)................28-3 6. James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No.13) ............ 28-3 7. Lock No. 2 and Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No.2), AR ....28-3 8. Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No.3), AR ................... 28-4 9. Lock and Dam No.5, AR ........................................ 28-4 10. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, AR ..........................2.8.-.4.......................... 11. Murray Lock and Dam (No.7), AR............28-4 12. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....2.8-.4. 13. Norrell Lock and Dam (No.1) and Entrance Channel, AR ...........................2.8.-.4........................... 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................... 28-4 15. Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No.8), AR .....2.8.-.4.. Flood Control 16. Black River Obstruction Removal, Butler Co., MO .................... ...............2.8.-5...... 17. Blue Mountain Lake, AR ...................2.8.-5............. 18. Clearwater Lake, MO.............................................28-5 19. DeQueen Lake, AR................................................28-6 20. Dierks Lake, AR .........................2.8.-6.......................... 21. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..........................2.8-.6.......................... 22. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR ..... ........ 28-6 23. Gillham Lake, AR ....................... ...... ......... 28-7 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................... 28-7 25. Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR ....2.8.-.7. 26. Little River Basin, AR...................... ..... 28-7 27. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR ..... ................... 28-7 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. Millwood Lake, AR..................................... 28-8 Nimrod Lake, AR ....................................... 28-8 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects...............28-8 Red River, 1-30, Little River Co., AR......................28-9 Red River, Hwy 71, Little River Co., AR................28-9 White River Basin (Little Rock Dist, AR & MO)......28-9 White River, Batesville, AR.................................28-10 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. Beaver Lake, AR .............................................. 28-10 36. Bull Shoals Lake, AR ..................................... 28-10 37. Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No.10), AR................. 28-11 38. Greers Ferry Lake, AR......................................... 28-11 39. Norfork Lake, AR ....................................... 28-12 40. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No.13), AR ...28-12 41. Table Rock Lake, MO ................................... 28-12 General Investigations 42. Surveys ........................................ .... 28-13 44. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................ 28-13 Tables Table 28-A, Cost and Financial Statement...................28-14 Table 28-B, Authorizing Legislation............................ 28-18 Table 28-C, Other Authorized Navigation Projects....... 28-21 Table 28-E, Other Authorized Flood Control Projects................................................. .28-22 Table 28-G, Deauthorized Projects............................ 28-23 Table 28-H, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation...... ..................... 28-24 Table 28-1, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Lakes .................................... 28-28 Table 28-J, Little River Basin, AR: Lakes.................... 28-29 Table 28-K, White River Basin, AR & Mo: Lakes......... 28-30 28-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND KS Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near Leadville, CO, and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA. (See Geological Survey state maps, 1:24,000, and flood control and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, 1970 edition scale 1:62,500.) Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel 9 feet deep and 444.8 miles long, beginning at mouth of White River, which enters Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA, thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River, thence 376.0 miles along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 49.8 miles up Verdigris River to head of navigation at Catoosa, OK. The waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark- Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiplepurpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for Verdigris River, 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River Entrance Channel. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and two in Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal cost are summarized in tables 28-H and 28-I, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation and Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Lakes, respectively. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. For McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear the increased costs of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Pine Bluff (Jefferson County), Little Rock, and Fort Smith, AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa-Rogers County), OK. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark, and Van Buren, AR, and Sallisaw, OK. Terminal facilities are in operation or being built at 35 locations in Arkansas and at 25 locations in Oklahoma along the improved waterways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. (See tables 28-H and 28-I for navigation and lake listings.) For details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, see the Tulsa District report. Flood damages prevented by Little Rock District projects in the Arkansas River Basin during FY 94 are estimated at $39,132,410; flood losses prevented through FY 94 are estimated $522,637,460. Projections on navigation activities in calendar year 1994 indicated that about 11.3 million tons of commerce were moved on the Arkansas portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. This represents a 14 percent increase in activity reported for 1993. Details of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Arkansas are shown on the following pages. Condition at end of fiscal year. (See tables 28-H and 28- I, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation/ Lakes, respectively, for status for individual items, navigation project, lakes, and basin plan.) Work continues on the Arkansas River project in this District including construction of a meander cutoff levee between the Arkansas and White Rivers, extension of the stilling basin at Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No. 2) and land acquisition studies. Installation of tow haulage equipment was completed at David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Lock and Dam No. 5, Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4), and Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No. 3) in FY 94. The district is proceeding with the completion of plans and specifications for the access facilities construction contract and the Feature Design Memorandum for Montgomery Lock and Dam. The FDM is scheduled for review in late FY 95. Land acquisition was scheduled to begin in December 1994 and is expected to be completed in 1995. 2. ARTHUR V. ORMOND LOCK & DAM (NO. 9), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower project, under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, was completed and placed into operation in August 1993. Overall completion completed in May 1994. Rockefeller Lake (pool 9) has four developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 2.2 million visitor-hours that resulted in 28-2 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT $21,765 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. Construction of Holla Bend closure structure (fish and wildlife mitigation) began in July 1986 and was completed in September 1987. 3. McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, AR Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas-White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining Arkansas and White rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. For a complete description of reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project, see the FY 81 Annual Report. Total Federal cost to date is $119,300,184 for existing project in Little Rock District. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) 4. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and lock and dam project was placed in operation in August 1968. Tow haulage equipment was added in June 1993. Currently, the project has two developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.3 million visitor-hours that resulted in $10,154 fee revenue. 5. EMMETT SANDERS LOCK AND DAM (NO. 4), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 4 has two developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.6 million visitor-hours that resulted in $3,116 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and lock and dam project was placed in operation in December 1968. Construction of a 40-foot wide, 9,600 long highway bridge crossing the lock and dam began February 1992 and is scheduled for completion in late 1994. The Corps of Engineers, as the Federal agency, has jurisdiction and custody of the dam (23 U.S.C. 320 [Public Law 85- 67]). The project is 100 percent funded by the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department and the Federal Highway Administration. Tow haulage equipment was placed into operation in June 1993. 6. JAMES W. TRIMBLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 13), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY 94, the project's three developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 3.2 million visitor-hours which resulted in $30,060 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and lock and dam were placed in operation in April 1969. Bridge across dam was completed in July 1968. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in November 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 7. LOCK NO. 2 AND WILBUR D. MILLS DAM (NO. 2), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Wilbur D. Mills has four developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 3.3 million visitor-hours that resulted in $85,314 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. Lock was placed in operation in March 1968. Emergency repairs to the scour protection features and tainter gates at the dam that resulted from a barge accident in December 1982 were completed in FY 85. The barges that clogged the dam gates during the December 1982 flood showed that, with a certain set of circumstances (higher than normal head combined with the clogged gates resulted in high current velocity that caused both upstream and downstream scouring), the structure could fail. This condition exists primarily because the structure was constructed on piling and designed for all of the gates to operate in unison. A model study by the Waterways Experiment Station determined the most feasible solution to this problem is to extend the stilling basin downstream. A contract to extend the stilling basin was awarded in June 1990 and completed in FY 1994. Project costs are estimated at $21.6 million. 28-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 8. JOE HARDIN LOCK AND DAM (NO. 3), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 3 has three developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.3 million visitor-hours that resulted in $12,590 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. Tow haulage equipment was installed and operational in 1993. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operation and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 5 has two developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.2 million visitor-hours that resulted in $26,901 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. Tow haulage equipment was installed in June 1993. 10. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of Dardanelle Marine Terminal began June 1968 and was placed in operation in November 1969. 11. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Murray has five developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 5.6 million visitor-hours that resulted in $178,487 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in May 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies under the small project continuing authorities program, navigation activities, Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. No activity during this fiscal year. 13. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO. 1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Recommended modification. The White River Entrance Channel is the first reach in the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System project. The water surface elevation in the entrance channel is controlled by the elevation of the Mississippi River. Increased fluctations in the Mississippi River have resulted in low water flows and reduced tow traffic due to constricted channel. A lock and dam near the entrance channel has been recommended to eliminated the tow restrictions caused by low flows. Model testing efforts by the Waterways Experiment Station support initial design concept Funds have been request for to continue engineering and design work and to complete real estate acquisitions. ( See 1. Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. The project currently has one developed park which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 108,582 visitor-hours; no fee revenue was realized. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963, and lock and dam were placed in operation in June 1967. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See table 28-C for other authorized navigation projects.) 15. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) 28-4 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY 94, the project's five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 3.5 million visitor-hours that resulted in $59,333 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Conway water supply project was completed and transferred to the city for operation and maintenance in July 1983. Flood Control 16. BLACK RIVER OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL, BUTLER COUNTY, MO Location. The project area begins approximately 6 miles south of Poplar Bluff, MO, and extends to Arkansas State line. This area is about 160 miles south of St. Louis, MO. Existing project. The Detailed Project Report recommends removing all major blockages from the channel just upstream of the Hargrove Bridge (R.M. 198.4) to the Arkansas State line (R.M. 170.9). The plan also involves the cutting of dead, dying or damaged rooted trees which are leaning over the channel at an angle greater than 30 degrees and in danger of falling and creating a blockage to flows. Local cooperation. The local cooperation agreement was signed May 15, 1992, by the Butler County Commission, the project sponsor, in accordance with Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936, and amendments thereto. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in early FY 94 and turned over to the local sponsor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project contract was awarded in June 1993, and construction was completed in November 1993. Project construction was authorized under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project cost was $364,000; $273,000, Federal; $91,000 non- Federal. 17. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-I: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes.) Existing project. Construction cost was approximately $5.1 million. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of 1962 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 28-B.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 94 are estimated at $1,089,980; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1994, are estimated at $25,254,140. The project's seven developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.9 million visitor-hours that resulted in $63,976 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational sanitary facilities. Construction of the project began in May 1940 and was placed in operation in March 1947. 18. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & MO: Lakes.) Existing project. Construction cost, including the cost of modifying the project, is estimated at $22.4 million. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation. ) Major rehabilitation. Construction began in November 1987 on a seepage berm on the upstream face of the dam, a grout curtain on the right abutment, and a parapet wall along the dam. An additional 9 acres of land was acquired to widen the spillway from 190 feet to 370 feet. The widened spillway will pass about 90 percent of the probable maximum flood with water surface at the top of existing dam and parapet wall, preventing waves from overtopping dam. The cost of the modification is estimated at $11 million. Construction was essentially complete in September 1989. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 94 are estimated at $32,590,430; cumulative benefits through September 1994 are estimated at $120,600,550. Project currently has seven developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 6.5 million visitor-hours that resulted in $155,013 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional and improvement to sanitary facilities in recreation areas. Construction of project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. 28-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 19. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR Location. On Rolling Fork River, river mile 22.8, a tributary of Little River, in Sevier County, about 4 miles northwest of DeQueen, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Chapel Hill, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,360 feet long, constructed to 160 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main embankment. Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 12 feet in diameter. The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and provides a total storage of 136,100 acrefeet (101,200 for flood control storage and 34,900 for conservation and sedimentation reserve). Federal cost of project is estimated at $19,623,752. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 94 are estimated at $808,490; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1994, are estimated at $6,733,020. In FY 94, the project's seven developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.8 million visitorhours that resulted in $28,695 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966. Project was placed in useful operation in August 1977. 20. DIERKS LAKE, AR Location. On Saline River, river mile 56.6, a tributary of Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Dierks Dam, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,760 feet long, about 153 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 800 feet wide is in a saddle at west end of dam. Outlet works consisting of a gated 6- by 9-foot oblong conduit, one 24- inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acre-feet for flood control and 29,700 acre-feet for water supply, conservation, and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet Federal cost of project is estimated at $16,002,781. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 94 are estimated at $663,070; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1994, are estimated at $4,580,040. During the year, 276 acre-feet of water supply storage were withdrawn by Tri-Lakes Water District. Currently has four developed parks which in FY 94 experienced 1.1 million visitor- hours that resulted in $71,117 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. In May 1975, the embankment closure was completed and the project placed in useful operation. 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (1) Emergency bank protection, Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: Black River, Randolph Co., Ark., $10,000; County Road #186, Red River, Little River Co., Ark., $15,993.15; State Hwy. #211, Current River, Clay Co., $182,138.57; Hwy 71, Red River, Little River, Co., Ark., $752.41; Interstate 30, Red River, Little River, Co., Ark.,$3,500-; and Sewage Lagoon, Little Red River, Judsonia, Ark., $90,210.02. (2) Snagging and clearing, Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: None. (3) Flood control activities, Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: Black River, Butler Co., Mo., $9,344.08; Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., $23,945.33; Bull Creek, Taney Co., Mo., $18,056.87; Cato Springs Branch, Fayetteville, Ark., $14,645.99; East Fork of Cadron Creek, Ark., $23,945.33; Gar Creek, Franklin Co., Ark., $40,565.59; Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR, $48,948.30; Reconnaissance Report, Harrison, Ark., $480,410.40; Rice-Carden Levee, Arkansas River, $287.86; Roark Creek, Branson, Mo., $9,785.90; White River, Batesville, Ark., $24,997.89; White River, Oil Trough, Ark., $0.15; and, White River, St. Paul, Ark., $15,000. 22. FOURCHE BAYOU BASIN, LITTLE ROCK, AR Location. On Fourche, Rock and Grassy Flat Creeks in vicinity of Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR. Existing project. The project, authorized by the Water Resources DevelopmentActof 1986 (PL 99-662),consists of widening, clearing and snagging with alteration of highway and railroad bridges. The estimated project cost is $29 million: Federal, $19.1 million; non-Federal, $9.9 million. Local cooperation. The city of Little Rock, the project sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in August 1987. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Construction continued on the remaining two channel improvement contracts. The final construction contract was awarded 28-6 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT on June 28, 1991. The overall project is 98 percent completed. Expenditures in FY 94 were $730,921.18. 23. GILLHAM LAKE, AR Location. Damsite is on Cossatot River, river mile 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham in Sevier County, AR.(See Geological Survey quadrangle map for Gillham Dam, AR, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, see pages 19-12 of Annual Report for 1977 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is estimated at $17,826,703. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 94 are estimated at $1,583,310; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $9,102,770. During the year, Tri-Lakes Water District withdrew 787 acrefeet of water supply storage. In FY 94, the project's five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.1 million visitor-hours that resulted in $33,100 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was completed in May 1975, and the project was placed in useful operation. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects were made to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Costs for FY 94 were $63,077. Total accumulative cost through September 30, 1994, was $1,646,499. 25. LITTLE RED RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CLINTON, AR Location. In Clinton, Van Buren County, AR, along the tributaries of the Little Red River. The city lies between the tributaries of Archey Fork and South Fork and is bisected by Town Branch. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consists of 100-foot bottom-width channel for 1.35 miles on Archey Fork Creek and a 300-foot bottom-width channel for 1.99 miles on South Fork, Little Red River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Mitigation measures to compensate for damages to the walleye pike fishery are being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. Condition at end of fiscal year. Mitigation measures continued. Construction of the project began in 1985 and was transferred to the city of Clinton in August 1986 for operation and maintenance. An operation and maintenance manual was furnished the city of Clinton. 26. LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR Location. Improvements are on Little River and tributaries in Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is shown in table 28-J. Existing project. Part of a six-lake system for flood control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on the Rolling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River, and, two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District boundary change, effective in October 1980, the fourprojects in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa District to the Little Rock District. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District (DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks) furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. The Southwest Arkansas Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water supply storage at Millwood Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. See individual projects for details. Flood damages prevented by the Little River Basin reservoirs during FY 94 are estimated at $3,555,530; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1994, are estimated at $31,412,340. Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 28-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 27. MILL CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR Location. In southwest Fort Smith, Sebastian County, AR. Existing project. The project was constructed under Section 205 of the Continuing Authority Program. The project included improvements on 3.9 miles of the Mill Creek channel and modifications on three bridges. The estimated project cost is $8,797,000: $4,576,000, Federal; $4,221,000, non-Federal. Local cooperation. The city of Fort Smith, the local sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in November 1988. Operations during the fiscal year. The contract for channel construction was awarded in August 1990. Project construction was completed in November 1992 and turned over to the city of Fort Smith for operation and maintenance. 28. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR Location. On Little River, river mile 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, AR, and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, AR. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map for Red Bluff, AR, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Fordescription of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see the 1969 Annual Report (Tulsa District). Federal cost of projec t is $46,100,082. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of66,231 acrefeet of water was released from the lake for water supply to Southwest Arkansas Water District. Flood damages prevented during FY 94 are estimated at $500,660; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1994, are estimated at $10,996,510. Millwood Lake has 12 developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.2 million visitor-hours that resulted in $26,672 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full floodcontrol operation in August 1966. Remaining work consists of additional recreational facilities. 29. NIMROD LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-I: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes.) Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,005,627. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. See table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities continued. In FY 94, seven parks experienced public visitation exceeding 2.2 million visitor-hours that resulted in $58,723 fee revenue. During FY 94, flood damages prevented on an average of 2,000 acres of improved land are estimated at $692,410; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1994, are estimated at $17,335,390. Ninety-three acre-feet of water was withdrawn by the city of Plainview, AR. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition of and improvement to sanitary recreation facilities. A vaultrest room was converted to waterborne with shower at Sunlight Bay Park. Construction of project began in January 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1942. 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 28-E: Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.) 31. RED RIVER, 1-30, LITTLE RIVER CO., AR Location. Red River at Interstate 30 in Hempstead County, located in southwestern Arkansas. Existing project. Plans consisted of construction of two stone-filled baffle dikes from the high top bank to the top of the existing pile revetment, which is capped out with stone. Construction authorized under Continuing Authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended; emergency streambank erosion protection. Local Cooperation. The Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department signed a local cooperative agreement April 3, 1992, and contributed $32,474 to project cost. The Federal share is $97,423. Total project cost was $129,897. Operations and results during ftiscal year.Construction was comileted FY 93. Financial obligations completed in FY 94. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was turned over to the sponsor in early FY 94. 28-8 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 32. RED RIVER, HWY 71, LITTLE RIVER CO., AR Location. Red River at Hwy. 71 in Little River Co., located in southwestern Arkansas. Existing project. Plans consisted of construction of a bankhead around the riverward piers for both the north and south bound bridges of Hwy. 71. The two bankheads have a 100-foot radius turnbacks on the upstream and downstream ends. Construction includes paving the existing drains at both bridges, and the scour holes around the southbound bridge pier. Construction authorized under Continuing Authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended; emergency streambank erosion protection. Local Cooperation. The Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department signed a local cooperative agreement April 3, 1992, and contributed $40,457 to project cost. The Federal share is $121,371. Total project cost was $161,828 Operations and results during fiscal year. Project turned over to local sponsor in FY 93. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in October 1992. 33. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR & MO Location. Improvements are on White River and tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 28-K: White River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in White River Basin. The plan includes seven lakes; two are flood control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry and Bell Foley lakes were selected and approved for construction by Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on six of these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. The Bell Foley project, the remaining unbuilt authorized project, was reevaluated in FY 89; the project continues to have a favorable benefit-to-cost ratio since its formulation in 1968. The lakes in the plan are listed in Table 28-K: White River Basin. (For authorization see Table 28-B. ) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin lakes during FY 94 are estimated at $46,983,790; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1994, are estimated at $416,249,420. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin levees during FY 94 are estimated at $3,359,090; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1994, are estimated at $74,781,710. Electric energy delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing during FY 94 totaled 2,747,782,000 kilowatt-hours. Water releases for fish hatcheries were: 28,960 acre-feet from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery; 14,480 acre-feet from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery; and, 14,480 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: Beaver Water District, AR, 31,460 acre-feet, and Carroll-Boone Water District, AR, 4,972 acre-feet, from Beaver Lake; Marion County Regional Water District, AR, 724 acre-feet from Bull Shoals Lake; Water and Sewer Improvement District No. 3 of Mountain Home, AR, 3,322 acre-feet from Norfork Lake; the city of Clinton, AR, 1,153 acre-feet, and the Community Water Treatment System, Cleburne County, AR, 946 acre-feet, from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry lakes are complete and in operation. Progress on these lakes is shown in individual reports. Bell Foley lake project is in a deferred status. Water Valley and Lone Rock lakes have been deauthorized. 34. WHITE RIVER, BATESVILLE, AR Location. On White River, within the city of Batesville, Independence County, AR. Existing project. The Definite Project Report, recommending construction of a levee and floodwall to protect the industrial area, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, was approved in June 1988. Estimated cost is $2.7 million. The federal share is $1.9 million. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, applies. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Revised plans and specifications for the National Economic Development (NED) alignment were completed in FY 94. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Batesville was signed in January 1994. Acquisition of real estate and the award of a construction contract is scheduled in 1995. Construction is scheduled for completion in 1996. 28-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. BEAVER LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin.) Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,797,000. For further information see 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 28-B. ) Major rehabilitation. Since the dam was constructed there has been a seepage problem below Dike No. 1. Based on detailed investigation, it was determined that the limestone foundation under dike 1 and 200 feet of the north end of the main dam embankment is the main problem. The plan of improvement was a concrete seepage cutoff in dike 1 and the north end of the main dam. A $16.9-million contract to construct a concrete cutoff wall was awarded in June 1989; the notice to proceed was issued in October 1989. The contract period was estimated to be 760 days. However, the contractor ceased productive work due to inability to excavate rock and was been placed in default. An $18.8 reprocurement contract was awarded in April 1992, and work began in May 1992 to complete the work. Project cost is estimated at $26.2 million; $11.7 million in FY 94. Water Quality Enhancement. Congress directed the Corps to implement best management practices (BMP's) in the Beaver Lake watershed and monitor the effects of these practices on water quality. A study was completed and a project report was approved in July 1989. The BMP's and water quality monitoring are being concurrently implemented over a 5-yearperiod which began in May 1991 with a project completion date of June 1996. The BMP's are being implemented under the terms of a memorandum of agreement between the Corps and the Soil Conservation Service with the assistance of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service. The local cost sharing for the BMP's are being obtained from the non- Federal participants (farmers) primarily by work-in-kind credit. The water quality monitoring is being implemented' under terms of a local cost-sharing agreement with the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission. Water quality monitoring is being performed in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency by a Corps administered contract. Project agreements were signed on May 11, 1991, at Rogers, AR. BMP's are being implemented by SCS" and AS&WCC obtained leases of the real estate for the water quality monitoring sites November 6, 1991. The water quality monitoring contract was awarded on January 29, 1992. Water quality sampling began in May 1992. Cost in FY 94, was $648940. Local Cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act, and Section 301 the 1958 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 94 are estimated at $1,366,250; cumulative benefits are estimated at $29,716,740. During the year, 180,946,800 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply storage withdrawn during the year was 36,433 acre-feet. The project has 9 developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 22.9 million visitor-hours that resulted in $590,615 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for modifications to existing recreation and sanitary facilities. Alterations to existing parks to enhance fee collections, improve efficiency, and reduce the maintenance effort or rehabilitate the 25-year old park operation through operation and maintenance and SRUF funds, as appropriate. Construction of project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. Work on a dam seepage problem is described above. 36. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Estimated cost with eight generating units is $96,356,000. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. For authorization see table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 94 are estimated at $5,828,900; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $123,057,170. During the year, 1,223,394,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply storage withdrawn during the year was 724 acre-feet. The project has 18 developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 20.2 million visitor-hours that resulted in $294,407 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for modifications to existing recreation and sanitary facilities. Alterations are needed to existing parks to enhance fee collections, to improve efficiency, to reduce maintenance effort or to rehabilitate 36-year-old park facilities through operations and maintenance or SRUF funds, as appropriate. Low dissolved oxygen readings in the downstream area of Bull Shoals Dam in October 1990 have resulted in ongoing studies to be undertaken to minimize harmful effects on the 28-10 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT trout fishing of the White River. Unguaranteed short-term solutions to the problem, consisting of limiting generation, will sustain the existing fishery, but long-term guaranteed changes will require congressional authorization. Construction of project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, December 1952, June 1953, January 1962, February 1962, August 1963, and September 1963, respectively. 37. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 10), AR Location. (See Table 28-H: Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation.) Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse contains four 31,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acre-feet. Estimated cost is $86,507,000. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool fluctuated within 2-ft. power pondage, elevation 336.0 to 338.0. Power generation continued. During FY 94, 669,558,600 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. In FY 94, the project's 15 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 19.6 million visitor-hours that resulted in $155,729 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. The hydraulic turbines at the Dardanelle powerplant will require extensive rehabilitation in the near future. Complete disassembly of the turbines will be required to replace the turbine blade bearings and oil seals. Several repair alternatives are being examined including replacement of the turbines to increase the available power output of the generating units. Index testing to determine new turbine design is underway. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line in April, May, and September 1965, and January 1966. Lock became operable in December 1969. Visitors Center and resident office were completed in May 1985. Major Rehabilitation. The feasibility report, completed in 1991, recommended replacing the existing four units at Dardanelle with new "state-of-the-art" generating units. The Design Memorandum was approved in 1993. The project is scheduled to be completed in December 1998. 38. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-K: White River, AR & MO. ) Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000. For further information see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, 1938 Flood Control Act and 1988 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 94 are estimated at $635,850; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $25,855,630. In FY 94, 178,626,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. In FY 94, 2,095 acre-feet of water supply storage was withdrawn. The project has 18 developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 30.3 million visitor-hours that resulted in $723,433 fee revenue. The project's operational management plan provides means by which the natural resources, including water quality, aesthetic value, forestry, fish and wildlife are managed and protected for future generations. An all-volunteer environmental program (annual cleanup) has been most successful and serves as a model for the Nation. During the past 25 years the program has won more than 25 national awards. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in June 1957 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in January 1962. Power units 1 and 2 were operable in March and May 1964, and water supply was operable in April 1971. The Visitors Center was completed in June 1983 at a cost of $813,000. 39. NORFORK LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Total estimated cost is $111,624,000, including $38,700,000 for addition of power units 3 and 4, and $40,000,000 for highway bridge construction. For further information see page 896 of 1962 Annual Report. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 94 are estimated at $3,223,840; total cumulative flood damages prevented through September 30, 1994, are 28-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 estimated at $41,338,950. During the year, 345,396,100 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply withdrawn by the city of Mountain Home, AR, totaled 3322 acre-feet. The project's 18 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 15.9 million visitor-hours that resulted in $235,481fee revenue during FY 94. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities, and addition of power units 3 and 4. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. Construction of two highway bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries was completed in November 1982. The bridges were transferred to the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department for operation and maintenance in July 1984. 40. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (No. 12), AR Location. (See Table 28-H: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Navigation.) Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. The dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed; spillway has 15 tainter gates 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acre-feet. In addition, 1 foot of power pondage is provided in pool 13 between elevations 391.0 and 392.0. Estimated cost is $86,167,000. (For authorization see table 28-B.) Local cooperation. (See section 1. ) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Delivered 324,561,450 kilowatt- hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Ozark Lake has 10 developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.7-million-visitor-hours that resulted in $50,406 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December-1964. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: unit 1,November 1972; unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 1973; and unit 5, May 1974. Remaining work consists principally of modifications to the powerplant. 41. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Estimated cost is $71,233,000. For further information see page 893 of 1962 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 28-B. ) Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 94 are estimated at $3,338,520; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $705,680,380. During the year, 819,519,100 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The District and the Waterways Experiment Station are investigating the possibilities of improving the quality of Table Rock releases with a hypolimnetic oxygenation system. Table Rock Lake has 16 developed parks which in FY 94 experienced public visitation exceeding 35.1 million visitor-hours that resulted in $637,096 fee revenue. This project's operational management plan provides means by which the natural resources, including forestry, fish and wildlife, are managed and protected for future generations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreational sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954. The project was ready for beneficial flood control use in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were added in April and June 1961. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Expenditures for surveys in FY 94 totaled $688,861: Flood damage prevention studies. Arkansas River Tucker Creek, $220,728; Arkansas River Wetlands and Flood Control, $964; White River Wetlands, 302,300 . Review of completed projects. Clearwater Lake Restudy, $63,074. Miscellaneous activities. Special investigations, $34,000; review of FERC licenses, $2,000; Interagency Water Resource Development, $18,746; North American Waterfowl Management Plan, $3,000. 28-12 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Coordination studies with other agencies. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, $5,000. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services (FPMS). The authority for the Flood Plain Management Services program is Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended.Under the authority of Section 321 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, PL 101-640, technical services and planning assistance are (1) provided to states and local governments without charge and (2) offered to Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery basis. Through these technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation of flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Hydrologic studies. During FY 94, 131 stations were operated; 78 cooperatively with USGS, 39 by the Corps, and 15 by the National Weather Service. The total cost for streamflow and some sediment data from all sources of funding was $807,740, of which $579,000 was transferred to USGS. The District also participated in a cooperative program with National Weather Service for rainfall and/or river reporting stations for use in forecasting streamflow for flood warning and operation of lake projects. Records were also collected at certain hydroclimate rainfall stations under a cooperative program between the two agencies. For these services, $52,600 was transferred to the National Weather Service. 28-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1,2 See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY93 FY94 Sept 3 0,19940 1. Arkansas River Basin, AR OK & KS 3. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, AR 2,4-9, McClellan-Kerr 11,13,15 Arkansas River Navigation Locks & Dams, AR 16. Black River, Obstruc. Removal, Butler Co., MO 17. Blue Mountain Lake, AR New Work Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Maint. Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Special Funds Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 56,035,960 11,968,850 44,067,110 59,936,450 12,040,914 47,895,536 $13,161,000 13,161,000 4,852,926 13,041,996 13,041,996 63,710,984 15,498,300 48,212,684 62,773,752 15,194,861 47,578,891 $ 670,000 29,905 57,766,113 15,415,400 42,340,713 59,679,646 17,695,243 41,984,403 84,439 $11,629,060 - 7,883,563 - 51,274,602 22,138,031 29,136,571 51,219,208 23,295,395 27,923,813 $2,488 $1,504,715,803 163,479,533 1,328,937,210 1,495,826,619 163,321,500 1,324,587,651 1,097,342,214 2 253,053,676 844,278,538 1,100,340,321 255398,401 2 844,941,920 291,106 378,033 1,609,842 1,609,842 19,926,755 - 19,926,755 531,336 531,336 119,300,184 119,300,184 4,561,666 4,561,666 9,445,000 13,161,000 12,205,094 13,041,996 19,059,039 20,817,284 21,710,994 20,269,430 247,625 494,725 25,900 14,940 2,171,734 997,656 8,000 18,824 12,226,000 10,098,218 487,374,690 12,235,536 7,177,025 484,434,158 20,729,000 22,138,031 362,918,635 2 19,690,882 23,295,395 360,567,710 2 4,769,009 3,642,132 239,000 231,768 86,900 67,932 5,723,348 6,312,969 531,336 531,336 917 9,344 313,817 312,900 86,900 67,932 - 5,069,974 _ 5,069,974 28-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT1'2 (Continued) See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept.30,19941 18. Clearwater Lake, MO 19. DeQueen Lake, Little River Basin, AR 20. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, AR 22. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR 23. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, AR 25. Little Red River & Tributaries, Clinton, AR 26. Little River Basin, (Little Rock Dist.), AR 27. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 880,400 883,204 1,768,800 1,806,030 779,000 893,713 834,400 956,492 793,600 805,733 5,807,000 3,882,948 558,200 468,103 887,300 945,719 9,942 958,200 903,965 1,943,600 1,763,943 1,010,000 1,103,613 1,810,800 1,916,004 972,225 969,653 59,100 63,073 2,078,019 1,960,593 60,000 64,553 946,300 952,856 949,300 1,001,592 16,558,887 2 2 11,132,503 11,123,277 34,041,319 34,075,525' 11,467,910 11,468,164 19,629,753 __ 19,623,752 1,015,000 953,532 1,020,000 871,176 2,417,000 1,113,000 4,543,525 2,101,900 400,000 359,064 904,400 970,716 23,325 178,223 989,000 904,179 1,103,515 1,162,626 12,134,716 12,111,6262 s 16,002,904 16,002,781 12,419,592 2 1,018,549 12,177,794 2 974,656 20,829,642 949,642 20,714,724 3 730,921 3 1,731,678 - 1,703,868 17,827,111 -_ 17,826,703 949,357 963,402 11,640,000 2 11,521,661 2 3,999,500 3 3,932,538 3 99,959,850 99,544,384 4,218,000 4,468,300 4,799,800 4,317,745 4,794,137 4,770,664 4,321,017 3,343,168 435,000 2,408,684 312,892 341,822 1,113,425 43,210 54,672 50,668 79,360 15,055 64,036,629 2 63,305,929, 2 4,345,972 4,210,390 33 580,652 498,975 28-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1',2 (Continued) See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept.30,1994'1 28. Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, AR 29. Nimrod Lake, AR 31. Red River, Hwy 71 Little River Co, AR 32. Red River, 1-30 Little River Co, AR 33. White River Basin, AR &MO (Little Rock District) 34. White River Batesville, AR 35. Beaver Lake, AR Beaver Lake Water Quality "" Beaver Lake Infrastructure New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Appropr. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Appropr. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Appropr. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 87,900 87,900 1,702,700 1,668,300 2,086,195 1,845,500 1,030,500 1,285,000 1,051,070 1,146,947 17,000 21,580 115,000 67,657 56,200 15,621 10,000 19,000 99,300 103,240 153,700 88,879 1,775,800 1,592,130 1,310,000 1,301,542 -8,892 48,118 -15,743 24,836 9,037 7,379 -67,635 12,971 1,954,432 1,989,532 1,411,325 1,502,194 752 752 4,280 -3,500 -3,500 _ 11,678,429 10,998,155 18,573,700 23,286,600 22,073,200 19,561,136 22,575,704 21,752,243 854 85,000 47,302 35,000 50,193 -_ 9,653,000 _ 9,542,098 3,942,200 3,657,000 4,081,426 3,841,602 340,400 2,092,000 17,161 1,834,472 1,256,000 1,000,000 205,687 1,025,263 4,145,000 3,114,427 13,2 24,9 12,5 4,384,7 4,828,2 - 12,835,9 841,972 11,671,2 1,582,000 1,015,847 547,4 648,9 _ 61,530 78,633 - 3,000,0 - 1302 46,175,218 46,179,148 32,473,410 32,548,0652 4,092,826 4,005,627 20,590,542 20,534,303 ? 123,860 4 142,150k 40,457 40,457 133,3374 110,619 4 86,065 101,850 347,330,302 -- 346,376,821 385,186,251 385,526,439 1 479,957 57 469,195 97 55,836,033 -- 55,666,678 05 60,483,495 97 59,112,055 65 19,851,661 41 18,674,452 38 4,485,427 27 2,934,614 39 61,530 - 78,633 3,000,000 00 10,279 79 28-16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT1' 2 (Continued) See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept.30,1994u 36. Bull Shoals Lake, AR 37. Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10) AR 38. Greers Ferry Lake, AR 39. Norfork Lake, AR 40. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock & Dam (No.12), AR 41. Table Rock Lake, MO New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4,287,400 4,299,000 4,323,288 4,287,539 4,814,200 4,668,761 6,132,000 6,021,095 4,913,000 5,710,( 4,479,216 5,368,: 4,804,000 5,921,8 5,251,657 5,626,8 -_ 540,000 __ 358,259 4,460,500 3,909,714 3,507,100 3,926,314 5,122,000 4,920,459 3,094,000 3,191,017 3,388,200 3,577,000 3,926,390 3,350,848 5,068,200 5,171,000 5,424,081 4,571,144 1,279,7 332,2 88,858,711 88,858,707 94,707,318 2 93,567,494 2 84,270,124 84,261,240 82,812,579 2 392 82,530,205 2 336 1,819,741 141 683,497 Z38 48,865,512 48,865,512 79,085,269 2 4,691,000 5,010,074 78,676,897 2 5,127,157 5,175,303 70,701,628 70,701,628 65,257,4532 3,242,000 4,012,349 64,755,100 3,126,440 3,584,566 85,629,412 85,629,412 65,605,489 3,449,000 3,944,092 65,237,754 3,586,114 3,906,943 67,224,000 67,224,000 89,457,882 5,082,200 6,252,102 88,084,401 5,063,031 5,785,817 1. For more details on project funds, see text for individual projects. 2. Beginning data shown in Table 28-A Includes special recreation use fees. 3. Includes funds for plans and specifications. 4. Includes total project cost, including study cost. 28-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, & KS (See Section 1 of text) Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, OK Oologah Lake, OK Canton Lake, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Wister Lake, OK Blue Mountain Lake, AR Nimrod Lake, AR Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK, and Mo, and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, OK Fall River Lake, KS Elk City Lake, KS Toronto Lake, KS Neodosha Lake, KS Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. Approved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, OK Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Blackburn Reservoir, OK Mannford Reservoir, OK Taft Reservoir, OK Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, AR Eufaula Lake, OK Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, AR Short Mountain Lock and Dam, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, OK. Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake for Mannford, Blackburn and Taft Reservoirs. 28-18 Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc 107, 81st Cong., 1st sess. LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all pervious authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. November 17, 1986 June 10, 1948 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (See Section 22 of text.) Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (See Section 27 of text.) RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK AND AR (See Section 26 of text) Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization. Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, Dierks Lakes Emergency streambank erosion protection, Red River, Little River Co., AR Emergency streambank erosion protection, Red River, Little River Co., AR Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662, Sec. 401. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Asst. Sec. of the Army (CW), 10/14/88. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Section 14, PL 79-526 Section 14, PL 79-526 WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 33 of text) June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Lone Rock Lake, AR, Norfork Lake, AR, Clearwater Lake, MO, Water Valley Lake, AR, Bell Foley Lake, AR, Greers Ferry Lake, AR, and White River emergency. Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals Lake, AR, and MO, Table Rock Lake, MO, and AR, and Norfork Lake, AR, and MO (power). Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added Beaver Lake to the plan. Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. Flood Control Com. Doc 1, 75th Cong.,lst sess. H. Doc. 917, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 290, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 352, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 28-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents March 1, 1974 May 11, 1962 October 22, 1976 June 30, 1948 Authorizing highway bridge construction across Norfork Lake. Environmental restoration of wetlands and fish and wildlife resources in the White River Basin, AR and MO. (See Section 33 of text.) White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for trout production facilities downstream from Beaver Dam. White River, Batesville, AR. (See Section 34 of text.) Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Report 102-344; Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1993, PL 102-377. Water Resources Development Act of 1976, P.L. 94-587, Sec. 105. Section 205, P.L. 80-858, construction to be approved by ASA (CW). 28-20 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Federal Cost thru Sept. 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR ' 1988 $736,869 Black River, AR and MO 2 1950 80,000 $ 930,324 Current River, AR and MO 2 1964 17,0003 132,178 Upper White River, AR 4" 1952 813,197 1,788,374 White River, AR (above Peach Orchard Bluff) 25 1950 _ 785,666 1984 43,110 White River, Jacksonport, AR 6 1. Completed. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R & H Act, as amended, (P.L.86-645). 2. Channel adequate for existing commerce; completion not contemplated. 3. Includes $7,000 for previous project. 4. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 30, 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams Nos. 1,2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in Public Law 996, 84th Congress. 5. Completed. 6. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream from Newport, AR; transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. 28-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR' Inactive 1975 $1,432,116 Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO Completed 1985 44,500 Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR Completed 1958 84,315 Butler County Drainage District 3, MO Completed 1983 42,172 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1951 919,955 Clarksville, AR Completed 1962 271,717 Conway County Drainage and Levee District District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1959 187,440 Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 8, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 1,018,840 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 390,952 Crawford County Levee District, AR Completed 1983 53,506 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1954 2,001,820 Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, AR Completed 1983 117,898 East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO Completed 1958 304,699 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1941 99,511 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1951 1,077,546 From North Little Rock to Gillett, AR (above Plum Bayou) Completed 1954 845,300 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR 2 Cancelled 1973 22,890 Jackson Couinty Levee District 2, White River, AR Completed 1986 131,699 Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR Completed 1983 198,096 Little Red River District 1, AR Completed 1988 28,968 Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, AR Completed 1983 63,355 Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Fourche Bayou, AR Completed 1975 1,901,899 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1950 422,549 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1953 198,069 Newport, White River, AR Completed 1941 314,276 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1958 512,001 Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR Completed 1987 162,204 Petit Jean River, AR Completed 1966 84,350 Petit Jean River, AR Completed 1991 88,379 Pine Mountain Lake, AR3 Inactive 1985 1,432,331 Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway County, AR Completed 1983 86,943 Red River, !-30, Little River Co., AR Completed 1992 119,897 Red River, Hwy. 31, Little River Co., AR Completed 1992 144,828 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, Completed 1950 269,907 AR Rolling Fork River, Sevier Coiunty, AR Completed 1983 64,500 28-22 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR Completed 1941 81,023 South Bank, Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), AR Completed 1964 1,404,852 South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, AR, Tucker Lakes Completed 1961 409,115 - Swan Creek Bank Stab., Taney County, MO Completed 1986 76,800 - Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 438,222 - Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, AR' Completed 1972 1,567,156 Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties, ARs Inactive 1977 510,217 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1962 1,269,959 White River, at Hwy 14, 1/4 mile east of Oil Trough, AR Completed 1981 214,308 - White River Bank Stab., Batesville, AR Completed 1986 101,100 - White River, Jacksonport, AR Completed 1987 277,600 - White River, Newport, AR Completed 1989 93,929 - White River, St. Paul, AR Completed 1990 22,400 - 1. Reclassified asinactiveinJun '77; reviewed & deferredin May'85; 3. Reclassified as inactive in Jul '85. funded for reevaluation (draft report dated Sep '89). 4. See H Doc 577,87th Cong for description. 2.Constructionof projectcancelledbecause local interestsfailedto 5. Reclassified In Jun '77; local Interests unable to meet local provide right-of-way for construction and maintenance, cooperation requirements; funded for reevaluation in FY 89; recommended to be placed in the inactive status. TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Federal Contributed Project Report For Authority Deauthorized Funds Funds Crooked Creek Lake & Levee, AR 1969 1990 Lone Rock, Buffalo River, AR 1959 1977 $130,653 Prosperity Lake, MO _ 1989 864,000 Water Valley, Eleven Point River, AR & MO 1959 1977 414,011 28-23 TABLE 28-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened stream Lock Pool of to 1 from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- Kind of Type of Naviga- Est Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dam Construction tion rotal imated Cost LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell Lock and Dam No. 1 Entrance Channel Lock No. 2 8 east of Arkansas Post, AR 110 by 600 30 max 142 16 15 1967 $22,472,000 43,649,000 1967 70,266,000 First 10.3 miles of system 6 east of Arkansas Post, AR 110 by 600 20nom 28 max 162 18 14 Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No. 2) Joe Hardin Lock and Dam No. 3 Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) Lock and Dam No. 5 3 southeast Arkansas 1968 Post, AR 5 north of Grady, AR 7 east of Pine Bluff, AR 4 southeast of Redfield, AR 110 by 600 20 182 110 by 600 14 196 110 by 600 17 213 18 14 18 14 18 14 1968 38,040,000 1968 45,246,000 1968 31,710,000 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6) 12 southeast of Little Rock, AR 110 by 600 18 231 18 14 1968 69,086,000 0 H 0 11 H rI1 C O 0 x r 0O y C3 M4 p1 O C) o ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened stream Lock Pool of to T form Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- Kind of Type of Naviga- Esti Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dam Construction tion 'otal imated Cost Murray Lock and Dam (No.7) Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8) Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9) Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10) Lock and Dam No. 11 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12) James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) 6 northwest of Little Rock, AR 6 west of Conway, AR 3 southwest of Morrilton, AR 2 northwest of Dardanelle, AR 110 by 600 110 by 600 18 249 16 265 110 by 600 19 284 110 by 600 54 338 18 18 18 18 14 14 14 14 1969 $46,076,000 1.969 57,831,000 1969 37,798,000 1969 84,270,124 Deleted 1 east of Ozark, AR 7 east of Fort Smith, AR 110 by 600 34 372 110 by 600 20 392 18 15 18 1969 85,629,412 14 1969 58,816,000 TABLE 28-H (Continued) r r 0 z ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened stream Lock Pool of to form Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- Kind of Type of Naviga- Est Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dam Construction tion Total timated Cost TULSA DISTRICT 3 James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) (part) W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14) Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (No. 15) Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No. 16) 1970 $6,858,000 4 east of Redland, OK 1 north of Cowlington, OK 1 northwest of Gore, OK 110 by 600 20 412 l10 by 600 48 460 110 by 600 30 490 14 15 18 14 19 16 1970 32,655,000 1970 94,578,237 1970 83,738,277 Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17) 4 northwest of Okay, OK 110 by 600 21 511 15 14 1970 31,619,000 Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No. 18) 8 southwest of Inola, OK 110 by 600 21 532 15 14 1970 44,355,000 TABLE 28-H (Continued) b H 0 'TI H 0 O rTI H I 0 OT '< '0 ---- ~ ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 percent complete ............ $119,300,184 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete ........... ............... 10,247,000 Total, Little Rock District ....................... 814,362,720 Navigation aids (U.S. Coast Guard) ................... ... 2,268,000 Tulsa District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete ............................ 12,700,038 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete ....................................... 2,750,000 Subtotal ................. ...................... $309,253,552 Upstream Lakes:2 Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete ...................................... $ 46,722,329 Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, complete .......................................... 123,170,773 Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, complete ......................................... 124,130,747 Subtotal ................ ................... . 294,023,849 Total, Tulsa District .......................... 603,277,401 Total Project Cost 96 percent complete ........... $1,419,908,121 1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River, except Dam No. 2. is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas River. 2. Details in Tulsa District report. TABLE 28-H (Continued) H M C cr -4 H^I . .. Table 28-I ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Year or 1 Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent Est Lake and State River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete Blue Mountain, AR Petit Jean 74.4 Paris, AR 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 - 1947 $ 5,( Canton, OK North Canadian 384.3 Canton, OK 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 1948 11,2 Elk City, KS Elk 8.7 Independence, KS 634 107 Earthfill 284,300 1966 19,( (Table Mound) Eufaula, OK ': Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 123,3 Fall River, KS Fall 54.2 Fall River, KS 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 1949 10, Fort Gibson, OK' Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK 12,492 110 Concrete- 1,284,400 45000 1953 42,5 Keystone, OK "12 Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK 74,506 121 gravity 1,836,500 70,000 1964 123,1 Markham Ferry, OK' Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, OK 11,533 90 Earthfill 444,500 100,000 1968 6,9 Neodesha, KS' Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 _ 0 Nimrod, AR Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, AR 680 103 Earthfill 336,010 1942 4, Oologah, OK2 Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, OK 4,339 137 Concrete- 1,519,000 1974 46, Pensacola, OK'* Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK 10,298 147 gravity 2,197,000 86,400 1940 Tenkiller Ferry, OK'S Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK 1,610 197 Earthfill 1.230,800 34,000 1953 24,( Toronto, KS Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS 730 90 Concrete arch 199,700 1960 13,8 Wister, OK Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 1949 10, Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah. 148 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK and KS: Navigation (Table 28-H). 1,419 Total, Arkansas River Basin, 96 percent complete. 1,567 rotal imated Cost )69,974 209,834 )52,990 350,791 550,873 591,298 171,173 )08,756 97,910 392,826 722,329 52,126 317,724 X96,324 501,226 ,041,861 ,908,121 ,949,982 1. Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2. Cost included In navigation project. 3. Details In Tulsa District report. 4. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation 5. Inactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O'The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 00 00 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-J LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR: LAKES (See Section 26 of Text) Project River Site' Nearest Town DeQueen Lake' Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, AR Gillham Lake' Cossatot River 49.0 Gillham, AR Dierks Lake' Saline River 56.6 Dierks, AR Millwood Lake' Little River 16.0 Millwood, AR 1. Project is reported separately herein. 28-29 WHITE RIVER BASIN; AR, AND MO: LAKES TABLE 28-K (See Section 34 of text) Miles Drainage Reservoir Power To Above Area Height of Dam Above Streambed Capacity Development Estir Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) and Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) C Beaver' White 609.0 Eureka Springs, AR 1,186 228 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 $ 52 Bell Foley2 Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, AR 519 136 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 518,000 93 Bull Shoals' White 418.6 Mountain Home, AR 6,036 258 feet concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96 Clearwater' Black 257.4 Piedmont, MO 898 154 feet earthfill 413,000 22 Greers Ferry' Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs, AR 1,146 243 feet concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55 Norfork' North Fork 4.8 Norfork, AR 1,806 216 feet concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 111 Table Rock' White 523.8 Branson, MO 4,020 252 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 3.462.000 200.000 71 Total 15,580,000 828,550 503 1. For details see Individual reports. 2. Inactive--placed in a deferred status in May 1985. Estimate based on 1983 price levels. )tal mated ost' ,631,472 ,700,000 ,356,000 ,462,553 ,125,000 ,624,000 ,233,000 ,069,472 C 0 (l t 0 y 0 x 0 H 0 -K r c ;r, 03 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT * The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 160,000 square miles which includes Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within the Arkansas and Red River Basins. The District's responsibilities within the Arkansas River Basin cover southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas. Panhandle. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above the mouth of the Poteau River, extending to the Kansas- Colorado State line, exclusive of that portion of the South Canadian River Basin and its tributaries west of the Texas-New Mexico State line. The District's responsibilities within the Red River Basin cover the northern portion of Texas, and the southern portion of Oklahoma. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Red River and its tributaries above Index, AR. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK 2. Other Authorized Navigation Projects Flood Control 3. Arcadia Lake, OK 4. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX 4a. Area V, Estelline Springs 4b. Area VIII 4c. Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK 5. Birch Lake, OK 6. Candy Lake, OK 7. Canton Lake, OK 8. Copan Lake, OK 9. Council Grove Lake, KS 10. El Dorado Lake, KS 11. Elk City Lake, KS 12. Fall River Lake, KS 13. Fort Supply Lake, OK 14. Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK 15. Great Bend, KS 16. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 17. Halstead, KS 18. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK 19. Hugo Lake, OK 20. Hulah Lake, OK 21. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 29-2 22. Kaw Lake, OK 29-2 23. Lake Kemp, TX 24. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 25. Marion Reservoir, KS 26. McGarth Creek, Wichita Falls, TX 29-2 27. Mingo Creek, OK 28. Oologah Lake, OK 29-3 29. Optima Lake, OK 29-3 30. Parker Lake, OK 29-3 31. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 32. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 29-4 33. Pine Creek Lake, TX 29-4 34. Sardis Lake, OK 29-4 35. Skiatook Lake, OK 29-4 36. Toronto Lake, KS 29-5 87. Tulsa & West Tulsa, OK 29-5 38. Waurika Lake, OK 29-5 39. Wister Lake, OK 29-5 40. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 29-5 41. Inspection of Completed Local 29-5 Flood Protection Projects 29.6 42. Scheduling Flood Control 29-6 Reservoir Operations 29-6 43. Emergency Flood Control Activities 29-6 44. Flood Control Work Under 29-6 - Special Authorization 29-7 29-7 29-1 29-7 29-7 29-7 29-7 29-8 29-8 29-8 29-8 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-11 29-11 29-11 29-11 29-11 29-11 29-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WOP.KS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Tables 45. Broken Bow Lake, OK 46. Eufaula Lake, OK 47. Fort Gibson Lake, OK 48. Keystone Lake, OK 49. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK and TX 50. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK 51. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK 52. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK General Investigations 53. Surveys 54. Collection and Study of Basic Data 55. Preconstruction Engineering and Design 29-11 29-11 29-12 29-12 29-12 29-12 29-12 29-13 29-13 29-13 29-13 29-A Cost and Financial Statement 29-B Authorizing Legislation 29-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 29-D Not Applicable 29-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 29-F Not Applicable 29-G Deauthorized Projects 29-H Arkansas River Basin Multiple-Purpose Plan 29-I Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects 294 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 29-K General Investigations Navigation L McCL E1AN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM (Tulsa District Portion), OK. Location. The Tulsa District portion of the McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a navigation route up the Arkansas River from the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK, near Tulsa, OK. The total length of the Tulsa District portion of the system is 137 navigation miles. Descriptions and costs for the entire navigation system can be found in Little Rock District's entry in this Annual Report. Existing projects. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation project is a component of the multiplepurpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin which provides for the improvement of the basin through the construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. The McClellan-Kerr project consists of bank stabilization, channel straightening, and cutoffs as required. The navigation channel has a minimum depth of 9 feet and minimum widths of 250 feet on the Arkansas River and 150 feet on the Verdigris River. The Tulsa District portion of the navigation system consists of Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Chouteau Lock and Dam, Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sans Bois Navigation Channel, W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, and the pool in Oklahoma which was created by Lock and Dam 13 in Arkansas. The other parts of the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin are listed in Table 29-H. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Muskogee and Catoosa, OK, and at Fort Smith, AR. At Sallisaw, OK, a port authority has been active in seeking development of public facilities at that location. Other private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at eight Oklahoma locations. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. See Table 29-C. Flood Control 3. ARCADIA LAKE, OK Location. On the Deep Fork River at river mile 218.3 in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, OK. (See Arcadia, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 29-2 29-13 29-23 29-25 29-26 29-27 29-27 29-28 29-28 29-29 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 102 feet high and 5,250 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of a gated tower and conduit. The lake has a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve), and controls a 105-square-mile drainage area. Construction began in October 1980 and the project became operational for flood control in November 1986. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. The United States filed suit to seek enforcement of the local cooperation requirements and the issue was mutually resolved by a Consent Decree entered into CIV 89-1507-A in United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, on February 10,1992. The decree was for the City of Edmond and the Edmond Public Works Authority to reimburse the Government $7,207,636 over a period of 40 years for the Recreation contract and $16,253,644 for the water supply contract over a period of 43 years. Operations and results during fiscal year. Remainingrecreation is unscheduled. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 4. ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECTS, KS, OK, AND TX Location. On certain tributary streams of the Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of the Tulsa District. Existing project. Provided for studies involving the control of water pollution caused by 15 natural salt sources identified in 1957 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The Arkansas and the Red Rivers represent major national and regional water resources severely limited due to poor water quality primarily caused by the natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. The Red River Basin is polluted by ten naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas and southwestern Oklahoma. These studies included the construction and subsequent maintenance of an injection well and a ring dike used for data collection. Preauthorization studies completed in 1966 and 1970 recommended construction of project features at 13 of the 15 sites. For a detailed discussion of the chloride control projects, see the page 19-4 of the Annual Report for 1983. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99- 662) authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966. The Arkansas River portion of the project was deferred in 1982 (not economically justified). 4a. AREA V, ESTEILINE SPRINGS. Location. Chloride Control Area V is located about 0.5 mile east of Estelline, TX, on the Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1987. Construction started in 1963 and the structure was completed in 1964. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. 4b. AREA VIII Location. Chloride Control Area VIII is located at river mile 74.9 of the South Fork of the Wichita River in King County, TX, about 5 miles east of Guthrie, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of one low-flow collection dam with attendant pumping station and pipeline facilities. This dam (the Bateman Low Flow Dam) is equipped with an inflatable fabrictype weir located in the spillway section which deflates to pass relatively good quality high flows. The collected brine is pumped to the storage reservoir behind the Truscott Brine Dam. This brine dam, located at river mile 3.6 on Bluff Creek (a tributary of the North Fork of the Wichita River) about 3 miles northwest of Truscott, TX, contain collected brine from this area as well as future collections from Area X. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and Truscott Brine Dam in 1976. The Bateman low-flow dam was completed and put into full operation in May 1987. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized construction of the remaining areas of the Red River Chloride Control project pending transmittal of a report of a favorable finding of the effectiveness of the operation of Area VIII. Public Law 99-662 established a panel to assess the improvement in water quality downstream of Area VIII as a measure of its effectiveness. A favorable report was submitted by the panel to the Secretary of the Army (CW) and to the Public Works Committees of the House and Senate in August 1988. 29-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 4c. RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK Location. The project is located in Cottle, Hall and King Counties, Texas and Harmon County, Oklahoma, along the Wichita and Red River. Area VI is located on the Elm Fork of the Red River in Harmon County, Oklahoma; Area VII is on the North Fork of the Wichita River, Cottle County, Texas; Crowell Brine Dam is on Canal Creek, a tributary of the Pease River; Area IX is on the Middle Pease River, Cottle County, Texas; Area X is on the Middle Fork of the Wichita River, King County, Texas; and Areas XIII-XIV are on the Jonah and Salt Creeks of Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River, Hall County, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of 1 deep-well injection system, 3 brine storage reservoirs, 4 low-flow brine collection dams, 2 well collection facilities, 6 pumping plants, and 56.3 miles of pipeline. Construction was completed at the Area X, low-flow dam, pump station and access road in March 1994. A Limited Reevaluation Report containing a project economic reevaluation was approved in November 1993. Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act authorized the project at full Federal expense. The Red River Authority of Texas has signed a 221 Agreement as the non-Federal sponsor. Operation and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $215,000,000 (October 1994 price level base). Design is underway for all Areas. A supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Study is being prepared. 5. BIRCH LAKE, OK. Location. On Birch Creek at river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall in Osage County, OK. (See Barnsdall, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, seethe Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in November 1973 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 6. CANDY LAKE, OK. Location. On Candy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 1.9. The damsite is about 1.5 miles northeast of Avant in Osage County, OK. (See Avant, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 103 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10-by 11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18-by 24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). The drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in September 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was about 13 percent complete when construction was delayed because the U.S. Justice Department decided to withdraw condemnation proceedings to acquire mineral rights. Estimated cost of the project was $38,300,000 (October 1984 price level base). The project was deferred in January 1984. Project land has been made available for low intensity recreation use. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 7. CANTON LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 394, about 2 miles north of Canton in Blaine County, OK. (See Canton, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 590 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in December 1940 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1948. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 29-4 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 8. COPAN LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little Caney River, a tributary of the Caney River in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 7.4, about 2 miles west of Copan in Washington County, OK. (See Copan, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. Copan Lake is operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in November 1972 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 9. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 450, about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove in Morris County, KS. (See Council Grove Lake, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 519 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1959 and the project was placed in useful operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 10. EL DORADO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Walnut River, a tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 100.2, about 4 miles northeast of El Dorado in Butler County, KS. (See El Dorado, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. El Dorado Lake was authorized as a unit of a threelake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Construction began in October 1973, and impoundment began in June 1981. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 1L ELK CITY LAKE, KS Location. On the Elk River at river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence in Montgomery County, KS. (See Table Mound, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 593 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in February 1962 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 12. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS. Location. On the Fall River at river mile 54.2, about 4 miles northwest of Fall River in Greenwood County, KS. (See Severy, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 953 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and the project was placed in full operation in April 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 13. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK. Location. On Wolf Creek, a tributary of the North Canadian River, at river mile 5.5, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward in Woodward County, OK. (See Fort Supply, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in October 1938 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 29-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 14. FRY CREEKS, BIXBY, OK Location. In the northern part of the city of Bixby in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Existing project. The project consists of enlarging both Fry Creeks, diverting Fry Creek 1 into Fry Creek 2 and then diverting the combined creeks into the Arkansas River. The total length of the modified channels would total 4.3 miles, bottom widths of 30 to 225 feet; and depths of 6 to 12 feet. Three bridges will be constructed and 20 acres of land will be acquired for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. Local Cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed in January 1995. Operations and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $17,900,000 (October 1994 price level base). Funds provided in FY 94 were used to complete plans and specifications and Project Cooperation Agreement negotiations. 15. GREAT BEND, KS. Location. In Barton County, KS, on the north bank of the Arkansas River about 4.5 miles above its confluence with Walnut Creek. (See Great Bend, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, provides for 6.2 miles of leveed channel to divert Walnut Creek flood flow around Great Bend into the Arkansas River upstream from the city; a 1.5-mile leveed channel to divert Little Walnut Creek flood flow into the Walnut Creek diversion levees along the Arkansas; a tie-back levee 4.3 miles long on the Arkansas left bank upstream from the junction of the Walnut diversion channel; and appurtenant facilities. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $36,350,000 (October 1994 price level base). Work on Phase III was completed in June 1994. 16. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK. Location. On the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River at river mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee in Alfalfa County, OK. (See Jet, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the project began in September 1938 and was completed in July 1941. The project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 17. HALSTEAD, KS. Location. In the city of Halstead in Harvey County, KS, along the Arkansas River. (See Halstead, KS, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for channel modification and construction of about 4 miles of levee in combination with straightening and widening approximately 3.6 miles of the Little Arkansas River channel to a 50-foot-bottom width in the vicinity of Halstead. Channel modification will be restricted to one side of the channel except in transition areas. Tree planting and revegetation will be done and ten pool riffle areas will be established to minimize environmental impacts. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funds provided in FY 93 were used to continue construction. Estimated project cost is $11,100,000 (October 1993 price level base). Scheduled completion will occur in May 1995. 18. HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK, OK. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 48.6, about 11 miles west of Sapulpa in Creek County, OK. (See Lake Heyburn, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 599 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction started in March 1948 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1950. Channel improvements below the lake were completed in September 1952. Local cooperation. The channel improvement project below the lake was never maintained by the sponsor, Joint Drainage District No.1, Tulsa and Creek Counties, Oklahoma. For this reason, the channel returned to its pre-project condition and does not provide flood protection for the affected area. The Corps of Engineers discontinued maintenance inspections of the channel project in 1982 due to the condition of the project and lack of cooperation on the part of the sponsor. 29-6 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 19. HUGO LAKE, OK. Location. On the Kiamichi River at river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo in Choctaw County, OK. (See Hugo Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in October 1967 and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 20. HULAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Caney River atriver mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, in Osage County, OK. (See Bowring, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 595 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1951 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 21. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS. Location. The dam is located on the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington in Coffey County, KS. (See John Redmond Dam, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 581 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction was initiated in July 1959 and was completed in December 1965. The project was placed in flood control operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 22. KAW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City in Kay County, OK. (See Charley Creek West, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-13 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in June 1966 and the project was placed in operation in May 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 23. LAKE KEMP, TX. Location. On the Wichita River at river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Northeast Lake Kemp, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-14 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in May 1970 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 24. LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK, TX. Location. The project is located in Wichita andArcher Counties, TX. The Lake Wichita dam and the Holliday Creek channel are located in the city of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Wichita Falls, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The proposed plan includes the replacement of the existing Lake Wichita darn with an earthen dam approximately 16,000 feet long, a concrete spillway, an auxiliary spillway, andlow-flowoutlet works. The plan also includes channel improvements along Holliday Creek from the new spillway to the Wichita River, a distance of 9.3 miles. 29-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Local cooperation. Fully compiled with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Phase III construction is approximately 90% complete. Estimated project cost is $48,300,000 (October 1993 price level base). 25. MARION RESERVOIR, KS. Location. On the Cottonwood River at river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion in Marion County, KS. (See Pilson, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 597 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1964 and the project was placed in flood control operation in February 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 26. MCGARTH CREEK, WICHITA FALLS, TX. Location. The project is located in the northern central portion of Texas, in the city of Wichita Falls. Existing project. McGarth Creek is approximately 3,900 feet long and connects Sikes Lake and the recently constructed Holliday Creek project. The project involves re-aligning and concrete lining the McGrath Creek Channel, and constructing anew spillway to pass flows through Sikes Lake. Local cooperation. The city of Wichita Falls, Texas, is the non-Federal sponsor. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in Water Resources Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary for the construction of the project; and pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract plans are complete. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in November 1994. The FY 95 funds will be used to monitor real estate activities. The FY 96 funds will also be used to monitor real estate activities and to initiate the channel construction, which is scheduled for a June 1996 award. 27. MINGO CREEK, OK. Location. On the right-bank tributary of Bird Creek in Tulsa County, OK. (See Tulsa, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan will consist of 23 detention sites which would capture peak flows and hold them temporarily until downstream flows subside. There would be about 9.4 miles of channelization in selected locations on the tributaries and main stem of Mingo Creek. This plan will provide a minimum of 65- year protection in the major damage area. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The local sponsor is the city of Tulsa, OK. On August 26, 1983, the city of Tulsa adopted a Resolution of Assurance to provide a minimum share equal to 35 percent or the traditional lands, easements, and rights-of-way, whichever is greater, and will be required to assist in the actual financing of construction. The city has constructed 4.75 miles of channel and placed two excavated detention facilities into flood control operation prior to initiation of federal construction in September 1988. The project is currently 54% complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. Reimbursement to date for work completed by the City of Tulsa is $13,000,000. Estimated project cost is $140,500,000 (October 1994 price level base). 28. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 90.2, about 2 miles southeast of Oologah in Rogers County, OK. (See Oologah, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-15 of the Annual Report for 1972. Construction began in July 1950, but the project was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction resumed in December 1955 and was completed in 29-8 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT May 1963 for initial development. Construction for ultimate (second stage) development was initiated in July 1967 and was completed in 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 29. OPTIMA LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty in Texas County, OK. (See Optima Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the existing improvement, see page 19-16 of the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in March 1966 and impoundment began in October 1978. Construction was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 30. PARKER LAKE, OK. Location. On Muddy Boggy Creek, a tributary of the Red River, about 23 miles east of Ada in Coal County, OK. (See Parker, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Parker Lake, when constructed, will be a multipurpose element in a plan of improvement for the Upper Muddy Boggy Creek Basin, OK. The project consists of an earthfill dam about 2,200 feet long, a gated outlet works for flood control and water supply, and a 100-foot-wide spillway. The lake created would have a total storage capacity of 220,240 acre-feet and would yield 42 million gallons per day for municipal and industrial water supply. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board, the sponsor, has agreed to cost share in the flood control portion of the project and the water supply provided enough interested users for the water supply can be identified. Operation and results during fiscal year. Estimated project cost is $71,400,000 (October 1992 price level base). 3L PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX. Location. On Sanders Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 4.6, about 12 miles north of Paris in Lamar County, TX. (See Grant, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in March 1965 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 32. PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS. Location. On Big Hill Creek at river mile 33.3, about 4.5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Dennis, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Construction began in April 1974 and impoundment began in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 33. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little River at river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City in McCurtain County, OK. (See Wright City, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in February 1963 and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 29-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 34. SARDIS LAKE, OK. Location. On Jackfork Creek, a tributary of the Kiamichi River, at river mile 2.8, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton in Pushmataha County, OK. (See Yanush, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Sardis Lake is operated as a unit of a two-lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin. (The other lake in the system is Hugo Lake). Construction began in August 1975 and the project became operational in January 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 35. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK. Location. On Hominy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 14.3, about 5 miles west of Skiatook in Osage County, OK. (See Avant S.E., OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1;24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see Page19-8 of the Annual Report for 1987. Construction began in January 1974, impoundment began in October 1984, and the project became operational in November 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Remaining recreation is unscheduled. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 36. TORONTO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 271.5, about 4 miles southeast of Toronto in Woodson County, KS. (See Fredonia, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 600 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in November 1954 and the project was placed in full operation in March 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 37. TULSA AND WEST TULSA, OK. Location. On the banks of the Arkansas River near Tulsa, Oklahoma. On the left bank, the levee extends from river mile 531.0 near Sand Springs, Oklahoma, downstream to river mile 521.4 at Tulsa. On the right bank, the levee extends from near river mile 526.7 downstream to river mile 521.3 and is adjacent to the major portion of the business and residential districts in West Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Existing project. The Tulsa and West Tulsa levees were completedby the Tulsa District in 1945. The project was turned over to the Tulsa County Drainage District No. 12 for operations and maintenance. The project consists of 3 levees with a total length of about 20 miles and an average height of 10 feet. The levees provide protection from flooding to property valued at approximately $1.0 billion dollars. Many of the pipes that pass under the levee have deteriorated and levee material has eroded into the pipes leaving small cavities in the embankment. The Tulsa District completed an evaluation of the levees in September 1989 which determined that rehabilitation would be required for the levees to operate as designed. Funds to repair the levee were provided in fiscal years 1991 and 1994 by the U.S. Congress. Local cooperation. The LCA was executed in March 1992 and Tulsa County and Levee District No. 12, the non-Federal sponsors, provided funds of $325,000 in March 1992. Approximately one-half of the project repairs have been completed to date. The sponsors will be required to sign a supplement to the LCA and provide and additional $150,000 as a result of funding and authority included in the FY 94 Energy and Water Appropriations Act by the U.S. Congress. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I contract for repair of 23 of the 48 deficient pipes was awarded July 30, 1992, and completed in July 1993. Phase II construction is scheduled to be initiated in August 1994, pending execution of a supplement to the Local Cooperation Agreement. 38. WAURIKA LAKE, OK. Location. On Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 27.0, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika in Jefferson County, OK. (See Hastings, OKTX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1983. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction began in July 1971 and impoundment began in August 1977. 29-10 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. 39. WISTER LAKE, OK. Location. On the Poteau River at river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister in LeFlore County, OK. (See Wister, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 601 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in April 1946 and was completed in May 1949. The project was placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year Per Congressional direction, the pool elevation was held to a minimum of 475.5 feet, NGVD. The current seasonal pool plan was suspended from July 15 to September 30. 40 . OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See Table 29-E. 41 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Inspections of completed, Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are owned, operated, and maintained by local interests are made to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operations and maintenance. The inspections assist the Corps of Engineers in determining if the project provides the flood protection for which it was constructed. See Table 29-I for a list of projects inspected in FY 94. Fiscal year cost was $182,896. 42. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. The Tulsa District, Corps of Engineers is responsible for flood control operations at 12 non-Corps projects. These include nine Bureau of Reclamation lakes, two Grand River Dam Authority lakes, and one city-county owned lake. All of these projects were constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. Routine flood control releases were required at several of the projects. Fiscal year costs for scheduling flood control reservoir operations totaled $613,491. 43. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES. Fiscal year cost for national emergency preparedness was $126,306 and for advance preparation was $157,363. 44. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. See Table 29- for FY 93 expenditures for Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorizedby Congress (Section 205); Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Projects (Section 14); and Snagging and Clearing. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 45. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Mountain Fork River at river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of BrokenBowinMcCurtain County, OK. (See Broken Bow, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements, see page 29-17 of the Annual Report for 1971. Construction began in November 1961 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1969. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 46. EUFAULA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Canadian River at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula in McIntosh County, OK. (See Porum, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 588 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in December 1956 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. Local cooperation. An LCA was executed with the Pittsburg County Board of Commissioners on March 1, 1993. The LCA contains provisions for the county to cost share 25 percent of the Muddy Creek bridge replacement expenses and to operate and maintain the complete project. 29-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 The Oklahoma Department of Transportation provided $330,000 cash contributions in April 1993. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract for Muddy Creek bridge replacement was awarded in September 1993. Construction completion is scheduled for June 1995. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 47. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north of Fort Gibson in Muskogee County, OK. (See Fort Gibson Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 604 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in March 1942 but was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction resumed in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The fourth generator was installed and the project placed in full operation in September 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 48. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, OK. (See Keystone Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 589 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in January 1957 and the project was placed in flood control operation in September 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 49. LAKE TEXOMA (DENISON DAM), OK AND TX. Location. On the Red River at river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Denison Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 603 of the Annual Report for 1969. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction started in August 1939 and was completed in February 1944. Commercial power generation was started in March 1945. Authorized work is complete except for installation of the third, fourth, and fifth power units. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 50. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw in LeFlore County, OK. (See Robert S. Kerr, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-21 of the Annual Report for 1972. The Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in April 1964 and closure was completed in October 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, 3, and 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Five sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 51 TENKIT ER FERRY LAKE, OK. Location. On the Illinois River at river mile 12.8, 7 miles northeast of Gore in Sequoyah County, OK. (See Gore, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1947 and was completed in July 1953. 29-12 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 52. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls in Muskogee County, OK. (See Webbers Falls, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-23 of the Annual Report for 1977. The Webbers Falls Lock and Dam is a unit of the McClellan-KerrArkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, and 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Facilities at the Port of Muskogee include: A cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built by the Muskogee City-County Port Authority; a liquid cargo loading facility and a steel unloading facility built by Frontier Steel Company; grain holding facilities built by Conagra, Inc.; and a general-purpose private dock built by the Fort Howard Paper Company. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. General Investigations 53. SURVEYS. Fiscal year cost was $578,311 which included 8 flood damage prevention studies; 2 special studies, 1 restudy of deferred projects; 2 authorization reports; 1 review of completed projects; miscellaneous activities-special investigations, review of FERC licenses, and intragency water resources development; and coordination with other Federal agencies, States, and non-Federal interests. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 54. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Fiscal year cost was $331,240 which includes floodplain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 55. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Fiscal year cost was $399,665 which includes three navigation projects and seven local protection projects. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 29-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30,1994 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas New Work River Navigation System, Approp OK, (Tulsa District Portion) Cost Maint Approp Cost - 130,936,6382 - 130,936,6382 3,079,178 3,461,500 3,189,400 3,413,250 149,155,962 3,267,423 3,559,308 3,118,662 3,206,865 143,976,218 3. Arcadia Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 4. Arkansas-Red River BasinsChloride Control, KS, OK, and TX 3,131,000 1,000,000 3,298,138 169,161 21,276 308,900 379,000 320,800 312,533 373,861 325,308 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 4a. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 4b. Area VIII. TX 4c. Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK 5. Birch Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 1,200 1,979 3,000 1,987 - 23,649 570 1,656 2,204 583,300 840,500 987,300 582,900 823,381 972,741 3,000 1,443 892,000 914,559 2,550,000 2,450,000 3,000,000 10,000,000 756,974 2,649,908 2,945,617 5,353,915 651,450 685,000 653,340 676,088 681,326 648,355 657,200 666,319 2914 -8,472 295,000 298,818 85,339,289 85,283,815 2,496,782 2,495,182 25,705,208 25,705,068 3,533,506 3,646,832 300,028 300,028 180,669 193,760 46,682,000 46,681,960 5,992,448 5,967,309 18,000.000 11,706,014 13,549,170 13,549,296 10,329,740 13,626,542 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sep 30,19941 6. Candy Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 7. Canton Lake, OK 30,400 18,712 33,000 33,431 16,570 12,745 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 8 Copan Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 9. Council Grove Lake, KS 1,595,250 3,825,800 1,427,000 1,566,840 3,934,771 1,455,190 -130,000 10,484 -2,248 873 759,600 884,000 889,000 812,715 878,128 846,853 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 10. El Dorado Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 11. Elk City Lake, KS 756,800 1,017,000 917,500 772,331 850,373 1,080,975 72,600 86,971 448,900 419,500 430,000 456,288 422,471 430,835 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 732,200 733,400 765,030 726,541 714,407 744,015 - 6,763 209 24,000 27,726 1,419,100 1,362,442 935,300 882,083 4,927,922 4,927,923 156,270 155,771 11,209,834 10,918,727 29,603,726 29,631,815 88,509,751 92,035,258 7,958,079 7,828,014 11,810,509 11,810,509 16,333,343 16,291,209 92,505,068 92,386,324 5,057,988 5,048,611 19,052,990 19,052,990 14,402,562 14,357,321 1,058,200 1,053,649 3,210 420,000 413,261 749,000 777,848 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section To in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Se 12. Fall River Lake, KS New Work 13. Fort Supply Lake, OK 14. Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK 15. Great Bend, KS (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 17. Halstead, KS (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 958,400 956,800 1,162,000 872,159 996,806 1,211,715 751,600 737,500 758,700 788,347 727,659 766,603 - 90,000 . - 77,520 4,985,400 4,065,797 231,000 478,600 - 325,800 351,078 262,000 202,957 10,000 - 4,786,000 5,548,146 2,733,000 2,034,480 337,000 326,261 2,828,000 2,808,865 390,000 311,848 3,444,000 1,569,026 242,000 580,072 - 352,000 356,411 3,204,000 2,536,569 400,000 -58,019 900,004 821,774 717,00 720,62 231,00 155,54 783,72 176,951 386,60 397,651 905,00 1,591,28! tal to ep 30,19941 - 10,550,873 - 10,550,873 0 15,883,691 0 15,977,512 - 7,724,134 - 7,723,127 0 14,472,398 1 14,440,071 0 321,000 5 233,065 - 21,473,400 7 19,598,082 - 4,081,000 6 3,888,107 - 4,626,270 - 4,626,270 0 8,918,386 0 8,903,849 0 8,283,000 9 8,199,263 - 800,000 - 253,829 - 2,560,572 - 2,560,572 29-16 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30, 1994' Heyburn Lake (cont'd) 19. Hugo Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 20. Hulah Lake, OK 611,300 683,000 673,130 680,453 665,157 692,616 3,456,700 - - 3,748,348 - - 1,250,500 1,410,500 1,607,000 1,323,840 1,307,664 1,684,980 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 21. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 389,700 306,000 343,100 385,644 .317,347 343,974 Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 961,800 1,022,000 1,020,280 1,049,933 1,021,250 1,014,293 1,030,000 23,914,080 993,779 23,977,212 22. Kaw Lake, OK 1,515,600 1,775,200 1,600,000 1,703,701 1,724,787 1,669,082 1,539,400 27,315,323 1,564,402 27,303,288 23. Lake Kemp, TX 7,637,702 - 7,637,702 174,700 137,000 184,720 183,575 125,281 188,149 -17 741,000 653,511 1,567,283 1,484,063 12,106,603 12,114,714 41,216,442 41,180,456 23,801,827 23,613,612 11,388,150 11,182,433 12,900,000 12,789,884 135,718 135,718 28,151,515 28,151,515 361,000 280,721 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp- Cost Maint Approp Cos 109,430,750 109,429,274 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 157,000 157,928 2,762,612 2,749,948 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30, 1994 24. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (Contrib. Funds) 25. Marion Reservoir, KS New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 26. McGrath Creek Wichita Falls, TX (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 27. Mingo Creek, OK (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Oologah Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 29. Optima Lake, OK 3,594,000 349,000 3,074,000 3,446,000 4,597,273 890,417 1,682,488 2,462,180 1,060,000 2,000,000 899,398 370,000 1,1000,000 939,900 907,600 949.000 949,944 907,012 959,555 1,500,000 2,014,046 1,008,800 996,250 86,000 63,102 6,221,000 12,183,000 5,395,000 11,500,000 6,540,605 12,359,164 3,125,564 7,250,412 1,100,000 1,800,000 1,414,242 410,147 778,055 381,031 1,485,800 1,427,500 1,546,000 1,617,150 1,699,766 1,423,709 1,558,987 1,604,516 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 454,700 429,500 488,700 462,093 427,111 468,849 400,000 424,560 29-18 31,100,000 28,422,521 7,260,000 6,783,341 13,420,817 13,420,817 16,710,518 16,661,624 86,000 63,102 00 47,360,000 39,894,691 6,288,000 5,737,373 46,722,3293 46,721,5563 26,924,363 26,889,383 47,173,438 47,173,438 6,975,050 7,012,337 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30, 19941 30. Parker Lake, OK 31. Pat Mayse Lake, TX New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 32. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 2,238 906,800 903,262 2,258 939,400 813,700 965,137 817,264 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 33. Pine Creek Lake, OK 804,600 937,000 870,861 925,070 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 34. Sardis Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 35. Skiatook Lake, OK New Work Approp- Cost Maint Approp Cost 35. Toronto Lake, KS 846,000 874,204 32 1,051,900 1,162,600 1,112,520 1,054,204 1,137,726 1,138,385 1,075,000 -169,000 226,259 4,068 5,562 832,700 926,000 930,100 874,352 862,618 949,340 471 141 1,127,000 1,256,000 858,800 1,160,717 1,076,141 989,018 New Work Approp Cost 29-19 846,200 841,146 841,210 815,567 1,233,000 1,219,309 -104,314 946,000 941,081 522,000 509,009 9,310,661 9,310,661 15,477,350 15,451,088 16,879,166 16,879,165 10,049,828 10,035,038 20,628,049 20,627,879 16,541,073 16,483,614 68,799,479 68,518,177 8,720,490 8,659,267 106,201,282 106,268,739 8,807,238 8,620,269 13,896,324 13,896,324 1.183.500 1,097,303 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30, 19941 Toronto (cont'd) 37. Tulsa & West Tulsa, OK (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 38. Waurika Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 39. Wister Lake, OK 45. Broken Bow Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Major Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 239,700 263,000 319,110 240,867 264,871 319,746 135,000 840,000 65,703 153,044 325,000 2,911,000 -323,752 2,911,338 -313,970 1,233,400 1,210,457 498,057 100,000 295,000 292,371 450,000 90,558 -8,340 1,235,600 1,206,410 1,261,658 1,224,948 715,100 720,000 781,000 772,332 716,466 793,560 3,996,000 4,095,199 270,394 84,439 1,210,000 1,207,690 916,000 798,671 2,488 1,740,400 1,752,200 2,171,200 1,728,000 1,671,878 1,860,381 2,161,510 1,726,921 46. Eufaula Lake, OK (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost Maint Approp Cost 670,000 29,905 330,000 4,366,794 4,038,400 3,573,473 4,385,849 3,923,005 3,795,793 - 124,020,747' 660,763 123,769,5974 212,318 4,409,679 3,985,602 330,000 212,318 71,129,712 67,585,298 6,680,216 6,675,463 1,425,000 807,362 325,000 100,000 69,740,298 69,731,529 14,838,963 13,830,963 10,501,226 10,501,226 14,729,653 14,598,805 11,131,529 11,131,529 41,222,692 41,222,692 27,552,721 27,517,804 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30, 19941 47. Fort Bibson Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 48. Keystone Lake, OK 3,055,000 3,734,000 3,542,700 3,087,214 3,533,649 3,801,859 3,392,100 3,330,648 New Work Approp Cost 42,591,298 s 43,497,7916 62,282,802 63,593,436 - 123,171,1738 - 123,170,6756 Maint Approp Cost 49. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam),OK and TX 2,680,100 3,022,685 3,109,000 2,742,665 3,050,124 2,977,460 3,306,542 3,250,637 New Work Approp Cost 54,641,277 54,517,074 68,168,9607 68,019,1097 Maint Approp 5,252,000 6,265,000 5,434,700 5,664,100 111,495,786 Cost 6,557,106 6,303,084 5,503,214 5,678,102 111,414,826 50. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 51. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 46,237 46,237 - - - 94,578,237 - - - 94,578,237 2,811,100 2,900,500 3,019,520 2,935,950 58,479,003 3,288,901 3,104,279 3,004,368 2,839,011 57,975,215 - - - 870,000 24,887,7208 - - - 45,775 24,103,4938 2,757,300 3,005,000 3,064,000 2,835,767 2,965,843 3,114,736 3,098,550 3,060,313 53,963,697 53,926,537 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 Table 29-A ([Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep 30, 1994' 52. Webbers Falls New Work Lock & Dam, OK Approp . - - 86,107,967 Cost . - - 86,108,391 Maint Approp 2,382,700 2,809,000 2,457,500 2,672,250 52,228,241 Cost 2,534,989 2,875,685 2,456,339 2,572,133 52,224,982 1. Includes $2,077,900 expended by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8 dated, March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Tables 29-M of the FY 85 Annual Report. 2. Includes $12,700,038 for Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification. 3. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 special funds. 4. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 special funds. 5. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 Public works acceleration funds. 6. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. 7. Includes $433,539 Emergency Relief funds. Exchange $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 8. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public Works acceleration funds. 9. The cost for Grand Lake O' the Cherokees has been added to amount reported in paragraph 41, Scheduling Reservoir Operations. TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section In Text 1. 3. 4. 4a. 4b.&4c. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Documents HID 79-758 PL 79-525 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 HID 91-299 PL 94-587 29Z23 Date of Authorizing Act " July 24, 1946 October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 October 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 November 17, 1986 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 Project and Work Authorized McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project W.D. Mayo Hydropwer ARCADIA LAKE Changed water quality to water supply ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL Authorized Area V (Estelline Springs) Authorized Areas VII, VIII, and X I Authorized Areas I, II-III, VI, IX, XIII, XIV, and XV Authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority. BIRCH LAKE CANDY LAKE CANTON LAKE Approved Irrigation Storage Approved Water Supply Storage COPAN LAKE COUNCIL GROVE LAKE EL DORADO LAKE ELK CITY LAKE FALL RIVER LAKE FORT SUPPLY LAKE FRY CREEKS GREAT BEND GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE HALSTEAD HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK SD 87-107 PL 89-789, SD 110 PL 91-611 PL 99-662 HD 87-563 HD 87-563 HD 75-569 HD 87-563 HD 80-442 HD 89-232 HD 76-440 HD 76-440 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 PL 99-662 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 80-290 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 TABLE 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act July 24, 1946 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Project and Work Authorized HUGO LAKE Documents HD 79-602 June 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 February 15, 1958 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 March 14, 1990 November 17, 1988 November 17, 1986 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 10, 1978 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 December 4, 1981 October 23, 1962 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941. December 30, 1963 June 28, 1938 See Section In Text 19. HULAH LAKE HD 74-308 JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR HD 80-442 Authorized name change PL 85-327 KAW LAKE HD 87-143 LAKE KEMP HD 87-144 LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK PL 99-662 MARION RESERVOIR HD 80-442 Authorized name change PL 101-253 MCGARTH CREEK WICHITA FALLS, TX PL 100-676 MINGO CREEK PL 99-662 OOLOGAH LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session OPFIMA LAKE HD 74-308 PARKER LAKE PL 99-662 PAT MAYSE LAKE HD 88-71 PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE HD 87-472 Authorized name change PL 95-265 PINE CREEK LAKE HD 85-170 SARDIS LAKE SD 87-145 Authorized name change PL 97-88 SKIATOOK LAKE HD 87-563 TORONTO LAKE HD 76-440 PL 77-228 TULSA & WEST TULSA, OK PL 77-228 WAURIKA LAKE SD 88-33 PL 88-253 WISTER LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session 39. VV " r "w-r . TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 44. (cont'd) July 30, 1983 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 July 24, 1946 July 16,1984 November 17, 1986 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 November 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 June 28, 1938 October 17, 1940 Sepember 30, 1944 August 14, 1953 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 July 8, 1963 June 28, 1938 June 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 Changed conservation pool elevation BROKEN BOW LAKE EUFAULA LAKE Authorized Piney Creek and Muddy Creek bridge replacement Authorized cost sharing FORT GIBSON LAKE Incorporated into the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin Added hydropower units 5 & 6 KEYSTONE LAKE LAKE TEXOMA (Denison Dam) Flood control and power Navigation and regulating flows Authorized name Water supply Recreation ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR Authorized name change TENKILLER FERRY LAKE Power PL 98-63 HD 85-170 SD 87-137 HD 79-758 PL 98-360 PL99-662 HD 76-107 PL 76-228 PL 99-662 SD 81-07 HD 75-541 PL 76-868 PL 78-454 PL 83-273 PL 99-662 HD 79-758 PL 88-62 TABLE 20-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1994 See Annual Operation and Project Status report for Construction Maintnenace Big and Little Sallisaw Inactive Navigation Project Poteau River Navigation Project, Complete 1983 536,952 OK and AR Red River from Fulton, AR, Complete 1924 378,574 182,157 to Mouth of Washita River 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. HD 79-758 WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM HD 79-758 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 TABLE 29-E OTHER AUTHORIZEFLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1994 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Augusta LPP, KSU2 1938 84,217 Big Pine Lake, TX3 1984 1,701,670 Boswell Lake, OK3 1952 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK2 1970 261,448 - Crutcho Creek LPP, OK3 1972 213,016 Dodge City LPP, KS2 - Enid LPP, OK2 1963 743,612 14,599 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, 1975 1,741,000 Tulsa, OK2, ' Florence LPP, KS2 1965 369,782 Hutchinson LPP, KS2 1956 3,497,718 Iola LPP, KS2 1939 22,290 Jenks LPP, OK2 1950 344,797 Joe Creek LPP, OK2 308,041 Lamed LPP, KS2 Lukfata Lake, OK3 1983 1,424,685 Marion, KS 1988 5,488,618 McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX5 Oklahoma City LPP, OK2 1960 8,047,512 Red River Bank Stabilization Below Denison, 1953 222,105 OK and TX' Sand Creek LPP, KS2 1968 545,996 Sand Lake, OK3 1963 Shidler Lake, OK3 1983 568,191 Tulsa and West Tulsa LPP, OK? 1954 3,592,432 Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK3 1975 144,853 Tuskahoma Lake, OK3 1963 West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS2 1965 364,200 Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS2 1960 12,247,379 Winfield LPP, KS' , 2 1937 LPP - Local Protection Project. 1. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 2. Complete. 3. Deferred. 4. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. 5. Active with no current year expenditures. TABLE 29-G TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Day Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Cedar Point Lake, KS 1980 November 17, 1986 0 0 Public Law 99-662 Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS 1971 November 17, 1986 363,720 0 Public Law 99-662 El Dorado, West Branch, 1977 November 17, 1986 92,319 0 Walnut River, KS Public Law 99-662 Neodesha Lake, KS 1952 November 17, 1986 97,910 0 Public Law 99-662 Towanda Lake, KS 1981 November 17, 1986 392,361 0 Public Law 99-662 TABLE 29-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PLAN (See Section 1 of Text) Feature River River Mile' Nearest Town LAKES Canton North Canadian 394.3 Canton, OK Elk City Elk River 8.7 Elk City, KS Eufaula Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK Fall River Fall River 54.2 Fall River, KS Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, OK Neodesha Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, OK Tenkiller Ferry Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK (Tulsa District Portion) Bank Stabilization and Verdigris and N/A2 Fort Smith, AR, Channel Rectification Arkansas to Catoosa, OK Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK Verdigris 401.5 Okay, OK Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK Verdigris 421.6 Inola, OK Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK Arkansas 339.0 Sallisaw, OK Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK Arkansas 336.2 Cowlington, OK Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK Sans Bois Creek 341.0 Keota, OK W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK Arkansas 319.6 Redland, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK Arkansas 366.6 Gore, OK 1. On the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, these are navigation miles. 2. As required for a channel 9 feet deep. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 TABLE 29-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 41 of Text) Proiects Inspected in Fiscal Year Inspection Date South Deer Creek,OK Dodge City, KS Florence, KS Hutchinson, KS Iola, KS Lamed, KS Marion, KS Mingo Creek, Audubon Creek Mingo Creek, 36th Street North Sand Creek, City of Newton, KS Cherry/Red Fork Creeks, OK Flat Rock/Valley View Cks, OK Haikey Creek, OK Jenks, OK Joe Creek, OK Tulsa/West Tulsa Levees, OK Enid Diversion Channel, OK Oklahoma City Floodway, OK Park City, KS West Branch Chisholm Creek, KS Wichita/Valley Center October 1993 November 1993 November 1993 April 1994 December 1993 November 1993 November 1993 October 1993 October 1993 December 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 October 1993 December 1993 June 1994 May 1994 May 1994 May 1994 TABLE 29-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 44 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS (Section 205) Branch Creek, Del City, OK Coal Creek, Dewar. OK Coal Creek, Heneryetta, OK Coody Creek, Muskogee, OK Cowskin Creek, Haysville, KS Liberal KS Oil Branch Creek, Heavener, OK Pole Creek, Poteau, OK Rock Hollow Creek, Chichasha, OK Salt Fork River, Kay County, OK Wichita Falls, TX, Plum Creek Wolf Creek, Lawton, OK TOTAL SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (Section 14) Arkansas River,Sand Springs, OK. Chikaskia River, Ft Oakland, OK City Dam, Fall River, KS 3019 15,000 75 7,318 9,019 54,156 301 2,389 6,633 2,500 37,018 9,962 147,390 14,706 2,091 17,556 _ TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK (Continued) UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 44 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost City Dam, Little Caney River, KS 10,550 County Bridge, Arkansas River, Ralston, OK 19,983 County Bridge, Washita River, Garvin County, OK 8,447 County Road, Neosho River, Lyon County, KS 9,985 Dam and Bridge, Neosho River, KS 177 Kiowa Tribe Housing Developement, Andarko, OK 12.103 Levee, Arkansas River, Tulsa, OK 16,443 North Canadian River, Canadian County, OK 1,408 North Canadian River, Okfuskee County, OK 272 Route 418, Lyon County, KS 13,428 Sewage Lagoons, Washita River, OK 19,472 Sewage Lagoons, North Canadian River 3,442 Sewage Lagoons, Minnehaha Creek, Canton, OK 4,148 Walnut River, Cowley County, KS 395,012 TOTAL EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION 549,223 SNAGGING AND CLEARING Boggy Creek, Bryan County, OK 61 TOTAL SNAGGING AND CLEARING 61 TABLE 29-K GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 53, 54, and 55 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Bird Creek Basin, OK 256,030 Bowie County Levee, TX 76,078 North Canadian River, OK 61,321 Special Studies Environmental Services Partners 59,109 Fed Strategy America Infrastructure 240 Review of Authorized Projects Review of Completed Projects Recon Phase of Study, Wister, OK -1,468 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations 68,928 Review of FERC Licenses 2,068 Intragency Water Resources Development 18,182 North American Water Fowl Management 184 Coordination with Other Federal Agencies, States, and Non-Federal Interests Soil Conservation Service 9,940 Coordinate Studies with Soil Conservation Service 1 Bureau of Reclamation 14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 TABLE 29-K GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (See Sections 52, 53, and 54 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost Planning Assistance to States Kansas, Neosho River, Basin Yield 4,825 Planning Assistance to States - Oklahoma, Mangum Lake 1,678 Planning Assistance to States - Negotiation Funds 10,054 Planning Assistance to States -Oklahoma, Deep Fork River 11,114 Planning Assistance to States - Oklahoma City, OK 13 TOTAL SURVEYS 578,311 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Bixby, OK FPP 24,999 Haysville, KS 19,956 Shawnee, OK 26,980 Claremore OK, FW/P 28 Eastgate, Ottawa County, OK 9,985 Flood Plain Management Services 99,084 Quick Responses 10,174 Chickasha, OK 36 Moore, OK 1,246 Sterling, KS 40 Wichita, KS 329 Shawnee, OK, FHS 37 Skiatook, OK 7 Technical Services General 137,906 Wagoner County, CO, FHS 433 .TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 331,240 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation Projects Red River Waterway to Denison Dam, TX 126 Red River Waterway, Bowie County Levee 6,374 Flood Control Projects Local Protection Arkansas City, KS 236,109 Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK 800 McGrath Creek, TX 57,505 Mingo Creek, OK (CP&E) 4,818 Winfield, KS 98,751 TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 399,665 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT * District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River, exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Thxas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from 'bwn Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffin Bay; coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and south to the northern boundaries of Newton, Jasper, Tyler, Polk, Trinity, Walker, Waller, Austin, Fayette, Gonzales, Karnes, Live Oak, Jim Hogg, Zapata; the northern and western boundaries of McMullan; and the western boundaries of Montgomery and Duval Counties, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. 30-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Trinity River Project, TX................... 30-2 Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, TX........................ 30-3 3. Bardwell Lake, TX ..................... . 30-3 4. Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX ............... 30-3 5. Belton Lake, TX......................... 30-4 6. Benbrook Lake, TX ...................... 30-4 7. Canyon Lake, TX ........................ 30-4 8. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX............. 30-4 9. Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' The Pines, TX ................... 30-6 10. Grapevine Lake, TX ..................... 30-6 11. Hords Creek Lake, TX ................... 30-6 12. Joe Pool Lake, TX ....................... 30-6 13. Lavon Lake, TX.......................... 30-7 14. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX ................ 30-7 15. Lewisville Dam, TX. .................... 30-7 16. Navarro Mills Lake, TX .................. 30-8 17. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX............ 30-8 18. Proctor Lake, TX ........................ 30-8 19. Ray Roberts Lake, TX... ............... 30-8 20. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX ..... 30-9 21. San Gabriel River, TX .................... 30-9 22. Somerville Lake, TX ................. . 30-10 23. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX .............. 30-10 24. Waco Lake, TX......................... 30-10 25. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ........ 30-11 Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Channel to Liberty in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,060,000,000 including $44,000,000 non-Federal cost for land acquisition and relocation required for the local protection features (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). Operations during fiscal year. Channel to Liberty and Tennessee Colony Lake have been dormant for several years due to lack of local support. The Dallas Flood Control (Cont) Page 26. Inspection of Completed. Flood Control Projects .................. 30-11 27. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ........................... 30-11 28. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.... 30-11 29. Work Under Special Authorization. ........ 30-11 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 30. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX ..... 30-12 31. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX ...... 30-12 32. Sam Rayburn Spillway (Dam Safety Assurance), TX .............. 30-12 33. Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX ................ 30-12 34. Whitney Lake, TX..................... 30-12 General Investigations 35. Surveys ............................... 36. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ... 37. Collection and Study of Basic Data. ........ 30-13 30-13 30-13 Tables Table 30-A Cost and Financial Statement ..... 30-15 Table 30-B Authorizing Legislation........... 30-19 Table 30-C Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 30-22 Table 30-D Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ 30-22 Table 30-E Work Under Special Authorization ................... 30-23 Floodway Extension has advanced to the Preconstruction Engineering and Design stage and is described in Preconstruction Engineering and Design section. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: Location. The Channel to Liberty begins at the Houston Ship Channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou Channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston Ship Channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $147,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $44,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $191,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). 30-2 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $34,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $913,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $461,754,000 for water supply and $9,533,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $471,287,000, exclusive of interest. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing Acts see Annual Report for 1984. Construction was started March 1977, and project was ready for beneficial use April 29, 1983. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29,1976. To date, the Authority has paid $691,591 toward principal and $40,890 to operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. Benefits accrued to Aquilla Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $19,063,900. 3. BARD WELL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $1,039,739 toward principal and $1,377,934 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Bardwell Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $28,457,200. 4. BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX Location. Beals Creek, Big Spring, Texas is located in the city of Big Spring, Howard County, Texas on Beals Creek, a tributary of the Colorado River. Existing project. The Beals Creek Section 205 Flood Control Project consists of construction of a channel to the north of and within a portion of the existing Beals Creek channel. The channel extends approximately 7,200 feet from a point south of Channing Street and ends at the Benton Street Bridge. The channel is a trapezoidal grasslined channel with an average depth of 11 feet, a bottom width of 20 feet, and side slopes of 1 vertical to 3 horizontal. A grade control structure will be constructed at the eastern edge of Onelake to allow the proper drainage gradient while preserving the existing wetland environment in the Onemile Lake area. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1994 base price) is $3,950,000; non-Federal cost for real estate and relocation of utilities is $1,550. Project is scheduled for completion in September 1996. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement with the city of Big Spring was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) on March 10, 1994. 30-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Operations during fiscal year. The city is pursuing purchasing lands, easements and rights-of-way and is expected to complete them by June 1995. A relocation contract was signed with the Union Pacific Railroad in May 1994 for the relocation of a spur bridge. Plans and specifications are continuing. 5. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $1,602,822. To date $1,560,379 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $2,049,538 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 2,1957. Amount of $433,083 paid by authority on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Belton Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $530,413,200. 6. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in Benbrook Lake. Contracts have been negotiated with the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation storage for water supply purposes until such storage is required for Trinity River Navigation. To date $429,169 has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $145,354 by Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost sharing contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 20, 1977. To date, $19,645 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 are estimated at $2,662,256,300. 7. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: The Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority (GBRA) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 6,070 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. GBRA has an agreement with the Pedernales Electric Cooperative for sale of power. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1989 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the water storage contract is about $9,000,000. To date $2,563,627 has been paid. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $1,605,761 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Canyon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $168,618,200. 8. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Location. Cooper Dam is located in northeast Texas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13.0 miles north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.3 on the South Sulphur River. The South Sulphur River rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 30-4 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River to form the Sulphur River. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a multipurpose reservoir with levee and channel improvements on the Sulphur River. The reservoir consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height of about 79 feet, 28,070 feet long at its crest, a single conduit 10.5 feet in diameter, 530 feet long, two 10.5 foot by 4.75 foot sluices, and a 700 foot wide uncontrolled concrete spillway. The reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres at the top of the flood control pool, 19,305 acres at the top of the water supply pool, and 5,084 acres at the top of the sediment pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acrefeet of flood control storage, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply storage, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Construction of the project began in July 1958 and, to date, approximately 99 percent of the lands required for project construction have been acquired and 100 percent of the levees and 100 percent of the channel work have been completed. Approximately 14.8 miles of the South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of the Middle Sulphur River channels have been excavated. Approximately 3.4 miles of levee embankment on the South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles on the Middle Sulphur River have been constructed upstream of the Cooper Lake. About 10.5 miles of levee on the North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on the Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Cooper Lake. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel work between April 1964 and February 1971. Construction was started again, however, in May 1971. The Texas Committee on Natural Resources, et. al., secured an injunction to halt construction on the project pending preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. A statement was prepared and filed on June 24, 1977. The plan recommended, in the Final EIS, minimized further construction of the authorized channels and provided for construction of the lake and downstream levees. The sufficiency of the Final EIS was challenged in the court and in December 1978 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled the statement inadequate, citing five deficiencies and halting all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with the court's decision was prepared and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency in March 1981. The recommended plan of improvement consists of the multipurpose lake, 48.2 miles of levee, and the acquisition of 24,724 acres of wildlife mitigation lands. All remaining channel and levee work was deleted from the recommended plan. The Supplemental EIS was filed with the court in July 1981 and numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs weresubsequently filed. After the Supplemental EIS was filed in July 1981, numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were filed through October 1982. On December 30, 1982, the U.S. District Court issued a 95-page order continuing the permanent injunction. On March 22, 1983, the order was revised and Judge William Wayne Justice issued an Amended Memorandum Opinion and a Permanent Injunction against the construction of Cooper Lake. The Government filed a Notice of Appeal with the court in May 1983. On July 16, 1984, litigation was resolved and the injunction was released. The project was transferred to the Fort Worth District at the end of Fiscal Year 1979. Public Law 101-101, H. R 101-235, approved September 29, 1989, authorized $5 million for additional recreation. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1994 base price) is $143,000,000, non- Federal cost for land for the levees is $227,000 and in addition $54,590,000 is to be reimbursed by water supply users over a 50-year period. Local cooperation. Local interests (North Texas Municipal Water District, Sulphur River Municipal Water District, city of Irving) will utilize water impounded for present and future water supply. The total cost allocated to water supply to b'e reimbursed is $54,590,000. North Texas Municipal Water District, NTMWD, has contracted for 36.859 percent of the water supply storage for future use with deferred payments for ten years. Under the contract NTMWD must pay 13.803 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Sulphur River Municipal Water District, SRMWD, has contracted for 6.5 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.78 percent for future use for a total of 26.282 percent of the water supply storage. TI date $104,609 has been paid. Under the contract SRMWD must pay 2.435 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. To date $15,512 has been paid. The city of Irving has contracted for 16.923 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.936 for future use for a total of 36.859 of the water supply storage. To date $237,509 has been paid. Under the contract Irving must pay 6.337 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. Tb date $40,370 has been paid. The Texas Parks and Wildlife and the Corps of Engineers have entered into or have agreed to formal Operation and Maintenance contracts for recreation facilities and wildlife conservation and management. Under the contracts for recreation facilities dated 7 November 1988 and 11 September 1990, Texas Parks and Wildlife will be responsible for 100 percent of the operations and maintenance of two state parks that are being constructed with Federal funds. Under the contracts for wildlife conservation and management the state will be responsible for 24.14 percent of the operations, maintenance and replacement annual costs for areas totaling approximately 35,500 acres. The remaining balance will be the responsibility of the Project Sponsors and the Government. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1994 the State of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department awarded recreation contracts. Cooper Lake and Channels is approximately 91 percent complete overall. Major items completed through FY 1994 are Relocations of Railroads, 100 percent; Channels and Canals. 100 percent; 30-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Levees and Floodwalls, 100 percent; and Lands and Damages, 99 percent. Land Acquisition, Engineering and Design and construction continues. Deliberate Impoundment began 29 September 1991 and project completion is scheduled for September 1995. Benefits accrued to Cooper Lake and Channels project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 are estimated at $3,207,100. 9. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE O'THE PINES, TX Location. Dam is on Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Texas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,000 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed June 1960. Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and $399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O'The Pines project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $34,152,500. 10. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. A contract for modification of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 30, 1983 and completed Fiscal Year 1990. The improvements provided for spillway modification by construction of spillway chute and stilling basin and a berm on the downstream side of the main embankment. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with city of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17, 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with city of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000. To date, $126,464 has been paid. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part is to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities, $124,231; Dallas, $642,746; and Grapevine, $235,071. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $5,031,988,100. 11. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Texas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $5,198,300. 12. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Location. Dam site is located at River Mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet above the streambed and a total length of 22,360 feet, including 50-foot type spillway, which will control 232 square 30-6 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 10,940 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 123,100 acre-feet for flood control, 142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of the project $226,890,000 (Oct. 1, 1993 base price) including $11,350,000 non- Federal first cost. Project is a unit in the general comprehensive plan for development and control of the water resources of the Trinity River Basin. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority were approved by the Acting Secretary of the Army, June 15, 1977. The recreation contract with Trinity Valley Authority was modified March 28, 1979, to allow the Corps to participate with the State of Texas and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Recreation development contract with the State oflTexas was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $57,240,000 for water supply and $19,840,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $76,790,000 exclusive of interest. To date $50,693 has been paid. Of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, $6,086 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. The project has been under construction since FY 1975 and through FY 1994 is approximately 99 percent complete overall. All major items are complete thru FY 1994 except for the state park recreation. Deliberate Impoundment began January 1986. Project completion is scheduled for March 1995. Public Law 97-400, H.R. 7377, 97th Congress, effective December 31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool Lake. Benefits accrued to Joe Pool Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $464,192,100. 13. LAVON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,261.67. To date North Texas Municipal Water District has paid $3,685,645. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, and to date has paid $849,874. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $352,590,200. 14. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, T'Iexas, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22.0 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Miles 31.8 Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1988. Construction of project was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and $220,000 local interests, a total of $69,970,000. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22, 1967, by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $3,937,675 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurance to contract for 57 percent of future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $37,825,004. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal year. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees and total project are 100 percent complete. 15. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. Dam is in Denton County, Texas, on Elm Fork ofTrinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed 30-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000, including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: The city of Denton, Texas (COD) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 2,000 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. A contract with city of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supplystorage land rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16, 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. Local contributions have been paid in full. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denison must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $3,685,873 and Denison $155,891. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $7,868,468,700. 16. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16.0 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Estimated cost of project $13,154,000 including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date .the Authority has paid $1,106,268 for water supply and $1,199,517 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $105,400,300. 17. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake January 3, 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,336 toward operation and maintenance for a 50-year period. The Authority must pay additional contributions of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning January 1, 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $16,853,400. 18. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8.0 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1, 1960, and was modified and approved May 9, 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $484,188 for water supply and $475,380 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Benefits accrued to Proctor Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $58,113,000. 19. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 1IU teet long, controlng 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The 30-8 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. The Water Resource Development Act of 1990 authorized the Greenbelt Corridor between Lewisville and Ray Roberts Lakes. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $324,030,000 (Oct. 1, 1994 base price). Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8094, effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Hydropower: At the request of the city of Denton and the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum facility for future hydropower. The city of Denton, Texas (COD) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 1,000 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, ie., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. To date the city of Dallas has paid $6,238,693 and the city of Denton has paid $2,189,790 toward principal. Dallas has paid $172,316 and Denton has paid $60,542 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project. Operations during fiscal year. The project is about 98 percent complete overall. Through FY 1994 about 95 percent of the land acquisition, the road and utility relocations and the embankment, spillway and outlet works have been completed. Major work items remaining to be completed are fencing at Lewisville Lake, seepage control, recreational facilities, and the Greenbelt. Deliberate Impoundment began 30 June 1987 at Ray Roberts Lake, the pool raise at Lewisville Lake was 30 November 1988. The project is scheduled to be completed in July 1997. Benefits accrued to Ray Roberts Lake project: Accumulated flood damage prevented through FY 1994 were $4,580,728,800. 20. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, Martinez Creeks, and Espada Aqueduct located in vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Existing project. The project consists of 30.7 miles of channel and associated improvements on six separate streams. Completion of detailed engineering and design studies revealed that the least costly alternative for the remaining channel improvements would consist of two tunnels 120 feet below the surface each having an inside diameter of 24 feet and vertical intake, outlet and access shafts. The San Pedro Creek tunnel would be 6,040 feet in length and the San Antonio River tunnel would be 16,360 feet in length. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $145,200,000 (Oct. 1, 1994 base price), and estimated cost to local interests is $65,200,000 which includes $3,800,000 cash contributions and $61,400,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $210,400,000. Existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Construction was started in October 1957 and the project is about 95 percent complete. The Federal portion of the project is scheduled to be completed in October 1996. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after comptletion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on April 15, 1957. To date $3,511,330 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio Channel. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1994 funds were used to continue construction and engineering and design studies. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1994 were $382,377,300. 21. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. Project is a system of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin, which consists of Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7.0 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.0 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $181,400,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price) and estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000 for a project total of $272,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total 30-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acrefeet are for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $62,062,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acrefeet of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $171,173,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H.R. 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $13,315,000 for Granger, $6,295,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $50,563,000 for South Fork, for a total of $70,172,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18, 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Through 1983 all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed in preparation of General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. A Draft Reevaluation Report on South Fork Lake was submitted to headquarters in October 1986. The report recommended no Federal action and defer further studies indefinitely. Future water supply needs of the area would be addressed by reallocating storage at Granger Lake. The South Fork Lake project was placed on inactive status and would be eligible for deauthorization in FY 1997 if no funds are obligated by then. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Lake Georgetown: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $41,570,500. 22. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For.description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started in June 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as. amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, has paid $1,854,308 to date. Also under the contract, the Authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Somerville Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $115,636,500. 23. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $2,348,734. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $1,113,077. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Dam Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 1994 is $60,281,800. 24. WACO LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at city of Waco, McLennan County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2.500,000 other non-Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, 30-10 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the city of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. To date, the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $2,425,668. Also under the contract the Authority and the city must pay 14.706 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. T'Ib date the Authority has paid $1,124,692 and the city has paid $173,065. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, for additional storage for municipal and industrial water supply, was approved by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, September 28, 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Waco Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $286,873,800. 25. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1984. Estimated cost of project is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Texarkana, Texas, for reserving water supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 17, 1968. To date, the city has paid $638,170. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $75,966,200. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with Section 208.10, of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local floodprotection works approved by the Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. See Table 30-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY 1994 from regular funds for maintenance were $73,441. Total costs to September 30, 1994 were $1,157,938. 27. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944, expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near city of Austin, Texas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near city of San Angelo, Texas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 1994 were $256,108,000 and by Twin Buttes through FY 1994 were $418,000. Twin Buttes Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for operation of both reservoirs were $127,259. 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 30-C.) 29. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 30-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 585, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization); emergency streambank protection under Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended; Snagging and Clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control Section 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress, as amended. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $119,288 for disaster preparedness; no levee repair. 30-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 30. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Town BluffDam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. Installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities at Town Bluff Dam was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-14), March 2, 1945, but deferred in the original construction. Town Bluff Dam was completed and placed in operation in 1951. A Design Analysis Report completed in April 1982 and a Feasibility Report was approved September 9, 1983 indicated that installing hydropower at this project was economically feasible. The hydropower facilities include a 7,400 kilowatt power plant (two units at 3,700 kilowatts each), intake and outlet facilities, and necessary switchgear equipment is located in the main embankment at the old diversion channel. The plant is operated remotely from the Sam Rayburn project. The project produces an estimated 35,900 megawatt hours of energy per year. There is no Federal cost on this project. It is completely funded by non-Federal funds. The estimated non-Federal cost is $18,900,000. 101st Congress House Report 923, effective February 7, 1989, changed the name ofTown BluffHydropower to Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower. Local cooperation. A contract with the Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Authority was approved by Secretary of the Army, June 28, 1985, relative to financing, escrow agreement, and power sales agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 31. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10.0 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report 1969. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute '$3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22, 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in flil and annual payments to date of $4,600,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the city of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved May 27, 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the city has paid $185,255. Also under the contract the city ofLuflkidn must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the city has paid 160,943. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $455,111,100. 32. SAM RAYBURN SPILLWAY (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE), TX Location. For location of completed dam see Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The existing 2200-foot wide uncontrolled spillway is constructed through erodible loose sand, shaley clay, and sandstone. Based on experience of significant erosion at other uncontrolled and unlined spillways constructed through less erodible material, the spillway at Sam Rayburn Dam would experience severe erosion damage, and probably breach during passage of floods in excess of the 150-year flood frequency (25 percent of Probable Maximum Flood). The modification of the spillway consists of constructing a new reinforced concrete weir, stilling basin and outfall channel at or near the existing spillway structure. The proposed weir would have a width of 640 feet, an overall length of 433 feet, an outfall channel approximately 5,000 feet long and a crest elevation of 176.0 feet NGVD. Estimated Federal cost for the spillway modification is $36,200,000 (Oct 1, 1994, base price) and $1,350,000 is to be reimbursed by hydropower sponsors. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1994 funds were used to award and initiate construction on the spillway modification and parapet wall and engineering and design continues. The project is scheduled for completion in August 1996. 33. TOWN BLUFF DAMB. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Texas, and 93.0 river miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2,000,000 contribution by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 34. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, ITexas, and about 38 miles upstream from city of Waco, Texas. 30-12 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. To date, the Authority has paid $246,333. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Whitney Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1994 were $699,891,000. General Investigations 35. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $855,663 for flood damage prevention studies; $67,853 for coordination with other agencies; $290,072 for reviewed of deferred projects; $3,157 for review of completed projects; $246,235 for environmental services partnerships; $62,366 for miscellaneous activities; and for a total of $1,525,346. 36. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX: Beals Creek is located in the city of Big Spring, Howard County, Texas. The project includes local protection features including channel improvement and relocations. The channel will be a trapezoidal grass-lined channel with an average depth of about 11 feet and a bottom width of 20 feet. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $884,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1988. Fiscal Year costs were $6,918. The Project Cooperation Agreement with the city of Big Spring was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on March 10, 1994. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TX; Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the city of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. The plan of improvement provides for extending the existing Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists of a leveed floodway and flood conveyance improvement (channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the levees and channels would provide Standard Project Flood protection for approximately 7,300 acres of urban lands currently subject to flooding. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $4,080,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1991. Fiscal year costs were $192,311. FIVE MILE CREEK, DALLAS, TX: Five Mile Creek is located in the southwestern portion of Dallas County, entering the Trinity River just north of Hutchins, Texas. The plan consists of enlarging the channel in the middle portion of the watershed, possible channelization of some major tributaries, and detention ponds in the upper portion of the watershed. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,600,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1989. Fiscal year costs were $1,149. Study was terminated due to lack of economic justification. SHOAL CREEK (HANCOCK CREEK), AUSTIN, TX: Hancock Creek, a tributary to Shoal Creek, Austin, Texas, flows through a highly urbanized area of Austin. The authorized project will consist of approximately 4,700 feet of grass-lined channel, concrete-lined channel, and selective clearing along Hancock Creek from Houston Street to its confluence with Shoal Creek with bottom widths varying between 25 and 50 feet. The project will also include alteration to or replacement of three highway bridges, construction of a 10-foot by 10-foot box culvert to divert flows around a shopping center, relocation of utility lines, and acquisition of approximately 4 acres of lands and easements for construction purposes. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $780,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1992. Fiscal year costs were $40,698. 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $172,066. Fiscal year costs were $12,089 for hydrologic studies. 30-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 This page intentionally left blank. 30-14 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994'' 1. Trinity River Project, TX Includes Channel to Liberty, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Dallas Floodway Extension 2. Aquilla Lake, TX 3. Bardwell Lake, TX 4. Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX 5. Belton Lake, TX 6. Benbrook Lake, TX 7. Canyon Lake, TX 8. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX (Contributed Funds) 9. Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' The Pines, TX New Work: Approp. Cost: New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 22,574,865 - 22,574,865 516,000 534,383 1,156,938 1,601,315 544,000 551,000 600,262 537,052 943,0C 686,92 1,964,000 1,205,500 1,797,0( 1,977,376 1,181,948 1,825,52 - 430,000 - 251,428 - 45,506,300 - 45,506,300 )0 5,676,107 Z2 5,378,768 - 10,934,505 - 10,934,505 )0 22,418,32218 Z4 21,229,67018 430,000 251,428 -- - - 16,960,549 -- - - 16,960,5491 1,791,000 2,845,000 2,741,000 2,733,000 33,162,109 1 2,638,460 2,398,521 3,202,582 2,759,446 33,032,92018 -- - - 13,130,463 -- - - 13,069,9912 1,581,950 1,495,000 1,439,000 2,122,000 28,977,33518 1,002,687 1,557,277 1,413,343 2,134,845 27,527,5291'8 -- - - 19,088,5243 -- - - 19,088,524 1,292,000 1,544,000 1,438,000 1,763,600 22,589,104 '1 1,352,930 1,397,919 1,557,630 1,748,915 22,263,547 18 12,846,000 9,102,000 10,473,000 7,200,000 134,595,887 13,279,210 11,132,249 9,518,230 8,562,318 131,901,386 -- - - 227,000 -- - - 227,000 5,000 541,000 719,000 818,000 2,083,000 - 520,741 704,853 799,893 2,025,487 -- - - 14,175,197' -- - - 14,175,19756 2,180,998 2,276,000 2,072,000 2,798,000 2,838,139 2,257,701 2,066,249 2,673,620 37,560,025 ' 37,343,512 ' 30-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994" 10. Grapevine Lake, TX 11. Hords Creek Lake, TX 12. Joe Pool Lake, TX 13. Lavon Lake, TX 14. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX 15. Lewisville Dam, TX 16. Navarro Mills Lake, TX 17. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX 18. Proctor Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Aprop. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 21,317,790 - 21,317,790 1,715,000 1,665,600 1,720,800 1,981,600 2,621,486 1,625,900 1,712,282 2,048,010 33,565,339 " 33,525,51218 - 2,731,0898 - 2,731,089 809,000 778,039 230,000 925,867 668,988 669,718 2,079,000 3.182.751 928,000 843,000 954,698 836,038 426,000 595,234 555,000 557,343 894,000 641,036 612,000- 588,344 2,721,000 2,453,000 2,138,896 3,090,418 964,950 999,910 152,000 320,401 1,241,000 988,169 2,761,900 2,657,652 15,652,16718 15,566,07018 188,960,000 188,779,580 5,015,608 4,704,785 12,864,796 12,864,796 38,030,83618 37,889,76618 _ 69,796,862 - 69,796,862 3,099,300 4,507,035 981,959 1,187,582 2,950,600 2,889,361 1,283,500 1,246,410 1,495,000 1,258,000 1,540,284 1,230,446 1,193,998 2,034,878 1,369,000 1,294,068 2,099,500 2,126,866 1,183,100 1,255,897 1,129,000 1,109,503 1,944,000 1,808,845 2,348,000 2,261,609 1,691,600 1,685,954 1,584,000 1,485,677 4,219,400 4,458,311 25,333,988 25,333,988' 48,902,58518 46,080,89418 9,846,759 9,846,75911 21,185,61318 21,141,10818 16,027,467 16,027,467 19,407,92518 19,218,44918 14,469,585 14,469,585 25,360,339 " 25,101,62218 30-16 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994'T 19. Ray Roberts Lake, TX 30. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (Contributed Funds) 31. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservior, TX 32. Sam Rayburn Spillway (Dam Safety Assurance), TX (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. San Gabriel River, TX Granger Lake Georgetown 22. Somerville Lake, TX 23. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contri. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Aprop. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7,964,000 9,360,490 555,000 547,667 50,000 123,828 4,534,000 5,900,903 601,000 635,492 4,117,000 4,328,933 697,000 712,744 8,600,000 9,519,329 1,312,000 976,883 1,255 2,733,000 4,553,279 3,565,000 2,919,386 4,502,139 3,051,502 400,000 177,798 5,843,0( 5,889,0E 884,000 1,304,000 10,770,0( 1,049,007 1,331,960 8,183,4: - 73,4E - 56,21 5,713,000 15,000,000 15,692,809 16,762,775 - 668,955 - 668,955 998,000 1,091,454 1,096,000 1,094,698 1,774,000 1,751,570 1,141,000 1,134,548 5,791,000 5,772,925 805,621 564,911 1,247,000 1,249,429 1,134,000 1,158,318 2,063,000 2,127,500 1,966,800 2,479,0C 2,170,664 2,006,947 2,114,277 2,267,41 1,192,000 1,334,128 1,352,000 1,616,000 1,822,95 1,278,094 1,654,630 1,875,23 2,536,000 2,890,538 67,204 220,666 304,471,700 304,048,776 4,551,402 4,188,452 - 18,672,000 - 18,628,463 - 60,670,957 - 60,670,957 12 30 58,498,533 1 36 57,539,139 18 30 13,558,000 21 10,844,042 37 73,487 35 56,235 132,503,048 132,309,409 3,511,330 3,511,330 - 101,796,100 - 101,796,100 1,457,000 15,890,951 8 1,416,971 15,798,65118 1,299,500 14,548,32318 1,317,434 14,519,346 ' - 27,790,438 - 27,790,438 )0 34,050,13818 17 31,288,771 18 - 20,522,08413 - 20,522,084 50 21,357,497 18 37 21,266,416 18 30-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994" 33. Thwn Bluff Dam- New Work: B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Approp. - - - - 6,602,737 TX Cost - - - - 6,602,737 " Maint. Approp. 1,249,000 1,055,621 1,229,000 1,448,000 20,695,457 18 Cost 1,679,080 1,049,431 1,141,331 1,540,534 20,588,84618 24. Waco Lake, TX New Work: Approp. - - - - 49,521,121 15 Cost - - - - 49,521,121 Maint Approp. 1,611,990 1,815,000 1,980,000 3,205,500 33,419,0141 Cost 2,249,353 1,813,450 2,037,952 2,766,048 32,848,842 18 34. Whitney Lake, TX New Work: Approp. - - - - 42,952,938 Cost - - - - 42,952,938 !" Maint. Approp. 3,687,999 2,897,000 2,923,000' 3,980,000 55,485,664" Cost 4,592,861 3,158,294 2,863,593 3,911,727 54,938,13318 25. Wright Patman Dam New Work: and Lake, TX Approp. - - - - 35,731,626 Cost - - - - 35,731,626 Maint. Approp. 1,224,885 1,577,000 1,779,000 3,740,200 36,311,14518 Cost 1,460,554 1,728,512 1,847,306 3,317,209 35,814,526 18 ' Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. s Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. ' Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. a Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 6 Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. 'Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. * Excludes $105,079 expended from contributed funds. 'Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 which were deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. 10 Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. ' Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. 12 Excludes $3,000,000 expended from contributed funds. 13 Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds related thereto. 14 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. 16 Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. 1 Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 17 Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98-8, dated March 24, 1983). 16 Beginning Fiscal Year 1985 data shown on Table A includes Special Recreation Use Fees. Data for previous fiscal years have been changed to conform to the new procedure. 30-18 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. 3. 4. 5. Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 31, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 3, 1955 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 18, 1941 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 30-19 AQUILLA LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX Construction of a channel. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE O' THE PINES, TX Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River, about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 115, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc, 247, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 488, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 18, 1941 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 3, 1975 Sep. 3, 1954 14. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Enlarge Lavon Dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles.of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAM RAYBURN SPILLWAY (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE), TX Modification of the spillway and embankment. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. 30-20 15. 16. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. and H Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 17. 18. 19. 31. 32. 20. 21. 22. FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 23. 33. 30. Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 24, 1946 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B.A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX Construction of two units at 3,000 kilowatts each of hydroelectric power generating facilities connected with Town Bluff-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel Trom the Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinty River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and Middle Bosque Rivers. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. 30-21 H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc, 390, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc, 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 24. 34. 25. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 30-C OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1994 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Belton Lake Modification, TX3 1988 - - Big Fossil Creek, TX' 1969 - - Big Sandy Lake, TX4 1986 - - Big Spring, TX2 1979 - - Boggy Creek, Austin, TX' 1992 - - Brownwood Channel Improvment, TX5 - - - Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX' 1979 - - Dam "A" Lake, TX6 1987 - - Duck Creek Channel Improvment, TXS 1983 - - Elm Fork Floodway, TXS 1987 - - Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX' 1971 - - Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX' 1971 - - Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill)' 1987 - - Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road)' 1989 - - Greenville, TX' 1983 - - Lake Brownwood Modification, TX5 1983 - - Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX5 - - - Millican, TX2 1988 - - Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX' - - - Roanoak Lake, TXS 1979 - - Rockland Lake, TX' 1988 - - Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX' 1969 - - Zacate Creek Channel, TX' 1983 - - Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX' 1986 - - 'Completed 'Inactive 'Deferred 'Recommended for Deauthorization 'Deauthorized INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 30-D (See Section 26 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Big Fossil Creek ................................................................. Mar. 15, 1994 Boggy Creek, Austin ........................................................... ............ Apr. 1, 1994 Calloway Branch, Hurst .................................................... ............ Oct. 20, 1994 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene ........................ ..... .............................. Sep. 22, 1994 Dallas Floodway ............................. ........................... ............. Dec. 5, 1994 East Fork ................................................................ Jul.20 & Nov. 30, 1994 Fort Worth Floodway .................. ......................................... Sep.27,1994 Grand Prairie Landfill ................................................................. Feb.25, 1994 Grand Prairie Meyers Road...................................................... Feb. 25, 1994 Long Branch, Greenville ..................................................... ............ Oct. 25, 1994 Lorean Branch, Hurst .................. ............................................... Oct. 20, 1994 Munday ............................... .. ..................... Nov. 9, 1994 ParkRow Bridge,Arlington ............................................................... Dec. 1, 1993 Pleasanton..................................... . .... ................................. Nov 17, 1994 Poteet ....................... ........ ............ ........... ......... ........... Nov 16, 1994 San Antonio Floodway......................................................Nov 15, 1994 Walnut Creek, Seguin .............................................. .............. Nov. 16, 1994 Wheeler Creek, Gainsville ................. .................................... Jun. 30, 1994 Zacate Creek, Laredo..................................................... ........... Dec. 20, 1994 30-22 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-E Project WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 29 of Text) Flood Control Activities - Section 205 Cost Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX ...................... .................................... $ Browder Creek, Springton, TX . ................... ................................... Calloway Branch, Richland Hills, TX .................................................... Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX............................... ....................... ...... Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX ................................................ Duck Creek, Garland, TX ................................... ................... .... Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX........... .............. ................... ..... Greentree, Subdiv., Midland Draw, TX. ................... . ............................. Indian Creek, Fort Worth, TX ..................................................... Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX ....................................... Little Walnut Creek, Austin, TX .............................................................. Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX .......................................................... Mary's Creek, Fort Worth, & Benbrook, TX................................ ................ Midland/Jal Draw, Midland, TX ............................................................ Oak St. Bridge, Midland, TX ............................................... Perry Rd., Hutton Br., Carroll, TX.................................... . ............... Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX .................................... . ............. Rush Creek, Arlington, TX .................................. ......................... Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX ............ ........................................ . South Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX ...................................... Sulphur B ranch, E uless, TX .............. .................................................... Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX ................................................. Ten Mile Creek, Lancaster, TX . .............. .......................................... Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX ....................... ................... .............. Walnut Creek, Mansfield, TX.................................................................. Walnut Creek, Seguin, TX .............................................. Walnut Creek, Springtown, TX ........................................................... 71,458 42,686 37,090 7,088 6,857 20,294 2,226 50,498 1,743 2,538,704 0 27,818 2,827 21,544 21,640 45,724 35,645 (-) 606 1,981,975 35,256 46,848 53,845 18,311 85,200 (-) 1,221 56 0 Project Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 Cost Bear Creek, County Rd. 485, Collin, TX ............. ..................................... $ 39,238 Beltline Road, Cottonwood Creek, TX................................................. ........ 1,893 Bridge, Mary Creek, TX ............ ........................... ................... ......... 83,680 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene, TX ....................... ........................ ... 261 Dudley Branch, Hebron Parkway, Carrollton, TX................................................ 38,433 Furneaux Creek, Carrollton, TX ..................................................................... 29,262 Hutton Bridge, Reach H. Stream, TX ......................................................... 39,791 Little River, Cameron, TX......... ...... ......................................... ... 586 Roaring Springs Rd., Bridge, TX ............................................................ 20,635 South Llano River, Junction, TX ............................................................ 10,101 Washington on Brazos State Park, TX .................................................. ... 19,297 Washington Street Bridge, Laredo, TX................... . ...................................... (-) 21,293 Project Snagging and Clearing of Flood Control - Section 208 Cost No cost for 1994. 30-23 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT * Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division)........................ ..... 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX ................ 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX .............. 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX .......... 5. Freeport Harbor, TX ................... . 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX ........ 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican Border................................ 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX ............... 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX ............. 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX............. 11. Texas City Channel, TX ................. 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX ......... 12A. Anahuac Channel, TX .................. 12B. Channel to Liberty, TX .................. 12C. Wallisville Lake, TX ................... . 13. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys.... 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... Beach Erosion Control 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX ............... Flood Control 16. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ....... 16A. Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX ....... 16B. Brays Bayou, TX ...................... 16C. Greens Bayou, TX ..................... 16D. Halls Bayou, TX ...................... 16E. Hunting Bayou, TX ................... . 16F. Little White Oak Bayou, TX ............. 16G. Carpenters Bayou, TX ................. 17. Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point Village, TX .. 18. Clear Creek, TX ....................... 19. Cypress Creek, TX ................... .. 20. Falfurrias, TX ........................ 21. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX .... ........ 21A. Arroyo Colorado, TX ................... Page Flood Control (cont.) Page 21B. South Main Channel, TX ............... 31-14 31-2 21C. Raymondville Drain, TX ................ 31-14 31-2 22. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX 31-2 Hurricane-Flood Protection ............. 31-14 31-3 23. Sims Bayou, TX ....................... 31-14 31-3 24. State Highway 111 Bridge, 31-4 Lake Texana, TX ...................... 31-15 25. Taylors Bayou, TX .................... 31-15 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control 31-5 Works .............................. 31-16 31-7 27. Flood Control Work Under Special 31-7 Authorization ......................... 31-16 31-7 28. Emergency Stream Bank and Shoreline 31-8 Erosion Work and Snagging and Clearing 31-9 Under Special Authorization ............ 31-16 31-9 31-9 31-9 Environmental Restoration 31-10 29. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment ......................... 31-10 30. Laguna Madre Seagrass Restoration, TX .. 31. Salt Bayou, McFadden Ranch, TX ........ 31-10 31-11 31-11 31-12 31-12 31-12 31-12 31-12 31-12 31-13 31-13 31-13 31-13 31-14 31-14 General Investigations 32. Surveys .................. .......... 33. Planning and Engineering .............. 34. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 31-16 31-16 31-17 31-17 31-17 31-18 Tables 31-A Cost and Financial Statement .. 31-19 thru 31-21 31-B Authorizing Legislation........ 31-23 thru 31-36 31-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... 31-37 31-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects... 31-37 31-E Total Cost of Existing Projects ........... 31-38 31-F Channel Dimensions .......... 31- 39 thru 31-41 31-G Channel Dimensions, GIWW Tributary Channels ........ ... 31-42 thru 31-43 31-H Dredging Operations .......... 31-44 thru 31-45 31-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Control of hydrilla, waterhyacinth and alligatorweed continues in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, Colorado River Basin and Brazos River Basin. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Control work by the State of Texas continued. The contract was renewed for its final year. A new contract with the State is being pursued. Monitoring of the biological control nursery areas was maintained and increased with the successful overwintering of the Hydrellia fly at Sheldon reservoir. The fly populations were supplemented with further introductions throughout the summer. Additional lakes will be added to the program in 1995. Contract costs for FY 1994 were $170,309. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 31-F. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $27,731,647, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, and non-Federal $12,383,258, including $7,193,258 contributed funds, $1,400,000 lands, $796,000 relocations, and $2,994,000 other costs, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. (October 1, 1994 base price). Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was deauthorized under Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The entrance channel was enlarged from 38 feet by 300 feet to 44 feet by 300 feet in FY 1992. Of the 14.8 miles to be enlarged, 12.0 miles has been completed through FY 1994. Work remaining consists of enlarging 2.8 miles of the existing Brownsville Channel from 36 feet by 200 feet to 42 feet by 250 feet. The turning basin would be enlarged to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) Local cooperation. Complied with for the completed work. For the 42 foot project authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; levees and spillways for disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, during construction, and pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1991.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract for dredging Inshore Reach No. 2, Stations 23+000 to 46+000, awarded May 11, 1993, was physically completed April 4, 1994 at a FY 1994 cost of $2,077,365. A construction contract for dredging the final reach, Inshore Reach #3 Stations 46+000 to 89+500, was awarded March 11, 1994 and continued through the year at a cost of $3,824,224. Maintenance: A 2,914-foot length of relocated levee at Disposal Area No. 3 was constructed at the expense of $34,000 in May 1994. This cost was born by the Port Isabel-San Benito Navigation District of Cameron County. A construction contract for erosion protection for Disposal Area No. 3 was awarded August 2, 1994 and continued for a cost of $562,387 for August and September. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 3. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX Location. Port Bolivar is at end of Bolivar Peninsula and 4 miles north of city of Galveston. Channel connects the port with channel in Galveston Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Appendix to Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for 31-2 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT channel are shown in Table 31-F. (Also see Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Enlargement of turning basin from 1,000 to 1,600 feet is inactive. A channel 14 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and approximately 950 feet long is maintained across the east end of the turning basin to accommodate the Galveston-Port Bolivar ferry. Project is complete except for inactive portion. Project dimensions have not been maintained in the completed part since lesser dimensions are adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminals are privately owned and consist of 2 slips and 2 piers. The piers, 400 feet wide by 1,200 feet long and 210 feet wide by 1,200 feet long, are badly deteriorated and not in use. The slips are used as anchorage by shallow-draft vessels. A highway ferry landing owned by the State of Texas is located at south end of turning basin. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. No maintenance required for fiscal year. 4. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 31-F for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $74,938,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects: and non-Federal $18,977,431 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $7,644,435 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (October 1, 1992 base price.) The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Tule Lake Turning Basin through Viola Turning Basin was completed in 1989, and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins has been deferred. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to and through the Chemical Turning Basin at 45-foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in May 1979. Disposal area levees, Area 1 and Rincon were completed in August 1984. First stage disposal area levees, South Shore, were completed in September 1984. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1983, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for grade raising in the mitigation area, demonstration site was awarded January 25, 1994 and work was completed on April 11, 1994 for a cost of $278,000. Maintenance: A construction contract for stone protection of Disposal Area No. 13 levee side slopes exposed to the bay, awarded May 25, 1993, was completed November 13, 1993, at a cost of $328,852 Federal funds and $129,617 non-Federal funds for FY 1994. A construction contract to repair the North and Southjetties was awarded September 22, 1993 and completed June 17, 1994 at a cost of $4,582,384. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 5. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, 31-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 31-F on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. New work consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening. Brazos Harbor Turning Basin, as authorized by the R&H Act of 1970. The initial contract for the 45 foot project, construction of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty, was awarded in May 1987. Project is essentially complete. Quintana Recreation area is under construction by the Local Sponsor. Navigation problems have been identified by the Local Sponsor and pilots, and studies are underway by Waterways Experiment Station and the District. These studies will recommend a solution to provide full utilization of the 45-foot channel. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $62,397,000 Federal (Corps); and $33,536,000 non-Federal, including $21,018,303 contributed funds, $360,249 contributed work, $7,440,000 lands, $3,830,000 levees and spillways, and $570,000 relocations. (October 1, 1994 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970, modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation Agreement, executed June 26, 1986, along with Amendments 1, 2 and 3, executed March 19, 1987, June 19, 1991 and June 19, 1991, respectively, require that local interest provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including land for recreation, and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $11,270,000, modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project, presently estimated at $570,000, contribute in cash one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $530,000; and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the construction costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, presently estimated at $19,730,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1991, for additional facilities.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The contract to rehabilitate the South Jetty and add 500 feet to the North Jetty, physically completed May 12, 1993, was financially completed August 5, 1994 for a final cost of $2,088. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 6. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966. 31-4 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. See Section 12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX regarding work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1979). A containership terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal containership has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance included mosquito control spraying at a cost of $5,428 and a landscaping contract for the Fort Point reservation at a FY 1994 cost of $30,832. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 7. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about' 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about one-fourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Texas.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. (See Table 31-G on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been deauthorized. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River was completed in 1986. Construction of a navigation channel from the Gulf to the GIWW and an impoundment basin were fiscally completed in Fiscal Year 1991. Construction of Tiger Island Dam and recreation facilities were also completed in Fiscal Year 1991. Construction of the recreation facilities is complete. Construction of the diversion dam and connecting channel was completed in FY 1993. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: (1) Mouth of Colorado River, construction of an oyster cultch; (2) Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. (3) Sargent Beach, work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 for construction of a 31-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 concrete-pile and concrete-block revetment structure which extends for an estimated 8 miles to protect the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (4) Brazos River Floodgates, major rehabilitation of the East Floodgate Guidewalls. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $147,372,000 (excluding $223,000 Department of Transportation cost for Channel to Victoria) Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, $356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous projects; non-Federal $25,394,174 ($395,000 voluntarily expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 contributed funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for channel to Aransas Pass, $3,533,000 contributed funds for Mouth of Colorado River, $2,707,000 contributed funds for Channel to Victoria, $6,022,000 lands for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, $4,291,000 relocations for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, and $5,556,000 other costs for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway; and Inland Waterways Trust Fund $43,900,000 ($39,400,000 for Sargent Beach and $4,500,000 for major rehabilitation of guidewalls for Brazos River Floodgates). (October 1, 1994 base prices.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act and Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Non-Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Texas, $49,665 for Offatts Bayou, Texas, $347,950 for Channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, and $3,533,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, Texas, and $2,707,000 for Channel to Victoria. The Project Cooperation Agreement for Channel to Victoria was executed November 17, 1994. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1988), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1983) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1991), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work:-Mouth of Colorado River New Work: The construction contract to construct additional mooring facilities at the Mouth of the Colorado River connecting channel was completed on December 4, 1994 at a cost of $3000,000 for FY 1994. A contract to construct the oyster cultch was awarded August 10, 1994 but no cost was incurred in FY 1994. Channel to Victoria New Work: Engineering and design for disposal areas and channel construction on the land locked portion of the channel was initiated and real estate interests from the local sponsor are being coordinated. Also see Section 33, Planning and Engineering. Sargent Beach New Work: A contract for a preconstruction pile driving test was awarded March 16, 1994 and completed August 5, 1994 at a cost of $116,320. See Section 33, Planning and Engineering. Maintenance. Channel to Harlingen Maintenance: A contract for dredging the Channel to Harlingen was awarded August 18, 1994 and incurred a cost of $195,400 for levee work in FY 1994. Channel to Port Mansfield Maintenance: Contract for dredging Channel to Port Mansfield, awarded February 2, 1990, was financially completed with a claim settlement for a cost of $77,839 in FY 1994. Main Channel and Tributaries Maintenance: Contract to dewater Disposal Areas 35, 36, 42, 64, 65, 70, 71, and 72 was awarded July 29, 1994, and continued through FY 1994 at a cost of $323,204. Construction contract for barge mooring facilities at Atkinson Island, Pelican Island, and Bolivar Basin was awarded in April 1994 and completed in June 1994 for $1,384,870. A contract modification for the removal of shoal material from circulation ditch around the Disposal Area 127A and to provide shore protection and repair bank erosion at Disposal Area 128 at Turnstake Island to Sundown Bay was issued and completed at a cost of $18,500 for FY 1994. A contract for dredging Port Isabel to Arroyo Colorado was awarded August 18, 1994 and has incurred a cost of $411,780 through September 1994 for levee work. Aransas National Wildlife Refuge Maintenance: Contract awarded May 23, 1994, for shoreline protection along the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge in Aransas and Nueces County at Station 829+213 to Station 811+460 was completed in August 1994 for a cost of $841,007. Brazos River Floodgates Maintenance: The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $1,366,195 including engineering and design, supervision and administration, and real estate activities. A contract to rehabilitate sector gates was awarded January 14, 1990, physically completed August 26, 1991, and financially completed March 8, 1994 for a final cost of $10,089 in FY 1994. A contract for maintenance of mooring facilities was awarded August 20, 1993 and was completed November 4, 1994 at a FY 1994 cost of $307,883. A construction contract for a new fence, erosion protection, boat dock, and repair access road at the west gate was awarded June 23,1994 and continues through the fiscal year at a cost of $50,000. Colorado River Locks Maintenance: The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $4,672,476 including engineering and design and supervision and administration. A contract to rehabilitate sector gates was awarded January 14, 1990, physically completed August 26, 1991, was financially completed March 8, 1994 for a final cost of $5,442. A contract to construct a boat slip was awarded August 12, 1993 and completed on January 22, 1994 for a cost of $245,523. A contract to replace the 31-6 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT guidewalls at the east lock - west gate was awarded November 5, 1993 and continued through 1994 at a cost of $3,092,643. A maintenance contract for mooring facilities was awarded August 20, 1993 and was. completed November 4,1994 at a cost of $119,158. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 8. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jensen Drive, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, has been deauthorized. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and 1 foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Houston Ship Channel. Local Cooperation Agreement for assumption of maintenance on Bayport Ship Channel was executed April 6, 1993. Local Cooperation Agreements were being developed for assumption of maintenance on Barbour Terminal Channel and Greens Bayou Channel. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1989), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was awarded August 9, 1994 and incurred a partial mobilization cost of $100,000 for FY 1994. A contract to construct barge mooring facilities at Atkinson Island, Pelican Island and Bolivar Basin was awarded in April 1994 and completed in June 1994 for a cost of $699,836. Routine maintenance included mosquito control spraying at a cost of $126,763. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) See Section 33, Planning and Engineering. 9. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 31-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. The costs for new work was $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 non-Federal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, $182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 other costs. The project was completed in March 1967. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Repair to the North and South jetties and slope protection was performed by contract awarded April 14, 1994 and completed August 1, 1994 for a cost of $768,820. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 10. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine- Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) 31-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 31-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1988), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance included mosquito control spraying at a cost of $36,084. An equitable adjustment in the amount of $247,605 was paid for the additional volume of fill material used to repair the Disposal Area No. 6 levee on a dredging contract completed January 12, 1993. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 11. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/ 5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. Work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 would modify the project by providing for deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7- mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also proposed. At the request of local sponsor, City of Texas City, the project has been placed in the "deferred" category. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $123,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $74,393,700 non-Federal, including $62,027,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $10,737,000 levees and spillways, $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Shoal Point (formerly known as Snake Island), $561,000 for berthing areas, and $386,000 relocations. (October 1, 1988 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide levees for disposal areas and wetlands; relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide berthing areas; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities, and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation to a depth of 45 feet plus 50 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation deeper than 45 feet; pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas; and pay 50 percent of the costs incurred for operation and maintenance below the 45-foot depth. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dewater Snake Island was awarded July 29, 1994 and continued through FY 1994 at a cost of $140,621. An erosion 31-8 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT protection contract for Snake Island was awarded August 24, 1994 and continued through September at a cost of $222,671. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 12. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1933. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 12A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX Location: Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was incurred during the fiscal year. (See Operations during fiscal year for 12B., Channel to Liberty.) 12B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.) at an estimated total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and rights-ofway and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- by 150-foot channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A modification and equitable adjustment in the amount of $756,963 for differing site conditions for dredging Trinity River and tributaries, Anahuac Channel, and Channel to Liberty was issued in FY 1994. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 12C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to prevent salinity intrusion and create a 3,800 acre reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 2 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. (The reservoir was reduced from 5600 acres with a maximum pool elevation of 4 feet N.G.V.D. by agreement to protect the endangered bald eagle.) Project provides for an 84 foot by 600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project also provides for two recreational areas. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 14,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of authorized project is $80,081,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1994 base price.) A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and 31-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Final supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement for the modified project authorized in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on September 21, 1983. In March 1986, the Court rendered its Memorandum of order continuing the injunction and directing the Corps to recommence the administrative process at the time when the first departure from standard NEPA procedures occurred prior to the 1983 legislative action. The Corps and local sponsors perfected an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals and on May 11, 1987, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Corps and dismissed the suit in its entirety. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1991 provided $9,200,000 for the project and directive language for continuation of construction. In the fall of 1989, a pair of bald eagles were discovered nesting at the project site which led to additional consultation under the Endangered Species Act. Solicitation of the contract for the non-overflow dam was postponed to allow for environmental coordination. An Environmental Assessment was prepared with a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) which was signed in September 1991. Environmental documents were approved and construction was resumed. Work remaining consist of design and construction of lock rehabilitation; gated navigation channel; controlled spillway and bridge; and two water control structures. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, one-half of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest reimbursement is estimated at $12,012,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contract for construction of non-overflow dam was awarded September 20, 1991. The contract was physically completed September 28, 1993 and incurred a cost of $181,807 for a variation in quantities price adjustment. A construction contract to repair the lock access road was awarded March 8, 1994 and completed July 19, 1994 for a cost of $280,787. An architecture/engineering contract was awarded April 4, 1994 to prepare plans, specifications and cost estimates for: rehabilitation and completion of the navigation lock; completion of the North and South navigation channels; design ofa new administration/resident office building;, and electrical and mechanical design of equipment controls for the controlled spillway structure. Costs for FY 1994 were $534,177. Maintenance: Ranger surveillance, administration of project, and administration of duck blind permit program was conducted. Routine maintenance included mosquito control spaying at a cost of $8,740. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys were conducted periodically on the following projects: Project Fiscal Year Cost Cedar Bayou Channel to Harlingen Clear Creek Double Bayou Texas City Channel $22 61 577 1,444 8,347 $10,451 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Reconnaissance study to review the impacts of existing navigation features on beach and shoreline erosion for the Galveston Entrance Channel was performed during FY 1994 at a cost of $5,820. The study was terminated in the Continuing Authorities Program and recommended for the regular feasibility authorization procedures as magnitude of the problem exceeds the programs authority limits. Beach Erosion Control 15. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978. Periodic nourishment and construction of sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. Estimated cost of new work is $2,150,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,265,000 non-Federal consisting of $2,150,000 Contributed funds, $43,000 relocations, and $72,000 lands. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Section 934 of Water Resources Development Act of 1986 provides for extension of nourishment period to 50 years for beach nourishment projects. A study to determine the appropriateness of such an extended nourishment period for the Federal beach nourishment project was completed. The study indicated that there was no economic justification for continued Federal participation in the program. The responsibility for beach monitoring and maintenance was transferred to the City of Corpus Christi in July 1990. 31-10 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Flood Control 16. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvements of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Cost of new work is $127,000,000 Federal (Corps) and $86,891,000 non-Federal for lands and relocations. (October 1, 1986 base price.) Channel rectification on Brays Bayou with an improved channel length 25.4 miles was completed in March 1971. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Work remaining consists of rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required bridge relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterment. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. 16A. ADDICKS AND BARKER RESERVOIRS, TX Location. Reservoirs are located in and west of the City of Houston in Harris, Waller, and Fort Bend Counties, Texas. Existing project. Construction of Barker Dam was complete in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was complete in 1969. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Darns to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Estimated cost of new work is $11,900,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects (Code 713 funds). Non-Federal funds consist of $11,900,000 contributions for recreational facilities. (October 1991 base price.) Work under the Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Work accomplished included raising approximately 32,400 feet of Addicks Dam 1 to 3 feet and raising approximately 57,600 feet of Barker Dam 3 to 5 feet and armor-plating low ends of both.dams. A contract with the city of Houston for cost-sharing in the construction of recreation facilities was entered into in November 1981. The lease for approximately 10,534 acres of land and water areas was approved in February 1983. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: Community Park West (Phase IB) and the velodrome were completed in November 1986. Grading and clearing for an archery range was performed by the City of Houston in March and April 1987. Work has been initiated on a construction contract, awarded for Community Park West (Phase 2) in 1988. Harris County Precinct 3, Cullen-Barker Park, completed Community Park 2 which includes soccer fields and parking lots. The plans for Community Park West, Phase III, were approved in 1989. Construction on Phase III was initiated in 1990 and is continuing. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance at Addicks and Barker Dams. A contract to install underground electrical service and a new generator was awarded October 26, 1993 and completed March 11, 1994 at a cost of $106,550. A contract for pest control was issued at a cost of $62,597. 16B. BRAYS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the south-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $164,314,000 Federal (Corps) and $164,314,000 non-Federal consisting of $18,479,000 cash contributions, and $145,835,000 for lands and relocations (October 1994 base price). Location cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $18,479,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 33, Planning and Engineering. 16C. GREENS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the north-central 31-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX, and does not include the Halls Bayou tributary, Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $133,698,000 Federal (Corps) and $88,353,000 non-Federal consisting of $13,032,000 cash contributions, and $75,321,000 for lands and relocations (October 1994 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $13,032,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 33, Planning and Engineering. 16D. HALLS BAYOU, TX Location. Halls Bayou is a major tributary of Greens Bayou, located in the north-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 18 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, boat ramps, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $58,721,000 Federal (Corps) and $46,362,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,687,000 cash contributions, and $39,675,000 for lands and relocations (October 1994 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $6,687,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 16E. HUNTING BAYOU, TX Location. Hunting Bayou is located in Houston, approximately 4 to 5 miles from the central business district. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 14.3 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $58,013,000 Federal (Corps) and $54,698,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,014,000 cash contributions, and $48,684,000 for lands and relocations (October 1994 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $6,014,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 16F. LITLE WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX Location. Little White Oak Bayou is a tributary of White Oak Bayou in north-central Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 6.0 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $17,958,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,957,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,996,000 cash contributions, and $15,961,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,996,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 16G. CARPENTERS BAYOU, TX Location. Carpenters Bayou is a tributary of Buffalo Bayou in northeastern Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 9.7 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $3,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,950,000 non-Federal consisting of $370,000 cash contributions, and $2,320,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $370,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 31-12 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 17. BUFFALO BAYOU AT PINEY POINT VILLAGE, TX Location. The project is located on Buffalo Bayou, within the city limits of Piney Point Village, an independent, incorporated community located 10 miles west of downtown Houston and entirely surrounded by the City of Houston. Existing project. The approved plan provides for erosion protection on 260 feet of the east bank of Buffalo Bayou adjacent to Farnham Park Drive. The protection consists of lightweight aggregate and granular fill covered by gabions, with riprap toe protection. The fill and gabions will be placed on a 2 horizontal on 1 vertical slope and will be filled with 4- to 8-inch stone. Estimated cost for the new work is $318,000 Federal (Corps) and $140,000 non-Federal, consisting of $107,000 cash and $33,000 for lands, easements and rights-of-way. Local cooperation. The City of Piney Point Village is the local sponsor for the project. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed August 15, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. The detailed project report was completed on October 1, 1992. Work on the plans and specifications began on April 1, 1993 and was completed in FY 1994. A construction contract for erosion protection was awarded September 29, 1994. No costs were incurred in FY 1994 for the contract. 18. CLEAR CREEK, TX Location. The project is located about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston, Texas, on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south in Harris and Galveston Counties above and below existing Clear Lake. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of an improved channel from Mile 3.8 to Mile 34.8 to contain within its banks all flood flows up to and including that of a 100-year flood. The selected plan provides channel enlargement and easing of bends within the existing stream from Mile 3.8 to Mile 26.05 to contain at least the 10-year frequency storm, and additional outlet with gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay, restriction of development in the residual 100-year flood plain and measures to mitigate environmental effects. In 1986, at the request of Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, that portion of the project upstream of the Brazoria/ Galveston County line, approximate improved Mile 19.1, was placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $64,431,000 Federal (Corps) and $51,704,000 non-Federal consisting of $5,807,000 cash contributions, $22,600,000 for lands, and $23,297,000 for relocations (October 1, 1994 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Galveston and Harris counties. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed June 30, 1986, requires local interests to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; modify or relocate building, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project; make a cash contribution for mitigation measures consistent with the non-Federal share of total project costs without mitigation measures; pay five percent of the total costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design is underway. 19. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Location. The project is located north of Houston, Texas in Harris County. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the Cypress Creek Channel, incorporating grassed side slopes and channel bottom and appropriate erosion control measures; application of floodplain management techniques in the residual floodplain; construction of project-oriented recreation features, including 11.5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related facilities for health, safety, and public access; and habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of the project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat along the creek, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. Estimated cost for new work is $106,190,000 Federal (Corps) and $36,653,000 non-Federal consisting of $13,668,000 cash contribution, $16,182,000 for lands, and $6,803,000 for relocations (October 1, 1994 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $13,668,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. See Section 33, Planning and Engineering. 20. FALFURRIAS, TX Location. The city of Falfurrias is located near the confluence of Palo Blanco and Cibolo Creeks, intermittent streams that drain a 600-square-mile area in south Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a 5.6 mile long diversion levee; a 1.8 mile long pilot channel; a flowage easement of 11,000 acres of land subject to overflows from the pilot channel; and a 0.8 mile long ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. Estimated cost for new work is $16,870,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,870,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,687,000 cash contribution, $13,013,000 for lands, and $2,170,000 for relocations (October 1, 1991 base price). Project was placed in the "deferred" category pending Local Sponsor's ability to provide their share of costs. Local cooperation. The local sponsor would be required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipeline, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,687,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Project was placed in the "deferred" category pending Local Sponsor's ability to provide their share of costs. Operations during fiscal year. No work was incurred in FY 1994. 31-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 21. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Location. The project is located in Willacy, Hidalgo, and Cameron Counties. The basin is bounded on the east by the Gulf of Mexico, on the south by the Rio Grande which forms the international boundary between the United States and Mexico, on the west by Starr County, and on the north by Brooks and Kenedy Counties. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. 21A. ARROYO COLORADO, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. The estimated cost for new work is $5,851,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,951,000 non- Federal consisting of $1,848,000 cash and $103,000 for lands and relocations (October 1, 1993 base prices). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Hidalgo County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,848,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 33, Planning and Engineering. 21B. SOUTH MAIN CHANNEL, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. The estimated cost for new work is $111,268,000 Federal (Corps) and $65,638,000 non-Federal consisting of $8,845,000 cash and $28,107,000 lands and $28,686,000 relocations (October 1, 1994 base prices). Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $8,845,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 33, Planning and Engineering funds. 21C. RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX Location. The project is located in northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide a drainage outlet to the Laguna Madres for northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties. The project consists of 43.8 miles of channel work, including enlargement of existing channels and construction of new channels, a 3.88-mile long levee, and diversion ditches along the west side of Raymondville. The estimated cost for new work is $51,499,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,167,000 non-Federal consisting of $4,484,000 cash and $6,142,000 lands and $6,541,000 relocations (October 1, 1994 base prices). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $4,484,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 22. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffin Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; constructing 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants. Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 1980. The project was initiated in March 1966 and the active portion of the project was completed in 1984. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $62,350,000 Federal (Corps) and $27,150,000 non-Federal consisting of $17,342,000 cash contributions, $3,403,000 for lands, $6,405,000 for relocations, and $449,000 for pumping station betterments and levee realignment betterments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. A severe settlement problem exists in the Chevron Sabine Road Tank Farm area. A contract to restore the embankment was awarded May 19,1994 and continued through FY 1994 at a cost of $844,549. 23. SIMS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in Harris County, in the southern portion of Houston, Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement 31-14 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT provides for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.3 miles of Sims Bayou to provide 25-year flood protection; environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development to include 27 miles of hike-and-bike trails connecting to existing public parks, together with picnic, playground, and other leisure facilities. Estimated cost for new work is $192,954,000 Federal (Corps) and $94,114,000 non-Federal consisting of $16,761,000 cash contributions, $35,604,000 for lands, $41,474,000 for relocations and $275,000 for channels (October 1, 1994 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. The Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control was executed on October 19, 1990. The recreation Local Cooperation Agreement is pending. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract for channel rectification from Interstate Highway 45 to Reveille Park was awarded January 28, 1994 and continued through FY 1994 at a cost of $1,691,834. 24. STATE HIGHWAY 111 BRIDGE, LAKE TEXANA, TX Location. The project is located 8.5 miles Southeast of Edna, Texas and 31 miles Northeast of Victoria, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement requires placement of granular fill and stone protection along the embankment slope at the southwest end of the East Relief Bridge to form a slope of 1 on 4. Stone protection will consist of an 18-inch layer of riprap placed on a 6-inch layer of graded blanket stone. The work will require placement of 2400 tons of granular fill, 390 tons of blanket stone and 1170 tons of stone riprap. Estimated cost for new work is $276,000 Federal (Corps) and $92,000 non- Federal consisting of $91,600 cash contribution and $400 for land. Local cooperation. The State of Texas is the local sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on July 17, 1992. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were completed in April 1992. A construction contract for embankment slope repairs, which consist of clearing, excavation, removal and disposal of material, and placement of stone protection, was awarded December 28, 1993 and completed February 18, 1994 at a cost of $190,097. 25. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement consists of enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the Outfall Canal. Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of Taylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 miles of Pivitot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 miles of Willow Marsh Bayou. Phase III consists of enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou. The Phase III portion of the project was placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. Initial contract on the "active" portion of the project was awarded in August 1982. All work on authorized features has been completed with the exception of Phase III and minor work, which includes armoring a small reach of the Alligator Bayou effluent ditch. Estimated cost for new work, excluding inactive portion, is $39,100,000 Federal (Corps) and $41,100,000 non-Federal, including $13,419 cash contribution, $3,662,000 lands, and $24,019,000 for relocations (October 1, 1993 base price). Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act, applies. Operation during fiscal year. Channel rectification contract for Hillebrandt Bayou Station 543+50 to Station 751+00 was awarded January 13, 1992, physically completed March 19, 1993, remains open for financial completion. Cost incurred for FY 1994 was $90,416. A contract for channel rectification on Willow Marsh Bayou, Stations 12+00 to 135+00, awarded December 12, 1991, physically completed March 20, 1993, was financially completed December 15, 1994 at a cost of $105,458 for FY 1994. A contract for channel rectification of Hillebrandt Bayou, Station 350+00 to Station 543+50 was awarded January 13, 1993 and was completed in September 1994 at a cost of $912,182 for FY 1994. A dredging contract for plug removal, drainage and flood control of Hillebrandt Bayou and Willow Marsh Bayou was awarded April 6, 1994 and physically completed October 24, 1994. FY 1994 cost for the contract was $1,141,389. The contract remains open for financial completion. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 31-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on the following projects. Fiscal year cost was $184,593. Date of Project Inspection Big Hog Bayou, TX - Intake Structure March 1994 Brays Bayou, TX - Channel Rectification May 1994 Freeport and Vicinity, TX - Hurricane Flood Protection March 1994 GIWW, Chocolate Bayou, TX - March 1994 Guadalupe River, Channel to Victoria, TX - Navigation including Rail Road Lift-Bridge November Kirbyville, TX - Flood Protection March 1994 Lavaca and Navidad Rivers, TX - Flood Protection at Halletsville Dam April 1994 Port Arthur, TX - Hurricane Flood Protection November : Sabine River, TX - Emergency Steambank March 1994 Three Rivers, TX - Flood Control April 1994 Tranquitas Creek, TX - Flood Protection at Kingsville, TX April 1994 White Oak Bayou, TX - Channel Rectification May 1994 1993 4 1993 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended: Feasibility studies continued at a fiscal year cost of $97,350 on the Lower Guadalupe River at Victoria, Texas. Funds in the amount of $76,056 were expended from contributed funds on the project. Reconnaissance studies continued on the Buffalo Bayou at Lynchburg, Texas at a 1994 fiscal year cost of $100,358. Funds in the amount of $71,971 were expended from contributed funds. Emergency flood control - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation): Cost was $320,455 for disaster preparedness. National Emergency Preparedness Program fiscal year cost was $92,180. 28. EMERGENCY STREAM BANK AND SHORELINE EROSION WORK AND SNAGGING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Stream bank and shoreline erosion activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 525, as amended: Construction of the erosion control project at State Highway Bridge 111, Lake Texana, Texas is discussed in Section 24. Construction of the steambank protection project at Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point Village, Texas is discussed in Section 17. Feasibility study of streambank protection at the Port of Liberty, Texas was completed at a fiscal year cost of $1,000 and was terminated. Snagging and clearing activities for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, Public Law 780, as amended: No new feasibility studies of snagging and clearing activities for flood control improvements were performed in fiscal year 1994. Environmental Restoration 29. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Project modifications for improvement of environment activities pursuant to Section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, as amended: Construction of the environmental restoration project at Laguna Madre, Texas is discussed in Section 30. Construction of the environmental restoration project at Salt Bayou, McFaddin Ranch, Texas is discussed in Section 31. An initial appraisal was initiated and continued through FY 1994 for restoration of the wetlands at Barker Reservoir for a waterfowl habitat. Project title is Addicks and Barker Waterfowl Habitat Restoration, Texas. A total cost of $1,298 was incurred for FY 1994. 30. LAGUNA MADRE SEAGRASS PROJECT Location. The project is located in Laguna Madre about 7 miles north of Port Isabel, Texas in Cameron County. Existing project. The objective of the proposed project is to determine whether unconfined open-bay disposal operations can be modified to increase the seagrass colonization rate between dredging cycles and improve habitat value for estuarine fauna in the disposal area. The work consists of transplanting seagrass from nearby undisturbed seagrass meadows onto freshly deposited dredged maintenance material in two open-bay disposal areas near the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The transplanted seagrass and control sites will be sampled and monitored for various physical and biological 31-16 t 4 t 4 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT parameters to determine the success of the demonstration project in restoring fish habitat in the disposal areas. Local cooperation. The local sponsor for this project is the Texas Department of Transportation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on October 6, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. Coordination with Texas Department of Transportation for preparation and execution of the Project Cooperation Agreement was ongoing through FY 1994. 31. SALT BAYOU WATER CONTROL STRUCTURE, PORT ARTHUR, TX Location. The project is located in the McFaddin National Wildlife Refuge, Sea Rim State Park, and J.D. Murphree Wildlife Management Area, near the City of Port Arthur, Jefferson County, Texas. Existing project. This project provides for the second of two water control structures needed to restore historical salinity conditions to a 60,000-acre wetland area. Prior to construction of the GIWW and Sabine-Neches Waterway, Salt Bayou consisted of fresh to brackish marshlands. Construction of the Sabine-Neches Waterway and GIWW disrupted natural drainage patterns and introduced salt water to the marsh. Increased salinity resulted in conversion of vegetated areas to open water and a reduction in wildlife habitat values. With this new structure at Salt Lake, historical estuarine conditions will be restored to the extent possible. Work consists of a Water Control Structure, 27,000 C.Y. of excavation, 4,600 tons of riprap, and 1,428 L.F. of precast prestressed concrete piles. A construction contract for the water control structure was awarded on 18 November 1994. The total estimated project cost is $2,264,500, of which $1,698,375 is Federal (Corps) and $566,125 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on March 8, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. The Project Cooperation Agreement was negotiated and executed during the fiscal year. General Investigations 32. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $2,331,952 of which $472,712 was for navigation studies; $69,977 was for flood damage prevention studies; $1,700,911 was for Review of Completed Projects; $7,038 was for coordination with other agencies; $44,393 was for Special Investigations; $20,360 for Interagency Water Resources; $15,288 was for National Estuary Studies; and $1,273 for the American Waterfowl Management Plan. 33. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Channel to Victoria, Texas - The project will provide for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet, the same dimensions as the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, with disposal of the dredged materials in upland areas. In addition, the project includes creation of additional marsh along the landlocked reach of the channel. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,434,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1989 and completed in FY 1994. Fiscal year costs were $1,266. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement of the Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Ship Channel. The recommended plan for the Houston Ship Channel consists of a 50-foot deep by 600-foot wide channel to the vicinity of the Shell Docks at Boggy Bayou in Houston with additional widening to the Clinton Island Turning Basin. The recommended plan for the Galveston Channel consists of a 50-foot deep by 450-foot wide channel within the existing 1,125-foot channel. The 50-foot by 800-foot entrance channel, previously authorized with the Texas City Channel but unconstructed, is also incorporated into this project. The project was recommended to be constructed in two phases, with Phase I enlarging the Houston Ship Channel to 45 by 530 feet, the Galveston Ship Channel enlarged to 45 by 450 feet, and deepening the entrance channel to 45 feet. Phase II would deepen both channels to 50 feet and widen the Houston Ship Channel to 600 feet. A locally preferred dredged material disposal plan for Galveston Bay has been incorporated with the plan of improvement. The plan would utilize confined or beneficial uses of dredged material in the bay and/or offshore disposal for Phase I and Phase II construction activities and the operations and maintenance resulting from them. The 50-foot increment (Phase II) was found to not be economically justified and the local sponsors have agreed that the work on this increment be stopped. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $18,380,000. Estimated planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $3,074,205. Brays Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $6,300,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $410,780. Greens Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $4,040,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $474,631. Cypress Creek, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the channel. Projectoriented recreation features include 11.5 miles of hike-andbike trails and related recreation facilities, habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway project land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $7,800,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $195,497. 31-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Arroyo Colorado, Texas - The project will provide flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,000,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $18,923. South Main Channel, Texas - The project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $6,000,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $499,194. Sargent Beach, Texas - The project consists of construction of approximately 8 miles of concrete-block revetment with two concrete sheetpile wall segments and tow protection on the barrier between a 10-mile reach of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in the vicinity of Sargent, Texas and the Gulf of Mexico. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,500,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1992 and completed in FY 1994. Fiscal year costs were $227,549. Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier, Texas - The project consists of a tainter gated salt water barrier structure, a gated navigation bypass channel, an access road and levee, and an auxiliary dam across an associated canal. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,100,000. A review of the project economics was completed in FY 1994. Fiscal year costs were $47,734. 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management, technical services and quick responses were performed at a cost of $15,628, $33,849 and $3,097, respectively. Contributed funds in the amount of $1,024 were expended in FY 1994 for technical services. Hydrologic studies cost $9,648. Flood plain management services were financially completed for Jasper County, Texas; Kemah, Texas; and League City, Texas at a fiscal year cost of $1,518; $180; and $885, respectively. Flood plain management services were initiated for Santa Monica for a fiscal year costs of $14,355. 31-18 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994" 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) (Regular Funds) (Inland Waterways Trust Fund) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 232,500 229,030 235,000 209,979 315,000 1,971,000 305,088 1,887,976 1,337,400 2,267,000 1,077,977 2,571,235 62,000 51,707 (100,000) 56,878 2,007,100 1,642,951 (10,400) -=. 28,046 5,110,000 5,481,015 292,000 317,642 4,973,000 4,181,644 70,000 69,987 1,000 593 300,000 78,065 2,903,000 2,786,618 275,000 219,974 5,913,000 4,143,377 2,123,0( 2,112,31 4,248,6001 4,108,6771 26,864,5022 24,123,2662 00 49,933,4763 33 49,919,5583 - 2,170,080 - 2,170,080 (440) 46 300,00 404,19 6,194,00 6,247,88 - 24,070 )0 )8 133,9254 133,9254 1,226,0615 1,226,0585 77,135,3596 76,982,1246 )0 106,463,7487 36 106,381,7307 - 3,576,684 - 3,576,684 - 6,279,088 - 5,983,232 10,140,000 13,534,000 5,128,000 1,300,000 58,860,1528 12,707,229 13,967,880 4,445,978 350,007 56,929,6408 297,000 1,095,000 4,299,500 2,347,000 58,226,9159 301,318 958,033 4,430,683 2,347,937 58,219,4669 -- - - 8,935 -- - - 8,935 -- - - 29,096,39210 -- - - 29,096,39210 3,846,000 279,000 4,664,200 3,184,000 98,306,288" 3,933,178 270,875 4,659,585 3,170,293 98,255,314" -- - - 7,969,329 -- - - 7,969,329 1,279,000 3,157,000 1,950,000 5,786,000 86,531,30312 2,127,947 3,082,996 1,644,840 1,774,646 81,911,49012 New Work: Approp Cost - 2,544,000 - 1,583,471 2,544,000 1,583,471 31-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 31-A See Section in Text Project 7. Gulf ntracoastal Waterway (Continued) (Regular Funds) (Inland Waterways Trust Fund) (Regular Funds) 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 9. Matagorda, Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Regular Funds) 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Includes Wallisville) 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX (Restoration Project) (Contributed Funds) 16. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX allIIInzl Appr Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Recreation: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: 24,877,900 24,410,286 23,287,700 17,130,800 24,871,000 336,940,04213 23,794,094 17,844,147 24,261,481 336,000,087" - 1,000,000 - 63,521 - 1,000,000 - 56,631 1,434,638 489,159 1,000,000 56,631 - - - - 835,873 - - - - 835,873 - - - - 35,760,38215 - - - - 35,760,38215 6,190,000 2,380,500 9,805,000 4,050,900 145,583,67816 6,457,007 2,311,819 9,856,764 3,990,130 145,496,70616 - - - - 18,058,77717 - - - - 18,058,777!7 803,000 2,379,200 2,393,500 5,209,540 54,574,47818 489,150 2,678,164 2,272,781 5,355,402 54,562,29918 - - - - 56,136,81519 - - - - 56,136,81519 15,507,600 4,952,000 3,345,000 14,305,233 5,893,587 3,574,422 2,761 5,315 201,000 1,483,500 166,220 1,521,052 12,620,000 186,800,54020 12,543,607 186,671,49320 - 15,131,97221 - 15,131,97221 452,000 26,618,01122 424,763 26,590,71422 726,158 726,158 214,608 2,257,188 710,000 795,000 841,233 819,140 2,700,000 3,114,931 356,500 403,226 8,000,000 2,719,171 2,074,000 2,040,590 43,923,676" 37,766,44623 17,652,51424 17,599,41624 - 2,120,641 - 2,120,641 - 2,038,345 - 2,009,710 756,000 1,249,100 713,744 1,018,131 333 11,500 1,077,000 1,642,000 1,035,815 1,678,401 813,000 1,210,570 880,000 61,832,424" 885,410 61,664,135" - 377,804 - 377,623 1,297,000 1,685,000 1,357,827 1,668,586 27,886,115 27,814,654 31-20 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost To Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994w GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 17. Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Clear Creek, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Cypress Creek, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Falfurrias, TX 21. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX 22. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane- Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Sims Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texana, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 25. Taylors Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 30. Laguna Madre Seagrass 31. Salt Bayou, McFaddin Ranch Wetlands, TX Funding Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 193,000 1,450,000 810,185 1,449,168 - 20,000 - 15,921 1,182,000 460,000 1,954,817 758,300 140,000 120,200 564,000 750,000 473,731 216,496 (67,000). 7,686 424 341,000 726,900 283,803 626,365 - 96,000 56,644 77,157 - 41,000 2,164 32,850 3,047,000 1,190,000 3,193,103 1,301,424 27,000 9,000 20,486 7,131 1,091,000 2,903,000 1,184,924 3,158,775 - 1,491,000 155,027 1,798,713 10,000 15,000 390 24,238 184,000 70,000 103,374 150,405 - - 931 2,730 78,000 35,000 72,592 39,487 - 140,000 617,000 506,000 453,258 282,821 (456,000) 254,000 228,779 195,497 - 169,200 - 105,426 516,000 359,000 413,391 518,116 170,000 2,100,000 116,523 713,344 45,800 522,900 31,377 302,813 1,514,000 8,100,000 1,381,353 5,132,752 - 600,000 - 84,592 21,155 155,000 23,439 150,675 - 95,000 - 61,774 3,477,000 2,010,000 3,425,816 2,129,557 2,470,600 700,000 1,916,405 652,181 - 5,000 105 303 233,000 - 173,653 59,556 Total Cost To Sep. 30, 1994" 12,475,000 12,475,000 12,773,000 12,691,564 133,000 128,000 140,000 13,985,361 13,408,800 640,000 618,596 1,326,000 1,241,512 169,200 105,246 104,000 103,453 2,117,900 2,009,242 62,268,509 60,798,349 16,901,675 26 16,656,82626 17,399,000 14,273,35527 600,000 84,592 234,155 223,680 95,000 61,774 37,153,198 36,747,905 12,970,600 12,268,826 30,000 25,036 487,000 486,988 31-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Excludes $1,431,891 credit for contributed work. 2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, $8,828,526 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects. Excludes $874,258 expended from contributed funds for dock removal for the local sponsor. 3 In addition, $1,352,092 expended from contributed funds and $34,000 expended from contributed funds for Port Isabel. * Includes $48,711 for previous projects. s Includes $46,101 for previous projects. 6 Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. ' Includes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $964,111 expended from contributed funds. * Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $19,348,578 expended from contributed funds. ($581,615 on 45' project.) 9 In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. 10 Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 11 Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $2,322,583 expended from contributed funds. a Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); and Mouth of Colorado River ($3,340,601). 1 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $7,767,480. Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600. Chocolate Bayou Channel $2,197,000. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $2,895,650. Channel to Port Mansfield $4,707,785. Also includes $3,975,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded beginning in fiscal year 1992. 14 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $7,685,011, Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600, Chocolate Bayou Channel $2,185,178. In addition $955,574 was expended from contributed funds for Chocolate Bayou Channel. Also includes amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $2,882,437. Channel to Port Mansfield $4,684,926. Also includes an expended amount of $3,962,256 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded in fiscal year 1992. ' Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. 16 Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $534,641 expended from contributed funds, of which $200,000 was for previous projects. Includes appropriated funds for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $34,000. Barbour Terminal Channel $47,400. Bayport Ship Channel $1,881,200. Expenditures for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $28,936. Barbour Terminal Channel $35,794. Bayport Ship Channel $1,876,748. "1 In addition, $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. 18 Starting in fiscal year 1990 includes an appropriation of $2,274,740 and expenditures of $2,268,272 for Channel to Red Bluff. 19 Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. n Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $4,281,847 expended from contributed funds and $5,793 expended from contributed funds for real estate acquisition for the local sponsor. 21 Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. = Includes $195,083 for previous projects. Z3 Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. In addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. u Includes $543,662 for previous projects. " Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. * Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands, $6,168,360 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. v Excludes $114,856 expended from contributed funds for real estate acquisition for the local sponsor. a Includes funds ($12,544,400) provided by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 15-I of Annual Report for 1985. 31-22 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. Amended cost sharing requirements to provide for 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal participation in control operations. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet.27 Enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet; construction of asphalt walkways with handrails on the crown of the North and South Jetties, and construction of park-type public use facilities at the inner end of the North Jetty. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 103(c), PL 99-662 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 201, PL 99-662 31-23 TABLE 31-B 2. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 31-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 3. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1919 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 19132 Sep. 23, 1922 Jul. 3, 19303 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Project and Work Authorized CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX A channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Galveston Harbor extending to a turning basin 1,000 feet square and 30 feet deep.3' Enlargement, extension and protection of turning basin.3 ' CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Acquisition of old curvey portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredge by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to 31-24 Documents H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1122, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Committee Docs. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 19546 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Channel to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deep draft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility. 31-25 H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 124, PL 94-587 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY.1994 5. TABLE 31.B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 19256 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 5, 1961 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 31-26 Project and Work Authorized FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance of jetties. Repairs to jetties and dredging. Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. Modified local cooperation requirements for the 1970 Act. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. 6. Documents Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 Sec. 101, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 19109 Jul. 27, 1916 Jul. 18, 1918 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 4, 1938 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street.8 Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St., and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in inner bar.'� Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 42 feet over the authorized width of 800 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to a point 2 miles west of the seawall and of the North jetty thence at a depth of 40 feet to the junction of the Houston Ship Channel, with widths of 800 feet to Bolivar Roads, thence decreasing to 400 feet at the junction with the Houston Ship Channel. 31-27 H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 7. Jun. 23, 1971 (House Res.) Nov. 18, 1971 (Senate Res. Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193813 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 19459 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945"4 Jul. 24, 1946 Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar to 43rd Street. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER 12 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Enlarge waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Texas, in Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Harlingen, Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. 31-28 H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong. H. Doc 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 248, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. (See PL 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Jul. 12, 1952 Sep. 3, 1954's Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 9, 1959 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 196216 Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. PL 516, 81st Cong. PL 527, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 31-29 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 196517 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Oct. 31, 1992 Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935"1 Aug. 30, 1935 Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri- Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. Modified 1968 authorization to provide that diversion features be constructed at Federal expense and operation and maintenance be shared 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. Enlarge existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. Provide 8 miles of erosion protection for the existing waterway in the vicinity of Sargent, Texas. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike.'8 A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou.' 9 Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 812, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 101 (20), PL 102-580 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-30 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2,1945 Mar 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 195820 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 9. Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 10. Jul. 25, 1912 Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou.21 Maintenance of Greens Bayou, Barbour Terminal Channel, and Bayport Ship Channel to forty-foot depths at Federal expense. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 819, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 773, 61 st Cong., 2nd Sess. 31-31 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 22, 1922 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 194623 Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen. Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine-Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turn- H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 287, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 14, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 60, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 158, 77th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 31-32 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents ing basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Jul. 24, 194624 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954" Oct. 23, 196226 11. Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine-Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine- Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River;, a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 31-33 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 (Senate Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) Nov. 17, 1986 12. Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. Deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channels to 52 feet; extending the Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52 foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico; and establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Anahuac Channel. Six-foot channel to Liberty. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) Sec. 201, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-34 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 30, 1983 15. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Senate Res.) 16. Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 28, 1990 18. Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 19. Nov. 17, 1988 20. Nov. 17, 1988 21. Nov. 17, 1986 Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 5,600 acres and confining the reservoir to east side of Trinity River. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. Flood damage reduction improvements and recreational development for the Houston, Texas urban area, divided into six separable elements - Brays, Greens, Hunting, Halls, Carpenters and Little White Oak Bayous. Flood control improvements consist of 75.3 miles of stream enlargement, 14 miles of stream clearing, 7 flood detention basins, 7 miles of diversion channels and environmental revegetation. Recreation features consist of 14.7 miles of trails, 502 picnic facilities, 12 group pavilions, 2 boat launching ramps, 10 restrooms, playgrounds, exercise stations and parking facilities. CLEAR CREEK, TX Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8.30 Modified local cooperation requirements of the 1968 authorization. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Enlargement and rectification of lower 29.4 miles of Cypress Creek channel and recreational development. FALFURRIAS, TX Construction of a 5.6-mile long diversion levee west of Falfurrias; a 1.8-mile long pilot channel west of Falfurrias; a flowage easement; and a 0.8-mile long ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Channel improvements to provide drainage protection for the area in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and to provide flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Raymondville, Edcouch, La Villa, and Lyford. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 98-63 H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 101, PL 101-640 H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 1001, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 31-35 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 31-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 22. Oct. 23, 1962 23. Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 29, 1989 25. Oct. 27, 1965 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees." SIMS BAYOU, TX Enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou; environmental measures and riparian habitat along entire alignment, and recreational development. Amended the Water Resources and Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 authorization as project cost estimate had exceeded limit established in Section 902 of WRDA 1986. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge." Documents H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 Sec. 103, PL 101-101 H. Doc. 206, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' 1 Contains latest published maps. 2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive. 3 Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. ' Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. a West leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. * Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. ' Dredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933. 8 Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 10 Deepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 11 Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12 H. Doc. 230 76th Cong., 1st Sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. '~ Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 14 Dredging upper 5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 15 Inactive. 16 Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. Relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 17 The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. SC8 onstruction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 19 Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 20 Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. * Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23 Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 2 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 2 Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. " The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 2 Jetty extension was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 2 Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. * Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou are inactive. 30 Portion of project upstream of Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximately mile 18.5, in inactive category. 31 Turning basin was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 31-36 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1994 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts)6 1967 38,252' - Bastrop Bayou, TX2 1931 9,920 27,129 Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington3 1924 216,9894 223,010 Cedar Bayou, TX 1990 681,2638 2,809,8169 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 1982 66,934 537,139 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal Peninsula 1968 1,194,344 26,467 Dickinson Bayou, TX 1954 33,942 57,553 Double Bayou, TX 1987 226,558 1,412,07810 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TXS 1922 2,476 847 Greens Bayou Bridges, TX 1993 450,000 - Johnson Bayou, LA6 1933 2,261 54,042 Little Bay, TX7 1979 - 252,728 Neches River and Trib., Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, TX (Advance Engineering & Design) 1984 1,503,843 - Oyster Creek, TX 1922 6,942 7,556 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (Echo to Morgan Bluff)3 1971 - - 1 Excludes $1,672 work contribution. ' Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport, TX, SWidening froWmi d66e00n i nffgee eefttr ottmoo 110000 ffeeeett aatt 4-f-ofooto t ddeepptthh cAocnt st(rHuc. teDdo cp. ro1je1c4t, a8s1 asut thCoornizge.,d 1bsyt 1S9e5s0s .)R ivine r 1a9n5d5 Huanrdbeorr was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Department of Army permit. Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 8 Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition ' Includes $123,676 for previous projects. $25,000 expended from contributed funds. s9 Includes $69,784 for previous projects. 6 In inactive category for maintenance. 'o In addition, $102,325 expended from contributed a Channel adequate for existing commerce. funds. TABLE 31-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1994 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, Texas 1986 201,300 - Baytown, Texas' 1980 245,400 - Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas2 1963 273,757 - Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection2 1984 29,285,0423 - Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas2 1978 505,749 - Highland Bayou, Texas2 1984 12,254,390 - Kirbyville, Texas2 1993 1,484,6137 - Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043 - General channel project 1952 21,086 - Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas6 1971 98,517 - Mill Creek, Texas' 1952 24,753 - Peyton Creek, Texas4 1975 66,377 - San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas2 1963 135,175 - Texas City and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection2 1993 38,882,4008 - Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas2 1956 130,239 - Three Rivers, Texas5s s 5,835,927 - Upper White Oak Bayou, Texas 1989 972,300 - U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, Louisianna2 1993 500,0009 - Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Texas 2 1993 19,307,100 - Inactive. 2 Completed. 3 In addition, $8,695,438 expended from contributed funds, $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands, and $2,726,446 for relocations by local interests. 4 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. s See Annual Report for 1983, Fort Worth District, page 16-12. 6 Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 7 In addition, $1,484,613 expended from contributed funds, estimated value of $200,096 for contributed lands, and $202, 456 for relocations by local interests. 8 In addition, $14,396,307 expended from contributed funds, estimated value of $1,224,219 for contributed lands, and contributed work in the amount of $1,070,806 by local interests. Work performed at 100% Local Sponsor expense was in the amount of $320,347. 9 In addition, $237,792 expended from contributed funds. 31-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 31-E TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Sep. 30, 1994 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Inland Waterway Trust Fund Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project 20,598,851 2,848,560 8,705,165 32,152,576 85,214 85,214 75,285,303 324,287 5,983,232 81,593,590 1,716,695 276,720 83,587,005 56,665,967 116,575 19,348,578 76,126,551 360,249 76,486,800 11,920,187 8,754,209 0 3,648,932 24,323,328 80,738,304 466,477 1,583,471 4,443,085 87,231,337 395,000 139,776 87,766,113 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 14,628,853 136,296 1,023,819 15,788,968 35,800,140 66,000 35,866,140 49,919,558 0 1,352,092 51,271,650 1,179,957 1,179,957 106,319,278 0 964,111 107,283,389 0 0 107,283,389 58,219,465 0 229,311 58,448,776 0 58,448,776 97,643,904 512,163 13,121 2,322,583 100,491,771 334,473,523 0 0 978,246 335,451,769 0 0 335,451,769 144,283,564 0 334,641 144,618,205 184,291,816 0 4,281,847 188,573,663 0 0 188,573,663 26,395,631 0 0 26,395,631 17,055,754 0 17,055,754 2,170,080 0 0 2,170,080 72,688,489 2,848,560 10,057,257 85,594,306 0 1,265,171 0 1,265,171 3,576,684 0 0 3,576,684 0 0 3,576,684 8,935 0 0 8,935 0 8,935 7,373,356 595,973 0 0 7,969,329 1,334,032 0 56,631 0 1,390,663 0 0 1,390,663 726,158 0 0 726,158 185,181,265 324,287 6,947,343 192,453,663 1,716,695 276,720 194,447,078 114,894,367 116,575 19,577,889 134,584,262 360,249 134,944,511 116,937,447 9,862,345 13,121 5,971,515 132,784,428 416,545,859 466,477 1,640,102 5,421,331 424,073,769 395,000 139,776 424,608,545 173,325,857 2,612,932 1,717,401 177,656,190 233,884,147 1,363,652 6,385,282 241,633,081 32,000 116,760 241,781,841 41,750,642 136,296 1,023,819 42,910,757 52,855,894 66,000 52,921,894 -31-38 TABLE 31-F GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 2. Brazos Island Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Harbor, TX Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel 4. Corpus Christi Aransas Pass Outer Bar Ship Channel, Channel TX Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewel Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) 5. Freeport Outer Bar Channel Harbor, TX Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel 44-42 42 42 42 42 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 45 45 47 45 45 45 45 45 45 30 30 36 31-39 400 300 300 300 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 270 100 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,2008 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,250* 100 200 150 150 400 400 7504 400 1,000' 375 1,200' 200 500 200 38-36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 40-45 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 45 38 36 36 36 36 36 30 25 30 300 2.5 200 2.1 200 9.6 200 3.2 500 1.3 1,000 2,670 0.5 200 1.4 200 0.8 1,000 1,300 0.2 370-305 1,470 0.3 370-305 1,200 0.2 370 1,470 0.3 265 1,230 0.2 100 770 0.1 700 1.8 600 1.0 Irregular 1,550 - 100 0.1 2002 200 - 300-400 900 0.2 600-500 8.5 500 3.6 400 8.6 1,000 5,423 1.0 400 1.1 1,000 1,150 0.2 350 0.6 1,0505 1,690 0.3 200 3.1 900 1,000 0.2 200-250 1.8 700-900 1,000 0.2 300-400 5.6 1,200 800 0.1 1,2503 1,250 0.2 100 - 0.8 200 400 0.1 150 - 0.8 300 - 3.0 200 - 0.8 200-350 744-800 350-375 600 200 500 200 - 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 600 0.1 - 1.1 500 0.1 - 0.5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Brazos Harbor Turning Basin Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel Bolivar Roads Channel to 43rd St. Bolivar Roads to Morgan Channel, TX Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Bayport Ship Channel Turning Basin Anchorage Area Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 9. Matagorda Ship Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel, TX Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff 10. Sabine-Neches Sabine Bank Channel Waterway, TX Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin 5. (Continued) 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 8. Houston Ship 36 52 52 50 36 50 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 750 800 800 800 2,8751 800 1,125 400 400 300 300 900-1,000' 800' 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 525-675 800 800 800 2,875 800 1,125 675 0.1 - 4.7 - 1.7 - 3.2 - 1.81 - 1.0 - 3.9 30 42 42 40 36 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 60 60 175 100 300 300-200' 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 - 4.1 - 0.8 - 0.3 - 1.3 - 3.2 - 20.9 - 1.1 1,000 0.2 - 4.1 532 0.1 - 1.9 1,682 0.3 1,750 0.3 - 20.2 - 14.7 - 3.4 - 4.1 3,000 - - 5.6 - 6.2 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 31-40 400 - 26.2 400 - 12.8 300 - 2.4 300 - 5.3 948-1,0009 1,375 - 965-1,0709 1,592 - 300 - 0.6 300 - 2.9 400-1,000 3,100 0.6 150 1,000 0.2 60 - 0.9 300 - 3.1 2,000 2,000 0.4 300 - 3.8 1,600 1,000 0.3 150 - - 125 - 1.9 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 10. (Continued) Port Arthur West Turning Basin 40 600 40 350-550 1,610 0.3 Channel connecting Port Arthur West and Taylors Bayou Turning Basins 40 200-250 40 200-250 - 0.6 Taylors Bayou Turning Basin 40 150-1,000 40 90-1,233 3,470 0.7 Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River 40 400 40 400 - 11.2 Turning Point at Mile 19.5 40 900' 40 900' _ 8 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area Beaumont Turning Basin 40 400 40 400 - 18.3 Turning Point, Mile 31.1 40 1,000' 40 1,000 700 8 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 40 1,000' 40 1,000 930 8 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 40 1,000' 40 1,300 1,530 8 Channel Extension, Mile 40.3 36 350 36 350 1,265 0.2 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin 40 Irregular 40 Irregular 1,300 0.2 Beaumont Turning Basin 34 500 34 160-535 1,500 0.3 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension 34 350 34 300 - 0.4 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company 30 200 30 200 - 0.7 Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River 30 200 30 200 - 4.4 Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. 30 200 30 200 - 9.5 Orange Turning Basin 30 Irregular 30 Irregular 1,550 0.3 Orange Municipal Slip 30 200 30 150-200 2,435 0.5 Old Channel Around Harbor Island 25 150-200 25 150-200 - 2.4 Channel to Echo' 12 125 - - - - Adams Bayou 12 100 12 100 - 1.7 Cow Bayou 13 100 13 100 - 7.0 Orangefield Turning Basin 13 300 13 300 500 0.1 1 Average. .2 Includes 100-foot channel width. Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. ' Diameter. 6 Includes 350-foot channel width. 6 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. ' Deauthorized. 8 Included in channel length. 9 Includes 300-foot channel width. 31-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Depth in Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Fee! t Dimensions Length t) Feet Miles Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout West Turnout 9-Foot Channel Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel Colorado River Channel Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning Basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios Turning Basin No. 1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay Channel to Victoria Main Channel via East Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout Channel Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Main Turning Basin Turning Basin Extension Small Craft Basin Shrimp Basin TABLE 31-G Tributary Channel 2.3 2,200 0.4 500 635 1,130 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 12 12 2 12 S 12 4 9 9 5 9 6 9 99 7 15-12 12 12 12 12 12 * 12 12 12 9999 9. 99 9 14 14 14 14 to 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 125 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 200-100 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 100 60O cv 100 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 12 12 12 12 999 9 12 12 12 12 9 99999 9 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 125 125 125 100 100 400 150 125 200 300 130-400 100 500vG 100 100 200 100 200 342 VO) 125-175 300 0.2 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 80 23 1,22 2,21 12 1,80 - 34.8 )0Uv) 0.1 - 0.8 - 2.0 0 - - 0.5 - 2.1 5 0.2 - 6.1 2 0.4 5 0 0.3 - 0.8 - 0.4 30 0 0.1 - 7.7 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 31-42 1,250 580 860 1,450 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-G GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout from Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 125 - 25.812 Turning Basin near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 500 0.1 North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 - 0.7 Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 - 0.6 Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 - 0.4 South Leg 12 125 12 125 - 0.2 Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel 7 75 7 75 - 1.4 Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 - 0.3 Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 1,308 0.2 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at Mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. s Constructed by local interests. ' Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 was deauthorized. 6 Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 93-251. 6 Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) ' Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15- foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. e Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9 In the inactive category for maintenance. to Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) 1 South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 was deauthorized. 31-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 DREDGING OPERATIONS Brazos Island Harbor, TX (New Work) Dredging Inshore Reach No. 2, Station 23+000 to 46+000 October 1,1993 to January 4, 1994 1,647,637 $1,510,742 Dredging Inshore Reach No. 3, Station 46+000 to 89+500 April 5, 1994 to September 30, 1994 2,102,321 $2,292,410 Brazos Island Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Port Isabel Channel and Turning Basin November 3, 1993 to May 7, 1994 1,197,796 $1,315,588 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Beacon 82 through Tule Lake Turning Basin August 19,1994 to September 30, 1994 682,500 $921,109 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Entrance Channel August 3, 1994 to September 30, 1994 1,758,035 $2,238,657 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Bolivar Roads to Pier "B" December 7, 1993 to June 30, 1994 5,162,753 $2,673,610 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Emergency Dredging Freeport Harbor to Brazos River Crossing October 1, 1993 to December 2, 1993 800,078 $1,023,959 Dredging Port Mansfield Entrance Channel and Channel to Port Mansfield February 3, 1994 to April 6, 1994 1,030,306 $1,554,681 Dredging Main Channel in Matagorda Bay January 24, 1994 to March 25, 1994 408,775 $716,714 Dredging Main Channel across Aransas Bay January 13, 1994 to February 16, 1994 799,496 $411,308 Dredging Colorado River and Turning Basin March 24, 1994 to June 1, 1994 291,168 $801,029 Dredging Mile 302 to High Island May 13, 1994 to September 2, 1994 826,637 $1,779,301 Dredging Channel to Victoria and Channel to Sea Drift June 23, 1994 to August 20, 1994 1,135,211 $1,204,394 Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel October 1, 1993 to January 4, 1994 947,512 $732,529 Dredging Navigation Channel and Impounding Basin at Mouth of Colorado River December 21, 1993 to February 15, 1994 876,337 $1,689,849 Houston Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Bayport Ship Channel October 1, 1993 to December 23, 1993 882,139 $94,846 Dredging Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou May 31, 1994 to September 30, 1994 649,164 $1,913,208 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Matagorda Peninsula to Point Comfort October 26, 1993 to July 7, 1994 6,620,280 $2,979,410 Dredging Channel to Port Lavaca and Channel of Refuge April 15, 1994 to May 28, 1994 1,418,770 $591,833 31-44 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-H DREDGING OPERATIONS Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Red Bluff October 1,1993 to October 3, 1993 813,190 $77,343 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Port Arthur Canal October 1, 1993 to December 2, 1993 1,530,352 $1,357,456 Dredging Port Arthur Turning Basin, Junction Area, and Port Arthur and Sabine Neches Canals April 28, 1994 to September 30,1994 1,322,751 $1,646,054 Dredging Middle and Upper Reaches Neches River Channel May 20, 1994 to September 30, 1994 1,003,174 $1,635,923 Dredging Sabine Bank Channel (US Hopper Dredge Wheeler) December 10, 1993 to January 10, 1994 1,911,311 $2,294,000 Dredging Sabine Bank Channel (US Hopper Dredge Wheeler) August 12, 1994 to September 12, 1994 1,337,096 $2,146,000 Dredging Sabine Pass Outer Bar September 1, 1994 to September 30, 1994 1,883,984 $1,869,161 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Anahuac Channel and Channel to Liberty August 7, 1994 to September 30, 1994 475,086 $699,983 Taylors Bayou, TX (New Work) Dredging Plug Removal, Hillebrandt Bayou, Willow Marsh Bayou, and Bayou Din June 11, 1994 to September 30, 1994 282,944 $1,004,422 31-45 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises the watershed of the Canadian River and its tributaries in New Mexico; the watershed of Arkansas River and its tributaries in Colorado; the watershed of Rio Grande and its tributaries including the Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and the San Juan River Basin in New Mexico; and the watersheds of the Gila, San Francisco and Mimbres Rivers and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in June 1986 to include the portion of New Mexico west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM ........ 2. Alamogordo, NM .................. 3. Alamosa, CO .................... 4. Cochiti Wetfields, NM ............... 5. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM ..... 6. Conchas Lake, NM ................. 7. El Paso, TX ..................... 8. John Martin Reservoir, CO ............ 9. Rio Grande Basin, NM .............. 9A. Abiquiu Dam, NM ................. 9B. Cochiti Lake, NM ................. 9C. Galisteo Dam, NM ................ 9D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM .............. 9E. Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM ............. 9F. Rio Grande Floodway, NM ............ 9G. San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM . 9H. Truth or Consequences Unit, NM ........ Page 32-1 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-3 32-3 32-4 32-4 32-5 32-5 32-6 32-7 32-7 32-7 32-8 32-8 Flood Control (Continued) 10. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM .......... 11. Trinidad Lake, CO .................... 12. Two Rivers Dam, NM ............... 13. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................... 14. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ................. 15. Other authorized flood control projects ................... 16. Flood control work under special authorizations ................ General Investigations 17. Surveys .......................... 18. Collection and study of basic data ........ 19. Environmental Data Studies ............ 20. 21. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .. . Advance Engineering and Design ......... Flood Control 1. ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM Location. There are about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico, most of which are located in northcentral New Mexico. Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 1113, the project consists of about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico. These community ditch systems provide irrigation water to about 160,000 acres on an estimated 12,000 farms. Acequias have been in existence since the early Spanish Colonization period of the 17th and 18th Centuries and represent one of the oldest forms of cooperative institutions in the United States. They are an integral part of the culture and heritage of New Mexico. Diversion structures, many of which are constructed of available materials such as rock and brush, are frequently destroyed by flows greater than normal resulting from *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 32-1 Page 32-8 32-8 32-9 32-9 32-10 32-11 32-11 32-11 32-11 32-11 32-11 32-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 spring runoff or summer thunderstorms. Disruption of the ditches usually occurs during peak irrigation season and severely impacts crop production. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 directs the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to undertake measures, without regard to economic analysis, as are necessary to protect and restore the river diversion structures and associated canals. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor, the State of New Mexico, has a law whereby the State of New Mexico provides 17.5% of the project costs, and low interest loans to the local Acequias for the remaining 7.5%. The State of New Mexico has appropriated, and will appropriate on an annual basis, the funds necessary to meet the requirements of local sponsorship. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. Construction contracts were awarded in FY 1988, FY 1989, FY 1990, FY 1991, FY 1992, FY 1993 and FY 1994. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed on structures for three projects in FY 1993: El Ancone Diversion Ditch, Cabresto Irrigation Ditch and Santa Cruz and Llano Ditch. 2. ALAMOGORDO, NM. Location. The project is located in south central New Mexico in Otero County, in and near Alamogordo, NM. The city is situated at the foot of the Sacramento Mountains near the eastern edge of the Tularosa (Closed) Basin. Proposed Project. The authorized project consists of a concrete and rip-rap lined diversion channel with a Standard Project Flood flow capacity, which will intercept flows from the Sacramento Mountains east of the City. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 694 of Annual Report for 1966. Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and Results during fiscal year. An Interim Letter Report, which addressed locally preferred alternatives for the 100-year flood protection, was prepared and submitted. The letter report was approved and a General Reevaluation Report is being prepared. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Study efforts continued through FY 1994. 3. ALAMOSA, CO Location. The project lies in south central Colorado along the Rio Grande, in the community of Alamosa, CO. Proposed Project. The project consists of a levee system which will replace and augment the existing spoil bank levees. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design activities were initiated in FY 1990 and continued through the fiscal year. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. The project cooperation agreement is scheduled to be signed in January 1995. Construction is scheduled to begin in January 1996. 4. COCHITI WETFIELDS, NM Location. Cochiti Dam and Lake is in north-central New Mexico approximately 50 miles north of Albuquerque, New Mexico. The Pueblo de Cochiti is located immediately downstream of the dam. Proposed Project. The project consists of installing an underground drainage system on 625 acres, the establishment of an operation, maintenance, and replacement sinking fund, settlement of past crop losses sustained by Pueblo de Cochiti, and wetland mitigation. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Operation and results during fiscal year. Plans and specification were completed in FY 1993. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Construction of the subdrain system was completed in September 1994. 5. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION CHANNELS, NM Location. The project is located in an area which comprises watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15-mile reach of the Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, NM, and vicinity. 32-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT Combined drainage area of the tributaries is about 276 square miles. The Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of the Rio Grande, forms the eastern border of the watersheds. The crest of this mountain range rises more than a mile over the river to an elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Existing project. Improvements consist of north and south diversion channels on high ground east of and parallel to the valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude to standard project flood from all tributaries. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-15 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 17-2 of the Annual Report for FY 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The North Diversion Channel prevented $4,519,500 in flood damages during FY 1994. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented are $144,721,800. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1994 were: North Diversion Channel near Alameda 5,040 c.f.s.; South Diversion Channel 1,030 c.f.s. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the North and South Diversion Channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. The South Diversion Channel is in good condition and well maintained by the local interests. The North Diversion Channel has experienced severe arching and cracking of the concrete lined portion. Construction to correct this problem was initiated and completed in FY 1987. Additionally, a hydraulic flow problem exists on the North Diversion Channel. A model study, completed in February 1986, identified corrective measures. A letter report will be completed in FY 95 addressing alternatives to correct the hydraulic deficiency. 6. CONCHAS LAKE, NM Location. The dam is in San Miguel County, NM, on the Canadian River, just below the confluence of the Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map, Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This dam consists of a concrete gravity main section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in the Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side having an overall length of about 3.7 miles. The main section contains conduits in its base for the release of water from the reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. The earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and the north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 513,900 acre-feet (198,170 for flood control, 254,200 for water conservation and irrigation, and 61,530 dead storage). The dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None Required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for storage of floodwater and releases for irrigation purposes. Sediment damages of $141,300 were prevented during FY 1994. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 1994. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1994 were $3,698,600. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1994 were $163,500. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1994 were $10,172,600. The pool elevation at the start of FY 1994 was 4,194.35 feet with corresponding storage of 265,785 acrefeet. Total releases for this reporting period were 162,267 acrefeet. Releases of 95,036 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,664 acre-feet to Bell Ranch and 64,566 acre feet to the Canadian River Channel. The pool elevation on September 30, 1994 was 4,196.53 feet with corresponding storage of 275,022 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 1,262 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was essentially complete in 1939. Irrigation of some lands downstream from the project began in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was completed in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1983. A contract to realign the north and south dam road approaches was awarded in 1994. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 7. EL PASO, TX Location. The project is located at El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on the left bank of the Rio Grande in the reach that forms part of the international boundary between the United States and the Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of a single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, conduits 32-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into the Rio Grande, Runoff from the tributary arroyos on the eastern, southern, and western slopes of the adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of the city and its outlying suburban developments. The project is divided into three independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applied for the Northwest and Central areas. The Local Cooperation Agreement for the Southeast area reflects the cost sharing requirements contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1992 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (September 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982); Keystone Dam (September 1983); Keystone Outlet Conduit (March 1984); Highway Diversion Channel (May 1985); Dam Safety Assurance Program to the existing Range and Northgate Dams (May 1986); Borderland Diversion Channel (September 1986); and Phelps Dodge Basin (January 1990). During FY 1992 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal, however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Pershing Dam, Dam Safety Assurance work was completed in December 1992. It was the only remaining work in the Central Area. The Northwest Area of the project for all practical purposes is 100 percent complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Southeast Area was completed in September 1987. Construction was completed in January 1990 on the Phelps Dodge Basin, in June 1992 on Phelps Dodge Channel, in March 1993 on Americas Basin, and in January 1994 on Bluff Channel Phase I. 8. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO Location. The project is located on the Arkansas River, in Bent County, 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, about 18 miles upstream from the city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. The project consists of a concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 106 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Total capacity of the reservoir at the top of flood control is 608,250 acre-feet (259,800 for flood control and 348,450 for conservation and recreation storage). This reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For details of the completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17- 16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of the Arkansas River Compact. Sediment damages of $151,900 were prevented during FY 1994. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by this project through FY 19943 were $92,418,100. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1994 were $361,100. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $25,827,700. Maximum pool elevation of 3,830.55 feet with corresponding storage of 151,429 acre-feet occurred on June 14, 1994. Total releases for FY 1994 were 223,833 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 92,387 acre-feet. Sediment deposition was 1,356 acre-feet in FY 1994. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of the reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. A contract to for painting the tainter gates was awarded in 1994. The project structures are in good condition and operational. 9. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Location. Improvements are on the Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of development of water resources of the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico (H. Doc 243, 81st Cong., Ist sess.) with the exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at 32-4 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT Chamita Dam. Although recommended, Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from the authorized plan. It was excluded without prejudice from future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by the States of Colorado and Texas, that the project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By the same act, Congress also authorized for the construction irrigation phase of the comprehensive plan as recommended by the Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with a joint agreement approved by the Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement the Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of the unified plan of improvement. Authority for the Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation and Table 32-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects contained in the authorized plan are reflected in individual reports on the following pages. 9A. ABIQUIU DAM, NM Location. The project is one unit of the flood control plan for the Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is on the Rio Chama near the town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from the confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-1, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of the left abutment. The reservoir provides 568,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at the spillway crest is 1,198,500 acrefeet. For a detailed description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. A non-Federal hydropower plant was completed in 1990 by the County of Los Alamos. The capacity of this plant is 13.2 MW. Drainage adits were completed in 1990 to alleviate seepage problems in the north and south abutments. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 1960. On October 1, 1993, the pool elevation was 6,226.79 feet. The maximum pool (6,232.66 feet) and storage (244,441 acre-feet) occurred on May 26, 1994. On September 30, 1994, the pool elevation was 6,213.28 feet with a corresponding storage of 162,698 acre-feet. There was 1,489 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1994. There were $55,248,900 in flood damages prevented during FY 1994. Sediment damages prevented were $166,800. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $364,997,600 through FY 1994. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in February 1963. A contract to paint the tower shaft is in progress. Emergency gates were not installed in the outlet conduit of Abiquiu Dam during its construction. A plan for the Abiquiu Dam emergency gates has been prepared in accordance with Section 1112 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Construction of the emergency gates is necessary to increase safety and enhance flood and sediment control. A Design Memorandum was prepared in FY 1991. 9B. COCHITI LAKE, NM Location. The dam is at river mile 340 on the Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at the intersection of the New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. The project extends generally in an east-west line across the Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of the Rio Grande and then southward across the Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160- foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is part of the embankment on the south side of the Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in the left abutment on the Rio Grande. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 597,000 acre-feet at the spillway crest, of which 155,000 acre-feet is dedicated for recreation and sediment control. The project controls flood waters from a 32-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvement details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17- 14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1993, the pool elevation was 5,335.68 feet with a corresponding storage of 50,557 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,372.41 feet with a storage of 123,187 acre-feet on June 7, 1994. On September 30, 1994 the pool elevation was 5,337.75 feet with a corresponding storage of 53,179 acre-feet. There was 1,240 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1994. There were $101,696,100 flood damages prevented during FY 1994. Sediment damages prevented were $138,900. Accumulated total damages prevented are $399,098,600. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completed in 1977. The Tetilla Peak recreation area was completed in 1981. A contract to paint the service gates is underway and is scheduled to be completed in March 1994. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 9C. GALISTEO DAM, NM Location. The dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande. The reservoir will extend upstream from the dam for about 4 miles, near the village of Waldo, NM. (See Geological Survey Map,. San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above the streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10-foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with a discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with a pool at the spillway crest elevation. The spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in the right abutment. The project has 79,600 acre-feet of flood control storage and 9,856 acre-feet of sediment space. For more details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations aid results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1993. No storage occurred during FY 1994. Peak inflow was 1,230 c.f.s. and maximum outflow was 1,230 c.f.s. There was 53 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1994. Sediment damages prevented during the FY were $5,900 totaling $145,300 through FY 1994. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1970. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 9D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM Location. The project is located in Sandoval County, NM, on the Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from the confluence of the Jemez River and the Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, NM. (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 780 feet long with maximum height of 146.6 feet above streambed, and off-channel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13-foot diameter gated outlet in the left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with a pool at spillway crest elevation. The dam was raised 14.1 feet and the spillway widened 28 feet in 1986 and 1987 to provide adequate discharge capability to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir has a capacity of 100,485 acrefeet at spillway crest (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 33,100 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1993, the pool elevation was 5,192.67 feet with a corresponding storage of 22,120 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,199.49 feet with a storage of 31,377 acre-feet on May 10, 1994. On September 30, 1994 the pool elevation was 5,192.24 feet with a corresponding storage of 21,585 acre-feet. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during FY 1994. Sediment deposition during FY 1994 was 387 acre-feet. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1994. Sediment benefits during FY 1994 were $43,300. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1994 were $17,557,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1953. A contract to dewater the stilling 32-6 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT basin for inspection was awarded. Project structures are in good condition and all structures are in operation. 9E. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM Location. The project is composed of 45 square miles of floodplain lying along the Rio Grande from the vicinity of Corrales to Belen, New Mexico. Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project consists of raising and rehabilitating 51.5 miles of levees to provide the 270-year level of protection, and the creation of 75 acres of wetlands from borrow areas within the bosque, and acquisition of 200 acres to satisfy fish and wildlife mitigation requirements. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $59,300,000 ($44,600,000 Federal and $14,700,000 non-Federal) 1 Oct 92 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Limited Reevaluation Report was completed in FY 94 and the Project Cooperation Agreement for the Corrales Unit of the project is scheduled to be executed in May 1995. A Limited Reevaluation Study of the Belen Unit was initiated. 9F. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Location. This project is one unit of the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of improvement for the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is on the Rio Grande and covers a section of the river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream to Espaiola, NM, about river mile 394. (See Table 32-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) Existing project. This project consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect the levees. Construction of the project is a joint undertaking by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by the Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, and bank protection work, with channel-rectification and drainage-rehabilitation work being the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist throughout the reach of the river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by the meandering river. (See Table 32-D on existing project and Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to the usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of the project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act, Section 401, 1986 Water Resource Development Act, and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for the completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with the construction of the Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. The Espafiola Valley unit is in the deferred category. Neither the city of Espafiola nor Santa Clara Pueblo have given any indication that they plan any positive action to solve the flooding problem. For more details see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were $2,918,400 flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1994. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1994 amounted to $48,319,400. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 7,760 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on May 11, 1994. The peak at San Acacia was 7,760 c.f.s. on July 8, 1994. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Albuquerque unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Bernalillo to Belen unit was completed in June 1986. The General Design Memorandum for the San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit was approved in August 1990. Construction was initiated on the Truth or Consequences Unit in fiscal year 1989. The Espaiiola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 9G. SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT, NM Location. The project is located along the Rio Grande, extending from the upper end of the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel at the San Acacia diversion works to the head of Elephant Butte Reservoir. Proposed project. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consists of the reconstruction of 55 miles of existing spoil bank levee which separates the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel from the cleared floodway. 32-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $57,600,000 ($50,400,000 Federal and $7,200,000 non- Federal) 1 Oct 93 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 apply. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 modified the Local Sponsor's required contribution. 9H. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Location. This project is located on Cuchillo Negro Creek in the vicinity of the city of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948 and 1950, modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, to provide that the Secretary is authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande in lieu of the originally authorized floodway. The project has been constructed at an estimated total cost of $17,200,000 ($12,910,000 Federal and $3,400,000 Non-Federal) 1 October 1991 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of this unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project was completed in July 1991. 10. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM Location. The project is located on a lake in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM. (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Operation of the project began in November 1979. It consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. The purposes of the project are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipator. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 439,860 acre-feet which includes 72,860 acrefeet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. The surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,594 acres. The contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. For a more detailed report of the authorized project including the modification to existing Sumner Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs is the responsibility of the Federal Government; however, the Carlsbad Irrigation District is required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an equal amount to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. The Carlsbad Irrigation District also agreed to use Sumner Lake for flood control. Because they realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, they will continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks manages the recreation facilities. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974 for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The project was completed in late 1979 and reservoir operation for irrigation was started in March 1980. Pool elevation at the start of the fiscal year was 4,744.09 feet with storage of 93,787 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 111,577 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1994 was 4,740.03 acre-feet with a storage of 80,093 acrefeet. The maximum elevation was 4,746.31 feet with a storage of 101,906 acre-feet on June 4, 1994. There was 1,172 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. No flood damages were prevented in FY 1994. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $131,300. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 53,471 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $187,100 with an accumulative total of $2,313,200 through FY 1994. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the recreation area was completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979 and construction was completed in FY 1982. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 11. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO Location. This project is located on the Purgatorie River 32-8 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT about 161 miles above its junction with the Arkansas River. The Project is about 4 miles upstream from the city of Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map, Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in the left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in the right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,800 c.f.s. with a water surface at top of the flood control pool. In 1985, a 3- foot high parapet wall on top of the upstream face of the dam and a supplemental 700-foot wide rock cut emergency spillway located on the right abutment were constructed to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir provides for storage of 63,698 acre-feet for flood control, 37,325 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet for irrigation, and 4,500 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 125,523 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and is operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatorie River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of the irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. On October 1, 1993 the pool elevation was 6,178.05 feet with a corresponding storage of 20,443 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,194.05 feet with a corresponding storage of 32,693 acre-feet on May 13, 1994. On September 30, 1994 the pool elevation was 6,160.32 feet with a corresponding storage of 10,976 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 1994 was 245 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1994 was $58,300. Accrued sediment benefits are $2,338,100. Irrigation benefits for FY 1994 were $106,200. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1994 were $1,678,100. Irrigation benefit releases for the year were 27,029 acre-feet. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was completed in May 1983. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 12. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM Location. The project is located about 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM on the Rio Hondo and the Rocky Arroyo. The Rio Hondo is formed at the confluence of the Rio Ruidoso and the Rio Bonito, near the village of Hondo, NM, in the foothills region east of Sierra Blanca in the southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with the Pecos River near Roswell, NM. (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The Two Rivers project consists of two dams: Diamond "A" and Rocky. The Diamond "A" Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. The Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for water storage, except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled so that flows through Roswell will not exceed the Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 600 c.f.s. The capacity of the Two Rivers Reservoir at its spillway crest is 163,775 acre-feet, of which 13,775 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-18, of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1993. There were no flood damages prevented during 1994. Sediment damages prevented were $9,700. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1994 were $85,010,800. There were 87 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1994. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 1994 are $1,089,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and was placed in operation July 1963. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. The projects in Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for fiscal year 1993 were $137,288. 32-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 14.' SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, five projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, Sumner, Navajo, and Brantley Dams. Platoro Dam on the Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. The authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Platoro is operated by the Conejos Water Conservancy District. Total storage is 59,571 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acre-feet solely for flood control. The 53,571 acre-feet is joint use storage with flood control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by the Interior Appropriation Act of 1941. (See H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of this project was completed by the Bureau of Reclamation in 1952. On October 1, 1993 storage in Platoro Reservoir was 42,960 acre-feet at elevation 10,015.51 feet. Maximum storage of 53,530 acre-feet at elevation 10,027.53 feet occurred on June 30, 1994. On September 30, 1994, storage was 40,090 acrefeet at elevation 10,012.02 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 2,420 c.f.s. on June 2, 1994. There were $220,000 in flood damages prevented by the project during FY 1994. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $5,159,000. Total cost for activity, by the Corps of Engineers during FY 1994 was $17,221. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Bureau of Reclamation and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County, Colorado. Pueblo Reservoir has 27,000 acrefeet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1994 was 115,795 acre-feet, elevation 4,839.39 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 212,219 acre-feet at elevation 4,868.37 feet on March 28, 1994. Storage on September 30, 1994 was 99,073 acre-feet at elevation 4,835.03 feet. There were $289,600 flood damages prevented in FY 1994. Total flood damages prevented to date are $4,386,200. Total cost for FY 1994 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $25,978. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 71b.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Sumner is operated by the Carlsbad Irrigations District. Storage on October 1, 19932 was 34,823 acre-feet at elevation 4,257.60 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1994 was 44,967 acre-feet at elevation 4,261.42 feet on June 22, 1994. Storage on September 30, 1994 was 25,632 acre-feet at elevation 4,253.47 feet. Total cost for FY 1994 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $15,831. Navajo Dam and Reservoir is located on the San Juan River at river mile 298.6 in San Juan County, New Mexico. Navajo Dam was authorized as part of a Colorado River Storage Project by an act of 84th Congress, 11 April 1956 (PL 485). The Bureau of Reclamation constructed and is responsible for operation of the project. Construction was initiated in June 1958 and the project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,708,600 acre-feet. The project controls a drainage area of 3,230 square miles. Storage on October 1, 1993 was 1,659,900 acre-feet, elevation 6,082.66 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1994 was 1,659,900 acre-feet, elevation 6,082.66 feet on May 2, 1994. Storage on September 30, 1994 was 1,400,600 acre-feet, elevation 6,064.43 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1994 activity was $17,469. Brantley Dam on the Pecos River above the town of Carlsbad in Eddy County, NM controls runoff from 13,208 square miles of uncontrolled area. The authorized purposes are irrigation, flood control, fish and wildlife and recreation and for the elimination of the hazards of failure of the McMillan and the Avalon Dams. The total storage is 348,544 acre-feet with 189,700 acre-feet for flood control. The Brantley Dam was authorized for construction on 20 October 1972 by Public Law 92-514 with the cost ceiling raised for the project in October 1980 by Public Law 96-375. On September 6, 1988 the conduits were closed and Brantley Dam started its initial filling. On September 30, 1994, the storage was 24,946 acre-feet at elevation 3,246.85 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1994 activity was $13,880. 32-10 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-E. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Costs during FY 1994 were: Canon City, CO, $7,289; Kings Arroyo, CO, $334; Little Puerco River, Gallup, NM, $9,740; Oak Creek, Florence, CO, $531; Rio Ruidoso Village, NM, $98; Zuni River at Zuni, NM, $101,602; and Rio Ojo Caliente, NM, $15,000. Emergency flood control activities; repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) There were no Federal costs in FY 1994 for advance preparation, none for flood emergency operations, and there were no repair and restoration costs. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Alameda Street, Santa Fe, NM, $94; Camino Alire Bridge, Santa Fe River, Santa Fe, NM, $30,390; Hampton Arroyo at McCoy Street, Aztec, NM; -$31,560; Highway 62 Bridge, Santa Fe River, Santa Fe, NM, $24,134; Highway 75, Embudo Creek, Rio Arriba, NM, $14,168; Isidro Road, Santa Fe River, Santa Fe, NM, $65,607; Overton Road, Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO, $37,956; Pump Station at the Rio Fernando de Taos, Taos, NM, $22,141; State Highway 194, Bents Old Fort, Arkansas Road, La Junta, CO, $2,086; State Road 12, Starkweather Road, Reserve, NM, $111,251; State Road 44 at Rio Salado, San Ysidro, NM, $54,621; Cubero Village Bridge, NM, $5,000; Madrid Fire Station, NM, $14,629; Mora Sewage Lagoons, NM, 11525. Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control (Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, 83rd Cong.) There were no costs during FY 1994. General Investigations 17. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $891,696 for flood damage prevention studies, $11,446 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies). 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $198,041 for flood plain management and technical services. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, special study for Pikes Peak flood warning systems, hydrometeorological studies, sedimentation studies, and environmental data studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $9,774. 19. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES Environmental Data Study costs for FY 1994 were $7,404. 20. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Continuation of Planning and Engineering costs in FY 1994 were $2,849. 21. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Advance Engineering and Design Costs for FY 1994 were $8,429. 32-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 1. Acequias Irrigation New Work System, NM Alamogordo, NM Alamosa, CO Cochiti Wetfields, NM Albuquerque Diversion Channels Project, NM (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) Conchas Lake, NM Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 1,972,000 851,000 1,403,995 1,245,399 230,000 209,013 259,000 242,776 - ".-5,939 181,000 111,811 241,000 250,751 270,000 268,438 300,000 206,200 95,000 88,537 808,000 1,054,199 202,000 198,776 205,000 204,681 750,000 8,259,000' 518,973 7,168,745' 345,000 2,806,000 343,800 2,770,101 300,000 72,809 10,340,000' 78,7042 1,718,000 11,232,000 14,000,0003 106,899 1,059,739 13,645,851' 81,669 30,000 17,875,450 22,410 17,710,538 518,356 518,356 854,664 854,664 13,821,4994 13,821,4994 879,000 1,044,000 891,397 901,113 827,000 959,639 1,194,000 19,898,519 1,100,671 19,774,906 2,138,000 6,095,000 3,590,000 6,830,000 82,093,2945 1,276,426 4,869,596 6,021,890 1,690,991 79,707,3925 S.- - 15,555,3586 - - - - 15,555,3586 1,687,400 1,527,826 1,673,000 2,069,700 25,861,918 1,738,677 1,460,533 1,648,419 1,968,115 25,733,911 32-12 2. 3. 4. 5. 8. El Paso, TX John Martin Reservoir ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 Rio Grande Basin, NM Abiquiu Dam, NM 9B. Cochiti Lake, NM Galisteo Dam, NM Jemez Canyon Dam, NM Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. NM Cost 26,745,028 26,745,028 1,035,000 1,550,100 1,302,000 2,510,951 31,461,204 1,216,334 1,618,868 1,351,351 2,200,973 31,139,705 S- - - 128,000 96,956,559 - - - 128,000 96,956,559 1,587,000 1,791,900 1,604,000 1,926,000 21,467,967 1,540,779 1,699,299 1,771,798 1,868,275 21,342,452 14,275,053 14,275,053 193,000 209,635 171,000 162,257 202,000 184,000 2,907,924 194,029 190,540 2,897,037 6,293,972 6,293,972 430,000 723,000 489,518 458,915 50,000 40,697 200,000 132,037 554,000 566,500 9,104,132 725,083 631,877 9,074,367 422,000 1,816,000 1,859,0007 416,988 778,852 1,776,7227 9F. Rio Grande Floodway New Work Approp. Cost Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache, NM Rio Grande Floodway T or C Unit, NM New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 351,000 450,000 380,527 389,372 4,042,000 180,000 5,219,452 573,136 225,000 6,100,000 8,322,0009 177,380 216,173 2,440,9259 53,156 - 13,005,0000'- t 66,625 13,000,050'"' 32-13 9. 9A. 9C. 9D. 9E. 9G. 9H. 4,794,868d 4,794,8688 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sept. 30, 1994 10. Santa Rosa Dam New Work & Lake, NM Approp. - - - 41,039,741 Cost - - - - 41,039,056 Maint. Approp. 787,000 769,000 770,000 807,000 8,837,136 Cost 870,253 754,693 740,879 783,562 8,760,932 11. Trinidad Lake, CO New Work Approp. - - - - 55,774,758 Cost - - - - 55,774,758 Maint. Approp. 465,000 557,000 331,000 554,000 7,570,529 Cost 514,772 523,991 346,159 513,897 7,505,586 12. Two Rivers Dam, New Work NM Approp. - - - - 4,847,244 Cost - - - - 4,847,244 Maint. Approp. 418,000 171,000 224,000 334,000 4,043,722 Cost 363,255 237,213 217,110 337,611 4,027,882 'Reflects PED funding appropriations beginning in FY 1986. include non-Federal contributions of $1,529,000. 2PED activities were initiated in FY 1991. 3Includes $750,000 FY 88 Construction General Funds and $300,000 O&M funds, added in FY 1992. Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs and $869,978 for emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326, cost of initiating project under the authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work performed with funds transferred to the Corps under Public Works acceleration Act of 1962. 3Does not include non-Federal contributions of $1,130,000. 6Excludes $59,977 emergency Includes $30,000 for Code 710. relief funds for new work. 'Includes $1,177,000 PED funds. 8Includes funds for preconstruction planning of Espaiiola Valley unit. Excludes $1,000,011 appropriated funds transferred to Bureau of Reclamation under memorandum of agreement between that agency and the Corps. '4ncludes $1,658,000 PED funds. 'OStarting in FY 1982, AE&D programs are funded through GI appropriations. "Does not include non-Federal contributions of $3,425,000. 32-14 TABLE 32-A (Continued) ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 31, 1992 Aug. 26, 1992 Oct. 27, 1965 See Section T T t Documents Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. (Sec. 1113) Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 101) Public Law 102-358 102d Cong, (H.R. 4437) H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' 32-15 Project and Work Authorized ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM. An Irrigation System dating back to the eighteenth century with significant engineering works in the settlement and development of the western portion of the United States. Restoration and preservation of this system has cultural and historic values to the region. Measures are necessary to restore and protect the river division structures and associated canals. ALAMOSA, COLORADO Authorized a flood control project for Alamosa, Colorado. COCHITI WETFIELDS, NEW MEXICO Authorized and directed the construction of an underground drainage system necessary to correct the high ground water problem at the Pueblo de Cochiti. EL PASO, TX A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) 1. 3. 7. I I ex� REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948 and May 17, 1950 Oct. 31, 1992 RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Department of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized installation of the Abiquiu Dam Emergency Gates by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM Authorized project for flood control, Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM. Authorized increase of flood protection through the dredging of the bed of the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Albuquerque, NM to an elevation lower than existed on the date of enactment of this Act. The project shall include the establishment of 75 acres of wetlands for fish and wildlife habitat and the acquisition of 200 acres of land for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache Unit.) RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT, NM Modified the cost sharing to more equitably reflect the non-Federal contribution for the project by that percentage of benefits which is attributable to the Federal properties; except that, for purposes of this subsection, Federal property benefits may not exceed 50 percent of the total project benefits. 32-16 H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong.,1st sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. Public Law 662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Cong., 1st sess.' and Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 102(e)) 11E. 11F. 11G. ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents I1H. Jun. 30, 1948 TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM H. Doc. 243, 81st Approved comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin is set forth Cong., 1st sess. in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 15, 1948, for flood control of Rio Grande Basin. May 17, 1950 In addition to previous authorizations, the completion of the plan H. Doc. 243, 81st approved in the Flood Control Act of 1948, for the Rio Grande Basin, Cong., 1st sess. at an estimated cost of $39,000,000. Nov. 17, 1986 Modify previous authorizations to provide that the Secretary is Public Law 662, authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek 99th Cong., 2nd in lieu of the authorized floodway. sess. (Sec 871) 'Contains latest published maps. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM TABLE 32-C RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8 of Text) Miles Drainage Total Above Nearest Area (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espaiola, 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high, 30,397,0963 NM 1,212,000 acre feet capacity Jemez Canyon Jemez Dam 2 Bernalillo, 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 106,100 4,217,206 NM acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Rio Grande 123 - - Channel rectification, levee 25,744,0002 Floodway to 394' enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 340' Cochiti, NM 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 596,300 96,900,000 acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, NM 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 89,000 14,340,280 acre-feet capacity 'River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. 3lncludes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities and $3,600,000 for emergency gates. 32-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 32-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation & Proiect Report For Construction Maintenance Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico 1966 189,356 - Alpine, Texas' 1977 130,488 - Cibolo Creek, Texas' 1983 829,500 - Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colorado (Templeton Gap Floodway)' 1959 881,262 - Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)' 1952 219,789 - Fountain Creek, Pueblo, Colorado' 1993 6,564,399 - Highway 12, Colorado' 1985 120,500 - Holly, Colorado' 1985 2,021,400 - Las Animas, Colorado' 1980 4,956,000 - Las Cruces, New Mexico= 1980 4,815,236 - Pecos, Texas' 1977 480,273 - Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec.212)' - 130.678 - Pueblo, Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)' 1954 201,958 - Puerco River, Gallup, New Mexico' 1993 4,678,239 - Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico' 1983 1,123,900 - Smith Creek, Colorado' 1985 219,000 - Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico' 1965 2,259,328 - 'Completed. 'Responsibility of local interests. 'Inactive. 'Deferred. 32-18 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT * This district (total area about 230,000 square miles) which is southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific southwestern Utah, and all of Arizona, except the Ocean that are in California between the Mexican northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 miles north in southern Nevada and southeastern California;and the of the entrance to the Los Angeles Harbor). The lower southern Arizona that drain southward into Mexico. Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ.) IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA 2. LA-LB Harbor (LA Harbor), CA 3. Marina Del Rey, CA 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 5. Newport Bay Harbor, CA 6. Oceanside Harbor, CA 7. Oceanside Sand By-Pass, CA 8. Port Hueneme, CA 9. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA 10. San Diego Harbor, CA 11. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA 12. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 13. Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA 14. Ventura Harbor, CA Flood Control 15. Alamo Dam, AZ 16. Clifton, AZ 17. Hansen Dam, CA 18. Holbrook, AZ 19. Lake Elsinore, CA 20. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA 21. Los Angeles River, CA 22. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA 23. Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ 24. Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (Stage 2) 25. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dam, Colorado RB, NV 26. Rillito River, CA 27. Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA 28. Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA 29. Santa Paula Creek, CA 30. San Luis Rey River, CA 31. Sepulveda Dam, CA 32. Sweetwater River, CA 33. Tucson Diversion Channel (Recreation Development), 34. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ 35. Whitewater River and Floodwarning, San Bernardino and Riverside County, CA 36. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 37. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 38. Flood Control work under Special Authorization Page 33-02 33-02 33-03 33-03 33-03 33-03 33-04 33-04 33-04 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-06 33-06 33-06 33-06 33-06 33-07 33-07 33-07 33-07 33-08 33-08 33-08 33-08 33-09 33-09 33-09 33-10 33-10 33-10 33-10 AZ33-11 33-11 General Investigations 39. Surveys 40. Collection and Study of Basic Data 41. Preconstruction Engineering and Design 41A. Carneros Creek, CA 41B. Lower Santa Cruz, AZ 41C. Nogales Wash, AZ 41D. Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV Tables Table 33-A Table 33-B Table 33-C Table 33-D Table 33-E Table 33-F Table 33-G Cost and Financial Statement Authorizing Legislation Other Authorized Navigation Projects Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects 33-11 33-11 33-1 1 33-12 Page 33-12 33-12 33-12 33-12 33-12 33-13 33-13 33-14 33-21 33-35 33-36 33-37 33-40 33-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Navigation 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about a mile northwest of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202). Existing project. For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1981. Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Normal maintenance was performed. 2. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS (LA HARBOR), CA Location. On the coast of southern California in San Pedro bay about 25 miles south of the City of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. Previous projects. For details see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report 1984. Existing project. The recommended Federal project will include project increments 2 through 5 for the Port of Los Angeles. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development act. The revised recommended project has changed due to the withdrawal of the Port of Long Beach on 1 October 1991. The Port of Los Angeles might receive credit, contingent upon the Secretary of the Army's approval for advance work performed per WRDA 1988. Terminal Facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 82,553 feet of wharves, of which 75,729 feet are owned by the city and 6,824 feet are owned by private interest, In Long Beach Harbor, 58,985 feet of wharves, of which 51,775 feet are owned by the city and 7,210 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, Federal Government owns 19,700 feet of waterfront inside the Navy Mole, exclusive of finger piers. The Final Report presented and recommended four project increments. Increment No. 2 would deepen the existing Los Angeles Harbor approach and entrance channels to Pier 300 to provide better access to dry bulk facilities. Increment No. 3 would further deepen the Los Angeles approach and entrance channel to Pier 300 and part of Pier 400, and deepen a south channel to provide access to the eastern side of Pier 400 and liquid bulk facilities. Increments No. 4 and 5 would extend Increment No. 3 of Los Angeles to provide access to container terminals that would be located on part of Pier 300 and pier 400. The material obtained from the dredging will be used to create new landfill within the port and shallow water habitat for the least tern. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is poor. Continued Comprehensive Condition Survey of the Los Angeles-Long Beach breakwaters; preliminary indication that structure elevations are below project design. Shoaling in Los Angeles River Estuary and Los Angeles Harbor (East Basin Channel) affecting navigability of these waterways. Extensive shoaling of Los Angeles River Estuary and downstream movement of shoal threatens closure of Queen's way Marina. Last hydrosurvey of Los Angeles River Estuary was March 1993; last hydrosurvey of Los Angeles Harbor was April 1994. Initiated contract for sediment testing in Los Angeles Harbor and Los Angeles River Estuary. Record of decision was issued on 21 January 1994. The Port began advance construction of increments 2 and 4 in September 1994. 3. MARINA DEL REY, CA Location. Marina Del Rey is located on Santa Monica Bay, 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles, 29 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 390 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay. Existing project. For details see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981. Existing Federal navigation project 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT consists of two jetties and navigation channels. A severe shoaling problem in the harbor is complicated by contaminated materials, causing a potential threat to navigation and costly maintenance. Local cooperations. Fully complied with. County of Los Angeles requested a new study, and local support expressed by letter to CESPL dated 5 August 1992. Terminal facilities. There are over 6,000 berths servicing recreational craft within the Harbor and 28 additional transient slips located at Chase Park. A Coast Guard Station with a permanently assigned 82-foot cutter; a fire fighting detachment with a fire boat, a pumper, a ladder truck; and a Sheriff's Harbor Patrol with five patrol boats and five auxiliary vessels are on 24-hour duty. A fuel dock is located on the west side of the main channel. A 10-lane public launching ramp with parking for 740 cars and trailers; dry storage for 396 trailer-borne boats; and several commercial hoists are in operation as well as two haul-out yards, one containing a 100-ton and a 60-ton marine travel lift. Six hotels, 14 public parking lots, 26 restaurants, 19 apartment complexes, a ship chandlery, a fisherman's village shopping and tourist center, 26 restaurants, several snack bars, five coffee shops, and eight yacht clubs called the marina home port. Also included are sailing instruction, boat rental, repair and storage, harbor tours, sport fishing, yacht clubs, and retail facilities. Operations during fiscal year. There are elevated levels of contaminants contained within the Marina's sediments. Suspect Ballona Creek as primary source of contaminants. Portions of the Marina's sediments unsuitable for unrestricted open disposal. Efforts are underway to identify suitable placement areas for these sediments. 4. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles south of Monterey Bay 120 miles northwest of Santa Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles. (see Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5387). Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. The City of Morro Bay signed a FCSA 1 September 1988. PCA scheduled for execution in FY95. Terminal facilities. Facilities which are adequate for existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by California Department on Parks and Recreation; 1,396 feet of floating docks constructed by the city of Morro Bay; 1,398 feet of privately owned piers; and 5,435 feet of privately owned floating docks. Operations during the fiscal year. Project comprises dredging seaward of entrance to a depth of 40' and dredging a sand trap within the entrance to a depth of 30. 5. NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA. Location. Forty miles southeast of Los Angeles. Existing project. Provides rubblemound entrance jetties, 920-foot deep and 500 foot wide entrance channel and main channel, inner channels, a turning basin, and anchorage areas. Upper Newport is a shallow 800 acre Marine Estuary. Navigation project maintained by SPL. Pursuant to Section 841 and subject to Section 903 (b) of WRDA, 1986 the project for navigation for the Harbor is modified to dredge and maintain a 250-foot wide channel in Upper Newport Bay to boundary of Upper Newport Bay State Ecological Preserve to a depth of 15-feet. Local cooperation. Orange County by letter dated 25 March 1987. Letter of support dated 3 March 1993. Operation during fiscal year. Project condition is adequate. 6. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Oceanside Small Harbor Craft District sent letter of support dated 33-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 April 1985 and Letter of intent in March 1989. Project Cooperation Agreement, executed in January 1993. Terminal Facilities. Berthing for 957 boats, single-tie slips, 38 double-tie slips and 136 side-ties, of which 54 are visitors' slips); 1 2 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center; a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,732 cars; with temporary parking for about 141 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a hotel/motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Navigation improvements include initial new dredging and biannual dredging of expanded entrance channel area. Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance and new work dredging of 480,000 cubic yards were completed. Hydro survey was performed in January 1994. Also, a three-year maintenance dredging contact was awarded in September 1994. The operations and maintenance manual was completed in August 1994. 7. OCEANSIDE HARBOR SAND BYPASS, CA Location. On the coast of southern California along Oceanside Beach near Jetty, about 30 miles north of city of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. Underwater experimental pumping system with the pumps, fluidizers, and submerged pipeline to remove sand from harbor entrance and deposit it to down coast beaches, on a continual basis. Phase I and Phase II have both been completed and successfully tested. Phase II evaluation was prepared after data was available from the first full year of Phase II operation (September 1992). Final completion (Phase III) is scheduled for FY94 and will be designed to maximize the system's production, complete the experiment, and evaluate the ultimate effectiveness that the bypassing technology has on maintaining the harbor channel. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. We have currently been asked to further evaluate the compatibility of the bypass system with the authorized Harbor Improvement Project before finalizing the Evaluation Report. Operation during fiscal year. Phase three design was completed. A contract was awarded to maintain the operations for the past 18 months. 8. PORT HUENEME, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, about one mile southeast of Channel Islands Harbor, immediately west of the City of Port Hueneme, four miles southwest of the City of Oxnard, and 10 miles southeast of the City of Ventura. Existing project. Authorized in 1970 for restudy of completed project. The harbor serves both military and commercial uses with port facilities consisting of terminals, wharves, and warehouses servicing a wide variety of products. The existing Federal project consists of an approach channel, entrance channel, central basin, and two rubblemound jetties. The Navy has plans to utilize the harbor more extensively for vessel berthing and repair; effectively reducing maneuverability in the harbor. Harbor District would like to use deeper draft wood pulp carrier vessels and possibly tankers. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1976. The Oxnard Harbor District expressed their continued strong support of the study on 15 December 1993. Operations during the fiscal year. Project condition is fair. Hydro survey was performed in February 1993. Latest inspection indicated some damages at the East and West Jetties. Reconnaissance study was initiated in May 1993. Final Recon Report scheduled to SPD in October 1994. 9. REDONDO (KING HARBOR), BEACH CA HARBOR Location. On the coast of southern California on the southern portion of Santa Monica Bay, about 17 miles southwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. WRDA of 1986 (H.R. 6) Conference Bill, Title VIII - Project Modification, Section 809 - King Harbor, Redondo Beach, CA modifies the King Harbor project in order to carry out maintenance dredging and 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT for breakwater construction, and authorized the Secretary to restore the breakwater to a height of 22 feet and maintain breakwater at such height to provide greater protection from heavy wave action. Local cooperation. City of Redondo Beach officials are in full support of the study and have indicated desire to construct improvements to reduce continued storm related damages. Operations during fiscal year. Project Condition is good. Normal maintenance was performed. 10. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California just north of the Mexican border, about 109 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5107). Previous projects. For details, see page 1976 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1642 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details, see pages 33 and 34 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 33 to 35 of Annual Report for 1980. Terminal facilities. Consist of 45,070 feet of wharves, exclusive of Government-owned and 24,000 feet are privately owned. Government-owned wharves at North Island are restricted to military use only. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is fair and there is some minor shoaling of the entrance channel. Normal maintenance was performed. 11. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Location. The San Diego River has its source on the tableland in the Cuyamaca Mountains near Santa Ysabel, CA, and flows southwestward 52 miles to the Pacific Ocean, 6 miles northwest of San Diego. Mission Bay Harbor is adjacent to the outlet of the San Diego River, 77 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. The Bay has a perimeter of about 11 miles and area of about 2,400 acres. Existing project. For details, see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1991. Authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944, the existing project consists of a levees channel, entrance channel, main channel, altered railroad bridge, Anchorage Basins (West Anchorage and Quivira) and three jetties. Reevaluation of constructing a weir in middle jetty. This weir is to restore design conveyance capacity at the mouth of the San Diego River. A sand plug in mouth of river reduced flood carrying capability. Los Angeles District has recommended replacing the existing timber pile breakwater at Quivira Basin with a permanent rubble-mound breakwater. Our recommendation for the rubble-mound breakwater project be implemented under the authority of the existing project as continuing construction of an uncompleted feature. Local cooperation. Letter dated February 1989 from the City of San Diego stated a desire to proceed on weir based on cost-sharing requirements of WRDA 1986. The city desires Federal assistance for improvements to reduce storm damage potential and shore erosion in Mission Bay area. Operations during the fiscal year. The weir was completed on 25 March 1994 and was operating as planned. Repairs to revetment were completed with the rock that was removed from the weir with some additional stone being brought in from an external source. 12. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California, 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor. Existing Project. For details on original, see page 33-4 Annual Report for 1983. For reevaluation details see WRDA, 1986. The recommended plan includes acquiring a permanent dredge for the city and they will assume the operation and maintenance of the channel. Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969, for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. The city reaffirmed its support on 3 August 1993. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of 480,000 cubic yards completed and post-dredge hydro- 33-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 graphic survey performed in April 1994. Also, maintenance dredging contract awarded. 13. SURFSIDE, SUNSET AND NEWPORT BEACH, CA Location. Project extends along Orange County Coast, 17 miles, from San Gabriel River mouth down coast to Newport Bay Harbor entrance. Existing project. Authorization Section 101 of Rivers and Harbors Act 1962. Project is an indefinite continuing construction project. Local cooperation. State of California, Orange County, Cities of Newport and Huntington Beach, and Surfside Colony. Letter of intent dated December 1993 sent through coordinating sponsor State of California, Department of Boating and Waterways. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design is in progress for Stage 10. 14. VENTURA HARBOR, CA Location. Located 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and six miles northwest of Channel Island Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of the Annual Report for 1981. Reevaluation under WRDA 1990 consists of modification to the exiting harbor by constructing a separate South Beach groin, extending the offshore breakwater, adding a spur groin to the north jetty, and deepening and extending the entrance channel and sand trap. Local cooperation. Ventura Port District executed Project Cooperation Agreement, in April 1993. Operations during fiscal year. Hydro survey performed in April 1994. Completed condition survey in April 1994. The yearly maintenance dredging completed and repairs to detached breakwater. 15. ALAMO DAM, AZ Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, AZ on the Bill Williams River, AZ a tributary of the Colorado River. Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual Report 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were completed. Project condition is good, except for the downstream gage. Engineering and design efforts are completed. Flood Control 16. CLIFTON, AZ Location. Clifton is in Greenlee County, AZ, about 170 miles northeast of Tucson. Existing project. The project consists of both structural and nonstructural elements, including an earthfill levee about 3,000 feet long, with floodgates and bridge modifications. Implementation will involve flood proofing of 11 businesses, flood plain evacuation plans, and recreation development. Estimated cost (October 1994) for existing project is $13,400,000 (includes $1,680,000 cash contribution and $2,520,000 other costs). Local cooperation. The State of Arizona, Division of Emergency Services, is the local sponsor. Project Cooperation Agreement executed on 30 July 1993. The project authorized under WRDA of 1990. Operations during fiscal year. Final GDM approved in April 1993. Real Estate acquisition initiated in July 1993. The levee contract was awarded in September 1994. 17. HANSEN DAM, CA Location. In the San Fernando Valley area of the city of Los Angeles about 20 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. Recreation lake and facilities lie within flood control basin boundaries. Existing project. Original project authorized under Flood Control Act 1936, and modified by WRDA 1986, Section 847 Energy and Water Development Act 1992 (PL 102-104). Proposed plan is to construct a 10.5-acre recreation lake, picnic facilities, access roads, and parking lots. 33-6 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with the City of Los Angeles. Operations during fiscal year. Debris removal license has been extended through 1998. Master Plan is completed. Feature Design Memorandum is completed. Plans and specifications for first phase (8-A contract) complete. 18. HOLBROOK, AZ Location. In the City of Holbrook, AZ, about 150 miles northeast of Phoenix. Existing project. The plan will provide 100-year-flood protection by raising and extending the existing Corps of Engineers levee on the north side of the Little Colorado River, building a ring levee around the McLaws area, relocating residents of the south bank flood plain east of the Apache Railroad, acquisition of ponding areas and wildlife mitigation. It is the NED plan. The authorized plan is a double levee offering SPF protection. Estimated cost (October 1994) for existing project is $14,600,00 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $11,000,000 is Federal and $3,600,000 is non-Federal (includes $2,55- 8,000 cash contribution and $1,342,000 other costs). Local cooperation. The City of Holbrook signed the Project Cooperation Agreement, on 24 August 1993. Operations during fiscal year. Real Estate acquisition was initiated in October 1993 and relocation of southside residents continued. 19. LAKE ELSINORE, CA Location. In Riverside County, about 70 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles, and 30 miles southeast of the City of Corona. Existing project. The plan consists of an earthen-trap outlet channel about 2.5 miles long, with a 30-foot to 80- foot base and IV on 3H side slopes. The outlet channel will relieve flooding at the 100-year-flood level in the downtown area, as well as around the perimeter of the lake. The final plan includes building six bridges and protecting an endangered species habitat. Local cooperation. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District signed a Local Cooperation Agreement on 27 March 1992. Operations during fiscal year. Construction contract awarded in September 1993 and completed in September 1994. 20. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Compton Creek, CA. Previous Project. For Details, see pages 1768 to 1772 of Annual Report for 1942; page 1602 of Annual Report for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. For details on units see Annual Report for 1991. Authorized WRDA 1990 Section 101.B; Chief of Engineers Report 4 June 1992. Existing project. Project will consist of channel improvement to Lower Los Angeles, Rio Hondo Rivers, Compton Creek, and modification/replacement of as many as 27 Bridges necessitated by the channel improvements. A map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General Design Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation under the Major Rehabilitation Program," dated January 1984 and revised in March 1984. Local cooperation. The Los Angeles County, Department of Public Works has actively participated in extensive briefings with representatives of Los Angeles County, Board of Supervisors and most of the affected Congressmen. Local sponsor reaffirmed support in February 1992. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were completed. Project condition of dams and channels is good. In FY94 Congress added the mission to perform Environmental Review Guide to Operations (ERGO) inspections and they were completed. 21. LOS ANGELES RIVER RECREATION DEVELOPMENTAL, CA Location. Upper Los Angeles River from Sepulveda Flood Control Basin (located 25 miles northwest of the City of Los Angeles) to the confluence of the Arroyo Seco channel, a distance of 20 miles. Existing project. The upper Los Angeles River con- 33-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 sists primarily of a rectangular channel from the Sepu- Iveda Basin to a point approximately four miles above the Arroyo Seco, thence as a trapezoidal channel of the Arroyo Seco. Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation. Operations during fiscal year. This project was created in FY94 in the amount of $400,000 specifically to initiate and complete a master plan (MP). 22. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from the mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project. For details, see page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance was completed. Project condition is good. Local agencies have indicated interest in operations and maintenance recreational development immediately upstream & downstream of the dam. This will help considerably in controlling access. There has been extensive de facto off road vehicle use both upstream and downstream sides of the dam. 23. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ Location. About 20 miles northwest of Gila Bend, and 120 miles southwest of Phoenix, AZ. Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were completed. Project condition is fair. Repair of damages cause by spillway flow in January 1993 were completed in January 1994. 24. PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (STAGE 2). Location. Project located in Maricopa County, AZ, adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, AZ. Existing Project: For details see Annual Report FY91 page 33-7. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 3, General Design Memorandum-Phase I, plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," Prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1981. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2 detention basins and recreation facilities; ACDC, 16.5 miles long of which 4,300 linear feet (LF) is covered at Paradise Valley and Alta Vista (locals withdrew support for Central Ave), total levees about 4.0 miles, flowage easement about 19.5 miles long; 3.1 mile channel along new and Agua Fria River's; and bank stabilization about 2.2 miles along Skunk Creek and New River. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 Annual Report for 1981. Project Cooperation Agreement relating to covered channel executed in 8 July 1992 by Flood Control District of Maricopa County. Operations during fiscal year. Covered channel modification directed by National Defense Authority Act 1992-1993 to mitigate damage caused by construction of project by covering 3 segments of ACDC; work completed on 2 segments in August 1994, 3rd segment withdrawn by locals. Heavy rains in July of 1992 caused some damage to ACDC. Most damage occurred on north side between Central Avenue and 7th Street. Some deflection of wall occurred, and some base of maintenance road washed away with accompanying collapse of asphalt pavement, cause, due in part, to a storm drain pipe flowing full, that disconnected from wall. A change order for necessary repairs was issued in 1993 and completed in April 1994. Project is approximately 99 percent completed. 25. PINE AND MATHEWS YONS DAMS, COLORADO BASIN, NV CANRIVER 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Location. In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project. For details, see page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were completed. Project condition is good. Periodic inspections were performed in FY94. These flood control structures are ungated and require little maintenance. 26. RILLITO RIVER, CA Location. The project is located in Tucson metropolitan area of Pima County, AZ. Existing project. Plan of improvement includes: building a soil cement for bank erosion control and gradecontrol structures in the channel bottom to prevent degradation along 13.2 miles of the river. Estimated cost (October 1994) for existing project is for $40,400- ,000 includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $30,200,000 is Federal and $10,200,000 is non-Federal (includes $8,077 cash contribution and $2,123 other costs). Local cooperation. Pima County Transportation and Flood Control District submitted letters of assurance on February 24, 1986 and May 6, 1987. PCA was executed in June 1994. Operation during fiscal year. Design completed in April 1994; construction for first increment from North Campbell to Shannon Road, initiated in September 1994. 27. SANTA ANA MAINSTEM, CA Location. Along a 75-mile reach of the Santa Ana River in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties, emptying into the Pacific Ocean between the cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Harbor, 50 miles south of Los Angeles, and 90 miles north of San Diego. Existing project. For details, please see page 33-9 of the Annual Report for 1987. Plan of improvement: Seven Oaks Dam, management of overflow area - Seven Oaks to Prado; raise Mill Creek Levee; additional storage at Prado; improvements along: Oak Street Drain/Riverside Co., Santiago Creek/Orange Co., and Lower Santa Ana River; recreation development: mitigation and preservation; and San Timoteo. Estimated cost October 1994 for existing project is for $1,446,0- 00,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period, of which $920,000,000 is Federal and $526,000,000 is non-Federal includes $79,000,000 cash contribution and $447,000,000 other costs). Local cooperation. Counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange. Project Cooperation Agreement, signed on 14 December 1989. Operations during fiscal year. January and February storms delayed construction for Reach Two, outlet works, and rockfall gate chamber in February 1993. Late start on Oak Street (upper and lower) resulted in less placement. Protest by the second low bidder delayed award of Seven Oaks Embankment contract. Construction completed on Lower Santa Ana River Reach One and Ten, 10 July 1993, continue construction on Reach Two, Oak Street (lower), and Seven Oaks Diversion Tunnel. Initiated construction Lower Santa Ana River Reaches Three and Four in April 1993 and Oak Street (Upper) Drain in June 1993. Engineering and design continue on Lower Santa Ana River, Santiago Creek, Prado Dam, and San Timoteo Creek. Project Cooperation Agreement Hazardous Toxic Waste Clause revision signed by local in sponsors and Division/Engineer as authorized by ASA(CW). Completed construction on Lower Santa Ana River Reach Two, Lower Oak Street Drain, and the Seven Oaks Outlet/Diversion Tunnel, continues construction on Lower Santa Ana River Reach Three and Four and Upper Oak Street Drain. Initiated construction on Seven Oaks Embankment Spillway and San Timoteo Reach One. 28. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN AND ORANGE COUNTY, CA. Location. On the Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. Existing project. For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. 33-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Orange County Water District advocated an increase in water conservation at Prado Dam up to elevation 505'. Prado Basin includes significant riparian wetlands, including nesting areas of the endangered least Bell's vireo. The Basin is currently under review as proposed critical habitat for the vireo. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance was completed. Project condition of dams and channels is good. Periodic inspections of Brea, Carbon Canyon, and Fullerton Dams occurred in FY94. 29. SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA Location. Santa Paula Creek is a tributary of the Santa Clara River in the vicinity of the City of Santa Paula, Ventura County, about 16 miles from the ocean and approximately 60 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. Authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611 (HD 443/80/1), for details see Annual Report FY91, page 33-10. Plan 3.8 miles of concrete channel and 9 debris basin on Santa Paula Creek and 0.7 miles of concrete channel and a debris basin on Mud Creek. Estimate cost (October 1994) for existing project is $51,800,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $47,900,000 is Federal and $3,900,000 is non- Federal (includes $730,000 cash contribution and $31,700,000 other costs). Local cooperation. Ventura County Flood Control District. If a new project authorization is required as a result of the ongoing GRR process, the local sponsor will be required to cost share in accordance with WRDA 1986. Letter dated 4 December 1986 gave support for channel removal subject to approval of flood assistance plan. Operations during fiscal year. Debris due to storms of 1991-1992 and 1992-1993 caused damage to existing phase one channel. First channel repair completed in May 1993, second repair contract initiated in January 1994. Conference held in May 1993 identified some justifiable alternatives for the reevaluation study regarding deteriorating reach of original project. 30. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA Location. Along the lower 7.2 miles of the river, in and around the city of Oceanside, San Diego County, about 86 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. A double levee, 5.4 miles long; stone protected channel with a soft bottom; 1,330 feet of parapet walls at the ocean on the north and south levees; six interior drainage ponds; and a five-mile bike trail. Estimated cost (October 1994) for existing project is $75,100,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $54,900,000 is Federal and $20,200,000 is non-Federal (includes $3,700,000 cash contribution $16,500,000 other costs). Local cooperation. Fully complied with the City of Oceanside. Operations during fiscal year. The weir has been completed and is operating as planned. Repairs to revetments were completed with the rock that was removed from the weir with some additional stone being brought in from an external source. 31. SEPULVEDA DAM, CA Location. The project is located between the communities of Encino and Van Nuys, 15 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. Flood Control Act 1936 and Public Law 77-387 1941, and 1989-1972. Primary project purpose is flood control. Subsequent Act of Congress authorized a secondary project purpose for park and recreation. Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with the City of Los Angeles. Federal funds will complete Lake Balboa and Park with comfort station, trails, fencing, irrigation, children play area and revegetation and develop and add final wildlife area. The city will continue reclaimed water distribution and develop several parks areas. Operations during fiscal year. Private conservation groups keep constant watch and desire that remaining agricultural areas be dedicated to wildlife. PCA and finance plan were submitted and approved by HQUSACE and OASA(CW). 32. SWEETWATER RIVER, CA 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Location. The project empties into San Diego Bay in the city of Chula Vista and National City and unincorporated San Diego County, four miles south of the city of San Diego, and eight miles north of the Mexican Border. Existing project. Construction of 3.2 miles of channel improvements along the Sweetwater River from Interstate 805 to San Diego Bay, in combination with State Route 54 and Interstate 5 construction; and construction of two railroad bridges and 188 acres of preservation and mitigation land. Local cooperation. San Diego County is cost-sharing, agreement signed in December 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated required environmental monitoring. 3 . VvflI I iVVA i 1 IRI IVER R 61IIN 33. TUCSON DIVERSION CHAN- FLOOD-WARNING SYSTEM, CA Nl I(RECREATION iFVL1 OPMENT), AZ Location. The Tucson Detention Basin and Diversion Channel is in southeast Arizona. The project area initiates within the basin and proceeds approximately five miles downstream, until it meets Interstate 19. Existing project. The recreational development will consist of a bicycle and hiking trail; four rest areas at the basin's inlet and outlet areas, near the intersection of Park Ave. and Ajo Way, across the street from Wakefield Middle School and the near Interstate 19, where the project ends; four channel undercrossing areas at Ajo Way (near the basin's outlet), Interstate 10; Kino Parkway; and Benson Highway; a restroom facility and five to seven car parking area located near the end of the project area; lighting at rest areas; benches; pedestrian bridges; and landscaping. The flood control channel maintains a 30-40 foot width, with a average 30 foot right-of-way on each side of the channel. The trail system will primarily be located along the north bank of the channel. Local cooperation. Pima County is the local sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated master plan and public workshop. 34. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, AZ Location. Fifty miles southeast of Phoenix, AZ in Pinal County, on Queen Creek, AZ a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, AZ. Existing project. For details see page 33-10 of Annual Report 1981. Project element earthfill Dam, circular conduit outlet works and reservoir. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance was completed. Project condition is good. Project is ungated and requires little maintenance. 3 1|A ILIrTCrAIA " DI\C r- A Ik1 Location. The Coachella Valley area of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, about 100 miles east of the city of Los Angeles. Existing project. Rain and stream gages have been installed in appropriates locations in the Whitewater River tributary basin. Receiving and processing stations are operational at two local emergency agency offices. Local cooperation. The Coachella Valley Water District signed the local cooperation agreement in August 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Installation of equipment complete. 36. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of 22 completed and two partially completed local flood control projects consisting of the following: 375 miles of channels, six dams, and appurtenances, and 23 debris basins. Inspection costs for FY94 were $668,968. 37. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Section seven, Flood Control Act of 33-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued. The flood control structures were Hoover, Twitchell, and Management Planning; and $80,225 for Planning Assistance to States ($32,370 - California and $47,855 - Arizona). Tat Momolikot Dams. Costs for FY94 were $169,226. 40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 38. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UN- BASIC DATA 1 EF' L'U r1 I A I A I IILI I A "rlU DR ICI.IAL AU 1IJ i 1I -I ON Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 33-J on flood control work under special authorization. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $323,548. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was -$433 for advance mobilization preparation and $128,693 for disaster preparedness program. Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448, as amended) In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter- Agency Agreements under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. Total reimbursable in FY94 was $40,462. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 39. SURVEYS Total fiscal year costs were $4,889,017 of which $634- ,357 was for navigation studies; $2,557,319 was for flood damage prevention studies; $993,971 was for shoreline protection studies; $482,287 for special studies; $113 for review of completed projects; $89,316 for special investigations; $10,078 for FERC licensing activities; $36,891 for Intra-agency Water Resource Development; $4,460 for North American Waterfowl Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year costs of $124,298 and $8,830 for hydrologic studies. 41. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year expenditures were $6,870,558 of which $1,580,206 was for projects not yet authorized for construction and $5,290,352 was for projects authorized for construction. 41A. CARNEROS CREEK, CA Location. Located in Goleta Valley area, 6 miles west of Santa Barbara, and 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Description. Carneros Creek is one of several streams in the 48-square mile area of Goleta Valley which flow from southern slopes of Santa Ynez Mountains through residential, commercial and industrial areas of the Goleta into the Pacific Ocean at Goleta Beach property to be protected is primarily industrial. Local cooperation. Santa Barbara County, Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Under WRDA of 1992 H.R. 6167, the recommended project consists of an off-line excavated debris basin in combination with a diversion channel connecting to an existing borrow pit that will be modified slightly to become a detention basin north of U.S. Highway 101. Operations during fiscal year. Project overflow analysis requires reevaluation. Sensitivity analysis completed in 31 January 1994. Project was reclassified to inactive status on 11 March 1994. Economic analysis during Preconstruction Engineering and Design determined project was no longer economically justified. 33-12 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 41B. LOWER SANTA CRUZ, AZ Location. Study area in lower reach of Santa Cruz River in Pinal County about 50 miles south Phoenix, AZ and lies between town of Red Rock and confluence of Gila River. Damage area is experiencing accelerated urbanization as a result of growth pressure from the Phoenix and Tucson metro areas. Local cooperation. Authorized under Flood Control Act 28 June 1938 (Gila River and Tributaries). Local Sponsor Pinal County Flood Control District reaffirmed support in letter dated, 26 October 1993. Operations during fiscal year. Project is being closed out. 41C. NOGALES WASH, AZ Location. At the Mexican Border, in extreme southern Arizona in central and northern portions of the city of Nogales, about 60 miles south of Tucson. Existing project. Plans include a lateral collector channel to capture Overland Street flow and divert it into the existing covered channels; a 3,300-foot-long grouted stone/concrete channel system in the Chula Vista community; and a flood warning system and recreation component associated with Chula Vista channels. Current plan includes a interceptor channel and levee at Chula Vista and a floodwarning system in Mexico and United States. Local cooperation. Project Cooperation Agreement scheduled for execution in March 1996. Sponsor expressed willingness to financially participate in the construction of the project at a level consistent with current cost-shared policy. Operation during fiscal year. Flood warning system installation not yet approved by Mexico; without - less than 6 hours warning time. Mexico considering improvements to East Channel lateral collector - Corps progress on hold. State certification for Section 404 (b) (1) required prior to construction was approved 30 March 1993. 41D. TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES, NV Location. West of and through urbanized Las Vegas community along both washes. Existing project. Senate Resolution October 1982; WRDA 1992, PL 102-580, 31 October 1992 Sec 101(3). Study structural and nonstructural means of reducing flood damage and provide erosion control, water supply, recreation and enhancement. Local cooperation. The Clark County Regional Flood Control District reaffirmed support in January 1992. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design effort continued. Working with the sponsor to negotiate and execute Project Coperation Agrement. Preconstruction engineering and design completed. 33-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 30 Sep 94 Channel Islands, CA Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) Model Study 3. Marina del Rey, CA (Regular Funds) 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 5,123,345 5,123,345 2,635,000 741,600 2,202,000 2,635,131 760,456 2,203,111 876,615 760,000 785,628 350,000 409,430 863 482,000 478,901 510,000 436,874 150,000 210,104 141,390 1,182,500 143,394 940,444 1,672,000 694,000 2,385,889 757,969 987,000 34,452,120 976,712 34,425,523 485,000 324,000 152,000 151,830 440,000 642,760 100,000 38;371 7,448,842 7,185,574 29,749,000 29,749,000 1,219,655 1,219,655 8,767,887 8,727,012 4,718,916 4,668,395 100,000 38,371 298,000 2,191,000 14,732,471 283,011 2,157,041 14,651,342 5. Newport Bay Harbor, CA 2. Maint.: Approp. Cost 200,000 165,197 1,580 33-14 200,00 197,278 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 30 Sep 94 6. Oceanside Harbor, CA New Work: Approp. Cost Required: Cash Cost Navy Approp. Cost 390,000 2,405,000 300,001 848,281. 386,600 1,342,000 10,427,787 177,115 1,010,685 10,421,620 Oceanside Sand By-Pass, CA Port Hueneme, CA 9. Redondo Beach, (King Harbor) 10. San Diego Harbor, CA New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 2,515,200 1,105,237 441,765 597,100 1,682,000 185,889 134,000 132,292 - 1,364,000 876,615 1,536,676 852,000 656,184 (431,000) 984,963 3,045 -37,600 2,472 39,000 118,570 735,000 19,305,900 452,850 18,931,904 409 401 132,000 131,289 1,885,000 1,885,000 1,256,165 1,256,165 5,235,343 5,235,167 4,677,190 4,555,965 33-15 293;000 1,562,849 Maint.: Approp. Cost 3,088,000 2,711,231 1,187,500 1,187,500 1,599,547 1,599,547 64,200 98,937 726,000 738,007 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 30 Sep 94 Contrib. Cash Cost Contrib. Required Cash Cost 712,192 712,192 1,922,122 1,922,122 11. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA 12. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 70;000 71,369 97,000 103,475 866,000 831,000 80,000 56,742 16,212 825,000 47,291 300,000 6,742,345 715,450 6,356,683 - 291,400 3,561,689 8 285,963 3,556,238 787,000 1,556,500 1,268,000 15,795,774 886,582 1,403,594 1,395,554 15,717,802 13. Surfside,Sunset and Newport Beach, CA 14. Ventura Harbor (Ventura Marina), CA New Work: Approp. Cost Contrib. Required Cash Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 16,000 - 814,113 46,862 24,187 904,700 2,785,000 2,392,400 950,774 1,888,498 3,375,893 360,000 165,347 376,000 165,347 209,500 206,345 200,000 1 5,978,712 167,224 14,978,712 440,006 26,855,336 642,790 26,803,096 715,819 715,819 33-16 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 30 Sep 94 15. Alamo Dam, AZ 16. Clifton, AZ 17. Hansen Dam, CA 18. Holbrook, AZ 19. Lake Elsinore, CA 20. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA Contrib. Required Cash Cost Other Con trib. Maint. Cash Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib Cost 1,865,836 1,552,000 3,417,836 1,865,557 43,952 1,909,509 - 3,417,836 947,463 3,145,679 258,500 242,273 16,934,000 16,934,000 1,214,900 1,541,268 400,000 456,759 30,000 683,846 140,000 502,908 170,000 370,000 863,000 906,365 300,000 318,243 700,000 606,613 864,000 778,659 782,000 12,606,859 854,837 12,533,330 300,000 2,092,000 4,692,000 192,451 723,071 3,213,027 142,000 424,060 100,678 204,000 2,079,000 5,250,000 219,941 430,552 3,572,234 217,000 184,785 1,252,000 1,235,955 110,000 73,000 355,000 3,330,000 4,817,500 168,465 3,389,114 4,646,141 9,332,867 8,332,365 Contrib. Required Approp. Cost 14,865,109 12,924,936 33-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 30 Sep 94 21. Los Angeles River, CA 22. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA New Work: Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Other Contrib. Approp. Cost 837,968 1,920,000 2,757,968 628,118 1,997,516 2,625,634 - -333,000 129,598 46,849 7,432 - 34,223,000 16,776 34,207,799 2,327,400 2,496,100 1,832,800 3,091,000 72,614,302 2,473,742 2,500,897 1,821,087 1,817,434 72,173,894 235,000 120,761 221,800 670,769 21 5,000 209,774 241,000 241,660 235,000 120,761 115,000 5,068,536 108,000 5,056,220 17,838,198 17,838,198 932,848 932,848 23. Painted Rock, AZ (Gila Rvr) 24. Phoenix, AZ and Vicinity (Gila Rvr) 25. Pine & Mathews Canyons Dam, Colo River Basin, NV Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 625,800 627,459 744,000 2,204,400 2,673,000 17,361,183 754,849 209,1 58 2,559,145 17,030,843 29,816,000 24,037,000 13,147,000 33,233,917 25,543,262 13,291,791 61,000 117,835 96,138 96,138 21,000 16,956 300,000 259,948,297 3,034,663 259,616,963 250,060 253,909 New Work: Approp. Cost 1,872,329 1,868,681 1,401,248 1,401,248 33-18 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 30 Sep 94 Rillito River, AZ Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA Santa Ana River Basin OC, CA 29. Santa Paula Creek, CA San Luis Rey River, CA 31. Sepulveda Dam, CA 32. Sweetwater River Basin, CA New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contrib.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Oth Contrib. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Req Contr Approp. Cost 459,000 1,105,000 507,467 1,006,469 53,710,000 50,609,693 59,089,000 64,717,151 1,1 56,000 4,200,000 8,025,000 841,314 4,690,238 4,690,238 73,828,000 63,375,949 96,11 3,000 74,524,889 334,501,000 297,867,106 2,643,000 2,448,248 2,866,669 3,214,000 15,398,168 1,492,146 4,307,231 2,742,084 3,404,352 12,965,238 1,586,000 2,012,500 1,832,000 1,861,000 37,410,094 1,738,763 1,995,217 1,821,987 1,817,434 37,262,063 200,000 173,823 711,000 785,876 904,000 1,041,000 7,689,000 974,478 1,094,479 7,636,417 1,765,000 16,992,000 6,624,000 11,052,000 831,034 16,562,010 7,098,135 9,663,873 47,845,000 46,140,002 130,000 130,000 78,000 78,000 2,134,010 2,052,246 335,927 60,928 458,620 458,258 4,492,000 6,140,000 1,121,000 6,456,306 1,237,947 70,000 120,671 106,000 7,765 (73,000) (7,851) 60,558 2,989,115 122,456 2,693,888 - 34,800,503 441,484 34,476,375 38,251 206,000 168,836 33-19 26. 27. 28. 30. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 94 TABLE 33-A .COST AND. FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 30 Sep 94 33. Tucson Diversion Channel (Recreation), AZ New Work: Approp. Cost 200,000 120,761 200,000 139,283 Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ New Work: Approp. Cost - 1,867,963 - 1,867,963 47,000 1,326,850 46,044 1,326,850 35. Whitewater River Floodwarning System, CA New Work: Approp. Cost - 400,000 - 354,584 Preconstruction Engineering and Design Carneros Creek, CA Lower Santa Cruz, AZ Nogales Wash, AZ Tropicana/ Flamingo, NV New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 531,100 334,977 164,151 432,000 516,462 2,115 93,000 193,900 1,056,000 1,045,339 55,008 55,446 172,000 1,272,000 169,815 1,269,370 - 3,140,000 5,144,000 8,284,000 - 3,025,971 2,446,1 25 5,472,096 33-20 34. Maint.: Approp. Cost 67,237 20,136 67,200 117,835 81,000 79,499 41A. 41B. 41C. 41D. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Sep. 3, 1954 June 3, 1988 June 25,1896 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Fermin. Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance channel. For silt-diversion works. Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor entrance channel. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). 33-21 H.Doc. 362,83d Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc.18, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 969, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.9, 64th Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 1013, 66th Cong.,3d sess. H. Doc.349, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.33, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 2. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Do. S.Doc.130, 71st Con- .,2d sess. Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. Dredge 1,000-foot wide entrance channel to Los Angeles outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet area A and B adjacent to 40-foot-depth entrance channel; construct and maintain a rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. 33-22 S.Committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.843, 76th Cong., 3d sess. Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 22, 1976 H.Doc.161, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.401,86th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.94-594, 94th Cong., 2d sess.1 33-23 Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modification of existing project. This act provides that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefor and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1988 If non-Federal interest carry out any work Public Law 100-676. associated with such project which is later recommended by the Chief of Engineers and approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may credit such non-Federal interest an amount equal to the Federal share of the cost of such work, without interest. In analyzing costs and benefits of such project, the Secretary shall consider the costs and benefits produced by any work which is carried out under the preceding sentence by non-Federal interests and which the Secretary determines is compatible with such project. The feasibility report for such project shall include consideration and evaluation of the following proposed project features: Long Beach Main Channel, Channel to Los Angeles Pier 300, Channels to Los Angeles Pier 400, Long Beach Pier "K" Channel, and Los Angeles Crude Transshipment Terminal Channel. Section 4(d) of WRDA 1988 (102 Stat. 4015) is amended by inserting after "approved by the Secretary" in the first sentence the following: "or which is carried out after approval of the final report by the Secretary and which is determined by the Secretary to be compatible with the project". MARINA DEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Adoption and improvement of existing entrance channel to bay, a breakwater extending south by west from Morro Rock, and bay channels and basins at locations and of dimensions substantially as shown on the Navy Department map on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. 33-24 H.Doc.389, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.283, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Nov. 28, 1990 3. Sep. 3, 1954 4. Mar. 2, 1945 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 5. May 22, 1991 Oct. 27, 1965 May 22, 1991 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 21, 1950 Mar. 3, 1875 Sep. 19, 1890 June 25,1910 Mar. 4, 1913 6. 33-25 NEWPORT BAY HARBOR (& REVIEW), CA Maintenance and improvement of main and inner channels. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. OCEANSIDE HARBOR SAND BY-PASS SYSTEM, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. PORT HUENEME, CA Adoption and maintenance of existing harbor for deep-draft vessels; dredged central basin to 35 feet deep, and extend southernmost interior channel. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Maintain harbor dredging and breakwaters. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Diversion dike. Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet deep and 600 feet wide, and a channel through middle ground to 30 feet deep. Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet wide and 35 feet deep, and a channel through middle ground 32 feet deep. Doc.PL99-662 (WRDA 1986, Sec 841). R&H Acts 1937 & 1945 S. Doc. 138 78th Cong. H.Doc.76, 89th Cong., 1st sess. EWDA Act 1992. H.Doc.362, 90th Cong., 2d sess. R&H Act 1950 (H.Doc 303 81st Cong.) PL99- 662 (WRDA 86, Sec 809), Amended in WRDA 1988. Annual Report. 1873; p.1142 H.Ex.Doc.177, 50th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report, 1888; p.2114). H.Doc.961, 60th Cong., 1st session. H.Doc.1309, 62d Cong., 3d sess. 7. 8. 9. 10. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 Widen approach (area B) to San Diego municipal pier by dredging area C (north of area B). Dredging area A (south of area B). Dredge 35-foot channel through middle ground. Dredging areas D and E. Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal pier 1 by dredging an portion of area F (north of area C). Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; along south and north banks, main channel; dredge turning basin, widen area H, and dredge a channel to National City and Chula Vista Widen bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 35 feet from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in lower bay to Naval Air Station opposite turning basin. Dredging areas Q.Q-1, M, N, and O. Dredge a seaplane basin (area S.) of about 3,000 acres, 10 feet deep, and fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of basin. Dredge triangular approaches to 26-and 35- foot anchorages, area M. Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, delete uncompleted parts, and extend maintenance. H.Doc.648, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.1000, 66th Cong., 3d sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc.2, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc.81, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.223, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.89, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.844, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.390, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.365, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 1 33-26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11., 13. Oct. 23, 1962 14. Aug. 13, 1968 July 24, 1946 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 H.Doc.760, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 1 S.Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.518, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Modification of existing flood control project for San Diego River, CA, to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,- 000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefor; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Modification of existing project. Dredging and maintenance by United States. SURFSIDE, SUNSET & NEWPORT BEACH, CA Beach erosion. VENTURA HARBOR (VENTURA MARINA), CA Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. Sec 101 of R&H Act 1992. H.Doc.356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 33-27 None. 12. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1988 15. Dec. 22, 1944 The Harbor commonly known as Ventura Marina, located in Ventura County, CA, and adopted and authorized by section 101 of Public Law 90-483, shall hereafter be known.and designated as "Ventura Harbor". ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. Public Law 100-676. H.Doc.625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Jan. 23, 1990 WRDA 1990, Sec 3a CLIFTON, AZ modified WRDA 1998. Flood control. 17. Oct 2, 1992 18. May 22, 1991 19. Feb. 24, 1948 June 22, 1936 May 15, 1992 June 28, 1936 HANSEN DAM, CA Develop water conservation on existing spreading grounds. HOLBROOK, AZ Flood prevention and protection. LAKE ELSINORE, CA Flood Control in downtown area as well as around perimeter of lake. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $70 million. Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project. Provision of lands, easements, and rightsof- way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant Additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000). PL 102-377 Energy & Water Appropriation Act, 1993. WRDA of 1986, PL 99- 662. Sec 205, 1948 Flood Control Act (1). None. None. H.Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 3d sess. 33-28 16. 20. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 18, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3. 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 30, 1963 Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug. 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River Downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. 33-29 None. None. None. None. None. None. None. None. None. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 18, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 July 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 Jul. 6, 1949 In additional to all previous authorizations, completion of improvements under to comprehensive plan for flood control in the Los Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated cost of $31 million for completion. Authorized modifications of Hansen Dam by removing and selling dredged material to facilitate flood control, recreation, and water conservation. The Secretary may convey to the city of South El Monte, CA, approximately 7.778 acres of real property, together with improvements thereon, located within the Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin. LOS ANGELES RIVER (SEPULVEDA DAM TO ARROYO SECO), CA Recreation development for bicycle/hiking trails along the upper Los Angeles River. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. None. None. None. Flood Control Act 1936, PL 77-387 1941, PL 89- 72 and EWDA 199. H.Doc.164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 33-30 21. 22. 23. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27,1965 May 17, 1950 June 20, 1989 May 20, 1991 June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 24. H.Doc.216, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Energy and Water Develop- ment Appropriation Act 1990. WRDA 1986, PL 99- 662, Energy and Water Approppriation Act 1988, and WRDA. PHOENIX, AZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Dams and flood control basins. RILLITO RIVER, AZ Bank erosion control and grade control structures in the channel bottom to prevent degradation. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA Flood control along 75 miles reach of Santa Ana River, recreation development, and mitigation and preservation. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States. $3,500,000). Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, CA. H.Doc.688, 75th Cong., 3d sess. None. H.Doc.534, 78th Cong., 2d sess.1 33-31 None. 25. 26. 27. 28. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Authorized to be appropriated an additional None. $8 million for prosecution of projects approved in above-mentioned flood control acts. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet area A and B adjacent to 40-foot-depth entrance channel; construct and maintain a rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modification of existing project. This act provides that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interest for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests for so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefor and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification faa existing project. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet depth, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet 33-32 H.Doc.843, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.161, 83 Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.401, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.94-594,94th Cong., 2d sess.1 Oct. 17, 1940 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 22, 1976 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures. Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 17, 1970 3 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 22, 1976 SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA Flood control improvements and prevention. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Channel and levee, and beautification features. The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, including Santiago Creek, CA, is modified to authorized the Secretary to develop recreational trails and facilities on lands between Seven Oaks Dam and Prado Dam, including flood plain management areas. SEPULVEDA DAM, CA RECREATION FACILITIES SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood control and highway project. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL (RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT), AZ The project for recreational development along the Tucson Diversion channel. 1948 Flood Control Act, H.Doc.443, 80th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc.91-106, 91st Cong., 2d sess. FC ACT 1936, (Amended 1937, 1941, 1950) and Fed Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. H.Doc.148, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Act 1936 (amended 1937) 1941, 1950 and Fed Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 33-33 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 Aug. 3, 1989 WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basins. WHITEWATER RIVER & FLOODWARNING, SAN BERNARDINO & RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA Flood Control system for Coachella Valley. H.Doc.220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. HR.2330, adopted 3 Aug 1989, House Committee on Public Works and Transportation. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended. 3. Final date of approval by House and Senate Public Works Committees resolution under provisions of Section 201, Public Law 89-298. 33-34 34. 35. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Dana Point, Harbor, CA Completed 1984 $ 4,737,550' 555,147' Harbor office at Morro Bay, CA 3 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, San Pedro Bay, CA 3 Newport Bay Harbor, CA3 Inactive and 1982 796,897' 621,5455 Active (mod) Port San Luis, CA Completed and 1984 1,426,0506 1,042,3527 Active (mod) Redondo Beach Harbor Completed and 1984 4,766,8989 1,765,252'0 (King Harbor), CA8 Active (mod) Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), CA 3 1. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 2. Includes $45,147 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 3. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986, subject to favorable report. 4. Public Works Administration funds. Excludes $796,897 required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. 5. Includes $137,622 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY1958. Excludes $7,000 other contributed funds. 6. Includes $568,417 for new work prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. Includes $104,031 expended in FY1987. 7. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to modification by 1965, River and Harbor Act, and $18,958 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Includes $90,130 expended in FY87. 8. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 9. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 10. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY58. Includes $293,167 expended in FY87. 33-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange Completed 1967 $ 89,119 County, CA' Bird Rock area, La Jolla Completed 1967 25,8813 San Diego County, CA2 Coast of California, Point Mugu, Completed 1972 1,253,5944 to San Pedro breakwater, CA Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny Completed 1968 578,7175 State Beach), CA Imperial Beach, CA Active 1986 2,194,3676 Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA Active 1976 107,484 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA7 Completed 1960 7,912 Oceanside, San Diego County, CA Completed 1982 4,367,4428 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Active 1979 365,0009 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay Active 1985 9,722,100'10 (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed (part) 1969 715,819" and Deferred (part) 1. Authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, H.Doc.602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 103, Public Law 87-874. 3. Excludes 475,614 required contributed funds. 4. Excludes $1,238,418 required contributed funds. 5. Excludes $431,260 required contributed funds. 6. Excludes $919,437 required contributed funds; $66,124 other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. 7. Plant in service. 8. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. 9. Excludes $180,438 required contributed funds. 10. Excludes $4,626,638 for required contributed funds. Includes $10,772 expended in FY87. 11. Excludes $1,117,406 other contributed funds for beach-nourishment betterments and $618,949 required contributed funds. 33-36 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1 990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allenville, AZ' City Creek levee, San Bernardino County, CA' Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ Coyote and Berryessa Creeks CA Gila River Basin, AZ: Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Gila and Salt Rivers levee and channel improvements Indian Bend Wash Lower Gila River levee and channel improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Middle Gila River channel improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek channel improvements (Globe) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) Tucson diversion channel Goleta, CA, and vicinity Hansen Dam, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA (mod)7 Holbrook levee Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ Little Colorado River at Holbrook7 Needles, San Bernardino Co. Nogales Wash and Tributaries, AZ Oceanside Harbor, CA Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA' Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino Co. CA Ridgecrest, Kern County, CA' Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA' San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA Santa Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee Mill Creek levees Riverside levees San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, CA Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA Completed Completed Active Active Deferred Active (part) and Deferred (part) Completed Inactive Active Deferred Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Active Active Completed Completed Terminated Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1984 1988 1989 1963 1966 1985 1975 1970 1968 1982 1986 1982 1950 1973 1989 1989 1970 1973 1972 1978 1962 1961 1959 1985 1961 1984 $ 3,000,0002 400,0002 12,510,000 56,300,000 73,2014 31,809,2945 2,413,051 402,867 121,509' 10,21 8,900 6,922,6336 500,000 335,000 1,000,0008 11,100,000 5,100,000 1,000,0009 212,745 195,194 982,43210 1,708,437 7,753,93711 617,890' 2 2,104,478 9,258,207' 3 2,126,672 10,079,927'" 33-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Santa Paula Creek channel and Active 1983 4,790,17315 debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA' South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA' Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA' Tijuana River Basin, CA Ventura Harbor, CA Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon debris basin and channel Ventura River levee Completed Active Active Completed Active Completed Completed 1984 1985 1985 1979 1990 1964 1950 4,000,000'6 632,158 844,73217 1,703,03118 6,455,000 939,90819 1,349,63820 33-38 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Whitewater River, CA: Banning levee-San Gorgonio Completed 1966 97,868 River, Riverside County' Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Completed 1973 819,8782' Springs' Tahchevah Creek detention basin Completed 1967 1,420,55222 and channel improvements Tahquitz Creek Inactive 1974 1,063,600 Winslow (tributaries of Little Completed (part) 1973 1,831,300 Colorado River), Little Colorado and Deferred (part) River Basin, AZ 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 2. Excludes $187,965 required contributed funds. 3. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 4. Advance planning only. 5. Excludes $304,720 required contributed funds and $3,130,762 other contributed funds. Includes $31,071 expanded. 6. Includes $1,158,006 Code 710 funds since FY77. Excludes $749,058 required contributed funds and $394,364 contributed funds. 7. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 8. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and $91,160 other contributed funds. 9. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and $176,295 other contributed funds. 10. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and $154,733 funds. 11. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds and $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 12. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. 13. Excludes $712,000 other contributed funds. 14. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. Includes $74 expended in FY87. 15. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for local cooperation items for required and $49,458 16. Excludes $559,525 required contributed other funds. 17. Includes $3,846 expended in FY87. Excludes $104,941 other contributed funds. 18. International Boundary & Water Commission funds. 19. Excludes $179,148 other contributed funds. 20. Includes $6,000 Code 710 funds since FY77. 21. Excludes $8,718 required contributed funds. 22. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. 33-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: Aliso Creek Dam San Juan Dam Trabuco Dam Villa Park Dam Sierra Madre Wash channel, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA Lower Mission Creek Santa Barbara, CA University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA 1958 1964 1950 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1977 Sec. 12, Public Law 93,251 1986 Sec. 1002 Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1988 Sec. 1001(A), Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 1988 1975 33-40 295,191 67,361 1,641,144 213,313 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California State line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south, except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benicia- Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Oakland Harbor, CA ................ 34-1 2. Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA ..... 34-2 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ..................... 34-3 4. Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project, CA ........... 34-3 5. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA.. 34-4 6. San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA .... .34-4 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys... 34-5 8. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ...................... 34-5 9. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization ....................... 34-5 Flood Control 10. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 34-5 11. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ...................... 34-5 Navigation 1. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Location. Oakland Harbor is located in the City of Oakland, California, on the eastern shore of central San Francisco Bay immediately south of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of June 23, 1874, June 25, 1910, September 22, 1922, January 21, 1927, April 28, 1928, July 3, 1930, March 2, 1945 and October 23, 1962. The project was completed February 1975, except for deepening the tidal canal to 35 feet from Fortman Basin to Park Street, and to 25 feet above Park Street which was deauthorized November 1977. Reconstruction of the Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge was completed in December 1973 and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance. Project consists of entrance channel to Oakland Outer Harbor, 35 feet deep from deep water in San Francisco Bay and 800 feet wide across the shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island, narrowing to 600 feet at Oakland Mole; thence, a channel and turning basin 35 feet deep and 12. Miscellaneous Work under Special Authorization ...................... 34-5 General Investigations Page 13. Surveys ........................... 34-6 14. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 34-6 15. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.. 34-6 Tables Table 34-A Table 34-B Table 34-C Table Table Table Table Table 34-D 34-E 34-F 34-G 34-H Cost and Financial Statement ........... .... 34-7 Authorizing Legislation .............. 34-11 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 34-13 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ...... 34-13 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......... 34-14 from 600 to 950 feet wide in outer harbor to the Army Base. Project also provides entrance channel to Oakland Inner Harbor, 38 feet deep and 600 feet wide to Howard Terminal and 35 feet deep to west end of Government Island, with additional widening to within 75 feet of the pierhead line in front of Grove and Market Street (formerly municipal) piers and along the south side of the channel from Harrison Street eastward to harbor line point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Brooklyn Basin; for a triangular area 35 feet deep about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin; a channel along north side of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 1,300 feet, thence 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,700 feet to a turning basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long; a channel in the tidal canal 35 feet deep and 275 feet wide from Brooklyn Basin to Park Street, thence 18 feet deep to San Leandro Bay; a total channel length of 8-1/2 miles from San Francisco Bay to San Leandro Bay. Project also includes parallel rubblemound jetties at entrance to inner harbor. north jetty 9,500 feet long and south jetty 12,000 feet long; three highway 34-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 bridges across the tidal canal, two of which (at Park Street and High Street) have been replaced by local interests and the Fruitvale Avenue Bridge constructed by Federal Government has been transferred to Alameda County. The railroad bridge has been transferred to the County for operation and maintenance. The Federal Government will reimburse the County for the cost of operating and maintaining the railroad bridge. Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 authorized deepening the 4 mile Inner and 3.4 mile Outer Harbors channels to 42 feet deep and widening the entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocation of the Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward; and widening the turning basin to 1,800 feet and constructing a 1,200 foot turning basin in the Inner Harbor, 42 feet deep, at mile 3.7. Present estimated total cost for the authorized improvements is $119,150,000 of which $89,360,000 is Federal cost (includes $125,000 Coast Guard cost) and $29,790,000 is non-Federal cost. Under WRDA 1986, the Bar Channel and Inner Harbor were deepened to 38 feet deep up to Howard Terminal as a separable element of the authorized 42-foot deep project. Local cooperation. The Port of Oakland signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on December 9, 1994 satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. The agreement includes the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; (2) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction; and (3) pay additional 10 percent plus interests of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Terminal facilities. The port occupies 19 miles on the mainland shore of San Francisco Bay. There are 550 acres of marine terminal facilities, 28 deepwater berths and 25 container cranes, including 5 of the post Panamax type. On-dock covered storage space exceeds 600,000 square feet. Three major railroads, Santa Fe, Southern Pacific and Union Pacific serve the port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preparation of SEIS draft and GDM draft. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Fruitvale Avenue R.R. Bridge including engineering and design by hired labor, cost $539,985; and operation and maintenance Oakland Inner and Outer Harbors including engineering and design with contract dredge. Removed 30,000 cubic yards of shoal material from the Inner Harbor and 30,000 cubic yards from the Outer Harbor, cost $353,500. 2. RICHMOND HARBOR (DEEPENING), CA Location. Richmond Harbor is located in central San Francisco Bay, in Contra Costa County in the City of Richmond. Existing project. The existing navigation channel extends from deep water in San Francisco Bay into the Port of Richmond. The Southhampton Shoal Channel and Long Wharf Maneuvering Area, at the entrance to the harbor channels are maintained to -45 feet MLLW. The Entrance Channel, Potrero Reach Channel, Potrero Sharp Turn, Inner Harbor and about half of the Santa Fe Channel, to -35 feet and the remainder of the Santa Fe Channel to -30 feet. The width of the navigation channel is 600 feet for most of its length to Point Richmond with two maneuvering areas: one in front of the Long Wharf and the other at Point Richmond. At Potrero Reach, the 500 foot width flares to about 600 feet at Point Potrero with a turn at the point, 1,150 feet wide and 35 feet deep except for a depth of 30 feet at the southerly apex of the bend. Thence, the channel continues into the inner harbor at a width of 850 feet in a northerly direction to the entrance of the Santa Fe Channel. The Santa Fe Channel extends northwesterly at a width of 200 feet into the upper basin terminus. A turning basin is provided at Point Richmond, and a rubble-mound training wall extending 10,000 feet westerly from Brooks Island is also provided in the Potrero Reach. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Proposed improvements consist of a construction plan involving four and one-half miles of channel between Richmond Long Wharf and the Santa Fe Channel. The project would deepen the existing 35-foot channels to 38 feet, and provide a turning basin of 1,200 feet in diameter near Point Potrero. Approximately 2,000,000 cubic yards of sediment are to be dredged and transported to aquatic and upland disposal sites, depending on the sediment quality. The estimated cost $33,050,000 of which $25,800,000 is Federal cost (includes $50,000 Coast Guard costs) and $7,250,000 is non-Federal cost. The existing project was authorized on October 27, 1965. Previous projects were authorized by Acts adopted in 1917, 1930, 1935, 1938, 1945 and 1954. The proposed improvements are authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) pay 10 percent of the costs to 20 feet below mean lower low water and 25 percent of costs between 20 and 45 feet below mean lower low water and (2) reimburse an additional 10 percent with interest of the costs allocated to general navigation facility of the project within a period of 30 years following 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT completion of construction; and (3) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocation and dredged material disposal areas necessary for the projects. The value of lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas can be credited toward the payment required under item (2) above. Terminal activities. The Port of Richmond encompasses nine privately-owned terminals and seven terminals owned by the Port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued preconstruction planning and engineering. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Richmond Inner, Outer Harbors including engineering and design and U.S. Hopper dredge Essayons. Essayons removed 75,759 cubic yards of shoal material from Inner Harbor and 223,934 cubic yards from the Outer Harbor, cost $1,346,944. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel. Navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Suisun Bay near Martinez through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See National Ocean Service Charts 18649, 18654 and 18656 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of the existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay Channels to the vicinity of Pt. Avon to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to the vicinity of Pt. Avon; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along the channel route. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed in February 1974. The South Hampton Shoal Channel and the Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area was completed in December 1986. For the approved cost estimate (1991) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Estimated volume of dredged material is 9 million cubic yards. Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. The local sponsor, Contra Costa County, supports the project. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1991, No. 31, revised 1991, and No. 32. revised 1986, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco. Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif."; "'The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and the Ports 'on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued planning engineering and design activities. 4. SONOMA BAYLANDS WETLANDS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, CA Location. The Sonoma Baylands site is located in Sonoma County, CA, approximately 25 miles north of San Francisco near the mouth of the Petaluma River, on the northern shoreline of San Pablo Bay. Existing project. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1992. The project includes restoration of tidal wetlands on 348 acres of diked lands, including construction of 11,645 feet of replacement levee around the landward periphery of the site, fifteen internal peninsulas for wave protection, three weirs for the discharge of dredged material supernatant, and modification of three existing high voltage electrical towers. Project also includes placement of 207,000 cubic yards of maintenance-dredged material from the Petaluma River navigation channel in a pilot project area and placement of about 2.5 million cubic yards of suitable dredged material from the Oakland Harbor deepening projects on the remainder of the site. The final phase of the project will be monitoring of project success and function and corrective action if necessary. The estimated project cost is $8,500,000, of which $6,375,000 is Federal cost and $2,125,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. The California State Coastal Conservancy signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on May 6, 1994 satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, PL 102-580 and signed an amendment on December 9, 1994 to include the placement of Oakland Harbor dredged material. The local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easement, and right of ways; (2) modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; (pay 25 percent of the total project cost in accordance with Section 106 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Terminal facilities. N/A Operations during fiscal year. Demonstration Project Report, Assessment, and construction specifications. Preparation of the Completion of Environmental plans and site to receive 34-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 II I I ii i dredged material, including construction of levees, peninsulas and weirs, was initiated July 5, 1994 and essentially completed by the end of the fiscal year. 5. SAN FRANCISCO BAY-DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA Location. The model, including a Class A regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond the Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay and Tributaries, CA, Study authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81- 516, Section 110). The model was Sauthorized as an operation and maintenance project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the model continues. A contract with U.C. Berkeley was consummated December 1991 for the joint operation and management of the physical Bay Model for a one-year period with two option years implemented for continuation of program. Historical summary. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957. The addition of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. Annual visitation to the model averages between 100,000 to 150,000 people. The central exhibits were completed in December 1981. Extensive exhibit upgrade for the Visitor Center and development of Cooperative Association completed September 30, 1989. The Cooperative Association provides financial and educational support to visitor center programming. An active volunteer program exists at the Visitor Center providing approximately 80 man-days of effort monthly. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including, but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, and other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1994, was $25,798,994, of which $9,832,889 was for the regional visitor center, $1,253,208 for exhibits, and $14,712,897 for maintenance. 6. SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (LTMS), CA Location. The San Francisco Bay Long-Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredged material disposal covers deep and shallow draft navigation channels of the San Francisco Bay region including Central San Francisco Bay, South Bay, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay environs. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay region has an annual disposal requirement of approximately 8 million cubic yards (mcy) to maintain navigation channels. The Bay also has a one-time new civil works requirement of approximately 16 mcy for the Oakland Harbor, Richmond Harbor, and John F. Baldwin Phase III ship channel. In January 1990, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, the San Francisco Bay Water Quality Control Board and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission convened with thirty interested agencies and organizations with concerns regarding dredged material disposal in San Francisco Bay. These four agencies have the responsibility for regulation of the waters of the US and California for disposal of dredged material. The four agencies and the concerned navigation interests formed the LTMS to develop technically feasible, economically prudent and environmentally acceptable long range solutions to the dredging and disposal needs for the San Francisco Bay region over the next fifty years. In determining acceptable dredged material disposal locations, the LTMS evaluated a broad array of potential ocean, in-Bay and non-aquatic disposal alternatives. Local cooperation. Pursuant to their regulatory responsibilities, the Division commander of the South Pacific Division, Corps of Engineers; the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX; the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board and the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission agreed to jointly undertake the development and implementation of a Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredging and disposal of dredged materials from the region. Based on the outputs from the LTMS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Bay Conservation and Development Commission will consider modifications to the dredging elements of their respective Basin and Bay Plans for San Francisco Bay. Terminal facilities. Besides identifying implementable disposal options, the LTMS will: (1) develop coordinated regional disposal policies between federal and state agencies; (2) provide a 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT local decision-making framework for dredging and disposal projects; (3) streamline existing permit and testing procedures; and (4) provide a long term site monitoring apparatus and feedback mechanism. Operations during fiscal year. The LTMS has three work groups investigating disposal options. Their progress and accomplishments for FY 1994 are listed below: (1) In-Bay Studies Work Group - A. A standard methods manual for chemical analyses was developed and reviewed in FY 1994. B. Sediment toxicity contract to look at toxicity test interferences and review approaches for assessing sub-lethal, chronic sediment evaluations was continued. (2) Nonaquatic/reuse Studies Work Group - A comprehensive list of nonaquatic sites was developed for the region identifying approximately ninety options. Five sites are being investigated. (3) Ocean Studies Work Group - Final designation of ocean site occurred in August 1994. (4) Environmental Impact Report and Management Plan - A. EPA is federal lead on a Policy EIS for the LTMS. Work underway on a draft. B. The Interim Management Plan was released in August 1994. C. The LTMS Management Plan will be revised following completion of the EIS. 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels to be dredged in years other than Fiscal Year 1994 and jetty structures were conducted on the following projects: Bodega Bay; Crescent City Harbor; Fisherman's Wharf; San Francisco Harbor; San Leandro Marina; San Pablo Bay; Suisun Bay Channel; Redwood City; West Richmond; Islais Creek; San Bruno Shoal, and Gashouse Cove Breakwater; all in California. Fiscal year costs were $710,000. 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). None. Mitigation of shore damages activities pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $4 for Moss Landing Harbor, CA. 9. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $80,664 for Emeryville, Alameda County, CA. 10. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included a requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $178,713. Total cost to September 30, 1994 was $2,005,211. See Table 34-H for inspections made this fiscal year. 11. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $146,226 for preauthorization studies of which $67,566 was for Petaluma River, Sonoma County, CA; $58,560 for San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA; $20,100 for White Slough, CA; and $55 for Rohner Creek, CA. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year cost incurred for emergency flood control activities was $227,000 for disaster preparedness. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year total costs were $35,504, of which $10,239 was for Salinas River, San Ardo, CA; and $25,265 for Shelter Cove, CA. 12. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modification for Improvement Environment (Section 1135, PL 99-662). of Fiscal year total costs were $4,846, of which $92 was for Redwood Creek, CA and $60 for Sonoma Bay 34-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Wetlands, CA, and San Lorenzo River Habitat Restoration, CA $4,694. General Investigations 13. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $1,475,717, of which $314,816 was for navigation studies; $742,459 for flood damage prevention; $120,731 for miscellaneous activities; $97,818 for special studies; $179,520 for shoreline protection studies; and $20,373 for coordination studies with other agencies. 14. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $31,441 were incurred, of which $17,431 was for flood plain management service program and $14,010 for hydrologic studies. 15. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, modified by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act, authorized up to two breakwaters as necessary to provide protection. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, authorized construction of additional channel improvements. Recommended plans of improvement for the breakwater and channel improvement were previously considered as a single project. Due to significant differences in the time required for planning and construction, each part is now reported separately. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA provides for one detached offshore 400-foot breakwater aligned in a northsouth direction along the southern portion of Noyo Cove, west of the entrance channel in Noyo Harbor. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $3,830,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $497,317 with General Investigation funds. Planning is about 71 percent complete. A Project Management Plan has been prepared to outline the work remaining on this project. The breakwater has an estimated cost of $18,870,000. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Channel Extension), CA provides for a 60-foot wide channel, 7 feet deep, for a distance of about 3,000 feet upstream from the end of the existing Federal project to the Dolphin Isle Marina. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $580,000. This project has been put in an inactive category at the request of the sponsor. SAN RAFAEL CANAL, CA San Rafael Canal is located on the northwestern shoreline of San Francisco Bay in the city of San Rafael, about 17 miles north of the city of San Francisco. The Canal is surrounded by San Rafael's central business district and dense residential areas. The Study was authorized by a resolution adopted by the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the United States House of Representatives on August 8, 1984, Section 142 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1976 (Public Law 94-587), as subsequently amended in Section 705 of WRDA of 1986 (Public Lay 99-662). The Feasibility Study recommended the South Floodwall Plan. This plan consists of 750 linear feet of new levees and 11,600 feet of steel sheet-pile floodwall along the south bank of the canal and along the crest of the Bayfront levee. The South Floodwall Plan has a benefit-to-cost ratio of 2.0 to 1. The estimated project cost is $29,400,000 of which $19,100,000 is Federal cost and $10,300,000 is non-Federal cost. Total costs during the fiscal year were $619,881 with General Investigation funds. 34-6 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 Bodega Bay, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Crescent City New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Fisherman's Wharf New Work Areas, San Francisco Approp. Harbor, CA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Humboldt Harbor New Work and Bay, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Moss Landing New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Napa River, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Noyo River and New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost 1. Oakland Harbor, New Work CA Approp. Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 839,307 664,823 - 725,489 719,206 29,376 29,376 3,701,945 2, 2,973,797 2, 83,897 91,838 253,046 253,046 8,068 219,600 228,602 5,245,000 1 5,492,399 1 1,592,900 1 1,529,707 1 - 1 - - - - $1,226,765 1 2 40 - - - 1,226,765 1 3 40 155,052 112,607 36,476 2,492,791 4 40 253,491 146,333 78,795 2,492,791 4 40 - - - 397,779 5 - - - 397,779 5 - - - 9,454,972 6 40 - - - 9,454,972 6 40 971,927 578,247 73,208 24,635,809 7 40 984,935 452,869 213,956 24,635,806 ' 40 - - - 525,000 8 - - - 525,000 8 - - - 9,199,000 41 48 50 - - 9,199,000 41 49 s50 382,007 -49,569 - 387,318 51 269,691 62,747 - 387,318 51 - - - 9,847,299 9 40 - - - 9,847,299 40 ,076,040 2,853,922 3,110,000 74,884,707 10 40 ,917,775 2,745,180 3,108,880 74,764,393 10 40 - - - 338,215 11 4 - - - 338,215 11 40 41,472 692,918 11,138 5,869,630 12 40 41,596 634,892 69,164 5,869,630 12 40 - - - 1,021,274 13 40 - - - 1,021,274 13 40 227,360 2,737 491,648 4,869,673 13 14 40 227,360 2,737 445,354 4,823,379 13 14 40 354,000 761,000 - 203,000 15 16 40 238,490 518,826 - 497,317 15 1740 33,000 498,438 84,254 8,426,383 18 19 40 24,862 488,365 105,603 8,426,384 18 19 40 - - - 222,810 20 40 - - - 222,810 20 40 ,930,000 2,828,000 2,019,000 32,164,684 21 ,946,689 2,395,507 2,416,022 31,966,270 21 ,380,011 1,929,660 1,885,664 44,407,679 22 ,451,690 1,652,430 2,089,303 44,331,979 22 ,010,000 - - 1,010,000 400,000 450,790 - 850,790 34-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 Petaluma River, CA Pillar Point Harbor, CA Redwood City Harbor, CA Removal of Sunken Vessels 2. Richmond Harbor, CA 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - - - 297,146 297,146 a3 40 - - - 297,146 297,146 a 40 - 1,046,000 32,000 1,007,108 12,523,819 24 40 -947 651,685 410,047 917,176 12,416,090 24 40 - - - - 6,697,396 43 44 S- - - 6,697,396 43 44 8,731 367 17,918 8,429 2,194,193 44 45 8,731 367 17,918 8,429 2,194,193 4 4s - - - - 1,672,722 25 40 - - - - 1,672,722 25 40 144,629 790,142 1,937,677 70,445 13,573,641 26 40 116,657 842,097 1,918,065 90,058 13,573,641 26 40 - - 283,068 - 283,068 - - 283,068 - 283,068 878,000 831,000 801,000 1,250,000 10,165,527 27 28 924,710 855,848 704,345 1,196,550 9,935,154 27 28 2,187,020 2,392,165 2,133,977 1,999,408 31,491,123 2 40 2,193,492 2,441,777 2,123,511 2,004,863 31,485,363 29 40 - - - - 164,689 - - - - 164,689 835,000 1,142,000 835,000 946,000 35,269,200 42 1,983,042 1,277,722 745,449 836,146 35,033,314 42 5. San Francisco Bay New Work and Delta Model, Approp. CA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. San Francisco Bay Maint. Long Term Approp. Management Cost Strategy (LTMS), CA San Francisco New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Francisco New Work Harbor and Bay, CA Approp. (Removal of Drift) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,750,100 2,622,883 1,555,679 2,623,639 5,134,000 2,623,000 4,161,254 2,408,495 1,580,000 1,604,000 26,017,917 1,795,590 1,590,169 25,798,994 1,719,000 955,000 10,431,000 1,724,960 1,550,260 9,844,969 - - - - 2,689,356 283040 - - - - 2,689,356 28 30 40 -737,420 1,184,069 1,125,694 1,993,700 35,121,183 31 40 765,563 1,191,122 1,107,238 1,952,625 35,060,456 31 40 1,666,300 1,948,000 1,576,000 2,062,000 34,160,580 40 1,792,754 1,902,153 1,484,351 2,089,876 34,010,413 40 34-8 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 San Leandro Marina, CA San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA San Rafael Canal, CA San Rafael Creek, CA Santa Cruz Harbor, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demo Project, CA Suisun Bay Channel, CA Suisun Channel, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintm. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintm. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintm. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintm. Approp. Cost 29,349 29,369 1,129,300 1, 1,110,685 1, 691,825 376,634 66,617 1,009,500 100,099 3,642,740 2 66,617 706,935 336,661 3,576,737 2 - - - 1,369,372 28 3340 - - - 1,369,372 283340 ,031,000 2,114,700 557,666 41,780,309 3 4 ,046,892 1,659,292 1,007,848 41,767,485 4 - 585,000 583,000 1,168,000 - 363,087 619,881 982,968 - - - 32,359 40 47 - - - 32,359 40 47 104,684 823,000 (412,942) 5,023,529 40 4e 420,311 476,550 (66,492) 5,023,529 40 48 - - - 4,126,808 52 - - - 4.126.808 52 5,527 17,918 5,527 17,918 - 375,000 - 191,117 402,700 407,427 - 466,600 481,652 63,062 62,524 4,000,000 1,687,973 160,000 35 160,000 35 9,709,988 40 53 9,709,450 40 53 4,375,000 1,879,090 - - - 200,928 - - - 200,928 662,917 488,000 1,276,542 7,188,704 623,374 508,037 826,455 6,712,506 - - - 217,677 - - - 217,677 78,810 - - 2,717,028 85,028 - - 2,717,028 36 36 37 40 37 40 38 38 39 39 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds and $129,000 General Investigation funds). 3. Includes $585,000 Preconstruction Planning costs ($456,000 Construction General costs and $129,000 General Investigation costs). 4. Includes $603,241 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. Excludes contribution funds of $385,134. 5. Excludes contribution funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $178,509 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. 8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royalty-free rock. 9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 34-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and (5,457 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. 11. Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. 12. Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $240,236 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. Excludes contributed funds of $180,200. 13. Excludes previous project costs. 14. Includes $845,247 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. Excludes $492,788 contributed funds. 15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes $3,371,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($2,791,000 for Breakwater of which $500,000 allocated under Construction, General and $2,291,000 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 allocated under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 17. Includes $3,307,633 Preconstruction cost ($2,727,633 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction, General and $2,227,633 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 was under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 18. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $75,078 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 19. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on existing project. 22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $41,223 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $215,298 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. Excludes contributed funds of $192,424. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes $464,127 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ."' 29. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. Includes $80,439 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. Includes $193,000 Public Works Administration funds. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $799,260 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. 32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $300,389 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1994. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. Excludes contributed funds of $879,454. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $32,832 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1994. 35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds on previous project. 36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for detail. 37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $48,735 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1994. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $451,208 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1978-1994. Includes $727,510 for previous project. Excludes $121,386 contributed funds. 40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. 41. Excludes Contributed Funds of $709,624. 42. See Sacramento District FY 1985 Annual Report for full report. 43. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 44. See FY 1979 Annual Report for last full report. 45. Includes $127,393 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1994. 46. Includes $235,757 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1994. Excludes $93,500 contributed funds. 47. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. 48. Includes $9,199,000 funds of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. 49. Includes $9,199,000 costs of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. 50. See FY 1987 Annual Report for last full report. 51. Includes $64,288 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1989-1994. 52. See FY 1988 Annual Report for last full report. 53. Includes $58,328 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1993-1994. 34-10 TABLE 34-B SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. June 23, 1874 June 25, 1910 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 2 Apr. 28, 1928 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 a Nov. 17, 1986 2. Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 4 OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Jetties. North channel in Brooklyn Basin, 25 feet deep, and tidal canal to 18 feet. Channel across shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island and thence to Webster St.; South channel in Brooklyn Basin; Turning Basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin; and channel in Tidal Canal from Brooklyn Basin to Park St., 30 feet deep. Channel from Webster St. to Brooklyn Basin, maintain area to within 75 feet of pierhead line south of channel from Harrison St. to Harbor Line Point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; dredge a triangular strip about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin, 30 feet deep. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide alteration or replacement of bridges by local interests shall apply only to that feature of project covering deepening tidal canal to 25 feet. Drawbridges across Tidal Canal were required by 1882 Decree of Court in condemnation proceedings whereby title was obtained to rightof- way for tidal canal. Entrance channel to outer harbor, 800 to 600 feet wide. Eliminated requirement that local interests contribute 10 cents per cubic yard toward deepening tidal canal. Maintenance of 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor and in outer harbor channel and turning basin. Deepen inner harbor 35-foot channels and lower 1,300 feet of north channel in Brooklyn Basin to 35 feet. Deepen Inner and Outer Harbor channels to 42 feet. Widen entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocate Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward and widen turning basin to 1800 feet. Construct 1,200 foot turning basin in Inner Harbor. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA Channel 24 feet deep and 600 feet wide from San Francisco Bay to Ellis Slough (Santa Fe Channel); a turning basin at Point Potrero; a training wall. A 30-foot channel with lessened widths; a turning basin at head of navigation. Increase project widths in inner harbor, maintenance of Santa Fe channel to 30 feet: approach areas in outer harbor to 32 feet. Annual Report, Part II, 1874, p. 378. H. Doc. 647, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 144, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 407, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Public Res. 28, 70th Cong. Rivers and Habors Committee Doc. 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 466, 77d Cong., 1st sess. Report on File in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 353, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 1986 WRDA, Public Law 99-662 H. Doc. 515, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 73d Cong., 1st sess., and 10, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 34-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 20, 1938 Widen channel at Point Potrero and north thereof; H. Doc 598, 75th Cong., enlarge and maintain to 30-foot depth turning 3d sess. basin at Terminal No. 1. Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in San Pablo H. Doc. 715, 76th Bay north of Point San Pablo. Cong., 3d sess. Sep. 3, 1954 Channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent H. Doc. 395, 83rd to Southampton Shoal; enlarge and deepen to 35 Cong., 2d sess. ' feet approach area to Richmond Long Wharf; widen and deepen inner harbor and entrance channels; deepen turning basin at Point Richmond and southerly 2,000 feet of Santa Fe Channel. Eliminate restriction that widening north of Point Potrero will not be undertaken until local interests furnish assurances industries will avail themselves of improved navigation facilities. and reclamation of Reservation Point. Oct. 27, 1965 West Richmond channel 45 feet deep, 600 feet H. Doc. 208, 89th wide; enlarge and deepen to 45 feet maneuvering Cong., 1st sess. ' area at Richmond Long Wharf (Sacramento Dist. "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)"). Nov. 17, 1986 Deepen channel to 38 feet between Richmond 1986 WRDA, Public Long Wharf and Santa Fe Channel. Construct Law 99-662 1,200 feet turning basin. 4. SONOMA BAYLANDS WETLANDS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, CA Oct. 5, 1992 Restoration of tidal wetland on a 348-acre site using Section 106, dredged material and construction of a replacement 1992 WRDA, levee around the landward periphery of the site. Public Law 102-580 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Included deepening of tidal canal above Park Street Bridge to 25 feet, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 3. Reconstruction of Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge (S. Doc. 75, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 4. Included in part in Public Works Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 34-12 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA ' Completed 1966 $155,550 2 $20,309 9 Berkeley Marina, CA ' Completed 1979 505,201 3 Monterey Harbor, CA Completed 1971 1,108,182 4 1,763,135 s San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA 1 Completed 1976 848,227 7 60,427 11 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA Completed 1974 180,472 s 88,060 10 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA ' Completed 1976 210,390 8 - Sausalito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA Inactive 1963 103,095 70,165 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, 6. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and Public Law 86-645). excludes contributed funds $153,618. 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. 7. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. 3. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. 8. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and 4. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administra- excludes contributed funds $138,189. don funds and breakwater modifications (1960 Act) 9. Includes $20,309 for jetty condition surveys placed inactive 1974. The barrier groin and sandtrap for FY 1987-1994. feature of the project was deauthorized November 17, 10. Includes $88,060 for reconnaissance and 1986, by WRDA of 1986. condition survey for FY 1990-1994. 5. Includes $308,901 for reconnaissance and 11. Includes $60,427 for reconnaissance and condition survey for FY 1956-1994. condition survey for FY 1994. TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Humboldt Bay (Buhne Point), CA 1958 Jan. 1, 1990 $ 2,000 - Lower San Francisco Bay, CA 1935 Jan. 1, 1990 - - Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA 1974 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Oakland Harbor, CA (Deepen Tidal Canal) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 - - Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 - - San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) 1962 Nov. 6, 1977 - - San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo) 1982 Nov. 6, 1977 - - Santa Cruz County, CA 1966 Jan. 1, 1990 245,639 - 34-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 34-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Alameda Creek Jul 1994 Corte Madera Creek Jun 1994 Coyote Creek Jun 1994 Dry Creek Aug 1994 East Weaver Creek Jul 1994 Eel River at Sandy Prairie Jul 1994 Klamath River Jul 1994 Mad River at Blue Lake Jul 1994 Pajaro River Aug 1994 Pinole Creek May 1994 Redwood Creek Jul 1994 Rheem Creek May 1994 Rodeo Creek May 1994 Russian River Aug 1994 San Leandro Creek Jul 1994 San Lorenzo River Jul 1994 San Pablo Creek May 1994 Uvas Creek Aug 1994 Wildcat Creek May 1994 34-14 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Sacramento River, CA ............... 35-2 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA ................... 35-3 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) .................... 35-3 4. San Joaquin River, CA ................ 35-5 Flood Control 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA ................ 35-5 6. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA ........ 35-6 7. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA ................ 35-6 8. Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO. . 35-7 9. Corte Madera Creek, CA ............. 35-8 10. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA .......... 35-9 11. Guadalupe River, CA ................ 35-9 12. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA ......................... 35-10 13. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA ........ 35-11 14. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA... 35-12 15. Little Dell Lake, UT.................. 35-13 16. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA ....................... 35-14 17. Merced County Streams ............. 35-14 18. Merced County Stream Group, CA ..... 35-15 19. Pajaro River, CA ................... 35-15 20. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA ..... 35-16 21. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA ..... 35-17 22. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA .. 35-18 23. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ........ 35-19 24. Walnut Creek, CA .................. 35-21 25. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks. CA ..... 35-22 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................... 35-22 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 27. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ..................... 35-23 28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............... 35-23 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 29. New Melones Lake, CA.............. 35-23 General Investigations 30. Surveys .......................... 35-25 31. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 35-25 32. Research and Development .......... 35-25 33. Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 35-25 34. Other Work under Special Authority... 35-26 Tables Table 35-A Page Cost and Financial Statement .............. 35-28 Table 35-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 35-36 Table 35-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 35-38 Table 35-D Not Applicable Table 35-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 35-39 Table 35-F Not Applicable Table 35-G Deauthorized Projects ..... .35-41 Table 35-H Sacramento River, CA: Tidal and Flood Conditions Prevailing ............... 35-41 Table 35-I San Joaquin River, CA: Total Cost of New Work for Project .............. 35-42 Table 35-J San Joaquin River, CA: Project Units (1950 Modification) Reclassified and Excluded from Project Cost ............. 35-42 Table 35-K Merced County Stream Group, Table 35-L CA, Maximum Inflow. Storage, and Outflow for Projects ... .35-43 Russian River Basin. CA: Estimated Cost for New Work ....... 35-43 35-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) Tables Table 35-M Table 35-N Table 35-0 Page Tables Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs .......... 35-44 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, Collinsville to Shasta Dam: Project Units Units Reclassified and Excluded from Cost Estimate ....... 35-44 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, from Collinsville Page to Shasta Dam: Construction Accomplished and Contract Costs ................... 35-45 Table 35-P Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as Amended (Preauthorization) ........ 35-45 Table 35-Q Surveys ............... 35-46 Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provided for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. However. shallow-draft channel feature Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallow-draft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by .city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallow-draft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974. remaining work for shallow-draft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. On November 17, 1986, remaining shallow-draft feature. Colusa to 35-2 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662). Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August. 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Location. On the Sacramento River between Collinsville and the Port of Sacramento, a distance of about 43 miles, in the counties of Sacramento, Contra Costa, Solano, and Yolo, CA. Existing project. Project provides for deepening to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to the Port of Sacramento, and the Avon to New York Slough reach to 35 feet which will be accomplished under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, and widening the channel as necessary. Current selected plan also provides for a water quality monitoring program, and establishment of wetland habitat and upland habitat to mitigate for losses of such habitat. Project estimate (October 1994) is $50,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $24,900,000; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $300,000; and non-Federal cost of $24,800,000 for lands and damages, relocations, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($8,300,000) that local interests must pay. Existing project was adopted by Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985, August 15, 1985 (Public Law 99-88), 99th Cong., 1st sess. and modified by 1986 Water Resources Development Act, November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) 99th Cong., 2d sess. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; and provide retention dikes for dredged material disposal area; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at S8,300,000. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) (sec. 221) was executed June 27, 1986. An LCA modification necessitated by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was executed December 6, 1988. Terminal facilities. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering was continued. Historical summary. General Design Memorandum was approved and Record of Decision was signed in May 1987. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) modification was approved and was signed by Port of Sacramento on August 19, 1987. LCA modification was executed December 6, 1988. First construction contract was awarded February 2, 1989 and completed in July 1990; second contract was awarded September 12, 1990 and completed in August 1991. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA, (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel, and San Joaquin River navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming shoreline marshes and inundated or low-lying areas by spoil deposit for public recreation and for industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on some of the reclaimed areas for public use; and placing additional rock revetment on waterside of levees bordering channels. Project estimate (October 1994) is $202,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation 35-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $172,250,000, including basic recreation facilities; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $780,000; and non-Federal cost of $29,270,000 for lands and damages, relocations, berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($20,000) that local interests must make for land enhancement at time of construction. Local interests must also pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including spoil-disposal areas designated by the Chief of Engineers; provide necessary spoil retention dikes, bulkheads, and embankments except as applicable to spoil-disposal areas designated as public recreation areas; make utility modifications and relocations required for construction, including new bridges or bridge alterations (except for railroad bridges), and absorb any increased annual maintenance and operation costs resulting there from; provide and maintain all necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be served by the deepened channels; and in recognition of the local land enhancement benefits to result from landfill during dredging, contribute to the United States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material placed during initial construction for modification of Suisun Bay Channel project on areas not developed for public use. Local interests must also give satisfactory assurances, before starting construction of the affected units, that they will maintain and operate the Federally provided recreation areas and facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards the levees altered, set back or provided revetment protection, and hold the U.S. Government free from damages due to deposition of spoil and construction of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, must, at time of construction, contribute $20,000 in cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation; and maintain and operate basic recreation facilities after construction and install additional basic facilities required as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation within the Avon-Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances for deepening and otherwise improving the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 1970. The Stockton Port District, in August 1980, formally provided their intent to sponsor the Avon to Pittsburg reach (Suisun Bay Channel) and recreational development on Roberts Island. The Port of Stockton, by letter of October 20, 1981, stated that they would furnish the necessary assurances for fish and wildlife mitigation and enhancement, and on April 13, 1982, provided formal updated assurances for the Avon to Stockton portion. A sec. 221 agreement satisfying all requirements of local cooperation for Southampton Shoal and Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area was obtained from Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and signed by District Engineer July 31, 1984. On May 3, 1988, Board passed a resolution of continued support for construction in West Richmond, Pinole Shoal, Carquinez Strait, and Suisun Bay Channels. A Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the Army, San Francisco District and Contra Costa County to sample berthing areas of project was executed September 12, 1989. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1991, and 31, revised 1991, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif." and "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, revised 1986,"The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sacramento District: Engineering continued including preparation of a draft dissolved oxygen mitigation facility operations and maintenance manual. San Francisco District: planning activities continued including continuation of hydrologic studies at the San Francisco Bay Hydrologic model in Sausalito; essential completion of a vessel simulation navigation study; and completion of sediment quality testing for ocean, upland and wetland disposal. Negotiations are underway for transferring local sponsorship of operations and maintenance for New York Slough and Suisun Bay Channel from the Port of Stockton to Contra Costa County. Historical summary. Construction of project was initiated in June 1971 and is about 37 percent complete. Suisun Bay Channel (Martinez to Point Edith) portion of project which had been placed in "deferred" status on November 16. 1989, was reclassified as "active" on August 24, 1993. Only 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Bulls Head Channel portion will be included as part of John F. Baldwin Ship Channel project. 4. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassifed and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif.," revised 1986. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. Dredging was initiated and completed at contract cost of S964,499. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 3.) Historical Sutnmary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. Flood Control 5. BUCHANAN DAM-H.V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205-foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $28,919,597, of which $27,369,597 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H.V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $208,100. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 90,557 acre-feet occurred May 2, 1994. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 1,319 cubic feet per second on February 5, 1994. Maximum release of 853 cubic feet per second on May 28, 1994, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, a total of 64,027 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances was combined under one contract. Project was completed in September 1983, except for installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam 35-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. Solar heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in FY 1984. An hydrilla eradication (spraying) program was initiated in FY 1989. Final land audit was approved on December 3, 1985. 6. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA (CACHE CREEK SETI'LING BASIN) Location. At the mouth of Cache Creek in Yolo County where it enters the Yolo Bypass about 2 miles east of city of Woodland and about 15 miles northwest of city of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for raising the perimeter levees of the existing settling basin an average of 12 feet, extending the levees upstream to County Road 102 to provide 50-year sediment storage capacity, enlarging and reconstructing the cobble weir, and degrading existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to western perimeter levee to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity (340 acre-feet annually.). Estimated cost (October 1993) for existing project is $20,130,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $11,710,000 is Federal and $8,420,000 is non-Federal (which includes $1,010,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986 (HD 98-134, 98th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map.) Project as authorized included development of a national wildlife refuge within the settling basin; however, the Department of the Army determined that such refuge would be more appropriately funded and developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project: pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent of which S 1,010,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Cache Creek Settling Basin work was transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance in December 1993. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Cache Creek Settling Basin enlargement (multicomponent) construction contract was awarded August 5, 1991, completed in September 1993, and work was transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on December 2, 1993. 7. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITILEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684. of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement (S488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3. Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non-Federal cost included in above amount is S3,242,867 for 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; a long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. Local interests paid $4,036,504 through December 31, 1993. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $234,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam-Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During rainflood season, maximum flow of Duck Creek Diversion was 55 cubic feet per second on February 20, 1994. Maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was 624 cubic feet per second on February 22, 1994. Maximum storage in reservoir was 299 acre-feet on February 20, 1994, and maximum estimated inflow to reservoir was 807 cubic feet per second on February 20, 1994. Maximum release of 302 cubic feet per second on February 20, 1994, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 4,285 acre-feet was released for flood control. New Hogan Lake-Maintenance and operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $240,797. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 137,788 acre-feet occurred October 1, 1993. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 2,108 cubic feet per second on January 22, 1994. Maximum release of 1,221 cubic feet per second on August 29, 1994, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 118,548 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 8. COLORADO RIVER AT GRAND JUNCTION, CO Location. On north bank of Colorado River from 9th Street west to the Denver Rio Grande Western Railroad Bridge at city of Grand Junction, CO, in Mesa County. Existing project. Provides for construction of a 3,200 foot levee located on north side of Colorado River, one road ramp over levee for accessing Watson Island, 3 detention basins, a relief well system and a 550-foot-long impermeable blanket to prevent seepage though railroad embankment. Estimated cost (September 1994) is $1,651,200, of which $1,086,700 is Federal cost and $564,500 is non-Federal cost for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of $63,000. Existing project was approved by Chief of Engineers on February 28, 1994, under provisions of section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local sponsor shall furnish to the Government all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, as determined by the Government to be necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, and shall furnish to the Government evidence supporting local sponsor's legal authority to grant rights-of-entry to such lands. Necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way may be provided incrementally, but all lands, easements, and rights-of-way determined by the Government to be necessary for work to be performed under a construction contract must be furnished prior to advertisement of the construction contract. Local sponsor shall provide or pay to the Government the cost of providing all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, including all monitoring features and stilling basins that may be required at any dredged material disposal areas necessary for project construction. Upon notification from the Government. local sponsor shall accomplish or arrange for accomplishment at no cost to the Government all relocations (excluding railroad bridges and approaches thereto) determined by the Government to be necessary for 35-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 project construction. Local sponsor shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, as amended by Title IV of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-17), and the Uniform Regulations contained in 49 CFR Part 24, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act. Local sponsor shall provide such documentation as contracting officer requires to demonstrate compliance. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) between the Department of the Army and the City of Grand Junction, CO, was signed April 8, 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed in August 1994. Non-Federal cash contribution of $63,000 for construction was received September 27, 1994. First construction contract in amount of $575,830 was awarded September 30, 1994. Historical summary. First construction contract in amount of $575,830 was awarded September 30, 1994. 9. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 28 square miles in Marin County, CA, and flow into west side of San Francisco Bay about 9 miles north of Golden Gate. (See Geological Survey quadrangle San Rafael.) Existing project. Provided for about 11 miles of channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, levees, riprapping, rectangular concrete sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous channel rights-of-way to deep water in San Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in the event of future tideland reclamation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures as necessary to individual properties and other necessary structural measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Portion of project upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard previously classified inactive was modified on November 17, 1986 to eliminate any chaiinel modification. Current project has 3 miles of channel enlargement and levees, about 1.8 miles of rectangular concrete channel improvements, and 450,000 cubic yards of redredging. on lower Corte Madera Creek. Approved estimated cost for new work in Unit 4 and previously constructed features (October 1992) is $31,800,000, of which $18,000,000 is Federal cost and $13,800,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $760,000 to be contributed by local interests.) (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for disposal of waste material, modify or relocate all bridges and utilities necessary for construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment on flood channels that would result in decreasing the effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of Federal construction cost of Ross Valley unit and tidal areas, an estimated $760,000. Main County Flood Control and Water Conservation District previously furnished resolution of local assurances dated March 29, 1966, March 28, 1967, August 15, 1967, and July 8, 1969, and Marin County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 1978. Project was authorized by the State of California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. Board of Supervisors of Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements for portion of project below Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation because a Superior Court Judgment ordered that county to take all steps required by law to complete channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging the lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed on June 29, 1985. Marin County also provided support for Ross Valley Unit 4 by resolution on March 24, 1987 and by the resolution on September 13, 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Minor engineering only. All other work was suspended pending coordination with local communities on selection of a plan to complete the project. Historical summary. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. Project is about 77 percent complete considering the portion being held in abeyance upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. Work remaining: Design construction of the remaining 3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. In lieu of the 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT authorized concrete channel, an alternative plan consisting of wing walls and individual house floodproofing is being recommended in the Significant Post-Authorization Change Report. The portion of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Madera Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack of local support. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed June 29, 1985. Construction on Lower Corte Madera Creek Channel was completed and transferred to Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by letter of May 28, 1987. San Francisco District monitors maintenance and operation of the project. 10. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA Location. On five streams in vicinity of cities of Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA. Existing project. Provides for channel improvement on Ledgewood, Laurel, and McCoy Creeks and diversion of three creeks upstream from Fairfield (Pennsylvania Avenue Creek into Ledgewood Creek, Union Avenue Creek into Laurel Creek, and Laurel Creek into McCoy Creek). Project related recreation facilities such as access roads, parking areas, a boat-launching ramp and hiking, bicycle, and horseback trails would also be constructed. Estimated cost (October 1993) for existing project is $39,420,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $14,770,000 is Federal and $24,650,000 is non-Federal (includes $595,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 201, 1965 Flood Control Act (1970 Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions) and Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), December 19, 1985, and Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1987. (HD 91-159, 91st Cong., 1st sess., contains published map). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project flood control features; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $595,000 (cash contribution); and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities and recreation facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Project had been in "deferred" status since September 15, 1977, due to lack of local assurances. In April 1982, the cities of Fairfield and Suisun affirmed their support and intent to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation for a modified version of the authorized project from 200-year to 100-year flood protection. On June 23, 1982, project was reclassified from "deferred" to "active" status. The State of California Reclamation Board has provided a letter of intent to the Assistant Secretary of the Army, November 8, 1982, to cooperate with the Federal Government to begin construction of the project. In accordance with FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) and sec. 117 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control and recreation (sec. 221) was executed June 3, 1986. Sec. 117 of Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 contained the following authorization language which will be reflected in any future modified agreements: "The Secretary shall include as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project for flood control, Fairfield Vicinity Streams, California, authorized in accordance with sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, the cost of any work carried out by non-Federal interests on the project after December 31, 1973, and before the date of the enactment of this joint resolution if the Secretary determines such work is reasonably compatible with the project. Costs and benefits resulting from such work shall continue to be included for purposes of determining economic feasibility of the project." Prior local expenditures of $6,600,000 have been reported by the sponsor. The Corps is evaluating costs and benefits of all completed works by non-Federal interests after December 31, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance inspections of mitigation planting on Ledgewood Creek and project close-out activities were performed. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 3, 1986. Construction was initiated in October 1986. Enlargement of McCoy Creek and construction of Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was transferred to local interests in July 1987; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase II, was transferred to local interests in November 1988; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel. Phase III, was transferred to local interests in April 1990; and Laurel Creek Diversion , Phase IIA, was transferred to local interests in December 1990 for maintenance. Channel improvement contract for Ledgewood Creek Channel, Phase IV, was completed and transferred to local interests in December 1991 for maintenance. Mitigation planting on Ledgewood Creek was completed in April 1993. Maintenance inspection was initiated.Construction of Laurel Creek pedestrian bridge overcrossing was completed and transferred to local interests on July 8. 1993. 11. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA 35-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Location. On Guadalupe River in downtown area of city of San Jose, Santa Clara County, CA. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for widening and deepening one or more sides of Guadalupe River for 2.5 miles from Interstate Highway 280 to Interstate Highway 880 in downtown San Jose, CA, and channel modifications with provisions for fish and wildlife mitigation, as necessary. Non-Federal sponsor must pay 100 percent of incremental construction cost of locally preferred plan. Project is an integral component of a much larger regional park plan being undertaken by the San Jose Redevelopment Agency. Estimated cost (October 1994) is $137,770,000 (which includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $63,300,000 is Federal and $74,470,000 is non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1990 which directed the Secretary of the Army to construct the project notwithstanding sec. 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 regarding project cost limitations. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, which are partially offset by a credit ($5,701,000) allowed for prior work (sec. 104, Water Resources Development Act of 1986); credit was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Federal reimbursement will be made to non-Federal sponsor for one-half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. On June 2, 1989, the local sponsor, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, expressed intent to provide all needed cost sharing funds. On September 21, 1990, the San Jose Redevelopment Agency requested modification of project to include recreation facilities and confirmed that they intend to participate as local sponsor for recreation. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract No. 1 for channel improvement (Highway 880 to Hedding Street) was essentially completed at fiscal year cost of S948,300, and was transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on August 11, 1994. Construction contract No. 2 was awarded July 8, 1994. Historical summary. Final General Design Memorandum (GDM) reflecting locally preferred plan, was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on March 26, 1992, with comments. Revision of GDM to address comments was completed in July 1993. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. Construction contract No. 1 for channel improvement (Highway 880 to Hedding Street) was awarded August 10, 1992; and was essentially completed and transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on August 11, 1994. Construction contract No. 2 was awarded July 8, 1994. 12. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163-foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of S69,314. Runoff of Fresno River below Hidden 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 36,930 acre-feet occurred May 30, 1994. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 726 cubic feet per second on February 19, 1994. Maximum release of 259 cubic feet per second on July 29,1994, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 40,195 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. Solar heating was installed at recreation areas in FY 1984. 13. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) In 1991, Isabella Lake and 16,000 acres of surrounding land was transferred to the Forest Service in exchange for about 2,500 acres of Forest Service land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs, based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid S1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreation purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps on May 15, 1991, in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. This was accomplished by using a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam for flood control and water conservation purposes. Authority for new concessionaire operating permits to be issued, as well as those previously granted by the Corps, will be transferred to the Forest Service. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $965,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $534,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Between 1962 and 1982, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was revised by Docket No. HB07-75-4-000 (order issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC. paragraph 62052) which modified cumulative use charges after 1974, effective retroactively. Such charges will now 35-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 vary each year. An adjustment (years 1974 through 1984) was included in 1984 payment of S244,790. The 1985 payment was S52,747; 1986 payment was $51,905. No payment was received in 1987. The 1988 payment was $58,187. No payment was received in 1989. Two payments ($60,894 and $55,443) were received in 1990; $60,983 was received in 1991; $65,975 in October 1991 (FY 1992) $77,577 in October 1992 (FY 1993), and $62,231 in October 1993 (FY 1994). Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1994, amounted to $2,150,458. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $136. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 270,155 acre-feet occurred October 1, 1993. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 2,970 cubic feet per second on June 6, 1994, and maximum outflow of 1,373 cubic feet per second occurred June 9, 1994. During the year, 447,952 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. A memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service) was used. The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam for flood control and water conservation purposes. 14. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia. CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and water-right holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1993: Terminus, $2.117,458 and Success, $1,012.071. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT July 10, 1960, and at Terminus,. June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdiction of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $199,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council and developed a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($360,000) and the marina concessionaires ($373,000) is about $733,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Success Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 130,268 acre-feet occurred on June 13, 1994. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir on May 15, 1994, was about 2,080 cubic feet per second. Maximum outflow of 1,595 cubic feet per second occurred July 8, 1994. Irrigation and spreading releases totaled 188,208 acre-feet. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $740,210. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above Success Dam was below normal during the year. Maximum storage of 40,203 acre-feet occurred on June 9, 1994. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 640 cubic feet per second on November 30, 1993, and maximum outflow of 364 feet per second occurred on July 19, 1994. Irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 61,582 acrefeet. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968. Final land audit was approved on April 20, 1987. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. Piezometer installation and a cultural resources survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 15. LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT Location. On Dell Creek, a tributary of Parleys Creek, about 8 miles east of Salt Lake City upstream of Mountain Dell Reservoir in Salt Lake County, UT. Existing Project. Project providing for construction of a dam about 253 feet high to create a reservoir with a gross capacity of 30,000 acre-feet for flood control, municipal and industrial water supply, recreation and fish and wildlife was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 53, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map) as modified by sec. 170, Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976. Facility would be operated in conjunction with existing downstream 3,200 acre-foot Mountain Dell Reservoir on Parleys Creek for flood control and water supply. Authorized project has been reexamined and scaled down to reflect local interests' ability to pay. Current plan of improvement includes only flood control and water supply purposes. Recreation was deferred as of May 30, 1986, and Emigration Creek Diversion was deleted and placed in an inactive status. Project includes an earthfill dam 224 feet high, a 20,500 acre-foot reservoir, and 10,035 feet of pipeline to divert water from Parleys Creek. Estimated project cost (October 1994) is S60,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which S34,900,000 is Federal and S25,600,000 is non- 35-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Federal for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of $20,050,000. Project is included in FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) August 15, 1985. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply; pay 13 percent of costs allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a cash contribution presently estimated at $20,050,000. By letters of January 22, 1986, and January 24, 1986, the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County indicated their support and willingness to proceed with a reduced scale project based on their "ability to pay." A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed on June 10, 1986. Water Revenue Bonds were issued August 27, 1986, and proceeds from the sale in the amount of $14,300,000 have been deposited in the Little Dell Construction Fund Account. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued. Award of an exit channel improvement contract has been scheduled for February 1995. Historical summary. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed June 10, 1986. Construction was initiated in April 1988. Construction of core trench and test fill was completed in February 1989. Main dam and appurtenances contract was awarded May 12, 1989 and completed in September 1993. Project was transferred to the local sponsor for maintenance and operation on March 26, 1993. Dam was dedicated on August 5, 1993. 16. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 813 acre-feet occurred on March 10, 1994. Maximum inflow to the reservoir was 57 cubic feet per second on March 5, 1994, and maximum outflow of 26 cubic feet per second occurred March 5, 1994. During the year, 5,063 acre-feet was released for irrigation purposes. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 17. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, CA, on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles; nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 18, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed in FY 1957. Existing project provides for construction of three new reservoirs-Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs--Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa. providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby tying the existing project channels into Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects would provide flood control only; Castle and Burns projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa project, all three purposes. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed.) Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Burns reservoir. Mariposa 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman- Dutchman Creeks. Estimated total project cost (October 1994) is $124,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $85,900,000 is Federal and $38,600,000 is non-Federal (which includes a $6,400,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $270,000, of which $230,000 is a cash contribution and $40,000 is for lands; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Total non-Federal share of Castle Dam first cost is $5,000,000 and includes cash contribution of $530,000. The California Reclamation Board and the City of Merced are the local sponsors of the authorized project. The Reclamation Board will serve as sole sponsor for the Castle Dam Unit. Merced County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed their support for the project by letter of April 4, 1986. City of Merced by letter of March 13, 1986, reaffirmed its support for and intent to furnish assurances for recreation aspects of the project. California Reclamation Board reaffirmed its support for total project by letter of April 9, 1986. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 1986. State of California legislation (AB3369) was enacted on September 14, 1986 which enabled the Reclamation Board to financially participate in the project. A new Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army November 30, 1988, in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The California Reclamation Board and the Merced County Board of Supervisors have indicated support for balance of the project by letters of intent dated August 29, 1991 and August 20, 1991, respectively. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued. Castle Dam check structure contract was completed at a fiscal year cost of $306,375. Historical summary. Castle Dam multicomponent construction contract was awarded February 26, 1991. and construction was completed in March 1993. Castle Dam check structure contract was initiated in April 1993 and completed in January 1994. 18. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear. Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas below Merced County stream group reservoirs was below normal for the year. See Table 35-K for maximum inflow storage and outflow for the projects. Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Project prevented an estimated $138,000 in damages from the January-February 1994 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and stream-gaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 19. PAJARO RIVER, CA Location. In the Uvas-Carnadero and Llagas Creeks watersheds of the upper Pajaro River Basin in south Santa Clara County in vicinity of the city of Gilroy about 75 miles south of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Provides for construction of a 2-mile levee along the north side of Uvas Creek from a point about 2,000 feet downstream of Thomas Road to about 3,500 feet upstream of Miller Avenue. Project will also include a bikeway and hiking trail. 35-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Estimated cost (October 1992) for existing project is $13,814,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $6,907,000 is Federal and $6,907,000 is non-Federal (which includes $565,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Flood Control Act of 1944, December 21, 1944 (HD 505-78, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, right-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay one-half of separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests will receive an estimated Federal reimbursement of $5,649,000 for one half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Final accounting is underway. Historical summary. Responsibility for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications, and construction was transferred to Sacramento District in April 1982. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for flood control was executed with the Santa Clara Valley Water District on June 25, 1987, and LCA for recreation was executed with the City of Gilroy on July 27, 1987. Construction began in October 1987. Construction for the first contract (levee work and bike path upstream of Thomas Road Bridge), second contract (levee work and hiking trails), and third and final contract (landscaping) has been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Total reimbursement of $5,068,994 has been made to the local sponsor as of September 30, 1994. 20. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Project also includes 2.500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its distributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law as amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations under the early reclamation laws as being applicable to projects constructed by the Corps with two exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT $13,745,874 for irrigation services through December 31, 1993. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Pine Flat Marina and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $1,727,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost of $476,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Installation of a hydroelectric powerplant, located at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam, was completed in January 1984 by Kings River Conservation District. Project consists of an outdoor-type powerhouse containing three generating units with capacities of 55 megawatts each for a total of 165 megawatts. Conservation District would make use of the three existing 13.5-foot diameter penstocks that were installed in Pine Flat Dam when constructed in 1954. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds were paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2741, effective September 25, 1979, was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Kings River Conservation District for hydropower development at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam. Payment to the Department of the Army for construction and installation of the penstocks in the amount of S 1,044,685 was made to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury in November 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Contract for water stop repair at Pine Flat Dam was completed. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 669,416 acre-feet occurred on June 5, 1994. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 8, 637 cubic feet per second on May 30, 1994, and maximum outflow of 8,109 cubic feet per second occurred on June 30, 1994. During the year, 1,248,377 acre-feet was released for irrigation and spreading. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Pine Flat Lake acquired additional acreage as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The Corps exchanged Isabella Lake and the 16,000 acres around that lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. 21. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Location. Northeast and adjacent to the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan Area in Fresno County about 170 miles southeast of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a dam 45.5 feet high to create a reservoir with gross capacity of 10,300 acre-feet for flood control on Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recreational development. Since the local sponsor does not support recreational development at this time, the recreation feature of the project is considered to be inactive. The authorization Act states "measures determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Army to minimize 35-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 benefits to groundwater recharge" shall be included in the project. Estimated cost (October 1994) for existing project is $70,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation .through the construction period), of which $47,900,000 is Federal and $22,400,000 is non-Federal (which includes $3,510,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. (HD 98-147, 98th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, of which $3,510,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Construction contract for Big Dry Dam, Pup and Alluvial detention basins was completed at contract cost of $116,151. Big Dry Creek Dam and Pup Creek Detention Basin were transferred to sponsor in June 1994. Last piece of completed work, Alluvial Drain Detention Basin, was transferred to sponsor for maintenance and operation in July 1994. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 1, 1987. Project construction was begun in September 1987 with initiation of archaeological work on Cultural Resources Preservation. Construction contract for Dry Creek Crossing was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on January 10, 1989. Construction at Redbank Creek Detention Basin was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 23, 1990. Construction contract for Fancher Creek Dam awarded May 23, 1990, was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on March 13, 1992. Construction contract for Big Dry Dam, Pup and Alluvial detention basins was awarded March 18, 1992. Big Dry Creek Dam and Pup Creek Detention Basin were transferred to local interests on June 22, 1994. Last piece of completed work, Alluvial Drain Detention Basin, was transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on July 18, 1994. 22. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at 'Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Project also provides for expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, Warm Springs, to compensate for fish losses on Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-L and 35-M for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the joint-use construction cost, (30.2 percent currently estimated at $103,760,000) and an ultimate 32.5 percent of the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement joint-use costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $80,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. The Gualala Redwoods claim that their access to Kelly Road was cut off by Corps project (Warm Springs) went to trial in October 1992. Judgement resulting was a cost of $3,162,000 to the Federal Government. Major items of contract work included: Completion of Liberty Glen wastewater system at fiscal year cost of $353,795 and initiation and completion of contaminated soil remediation, $83,000. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $884. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian River at Coyote Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 82,316 acre-feet occurred on May 25, 1994. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 2,670 cubic feet per second on February 17, 1994. Maximum release of 994 cubic feet per second occurred on February 18, 1994. During the year, 17,152 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 132,762 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 244,751 acre-feet occurred March 14, 1994. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 6,367 cubic feet per second on February 17, 1994. Maximum release of 195 cubic feet per second occurred July 1, 1994. During the year, 82,028 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 99 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Warm Springs construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, project overlook in May 1981, reservoir clearing in July 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985, Rockpile Road Upgrade, Yorty Creek Beach, and remedial work at Liberty Glen camping area in September 1990, fish hatchery expansion in September 1992, final control tower grouting, dam access road repair, spillway stabilization, fish hatchery emergency water supply in September 1993, and Liberty Glen wastewater system and contaminated soil remediation. Initial filling of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 23. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1988), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages. including relocations. (See table 35-N on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood 35-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1987) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $31,000,000, of which $25,700,000 is Federal cost and $5,300,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations and cash contribution of $3,435,000. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1994) first cost for project is $159,100,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $112,200,000 is Federal and $46,900,000 non-Federal comprised of lands and damages including relocations and $24,390,000 required cash contribution toward first cost. Total estimated cost for recreation facilities, $2,750,000 (includes both Federal and non-Federal). Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported on page 35-3A under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $87,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 36 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1994) at $24,390,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution indicated above. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries-None. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project-Engineering and design activities continued. (See table 35-0 for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. None. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 71,842 acre-feet occurred March 22, 1994. Maximum hourly inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 4,997 cubic feet per second on February 20, 1994, and maximum outflow of 1,013 cubic feet per second occurred on February 22, 1994. During the year, 7.138 acre-feet was released for flood control and 156,754 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. 35-20 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 99 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required, which will accomplished under Sacramento River Bank Protection project. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 90 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 36 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1985 and transferred to State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento River, Tehama County--one site, mile 215, (Unit 5), was completed November 1982, two sites, mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), were completed in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0, 237.9, 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were completed in February 1985. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980 and completed in FY 1986. Piezometer installation and slope for protection at the dam were completed in FY 1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 24. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (October 1992) is $98.100,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $71,630,000 is Federal cost and $26,470,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $20,945,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,840,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about S3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including the concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project. In addition, local developers have made channel improvements for Upper Pine Creek valued at $5,050,000. The cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1992) at $5,840,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District will arrange for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. Flood Control District and city of Walnut Creek have requested that recreation be added as a project purpose and will share costs in accordance with Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Post Authorization Change was approved July 27, 1987. To date, $5,612,681 has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering was continued. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 98 percent complete. Total of 17.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, Drop Structures No. I and 2 and construction under San Ramon Bypass Contract No. i, Contract No. 2 and Contract No. 3 and Upper Pine Creek Channel contact have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Due to contractor difficulties with Contract No. 1 (Lionsgate claims and court action) 35-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 part of the contract work was completed under Contract No. lA with a different contractor. A contract for remedial work on San Ramon Bypass Contract No. 2 channel cover was completed in August 1993. The 9-acre mitigation contract was completed in June 1993. Work remaining consists of recreation and completion of erosion control mitigation (8-acre). Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 25. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA Location. Project is located in vicinity of San Pablo and Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA, about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Current plan of improvement reflects only Reach 1, which is from San Pablo Bay to AT&SF Railroad tracks on both Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks; Reach 1 consists of 9,900 lineal feet of channel improvements on Wildcat Creek and 10,000 lineal feet of channel improvements on San Pablo Creek. Improvements include channel deepening, levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. Additionally, about 20 acres will be planted for mitigation of fish and wildlife. Reach 2, which is upstream of AT&SF Railroad tracks and consists of 9,400 lineal feet of channel and levee work on Wildcat Creek, 1,800 lineal feet of channel and levee work on San Pablo Creek, and mitigation for fish and wildlife on 8 acres, was determined to be economically infeasible, excluded from total project cost, and reclassified as inactive. Project also includes recreation features on Wildcat Creek. Approved estimated cost of new work (1994) is $32,800,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $17,700,000 is Federal cost, and $15,100,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,490,000 cash contribution). Improvements adopted by House and Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 and 15, 1976, respectively, under provisions of sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511, 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map).For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights of way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of project: pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 73-466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations of local cooperation. On November 9, 1976, the Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which assures availability of funds for local share of non-Federal portion of flood control project costs for a modified plan of improvement. A flood control Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying all requirements of sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-661) and consistent with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662), was executed on June 20, 1986 between the Department of the Army and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. By Resolution No. 1985-12-351, adopted December 17, 1985, the East Bay Regional Park and Recreation District stated support for development of trail and recreational improvements for the project and indicated its intent to share in 50 percent of the cost of such improvements and perform operation and maintenance responsibility. A recreation Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering continued. Phase I recreation was completed. Channel improvement contract 3A, San Pablo Creek was initiated at fiscal year cost of $1,977,998. Historical summary. Local interests withdrew support of project in 1979. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. After 1982-1983 floods, local interests again indicated support of the project, and in October 1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento District. A revised final environmental impact statement was filed March 28, 1986, and a General Design Memorandum was approved May 29, 1986. Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was executed June 20, 1986. Recreation Design Memorandum was approved on February 19, 1992, and the recreation LCA was signed on April 15, 1992. Construction work under Contract No. 1 and Contract No. 2 for Reach No. 1 of Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks has been transferred to local sponsor for operation and maintenance. In March 1990, Reach 2 was declared infeasible and is now inactive. All costs have been deleted from project cost estimate. Overall project is about 80 percent complete. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Fairfield Vicinity Streams; completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Merced County Stream group; Middle Creek (Lake County); Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; completed units of Red Bank and Fancher Creeks including Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, and Fancher Dam and Redbank, Alluvial Drain and Pup Creek detention basins, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $1,024,935 included continuation of dam safety assurance program for Folsom Lake, CA $317,932. 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were $277,214. See Table 35-P for list of studies. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $363,607, all of which was for disaster preparedness. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). No emergency bank protection activities this fiscal year. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). No snagging and clearing activities this fiscal year. Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, two flood insurance studies were continued. Inter- Agency Agreements EMW-E-2226 and 2994, respectively, at a fiscal year cost of $97,479 under Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursable order. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Jordanelle, Little Dell, Lost Creek, Pineview, Red Fleet, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; and Blue Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, Ridgway, and Vallecito, CO, were prepared. No water control manual revisions were completed due to environmental issues. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $441,918. Total cost to September 30, 1994, was $7,626,543. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 29. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.). Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by 35-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. Approved estimated (October 1993) Federal cost is $400,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91-282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do so. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2. 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. On January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering activities continued. Fiscal year contract costs for major items of work included: Completion of Parrotts Ferry Bridge modification $430,485 and initiation and completion of Widening Highway 49 Intersection, $144,848; initiation and completion of Tuttletown recreation campgrounds, $200,000; and completion of Tuttletown and Glory Hole improvement, $306,476. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation, .water intake facilities, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification, reservoir area clearing, Tuttletown Phase I recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole Phase I and Phase II recreation area, and operations access road contracts have all been completed. Glory Hole minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. Boundary fencing, Lower Stanislaus Phase I and Phase II minimal recreation facilities, Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard, and Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contracts have been completed. Tuttletown minimal recreation facilities, McHenry recreation area, Tuttletown wastewater treatment, Knights Ferry recreation area,Knights Ferry Covered Bridge, Glory Hole recreation area sanitary system, Two-Mile Bar recreation, administration building, and Glory Hole recreation area force main contracts have been completed. Parrotts Ferry Bridge modification (Nov 93), Widening Highway 49 Intersection (Aug 94); Tuttletown Recreation Campgrounds, and Tuttletown and Glory Hole Improvement (Jan 94) have been completed. Overall project is nearing completion except for Lower Stanislaus River recreation facilities. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements and/or specific Congressional appropriation of funds. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal 35-24 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, CA. On December 20, 1982, the Court Upheld all 25 requirements placed on the Federal Government by the State Water Resources Control Board. The decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. The Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The Bureau had originally started generating power on a limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power generating benefits have been attained. Project is about 99 percent complete. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS See Table 35-Q. 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year costs of $378,000. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $12,000. 32. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10, 1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $1,829,827, of which $64,703 was for collection and study of basic data (including flood plain management service), $1,166,336 was for research and development, and $598,788 was for operation and maintenance activities. 33. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN COYOTE CREEK, CA (KNOWN AS COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS) Project is located in the cities of San Jose and Milpitas immediately south of San Francisco Bay in Santa Clara County, CA. Plan of improvement on Coyote Creek consists of overflow channels and offset levees. Improvement on Berryessa Creek includes two sedimentation basins at the upstream end of the concrete lined trapezoidal channel and offset levees. Combined plan would provide flood protection from Coyote and Berryessa Creeks to cities of San Jose and Milpitas, which include large industrial complexes and some residential development. Separate General Design Memorandums were continued on Coyote and Berryessa Creeks. General Design Memorandum for Coyote was submitted in May 1993. Local interests have completed construction of Reach 1 (sec 104, Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), Reach 2 (sec 27, WRDA) and Reach 3A (sec 215, WRDA). National Defense Authorization Act for FY 1994 directed the Secretary of the Army to construct project notwithstanding sec 902, WRDA. Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in September 1994 and Coyote Creek Reach 3B construction contract was awarded September 27, 1994. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $4,410,000. TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV Project is located in metropolitan area of Reno and Sparks in Washoe County, NV. Current plan of improvement consists of about 7 miles of levees, 5 miles of floodwalls, 3 bridge replacements along Truckee River and includes limited channel excavation, a detention dam on Steamboat Creek at Huffaker Narrows, and backwater levees along Steamboat Creek, Boynton Slough, and the North Truckee Drain just north of the Interstate Highway 80 crossing. Plan also includes recreation facilities with bicycle and pedestrian paths, river overlooks, and picnic sites; mitigation measures (31 acres of riparian plantings to replace vegetation losses); and fish and wildlife features. Project will provide flood protection from Truckee River to cities of Reno and Sparks and Truckee Meadows urban areas. Project has been deferred and preconstruction planning has been terminated as project is economically infeasible. Coordination with local agencies and sponsors was continued. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $4,300,000. NAPA RIVER, CA Project is located in city and county of Napa, CA. Current plan of improvement consists of channel excavation, floodwalls, set-back levees, bypass channels, and related environmental mitigation measures. The improvements on Napa River would 35-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 extend about 5.7 miles, from Trancas Street to Kennedy Park. Approximately 4,200 feet of Napa Creek, from its mouth to Jefferson Street, would also be improved. Project will provide 100-year level of flood protection from Napa River and Napa Creek to city of Napa. A hazardous, toxic and radioactive waste preliminary evaluation was continued. Drafts of a General Design Memorandum supplement and an Environmental Impact Statement supplement were completed in July 1994. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $11,200,000. UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UT Project is located in Salt Lake County, UT, just south of Salt Lake City corporate limit. Project consists of a flood control diversion and sediment control structure on Mill Creek above Highland Drive and a 7,440 foot long, 96-inch diameter conduit from the diversion structure into a proposed Hillview Detention Basin south of Mill Creek. Project is designed to operate as a system that will be integrated into existing flood control system of Salt Lake County. Once in place, project will provide nearly 100-year level of flood protection on Mill Creek above State Street. A draft General Design Memorandum (GDM) and Project Authorization Change (PAC) were submitted in November 1993; final GDM and PAC were submitted in March 1994. PAC was submitted to obtain Congressional authorization for a new cost limit established by sec 902, WRDA 1986. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,600,000. 34. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY YOLO BASIN WETLANDS, SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment The Yolo Basin Wetlands area is primarily located within the boundaries of the Yolo Bypass, an operative feature of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Yolo Bypass extends 43 miles from Fremont Weir on the Sacramento River, south to the town of Rio Vista where it rejoins the river. Project will include restoration of wetlands, and contribute to a larger program now in the planning stage, proposed by an interagency group of state and local governments and organizations. Proposed work will include physical improvements to help create a mixture of native marsh, permanent and seasonal wetlands, and riparian forest through modification of existing drainage canals or construction of small dikes and weirs to redirect available water sources to proposed wetland areas. Also to be included is preparation of a flood plain hydraulic management model to assess hydraulic impacts of future wetland projects proposed in the Yolo Bypass and construction of an administrative and maintenance facility. Estimated project cost is $11,800,000. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986, Public Law 99-662, sec. 1135(b), as amended by sec. 304 of WRDA 1990. The California State Department of Fish and Game is the project sponsor for 3,480 acres located within the Yolo Bypass. A Project Modification Report and an Environmental Assessment/Initial Study was completed in April 1992. Three existing sites have been identified for possible wetlands restoration: Putah Creek Sink (3,000 acres), Yolo Causeway (480 acres) and Willow Slough Bypass (345 acres). Willow Slough Bypass site was later withdrawn due to difficulty in acquiring lands. A flood plain hydraulic management model was continued. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for Putah Creek Sink site was executed on December 23, 1993. Fiscal year costs were $739,507. YOLO WETLANDS BASIN, DAVIS SITE, SACRAMENTO, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment Project is located contiguous to boundaries of Yolo Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass, which is a leveed tributary of Sacramento River on west side of Yolo Bypass. Yolo Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass are operative features of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Project will include a 396-acre site that consists of 212 acres of permanent wetland, 64 acres of riparian woodland, 64 acres of grassland/upland, and 56 acres of seasonal wetland, dikes, roads, gates, ponds and islands. Water for wetlands site is available from City of Davis waste water treatment plant and from its storm drain system. Estimated project cost is $6,260,000. A previous Davis site was included under Yolo Basin Wetlands, Sacramento River project, but was withdrawn for consideration by local sponsor due to difficulty in obtaining lands. Current project is proceeding under authority of sec. 1135(b) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Project Modification Report was continued at fiscal year cost of $193,266. SAN LORENZO RIVER, CA Project is located within the city limits of Santa Cruz, CA. in Santa Cruz County, about 70 miles south of city of San Francisco and includes the lower 2.5 miles of San Lorenzo River which terminates at the Pacific Ocean. 35-26 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Current plan of improvement for environmental restoration includes construction of precast-concrete- block and sheetpile floodwalls on top of the existing levees on both sides of San Lorenzo River from the Southern Pacific Railroad bridge to Highway 1 bridge, bridge modifications to increase flow capacity at Soquel Avenue and Water Street bridges, dredging, toe drains, floodproofing county buildings and a flood warning system. Original San Francisco District final Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) was signed August 18, 1989. Revised FCSA to complete feasibility study was executed on December 22, 1993. Local sponsor, city of Santa Cruz, expressed continued support for project by letter of January 21, 1994. Preconstruction planning was initiated on March 17, 1994, by Sacramento District. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,000,000. 35-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 1. Sacramento River CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost $964,200 1,353,399 3,269,000 3,799,847 1,500,000 1,266,274 - - - $40,331,192 1 - - - 40,331,192 1 526,400 1,122,618 189,000 46,949,578 2 443,966 1,144,951 238,875 46,893,849 3 - - - 85,000 4 - 119,443 -15,000 39,815 15,000 14,578 - 86,000 74,967 61,466 - -185,000 1,573 - 7,717,474 5 7,660,866 s 2,750,000 2,539,607 15,000 14,578 3. San Francisco Bay New Work to Stockton, CA Approp. (John F. Baldwin Cost and Stockton Ship Channels) 4. San Joaquin New Work River, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Buchanan Dam- New Work H.V. Eastman Lake, Approp. Chowchilla River, Cost CA (Federal Maint. Funds) Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 6. Cache Creek New Work Settling Basin, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 7. Calaveras River New Work and Littlejohn Approp. Creek and Trib- Cost utaries including Maint. New Hogan Lake Approp. & Farmington Dam, Cost CA (Federal Funds) 1,635,000 2,136,000 835,000 1,026,000 63,349,000 8 2,311,808 2,770,443 882,769 914,019 63,069,700 7 S- - 5,833.117 8 - - - - 5,833,117 8 450,000 1,096,000 130,000 1,377,245 16,029,382 9 442,440 1,098,445 142,154 1,265,828 15,910,798 9 - - - - 27,369,597 - - - - 27,369,597 938,700 1,196,000 1,377,000 1,583,000 16,534,393 1,073,433 1,224,513 1,342,424 1,566,273 16,465,084 - - - - 111,187 - - - - 111,187 3,900,000 426,525 400,000 40,335 400,000 - 5,379,000 7,320,728 415,000 622,305 353,000 557,361 500,000 2,163,932 164,000 236,039 -29,000 102,592 - 10,446.000 115,825 10,362,611 - 979,000 38,169 936,847 - 724.000 16,803 676,755 - - - - 23,723,144 - - - - 23,723,144 1,576,315 1,613.000 1,857,000 1,855,400 26.621.111 1,824.621 1,632,124 1,649,971 1,881,016 26,487,368 10 10 11 12 13 13 14 14 35-28 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 (Contrib. Funds, Other) 8. Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) 9. Corte Madera Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 10. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 11. Guadalupe River, CA (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 12. Hidden Dam - Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 13. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintm. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,398,251 15 16 17 1,398,251 15 16 17 5,000 63,000 170,000 217,142 10,814 24,700 2,447,000 2,001,354 18,605 463,000 576,362 1,200,000 1,138,152 - -25,000 - 82,507 24,690 -21,551 - - 4,260 - 41 4,341 - - 17,840 - 17,840 771,000 871,404 475,370 99,416 85,000 119,004 1,798,000 1,933,535 430,000 5,000. 63,000 12,458,725 12,437,169 190,355 190,213 804,761 804,761 18 18 19 19 20 20 - -54,000 14,779,000 426,018 -75,768 14,733,192 - - 533,370 377,400 - 533,365 - - 3,779,000 21 30,670 124,997 3,775,476 2 6,026,000 6,206,897 -343,000 86,556 441,000 344,491 12,022,000 7,804,439 3,202,000 189,000 24.177,000 19,951,155 3,289,000 86,556 630,000 23 344,491 24 - - - - 30,555,426 - - - - 30,555.426 1,035,700 1,306,000 1,388,000 1,355,700 17,221,518 1,124,821 1,318,900 1,356,119 1,371,749 17.179,484 - - - - 165,112 25 - - - - 165,112 25 2,216,900 2,548,784 40,000 39,911 - - - 24,450.537 26 - - - 24,450,537 26 673,000 931,000 599,000 37,660,062 27 28 683,359 876,324 656,706 37,647,004 27 28 2.500 - 7,500 753,000 29 2,575 - 5.145 749,571 30 35-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 14. Kaweah and Tule Rivers including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 15. Little Dell Lake, UT (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 16. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV, and CA 17. Merced County Streams, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 18. Merced County Stream Group, CA 19. Pajaro River Basin, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 20. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,252,500 2,452,863 26,000 27,518 2,985,000 4,731,928 2,050,000 4,027,430 14,724 2,583,853 2,811,795 2,629,169 2,758,093 - 5,000 3,135 6,683 5,884,000 8,121,629 4,400,000 5,009,731 1,841,000 729,187 2,400,000 2,497,590 1,259 1, 259 - 34,997,230 31 - 34,997,230 31 3,561,200 40,919,874 32 3,487,774 40,724,648 32 - 633,420 33 34 61 632,342 33 35 -300,000 415,779 550,000 545,564 -20,318 35,599,900 34,635,480 19,000,000 18,477,616 4,300,147 a3 4,300,147 37 - - - - 8,504,989 a3 - - - - 8,504,989 38 326,400 291,500 359,000 422,000 6,224,383 325,688 313,889 337,282 418,835 6,184,898 1,612,000 2,100,000 2,996,121 3,034,139 - 430,000 - 291,000 270,000 707,125 582,769 969,395 1,356,000 1,325,185 80,000 139,000 115,496 319,584 1,348,000 16,649.000 1,509,149 16,571,915 - 510,000 80,000 510,000 480,000 1,275,048 4,155,121 39 4,047,759 39 - - - - 2,751,259 - - - - 2,751,259 134,800 117,000 135,000 197,000 2,461,840 123,702 135,193 118,923 162,155 2,401,092 1,122,000 1,184,685 6,007 2.324.800 2,398,853 18,798 18,883 989 6,046 2,770 40 40 8,206,968 41 960 8,204,541 41 610,000 51 568,460 37,250 42 34,323 43 - - - 43,356.265 4 - - - 43,356.265 " 1,916.000 1,917,000 1,928.900 32,525,282 4s 1,943,666 1,929.273 1,869.514 32,431.715 45 35-30 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Contrib. Cost 110,000 4a 110,000 48 21. Redbank and New Work Fancher Creeks, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 22. Russian River Basin, CA, Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 23. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 24. Walnut Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 25. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks. CA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 11,500,000 10,746,289 785,000 1,060,100 392,298 10,471,000 9,844,812 425,000 449,417 135,000 156,516 6,878,000 800,000 9,023,270 832,066 247,000 -8,500 285,420 2,796 - 8,500 38,618 23,134 46,606,065 47 46,453,910 47 3,251,000 3,181,684 763,500 4 705,566 4 - - - - 14,435,869 4* - - - - 14,435,869 49 1,693,000 2,175,000 2,487,000 2,318,500 39,820,924 so si 1,879,266 2,158,612 2,438,883 2,324,765 39,732,909 so si 1,500 1,968 3,111,000 5,226,418 2,701,800 3,013,313 10,174 20,658 1,101,000 2,677,698 1,217,300 1,331,790 275,800 622,674 31,500 3,049 1,936,000 3,561,848 422,600 379,198 1,477, 100 1,703,646 12,386 329,114 12,444 8,721 5,217,000 3,291,802 2,579,000 2,705,031 12,400 1,234,000 1,750,674 1,402,000 1,452,100 -29,434 156,109 39,434 62,949 300,000 839,262 25,000 52,958 259,457 31,614 900,000 3,148,408 2,708,000 2,636,918 313,695 3,400,000 3,877,691 2,588,900 2,599,714 12,400 2,201,000 2,324,005 1,580,000 1,551,873 63,000 489,903 15,000 12,008 1,150,000 1,192,099 60,300 18,112 2,654,000 2,603,331 1,454,200 1,487,843 930,000 387,030 15,000 24,468 589,911 52 570,774 53 332,282,645 54 332,067,380 54 23,572,043 55 26,458,230 s 230,574 s57 228,732 58 124,624,000 s9 60 124,249,724 6so 24,172,128 61 24,138,123 81 24,158,404 23,397,003 2,916,296 a2 63 2,916,237 62 63 64 200,000 71,392,430 6s 195,629 71,387,562 66 - 5.612,681 67 5,173 5,612,300 68 - 14,854.344 69 - 14,570,653 69 -609.000 1,067.000 408,000 2,510,000 15,779,000 1,253.364 893,311 614,839 2,477,730 15,725,545 35-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. 235,504 - - 40,000 899,662 Cost 68,112 43,293 34,627 283,598 888,314 (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. - - - -40,000 1,626,000 70 Cost 16,951 - - - 1,582,383 71 29. Lower San New Work Joaquin River Approp. 5,223,000 3,651,000 904,000 64,000 370,992,996 72 73 and Tributaries, Cost 5,400,459 2,669,051 2,326,274 1,571,821 370,271,121 73 CA including Maint. Tuolumne and Approp. 692,000 798,000 845,000 841,000 8,608,316 Stanislaus Rivers, Cost 808,000 827,141 776,081 859,828 8,538,402 CA, New Melones Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. - - - - 80,000 74 Cost - 67,415 - - 80,000 74 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular Funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $16,414,432 for shallow-draft and $29,911,426 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $552,720; existing project, $16,380,151 for shallow-draft and $29,889,978 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 4. Includes $85,000 contributed funds, other, from Sacramento-Yolo Port District for clearing and grubbing on dredged material deposit areas to be used on ship channel maintenance dredging work. 5. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($33,474) for Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 6. Includes $28,079,800 funds for Sacramento District and $35,269,200 for San Francisco District. 7. Includes $28,036,386 costs for Sacramento District and $35,033,314 for San Francisco District. 8. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207, 198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes S19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition. S1,342,500 was expended from required contributed funds. 9. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required contributed funds for maintenance. 10. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 11. Includes $724,000 contributed funds, other, from State of California for relocation activities including demolition or salvage of various pipes and facilities, construction of ramps, turnouts, pipe gates and bank protection at Cache Creek Settling Basin. 12. Includes $676,755 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation activities for State of California. 13. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: total to date $897,742. 14. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees and costs at New Hogan Lake, and $655,600 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at New Hogan Lake beginning in FY 1988. 15. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily for Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes $10,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 16. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other. from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 17. Includes $104,000 contributed funds, other, and costs from Calaveras County Water District for New Hogan hydropower studies. 18. Includes S6,999,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 19. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 20. Contributed funds, other, and costs, from Marin 35-32 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $267,840 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 21. Includes $3,643,000 contributed funds, other. from the State of California for relocations (automotive type bridges) at Laurel Creek Diversion near Fairfield, $23,000 from City of Fairfield for Phase III contract for channel development on Laurel Creek, and $113,000 from City of Suisun for Phase IIA contract for widening of Railroad Avenue. 22. Includes $3,643,001 contributed funds, other, costs for relocations at Laurel Creek Diversion, $19,537 contributed funds, other costs for Phase III contract, and $112,939 for Phase IIA contract. 23. Includes contributed funds, other: $190,000 for recreation betterment, $254,000 for NED relocations and $70,000 for incremental relocations at Guadalupe River. 24. Includes contributed funds, other costs: $180,989 for recreation betterment, $93,766 for NED relocations and $69,736 for incremental relocations at Guadalupe River. 25. Contributed funds, other from the State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 26. Includes $2,199,085 Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake and $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 27. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees and costs at Isabella Lake. 28. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at Isabella Lake beginning in FY 1985. 29. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula and $337,500 for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 30. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, costs for boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula, and $311,661 costs for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 31. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date: $704,000. 32. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees and costs at Success Lake. 33. Includes contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, $30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 34. Includes contributed funds, other, from Kaweah River Power Authority, Visalia, California for Terminus Dam hydropower studies, $423,000; and from DITT, Inc., Paris, France, for Success Lake hydropower studies, S168,000. 35. Includes contributed funds, other, costs for Terminus Dam hydropower studies, S422344, and for Success Lake hydropower studies, $167,579. 36. Includes $4,300147 contributed funds, other from the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 37. Includes $4,300,147 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 38. Includes $1,200 initiation of plans and specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 720 was determined to be infeasible. 39. Includes contributed funds, other, for lands, easements and rights-of-way for Castle Dam from State of California. 40. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of right-of-way and utility alterations for Merced County Stream Group. 41. Includes $1,949,968 San Francisco construction funds and costs and $260,000 Sacramento general investigation funds and costs for Pajaro River. 42. Includes $37,250 contributed funds, other, from Santa Clara Valley Water District for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 43. Includes $34,323 contributed funds, other, costs for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 44. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date: $1,595,100. Includes Public Work Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds and costs ($239,235) for recreation facilities and $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 45. Includes $158,300 special recreation fees and costs at Pine Flat Lake and $528,785 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Pine Flat Dam. 46. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 47. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($29,065) and FY 1986 allocation for Redbank and Fancher Creeks to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 48. Includes contributed funds, other, from Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District for road relocation and betterments (Nees Avenue) at Fancher Dam. 49. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds; $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 50. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and cost for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 51. Includes $1,378,980 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino for FY 1985 through FY 1993. 52. Includes $251.911 contributed funds, other from City of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. hydropower studies; and $338,000 from 35-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 53. Includes S250,117 contributed funds, other, costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $320,657 for California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 54. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 55. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 56. Includes $75,400 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 57. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, from Sonoma County for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies; and $22,500 from City of Ukiah for hatchery pump design at Lake Mendocino. 58. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies; and $20,658 costs for hatchery pump design. 59. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 60. Includes Code 710 funds and cost for recreation facilities at Black Butte lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 61. Includes $104,100 special recreation use fees and costs at Black Butte Lake. 62. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries project). Includes State Highway Commission payment, $789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment through city of Chico. 63. Includes $41,984 contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities and salmon rearing habitat, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff;.$ 15,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; $380,500 contributed funds, other, from the City of Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte Lake; and $59,334 contributed funds, other from State of California for relocations. 64. Includes $380,441 contributed funds, other, costs for Black Butte hydropower studies; and $59,334 costs for relocations. 65. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction funds for Walnut Creek. 66. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction costs for Walnut Creek. 67. Includes $450,268 San Francisco required funds for Walnut Creek. 68. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required costs for Walnut Creek. 69. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed funds, other, and contributed funds costs for Walnut Creek. 70. Includes $1,626,000 contributed funds, other, from Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 71. Includes $1,582,383 contributed funds, other, costs for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 72. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, and Tuolomne River Basin, California). (See Table 35-E). 73. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 74. Includes $80,000 contributed funds, other, and costs, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 35-34 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sp ,30, 1994 1 2 American River New Work Watershed CA, Approp. - $1,600,000 2,542,000 4,850,000 S8,992,000. Cost - 1,177,627 2,952,122 4,834,610 8,964,359 Caliente Creek, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 60,000 Cost - 9 - - 60,000 Coyote and Berryessa New Work Creeks, CA Approp. 1,160,000 885,000 1,016,000 - 4,410,000 Cost 1,066,409 835,620 1,307,497 83,843 4,409,998 Napa River, CA New Work Approp. 560,000 2,000,000 850,000 1,400,000 6,873,000 3 Cost 532,776 1,933,885 1,119,968 1,422,351 6,864,391 3 San Lorenzo River, New Work CA Approp. - 170,800 170,800 Cost 169,928 169,928 Truckee Meadows, New Work NV Approp. 786,000 -307,000 -15,570 100 3,787,530 Cost 818,804 67,736 7,121 7,439 3,787,530 Upper Jordan New Work River, CA Approp. 525,000 375,000 - 50,000 1,150,000 Cost 352,887 346,138 170,182 91,850 1,138,294 West Sacramento, New Work CA Approp. - - 525,000 1,040,000 1,565,000 4 Cost - - 496,395 1,035,889 1,532,284 4 1. Beginning in FY 1982, Advance Engineering and Design (Preconstruction, Engineering and Design) programs are funded under General Investigations Appropriations. 2. Includes FY 1985 unobligated carryover and FY 1986 allocation for CP&E funds and all AE&D funds to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 3. Excludes $2,639,955 funds and costs for a previous flood control project on Napa River. (See Table 35-E.) 4. Previously studied under Sacramento Metropolitan Area, Northern California Streams, CA. Funds transferred from American River Watershed. 35-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1987 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 1. 35-36 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento. H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., works. 2d sess., and 48, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). For work above Sacramento.. H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess. ' The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento. H. Doc. 123, 69th Cong., 1st sess. A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa Rivers and Harbors and 5 feet between Colusa and Chico Landing Committee Doc. 35, at a cost of $390,000 provided flow of rivers 73d Cong., 2d sess. is increased to minimum flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Rivers and Harbors Federal Government of $12 million in cost Committee Doc. 35, of Shasta Reservoir. 73d Cong.., 2d sess. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., River, CA, to provide for construction of a ship 2d sess. channel 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. Deauthorization of shallow-draft channel, Colusa Sec. 1002, 1986 WRDA to Red Bluff, feature of project for navigation, Sacramento River, California. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as 2d sess. modified by Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to Sec. 204, 1966 Flood provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward Control Act. cost of Ross Valley unit. Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit Sec. 823, 1986 WRDA 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Further modify project to eliminate any channel modifications upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong.. improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River 2d sess. and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial PL 404,. 84th Cong., stage of project development. 2d sess. 8. 22. TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA 23. Dec. 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 May 12, 1967 Mar. 7, 1974 June 19, 1975 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., to provide for extensions in levees and other 2d sess. 2 structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct low-level Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. Improvements for protection of Upper Butte Basin H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., (included full monetary authorization). 1st sess. 2 Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning 2d sess. 2 area below dam and modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. Further modification of Sacramento River Flood S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., Control Project by construction of initial 10- year phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. Additional authorization of $7 million for bank PL 90-17 protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. Initiation of construction of second phase of bank PL 93-251 erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose. 3 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Reservoir. ' Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see H. Doc. 1123, 60th Cong., 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 35-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, CA 1951 - $ 5,7521 2 Middle River and Connecting Channels, CA Completed 1974 $ 8,354 3 93,4944 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,132 s 8 - Old River, CA Completed 1970 23,1857 631,128 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA Completed 1970 253,151 8 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 200,928 9 10 11 3,316,622 12 13 Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 217,677 733,48913 14 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 191,728 5 _- 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for lands, damages and public landings. Remaining portion of project, consisting of side channel at Orwood and completion of project channels from mouth of Old River to Lammers Ferry road and from Crocker Cut to Holly Sugar Factory was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveras River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58,901 for previous project. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal year 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 35-38 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA American River, CA Aquatic Plant Control, CA Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT Burch Creek, Weber County, UT Cache Creek Basin, CA (Outlet Channel) Chester, CA Cottonwood Creek, CA Coyote Creek, CA Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA East Weaver Creek, CA Folsom Lake, American River, CA Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA Kays Creek, UT Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA Klamath River, CA Lake Camanche, CA Lake Oroville, CA Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Marysville Lake, CA Merced River, CA Middle Creek, CA Mormon Slough, CA Napa River Basin, CA New Bullards Bar, CA North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA Pinole Creek, CA Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV Rheem Creek, CA Rodeo Creek, CA Salinas River, CA Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT San Leandro Creek, CA San Lorenzo Creek, CA San Lorenzo River, CA Sevier River near Redmond, UT Sonoma Creek, CA Truckee River and tributaries, CA and NV Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 94 expenditure Active/no FY 94 expenditure Active/no FY 94 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 94 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 94 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Active/no FY 94 expenditure 1978 1959 1967 1955 1961 1964 1993 1981 1991 1968 1967 1965 1957 1963 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1974 1968 1970 1969 1962 1966 1952 1961 1973 1962 1966 1952 1973 1968 $26,995,350 2, 125,818 3 1,000 1,369,931 4 217,879 6 6 26,049 s - 7 3,570,000 8 15,765,000 705,622 1 s 664,825 5 9 220,636 1 s 10 63,014,810 11 136,026 s 12 407,989 6 13 1,503,073 s 14 4,838,000 1 10,252,950 15 70,425,470 16 27,835,263 17 - 18 10,918,796 19 2,643,499 20 2,965,402 21 2,639,955 1 22 12,890,625 23 904,278 s 24 25 885,750 1 5 4,620,070 1 26 133,339 5 27 400,000 1 5 28 974,1001 5 94,213 1 29 1,227,570 30 1,000,000 1 31 5,130,821 1 32 4,314,406 1 33 919,000 34 781,500 1 3s 1,038,960 35-39 $54,778 1 2 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 1. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 3. Excludes S54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 4. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 6. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Project not economically feasible; preconstruction planning was terminated in FY 1993. 8. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. A fish ladder modification project was continued under sec. 1135 in FY 1994 at fiscal year cost of $803,220 (including construction contract for $703,502; $602,442 Federal; and $101,060 non-Federal). 9. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 10. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 11. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 12. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 13. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocations. 14. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non-Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). 15. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $34,988,536. 16. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9. 1981 (total S69,994. 105) for flood control reservation. 17. Cherry Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of S308.898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New Don Pedro. Excludes S3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (nonproject) at local interest expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-of-way for levee and channel improvements on Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries. Unconstructed portion of snagging and clearing project modification of Lower San Joaquin River and Tributraries) was classified as "deferred" on April 9, 1993. For full report see Annual Report for FY 1993. 18. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of Marysville project. 19. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District, Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 20. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 21. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (FY 1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 22. This project was reclassified as "active" on August 3, 1987. 23. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 24. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 25. Excludes S146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, and utility alterations. 26. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 27. Includes $19,000 for preauthorization studies. 28. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 29. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 (FY 1962 - 1963) to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 30. Estimated costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. Project prevented $4,544,000 in damages from the April-May 1994 snowmelt runoff. 31. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 32. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 33. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were S118,000 (1951). Project prevented S9,000 in damages from the April-May 1994 snowmelt runoff. 35. Placed inactive 1974. 35-40 TABLE 35-G SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Alhambra Creek, CA 1981 1986 $ 300,000 - Bear River, CA 1980 1986 - - Eel River, CA 1971 1986 1,272,816 - Gleason Creek, NV 1977 1986 215,826 - Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV 1982 1986 1,532,932 - Lakeport Lake, CA 1 1976 1993 2,353,000 - Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 - - Mad River Basin, CA 1973 1986 4,243,750 - Spanish Fork River, UT 1955 1977 20,000 - Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 - (Morgan County) 1. Lakeport Lake was deauthorized on November 17, 1986; reauthorized November 17, 1988; and deauthorized November 18, 1993. TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Range in Feet Miles from Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Mouth of Tidal 1 Tidal 2 Flood 3 Flood 4 Place River Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.0 2 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 2. Tide at low water season only. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. 35-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT (See Section 4 of Text) Federal Non-Federal 2 Modification Corps of Engineers (Construction) Coast Guard (Construction) Required Cash Contribution Lands and Damages (including Relocations) Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,000 170,000 1,993,110 Total $5,833,117 $80,000 $1,342,500 $1,177,0000 $2,519,500 $8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST (See Section 4 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineers Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff 1 $1,073,000 $ 30,000 $ 200,000 $ 230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel 2 5 7,882,0003 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement 4 s 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. 3. For lands and construction. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. 5. Deauthorized November 17, 1986. 35-42 Total Total Project SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-K MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA, MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 18 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c.f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (hourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns 1,373 254 1,172 Bear 822 146 669 Owens 37 4 28 Mariposa 1,454 291 208 TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 22 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,000 1 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements below Dam 259,240,000 103,777,000 2 363,017,000 Total $273,676,000 $109,375,000 $383,051,000 1. Exclusive of S1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage to be paid over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of storage is initiated and inclusive of lands and damages. 35-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-M RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 22 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet- 122,500 $ 17,550,0001 Mendocino) of Russian River Earthfill Channel Improvements (East Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 Fork) Fork below Coyote Valley Dam Guerneville Mile 0 to 98, Russian - - - and lower 98 miles of River Russian River) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet- 381,000 360,153,000 Earthfill Channel Improvements (Dry Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - 2,864,000 Creek) below Dry Creek Creek (Warm Springs Dam) 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 23 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal 1 Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek 2 Inactive $1,400,000 S 340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin 3 Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomas Creek 2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek 2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees 4 Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees 4 Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin 2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). 4. July 1961 price level. 35-44 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-0 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 23 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total Contract 43A initiation (Bank protection, miles 88.8-143.3, Sacramento River, Sacramento, Colusa, Sutter and Yolo Counties) S1,512,041 $160,431 $1,672,472 Contract 42C completion emergency bank protection (Sacramento River Bank Protection project) miles 90-4R and 90-9R, Sacramento River -2,815 -504 -3,319 TABLE 35-P FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 27 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Stage Cost (Federal) Burney Creek, Shasta County, CA Reconnaissance S 2,925 Churn Creek, Shasta County, CA Reconnaissance 5,113 City of Isleton, CA 1 Reconnaissance 1,060 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO 2 Plans and Specifications 90,189 Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA Feasibility 177.926 Smithneck Creek, Loyalton, CA 1 Reconnaissance 1 $277,214 1. No further studies recommended. 2. See Improvement No. 8 for construction information. 35-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-Q SURVEYS (See Section 30 of Text) Fiscal year costs were as follows: Flood Damage Prevention Studies Required Cost Contributions Non-Federal Contributions (not required) Sacramento-San Joaquin Rivers Special Study Special Investigations Review of FERC Licenses Interagency Water Resources Development National Estuary Program American Waterfowl Management Plan Coordination with Other Water Resource Agencies Planning Assistance to States (Colorado - $1,997) (California - $10,765) National Marine Fisheries Service $3,490,589 461,246 0 99,330 84,000 23,000 37,000 7,000 8,000 20,000 12,762 10.999 Total $4,253,926 35-46 PROJECTS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED UNDER THE FORMER CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION The California Debris Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into the Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. On November 19, 1986, the Commission was abolished by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and all authorities, powers, functions, and duties were transferred to the Secretary of the Army. All acquired lands and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission were authorized to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans ............... 35-1A 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA (debris control) ................... 35-2A 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA ...... 35-2A Flood Control 4. Sacramento River, CA ............... 35-3A Tables Table 35-AA Table 35-BB Table 35-CC Page Cost and Financial Statement ............... 35-6A Authorizing Legislation .............. 35-8A Sacramento River, CA: Total Cost of Existing Project .... 35-9A Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provided for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners were fully investigated by the former California Debris Commission and permits to operate were issued to those who provide satisfactory debris-restraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19. 1934. as set forth below. For location and description of Government-constructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners bore all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the former Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. 35-1A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The former Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L. Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. Permit No. DACW05-4-79-527 was renewed for 5 years on March 1, 1984, March 1. 1989, and on March 1, 1994. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105-eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., (PG&E) (a 1941 contract which expired July 31, 1991) payment was made to Federal Government of $18,000 per year for first 30 years and $48,000 per year for the next 20 years in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1994, amounts to $1,566,393; these funds are now paid to the Secretary of the Army and deposited for return to the Treasury. PG&E has obtained a new license, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License No. 1403-004, issued February 11, 1993, for continued operation of Narrows No. 1 Hydroelectric Project and has entered into a new storage agreement and an operation agreement with the Federal Government (Corps). Total payment of $66,070 was received in FY 1994, but only $48,000 was reallocated to the District. Payments under new agreement are effective as of Fiscal Year 1993 and will be 8.2 percent of previous fiscal year's total costs for operation and maintenance. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant was put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENG- 66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1994, amounts to $2,373,151. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $1,008,959, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies at Englebright Dam have been completed. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debris-control structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981 and were completed in FY 1987. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATION-RESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the 35-2A SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations consisted of condition and operation studies by hired labor on Yuba River. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training wails and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic feet, are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 35-BB for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1987) cost for original project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $163,925,000 of which $68,925,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non-Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction. bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, S4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Estimated October 1994 total project cost is $199,803,000, of which $97,275,000 is Federal and $102,528,000 is non-Federal. Total estimate now includes remedial levee work for Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109); Mid-Valley Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and Upper Sacramento Area (engineering and design only), but excludes Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction and Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction. Colusa Basin Drain and Knights Landing (West Levee) are not incrementally economically feasible, but these sites have been transferred to Upper Sacramento Area. Knights Landing (East Levee) has been included with Mid-Valley Area. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was 35-3A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Phase I - Sacramento River Flood Control System Evaluation recommended reconstruction of 32 miles of Sacramento area levees. Report was approved and in March 1989, Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. New project is located within boundaries of Sacramento River Flood Control System in highly urbanized area around city of Sacramento, near confluence of Sacramento and American Rivers. It includes Natomas area levees from Natomas Cross Canal Bypass through Reclamation District 900 and portions of the Yolo Bypass east levee in West Sacramento; and, in South Sacramento, the east bank of Sacramento River from Miller Park to town of Freeport. Estimated (October 1994) cost for Sacramento Urban project is $46,800,000 of which $28,800,000 is Federal and $18,000,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $3,530,000). Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn-Colusa irrigation District) (G.C.I.D.) is part of the fishery/irrigation enhancement project being developed by G.C.I.D. Project is located between River Mile 202 and 206 on Sacramento River near the Glenn-Tehama county line. The Corps riffle restoration project includes multiple weir structures in the river to restore river hydraulic gradient to pre-1970 conditions. This will stabilize river hydraulics. Estimated (October 1994) project cost is $14,200,000, of which $10,650,000 is Federal and $3,550,000 is non-Federal. Project was established under authority of the 1917 Sacramento River Flood Control Project (see Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1990). Phase II - Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Butte, Sutter and Yuba counties in north-central California. Area includes Feather and Yuba Rivers and their tributaries, Sutter Bypass, cities of Marysville and Yuba City and communities of Linda and Olivehurst. An evaluation of about 134 miles of Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in Marysville/Yuba City area identified about 22 miles of levees as being structurally unstable. Project consists of reconstructing those levees by installing about 17 miles of toe drains, installing about 4 miles of slurry cut-off walls and backfilling about 1 mile of a drainage ditch to rectify structural stability; also consists of raising about 10 miles of levees to restore design freeboard and developing about 76 acres for fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated October 1994 project cost is S31,000,000, of which $23,300,000 is Federal and $7,700,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $1,800,000). Project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work. Local interest costs from required contributed funds for project work total $4,949,438 for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction: Construction is complete, however, final payment and contract close-out activities remain. (b) Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.): Engineering was continued on riffle restoration on Sacramento River including building of multiple weir structures to restore river hydraulic gradient to pre-1970 conditions. (c) Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction: Engineering continued. Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees: five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Mhoulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. 35-4A SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947, 1948, 1949. and 1951. Yolo Bypass and Cache Slouth (Unit 109) was completed in 1990. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction-Marysville/Yuba City Area levees; Mid-Valley Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and Upper Sacramento Area. (See Table 35-CC for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1994.) 35-5A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-AA COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (Debris Control) (Contributed Funds, Other) 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barriers, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 4. Sacramento River, CA including Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $821,325 821,325 681,300 700,000 695,998 725,921 - 11,010 -m - 14,700 347 347 2,000 18,634 12,000 8,790 5,093,9991 2 5,093,9991 2 830,000 805,736 299,990 23,040 7,000 9,407 1,064,800 12,983,733 3 1,056,959 12,932,717 4 280,317 280,317/ 323,420 s 315,7776 361, 482 361,482 -1,000 1,819,0317 1,145 1,815,6247 27,500 11,722 2,000 - 1,053,904 1,053,904 361,777 361,777 1,841,338 1,795,175 1,053,904 1,053,904 36,000 8 34,0008 950,000 1,221,000 484,000 567,000 76,742,835 9 14 1,221,226 1,515,322 398,056 631,372 76,713,881 9 14 - - - - 1,979,104 - - - - 1,979,104 - - - - 10,724.085 10 - - - - 10,724,085 10 310,663,000 5,005,372 - - - 9,686 11 - - - 9,686 11 3,371,000 5,406,000 -600,000 23.640.000 8,823,196 6,203,394 842,439 23.352,501 35-6A SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-AA (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 (Required New Work Contributed Contrib. 1,000,300 514,900 134,800 - 2,040,000 Funds) Cost 395,330 634,064 739,445 197,338 2,020,588 (Contributed New Work Funds, Other) Contrib. 2,615,000 2,196,712 270,928 - 5,592,640 12 Cost 929,456 2,227,152 2,309,364 -10,217 5,466,315 12 Sacramento New Work River Flood Approp. 500,000 300,000 500,000 400,000 2,193,000 13 Control Cost 329,783 662,724 578,432 209,066 1,887,853 13 (G.C.I.D.), CA (Federal Funds) Sacramento New Work River Flood Approp. - - 538,000 689,000 1,227,000 14 Control Cost - - 535,842 656,774 1,192,616 14 (Marysville/Yuba City Area levees), CA (Federal Funds 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes S477,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 appropriations and costs. 3. Includes $11,471,651 from regular funds and $1,512,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 4. Includes $11,420,636 from regular costs and $1,512,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 5. Includes $12,420 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float; and $311,000 funds from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for refurbishing restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 6. Includes $12,420 costs for acquisition of boarding float and $280,317 costs for refurbishing restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 12. Includes contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocation of utilities, irrigation ditch, access ramps, and miscellaneous small structures in the Natomas, Greenhaven Pocket and West Sacramento areas. (Sacramento Urban Area). 13. G.C.I.D. construction funds received in FY 1991, but no costs were incurred. Includes $493,000 total funds and costs under General Investigations for Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 14. Not reflected in actual annual accounting records for Marysville/Yuba City are $1,710,000 costs for FY 91 and FY 92 incurred under Sacramento River Flood Control Project for design effort. These costs are considered part of Marysville/Yuba City cost-shared project. 35-7A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 35-BB AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, 47th Cong., 1st sess. 1 (Amendment of sec. 13, Act of Mar. 1, 1893.)' Mar. 1, 1893 Feb. 27, 1907 35-8A REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit hydraulic mining without construction of impounding works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rightsof- way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. Abolished the California Debris Commission and transferred all authorities, powers, functions, and duties to the Secretary of the Army. Authorized all acquired land and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. Sec. 1001, 1986 WRDA June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-BB (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Dec. 22, 1944 Additional levee construction and reconstruction, H. Doc. 649, 78th and May 17, 1950 including levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, Cong., 2d sess., and and multipurpose reservoirs. 2 367, 81st Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Bank protection and incidental channel improve- H. Doc. 272, 84th ments, Sacramento River from Chico Landing Cong., 2d sess. to Red Bluff, and local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing. 2 July 14, 1960 Bank protection works at critical locations, S. Doc. 103, 86th Sacramento River. 2 Cong., 2d sess. 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 23. Document 50, 74th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 35-CC SACRAMENTO RIVER CA: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $74,547,412 $1,979,104 $76,526,516 1 Public Works 1,486,469 - 1,486.469 Total U.S. 76,033,881 1,979,104 78,012,985 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 - 5,104,333 Total All Funds 86,077,966 1,988,790 88,066,756 2 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plant purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 2. Excludes financial information for Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction, Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.) and Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction projects, all authorized under the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. (See Table 35-AA). 35-9A PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION The Pacific Ocean Division is an operating division with both district and division functions. Its civil works responsibilities encompass the State of Hawaii, the Territory of Guam, the Territory of American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The division is unique in that its area of responsibility is totally comprised of islands dispersed over an ocean environment exceeding 6 million square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii ....................... 2. Maalaea Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ........... 3. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................ Erosion Control 5. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ........................ Flood Control 6. Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii .......... 7. Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii .......... 8. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 9. Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia ........... Page General Investigations 10. Surveys ............................. 36-1 11. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 36-2 12. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ... 36-2 Tables 36-2 Table 36-A Table 36-B Table 36-C 36-2 Table 36-D Table 36-E 36-2 36-2 Table 36-F Table 36-G 36-3 Table 36-H Cost and Financial Statement .... Authorizing Legislation .......... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ......... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ........... Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 .......... Page 36-3 36-3 36-4 36-5 36-6 36-7 36-8 36-9 36-9 36-11 36-3 Navigation 1. KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. Kawaihae Harbor is located on the west coast of the island of Hawaii, approximately 85 nautical miles northeast of Hilo, County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-2 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is delayed pending submission and approval of the General Reevaluation Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included continuation and finalization of the General Reevaluation Report for submission to HQUSACE in early Fiscal Year 1995. The Environmental Assessment was delayed due to difficulties in negotiation and 36-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 finalization of a Memorandum of Agreement for Section 106 Historic Preservation regarding Native Hawaiian concerns. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $188,585. Plans and specifications were approximately 90% complete as of September 30, 1994. 2. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Maalaea Bay is situated on the southwest coast of Maui, approximately 7 miles south of Wailuku, the county seat of Maui. (See NOAA Chart 19350) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is delayed due to resolution of environmental concerns as a result of the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. The PCA is being coordinated with the local sponsor for execution prior to construction. Terminal facilities. There is an existing 1,000-foot long south breakwater, a 870-foot long east breakwater, 300-foot long wharf, 90-foot wide entrance channel, and a single lane launch ramp, all constructed by the State of Hawaii. Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included updating of the plans and specifications to incorporate new concrete armor units, circulation of the Final Supplemental Impact Statement, continued efforts to obtain necessary permits, continuation of computer model studies and filing of a water quality certification application. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $260,194. The plans and specifications phase was approximately 90% complete as of September 30, 1994. 3. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were conducted by the Portland District at Hilo Deep Draft Harbor, Hawaii; Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai; Kawaihae Deep Draft Harbor, Hawaii; and Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai between March and April 1994. Surveys were also conducted in American Samoa at Auasi Small Boat Harbor, Aunuu Small Boat Harbor, Faleasao Harbor, and Tau Harbor during August and September 1994. Total cost to conduct the above surveys was $91,000. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $8,998 for Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui; $10,000 for Kahului Harbor Modification, Maui; $13 for Mahukona (North Kohala), Hawaii; $38,181 for Rota Harbor, CNMI; and $20,000 for Western District, American Samoa. Beach Erosion Control 5. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 (Preauthorization). See Table 36-H. Beach Erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $7,822 for Agana Bayfront, Guam; $45,802 for Commercial Port Road, Guam; and $14,993 for East Agana Guam. Flood Control 6. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. The Alenaio watershed is located in the South Hilo District on the island of Hawaii. Hilo is the principal urban center in the South Hilo district and the County seat for the County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 81408) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-4 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. ALocal Cooperation Agreement was executed on April 27, 1992. Requirements are described in full on page 36-3 of the FY92 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included completion of plans and specifications, acquisition of all lands required for the project by the local sponsor, and completion and circulation of an Environmental Assessment. The project was advertised for construction in September 1994. The estimated cost of construction is $15,161,000 of which $10,649 is Federal cost and $4,512,000 is non-Federal cost. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $223,821. 7. KAWAINUI MARSH, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Kawainui Marsh is located in Kailua on the windward coast of the island of Oahu, Hawaii. It is bounded by the Mokapu Saddle Road on the north, Kailua Road on the south, and the community of Coconut Grove on the east. (See USGS Quadrangle for Mokapu, HI) Existing project. The authorized project provides a combination of concrete floodwalls on a raised levee. The floodwall would vary in height to a maximum of 4 feet 36-2 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION along the total levee length of about 6,300 feet. A flood warning system is an integral part of this plan. The existing project is authorized under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The estimated project cost is $10,495,000 of which $5,000,000 is Federal cost and $5,495,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. ALocal Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on October 3, 1993 between the Department of the Army and the City and County of Honolulu. Requirements are described in full on page 36- 2 of the FY92 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included completion of Plans and specifications and the execution of the LCA. A construction contract was awarded in September 1994. The estimated cost of construction is $5,901,733 of which $4,362,249 is Federal cost and $1,539,084 is non-Federal cost. The estimated completion date of construction is in March 1997. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $67,308. 8. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $1,764 for Agana Bayfront, Guam; $9,935 for Commercial Port Road, Guam; $6,035 for East Agana, Guam; $10,000 for Kahawainui Stream, Oahu; and $48,000 for Keopu Stream, Hawaii. Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. Fiscal Year costs were $8,237 for Kanaha Valley, Maui, Hawaii. Project Modifications for Improvements of Environment pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99- 662, as amended. (Preauthorization) Fiscal Year costs were $1,637 for Hoomaluhia Stream, Oahu, Hawaii; and $609 for Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii. Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 84-99. Federalcost during the fiscal year for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriation was $344,660 ofwhich $315,193 was for disaster preparedness; $26,394 for emergency operations; and $3,073 for field investigations. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 9. NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA Location. Nanpil River is located on the island of Pohnpei in the Federated States of Micronesia (See State of Hawaii, the New Pacific map). Existing project. For a description of the existing project see page 36-4 of the FY85 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-5 of the FY85 Annual Report. Terminal Facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included award of a contract for the installation of an electric trash rake for the intake structure and is scheduled for completion in early Fiscal Year 1995. Operation and maintenance of the facility was turned over to the Pohnpei Utilities Corporation. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $6,067. General Investigations 10. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $509,272 of which $235,995 was for navigation studies; $66,096 was for flood damage prevention studies; $91,977 for miscellaneous activities; and $115,204 for coordination with other agencies. In addition, $1,586 in non-Federal funds for coordination with other agencies. 11. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. The Flood Plain Management Services Program is authorized and implemented under Section 206, PL 86-645, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Non-Federal agencies are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas without charge. 36-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Beginning November 21, 1991, Federal agencies and private entities were also offered these services on a cost recovery basis. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance requirements, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and timing, floodwater velocity, extent of flooding, duration of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. Requests and responses for technical services and planning assistance totaled 2,633, which included services to Federal and non-Federal agencies, individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects and others. Costs for providing these services during the fiscal year were $254,607. Hydrologic Studies. Storm studies cost was $5,016. Total costs for collection and study of basic data during the fiscal year were $259,623. 12. PREC ONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, HI- As directed by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993, preconstruction engineering and design studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1993. The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1994 also directed the continuation of preconstruction engineering and design in Fiscal Year 1994. Work during the Fiscal Year consisted of initiation of a Special Report and Technical Appendix, to include physical and numerical modeling studies by the Coastal Engineering Research Center; completion of hydrographic and topographic surveys; completion ofwave gage efforts; and initiation of environmental coordination. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $480,316. Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI - The project was authorized by Section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (PL 90-483). A General Design Memorandum (GDM) and Final Environmental Impact Statement were completed in September 1980 and approved by the Director of Civil Works in September 1981. Work during the Fiscal Year consisted of design review with the local sponsor, review and updating of project economics, and distribution and analysis of a boater survey. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $112,000. 36-4 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To In Text Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 Sept. 30, 1994 1. Kawaihae Small New Work: Boat Harbor, Approp. 260,000 130,000 160,000 3,560,000 4,518,200 Hawaii, HI Cost 237,196 153,136 151,330 188,585 1,138,110 (Federal Funds) 2. Maalaea Harbor New Work: Maui, HI Approp. 250,000 119,000 235,000 3,575,000 4,662,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 126,373 233,505 196,273 260,194 1,288,259 6. Alenaio Stream, New Work: Hawaii, HI Approp. 265,000 256,000 220,000 2,995,000 4,490,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 276,943 344,714 194,946 223,821 1,668,795 7. Kawainui Marsh, New Work: Oahu, HI Approp. 75,000 0 191,000 74,000 590,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 95,203 393 187,692 67,308 579,999 (Contributed Contrib. 30,000 0 0 0 250,000 Funds) Cost 43,850 17,951 9 0 250,000 9. Nanpil River New Work: Hydropower, Approp. 412,000 126,000 138,000 0 8,000,000 Pohnpei, FSM Cost 293,310 205,628 127,834 6,067 7,840,802 (Federal Funds) 36-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. 2. 6. 9. Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 3, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Mar. 20, 1980 Dec. 8, 1983 KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII An 850-foot long, 120-foot wide, and 12-foot deep entrance channel; a 1.2 acre and 12-foot deep existing turning basin; a 640-foot long, 80-foot wide, and 8-foot deep access channel; a 1,225-foot long west protective revetstructure; a 1,050-foot long east protective revetted structure a 400-foot long wave absorber; and a 2.5 acre, 650-foot long revetted offshore island. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII A 620-foot long extension of the south breakwater, a new 610-foot length, 150 to 180-foot width, 12 to 15-foot depth entrance channel, a 1.7 acre and 12-foot depth turning basin and a 720-foot length, 80-foot width and an 8-foot deep access channel. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Project consists of approximately 1,640-feet of concrete-lined channel; floodproofing five individual structures, relocation of one public and six residential structures and incorporating floodplain management regulations for undeveloped areas. Modified by the General Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment dated March 1990, at a total cost of $12,060,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $7,730,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $4,330,000. NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, FSM Construction of a hydroelectric power facility. Appropriation of funds for a feasibility study and construction of a hydroelectric project. 36-6 Sec 301, PL 89-298 Cong., 1st sess. Sec 101, PL 90-438 Cong., 2nd sess. Sec 401, PL 99-662 Sec 102, PL 101-640 Sec. 101, PL 96-205 Sec. 2. PL 98-213 TABLE 36-C PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam Completed 1978 $ 937,798 1 $ 52,555 Agat Harbor, Guam Completed 1989 2,000,000 2 -- Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,033,015 3 76,197 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,783,129 * 1,018,596 Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1990 53,513,276 s 485,551 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbori, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1978 527,047 6 208,902 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1991 5,512,440 4,091,308 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1971 781,036 7 63,693 Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 16,044,095 8 3,037,171 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1976 751,867 9 --- Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1984 7,203,221 10 7,287,654 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1968 157,997 9 3,127 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Active 1990 171,400 -- Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1981 5,983,501 11 61,800 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1956 3,348,000 12 41,857 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Active 1981 193,000 --- Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1990 3,623,450 13 Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Completed 1986 372,000 14 495,256 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1987 2,127,724 1s 10,116,779 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1976 584,513 16 30,707 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1976 980,018 '7 4,111,791 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1979 432,523 9 -- Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1984 752,645 18 2,786,442 Rota Harbor, CNMI Completed 1985 2,000,000 19 436,200 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI Deferred 1982 194,000 --- Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1985 1,991,569 20 546,600 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1979 1,940,011 21 92,900 Welles Harbor, Midway Island Completed 1950 2,448,056 " 2,111 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $282,474 for Construction. 2In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,239,364 for Construction. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $86,563 for Construction. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $231,437 for Construction. s5n addition, Contributed Funds of $2,402,909 for Construction. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and Maintenance. 'In addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. 8In addition, Contributed Funds of $201,282 for Construction. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 10In addition, Contributed Funds of $30,200 for Construction. "In addition, Contributed Funds of $62,102 for Construction. '2Abandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 89th Congress, 1st Session). 13Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $364,757 for Construction. 14In addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. 15 In addition, Contributed Funds of $223,261 for Construction. 16Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction. 17Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 for Construction. 1 ln addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construction. 19Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $774,373 for Construction. �2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. Contributed Funmds of $54,034 for Construction. 211n addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. 2Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 36-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 $ 254,015 $ -- Asquiroga Bay, Guam Completed 1986 227,181 2--- Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 240,148 3-- Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1976 176,488 4-- Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1977 158,916 S --- Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1981 999,996 6 -- Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1972 154,313 7 --- Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii Terminated 1982 355,472 e --- Lepua Area, American Samoa Completed 1992 1,706,225 9 --- Masefau Bay, American Samoa Completed 1992 500,000 2--- Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa Completed 1984 225,000 2 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa Completed 1987 189,500 -- Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa Completed 1984 174,941 2--- Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa Deferred 1978 394,187 10 Poloa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 136,040 1-- Saipan Beach Road, CNMI Completed 1992 176,000 2--- Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1981 301,879 12--- Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1992 1,313,40013 _.' Vatia Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 154,309 '4-- Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1979 729,087 is 183,000 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $209,549 in Contributed Funds. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3In addition, $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $97,075 in Contributed Funds. SAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $56,916 in Contributed Funds. GAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed funds. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. sAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. In addition, $177,300 in Contributed Funds. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $485,371 in Constibuted Funds. 'oAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $312,480 in Contributed Funds. uAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $101,547 in Contributed Funds. nAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $255,728 in Contributed Funds. '3Authorized for construction by Public Law 100-71. In addition, $1,226,486 in Contributed Funds. 14Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $132,075 in Contributed Funds 1SIn addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and S17,640 in Contributed Funds. 36-8 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1994 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana River, Guam Inactive 1989 $ 250,000 $ --- Asan Village, Guam Completed 1986 1,275,500 --- Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 784,867 ' --- Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1985 12,285,000 115,495 Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1990 3,910,000 2- Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1990 10,708,122 --- Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 25,552,400 --- Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1950 73,478 5 -"- Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,567 --- Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,000 6 --- Namo River, Guam Completed 1982 2,416,314 s -"- Paauau Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1985 1,978,514 --- Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1966 1,044,888 --- 'In addition, $11,953 in Contributed Funds. 4lncludes Non-Federal reimbursement of recreation construction 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $459,001 in cost of $5,668,300. In addition, $8,175 in Contributed Funds. Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 31n addition, $518,272 in Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $540,335 in Contributed Funds. TABLE 36-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii 1976 1967 1967 1965 1972 1967 1975 November 1986 PL 99-662 November 1977 HD #94-413 November 1981 HD #97-59 November 1986 PL 99-662 January 1990 PL 99-662 January 1990 PL 99-662 July 1981 Director of Civil Works 36-9 $ 40,117 1,481 86,235 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 36-G (Cont'd) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, 1979 July 1981 221,500 Molokai, Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, 1966 January 1990 133,188 292,441 Molokai, Hawaii PL 99-662 Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor, -- January 1990 Molokai, Hawaii PL 99-662 Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 September 1975 98,800 Director of Civil Works Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maul, Hawaii 1977 January 1990 186,937 PL 99-662 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, 1972 January 1990 30,378 Oahu, Hawaii PL 99-662 Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii --- January 1990 PL 99-662 Rainmaker Hotel, American Samoa -- November 1991 PL 99-662 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii 1967 January 1990 PL 99-662 Saipan Harbor, Northern Marianas -- November 1991 PL 99-662 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam -- August 1981 80,764 Director of Civil Works Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii --- November 1986 --- PL 99-662 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island 1950 November 1986 --- PL 99-662 36-10 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-H EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Agat Shoreline, Guam Garapan Beach Road, CNMI Haaula Highway, Oahu, Hawaii Inarajan Shoreline, Guam Kaaawa Highway, Oahu, Hawaii Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii Ofu Airstrip (West End), American Samoa Power Plant Road, Guam Punaluu Highway, Oahu, Hawaii South Agat (Route 2) Shoreline, Guam Umatac Shoreline, Guam TOTAL $ 9,000 36,240 6,000 16,000 6,000 148 1,107 4,905 9,000 6,326 13,000 16,000 $123,726 36-11 PORTLAND, OR DISTRICT * The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA ..................................... 37-2 2. Chetco River, OR ................................................ 37-2 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ................. 37-2 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA ........... 37-4 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island ..................................... 37-4 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA ...... 37-4 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR .................................. 37-5 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR ..................................... 37-5 9. Columbia River, Vancouver Deep Draft Anchorage, W A ................................................... 37-5 10. Coos Bay, OR..................................... 37-6 11. Coquille River, OR ............................................. 37-7 12. Depoe Bay, OR ..................................... 37-7 13. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................................... 37-7 14. Port Orford, OR ..................................... 37-7 15. Project Condition Surveys ............................ 37-8 16. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR ........... 37-8 17. Siuslaw River, OR ..................................... 37-8 18. Skipanon Channel, OR .................................... 37-9 19. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR ............................ 37-9 20. Umpqua River, OR ........................................ 37-9 21. Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA ................. 37-10 22. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR ...... 37-10 23. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR ....................... 37-11 24. Yaquina River, OR ....................................... 37-11 25. 7.5 MCY Standby Time ................................. 37-12 Flood Control 26. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ........ 37-12 27. Blue River Lake, OR ..................................... 37-12 28. Cottage Grove Lake, OR ............................... 37-13 29. Dorena Lake, OR .................................... 37-13 30. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR......... 37-13 31. Fall Creek Lake, OR .................................. 37-14 32. Fern Ridge Lake, OR ........ ...................... ... 37-14 33. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................................... 37-15 Page 34. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................................................... 37-15 35. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA. ........................................ 37-15 36. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA .......... 37-16 37. Mount St. Helens and Vicininty, WA ............ 37-16 38. Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR ............ 37-16 39. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ..................................... 37-17 40. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR ......................................... 37-17 41. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR .......... 37-17 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 42. Bonneville Lock and Dam- Lake Bonneville, OR and WA.................. 37-17 43. Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Dredging, OR and W A ........ .............................. .......... 37-18 44. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program, OR and WA .................................... 37-19 45. Columbia River Treaty Fishing Sites, OR and WA ..................................... 37-19 46. Cougar Lake, OR .............................................. 37-19 47. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR ................... 37-20 48. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ............. 37-20 49. Hills Creek Lake, OR ................................. 37-21 50. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA .................... 37-21 51. Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR ..................... 37-22 52. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ....... 37-22 53. The Dalles Lock and Dam- Lake Celilo, WA and OR ........................... 37-23 General Investigations 54. Surveys ........................................ 37-24 55. Collection and Study of Basic Data .............. 37-24 56. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ....... 37-24 Tables Table 37-A Cost & Financial Statement ............ 37-25 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation ..................... 37-32 37-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Page Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................................... 37-38 Table 37-D Not Applicable Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................................... 37-39 Table 37-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ................. 37-41 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects ...................... 37-41 Table 37-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR .................................... 37-42 Page Table 37-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 37-42 Table 37-J Project Condition Surveys .................. 37-42 Table 37-K Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks ................ 37-43 Table 37-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... ............. 37-43 Table 37-M Flood Control Reservoir Operations ... 37-44 Table 37-N Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, and Powerplant ................................ 37-44 Navigation 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 40 miles east of Portland, OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over the sill. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88, August 15, 1985. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent of the project cost in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. The new lock chamber will be 86 feet wide and 675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. Estimated cost for construction of the new navigation lock is $348,100,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the lock is completed. The lock opened to shipping on March 26, 1993. Work to restore the grounds and historic buildings continued. 2. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification of 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction of jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was completed in March 1970. The authorization was modified by WRDA 92 to "direct the Secretary of the Army to assume maintenance of the approximately 200-foot long access channel to the south commercial boat basin consistent with authorized project depths". This channel will be maintained in lieu of the small boat access channel. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 15,722 cubic yards of material was removed by contract hopper dredge. 3. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, and 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington.) Willamette River 37-2 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT rises in Cascade Range in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from the mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens, (Oregon); and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended to its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth of Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver, about 3 feet at low stage of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver, they average about 12 feet, while highest know reached a stage of 33 feet above water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette river and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lifton- lift-off and roll-on-roll-off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the west coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement, and steel products. At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll-on-roll-off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details, see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) A feasibility study for deepening the Columbia and Lower Willamette navigation channel is being conducted in cooperation with the Association of Lower Columbia River Ports. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance continued through the year. A total of 4,755,702 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. 37-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 hopper dredge Essayons removd 2,067,382 cubic yards, the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 318,832 cubic yards, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed 2,008,576 cubic yards, and the contract dredge Newport removed 360,912 cubic yards. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, was finished December 1957, and again, deepening of the west channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 107, finished the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 76,528 cubic yards and a contract clamshell dredge from Aqua Marine removed 52,303 cubic yards. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing Project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook; a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A condition survey was performed. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north or San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Section 4. Existing project. Provides for a one-half-mile-wide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A" is about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A") was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 1984. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. 37-4 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 4,348,230 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 3,345,562 cubic yards of material, and the contract dredge Newport removed 1,002,668 cubic yards. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, See Section 3, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 16 feet, which is adequate for using traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government Island completed 1985 under section 107. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, WA, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of paper-mill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There is a one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and barges. At numerous locations along the entire waterway there are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey was performed. 8. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Location. The memorial will be located at Point Adams, in the City of Warrenton, OR, at River Mile 8.5 on the Columbia River approximately 50 yards off shore and adjacent to an existing Corps of Engineers pile dike. Existing project. None. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) with the local sponsor, City of Warrenton, OR, is being developed. This LCA will require the sponsor to pay for all costs above the authorized $150,000 for engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a support structure to serve as the foundation for the Seafarers Memorial. In addition, the sponsor is providing the statue for which the foundation structure is being built. Operations during fiscal year. All work has been suspended until the LCA has been approved by all parties and the local sponsor has raised sufficient funds for purchase of the statue and any costs above the $150,000 limit for the support structure. 9. COLUMBIA RIVER, VANCOUVER DEEP DRAFT ANCHORAGE, WA Location. The deep draft anchorage, which includes the U.S. Coast Guard designed anchorage area near Hayden Island, is located on the Oregon side of the existing federally 37-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 authorized 40-foot Columbia River channel, near Vancouver, Washington, between river miles 102 and 103. Existing project. Work was authorized under special continuing authority contained in Section 107 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, for navigation projects. The existing procedure being used is for the Columbia River Pilots to decide where to anchor a vessel. The vessel drops either one or two bow anchors at the recommendation of the pilots. At the onset of anchoring, the vessel is outside of the boundary of the 40-foot navigation channel. As wind conditions change, the probability of a vessel tending to swing on its anchor increases. This then creates a hazardous condition for vessels navigating the main channel as they attempt to maneuver around anchored vessels that are partially in the channel. Safe anchoring in the Columbia River is dependent upon a combination of several factors: water and wind currents, tides, vessel size (overall length, draft, and cargo volume), and the level of congestion in the anchoring area. The project which was constructed, consists of two anchorage areas in the Columbia River by placement of two stern anchor buoys, one at each location. The downstream one is designated as a deep site for a loaded or fully laden vessel. A buoy was placed in the river 300 feet off the existing channel. The second buoy was placed 725 feet off the existing channel, which would be designated for light laden vessels or empty vessels. The estimated cost for preparation of plans and specifications and the construction of the project is $311,000, of which $221,000 is federal and $90,000 cash is non-federal. The non-federal sponsors, Port of Portland and Port of Vancouver, provided $49,500 and $40,500, respectively. Local cooperation. The Ports of Portland and Vancouver signed Project Cooperation Agreements on January 3, 1994. In accordance with cost sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the federal government will initially provide 75 percent of the costs associated with the general navigation features of the Project. The non-federal sponsors are required to provide 25 percent of the total construction cost of the general navigation features up front. The sponsors are also required to provide an additional 10 percent of the cost of the general navigation features of the project in cash over a period not to exceed 30 years. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The contract for construction of the project was awarded in August 1994 and completed in September 1994. 10. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty wasrestored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance of Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1989. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 to Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300-foot, 576-foot and 500-foot frontages, respectively. In the North Spit industrial area, there is one woodchip loading facility having a frontage of 1200 feet and a smaller T-dock operated by the Port of Coos Bay. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. A barge slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat 37-6 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT basins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. A feasibility study for deepening the Coos Bay navigation channel is being conducted in cooperation with the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 758,278 cubic yards of material was removed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 192,074 cubic yards, the contract dredge Newport removed 470,129 cubic yards, and the contract dredge Northerly Island removed 96,075 cubic yards. The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced sand from shoal areas in Charleston entrance channel. 11. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. Port of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction with protective breakwater and entrance channel construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) A plan to deepen the entrance channel of the Coquille River from 13 feet to 18 feet was approved in May 1988. The economics were reevaluated in FY1993 and the project was not economically feasible at this time. Local cooperation. None required. However, restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract hopper dredge Northerly Island removed 25,012 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. 12. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modifications, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, were accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Repair of concrete retaining wall and dredging of the boat basin was completed. A total of 6,966 cubic yards was dredged. 13. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization): Construction of a deep draft anchorage at Columbia River, Vancouver is discussed in Section 9. Construction of a navigation channel at Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA is discussed in Section 21. Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See Table 37-I for expenditures under Section 107 during the fiscal year. Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-433 (preauthorization): Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See Table 37-I for expenditures under Section 111 during the fiscal year. 14. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR) 37-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 55-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October, 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. The authorization was modified by WRDA 92 to allow the Corps to maintain the authorized navigation channel within 50 feet of the port facility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. Expansion of the dock structure to 210 x 220 feet is complete. The installation of the second hydraulic crane was completed in FY 1986. About 150 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During the summer months the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 39 days. 15. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted during the fiscal year at a cost of $107,367; (See Table 37-J). 16. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon; flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. In 1985, three pile dikes, located on the south side of channel oceanward of the boat basin entrance, were completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract hopper dredge Northerly Island removed 120,059 cubic yards, and the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 62 days. 17. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 19583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. (For details relating to previous project, see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty modifications were completed in FY 86. Modifications provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originates approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment-and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance 37-8 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Modern docks for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by the Davison Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 157,539 cubic yards of material. 18. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 7 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to pubic on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use by a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility for chips and lumber. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A condition survey was performed. 19. TIiL AMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alignment extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet,, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956 and small-boat basin in 1958. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1965 and again in 1991. South jetty construction was initiated in 1969, extended in 1974, and completed to the authorized 8,000 feet in 1978. 18 foot channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections performed. 20. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. Ajetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth 37-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed in 1984. Project was modified in 1951 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August, 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 229,039 cubic yards of material. The contract pipeline dredge Nehalem removed 29,588 cubic yards of material from the entrance channels to Winchester Bay. This material was pumped to the north spit of the Umpqua River to create approximately 8 acres of nesting habitat for the western snowy plover and 2 acres of wetland habitat. This project was a cooperative effort with the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Port of Umpqua under the Coastal America program. 21. WESTPORT, OR - PUGET ISLAND WA, (WAHKIAKUM FERRY) Location. The Wahkiakum Ferry route extends across the Columbia River at approximately River Mile 43, between Westport, in Clatsop County, Oregon and Puget Island, Wahkiakum County, Washington. These counties are located about 70 miles west of Portland, Oregon. Existing project. Work was authorized under special continuing authority contained in Section 107 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, for navigation projects. Shoaling occurs directly off shore of the ferry dock at Puget Island and cannot be circumnavigated, causing delays and unsafe operation conditions for the ferry, especially at low tide. The ferry has been restricted to half capacity during part of the year. The project consists of a channel extending 1,900 feet from the Wahkiakum County Ferry ramp at Puget Island to the existing federally authorized Columbia River navigation channel. This newly dredged channel is 9 feet deep (Columbia River Datum), 200 feet wide and 900 feet long: the remaining 1,000 feet extending to the existing authorized channel is in a naturally deep area and did not require dredging. The estimated cost for preparation of the plans and specifications and the construction of the project is $238,000, of which $214,200 is federal and $23,800 cash is non-federal. Local cooperation. Wahkiakum County, Washington, the non-federal sponsor, executed a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the Corps of Engineers in October 1993. In accordance with cost sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the federal government will initially provide 90 percent of the costs associated with the general navigation features of the project. The non-federal sponsor is required to provide 10 percent of the total construction cost of the general navigation features up front. The sponsor is also required to provide an addition 10 percent of the cost of the general navigation features of the project in cash over a period not to exceed 30 years. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The plans and specifications were prepared and a contract for construction of the project was awarded on December 23, 1993 and completed on February 18, 1994. Post construction monitoring will continue through May 1995. 22. WILLAMEITTE RIVER AT WILLA ETE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Canal and locks were originally constructed by private interest in 1873 and were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in the Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. The project includes four locks a canal basin and an extra guard lock used to prevent flooding when river levels are high. The system acts as a fluid staircase between the upper and lower reaches of the Willamette River. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 37-K. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and 37-10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Until the 1940's, the gates were opened manually. Now, the gates are operated by hydraulic pumps controlled by switches in two control stations with the aid of closed-circuit television and radio communication. All the gates have been replaced under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in good condition and in continuous operation. New service building was completed in 1988 costing $523,000. The project was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1974, and was established as an Oregon Civil Engineering Landmark in 1991. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. James River Paper has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and shipping paper and paper products. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance performed. A contract for repair of lock gates 1 and 7 was completed. 23. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Yaquina Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30- foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1978 and again in 1988. (For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annul Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two berths capable of serving ocean-goiig vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage of 120 boats, is completed. A swing hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 206,971 cubic yards. Continued MCCP study of deterioration of the north jetty and Major Maintenance Report. 24. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows about 50 miles in a westerly direction, and empties into Yaquina Bay, on Oregon Coast. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 5802 and 6058.) Existing project. Provides for two controlling half-tide dikes of piling, brush, and stone, each about 1,100 feet long (constructed by local interests), and for a channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depot' Slough, extending from town of Yaquina near RM 4.0 to Toledo at RM 14.4. 37-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme about 12 feet. Freshet heights are about 12 feet at mouth of Depot Slough. Channel work authorized March 1913 was completed in 1914. Additional work authorized in 1960 was completed in 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Near town of Yaquina at river mouth, which is also head of Yaquina Bay, there is a moorage for small vessels and a small-craft shipyard. The Port of Toledo has public-terminal facilities for accommodation of local craft. There are also privately owned facilities for loading lumber barges, receipt of bunker fuel, and log rollways for receipt of logs. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed and a Public Notice issued describing proposed dredging for FY 1995. 25. 7.5 MCY STANDBY TIME Existing Project. General Provisions of the FY 1994 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, PL 103-126, state that "In fiscal year 1994 the Secretary (of the Army) shall advertise for competitive bid at least 7,500,000 cubic yards of the hopper dredge volume accomplished with government-owned dredges in FY 1992. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the Secretary is authorized to use the dredge fleet of the Corps of Engineers to undertake projects when industry does not perform as required by the contract specifications or when the bids are more than 25 percent in excess of what the Secretary determines to be a fair and reasonable estimated cost of a well equipped contractor doing the work or to respond to emergency requirements." Operations during fiscal year. This requirement resulted in a 50 day reduction in scheduled work days for the Essayons and the Yaquina, and the contracting out of 2,900,000 cubic yards. The projects dredged were Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA; Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR; Coquille River, OR; Coos Bay, OR; Chetco River, OR; and Rogue River, OR. Flood Control 26. APPLEGATE BASIN, OR LAKE, ROGUE RIVER Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities were provided by the Corps of Engineers with operation and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of agreement. Project is complete and operating. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. 27. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-and-gravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968..Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) was granted a FERC license in November 1989 to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. EWEB has delayed their plans for hydropower units pending the conclusion of a Corps proposal to add water temperature control to the regulating outlet tower. An EIS has been completed and is out for review. Local cooperation. None required. 37-12 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 37-M. 28. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. On Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfll dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at five sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work continued. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 29. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigational and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since Sept. 1976. It includes 4 projects and 14 parks. At Dorena Lake, 6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane County under a lease agreement. Future recreation development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 37-M: 30. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Construction work for the 249-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam has been stopped due to a court injunction. The project would control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles, and provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of roads and the main dam structure and outlet works to elevation 1563 (approximately 1/3 proposed height). All lands for the project have been acquired with the exception of the clearing of water rights for a seemingly abandoned irrigation canal which originates within the project boundaries. Environmental statements were filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement No. 1 addressing water quality and social/demographic information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. Estimated federal cost of project is $174,000,000. In October 1985, the Corps was advised by Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC), an environmental group, they intended to file suit against the government to halt construction of Elk Creek, on specific environmental issues. A hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction was scheduled before Oregon Federal District Court December 16, 1986. On that date, the Court refused to grant the injunction to halt construction and bids were opened and the contract subsequently awarded to Ohbayashi Corp. An appeal was filed by ONRC in March, 1986 and heard by the 9th Circuit Court in July, 1986. On June 23, 1987, the Circuit Court reversed the decision of the District Court and returned the case to the District Court for appropriate injunctive relief. The resulting District court order issued in August and September 1987 allowed construction of the dam to El. 1563 ft. (approximately 1/3 the height of the dam), backfilling of the foundation key trench, aggregate processing, quarry 37-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 restoration, and other miscellaneous work. The construction of the main dam to elevation 1563 was reached in mid- January 1988. The Department of Justice petitioned the 9th Circuit Court for a rehearing. On December 10, 1987 the 9th Circuit Court rejected the petition for a rehearing, requiring the termination of the existing main dam and reservoir clearing contracts. The Department of Justice petitioned with the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of the decisions made by the 9th Circuit Court. The hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court was held May 1, 1989. The U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case back for injunctive relief. In September 1989, the District Court was requested by the Corps to remand the case back to the Corps for preparation of a supplemental EIS. To lift the injunction against the dam a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EISS) has been prepared to address cumulative effects. Additional studies have been conducted in water temperature and turbidity, and fish and wildlife. The EISS identified a preferred interim operating alternative of operating the project without a conservation pool. The reservoir would only temporarily store water during flood control operations. On July 22, 1992, the Department of Justice filed a motion with the court to remove the injunction. A hearing was held on May 20, 1993. The ONRC and Department of Justice have filed appeals with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals over the issues of the legal sufficiency of the EISS and on the authority of the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to issue a determination of impacts under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. In FY 1993, Congress added $2,500,00 for design necessary to complete the project pending removal of the injunction. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain a minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities require a local sponsor willing to cost share in recreation development and assume operations and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Operation and maintenance during the construction phase of the project, fishery evaluation studies, and water quality analysis. 31. FALL CREEKLAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Bethel School District. Bethel School District has a sub-agreement with the Springfield Kiwanis Club for management of this facility. The Corps manages one park at the project. Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of the Middle Fork, Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 32. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane county, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acrefeet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane county, 37-14 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Three parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreements. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water for migratory waterfowl under a lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 1135 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended. This authority allows modifications to structures and operations of constructed Corps projects to improve the quality of the environment. In fiscal year 1993, plans and specifications were prepared and construction for the Fern Ridge, Long Tom River, Fisher Butte waterfowl impoundments was initiated in July 1993. The modification consists of three impoundments (totaling 115 acres) by constructing levees and ditches, installing an irrigation water supply pump and 8-inch diameter water supply pipeline, construction of overflow spillways, and installation of drainage culverts with positive closure gates. This modification was constructed under a cooperative agreement with the Bureau of Land Management and was completed on May 6, 1994. The non-federal sponsor is the State of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Total cost for this modification, including all planning, design, and construction was $210,664, of which $157,998 is federal and $52,666 is non-federal. Maintenance: A contract was awarded and repairs made in the discharge channel below the dam as well as riprap replacement on the adjacent bank. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 37-M. 33. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization): Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See Table 37-L for expenditures under Section 205 during the fiscal year. Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended (preauthorization): Construction of a bank protection project at Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR is discussed in Section 38. Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See Table 37-L for expenditures under Section 14 during the fiscal year. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation: Federal costs for the fiscal year were: $374,325 for disaster preparedness; and $1,233 for advance measures associated with the Mount St. Helens recovery effort. National Emergency Preparedness Program fiscal year costs were $174,590. Project modification for the improvement of the environment pursuant to Section 1135 (b), Public Law 99-362 as amended: Construction of a waterfowl impoundment at Fern Ridge Lake, OR is discussed in Section 32. See Table 37-L for expenditures under Section 1135 during the fiscal year. 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. A total of 56 leveed areas and 209 bank protection works are inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin are supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Of the 56 leveed areas inspected during the fiscal year, one was reported deficient in maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $142,243. 35. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. A total of 191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $25,600,000. 37-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Local Interests will also be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each site. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $1,500,000. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of coordination with sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. 36. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems impacted by the project include Toutle, Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the problems reside in the communities of Longview, Kelso, Lexington, and Castle Rock, Washington. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88, 99th Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization "... to construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention structure near the confluence of the Toutle and Green River, Washington, with such design features and associated downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 1984." The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Decision document recommended construction of a single sediment retention structure (SRS) with a 125- foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. Local cooperation. Local interests were responsible for provision of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, and levee improvements. Local interests were also responsible for all alterations and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites are the responsibility of local interests. Cowlitz County offers visitor services in their viewpoint area. Non-federal cash contribution is $3,690,000 and the estimated non-federal land, easements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are $21,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Fish and wildlife mitigation studies, real estate activities and preparation of as-built drawings continued. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. 37. MOUNT ST. HELENS AND VICINITY, WA Location. Along the Cowlitz and Toutle rivers from Spirit Lake at the base of Mount St. Helens to the confluence of the Cowlitz with the Columbia River (River Mile 68) approximately 55 miles downstream of Portland, OR. Existing project. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrographic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle River valleys. Mudflows triggered by the eruption carried large volumes of sediment from the debris avalanche into these river valleys, reducing hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected even with normal runoff. Storm runoff and surface drainage continue to deliver sediment from the debris avalanche into the rivers. Funds allocated under Public Law 84-99 were used for major recovery work on the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers. In late FY 1983, interim flood control measures were implemented under the authority of Public Law 98-63 to assure 100-year flood protection to developed areas along the Cowlitz River. Measures implemented are primarily dredging on the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers, temporary levee improvements on the Cowlitz River and a monitoring program. Local cooperation. Local sponsors are responsible for obtaining any additional lands, easements, and rights-ofway. The State of Washington has agreed to act as the local sponsor. State funds have been appropriated for acquisition of lands and related expenses for Mount St. Helens recovery operations. The State of Washington has spent over $4,500,000 to procure disposal sites for dredged material. Operations during fiscal year. The settlement of contract claims was the only activity in the fiscal year. 38. SANDY RIVER, CITY OF TROUTDALE, OR Location. Located within the Troutdale city limits on the left bank of the Sandy River between the Interstate 84 highway bridge and the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, approximately 11 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. This authority allows construction of emergency bank protection to prevent flood damage to public works. Project consists of construction of 600 feet of embankment fill and revetment stone to stabilize the bank to protect both the Interstate Highway 84 bridge abutment and the City of Troutdale sewage treatment ponds. The cost for preparation of plans and specifications and construction of the project was $431,230, of which $323,422 is federal and $107,808 is non-federal. The nonfederal cost includes cash contributions of $98,313 and the 37-16 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT value of $9,495 for lands, easements and rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas (LERRD). Local Cooperation. The City of Troutdale, OR, the local non-federal sponsor, provided lands, easements and rights-of-way. In addition, the City of Troutdale participated financially in accordance with the cost sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were prepared and a contract for construction of the project was awarded on July 2, 1993. Construction was completed on October 22, 1993. 39. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins), one local project operated by' Douglas County (Galesville), and one municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light (Mossyrock). The projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. The four Bureau of Reclamation projects, Douglas County project and Mossyrock project were operated during the fiscal year within the flood control regulations specified for each project. Total cost of monitoring the six projects during the fiscal year was $42,964. There was a regional drought in 1994, therefore, no flood control benefits were accrued. 40. WILLAM~TTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $30,700,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of 489,795 linear feet of bank protection work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 and Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $2,300,000. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: continued coordination and evaluation of local erosion problems. 41. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs (cubic feet per second), an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acrefeet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has leased recreation facilities at Willow Creek Lake. A courtesy handling dock was constructed by the Recreation District utilizing Oregon State Marine Board funds. A playfield area below the dam has been leased to the City of Heppner. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provisions of the Clear Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. The Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has withdrawn sponsorship. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 42. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River, see Section 3. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Cascade island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 vertical-lift steel gates, 10 with remote control hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway provides access, and two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. 37-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of one unit of 48,000 kilowatts, one unit of 59,500 kilowatts, and eight units of 60,000 kilowatts each, totaling 587,500 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough Channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and powerhouses are founded on andesite, and main dam rests on solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 27 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock, spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-N. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest-Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provided for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,145.7 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1943. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse is near completion. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 2,700,000 project wide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) is an integral part of that structure. The total cost for construction of the second powerhouse is estimated at $683,000,000. The first powerhouse, spillway, navigation lock and associated facilities have been designated as a National Historic District. A cost sharing agreement between the Corps and Skamania County has been finalized. Development of recreation facilities at Home Valley was completed in FY 1989. Through September 1994, power generation totaled 228.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $557,192,235 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for nonfederal cost-sharing for development of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contracts for purchase of a crane to handle trash and the removable Turbine Intake Extensions (TIE) and Crane Rail Extension, and TIE Storage Facilities were awarded on October 7, 1993 and April 26, 1994 respectively. These contracts are scheduled to be completed in fiscal year 1995. Development of a portion of Steigerwald Lake for mitigation continued. Additional investigations to determine the scope of necessary environmental cleanup actions for Hamilton Island continued. Environmental cleanup of parcel 2 was initiated and completed. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Plans and specifications for the first powerhouse transformers, switchgear, and main units rehabilitation were completed. Routine operation and maintenance was performed with enhanced maintenance on the turbines. During the fiscal year 3,981,499,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 3,953,053 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. 43. COLUMBIA AD SNAKE RIVERS PORTS DREDGING, OR & WA Location. On the Columbia River from Bonneville Dam to McNary Dam Existing project. On a one-time basis, at full Federal expense, and without requirement of local sponsorship, 37-18 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT maintain navigation access to, and berthing areas at, all currently operating public and private commercial dock facilities associated with the Federal navigation project on the Columbia River from Bonneville Dam to Umatilla, Oregon, at a depth commensurate with the Federal. navigation project, and the Federal Government is exempted from any liability due to public and private facilities including docks adjacent to the access channels and berthing areas resulting from this maintenance. Sites identified for dredging under this authorization included recreational channels at Wind River, Mayer State Park, and Rock Creek State Park; recreational boat basins at The Dalles, Cascade Locks, and Bingen; commercial docks at Port of Morrow, Stevenson Co-Ply, Mt. Adams, Hood River Inn, Rock Creek Cove, SD&S, Mountain Fir, Bernert, Cargill, Biggs, and Roosevelt; commercial log storage facilities at Wind River, SD&S, and Government Cove; commercial channels at Hood River, McNary, Port of Skamania, Herman Creek, and Little White Salmon. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of Irrigon boat basin. 44. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM , OR AND WA Location. At Bonneville, The Dalles, and John Day Dams on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. This program encompasses work at five other locations within Walla Walla District. Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric projects on the lower Columbia and Snake Rivers have been identified as a major contributing factor in causing mortality to downstream migrating juvenile salmon and steelhead. Without adequate bypass facilities to guide these juvenile fish away from the power turbines at the dams, mortalities incurred through project passage severely impact the commercial, recreational, and Indian fisheries. The Corps has recognized the need to reduce juvenile mortality and has undertaken bypass measures that include mechanized fish bypass systems with barge and truck transportation. Spill as an additional bypass route over the spillways has been used to divert fish from entering turbine units, but it is a significant adverse economic factor due to lost power revenues. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of funds for the design, testing, and construction of new or improved fish bypass facilities for the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation projects. Completion of the bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the fish mitigation facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The plan of improvement within Portland District includes the following: (a) Bonneville - new juvenile fish monitoring facilities, and outfall relocation; (b) The Dalles - submerged extended fish screens and bypass system, new gantry crane and maintenance facility; (c) John Day - new juvenile fish monitoring facility, and planning and design for potential drawdown of the reservoir to minimum operating pool; (d) a mitigation study that analyzes longterm alternatives to improve fish passage and survival through Corps dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. The current fully funded total estimated Federal project cost is $587,900,000 which includes $316,500,000 for improvements in Walla Walla District, $267,100,000 in Portland District and $4,300,000 provided by the Bonneville Power Administration for design of the Bonneville juvenile fish monitoring facility. For information on the planned improvements in the upper Columbia and Snake Rivers, see Walla Walla District's Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Bonneville - design of the juvenile fish monitoring facilities continued using funds provided by the Bonneville Power Administration; The Dalles - design of the juvenile bypass system and testing of the prototype submerged extended fish screen continued; John Day - planning and design continued for the potential drawdown of the reservoir to minimum operating pool (elevation 257 msl) and design of the new fish monitoring facility was initiated; Mitigation Studies - completed reconnaissance level studies on the John Day drawdown, and improvements to existing bypass systems at the three lower Columbia projects. 45. COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA Location. This project provides for construction on four sites along the Columbia River on Bonneville pool. Existing project. Congress has provided authority through public law to implement a wide range of land management, transfer, acquisition and development actions to provide fishing access for Indian tribes who exercise treaty fishing rights on the Columbia River. The law designates certain federal sites on Bonneville pool for fishing access. The improvements required at the access sites are specified in the authorizing legislation. They will include all weather access roads, camping facilities, boat ramps, docks, sanitation, and fish cleaning facilities. Construction of these facilities will greatly improve access to the Bonneville pool, the pool most heavily used for treaty fishing by the four tribes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Completed the Phase I Evaluation Report, the Land Acquisition Study, and Phase I plans and specifications. 46. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. 37-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as.a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1994 power generation totaled 4.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $22,996,295 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit is $114,000,000. The EIS for the addition of water temperature control to the intake tower is out for public review. Water temperature control will enhance fish passage and incubation in the McKenzie River. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 114,180,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 113,469,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-M. 47. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 40 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acrefeet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acrefeet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed on-line June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1994 power generation totaled 19.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $70,706,261 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 346,991,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 343,829,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 48. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gate-controlled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its 37-20 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1994 power generation totaled 9.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $56,890,347 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Future recreation development at Foster or Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation facilities at Foster Lake includes 4 parks and 2 parks at Green Peter Lake. Five of these parks were developed by the Corps. and are operated by Linn county under lease agreement. One park is operated by the Corps. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contractor completed the removal of rock and debris from the spillway stilling basin in an effort to reduce erosion of the concrete structure. Improvements were made to one of the spillways to enhance smolt survival and downstream passage. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During the fiscal year 259,308,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 256,892,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 49. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from Lookout Point. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Through September 1994, power generation totaled 5.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $22,025,120 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 77,255,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 76,701,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37- M. 50. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMAT'LLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acre-feet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 37-N. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete. Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 was completed in FY 1986. Entire project is estimated to be 99 37-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 percent complete. Through September 1994 power generation totaled 266.4 billion kilowatt-hour. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $394,299,836 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $513,168,000, consisting of $512,835,000 Corps of Engineers and $333,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids. Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 5 parks are operated and maintained by local agencies under lease agreement with the Corps. Six developed recreation areas are operated and maintained by the Corps of Engineers. Any future recreation development will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work continued on modifications to the fish bypass system. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 8,302,903,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 8,283,102,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Rehabilitation: Final major contract for rewinding of 5 generators continued and is scheduled for FY 1996 completion. 51. LOOKOUT POINT -DEXTER LAKES, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of mainstem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1,2, and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Dexter was placed in operation for reregulation in December 1954. Through September 1994 power generation totaled 15.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $77,179,446 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All these parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Recreation opportunities are provided at 2 parks on Dexter Lake which are operated by Lane County via the multi-project cost-sharing agreement and lease instruments. The north shore of Lookout Point Lake is also leased to Lane County for recreation purposes; there is essentially no development. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded to supply new generator windings for Lookout Point and Dexter over the next two years. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 242,140,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 240,282,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 52. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On Upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gate-controlled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility was provisions for temperature regulation 37-22 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acrefeet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council. on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Recreation opportunities are provided by 4 parks at the project. The State of Oregon operates 2 parks, including a 200 unit campground, part of Stewart State Park. Through September 1994, power generation totaled 4.7 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $29,060,506 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Cole M. Rivers Fish Hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides full funding for the operation and maintenance of the hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 204,384,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated by the project of which 201,576,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. 53. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WAAND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially with substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fish-water units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. The total generating capacity is 1,806,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 37-N. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks on Lake Celilo. These parks were further expanded with code 710 funds in the late 60's and early 70's. Two parks are operated by Washington State Park Commission under a lease agreement. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. However, it was determined that it was not within the Chief of Engineer's authority to add these power facilities. A local interest, North Wasco County Public Utility District pursued the construction of these power facilities through the FERC license processes and awarded a construction contract in September 1989. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. Through September 1994, power generation totaled 263.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $363,894,621 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Further recreation development will require cost sharing and assumption of operation and maintenance by local, non-federal sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Studies to rehabilitate the fishwater generators and generating units 1-22 are continuing. Routine operation and maintenance 37-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 continued. During fiscal year 6,119,443,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 6,102,262,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. General Investigations 54. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,620,312 of which $242,907 was for navigation studies, $1,135,999 for flood damage prevention studies, $7,385 for Environmental Services Partnerships, $111,112 for miscellaneous activities, $108 for comprehensive studies, $93,900 for Review of Authorized Projects, and $28,901 for coordination with other agencies. Contributed funds in the amount of $105,686 were expended of which $82,012 was contributed by the International Port of Coos Bay for the Coos Bay navigation study and $23,674 contributed by the Association of Lower Columbia River Ports for the Columbia River Channel Deepening Study. 55. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non- Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Fiscal year costs totaling $116,777 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program: FPMS Unit $26,062; Technical Services $61,223; Quick Responses $5,114; and special studies for Portland Metro $127; Salem, OR $12,102; Scappoose, OR $3,000; Stanfield, OR $3,149; and Warrenton, OR $6,000. Contributed funds in the amount of $4,921 were expended for technical services. 56. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Columbia River Treaty Fishing Access Sites, OR and WA The authorized plan includes land management, acquisition, and river access facility development for Indian tribes who exercise treaty fishing rights on the Columbia River, Oregon and Washington. Public Law 100-581 Title IV designates 21 sites on Bonneville, The Dalles, and John Day pools for treaty fishing use and authorizes the acquisition of 6 additional sites on Bonneville pool from willing sellers. The law specifies the construction of access roads, boat ramps, dock sanitation, fish cleaning facilities, and others at these locations and provides additional authority for facility improvements at five sites currently administered for treaty fishing access resulting from construction of Bonneville Dam. Plans and specifications for Phase I which consists of four early action sites on Bonneville pool and of the Phase II Evaluation Report were completed. Fiscal year expenditures were $714,786. Coos Bay, OR (Deep Draft Navigation) The feasibility report was completed and submitted to Congress in August 1994. The report recommended deepening the bar and the existing 15-mile channel by two feet to 47 and 37 feet, respectively. The construction cost estimate for this project is $14.6 million including $174,000 for local interests to dredge berthing areas and dock rehabilitation. The estimated average annual costs and benefits (October 1994 price levels) are $1.3 and $2.9 million, respectively. The benefit-to-cost ratio is 2.3 to 1. Project cost sharing will include requirements for nonfederal interests to pay 25 percent of the project cost during construction, and an additional 10 percent to be repaid over a period not exceeding 30 years. Fiscal year work consisted of completion of the Feasibility Study Phase. Preparation of plans and specifications were initiated. Fiscal year expeneditures were $365,638. 37-24 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 to In Text Sep.30, 1994 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (Federal Funds) (Inland Waterway Trust Fund) 2. Chetco River, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver,WA and The Dalles, OR 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR 9. Columbia River, Vancouver Deep Draft Anchorage, WA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contrib. Cost 38,949,000 32,440,000 18,889,000 38,867,937 32,423,462 18,900,338 38,949,000 32,440,000 18,889,000 38,864,327 32,417,676 18,960,239 5,021,000 4,789,539 5,021,000 4,737,777 489,000 342,000 340,000 801,000 500,675 341,065 328,748 249,262 10,496,000 10,887,000 11,899,000 10,993,000 10,588,846 10,888,793 11,741,316 10,350,493 34,000 16,000 31,000 641,000 38,263 16,528 28,034 632,010 250,000 256,000 249,278 258,564 4,000 31,000 723 10,402 173,299,307 0o 172,725,930 5o 173,299,000 172,831,343 2,043,713' 2,043,713 ' 8,236,673 7,672,662 28,349,304 2 28,349,304 2 326,114,296 3 325,296,273 3 665,954 4 665,954 941,252 941,252 4,663,087 4,649,651 220,283 6 220,283 5,951,877 5,927,986 24,913,661 6 24,913,661 6 6,410,000 7,774,000 5,331,186 6,576,000 139,224,835 6,571,092 7,761,894 5,343,357 6,397,432 138,993,128 ' 7,322,878 7,322,878 5,989,509 a 5,989,509 315,000 208,000 111,000 95,000 335,274 206,931 94,447 88,958 50,000 16,000 36,226 15,798 6,000 18,354 8,800 72,848 84,000 168,600 126 166,284 90,000 477 13,158,359 9 13,124,658 9 150,000 52,024 309,000 306,519 90,000 477 37-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 37-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 to In Text Sep.30, 1994 10. Coos Bay, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Coquille River, OR 12. Depoe Bay, OR 14. Port Orford, OR 16. Rogue River Harbor At Gold Beach, OR 17. Siuslaw River, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Skipanon Channel, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 4,776,500 3,595,000 3,814,000 3,095,000 4,777,143 3,630,859 3,660,691 3,215,052 511,000 638,000 335,000 515,000 525,445 636,419 339,017 499,311 7,000 7,743 7,000 98,000 629,000 5,418. 77,423 630,082 237,000 290,000 408,000 359,000 235,425 281,764 397,748 265,572 1,025,000 944,000 994,000 1,069,000 1,050,034 929,545 1,005,977 1,063,197 884,000 781,000 763,000 772,000 896,203 789,737 732,768 752,569 29,750,092 0 29,750,092 "L 95,752,718 " 95,666,865 " 2,335,966 2,335,966 486,680 486,680 693,366 12 693,366 12 7,897,987 '3 7,882,298 13 367,364 367,364 1,681,717 1,657,087 758,692 14 758,692 '1 4,657,217 4,542,010 4,156,252 '" 4,156,252 ' 15,190,394 16 15,179,518 16 635,783 635,783 29,502,212 17 29,502,212 1: 15,672,384 1 ' 15,620,770 ' 879,285 879,285 493,611 493,611 280,854 280,854 37-26 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 to In Text Sep.30, 1994 19. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR 20. Umpqua River, OR 21. Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA (Contributed Funds) 22. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 23. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 24. Yaquina River, OR 25. 7.5 MCY Standby Time 26. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin OR Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 9,000 19,000 3,149 21,311 3,596,000 -45,000 3,535,492 15,405 1,191 524 8,000 30,000 18,627 30,812 1,291,000 869,000 1,180,000 1,070,000 1,317,613 874,091 1,160,367 1,008,564 13,496 5,000 40,400 162,200 4,382 14,487 168,130 23,800 17,728 620,000 664,000 734,000 1,247,000 624,494 684,759 710,047 1,253,840 1,601,500 1,603,000 2,126,000 1,477,000 1,648,282 1,602,679 2,038,446 1,495,491 30,000 22,856 1,154,000 3,505,064 3,502,771 22,434,827 '9 22,434,827 19 6,756,082 20 6,755,945 20 2,839,799 2,839,799 17,718,877 21 17,718,877 21 30,021,093 29,936,354 2,500,677 2,500,677 260,046 238,598 23,800 17,728 520,005 22 520,005 22" 20,313,818 23 20,287,192 23 234,794 234,794 19,242,046 24 19,242,046 24 36,094,758 25 36,023,446 25 12,005 12,005 28,800 28,800 779,694 s' 772,550 31 1,154,000 91,642,489 91,642,489 37-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 37-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 to In Text Sep.30, 1994 27. Blue River Lake, OR 28. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 29. Dorena Lake, OR 30. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 31. Fall Creek Lake, OR 32. Fern Ridge Lake, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 35. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection OR & WA 36. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 37. Mt. St. Helens and Vicinity, WA Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 425,000 519,000 556,000 563,000 425,054 511,520 546,733 570,193 147,000 182,000 238,000 334,000 144,629 178,433 230,545 336,866 622,000 434,000 598,000 666,000 575,680 487,367 585,253 681,923 418,000 411,000 522,000 476,000 380,554 418,433 543,752 471,695 6,722,115 '18 6,705,725 18 32,038,225 26 32,038,225 26 3,542,299 3,524,749 4,013,123 27 4,013,123 27 13,224,288 28 13,202,870 28 14,568,262 29 14,568,262 29 8,555,460 8,522,180 2,054,000 1,110,000 550,000 2,985,000 107,429,579 1,732,568 1,226,541 747,616 533,812 104,926,908 22,118,264 30 22,118,264 30 510,000 616,000 522,000 581,000 470,766 663,086 527,537 554,509 61,000 60,840 6,000 156,900 -65,200 4,823 149,437 -56,400 744,000 912,000 840,000 961,000 750,600 919,406 827,935 982,043 75,000 -22,334 52,666 25,000 23,000 62,000 38,684 45,084 18,536 1,824,000 1,695,826 7,809,671 7,765,187 8,685,635 31 8,685,635 31 18,180,198 32 18,165,763 32 52,666 52,666 21,067,745 11,442 21,008,443 111,719,000 536,658 115,463 -8,519 111,655,638 53,872 53,872 389,000 396,000 305,000 372,000 383,937 389,294 311,716 347,114 3,703,112 3,703,112 1,462,000 1,432,061 -62,000 42,096,000 7,500 42,035,050 37-28 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 to In Text Sep.30, 1994 38. Sandy River City of Troutdale, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 40. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR 41. Willow Creek Lake, OR 42. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville OR and WA 43. Columbia and Snake Rivers, Ports Dredging, OR and WA 44. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program OR and WA 45. Columbia River Treaty Fishing Access Sites, OR & WA 46. Cougar Lake, OR 47. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR 48. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR New Work Approp. / Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost 10,000 27,400 445,200 -117,600 3,818 32,311 289,078 39,793 146,865 -48,552 48,608 49,705 -25,000 30,800 10,000 4,575 365,000 365,000. 98,313 98,313 24,853,816 33 4,939 24,853,330 33 82,000 56,000 93,000 40,000 67,732 61,566 77,043 51,750 30,000 25,000 37,000 14,332 40,420 37,248 432,000 420,000 409,000 463,000 457,792 412,532 401,943 450,911 4,055,709 4,041,902 37,260,114 37,260,114 4,771,051 4,730,921 3,911,000 2,716,000 4,693,000 4,701,000 785,532,604 34 3,888,349 2,888,142 3,644,484 5,654,549 785,116,511 34 12,153,300 13,393,000 14,277,000 15,798,000 12,417,302 13,161,143 14,162,891 15,819,748 1,290,000 5,875,000 784,239 2,565,983 5,630,000 196,000 5,587,370 128,587 83,969 1,343,000 3,804,000 6,700,000 7,200,000 1,114,175 3,434,045 6,514,078 5,468,865 3,360,000 21,608 913,000 920,000 1,042,000 1,351,900 860,144 989,556 1,017,213 1,366,112 1,720,000 1,699,000 1,875,000 1,885,900 1,597,219 1,811,308 1,831,455 1,896,191 230,974,663 35 230,406,523 3s 7,165,000 3,350,222 5,826,000 5,799,926 19,047,000 16,531,163 3,360,000 21,608 58,636,393 36 58,636,393 36 17,295,196 '9 17,249,463 '" 62,729,698 62,729,698 37,000,607 '7 36,937,193 17 363,086 363,086 84,005,788 3 84,005,788 37 37-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 37-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 to In Text Sep.30, 1994 49. Hills Creek Lake, OR 50. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA Major Rehab. 51. Lookout Point - Dexter Lakes, OR 52. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 53. The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lake Celilo, WA and OR Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,118,000 1,981,000 2,270,000 2,633,900 2,072,319 2,038,785 2,232,324 2,464,234 627,000 601,000 739,000 819,000 612,945 606,010 737,248 783,167 123,266 51,754 3,731 11,045,300 10,719,000 11,022,000 14,0C 10,985,601 10,906,494 10,674,129 13,98 36,510,703 38 36,292,543 38 45,700,619 45,700,619 12,100,375 3 12,052,511 39 512,400,246 40 7,913 512,400,087 t0 )8,000 170,652,727 41 36,274 170,050,897 41 735,000 2,134,000 2,535,000 6,100,000 37,040,128 761,975 2,073,299 2,574,972 5,514,311 36,422,015 88,238,395 12 88,238,395 12 3,468,000 3,265,000 3,566,000 6,670,900 61,801,532 13 3,333,658 3,399,006 3,518,176 4,296,520 59,308,634 13 136,408,150 136,408,150 2,996,000 3,149,000 3,296,000 3,817,900 40,890,618 1" 3,039,651 3,114,685 3,230,620 3,779,970 40,742,648 " 229,789 8,214,300 9,700,000 7,921,077 10,024,491 9,856,000 11,771,000 9,478,630 11,975,161 303,260,288 15 303,260,288 '5 153,146,670 '6 152,765,454 16 1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project.Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, OR (not part of regular project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 8. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393. Entrance to Oregon slough; $161,897, Camas-Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908, Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470, Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9. Includes $2,033,408 under code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 10. Includes $802,096 for previous project, Excludes contributed funds. 11.Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 12. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. includes $36,000 under Code 711. 13. Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 14. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 16. Includes $21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. 37-30 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 17. Includes $1,159,357 for previous project. 18. Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 19. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 20. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 21. Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 22. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 23. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 24. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 25. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 26. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 27. Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 28. Includes $167,878 special recreation use fees. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 29. Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 30. Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 31. Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 32. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 33. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 34. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recover Act Funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $136,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $627,593,352 allotted and $642,322,501 expended second powerhouse funds, $6,000 allotted, $6,000 expended power units funds. 35. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 36. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 37. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 38. Includes $779,178 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 39. Includes $75,400 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 40. Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 41. Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 42. Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 43. Includes $784,178 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 44. Includes $778,978 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 45. Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15 - 22 funds. 46. Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 47. Includes $727,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 48. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 49. Includes $652,278 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 50. Includes $24,307 under code 422 General Investigation. 51. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 37-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 15, 1985 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 02 , 1945 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 04, 1981 Oct 31, 1992 3. Feb 27, 1911 Jul 25, 1912 Jul 27, 1916 Aug 08, 1917 Sep 22, 1922 Mar 04, 19232 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 03, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Sep 06, 19333 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 1. 37-32 2. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Construction of a new navigation lock just south P.L. 99-88 of existing lock. Construction to be funded 50% from fuel taxes paid P.L. 99-662 into Inland Waterways Trust Fund. CHETCO RIVER, OR To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. improvements. Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. Assume responsibility for O&M of the approximately P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. 200-foot-long access channel to the south commercial boat basin consistent with authorized project depths. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' Increasing main channel to 30 feet. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and No Prior Report between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess.' Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of H. Doc 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Willamette River to Vancouver, WA. Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River Rivers and Harbors on condition that main channel to be opened to project Committee Doc. 10 dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. 69th Cong., 2d Sess. For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., the sea. 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess.' A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess.' Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette Rivers and Harbors to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, Committee Doc. 1, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning 74th Cong., 1st Sess. basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35 foot depth at low water Rivers and Harbors in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its Committee Doc. 6, mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, Rivers and Harbors 1,000 feet downstream. Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess.' An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. H. Doc. 630. 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong.,2d Sess.' A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec 11, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 02, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jun 20, 1938 Sep 03, 1954 Mar 03, 1905 Dec 22, 1944 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 30, 1983 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Nov 5, 1990 Oct 29, 1993 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 30, 1948 Dec 31, 1970 COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA East Channel Main channel West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 5. 6. 37-33 4. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Channel 8 feet deep. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50,75th Cong., 2d Sess. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong.,1st Sess.' COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec. 4, Flood Control facilities. Act of 1944 as amended Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore.9 H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel P.L. 98-63 cross section to 55 feet. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from H. Committee Doc. 94, Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.' by 800 feet long. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a P. L. 101-514; H. R. 101-889, 101st support structure to serve as the foundation for the Cong, 2d Sess. Seafarer's Memorial in the Columbia River, in cooperation with the City of Hammond, Oregon. COLUMBIA RIVER, VANCOUVER DEEP DRAFT ANCHORAGE, WA Construct Anchorage Sec. 107, Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960 COOS BAY, OR Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong.,lst Sess. A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to S. Committee Print, Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. 73d Cong., 2d Sess.' Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. H. Doc 646, 80th Cong.,2nd Sess. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. 7. 8. 9. 10. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 37-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 02, 1945 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 31, 1970 Oct 31, 1992 Sep 03, 1954 Sep 19, 1890 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 03, 1925 Jul 03, 1958 Oct 22, 1976 Oct 01, 1980 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 26, 1937 Jun 30, 1948 Jul 26, 1912 Mar 04, 1913 Mar 02, 1919 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 27, 1965 11. 37-34 COQUILLE RIVER, OR Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. H. Doc. 207, 65th Cong.,1st Sess.' .Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of S. Committee Print, North Jetty. 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Food Control recreation facilities. Act of 1944 as amended For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.' River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. DEPOE BAY, OR Construction of an inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong. and 5 feet deep, with an entrance channel of same depth 1st Sess. and 50 feet wide. Construction of an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong. and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 1st Sess. 30 feet wide. PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong.,2d Sess Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, H. Doc 151, 91st Cong.,2d Sess. 16 feet deep. Maintain the authorized navigation channel including P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. those portions of the channel within 50 feet of the port facility. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong. 2d Sess. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Build two high-tide stone jetties. H. Doc. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot south jetty. 12-foot deep channel. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong.,1st Sess.' extension of north Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Phase I advance engineering and design for north Final Report of Chief and south jetty extensions, of Engineers Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and P.L. 96-367 2,500 feet, respectively. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. bridge, 30 feet deep. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. S. Doc. 93, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging H. Doc. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.' caused by storm Jan. 1939. Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' Construct South Jetty, 80,000 feet long. S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., Ist Sess.' 12. 14. 16. 17. 18. 19. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-B. (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 20. Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 20, 1938 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 21. Sep 29, 1993 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 08, 1917 Jun 26, 19346 Mar 02, 19458 Mar 02, 1919 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 03, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Mar 4, 1913 Oct 2, 1992 Oct 28, 1993 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 07, 1974 May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 UMPQUA RIVER, OR North Jetty, 7,500 feet long H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess ocean bar. A short south jetty H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging Rivers and Harbors Committee to a 26-foot depth. Doc. 9,72d Cong., 1st Sess. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong.,3d Sess.' to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel S. Doc. 86,76th Cong., 1st Sess.' to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep; 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River.5 S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. WESTPORT, OR - PUGET ISLAND, WA Channel Excavation WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, as far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Construction of channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depot Creek. Sec. 107, Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960 H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, P. 4374 H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 Doc. 579, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. 7.5 MCY STANDBY TIME In FY 1993 ( and FY 1994) advertise for competitive bid at least 7.5 million cubic yards of the hopper dredge volume P.L. 102-377, 102 Cong. accomplished with government -owned dredges in FY 1992. P.L. 103-126 APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. Authorizes Construction of hydroelectric power facilities H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 93-251 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 99-662 37-35 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. . S. 1 1 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 37-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 28. 29. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DORENA LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities.. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Roller compacted concrete dam. Authorized construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Earthfill embankment dam Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. Construction of waterfowl impoundments. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong.,2d Sess. P.L. 91-439 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc 403, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. Sec 1135(b), P.L.99-362 as amended Jun 28, 193"8 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 07, 1970 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 4, 1993 May 17, 1950 Aug 15, 1985 Jul 30, 1983 Feb 25, 1993 Jun 22, 1936 Jun 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct 27, 1965 42. Aug 30, 1935 Aug 20, 1937 Dec 22, 1944 SANDY RIVER, CITY OF TROUTDALE, OR Construction of emergency bank protection. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLI Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergengy Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by congress. Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions herein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 14, Flood Control Act of 1946 as amended OR F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong.,2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. E, OR AND WA S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug 21, 1933) Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended 37-36 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Provides bank protection on Columbia River below H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. P.L. 99-88 MT. ST. HELENS AND VICINITY, WA Implement and maintain flood control measures in Cowlitz P.L. 98-63 and Toutle Rivers to assure flood protection for developed areas in the vicinity of such rivers against a one-hundredyear flood and to reduce sedimentation flow and the chance of blockage on the Columbia River. 30. 31. 32. 35. 36. 37. 38. 40. 41. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar 07 1974 Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville P.L. 93-251 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. to new town site. Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area. Authorizes transfer of lands to town of North Bonneville, P.L. 98-396 P.L. 102-396, Sec. 9147 COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVERS PORTS DREDGING, OR AND WA Maintain navigation access to commercial dock facilities P.L. 102-104, 102d Cong., 1st Sess. from Bonneville Dam to McNary Dam. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM, OR and WA Design, test, and construct fish bypass facilities. P. L. 100-371 COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA Authorizes project for mitigation of lost treaty fishing Title IV of P.L. 100-581 access resulting from construction of Bonneville Dam. Aug 22, 1984 Oct 1992 Aug. 17,1991 Jul 19, 1988 Nov 1, 1988 May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 Jun 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 24, 1965 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 Sep 21, 1962 Oct 15, 1966 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780. P.L. 87-874 DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam with power. P.L. 858, 80th Cong.2d Sess. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Authorized Green Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). Addition of power at Green Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780, F. C. Act 1954 S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended John Day waterfowl management area. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Earth-and-gravel filled dam. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. as reregulating dam. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Authorizes construction of project but not operation for P.L. 89-689, Public Works irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. Approp. Act, 1967 THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities. as amended 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3. Public Works Administration 4. Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 5. Inactive. 6. Permanent appropriations Repeal Act. 7. Flood Control Act 8. Classified Deferred. 9. Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 37-37 COUGAR LAKE, OR Rockfill dam. Addition of power Strube Lake reregulating dam. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 37-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alsea River, OR AstoriaTurning Basin, OR' Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR' Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA' Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR' Clatskanie River, OR2 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA' Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR Cowlitz River, WA Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR' Deep River, WA2 Depoe Bay, OR' Elochoman Slough, WA2 Grays River, WA2 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR' Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge(Barge Channel), OR' Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA' Lake River, WA Lewis River, WA Long Tom River, OR Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Multnomah Channel, OR2 Nehalem Bay, OR Nestucca River, OR Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR 2 Salmon River, OR2 Smith River, OR2 Skamokawa Creek, WA South Channel, Government Island, OR' South Slough (Charleston), OR' The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, Or' 2 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Or and WA'3 Tongue Point, OR' Umatilla Harbor, OR'4 Westport Slough, OR2 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Or' Yaquina River, OR' Youngs and Claskanie River, Or Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR2 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Abandoned Completed Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 2,000 26,237 1977 1985 1944 1971 1985 1969 1986 1991 1985 1975 1963 1971 1990 1941 1977 1961 1963 1986 1983 1985 1982 1987 1963 1949 1974 1991 1985 1970 1939 1957 1992 1952 1966 1985 1985 1979 1971 1979 870,139 1,173,524 1,081,806 171,467 1,197,300 19,240 3 1,589,231 350,238 ' 277,436 6 329,423 15,384 145,588 5 18,641 ' 2,500 519,090 7 1,154,162 8 15,281 302,000 2,700 58,132 437,669 9 302,006 'o 16,881 2,145 143,120 2,400 119,800 " 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 2,807,876 19 16,276 862,918 1,616,369 891,695 1' 195,313 16 2,000 9,348 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 107). 2. Channel adequate for present commerce. 3. Includes $15,537 for previous project 4. Includes $23,489 for previous project. 5. Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. 6. Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. 7. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 8. Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 9. Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. 10. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $102,000 contributed funds. 12. Project abondoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 13. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 14. Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 15. Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds 17. Excludes $86,586 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds; includes $8,000 for previous project. 19. Excludes $1,776,008 contributed funds. 37-38 16,648 194,896 2,152,914 1,474,036 32,768 196,864 35,670 58,127 685,677 4,000 25,000 55,195 6,000 90,514 205,130 436,185 559,858 2,833,888 171,909 17,900,293 34,449 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 163,397 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1941 163,291 Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1942 69,724 Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Completed 1943 574,123 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 161,381 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1941 258,795 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County WA Completed 1941 26,810 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR Completed 1951 169,542 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 240,939 John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 33,080 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1941 25,773 Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 18,789 Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR. Completed 1942 158,419 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1961 91,652 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 61,186 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 39,475 Midland Drainage District Columbia County, OR Completed 1939 77,774 3 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1951 593,034 * Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1942 241,148 Port of Kalama, WA' Completed 99,844 Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1942 47,662 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1951 1,623,505 Scappoose Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,991,558 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1946 178,885 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA Completed 1985 5,289,833 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 133,778 Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed 1947 61,263 State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA' Completed 1985 504,642 " Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932 Warrenton Diking District, 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596 Webb District Improvement Co.,Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA Completed 1939 42,978 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA' Completed 1985 250,000 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,131,944 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WAL ' Completed 236,860 Hayden Island, OR Inactive Midland Drainage District, OR Completed 1971 304,511 37-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 37-E (CONTINUED) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sen. 30. 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Rainier Drainage District, OR Sandy Drainage District, OR Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Vancouver Lake Area, WA Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR Woodson Drainage District, OR WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Mill Creek, Salem, OR Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR' Whelton Ditch, OR Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR7 Bear Creek, Medford, OR' Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR' Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR' Deschutes River, Bend, OR2 John Day River (West), OR' Johnson Creek, OR McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR' McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Miami River, OR' Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR2 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR' Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR' Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR9 (a) Riverside Area Units (b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR9 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 Rogue River, OR' Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA' Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR' Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Sumner Parker Airport, OR' Trask River, Tillamook County, OR' Tualatin, OR Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR' Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR' Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR West Makinster Rd., Wilson River, OR' Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR' Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1964 1961 1967 1954 1966 1981 1971 1973 1964 1960 1993 1967 1950 1967 1957 1959 1952 1982 1988 1986 1981 1985 1966 1948 1955 1952 1960 1959 1960 1939 1971 1960 1985 1961 1984 1985 1985 1952 1952 1986 1,499,186 35,265 593,945 154,012 5 674,137 889,391 48,619 1,803,488 162,500 1,214,300 6 175,800 '4 276,700 39,624 23,439 23,050 106,198 104,921 182,655 42,761 70,845 8 1,307,216 22,963 106,250 13 127,800 170,245 29,500 148,358 15,321 118,433 55,007 55,189 11,690 16,000 9,100 267,748 161,540 143,263 968,716 'to 86,230 288,447 435,000 '12 215,939 176,351 92,500 121,273 1,803,094 33,835 154,600 428,881 45,677 176,000 30,000 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 3. Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act Funds 4. Excludes $25,000 contributed funds 5. Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs project constructed by local interests. 6. Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 7. Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L. 80-85. See FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887 8. Excludes $2,520 contributed funds 9. Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974 10. Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 Government furnished sheet steel pile. 11. Includes $254,642 contributed funds. 12. Includes $185,000 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $5,822 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $31,031 contributed funds. 37-40 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Completed 1969 185,000 Bonneville, OR TABLE 37-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR 1977 Bachelor Island, WA 1977 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 11,595 Cascadia Lake, OR 1987 954,114 Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 4,472 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR 1978 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR 1987 Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 21,352 Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR 1977 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1960 1970 6,819 Deer Island Drainage District, OR 1987 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 Ferguson Creek Long Tom River, Or 1978 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1977 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR 1977 Gate Creek Lake, OR 1987 745,001 2 Holley Lake, OR 1963 1987 241,992 3 John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 John Day River, OR 1974 1974 210,220 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 Lake River Delta Area, WA 1977 Lewis River Area, WA 1978 Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR 1977 Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR 1987 9,000 Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, Or 1967 1987 39,624 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 Soap Creek, WA 1977 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR 1978 Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24,145 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR 1987 4,000 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR 1958 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 Wiley Creek Lake, OR 1960 112,000 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portions) 1987 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR 1961 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 1948 1987 142,883 1. Excludes Pro-rata share of $112,000 for Sweet Home Reservoir. 3. Excludes $100,000 preauthorization study costs. 2. Excludes Pro-rata share of $95,000 for Quartz Creek Reservoir 37-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 37-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1994 (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 28,349,304 325,296,273 353,645,577 Public Works 446,296 14,414 460,710 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 28,934,049 325,409,355 354,343,404 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 442,928 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 29,600,003 325,433,675 355,033,678 TABLE 37-I NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (SEE SECTION 13 OF TEXT) Fiscal Year Costs Federal Non-Federal Total Channels and Harbors (Section 107) Coquille River, Bandon, OR3 1,769 1,769 Columbia River, Vancouver, WA4 166,285 477 166,762 Newport, OR' 33,692 13,650 47,342 Port of Gold Beach, OR' 64 64 Westport, OR- Puget Island, WA4 168,130 17,728 185,858 Yaquina River, Port of Toledo, OR' 513 513 TOTAL Channels and Harbors 370,453 31,855 402,308 Mitigation of Shore Damages (Section 111) Siuslaw River Near Florence, OR' 66 66 Umpqua River, Winchester Bay, OR3 91,124 91,124 TOTAL Mitigation of Shore Damages 91,190 91,190 1.Reconnaissance Study 4.Construction Funds 2.Feasibility Report 5.Construction Completed 3.Plans and Specifications TABLE 37-J PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 15 OF TEXT) Project Date Survey Conducted Depoe Bay, OR Nov 1993 Columbia River, Chinook, WA Nov 1993 / May 1994 Columbia River above The Dalles, OR & WA Jan 1994 Skamokawa Creek, WA Oct 1993 Tillamook, OR Nov 1993 / Jun/Jul/Aug 1994 Yaquina River, OR Apr 1994 Willamette River, OR Mar 1994 37-42 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-K WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (SEE SECTION 22 OF TEXT) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet' Lift of each lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22,5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet 2 Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price $375,000 1. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland of water, is at upper end of canal basin. Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland 2. A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 General Electric Co. to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, 3. The dam is owned by private parties. which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for TABLE 37-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (SEE SECTION 33 OF TEXT) Fiscal Year Costs Federal Non-Federal Total Flood Control (Section 205) Beaver Slough, OR' 7,198 7,198 Nehalem River, Sunset Drainage District, OR' 94 94 Mill Creek, OR' 2,500 2,500 Peninsula Drainage District #1, OR4 102,903 67,459 107,362 Pringle Creek, OR' 6 6 Spring Creek, Rockaway, OR' 2,566 2,566 Tillamook River, OR' 6,520 6,520 Umatilla River Water District, OR' 185 185 TOTAL Flood Control 121,972 67,459 189,431 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) Rogue River, Grants Pass, OR' 33,207 33,207 Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR 39.794 49.705 89.499 TOTAL Emergency Bank Protection 73,001 49,705 122,706 Project Modification for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135) Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River, OR4 -56,399 52,666 -3,733 Fern Ridge Lake Marsh Restoration, OR' 2,303 2,303 Coos Bay Western Snowy Plover, OR' 16,858 16,858 Rogue River Fisheries Habitat, OR' 2,500 2,500 Amazon Creek Wetlands, OR' 4,672 4,672 Initial Appraisals' 4.499 4.499 TOTAL Project Modification for Improvement of Environment -25,567 52,666 27,099 1.Reconnaissance Study 4.Construction Funds 2.Feasibility Report 5.Construction Completed 3.Plans and Specifications 37-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 37-M FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Date of Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Peak Inflow Cu. FtJSec. Acre/feet 26. Applegate Lake, OR Dec 19, 1993 1,100 1,170 27. Blue River Lake, OR Jan 2, 1994 4,040 3,900 28. Cottage Grove Lake, OR Jan 4, 1994 780 260 46. Cougar Lake, OR Jan 3, 1994 3,450 9,980 47. Detroit Lake, OR Jan 3, 1994 12,300 35,590 29. Dorena Lake, OR Jan 3, 1994 2,770 1,340 31. Fall Creek Lake, OR Jan 6, 1994 2,390 1,610 32. Fern Ridge Lake, OR Jan 4, 1994 1,500 310 48. Foster Lake, OR Jan 5, 1994 8,960 1,990 48. Green Peter Lake, OR Jan 3, 1994 10,660 31,820 49. Hills Creek Lake, OR Jan 3, 1994 3,190 6,690 51. Lookout Point Lake, OR Jan 6, 1994 10,180 65,510 52. Lost Creek Lake, OR Feb 27, 1994 2,500 27,090 TABLE 37-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam OR and WA -- Lake Bonneville (See Section 42 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK (NEW) Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Open to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Elevation(Normal)(Above Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length (First Powerhouse) Length (Second Powerhouse) Width (First Powerhouse) Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) (First Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock)(Second Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators (First Powerhouse) Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed 86 Feet 675 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 19 Feet Andesite March 1993 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 CFS 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet Pool 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 Feet 190 Feet 235 Feet 190 Feet 200 Feet 1 @ 5,000 kw 1 @ 48,000 kw 1 @ 59,500 kw 8 @ 60,000 kw each 8 @ 66,500 kw each 2 @ 13,100 kw each 1,145,700 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute 37-44 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-N (Continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA -- Lake Umatilla (See Section 50 of Text) The Dalles Lock and Dam, OR and WA -- Lake Celilo (See Section 53 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area At Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened To Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units 86 Feet 669 feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Feet Tainter 50 ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 268-257 Feet 276 Feet 500,000 Ac.-ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each 37-45 SEATTLE, WA, DISTRICT * This District comprises Washington State except south- tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and ary to Cape Disappointment, and to the Columbia River northwestern Montana, embraced in drainage basins above Yakima River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA ......................... 38-1 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA ....................... 38-2 3. Ediz Hook, WA ..................................... 38-2 4. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA ...... 38-3 5. Friday Harbor, WA ..................................... 38-3 6. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA ........... 38-3 7. Lake Crockett, WA .................................. 38-4 8. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA.................... 38-5 9. Navigation Work under Special Authorization 38-5 10. Olympia Harbor, WA ........................................ 38-5 11. Project Condition Surveys .............................. 38-6 12. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA .... 38-6 13. Quillayute River, W A......................................... 38-6 14. Seattle Harbor, WA.................................. 38-6 15. Swinomish Channel, WA ................................ 38-7 16. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA................................ ...... ...... ........3..8..- 7 Beach Erosion Control 17. Beach Erosion Work under Special Authorization ...................................................... 38-8 18. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA ................... 38-8 Flood Control 19. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA..................................... 38-8 20. Clallam Bay at Sekiu, Clallam County, WA .... 38-9 21. Flathead River near Kalispell, MT ................ 38-9 22. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization .................................. .... 38-9 23. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA ............................ 38-9 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................................... 38-10 25. La Conner, WA ........................................ 38-10 26. Mud Mountain Dam, WA.............................. 38-10 27. Sammamish River Restoration, WA ............... 38-10 28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ..................................... 38-11 29. Stillaguamish, River, WA ................... 38-11 30. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA ................... 38-11 31. Wynoochee Lake, WA.................................... 38-11 Multiple Purpose Power 32. Albeni Falls Dam, ID .................................... 38-12 33. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA.. 38-12 34. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT ............. 38-12 Miscellaneous 35. Miscellaneous Work under Special Authorization ..................................... ... 38-13 General Investigations 36. Surveys ........................................ 38-13 37. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................ 38-14 38. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ....... 38-14 Tables Table 38-A Cost & Financial Statement ............. 38-15 Table 38-B Authorizing Legislation ............... 38-2-1 Table 38-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........... ....................... 38-26 Table 38-D Not Applicable Table 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................................. 38-27 Table 38-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Power Projects ................... 38-29 Table 38-G Deauthorized Projects ..... ............ 38-30 Table 38-H Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA Principal Features of Double Lock and Dam .................................. 38-30 Table 38-I Project Conditions Surveys ........... 38-31 Table 38-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 ... 38-31 Table 38-K Emergency Flood Control Activities - Public Law 99, 84th Congress ....... 38-31 Navigation north of Seattle. The main harbor is on Guemes Chan- 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA nel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18427.) Location. On northern point of Fidalgo Island in Puget Existing project. Channel in Capsante Waterway, 12 Sound, 17 miles south of Bellingham, WA, and 64 miles feet deep and 150 to 250 feet wide, between east side of -38-1- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 Q Avenue and deep water in Fidalgo Bay, a distance of 2,850 feet; a mooring basin 12 feet deep, 570 feet wide, and 960 feet long adjacent to north side of Capsante Waterway, protected by two pile breakwaters, each 470 feet long, east and southeast of basin; and a navigation channel 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide, extending 5,180 feet from deep water in Guemes Channel to the west shore of Fidalgo Bay (construction under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C). Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is about 15.5 feet. Project was completed in January 1977. Extensions completed in December 1964 increased lengths of both breakwaters to 470'. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1977.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 piers and wharves in the Port of Anacortes; 15 on Guemes Channel, 3 on Capsante Waterway, and 7 on Fidalgo Bay. Three wharves on Guemes Channel are open for public use; of these, one is publicly owned and operated and used for handling general cargo in foreign and domestic trade. In addition, two wharves are used for ferries plying to the San Juan Islands and to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Both are publicly owned and operated. Two of the wharves on Capsante Waterway and basin are publicly owned and operated and used for receiving petroleum products, and as a moorage for fishing and pleasure craft. All other wharves are used for general industrial purposes. In addition, there are two oil-refinery wharves located to the south of Capsante Waterway that are privately owned and operated and used for handling petroleum products in foreign and domestic trade. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with Port of Anacortes, city of Anacortes, and navigation users. Coordination included a Memorandum of Agreement and local Port of Anacortes contributions of $349,000 for added cost to rehandle and place 100,000 cubic yards of sandy dredged material from Swinomish Channel to a Port redevelopment site. Dredged resource will be used for preloading and grading purposes. Channel condition survey was conducted. 2. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep for inner 750 feet; I & J Street Waterway, a channel 100 feet wide and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water for a distance of 3,200 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek basin to 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway by construction and maintenance of two sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length of 5,400 feet, including maintenance of minimum depths of 12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 16 feet.The small-boat basin expansion from 3,900 feet to 5,400 feet at Squalicum Creek Waterway and channel at I & J Street Waterway were constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction costs for these features are recorded in Table 38-C. Project was completed in October 1980. (For further details see Annual Report for 1981. For details relating to previous project see page 797 of Annual Report for 1907.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-2 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Of the forty wharves and piers in Bellingham Harbor, 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway; 3 on Squalicum Creek Waterway; 3 on I&J Street Waterway; and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly owned and operated and is suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. There is one publicly owned terminal and small-boat harbor with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted. Routine coordination with Port of Bellingham and navigation users. Approval of two feet of advance maintenance dredging was obtained from higher authority for Squalicum Creek Waterway. 3. EDIZ HOOK, WA Location. Ediz Hook and the city of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, WA, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18468.) Existing project. Provides for about 16,400 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and periodic nourishment. Project was completed in October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Of the 27 waterfront facilities at Port Angeles Harbor, 3 are located along the inner side of Ediz Hook. Functional uses of the piers include plac- -38-2- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT ing logs into water from trucks for shipment by rafting; mooring harbor pilot boats; mooring U. S. Coast Guard vessels, Naval Reserve vessels, and occasionally, oceanographic research vessels; and fueling government vessels. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Inspection and coordination with local sponsor. 4. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18443.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23rd Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. Project was completed in April 1963. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with four berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. A portion of the East Waterway has been deepened and modified by the U.S. Navy for a Homeport. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Aerial survey of the Jetty Island habitat development site was performed. The city of Everett initiated a dredged material disposal plan with funding provided by the Port of Everett and Washington State Department of Ecology. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging contract for the Snohomish River channel and downstream settling basin was completed at a total cost of $1,484,695, $504,722 of which was funded by EPA for beneficial use of the dredged material resource to cap an EPA Superfund site at Eagle Harbor in Puget Sound. 5. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. San Juan Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan Island County seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) Existing project. 1,600-foot concrete breakwater to protect the existing port facilities and to allow the Port of Friday Harbor to provide 294 additional permanent moorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. Construction was completed in March 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with the Port of Friday Harbor, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. Conducted an annual inspection of the breakwater. The inspection confirmed that inappropriate commercial fish net storage on breakwater section "A" has been discontinued. 6. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project (including navigation improvements to date). Provides for an entrance channel across the bar and through entrance 600 to 1000 feet wide and 38 to 46 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, both at an elevation of 16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 36 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning Sbasin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; protection of Point Chehalis for an -38-3- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 exposed length of about 7,500 feet; and removal of 350- foot southwestern extension of the breakwater, replacing it with an 865-foot northeastern extension, and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the southerly entrance, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). Project was completed in 1981. Rehabilitation of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in October 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1981. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Improved project. Authorized by Section 202 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Project construction was started in April 1990. Completed project features are: deepen and widen 20 miles of existing 30- foot channel across ocean bar (46 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide), through the harbor entrance (46-38 feet deep and 1,000-600 feet wide), through South to Cow Point Reaches (36 feet deep and 350 feet wide); expand and deepen Cow Point turning basin; deepen two downstream local berths; and construct fish and crab mitigation. Remaining project features are: deepen and widen 3.5 miles of existing 30-foot river channel (36 feet deep and 300-250 feet wide); expand Elliott Slough turning basin; deepen two upstream local berths; improve navigation aids; modify Union Pacific Railroad bridge; modify highway bridge fendering; remove two old highway bridge piers; and relocate utility lines. Construction is estimated for completion no earlier than 1998, pending resolution of issues affecting the railroad bridge. Estimated project cost is $68,700,000 ($43,000,000 Federal; $25,700,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation Agreement with Port of Grays Harbor, local sponsor for improvement project, was executed on February 16, 1990. The Port is contributing 25-35 percent of improved project cost. In complying with terms of local cooperation, the Port is required to furnish lands and diked disposal areas and assure relocation of utility lines. Terminal facilities. There are 23 waterfront facilities.( piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which five are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade, they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, woodchips, conventional and containerized general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring company-owned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government-owned vessels. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Grays Harbor and Olympia, WA, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Supervised crab mitigation monitoring. Discontinued preparation of plans and specifications for railroad bridge modification, pending resolution by local interests of issues affecting replacement of railroad bridge end trusses and approach trestles. Coordinated with Port of Grays Harbor (local sponsor), resource agencies, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern Railroad, and Weyerhaeuser Company. New work, contract: A-E contracts covered crab utilization of mitigation sites. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredge Yaquina dredged in South Reach in May 1994, testing a device to reduce the entrainment of dungeness crab. 129,577 cubic yards were dredged at a cost of $456,630. The Corps hopper dredge Essayons was mobilized to dredge a shoal off terminal 4 at Cow Point, dredging 126,000 cubic yards in August 1994 at a cost of $282,000. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the inner harbor by clamshell was completed at a cost of $1,383,627 with 762,108 cubic yards of material being removed. The outer harbor was dredged by hopper contract at a cost of $1,700,287 with 996,657 cubic yards of material being removed. Beneficial uses of the dredged outer harbor sands included placement of 101,325 cubic yards and 276,594 cubic yards on offshore berms at Half Moon Bay and South Beach, respectively, to help reduce erosion adjacent to the south jetty. Crab mitigation for the incremental increase in crab entrainment due to the higher post-improvement channel maintenance dredging volume was completed in May 1994. This was accomplished by spreading 4,500 cubic yards of oyster shell over 10 acres to create enhanced crab habitat. A contract was awarded in September 1994 to fill up to 600,000 cubic yards of sand into a breached land spit adjacent to the south jetty at bid price of $3,730,000. 7. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. The lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett with an area of about 6 acres and 25 feet deep at mean lower low water, connected with Admiralty Bay by a channel of the same depth and 200 feet wide, protected by a breakwater; and navigation improvement by dredging, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C (Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet). The diurnal tidal range in Admiralty Bay is 8.4 feet and the extreme range is about 16.5 feet. Project was completed in March 1993. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1993.) Recreational facilities at project under costsharing agreement with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission include the following construction and improvements: construct a 35-unit camping loop -38-4- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT and restroom, new boat ramp handling facility, breakwater, a restroom in the day-use area and porto-potti dumps for boats; and expand day-use facility and add riprap at the construction site. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and privately owned passenger and automobile ferry landing within the dredged basin is open for public use, and is adequate for existing commercial traffic. The basin contains two publicly owned boat ramps open for public use. The ramps are adequate for recreational craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted during the year. 8. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam from gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is 24 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, WA) are set forth in Table 38-H. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The eight waterfront facilities at Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, marine repair, drydocking; outfitting, mooring fishing vessels and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, conducting 17,651 lockings, passing 12,648 commercial vessels, 56,163 pleasure vessels, and 1,999,970 tons of commerce. The fishladder passed more than 150,000 fish and there were 938,723 project visitors. Maintenance, contract: Contract for repair of the large lock upstream service and guard gates was fiscally completed with final costs of $4,070,635. Other contracts completed during the fiscal year included: reroof 3 buildings and the boat house ($157,101), modify control tower and operating houses ($163,024), repair visitor center ($133,463), install east boundary fence ($26,498). Contract for repair of Stoney Gate valve #2 continued. Contract for upgrading the Cavanaugh House was awarded. 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Anacortes Harbor, WA, $0 (Terminated); Nahcotta, WA, $9,570; Neah Bay, WA, $46,485; Seabeck Marina, Hood Canal, WA, $0 (Terminated); and Tokeland, WA, $9,942, a total of $65,997. In addition, $67,584 contributed funds were expended for Neah Bay, WA. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $1,801 at Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA, (Terminated). 10. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Location. Near southern end of Puget Sound at head of Budd Inlet, about 45 miles southwest of Tacoma. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6462.) Existing project. Provides for a channel between deep water in Budd Inlet and port terminal, 30 feet deep at mean lower low water and 500 feet wide, with suitable additional width at bend; a turning basin adjacent to port terminal 30 feet deep, 3,350 feet long, and 500 to 960 feet wide; and construction of a 656-foot concrete floating breakwater and dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C (East Bay Small Boat Basin). Extreme tidal range is 22.5 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.4 feet. Existing project was completed in 1985. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1369 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1873 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five port facilities are located in Olympia at Budd Inlet, exclusive of the numerous waterfront facilities in the ports used by recreational craft. The industrial docks are used for conventional general cargo, logs, timber products and miscellaneous mooring. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Grays Harbor and Olympia, WA, revised 1983.) -38-5- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination. Performed continuous water quality monitoring at East Bay Marina during the seasonal periods of poor water quality. A surface inspection of the floating concrete breakwater confirmed the breakwater and anchor pile system to be in good condition. 11. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Hydrographic surveys and inspections to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, and channels, not funded on a project basis for the current fiscal year. Soundings and visual inspections in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Hydrographic charts are prepared and distributed. Costs for the fiscal year were $99,255. Total costs to date are $3,343,919. (See Table 38-I.) 12. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Location. Puget Sound is in the western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18441, and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with the U.S. Coast Guard and city of Seattle, of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting large pieces of drift, waterlogged pilings, logs and other debris considered hazardous to navigation from Puget Sound and Federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett and Bellingham are cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in their harbors and setting up collection sites for our debris vessel. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The debris vessel Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters and removed approximately 3,100 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Snohomish River (upstream to town of Snohomish), Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. Maintenance, contract: 1,900 tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $142,000. Contractor continues to recycle much of the debris, reducing the cost of disposal by contract. Remainder of debris is placed in a demolition landfill or recycled through other Government agencies. 13. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth, and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; (b) channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; (c) basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel; and (d) maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The spit is nourished with dredged material in conjunction with channel dredging. The spit was rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, and in 1982. In addition, a 500-foot breakwater section paralleling the channel and extending the spit was constructed. Project was completed in February 1960. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Project sponsorship was transferred from the Port of Port Angeles to the Quileute Tribe Port Authority in 1983. Terminal facilities. There are 3 privately-owned docks at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. In addition, there is a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of the river channel. A Design Memorandum was prepared for maintenance of the coastal structures of the project. 14. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay, the 30-foot by 200-foot wide channel from West Waterway to 1st Avenue South Bridge, and the 20-foot by 150- foot-wide channel from 1st Avenue South Bridge to 8th Avenue; dredging Duwamish Waterway 150 feet by 15 feet from 8th Avenue to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep at the upper end of the waterway; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end -38-6- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions. Total length of all waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding maintenance of East Waterway above the 750- foot section. Turning basin, constructed under authority of R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925, in 20-foot deep waterway was deauthorized by P.L. 99-662 dated Nov. 17, 1986 (see Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 31, 1985). (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local sponsor has no maintenance responsibility. Terminal facilities. There are 196 piers, wharves, and docks located on the inner and outer harbors at Seattle, WA. Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine repair/outfitting/ drydocking/conversion, shipbuilding, handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company-owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft are not included. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys made of channels. Maintenance, contract: In February/March 1994, 57,243 cubic yards of material was dredged from the upper waterway at a cost of $145,445. Disposal of 44,106 cubic yards was at the Elliott Bay open water site. The balance was used to cap 4 acres of contaminated bottom sediment in Elliott Bay. Seattle District cooperated with the Port of Seattle on the capping project. 15. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the-Wall". Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharvls, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but three of which are privately owned. Of these, one is used for handling general cargo, five are used exclusively for moorage, unloading and servicing of fishing vessels; two are used for handling petroleum products; three facilities are used for log dumps; and two for handling non-metallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination with Port of Skagit County, Port ofAnacortes, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. Channel condition surveys were conducted. Sediment characterization tests confirmed that Swinomish Channel sediments are very clean and suitable for open water disposal. The beneficial use alternative of placing 100,000 cubic yards of shoal material from Swinomish Channel on a Port of Anacortes upland development site was successfully coordinated. 16. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; (b) channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; (c) channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram Lumber Mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; (d) channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; (e) mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; (f) entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and (g) removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and -38-7- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay Center, and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels. One of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 that are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The frequency of condition surveys on the Willapa bar channel was increased at the request of the U.S. Coast Guard. The alignment of the Willapa bar thalweg continues to be a problem for safe navigation. Beach Erosion Control 17. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Lummi Shore Road, WA, $43,798. In addition, $1,038 contributed funds were expended. 18. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA Location. Project is located within the city of Seattle, at Williams Point, and adjacent to the East Passage of Puget Sound. Existing project. Initial beach nourishment consisted of the placement of 34,000 tons of sand, gravel, and cobble fill seaward of the existing seawall, a distance of 2,300 feet along the southwest beach. 250 feet of rock revetment, at Williams Point, consisting of 2 layers of 1,500- pound to 4,000-pound armor rock were placed on a 2- foot thick filter bed of quarry spalls. The revetment is fronted by 2,000 tons of gravel and cobble fill, with the same top elevation, slope and seaward extent as the beach nourishment on the southwest beach. Periodic beach nourishment, consisting of placement of beach material to replenish the erosion loss approximately every 5 years, is an authorized part of the construction project. Monitoring of beach nourishment consists of initial and periodic profile surveys, estimates of alongshore/offshore volumes of material, periodic beach sediment sampling, and pre- and post- construction environmental monitoring. Initial construction was completed in December 1988. The first periodic nourishment is scheduled for October and November 1994. Local cooperation. Cost-sharing requirements for the local sponsor (city of Seattle) is to provide 35% of total project cost including the cost of periodic nourishment and surveillance. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 15, 1988. Amendment No. 1 to the LCA for the periodic nourishment and surveillance was executed in early December 1993. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Continued post-construction monitoring, produced plans and specifications, and concluded all work to produce a supplement to the Environmental Assessment and Amendment No. 1 to the LCA. Flood Control 19. CHEHALIS RIVER AT SOUTH ABERDEEN AND COSMOPOLIS, WA Location. The Chehalis River, about 125 miles in length, rises in the Willapa Hills in west central Washington, flows east, then north and finally west to Grays Harbor on the coast. The cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis are located at the mouth of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County. The project is located on the left river bank (south side) in Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Aberdeen, WA, 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement, authorized in P.L. 99-662, as refined in the plans and specifications, would provide standard project flood protection for most of the left bank flood plain (1,176 acres) at the mouth of the Chehalis River in the cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. The improvement would include segments of earthen embankment levee (2.0 miles) and steel sheetpile floodwall (1.1 miles), joining areas of high ground (1.2 miles). The project roughly follows the left bank of the Chehalis River from Devonshire Slough to Cosmopolis. Tide gates will be provided where existing drainage channels cross the project alignment. Closure gates will be provided to maintain road and rail access through the levee system. Estimated project cost is $14,300,000 ($10,700,000 Federal and $3,600,000 non- Federal). Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing re- -38-8- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT quirements, the local sponsor (city of Aberdeen assisted by the city of Cosmopolis) will pay a minimum of 25% of project costs. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed March 1, 1994. The local sponsor will provide operation and maintenance of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specifications, executed Project Cooperation Agreement, and local sponsor continued land acquisition activities and performed relocations. All work is scheduled for completion in September 1996. 20. CLALLAM BAY AT SEKIU, CLALLAM COUNTY, WA Location: Clallam Bay is located along the Strait of Juan de Fuca, about 40 miles west of Port Angeles, WA, and 25 miles from the Pacific Ocean. Project area lies along the western side of Clallam Bay next to the town of Sekiu. Existing project. The project consists of a 400-footlong rubble mound revetment to protect the Clallam County Waste Water Treatment Works at Sekiu. Work was accomplished by placing quarry spall fill and rock protection at a lV to 2H slope to stabilize the existing embankment. Estimated total cost is $220,000 ($165,000 Federal and $55,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Clallam County) is responsible for 25% of project costs, including real estate. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 16, 1993. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Prepared plans and specifications and advertised for contract work. New work, contract: Construction of revetment is being accomplished by equipment rental. All work is scheduled for completion in October 1994. 21. FLATHEAD RIVER, NEAR KALISPELL, MT Location. The project lies within north-western Montana in Flathead County. It includes the Flathead River flood plain from Badrock Canyon downstream about 40 river miles to Flathead Lake. Existing project. The project consists of nonstructural work to develop the following products: (1) a flood information brochure which will alert flood plain residents to the flooding danger within the area; (2) flood information videos which can be used by county officials to reinforce the message in the brochure; (3) a flood warning map which will describe the magnitude of flooding in a "phased" approach; and (4) a flood monitoring system (based on the best possible use of existing gages and a new upstream gage) which can be used to make predictions concerning when the flood will strike and how great it will be. Estimated total cost is $60,000 ($45,000 Federal and $15,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Flathead County) will pay 25% of project costs. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on September 1, 1994. The local sponsor will provide operation and maintenance of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed feasibility phase, initiated and completed plans and specifications, and initiated a contract for the work on September 30, 1994. All work is scheduled for completion in January 1995. 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Clallam Bay at Sekiu, Clallam County, WA, (under construction); Fox Island at Hale Passage, WA, $19,999; Lummi Shore Road, Whatcom County, WA, $25,359; Murden Cove, WA, $19,941; Stillaguamish River (North Fork), Darrington, WA, $8,765, a total of $74,064. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See Table 38-J. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation.) See Table 38-K. 23. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, WA.") Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Improvement is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, ditches, powerline, and other project features. Stilling basin in- -38-9- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 spection was accomplished. Work continued on water quality and sediment surveys. A reconnaissance report for strengthening the intake tower for seismic stability was completed. Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: Completed dam safety assurance program evaluation report and initiated plans and specifications for seismic strengthening of outlet works intake tower. New work, contract: Contract for exploratory drilling was awarded. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests, and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year, inspections were made on Yakima River at Yakima, American Lake near Tacoma, Dungeness River at Sequim, Shelton Creek at Shelton, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers at Startup, Elwha River near Port Angeles, Green River at Tukwila, and Sammamish River in Washington state; Coeur d'Alene, St. Maries and Placer Creek projects in Idaho; and, Clark Fork River at Missoula in Montana. Fiscal year costs were $63,980. Costs to date have been $1,212,487. 25. LA CONNER, WA Location. The project is located on the eastern bank of the Swinomish Slough, in the town of La Conner, about 64 miles north of Seattle, WA. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, La Conner, WA, 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement involves placement of rock riprap along approximately 1,600 feet of the Swinomish Channel bank in the La Conner Historic District and the repair of approximately 60 piles. Erosion control and repair/ replacement of the damaged piles will prevent erosive loss of the existing overwater buildings. Construction was started in September 1994. Estimated project cost is $1,522,000 ($1,053,000 Federal and $469,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (town of La Conner) will pay 25% of cost for erosion control measures. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed July 7, 1994. Repair of damaged pile and readjustment of existing floats were accomplished in the fiscal year entirely at local cost. The local sponsor will provide operation and maintenance of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specifications and executed the Project Cooperation Agreement. Local sponsor acquired necessary land and assured pile repairs were completed by the building owners. New work, contract: Awarded construction contracts (equipment rental and material supply). All work is scheduled for completion in November 1994. 26. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles upstream and southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, Washington.'") Existing project. Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 432 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Flood control outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled discharge of 17,600 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels with uncontrolled discharge over spillway having maximum capacity of 245,000 cubic feet per second. Improvement affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Project was completed in June 1953, except for recreational facilities. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1953.) To date the Corps has constructed two vistas, a picnic area, a wading pool, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, vista observation deck, recreation area, and fish facilities. Approximately 6,755 fish were transported from the fish collection facility. Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: Supervision and inspection of construction contracts. Continued engineering during construction support for the new reservoir outlet tower and tunnel modifications. Work is scheduled for completion in FY 1995. New work, contract: Work on the contract for construction of a new reservoir outlet tower continued on schedule. Major Rehabilitation. Major rehabilitation work which commenced in FY 1987 was completed in FY 1992. 27. SAMMAMISH RIVER RESTORATION, WA Location. Originates at northern end of Sammamish Lake, 11 miles east of Seattle, WA, and flows northwesterly 15 miles to northern end of Lake Washington, which forms eastern boundary of Seattle. (See Geological Survey quadrangles Bothell, Kirkland, Redmond, and Edmonds, East.) Existing project. Project was constructed by the Corps of Engineers in 1965. It provided for major drainage improvement and partial flood protection by enlarg- -38-10- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT ing the river channel from Sammamish Lake to Lake Washington, increasing depths an average of 5 feet, and increasing widths from an average of about 15 feet to a range of 32 to 50 feet. Modifications, under authority of Section 1135, consist of construction of low flow habitat features, planting of selected trees and shrubs, mechanical removal and regrading of embankment materials, and hydroseeding. Estimated total cost is $460,000 ($345,000 Federal and $115,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (King County) is responsible for 25% of project costs. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on December 23, 1993. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Prepared feasibility report and plans and specifications. Advertised for contract work. New work, contract: Construction work is being accomplished by equipment rental. All work is scheduled for completion in October 1994. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee project, WA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Issues relating to project operations were addressed. Regulation instructions were provided for flood control operations. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. No Lost Valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/ or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $373,118. Total costs to date have been $3,469,277. 29. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey Quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: Revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir (including a fishway) 275 feet long between steel-sheet-pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor to supervise replacement of riprap bank protection along downstream portion of segment 11. Maintenance, contract: Awarded equipment rental contracts to achieve placement of riprap. 30. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA. Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma, WA. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Improvement was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. A real estate design memorandum, approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers on October 2, 1985, changed the project boundary to allow the Port of Tacoma to create a wetland adjacent to the project. This action resulted in the Corps acquiring approximately 2,450 linear feet of setback levee in fee simple. Maintenance funds to cover the increased length of the project have been provided by the Port of Tacoma for the project life. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor to supervise removal of brush and noxious weeds from the entire project along slopes of levee. Coordinated annual clean-up with the Puyallup Tribe and installed 3 access gates. Maintenance, contract: Awarded equipment rental contracts to achieve removal of brush and noxious weeds. 31. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Location. On Wynoochee River, a tributary of Chehalis River, about 28 miles north of Montesano, Grays Harbor County, WA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Grisdale, Wynoochee Valley, and Montesano.) Existing project. Provides for a concrete and earthfill dam, 177 feet high, and reservoir of 70,000 acre-feet of total storage for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and fish and wildlife. Upstream fish facilities were op- -38-11- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 erational in the fall of 1970. The project was completed and became operational in December 1972. Installation of power-generating facilities was not authorized, pending a reexamination report by the Chief of Engineers. In February 1966, the Federal Power Commission asserted that power production as part of the Wynoochee project was not feasible at that time. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1972.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-12 of FY 1981 Annual Report. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 authorized the Secretary of the Army to transfer the Operations, Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation (OMR&R) of the Wynoochee project to the city of Aberdeen. The dam was built on a cost-share basis with the city which paid approximately 46% of the investment and the O&M costs. The legislation relieved the city of the O&M payment when it assumed the OMR&R, to the extent the city personnel does the work. The OMR&R was assumed by city of Aberdeen on July 1, 1990. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Beginning July 1, 1990 the Corps' effort has been limited to quality assurance monitoring and water control assistance in flood control operations. Legislation was enacted which allowed fee title transfer of the Wynoochee Lake project to the city of Aberdeen. Fee title transfer to the city of Aberdeen occurred September 20, 1993. Multiple-Purpose Power 32. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. On Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple-purpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, the river channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acre-feet. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillways, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Contract for annunciator system continued through the fiscal year. Completed contracts included: restroom repair ($122,653), Clark Fork debris facility repair ($95,890), rubber gate seals ($30,706), jet boat ($34,754), and upgrade project roads ($1,276,745). Contracts were awarded for protective generator relays and switchboard panels, bridge crane collector and remote control, standby generator, powerhouse emergency ingress, Clark Fork debris control facility (pile replacement), paint and refurbish cranes, and Clark Fork debris control facility (breakwater). 33. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at River Mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from Town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet, Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 88,274 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,457,384 kilowatts. Work was completed to bring turbine efficiency for units 17-27 up to design standards. Estimated cost of current construction project is $395,700,000, with completion scheduled for FY 1995. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed real estate acquisition. New work, contract: Contracts completed during the fiscal year included project security, data acquisition and control system, and turbine deficiency correction (units 17-27). Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Maintenance, contract: Contracts completed during the fiscal year included: seal spillway pier cracks ($25,000) and boat dock repair ($20,000). Contract for transformer repair continued. Major contracts awarded during the fiscal year included: joint seal replacement for elevation 970 roadway ($117,405), governor oil pump replacement ($485,220), portable generator ($101,125), and 250V battery replacement ($89,190). 34. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai and Columbia Rivers. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood con- -38-12- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT trol protection in Montana 'and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation at-site and at downstream plants through storage release. Project is operated as a unit of comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units.A fifth unit was completed in 1984 with capacity of 105,000 kilowatts, and there is a provision for three additional units. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acre-feet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water-resource development of the Columbia River basin. Construction is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Contracts for cultural resource curation and joint sealant replacement and concrete repair continued throughout the fiscal year. Completed contracts included: underground storage tank removal at project and Murray Springs Fish Hatchery ($56,028), power house HVAC renovation ($179,000), air quality sampling units ($50,173), digital circuit breaker test system ($42,510), and microcomputer monitor and annunciation system ($45,400). Contracts were awarded for unit #3 rewind and gate guide/sluice liner corrosion repair. Libby Additional Units Project. Provides for installation of 4 additional units at the Libby Dam powerhouse. Fabrication of generators for units 5 through 8 is completed; however, only the unit 5 generator was installed. Installation of the electrical equipment was limited to unit 5. Parts for units 6 through 8 have been stored at the site. Project is completed with units 1 through 5 operational. Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. Operations during fiscal year. None. Libby Reregulating Dam Project. Provides for construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam and associated relocation of about 9 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log haul road, 0.5 mile of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 miles of Montana State Highway. Funds were provided for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Congress did not authorize construction of the reregulating dam. Operations during fiscal year. In FY 1982, all work was terminated due to court direction. Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. Provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary Design Report was approved by the Office, Chief of Engineers on March 3, 1981. Miscellaneous 35. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662). Fiscal year costs were: Sammamish River Restoration, WA, (under construction); Wynoochee Anadromous Fish Restoration, WA, $103,359; Initial Appraisals, General, $7,303, a total of $110,662. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298). The program consists of control measures for selected water bodies currently infested with Eurasian watermilfoil and measures to prevent its spread into uninfested waters. Major operations under the cost-share program included mechanical harvesting of 27 acres, maintaining 6 acres of fiberglass bottom screens at Lake Washington, Lake Union and Lake Sammamish, WA; follow up to the chemical treatment of 82 acres with the aquatic herbicide fluridone in Long Lake, WA (inspection, diverhand- pulling, bottom barriers); rotovating 100 acres at Pend Oreille River, WA; harvesting approximately 55 acres at Columbia River, WA; follow up (inspection, diverhand- pulling, bottom barriers) to the chemical treatment of 17 acres at Wallace Lake, WA, and 240 acres at Swofford Pond, WA, with the aquatic herbicide fluridone; and chemically treating 20 acres at Carlisle Lake, WA, with the aquatic herbicide fluridone. The FY 1994 work also included treatment effectiveness and carryover studies, aquatic plant surveys, and public information efforts. Total costs for the fiscal year were $180,988. General Investigations 36. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $91,420 for flood damage prevention studies, $5,533 for special studies, $158,268 for review of authorized projects, $143,423 for miscellaneous activities, and $78,973 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $477,617. In addition, $321,264 contributed funds were expended for review of authorized projects, Howard Hanson Dam Water Storage, WA, and $51,360 contributed funds were expended for coordination with other agencies and non- Federal interests, a total of $372,624. -38-13- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake and Osoyoos Lake Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies and Indian tribes in flood hazard evaluation, flood reduction methods, and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $5,065 for international water studies, $134,225 for flood plain management services, and $5,840 for hydrologic studies, a total of $145,130. In addition, $36,957 contributed funds were expended for flood plain management services. 38. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) was started in FY 1984. General Design Memorandum studies which resulted in design changes providing a significant reduction in project costs while retaining essentially the same flood damage reduction benefits were completed in FY 1990. Preparation of plans and specifications were initiated in February 1992 following passage by the city of Aberdeen of a bond issue to fund the local share of project costs. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included completion of plans and specifications review and the revision of plans and specifications ready for advertising of the construction contract. The local sponsor, city of Aberdeen, continued work on land acquisition activities associated with the project. Work under PED is now concluded. Fiscal year costs were $216,729. Total costs to date have been $2,212,000 which is now included in the Cost and Financial Statement of this report. La Conner, WA Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) was started in FY 1991 to resolve environmental concerns raised during review of the 1989 Decision Document, primarily regarding project impacts on juvenile salmonids. The Draft Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment for the project was submitted in 1991. The project design was modified to include benches in the rock slope to assist fish passage as well as creation of a strip marsh along a portion of the project. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included completion of work on the final Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment, and the preparation of a Project Cooperation Agreement for review. Work under PED is now concluded. Fiscal year costs were $9,246. Total costs to date have been $183,000 which is now included in the Cost and Financial Statement of this report. Other Preconstruction Engineering and Design. Projects Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA Total costs to date have been $1,310,000, including $300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 101(c). Project is inactive. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1989. Centralia, WA Total costs to date have been $1,543,000. Project is inactive. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1993. East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, WA Total costs to date have been $663,000. Project has been deferred. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1988. Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA Total costs to date have been $5,670,000, $3,530,000 of which is now included in Cost and Financial Statement of this report. Project improvement by construction commenced in FY 1990. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1989. Yakima River at Union Gap, WA Total costs to date have been $502,000. Project has been deferred. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1988. -38-14- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Ediz Hook, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 5. Friday Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work. Contrib. Cost Maint Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 260 286 7,000 6,482 - 20,000 44 18,092 222,345 222,345 1 1,176,499 1,174,116 - 59,524 - 59,524 - 5,000 - 5,000 - 1,566,839 - 1,566,839 2 193,300 617,000 282,485 432,040 - 103,000 189,025 31,250 2,376,256 2,303,645 3 - 29,421 - 29,421 - 9,103 - 9,103 - 5,878,740 - 5,878,740 334,000 330,850 35,000 5,182 -30,000 2,869 157 1,501,860 1,501,860 - 385,850 - 385,850 31,800 29,272 -1,831 163,765 159,388 - 1,723,745 - 1,723,745 708,500 816,000 516,000 966,000 606,592 669,147 714,068 1,002,982 12,921,807 12,908,018 - 116,618 - 116,618 - 584,090 - 584,090 - 1,575,500 - 1,575,500 6 - 45,000 - 32,643 12,847 6,000 3,791 79,952 77,679 1,267,881 1,267,881 -38-15- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 6. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 7. Lake Crockett, WA 8. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 10. Olympia Harbor, WA 12. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA 13. Quillayute River, WA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 2,318,000 170,000 1,954,000 3,198,291 1,622,158 1,057,753 447,801 5,156,476 7,754,000 5,501,500 10,270,500 5,092,707 7,802,000 5,356,103 9,945,041 23,591,962 21,997,578 7 119,021,341 118,481,938 8 - 9,592 - 9,592 9 -- 4,606,145 - 4,606,145 396,000 571,000 336,000 150,000 1,202,468 502,831 372,980 146,698 7,500 7,371 69,614 159,000 15,674 212,926 15,000 8,848 6,014,000 5,978,356 to 55,889 55,889 377,990 377,990 " 948,754 942,459 - - - - 4,611,436 - - - - 4,611,436 12 7,239,400 6,393,000 4,960,000 5,790,000 102,432,737 7,220,250 6,135,650 5,208,861 5,618,589 101,977,658 13 - - - - 7,465,230 - - - - 7,465,230 - - - - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 - - - - 337,709 - - - - 337,709 14 9,400 10,400 9,397 6,633 3,795 5,000 3,941 764,177 763,107 15 - - - - 43,337 - - - - 43,337 695,520 890,000 864,000 965,000 22,139,750 697,751 857,511 915,433 915,665 22,078,624 16 - - - - 521,850 - - - - 521,850 17 525,236 524,627 - 520,000 50,000 -325 520,348 44,449 11,589,308 11,583,148 -38-16- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 (Contrib. Funds) 14. Seattle Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Swinomish Channel, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA 20. Clallam Bay at Sekiu Clallam County, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Flathead River, near Kalispell MT 23. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (Federal Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 237,000 681,000 132,000 452,500 231,022 684,210 136,650 436,566 - 41,595 - 41,595 - 35,000 - 32,880 331,700 34,412 31,000 191,000 459,582 34,450 30,084 117,755 20,000 20,000 170,335 170,335 9,941,373 9,923,546 69,333 69,333 96,595 94,475 808,332 808,332 18 7,644,972 7,570,765 - 32,000 -32,000 - 1,386,955 - 1,386,955 19 160,600 52,640 521,000 77,000 163,948 48,240 525,283 62,602 14,452,736 14,438,102 20 78,372 78,372 - - 165,000 -18,891 17,724 128,372 -26 15,170 1,185 - 136,000 - 97,048 163,000 600,000 556,000 1,292,000 116,959 392,502 619,736 573,841 - - 46,000 139,000 - - 43,102 136,260 -- - - 44,000 - - - 37,566 - - - 22,000 - - - 16,283 - - - 60,000 -- - 12,424 887,500 850,311 405,474 366,522 3,504,000 2,569,112 185,000 179,362 44,000 37,566 22,000 16,283 37,108,061 21 37,060,485 22 -38-17- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 Maint. (Contrib. Funds) 25. La Conner, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 26. Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 27. Sammamish River Restoration WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29. Stillaguamish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 31. Wynoochee Lake,WA Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 720,900 842,000 1,364,000 947,000 645,685 717,555 1,467,604 1,033,691 16,270,651 16,241,431 23 - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 123,000 60,000 88,099 47,209 -- 870,000 38,446 364,036 - - - 319,000 - - - 74,412 10,800,000 6,913,000 13,710,000 18,811,000 11,550,063 6,841,950 13,748,724 17,904,166 1,053,000 537,790 319,000 74,412 73,960,848 24 72,867,365 25 1,247,200 1,384,000 1,732,000 1,629,000 28,287,420 1,175,095 1,390,453 1,688,446 1,630,929 28,147,617 26 - - - - 285,908 - - - - 285,908 1,000,000 274,000 1,343,118 409,294 12,468 - 30,437,500 -- 30,437,500 3,928 3,928 - 30,000 - 29,822 -- 280,000 178 276,046 -- 70,000 -- 64,782 283,900 317,000 145,000 161,000 276,385 325,245 141,954 137,861 310,000 306,046 70,000 64,782 134,595 134,595 27 2,865,524 2,838,980 - 21,000 - 21,000 - 3,947,853 - . 3,947,853 28 21,600 33,000 48,000 62,000 22,000 35,646 47,984 61,270 - - - 329 812,367 811,358 54,405 7,336 - 23,494,445 - 23,494,445 29 -38-18- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 Maint Approp. 72,000 369,000 80,000 5,000 17,137,348 Cost 253,823 275,940 169,794 9,350 17,136,958 30 32. Albeni Falls Dam, ID New Work Approp. - - - - 31,741,561 Cost - - - - 31,741,561 31 Maint. Approp. 3,319,700 3,728,000 5,019,000 4,949,700 59,157,470 32 Cost 3,294,401 3,642,283 5,040,072 4,809,100 58,844,576 33 33. Chief Joseph Dam- New Work Rufus Woods Lake, WA Approp. 3,400,000 1,570,000 1,999,000 1,954,000 540,372,235 34 Cost 3,857,685 2,031,600 1,359,623 1,233,919 538,769,899 35 Maint. Approp. 9,947,156 10,009,000 10,254,000 12,186,000 148,948,538 36 Cost 9,872,186 10,010,518 10,072,390 12,324,159 148,581,421 37 Major Rehab. Approp. - - - - 297,630 Cost - - - - 297,630 34. Libby Dam - Lake New Work Koocanusa,MT Approp. - - - - 543,858,440 (Federal Funds) Cost 1,089 60 - - 543,858,440 38 Maint. Approp. 3,851,200 4,405,000 4,674,000 8,809,700 62,810,702 39 Cost 3,851,003 4,318,921 4,729,051 6,099,356 59,857,762 40 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 1,458,252 Cost - - - 1,458,252 41 1. Excludes $2,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 2. Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 3. Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous project. 4. Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 5. Includes $5,869 appropriated and expended for previous project. 6. Includes $1,180,500 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L.98-8). 7. Includes $3,530,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $113,134 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds. 8. Includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $409,660 Emergency Relief funds and $57,000 Public Works Administration funds expended. 9. Excludes $111,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 10. Excludes $3,418,000 contributed by Port of Grays Harbor in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 11. Includes $117,750 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 12. Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $485,002 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $246,567 expended by State of Washington and $742,071 expended by King County. Excludes $192,516 Public Works Administration funds expended. 13. Includes $1,631,195 (1916 to 1936) and $338,163 subsequently appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $32,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-8). 14. Includes $183,257 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $105,467 Public Works Administration funds expended. 15. Includes $14,418 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 16. Includes $64,996 appropriated and expended for previous project. 17. Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. 18. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 19. Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,314 Emergency Relief funds expended. 20. Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration funds expended. 21. Includes $37,048,061 appropriated for original project and $60,000 appropriated for Dam Safety Assurance. 22. Includes $37,048,061 expended for original project and $12,424 expended for Dam Safety Assurance. 23. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $8,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-8). 24. Includes $13,182,063 appropriated for original project, $87,785 appropriated for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $41,880,000 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds. 25. Includes $13,182,063 expended for original project,$87,785 expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $41,693,351 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 -38-19- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 Emergency Relief funds expended. 26. Includes $198,578 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $378,162 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-8). 27. Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration funds and $85,999 Emergency Relief funds expended. 28. Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 29. Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 30. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $27,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-8). 31. Includes $30,769,614 for original project and $971,947 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. Excludes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 32. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($58,020,574), Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($962,120). 33. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($57,707,680), Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($962,120). 34. Includes $144,338,252 appropriated for original project, $395,886,000 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 35. Includes $144,338,252 expended for original project, $394,283,664 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710).. 36. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($148,173,977) and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561). 37. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($147,806,860) and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561). 38. Includes $484,753,143 appropriated and expended for original project,$42,221,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, $475,000 for power planning, and $132,300 for Kelley Flats Airport. 39. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($61,601,278) and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($1,209,424). 40. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($58,648,338) and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($1,209,424). 41. Excludes $161,849 expended by Federal Aviation Agency, $32,000 expended by Lincoln County- City of Libby Joint Airport Board, $8,000 expended by Bonneville Power Administration, and $379,555 expended by U.S. Forest Service. -38-20- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1 ANACORTES HARBOR, WA 2. Channel in Capsante Waterway. Mooring basin. Navigation Channel. Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 . " REHR RW FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Construction of 1,600 feet of concrete floating breakwater. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 9, 1981. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. The 18-foot channel. H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty Rivers and Harbors Committee fixed at 13,734 feet. Doc. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. H. Doc. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. Dredging in bar channel. H. Doc. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. Dredging in bar channel. H. Doc. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of Rivers and Harbors Committee 16 feet above mean lower low water. Doc.2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized H. Doc. 53, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.; by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and Rivers and Harbors Committee combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation P.L. 78-534 facilities. Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays Report in Office, Chief of Engineers Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. Breakwater at Westhaven; protection of Point Chehalis; H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel. -38-21- BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels. Entrance channel in Squalicum Creek Waterway. Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek Basin. Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-foot channel. Channel 3,200 feet long, 100 feet wide, and 18 feet deep in I&J Street Waterway. EDIZ HOOK, WA Construction of 10,000 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment.Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling basin near 14th Street. Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. 3. 4. 5. 6. H. Doc. 1117, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L.86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 31, 1974. H. Doc. 1161, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 187, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 70, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 10, 1976. S. Doc. 46, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 5, 1965. H. Doc. 101, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 14,1960 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 June 26, 1934 ' Aug. 30, 19352 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1956 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 as amended July 13, 1892 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. Westhaven Cove small boat basin. Improve project features with accompanying fish mitigation. Modify existing railroad bridge. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Small-boat basin. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Change authorized channel depth from -18 mean lower low water to -25 mean lower low water by dredging. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Government Locks to be known as Hiram M. Chittenden Locks. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Channel 22-feet deep and 150-feet wide. Increase channel to 26-foot depth on east side of harbor. Elimination from project of 12-foot channel on east and west sides of harbor, and for a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Budd Inlet and port terminal, with turning basin of same depth. Widen outer portion of channel to 500 feet, and widen entrance to turning basin. 656-foot concrete floating breakwater and dredging of entrance and access channels and turning basin. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike on westerly side, to stabilize entrance. Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet long; moorage basin. 3 H. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, P.L.86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 7, 1979. P.L. 99-662 H. Doc. 303, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 78-534 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 7, 1988. H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 78-534 P.L. 84-779 H. Doc. 244, 69th Cong. 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 75, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L.86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 13, 1981. Annual Report for 1893, page 3425 H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. -38-22- 8. 10. 12. 13. 14. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 15. Aug. 30, 1935 July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 30, 1935 4 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 as amended June 30, 1948 as amended May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 Nov. 17, 1986 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVE Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet and minimum width of 500 feet. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Channel from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA 250-foot rock revetment and 2,550 feet of sand and gravel nourishment. Periodic monitoring and replenishing beach nourishment. CHEHALIS RIVER AT SOUTH ABERDEEN AND COSMOPOLIS, WA Construction of storm damage and high tide reduction/ interior drainage. CLALLAM BAY AT SEKIU, CLALLAM COUNTY, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. FLATHEAD RIVER, NEAR KALISPELL, MT Nonstructural work to produce a flood monitoring system. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. LA CONNER, WA Stabilize bank to prevent deterioration and destruction of historical, overwater buildings. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Flood control dam on White River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. SAMMAMISH RIVER RESTORATION, WA Restore fish habitat by providing in-stream wildlife facilities and predator protection. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank revetment at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. P.L. 99-662 S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662 Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 13, 1994. H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 75-761 -38-23- H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report for 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. R, WA H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 18, 1983 P.L. 99-662. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 5, 1994. Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers April 8, 1994. H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 85-592 16. 18. 19. 20. 21. 23. 25. 26. 27. 29. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 31. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Channel improvement to protect people and industrial section of city of Tacoma. Construction, operation, and maintenance of WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Dam and reservoir for water supply, flood control, irrigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Transfer to State of Washington as a part of project costs, $696,000 for construction of fish hatchery facilities. Amend contract between city of Aberdeen and United States for use of storage space, permitting deferral of the major portion of the first 10-year payments. Transfer operation, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (OMR&R) to the city of Aberdeen, WA. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA. 74th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. H. Doc. 601, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 100-676 S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 78-534. June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Nov. 17, 1988 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 as amended May 4, 1977 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 -38-24- 30. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of P.L. 78-534. recreation facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of P.L. 94-587 construction personnel. P.L. 95-26 LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction P.L. 89-789 personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. P.L. 90-239 5 Design standards for relocation of Montana State P.L. 90-483 8 Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, P.L. 91-282 7 operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded P.L. 91-625 by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Design and construction of sewage collection and sewage P.L. 91-611 treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering long-term economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation of S. Doc. 29, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. P.L. 93-251 Construction of fish production measures to compensate P.L. 93-251 for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Acquisition of land (not to exceed $2,000,000) for prevention P.L. 93-251 of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary P.L. 93-251 County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Compensation (not to exceed $1,500,000) to Drainage P.L. 93-251 32. 33. 34. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Oct. 22, 1976 Amends P.L. 93-251 by increasing limitation from $350,000 P.L. 94-587 to $380,000 for reimbursement to Boundary County, II), for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge. Nov. 17, 1988 Alleviate low water impact on existing facilities and protect H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. Indian archeological sites exposed during course of P.L. 100-676 operations, at an estimated cost of $750,000. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 2. Included in Public Works Administration program. 3. Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of James Island, is included in this modification. 4. Included in Emergency Relief program, May 28, 1935. 5. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section 502. 6. Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. 7. River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. -38-25- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and PROJECT Status Report for Construction Maintenance Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA' Completed 1977 825,263 Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway)' Completed .1966 125,634 6 - Blaine Harbor, WA Completed 1958 346,650 - Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA Completed 1923 274,390 " 7,693 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA' Completed 1985 1,619,956 - Edmonds Harbor, WA2 Completed 1987 - 224,756 Flathead River, MT Completed 1901 9,811 - Hammersley Inlet, WA Completed 1950 9,000 10,683 Hoquiam River, WA Completed 1950 18,921 9 5,316 Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA' Completed 1993 946,000 444,329 Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA' Completed 1993 264,000 o10 Kingston Harbor, WA Completed 1967 262,570 " 5,000 12 Kootenai River, ID and MT Completed 1933 9,255 5,643 Mats Mats Bay, WA' Completed 1970 137,679 '3 Neah Bay, WA Completed 1982 2,057,266 1,854,058 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Abandoned 1913 63,879 7,634 Poison Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Completed 1918 4,491 259 Port Angeles Harbor, WA3 Completed 1960 470,873 - Port Gamble Harbor, WA Completed 1953 11,911 4 13,337 Port Orchard Bay, WA4 Completed 1928 42,804 Port Townsend, WA Completed 1987 480,899 15 78,787 Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA' Completed 1985 1,461,590 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA Completed 1962 2,575,091 16 Skagit River, WA Completed 1950 102,330 "7 36,258 Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA' Completed 1981 1,744,025 18 Tacoma Harbor, WA Completed 1992 2,383,891 19 1,537,149 20 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA Completed 1987 73,322 378,378 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA' Completed 1981 2,000,000 21- 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 2. Constructed by local interests at a cost of $415,000. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended for new work. Corps of Engineers is responsible for maintenance. 3. Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 4. No maintenance required. 5. Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. 6. Excludes $2,500 Coast Guard funds expended. 7. Includes $8,005 appropriated and expended for previous project. 8. Excludes $2,184,766 contributed funds expended. 9. Excludes $32,373 Emergency Relief funds expended. 10. Excludes $114,272 contributed funds expended. 11. Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 12. Mitigation of shore damages study. 13. Excludes $28,288 contributed funds and $9,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 14. Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 15. Excludes $92,423 contributed funds expended. 16. Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 17. Includes $2,500 appropriated and expended for previous project. 18. Excludes $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. 19. Includes $159,585 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $51,609 Public Works Administration funds expended and $1,147,208 contributed funds expended. 20. Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $222,500 contributed funds expended. 21. Excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. -38-26- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last *Cost to Sep. 30. 1994 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report for Construction Funds American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA' Completed 1957 59,582 10,000 Bear Creek, Flathead CountyBridge, near Essex, MT2 Completed 1971 1,424 Bitterroot River, Florence, MT 2 Completed 1990 180,950 49,759 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT2 Completed 1964 17,836 - Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA 2 Completed 1981 156,000 - Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA 2 Completed 1981 57,000 - Cedar River, King County, WA3 Completed 1953 3,229 Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Completed 1949 32,264 - Chehalis River, City of ChehalisRaw Water Pumphouse, WA2 Completed 1966 35,454 Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1965 47,916 - Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Completed 1977 140,080 Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 48,698 Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Completed 1981 43,500 - Clark Fork River, near Garrison, MT2 Completed 1993 80,611 16,973 Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT2 Completed 1978 18,660 Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 Completed 1978 31,548 - Clark Fork River, Superior, MT2 Completed 1971 28,357 Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Completed 1950 27,947 Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Completed 1968 50,000 24,728 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1950 49,165 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Completed 1941 152,872 Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Completed 1950 25,452 Coffee Creek, WA3 Completed 1966 15,000 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Completed 1983 384,862 ' 13,500 Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Completed 1959 42,726 Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge near Tumwater, WA2 Completed 1965 26,292 Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Completed 1967 22,956 Dungeness River, Area 5, WA2 Completed 1950 2,155 2,155 Dungeness River, Area 8, WA2 Completed 1950 2,895 2,895 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA' Completed 1964 52,040 s Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Completed 1981 99,000 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1986 47,500 Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Completed 1961 14,093 3,314 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA' Completed 1991 1,455,023 119,449 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1951 17,303 Entiat River, WA3 Completed 1971 49,300 - Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Completed 1978 38,000 Flathead River, MT2 Completed 1972 20,940 Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT2 Completed 1955 26,265 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1948 33,347 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT Deferred 1981 300,000 ' Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1964 13,438 Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT 3 Completed 1950 2,320 Foster Creek, West Fork, WA2 Completed 1958 19,513 - Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA2 Completed 1962 50,000 Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Completed 1972 24,605 - Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Completed 1976 27,001 - Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Completed 1977 37,359 Hoh River, County Road 216, WA2 Completed 1980 143,000 Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 Completed 1980 194,000 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Completed 1956 22,082 21,807 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 Completed 1961 11,916 - Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Completed 1964 41,622 - Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1983 173,000 8 Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 21,083 - Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Completed 1977 59,812 - Hoquiari River, WA2 Completed 1977 52,600 Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA 3 Completed 1962 24,000 -38-27- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1994 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report for Construction Funds Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Completed Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID2 Completed La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Completed Lower Green River, King County, WA' Completed Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Completed Methow River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Completed Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Completed Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Completed Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA2 Completed Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA 2 Completed Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Completed Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Completed Missoula, MT (Sewage Treatment Plant)2 Completed Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Completed Naches River, Naches, WA2 Completed Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA 2 Completed Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Completed Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Completed Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Completed Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA2 Completed Nooksack River, WA 3 Completed Nooksack River, Acme, WA 2 Completed Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Completed Nooksack River, Middle Fork,Deming, WA2 Completed Nooksack River, above Highway 12 Bridge, WA2 Completed Okanogan River, WA2 Completed Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed Okanogan River, Omak, WA ' Completed Okanogan River, Oroville, WA' Completed Pilchuck River, WA3 Completed Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Completed Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Completed Placer Creek, ID Completed Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Completed Puyallup River, WA Completed Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA 2 Completed Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA2 Completed Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Completed Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Completed Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 Completed Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT2 Completed Rock Creek Road, MT2 Completed Rye Creek, MT2 Completed St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID Completed St. Regis River, MT 3 Completed St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT 3 Completed Sammamish River, WA Completed Sauk River, WA2 Completed Sauk River, Skagit County, WA 2 Completed Shelton Creek, WA' Completed Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements) Inactive Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA2 Completed Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 Completed Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Completed Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Completed Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Completed Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1)2 Completed 1950 1965 1979 1993 1974 1974 1974 1976 1949 1951 1951 1972 1965 1977 1982 1991 1972 1948 1960 1952 1948 1985 1950 1986 1960 1974 1949 1953 1981 1982 1948 1985 1971 1980 1971 1986 1964 1937 1977 1981 1972 1981 1961 1974 1973 1980 1973 1942 1942 1951 1967 1974 1989 1979 1982 1949 1966 1980 1980 1963 1966 42,325 14,885 40,525 912,000 15,700 11,200 13,450 19,810 31,783 33,300 11,726 11,836 50,000 17,608 59,000 253,995 24,792 37,636 26,790 19,345 24,006 77,300 6,075 79,000 10,807 10,100 52,100 7,987 2,231,030 1,787,630 25,401 81,000 10,713 54,000 30,973 5,865,000 11,291 50,000 9 86,160 125,000 39,300 208,000 15,928 49,657 31,565 50,000 22,819 357,698 7,234 to 2,983 2,582,536 " 20,860 119,600 872,021 1,934,792 50,000 46,489 93,000 137,000 40,753 17,719 120,518 .=- 6,786 11,726 5,339 78,433 - .=- 6,075 - 4,843 696,923 32,778 =- -. .- -. - -=. - 4,843 -38-28- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep, 30., 1994 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report for Construction Funds Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1)2 Completed 1967 50,000 24,488 Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA2 Completed 1981 222,500 - Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA2 Completed 1969 44,227 - Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA2 Completed 1970 60,900 14,307 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA2 Completed 1977 15,565 - Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1961 16,437 1,960 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Completed 1963 11,433 - Spokane River, Spokane, WA 2 Completed 1989 122,138 79,311 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA1 Completed 1970 271,713 - Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Completed 1964 50,000 46,182 Stillwater River, MT2 Completed 1973 17,457 - Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT2 Completed 1977 34,513 - Strong Creek, Hope, ID 2 Completed 1970 8,442 - Tahola, WA2 Completed 1979 223,893 - Upper Puyallup River, WA' Completed 1938 71,495 12 13,704 Willapa River at Raymond, WA Inactive 1982 508,130 13 Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Completed 1976 111,072 - Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Completed 1969 50,000 21,311 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72)2 Completed 1972 50,000 14 Yakima, Yakima River, WA Completed 1948 381,961 - Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Completed 1949 8,047 - Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA2 Completed 1947 48,272 Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 Completed 1977 36,768 - Yakima River, Yakima WA2 Completed 1983 125,500 15 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 8. Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98- 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 8). Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration funds ex- 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section pended. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. 9. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 10. Excludes amount expended by Works Progress Adminis- 2, Public Law 406, 75th Congress, as amended tration which is not available. 4. Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. 11. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. OP 65-93-917. 12. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 5. Includes $7,850 appropriated and expended for recreation 13. Includes $8,888 expended for restudy, FY 1967.- 1972. facilities at completed project (Code 710). 14. Excludes $17,988 Office of Emergency Planning funds ex- 6. Excludes $340,066 Public Works Acceleration Act funds ex- pended. pended. 15. Includes $118,000 expended under Productive Employment 7. Preconstruction planning only. Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-8). TABLE 38-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,000 1 1. For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquisition of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Congress. Project constructed by Grant County Public Utility District. -38-29- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Calispell Creek, WA' 1968 1968 $25,000 13 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA2 1958 1964 9,000 '13 Entiat River, WA3 1958 1986 - - Methow River, WA3 1958 1986 - - Okanogan River, WA3 1958 1986 1,100 '3 St. Regis River, MT4 1958 1978 1,400 '3 Wenatchee River, WA4 1958 1978 - - Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA 3 1980 1986 44,300 '3 " Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (RH 68)6 1973 1990 52,000 3 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 48) (Unconstructed Portion) 6'7 1962 1990 - - Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 30) 6,8 1933 1990 35,834 $35,834 Hammersley Inlet, WA (RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion)4' 9 1950 1978 - - Hoquiam,Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WA5 1948 1952 83,631 3 Olympia Harbor, WA (RH 45)6 1973 1990 21,606 13.15 Port Angeles Harbor, WA (RH 45)4 1960 1977 - - Port Gamble Harbor, WA) (RH 35)4 1953 1977 -- - Quillayute River, WA(RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion) "1' 1986 1986 - - Seattle Harbor, WA (RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion) 3." 1986 1986 -- Skagit River, WA (RH 10) (Unconstructed Portion) ** 1950 1978 - Skagit River, WA (RH19)4 1950 1978 - Skagit River, WA (Avon Pass)6 1968 1990 54,468 '3 Spokane River, Spokane, WA3 1939 1986 2,944 '3 Stillaguamish River, WA (RH 45)3 1946 1986 4,234 16 Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, WA6 1978 1990 544,331 '3 1. Authority for project expired October 27, 1968. 8. 16 foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano. 2. Authority for project expired July 1964. 9. Deepening shoal area near Cannery Point from 10 to 13 feet. 3. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 10. Dike with groins. dated November 17, 1986. 11. Settling basin at upper end of existing Duwamish Water- 4. Deauthorized under authority of Section 12, P.L. 93-251 dated way, about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge. March 7, 1974. 12. 5500-foot extension of training dike. 5. Authority for project expired in October 1952. 13. Preconstruction planning only. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1001 (b) (1), P.L. 14. Includes $14,300 expended for restudy, FY 1970. 99-662 dated November 17, 1986. 15. Includes $18,700 expended for restudy, FY 1968-1973. 7. 2200 linear feet of revetment at Point Chehalis. 16. Economic restudy only. TABLE 38-H LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (SEE SECTION 8) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 1 l 1'/ Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter sill' Feet 331/2 16 Depth on intermediate miter sil2 Feet 29 Depth on lower miter sil2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway. gated spillway. Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 1. Low water in upper pool. 2. Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. 3. Cost of double lock and dam was $2,382,200 and the emergency gates, completed in 1923, $262,300. -38-30- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 11) TABLE 38-I Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Washington: Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA January 1994 Neah Bay, WA September 1994 Port Townsend, WA June 1994 Tacoma, WA May, August 1994 TABLE 38-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1994) Cedar River, Renton, WA $ 52,992 Horseshoe Bend, WA 25,167 Lake Cavanaugh, WA 10,000 Long Road, F.C. District, Chehalis River, WA 29,429 Nooksack River, Everson, WA 562' Nooksack River, Whatcom County, WA 17 ' Skagit and Samish Rivers, WA 9,632 Skagit River, West Mt. Vernon, WA 32,833 Skykomish River, Index to Monroe, WA 803' Snoqualmie River, WA 4,387 Upper Cedar River, WA 4,869 TOTAL $170,691 1. Terminated. TABLE 38-K EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES REPAIR, FLOOD FIGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK (PUBLIC LAW 99, 84TH CONG., AND ANTECEDENT LEGISLATION) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1994) Disaster Preparedness $450,214 Emergency Operations 9,202 Rehabilitation 0 TOTAL $459,416 -38-31- WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT * This District consists of all Columbia River drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary pool (River Mile 345.4) and the Umatilla Bridge (River Mile 290.5) below McNary Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen Street Bridge (River Mile 8.4) near Richland, WA. The primary tributary drainage area is the Snake River which includes more than 107,000 square miles in six states: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, and small portions of Nevada and Utah. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .. 39-1 Flood Control 2. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects ..................................... 39-1 3. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................................................... 39-2 4. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects . 39-2 5. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works.............. 39-2 6. Jackson Hole, WY ..................................... 39-2 7. Lucky Peak Lake, ID ........................................ 39-3 8. Mill Creek, Bennington Lake, WA ............... 39-3 9. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ..................................... 39-3 10. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA ........................ 39-4 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 11. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program ..................................... 39-4 12. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID ................ 39-5 13. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam- Lake Sacajawea, WA..................................... 39-5 14. Little Goose Lock and Dam- Lake Bryan, WA ..................................... 39-6 15. Lower Granite Lock and Dam - Lower Granite Lake,WA .................................... 39-6 16. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam- Lake Herbert G. West,WA ............................... 39-7 17. Lower Snake River Fish & Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA,OR, ID .................... 39-8 18. McNary Lock and Dam - Lake Wallula, OR and WA .......................... 39-8 19. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID ........................... 39-8 General Investigations 20. Surveys ..................................... 39-9 21. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................. 39-9 22. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ........ 39-9 Tables Tables 39-A Tables 39-B Tables 39-C Tables 39-D Tables 39-E Tables 39-F Tables 39-G Tables 39-H Tables 39-I Tables 39-J Tables 39-K Cost & Financial Statement ........... 39-10 Authorizing Legislation .................. 39-12 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................................ 39-15 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................. ...................... 39-15 Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ............... 39-16 Deauthorized Projects .................. 39-16 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Control Projects ........................... 39-17 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................... 39-17 Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, Powerplant and Impoundment ..... 39-18 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA, and ID ...................... 39-21 Navigation 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. A reconnaissance study was initiated for adding a new barge slip at Port of Walla Walla, Snake River, near Burbank, Washington. Fiscal year costs were $2,931. Flood Control 2. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. -39-1- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 Location. Improvements included in this project are along Columbia River and its tributaries. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for the Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. Of that authorization, an amount not to exceed $15 million was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization would be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, should be required. (See Tables 39-B and 39-H for projects in Walla Walla District.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. No projects were deauthorized during the fiscal year. 3. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $8751 which included Salmon, ID ($3,820); and the Portneuf River at Pocatello, ID ($4,931). Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $270,294 for disaster preparedness, and $9,894 for emergency water supplies and drought assistance. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs were $64,468 including completion of Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA (-$2,965); and continuation of three feasibility studies: the Snake River upstream of Blackfoot, ID ($23,924); Fort Hall Landmark, ID ($25,449) and Willow Creek downstream of LaCrosse, WA ($2,638); and initiation of two feasibility studies: Grande Ronde River, OR ($2,447) and Little Weiser River near Gladhart Lane ($12,975). Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Fiscal year costs of $8,257 for completing two feasibil.- ity studies including Big Lost River upstream of Arco, ID ($7,752); and Little Weiser River upstream of Cambridge, ID ($505). Project modification for the Improvement of the Environment pursuant to Section 1135 (b), Public Law 99-362 as amended. Fiscal year costs were $64,592 including continuation of Jackson Hole Project, WY ($23,349); and initiation of two new feasibility studies: Portneuf River, Pocatello, ID unit restoration ($34,103); Walla Walla River, OR ($2,475); and two new initial appraisal studies: Catherine Creek at Union, OR ($2,500) and Upper Grande Ronde, OR ($2,165). 4. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise local interests as necessary of measures required to correct deficiencies. See Table 39-I for inspections made during the fiscal year. Fiscal year costs were $25,739. Total costs to September 30, 1994 were $2,765,241. 5. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PL-99 WORKS FY 1989 was the last year for expenditures on this program. The program is carried under the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriations. 6. JACKSON HOLE, WY Location. On both banks of the Snake River, Teton County, west of Jackson, Wyoming. Existing project. On the Snake River, approximately 23.5 miles of Federally constructed levees consisting of the following. On the right bank - a series of levees, offset levees, and bank protection structures, all with full riprap protection from 10 miles up-stream of the Jackson- Wilson Bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge, a total of 13.5 miles. The left bank - a series of Federally constructed levees and bank protection structures, all with full riprap protection, extending from 10 miles upstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge to 5 miles upstream and extending 1.5 miles immediately upstream of the same bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge, for a total length of 10 miles. In addition, a series of Federal and non-Federal constructed levees, with a total length of approximately 5 miles, most having some or full riprap protection, are interspersed along both banks of the Snake River from Highway 26 Bridge to 4 miles downstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge. On the Gros Ventre River, approximately 2 miles of riprap protected levees on the left bank from 1.5 miles west of Cattlemen's Bridge and extending to 0.5 miles east of the same bridge. On the right bank, a series of levees extending from 0.5 miles west of Cattlemen's Bridge to approximately 0.3 mile east of the same bridge. Project authorized by Public Law 516, Flood Control Act of 1950 for flood control protection by channel improvements consisting of channel rectification, levees, -39-2- WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT and revetments along the Snake River in the vicinity of Wilson, Wyoming. Public Law 99-662 modified the original Public Law 516 to provide that the operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions to the project become Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors shall pay the initial $35,000 in cash or materials of any such costs expended in any one year, plus inflation as of the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations during fiscal year. This was another low-water year for the upper Snake River. Routine levee maintenance was again performed by Teton County under the Local Cooperative Agreement. There was no bald eagle monitoring this year as project activities were scheduled around the critical eagle nesting period. Work on the NEPA documentation for local levee access roads has continued smoothly and a draft will be out for public review in December. Normal levee repairs were completed in October as was a contract for riprap. Fiscal year costs were $666,406. 7. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Location. On Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of the city of Boise, ID. Existing project. The project includes a rolledearthfill dam about 250 feet high above streambed and 1,700 feet long at crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acrefeet. Project provides for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. (For details, see page 2000 of Annual Report for 1962.) Construction of existing project was initiated November 1949 and completed June 1961. Since 1961, $165,962,000 (adjusted to October 1994 price index) in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. During a detailed study of outlet capacity and potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976. In FY 1978, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget in February 1982. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980 and modified on October 9, 1980 and 1982. Construction of the auxiliary outlet facility began in May 1984 and was completed in August 1986. Construction of modifications to the existing outlet tunnel and powerhouse excavation began in August 1986 and was completed January 1987. Powerhouse general contract construction began in April 1986. The project was completed and dedicated on October 7, 1988. Power on line for all units was on August 18, 1988. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Contract for sanitary facilities at Turner Gulch] Barclay Bay was completed. Normal operation and maintenance, which included the dam structures and recreation areas continued. Federally authorized 2nd outlet was deauthorized FY 1990. 8. MILL CREEK - BENNINGTON LAKE, WA Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of Walla Walla River. Existing project. The project includes an off-stream earthfill storage dam about 125 feet high above streambed and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concretelined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and diversion structures. Project provides for flood control and recreation. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel through the city of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Recreation was added to the project purposes through the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of the channel through city of Walla Walla was completed in 1948. Recreation facilities were completed in 1966. (For details, see page 2005 of Annual Report of 1962.) Since 1942, $12,299,000 (adjusted to October 1994 price index) in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. Rehabilitation of the existing project was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1979. The plan of rehabilitation included action to correct the seepage and internal erosion which have occured during each subsequent filling of the reservoir. A cutoff wall was constructed, but did not alleviate the seepage problem, thus requiring limited flood control use of the project. The seepage and internal erosion create a high vulnerability for dam failure. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. (For details, see page 2006 of Annual Report of 1962.) Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation areas. 9. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulation of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as -39-3- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, Idaho, for flood control were accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $322,350. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 10. ZINTEL CANYON DAM, WA Location. Located near Kennewick, Washington at the mouth of Zintel Canyon in Benton County. Existing project. The project consists of a 90-foot high, roller-compacted concrete detention dam with an uncontrolled spillway and a fixed release outlet works at the mouth of Zintel Canyon, a 78-inch buried conduit (400-cfs capacity), 4,165 feet in length through town, channel improvements, and a culvert under the Burlington Northern Railroad. A flood dike plug across the Union Pacific Railroad protects downtown Kennewick when major flood flows occur. The dam and associated works will provide 100-year protection at the damsite and approximately 50-year protection through the city. The average annual flood damage reduction benefits are $1,040,100. The project was authorized by Public Law 298, 89th Congress-Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was approved by the Assistant Sectretary of the Army (ASA) and signed by the city of Kennewick in July 1991. Funds were appropriated for construction in FY 1991. The project consisted of two parts (1) Channel which was awarded in January 1992 and (2) Dam which was awarded in March 1992. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors, city of Kennewick, Washington cost-shared 25 percent of the total project cost. Current estimated Federal and Non- Federal project cost is $9,700,000. The estimated Federal cost is $7,275,000. Operations during fiscal year. Both channel and dam contracts were completed. Fiscal year costs were $55,748. Total costs to September 1994 were $6,247,008. 11. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM (WALLA WALLA PROJECTS) Location. At Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Dams on the Snake River in the state of Washington and McNary Dam on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric projects on the lower Columbia and Snake Rivers have been identified as a major contributing factor in causing mortality to downstream migrating juvenile salmon and steelhead. Without adequate bypass facilities to guide these juvenile fish away from the power turbines at the dams, mortalities incurred through project passage severely impact the commercial, recreational, and Indian fisheries. The Corps has recognized the need to reduce juvenile mortality and has undertaken bypass measures that include mechanized fish bypass systems with barge and truck transportation. Spill as an additional bypass route over the spillways has been used to divert fish from entering turbine units, but it is a significant adverse economic factor due to lost power revenues. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act (PL 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of funds for the design, testing, and construction of new or improved fish bypass facilities for the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation projects. Completion of the bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the fish mitigation facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The plan of improvement includes the following facilities: (a) Ice Harbor - submerged standard traveling fish screens, intake gate raise, new gantry crane, collection bypass facility; (b) Lower Monumental - submerged standard traveling fish screens, gate raise modification, gantry crane, collection bypass facility, and holding and loading facility; (c) Little Goose - gantry crane modification, gate raise modification, submerged extended fish screens, and holding and loading facilities Phase I and II; (d) Lower Granite - submerged extended fish screens, two fish transport barges, gate raise modification, fish support facility, wet separator, barge moorage facility expansion, and gantry crane modification; (e) McNary - submerged extended fish screens, gantry crane modifications, collection and bypass facilities; transport holding and loading facility, gate raise modification, and extended screen rehab facility; (f) A mitigation study that analyzes long-term alternatives to mitigation for fish losses at Corps dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. The current total estimated full funded Federal project cost is $281,300,000 for the Walla Walla projects. Ice Harbor bypass facilities were not initially authorized for construction under the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. However in FY 1989, Congress authorized expenditures to proceed with design of a bypass system. The mitigation study project was added to the President's FY 1991 budget. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Fabrication was completed on the new gantry crane at Ice Harbor. Design was completed for double length submerged travel- -39-4- WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT ing screens at Little Goose, Lower Granite and McNary dams. Construction was completed on the contract for the collection/bypass and holding/loading facility at McNary Dam. Mitigation study Phase I draft report was completed in April 1994 and final report is scheduled for completion in FY 1995. Final scoping of Phase II is dependent on outcome of Northwest Power Planning Council's (NWPPC) "rule making report" scheduled to be completed in December 1994 and National Marine Fisheries Service recovery plan scheduled for release in January 1995. FY 1994 costs were $27,347,817. Total project costs through FY 1994 are $130,970,413. 12. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. Dam is on North Fork Clearwater River 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and area redevelopment. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 1600 and 1445 Mean Sea Level (MSL). The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acre-feet, of which 2,000,000 acre-feet are effective for both local and regional flood control and for at-site and downstream power generation. In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs. The reservoir is habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. Dam structure is about 3,300 feet long and about 717 feet high above streambed. Fish passage is not feasible due to the height of the dam. A hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of anadromous fish runs. Powerhouse has two 90,000 kilowatt and one 220,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 400,000 kilowatts. Provisions had been made for three additional 220,000 kilowatt generating units for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kilowatts and a reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 200,000 kilowatt fourth generating unit was completed in FY 1978. However, environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public opposition. Unit 4 is undeveloped. Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized FY 1990. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the project started in July 1966, was placed in operation in 1972 and was completed in 1986. Since the project became operational in June 1972, it has prevented about $737,000 (adjusted to October 1994 price index) of potential flood damages. Power generation through September 1994 was 35.13 billion kilowatt hours. Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a picnic table, U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic tables. Dent Acres and Freeman Creek recreation sites are open to the public.' Facilities consist of a boat launching ramp, boat docks, car-trailer parking, comfort stations, and fully developed overnight camping. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Development of wildlife habitat browse continued on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. Work initiated and partially completed on Big Eddy boat ramp extension. During fiscal year, 960 million kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the three generating units. Dworshak National Fish Hatchery (DNFH) operations were again free of IHNV disease in egg incubation and early rearing stages since completion of the hatchery water supply line from Dworshak Reservoir. The 6,500 gpm received from the Clearwater Fish Hatchery line is sufficient to allow eggs and fry to be raised in reservoir water. However, a loss of fish to IHNV followed by Ich disease occurred after fish were moved from the "clean" reservoir supply to the outside ponds on pumped river water. This loss reduced the number of smolts released to 1,823,877 or nearly 500,000 fish below the migration goal of 2,300,000 steelhead. Fish size was on target although lower numbers reduced production to 280,377 pounds as compared to 323,305 in 1993. For 1994 approximately 7.2 million eggs were collected from a return of 3,757 adult steelhead. A total of 2.45 million eyed eggs were shipped to Magic Valley and Clearwater fish hatcheries. DNFH also released 1,302,687 spring chinook weighing 75,386 pounds or nearly three times the production of the previous year. Spring chinook returns to Dworshak for 1994 were only 67 fish as compared to 1993's total of 823. It is anticipated that this year's low return will fill only 10 percent of the hatchery's chinook production capacity. The steelhead return to the Columbia River this year was down significantly from 1993. Only 160,000 were counted in 1994 compared to over 189,000 in 1993. These lower numbers carried over into the Snake River where 45,000 steelhead were counted compared to last year's record run of 73,000 steelhead. 13. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM - LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. On Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula (McNary Reservoir) and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 440 and 435 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Sacajawea extends upstream about 31.9 miles and provides slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. Powerhouse has three 90,000 kilowatt units and three 111,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 603,000 kilowatts. -39-5- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 Spillway dam is 610 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 391 MSL is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provides the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 453 MSL and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 41.6 miles long is provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam and from the dam to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in December 1955, was placed in operation in 1961 and completed in 1971. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1971 and completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1994 was 68.91 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work initiated and partially completed on navigation hard rock dolphin repair and on powerhouse roof repair. Contract completed on 3-D cams installation. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year, 1.4 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 3,905,357 tons during calendar year 1993. 14. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BRYAN, WA Location. Dam is 70.3 miles above mouth of Snake River at head of Lake Herbert G. West (Lower Monumental Reservoir), about 40 airline miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 638 and 633 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 2,655 feet long and about 165 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 498 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 581 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is singlelift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 feet by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide,14 feet deep and 37.2 miles long is provided from the dam to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 6.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry Bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in 1963, was placed in operation in 1970 and completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1974 and was completed in 1984. Power generation through September 1994 was 57.18 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract completed for raceway shading and the rerouting of surplus water. Contract continuing for units 2 and 3 turbine repair and fish pump turbine repair. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year, 1.66 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 3,306,280 tons during calendar year 1993. 15. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Location. At River Mile 107.5 on Snake River at head of Lake Bryan (Little Goose Reservoir) and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, appurtenant facilities, and required about 8 miles of backwater levees along the Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. Project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 738 and 733 Mean Sea Level (MSL) in Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area. Lower Granite pool extends upstream about 38 miles and provides slackwater to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 512 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 581 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 60 feet wide and 60.5 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 38.0 miles long is provided from the dam to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in July 1965, was placed in operation in 1975 and completed in 1984. Construction of the additional generating units was -39-6- WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT started in 1974 and completed in 1979. Power generation through September 1994 was 48.49 billion kilowatt hours. Approximately $4,347,000 (adjusted to October 1994 price index) in potential flood damages have been prevented since the levees became functional. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract completed for fishway controls. Contract completed for navigation lock guidewall timber replacement. Contract awarded for powerhouse roof repair. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year, 1.75 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 2,200,488 tons during calendar year 1993. As the first collection point on the Snake River, Lower Granite is a primary component of the District's Juvenile Fish Transport Program. Transport began in the 1960's as a study of methods of bypassing juvenile salmon and steelhead around turbines of the Corps' Snake and Columbia River Dams. Transport became a routine operation in 1980 while other structural modifications, installing of screens, and development of bypass systems continue. The 1994 transport season was marked by the continuation of drought conditions that have prevailed in the Columbia and Snake rivers for most years since 1987. Collection totaled 6,910,701 at Lower Granite compared with 8,025,621 in 1993 and 6,911,174 in 1992. Daily collection in 1994 peaked at 507,700 on May 10, down from the daily collection record of 893,100 juveniles set in 1993. High fish numbers for several days in a row resulted in over 53,000 fish being released back to the river on May 10 due to exceeding barge and raceway carrying capacity. At Little Goose Dam, 1,513,538 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected, a decrease from the 2,012,599 collected in 1992. Approximately 50,000 fish were bypassed at Little Goose in 1994 as a result of lack of barging space or for various research projects. Lower Monumental Dam collected 1,632,458 juvenile salmon and steelhead, up from the 1,337,339 collected in 1993. A total of 195,673 were bypassed for the same reasons as at Little Goose Dam. 1994 was the first year of operation for the new collection and transportation facilities at McNary Dam. A total of 8,759,448 fish were collected, an increase from the 6,659,623 collected in 1993. Peak collection was 189,150 on May 7 when yearling fish dominated collection, and 510,800 on July 9 when subyearling fish comprised 99.3% of the collection. A total of 956,830 salmon and steelhead were bypassed at McNary Dam due to lack of barge space and for research purposes. A fish loss at McNary Dam due to warm water temperatures on July 16 resulted in the plugging of the facility dewatering structure and loss of water to the juvenile fish holding facilities. Approximately 57,000 fish died and 567,486 juvenile fish were released back to the river before the facilities ran out of water. These fish are not included in the above seasonal collection numbers. River flows in the Snake and Columbia rivers were below the trigger levels for bypassing fish back to the river for increasing inriver migrations. At the request of National Marine Fisheries Service, a spill program was implemented from late May through mid June to improve inriver migration of juvenile salmonids. A grand total of 18,816,145 fish were collected in 1994, well below the record of 22,261,661 fish collected in 1990. A total of 17,370,462 fish were transported, 92.3 % of those collected. Of those transported, 473,518 (2.7%) were by truck and 16,896,944 (97.3%) were by barge. 16. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM - LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA. Location. On Snake River at head of Lake Sacajawea (Ice Harbor Reservoir), about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 540 and 537 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Herbert G. West extends upstream about 28.7 miles and provides slack water to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 3,800 feet long and about 135 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 508 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 483 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates,. 50 feet wide and 61 feet high, which provide capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 553 MSL and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 28.1 miles long is provided from the dam to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included railroads and highways. Principal data are set forth in Table 39- J. Construction of the original project started in June 1961, placed in operation in 1969 and completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1975 and was completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1994 was 70.4 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continuing for unit 3 repair and fish pump turbine repair. Contracts initiated for cavatation repair and powerhouse roof repair. Contract completed for installation of 3-D cams. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 1.8 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 3,405,391 tons during calendar year 1993. -39-7- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 17. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, ID Location. At various locations within the Columbia and Snake River drainages in the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Existing project. The project consists of a series of fish hatcheries, wildlife development areas and purchase of off-site project lands for fishing and hunting access. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple-purpose dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite). The real estate design memorandum, and feature design memorandums on all hatcheries and satellites, the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The Dworshak National Fish Hatchery Expansion, the Irrigon Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, McCall Hatchery, Sawtooth Hatchery, Magic Valley Hatchery, Clearwater Hatchery and water supply are in operation. The compensation plan is 91 percent complete. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $232,000,000. Local cooperation. None required Operations during fiscal year. New work: Offproject land acquisition is 100% complete. Letter supplements are being prepared for development actions. Hatchery completion contracts are in place for the Powell, Crooked River, Big Canyon, Imnaha, and Wallowa satellite facilities. Transfer actions, whereby the Corps turns real property over to US Fish and Wildlife Service, are processed for Eagle Lab, Magic Valley, Red River, and Lyons Ferry facilities. A design supplement is in place for correcting water supply deficiencies at Irrigon Hatchery. 18. MCNARY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, OR, and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and a system of levees and pumping plants. Project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 340 and 335 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Wallula extends upstream about 64 miles and provides slack water to Ice Harbor Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 7,365 feet long and about 183 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. Powerhouse has fourteen 70,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 980,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 1,310 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 291 MSL is surmounted by 22 vertical lift gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 2,200,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 32 miles long is provided from the dam to the mouth of the Snake River. Relocations along the lake included railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started May 1947, was placed in operation in 1954 and was completed in 1982. Power generation through September 1994 was 240.69 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts completed for fishway controls and purchase of fish tank trailers. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year, 5.40 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 14 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 7,450,618 tons during calendar year 1993. 19. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID Location. On Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, River Mile 230 Snake River, which is largest tributary of Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western part of Wyoming, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into Columbia River near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from Pacific Ocean. Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams as necessary for power, incidental irrigation, and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slack-water navigation and irrigation between mouth of Snake River and Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for the portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of existing project. Improvements included in existing project are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam - Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam - Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Table 39-A and 39-K. -39-8- WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite are in full operation. (See individual reports for details.) (For further details see Annual Reports, page 2246 for 1903; page 1986 for 1906; page 1991 for 1915; and page 1981 for 1962.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 18 privately-owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, wood products, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 smallboat launching ramps, all open to public use. The facilities serve slack-water navigation to Snake River Mile 140, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slack-water reaches the Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during fiscal year. See individual report for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and survey markers were maintained. No costs were incurred this fiscal year. General Investigations 20. SURVEYS The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the Corps to operate and maintain a system of non-Federal levees along the Snake River in the vicinity of Jackson Hole, WY. A draft reconnaissance study of the potential for improving the system with levee raises, extensions, or relocations was completed in FY 1990. The final reconnaissance study was combined with the Jackson Hole Restoration study which was completed in FY 1992 and revised in FY 1993. A combined flood protection and restoration feasibility study is expected to start in FY 1995. Jackson Hole River and Wetland Restoration and Flood Control reconnaissance study was initiated to restore fish and wildlife habitat in the 500-year floodplain of the leveed reach of the Snake and Gros Ventre Rivers at Jackson Hole, WY. The study has evaluated losses resulting from levee construction over the past 30 years and determined restoration measures to compensate for these losses. The report was approved in FY 1994. The Energy and Water Development Act, Public Law 102-104 authorized a study in cooperation with the Port of Walla Walla, Washington, for disposition of the current Walla Walla District Headquarters. Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) has requested that additional data collection and remediation in the motor pool area be accomplished in FY 1995. We participated in the Columbia River and Tributary Study, a survey directed by the North Pacific Division. Total cost of surveys was $544,788 for FY 1994, including: Flood Damage Prevention Studies ($229,542); Coordination with other Federal agencies and non-Federal interests including Cooperation Water Resource Agencies, Planning Assistance to States, and Lewiston, ID Regional Plan PH I ($63,336); Special Investigations, Inter Agency Water Resource Development, FERC licensing activities, North American Waterfowl Management Plan, and National Marine Fisheries Service ($123,850); and District Dispostion Study ($128,060). 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies, to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $125,036 which included: flood plain management services ($15,034), technical services, ($64,365), quick responses ($6,443), and special studies ($39,194). 22.PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN No Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) studies were conducted during the fiscal year. -39-9- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Total to Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30,1994 6. Jackson Hole, WY 7. Lucky Peak Lake, ID 8. Mill Creek Lake, WA 10. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA 11. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program 12. Dworshak Dam & Reservoir, ID 13. Ice Harbor Lock & Dam,WA 14. Little Goose Lock & Dam, WA 15. Lower Granite Lock & Dam, WA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 45,000 50,000 41,075 34,120 - 21,000 17,431 23,349 777,500 493,000 947,000 439,000 668,270 713,204 719,884 666,406 77,205 42,661 42,681 45,365 77,205 42,660 34,139 53,902 2,504,270 2,504,245 3,235,500 3,340,325 ' 207,912 1 207,906 - 19,652,081 2 -- 19,652,081 2 634,800 1,221,500 1,258,000 1,121,000 734,478 1,128,878 1,347,974 1,081,880 18,715,865 3 18,667,699 3 - 2,258,495 4 - 2,258,495 4 511,700 531,000 813,000 632,000 553,930 538,305 797,853 659,917 0 -1 8,500 8,500 4,899,000 1,050,000 4,859,972 1,027,263 11,978,940 11,968,779 - 17,714,107 -- 17,714,102 0 55,748 - 396,820 268,117 30,000 - - 506,746 30,430 21,136,000 28,152,000 28,869,000 35,294,000 20,617,366 27,723,497 28,092,559 27,347,817 - 5,000 - 5,000 6,365,300 7,802,200 7,399,000 7,588,500 6,534,885 7,748,991 7,674,875 7,287,364 6,259,000 6,247,008 694,937 537,176 113,451,000 103,790,239 - 329,528,296 5 - 329,528,296 95,068,357 6 102,720,437 6 - 168,029,757 ' 153,202 - 168,029,757 ' 6,806,900 8,019,500 6,766,000 8,362,000 104,154,404 $ 6,474,349 8,330,550 6,908,833 7,978,901 103,577,825 8 - 233,361,022 9 -- 233,361,022 9 4,290,400 5,655,000 5,313,000 7,920,429 3,883,098 5,191,554 5,571,138 6,991,605 543,004 543,004 80,206,558 to 78,513,915 to - 374,836,315 t" 1,257,307 - 374,836,315 tL -39-10- TABLE 39-A WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Total to Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30,1994 Maint. Approp. 5,330,900 8,421,000 6,826,000 6,647,000 102,775,468 12 Cost 5,436,731 8,464,239 6,898,866 5,987,998 101,995,932 12 Maint Contrib. - - - - . 20,000 Cost - - - - 20,000 16. Lower Monumental New Work Lock & Dam, WA Approp. - - - - 238,612,732 13 Cost 540,738 - - - 238,612,732 13 Maint Approp. 3,930,300 6,380,000 4,689,000 8,522,571 80,177,008 14 Cost 4,001,616 4,522,986 6,228,100 5,341,359 76,508,020 14 17. Lower Snake Fish & Wildlife New work Compensation, ID, OR & WA Approp. 27,902,000 6,813,500 5,180,000 7,308,000 207,913,241 Cost 28,988,737 7,094,430 4,984,930 4,994,517 205,009,098 (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 223,965 Cost - - - - 223;965 18. McNary Lock & Dam, - New Work Lake Wallula, OR & WA Approp. - - - - 326,293,105 15 Cost 505,723 - - - 326,293,105 '5 Maint. Approp 8,781,700 9,479,000 10,455,207 10,309,500 207,413,670 16 Cost 9,076,330 9,501,861 10,091,026 10,614,411 206,983,129 16 (Contributed Funds) Maint. Contrib. - - - - 43,707 Cost - - - - 43,707 19. Snake RiverDownstream New Work from Johnson Bar Landing Approp. 13,333,000 16,110,00020 10,268,781 9,912,219 1,064,898,589 17 OR, WA & ID Cost 15,630,347 15,893,07020 9,844,884 9,850,017 1,063,998,655 17 Maint. Approp. 20,358,500 28,494,500 23,587,000 31,449,500 367,902,877 18 Cost 19,799,683 26,516,385 25,606,845 26,302,538 361,179,814 i 1. $39,000 of cost sharing funds from county were received in FY 90, but were not expended until FY 91. 2. Includes $570,831 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 3. Includes $66,700 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 4. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $96,340 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 5. Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior in Fiscal Years 1969 through 1972 for hatchery operations. Includes $655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. 6.Includes $20,137,847 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior starting FY 1972 for hatchery operations. FY 72-78 funds of $6,097,000 were charged to project as a cost, but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. Includes $48,182 appropriated and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 1992 special recreation use fees included with O&M. Includes $1,059,950 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 7. Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36,748,021 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $914,256 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $789,000 appropriated and $788,999 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 8. Includes $48,919 appropriated and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 1992 special recreation fees included with O&M. Includes $641,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 9. Includes $60,941,807 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $12,006,000 appropriated and $12,006,000 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 10. Includes $621,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 11. Includes $46,212,534 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. Includes $63,800 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at completed projects. Includes $10,645,966 appropriated and $7,056,001 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 12. Includes $338,163 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. -39-11- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 13. Includes $51,661,371 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $2,239,000 appropriated and $2,239,000 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 14. Includes $372,376 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 15. Includes $1,976,586 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $3,778,000 appropriated and $3,778,000 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 16. Includes $28,851 appropriated and expended under special recreation use fees and $1,035,860 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. After FY 1992, Special Recreation Use Fees included with O&M TABLE 39-B AUTHO RIZII See Section in Text 17. Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $85,000 for new work on existing projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. 18. Includes $186,570 appropriated and expended for maintenance of previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $401,019 appropriated and $390,527 expended open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 19. Adjusted to correct FY 1989 appropriation from 2,140,000 to 2,120,000. 20. This does not include the appropriations and cost from the mitigation analysis under the Columbia River juvenile fish program which will be allocated at the conclusion of the analysis. NG LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. May 17, 1950 Table 39-G Oct 27, 1965 COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID. Levee left bank. H. Doc 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Blackfoot River, ID. Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, ID. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Ada County unit was deauthorized in 1986. Camas Creek, ID. Channel deepening and rectification of a 20-mile reach of Camas Creek. Deauthorized in 1965. Gooding Area, Little Wood River, ID. Channel improvement. Grande Ronde Valley, OR. Levees and channel clearing, straightening and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Deauthorized in 1986. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Henrys Fork Unit deauthorized in 1986. Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY. Flood protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID. Revetted levee. Little Wood River, ID. Flood protection in immediate area. Deauthorized in 1965. Malheur River, OR. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Mud Lake, ID, Idaho Falls Area. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1990. Palouse River, WA. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Deauthorized in 1986. Payette Valley, ID. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized October 3, 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, ID. Bank protection. South Fork Clearwater River, ID. Emergency construction of levees and revetments. Deauthorized in 1986. Teton River, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Tomanovich-Salmon City, Salmon, ID. Channel improvement. Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. Project deauthorized in 1990. Whitebird Creek, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. CATHERINE CREEK LAKE, OR Flood control and multipurpose dam on Catherine Creek H. Doc. 280, 89th Cong. 1st Sess. near Union, OR. Project deauthorized 1990. Oct 27, 1965 -39-12- _ _ TABLE 39-B (Continued) See Section in Text WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Table 39-E Sep 24, 1954 Table 39-E Jul 24, 1946 Table 39-E Dec 22, 1944 7. Jul 24, 1946 Oct 22, 1976 Dec 22, 1944 as amended 8. Jun 28, 1938 as amended Aug 18, 1941 Oct 31, 1992 Table 39-E Sep 24, 1954 as amended 10. Oct 27, 1965 11. Jul. 19, 1988 Jul 3, 1958 Oct 23, 1962 Aug 15, 1963 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 2, 1945 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Mar 2, 1945 Dec 31, 1970 Mar 2, 1945 CATHERINE CREEK, OR Organic debris removal along Catherine Creek. Sec 208, P.L. 83-780 Authorized by Chief Engineers Sep. 3, 1985 CLEAR & BURNT RIVER, OR Construction of riprap bank protection at city of Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Huntington Waste Water Lagoon. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jul 10, 1985 COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Provides for flood control works in vicinity of and through Flood Control Act of 1944 Colfax, WA, by channel enlargement and modification, H. Doc 888, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. levees, floodwalls, revetments, and modification of railroad bridges. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. P.L. 79-526, Chief of Engineers Report dated May 13, 1946 Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. P.L. 94-587 Deauthorized in 1990. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 facilities. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WA Off-stream storage project upstream fromWalla Walla. H. Doc. 578, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concrete- H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong. lined channel. Sec. 377, P.L. 77-228, Cong., 3rd Sess. Redesignation of reservoir to the Virgil B. Bennington Lake Sec. 118. P.L. 102-580 102nd Cong. OWYHEE RIVER, OR Gravel, brush and small tree removal from 12 miles of Sec. 208, P.L. 83-780 Owyhee River. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 11, 1985. ZINTEL CANYON DAM, WA. Local protection reservoir to provide flood protection to P.L. 89-298, Sec. 201 portions of the city of Kennewick, WA. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM Design, test and construction of fish bypass facilities at P.L. 100-371 Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite and McNary dams. (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Preparation of detailed plans. S. Doc 51, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Bruces Eddy dam and reservoir for flood control, H. Doc. 403, 87th. P.L. 87-874 navigation, power, recreation, and area redevelopment. Cong., 2nd Sess. Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. P.L. 88-96 Dworshak Added Units 4, 5 and 6, ID. Units 5 and 6 were P.L. 87-874 deauthorized in FY 90. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM - LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. 3rd Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec. 4, Flood Control of 1944 facilities. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BRYAN, WA Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. P. L. 91-638 LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. -39-13- 12. 13. 14. 15. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar 2, 1945 May 25, 1978 Oct 22, 1976 as ammended Nov. 17, 1986 Mar 2, 1945 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 17, 1986 19. Jun 13, 1902 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Table E Aug 18, 1941 Nov 17, 1986 Table E Dec 22, 1944 Table E Jul 11, 1956 Table E Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 22, 1976 Dec 29, 1981 Jul 30, 1983 Table G Oct 23, 1962 Oct 27, 1965 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 23, 1962 LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM - LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Herbert G. West. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, AND ID Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. Changes to land acquisition authority. McNARY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Construction, operation and maintenance of a second powerhouse. McNary Second Powerhouse automatically deauthorized Nov. 16, 1991 SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, OR, WA, AND ID Open-river navigation Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. Mouth to Riparia. Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. P. L. 95-285 P.L. 94-587 H.R. 6-P.L.99-662 H. Doc. 704., 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H.R. 6 - P.L. 99-662 Sec. 1001, P.L. 99-362 H. Doc. 127, 56th Cong., 2nd. Sess. H. Doc. 411, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Supersedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, ID only.'H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Dayton, Touchet River, WA. Flood protection. H. Doc. 662, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR. Flood Protection. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. Malheur Lake, OR, Flood Damage P.L. 99-662 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID.Channel improvement. H. Doc 452, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR. Flood protection. Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA. Levees and protective work P.L. 84-685 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA. Channel improvement. Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID. Construction of levee. Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID. Channel improvement. P.L. 87-874 Lapwai Creek Culdesac, ID. Construct left bank levee. Lyman Creek near Rexburg, ID. Channelization. Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, WA. Levee and channel work. Ririe Lake, Willow Creek, ID. Storage for flood control. P.L. 87-874 Jackson Hole, WY. Flood control protection by channel P.L. 81-188 improvement consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetment along Snake River in vicinity of Wilson, Wyoming. Also operation, maintenance, modifications, and P.L. 99-662 additions are Federal responsibility. Little Wood River, ID. Flood protection. P.L. 99-662 LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Four-lane highway bridge and approaches. P.L. 94-587 Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000. P.L. 97-140 Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in P.L. 98-63 Clarkston, WA. Increase of authorized amount to $24,000,000. Blackfoot Reservoir, Blackfoot River, ID. Modification to PL 87-874 increase spillway capacity. Authorized Oct 1962, Deauthorized in 1986. PL 89-298 Grande Ronde Lake, OR. Flood control, irrigation, water P.L. 99-662 supply, anadromous fish, downstream and resident trout PL 89-298 fishery, recreation and downstream power. Deauthorized in 1986. -39-14- See Section in Text 16. 17. 18. 6. & Table E Table F TABLE 39-B (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Table G Nov 17, 1986 Cottonwood Creek Dam, ID. Protection to highly- P.L. 99-662 developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Authorized Oct 1962, PL 89-298. Deauthorized in. 1986. Table G Dec 22, 1944 Pullman, Palouse River, WA. Flood protection. Authorized December 1944. Deauthorized in 1986. H.D. 452, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Table G Nov 7, 1966 Stuart Gulch Dam, ID. Protection to highly-developed P.L. 89-789, Sec: 201 urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Authorized Nov 7, 1966. Deauthorized in 1979. TABLE 39-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Columbia River and Tributaries Completed 1968 1,851,195 - above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA! 1. Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary projects. TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID' Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID' Big Wood River, ID 5 Boise River, ID 5 Catherine Creek, OR Clear and Blurnt River, OR Colfax, Palouse River, WA Connell, WA' Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, ID 2 Dayton, Touchet River, WA Dry Creek, WA' Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA' Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, WA' Gooding Area, ID' Graves Creek, ID ' Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID' Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID ' Little Wood River, ID 6 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA ' Lyman Creek, ID' Malheur Lake Project, OR Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR 3 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID' Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID 2 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive 1951 1970 1985 1985 1990 1990 1990 1967 1984 1966 1961 1967 1969 1954 1953 1955 1978 1972 1973 1993 1972 1971 1990 1957 1968 1965 1949 12,019 133,518 784,930 236,500 28,800 99,500 5,810,240 60,000 23,400 380,617 384,426 293,092 38,631 86,126 75,469 1,586,439 2,504,245 176,833 113,296 353,534 17,600 230,315 4,729,348 138,608 2,327,578 54,538 23,050 -39-15- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Owyhee River, OR Completed 1990 69,316 Rapid Creek, ID 6 Completed 1985 19,500 Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA 2 Completed 1977 110,815 Pataha Creek at Pomeroy, WA2 Completed 1993 308,511 Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID 2 Completed 1967 39,172 Riverside Area, Pasco, WA1 Completed 1972 28,839 Ririe Lake, ID Completed 1983 39,677,448 Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR 2 Completed 1985 75,000 Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR Completed 1970 5,000 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID ' Completed 1980 131,700 Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID2 Completed 1952 8,501 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID Completed 1968 32,425 South Fork, Boise River, ID 5 Completed 1985 44,400 South Fork Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID Completed 1973 61,055 Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID ' Completed 1955 128,635 Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA' Completed 1973 72,140 Tucannon River, Wooten, WA1 Completed 1971 74,305 Umatilla River, OR Completed 1961 161,540 Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, OR 2 Completed 1960 16,118 Weiser River, ID 5 Completed 1985 293,739 Willow Creek, ID ' Completed 1963 976 Willow Creek Lake, OR Completed 1985 37,231,332 Yakima River, West Richland, WA ', Completed 1964 229,890 Zintel Canyon Dam, WA 8 Active 6,784,184 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, PL 83-780. PL 80-858. 6. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL99-662. No 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14, PL funds authorized until FY 1990. 79-526. 7. Exclusive of $853,712 contributed funds. 3. Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. 8. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL 89-298. 4. Exclusive of $9,000 contributed funds. Construction began in 1992. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 208, TABLE 39-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Full report Operation See Annual and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge. ID 1990 23,085,832 TABLE 39-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID & WA Blackfoot Reservoir, ID Boise Valley, ID Ada County Unit Canyon County Unit Camas Creek, ID Catherine Creek Lake, OR Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID 1964 1980 1963 1963 1960 1978 1972 1975 1986 1986 1967 1965 1990 1986 267,626 46,084 10,600 9,080 1,552,000 195,686 -39-16- TABLE 39-G (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID 1990 1990 655,000 Grande Ronde Lake, OR 1966 1986 Grande Ronde Valley, OR 1958 1986 169,195 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Henrys Fork Unit 1968 1986 - - Little Wood River, ID 1960 1965 21,334 Lower Walla Walla River, WA 1953 1986 4,000 Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet, ID 1988 1990 Malheur River, OR Willow Creek Unit 1961 1969 13,000 McNary Second Powerhouse, OR & WA 1991 1991 Mill Creek, WA 1958 1977 3,537 Mud Lake Area, ID 1957 1990 5,994 Palouse River, WA 1958 1986 2,000 Payette Valley, ID 1960 1978 23,178 Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID 1969 1969 Pullman, Palouse River, WA 1964 1986 289,109 S.Fork Clearwater River, ID 1973 1986 3,899 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID 1974 1979 234,100 Teton River, ID 1955 1986 10,387 Touchet River, WA 1957 1977 11,198 Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID 1960 1990 112,757 Whitebird Creek, ID 1.957 1986 1,896 TABLE 39-H COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (SEE SECTION 2 OF TEXT) Estimated Federal Cost to Project Status Cost Sep. 30, 1994 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 209,403 Blackfoot River, ID Completed - 391,143 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Snake River Unit Completed - 3,402,958 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Completed - 85,873 Malheur River, OR Vale Unit Completed - 333,581 Mud Lake, ID Inactive 1,187,000 5,996 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit Completed - 6,456,032 Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 32,348 Weiser River, ID Deferred 1,565,000 37,757 Weiser River, ID Cambridge-Midvale Deferred - 75,000 TOTAL 11,030,091 1. Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. TABLE 39-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SEE SECTION 7 OF TEXT) Big Wood River, ID June 1994 Blackfoot River, ID June 1994 Burnt River, OR June 1994 Clearwater River, ID August 1994 Portneuf River, ID June 1994 Salmon River, ID July 1994 Snake River, ID June 1994 Snake River, OR May 1994 Snake River, WA May 1994 Touchet River, WA June 1994 Walla Walla River, OR August 1994 Walla Walla River, WA August 1994 -39-17- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (See Section 15 of Text) Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 16 of Text) SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Space for additional Rating, Each Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT - Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1600 Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 cfs 1613 feet Tainter 50 ft. by 55 ft. 2 428 feet 3 1 @ 90,000 kw 2 @ 220,000 kw 400,000 kw 3 3 @ 220,000 kw 1,060,000 kw 150 feet March 1973 1600-1445 feet 1605 feet 2,000,000 ac.-ft. 53 miles 17,090 acres 175 miles 86 feet 675 feet 97 feet 100 feet 103 feet 15 feet May 1962 Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 feet Radial 50 ft. by 51 ft. 10 671 feet 6 3 @ 90,000 kw 3 @ 111,000 kw 603,000 kw 226 feet December 1961 440-437 feet 446 feet 31.9 miles 9,200 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 80 miles -39-18- WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, (Continued) SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 18 of Text) Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 19 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line 86 feet 675 feet 93 feet 98 feet 101 feet 15 feet May 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 feet Radial 50 ft. by 60 ft. 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 244 feet March 1970 638-633 feet 646.5 feet 37.2 miles 10,025 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 92 miles 86 feet 675 feet 95 feet 100 feet 105 feet 15 feet May 1975 Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 581 feet Radial 50 ft. by 60.5 ft. 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 246 feet April 1975 -39-19- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, (Continued) SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 20 of Text) McNary Lock and Dam, OR and WA (See Section 22 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width 86 feet Clear Length 675 feet Lift Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 738-733 feet 746.5 feet 38 miles 8,900 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 91 miles 86 feet 675 feet 97 feet 98 feet 103 feet 15 feet April 1969 Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 feet Radial 50 ft. by 61 ft. 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 242 feet May 1969 540-537 feet 548 feet 28.7 miles 6,590 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 78 miles 67 feet 75 feet 83 feet 15 feet November 1953 Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 feet Vertical Lift 50 ft. by 51 ft. 22 -39-20- WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, (Continued) SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Acres Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 1,348 feet 14 70,000 kw 980,000 kw 193 feet November 1953 340-335 feet 356.5 feet 64 miles 38,800 14 ft. by 250 ft. 242 miles TABLE 39-K SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING OR, WA, AND ID (SEE SECTION 23 OF TEXT) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance Percent of Engineers to Sep. 30 1994 to Sep. 30, 1994 Corn- Constr. Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost pleted Started Ice Harbor Lock & Dam Initial Project 129,578,480 129,578,480 4 129,578,480' 104,154,404 103,577,825 100 FY 57 Code 710 Recreation Facilities 914,256 914,256 914,256 0 0 100 FY 57 Power Units 4-6 36,748,021 36,748,021 36,748,021 0 0 100 FY 71 Fish Bypass Program 27.800.000 15.128.000 14.812.548 0 0 53 FY 91 Totals 195,040,757 182,368,757 4 182,053,3054 104,154,404 103,577,825 93 Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project 160,413,215 160,413,215 5 160,413,215 80,206,558 78,513,915 100 FY 63 Power Units 4-6 60,941,807 60,941,807 60,941,807 0 0 100 FY 74 Fish Bypass Program 37.000.000 18.849.000 18.777.087 . 0 50Q FY 89 Totals 258,355,022 240,204,022 5 240,132,109 s 80,206,558 78,513,915 92 Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project 321,503,981 321,503,981 6 321,503,9796 102,775,468 101,995,932 100 FY 65 Code 710 Recreation Facilities 63,800 63,800 63,8000 0 0 100 FY 84 Power Units 4-6 46,212,534 46,212,534 46,212,534 0 0 100 FY 74 Fish Bypass Program 37.400.000 3 11.236.000 10.967.620 0 0 22 FY 88 Totals 405,180,315 379,016,315 6 378,747,9336 102,775,468 101,995,932 93 Lower Monumental Lock & Dam Initial Project 184,712,361 184,712,361 7 184,712,361 80,177,008 76,508,020 100 FY 61 Power Units 4-6 51,661,371 51,661,371 51,661,371 0 0 100 FY 75 Fish Bypass Program 34.700.000 26.501.000 26.256.813 0 0 75 FY 90 Totals 271,073,732 262,874,732 ' 262,630,545 7 80,177,008 76,508,020 96 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing 34,613 34,613 ' 34,613 398,519 2 393,202 Open River Pasco to Lewiston 0 0 0 4.350 4.350 Totals Existing Project 1,129,684,439 1,064,498,439 1,063,598,505 367,716,307 360,993,244 94 Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston 400,150 400,150 400,150 186,570 186,570 Totals Authorized Project 1,130,084,589 1,064,898,589 8 1,063,998,655 9 367,902,877 361,179,814 -39-21- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 39-K (Continued) SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING OR, WA, AND ID (SEE SECTION 23 OF TEXT) 1. New work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 2. Includes $-2500 appropriated and $2675 expended in FY 1994 6. Includes $1,628,000 appropriated and $1,626,084 expended for project condition survey cost. for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 3. Does not include mitigation analysis. 7. Includes $11,132,000 appropriated and $10,949,493 expended 4. Includes $203,000 appropriated and $201,931 expended for for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 8. Includes $13,333,000 appropriated and $13,136,097 expended 5. Includes $370,000 appropriated and $358,589 expended for for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. -39-22- ALASKA DISTRICT * This District consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK ........... 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK 3. Cordova Harbor, AK ............ 4. Craig Harbor, AK .............. 5. Dillingham Harbor, AK .......... 6. Homer Harbor, AK ............. 7. Humboldt Harbor, AK ........... 8. Kodiak Harbor, AK ............. 9. Metlakatla Harbor, AK .......... 10. Mountain Point, AK........... 11. Ninilchik Harbor, AK ........... 12. Nome Harbor, AK ............. 13. Old Harbor, AK ... ........... 14. Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK 15. Project Condition Surveys . ....... 16. Sitka Harbor, AK ............. 17. St. George, AK ............... 18. St. Paul Island Harbor, AK ........ 19. Wrangell Harbor, AK ........... 20. Wrangell Narrows, AK .......... Flood Control 21. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK .... 22. Chena River Lakes, AK ......... 23. Homer Spit Erosion, AK ......... 40-1 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-4 40-4 40-4 40-4 40-5 24. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 40-7 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Project ......................... 40-7 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 26. Snettisham, AK .......................... General Investigations 27. Survey ............................... 28. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... Tables 40-7 40-8 40-8 40-5 Table 40-A Cost & Financial Statement ........... 40-9 40-5 Table 40-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 40-12 40-5 Table 40-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects . . . 40-15 40-5 Table 40-D Not Applicable 40-6 Table 40-E Other Authorized Flood 40-6 Control Projects .................. 40-16 Table 40-F Not Applicable Table 40-G Deauthorized Projects ............... 40-16 Table 40-H Navigation Work Under Special 40-6 Authorization .................... 40-17 40-7 Table 40-I Project Condition Surveys ............ 40-17 40-7 Table 40-J Stream Bank Erosion Work Under Special Authorization .................... 40-18 extreme range is 42 feet. 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along a 3,300-foot baseline adjacent to the Port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 36 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29 feet and the Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977, was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of the limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was completed for the port during July and August of 1994. The contract was completed by Manson Construction and Engineering -40-1- Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 of Seattle, Washington. A total of 251,968 cubic yards of dredged material was removed to a project depth of 36 feet below mean lower low water. 2. BETHEL HARBOR, AK Location. The city of Bethel is located about 85 miles inland from the Bering Sea and adjacent to the Kuskokwim River. (See NOAA Chart 16006.) .Existing project. Bethel Small Boat Harbor was authorized by Section 107 of the Rivers and Harbors Act enacted 14 July 1960 (Public Law 86-645) as amended. The project consists of a small boat basin of approximately 6 acres dredged to a depth of 4 feet below mean lower low water, a maneuvering and turning basin, and an access channel connecting the channel to the Kuskokwim River. The project originally included four finger-type berthing areas providing beach moorage for 1,200 small river boats and a future medium-draft moorage basin. The fingers were removed by local interests in 1986 and replaced with floating docks in 1989. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling deep-draft vessels serves for general cargo. Small boat facilities in the basin area include publicly owned mooring floats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 18,411 yards of material removed from the end of March to the end of April 1992. 3. CORDOVA HARBOR, AK Location. Cordova is located on the Gulf of Alaska near the mouth of the Copper River, about 150 miles southeast of Anchorage. (See NOAA Chart 16710, 16709, 16700, and 16013.) Existing project. Adopted on 30 August 1935 and 30 August 1964, providing construction of two breakwaters 1,100 and 1,400 feet in length protecting a 23 acre area, with an initial 8.27 acre basin by 10.4 acres to a depth of 14 feet below mean lower low water, and construction of an entrance breakwater 183 feet in length. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include two docks for deep-draft vessels, the small-boat harbor, and a few piers associated with fish processing plants which are used by fishing vessels. Both municipal and city docks are owned by the city of Cordova, with the small boat inner harbor facilities being owned by the state but operated by the city. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with an estimated 8,500 cubic yards of material removed by the end of November 1992. Location. Craig is located on the west side of Prince of Wales Island about 200 miles south of Juneau in Southeast Alaska. (See NOAA Charts 17405, 17400, and 16016) Existing project. Adopted 2 March 1945, the harbor project includes a 3.6 acre mooring basin 225 feet wide and 700 feet long plus a 100-foot wide entrance channel in South Cove dredged to 11 feet below mean lower low water. Construction of two city owned and maintained rubblemound breakwaters to protect the expanded float system was authorized in 1979. The north breakwater is 160 feet long and the south breakwater is 300 feet long. Construction began in 1981 and was completed in 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include a city owned dock, publicly owned docks for deep draft vessels, two small boat harbors, and several piers which support commercial fishing. Operations during fiscal year. Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 6,380 cubic yards of material removed from the beginning of December 1992 to the end of April 1993. 5. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. Dillingham Harbor is located at the head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on the right bank of Nushagak River, just below its confluence with Wood River, about 470 miles northeast of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 0.0 feet mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek with an entrance channel 250 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek and a rock sill across its outlet. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four docks at the city of Dillingham; three privately owned, one owned by the city. Four publicly owned small boat floats located in the Harbor basin were installed in June 1982. They are removed before fall freezeup and replaced each spring. Facilities are inadequate for the number of boats using the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was accomplished from mid-May to mid-June 1994. .A total 72,535 cubic yards of material was removed. 6. HOMER HARBOR, AK Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water, southwest of Anchorage. The harbor site is near the extremity of Homer Spit, which varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16645.) 4. CRAIG HARBOR, AK -40-2- ALASKA DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for a sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit, about 50 acres in area. Project depth varies from 10 feet mean lower low water in the west end of the harbor to 20 feet below mean lower low water in the entrance channel and the east end. The entrance channel is protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The facilities consist of one publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels for passengers and general cargo. Small boat facilities in the basin include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. Construction has tripled the size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the harbor. Operation during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance dredging was accomplished by contract during September 1994. A total of 8,031 cubic yards was removed. 7. HUMBOLDT HARBOR, AK Location. Humboldt Harbor serves the city of Sand Point which is on Popof Island in the Shumigan Islands located 560 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA Charts 16540 and 16552.) Existing project. Adopted 20 September 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 27 October 1965 (P.L. 89-298); the project includes two rubblemound breakwaters, 640 and 995 feet long; protecting an area of approximately 16.6 acres; a 1,175- foot-long rubblemound diversion dike; an 810-foot-long diversion channel; and an entrance channel 1,200 feet long, 120 feet wide, and dredged to a depth of 18 feet below mean lower low water. Construction began in 1975 and was completed in 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Existing facilities include a small boat basin which provides protected moorage for 230 local and transient fishing boats, two docks for deep-draft vessels, and several piers which support commercial fishing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 817 cubic yards of material removed between 19 November and 16 December 1994. 8. KODIAK HARBOR, AK Location. The port of Kodiak is located at 242 and 175 nautical miles south of Anchorage and Seward, respectively, and approximately 1,258 nautical miles northwest of Seattle. St. Herman Harbor is located at Near Island across Near Island Channel from Kodiak. Existing project. The recommended plan has a 1,865-foot rubblemound split breakwater with a crest elevation of 22 feet above mean lower low water. The main entrance channel is located in the split breakwater and has a design width of 200 feet and design depth of 20 feet below mean lower low water. Since the natural water depth of the main entrance channel is 55 feet below mean lower low water, no dredging is required in this channel. A 100-foot rubblemound stub breakwater is recommended next to a secondary entrance channel at the north end of the harbor. This secondary entrance channel is to be 100 feet wide with a design depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and will require 4,400 square yards of rock excavation. The current estimated cost of $26,243,000, of which $23,478,000 would be the Federal first cost and $2,687,000 is the non-Federal first cost (cash and land easement rights of way). Local interests will pay 10 percent initially plus 10 percent during a period of up to 30 years, resulting in an ultimate non-Federal cost of $5,218,000. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on 6 July 1992. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers, wharves, and docks are located in the port of Kodiak. Four are located in Womens Bay and two in Gibson Cove, west of the main part of the city. Twenty-four facilities are along the main water front of Kodiak, with thirteen on St. Paul Harbor and eleven on Kodiak Harbor, respectively. The remaining facility is the St. Herman Small Boat Harbor between Uski and Near Islands, directly south of Kodiak Small Boat Harbor. Operations during fiscal year. The first contract, to place a consolidation pad where the main breakwater will be, was awarded on 11 September 1993 and was physically completed in September 1994. 9. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small boat basins. The existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. The new basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities consist of one general cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the -40-3- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. The existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year. The project is physically complete; contractor claims are pending. 10. MOUNTAIN POINT BREAKWATER, AK Location. The project is located within the Ketchikan Gateway Borough on Revillagigedo Island in Southeast Alaska. The city of Ketchikan is located approximately 250 air miles south of Juneau. Mountain Point is a residential area about 6 miles south of Ketchikan on the Tongass Highway. Existing project. The authorized Section 107 project consists of a 424-foot L-shaped rubblemound breakwater and a timber float. The existing local project consists of two ramps: a cast-inplace concrete slab extending 190 feet seaward from a parking lot to the 2 feet below mean lower low water level, and precast reinforced concrete planks extending 194 feet to the 5 feet below mean lower low water level. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement has been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. The project was physically completed. A Local Cooperation Agreement detailing cost sharing of the project was signed with the Ketchikan Gateway Borough. Funds were received for construction. 11. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Location. Ninilchik Harbor is located at the mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the village of Ninilchik. The community of Ninilchik, AK, is about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart # 16640.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 400 feet long by 150 feet wide is dredged to an elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by two rock jetties. Modifications for, river channel diversion, the 2 armor rock jetties, and beach protection were accomplished in 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are limited to shallow-draft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small boat floats in the project basin, provided by the state of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using the harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 8,271 cubic yards of material removed during April 1994. 12. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. Nome Harbor is located at the mouth of the Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on the northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of the Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16206.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly jetty of 951 feet and the westerly jetty not exceeding 676 feet long, at the mouth of Snake River, a channel 8 feet at mean lower low water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, ending in a turning basin of the same depth, 250 feet wide and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting all existing waterfront improvements on easterly beach by means of rock mount seawall 3,350 feet long extending easterly from east jetty. The project has been completed except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore, a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters the dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where a lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome received Department of Army authorization (permit) to construct a 3,600-foot gravel filled causeway. Construction of the causeway began in July 1985. Due to lack of complete funding, the length of the causeway was shortened to 2,700 feet. Construction was completed in May 1987. Use of this causeway for offloading petroleum products was delayed until the September 1987 arrival ofqired berthing barge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 3,545 cubic yards of material removed between July 15 and September 30, 1994. 13. OLD HARBOR, AK Location. Old Harbor is located on the southeast side of Kodiak.Island 54 miles southwest of the city of Kodiak. (See NOAA charts 16592, 16580, and 16013.) Existing project. Adopted on 15 June 1966, under Section 107 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, the project includes a small boat basin 200 feet mean lower low water, an entrance channel 600 feet long and 60 feet wide dredged to a depth of 8 feet below mean lower low water, an earth filled dike 1200 feet long to divert fresh water from Big Creek away from -40-4- ALASKA DISTRICT the basin area; and a gabion groin littoral drift barrier 240 feet long. Construction began in July 1967. Raising of the gabion groin structure was accomplished in August and September 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include a small boat basin which provides protected moorage for approximately 40 commercial fishing vessels and a city owned dock. Operations during fiscal year. Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 3.370 cubic yards of material removed between 19 November and 16 December 1994. 14. PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. Port Lions is located on the north end of Kodiak Island, approximately 19 air miles west of the city of Kodiak. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16594.) Existing project The Office of the Chief of Engineers approved construction of a small boat harbor at Port Lions on April 9, 1979. Construction consisted of a 600-foot-long breakwater, a 170-foot-long stub breakwater inclosing a 12 acre harbor. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 9.6 feet with an extreme range of 18 feet. A severe storm in November 1981 badly damaged the project. The repair work included replacing material of the existing main breakwater, extending the main breakwater 125 feet, changing the seaward breakwater slope to a 2.OH:1.OV adding a layer of armor rock and raising the design crest elevation from 18.5 feet above mean lower low water to 22 feet above mean lower low water. Minor dredging in the entrance channel to 15 feet below mean lower low water was also included. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A municipal timber pile dock at Port Wakefield serves as both a shallow-draft and deep-draft facility for Port Lions. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project has been completed. Contractor claim for differing site conditions were paid in FY 93. 15. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Preliminary and detailed surveys were completed to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, channels and tributaries of major rivers not within major project boundaries. Total costs for fiscal year were $522,162. (See Table 40-I) 16. SITKA HARBOR, AK Location The city of Sitka is located in southeastern Alaska, about 95 miles south-southwest of Juneau. It is situated on the western coast of 1,600 square mile Baranof Island. Sitka is about 20 miles from the open Pacific Ocean on the east side of Sitka Sound. Existing project. The recommended plan, also known as the Channel Rock plan, will consist of three rubblemound breakwaters constructed across the northern end of western Anchorage, and an inner harbor facility placed adjacent to Thomsen Harbor. This project will create a large protected harbor in which moorage basins could be developed using minimal or no wave protection structures. The three breakwaters would be 480 feet, 1,200 feet, and 320 feet long. Navigation openings in the breakwater, 325 feet and 190 feet wide at the design depth, would be located at natural channels where water depths are 50 to 55 feet at mean lower low water. Two gaps would allow for vessel traffic separation, which may be particularly important when log rafts or barges are being towed through western Anchorage. The two breakwaters forming the southern opening will overlap to minimize ocean swell in Thomsen Harbor. The breakwaters would be placed directly on the submerged rock reefs forming the northern boundary of western Anchorage. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on 7 December 1993. Operations during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded on 18 February 1994. 17. ST. GEORGE, AK Location. The city of St. George is located on St. George Island, the southernmost island of the Pribilof Islands, near the edge of the southwest Bering Sea shelf. Existing project. The project was authorized in the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993, P.L. 102-377. The work consists of excavating the St. George Harbor entrance channel to 20 feet below mean lower low water in accordance with cost-sharing provisions in P.L. 99-662. Local cooperation. The portion of the project was done by the Local Sponsor under Section 215, P.L. 90-483 with reimbursement to the Local Sponsor by the Government for its share on completion. Operations during the fiscal year. The Local Sponsor completed the portion of the project under the Section 215 agreement. Work on the remainder of the project is scheduled to be initiated in FY 1996. 18. ST. PAUL ISLAND HARBOR, AK Location. St. Paul Island Harbor is located on the shore of Village Cove, the southern side of St. Paul Island, the largest and most populated island of the Pribilof group in the central southeast Bering Sea. Existing project A St. Paul Harbor project was P.L. 99-662, based on a 1982 Corps of Engineers feasibility report. Since that report was published, new wave and climatic information was gained through field measurement and through a November 1984 storm that severely damaged a city built breakwater at St. Paul. -40-5- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 American vessels have also assumed control of the groundfish harvest in the area more rapidly than expected, while crab stocks and catches have declined markedly. St. Paul also constructed 750 feet of breakwater and a 200-foot dock at the harboi site. On 31 March 1989, Assistant Secretary of the Army signed an Agreement under Section 204(e) of P.L. 99-662 which states that the government would pay 80 percent of the costs of general navigation features of the Authorized Project The agreement was unique in that the city had to successfully build the harbor with their own funds and the government would reimburse them upon acceptance by the Corps of Engineers. The general navigation features consist of: (1) 1,050 feet of rubblemound breakwater with a finished elevation of 37 feet above mean lower low water, (2) 1,000 feet of rubblemound detached breakwater with a crest elevation of 18 feet above mean lower low water, and (3) a 200- foot-wide maneuvering area at a depth of 18 feet below mean lower low water. Construction commenced in May 1989 and was completed in December 1989. The city was reimbursed in March 1990 in the amount of $18,150,000. Local cooperation. A 204(e) agreement was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on 30 March 1989. One minor item remains incomplete. The agreement was amended on 30 April 1992 to allow the local sponsor an additional 5 years to complete the inner harbor facility. Operations during fiscal year. The general navigation features were completed in 1989 and accepted by the government. Coordination was performed with the city for compliance with the Project Cooperation Agreement. A condition survey was completed in June 1992. 19. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Location. Wrangell Harbor is located on the northwest side of Wrangell Island, 824 miles from Seattle and 160 miles from Juneau. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 8164, 8161, and 8201.) Existing project. The project consists of a rubblemound breakwater 300 feet long to protect the southern portion of the outer harbor, a mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep below mean lower low water within the protected area; an inner basin in the tide flat area east of Shakes Island, 325 feet wide and 550 feet long; a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long; a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long from the outer mooring basin all at a depth of 10 feet at mean lower low water, and construction of a rock mound breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Shakes Island. The range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.7 feet. The extreme tidal range is 26 feet Heavy swells, dangerous to small fishing boats, are caused by the wind, which causes an additional rise of about one foot. Construction of the breakwater north of Shakes Island was placed on inactive status as material to be used from the inner basin was unsuitable and the breakwater considered unnecessary for safe moorage of vessels. The cost of this portion was last revised in 1956 and estimated to be $6,500. (See table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves and floats in Wrangell Harbor. Two privately owned wharves serving general cargo and passenger terminals, one of which includes a cold storage facility, are open for public use. The remaining wharves serve various industrial purposes. One of the floats is publicly owned and is opened for public use for mooring and servicing of small craft, and two privately owned floats serve oil handling facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor was accomplished by contract in October 1993, yielding approximately 10,000 cubic yards of material. The harbor was last dredged in 1968. 20. WRANGELL NARROWS, AK Location. This project is located between Mitkof and Kupreanof islands adjacent to Petersburg and is about 120 miles southeast of Juneau. The initial work completed in 1934 provided for a 24-mile channel 200 feet wide and 21 feet deep. Modifications finished in 1963 increased the width to 300 feet, the depth to 24 feet, and added an anchorage basin of 20.7 acres that is 26 feet deep near midpoint in the passage. Local cooperation. A 1970 modification at Turn Point near Petersburg increased the depth to 27 feet and widened the channel through the turn. Maintenance dredging at Turn Point was performed in fiscal year 1979. The District removed two large rocks that posed navigational hazards in March 1988 at Green Rock. In August 1989, the District performed maintenance dredging at Turn Point, mile 1.5 to mile 2.5; Green Rock, mile 12.5; burnt Island, mile 17; Spile Rock, mile 18; and Battery Islets, mile 20. Operations during fiscal year. A condition survey was conducted from Mile 12.2 o 18.4 in April 1994. Flood Control 21. BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. Bethel, AK is located in southwestern Alaska on the north bank of the Kuskokwim River 400 miles west of Anchorage. Existing project. The project consists of rock riprap toe protection to be installed on the unprotected river bank and at locations where existing city construction bulkheads are threatened by erosion. This includes 3,500 feet of unprotected riverbank and 3,000 feet of previously installed bulkheads. Location cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on 3 March 1994. Terminal facilities. The POL tank farm is situated at the downstream end of the project and the city's general cargo dock is at the upstream end of the project. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were -40-6- ALASKA DISTRICT approved on 21 October 1993. The city initiated the real estate acquisition process for the project in June 1994. 22. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. Chena River Lakes is located in the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, Cl, D1, D2, and Big Delta D6.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek Dam has been constructed 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on the Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22 mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana river to point south and west of Fairbanks. Estimated Federal costs is $210,000,000, Little Chena Dam was submitted for deauthorization in September 1990. Operations during fiscal year. A contract was awarded in September 1993 for installation of ten relief wells between stations 355 +70 and 442 +25 downstream of the dam. Work is scheduled for completion in late June 1994. A contract was awarded in September 1993 for a public parking area near station 215 +0 on the upstream side of the dam. Work is scheduled for completion in late June 1994. The flood gates were operated for flood control in FY 1994. The Government expended $5,800 of Construction, General funds to repair areas of permafrost degradation on the Tanana River levee. The work was performed by contract. 23. HOMER SPIT, AK Location. The project is located near the town of Homer, Alaska, 120 miles southwest of Anchorage. It is a 4.5 mile long finger of land that varies in width from 30 to 500 yards wide extending into Kachemak Bay. Existing Project. The authorized project, which was constructed in 1994, consists of rock revetment along 1,400 feet project cost was received. Local Cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed detailing cost sharing of the project. Operations during fiscal year. The contract was awarded on 21 September 1992. The contractor spent the year trying to get an approved quarry. Notice to Proceed was given on 12 November 1992. Construction was completed in September 1994. 24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress,and antece-dent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $133,923 for disaster preparedness, emergency operations, and rehabilitation. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of flood control works at Fairbanks, Chena River Lakes, Tanana River Levee, Gold Creek, Klutina River, Copper Center, Lowell Creek, Salmon River, Skagway River, Snetisham, and Talkeetna River, Alaska. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 26. SNETTISHAM, AK Location. The project is located at the mouth of the Speel River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the north, 29 nautical miles southeast of Juneau. (See Coast Geodetic Survey chart 8227.) Existing project. Snettisham is a multi-stage power project. The initial stage, which was completed in 1977, tapped Long Lake and included an underground powerhouse with two 23.4 megawatt units and a transmission line to Juneau, AK. The project was turned over to the Alaska Power Administration for operation and maintenance. The second stage, which is nearly completed, provided a tunnel to Crater Lake and added a third unit. The final phase will provide a dam on Long lake to increase storage and the energy capability of Long Lake. The Long Lake Dam is currently unscheduled. The existing Long Lake (elevation 815 feet) water is transported through an approximately horizontal 13 foot diameter tunnel 8,400 feet long and a 1,400 foot penstock dropping at a 46 degree angle to the underground power house at tidewater to drive two turbines with a combined generating capacity of 47,600 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to Juneau by a 13.8 kilovolt overhead transmission line and a submarine cable traversing Taku inlet. The Crater Lake stage of construction tapped Crater Lake (elevation 1,002 feet) to drive a third turbine installed in the existing underground powerhouse. An additional nameplatedrated generating capacity of 34,500 kilowatts was added. Estimated cost of the first stage and second stage construction is $148,284,000. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during fiscal year. The Remote Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Contract (SCADA) was completed in September 1993. A successful lake tap occurred on 21 October 1988. Power-on-line initially occurred in May 1989, but was shut down for repairs to the turbine and generator. It has since been brought back on line. The project is physically complete. Audit and Mapping is currently being completed in preparation for transfer to Alaska Power Authority in FY 1995. -40-7- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 General Investigation 27. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs.for surveys include $1,083 for Coordination Studies and $4,777 for Miscellaneous Activities. No funds were expended for Flood Control Projects in FY 1994. 28. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain management guidance, and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, state agencies, Architectural/Engineering firms, lending institutions, and private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $124,124. Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $17,901. -40-8- ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Teit Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 30 Sep 94 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK 3. Cordova Harbor, AK 4. Craig Harbor, AK 5. Dillingham Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 6. Homer Harbor, AK 7. Humboldt Harbor, AK 8. Kodiak Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp, Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 994,680 1,069,549 585,647 560,618 447,000 83,664 471,000 79,798 480,500 516,326 221,000 221,148 375,000 403,840 1,107,100 1,127,641 52,433 77,462 329,161 -75,500 314,748 356,000 76,303 396,200 388,230 239,700 239,829 993,000 752,344 -11,262 21,169 -1,054 -2,535 277,163 440,000 390,923 188,000 187,555 331,158 56,506 250,000 3,999,798 223,394 3,182,053 605,000 541,874 -40-9- 1,095,000 1,451,211 -1744 2,000 2,000 423,000 459,008 533,235 533,235 27,478,707 27,450,964 638,080 638,080 433,994 433,994 395,500 394,546 358,000 78,303 548,790 580,209 8,987,282 8,976,715 1,700 1,700 188,000 182,617 3,512,350 3,512,350 5,144,113 4,832,223 67,974 67,974 -29,000 224,030 220,000 457,183 40,000 38,354 3,679,683 302,158 280,536 5,989,490 5,363,905 645,000 580,228 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 30 Sep 94 9. Metlakatla Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 10. Mountain Point Breakwater, AK (Contrib. Funds) 11. Ninilchik Harbor, AK 12. Nome Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 13. Old Harbor, AK 14. Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds). 16. Sitka Harbor, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 5,077,470 644 2,555 69,000 54,883 635,000 637,339 -125,000 135,330 72,900 100,642 99,100 275,678 207,300 159,601 271,300 241,890 140,000 191,922 430,535 330,879 2,500 2,500 174,689 _-.. 174,689 50,000 48,751 314,157 61,632 76,155 97,275 -20,550 -28,600 -16,822 32,462 191,000 191,331 66,500 182,261 .-. 2,500 5,000 -36,000 206,259 1,352 395,144 5,120,000 326,529 3,383,795 -40-10- 5,077,470 5,075,374 148,520 148,520 830,644 704,101 675,400 675,400 -125,000 167,792 428,720 428,720 4,678,039 4,677,097 1,348,240 1,348,240 9,986,580 10,066,330 177,500 180,000 132,946 370,415 -36,000 400,837 1,825,311 1,826,663 150,844 271,964 5,565,144 3,759,075 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 30 Sep 94 17. St. George, AK (Contrib. Funds) 18. St. Paul Island Harbor, AK 19. Wrangell Harbor, AK 21. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK 22. Chena River Lakes, AK (Contrib. Funds) 23. Homer Spit Erosion, AK (Contrib. Funds) 26. Snettisham, AK New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 203,000 2,797,000 531,360 143,493 865,187 2,366,172 2,283,937 173 130 2,564 340,000 30,683 334,021 297,000 41,248 62,137 331,707 424,854 499,548 8,185,000 125 312,456 447,127 137,381 114,000 358,671 1,312,200 1,182,576 8,163 -129,571 1,657,800 1,582,178 -100,000 21,358 1,638,000 1,319,205 46,000 110,000 2,030,000 90,000 110,423 131,176 25,000 1,871,744 2,113,055 910,000 2,442,672 7 1,568,520 -800,000 4,787,000 2,063,559 5,571,354 -25,000 520,309 150,000 284,262 -40-11- 7,000,000 4,932,080 3,004,000 2,824,171 19,635,200 383 19,593,945 537,020 537,020 1,240,377 6,646,179 10,266,854 2,058,065 214,063,928 214,047,562 6,479,744 6,197,014 2,182,300 2,145,929 4,010,000 3,652,431 30,000 1,575,802 143,334,550 143,320,240 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 Table 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. 2. -40-12- JuL 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 Jul. 14, 1960 ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Deep winter harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.' Extension of project limits. BETHEL HARBOR, AK Basin of 6 acres dredged to 4 feet below mean lower low water, maneuvering and turning basin, and access channel. Floating docks constructed by local in 1989. CORDOVA HARBOR, AK Two breakwaters, 1,000 and 1,400 feet in length protecting an 18.67 acre area dredged to a depth of 14 feet below mean lower low water. Harbor expansion from 8.26 acres to 20 acres by removal of 1,400-foot breakwater and construction of a new 2,000-footlong breakwater. The entrance channel dredged to 16 feet below mean lower low water and turning basin dredged from 10 to 12 feet below mean lower low water. CRAIG HARBOR, AK Dredging of a small-boat mooring basin approximately 157,500 sq. feet to a depth of 11 feet below mean lower low water, and entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. HOMER HARBOR, AK Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. HUMBOLDT HARBOR, AK Dredging of protected area of 16.6 acres and an entrance channel 120 feet wide to a depth of 18 feet below mean lower low water. KODIAK HARBOR, AK Breakwater 1,900 feet long with an entrance channel 930 feet long and 20 feet deep to serve 45 acres of moorage in St. Herman's Bay. H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 P.L 94-587 Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, P.L 86-645 H.R. 7634, 86th Cong. Doc. 33, Committee on Rivers and Harbors, House of Representatives 73rd Cong. Sec. 55, P.L 88-451, Senate Doc. 2881, 88th Cong. Sec. 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, P.L 86-645 H.R. 7634, 86th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945, Doc. #558, 76th Cong. 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.z P.L. 88-451 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 13, 1981 Section 201(a), P.L. 89-298 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Section 202, P.L. 99-662 S.Doc. 6, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. Section 102, Water Resource Development Act of 1990, P.L 101-640, 101st Cong. 3. Apr. 20, 1933 Aug. 19, 1964 Jul. 14, 1964 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 4. 5. 6. Jul. 2, 1958 Aug. 19, 1964 Jul. 14, 1960 7. Oct. 25, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 ALASKA DISTRICT Table 40-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 10. Jul. 14, 1960 11. Jul. 3, 1958 12. 13. 14. 16. 17. 18. Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 16, 1948 Jun. 15, 1966 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 31, 1992 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acre in extent to a depth of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters inclosing a 7.0 acre basin. MOUNTAIN POINT BREAKWATER, AK Construction of 424 feet of rubblemound breakwater. A 50- foot timber float is being provided by the local sponsors. Water depths range from 8 feet above mean lower low water to 20 feet below mean lower low water. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410 foot jetty. NOME HARBOR, AK Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide and 600 feet long.3 Seawall OLD HARBOR, AK Dredging of small boat basin 200 feet by 700 feet and an entrance channel 60 feet by 600 feet to a depth of 8 feet below mean lower low water. PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construction of a 600-foot breakwater and a 170-foot stub breakwater inclosing a 12-acre harbor. SITKA HARBOR, AK Boat harbor consisting of 3 rubblemound breakwaters. ST. GEORGE, AK Dredging the maneuvering area from an average depth of 3 feet above mean lower low water to 18 feet below mean lower low water and dredging the entrance channel from an average depth of 14 feet below mean lower low water to 20 feet below mean lower low water. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Add 1,050 feet of breakwater at existing crest height, 37 below feet mean lower low water and 1,000 feet long with a crest height of 18 above mean lower low water. H.Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. Section 201, P.L. 89-298 S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. 2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, Public Law 86-645, H.R. 7634, 86th Cong. H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H.Doc. 1932, 64th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H.Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Reports of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948 Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, Public Law 86-645, H.R. 7634, 86th Cong. Section 107, P.L 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineer, April 9, 1979 Water Resource Development Act of 1992, H.Doc. 103-37, 103rd Cong., 1st Sess. Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, Public Law 86-645, as amended. Section 202, P.L 99-662 -40-13- Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 Table 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 19. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Sep. 22, 1922 Breakwater 300 feet long to protect southern portion of H. Doc. 161, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. harbor. Aug. 30 1935 Mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet H. Doc. 202, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. deep. H. Doc. 284, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Inner basin and connecting channel from the existing mooring basin, both 10 feet deep at mean lower low water, and breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Snakes Island. BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK 21. Nov. 17, 1986 Streambank protection by placing riprap along 8,500 feet of Section 202, P.L. 99-662 riverbank. 22 CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Aug. 13, 1968 Dam and reservoir on the main Chena River, a dam and S. Doc. 89, 90th cong., 2d Sess.2 detention reservoir on the Little Chena River, and a levee along the north side of the Tanana River. 23. HOMER SPIT, AK Nov. 28, 1990 Extension of an existing rubblemound revetment along an Sec. 101, Water Resource existing sheetpile wall to provide protection and Development Act of 1990, P.L. 101- nourishment along a 1,000 foot portion of State highway. 640, 101st Cong. 26. SNETTISHAM, AK Oct. 23, 1962 Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission H.Doc. 40, 87th Cong, 1st Sess.2 facilities. 1. Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized November 6, 1977 under section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 4. Little Chena Dam deauthorized in 1991. -40-14- ALASKA DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS -40-15- TABLE 40-C Project Status Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AKL Completed Bar Point Harbor, AK3 Completed Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK Completed Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Completed Cordova Harbor, AK2 Completed Cordova, AK Completed Craig Harbor, AK Completed Douglas Harbor, AK Completed Dry Pass, AK Completed Egegik River, AK Completed Elfin Cove, AK Completed Gastineau Channel, AK Completed Haines Harbor, AK2 Completed Homer Harbor, AK Completed Hoonah Harbor, AK Completed Humboldt Harbor, AK Completed Iliuliuk Harbor, AK Completed Juneau Harbor, AK Completed Kake Harbor, AK Inactive Kasilof Harbor, AK2 Completed Ketchikan Harbor, AK Completed Kodiak Harbor, AK Completed Mekorykuk, AK Completed Myers Chuck Harbor, AK Inactive Naknek River, AK Completed Neva and Olga Straits, AK Completed Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK Completed Pelican Harbor, AK Completed Petersburg Harbor, AK Completed Port Alexander, AK Completed Port Lions, AK2 Completed Rocky Pass, AK Completed St. Michael Canal, AK Completed Seldovia Harbor, AK Completed Sergius Whitestone, AK Completed Seward Harbor, AK Completed Sitka Harbor, AK Completed Skagway Harbor, AK Completed Stikine River, AK Completed Valdez Harbor, AK Completed Wrangell Narrows, AK Completed L Abdo** mt recoMended in H.Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Seas. 2. Authorized by Chiaf of Engineer (Sec. 107). 3. In addition, $272,779 of State nda. 4. Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. . In addition, $925,500 of State funds 6. In addition, $973,875 of State funds. For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Report for Construction Maintenance 1920 128,896 2,154 1983 2,000,000' 1985 1,520,272 1977 1,220,000 5,000 1978 843,534 488,156 1986 9,642,000 1983 1,033,500' 72,500 1963 282,019 1983 943,351 23,466 1972 4,441 3,107 1959 154,191 1964 789,461 102,701 1977 1,000,000' 1987 2,000,000 1983 4,255,000' 1977 3,679,683' 1941 66,037 1974 1,381,150 260,991 1991 870,700 1975 109,848 1979 1,602,417 331,256 1973 1,891,212' 37,946 1986 1,372,139 1970 9,700 1961 20,789 1960 155,009 1972 370,415 132,946 1964 369,683 18,973 1972 252,932 26,800 1949 17,000 1986 1,825,311 1960 337,668 1916 377,062 560 1974 1,051,883' 5,518 1973 1,798,010 1,934 1973 712,36910 219,789 1973 1,611,009 15,400 1972 133,180 32,665 1987 8,804 1968 649,740" 221,498 1979 3,562,343 309,260 7. In addition, $857,000 of State funds. 8. Inchldes $594,163 for ehabilitation. 9. Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $90,026 for zehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710. Recreation failities at Completed projects. 11. Incldes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710. Recreation faclities at Completed projects. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 40-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River' Completed 1985 553,970 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,0062 4,301 Klutina River, Copper Center, AK' Completed 1973 260,681 Lowell Creek, AK' Completed 1945 416,382s 30,771 Salmon River, AK Completed 1963 37,770" 162,925' Talkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 1. Section 14. 5. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 2. In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 7. In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 4. During FY88, $551,690 was expended from FC and CE. 8. In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. TABLE 40-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Allison Lake, AK (Valdez Hydropower) 1992 Anchorage Harbor, AK (Uncompleted Portion) 1967 1977 Bradley Lake, AK 1983 1983 1982 46,701,000 Ketchikan Harbor, AK (West Breakwater) 1979 1979 Port Alexander, AK (Inner Harbor) 1949 1977 Tolovana River, AK (Snagging) 1931 1977 Little Chena River Dam 1983 * 1990 Long Lake Dam 1975 1990 Myers Chuck Harbor, AK 1970 1991 9,700 Scammon Bay, AK 1992 Skagway River, AK 1966 1991 26,385 -40-16- ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs 9 uo, Ketchikan, AK King Cove, AK Larsen Bay, AK Little Diomede, AK Metlakatla, AK Nome, AK Ouzinkie, AK Port Lions, AK Seward Marine Industrial Center Tatitlek, AK Valdez, AK Whittier, AK Williamsport, AK TOTAL 16,992 5,798 13,157 9,990 6,722 35,979 1,351 6,879 1,123 8,843 5,291 170,985 285,192 TABLE 40-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Date Survey Conducted Ketchikan, Bar Point January 1994 Ketchikan, Thomas Basin February 1994 Hoonah Harbor February 1994 Skagway Harbor May 1994 Seward Harbor April 1994 Seldovia April 1994 Wrangell Narrows Channel (Mi. 12.2 to 18.4) May 1994 Cordova Harbor June 1994 Valdez Harbor June 1994 -40-17- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1994 TABLE 40-J STREAM BANK EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Annette Island, AK 34,327 Buckland, AK 648 Deering, AK 35,245 Eagle, AK 12,116 Metlakatla, AK 18,784 Noatak, AK 16,919 Emmonak, AK 39,695 TOTAL 157,734 -40-18- MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: BG Eugene S. Witherspoon, President Designee, Mr. Sam E. Angel, appointed Sep. 25, 1979; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; Mr. Frank H. Walk, appointed Oct. 22, 1987; BG Albert J. Genetti, Jr., appointed Oct. 9, 1992, Commander, Ohio River Division; RADM J. Austin Yeager, Member Designee, NOAA; COL Gerald E. Galloway, U.S. Army, appointed Oct. 28, 1989; COL Walter S. Tulloch, served as Secretary of the Commission. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefor. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction of five salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement, four in lower Mississippi River Delta region, and one in the Mississippi - Louisiana Estuarine Area; Bonnet Carre' and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Bateh Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a demonstration erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portions east and west of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou *Authorizing legislation (Tables 42-D and 42-E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 41-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds- Mound City area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L'Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Channel improvements to Eight Mile Creek, Arkansas; Ten Mile and Fifteen Mile Bayous in West Memphis, and vicinity Arkansas; Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, Mississippi; and Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and Mississippi. Navigation channel and harbor improvements to Helena Harbor and vicinity, Arkansas at Mississippi River, mile 652 AHP. Channel improvements and pumping station for Helena, Phillips County,and vicinity, Arkansas and St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Missouri. Field operations of the commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction-St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N. page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time high in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 61 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 41-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realinement and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 42-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 42-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 42-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 42-D and 42-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 42-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Based on the estimated cost of $11,327,400,031 (cost projected through the construction period), and actual expenditures through Sep. 30, 1994, of $5,783,131,051, the entire project is about 84 percent complete. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 21, 1990, for Ports of Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1990, for Port of New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (59th edition), 1992. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, excluding maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1994, was $5,835,355,857. (See Table 42-V.) (See also Tables 42- U, 42-W, and 42-X for additional financial statements. Operations and results during fiscal year. The 344th Session was held Apr. 25-29, 1994, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cape Girardeau, MO, to New Orleans, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed enroute. Public meetings were held at Cape Girardeau, MO; Memphis, TN; Vicksburg, MS; and New Orleans, LA; with approximately people in attendance. This 344th session adjourned at New Orleans, LA, at 11:40 a.m. on Apr. 29, 1994. The 345th Session was held Sep. 12-16, 1994, onboard the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to Morgan City, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed. Public meetings were held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Greenville, MS; and Morgan City, LA; with approximately 295 people in attendance. This 345th Session adjourned at 11:40 a.m. at Morgan City, LA, on Sep. 16, 1994. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Roadmap- type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1993 4th edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:24,000) covering the Atchafalaya River system and outlets to the Gulf was revised and printed during FY 1994. Approximately 10,846 flight-line miles of black-andwhite aerial photography (various scales); 2,273 flightline miles of color true photography; and about 889 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District: The revision of 1:62,500 scale quadrangle maps Belle Island, LA; Centerville, LA; Fordoche, LA; Maringouin, LA; Morgan City, LA; and Point au Fer, LA were completed and printed in 1994. Memphis District--Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quads of Alamo, TN; Humboldt, TN; Bells, TN; Brownsville, TN; Osceola, AR-TN; Rialto, TN; Hales Point, TN-AR; Blytheville, AR-TN; are completed. Vicksburg District--Series Conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale quadrangles to 1:62,500- scale quadrangles of Homer, LA; Summerfield, LA; Bigsland, LA; Arcadia, LA; Bienville, LA; and Many, LA, were completed and published in 1994. Jamestown, LA; LeCompte, LA; Alexandria, LA; and Boyce, LA, are in progress. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage of 54.2 feet at Cairo gage on Apr. 17, 1994, and maximum discharge of 1,375,000 cubic feet per second occurred at Hickman, KY and crest stage of 37.3 feet at Memphis on Apr. 13-15, 1993, with maximum discharge of 1,441,000 cubic feet per second on Apr. 23-24, 1994. Vicksburg District--The Mississippi River in the Vicksburg District reached its highest levels in 10 years during FY 94. Peak stages and discharges on the Vicksburg Districts reach of the Mississippi River were 41-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 as follows: Arkansas City, 40.5 feet on Apr. 28, 1994, and maximum discharge of 1,460,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg, 46.0 feet on May 3, 1994, and maximum discharge .of 1,570,000 cubic feet per second. New Orleans District-On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 56.40 feet NGVD on May 11, 1994, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 16.5 feet NGVD on May 11, 1994. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 37.6 feet NGVD on May 10, 1994. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill of 1990 directed the Corps to develop the most cost-effective flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without regard to frequency of flooding, drainage area, and the amount of runoff. It also directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate existing flood control features of the Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. The FY 1994 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act (Public Law 103-126), dated Oct. 28, 1993, includes authority to within available funds, investigate conditions at Wax Lake Outlet Bayou Black and other features, and recommend modifications desirable for flood protection, navigation, and environmental management. It will take about four years to complete the study. This project includes an extensive public involvement program, with the objective to promote public awareness and participation. Engineering studies. A research program was continued for development of materials and more effective and economical design of regulation features for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi River in a suitable alinement. Potamology investigations of river behavior continue to be made. Investigations into the major cause-andeffect relationships attributable to major changes in stage-discharge relationships on the Mississippi River as a result of both natural and man-made modifications are continuing. Mississippi River and Tributaries - Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 42- N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Enlarged 9.8 miles of levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-K. Vicksburg District-Initiated construction on 7.6 miles of berms in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-L. Memphis District-Initiated construction on 3.2 miles of berms in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 42-K, 42-L, 42-M, and 42-N.) There are 1,608.7 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,601.9 are in place with 1,269.9 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,202.5 miles, of which 2,195.7 are in place with 1,771.8 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are 85.4 miles of levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River miles (all completed); 59.2 along the south bank of Red River (all completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 miles in place and 357.3 miles completed to grade and section (see Table 42-N). Of the authorized 686.3 miles of berms, 527.3 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 2,093.7 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,511.0 miles of authorized tributary levees in the MR&T Project, of which 1,214.7 miles, are in place with 1,014.6 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 15.3 miles and 869.6 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For summary of levee work Table 42-N. Mississippi River and Tributaries - Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 42-G.) Work included dredging 18,276,500 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: Vicksburg District, channel maintenance was performed by government-owned dredge Jadwin. Memphis District channel maintenance dredging was performed by the Government-owned dustpan dredge Hurley. The MR&T Harbor maintained in New Orleans District was Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), cutterhead dredge E. Stroud. New Orleans district channel maintenance dredging was performed by government-owned dustpan dredge Jadwin. The MR&T Harbor maintained in Memphis District was Memphis Harbor (McKellar Lake), by leased cutterhead dredge Natchez. MR&T Harbors maintained in Vicksburg District were Greenville Harbor and Vicksburg Harbor by cutterhead dredge Natchez. Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 42-H, 42-I, and 424.) Construction of 8.95 miles of new bank 41-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION revetment and 172,617 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 9.86 miles of new dikes were constructed and required maintenance was performed. Approximately 1.9 miles of new bank revetment was constructed on the Atchafalaya River. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 42-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alignment improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 1,000.62 miles of operative bank revetment and 270.25 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9 by 300 feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low- water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 128.5 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 73.6 miles of revetment and 5.7 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 42-H, 42-I, and 42-4. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. Construction of levee enlargements and floodwalls continued on the east and west protection levees. There are two ongoing levee enlargement contracts, E- 64 and E-76, along the east protection levee. The total distance of these two levees is 6.4 miles with a placement of 109,000 cubic yards during this period. There was one levee enlargement contract completed, and one levee slide repair contract completed along the west protection levee. The total distance of these two levees is 8.2 miles with a total placement of 152,000 cubic yards during this period. Another contract to construct a floodwall in the city of Berwick, which is two miles long, ongoing with a scheduled completion in early FY 95. Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrel Locks, Morganza Control Structure, condition and operation studies, and water control management activities were continued. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 2,600,000 cubic yards by two leased cutterhead dredges from Berwick Bay harbor at a total cost of $2,300,239. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. The project is 90 percent complete. The current estimated Federal cost is $1,660,000,000 and non-Federal cost is $8,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 357.3 miles are built to grade. See Table 42-K for status of levees. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel training works below Morgan City, modification of existing structures and construction of two freshwater distribution structures. Approximately 42.1 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 42-H. Flood Control ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA Location. The project lies in the lower part of the Atchafalaya Basin which is situated in south-central Louisiana. It lies in parts of Iberville, Iberia, Pointe Coupee, St. Martin, St. Mary and St. Landry Parishes. Further, it is limited to the part of the Atchafalaya River Basin that has been confined between protection or guide levees that are about 15 miles apart. The northern boundary, west of the Atchafalaya River, lies along the south right-of-way line for the Union Pacific Railroad near the south side of U.S. Highway 190 between the West Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee (WABPL) and the west limits of the Town of Krotz Springs, thence southerly along the west limits of the town and easterly along the south limits of the town to the Atchafalaya River; east of the Atchafalaya River it lies along the southern right-of-way line for the 41-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Union Pacific Railroad. The eastern and western boundaries lie at the floodside toes of the East Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee (EABPL) and WABPL, respectively. The area within these limits has been calculated at about 595,000 acres. Existing Project. This project consists of the acquisition of 50,000 acres of fee title, excluding minerals, from willing sellers and 338,000 acres of easements including: (1) flowage easements; (2) flowage, developmental control and environmental protection easements; and (3) developmental control and environmental protection easements. All acquisition is over privately owned land. The state will provide its 150,000 acres of existing lands and also about 30,000 acres of land donated by the Dow Chemical Company to accomplish the project features. Other state and Federal lands in the project area include 15,000 acres acquired by the Department of Interior for the Atchafalaya National Wildlife Refuge and 12,000 acres acquired by the State for the Sherburne Wildlife Management Area. To date approximately 16,000 acres of each, fee and easements, have been.acquired. Local Cooperation: A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is not required for the acquisition of flowage, developmental control and environmental protection easements nor for acquisition of the public access lands (fee). A PCA will be required for the unscheduled work, such as the Operations and Maintenance and Recreation features. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year: The Supplemental Real Estate Design Memorandum No. 1 was approved in January 1994. Contracts were put into place for the HTRW Assessment, Title Contracts, Timber and Appraisal Contracts. Condition as of Sep 30: A large ownership has indicated a willingness to sell approximately 16,000 acres of land in fee. Negotiations should begin in late March or early April 1995. Acquisitions of another 3,000 acres of easements over the previously acquired land is also scheduled to begin in FY 95. BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS SWAMP), LA Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. Maintenance dredging was performed in FY 1994, at a cost of $142,961. The remaining 2.5 miles were to be constructed when development of the initially constructed portion warrants expansion. Project expansion has not been necessary. Therefore this feature was deauthorized on Nov. 2, 1979, under the provisions of Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74), as amended. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $20,400,000 and non-Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. With the termination of the Eastern Rapides and South Central Avoyelles project, it has become necessary to provide an adequate outlet structure solely for the Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries project. The economic effects of this change along with current benefits estimates have caused the benefit-cost ratio for the project to be less than unity. As a result, the project has now been classified as "inactive." If economic conditions change, the project could be reactivated. BONNET CARR.E SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in FY 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 1979, and 1983. A new office building was completed in FY 1990 at a cost of $245,500. OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, water control management, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, and engineering studies. A picket boat was previously used at the inflow channels to the low sill and auxiliary control structures. It was removed from operation in FY 1988. 41-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Maintenance by contract: Maintenance dredging was performed in FY 1994 at the Old River Lock Forebay where approximately 239,676 cubic yards were removed at a cost of $166,521. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is complete at a Federal cost of $292,273,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; auxiliary structure, September 1986; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels for the low-sill structure, February 1961; inflow and outflow channels for the auxiliary structure, August 1987; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfll dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 9.4 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 42-H for details of bank protection.) Vicksburg District LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bankprotection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. Little Bayou Meto gates and lifting mechanism were replaced during FY 88. LOWER RED RIVER - SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. The engineering studies included preparation of a report on incorporation of the Bayou Rapides drainage structure and pumping plant into the project. This report was approved by HQUSACE in Jun. 93. A Project Management Plan to address rehabilitation of the drainage structure and pumping plant was approved in Aug 94. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY 92 and is complete. All of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized are completed to approved grade and section. The Bayou Rapides drainage structure and pumping plant are in need of repair, and studies were initiated in FY 94 to address this need. TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning and design on project features are complete. The Lake Chicot Pumping Plant and related features are complete and in operation. The riverside gate repair contract the contract for the bulkhead gate repairs are complete, and the contract for pump repairs. No further work on the Tensas River Project (Separable Element) will be initiated due to lack of commitment from a local sponsor to cost share remaining E&D and construction. This project has been placed in the "inactive" category. Condition as of Sep. 30. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 741.7 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additionally, 61.0 miles of the Tensas River has been cleared and snagged. The GDM for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61, including Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal is complete. However, no further work will be initiated due to lack of a local sponsor. (b) Red River backwater area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning and design continued on project features. All channel work required to get flows to the Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant and gravity structure is complete. The gravity structure and the pumping plant are complete and are being operated and maintained by contract. One mitigation item, the construction of two water control weirs, was completed in May 1988. Contracts for three additional mitigation features are complete. Construction of the Durham Prong mitigation feature is underway (contract was awarded on 19 Sep 95.) Planning and design has been deferred on the remaining mitigation feature. Tensas-Cocodrie, Item 4-A, levee enlargement, 6.3 miles in length, was completed in September 1988, and Item 4-B, 2.4 miles of levee enlargement, was completed in October 1990. A contract for Item 2 was awarded in January 1991 and is physically complete. These contracts will complete the levee enlargement for all of the levee system, except 0.8 miles. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM has been reclassified as inactive. A contract for Sicily Island Item 5-B, is complete and the contract for Sicily Island Item 5A-R is substantially complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Levees in Tensas-Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising of 0.8 miles. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 63.4 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. A levee grade reevaluation study for all levee systems in the Red River Backwater area was completed in Mar. 1985. 41-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Based on results of that study, work is underway to complete enlargement of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee system. Levee Items 4-A and 4-B have been completed. Levee work on Sicily Island area consists of 56 miles of new levee, 15.8 miles of which have been completed. YAZOO BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Big Sunflower River, etc. The contract for Weir B on the Yazoo National Wildlife Refuge and the contract for selective clearing and snagging on Black Bayou, Item 1-A, have been completed. Work continued throughout FY 94 on Steele Bayou, Item 66-B, Levee and Channel, and it is now 98% complete. The Phase II was awarded in March 1994 and is now 67% complete. Main Canal, Item 1, the first construction item in the reformulated Upper Steele Bayou Project, is scheduled for award in January 1995. (b) Flood Control Reservoirs (1) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 228.17 feet NGVD on April 7, 1994, and storage in flood control pool was 255,500 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 26,000 cubic feet per second on Jan. 28, 1994. On Sep. 30, 1994, the pool elevation was 216.7 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 85,400 acre-feet. (2) Enid Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 255.93 feet NGVD on July 29, 1994, when storage in the flood control pool was 376,000 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 20,500 cubic feet per second on Jan. 28, 1994. On Sep. 30, 1994, pool elevation was 248.2 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 242,000 acrefeet. (3) Grenada Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of remaining public-use facilities has been deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements with local interests for construction and non-Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with projects for which recreation facilities are being constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 220.75 feet NGVD on July 30, 1994, when storage in the flood control pool was 780,400 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 59,800 cubic feet per second on Feb. 12, 1994. On Sep. 30, 1994, the pool elevation was 213.7 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 504,000 acrefeet. (4) Sardis Lake (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 267.72 feet NGVD on July 31, 1994, when storage in the flood control pool was 893,000 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 30,300 cubic feet per second on Feb. 13, 1994. On Sep. 30, 1994 the pool elevation was 256.7 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 510,400 acre-feet. A construction contract was awarded for the seismic remediation of Sardis Dam utilizing driven pre-stressed concrete piling as a result of an extensive study and evaluation of the expected performance of the dam during a major earthquake in the New Madrid earthquake zone of the central United States. (c) Greenwood, Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (d) Main stem. Remaining unconstructed features are subject to Yazoo Basin Reformulation Study. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (e) Mississippi Delta, MS. Feasibility studies limited solely to flood control problems in the Big Sunflower River Basin, are proceeding at full Federal cost. These investigations are scheduled for completion in FY 97. (f) Reformulation Study. The uncompleted portions of the Yazoo Basin construction program are being reformulated. This reformulation study includes investigations of the engineering, economic, and environmental aspects of the basin and is being accomplished in 4 phases. These studies will evaluate reasonable arrays of alternatives to the project features that remained after construction of items budgeted and scheduled for award in FY 90 and the upper Yazoo projects report was approved on June 21, 1994. The Upper Steele Bayou report was approved on May 25, 1993. Concerning the final 2 phases, the Yazoo Backwater Reformulation Study began in FY 93 and the Tributaries study will begin in FY 95. (g) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2; Hunter Creek, Item A; South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 5A and 5B; North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A; Batupan Bogue, Items 4A, 4A-1, and 4A-2; Perry Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek, Item 7. All construction under this feature is complete, and a final report was submitted to the Secretary of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed has been turned over to the local sponsors for operation 41-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION and maintenance except for the instrumented system on Goodwin Creek where the structures were retained for possible future studies. The Demonstration Erosion Control Project (DEC), a joint project with the USDA Soil Conservation Service was initiated by FY 85 appropriations as a continuation on streambank erosion control efforts. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the applicability of a systems approach to the design of erosion, sedimentation, and flood control works by applying this approach to 15 demonstration watersheds in the Yazoo Basin hill area. During FY 94, work continued in the DEC toward development of the systems plans and implementation of a monitoring program. Cumulative through FY 94, the District has completed the construction of 82 low drop grade control structures, 456,551 linear feet of bank stabilization, 88,365 linear feet of channel improvement, 9 box culverts, 6 high drop grade control structures, and 427 riser pipe grade control structures. (h) Tributaries. Construction: (1) (1) Bank Stabilization. Three bank stabilization items located on the Tallahatchie and Yalobusha Rivers were awarded in FY 94. The work should be complete in FY 95. (2) Channels. Construction of the Alligator-Catfish, Round Lake Water Control Structure was completed Nov. 28, 1989. Construction on the remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (3) Levees. Levee work associated with the last item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Levee work associated with Item 1 and Item 1-A Pelucia Creek is complete. Three Pelucia Creek pumping stations are complete. Construction of Pelucia Creek, Item 2, Item 3, and Item 4 were completed in FY 94. Pelucia Creek relocations are scheduled for completion in FY 97. (i) Upper Yazoo Projects. The first eight items of channel improvement, approximately 56 miles, and four drainage structures have been completed. This work extends from Yazoo City, Mississippi, to about 15 miles upstream of Belzoni, Mississippi. The Fort Pemberton Flood Control Structure was completed on Apr. 29, 1991. The Upper Yazoo Projects Reformulation Study was completed in December 1993. Item 3A-2 levee was completed in FY 94. Item 3A-1 channel was awarded in FY 94 and is scheduled for completion in late FY 95. Item 3A-2 channel work is scheduled for award in the second half of FY 95. This item will contain the first thin layer disposal site. Roebuck Lake and Fort Loring water control structures and Tchula Lake weirs are under construction and scheduled for completion in FY 95. Design efforts for Channel Items 3, 3B, and 4 are underway. Plans and specifications are being prepared for the Alligator-Catfish water control structure, scheduled for award in May 1995. The Belzoni Bridge (known as the Brooklyn Bridge) is an old steel turn span which served as a river crossing at Belzoni, MS, until the 1970's. In July 1993, the bridge collapsed and fell into the Yazoo River. The Corps determined the collapsed bridge was adversely affecting flood control. A report to the Senate was prepared in March 1994 requesting approval to remove the bridge. Approval and funds for bridge removal were received in October 1994, contingent upon Humphreys County and the City of Belzoni, MS, officially abandoning the bridge. Plans are currently being developed for removal of the bridge. A contract for the work is expected to be awarded in July 1995 and completed in December 1995. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. Rocky Bayou area levee Items 1A and 1B have been completed. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four Greentree Reservoirs and pumping stations have been constructed to mitigate for the waterfowl impacts of the project. Mitigation of the terrestrial impacts is now underway. Approximately 8,800 acres of cleared, frequently flooded, agricultural lands have been obtained in the Yazoo Backwater area of Mississippi to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the Yazoo Area and Satartia Area levees projects. This land is now being reforested and will be managed for terrestrial wildlife. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 70 percent complete. A total of 51.6 miles of backwater levee has been completed. Memphis District CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. 41-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1971 and is 4 percent complete. CONSTRUCTION GENERAL Nonconnah Erosion Protection I-B, awarded, Jun. 25, 1992, completed Apr. 12, 1993. Fulton, KY, Lake 9 Outlet Structure, Gate 6 Hoise, awarded De. 13, 1993, 0 percent complete. Helena, AR, concrete mattress at Helena, awarded Jan. 21, 1994, completed Oct. 5, 1994. HELENA HARBOR,. PTILLTPS COUNTY, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. Remaining work consists of tree growth on Item 1. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1989 and Item 3-2, awarded Sep. 10, 1992, is 98 percent complete. HORN LAKE CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES INCLUDING COW PEN CREEK, TENNESSEE AND MISSISSIPPI Location. Horn Lake Creek is located in northwest Desoto County, MS and southwest Shelby County, TN. Existing project. The project was approved for construction on Nov. 17, 1986, under authority of Title IV, Section 401 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project consists of 3.5 miles of drift removal and 2.75 miles of channel clearing on Horn Lake Creek; 2.1 miles of channel clearing on Rocky Creek and 0.62 miles of channel clearing and 1.85 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. The project will provide 1.1-year flood frequency protection on Horn Lake and Rocky Creeks and 25-year flood frequency protection on Cow Pen Creek. The estimated construction cost for the project is $4,700,000. The initial contract for project construction was awarded in Apr. 1993. Local Cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the Horn Lake Creek Watershed Drainage District on Feb. 26, 1992. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, rights-ofway and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution. Total non-Federal cost share will be between 25 and 50 percent of total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. The initial construction contract for drift removal and channel clearing on Horn Lake Creek was completed in Aug. 1993. The contract for work on Rocky Creeks was awarded in September 1994. Cow Pen Creek will be awarded once the Horn Lake Drainage District completes acquisition of rightsof- way. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 36 percent complete. Engineering investigations are underway to provide a gravel surface on the 6.0 miles at Clarendon. Gravel was not originally provided on the levee crown. NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN Operations and results during fiscal year. Item 1-A, bridge protection, awarded Oct. 26, 1990, completed Feb. 28, 1993. Item 1-B, bridge protection awarded Jun. 24, 1993, completed Feb. 28, 1993. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1990 and is 39 percent complete. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. In addition minor maintenance on levees is performed as required by the local interests and major maintenance is performed as required for slide repairs, road rehabilitation, and other similar work by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Huffman, AR, Berm was awarded Sep. 24, 1993, and is 85 percent complete. Tiptonville, TN Berm was awarded Nov. 19, 1993, and is substantially complete. Ridgely, TN Berm was awarded Apr. 28, 1994, and is 30 percent complete. Slope stability work was awarded at Walls, MS Jun. 27, 1994, and is 39 percent complete. Flower Lake, MS Aug. 19, 1994, 0 percent complete. Below Porter Lake, Levee Rdwy, awarded Oct. 28, 1993, completed Jul. 30, 1994. Barfield/Joiner Resurfacing, awarded Nov. 30, 1993, completed Jul. 29, 1994. Lake County Seepage Berm L-872, awarded Nov. 19, 1993, completed Oct. 20, 1994. Dogtooth Bend Culvert Gate/Hoist, awarded Dec. 1, 1993, 97 percent complete. Seepage Berm, L-859, Par 2 Ridgely Lake, TN, awarded Apr. 28, 1994, 30 percent complete. Levee Slope Restr., Walls, MS, awarded Jun. 27, 1994, 39 percent complete. Levee Slope Stab., St. Johns-New Madrid, awarded Jul. 28, 1994, 8 percent complete. Below Commerce, Levee Resurfacing, awarded Aug. 23, 1994, 0 percent complete. Long Lake Culvert Repair, awarded Sep. 24, 1993, 8 percent complete. Mud Lake Floodgate awarded Jun. 30, 1992, 98 percent complete. Culvert Replacement Blue Bayou, awarded Sep. 30, 1992, 95 percent complete. Repair Cache River Culvert awarded Sep. 22, 1993, 8 percent complete. Levee Seepage Control, Huffman, AR, awarded Sep. 23, 1993, 91 percent complete. Below Whitehall Resurfacing, 41-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION awarded Aug. 31, 1994, 0 percent complete. Wilson Levee Resurfacing, awarded Aug. 31, 1994, 4 percent complete. REELFOOT LAKE - LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during this fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 89 percent complete. ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO (a) Little River Drainage. Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed this Fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 90 percent complete. (b) St. Francis River and Tributaries. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Lower St. Francis River. Blackdale Mangrum Gravel awarded Sep. 29, 1993, 85 percent complete. Mark Tree, AR Siphon Rehabilitation awarded Sep. 27, 1993, 62 percent complete. Below Rivervale Levee Restoration awarded Sep. 27, 1993, 74 percent complete. Mark Tree Levee Slope Restoration awarded Jun. 24, 1993, 100 percent complete, Oct. 23, 1993. Schug Levee Graveled awarded Jun. 29, 1993, completed Oct. 23, 1993. Ditch 1, Item 2, bridges, miles 14.32 and 15.00, awarded Jun. 13, 1989, completed Sep. 30, 1994. Ditch 1, Item 3, bridges, miles 22.80 and 27.63, awarded Oct. 23, 1990, completed Aug. 6, 1993. Ditch 7, bridge, mile 6.05, awarded May 21, 1992, 99 percent complete. Ditch 7, channel and culverts, awarded Sep. 22, 1993, completed July 29, 1994. Ditch 1, Item 2, channel, awarded Jul. 15, 1993, completed June 7, 1994. Rivervale Culvert, near Mark Tree, AR, awarded Jan. 25, 1994, completed Aug. 26, 1994. Hwy 63 - Hwy 62 Levee Resurfacing, awarded Aug. 31, 1994, 7 percent complete. (c) Upper St. Francis River. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Main-New Franklin, bridge, mile 3.64, awarded Sep. 29, 1989, completed Aug. 15, 1994. Bypass Steele, bridge, mile 2.49, awarded May 1, 1991, completed Sep. 9, 1994. Bypass Steele, bridge, mile 3.10, awarded May 1, 1991, completed Sep. 9, 1994. New Franklin, bridge, mile 6.00, awarded Jul. 30, 1992, 4 percent complete. New Franklin, bridge, mile 6.94, awarded May 27, 1993, completed Jul. 15, 1994. New Franklin, bridge, mile 9.60, awarded Jul. 30, 1992, 4 percent complete. New Franklin, bridges, miles 0.68 and 1.72, awarded May 25, 1993, completed Jun. 30, 1994. Ditch 1, Channel Enlargement, Item 2 awarded Jul. 15, 1993, completed Jun. 7, 1994. Ditch 7, Channel Clearing awarded Sep. 22, 1993, completed Jul. 29, 1994. Main and Ditch 2, Item 1, Mile 12.13 and 14.65, awarded Apr. 28, 1994, 76 percent complete. Ditch 24 Channel Clearing, awarded Jul. 12, 1994, 58 percent complete. Ditch 12 Channel Clearing, awarded Jul. 15, 1994, 39 percent complete. Dudley Ditch-Lick Creek, Channel clearing, awarded Jul. 29, 1994, 0 percent complete. N. Franklin Ditch, Lat 2 Channel Enlargement, awarded Aug. 10, 1994, 20 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project initiated 1937. project is 86 percent complete. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contract awarded or completed during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. Project is currently inactive due to lack of local support. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Forked Deer River and principal tributaries, TN. Forked Deer River channel improvement is 13 percent complete. (b) Item 2, Bridge Protection. Awarded Apr. 8, 1993, completed May 31, 1994. (c) Obion River and principal tributaries, TN. Obion Rivers channel improvement is 66 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. West Tennessee Tributaries Project is 45 percent complete. WHITEMAN'S CREEK, ARKANSAS Location. The project is located in the city of Jonesboro, AR. Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, on Oct. 31, 1992. The project consists of 6.1 miles of channel improvements on Whiteman's, Turtle, Moore's and Higginbottom Creeks. The proposed improvements will provide 10-year level of flood protection along Whiteman's, Turtle and Moores and 25-year protection on Higginbottom. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is expected to be executed in early FY 1995. Conditions as of Sep. 30. The City of Jonesboro, AR, the project sponsor, continues to work to meet PCA requirements (i.e., lands, relocations, etc.) 41-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-A MISSISSSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 0-9571 10-81 11-25 38 45 118 81 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 104-234 127-129 129 129-234 235 279-287 287-303 Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL The Jump-New Orleans, LA Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA Homeplace, LA Bohemia, LA Davis Pond, LA (formerly Myrtle Grove, LA) Caernarvon, LA Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans-Morganza, LA New Orleans-Baton Rouge, LA Bonnet Carre' Floodway, LA Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Areas, LA/MS (Bonnet Carre') Bonnet Carre'-Baton Rouge, LA Baton Rouge Harbor Morganza Floodway, LA Morganza-Old River, LA Dredging, revetment, and contract work Main line levee, right bank Local levees, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank 41-12 Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Postauthorization change report, approved June 1987. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. -- Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Public Law 100-676 Modified by Public Law 87-874. -- Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-A (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 303-314 314-572 437 437-721 490 537 646 605-666 672-993 722-725 721-734 803-873 857 890 890 890-954 902-922 922 946 9571 Old River, LA control Old River-Cypress Creek, AR Vicksburg Harbor, MS Vicksburg-Lake View, MS Wilson Point, LA Greenville Harbor, MS Long Lake, Helena, AR Henrico-Helena, AR St. Francis River-Commerce, Mo3 Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) Memphis Harbor, TN Tiptonville-Obion River Near Mud Lake, TN St. Johns Bayou, MO New Madrid Floodway, MO New Madrid-Birds Point, MO Slough Bend, Hickman, KY Hickman, KY Peafield, MO Cairo, Cairo drainage district Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83-780. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966.2 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. Main line levee, left bank, levee extension, and diversion Obion River Pumping station and adjacent channel improvements Drainage floodgate and levee closure Drainage floodgate and levee closure Floodway, right bank Main line levee, left bank Floodwall, left bank Drainage floodgate Floodwalls and levees 41-13 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 Act. Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-A (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage Floodwalls, levees, and pumping -- district, Mounds, Mound plant City, and vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL Levees, both banks Intermittent (Sec. 6). Cape Girardeau, MO, to Rock Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). Island, IL 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Commerce, MO, is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. 41-14 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 117 117-129 117-129 105 105-120 115 116 5 5-105 29 Floodway Floodway Floodway ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA1 Atchafalaya Basin, Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Flood ways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrell Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City Morgan City Below Morgan City Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee Calumet Below Morgan City Berwick1 Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Floodways) Simmesport-Hamburg Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 42-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. 41-15 Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf1 Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 29 40 40 40 41 41 41 94 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 0-8 50-133 96 133 Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges East bank, levee Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement Washington to west protection levee. 41-16 Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. -- -- Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf Intercepting drainage channel. 0-17 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 17-40 40-51 51-60 17-42 87-107 40 60 87 Bayous Cocodrie-Boeuf diversion Bayou Boeuf Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boeuf Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Bayou Rapides Pumping plant and gravity structure Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing, and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing Flood protection Bank protection Levee, south bank Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Senate Doc. (Public Law 84-99) Added to project by Public Law 101-514. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. (4) (4) 41-17 (2,3) 82-145 3-56 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks Sicily Island area 3-56 5 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot 0-6 0-165 0-22 0-0.2 Below Red River area Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR and LA Boeuf River, AR and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou La Fourche Boeuf River, AR and LA above Bayou La Fourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks Tributaries of Boeuf River-- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary of Bayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, LA Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Clearing Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal Levee, south bank 41-18 (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977, MR&T authority.2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526.2,3 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) See Table 42-E (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. 23-98 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 35-98 48-102 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 - 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 Revetment Levee, north bank Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank Levees, left bank (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Fletcher Bend, AR, to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocono River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and enlargement of pumping plant. Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 41-19 Floodway channel REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 Tallahatchie River, MS Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries Clarendon levee Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Des Arc, AR CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS, and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and structures Levee and outlet structures Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement 41-20 Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 42-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 42-D. See Table 42-C. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 0-17 0-12 0-108 0-25 0-20 0-15 0-47 Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Porter Gap, TN REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Obion Creek, KY LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO MISSOURI RIVER, MO Mouth to St. Charles, MO ILLINOIS RIVER, IL Mouth to Havana, IL Levees Levees Levees Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtenant structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station Channel improvement Mile 49 above Cairo. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). 41-21 Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 1970.2 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 0-28 0-120 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Floodwall, levee, revetment, and Mounds, IL pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA, and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Tech Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans District. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526.3 See Table 42-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 41-22 TABLE 42-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Names Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Nearest town to damsite Drainage area, square miles Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Elevation, feet, NGVD Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Outlet gates: Number Size, feet Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Length, feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Elevation, feet, NGVD Dam: Type, earthfill Length, thousand feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Yalobusha Grenada 1,320 10 86 193.0 65 1.252 17.8 3 7.5 by 14 10.7 Chute 200 231.0 52 106 1,385 19.7 247.5 Rolled 13.9 256.0 Yocona Enid 560 6 58 230.0 28 602 20.2 Little Tallahatchie Sardis 1,545 11 108 236.0 58.5 1,462 17.7 2 4 8 by 16 6 by 12 9.4 Chute 200 268.0 50 41 554 18.5 284.0 Rolled 8.4 293.0 10.0 Chute 400 281.4 132 90 1,447 17.6 301.0 Hydraulic 15.3 311.4 41-23 Coldwater Arkabutla 1,000 5 31 209.3 33 494 9.3 3 8.5 by 19 10.0 Chute 300 238.3 89 63 858 16.1 256.3 Rolled 11.5 264.3 St. Francis Wappapello 1,310 4 31 354.7 23 582 8.4 3 10 by 20 18.0 Gravity 740 394.7 229 32 521 7.5 413.7 Rolled 2.7 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis, and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carre' Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands. Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for floodcontrol work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title). Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN. Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR. Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River: construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River, and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN. Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, IL. Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood-control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Beouf, and Cocodrie, LA. Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS. Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess... 41-24 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 351, 72d Cong. Public Law 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS.1 Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR. 1 Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA. Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees(below Plum Bayou).1 Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).1 Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA.1 Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements. 1 Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO. Big Sunflower River, etc.1 Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO, with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR. Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA.1 Flood protection at Des Arc, AR. Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO. Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO. Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Mete Basin, AR. Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA.1 Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA. 41-25 TABLE 42-D (Continued) Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516,78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA. Bank protection, Amite River, LA. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA, levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.' Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR. Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA. Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS. Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN. Improve Greenville Harbor, MS. Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-- $50 million. Modification-Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA. Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS. Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Mete. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874 Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. . H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 41-26 Oct. 30, 1951 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 18, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA, project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR. Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA. Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS. Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR. Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR. Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS. Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS. Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA. Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report. Approved Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. 41-27 TABLE 42-D (Continued) Apr. 14, 19662 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 Apr. 29, 19703 Jun. 4, 19703 Dec. 31, 1970 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970. respectively. River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, authorized: a.. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and TN. b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million. Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR. Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS. b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251, Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. 41-28 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1-Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda-On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26,1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, project: Report of OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. 41-29 TABLE 42-D (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Ind. on VXD May 31, 1977, Letter Report.2 Jun. 28, 1980 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act. 1981 Supplemental Appropriations Bill for FY Ending Sep. 30, 1985 (PL 99-88), and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA. The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for the preservation and development of environmental resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc., for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. Unpublished Vicksburg District report dated May 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Six Mile Bayous, LA. Public Law 96-285, Jun. 28, 1980. Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, 1980. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Bill (PL 99-88), and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). 41-30 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Energy and water Development Appropriation Act, 1994 Sec. 104(a), Authorization of Projects - Authorization of Construction: Incorporation of the project for flood control, Louisiana State Penitentiary levee, Mississippi River, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 10, 1982, at a total cost of $23,400,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $17,600,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $5,800,000. No acquisition of land for or actual construction of the project may commence until appropriate non-Federal interests shall agree to undertake measures to minimize the loss of fish and wildlife habitat lands in the project area. The work is unscheduled. a. Bushley Bayou, LA. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project for flood control, Bushley Bayou, LA. b. Eight Mile Creek, Paragould, AR. Project entails channel improvement along the creek with miniparks and hiking/ biking trails. c. Helena and Vicinity, AR. The Helena Basin is an urban basin containing approximately 3,500 acres which frequently and severely floods the city of Helena. A pumping station and sump with channel enlargement and a gated culvert was recommended. d. West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Channel improvements along Ten Mile Bayou and Fifteen Mile Bayou for a total of 23.86 miles, with limited revegetation of right-of-way to maintain environmental stability. e. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO. Flood control for urban and rural land. f. Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, TN and MS. Channel enlargement, recreation features with channel construction and environmental enhancement. g. Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS. This is an urban flood control project located in extreme northwest Mississippi and southwest Tennessee. The plan of improvement consists of 3.5 miles of selective drift removal on lower Horn Lake Creek and 2.6 miles of vegetative clearing on Horn Lake Creek, 2.1 miles on Rocky Creek and 0.6 miles of vegetative clearing and 1.8 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. Hike/bike trails are included along Rocky Creek and Cow Pen Creek. h. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, La. Not mentioned, but this Act authorized basic cost sharing principles for the project. In particular establishes that the fish and wildlife enhancement feature of the project is of national significance, and therefore, a 100 percent Federal cost. i. Lower Atchafalaya Basin Reevaluation Study. Authority to, within available funds, investiage conditions at Wax Lake Outlet, Bayou Black, and other features, and recommend any modification desirable for flood protection navigation, and environmental program. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 41-31 TABLE 42-D (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Sec. 601(a) Authorization of Projects. Authorization of Construction: a. Yazoo Backwater Area, MS. Authorized the project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at the Yazoo Backwater Project, MS. The project shall include acquisition of 40,000 acres for mitigation of project-induced fish and wildlife losses. b. Greenville Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, MS, as contained in the reports of Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1977 and Feb. 2, 1982, at a total cost of $43,700,000 with an estimated first Federal cost of $28,000,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $15,700,000. c. Vicksburg Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Vicksburg Harbor, as contained in the report of the Chief of Engineers, Aug. 13, 1979, at a total estimated first Federal cost of $55,900,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $23,300,000. d. Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR. The recommended plan consists of dredging a navigation channel to provide access to 685 acres of landfill; construction of an overlook park; implementing landscaping and erosion control measures; and mitigation fish and wildlife losses. The project is scheduled to be constructed in two phases. e. White River Navigation to Batesville, AR. The plan of improvement recommended in the Feasibility Report provides for construction and maintenance to provide a 200-foot wide, 9-foot deep channel available 95 percent of the time from mile 10 (Arkansas Post Canal) to mile 254, two scenic overlooks, a primitive camping area, and acquisition of about 1,865 acres of woodlands for mitigation. However, section 52 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 deauthorized this project. f. Obion Creek, KY. To prevent headwater flooding along tributary streams and backwater flooding of alluvial lands. g. Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN. This is a navigation project in the vicinity of Memphis, TN, which would consist of dredging and maintaining a 4.9 mile long, 500-foot minimum width, 9-foot deep general navigation channel with additional dredging as required and strategic placement of dredged material to create and provide navigation access to 1,000 acres to be developed as a waterfront industrial complex. Sec. 806. Reelfoot Lake, KY. This project is modified to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operating the pumping plant feature of such project shall be 50 percent. Sec. 836. Mud Lake, Western Tennessee Tributaries. This project is modified to provide that the requirements of local cooperation shall be (1) 50 percent of the value of the lands, easements, and rights-of-way, (2) to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, and (3) to maintain and operate all the works after completion. 41-32 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Jun. 4, 1987 Water Resources Development Act, 1988 Water Resources Development Act, 1988 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill, 1990 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill, 1990 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill, 1990 Water Resource Development Act, 1992 Modification of Mississippi Delta Region project to construct salinity control structure at Davis Pond (mile 118) rather than at Myrtle Grove (mile 59). Sec. 3(a), Project Authorizations - Authorization of Construction: a. Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Area, MS and LA. Authorized the project for environmental enhancement, as contained in the report of Chief of Engineers, dated May 19, 1986, at a total cost of $59,300,000. Section 4(b) West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Modified the project by allowing that non-Federal cooperation may be provided by levee districts, drainage districts, or any unit of a state, county, or local government. West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Directed the Corps to develop the most cost-effective flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without regard to frequency of flooding, drainage area, and the amount of runoff. Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant Directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate existing flood control features for the Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. Atchafalaya Basin Flooding System, LA. Does not mention this act for our project added language that will standardize the nature of the United States' title in this area and afford equal treatment to the affected landowners (right of First Refusal). Whiteman's Creek, Arkansas. Directed the Secretary of the Army to implement flood control improvement, which essentially consist of 6.1 miles of channel enlargement along streams within the city limits of Jonesboro, Arkansas. Unpublished New Orleans District report, Nov. 1, 1984. Public Law 100-676 Nov. 17, 1988 Public Law 100-676, Nov. 17, 1988 Public Law 101-83, Jul. 25, 1989 Public Law 101-514, Nov. 5, 1990 Public Law 101-514, Nov. 5, 1990 Public Law 102-580 Oct. 31, 1992 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 42-E. 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 41-33 TABLE 42-D (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act of Incorporation Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Public Law No. 79-526 79-526 79.526 79-526 79-526 79-526 80-858 81-516 81-516 Authorizing Act Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 22, 1936 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Description Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements, TN Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, AR, on north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou) White River levees, Augusta to Clarendon and De Valls Bluff, AR Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, LA Big Sunflower River, etc. Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton Rouge, LA (Baton Rouge Harbor) Jonesville, LA Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA For Last Full Report See Annual Report for 1941, p. 943 1946, p. 1029 1946, p. 1053 1946, p. 1083 1945, p. 982 1946, p. 1061 1948, p. 1059 1953, p. 773 1953, p. 737 41-34 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost1 Project Title Fiscal Year 1994 Completed features2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River--South Bank Red River levees, LA Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control & Water Supply) Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR (All except Big Creek & Tribs.) Lower White River (Big Creek & Tribs.) Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO Eight Mile Creek, AR L'Anguille Basin, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake, TN and KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance), MS St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS Greenville Harbor, MS Memphis Harbor (Ensley Berm), TN Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR Helena, AR, and Vicinity West Memphis, AR, and Vicinity Vicksburg Harbor, MS Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, LA Hickman Bluff, KY $ 239,238,000 1,341,000,000 5,270,0003 4,000,0003 3,570,000,000 1,666,000,000 164,000,000 20,400,0003 292,273,000 23,200,0003 50,000,0003 92,800,000 478,000,000 29,676,0003 130,900,0003 1,926,145,000 16,802,0003 55,400,0003 155,000,000 381,000,000 8,620,0003 13,300,0003 128,000,000 14,300,0003 (11,000,000) 3 440,000 10,560,0008 24,800,0003 29,200,000 46,600,0004 18,400,0004 2,400,0004 32,400,0003'4 23,100,0004 32,156,0004 7,700,0003,4 11,600,0004,6 63,500,0004 24,800,0004,7 3,000,0003,8 41-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-F (Continued) SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost1 Project Title Fiscal Year 1994 Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas, LA and MS 57,200,0005 Whiteman's Creek, AR 3,340,000 Eastern Arkansas, AR 114,0003 Jackson and Trenton, AR 9,650,0003 Mississippi Delta, MS 61,600,0003 Bushley Bayou, LA 37,000,000 TOTAL $11,327,400,031 1. Inflation projected through the construction period. Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads. 2. Includes Bonnet Carre', Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features; Teche-Vermilion Basins, LA. 3. Incremental (not projected through the construction period). 4. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 5. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676, Nov. 18, 1988. 6. Locals are building their own project. 7. Price Level as of 1988. 8. Not authorized. 41-36 TABLE 42-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Location Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Mileage Fiscal Year 1994 Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 -- 152.3 152.3 Main stem channel 234-320 -- 780 780 Vicksburg Main stem channel 322-600 -- 1813.4 1813.4 Vicksburg Harbor 437 -- 12.3 12.3 Greenville Harbor 537 -- 192.3 192.3 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 -- 14,864.9 14,864.9 Memphis Harbor, McKellar Lake 725 -- 461.3 461.3 TOTAL -- 18,276.5 18,276.5 41-37 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares) 1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Venice, LA............... Olga, LA ............... Lower Childress- Fort Jackson, LA ......... Neptune, LA ............ Buras, LA .............. Tropical Bend, LA ........ Bayou Lamoque, LA ...... Port Sulphur, LA ......... Nestor, LA .............. Point Michel, LA ......... Bohemia, LA ............ Diamond, LA ............ Gravolet, LA ............ Junior, LA .............. Harlem, LA ............. Myrtle Grove, LA ........ Monsecour, LA .......... Alliance, LA ......... Belair, LA .............. Jesuit Bend, LA .......... Linwood, LA ............ Oak Point, LA ........... Scarsdale, LA ........... English Turn, LA ........ Poydras, LA.............. Twelve Mile Point, LA ..... Cutoff, LA .............. Third district reach, LA .... Algiers Point, LA ......... Gouldsboro Bend, LA ...... Gretna Bend, LA ......... Greenville Bend, LA ...... Carrollton Bend, LA ...... 12 19 22 23 25 30 33 39 41 44 46 49 51 54 56 59 61 62 65 68 71 72 75 78 82 84 88 93 95 96 97 100 104 RL RL RR L RL RLRL RL R L R L R L R L R L R R L R R R R L -- 40,126 -- 13,885 .. 1,984 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. -- .. -- -- -- -- -- -- --. -- 12,506 1,269 -- --. 12,06 --. --. --26 -- -- --. --. --. .. .. .. ,. .. .. -.-. .. .. -- 160 -- --. .; .. -- -- .,. .. 73,489 .. .. --. .. .. .. -- -- -- -- 73,48 --. --. --. --. --. --. .. 12,173 �. .� .. �. .. .. .. -- -- - .. __ .. -- -- .. --_ --. -- - -- 1,666 3,346 3,731 7,794 -- -- -- -- 15,430 14,399 17,283 25,012 21,505 36,995 12,506 22,932 15,441 11,600 23,874 23,599 15,148 17,435 11,571 17,265 26,111 24,978 12,005 12,377 17,839 19,718 45,864 9,979 23,234 27,167 12,238 4,960 9,662 22,045 16,262 oo 00 V1 O OZ r 0 0 zH O d 0 r 0 Ci P TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares). Feet) Feet) Avondale Bend, LA ....... Kenner, LA ............. Luling, LA .............. Destrehan, LA ........... Good Hope, LA .......... Waterford, LA ........... Montz, LA .............. Lucy, LA ............... Reserve, LA ............. Willow Bend, LA ......... Angelina, LA ............ Vacherie, LA ............ Belmont, LA ............ Rich Bend, LA ........... Romeville, LA ........... St. Alice, LA ............ Burnside, LA ............ Aben, LA ............... St. Elmo, LA ............ Smoke Bend, LA ......... Marchand, LA ........... Philadelphia Point, LA .... New River Bend, LA ...... White Castle, LA ......... St. Gabriel, LA .......... Plaquemine Bend, LA ..... Manchac, LA ............ Missouri Bend, LA ........ Arlington, LA ........... Port Allen, LA ........... Scotlandville, LA ......... Allendale, LA ........... Springfield Bend, LA ...... Arboth, LA ............. Faulkner Lake, LA ....... Grand Bay, LA .......... Bayou Sara, LA .......... 109 114 119 102 126 128 132 136 138 141 145 148 152 157 161 165 170 172 174 177 180 183 185 193 201 209 215 222 227 231 234 238 244 250 253 258 265 R L RLL RL RLRL RLRLRL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL 1,138 1,866 2,142 7,209 -- -- -- .-- --. .-- --. --. 190 280 160 800 190 28 -- 160 -- -- -- -- -- 80 -- 6,025 9,604 9,377 --36,462 -- --. .-- 1,480 2,444 1,479 1,620 2,432 -- -- -- -- --3 6,095 15,378 7,168 9,396 11,747 2,795 --. 10,494 13,178 8,737 17,716 18,040 5,146 -- 28,409 41,595 41,948 5,409 24,531 20,386 17,502 19,450 23,234 13,227 31,727 26,025 25,575 38,498 25,966 31,048 29,304 11,700 12,014 18,180 19,449 5,379 45,672 45,968 33,292 45,094 38,976 30,437 16,615 17,627 1,623 28,698 25,690 20,399 17,382 18,234 27,698 r-+ 71 TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Red Store, LA ........... Arrow Bend, LA ......... Boies Point, LA .......... Morganza, LA ........... Iowa Point, LA .......... Brunette Point, LA ....... Greenwood Bend, LA ...... Hog Point, LA ........... Carr Point, LA .......... Above Old River, LA ...... Fort Adams, MS ......... Point Breeze, LA ......... Coochie, LA ............. Palmetto, MS ........... Subtotal New Orleans District, Mississippi River ..... Dikes: Profit Island Chute Closure, LA ............. Hog Point, LA ............ OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard revetment: Inflow channel ........... Inflow channel ........... Outflow channel ......... 269 272 275 279 282 285 289 296 304 305 308 313 317 322 RL RRL RL RRRL RRL 252 L 299 L .. �. �. �. �. 3,303 �. -- -- 18,464 13,600 16,094 20,513 15,477 11,435 25,815 24,454 20,725 8,170 24,206 13,565 17,150 34,650 �. �� �. �. ,� �. 1,336 �. �. -- 29,160 2,926 142,429 11,439 61,957 103,402 -- 1,828,724 (5.52 Miles) (2.17 Miles) (346.35 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,315 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,850 11,165 (2.12 Miles) 315 L 315 R 315 L&R 2,415 4,365 19,891 0O Or TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Auxiliary inflow channel ... 312 L&R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,200 Auxiliary outflow channel .. 312 L&R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,790 Total standard revetment, Old River ............ -- 49,661 (9.41 Miles) ATCHAFALAYA RIVER Standard revetment: Mile One, LA ............ Coville Bayou, LA ........ Legonier, LA ............ Simmesport, LA ......... Kuhlman Bayou, LA ...... Odenburg, LA ........... Cason, LA ............. McCrea, LA.............. Woodside, LA ........... Provosty, LA ............ Crooked Bayou, LA ....... Mercier, LA ............. Barberton, LA ........... Evans Point, LA ......... Goudeau, LA ............ Morris Bayou, LA ........ Goodwood, LA ........... Red Cross, LA ........... Melville LA ............. Cross Bayou, LA ......... Melville South, LA ....... Toles, LA ............... Petite Prairie, LA ......... Three Mile Bayou, LA ..... Below Confluence of Red and Atchafalaya Rivers 1 3 4 6 7 9 12 13 14 17 18 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 35 36 37 L RLRLRRLRLRLRL RL R L R L RL R R H Cl) Cl) Cl) CCl) n dd H zr 310 970 -- 1,430 2,205 6,510 4,150 6,550 8,940 10,636 5,565 5,375 10,798 6,572 13,002 9,111 16,246 10,478 3,592 6,328 3,938 3,800 8,505 8,065 4,870 6,020 4,070 6,355 8,381 6,510 9,112 -- --. 13,427 31,372 1,725 4,754 TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) Holloway Lake, LA ....... 37 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,085 Bayou Sherman, LA ...... 38 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,200 Krotz Springs, LA ........ 40 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,925 Sherburne, LA ........... 43 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,035 Bayou Big Graw, LA ...... 46 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,394 Otis Landing, LA ......... 54 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,251 Morgan City ............ 115 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,410 Total standard revetment 10,145 1,280 53,911 -- -- 6,479 -- 222,157 (1.921 Miles) (42.08 Miles) Dikes: Ten Mile Dikes 10 R 2,500 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,500 (.47 Miles) (.47 Miles) Below Confluence of Old River LOWER RED RIVER Outflow Channel and Red River Standard revetment: Long Lake, LA ........... 10 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,652 Naples, LA ............. 7 R .- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,190 Turnbull Island, LA ....... 9 L -- -- -- -- -- -- - 11,038 Total standard revetment -- - -- -- -- -- -- 23,880 (4.52 Miles) Dikes: None 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). bO O n O O O 73 0 m 1 a n 0 C,' U) 0 TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Bougere Bend, LA ........ Dead Mans Bend, MS ..... Glasscock Cutoff, MS-LA ... Railroad Landing, MS ..... St. Catherine Bend, LA .... Morville, LA ............ Natchez Island, MS ....... Carthage, MS ........... Vidalia Casting Field ...... Natchez Front, MS ....... Giles Cutoff, LA-MS ...... Gibson, LA ............. Ashland, LA-MS .......... Kempe Bend, LA ......... Browns Field, LA ........ Goldbottom, MS .......... Hardscrabble, LA ........ Grand Gulf, MS .......... Point Pleasant, MS-LA .... Togo Island, LA .......... Lake Karnac, LA-MS ...... Diamond Point, LA-MS .... Reid-Bedford, LA ......... Racetrack, MS ........... Barge Line Terminal, MS .. Vicksburg Harbor, MS ..... Delta Point, LA .......... King's Point--Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS ...... False Point, LA .......... Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-MS ............... Milliken Bend, LA ........ Belle Island, LA-MS ...... 329 335 342 346 350 356 357 361 363 364 366 371 374 383 389 392 398 403 413 415 419 423 429 433 437 437 437 R L R L R RR L L L R R L R R L R L R R L R R L L L R 4,418 8,448 -- --. -- --. -- 1,328 2,062 1,060 -- -- -- --_ -- --_ -- -- _ 1,509 1,280 7,900 10,316 -- -- 3,476 26,055 33,220 26,083 12,835 29,108 16,917 2,180 14,700 2,670 6,510 12,020 26,000 29,407 28,285 9,280 30,250 22,530 53,948 32,345 7,080 19,260 15,725 18,392 13,935 3,040 7,350 7,650 200 -- 439 L 443 R 446 L 453 R 460 L -- 19,330 -- 12,860 19,580 46,140 24,160 TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) Goodrich, LA............ 467 R 1,560 -- 6,607 -- -- 2,700 -- 40,765 Cottonwood Bar, MS ...... 470 R -- -- -- -- --.. -- -- 18,580 Filter-Cottonwood, MS ..... 474 L --.. -- -- -- -- -- 28,427 Hagaman, LA ........... 481 R -- -- -- .. -- -- 37,756 Ben Lomond, MS ......... 486 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,235 Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS .......... 488 R -- -- --.... 52,1242 Lake Providence, LA ...... 489 R --. -- ...- -- - - 11,600 Mayersville, MS ......... 497 L -- - -- -- --.. -- -- 34,992 Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-MS .......... 503 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,815 Carolina, MS ............ 507 L -- .... -- -- -- -- 11,080 Cracraft, AR ............ 511 R -- --- -- -- -- 22,210 Worthington, MS-AR ...... 514 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,350 Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS ............. 519 L -- -- -- -- - -- -- 45,653 American Cutoff, MS-AR ... 526 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,980 Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ... 530 R -- -- -- -- .. -- -- 33,685 Vancluse, AR ............ 534 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,016 Island 84, AR-MS ........ 535 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,475 Warfield Point, MS ....... 537 L -- -- -- -- .. -- -- 4,320 Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS .. 538 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,150 Spanish Moss, AR ........ 539 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,580 Tarpley Island, MS ....... 542 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 Miller Bend, MS ......... 544 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,360 Island 82, AR ........... 546 R -- --- -- -- -- . -- 3,080 Ashbrook Island, MS ...... 549 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,455 Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR .............. 553 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 43,015 Huntington Point, MS ..... 556 L -- -- -- -- .. -- -- 21,205 Pair O'Dice, AR ........... 561 R -- -- -- -- .. -- -- 9,095 Eutaw-Mounds, MS ....... 563 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 40,188 Cypress Bend, AR ........ 568 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,575 Catfish Point, MS ........ 573 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,075 Ozark, AR-MS............ 578 R -- -- -- -- - -- -- 22,015 0o tTI O rOn 0 z -- 20,315 Prentiss, AR-MS ......... 582 L, TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) Rosedale Bend, AR ....... Riverton, MS ............ Klondike, AR ............ Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS Lake Concordia, MS ...... Big Island, AR ........... Smith Point, MS ......... Dennis, MS ............. Cessions, MS ............ 585 586 588 593 596 598 601 611 615 L L R L L R L L L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,820 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,500 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,400 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,245 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,980 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,515 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,185 -- -- -- -- -- -- - 25,195 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,910 Total revetment, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ....... 6,010 (1.14 Miles) Dikes: Jackson Point, MS ........ Buck Island, MS ......... Opposite Warnicott Ldg., MS .................. Natchez Island, LA-MS .... Waterproof Bar, LA ....... Spithead Towhead, MS .... Browns Field, LA ........ Cottage Bend, LA-MS ..... Bondurant Towhead, LA ... Coffee Point, LA ......... Yucatan, MS ............ Togo Island, LA .......... Below Racetrack, MS ...... Racetrack Towhead, MS ... False Point, LA .......... Marshall Cutoff, LA ...... Below Grand Gulf, MS .... Fritz Island, LA .......... 330 L 339 L 352 358 379 386 388 389 394 405 410 416 430 431 441 448 399 338 L R R L R L R R R L L R R R L R -- 22,949 23,905 (3) 6,345 --. 360 250 5,850 --. -- --. -- 1,456,766 (275.90 Miles) -- 4,306 -- 6,345 -- 5,351 -- 14,658 -- 14,580 -- 9,511 -- 10,917 -- 14,049 -- 6,029 -- 8,770 -- 9,010 -- 8,256 -- 12,559 -- 10,880 -- 5,675 -- 5,166 -- 3,575 -- 4,160 TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Forest Home Towhead, LA Willow Cutoff, LA ........ Arcadia Point, MS ........ Cottonwood Bar, MS ...... Point Lookout, LA ........ Ajax Bar, MS ............ Ben Lomond, MS ......... Baleshed Ldg., MS ....... Wilson Point, LA ......... Corregidor, MS .......... Carolina, AR ............ Cracraft Lower, AR ....... Cracraft, AR ............ Leota, MS .............. Island 86, AR ........... Seven Oaks, AR .......... Walnut Point, MS ........ Anconia Chute, AR ....... Refuge, MS ............. Island 84, AR ........... Leland Bar, AR-MS ....... Leland Neck, AR-MS ...... Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR .... Island 82-Miller Bend, AR-MS ............... Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS ............... Ashbrook Cutoff, MS ...... Chicot Ldg., AR .......... Catfish Point, MS ........ Below Prentiss, MS ....... Malone Field, AR ......... Terrene, MS ............ White River Landing, AR .. Montgomery Towhead, AR .. Victoria Bend, AR ........ 449 462 470 471 478 482 488 493 500 505 509 510 513 514 520 523 525 527 528 532 538 540 540 L R L R RLLL RLL R R L R R LRL L R L R 2,240 5,955 -- 13,533 -- 4,275 -- 9,463 -- 2,406 -- 2,751 -- 28,152 -- 24,667 -- 15,091 -- 8,423 -- 6,730 -- 2,897 -- 10,329 -- 3,809 -- 7,571 -- 17,067 -- 5,829 -- 4,725 -- 4,604 -- 15,165 -- 12,475 -- 15,086 -- 4,315 -- 10,478 -- 13,646 -- 13,015 -- 8,728 -- 17,451 -- 5,290 -- 7,813 -- 7,549 -- 7,921 -- 2,201 -- 6,071 -- 6,773 544 R&L 547 549 564 571 580 585 590 591 592 596 L&R L RL RRL RRR 1,740 33 bO H O c3 O tri 0 (1 O Oz n r 0 .x 0 rr TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Smith Point, MS ......... Island 70, MS ........... Total dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ....... 600 L 608 L R R R R R -- 7,617 4,920 -- 26,355 27,660 (5.24 Miles) -- 514,068 (97.36 Miles) Miles Above Mouth ARKANSAS RIVER4 Standard revetment: Menard Bend, AR ........ Como, AR .............. Morgan Bend, AR ........ Yancopin, AR ........... Total standard revetment, Arkansas River ........ Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, AR ...... Morgan Bend, AR ........ Fletcher Bend, AR ........ Total dikes, Arkansas River ................ RED RIVER5 Standard revetment: Dupre, LA .............. Bringol, LA ............. Egg Bend, LA ........... Cologne Bend, LA ........ Roxana, LA ............. 31 34 36 24 30 36 39 L RL R R L R Cl) CH l) C) H n Mai Hl zn -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,770 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,720 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,250 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,800 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,540 (5.97 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,848 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,658 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,187 -- 7,693 (1.46 Miles) 69 73 75 77 83 2,690 4,000 2,400 650 3,325 TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) Ryland, LA............. 88 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,925 Whittington, LA ......... 89 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,900 Smith, LA .............. 91 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 Latanier, LA ............ 93 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,460 Hudson, LA ............. 99 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,458 Robert, LA.............. 102 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,500 Alexandria Front, LA ..... 105 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,280 Callahan, LA ............ 110 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,000 Cotton, LA .............. 116 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,700 Rapides, LA ............. 119 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,030 Boyce, LA .............. 125 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,548 Total standard revetment, Red River ......... . ---- -- -- -- -- 61,566 (11.66 Miles) Dikes6: Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA .. 71 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 Bringol (Egg Bend), LA .... 73 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,477 Egg Bend, LA ........... 75 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 900 Cologne Bend, LA ........ 77 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,850 Echo, LA ............... 78 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,900 Richardson, LA .......... 79 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 Alexandria, LA .......... 105 R -- -- -- -- -- -- . (Rock groin) 270 Bertrand, LA ............ 122 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,630 Total dikes, Red River . . . . -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,727 (3.74 Miles) 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). 3. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 4. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. 5. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. 6. Includes all types of dikes and retards. 00 d O t0 i O zO m 0 TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Big Island, AR ........... 598 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,905 Scrubgrass Bend, AR ...... 600 R -- -- -- -- - -- 7,315 Henrico, AR ............. 606 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 33,310 Cessions Towhead, AR ..... 615 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,465 m Island 67, MS ........... 621 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,630 Island 68 Bar-- Knowlton, AR ........... 622 R -- -- -- -- - -- -- 26,710 Ludlow, AR .............. 626 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,390 Rescue Land, AR-MS ...... 629 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 27,020 Fair Landing, AR ........ 632 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,690 Burke Landing, MS ....... 637 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,070 Island 62, AR ........... 638 R -- -- -- -- - -- -- 9,030 Island 63, MS ......... . 639 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,514 Island 63 Bar, MS ........ 639 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,795 Oldtown Bend, AR ........ 644 R -- -- -- - 26,860 Horseshoe, MS .......... 647 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,385 Westover, AR ........... 650 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,640 Delta-Friars Point, MS .... 665 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30,090 Helena, AR ............. 660 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 36,460 Helena Towhead, AR ...... 664 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,690 Trotters Landing, MS ..... 665 L 1,960 105 -- -- -- -- -- 50,930 Flower Lake, MS ......... 667 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,385 St. Francis, AR .......... 672 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 24,663 Harbert Point, MS ........ 675 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,065 Walnut Bend, AR ........ 680 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,070 Mhoon Bend, MS ......... 685 L -- -- -- -- -- 6,065 -- 35,828 Peters, AR .............. 692 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 33,760 Commerce, MS .......... 695 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,085 Porter Lake, AR ......... 700 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 34,155 Pickett, MS-AR .......... 703 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,575 Seyppel, AR ............. 709 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,830 Norfolk-Star, MS ......... 711 L -- -- -- -- -- 21,854 -- 35,582 Cow Island Bend, AR ..... 714 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,274 2 4 4 Q .1 )y TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) .Feet) Feet) Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN............. Coahoma, TN ........... Ensley, TN ............. Dismal Point, AR ......... Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR .... Presidents Island, TN ..... Hopefield Point, AR-TN .... Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN .................. Loosahatchie Bar, TN ..... St. Clair, AR ............ Island 40, TN-AR ........ Brandywine, AR-TN ...... Shelby Forest, TN ........ Dean Island, AR ......... Cedar Point-Densford, TN .................. Chute of Island 35, TN .... Lookout Bar, TN ......... Lookout, TN ............ Sunrise Towhead, TN ..... Lower Bullerton, AR ...... Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN .......... Osceola, AR ............. Osceola, AR ............. Ashport-Keyes Point, TN ... Kate Aubrey, TN ......... Island 26, TN .......... Bend of Island 25, TN ..... Barfield, AR ............ Obion-Tamm, TN ......... Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN ............... Heloise, TN ............. 716 717 723 724 730 733 736 737 740 742 744 750 753 756 759 764 772 774 776 782 786 786 786 791 793 798 803 808 819 R L L R R L R L R R R R L R L R R R R R R R R L R R L R L 826 R 831 L 8,623 9,270 44,026 7,200 24,530 12,755 10,360 31,293 2,070 2,930 30,750 18,010 9,550 7,555 20,190 30,400 2,990 5,005 16,995 28,350 30,808 1,3503 5,823 44,232 2,500 15,690 31,565 52,335 729 53,831 -- 26,984 -- 12,935 0 j ol TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Island 18, MO ........... Linwood Bend, TN ........ Blaker Towhead, TN ...... Bells Point, MO .......... Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO .................. Island 15, TN ........... Hathaway Landing, TN .... Robinson Bayou, MO ...... Fritz Landing, TN ........ Lee Towhead, MO ........ Bend of Island 14, TN ..... Above Lee Towhead, TN ... Little Cypress, MO ....... Merri wether-Cherokee, TN .................. Linda, MO .............. Below Toney's Towhead, TN .................. Toney's Towhead, KY-TN ............... Kentucky Point, KY ....... New Madrid Bar, KY ...... New Madrid Bend, MO .... La Forge, MO ............ Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY ............... Winchester Towhead, MO .................. Island 9, KY-TN ......... Milton Bell, MO ......... Chute of Island 8, KY ..... Bend of Island 8, MO ..... Island 8, KY ............ Hickman-Reelfoot, KY ..... Beckwith Bend, MO ...... 836 841 845 845 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 864 RLLR RLL RLLLL R 869 L 876 R 879 L 882 887 888 889 892 24,240 14,850 18,562 5,420 3,505 --. --. -- 25,600 -- 3,630 -- 1,000 -- 22,630 -- 15,670 -- 9,640 -- 12,050 -- 4,943 -- 40,140 -- 41,058 -- 16,505 -- 20,895 L L R R R 13,640 7,960 16,825 43,262 24,930 899 L 900 905 908 913 914 914 919 924 R L R L R R L R -- 37,520 6,3807 -- --. -- 25 25 -- 13,157 -- 5,540 33,585 16,600 12,620 31,345 18,515 43,359 14,588 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop. Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) Williams, KY ............ Wolf Island, KY .......... Columbus, KY ........... Belmont, MO ............. Island 3 and 4, KY ....... Campbell, KY ........... Pritchard, MO ........... Mayfield Creek, KY ....... Wickliffe, KY ............ Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River) ........... 927 934 937 938 940 943 948 949 953 L RLRRLRL L 10,015 19,205 7,395 5,785 19,970 6,865 15,045 8,935 8,455 958 R 3,775 60 12,162 4,160 13,826 -- 29,927 Total revetment, Memphis District, Mississippi River ....... 12,115 (2.29 Miles) Dikes: Henrico, AR ............. Below Knowlton, AR ...... Island 67, MS .......... Below Ludlow, AR ........ Sunflower, AR ........... Island 64, AR ........... Island 62, AR ........... Island 63 Bar, MS ....... . Island 63, MS ........... Kangaroo Point, AR ....... Friars Point, MS ......... Montezuma Bar, MS ...... Montezuma Towhead, AR . . Prairie Point, AR ......... Flower Lake, MS ......... St. Francis Towhead, MS ... Below Walnut Bend, AR ... Bordeaux Point, MS ...... 190 12,162 4,160 13,826 (8) 603 616 621 624 627 630 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 668 671 676 RRL RL R RL L R LL RRLL R 681 L "45,310 (6) 1,400 50 2,600 --0 -6-0 -- 1,997,795 (378.37 Miles) -- 9,080 -- 20,670 -- 4,320 -- 5,040 -- 5,520 -- 7,330 -- 23,180 -- 2,600 -- 5,640 -- 5,730 -- 6,870 -- 15,240 -- 3,450 -- 10,391 -- 11,060 -- 3,380 -- 6,420 -- 11,080 0hh O b O O P011 CC O O z TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Peters, AR .............. Commerce, MS .......... Basket Bar, AR .......... Buck Island, MS ......... Porter Lake, AR ......... Pickett, MS ............. Seyppel, AR ............. Cat Island, AR .......... Coahoma, TN ........... Armstrong, AR-TN ....... Dismal Point, AR ......... Engineers Bar, AR ....... Hopefield Point, AR ....... Memphis Front, TN ....... Robinson Crusoe, TN :..... Loosahatchie Bar, TN ..... Sycamore Chute, AR-TN ... Above Loosahatchie, TN ... Redman Point, AR ........ Randolph Point, TN ....... Poker Point, AR .......... Corona Bar, TN-AR ....... Densford, TN ............. Cedar Point, TN ......... Below Richardson Landing, TN ........... Lookout, TN-AR ......... Plum Point, TN .......... Lake Neark, AR ......... Island 30 ............... Kate Aubrey, TN ......... Keyes Point, TN ......... Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR ... Forked Deer, TN ......... Island 25, AR ........... 693 694 696 700 701 704 706 710 718 720 724 734 736 736 738 739 741 742 743 747 748 755 757 759 767 771 784 786 787 791 791 795 798 804 R L R L R L R R L R R R R L R R R L R L R R L L L R L R R R L R L R (8) -- 4,155 6,725 -- -- -- 1,655 109 -- -- (6) __ -- -- 2,85 -- .. -- -- -- -- -- 7,830 -- 10,745 -- 5,560 -- 4,705 -- 22,315 -- 7,180 -- 12,250 -- 15,590 -- 4,640 -- 18,690 -- 25,510 -- 4,155 -- 5,350 -- 6,300 -- 21,939 -- 3,950 -- 6,725 -- 10,645 -- 7,750 -- 16,740 -- 8,060 -- 8,430 -- 7,780 -- 2,890 -- 5,950 -- 12,865 -- 9,695 -- 2,545 -- 3,010 -- 11,270 -- 24,690 -- 17,330 -- 8,550 -- 5,450 -p r-+ 1cn Ci) Ci) -4 Ci) 0 Ci) H n Hd Hd 0 z) TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares) (Squares) Feet) Feet) (8) (6) Nebraska Point, TN ....... 808 L -- -- -- -- - -- -- 12,149 Below Tamm Bend, TN .... 813 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,300 Wrights Point, AR ........ 820 R -- -- -- -- - -- -- 34,775 Island 21, Chute, TN ...... 824 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,170 Head of Island 21, TN ..... 828 L 10,080 500 -- -- -- -- -- 15,540 Island 20, MO-TN ........ 831 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,139 Island 18, TN ........... 837 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,670 Tennemo, TN ........... 842 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,240 Blaker Towhead, TN ...... 843 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,080 Caruthersville-Linwood "- Bend, MO ............. 844 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 28,630 m Opposite Carthersville, TN 846 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,300 Sandy Hook, TN ......... 850 R -- -- -- -- - 200 -- 2,350 Island 15, TN ........... 851 L -- -- -- -- - -- -- 8,830 Robinson Bayou, MO ...... 853 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,768 Hathaway, TN ........... 854 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 27,355 Island 15 Neck, TN ....... 854 L -- -- -- -- - -- -- 21,100 Above Lee Towhead, TN ... 859 L -- -- -- -- -- 300 -- 1,300 Below Cherokee, TN ...... 866 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,230 Stewart Towhead, MO ..... 871 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,290 Ruddles Point, MO ....... 874 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,130 Island 11, MO ........... 882 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,330 New Madrid Bend, MO .... 887 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,715 Kentucky Point, KY ....... 887 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,400 Morrison Towhead, MO .... 890 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,070 Hotchkiss Bend, MO ...... 895 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,208 Slough Landing, KY ...... 896 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,065 Below Island 9, TN ....... 901 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,859 Donaldson Point, MO ..... 905 R 1,790 1,115 -- -- -- -- -- 18,225 Island 9, KY ............ 906 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,010 Island 7 - Island 8, MO-KY . 917 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,795 Below Williams, KY ....... 925 L -- -- -- -- -- 2,160 Moore Island, KY-MO ..... 929 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,925 Above Williams, KY ....... 930 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,150 Campbell, KY ........... 942 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,610 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) (8) (6) Pritchard, MO ........... 944 R -- -- -- -- -- -- - 9,390 Island 1, KY ............ 948 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,345 Total dikes Memphis District, Mississippi River ....... 24,415 4,470 -- -- -- 4,550 -- 901,688 (4.62 Miles) (170.77 Miles) Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). Changed to correct previous errors. Lumber mattress revetment. Rock Groins. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. Riprap paving only. Linear feet of. dike which were raised. 1,790 feet of new construction less 1,780 feet of dike removal yields 10 feet net gain. Lu 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. C,) Cl) Cl) ro n 0 Cl) OCl TABLE 42-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Cor- Cur- In Com- C in Total rently System plete rently System plete ren Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Un for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This C Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY stru Main Stem Levees Mississippi River Levees Fifth Louisiana Levee District .. Levees ................... Old River structures and (16.8) 15.5 levees ............. ...... 1.3 Atchafalaya Basin Levee District .................. (126.3) Levees ................... 118.7 Morganza structure and levee ................... 0.8 4 Morganza forebay levee ...... 6.7 Port Allen lock ............ 0.1 t Lafourche Basin Levee District O Levees ..................... 61.7 Plaquemines West Levee District Levees ............ 37.9 Buras Levee District ......... (34.1) Levees ................... 34.0 Empire lock .............. 0.1 Baton Rouge front levees ...... 2.1 Pontchartrain Levee District .................. (124.9) Levees ................... 110.8 Bonnet Carre' guide levees ... 11.3 Bonnet Carre' forebay levee .. 1.3 Bonnet Carre' structure ..... 1.5 East Jefferson Levee District Levees.................... 11.6 West Jefferson Levee District .. (20.0) Levees ............... ...... 19.8 Floodwalls ................ 0.1 Harvey Canal Lock ......... 0.1 (16.8) (--) (10.7) (--) 15.5 -- 9.4 - 1.3 - (--) (--) (--) (-) (15.5) - - -- - 15.5 1.3 - (126.3) (--) (102.2) (3.6) 118.7 - 94.6 3.6 0.8 - 6.7 - 0.1 - 61.7 0.8 6.7 0.1 - 41.1 12.7 0.1 37.9 - 30.7 - (34.1) - (34.1) (--) 34.0 - 34.0 - 0.1 - 0.1 - 2.1 - 0.9 1.0 (124.9) - (94.9) (12.3) 110.8 -- 80.8 12.3 11.3 - 11.3 - 1.3 -- 1.3 - 1.5 - 1.5 - 11.6 -- 10.8 - (20.0) (--) (16.9) (3.1) 19.8 -- 16.7 3.1 0.1 -- 0.1 - 0.1 -- 0.1 - (--) (5.3) (--) (1.0) 5.3 - 1.0 (--) (118.7) 118.7 - 0.1 (--) -M (4.7) (--) 4.7 - -. -- (--) (--) -- -- (--) (--) (--) - - 61.7 - , 37.9 (--) (34.0) - 34.0 - 2.1 (--) (110.8) - 110.8 (--) 11.6 (19.9) 19.8 0.1 '3d (--) (15.5) (--) - 15.5 - -- - - (--) (118.7) - 118.7 - _ - - 61.7 0 - 37.9 - (--) (34.0) (--) - - - 34-.0 --_ .0 - 2.1 (--) (110.8) (--) - 110.8 - - - _C - 11.6 - (--) (19.9) (--) C - 19.8 - - 0.1 -- - P ro o 0* .x ur- 'tly der nction (-) TABLE :42-K (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Cu in Total rently System plete rently System plete rent Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Und for This This This Con- Comrn. T This This Con- Com- This This Co Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struc Orleans Levee District......... (27.2) Left descending, east bank ..... (13.3) Levees .............. ".... 4.6 Floodwalls ................ 8.6 IHNC lock ................ 0.1 Right descending, west bank ... (13.9) Levees ................... 13.8 Algiers Canal lock .......... 0.1 Lake Borgne Basin Levee District Levees ............ 11.6 Grand Prairie Levee District Levees ................... 37.4 Total Mississippi River ..... 511.6 Other Levees Included in Mainstem Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises .......... (148.4) East Bank Atchafalaya River.. 52.5 Bayou des Glaises .......... 7.9 West bank Atchafalaya River.. 60.1 Simmesport Ring............ 1.6 Melville Ring............... 4.1 Krotz Springs Ring ......... 1.7 Mansura Hills to Hamburg ... 20.5 West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet ................. Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal ............ Morganza upper guide levee .. . 128.7 56.5 8.9 (27.2) (1.6) (23.2) (13.3) (1.6) (11.0) 4.6 1.6 2.3 8.6 - 8.6 0.1 - 0.1 (13.9) (--) (12.2) 13.8 - 12.1 0.1 - 0.1 11.6 - 11.6 37.4 -- 28.4 511.6 1.6 405.5 (148.4) (--) (143.9) 52.5 - 52.5 7.9 - 7.9 60.1 - 55.6 1.6 - 1.6 4.1 - 1.7 - 20.5 - (1.7) (--) (1.7) 1.7 9.0 43.4 (--) -- - 2.0 (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) 10.1 - 1.1 (--) (-(--)) - (--) (--) (--) (--) -Y (18.4) (4.6) 4.6 (13.8) 13.8 -- 11.6 -- 37.4 - 479.6 (--) - 4.1 1.7 20.5 128.7 8.2 99.1 56.5 - 17.1 8.9 - 8.9 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 - 128.7 - - - - 56.5 S - - 8.9 (--) (18.4) (--) (4.6) - 4.6 (--) (--) (--) (13.8) (--) - 13.8 - - - - r12 - 11.6 - c,- -- 37.4 - 479.6 (--) (148.4) - 52.5 - 7.9 - 60.1 - 1.6 - 4.1 - 1.7 - 20.5 - 128.4 - 56.5 - 8.9 d 12 z O _ rtly ler ntion --- TABLE 42-K (Continued) Location East Protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee ................. Total Atchafalaya Basin ...... Total-Main Stem Leaves ....... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA ........ Item A levees .............. 4A Item B levees .............. Item C levees .............. oo Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .................... GRAND TOTAL ............. PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees M (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Corn- Cur- Ci in Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Corn- This This Con- System FY FY FY struction pleted I FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction 106.7 106.7 -- 88.3 6.4 -- -- -- -- 105.0 -- 86.0 -- 449.2 449.2 8.2 357.3 8.4 -- -- -- -- 447.5 .. 428.2 -- 960.8 960.8 9.8 762.8 51.8 10.1 - 1.1 - 927.1 - 907.8 O (17.4) (17.4) (--) (17.4) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (17.4) (--) (17.4) (--) 5.0 5.0 - 5.0 - - - - - 5.0 - 5.0 - 10.1 10.1 - 10.1 - - - - - 10.1 - 10.1 - 2.3 2.3 -- 2.3 -- -- -- -- -- 2.3 -- 2.3 - 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - - - 17.4 - 17.4 - 978.2 978.2 29.8 770.4 35.9 10.1 - 1.1 - 944.5 -- 925.2 1. Figures indicate landside seepage berms only. 0 O O tD C) 1 0 TABLE 42-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Levees and Floodwalls Berm1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Mil(MileMiles) (Miles) . Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur. In Com- Cur. In Corn- Cu in Total rently System plete rently System plete ren Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Und for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com. This This Co, Location System FY FY FY2 struction pleted' FY FY struction pleted FY FY struc rtly ler ntion MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Levees East bank in Mississippi ...... 178.34 178.3 - 109.1 - Greenville Harbor dikes ...... 7.8 7.8 - 7.8 - West bank in Arkansas ....... 75.6 75.6 - 55.0 - West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) .......... 198.7 198.7 -- 67.1 4.6 Total Mississippi River Levees ................ Other Levees Included in Main 4A Stem Lower Red River-South Bank O Red River levees ........... Hotwells to Moncla, LA, levees .................. Arkansas River, South Bank .. Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem .............. Total--Main Stem Levees .... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Arkansas River, North bank .. Red River Backwater Levees .. 460.4 460.4 - 239.0 156.9 61.3 - 119.3 - 54.3 93.3 -- 69.6 4.6 311.5 - 243.2 (59.2) (59.2) (--) (59.2) 59.2 85.4 59.2 -- 59.2 85.4 - 85.4 144.6 144.6 -- 144.6 605.0 605.0 - 383.6 61.55 56.2 -- 56.2 263.6 192.16 - 178.46 (--) (--) (--) (--) - 24.7 -- 24.7 4- 24.7 -- 24.7 4.6 336.2 -- 267.9 - 8.3 -- - 7.6 174.2 - 2.7 - 75.4 2.3 197.8 9.9 450.1 (-) (59.2) - 59.2 - 84.1 - 143.3 9.9 593.4 - 8.3 - 47.4 - - - 249.0 - 174.2 - 2.7 2.7 - - 75.4 - (1 -- 197.8 - 2.7 450.1 -- (--) (59.2) (--) - 59.2 - 0 -- s81.1 -- 140.3 - 2.7 590.4 - O z - 47.4 - - 153.6 - TABLE 42-L (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Comn. Cur- In Com- C in Total rently System plete rently System plete rei Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Un for This This This Con- Comn- This This Con- Coin- This This C Location System FY FY FY2 struction pleted s FY FY struction pleted FY FY stru Yazoo River Basin ........... . (624.1) (419.6) (10.1) (235.0) (0.5) (--) (--) (--) (--) (624.1) (4.1) (337.7) (0 Headwater ................ 527.5 368.0 10.1 183.4 0.5 - - - - 527.5 4.1 298.7 0 Backwater ................ 96.6 51.6 - 51.6 -- - -- - 96.6 - 39.0 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ........... . 949.2 667.9 10.1 469.6 0.5 8.3 - 8.3 - 920.5 4.1 538.7 0 GRAND TOTAL ............. . 1,554.2 1,272.9 10.1 853.2 5.1 344.5 0 276.2 9.9 1,513.9 6.8 1,129.1 0 1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepage b contracts. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. S4. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 5. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 6. Changed to correct previous error. erm 0z 0 0 0 -o 0 urntly der onction j .5) '.5 .5 . 0 TABLE 42-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Com- Cu in Total rently System plete rently System plete ren Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Und for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Com- This This Co Location System FY FY FY struction pletedi! FY FY struction pleted FY FY struc rtly der ion tion MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Mounds, IL ................ Mound City, IL ............. Cairo Drainage District ....... City of Cairo ............... Little River Drainage District .. Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO .............. Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO .............. .j St. Johns Levee and Drainage '; District................. S St. Francis Levee District of MO ................... City of Hickman, KY ......... Board of Levee Commissioners Fulton, County, KY ......... Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN ..... Madrid Bend Levee District, Lake Co., TN............. Lake County Levee and Drainage District .................. Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1 ............. Tipton-Obion levee extension... St. Francis Levee District of AR .................... Helena Improvement District No. 1.................... Cotton Belt Levee District 3.9 2.7 13.82 6.2 19.3 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 13.8 - 13.8 26.0 26.0 - 26.0 59.03 55.7 1.4 58.7 55.7 1.4 - 58.24 - 55.7 - 1.4 16.7 16.7 - 16.7 - 4.5 4.5 - 4.5 - 5.2 5.2 - 5.2 15.9 15.9 - 15.9 21.3 6.5 156.7 21.3 156.7 5.3 5.3 - 21.3 - 153.2 - 5.3 0.5 2.5 1.6 4.4 9.7 0.5 2.5 2.0 4.9 3.6 1.1 8.5 4.0 19.3 4.2 - - - 13.8 - 12.9 - 4.9 9.2 - 23.0 - 12.0 - 26.0 - 46.9 - 55.1 - 0.5 15.1 - 11.4 - 16.3 0.6 - 0.3 - 4.5 -- - -- - 5.2 - 9.6 1.3 - 88.4 2.4 - 6.4 3.2 15.9 - 0.4 - 83.2 -- 2.4 - 21.3 - 6.5 5.2 156.7 - - 3.6 - - 1.1 - - 8.5 - - 3.5 - ( - 19.3 - - 13.8 - - 26.0 - 46.1 - 55.1 - - 15.9 - - 21.3 -- 156.7 - 4.7 - 4.2 23.9 -- 23.9 -- 19.4 - 19.4 - 23.9 - No. ... :'................ 23.9 - 23.9 TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Com- Cur. In Com- Ct in Total rently System plete rently System plete re Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Un for This This This CC on- Com- Thi This C Location System FY FY FY struction pleted / FY FY struction pleted FY FY strl 20.5 Laconia Drainage and Levee District Phillips County, AR .. Laconia Levee District No. 1 of Deshna County, AR ........ Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Deshna County, AR .............. Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District .................. 93.6 Madrid Bend L.D., Fulton Co., KY ...................... 4.8 4 Birds Point-New Madrid setback levee ................... 35.3 N Total Mississippi River . .... 636.7 TOTAL MAIN STEM LEVEES .. 636.7 TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT St. Francis River ............. (308.2) East bank ................. 159.5 West bank ................ 148.7 Little River ................. (130.1) East bank (left) ............. 40.7 West bank ................. 35.1 Elk Chute ................. 39.9 West Basin and middle valley .. Lower White River ............ White River backwater levee .. . Augusta to Clarendon ........ Clarendon levee ............. 14.4 (95.6) 40.2 49.2 20.5 - 18.1 18.1 20.5 - 18.1 - 11.5 - 12.6 6.6 6.6 - 6.6 - 93.6 4.8 - 93.6 - 4.8 35.3 - 35.3 629.9 - 625.4 629.9 - 625.4 (302.9) - (302.9) 156.2 - 156.2 146.7 - 146.7 (130.1) -- (130.1) 40.7 - 40.7 35.1 - 35.1 39.9 - 39.9 14.4 - 14.4 (85.9) - (84.1) 40.2 - 40.2 39.5 -- 39.5 6.2 6.2 - 3 3 - 11.5 - 9.2 - 20.5 - 16.5 - 20.5 - 16.5 urntly ider onction nz -3 0 N -Y-Y - N- - - 87.3 - 87.3 - 93.6 - 93.6 - - - - - 4.8 - 4.8 - 23.8 - -- - 35.3 - 35.3 - 40.0 - 258.3 8.4 604.5 - 595.5 - O 40.0 - 258.3 8.4 604.5 - 595.5 - (301.0) 156.7 144.3 (128.9) 40.7 35.1 39.7 13.4 (88.0) 38.8 49.2 4.4 - (133.5) 94.7 38.8 (94.5) 40.1 23.7 17.3 13.4 (75.0) 38.8 36.2 - - x - -- f 0 O C OH O H1 - TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Section Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Cu in Total rently System plete rently System plete. renl Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Und for This This This Con- Com- T Thi This Con- Com- This This Co Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted/ FY FY struc Memphis Harbor ............. 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 - 7.0 - 7.0 - 10.5 - 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ............. 544.4 529.4 - 527.6 - 7.0 - 7.0 - 528.4 - 313.5 - GRAND TOTAL.............. .. 1,181.1 1,159.3 - 1,153.0 - 347.0 - 265.3 8.4 1,132.9 - 909.0 - 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondarylevee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 4. Changed to correct previous error. rtly ler ntion CA Cl) 11 C12 0 Hl TABLE 42-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Levees and Floodwalls Bermi Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Com- C1 in Total rently System plete rently System plete re Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Un for This This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Com- This This C Location System FY FY FY struction pleted! FY FY struction pleted FY FY stru MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River New Orleans District, Table 42-K ................ 511.6 511.6 1.6 405.5 Vicksburg District, Table 42-L.. 460.4 460.4 - 239.0 Memphis District, Table 42-M .. 636.7 629.9 - 625.4 Total Mississippi River ...... 1,608.7 1,601.9 1.6 1,269.9 Other Levees Included in Main Stem - Atchafalaya Basin Floodway- NOD ..................... 449.2 Lower Red River-South Bank- VXD .................... Arkansas River-South Bank- VXD .................... Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem ........... 449.2 8.2 357.3 59.2 59.2 - 59.2 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 593.8 593.8 8.2 501.9 Total Main Stem Levees .... 2,202.5 2,195.7 9.8 1,771.8 TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA,--NOD .. 17.4 Yazoo River Basin--VXD ....... 624.1 Arkansas River-North Bank-- VXD ...................... 61.5 Red River Backwater--VXD ..... 263.6 St. Francis River--MD ......... 308.2 Little River--MD ............. 130.1 Lower White River--MD ....... 95.6 17.4 - 17.4 419.6 10.1 235.0 56.2 -- 56.2 192.13 - 178.43/ 302.9 -- 302.9 130.1 - 130.1 85.9 -- 84.1 43.4 4.6 48.0 8.4 10.1 311.5 340.0 661.6 - 1.1 - 243.2 - 258.3 - 502.6 - 479.6 9.9 450.1 8.4 604.5 18.3 1,534.2 - 447.5 - - - - 59.2 -- 24.7 - 24.7 8.4 24.7 - 24.7 56.4 686.3 - 527.3 - 84.1 -- 590.8 18.3 2,125.0 - - - - - 17.4 0.5 - - - - 624.1 8.3 8.3 - 47.4 249.0 301.0 128.9 88.0 - 479.6 - 2.7 450.1 -- - 595.5 - 2.7 1,525.2 - - 428.2 - - 59.2 - - 81.1 -- - 568.5 - O 2.7 2,093.7 - C11 - 17.4 4.1 337.7 - 47.4 - 153.6 - 133.5 - 94.5 -- 75.0 -- 0.5 - -- 0 -- 1. Landside seepage berms only. 2. Subject to change as planning progresses. 3. Changed to correct previous error. C) O m~ urntly ider onction TABLE 42-N (Continued) RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Levees and Floodwalls Bermn I Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) : (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Cu in Total rently System plete rently System plete ren Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Un for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Co Location System FY FY FY struction pletedy FY FY struction pleted FY FY struc Memphis Harbor--MD ......... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 - 7.0 - 7.0 - 10.5 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ............ 511.0 1,214 7 10.1 1014.6 0.5 15.3 - 15.3 -- 466 4.1 869.6 0 Grand Total in Project ....... 3,713.5 3,410.4 19.9 2,786.4 56.9 701.6 - 542.6 18.3 3,591.3 6.8 2,963.3 0. 1. Landside seepage berms only. 2. Subject to change as planning progresses. 3. Changed to correct previous error. uritly der unction .5 .5 Cl) CI) Ci) CI) H nn 0' N Hi c0) -4 Cd REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) Bayou des Glaises diversion channel .... .......... 1938 6.0 -- 6.0 100 -- Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie .............. 1946 92.6 -- 63.4 75 -- Charenton drainage and navigation canal .......... 1939 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- Wax Lake Outlet ............................. 1938 15.7 -- 15.7 100 -- Atchafalaya Basin Floodway .................... 1933 244.2 -- 186.4 76 -- Morganza Floodway ............................ 1941 3.3 -- 3.3 100 -- Old River outflow channel ...................... 1956 8.3 -- 8.3 100 -- Old River inflow channel ....................... 1960 2.3 -- 2.3 100 -- Old River lock approach channels ................ 1961 2.2 -- 2.2 100 -- Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) .............. 1958 2.5 -- 2.5 100 -- Teche-Vermilion Water Supply .................. 1977 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- Old River Auxiliary Control Structure inflow channel . 1986 1.9 -- 1.9 100 -- Old River Auxiliary Control Structure outflow channel 1988 0.9 -- 0.9 100 -- Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion channel .......... 1988 1.7 -- 1.7 100 -- 41-66 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MS Big Sunflower River ........................... 1947 199.1 -- 199.1 100 -- Quiver River ................................. 1947 69.6 -- 69.6 100 -- Deer Creek .................................. 1947 7.0 -- 7.0 100 -- Steele Bayou ................................ 1947 54.9 -- 54.9 100 -- Steele Bayou1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 71.2 -- 68.5 97 2.7 Main Canal ........................ ..... ....... 1959 21.1 -- 21.1 100 -- M ain Canal 2 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . - 25.3 .- -- --....-- Black Bayou .. ................................ 1992 36.5 6.3 6.3 17 -- Big Sunflower River tributaries .................. 1957 227.2 -- 227.2 100 -- Quiver River tributaries ....................... 1960 35.4 -- 35.4 100 -- YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ............... ............. 1960 39.9 -- 39.9 100 YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS Upper Yazoo Project ............................. .. 1976 179.0 -- 55.7 28 4.1 Coldwater River ............................. 1941 54.6 -- 54.6 100 -- Arkabutla Canal ............................. 1948 0.4 -- 0.4 100 -- Tallahatchie Canal .......................... 1940 74.8 -- 73.5 85 -- Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway ..................... 1939 48.0 -- 48.0 100 -- Greenwood protection works ..................... 1971 2.9 -- 2.9 100 -- Yacona River ................................. 1952 1.8 -- 1.8 100 -- Bobo Bayou ................................... 1944 16.1 -- 16.1 100 -- Cassidy Bayou ................................ 1934 69.0 -- 69.0 100 -- Cassidy Bayou 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . - 26.0 .- --.. Bear Creek Diversion ....................... - 4.8 -- - -- -- Lake Cormorant ............................. .- 20.9 .- ...... Hurricane Bayou ............................... - 2.5 .-- ----.. Opossum Bayou .............................. . .20.8 20..... .... Abaica Creek ................................... .- 7.7 .- -- .... Chicopa Creek ........................................... - 7.0 .- ---.. Bear Creek ........... ....................... .- 23.3 .- .... Rocky Bayou ........................ ..... ........... . - 7.8 -- ..... Whiteoak Bayou ................................. - 55.9 .. .... Miscellaneous ditches ......................... .- 12.3 --.-.... Yalobusha River .............................. 1939 46.0 -- 46.0 100 -- Yazoo River .................................... 1940 160.2 -- 160.2 100 -- Whittington Auxiliary Channel .................. 1956 30.8 -- 30.8 100 -- Tchula Lake ................................. 1964 26.4 -- 26.4 100 -- David-Burrell Bayou .......................... . 1957 40.4 -- 40.4 100 -- McKinney Bayou ............................ 1960 3.5 -- 3.5 100 -- Hillside Floodway ............................ 1964 11.0 -- 11.0 100 -- Yazoo City protection works ................... 1953 1.6 -- 1.6 100 -- Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous ........................ 1975 30.2 -- 15.1 50 -- 41-67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-P (Continued) CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS (Continued) Alligator-Catfish Bayou ........................... 1973 8.3 -- 8.2 99 -- Pelucia Creek ......................... ....... 1975 13.7 7.9 13.5 98 0.2 BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR Bayou Lafourche ............................... 1949 45.3 -- 45.3 100 -- Bayou Lafourche4 '7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1972 43.0 -- 4.4 10 -- Big & Colewa Creeks .......................... 1947 81.4 -- 81.4 100 -- Big & Colewa Creeks 5 ,7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 86.8 -- 51.5 60 -- Tensas River .......... :..................... 1947 96.5 -- 96.5 100 -- Tensas River6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1968 165.0 -- 61.0 37 -- Boeuf River, AR and LA ....................... 1953 103.9 -- 103.9 100 -- Fleschmans Bayou, AR ........................ 1963 6.6 -- 6.6 100 -- Caney Bayou, AR ............................ 1964 7.4 -- 7.4 100 -- Canal 18, AR ................................ 1963 10.3 -- 10.3 100 -- Big Bayou, AR ............................... 1952 33.3 -- 33.3 100 -- Black Pond Slough, AR ........................ 1962 14.3 -- 14.3 100 -- Bayou Macon, AR and LA ...................... 1959 150.8 -- 150.8 100 -- Rush Bayou, AR ............................... 1964 6.7 -- 6.7 100 -- Canal 19, AR ................................ 1957 50.2 -- 50.2 100 -- Canal 43, AR ................................ 1956 34.5 -- 34.5 100 -- Canal 81, AR ............................... ... 1957 32.7 -- 32.7 100 -- Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal-Bayou Vidal Cutoff ................................ - 17.1 -- -- - --.. Kirsch Lake Canal ............................ . -. 9.3 -- -- .. .. Canal 19 Extension .................. .... ..... 1964 9.4 -- 9.4 100 -- Lake Chicot Pumping Plant ...................... - 2.5 -- 2.5 100 -- Mill Bayou ................................... 1955 4.8 -- 4.8 100 -- RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant ................. 1976 6.9 -- 6.9 100 -- Six Mile Bayou, LA ........................... - 1.5 -- 1.5 100 -- GRAND PRAIRIE, AR .................. ....... .- 338.1 -- -- -- --.. BAYOU METO, AR ........................... .- 164.9 - -- .. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the project. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 68.5 additional miles of channel to the project. Further work on these items has been deferred due to local oppositions and withdrawal of sponsorship by the levee district. 41-68 TABLE 42-Q MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1994) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, MO .................. ... .... ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, MO ..................... St. Francis River, MO and AR ................... West Memphis Drainage, AR .................... Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR ................. Tyronza River, AR ........................... L'Anguille River, AR .......................... LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, AR Cache River Basin, AR ........................ Big Creek and tributaries, AR ................... WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES Obion Creek, KY ............................. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES MS River, Western TN tributaries (Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) .................. Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act) .............................. Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN ............. Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN .................... MS River Below Cape Girardeau: West TN tributaries (1948 Act) ..................... Wolf River and tributaries, TN .................. NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN Nonconnah Creek, MS and TN ................. HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR Helena Harbor, AR(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1952 1963 1953 1951 1960 1939 (1) 1972 (1) (1) 1952. (1) 1974 1955 1961 1960 1990 1989 9.6 298.9 638.5 19.8 28.0 12.7 95.0 231.5 103.8 -- 9.6 0 19.69 283.7 538.93 19.8 28.0 12.7 -- -- 7.2 ---- 100 95 84 100 100 100 3 -- 41.7 34.3 9.3 15.8 19.7 225.0 25.5 18.2 2.2 -- 34.3 -- 3.0 -- 19.7 -- 89.8 -- 25.5 100 19 100 41 100 -- 0.5 38 1. Not started. 2. Data for Stage 1 only. 41-69 8.9 8.9 -- -- -- 0.5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-R PUMPING STATIONS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Bayou Yokely 489 100 1955 1990 100 1991(A) Bayou Yokely Enlargement 568 100 1963 1990 100 1991(A) Centerville 332 100 1964 1991 100 1992(A) Ellerslie 136 100 1953 -- -- -- Franklin 144 100 1958 1992 100 1993(A) Franklin Enlargement 144 100 1978 1992 100 1993(A) Gordy 238 100 1964 -- -- -- Maryland 136 100 1957 1991 100 1992(A) North Bend 52 100 1962 -- -- -- Tiger Island 75 100 1955 -- -- -- Wax Lake East 1,008 100 1961 1990 100 1992(A) Wax Lake West 496 100 1965 1990 100 1992(A) Teche Vermilion 1,300 100 1982 -- -- -- Point Coupee 1500 100 1983 -- -- -- TOTAL 6,618 41-70 TABLE 42-S MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION PUMPING STATIONS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Chauvin Bayou, LA 250 99 1994 1991 100 Bawcomville 270 100 1955 1992 100 1993(a) Jonesville 180 100 1952 -- -- -- Natchez Port 100 -- -- -- -- Wilson Point 50 -- - -- -- Greenwood - Lee Street 90 100 1953 1952 -- -- Greenwood - Wilson Street 67 100 1953 1952 -- -- Greenwood - Walker Lake 675 100 1949 1952 -- -- Yazoo City 540 100 1954 1957 -- -- Columbia 45 100 1939 -- -- -- Calion 200 100 1959 -- -- -- McKinney Bayou, MS 250 100 1962 1961 -- -- Lake Chicot 6,500 100 1987 -- -- -- Tensas Cocodrie 4,000 100 1986 -- -- -- Yazoo Backwater 10,000 -- -- -- -- -- Natchez Area 300 -- -- -- -- -- Bushley Bayou 300 -- Indef1 -- -- -- Bushley Bayou 20 -- Indef -- -- -- Sicily-HAHA Bayou 750 -- 2000(s) -- -- -- Sicily - Fool River 300 -- 1997() -- -- -- Pelucia Creek - Rising Sun #1 10 100 1992 1991 -- -- Pelucia Creek - Rising Sun #2 15 100 1992 1991 -- -- Pelucia Creek Pump 75 100 1993 1992 -- -- Below Red River 500 -- Indef -- -- -- Bayou Rapides2 222 100 1936 -- -- -- Total 26,197 1 This project has been placed in the inactive category. 41-71 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-T PUMPING STATIONS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Devall's Bluff 215 100 1949 1987 100 1989 Des Arc, Ark. 30 100 1954 -- -- -- Ensley 900 100 1966 -- -- -- DD #17, Station #1 375 100 1-- -- -- Huxtable Pumping Plant 12,000 100 1977 -- -- -- Graham Burke 1,500 100 1964 -- -- -- Finley Street 100 100 1978 -- -- -- Dyersburg 26 100 1961 -- -- -- Cotton Slough 50 100 1964 -- -- -- West Hickman 190 100 1976 -- -- -- Cypress Creek 3,000 100 1944 -- -- -- Fairfax 53.5 100 1950 -- -- -- Goose Pond 110 100 1976 -- -- -- Marble Bayou 220 100 1952 -- -- -- Workhouse Bayou 520 100 1950 -- -- -- Nonconnah 1,620 100 1944 -- -- -- L&DD #3 Peafield 400 100 1 Treasure Island 150 100 1976 -- -- -- Lake No. 9 500 100 1981 -- -- -- Cairo 10th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- Cairo 28th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- -- DD #17, Station #2 700 100 1981 -- -- -- Drinkwater Sewer 150 100 1979 -- -- May Street 5 100 1948 -- -- -- Cairo 22nd Street 37 100 1 Gayoso Bayou 1,500 100 1915 -- --- Mud Lake 200 --- -- ... Madison 25 -- - -- -- --.. Cache River 200 -- -- -- -- New Madrid 1,500 -- - -- --.. St. John's Bayou 1,000.. -- .... TOTAL 27,406.5 1 Unknown constructed by local interest. 41-72 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-U COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: St. Louis District: St. Francis Basin-Wappapello Lake Subtotal Memphis District: General investigations Mississippi River levees St. Francis Basin White River Backwater Cache Basin, AR Channel improvement West Tennessee tributaries West Kentucky tributaries Inspection of completed works Mapping LWR, Augusta to Clarendon Reelfoot Lake No. 9, TN-K Mud Lake, TN Eight Mile Creek Helena Harbor L'Anguille River Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS Horn Lake Creek & Tribs Memphis Harbor (McKeller Lake) Lake #9 Pumping Plant, KY Subtotal Vicksburg District: General investigations Mississippi River levees Lower Arkansas River Tensas Basin Yazoo Basin Channel improvement Mapping Inspection of completed works Lower Red River--South Bank Red River Levee Dam Safety Assurances Subtotal New Orleans District: General investigations Mississippi River levees Mississippi Delta Region Old River Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries Atchafalaya Basin 6,181,092 9,106,964 199,399 18,278,771. 999,427 147 20 1,115 45,814 1,669,245 9,423 1,578 148,964 34,939 -- $ 4,918,317 4,918,317 5,293,647 9,671,293 1,070,605 26,603,991 879,620 356,081 253,560 14,677 3,241,321 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 36,676,898 44,143,472 3,241,321 -- -- 1,999,082 5,074,180 1,239,752 -- -- 418,004 -- 2,896,075 4,662,147 -- 45,137,456 29,538,768 -- 28,524,529 18,261,691 -- -- 227,556 -- -- 184,390 -- -- 118,708 -- 9,744,578 -- --.. 91,376,818 54,651,015 1,999,082 13,651,502 2,742,174 .26,401,086 412,019 -- -- -- -- -- 5,023,091 55,778 4,163,734 117,087 11,927,267 41-73 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-U (Continued) COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Item Construction Maintenance Other New Orleans District (Continued): Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System 1,990,791 -- -- Channel improvement 48,847,067 21,610,544 -- Mississippi & LA Estuarine 815,622 -- -- B. R. Harbor Devil Swamp -- 30,888 -- Inspection of completed works -- 277,942 -- Mapping -- 273,219 -- Subtotal 94,448,241 43,479,651 412,019 Total Federal Funds 222,501,957 147,192,455 5,652,422 CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Memphis District -- -- 49,704 Helena Harbor Port Authority 232,333 -- -- Vicksburg District Bank Protection -- 161,925 -- New Orleans District: Old River -- 71,607 -- Mississippi Delta Region 2,753,504 -- -- Total Contributed Funds 2,985,837 233,532 49,704 Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 225,487,794 147,425,987 5,702,126 41-74 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1994 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1994 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, AR Contraction works DeValls Bluff, AR Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, LA Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 co'n E3Cn $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 1on o') 1,076,520 1,076,520 -- 178,925 178,925 -- 8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 231,215 231,215 -- 1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 18,736,432 18,736,432 -- 6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 1,723,620 1,723,620 -- 12,426 12,426 -- 1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 39,546,054 39,546,054 -- 2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 125,074 125,074 -- 1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 826,235 826,235 -- 4,664,515 4,664,515 -- 2,864,516 2,864,516 -- 7,070 7,070 -- 1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 172,950 172,950 -- 3,980,000 3,980,000 -- 105,660 105,660 -- 2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 57.184.031 57 184.0.1 -- New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, LA Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA Bonnet Carre' Spillway, LA Contraction works Mapping v ,+vz.vv 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 41-75 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1994 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1993 New Orleans District: (Continued) Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Teche Vermilion Basin Water Supply Old River Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Reelfoot Lake Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake St. Francis River and tributaries Big Slough and Mayo ditch Little River drainage 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 34,506,000 292,274,000 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 34,506,000 292,274,000 87,917 387,917 -- 402,673,123 402,673,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 19,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 532,012,500 532,012,500 -- 579,462 579,462 -- 1,897,980 1,897,980 -- 2,477,442 2,447,442 -- 191,168,354 98,000 398,994,506 58,566,439 201,519,763 439,434 7,895,000 9,019,908 263,646,182 965,429 52,145,092 190,056,546 98,000 397,394,589 58,566,439 198,227,835 439,434 7,895,000 9,019,908 262,488,635 965,429 52,120,789 1,111,808 1,599,916 -- 3,291,928 -- -- 1,157,547 24,303 41-76 'en ni nr 'On Al nC MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1994 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1994 Lower White River: Clarendon Levee Augusta to Clarendon, AR White River backwater levee, AR Horn Lake Creek & Tribs Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS West Memphis and Vicinity Whiteman's Creek, Ar Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Actof 1928 West Tennessee tributaries Helena Harbor Cache Basin, AR West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN L'Anguille River Eight Mile Creek Subtotal Vicksburg District: Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) Section 6 Levees Lower Arkansas River: North Bank South Bank Tensas Basin: Lake Chicot pumping plant Tensas River Red River Backwater: Below Red River Red River backwater levee, LA Tensas Cocodrie pumping plant Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Ouachita River Levees Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Greenwood Belzoni Yazoo City 505,715 1,788,846 10,624,501 1,173,000 3,547,000 7,408,000 570,000 242,000 108,651 45,477,900 15,295,000 10,720,000 1,440,000 107,000 196,000 2,068,000 1,285,729,720 223,462,990 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 95,639,986 41,505,235 639,400 78,244,425 55,478,900 756,300 39,800,000 466,510,065 23,549,260 144,120,040 958,175 400,000 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,401,494 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 505,703 1,788,846 10,624,501 773,744 3,509,397 7,301,856 569,540 108,651 44,620,144 14,240,520 10,676,809 1,439,545 99,139 191,307 1,999,825 1,275,722,134 220,569,565 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 95,639,945 41,505,235 639,400 75,141,422 55,457,048 756,300 39,800,000 464,524,607 23,549,260 141,571,410 958,175 400,000 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,401,494 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 41-77 12 -- 399,256 37,603 106,144 460 242,000 -- 857,756 1,054,480 43,191 455 7,861 4,693 68,175 10,007,586 2,893,425 -- 41 -- 3,103,002 21,852 1,985,459 2,548,630 -- -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1994 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1994 Yazoo Basin: (Continued) Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel Big Sunflower, etc. Main Stem Upper Yazoo Projects Yazoo Basin-Tributaries Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) Tributaries--Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Yazoo Basin Backwater Yazoo Backwater Rocky Bayou Yazoo Backwater Pumping Plant Muddy Bayou Yazoo Backwater, F&WL Mitigation Yazoo Basin Reevaluation Streambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. Demonstration Erosion Control Dam Safety Assurances-Sardis Dam 10,950,966 66,456,000 34,450,300 92,609,036 99,687,166 612,484 23,977,200 56,901,200 3,401,500 9,064,850 5,145,200 5,566,900 17,147,170 14,767,000 146,870,900 19,357,000 10,950,966 64,568,154 34,441,815 92,153,264 97,729,648 612,484 23,977,200 56,736,464 3,401,498 9,064,850 5,145,200 5,286,771 16,289,428 14,767,000. 141,167,369 17,559,825 -- 1,887,846 8,485 455,772 1,957,519 164,736 2 280,129 857,742 5,703,531 1,797,175 Subtotal New Orleans District: Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Miss. & LA Estuarine Channel Improvement: Dredging Revetments Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Mississippi River Levees Mississippi Delta Region Atchafalaya Basin Floodway: Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River Navigation Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System 1,884,226,610 5,008,008 2,421,000 35,945,266 957,847,117 18,056,600 200,680 307,358,000 26,465,520 732,608,537 303,463 29,945,000 1,860,561,264 5,008,008 2,320,264 35,945,266 956,794,962 18,056,600 200,680 301,402,886 25,859,790 723,551,371 303,463 28,164,027 Subtotal TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, AR Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River 2,116,159,191 2,097,607,316 18,551,874 5,288,592,962 5,236,368,156 52,224,806 150,000 30,000 420,000 365,000 150,000 30,000 420,000 365,000 41-78 23,665,346 -- 100,736 -- 1,052,155 -- 5,955,114 605,730 9,057,167 1,780,973 1,780,973 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1994 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1994 Memphis District: (Continued) Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region (EP 309) Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes Subtotal TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN RECREATION FACILITIES--COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Project Funds St. Louis District: Wappapello Lake, MO Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing Subtotal Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Subtotal Total Eight-Year Program Funds Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies Total maintenance since Jul. 17, 1941 65,000 175,000 350,000 540,000 65,000 175,000 350,000 540,000 2,095,000 2,095,000 29,700 29,700 -- 200,000 200,000 -- 229,700 229,700 -- 69,753 69,753 -- 1,109,000 1,109,000 -- 965,247 965,247 -- 2,144,000 2,144,000 -- 4,468,700 4,468,700 -- 5,825,074,162 5,772,849,356 52,224,806 2,405,300 2,405,300 -- 203,286 203,286 -- 2,608,586 2,608,586 -- 1,584,339 1,584,339 -- 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- 7,673,109 10,281,695 5,835,355,857 2,582,079,855 7,673,109 10,281,695 5,783,131,051 2,573,030,400 52,224,806 9,049,455 41-79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1994 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1994 Total rehabilitation 31,113,000 31,113,000 -- Total flood control emergencies 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- Total general investigations 94,696,381 93,432,895 1,263,487 Total flood control, MR&T appropriations 8,558,145,393 8,495,607,646 62,537,748 Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1994 8,590,214,302 8,527,676,554 62,537,748 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been excluded from this report. 41-80 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-W COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Project Funding FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 Mississippi River General investigations: and tributaries Allotted 2,510,000 3,774,000 3,704,000 5,959,000 94,696,381 (Regular Funds)' Cost 2,610,794 3,642,732 3,850,132 5,652,422 93,432,895 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Allotted 215,162,000 217,256,000 216,540,520 210,458,000 5,655,172,962 Cost 217,709,941 236,938,418 187,423,226 222,501,957 5,602,948,156 Maintenance Allotted 126,690,000 132,439,000 134,142,000 132,458,000 2,582,079,855 Cost 129,231,497 131,656,191 119,066,374 147,192,455 2,573,030,400 Rehabilitations Allotted -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Cost -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Allotted -- -- -- -- 14,885,992 Cost -- -- -- -- 14,885,992 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed 1,283,910 420,000 2,398,000 2,068,480 22,094,160 Cost 2,168,592 246,037 883,264 3,035,538 21,163,598 Maintenance Contributed 14,423 -- 54,773 253,538 2,996,138 Cost 7,700 171,638 77,833 233,532 2,935,356 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1994): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Transferred to revolving fund: Impounded savings: Flood control emergencies: Net total allotted: Impounded savings: Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1994 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: $5,824,654,390 10,281,695 4,995,215 24,944,460 1,593,097 14,885,922 14,378 94,696,381 2,582,079,855 $5,866,468,857 14,900,300 2,676,776,321 32,068,909 8.590,214.302 41-81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-W (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Project Funding FY 94 Sep. 30, 1994 Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1994 Transferred to revolving fund: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: 8,558,667,152 24,944,460 4,995,215 1,607,475 Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1994: 8,590,214,302 Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 91: $344,362,000 FY 93: $354,386,520 FY 92: $353,469,000 FY 94: $348,875,000 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 1978, teletype. 41-82 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-X MISSISSIPPI RIVER'AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 94 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (112) New Orleans District Morganza, LA to the Gulf of Mexico-12825 $ 412,019 Vicksburg District Mississippi Delta, MS-12803 1,737,654 South Bank Levee, Bayou Rapides, LA-10220 40,049 Subtotal 1,777,703 Memphis District Jackson & Trenton, TN - 12874 -$1,008 Reelfoot Lake, TN - 12394 136,225 St. Francis River Below Wappapello (Whiteman's Creek)-22000 967 St. Francis River F&WL, AR & MO-79690 1,493 Subtotal 137,677 TOTAL (Category 110) $2,327,399 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 120) Vicksburg District 221,377 Memphis District 94,314 TOTAL (Category 120) 315,691 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 140) Flood Control Projects (141) Memphis District Eastern Arkansas Regional- Comprehensive Study - 81266 $2,420,680 $2,420,680 TOTAL (Category 140) 2,420,680 41-83 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 TABLE 42-X (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 94 Categories PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (Category 160) Flood Control Projects (162) Memphis District Helena AR & Vicinity-81280 43,960 Lower White River Big Creek & Trib-12472 393,875 St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Fdwy-77005 1,383 Whiteman's Creek, AR-12738 148,985 TOTAL (Category 160) 588,203 GRAND TOTAL MR&T GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 4,6512973 41-84 U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES Background The U. S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL) serves the Corps, the Army and the Nation with technical accomplishments in many areas dealing with the facility infrastructure and environmental quality problems that Army installations encounter. Today's Army faces huge challenges in providing sustainable Civil Works structures. At USACERL, we explore innovative ways to construct cost-effective, modern structures which can be built, operated and maintained with increased ease and reduced cost. The mission at USACERL is primarily of a military construction and maintenance nature; however, many technologies have dual application and are of extreme value in the Civil Works arena. Our Civil Works efforts historically have been in the areas of corrosion control, engineered management systems, ceramic coatings technologies, high performance paints, removal of lead based paints, structure evaluation procedures, and environmental sustainment. USACERL has a superb Federal staff working in a variety of partnerships with academia and industry. A critical relationship is our alliance with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). UIUC is an internationally recognized institution for engineering excellence. The partnership between USACERL and the University is a resource multiplier that has paid the Army, the Department of Defense, and the Nation dividends beyond expectations. USACERL's people, their expertise, and the ability to draw upon multiple sources of talent have all fostered a climate in which research flourishes and success builds on success. USACERL's spirited professionals take great pride in contributing to the welfare of the Army and America. Special support centers outside and within USACERL help Army and other customers use the products developed by USACERL researchers. In-House Centers include: (1) Welding Technology Center, POC: Mr. Robert Weber, (2) Spatial Planning and Management Center, POC: Mr. Bill Aley, (3) Paint Technology Center, POC: Mr Alfred Beitelman, (4) Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center, POC: Mr. John Isaacson, (5) Geographic Resources Analysis Support System Center, POC: Ms. Brenda Waller, and (6) Robotics Center, POC: Dr. Simon Kim. These in-house people can all be reached by calling our 800 number 800-USA-CERL. Out-of- House Centers include: (1) Geographic Information System (GIS) Laboratory, POC: GIS Lab, University of Illinois, 220 Davenport Hall, 607 S. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, 217-244-1222, (2) Micro PAVER, ROOFER, and RAILER Support Centers, POC: PAVER - Dr. Mo Shahin, ROOFER - Mr. David Bailey, and RAILER - Dr. Don Uzarski, who can all be reached at 800-USA-CERL, (3) Environmental Technical Information System (ETIS) Support Center, POC:' ETIS Support Center, 909 W. Nevada, Urbana, IL 61801, 217-333-1369, (4) Building Loads Analysis and System Thermodynamics (BLAST) Support Office, POC: BLAST Support Office, 140 Mechanical Engineering Bldg., 1206 W. Green St., Urbana, IL 61801, 217-333-3977, and (5) Construction Automation Support Center, which supports automating work at Corps of Engineers construction field offices, including the fielded version of the Resident Management System (RMS), POC: CASC, 1408 W. University Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 217-367-0137. EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES USACERL has several million dollars' worth of test and evaluation equipment. A scanning electron microscope at USACERL has 50 Angstroms resolution (400,000 times magnification) enabling research at the subparticle level. The almost-finished, upgraded Triaxial Shock Test Machine or "Shake Table" can simulate many vibrational environments, including earthquakes, and will be the most powerful shaking table in the U.S. The heating, ventilating, and airconditioning test facility supports energy research. Our ion plater is a state-of-the-art physical vapor deposition capability that can also check the quality of shielded materials. Other equipment includes that supporting the welding lab, acoustics lab, integrated simulation language lab, water quality lab, semiconductor fabrication system, plasma energy research lab, laser research facility and bioengineering research lab. USACERL also has access to the excellent research facilities at UIUC, including those at the Hazardous and Toxic Waste Laboratory, the National Center for Supercomputing Applications, and many capabilities within the College of Engineering. Civil Works R&D PROGRAMS Lead-Based Paint: Activities at the USACERL Paint Technology Center This work yields methods of lead paint detection and management that are safe, effective, and reasonable in cost. USACERL is looking at new technologies for the identification and measurement of lead in 42-1 paint on surfaces, the abatement of lead-based paint on buildings, and the safe removal of lead paint from steel structures. Materials Selection Guide for Mechanical Components Used in Civil Works Projects Maintenace to prevent corrosion damage is a high-cost item in the Civil Works maintenance and repair budget for water resource projects. Corroded parts are often replaced with parts of the same corrosion- susceptible materials, leading to future maintenance costs. Through a better understanding of the corrosion process and selection of more appropriate corrosion-resistant materials for given environments, these costs can be reduced. The Materials Selection Guide allows Civil Works managers to choose the materials most appropriate for high-strength, corrosion- resistant, cost-effective mechanical components. Civil Works Energy Data System Version 2.5 (CWEDSII) The Civil Works Energy Data System (CWEDS) is a microcomputer-based system designed to aid in the management and reporting of energy consumption data on civil works projects. The system enables users to track energy deliveries, issues, inventories, losses, sources, users, and annual factors. It serves as a pre-processor to the Army DUERS (formerly DEIS) Data System (ADDS). CWEDS selectively produces up to 11 reports for use in flagging problems, tracking energy use, energy planning, and for direct keying to ADDS. Since its release in FY89, CWEDS has been upgraded and revised several times to keep in step with energy reporting requirements and ADDS. The current version, released April 1995, is 2.51. Advanced Composite Prestressing Cables for Waterfront Structures Corrosion of concrete and steel structures in coastal environments has led to the search for and development of alternative prestressing materials. As cracks develop in the concrete covering, steel reinforcement cables are exposed to corrosive ocean waters. USACERL has joined the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSM&T) and several industry partners in a project to demonstrate the effectiveness of fiberglass and carbon fiber reinforced composite cables which prove to be strong and do not corrode. REMR Management Systems for Civil Works Structures USACERL is currently developing Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation (REMR) Management Systems for numerous types of Civil Works structures owned by the Corps. REMR Management Systems are designed to be decision-support tools for determining when, where, and how to effectively allocate M&R dollars for Civil Works structures. These systems are being developed to provide: (1) objective condition assessment procedures, (2) means for comparing the condition of facilities and tracking change in condition over time, and (3) procedures for life-cycle cost analysis of different maintenance policies and rehabilitation alternatives. The primary objective of the REMR Management Systems is to help managers and engineers obtain the best facility' condition for a given budget level. REMR Management System for Concrete Navigation Lock Monoliths The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers operates some 270 navigation lock monoliths constructed of plain reinforced concrete. Many of these structures require, or will require, significant repairs to ensure safe and efficient operations. To help M&R managers with project planning and budgeting for concrete navigation lock structures, USACERL has developed a REMR Management System called LOCKWALL. The following are the fundamental pieces of LOCKWALL: (1) User interface - LOCKWALL runs in an IBM-AT compatible, DOS environment, and requires 640K free RAM, (2) Inventory - LOCKWALL houses an inventory of all waterway systems and navigation lock structures within any given Division, (3) Condition assessment - the condition inspection data is gathered by visual observation and simple measurements, (4) M&R Alternatives - a wealth of information regarding M&R operations for concrete lockwalls has been gathered and stored in the LOCKWALL program, (5) Life-cycle costs - LOCKWALL has a life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) utility that can be directly tied into the condition inspection data base. REMR Management System for Miter Lock Gates To help those involved in M&R project planning and budgeting for lock and navigational facilities, USACERL is developing a REMR Management System for steel sheet pile structures. This computerized management system contains standardized inspection and condition rating procedures, life-cycle cost analysis routines, and data storage and handling capabilities. Bridge Engineered Management System (BRIDGER) Bridges are critical to Army installations' transportation systems. Limits on bridge loading and bridge clearances often dictate the weights and dimensions of loads that can be carried over a particular route. Under direction of the U.S. Army Center 42-2 for Public Works, USACERL is developing a computerized bridge Engineered Management System (EMS) called BRIDGER. BRIDGER is one of a series of EMSs being created to assist in managing maintenance on a variety of Army facilities. The BRIDGER system will include a standardized procedure for collecting inventory and inspection information for highway, railroad, and pedestrian bridges. Cathodic Protection (CP) Diagnostic The Army owns and maintains about 20,000 underground fuel storage tanks (USTs); 4,000 miles of buried gas pipes; and 300 elevated water storage tanks. Millions of dollars are spent annually to repair corrosion damage to these structures. USACERL has developed the CP Diagnostic computer program which operates on an IBM-AT or compatible microcomputer with hard drive and 640K RAM. The program assists installations in evaluating, troubleshooting, and maintaining data on CP systems for underground piping, USTs, elevated water storage tanks, and Civil Works structures, such as miter and sector gates. Coatings to Repel Zebra Mussels The zebra mussel is not native to U.S. waters, but was believed to be introduced into this country by European freighters in 1986. Since then, this organism has progressively infested waters from the Hudson Bay to the Great Lakes, west of the Mississippi River, and as far south as the Gulf of Mexico. Zebra mussels adhere to surfaces coming into contact with infested waters, which causes severe fouling. USACERL is evaluating different coating systems that could repel zebra mussels and prevent this fouling. This work is in cooperation with the U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station, which is the lead Army laboratory for zebra mussel research. These coatings are being evaluated for potential in either being toxic to the mussel or providing a low-tension, nonadherent surface. REMR Management System for Timber Dikes Timber dikes are often used in rivers to control water flow so that a favorable channel can be formed in reaches where the channel had previously been inadequate for navigation. To assist those involved in M&R project planning and budgeting for timber dikes, USACERL is developing a REMR Management System. This computerized management system contains standardized inspection and condition rating procedures for timber dikes, life-cycle cost analysis routines, and data storage and handling capabilities. It also includes software for performing required calculations and producing a variety of reports for work planning and budgeting. System to Manage Current Year Operating Budget This project is developing a method that allows Districts and Divisions to respond to HQUSACE directives in time to enhance the budget approval process. The goal is to provide HQUSACE with a reengineered method for distributing funding allocation information, while providing Districts and Divisions with a more efficient system for responding, which greatly improves the Reclama process. Less time spent on the manual preparation of documentation allows more time for gathering and analysis to provide the most up-to-date information possible. Reviewers from Civil Works Districts and Divisions will no longer have to be detailed to HQUSACE for this task, resulting in savings in TDY, training and manpower costs. PRISM: Planning and Resource Integration Stewardship Modules and Decision Support System The PRISM decision support system assists in fulfilling laws and statutes which protect the natural and cultural resources for which the Army, the Department of Defense, and Army Corps of Engineers are legally responsible. PRISM is an easy-to-use computer decision support system which allows a long-term approach to preventing conflicts in land management and to monitor dynamic resources which are geographically diverse and constantly changing. The PRISM system has potential for use throughout the Corps of Engineers and Department of Defense as well as other agencies with resource management responsibilities. Improved Specification For Hydraulic Cylinder Piston Rods The Corps of Engineers uses hydraulic pistons on Civil Works facilities. Ceramic-coated piston rods which improve performance and durability are now commercially available from a variety of manufacturers. CERL is currently evaluating the characteristics of ceramic-coated pistons rods necessary for long term performance on hydroelectric power turbine applications at Civil Works facilities. This knowledge will be used to develop an improved specification for these components. Non-Lubricating (Greaseless) Bushing for Hydroelectric Applications The Corps of Engineers has traditionally used grease lubricated bushings between parts having relative motion at Civil Works facilities. These systems have given reliable performance over long periods of time. However, grease poses environmental and operating problems. It has a potential for environmental contamination, so that special precautions and 42-3 procedures are needed for handling and disposal. Recently, many types of greaseless bushings have been developed by the industry for a variety of applications. These systems have the obvious advantage of avoiding the problems associated with greases and show promise for application at Corps facilities. To ensure their performance on Civil Works facilities, CERL is evaluating these systems. Important test characteristics for long term system operation and initial parameters have been identified. "The Corps of Engineers Greaseless Bushing Test Procedure" was developed and greaseless bushing systems have been tested. This test procedure is currently the industrial benchmark for bushing systems. CPAR PROJECTS Prestressed Clay Brick Walls USACERL is working jointly with the University of Nebraska through the CPAR program to develop an easy-to-use prestressed brick wall system. A prestressed masonry wall system will improve the performance of both veneer and load bearing wall systems through reduced cracking from out-of-planeloads, reduced water penetration, increased out-ofplane load carrying capacity and, in veneer systems, reduced or eliminated need for interstory wall ties. This will simplify wall construction and insulation while eliminating problems associated with ties such as wall stiffness incompatibilities, differential in-plane deformations, and corrosion. Design aides and connection design details are being developed as well to faciilitate use by engineers and designers. High Performance Ultra-Light Concrete Masonry Unit A concrete masonry unit (CMU) of comparable quality to existing normal weight CMUs but with the weight reduced by 50% has been developed. This product was achieved through optimization of both the mix design and the unit shape using materials and equipment currently available to the block making industry. Lightweight aggregates and high strength concrete technologies are combined in the mix optimization process. Finite element analysis was used to optimize the unit shape, web thicknesses, and face shell thickness. Careful attention was given to the manufacturability, transportability, and constructability of the new unit. Both direct and indirect benefits will result from this new CMU. Cost estimates indicate a direct savings of as much as 20% of the constructed facility. This does not include the savings that would result from the increased use of masonry due to greater competitiveness in construction. Indirect benefits would also result in the reduced costs for is the effect of a lighter CMU on the labor force. Use of these units can help reduce early retirement due to back injuries or other disabilities and reduce the costs of workman's compensation. foundation and seismic design due to reduced dead load of the structure. Of perhaps greater significance 42-4 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY BACKGROUND The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL), in Hanover, New Hampshire, maintains the finest research and engineering staff and facilities in the world for the study of cold regions science and technology. CRREL's experience spans 50 years, starting with the Boston District's Soils Laboratory work on frozen soils in the early 1940s. The creation of CRREL began in 1961 with the merger of the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory (ACFEL) and the Snow, Ice, and Permafrost Research Establishment (SIPRE), both of which were outgrowths of the Army's World War II experience in Alaska, Iceland, and Greenland. This merger put the Nation's and the DoD's principal cold regions expertise in one place. The early 1970's were the beginnings of a long-term program headed by the Corps of Engineers to investigate ways of extending navigation on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway throughout the winter, and also the beginnings of Civil Works research at CRREL. As part of this Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Winter Navigation Demonstration Program, begun in 1971, CRREL researchers investigated ice booms to impede the flow of ice into navigation channels, and later developed various methods of keeping waterway locks ice-free, including the use of chemical coatings, saws for cutting ice from lock walls and bubblers for preventing ice formation. CIVIL WORKS RESEARCH FACILITIES CRREL's Ice Engineering Facility is one of the largest refrigerated hydraulics laboratories in the world. It contains a research area for large-scale refrigerated hydraulic models, a refrigerated flume, and a wind tunnel for simulating drifting snow; it also includes the only active lowtemperature, ice towing tank in the United States. It serves the civil works needs of the Corps, the Navy's needs for testing the ice capability of its surface and submarine hulls, and, when necessary, provides support to private industry. The Army Corps of Engineers Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems (RS/GIS) Center is located at CRREL. The Center provides a focus for assisting the Corps District offices in exploiting the rapidly expanding capabilities of remote sensing and geographical information systems technologies in the execution of their water and natural resources and environmental missions. CIVIL WORKS RESEARCH PROGRAM Major Civil Works Research Programs at CRREL include: Ice Engineering, River Confluence Ice, Remote Sensing, Water Resources of Cold Regions, and Construction Productivity Advancement Research. The following is a summary of each program and a list of accomplishments for FY94. 43-1 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 Ice Engineering Program The Ice Engineering Research Program has developed the Nation's principal guidance for winter navigation, river ice management, and ice jam flood control. In severe winters, ice jams are responsible for more than $100 million in damage due to ice-induced flooding. Efforts to understand and control ice jams and iceinduced floodings have helped reduce their cost to the Nation. Accomplishments: * The first comprehensive river ice jam database was designed that includes information on more than 9,000 ice events in the United States. This database allows statistical analyses and correlation of local and regional hydrometeorological characteristics and jam occurrence and severity and is electronically accessible on the Internet. * Rugged and economical heated panels were developed to eliminate ice accumulation on lock walls or dam pier walls. * A low-cost, environmentally compatible structure for break-up ice jam control in small rivers was developed and field-tested. This structure consists of properly spaced granite or concrete blocks that arrest ice runs at selected sites, thus preventing ice jam formation at undesirable downstream locations. * Through the Alaska District, a reconnaissance study was conducted on the Northern Sea Route, a navigational route which follows the Eurasian coastline between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. This study addressed navigational difficulties experienced due to bitter weather conditions, the short daylight season, iceinfested waters, and isolation. A technical report was published which outlines longterm solutions to these problems and provides options to increase international traffic along the Northern Sea Route. River Confluence Ice Program The River Confluence Ice Program began in FY 94. The objective of this program is to develop practical methods to reduce the incidence of ice problems at the junction of a river tributary and its mainstem. The resulting benefits will include reduced losses to shoreline properties and commercial shipping concerns and a reduction in costs associated with icing problems. Accomplishments: * Mulched leaves were found to be an environmentally acceptable material to accelerate decay and weakening of river ice and minimize ice jam effects. * Developed framework for probabilistic breakup ice jam prediction. Remote Sensing CRREL is the Program Manager of the Corps of Engineers Civil Works Remote Sensing Research and Development Program. This program emphasizes the exploitation of real-time in-situ sensors and commercially available aircraft and satellite imagery. These data are integrated into a spatial data management system. Development and utilization of remote sensing technology for civil works applications in water and natural resources is urgently needed to provide cost-effective information necessary for many of the Corps 43-2 engineering, operations, and planning missions. Accomplishments: * Satellite imagery of the pipeline oil spills in the Komi Region of the Republic of Russia were completed. The spill took place in the summer and fall of 1994. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and SPOT multispectral images were acquired in late August and early November 1994. These images allowed the analysis of the terrain in this region before and after the spill. The results suggest that oil spills can be monitored using change detection techniques when comparing pre- and post-spill imagery. The presence of ice and snow cover in the November images suggest that SAR may be more efficient than multispectral SPOT imagery at detecting oil under winter conditions. * An object-oriented distributed snowmelt model for real-time simulation of upland watersheds was created. Modular simulation tools were also created for adapting Miskingrum-Kunge routing techniques to real-time water control. * Data has been collected from Landsat TM and AVIRIS for the Kings River Basin in California. Using these data, snow mapping algorithms and links to distributed snowmelt models have been developed. In the future, this information will be integrated into Corps Water Control Systems for improved snowmelt flood forecasting. * A graphical user interface system has been developed that integrates GIS, water control databases, Corps models and remotely sensed spatial data. This system is being applied in the Mississippi River Modeling system, the Real Time Water Control program, and Corps district and division demonstration projects. * Through the Defense Nuclear Agency, assistance was provided to the Republic of Belarus for the environmental restoration of toxic and hazardous wastes. Remote sensing components were designed and implemented in a Belarus AN-26 aircraft. Image data processing facilities were also designed for environmental data analysis in Belarus. Water Resources of Cold Regions The prediction of runoff, water quality, sedimentation and river morphological response during winter and spring is important to the Corps of Engineers management of the nation's water resources. This program addresses the deficiencies that exist in being able to economically and efficiently analyze, simulate, and predict snowmelt run-off for flood forecasting and water supply, winter low flows, runoff and sedimentation from partly glacierized and permafrost basins, bank erosion impacts on habitats, fisheries and aquatic resources, and winter water quality beneath river and lake ice covers. Accomplishments: * Oxygen isotope data was used to quantify the groundwater input to the snowmelt runoff in three nested basins at the Sleepers River Watershed in Vermont. This relatively large groundwater flow suggests a significant interaction between the surface and groundwater flow systems. * A study of winter low flows in the White River in South Dakota, a tributary of the Missouri River, showed that in an average winter, the ice growth and storage in 43-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 one reach is the same as the stream flow. In an exceptionally cold, dry winter month, the ice storage was 15 times the streamflow. This study showed that the previously ignored "ice" term can be the dominant water balance variable. * A CRREL Monograph on Glaciohydrologic and Hydraulic Effects of Runoff and Sediment Yield in Glacierized Basins was published. Construction Productivity Advancement Research Program The Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Program is a cost-shared partnership between the Corps of Engineers, the United States construction industry, academia institutions, state and local governments, and other groups. Its purpose is to cooperatively advance the research innovation in the United States construction industry, thereby enhancing its productivity and competitiveness. The Corps CPAR program is a catalyst for cooperation with industry on research topics important to both the private sector and the Army. Accomplishments: * Through two CPAR efforts with private industry (Master Builders, Inc. and W. R. Grace & Co.) it was laboratoryproven that special chemical compounds, when added to a concrete mix, are capable of protecting concrete placed at low air temperatures without requiring added heat. In laboratory tests of concrete strength, it was found that the concrete admixture protects concrete down to at least -50C. The cost of using antifreeze admixtures is projected to be less than half the cost of using conventional heated shelters. Antifreeze admixtures can effectively add several months to the con-struc tion season in the colder areas of the 48 contiguous United States. This admixture product has a strong potential to be marketed by the industry partners for the 1995-96 winter season. CRREL's CPAR project with the Town of Berlin, New Hampshire, and UC Industries to demonstrate the effectiveness of foam insulation frost-shielding technology for shallow burial of utilities such as water and sewer lines was successfully initiated in FY94 with construction of a utility insulation test section. Shallow burial of utilities promises to generate significant savings on construction projects where near surface ledge would otherwise force expensive blasting to bury the utilities below normal frost penetration depths. 43-4 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES Background The U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (WES) has served the Corps, the Army, and the Nation with technical accomplishments in a variety of engineering and scientific fields for nearly 66 years. From its beginning in 1929 as a small hydraulics laboratory established to assist in developing a comprehensive plan for flood control of the Mississippi River, WES has grown into a 280-hectare complex of six centrally managed laboratories that is the largest and most diverse civil and environmental research and development organization in the world. With pride in its past, confidence in the present, and a clear vision of the future, WES dedicated its headquarters building in October 1985 in honor of the late BG Herbert D. Vogel, founder and first Director of WES. Vogel was instrumental in developing hydraulic research techniques that helped to mold federal water resources development. Presently, WES has unparalleled experimental facilities and expertise in hydraulic, geotechnical, structural, environmental, and coastal engineering complemented by state-of-theart sophisticated computational, simulation, and communications capabilities. During FY94, WES had over 1500 employees of which 722 were highly trained engineers and scientists. This professional staff was comprised of 183 PhD's, 308 with Masters' degrees, and the remaining 231 Bachelor's degrees. Yearly performance goals are established for both the Civil Works and Military programs. Within the Civil Works program, WES executed 94.5 percent of its FY94 civil works authority and exceeded all obligation and disbursement goals established for Military appropriations. WES executed a total Civil Works program totalling $116.5 million; of this total over $46.6 million was executed in direct allotted R&D Programs. The remaining $69.9 million was executed in support of USACE District and Division offices ($64.3 million) and in support of non-Corps customers ($5.6 million). Major non- Corps customers included the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. During FY94, WES published 590 technical documents in-house including 203 Technical Reports, 132 Miscellaneous Papers, 23 Contract Reports, 12 Instruction Reports, 2 Video Reports, and 188 special purpose documents. In addition to these documents, 30 Information Exchange Bulletins on technical subjects were produced. WES engineers and scientists also published 40 technical articles in refereed journals and 135 technical papers in conference proceedings. Perhaps the most impressive demonstration of customer satisfaction is that 43 percent of WES' total obligations were accomplished with funds provided on a reimbursable basis from customers. Another clear measure of customer satisfaction is the nearly 200 citations and letters of commendation and appreciation received from sponsors during the year. EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES WES has unparalleled experimental facilities and equipment, with capital assets of $630 million that include $150 million in information technology resources. The research and development missions are technically supported by extensive in-house capabilities in instrumentation and a 44-1 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 full array of shops for engineering and construction services. The WES team includes the administrative infrastructure for all functions. Supercomputing Facility In April 1993, DoD funded the installation of a $40.3 million Cray C90 supercomputer at WES which is operated in conjunction with the existing Cray Y-MP system. The facility provides a computational capability of 19 billion mathematical calculations per second, with enough capacity to store ten trillion characters of on-line information. The facility is part of the DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Plan.. High Speed, High-Bandwidth Communication Facilities One of the largest such communication networks in the world, it includes a 14.7-km-long fiber-optic backbone connecting 39 research facilities spread over 280 hectares and operating at FDDI speeds (100Mb/sec). The network connects over 45 LANS to high-performance computing resources located at WES and elsewhere. Directional Spectral Wave Generator This computer-controlled facility can reproduce waves of varying period, amplitude, and direction in the laboratory, thereby enabling research addressing the effects of waves on coastal structures. Engineering Geology Research Facility This facility is equipped for research on engineering geology problems including site characterization of contaminated installations. It contains a sedimentation laboratory, petrography laboratory, and x-ray equipment plus supporting data acquisition instrumentation and computer hardware. Fate and Effects Facility This 2400-sq m unique combination of laboratory facilities contains state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation and monitoring equipment to study the behavior of inorganic and organic contaminants in the environment and permits determination of critical biogeochemical cycles and microbiological processes important to bioremediation of contaminated soils and sediments. Hazardous Waste Research Facility This 1000-sq m Resource Conservation and Recovery Act-permitted facility is the only one in DoD; EPA has deemed it a Center of Expertise. The variety of equipment housed provides DoD and other Federal agencies with the capabilities to evaluate and develop a wide range of treatment technologies for contaminated groundwaters, soils, sediments, and sludges. Prototype Data Facility This 20,000 sq ft facility houses staff and equipment to support acquisition of coastal and nearshore data. A multi-million dollar inventory of state-of-the-art oceanographic instruments is maintained in readiness for quick deployment to meet the Corps' need for coastal data. A unique system of networked computers supports instrument maintenance, calibration, and testing; hardware and software development; data acquisition from a network of 22 wave/tide gages; and data analysis. Coastal Field Research Facility The largest facility of its type in the world and located on a 72- hectare site at Duck, North Carolina, it includes a 600 m research pier and associated laboratory and data collection equipment for monitoring the coastal/ocean margin. 44-2 Scientific Visualization Center (SVC) The SVC is an integral part of the high-performance computing, highspeed communications, and visualization triad. The Center provides a variety of integrated graphics, animation, and video capabilities to help analyze complex behavior of scientific phenomena associated with solving large and complex numerical problems. Special capabilities of the Center include virtual reality, direct volume visualization, and data sonification. Navigation Effects Flume This 400 ft long by 70 ft wide by 4 ft deep basin is equipped for research on the physical effects of navigation on the environment, navigation channel stability, and vessel performance in a variety of navigation settings. The flume includes a towing carriage and a recirculating water supply system to simulate flow effects on navigation. Sediment and Water Quality Sampling Facilities As part of the multiagency Federal Interagency Sedimentation Project, special facilities for sediment and water quality sampling provide worldrecognized equipment, technology, and research for future improvements. Materials Research and Forensic Facility This one-of-a-kind facility is equipped with a scanning electron microscope, x-ray diffractometer, atomic adsorption spectroscope, infrared spectroscope, rheometer, calorimeter, gas and liquid chromatograph, energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometer, light microscopes, and high-resolution 4096 by 4096 pixel video color-image analysis capability uniquely adapted to the study of microscopic and macroscopic features of construction materials. Ship/Tow Simulator Linked, real-time maneuvering simulators, specially developed for navigation channel design and evaluation, can simulate both deep ports and harbors and inland waterways. The simulators are linked to complex hydrodynamic models to accurately portray currents and wave conditions that impact vessel handling. An interactive, multidisciplinary approach uses teams of specialists, including licensed pilots, for design of the optimum channel to minimize dredging and construction costs and maintain navigation safety. Riprap Test Facility This is the largest curved channel test facility of its kind. It is capable of recirculating flows up to 200 cubic feet per second in a 780- ft-long special design open channel that is 3 ft deep and 12 ft wide. The facility is being used to develop design criteria for riprap protection on stream banks and flood control channels, and to study other hydraulic problems associated with curved channel flow. Aquatic Plant Field Research Facility A 50-hectare facility at Lewisville, Texas incorporates 53 research ponds, laboratory and office space, a greenhouse, a 30-tank mesocosm system, 18 flowing-water raceways, and additional tank systems for deep- and shallow-water studies. Work includes biological, chemical, and ecological studies of aquatic plants. In 1993, a Variable Depth and Light Tank Facility was completed, consisting of eighteen 14,000-liter tanks that will be used to determine seasonal growth and development of problem aquatic plants under low light conditions. Soils Research Center The largest such facility in DoD, the Soils Research Center has the facilities to perform comprehensive tests on undisturbed and compacted soil samples of all types. Major equipment includes 5 automated controlled-strain direct shear machines, 64 consolidated undrained triaxial compression chambers, a 44-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 cyclic triaxial apparatus, 29 consolidometers, a direct shear apparatus, a six-station MTS closed-loop electrohydraulic system with an activator capacity of 250,000 lb, a 15- inch diameter triaxial apparatus which is the largest in the U.S., and a unique large-scale stress chamber capable of accommodating 5 ft diameter specimens up to 6 ft high. Geophysics Test Facility New geophysical research instrumentation is evaluated in this DoDunique facility which includes temperature and humidity controls within a sound-proof chamber. Environmental Geophysical Training Facility. Buried target anomalies are detected by a variety of geophysical techniques at a site extensively characterized prior to target placement. Effective training is conducted in the use of magnetic, electromagnetic, resistivity, seismic refraction, and ground-penetrating radar surveys. Microtunneling Test Facility This unique field test facility includes six selected soil profiles within which horizontal inclinometers, settlement plates, and strain gages are installed for the purpose of evaluating microtunneling and directional drilling equipment. Civil and Environmental Engineering Centrifuge Test Facility Currently under construction, this complex will house the world's most powerful centrifuge (1,260 g-tons) with a 21-ft radius and a maximum payload capacity of 8.8 tons. Multiple chambers with specialized vibrator, detonation system, hydraulic interfaces, and freezing capabilities will facilitate studies addressing deep foundations, pollutant migration, explosion simulations, freeze-thaw effects, and dynamic loadings produced by explosions and earthquakes. LABORATORIES The diverse civil engineering and environmental quality research and development organization is a complex of six centrally managed laboratories with world-renowned expertise and facilities for solving a wide range of civil engineering and environmental quality challenges. Each laboratory adds a unique perspective and set of capabilities to the overall WES team. Hydraulics Laboratory The Hydraulics Laboratory, founded in 1929, was the original "Waterways Experiment Station", the name now being perpetuated because of the early and continuing renown the institution demonstrates in hydraulics and hydrosciences. The laboratory currently is comprised of 145 scientists, engineers, technicians and administrative staff. Together, they were responsible for executing a total program of $38 million. The WES Hydraulics Laboratory possesses broad and deep expertise in the field of hydraulics and hydrosciences. Nationally and internationally recognized experts in the fields of riprap design, navigation engineering, pump station design, fisheries engineering, sediment transport, estuarine engineering, dredging equipment, hydrodynamics, groundwater modeling, and mobile boundary channel design all reside in the WES Hydraulics Laboratory. Geotechnical Laboratory The flood control R&D work of the Hydraulics Laboratory led almost immediately to the need for soil 44-4 testing and prediction of the behavior of structures built on and/or with soil materials. Since its establishment in 1931, the Geotechnical Laboratory has grown to a strength of 211 engineers, scientists, and support personnel executing a total program of $40 million. The thrust of geotechnical engineering involves investigation, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of structures with, on, or in earth materials. From the establishment of the Geotechnical Laboratory, its personnel have been recognized as National and worldwide leaders in addressing problems in areas such as soil and rock mechanics, foundation behavior, engineering geology, engineering geophysics, earthquake engineering, pavement technology, mobility testing and modeling, and trafficability studies. Coastal Engineering Research Center The Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) was established by Public Law in 1963 as the direct successor to the Beach Erosion Board, which also had been created by Congress in 1930. Located in the Washington, D.C., area for two decades, it functioned as an autonomous laboratory until it relocated to Vicksburg in 1983 to become part of the WES. By FY93, a staff of approximately 150 persons was executing a total work program of $25 million. The CERC is the Nation's center for engineering and scientific research and development in the coastal zone. It is structured around balanced capabilities in prototype data collection, physical modeling, and numerical simulation to investigate processes involving waves, winds, water levels, tides, and currents, and their interactions with coastal sediments and structures. Results from research in these areas are applied by CERC staff, Corps field offices, to support the execution of projects for shore and beach erosion, coastal flood and storm protection, navigation maintenance and improvement, and harbor design and modification. In addition to numerous other publications, CERC originated the Shore Protection Manual, a document translated into many foreign languages and recognized worldwide as the "bible" of the coastal engineering profession. CERC is presently updating and expanding the document into the "Coastal Engineering Manual." Structures Laboratory The Corps' Concrete Laboratory was transferred from Mt. Vernon, NY to become a part of WES in 1946. In 1983, WES combined the Concrete Laboratory and the Weapons Effects Laboratory into the current Structures, Laboratory. The Structures Laboratory employs approximately 150 people and conducts an annual work program of approximately $40 million. Sole Federal responsibility for sampling, inspecting, and acceptance testing of portland cement and pozzolan rest with the Structures Laboratory. It is a world leader in research on concrete materials and construction techniques, and the evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of civil works concrete structures. Other areas of expertise include phenomenology and effects of explosions, dynamic properties of soil and rock masses, and response of structures to a wide assortment of loading conditions, including seismic, penetration, and blast effects. Environmental Laboratory The Environmental Laboratory is the acknowledged leader for conducting environmental quality research and problem solution involving the consequences of water resources development, navigation, regulation of wetlands and inland and oceanic water quality, management of natural and cultural resources and cleanup of contaminated sediments and soils. For over 20 years, an interdisciplinary staff of 255 peer-recognized professionals, augmented with the finest network of academic and pri- 44-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 vate scientists and engineers in the country, have provided the environmental quality technology necessary to further the Corps missions executing an FY94 work program of $57 million. In the mid 1970's, scientists of the Environmental Laboratory developed the landmark technical environmental criteria required by the clean water and ocean disposal acts to regulate the disposal of dredged material in terms of environmental effects. In the late 1970's, the technical criteria required to delineate wetlands in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act were developed by Environmental Laboratory scientists and adopted by all Federal agencies with wetlands responsibilities. This trend of excellence has continued today with such notable examples as development of the Chesapeake Bay mathematical water quality model to guide bay cleanup efforts, development of innovative and cost effective treatment technologies for cleanup of contaminated ground water and soils, demonstration of innovative methods for dredging and treating of highly contaminated sediments, and development and demonstration of wetlands restoration technology. Information Technology Laboratory The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) was established at WES in 1986 to provide research, development, testing, evaluation, and services for the Corps of Engineers in the information technology and computer-aided engineering and computer science areas. ITL provides WES, the Corps of Engineers, Army, and DoD with a variety of advanced information technology capabilities and expertise. ITL has 220 employees and a total program in FY94 of $48 million. It manages the only DoD High Performance Computing Center for shared, stable systems; the Tri-Service CADD/GIS Technology Center; the Corps' Civil Works Guidance Update Program; one of two CEAP Regional Processing Centers providing .60 percent of the Corps' MIS data processing; one of the largest high-bandwidth, high-speed data communication networks in the world; the largest library in the Corps which is also one of the finest civil engineering libraries in the Nation; and the largest publishing and visual information facility in the Corps. ITL has recognized expertise in the areas of high-performance computing, application of CADD and GIS technologies for facility management, computer-aided interdisciplinary engineering and analysis, computer science applications, software engineering, large relational database systems, high-speed communications, and scientific visualization. This expertise is applied to address problems in design, analysis, and management of projects and facilities to support the various missions of the Corps of Engineers. CENTERS AND INSTITUTES Because of its unique organization and broad mission area, WES is able to apply multidisciplinary approaches to complex problems within the framework of a single overall management structure. Such approaches are especially important in critical, complicated areas such as environmental quality. Centers and Institutes have been established as part of this structure to facilitate interdisciplinary efforts and to serve as focal points for expertise in specific technical areas. Six examples are: Wetlands Research and Technology Center (WRTC) The WRTC consolidates all areas of 44-6 wetlands science and engineering, including the Corps' National Wetlands Research Program and other sponsor specific wetlands R&D, wetlands training, interagency coordination and technology transfer. In FY 94, the WRTC hotline responded to over 1200 inquiries from Corps and non-Corps sources. The Center also facilitates the assembly of interdisciplinary teams, made up of experts from each of the WES Labs, to respond to sponsors' needs for application of state-of-the-knowledge wetlands techniques and methodologies. Center for Contaminated Sediments (CCS) The CCS was established to focus existing expertise on the problem of contaminated sediments to include identification, assessment, evaluation, and management. The activities of the center include technical and regulatory assistance, training, technology transfer, research and development, and response to general information requests. The CCS incorporates over two decades of experience from all WES elements in evaluating, managing and remediating contaminated sediments. This expertise is a direct result of research and development supporting Corps navigation dredging and mission support work related to military clean-up activities, EPA's Superfund and Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments Programs, and NOAA's Natural Resource Trustee Program. Center for Cultural Site Preservation Technology This Center consolidates administrative, technological, and research skills at WES and other Corps laboratories in support of scientific and engineering site protection and preservation work, training, and interagency coordination. It serves as a source of interdisciplinary technical expertise, an information clearing house, and direct technical assistance. DoD CADD/GIS Technology Center This Center was established to set standards and foster the application of computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) and geographic information system (GIS) technologies within the Department of Defense, promote system integration, support centralized acquisition, and provide assistance for the installation, training, operation, and maintenance of CADD/GIS systems. This includes directing specific applications development, promoting communications, promoting standards, furnishing technical advice, interfacing with professional organizations and industry, evaluating technological developments, and recommending necessary CADD/GIS policy. Civil Works Guidance Update Center The Civil Works Guidance Update Center is tasked with modernizing Corps civil works engineering guidance criteria contained in engineering manuals, regulations and guide specifications. The necessity for this effort is to comply with 1986 and 1988 Water Resource legislation that mandates cost sharing between the Government and local sponsors for water resource, protection, and navigation projects. Such cost sharing in turn requires modernizing Corps criteria for acceptance by the engineering profession and local sponsors as being cost effective with current state of the technology guidance. In FY94 the Center completed execution of a five-year program to update over 320 civil works engineering manuals, handbooks, regulations, circulars, pamphlets, and technical letters, and related guidance tools at a total cost of $25,000,000. Natural Resources R&D Center This Center was established to advocate and coordinate investigations on natural and cultural resources in a watershed context. The NRRDC coordinates R&D efforts in such areas as resource identification, evaluation, modeling, restoration, 44-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 mitigation, and management activities. The NRRDC is responsive to rapidly developing biodiversity, ecosystem, landscape, and watershed management initiatives; and an advocate for increased Army participation in such initiatives. The Center coordinates activities among various research programs and reimbursables. It is also responsible for facilitating and coordinating team building, activities, and products among its contributing elements. The result is a technically strengthened support capability for our clients. The objectives of the Center are to provide an initial point of contact for Department of Army Natural Resources R&D and technical assistance needs; promote a landscape-based approach to Natural Resources characterization, analysis, and management; improve information exchange and coordination in Natural Resources programs and issues; facilitate organization of teams to address Department of Army Natural Resources R&D and technical assistance needs; and facilitate preparation and processing of R&D and technical assistance proposals. WES contains the following similar entities: o Ecosystem Modeling Institute o DoD High Performance Computing Center o Center for Aquatic Plant Research and Technolog o Computational Hydraulics Instiute In addition, WES operates five civil works funded Technical Information Analysis Centers. CIVIL WORKS R&D PROGRAMS Civil works research and development efforts at WES cover virtually the entire spectrum of technology and problem areas in the Army's civil works arena: Environmental Impact Research Program (EIRP) The EIRP supports the Corps' planning, engineering, and operations functions by developing, verifying, and demonstrating impact prediction and assessment techniques; documenting and quantifying environmental effects associated with various Corps activities; and developing and demonstrating practical engineering and resource management strategies. In FY 94, the EIRP addressed 12 separate issues of immediate concern to Corps field operating elements in terrestrial, riverine, and coastal settings. The Corps' widely acclaimed and widely used Wildlife Management Manual is nearing completion with 85 sections published and a glossary and final sections in progress. As a means of assessing the benefits of channel modifications for aquatic habitats in channels, the Riverine Community Habitat Assessment and Restoration Concept has been developed and applied to the mainstem Missouri River downstream from four Corps reservoirs. Also pertaining to channels, a variety of bioengineering concepts for erosion control from various parts of the world have been documented and a video is in preparation as a means of technology transfer. Guidance is being prepared on selecting and installing vegetation along channels to maximize aquatic and riparian habitat while still maintaining hydraulic efficiency. With a focus on coastal areas, a variety of projects have been examined to evaluate the overall environmental and cost effectiveness of mitigation measures associated with engineering projects. Planning and operational strategies which have the highest probabilities of achieving intended objectives are being identified. A conceptual framework is being constructed to provide Corps staff with a framework for making 44-8 better decisions concerning what types of habitats to create and the trade-offs involved. Considerable information has been compiled on new and innovative aquatic-based remote sensing equipment and techniques for rapidly and economically assessing benthic habitats and biological resources. Wetlands Research Program (WRP) The WES has been conducting wetlands research for more than 20 years and is considered the National leader in wetlands delineation and evaluation. Through the Wetlands Research and Technology Center, the WRP continues to provide innovative and cost-effective technical guidance documents to the Corps, Army, DoD, and other Federal and state agencies in support of wetland missions at the field level. Wetlands research findings in wetland characterization, restoration, and management have direct application for regulatory compliance and land management at military installations. Associated technology transfer including "how to" guidance documents and training courses are available and already being used by DoD elements. The Cache River basin in Arkansas is a major bottomland hardwood wetland which has been studied extensively to develop information on the critical processes that occur. Process descriptors of surface and groundwater movement, sedimentation, water quality, soils and vegetation have been completed and provide the basis for development of automated systems to characterize these systems and their changes over time, as well as predict impacts of human activities. This and other regional studies provide data for development of the hydrogeomorphic classification system for determining wetland functions and values, which has been endorsed as a component of wetlands policy by the Administration. National demonstration studies at 43 field sites contributed valuable knowledge and technical information on the design and construction of bottomland hardwood and coastal wetlands, both for restoration of degraded wetlands and creation of new wetlands. These and other studies throughout the U.S. provide data for development of guidance documents on wetland management techniques, including plant propagation and manipulation, and low cost management techniques to maintain and enhance the physical, chemical and biological integrity of wetland ecosystems. Direct technical assistance to rapidly address wetland regulatory issues and resolve complex permitting problems is available to field offices through the Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program of the WRP. Zebra Mussel Research Program (ZMRP) The ZMRP includes development of control methods (i.e., hot water treatment, dewatering, ant ifoulant coatings, chemical control, etc.) and strategies to apply these methods at public facilities. It also addresses environmental effects of zebra mussel infestations as they pertain to bioaccumulation of contaminants and subsequent disposal problems, impact to natural resources, and changes in water and sediment quality. Methods are being developed to mitigate environmental effects. The ZMRP is coordinated with other Federal, regional, state, and private industry research programs through the Zebra Mussel Coordination Committee established under the Aquatic Nuisance Species Program. In FY 94, the ZMRP initiated design work for a backwash filter system for the Nashville District, completed assessment of the effects of zebra mussels on nutrient gradients in sediments, analyzed results of periodic laboratory leachate test, and conducted a field inspection of antifouling coatings exposed at Black Rock Lock. Results of this work will soon be published as a final report or in a Technical Note. WES continues to conduct research funded by the EPA, which involves a 44-9 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 multi-year study to determine the effects of zebra mussels in the Upper Mississippi basin ecosystem. WES is working cooperatively with the USFW Environmental Management Technical Center to execute this study. As the zebra mussel continues to expand its range in the U.S., the audience for the ZMRP Technical Notes is also expanding. At present there are approximately 900 individuals on the ZMRP mailing list and the list is constantly growing. COASTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM The Coastal Research Program incorporates six coordinated individual programs to develop products and guidance for planning, designing, and building the coastal projects that protect the Nation's infrastructure against erosion, flooding, and storm damage, and provide for safe and effective waterways and harbors. Research in FY94 focused on understanding waves, winds, water levels, tides, and currents. Their impact on shores and structures is critical to the effective and cost-efficient design and operation of projects. Improving prediction of project and structure performance will reduce costly over-design and repairs. New technologies will provide solutions for improving and protecting our coastal projects, thereby reducing costs and lessening adverse impacts. CORE-LOC The patent-pending CORE-LOC is the first randomly-placed concrete armor unit developed by WES for high energy wave environments, and was successfully 2-0 and 3-D stability tested in FY94 as primary armoring and as a repair unit for existing structures. Testing has produced outstanding results, with performance far surpassing all other common armor units used by the Corps. CORE-LOC may be used at Kodiak, Alaska, breakwater instead of natural quarry stone armoring, resulting in savings of over $1 million. The Noyo River, California, offshore breakwater, unable to pass the planning stages for over 20 years, now with CORE-LOC can meet the required benefit-to-cost ratio and should be constructed in 1998. The Kaumalapau, Hawaii, breakwater cost will be $3 million less than alternatives by using CORE-LOC. Corps Districts are considering using CORE-LOC on the Ouzinkie, Alaska, and Maalaea, Hawaii, breakwaters; Grays Harbor, Washington, and Manasquan, New Jersey, jetties; and contaminated island retaining structures in New York. Patents have been applied for in all major industrial coastal countries. Inquiries have been received regarding licensing CORE-LOC from private companies in the U.S., Japan, France, and Korea. It is expected that CORELOC, in addition to saving U.S. taxpayers considerable sums of money on coastal infrastructure projects, will generate substantial royalty income for the U.S. government when licenses are granted. ACES 2.0 ACES 2.0 is a newly released enhanced version of the Automated Coastal Engineering System (ACES) for Corps and public use. ACES is an interactive computer-based system for use in design and analysis of coastal projects and has over 500 users throughout the Corps and industry. ACES 2.0, released in FY94, is an integrated system connecting prediction technology with large coastal data sets and visualization graphics software in a user-friendly environment. The system contains sophisticated algorithms in the areas of wave theory, prediction, and transformation; wave/structure interaction; and littoral processes. ACES 2.0 allows planners and designers to study multiple scenarios 44-10 resulting in more reliable and costeffective engineering of coastal structures. SBEACH The Storm-Induced BEACH Change (SBEACH) model was developed to provide field engineers with a method of quantitative damage reduction evaluation, calculation of dune overwash, and improved designs for beach fill protection projects against hurricane and storm erosion and flooding. An upgraded version (SBEACH 3.0) was released in FY94 for field use. SBEACH 3.0 includes several model enhancements, primary among which is a random wave model developed to provide more realistic simulation of storm erosion produced by naturally varying wave conditions. SBEACH 3.0 is presently being used in numerous project applications throughout the Corps to estimate storm erosion and damage for beach fill design. DUCK 94 DUCK 94 was the largest research effort ever conducted in the coastal surf zone. During summer of FY94, the Corps' Field Research Facility (FRF) at Duck, North Carolina, hosted over 100 U.S. and foreign researchers representing 6 government agencies, 16 universities, and 2 private companies. Almost 500 instruments were deployed from the sand dunes to 60 miles offshore. These research efforts were focused on determining how sand moves along the coastline so that better understanding of coastal processes can enhance numerical models to predict beach effects over a period of decades. To grasp this understanding, 30 major investigations were conducted during DUCK 94 at a cost of about $15 million funded by the Corps, U.S. Navy, U.S. Geological Survey, and the National Science Foundation. All experiments were interrelated to provide comprehensive knowledge about a very complex process. A Sensor Insertion System mounted on the FRF's 1,800-ft-long concrete pier allowed instruments to be precisely placed at any depth and location, even in the most severe wave climate. The FRF has been hosting increasingly complex field experiments every 3 or 4 years since 1981. While DUCK 94 was the largest to date, it is just a prelude to the SANDYDUCK experiments scheduled for FY97. Field Wave Gaging The Field Wave Gaging research develops wave data from a nationwide network of wave gages. Long-term wave conditions around the U.S. coastline are analyzed to produce wave climate information for planning, design, and operation of coastal projects. Enhanced efficiency and cost-sharing permitted the network to grow by 6 gages in FY94 to a total of 54 gages. Cooperative agreements were continued with California, Florida, Virginia, Washington, and Texas. The Wave Data Analysis Standard was written, resulting in improved data management and distribution of a monthly summary for all U.S. gages. CEDRS The Coastal Engineering Data Retrieval System (CEDRS) is an interactive microcomputer resident database system which provides both hindcast and measured wind and wave data for use in the field of coastal engineering and shore protection. The objective of CEDRS is to assemble, archive, and make available regional databases containing data applicable to requirements of individual coastal districts of the Corps. During FY94, regional databases were installed on computer systems in Portland, Seattle, Alaska, and New York Districts, and the Pacific Ocean Division office. CEDRS regional databases were updated with the latest hindcast and measured data for the Jacksonville, Mobile, New Orleans, and Galveston Districts. Plans are being formulated to develop an expanded and enhanced version of CEDRS for workstation environments. 44-11 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 WIS The Wave Information Studies (WIS) produced during FY94, updated wave hindcasts and associated statistics for Atlantic coastal stations of the U.S. for the period 1976-1993. This hindcast information includes tropical storms and hurricanes as well as daily occurrences of typical wave conditions. A nowcast procedure was developed to routinely produce a month of current wave information to be added to the wave data base. These new wave data arising from the nowcasts will be added to the previous Atlantic wave information starting in 1995, and will be invaluable for coastal planning and evaluation. Studies were conducted regarding propagation of southern hemisphere swell on the Pacific Ocean in preparation for supplemental Pacific wave hindcasts to enhance the existing database of wave knowledge along the Pacific coastlines of the U.S. Technologies Application Technologies developed in the Coastal Research Program were used in FY94 to assist CE districts and divisions in design of harbor entrances, coastal channels, and shore protection. Some examples are: Yaquina Bay, OR: Recurring damage to the north jetty at the entrance to Yaquina Bay in 1970, 1979, and 1984 required $16 million in rehabilitation costs. After the repair in 1988, a monitoring program was undertaken to collect field data to determine the basic cause of the jetty failure. A physical model was used to test damage hypotheses. This was the first time in the U.S. that both waves and currents were used in structural stability tests on a moveable bed model. Test results support the theory that waves on adverse currents were the primary cause of damage. Data gathered during the monitoring project will aid in the design of a permanent repair that accounts for the effects of currents. Rochester Harbor, NY: Marinas in the lower reaches of Genessee River are experiencing damaging wave conditions due to waves propagating through the vertical-walled jetties at the Rochester Harbor entrance. A 1:75-scale model was designed, constructed, and tested to develop a solution that would alleviate the adverse wave conditions. Test plan concepts consisted of a dogleg breakwater, an offshore breakwater, rubble linings inside the existing jetties, and/or jetty spurs. Kaumalapau Harbor, HI: Kaumalapau Harbor, a small barge harbor located on the southwest coast of the island of Lanai, is susceptible to damages from storm generated waves. Major storms have caused extensive damage to the existing breakwater. A 1:49- scale model was designed and constructed to address breakwater stability and adverse wave conditions inside the harbor. Tests were conducted for various alternatives to alleviate breakwater damage and undesirable wave conditions in the harbor and develop a stable breakwater design using core-loc armor. Beachfill Projects: Storm protection beachfill projects at Coney Island, Long Beach, and West Hampton, NY, and Grand Isle, LA, were assessed using the latest shoreline and dune response technology developed through the Coastal Research Program. Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation (REMR-II) Research Program The REMR-II research program is a multi-disciplinary, multi-lab effort managed by WES with participation by the Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (CERL) and the Cold 44-12 Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL). The overall objective of this 7-year, $35 million program is to identify and develop effective and affordable technology for maintaining and extending the service life of Corps civil works projects. This broad-based program encompasses six problem areas: Concrete and Steel Structures, Geotechnical, Hydraulics, Coastal, Electrical and Mechanical, and Operations Management. FY94 accomplishments under this program include: (a) preliminary performance criteria for concrete repair materials based on dimensional compatibility with the material being repaired, (b) guidelines for monitoring and restoring relief wells and drains using chemicals in compliance with EPA guidelines, (c) an improved numerical code for the hydraulic modeling of near-field approach flows (a users workshop was conducted on the use of the code), (d) development of a computer program called "PC-ARMOR" for designing coastal armor units, and (e) development of guidance for removal of lead-based paints and incorporating the guidance into appropriate Guide Specification. MATERIALS RESEARCH PROGRAM Four integrated materials programs provided solutions to field-identified problems involving investigation, design, and construction of project features associated with water control structures. The Soils Program emphasized earth- and rockfilled dams and foundations; the Rock Program emphasized the behavior and methods of improving the response of rock masses to changing loads; the Concrete Program emphasized the properties and behavior of concrete materials and structures; and the Structural Engineering Program emphasized development of design and analysis techniques as well as computer-aided computational tools. The overall thrust of these programs is to produce project features in a more economical manner while ensuring that public safety is maintained on Corps projects. Selected FY94 accomplishments include: Soils: As the Soils Program has matured, the focus has shifted to technology transfer of the results of work units nearing completion. Three refereed journal articles were published in FY94 describing the advances made in testing of largeparticled soils. This R&D has essentially eliminated the uncertainty in testing and compaction control of these soils and has earned the WES research team an Army R&D Achievement Award, along with recognition from the American Society of Materials (ASTM). A patent was received for the Computer Controlled Ball Valve developed under the R&D focusing on laboratory determination of soil properties. This development enhances the reliability of laboratory test results through precise, automated control and should have wide-ranging commercial applications. Accomplishments under recently begun and ongoing work units included completion of numerical analyses to provide insight for development of design guidance for soft soils reinforced with geosynthetics. Advances were made in understanding and interpreting results of in situ penetration tests, nuclear moisture density tests, and in understanding and analyzing the behavior of soils subjected to large deformations, such as earthquake-induced levee or slope failures. Rock: Numerous improvements have been developed to predict the behavior of jointed rock masses and their interaction with facilities and structures. Numerical modeling efforts included refinements to the Discontinuous Deformation Analysis method and Key Block theory, which has generated significant interest in the academic community. Especially important was the development of a 44-13 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 technique called Simplex Integration that provides a means to perform closed-form solutions to directly compute the volume and center of gravity of complex block shapes. Computations are much more accurate and efficient than numerical integrations. Simplex Integration can be adapted to improve the accuracy and efficiency of other numerical methods as well, including Finite Element and Distinct Element methods. Concrete: Roller-compacted concrete (RCC) is an economical material for constructing dams and other massive structures. However, designers have generally recognized that it is potentially susceptible to damage caused by weathering cycles. Research led to the successful development of procedures for entraining and controlling protective air-void systems in RCC that render it much more durable in severe environments. Technology from this research was used by the Walla Walla District during construction of the Zintel Canyon Dam in Washington. Structural Engineering: The structural Engineering Program is conducting research in the area of fracture mechanics of concrete gravity structures, numerical analysis of welds, soil-structure interaction of walls, flow-induced vibrations of gates, and numerical analysis of mass concrete structures. This program has produced a series of computer programs to assist structural engineers in the design/analysis of hydraulic structures. Since 1980, the computer applications have been used over 275,000 times on over 2,400 structures/projects and have realized an estimated $90 million total savings in cost of design and manyear reduction. The research in the area of numerical analysis of welds and analysis of massive concrete structures has produced design tools which are already resulting in significant cost savings. The results of welds research has assisted in the evaluation of several cracked gates. The research products in the area of mass concrete placement were used in the design of Lock and Dam No. 2 on the Red River and are presently being used in the design of the Olmsted Locks and Dam on the Ohio River. The steel/construction sequence developed from these analyses resulted in $1 million cost savings for the Red River Lock and greater cost savings are anticipated for the Olmsted structure. The newest work unit on flowinduced vibrations of gates compares the dynamic properties of a structural model using parameter identification experiments with the results from finite-element models. Procedures are being formulated for the assessment of cumulative damage and structural reliability of steel gates under flow-induced vibrations in lock and dam systems. This research effort is developing experimentally-based models for the hydrodynamic pressure field on gates under different operating conditions, to be followed by the development of risk-consistent techniques for the design of structural components. Earthquake Program Engineering Research The Earthquake Engineering Research Program (EQEN) is an applied research program to provide design procedures and criteria for assuring the seismic safety of many of our Nation's dams, locks, and levees. More than 200 reservoir dams are subject to potentially significant seismic shaking and most were built when earthquake engineering was in its infancy. The life safety risk is 44-14 enormous. The new program is designed to characterize the sites, physically and numerically model the predicted behavior resulting from a seismic event, compute the expected damage, and develop cost-effective remedial measures and improved design procedures. The program is divided into geotechnical and structural elements. Geotechnical research solves problems associated with embankment dams while concrete dams and outlet works are addressed by structural research. The effort is extremely costeffective because the cost of partial failure of even one facility is estimated to exceed that of the entire research program. Coordination includes interactions with numerous other government agencies, industry, academia, and international experts. The 7-year program began in FY95. Navigation Hydraulics Program The Navigation Hydraulics Program has been instrumental in developing design guidance for deep-draft and shallow-draft projects which is least disruptive to the environment. This has included design guidance in the form of Engineering Manuals for both deep- and shallow-draft waterways and transferring past and on-going technology through Corps training courses and symposiums. The Program was deeply involved in early development of the WES ship/tow simulator which is a state-of-the-art design tool for waterway development. The Program has continued to provide design tools to the Corps field offices which have reduced the cost of design and maintenance of the navigable waterways in the U.S. During FY94, the second phase of development of design guidance for small-craft coastal port design continued. Phase two is focusing on the minimum channel required by small, commercial vessels in our coastal ports by evaluation of the vessel characteristics of the three. types of small-craft. Special needs on this particular research required the enhancement of a Motion Analysis System which allows researchers to measure the six degrees of freedom on model craft to a high degree of accuracy. This particular system has allowed collection of large amounts of detailed data and reduced data reduction time to a manageable level. Without this system, such research would be virtually impossible. The system will also have future uses within the Program and on site specific navigation studies. Research continued on development of design parameters for bendway weirs. Bendway weirs are an innovative method of river training structure initially developed on site specific studies. This research is focused on development of generally applicable design parameters for a broader application of bendway weirs on other navigation channels. Research also continued on necessary channel protection required due to the forces imposed on bank protection. This research is directed toward quantifying the forces shallow-draft vessels impose on river banks and the size of the material required to resist those forces. This research is unique in that measurements are being taken to quantify specific forces created by a moving tow including jets and waves from the propeller and the bow waves created by the entire tow. Research to additionally enhance the ship/tow simulator was also continued. This research will provide guidance to allow more accurate numerical definition of the stream flow for inclusion in the various simulator studies for navigation projects. Flood Control Structures R&D Program The Flood Control Structures Program is directed at developing new or improved guidance for cost effective design, construction, rehabilitation, operation, and maintenance of flood control structures. This guidance results in better projects and significantly reduces the time required 44-15 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 for engineers in District offices to develop the design or plan for many operational and maintenance activities. Several design guidance publications including a new chapter in EM 1110-2-1601 on riprap design for streambank protection have been produced by this program. The Flood Channels Research Program (FCCRP) The Flood Control Channels Research Program provides both timely guidance for the solution of problems encountered by the Corps while improving and maintaining rivers and tributary streams for flood control, and systematic methods which satisfy requirements in ER 1110-2-1405 designed around file based, PC-computer programs. Technology needed to fill gaps in the existing methods is being pursued. The PC code, Hydraulic Design of* Flood Control Channels (SAM), has been developed, tested, released, and taught in various training courses. Assorted miscellaneous papers covering the channel stability methods, use of stream reconnaissance record sheets, and topics on gravel bed streams have been printed. Design guidelines have been incorporated into engineering manuals EM 1110-2-1418 and EM 1110-2- 1601. Current work involves developing guidance for predicting bankline migration and planform response to channel modifications, and for selection of planform design parameters. Also under way are the development of procedures to select the channel forming discharge appropriate for use in stable channel design. A systematic method for siting, configuring and sizing sedimentation basins appropriate for sediment transport regime entering the basin is also under development. A current emphasis is to determine hydraulic effects of environmental features of flood control channels. To this end, work is under way to develop and test a methodology for assessing the effect of habitat enhancement measures on water-surface profiles, and formulate guidance for the selection and design of habitat enhancement features that optimize flood conveyance and environmental value. This work will be a joint effort with the EIRP. (Environmental Impact Research Program) Work is also being done to determine the Manning n values of various mature plant species as a function of local velocity, depth of flow, and soil type for use in both selecting the plant species which are compatible with the hydraulics of any particular project and for performing hydraulic design computations for those plants selected. It is essential that hydraulic properties of various plant species be determined and documented to maintain the flood control capacity of a project while providing it with environmental diversity in a more complex multiple-habitat setting. Future work will build on previous FCCRP and EIRP work to develop procedures for calculating water surface elevations and channel stability in a complex cross-section with vegetative roughness and develop a methodology for designing planting arrangements and species compositions to optimize environmental conditions within the limits of hydraulic stability constraints. Other areas that the FCCRP plans to address include evaluating or developing new analytical techniques for calculating hydraulic parameters in complex channels; developing methodology to develop hydraulic design parameters for streams with cohesive banks and intermittent invert hard points; developing a transport function for cohesive sediments; improving understanding of steep boulder channels, of system sediment loading and delivery, for 44-16 use in forecasting sediment yield as land use changes, and of the effect of particle sorting on sediment transport; multi-dimensional sediment modelling; and developing a transport function for of sediment mixtures, i.e., clay-cobbles. Improvement of Operations and Management Techniques (IOMT) This multi-laboratory, multi-disciplinary program managed by WES has participating researchers from CERL, the Institute for Water Resources (IWR), and CRREL. The program is focused on providing measurable means for reducing costs and increasing efficiency in operations and maintenance management procedures at all levels of the Corps' massive O&M program. Representative products provided to the Corps O&M community include Decision Support Software for O&M budget analysis, a budget scenario generator and comparison tool that has completely revamped O&M pre-budget analysis and reduced computational costs; a multi-regression statistical procedure for analysis of existing stream gauge records as a check for possible gauge elimination and resulting cost savings; and guidance for integration of automation upgrades at flood control, navigation, and hydropower projects; and QUADRANT, an incremental economic analysis tool that is used for hydropower and navigation projects to assist project decision makers in assessing incremental performance benefits by adding incremental maintenance improvements. Aquatic Plant Control Research Program (APCRP) The APCRP is the Nation's leader in aquatic plant research and technology for managing problem aquatic plant infestations of major economic significance in public and navigable waters. The APCRP provides environmentally compatible, cost effective methods for identification, assessment, and management of these aquatic plant problems. Through direct application of APCRP developed technology, researchers have successfully reduced the problem populations of two major emergent problem species, alligatorweed and waterhyacinth to maintenance levels throughout the U.S. Currently, major research efforts are focused on developing technology to manage two major submersed problem aquatic plants, hydrilla, and Eurasian watermilfoil, that infest waters in 43 states in the U.S. Throughout FY94, WES and the Agriculture Research Service of the USDA continued their cooperative research efforts to develop biological agents for long-term management of hydrilla and Eurasian watermilfoil. This included domestic and foreign searches for biological agents and subsequent testing, quarantine, release, and establishment of approved biocontrol agents. The APCRP continued to develop improved techniques for the environmentally compatible use of aquatic herbicides and plant growth regulators. These techniques include the development of innovative aquatic herbicide application techniques and development of controlled-release herbicide carriers. In FY94, the APCRP established a working group of applied scientists from other Federal agencies including EPA, that has greatly enhanced EPA's technical understanding of the special aspects of aquatic plant management. In addition, the cooperative relationship with the chemical industry, established in 1978 for aquatic herbicide registration and labeling, was continued. In FY94, APCRP initiated the development of a PC\knowledge based Aquatic Plant Management Planner for use by CE Districts and their state cost-share agencies to provide a consistent basis for the planning and decision making process. Natural Resources Research Program (NRRP) 44-17 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 NRRP provides CE natural resource managers and planners with state-ofthe- art technology for managing natural resources and recreation at Corps projects. Using WES expertise in the technical fields of recreation, agronomy, forestry, sociology, landscape architecture, and related biological sciences, NRRP develops research products that provide resource managers with the capability to effectively resolve natural resource and recreation problems. Direct technical assistance is provided through the Natural Resources Technical Support (NRTS) Program. This program provides oneon- one, rapid technical service in solving natural resources or recreation problems at Corps projects. The NRRP developed, tested, and assisted in the CE-wide application of the Automated Use Permit System (AUPS) for issuing Corps campground use permits, provides cost-savings of more than $1 million annually. In addition, NRRP developed and tested a procedure for effectively managing water-based recreation use at Corps reservoirs, which is presently being utilized at several Corps projects experiencing water-based problems. In FY 1994 over 50 responses to requests for NRTS direct technical assistance were provided to over 30 Corps projects. These requests included problems related to carrying capacity, wildlife management, water-based recreation, impacts of reservoir pool fluctuation, fisheries and waterfowl habitat, and visitor attendance and profiles, and effects of day use fees. Water Quality Research Program (WQRP) The WQRP conducts research for solving water quality problems on all Corps inland reservoir and waterway projects. The WQRP provides costeffective methods, applications and guidance for problems related to the management of project water quality. In FY94, WQRP continued research efforts in developing relationships to describe and understand the fundamental processes affecting water quality in both reservoirs and tailwaters; the biotic structure of aquatic systems; sediment oxygen demand and gas absorption in draft tubes. Particular emphasis is placed on producing research results that relate to assessment and management issues. In addition, the program continued the development of assessment capabilities for managing CE water resource projects, such as evaluation of remote sensing applications. Also in FY94, WES provided over 40 direct technical assistance responses to CE projects requests through the Water Operations Technical Support (WOTS) Program. The WOTS Program provides for the effective transfer of technology and assistance in the implementation of technology developed by WQRP and the Zebra Mussel Research Program (ZMRP). Under WOTS, WES researchers responded to over 250 direct one-stop service requests from CE projects for solving water quality environmental problems. Sea Turtle Research Program The Sea Turtle Research Program was successfully completed in FY94, having achieved its major goal of developing a sea turtle deflector draghead to be used during hopper dredging activities along the southern Atlantic coastline of the U.S. Associated biological studies employed physical observations, animal counts, and statistical representations of data to establish meaningful indices of turtle populations and behavioral traits to determine when they would most likely be in the vicinity of channel dredging activities. An engineering 44-18 approach made use of physical model studies, and field demonstrations to devise hardware modifications that make dredging operations safer for resident sea turtles. The turtle rigid deflector draghead was field tested for the Corps' Californiastyle draghead on the hopper dredge McFarland using 350 mock (prototype size and density) sea turtles placed on the ocean bottom, and video documenting the effectiveness of the deflector. The rigid deflector draghead effectively excludes sea turtles, and dredging production is not adversely impacted. The McFarland has now been equipped with two rigid deflector dragheads for performing dredging operations along the south Atlantic coasts. Coastal Inlets Research Program The 6-year, $20-million Coastal Inlets Research Program (CIRP) was initiated in FY94. The objective of CIRP is to provide technical tools to increase the efficiency of Corps activities in coastal inlet systems. The need for CIRP arises from the fact that the Corps maintains marked or dredged channels, navigation, and shore protection structure at more than 100 coastal inlets around the U.S. The Corps will expend over $8 billion at coastal inlets over the next 25 years. Most experts agree that scientific understanding of the flow and sedimentation processes in inlets is not nearly adequate for addressing basic Corps engineering requirements, much less for obtaining innovative and cost-effective solutions to Corps problems. CIRP will develop fundamental understanding of inlets to assure that activities and policies of the Corps are technically sound and reduce adverse impacts on adjacent coastal areas. Long-Term Effects of Dredging Program (LEDO) The provide predict LEDO Program is designed to new or improved technology to long-term environmental impacts and to address methods of managing contaminated sediments. The technology will allow the Corps to meet its dredging and environmental constraints in a manner that is technically sound while reducing or eliminating unneeded constraints. The leaching protocol developed under the LEDO program has farreaching civilian and military applications. It has been used in association with the Corps National Dredging Program, the Defense Environmental Restoration Program, and the Corps Superfund construction support mission. It has been used to determine potential leachate impacts from sediment for the CE, the Navy, and the EPA Superfund program. It is currently being used to evaluate mobilization of explosives from contaminated soils at Army installations, efficacy of contaminant immobilization resulting from treatment of contaminated soils and sediments, and the ability of additives such as surfactants to facilitate the removal of contaminants from soils. The leachate protocol is a dual-use technology. It was transitioned to civilian contractors in FY 93 and used to predict potential leachate problems at a number of sites for the Port of Seattle. Currently, it is being used by the State of New Jersey to evaluate potential sediment leaching impacts, and by researchers at Louisiana State University to investigate contaminant transport through earthen dikes. It is coming into increasingly general use because it is the only test that provides the information needed to quantitatively evaluate contaminant losses from sediments and soils under the environmental conditions encountered in the field. In addition, the program continues to support a National bioaccumulation database and an electronic bulletin board to make that and other contaminated sediment information available to a broad audience. As designed the program continues to 44-19 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 have direct programmatic input to the development of the EPA/Corps Testing Manuals for dredged material. SHOALS The Scanning Hydrographic Operational Airborne Lidar Survey (SHOALS) is a hydrographic survey system recently developed for the Corps through a joint program with the Canadian Department of Science, Industry, and Technology and developed by Optech Inc, of Toronto. The SHOALS system consists of an airborne laser transmitter/receiver capable of measuring 200 soundings per second. The system operates from a Bell 212 helicopter, flying at 200 to 1,000 meters altitude with a ground speed of 0 to 100 knots. The Bell 212 is being provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration through a Memorandum of Agreement. The SHOALS system also includes a ground-based data processing system for calculating accurate horizontal position and water depth. Data processing utilizes a state-of-the-art depth extraction algorithm developed by the National Ocean Service. The SHOALS system completed field testing in March 1994, in Sarasota, Florida. Field tests objectives were to determine the operational window or envelop over which the system meets the performance specifications. This included specific tests to assess vertical accuracy, horizontal position accuracy, minimum depth capability, and maximum depth of survey. Ground truth data, collected by John E. Chance & Associates and Mote Marine Laboratory, were used for evaluation of system performance. During fiscal years 1995 and 1996, SHOALS will be demonstrated to Corps districts as it is transitioned from developmental to fully operational. Dredging operations Technical Support (DOTS) Program The DOTS Program provides direct environmental and engineering technical support to the Corps' Operations & Maintenance (O&M) dredging elements. The program's field assistance and technology transfer activities have supported diverse field needs for years and have directly benefitted the Corps' dredging mission. In FY94, DOTS responded to 136 requests from 31 Corps elements (Divisions/Districts) for technical assistance dealing in almost all environmental and engineering aspects of dredging and dredged material disposal. Major areas of assistance included management of highly contaminated sediments, application of risk assessment methods, endangered species issues, application of long-term management strategies for dredged material disposal, and application of new technologies in materials modeling, sediment profiling, dredge positioning, materials movement monitoring, etc. The program also plays a major role in application of the Corps-EPA Technical Framework for Dredged Material Management. This framework provides a consistent "road map" for evaluating the environmental acceptability of dredged material management alternatives. DOTS continues to support the joint Corps/EPA task force to develop analytical procedures and a decision making framework for disposal of dioxin contaminated dredged material. In FY94, the program played a major role in printing, distributing, and organizing the Corps/EPA field and public responses to the draft Inland Testing Manual. In addition, the Corps/EPA dredged material management and assessment training seminar continues to be supported through the DOTS Program where over 1,800 Corps, EPA, other Federal and state resource and regulatory, etc., 44-20 personnel have participated and been made aware of the technical and procedural requirements for disposal of dredged material. Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Program Authorized by the 1988 Water Resources Act, the CPAR Program permits cost-shared cooperative research and development between the Corps laboratories and the construction industry. The purpose of the program is to help the domestic construction industry improve productivity and regain its competitive edge Nationalally and internationally. WES is a major participant in this vital program with more than half of the total research being conducted by WES and its industry partners. Four CPAR Projects were completed by WES and its industry partners during Fiscal Year 1994. (a) The project Falling Beam Soil Saw resulted in equipment that can install slurry walls to depths of 100 feet at the rate of three to five feet per minute. The slurry wall can be designed to meet the Corps permeability specs of <10'6 cm/sec. The Soil Saw can be use for dam and levee reinforcement, slope stabilization, and containment of contaminants in ground water. (b) The Evaluation of the Applications of DELVO Technology resulted in new applications for this technology. DELVO, through its influence on the length of time that certain fresh concrete properties are maintained, was found to significantly impact construction productivity by making possible different and more practical approaches to transporting and placing concrete. (c) The project on Trenchless Construction resulted in guidelines for the selection and use of appropriate trenchless construction methods and materials. Guidance was developed on directional drilling, microtunneling, and the long-term performance of pipe rehabilitation systems (pipe liners). (d) The project Improving Construction Productivity Through Real-Time Position Measurement With CAD/CAE resulted in an exact positioning real-time system. The system uses two laser transmitters and an optical receiver to obtain a real-time three-dimensional position for the point being measured. The system has an accuracy of up to 1:100,000, which is equivalent to 5mm over 500 meters. The six new WES CPAR Projects approved during the last year were: Reactive Powder Concrete (RPC) for producing pipes and piles, a unique polymeric fibers and fiber delivery system, TDR pulser for monitoring groundwater levels, a portable innovative contaminated sediment dredge, a multi-segment beach dewatering system, and a new building system based on foamed concrete cast between stay-in-place forms. Fail-Safe, Retrievable Microtunneling Industry and laboratory partners signed a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRDA) to demonstrate, evaluate, and gain commercial acceptance of an innovative, fail-safe, retrievable microtunneling system that is ideally suited for environmental restoration and other critical projects where surface access is severely limited (drives under highways, airport runways, or railroad tracks). Features that set this microtunneling system apart include the versatility to handle practically any ground conditions by the use of temporary high strength steel pipes during the jacking process, a reamer system that allows the installation of a variety of product pipe diameters, and a provision for successful retraction in the event that unexpected conditions are encountered. The WES teamed up with McLaughlin Manufacturing Company, Greenville, SC, and Markham & Company, Ltd., Chesterfield, England, to evaluate the performance of the system under a variety of known, controlled ground 44-21 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 conditions at WES' instrumented Microtunneling Test Facility. The results are expected to provide U.S. owners, designers, and contractors the justification and documentation they need to specify and use the system in the U.S. Horizontal Directional Drilling Beneath Levees The WES has teamed with O'Donnell Associates, Inc., Sugar Land, TX, to develop guidelines for installing pipelines beneath rivers and within levee rights of way using horizontal directional drilling (HDD) techniques. The Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRDA) is expected to demonstrate that these techniques offer substantial economic and operational advantages over current practices. A two-phase program is designed to investigate hydraulic forces, determine the effect of the drilling fluid, establish techniques for eliminating undesirable fluid returns, and develop guide specifications. The first phase includes development of a conceptual model to evaluate machineground interaction and stability problems using numerical modeling methods. Various ground conditions, geometries, and machine operational characteristics will be considered. Findings are to be validated during the second phase where subsurface pressures will be monitored during actual drilling beneath inactive levee sections. Industry participation will be derived from individual pipeline and utility companies who have expressed an interest, and industry associations that include the American Gas Association's Pipeline Research Committee (AGA-PRC), the Gas Research Institute (GRI), the Directional Crossing Contractor's Association (DCCA), and the North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT). The elimination of features normally required in construction and maintenance of levee and adjacent road crossings (bridges, concrete boxes, earthen cover, and ramps) is expected to save the pipeline industry millions of dollars. Falling Beam Soil Saw The WES teamed with Brown and Root Environmental to develop a capability to create an underground barrier wall without the need for conventional excavation or backfilling. The Soil Saw Barrier System creates a cutoff wall by the use of high-energy jets on a reciprocating beam to liquify and mix insitu soil with a permeability modifying reagent such as a bentonite or cement/bentonite slurry. Cutoff walls have been installed at rates of up to 100 square feet per minute and are expected to produce savings of up to 30% over conventional methods. Evaluation of Environmental Investments Research Program (EEIRP) Interdisciplinary research by WES scientists and engineers in this program, which is managed by IWR, has been significant. Increased demands for the Corps to pursue environmental initiatives have emphasized the need for improved methods to evaluate and compare proposed environmental projects and programs regionally and Nationally. Currently, accepted methods are lacking to assess the effectiveness (Does the project meet its objective?) and efficiency (Is it the least costly alternative?) of investments in maintenance, mitigation, or restoration of natural resources. Emphasis has shifted since early in the 1970's from construction of new water resources development projects to improved operation and management of existing projects. Environmental concerns 44-22 continue to receive increased attention. The objective of the EEIRP is to develop techniques to select the most efficient and effective projects when a common metric of measurement such as money cannot be applied to all for purposes of comparison. The WES/IWR team is developing an evaluation framework, techniques, and procedures to meet that objective. A series of manuals will be developed to address planning and evaluation processes and for use in assigning priorities to projects. Risk Analysis for Water Resource Investments WES provides a range of research engineering input to this program, which is managed by IWR. The objective of the program is the development and application of risk analysis techniques to a variety of Corps civil works issues and problems in water resource planning, engineering, design, operations, and project management. Along with increases in budget constraints and local cost sharing, the concern for cost effective performance and reliability has raised the Corps' need to consider risk and uncertainty. WES work covers reliability and risk applications in the areas of Major Rehabilitation (reliability assessment of navigation structures including pile-founded and gravity structures, and degradation rates for engineering reliability assessment) and Flood Control (determination of stage-discharge relationships, and stability evaluation of levees). Currently, Corps Districts are required to justify civil works project funding in the area of major rehabilitation by providing a report that demonstrates a need for improvement in reliability or efficiency. Districts have cited a lack of criteria for assessing the reliability of structural performance; therefore, WES's work units develop such procedures and methods together with examples and case studies to enhance their usefulness. During FY94, WES developed and refined guidance and procedures for conducting required risk-based benefit- cost analyses. For Major Rehabilitation, methods were developed and refined to quantify initial and future reliabilities of timber pile founded structures and non-anchored gravity structures. Computer procedures were developed to apply this guidance to reliability assessment and quantification of structural degradation rates. Surveys were conducted and analyzed to determine degradation rates on verticallyframed miter gates and concrete lock walls. For Flood Control, methods were developed and refined to quantify the stage-discharge relationship. Initial analysis of levee stability was performed. WES conducted and/or participated in seven training sessions on Major Rehabilitation for Navigation or Hydropower Structures and five training sessions on Flood Damage Reduction for Corps personnel. INTERDISCIPLINARY/LARGE SCALE STUDIES Increasingly, WES expertise and products developed in R&D programs are being requested in comprehensive, integrated packages that address broad or critical areas of concern. Examples of such efforts during FY93 include the following: Demonstration Erosion Control (DEC) Proj ect The DEC Project, Yazoo River Basin, Mississippi, is a multi-year, multi-agency effort designed to provide for the development of a system to control sediment yield, erosion, and flooding in the 15 watersheds that compose the DEC project. The participating agencies are the Department of Defense; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Vicksburg District; the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service and Agricultural Research Service ; and the U.S. Department of the 44-23 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 Interior U.S. Geological Survey. The DEC monitoring effort being conducted at WES evaluation and watershed response project features. the DEC Project is yield to the Yazoo a major objective program is to is related to the documentation of to the implemented One major goal of to reduce sediment River. Therefore, of the monitoring determine the effectiveness of DEC Project features in reducing sediment yield. Documentation of watershed responses to DEC Project features will allow the participating agencies a unique opportunity to determine the effectiveness of existing design guidance for erosion and flood control in small watersheds. During monitoring collection evaluation performance of channel hydrologic sediment FY94 WES continued DEC efforts through data and data management, of the hydraulic of structures, evaluation response, development of tools for input into yield calculations, determination of measurable changes in the quantity of sediment being transported from upland watersheds, determination of the effects of the DEC Project on reservoir sedimentation, bank stabilization efforts including new applications such as bendway weirs and bioengineering techniques such as willow posts, and development of design tools for future application of stabilization works in DEC. Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Waterways Navigation Study (UMR-IWS) Due to the deterioration of much of the navigation infrastructure on the UMR-IWS, and the potential for increased navigation traffic on these key waterways over the next 50 years, the Corps of Engineers is evaluating alternative investment strategies for provision of reliable navigation projects on the UMR-IWS. Equally, the natural resources of the UMR-IWS represent one of the most vital ecosystems in the United States. Thus, as a critical component of the Corps study, the environmental impacts of increased navigation traffic on the UMR-IWS, and potential measures to avoid, minimize, and/or mitigate any associated impacts, are being assessed. In FY94, WES has conducted a number of investigations in support of the engineering and environmental components of the overall UMR-IWS navigation study. Physical model studies of potential alternative new structures at Locks and Dams 22 and 25 are underway. These studies will investigate the ramifications of differing structural designs on waterway navigatibility. These studies are utilizing state-of-theart visualization and data analysis techniques in support of superior hydraulic designs. In addition, WES was tasked in FY94 with technical leadership of several critical aspects of the environmental studies. WES is leading the Modeling Integration Simulation Team (MIST), a multidisciplinary technical team charged by the Corps of Engineers with coordination and integration of the major environmental study components (which are being performed by multiple groups). These components involve multiple studies in the following technical study areas: fisheries, aquatic macrophytes, mussels, bank erosion, recreational boat craft, side channel /backwater sedimentation, tow-induced physical forces, and hydrodynamic modeling. WES is conducting, or will initiate in FY95, a several of these study components. In particular, WES is conducting state-of-the-art analyses of the physical forces imparted by moving tows on a waterway, the resuspension of sediment resulting 44-24 from tow passage, and the potential for transport of these resuspended sediments into critical side channel and backwater aquatic habitats. New York Bight-Harbor Apex Hydro- Environmental Study The New York District anticipated needs for process modeling tools applicable to the New York Bight, but more specifically to the New York Harbor and Bight Apex, for the purpose of analyzing and implementing aquatic-based dredged material placement alternatives in support of the Dredged Material Management Plan Study. These needs require refinement of the modeling approach developed in the previous New York Bight Study and correlate well with similar needs of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II Harbor Estuary Program (EPAII-HEP). The new study was initiated in FY 94 with the objective of developing the required, validated model technology to meet both Corps and potential EPAII-HEP needs (including wasteload allocation, superfund clean- up, and toxics reduction and remediation). The new study is developing a suite of highresolution models/tools to simulate hydro-dynamics, storm surge, water quality, and contaminant and sediment transport in the Bight and harbor system. These models will be system wide, including portions of Long Island Sound, the Bight Apex, and the entire New York Harbor Estuary system. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels Texas Projects This project, jointly sponsored by the Ports of Houston, Galveston and the U.S. Army Engineer District, Galveston, Texas, has been closely coordinated with all interested parties. To this end, an Interagency Coordination Team (ICT) was established by the Galveston District to ensure that this large scale navigation channel deepening project addressed pertinent engineering and environmental concerns. WES researchers have used complex two and three dimensional hydrodynamic models to provide guidance on channel design through the WES Ship Simulator and input to complex environmental models developed by Texas A&M and Old Dominion Universities. The WES 3-D hydrodynamic code, RMA10- WES, has been used to simulate 24 years of real time, representing 30 different scenarios requested by the ICT. The simulations, performed on site at the WES Supercomputing Center, produced 500 gigabytes of output representing water elevations, velocities and salinity concentrations at thousands of points throughout Galveston Bay. These data were used to evaluate project impacts on the vital oyster industry and served as the basis for designing mitigation features. Olmsted Lock and Dam Design This project, estimated to cost $1.2 billion, is the Corps of Engineers' largest Civil Works Design and Construction project and is being managed by the U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville, Kentucky. Located on the Ohio River 25 miles downstream from Paducah, Kentucky, it consists of two 110 by 1200 foot navigation locks, a 2200 foot wide navigable pass regulatory section, with a navigation pool controlled by 220 wicket gates and a fixed weir. WES expertise in the fields of lock design, earthquake engineering, geotechnical engineering, sediment transport, structural engineering, concrete design and high speed computing have all contributed to this endeavor. Unique features and engineering challenges include the need for an innovative wicket gate design, due to large downstream water surface fluctuations and the fact that the structures will be built in an active earthquake zone. Ground motions due to various earthquake intensities were determined to use in the design of all affected components of the 44-25 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 project. Thermo-stress studies were performed to determine the effect of different concrete mixes and construction techniques on the residual stress of mass concrete in the navigation lock. Physical model studies are being used to study navigation conditions at the structure and to determine loads and vibration tendencies of the wicket gate. A finite element analysis of the wicket gate is being developed to assist in the structural design of the gate. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Model Study Chesapeake Bay is our nation's largest and most productive estuary. The Bay is plagued with problems (bottom-water anoxia, decline in fisheries, and loss of submerged aquatic vegetation) that accompany agricultural and industrial development and population growth along its shores and headwaters. WES formed a multi-disciplinary team to develop fully three-dimensional hydrodynamic and eutrophication models of the Bay and modeling strategy for providing quantitative information to Federal and State management decision makers for use in Bay cleanup. This work was jointly funded by the Baltimore District and EPA, and was conducted under the auspices of the Chesapeake Bay Program and an expert Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee. The in-depth review contributed greatly to the success of the study and acceptance of study products. The achievements of the Bay study influenced additional joint-agency support of a second study focusing on the Bay tributaries. This effort will include detailed studies of aquatic vegetation and important living resources. The four-year study was initiated in FY94. Cooperative Research with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The WES, in conjunction with the EPA, has undertaken development of spatially varying two dimensional watershed models. These models will take full advantage of emerging technologies such as NEXRAD radar precipitation data and couple the watershed runoff response to groundwater aquifer recharge. In addition, the fate and transport of contaminants such as pesticides and their effect on surface and groundwater resources will be determined. Together, these models will provide for the management and mitigation of pollutants in the environment. Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) During FY 94, HELP Version 3 was released. The HELP computer program is a quasi-two-dimensional hydrologic model of water movement across, into, through, and from landfills. The model accepts weather, soil, and design data, using solution techniques that account for the effects of surface storage, snowmelt, runoff, infiltration evapotranspiration, vegetative growth, soil moisture storage, lateral subsurface drainage, leachate recirculation, unsaturated vertical drainage, and leakage through soil, geomembrane, or composite liners. Landfill systems, including various combinations of vegetation, cover soils, waste cells, lateral drain layers, low-permeability soils, and synthetic geomembrane liners may be modeled. The model facilitates rapid estimation of the amounts of runoff, evapotranspiration, drainage, leachate collection, and liner leakage that may be expected to result from the operation of a wide variety of landfill designs. It assists in comparison of design alternatives based on their water balances. HELP Version 3 represents 44-26 a significant advance over the input techniques afforded by Version 2, facilitating the preparation and editing of landfill profiles and weather data, as well as the use of metric units, international applications, and geosynthetic material designs. Los Angeles County Drainage Area (LACDA) WES is investigating the hydraulic aspects of existing high velocity control channels in Los Angeles, California. This is being undertaken as a cost-shared effort between the County of Los Angeles, California and the U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles. Efforts are focused on design modifications to existing bridges, such as pier extensions, changes to the channel invert and identification and remediation of reaches where unstable flow conditions exist. WES studies have recommended modifications to existing bridges and channels that will allow the design flow to pass and save many of the bridges from complete replacement. The WES-recommended changes are much less expensive than complete bridge replacement, and the Los Angeles District estimates that savings resulting from this study will be in excess of $100 million. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors Model Enhancement Program In response to the expansion of oceanborne world commerce, the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California, are conducting planning studies for harbor development in coordination with Los Angeles District to accommodate master plan development through the year 2020. The Corps of Engineers will be responsible for providing navigation channels with increased depth and for determining effects of the harbor improvements on water quality. A Model Enhancement Program was developed to significantly upgrade the Corps' capacity to determine these effects based on state-of-the-art field data and modeling technology. All elements of the Coastal Engineering Research Center and parts of the Environmental Laboratory were involved in this effort. The Model Enhancement Program includes two major portions. The first was concerned with the action of long-period waves on the harbors. Very little is known about the origin and frequency of occurrence of these waves, but their existence is evident in producing extremely adverse ship loading/unloading conditions at various berths throughout the harbors. This portion of the enhancement program provided prototype wave data, a moored ship motion model, and an upgraded testing capability for the existing WES physical model of Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbors. The second major part of the enhancement program provided an improved threedimensional tidal circulation model to couple hydraulics and water quality variables. All major elements of the enhancement program have produced significant improvements in modeling capability. A large data base is available for determining frequency of occurrence of long-period waves. A moored ship motion model was calibrated with field data. The physical model now has the capability to produce long-period wave spectra. A three-dimensional numerical model of tidal circulation and water quality has been completed and applied. Results of the Model Enhancement Program have provided a significantly improved capability to evaluate the effect of harbor improvement plans on circulation, water quality, harbor resonance, and ship mooring conditions. Columbia and Snake Rivers Fish Guidance Studies The number of adult salmon migrating up the Columbia/Snake River System to spawn has decreased in recent years. Some of this reduction has been attributed to the construction 44-27 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY94 of dams and hydroelectric projects. Since juvenile salmon that migrate to the ocean along the same path as their parents do not use fish ladders at these projects, they must pass through the powerhouse, over the spillway or be diverted around the structure. Passing through the powerhouse turbines is the least attractive alternative because of the high mortality rate. Numerous laboratory and field studies are under way at WES to improve fish attraction, guidance, collection and bypass to reduce the mortality rate of juveniles moving downstream. These studies involve numerical and physical model studies of flow conditions near the structures, various screening devices, surface collectors, bypass channels and other fish guidance devices. Field studies are conducted to determine fish behavior and reaction to various modifications to the prototype structures. Acoustic technologies are being developed to improve the performance of the various bypass systems being investigated. 44-28 U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS The U.S. Army Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) is a widely recognized laboratory whose primary technologies relate to accurate, realistic, and timely hardcopy map products, field guides, and softcopy visualization of the earth's surface for both military and non-military applications. With the increased emphasis on construction and infrastructure efficiency, and on the recovery, sustenance, and enhancement of the earth's lifesupport systems, it has become increasingly urgent to develop effective tools for surveying and mapping, and for environmental monitoring and control. To meet this challenge, TEC scientists and engineers have developed faster, more accurate, and cost-effective ways to use remote sensing technologies to describe, characterize, and analyze the surface of the earth. The tools and technologies that TEC provided for the rapid deployment and precise management of forces in Desert Shield and Desert Storm are being applied to environmental restoration and management. The ultimate success of the nation and the globe to creatively meet the environmental challenges of tomorrow could well depend on the successful adaptation of technologies that TEC has developed, largely for military purposes, to existing and new civil program applications. TEC's technologies provide the nation with a "visual stethoscope" with which to diagnose and focus corrective action in assessing, maintaining, and enhancing our nation's environmental health. The technologies for which TEC is responsible are integrating technologies, bringing together the macroscopic view from air and space and the microscopic view on the ground. The exploitation of these visualization, spectral, and spatial data capabilities provides the nation with very powerful tools for use in environmental monitoring and remediation, both for domestic needs and for our role in global environmental leadership. TECs ability to cost-effectively participate in the Corps Civil Works Program is enhanced by its extensive ongoing efforts in the development of remote sensing technologies for both military and non-military applications. These efforts include the following research and development activities: * Multispectral image (MSI) and hyperspectral Image (HSI) analysis * Automated Image registration techniques * Development of advanced image compression techniques * Change detection * MSI/HSI enhanced software development * Development of one of the world's finest and most extensive spectral signature data bases * Computer-assisted stereo editing * Photogrammetric interfaces with computer vision * Research in HSI data processing and classification using neural networks * Development of spatial data analysis systems * Development of precise positioning systems * Terrain visualization, and * Extensive modeling and simulation. TEC, currently developing one of the world's most extensive spectral signature data bases, along with the techniques and tools to exploit it, offers remote sensing technologies that could form an essential part of a new national approach to environmental management and control. These technologies include advanced, efficient methods of surveying and mapping, as well as advanced methods of identifying environmental problems and trends on the earth's surface. These tools can already accurately characterize different surface conditions, including certain types and conditions of vegetation, soils, and surface water. With further development, these tools can provide rapid and accurate determination of change in the biosphere for a wide and yet-to-be determined range of applications, to indicate both the location of point and non-point pollution sources as well as to warn of impending negative or positive environmental change. The extensive development of remote sensing technologies for use in construction, environmental rehabilitation, and resource management will give the nation the research and operational tools it 45-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 needs to both increase its capabilities to accomplish tasks which might otherwise not be feasible, while at the same time doing those tasks more rapidly, more accurately, and at the lowest possible cost. TEC looks forward to helping the Corps and the nation increase its survey and mapping capability, improve its construction and transportation efficiency, and develop efficient environmental and resource management tools by adapting remote sensing technologies for civil program use. OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FY94 During FY94, TEC concentrated on developing new applications of rapidly advancing technology in the surveying engineering and mapping sciences, as well as on applying digital image processing and spectral research capabilities to the wetland monitoring and watershed analysis needs of the Corps districts and other civil agencies. Considerable effort was devoted to transferring technology through field demonstrations, technical papers and reports, criteria documentation and formal classroom training. Technologies especially relevant to the Corps of Engineers include the Global Positioning System (GPS), Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and photogrammetry. Activities for other civil agency needs included the following: * Surface water quality monitoring for the EPA * Cooperative wetlands and aquatic studies with USGS, the Soil Conservation Service, the U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Mines, the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS), and EPA, and * National study, sponsored by the Department of Transportation (DOT), to provide a GPS augmentation architecture for use by federal users. Global Positioning System (GPS) The GPS is a satellite navigation, timing and ranging system developed by Department of Defense (DOD). Highly efficient measurements of position can be made with GPS using several techniques, with accuracies ranging from meters to millimeters. One of TECs major endeavors was the development of the real-time centimeter GPS On- The-Fly (OTF) positioning system. The operational prototype of this project was completed in 1993. The formal demonstrations of the OTF system were held in Wilmington, North Carolina (Oct 94) and Astoria, Oregon (Nov 94). Both demonstrations were outstanding. A paper on the OTF results won "Best Paper Award" from the Institute of Navigation (ION) , and later the OTF system results were printed as a separate ION journal. The OTF GPS System provides real-time positions accurate to the centimeter level in all three dimensions. The system has a range of 20 km, but preliminary research has shown that this range can be extended to 40-60 km. This is the first system in the world to be publicly demonstrated that can provide this type of accuracy using GPS carrier phase measurements that is packaged in a robust, reliable system. Two GPS manufactures built their own OTF GPS systems this year. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers clearly set the tempo for this type of GPS positioning. The OTF GPS system is the crowning product of a six year research effort funded under the USACE Dredging Research Program. Although the initial group targeted to benefit from the OTF technology is the Corp's hydrographic surveyors and the U.S. dredging industry, it is anticipated that this technology will revolutionize the face of surveying, engineering, navigation, and aircraft approach systems. TEC's development of several applications of this technology are already underway. Examples are the Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) effort with Caterpillar, research to determine tides in real time, and work with autonomous land vehicles. Several agencies and representatives from industry have approached TEC about its robust OTF centimeter system. TEC has successfully aided the Corps districts and divisions in the implementation of Differential GPS (DGPS) to the extent that they have great confidence in and call frequently upon the expertise of TEC. Assistance ranges from a variety of technical questions and training to helping in the establishment of regional and national implementation plans. A great deal of time, effort and funds have been saved in this manner. A premier example of how TEC has served the 45-2 U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER Corps is the support lent to the Lower Mississippi Valley Division (LMVD) for the establishment of a DGPS system along the Mississippi River. Experiments run by TEC, the United States Coast Guard (USCG), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) illustrated how the USGS radio beacon system could be used by the USACE for dredging contract payment surveys. A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was signed in early 1994 to combine DGPS systems and run the joint radio beacon system up the inland rivers, saving the government, industry and taxpayers large amounts of money. Another large effort that TEC has recently embarked upon reflects TECs reputation as a leader in GPS and surveying expertise. In early 1994, the Department of Transportation (DOT) asked TEC to be the GPS expert on a study to determine the optimum system or systems to augment GPS for use by federal users. The primary goal of this study was to provide, through an independent evaluation, a GPS augmentation architecture that will meet the needs and requirements of most, if not all, federal users with a primary goal of meeting transportation requirements. A GPS augmentation architecture can consist of a number of different applications including, but not limited to wide area/local area differential GPS, subcarriers, triangulation, dead reckoning, and map matching. For the purposes of this study, this also included distribution of integrity information and increased availability of navigation information. The report was published in December, 1994 under the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) of the Department of Commerce. The title of the report is "A Technical Report to the Secretary of Transportation on a National Approach to Augmented GPS Services" and is NTIA Special Publication 94-30. Oversight of the study was provided by a Study Review Board (SRB), which consisted of top level officials from the Department of Transportation (DOT), Department of Defense (DOD), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The study was managed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through an Inter-Agency Agreement with the Institute for Telecommunications Sciences (ITS) of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. The additional, work that TEC conducts in its interface with the larger surveying community has aided tremendously in posturing TEC to be able to conduct work at this level. TEC has representatives working with the Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee (FGCS) and has been instrumental in the development of standards for GPS within the larger federal community. Currently, a TEC member is the Chair of the Instrument Working Group and a member of the Fixed Reference Station Working Group of the FGCS. Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) CORPSMET This software automates construction of geospatial metadata files using the specification developed by the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC), Content Standard for Geospatial Metadata, 8 June 1994. The specification was written to facilitate access to and sharing of geospatial data sets under Executive Order 12906, "Coordinating Geographic Data Acquisition and Access: The National Spatial Data Infrastructure," 11 April 1994. CVTPC The software, CVTPC, imports spatial data files into CADD design files. The user directs the program to read the information and place the data into selected layers, data types or symbols, colors, and line weights. During FY94, USACE district suggestions were incorporated to improve the versatility of the user interface. This program is now popular in the districts for importing raw spatial data files into finished CADD design files. Surveying Engineering Vertical and Horizontal Conversion Software The well known Corps horizontal datum conversion program CORPSCON has been enhanced to include the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) vertical conversion program called VERTCON. The new CORPSCON software allows a user to convert between both vertical and horizontal datums within the same program. The new software calculates the orthometric heights between the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 45-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 1929 (NGVD 29) and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). This program will allow a user to calculate height differences using state plane coordinates systems, Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates, and geographical coordinates. GPS Water Levels USATEC scientists and engineers are conducting research to find practical solutions for the measurement of useful gravity based heights such as water flow from precise, expedient Global Positioning System (GPS) heights based on a model coordinate system. The goal of the project is to establish a construction datum for any dredging project by direct measurement in the channel; not on a dock, and not by using a model. Highly successful tests using GPS equipment in conjunction with motion sensing equipment inside a buoy were performed, May-June 1994, in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. The project was an international effort. The organizations involved were: The USACE and NOAA from the United States, the Canadian Coast Guard, the Canadian Hydrographic Service, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada , and the United States/Canada Hydrographic Commission. Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Autonomous Construction Vehicle Navigation and Automation (Robotics) This development effort, part of the Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) program, utilizes a technology transfer partnership between the Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) and Caterpillar Inc. to develop a system to position, track, and maneuver construction and other equipment -- an off highway truck, a dozer blade, or a motor grade blade -- during their normal construction activities. The positioning system will be based on software developed by TEC that utilizes the Global Positioning System (GPS). This software will be integrated with Caterpillar developed software tools that serve to automate the construction activities and increase productivity and safety. This effort will assist Caterpillar Inc. to significantly increase the operational efficiency of its products by providing the ability to precisely position and navigate construction equipment in real time and with a positional accuracy of approximately 4 inches. Use of this system will increase accuracy and efficiency of construction operations by reducing operator workload and by permitting development of autonomous systems, resulting in greatly increased productivity and 24- hour operational capability. Development of this product to its full potential will give Caterpillar Inc. and the entire U.S. construction industry a considerable competitive and technical advantage in the U.S. and international construction markets. The TEC positioning software was successfully combined with Caterpillar's Dynamic Site Data Base on a Track-type Tractor (dozer) at the Peoria Proving Grounds on December 13-17, 1993. The machine operator was able to prepare a section of a highway construction site without grade stakes or a survey crew, relying on the geographical display on the machine only. Simultaneously, the dynamic construction site data was broadcast to a remote location (Reference Station/Base) and updated in real time to provide a current, topographic model of the site. Future uses of this technology outside this CPAR effort may permit integration within a total system that performs autonomous steering, braking, guidance, and vehicle control with little or no human interaction, resulting in an autonomously guided robotic construction vehicle. Extensions of this technology may find application in a wide range of existing and advanced forms of freight and passenger transportation, especially those groundbased systems operating at high speeds, such as Maglev or high-speed rail; those whose safety and reliability might be improved by its use, such as rail, truck, and air systems; and those systems for which autonomous or semi-autonomous operation are envisioned. Advanced Hydrographic Surveing/Dredging System This Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRDA) is to produce an advanced hydrographic surveying system using new 45-4 U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER technology and procedures developed by TEC. The HYPACK software package can now produce more accurate and efficient dredge volumes using triangulated irregular network terrain modeling routines provided by TEC. This hydrographic survey software product can also be interfaced to high-accuracy GPS developed by TEC, enabling determination of accurate, real-time tide corrections during surveys. Procedures specified by the Corps Hydrographic Surveying Manual (EM 1110-2- 1003) have been incorporated into HYPACK so that quality assurance can be maintained in hydrographic surveys. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Training Symposium, August 1994, New Orleans TEC coordinated schedules, conducted workshops, presented papers, and published the proceedings for the training symposium. This symposium was sponsored by the Headquarters of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to provide training in the effective utilization of spatial data technologies in accomplishing the Corps' military construction, civil works, and environmental restoration missions. The primary objective was the promotion of geo-spatial data exchange among data collectors, producers, processors, and users through the use of data standards and participation in federal coordination activities. Surface Water Quality Monitoring Technologies Demonstration TEC, through an Interagency Agreement with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), received project funds to assess defenserelated technology to address a current, high priority water quality monitoring need and demonstrate the technology's potential for economic as well as ecological benefits. Additional funding was provided by Vice President Gore's Environmental Task Force (ETF) to assess the value-added of using the nation's intelligence assets for application to environmental problems. The Environmental Research Institute of Michigan (ERIM) assisted TEC under the project entitled, "NTM Assessments for Temperature Impaired Rivers and Streams in the Pacific Northwest." National Technical Means (NTM) capabilities were assessed to determine the likelihood of temperature impairment in the Upper Grande Ronde (UGR) watershed located in the Blue Mountains of eastern Oregon. Degraded water quality in many Pacific Northwest rivers and streams has led to the rapid decline in anadromous fish populations. The goal of the ETF experiment was to determine whether or not NTM could be used to effectively characterize riparian zones in the UGR for water quality assessments and then demonstrate the results through EPA's Environmental Technology Initiative (ETI) companion project. In conjunction with the U.S. Forest Service/Pacific Northwest Research Station (PNW), TEC and ERIM conducted a Geodetic Positioning System (GPS) survey of key locations in the Upper Grande Ronde (UGR). Results of this survey will be used to register various GIS data sets and to rectify imagery collected for the project. TEC personnel analyzed and edited required GIS data sets to be used for the project and provided "clean" copies to PNW for GIS algorithm development.' ERIM collected Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) imagery over the study site and provided TEC and PNW with thermal IR data. FLIR temperature data is being compared to in situ stream temperature monitoring stations located throughout the UGR watershed. Both GPS and FLIR technologies are routinely used by DoD in support of it's military missions worldwide. Using these capabilities and NTM data for environmental monitoring applications is proving to be extremely beneficial to land management decision makers in the Pacific Northwest. The following list provides a brief look at some of the major milestones completed during FY94: * Coordinated meetings with agencies and contractors * Reconnaissance field trip to UGR and PNW * Completed NTM taskings * Completed GIS data base design * Completed Geodetic Positioning System (GPS) survey * Completed interim report to EPA * Trained on Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) sensors * Signed Interagency Agreement (IAG) between TEC and EPA 45-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 * Completed Digital Elevation Model generation using NTM, and * Completed monitoring technologies conceptual design plan for FY95. FY94 success has led to further project funding from the Government Applications Task Force (GATF). Likelihood of obtaining funding through GATF was greatly enhanced by EPA's willingness to co-fund the FY94 water quality efforts. The GATF was established to take the NTM research results of FY94 and apply them to environmental problems in an operational scenario. TEC will provide intelligence and GIS support to EPA, the lead agency in this FY95 effort. Spectral Research and Environmental Applications Environmental studies being conducted by the Spectral Research Division staff include collaborative studies with other agencies. Collaboration leverages Spectral Research Division's in-house spectroradiometric measurements, digital multispectral video, and multi/hyperspectral (MSI/HSI) image processing capabilities with other agency and private industry capabilities. Shared scientific interest and data are primary objectives. Acquired data and experience have dual use for meeting civil and military intelligence and environmental requirements. Environmental/Vegetation Stress TEC performed in-house studies at the Savannah River Site in collaboration with DOE and the site contractor, Savannah River-Westinghouse. The purpose was to develop remote sensing spectroradiometric methods for detecting vegetation stress as indicators of environmental insults. Ground level spectral measurements and high definition spectral imagery were used. In addition, field studies were conducted with the Office of Research and Development (ORD) and DOE at the Savannah River Site involving spectroradiometric measurements, reflectance and thermal. Collaborative greenhouse spectroradiometric studies of plants doped with specific organics and heavy metals were conducted with funding by ORD. In another cooperative effort with Disney World Epcot Center-the-Land; DOE and EG&GRSL, Las Vegas, NV; and EG&G, Santa Barbara, greenhouse spectroradiometric studies of stressed vegetation were made, taking reflectance and thermal spectral measurements of plants doped with heavy metals and those affected by biotic factors. TEC also conducted greenhouse and preliminary field spectrofluorescence studies of plants doped with specific organics and heavy metals. Wetlands/Aquatic Studies Cooperative studies with Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) and EPA were conducted of wetland environments in Northern Virginia, using digital multispectral video (DMSV) and ground based spectroradiometric measurements. Additional wetland studies were conducted with the Soil Conservation Service at Cedar Run Marsh. Cooperative studies were conducted with USGS, Bureau of Mines, and EPA to characterize differences in water quality resulting from natural runoff and acid mine drainage. Spectral properties of acid mine drainage, detected by DMSV narrowband, high resolution imagery and spectral radiometric data, separated iron-oxide bacterial precipitates from acid mine drainage waters. Criteria Documentation Work has continued on writing and updating criteria documentation for the Corps. The following document was completed during FY94: * EM 1110-1-1003, Navstar Global Positioning System Surveying (Revision). The following report was published in FY94: * "A Technical Report to the Secretary of Transportation on a National Approach to Augmented GPS Services." 45-6 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) is a field operating agency under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Center consists of the Institute for Water Resources, the Navigation Data Center, the Washington Level Review Center, and support elements. It is located at the Humphreys Engineer Center, Alexandria, Virginia, with satellite elements at other locations, including the Hydrologic Engineering Center at Davis, California; and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center, part of the Navigation Data Center, in New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments ofWRSC during FY94 are listed by division. The Washington Level Review Center was eliminated from WRSC 9 October 1994. HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER The mission of the Hydrologic Engineering Center is to support the Corps and the Nation in its water resources management responsibilities. This is accomplished through research, training, and technical assistance programs in hydrologic engineering and planning analysis. HEC makes every effort to be aware of the present needs and upcoming problems of the water resources community. HEC maintains continuous dialogue withuniversities, private industry, other Federal Agencies, and state and local governments to keep abreast of the latest developments. In FY94, HEC emphasized development of new generation hydrologic engineering software, completing technical guidance documents, initiating the real-time water control research project, development and implementation of risk-based analysis methods and tools, carrying forward new hydrologic engineering research initiatives, and several special projects: Mississippi mainstem forecast model, ground-surface water interaction analysis, Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint, Alabama- Coosa-Tallapoosa (ACF/ACT) system water quality model, and water use conflict pilot studies. HEC continues to make excellent progress on its NexGen software development project, initiated in October 1990. The project is developing successor software packages to the existing family of HEC batch computer programs. The project is at the end of the fourth year of an initial five-year effort. The beta version of the River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) released in March has now been tested by over 250 interested users from the Corps, other Federal agencies, state and local government, private consultants, and members of the international community. Over 150 comments have thus far been received and acted upon. A second beta version will be sent to the testers with the maiden release targeted for spring 1995. The maiden release version will be a Windows 3.1 application. The first beta version of the Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) is also scheduled to be released in early spring 1995. The Galaxy development system, by Visix Corporation, was adopted as the multi-platform GUI development system for HEC programs. The HEC-HMS beta GUI is being developed with the Galaxy systems. Subsequent HEC-RAS releases will likewise be multi-platform via the Galaxy system. A study is near complete for a solution to the multi-platform graphics issue and a selection is expected early in the calendar year. HEC continues to actively support, and has made selected enhancements to the mature versions of its major batch programs HEC-1, HEC-2, HEC-5, HEC-5Q, HEC-6, UNET, HEC-FDA, HEC-IFH, and several others. Major enhancements are being made to HEC-5Q in conjunction withthe ACF/ACT system water quality study. Several user's manuals were also revised and updated this year. The hydrologic engineering guidance update project received priority emphasis in FY 94 and brought to closure almost all documents scheduled for completion. The remainingfew will be completed early next year. For this six year project, HEC prepared eight Engineer Manuals, ten Engineer Regulations, seven Engineer Pamphlets, and six Engineer Technical Letters for a total of 31 major new engineer technical guidance documents. HEC was assisted by field office staff, University Intergovernmental Personnel Agreement (IPAs), and private contractors. The project is being recast at a reduced level to develop a number of new products. HEC is assisting with the development of a main-stem Mississippi River real-time stage forecasting model. The model extends from St. Paul on the upper Mississippi, from Cincinnati on the Ohio, from Gavin's Point on the Missouri, down to the Gulf of Mexico. The objective is to assemble data for and calibrate the unsteady flow model UNET, adapt the model to real-time forecasting, and integrate the model into the real-time data system. Activities this year included scoping the project, conducting technical training sessions for field office staff involved, assembling geometric and flow data, and developing preliminary models for the Mississippi system. At year's end, a complete preliminary model (in pieces) had been assembled and executed for the entire Mississippi River main-stem. Work to support implementation of risk-based analysis for flood damage reduction studies was intensive throughout the year. In the past two years, five PROSPECT courses, eight field location workshops, seven executive sessions, and eight field project working sessions were held for a total of over 800 Corps professionals. Two PROSPECT courses will be presented in FY 1995 and several field workshops have already been scheduled. HEC continues to improve and support the interim Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet while development is * underway on a more capable software package. An early release is planned for this new package in spring 1995. 46-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Research work continues on quantifying uncertainty in hydrologic and hydraulic relationships, evaluating the efficacy of Monte Carlo and otheranalysis techniques, and development of algorithms for the software package that will replace the interim spreadsheet. Even though the new real-time R&D project was not funded until about mid-year, progress was notable. A program review was held in late April to finalize the program's scope and plans, and prioritize activities. This was followed by a series of regional workshops wherein field water control staff were provided an opportunity to assist in shaping the research effort. The workshops were excellent vehicles for involving a wide variety of field staff in the project. Another mid-period program review was held in October to monitor progress and fine tune scopes and priorities. A well structured and supported real-time R&D program is now the result of the intensive coordination and management that took place this past year. From the product standpoint, a spatial visualization graphics product for real time data display was readied for release. Working sessions involvingfield office staff were held to address workstation implementation issues and intra- and inter-office data exchange via MOSAIC. Two additional sessions; one devoted to staff from offices with new SUN UNIX workstations, and the other to design the Corps data base management system, were scheduled for the first quarter of FY 1995. Also, a basic flood forecasting package that will use data from NEXRAD radar sites is near ready for test deployment. Ten PROSPECT courses were conducted for a total of 12 weeks of training. The courses covered a variety of hydrologic engineering and planning analysis topics. Attendance averaged 30 students per course. Fourteen on-site workshops were also held totaling eight weeks of training. Topics presented included risk-based analysis (6 sessions), HEC-1, HEC-2, HEC-5, UNET, HEC-DSS and water control. A seminar on Urban Hydrology was held and the proceedings will be published early in FY95. Reimbursable project work was undertaken for 43 Corps offices including districts, divisions, headquarters, and R&D laboratories. A major river system water quality modeling project, the largest HEC has ever undertaken, was initiated for the ACF/ACT Comprehensive study. The total reimbursable program was $1,319,000 with individual projects ranging from a few thousand dollars to over $500,000. Projects include watershed modeling, water quality, risk-based analysis, reservoir systemanalysis, interior flooding, water control software development, and groundwater modeling. The planned program for FY 1995 will include reduced- scope guidance update activities. HEC also will field the maiden version of the new NexGen software package HEC-RAS and beta version of HEC-HMS, software designed for river and catchment analysis on engineering desktop computers. Training activities will be steady at ten courses totaling 11 weeks. Technical assistance is expected to continue at this past year's level. R&D funding should show modest growth with a few new work units starting in existing R&D programs. Overall program emphasis will be about the same with some decrease in document preparation and increase in technical method and software development work. INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH DIVISION The Technical Analysis and Research Division responds to water planning research needs of the field offices, as well as unique projects assigned by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. At the same time, technical assistance is provided to Corps field divisions and districts. Engineers and scientists in the division apply specialized knowledge in fields such as economics, environmental science, and geography and engineering to develop and conduct a broad range of research aimed at producing practical and effective planning and management tools. Research outputs are applied to water resources activities throughout the Corps. During FY94, the Technical Analysis and Research Division conducted research and provided technical assistance in the areas of risk analysis and planning methodologies. This year, a new research program, Evaluation of Environmental Investments, focused on developing evaluation methodologies for planning environmental restoration projects. Several case studies with Corps field offices were initiated to develop techniques for environmental evaluation. Also, work continued to refine guidelines for incremental cost analysis for environmental projects. These guidelines will serve as a base for establishing generic guidance for evaluating contributions to fish and wildlife habitat. A course in environmental evaluation was developed and conducted for Corps field planners. Other activities of the division were the continuation of a cooperative program with USGS to develop and provide educational materials for training young people in water resources topics. Technical Assistance was provided to a number of field offices to implement risk analysis in flood damage prevention, coastal protection, and navigation projects. POLICY AND SPECIAL STUDIES DIVISION In carrying out its mission in support of the Director of Civil Works, the Division conducts policy analysis planning and studies of national and regional scope. 46-2 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER Since the early 1980s, the program has contributed to the development of numerous policies and programmatic initiatives within Civil Works. The program continues to serve the Corps by assessing and evaluating changing national water and natural resources uses and management and related public works infrastructure management needs as they affect Corps Civil Works missions, policies, practices, legislative mandates, and executive directives. During 1994, the Division completed 21. policy studies and two national studies, initiated two new national studies, played leading roles in three White House Task Forces on Wetlands, Ecosystem Restoration, and Flood Plain Management. Some of the more noteworthy recent projects focus on reexamining and consolidating all Corps guidance on environmental planning for restoration projects, and an analysis of how the Corps manages its extensive navigation dredging and dredged material disposal responsibilities. In addition, the Policy and Special Studies Division supports the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in formulating an agenda of emerging issues and by detailing staff personnel who work on special projects in the Assistant Secretary's office. Major activities conducted during 1994 included the following programs: * National Study of Dredged Material * Nation' s Harbors (Section 216, Water Resources Development Act of 1992) * National Study of Wetlands Mitigation Banking * Shoreline Protection and Beach Erosion Control Study (For the Office of Management and Budget * Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa and Apalachicola- Chattahoochee-Flint Comprehensive River Basin Study * National Study ofWater ManagementDuring Drought * Federal Infrastructure Strategy * Economic Impacts of Climate Change Research Program * White House Task Force on Wetland Mitigation Banking * White House Task Force on Ecosystem Management * White House Task Force on Flood Plain Management * Civil Works Environmental Action Plan * New Direction in Environmental Programs * Study of Dredged Material Management * O&M Task force on Standard Operating Procedures * Global Change Program * Environmental Policies Review Task Force * Watershed Planning Principles * Upper Mississippi River Flood Assessment: Wetlands Storage * Florida Everglades Ecosystem Study * National Water Demand and Availability Study * Water Supply and Conservation at Military Installations The National Study of Water Management During Drought and the National Infrastructure Strategy were completed in 1994. NAVIGATION DIVISION The IWR Navigation Division provides support to Corps field divisions and districts for project-specific and system studies of navigation improvements. In this regard, it also performs recurring national-level analyses such as the update of vessel operating costs for inland and deep draft waterways, the developments of deep draft harbor traffic and fleet forecasts, and analysis of the recovery of navigation costs. It also provides support for the Inland Waterways Users Board andperforms national and special studies as directed by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. Ongoing national studies include the Maintenance Dredging Needs Study (Section 402 of the WRDA of 1992) and program management support to the Construction, Operations, and Readiness Division on the Operations and Maintenance Program Plan of Improvement. The special studies address a variety of subjects where expertise in economic analysis is required, and range from assessment of transportation infrastructure to identification of regional economic impacts. Continuing Sunort Activities. The foundation for evaluation of navigation projects, both inland waterway and deep draft harbors, is the comparison of transportation costs with and without proposed improvements. The division maintains and annually updates data on ocean and inland water vessel operating costs, the dimensions of those vessels, the distribution of ocean vessel sizes in the world fleet, and the configuration of barge tows on inland waterways. Coordination of Navigation Studies. The Inland Waterways Users Board, created by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, is charged with advising Congress on priorities for improving inland waterways. To provide information desired by the Board and by the Corps, the division performs an ongoing Trust Fund analysis, and leads a Corps Task Force which is updating the evaluation of high priority inland navigation projects to determine investment priority alternatives which would maximize net national transportation benefits and observe the budget constraints imposed by the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. PROGRAM ANALYSIS DIVISION The Program Analysis Division (PAD) provides analytic and process management services in support of improving the effectiveness of Civil Works program execution. Key functions performed include evaluation studies of current programs to define problems and identify options for achieving greater program efficiencies; special evaluation studies of critical Civil Works business processes; and development of analytical tools to assist management, budgeting and man-power decision making. During FY94, the primary clients of the Division were Programs Division and Operations, Construction and Readiness Division. Representative projects include the following efforts: - O&M Performance Measures: Building on the 46-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 O&M Performance Improvement Program, PAD is supporting the validation and refinement of O&M performance measures for use in charting progress toward O&M effectiveness and efficiency goals. The project supports the official pilot project being performed as part of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. - Project Management Career Development and Training Master Plan: PAD staff evaluated project management career development and training needs using a Technical Advisory Panel, field survey, and other analytic methods, and have developed a comprehensive career development and training plan. - Civil Works Product Development Task Group: PAD staff served on the Task Group, and provided significant analytical support to the group. The Task Group identified 14 opportunities for improving CW business processes. The Director of Civil Works endorsed the group's recommendations and has implemented those that were within his purview. - QUADRANT O&M Budgeting Tool: A computer model has been developed under PAD direction to prioritize navigation and hydropower maintenance projects on the basis of economic efficiency measures. QUADRANT is to be incorporated into the budget process in FY 97. - CW RestructuringAnalytical Support: PAD staff designed an analytical structure and negotiation process to foster intra-CW communication and consensus about delegation of CW Headquarters functions, and the setting of specific performance goals and objectives for CW for FY 95. NAVIGATION DATA CENTER The Navigation Data Center's (NDC) mission is to collect and supply information on the U.S. Waterways and Ports. NDC directly supports not only the USACE navigation mission but navigation-related missions of other Federal and state agencies in its role as the Federal center of expertise on waterway and port information. The data and statistics available through the Center include: Use data - commodity tonnage, vessel traffic, passenger traffic, ton-miles and lockages; physical facilities -- port and waterway facilities, vessels, and waterway network; and, operation and performance data on dredging and locks. During FY94, the realized initiatives included: enhanced distribution of products using internet, Bulletin Board and CD-ROM technology; automated data input and processing at source through pilot automation of selected vessel operating companies' reporting systems and by supporting development of private vendor reporting software. Working with U.S. Census and Statistics-Canada was instrumental in the implementation of a U.S.-Canadian vessel manifest exchange. Beginning in 1995, this exchange will provide the Corps U.S.-Canada waterborne export data, which had been missing since 1990. WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS CENTER (WCSC) FY94 found the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center completingmajor enhancements to the ORACLE database system. Software was developed for the preparation of special consolidated tables and the routing algorithm was upgraded. WCSC completed digitizing the waterway network into a 1:100,000 scale latitude/ longitude representation suitable for use in a geographic information system as well as the WCSC routing module. WCSC began compilation of CY93 files (waterborne commerce, lock performance monitoring system, port facilities, dredging, domestic and foreign vessel, foreign port/U.S. Port Trade, foreign vessel entrances and clearances; U.S. Coast Guard spill, groundings, collisions, and casualties; and the digitized waterway network) for a January 1995 release of a public Waterway Data CD-ROM. PORTS AND WATERWAYS Automated port facility information was integrated into the overall NDC database. Latitude/longitude coordinates are being included in each facility record, as well as being computed for each waterway mile point, thereby forming a commonality for interagency dissemination of port and waterway information. Descriptive data encompassing over 9,300 docking facilities is resident in the NDC database. The focus for FY94 was on continued progress in linkage across databases including key terms, and input to Executive Workstation. In FY94, three reports were completed: Number 3 - Boston, MA; Number 4 - Ports of Southern New England (Bridgeport, CT; New Haven, CT; New London, CT; Providence, RI; Fall River, MA; New Bedford, MA) and Number 36- Seattle, WA. LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM (LPMS) The LPMS evolved during FY94 into an integral part of standard NDC quality control procedures and system linkages developed using the ORACLE database. Data from LPMS and WCSC are now compared on the same computer platform in a shorter time frame with more accuracy. Cross-correlation between LPMS and WCSC vessel information has enabled users to get a more complete picture of navigation information. Efforts undertaken to automate the production of the LPMS Summary of Lock Statistics were successful in reducing the production time from two months to one week. LPMS eliminated its final lock reporting form by switching to electronic entry saving 300,000 pieces of paper. 46-4 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER DREDGING STATISTICS PROGRAM The Dredging Statistics Program product distribution grew markedly in FY94 with the newly instituted practice of monthly updates onto NDC's public access electronic bulletin board. Industry publications in turn extracted statistics for inclusion in their periodicals. By the end of FY94 all Corps districts were routinely reporting and uploading to the central NDC database. The centralized Dredging Statistics Program oversight of data quality and program integrityhas resulted in timely, accurate andcomplete database responding rapidly to tailored data requests. The data supports management decisions within a local, regional and national framework. THE WASHINGTON LEVEL REVIEW CENTER The mission of the Washington Level Review Center (WLRC) was to review feasibility reports, major rehabilitation reports, general and limited reevaluation reports, continuing authority reports, and other decision documents that the Director of Civil Works may request. These reports address proposed water resource developments involving deep-draft harbors, inland navigation, flood damage reduction, fish and wildlife restoration and mitigation, hydroelectric power, water supply, hurricane and storm damage protection, and other related water resource needs. In addition to reviewing reports, during FY94 WLRC: a. Managed the concurrent Washington level review process for feasibility reports in which projects have been recommended for Corps implementation. b. Coordinated feasibility report review comments from Washington echelons and provided information to assist the Chief of Engineers, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, and the Office of Management and Budget. c. Monitored and tracked the review and processing of feasibility reports recommending Corps action beginning with issuance of the division commander's public notice through project authorization. d. Transmitted feasibility reports to states and Federal agencies for a 90-day review and comment period. e. Conducted professional training in water resources planning and project management as directed by the Chief of Engineers. WLRC managed the comprehensive review of 18 feasibility reports recommending USACE action and 4 major rehabilitation reports. Inaddition, WLRC staff reviewed and provided written documentation for 24 design memoranda, 12 continuing authority reports, 20 reevaluation reports, 6 feasibility reports recommending no USAGE action, and 45 miscellaneous documents. Also, staff members reviewed draft reports in preparation for attendance at 20 conferences and completed 24 follow-up actions. WLRC staff also reviewed 42 resolutions and Examiners Committee reports of the Foreign- Trade Zones Board for action by the Director, WRSC. The WLRC Education and Policy Division conducted the Planners and Project Managers (PPM) Program. This program is an 11-month internship for Corps water resource planners, project managers, and other technical personnel from various areas of expertise who exhibit exceptional promise and demonstrate potential for advancement to positions of greater responsibility. There were 13 participants who graduated from this program in June 1994, including 5 women. Instruction in the form of lectures, workshops, short courses, case studies, and field trips was presented by staff members of WLRC, IWR, MSC and district offices, and HQUSACE. A number of representatives from other government agencies and private consulting firms participated in the instruction. Also, PPMs were assigned to work at HQUSACE for 6 weeks, and they taught the Planners and Project Managers Orientation Course for 2 weeks in several Corps offices. As of 9 October 1994, the review mission and staff of the Washington Level Review Center were transferred to the Policy Review and Analysis Division, Directorate of Civil Works, with the Center's name changing to Policy Review Branch. 46-5 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESS (PIANC) The Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization consisting of approximately 40 national members, with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a clearinghouse where technology and experiences relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements are exchanged among engineers, scientists, port operators, and marina and vessel owners, to name a few. Its objective, broadly stated, is to promote the worldwide progress of inland and maritime navigation through the exchange of technical information on port and waterway development. The objective of the Association is met by holding International Congresses and by publishing quarterly technical bulletins and special reports. Special reports are published as a result of international research teams, called Working Groups, made up of those national members interested in the particular subject under study. Examples include methods of disposal of dredged material, means of combating oil spills, an international survey of dry dock facilities and their characteristics, the beneficial use of dredged material, and other various topics relating to port and waterway development. The organization also serves as an excellent source of identifying individual and corporate expertise throughout the world on PIANC-related subjects. Personal interchange of ideas and information also is promulgated by members attending the International Congresses held once every 4 years. The affairs of the Association are managed by a Permanent International Commission (PIC), composed of delegates from each member government. It is in this way that member governments are represented in PIANC. The number of delegates is determined by the size of the national membership, but may not exceed 11 per country. The United States has been a member of PIANC since 1902 and has since provided an annual appropriation for the support and maintenance of the organization. This includes an annual subvention to PIANC International and payment of the travel expenses of properly accredited national delegates (Commissioners) of the United States to meetings of the International Commission and Congresses. Total appropriations forthe U.S. Section, PIANC are currently $45,000 per year, including the annual subvention of approximately $15,000 to PIANC International. The United States Section is administered by law, under the auspices of the Department of the Army (Corps of Engineers). The U.S. Section is composed of both individual and corporate members who pay their own membership dues. Membership of the U.S. Section on September 30, 1994 totaled 387, consisting of 318 individual members and 69 corporate members. Like all other member nations, the United States National Commission constitutes the governing body of the National Section. The ex-officio offices of the U.S. National Commission are: Chairman (Dr. John Zirschky, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW)); President (MG Stanley Genega, Director of Civil Works); and Secretary (Mr. DuWayne Koch). During fiscal year 1994, U.S. National Commissioners were: Mr. Charles F. Connors, Consultant; Dr. Tudor T. Davies, Director, Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Dr. G. Edward Dickey, Chief Planning Division (Civil Works); Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, Director, George Washington/Louisiana State University Ports and Waterways Institute; Mr. Charles F. Lehman, Vice President, American Commercial Barge Line Company; Mr. John M. Pisani, Maritime Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation; Walter D. Ritchie, Chief Engineer, Port of Seattle; and Mr. R. Erik Stromberg, President, American Association of Port Authorities. The U.S. Section representatives to the two Permanent Technical Committees (PTCs), the Permanent Environmental Commission (PEC) and the Permanent Committee for Development Cooperation (PCDC), and active Working Groups of PTCs were as follows: International Commission on the Environment - Dr. Robert M. Engler, USACE WES. Permanent Committee for Development and Cooperation - Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, LSU/GW Ports and Waterways Institute. Permanent Technical Committee I (Inland Waterways and Ports)- Anson Eickhorst, Executive Assistant to the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, St. Louis. Active Working Groups under PTC I were: Working Group 14, Inland Waterway Vessels and Pollution - Barry T. Dyer, American Commercial Barge Line Company. Working Group 16, Coasters - No U.S. representative. Working Group 17, Treatment and/or Disposal of Contaminated Dredged Material -Norman R. Francingues, Jr., USACE WES. Working Group 18, Advanced Control of Locks and Bridges - No U.S. representative. Working Group 19, Problems of Collisions Due to the Presence of Bridges - Michael A. Knott, Assistant Vice President, Greiner,Inc. Working Group 20, Standardization of Dimensions of Class Vb Navigation Canals - No U.S. representative. Permanent Technical Committee II (Maritime Ports and Seaways) - Thorndike Saville, Jr. (Retired). Active Working Groups under PTC II were: Working Group 7, Dimensions and Layout of One- and Two-Way Channels and Fairways-Dr. Ernst G. Frankel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Working Group 11, Consequences of New Developments of Car/Passenger Ferries - No U.S. representative. Working Group 18, Planning of Fishing Ports -No U.S. representative. Working Group 24, Movement of Moored Ships - Gary K Greene, Gary Greene Consulting Engineers. Working Group 25, Coastal Instrumentation - No U.S. representative. Working Group 26, Means of Combating Oil Spills - No U.S. representative. 47-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 Working Group 27, Artificial Islands - Dr. Ernst G. Frankel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Working Group 28, Breakwaters with Vertical and Inclined Concrete Walls - No U.S. representative. Working Group 29, Recommendations for By-Pass Systems for Harbours on Sandy Coasts - Dr. Richard Weggel, Drexel University. Working Group 30, Dimensions of Channels and Fairways-- A Practical Guide - No U.S. representative. Working Group 31, Life Cycle Management of Port Structures, The Effects of Degradation and Damage to Marine Structures of Different Types an Recommendations for Life Cycle Management, including Inspection, Maintenance, and Repair - Dr. Valery M. Buslov and Charles F. Connors. Special Commission for Sport and Pleasure Navigation (SPN) -- John M. Nichol, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers (Retired). Active Working Groups under SPN were: Working Group 1, Ecological Conservation in Relation to Sport and Pleasure Navigation -- Neil W. Ross, International Marine Institute. Working Group 6, Use of Jetskis and Similar Personal Powered Craft on Controlled Waters - Roger F. Hagie, Director, Public Affairs, Kawasaki Motors Corporation. Working Group 7, Marine Sanitation Pumpouts - Edward F. McKiernan, President, SeaLand Technology, Inc. 47-2 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps Divisions and districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation numerous international boards, committees, and other groups. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering, technical, or study boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources ofjoint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineer memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 48-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the various boards and committees, see the FY 77 and FY 80 annual reports. An innovative study organization, neither a board nor a committee, was established to initiate a study of impact from fluctuating Great Lakes levels pursuant to a Reference to the IJC from the Governments of Canada and the United States, dated August 1, 1986. A discussion of that study organization, which has since appointed a formal study board, follows Table 48-1. TABLE 48-1 IJC BOARDS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Int. Lake Superior Int. St. Croix River Int. Lake of the Woods Int. Lake Champlain Int. Kootenay Lake 6. Int. Rainy Lake 7. Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St. Lawrence River 10. Int. Skagit River 11. Int. Souris River 12. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineer 13. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 14. Int. Great Lake Diversios and Consumptive Uses Study 15. Int. Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board YEAR ESTABLISHED 1914 1915 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1953 1953 1967 1959 1948 1975 1977 1979 *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Div. Engr., NCD *Div. Engr., NED *Dist. Engr., St. Paul *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Dist. Engr., Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *Dist. Engr., St. Paul 1. Dist. Engr., Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma, WA 3. Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission, Olympia, WA * 1.'Div. Engr., NCD 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. St. Lawrence-Eastern Ontario Commission, Waterton, NY 3. NY Power Authority, Massena, NY *Dist. Engr., Seattle 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. ND State Engr., Bismark, ND 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Bismark, ND 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, BOR, Washington, D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Reston, VA *1. New York Dept. Environ. Conser. 2. Dist. Engr., New York 3. Vermont Agency Environ. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commision, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior F&WS Boston, MA *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Michigan Dept. Nat. Res. 3. Illinois Dept. of Trans. 4. Pennsylvania Dept. of Envir. Res. 5. Dept. of Energy, FERC, New York, NY * 1. CENCE-ED, Detroit, MI 2. Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab., NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 3. USGS, Reston, VA 48-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 OTHER INTERNATIONAL BOARDS OR GROUPS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 16. Int. Lake Memphremagog 17. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 18. Int. Niagara Committee 19. Columbia River Treaty Entities 20. Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering YEAR ESTABLISHED 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. Study of Fluctuating Great Lakes Levels Under the August 1, 1986, Reference. In 1986, the Governments of Canada and the United States issued a reference to the IJC to study methods to alleviate the adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. The IJC was requested to address the immediate high lake level crisis and identify and evaluate intermediate and long-term potential measures, while considering such vital matters as domestic waste supply and sanitation, navigation, agriculture, shore property, flood control, wildlife and others. The IJC is to determine the full costs and benefits of any works or measures and indicate how the various interests on either side of the boundary would be affected. Compensatory works or measure to offset costs to the interests which may be adversely affected by any proposed regulatory measures also must be determined. The IJC proceeded with its reference responsibilities on three tracks. First, it submitted an initial report to the federal governments on November 14, 1986, listing immediate actions that could be taken to lessen damages from the then current high water levels. Second, the IJC formed a taskforce to evaluate measures which could be implemented within approximately one year to reduce high lake levels. The third track is the comprehensive study of long-term measures. UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Eng. Div., North Central Div. 2. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Rockville, MD *Div. Engr., NCD 1. Div. Engr., NPD *2. Bonneville Power Admin., Portland, OR *1. HQUSACE, CECW-ZB, Washington, D.C. 2. Dept. of Energy, Tulsa, AR The IJC, through the U.S. Department of State, requested by letter dated November 24, 1986 that the Corps of Engineers provide lead agency support on what became known as the Levels Reference Study. The Division Commander, NCD assumed the role of U.S. Chair of a multi-discipline study group which functioned as a Project Management Team. The team consisted of five functional groups co-chaired by U.S. and Canadian representatives. The Canadian counterpart to the Corps of Engineers was Environment Canada. A Plan of Study was completed in April 1987. The plan called for a twophase study with the initial phase emphasizing problem identification and a program of measures for detailed study and evaluation in Phase II. The Phase I progress report was submitted to the IJC in July 1989. After a period of public review in February 1990, the IJC issued a directive for the Phase II study, which included the appointment of a ten-member Levels Reference Study Board. The Board appointed a full-time study director and a 18-member Citizens Advisory Committee. Upon completion of the Phase II Plan of Study in May 1990, the Board also appointed four Working Committees to carry out the detailed study plan. The working committees are: (1) Public Participation and Information; (2) Land use and Management; (3) Existing Regulation, System-wide Regulation, and Crisis Conditions; and (4) Principles, Measures Evaluation, Integration and Implementation. 48-2 INVESTIGATION OF PROJECTS UNDER FEDERAL POWER ACT The Federal Water Power Act of June 10, 1920, created the Federal Power Commission (in 1977 renamed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC), composed of the Secretaries of War, Interior, and Agriculture, with authority to grant permits and licenses for hydroelectric development of all water over which Congress has jurisdiction. The act further required that work of the Commission be performed by and through the Department of War, Interior and Agriculture and their engineering, technical, and other personnel except as may be otherwise provided by law. By an act of June 23, 1930, entitled "An Act to reorganize the Federal Power Commission," Sections 1 and 2 of the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 were amended. A commission was provided, to be composed of five commissioners to be appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The necessity of performing work through the Departments of War, Interior and Agriculture was removed and the Commission was authorized to appoint such officers and employees as necessary in executing its function. By Title II, Public Utility Act of 1935, the original Federal Water Power Act was made Part I of the Federal Power Act, and Part II and III were added to the act. On October 1, 1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of the Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 59-91 Stat. (August 4, 1977) and Executive Order No. 12009, Federal Regulation 46267 (September 16, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary of the Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission with the Department of Energy was activated on October 1, 1977. Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act provides that no water power license affecting navigable waters of the United States shall be issued until plans of the structures affecting navigation have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of the Army. By an action, notice of which was published in the Federal Register Volume 40, Number 74, dated April 16, 1975, the Secretary of the Army delegated to the Chief of Engineers his authority under Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act. The Chief of Engineers, on September 5, 1980, delegated to the Corps division engineers the authority for Section 4(e) approval of the plans for non- Federal hydropower development affecting navigation. The following work of an engineering nature was accomplished by the Corps division and district offices under the direction of the Chief of Engineers during the fiscal year: (1) Two hundred twenty-seven applications from non-Federal entities for planning, design, construction and operation ofhydropower projects were reviewed and appropriate recommendations in the interest of flood control, navigation, structural safety, and environmental impacts, relative to Corps projects, were furnished to the FERC. (2) Twenty-dive licensed power plants were in various stages of design review and approval for addition of power at Corps dams, and (3) One Corps approved non-Federal power plans was in active construction stage by the end of the fiscal year. The Corps bills FERC licensees for the cost incurred by the Corps for reviewing and approving final design, plans and specifications and construction of power plants at Corps projects. In FY 94 the total cost reimbursement to the Corps for this service was $308,115. Review and approval of license applications for hydropower development at non-Corps dams are funded by the Corps as a line item in the General Investigation Account. In FY 94, the cost of this activity was $302,952. This cost was reported to the FERC for collection from appropriate licensees. 49-1 REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL & NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 1. Regulatory Activities Authorities. The following authorities charge the Corps of Engineers with the regulation of various construction related activities in U. S. waters and wetlands: Sections 9 and 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 (structures in the alteration of waterways); Section 103 of the Marine, Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (Ocean Dumping); and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (discharge of dredged or fill material) Work Completed. During FY 1994, the Corps reviewed and authorized over 60,000 permit activities, 90 percent of which were approved within 60 days. About 8,200 projects were issued individual permits, and another 55,000 activities were reviewed and approved under regional or nationwide general permits. General permits are issued to the public at large and define type of minor activities which do not usually require the extensive review necessary for projects authorized by individual permits. Use of general permits provides significant relief to the regulated public by avoiding red tape for small projects with minimal environmental impacts. In addition, many thousands of additional activities which did not require formal review were also authorized under general permits. The Corps denied only about 450 permits during FY 1994 since most projects which might otherwise have been denied a permit were either modified or conditioned to meet Corps requirements, scaled down to qualify for approval under general permits, or withdrawn. About 5,000 permit applications were either withdrawn or canceled. Under the regulatory program, the Corps made over 40,000 jurisdiction determinations in FY 94, many of which were made in response to requests from landowners who where not applying for permits. The Corps investigates 6,000 alleged illegal activities, most of which were violations of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Under the permit program in FY 1994, the Corps allowed the filling of 17,200 acres of wetlands but required the restoration, enhancement, or creation of 38,000 wetland acres. In FY 1994, the Corps of Engineers signed a memoranda of agreement with the other Federal resource agencies regarding wetland delineations on agricultural lands. The agreement reduces impacts on farmers and minimizes duplication of effort among the Corps, the Environmental Protection Agency, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) which was formerly known as the Soil Conservation Service. The agreement establishes lead agencies for federal wetlands calls. The NRCS will have the lead for agricultural lands and the Corps will have the lead for non-agricultural lands. During FY 1994, the Corps began initial work to implement some aspects of the President's Wetlands Plan, announced in August 1993. The plan was designed to both improve protection of the nation's wetlands and to make the regulatory process easier and more fair for the regulated public. The Corps began work to review or develop regulations to expedite the review of permit applications; the President's plan provides that permit applications will be evaluated within 90 days from the date of the notice, unless otherwise precluded by law. The Corps continued work in FY 1994 to establish its Wetland Delineator Certification Program, designed to certify individuals as wetland delineation experts. The program will create a national pool of qualified nonfederal wetlands experts. TABLE A GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 93 ........... $ 1,304,261 Allotments ................. ........................... 92,000,000 Total Funds Available ......................... 93,304,261 Obligations ..................................... 92,087,107 Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 93........... $ 1,217,154 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 93........ $ 3,760,096 Allotment ..................................... 92,000,000 Total Funds Available ......................... 95,760,096 Expenditures........................................... 92,494,945 Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 93........ $ 3,265,151 2. Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels Under the authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1988, the Corps of Engineers investigated sunken vessels in navigable waters and removed those obstructing navigation. For obligation expenditures, see Table B TABLE B REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 93 ......... $ Allotments ..................................... ..... Total Funds Available .................... Obligations .......................................... Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 94 ......... $ Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 9 ........... $ Allotment ............................................ Total Funds Available ............................ Expenditures........................................... Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 94......... $ 48,802 373,166 421,968 387,031 34,937 19,454 373,166 392.620 347,031 45,589 50-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1994 3. National Emergency Preparedness Activities Authority. Executive Order 12656, as amended, assigns responsibilities to executive departments and agencies in order to undertake the national emergency planning and preparedness activities necessary to develop an effective national capability to meet essential civilian and defense needs during major domestic crises and national security emergencies. Status. During FY 1994, the Corps of Engineers continued its effort to improve the command's readiness posture and its ability to respond to various national emergencies. Emphasis on those activities necessary for a successful transition from a "cold war" focus to preparedness associated with catastrophic natural disasters and adjusting Continuity of Government (COG) programs was continued. The primary focus during FY 1994 was the preparation for catastrophic natural/technological disasters. Lessons learned from Midwest Floods of 1993, as well as those gleaned from events such as Hurricanes Hugo, Andrew and Iniki, Loma Prieta and Northridge Earthquakes and the evolving New Madrid Earthquake scenario, clearly indicate that, while the Federal Response Plan is a solid response system, it does not provide for response to disasters with national implications in a way that is sufficiently timely or comprehensive. The Corps has initiated a program that will use the deliberate planning process to develop scenario specific plans for catastrophic disasters. This should lead to a more timely and effective execution of Corps responsibilities during disasters that have national implications. Extensive coordination with Federal agencies and state and local governments will be incorporated into plan development. During FY 1994, the Corps also continued to refine the information already developed regarding Corps readiness roles and responsibilities for the 1990's (and into the 21st Century) and initiated the implementation phase of this effort. Other activities included a continuation of the planning for and maintenance of emergency facilities needed to support continuity of operations and coordination with the Federal Emergency Management in the development of a new Continuity of Government (COG) concept of operations. Executive Order 12656 has tasked the Corps of Engineers to be the lead Federal agency responsible for national emergency water planning. In this regard, an interagency working group has been established to set objectives and requirements. As the new COG concept is clarified, this group will be used to identify and implement appropriate emergency water programs/activities. Forfiscal year obligations and expenditures, see Table C. TABLE C NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 93 ......... $ Appropriations FY 94 ........................... Total Funds Available ....................... $ Obligation ........................................... Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 94 ......... $ Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 93........ $ Appropriations FY 93 ............................. Total Funds Available ....................... $ Expenditures.......................................... Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 94........ $ 859,316 7,000,000 7,859,316 6,805,323 1,053,993 1,561,043 7,000,000 8,561,043 6,783,898 1,777,145 50-2 NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ACTIVITIES Authority. Public Law 84-99 provides the authority for the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to provide emergency/ disaster assistance for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (33 U.S.C. 701n) (69 Stat. 186). Under this law, the Chief of Engineers, acting for the Secretary of the Army, is authorized to undertake activities including disaster preparedness, advance measures, emergency operations (Flood Response and Post Flood Response), rehabilitation of flood control works threatened or destroyed by flood, protection or repair of federally authorized shore protective works threatened or damaged by coastal storm, and provisions of emergency water due to drought or contaminated source. Under Public Law 93- 288, The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) (88 Stat. 143) Act (The Stafford Act), the Federal Emergency Management Agency may direct USACE to utilize its resources to provide assistance in the event of a major disaster or emergency declaration by the President. Under The Stafford Act and the Federal Response Plan, USACE has a standing mission to provide assistance in the area of Public Works and Engineering, Emergency Support Function #3 for response to a major disaster or catastrophic event. Activities. Major disaster preparedness activities included: the review and updating of response plans to ensure viability, training personnel to ensure their capability to respond in adverse circumstances, procurement and pre-positioning of critical equipment and supplies which would likely not be available during initial stages of a response; periodic exercises to test and evaluate plans, personnel and training; inspection of non-Federal flood control projects to ensure their viability to provide flood protection, and the overall management of the response program to ensure a workable, coordinated effort is undertaken in a timely manner. In addition, work continued on response planning activities related to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Federal Response Plan for providing engineering and construction support following catastrophic events such as Hurricane Andrew and the Northridge Earthquake. (For each specific event, Headquarters augments its staff to manage the event concerning resource allocations (dollars and people) logistics of moving people and materials, funding contractors and materials and coordination with agencies involved in the event. These augmentation activities include overtime for Headquarters staff, travel to the event area, materials and supplies, increased staff from the field to include Individual Mobilization Augmentees (IMA), and Geographic Information System (GIS) services.) Significant Events. During Fiscal Year 1994, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers continued the rehabilitation of levees damaged from the Midwest Flood of 1993. This program involved a $230 million rehabilitation effort of 201 levees damaged by the 1993 event under Public Law (PL) 84-99 (Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies) and $20 million in emergency flood fight operation activities during the actual event. In November 1993, the Corps provided emergency water assistance to Jamestown, Rhode Island, through the construction of a temporary pipeline to relieve drought conditions. Just when the Corps was seeing some light at the end of the tunnel, the Northridge Earthquake (6.8 magnitude) occurred on 17 January 1994 at 4:31 a.m. in Southern California. The Corps actively supported FEMA relieve and recovery efforts from the earthquake with over 800 personnel. The earthquake killed over 50 people and injured more than 9,000. Damage estimates were approximately $30 billion. Missions ranged from providing electrical power to distributing water, t structural inspections of schools, public buildings, medical facilities, and constructing a temporary rail facility for mass transit. The dollar value of the FEMA mission assignments exceeded $23 million. In addition, the Corps inspected its own projects and continues to coordinate with state and local governments. PL 84-99 activity for Northridge was approximately $1 million. The Corps also administered a $4.8 million mission assignment for the Small Business Administration that involved housing inspections. During the summer of 1994, Tropical Storm Alberto created floods in the Southeastern United States and caused extensive damage that resulted in response and recovery missions under both PL 84-99 and PL 93-288, The Robert T. Stafford Act. The Corps was again tasked (over $26 million in mission assignments) to provide: ice, portable toilets, potable water, temporary housing, DSR inspectors, and technical assistance. Under PL 84-99, the Corps participated in flood fight operations, provided technical advice, issued sandbags and pumps, and began the task of rehabilitating the damaged dams and levees. 51-1 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) ALASKA Chena River Lakes Yukon -Kuskokwim Chena River Fairbanks 1979 2,000 NPP FR Earth 50 40,200 ARIZONA Adobe Alamo Cave Buttes Dreamy Draw New River Painted Rock Tat Momolikot Whitlow Ranch Gila Colorado Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Skunk Creek Phoenix 1982 18,350 Bill Wms. River Wenden 1968 1,046,310 Cave Creek Phoenix 1979 46,600 Dreamy Draw Phoenix 1973 320 New River Phoenix 1985 43,520 Gila River Gila Bend 1959 2,476,340 Santa Rosa Wash Casa Grande 1974 198,550 Queen Creek Superior 960 34,500 ARKANSAS Blakely Mountain Dam Blue Mountain DeGray DeQueen Dierks Gillham Millwood Narrows Dam Nimrod Ouachita Ouachita Arkansas Ouachita Red Red Red Red Ouachita Arkansas Hot Springs 1955 2,768,500 Petit Jean River Paris 1947 257,900 Caddo Arkadelphia 1971 881,900 Rolling Fork River DeQueen 1977 136,100 Saline River Dierks 1975 96,800 Cossatot River Gillham 1975 221,800 Little River Ashdown 1966 1,854,930 Little Missouri Murfreesboro 1949 407,900 Fourche Plainview 1942 336,010 La Fave River NPP 560 NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP FR FRWX FRX FRX F FRWX GWX FX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 109 283 109 50 104 1281 75.5 149 235 115 243 160 153 160 88 175 97 2,275 975 2,275 448 2,320 4,780 12,500 637 1,100 2,800 3,400 2,360 2,500 1,75f0 17,554 941 1,012 20,900 2,910 6,400 1,680 1,360 1,370 29,200 2,500 3,550 FP FRWX FPRSQN FSQRW FSRAW FSQW FSW FP FSWX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Concrete Concrete APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA Black Butte Brea Buchanan Dam- H.V. Eastman Lake Carbon Canyon Coyote Valley Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Farmington Fullerton Hansen Harry L. Englebright Hidden Dam- Hensley Lake Isabella Lopez Martis Creek Merced County Stream Group: Bear Burns Mariposa Owens Mojave River New Hogan Sacramento Stony Creek Orland 1963 160,000 770 Santa Ana Brea Creek Fullerton 1942 4,010 NPP San Joaquin Chowchilla River Chowchilla 1975 150,000 470 Santa Ana Carbon Canyon Brea Russian River East Fork Russian River Ukiah 1961 6,610 NPP 1959 122,500 1,700 Russian Dry Creek Healdsburg 1983 381,000 500 San Joaquin Littlejohn Creek Farmington 1952 52,000 NPP Santa Ana East Fullerton Crk Fullerton 1941 760 NPP Los Angeles Big Tujunga Wash Los Angeles 1940 25,450 120 Sacramento Yuba River Marysville 1941 69,000 400 San Joaquin Fresno River Madera 1975 90,000 5,000 San Joaquin Kern River Los Angeles Pacoima Wash Sacramento Martis Creek Bakersfield 1953 570,000 1,850 San 1954 440 NPP Fernanado Reno 1971 20,400 HRX FRX FIRW FERX FRX FRSW F FRX FRWX DR FIRW FIRW FX 71 FSR San Joaquin Bear Creek Merced 1954 7,700 NPP San Joaquin Burns Creek Merced 1950 7,000 NP San Joaquin Mariposa Creek Merced 1948 15,000 NPP San Joaquin Owens Creek Merced 1949 3,600 NPP Mojave Mojave River Victorville 1971 89,670 NPP San Joaquin Calaveras River Valley 1963 325,000 715 Springs FF F F FRWX FIRX Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock 156 87 205.5 2,970 1,765 1,800 99 2,610 160 319 60 45 97 280 163 185 50 3,500 3,000 7,800 575 10,475 1,142 5,730 4,952 1,300 113 2,670 92 55 88 75 200 210 1,830 4,075 1,330 790 2,200 1,960 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA (contin North Fork Pine Flat Prado Redbank and Fancher Creeks San Antonio Santa Fe Sepulveda Success Terminus Whittier Narrows w COLORADO ued) Sacra San Sant amento American River Auburn Joaquin Kings River Piedra a Ana Santa Ana River Corona 1939 14,700 280 1954 1,000,000 NPP 1941 196,240 NPP San Joaquin Fancher Creek Fresno 1993 9,712 NPP Santa Ana San Antonio Creek Upland 1956 7,700 NPP San Gabriel San Gabriel River Duarte 1948 22,110 NPP Los Angeles Los Angeles River Van Nuys 1941 17,430 NPP San Joaquin Tule River Porterville 1960 85,000 400 San Joaquin Kaweah River Visalia 1961 150,000 345 San Gabriel San Gabriel River El Monte 1967 35,150 NPP and Rio Hondo Bear Creek Chatfield Cherry Creek John Martin Trinidad Missouri Bear Creek Denver Missouri South Platte River Denver Missouri Cherry Creek Denver Arkansas Arkansas River Lamar Arkansas Purgatoire River Trinidad 1978 30,810 109 1974 231,429 1,412 1950 93,920 852 1943 608,250 1,844 197'Z 123,523 CONNECTICUT Black Rock Housatonic Branch Brook Thomaston 1970 8,700 Colebrook River Connecticut West Branch, Riverton 1969 97,700 Farmington Riv Hancock Brook Housatonic Hancock Brook Plymouth 1960 4,030 Hop Brook Housatonic Hop Brook Middlebury 1968 6,970 Mansfield Hollow Thames Natchaug River Willimantic 1952 52,000 Northfield Brook Thames Northfield Brook Thomaston 1965 2,430 Thomaston Housatonic Naugatuck River Thomaston 1960 42,000 West Thompson Thames Quinebaug River Thompson 1965 26,800 FRX FRX FRX FIR 280 FIRX 20 FR 760 FRSX 40 21 450 8 NPP 200 FRW FR FRW FRW F FRW Concrete Concrete Earth DR FIRX FRX F FX FRX FRX FIRX FIRX FRWX 155 429 106 44 160 92 57 142 250 56 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 620 1,820 2,280 16,135 3,850 23,800 15,444 3,490 2,375 19,960 Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth 180 148 141 106 200 154 223 57 97 68 118 142 70 5,300 12,400 14,300 13,962 6,610 933 1,300 630 520 12,420 810 2,000 2,550 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) IDAHO Columbia Boise River Kaskaskia River Farm Creek Fondulac Creek Kaskaskia River Big Muddy River Boise Carlyle 1955 307,000 1967 983,000 East Peoria 1951 East Peoria 1951 2,820 26,000 15,500 NPP 3,780 NPP Shelbyville 1970 684,000 Benton 1970 294,000 11,100 18,900 FIR Earth FSNRWA Earth Earth Earth 340 1,700 67 6,570 80 1,275 67 1,000. FSNRW Earth 108 FQRSW Earth 3,000 54 10,600 Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M. Harden Huntington Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Olio Ohio Ohio Ohio East Fork of Whitewater River Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Wabash River Mississinewa Salt Creek Patoka River Salamonie Brookville 1974 359,600 Tere Haute 1952 228,120 Rockville 1960 132,800 Huntington 1969 153,100 Peru 1967 368,400 Harrodsburg 1964 441,000 Ellsworth 1978 301,600 Wabash 1966 263,600 Lucky Peak ILLINOIS Carlyle Farmdale Fondulac Shelbyville Rend Lake Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi INDIANA 2,250 1,400 1,100 500 1,100 3,280 2,010 976 FRSW FRX FRX FRW FRW FARS FRSQW FRW Earth& Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth 182 150 117 91 137 93 84 133 3,000 950 1,790 5,332 8,100 1,400 1,550 6,100 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) IOWA Iowa River Iowa City 1958 492,000 Des Moines River Des Moines 1969 1,830,000 Chariton River Centerville 1969 552,000 Des Moines River Des Moines 1975 602,000 1,820 8,950 11,000 74,000 FARW Earth FARWQ Earth FNRWXQ Earth FARWQ Earth 100 1,400 110 5,676 86 125 10,600 6,750 Clinton Council Grove El Dorado Elk City Fall River Hillsdale John Redmond Kanopolis Marion Melvern Milford Pearson Skubitz Big Hill Perry Pomona Toronto Tuttle Creek Wilson Missouri Wakarusa River Arkansas Grand (Neosho) Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Lawrence 1977 397,200 Council 1964 112,882 Grove Walnut River El Dorado 1981 246,825 Elk River Independence 1966 287,200 Fall River Fall River 1949 254,900 Big Bull Creek Hillsdale 1981 160,000 Grand (Neosho) Burlington 1964 628,540 Smoky Hill River Marquette 1948 450,000 Cottonwood River Marion 1968 141,770 Marais des Cygnes Melvern 1972 363,000 Republican River Junction City 1965 1,160,000 Big Hill Creek Cherryvale 1981 39,540 Deleware River 110 Mile Creek Verdigris River Big Blue River Saline River Perry Pomona Toronto Manhattan Wilson 1969 770,000 1963 230,000 1960 200,800 1962 2,346,000 1964 776,000 7,000 3,310 8,400 4,440 2,330 4,580 9,670 3,815 6,210 6,930 15,600 1,190 12,500 4,000 2,660 15,800 9,000 FSWXRQ Earth & Rock FSQR Earth FSQR Earth FSQWR Earth FSXQR Earth FSQRWX Earth FSQR Earth FRWXS Earth FRQS Earth FRQWXS Earth FRSXWN Earth & Rock FSRW Earth FRSXWN Earth & Rock FRSWXQ Earth & Rock FXSQWR Earth FRWXONS Earth & Rock FIRWXN Earth Coralville Red Rock Rathrun Saylorville KANSAS Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Missouri Upper Mississippi 114 96 99 107 94 75 86.5 131 67 98 126 83 96 85 90 157 160 9,250 6,500 20,930 4,840 6,015 11,600 21,790 15,360 8,375 9.700 6,300 3,902 7,750 7,750 4,712 7,500 5,600 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total" (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) KENTUCKY Barren River Buckhorn Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Fishtrap Grayson Green River Martins Fork Paintsville Nolin Rough River Taylorsville Yatesville LOUISIANA Bayou Bodcau Caddo Lake Wallace Lake MARYLAND Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Red Red Red Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River Carr Fork Licking River Johns Creek Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River Little Sandy Green River Martins Fork Paint Creek Nolin River Rough River Salt River Blaine Creek Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Cypress Bayou Glasgow 1964 815,200 Buckhorn 1960 168,000 Hazard 1976 47,700 Farmers 1974 614,100 Paintsville 1949 93,000 Pikeville 1968 164,360 Grayson 1967 118,990 Campbells 1969 723,200 -ville Harlan 1978 21,00 Paintsville 1983 73,500 Kyrock 1963 609,400 Leitchfield 1958 334,400 Taylorsville 1983 291,670 Yatesville 1988 86,951 Shreveport 1949 357,300 Shreveport 1971 175,000 Shreveport 1946 96,100 4,340 FARS 550 FQRW 530 6,790 1,100 569 1,050 5,070 578 261 2,890 2,180 1,625 3,921 NPP 32,700 2,300 FQRW FQRW FARW FARW Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Rock FQRW Earth & Rock FRSQW Earth & Rock FQRW FAR FRX FQRW FQRW FRW NFRS FQRS Concrete Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Concrete & Earth Earth 146 162 130 148 118 195 120 142 97 160 174 124 164 105 70 12,850 3,700 30 4,994 Jennings Randolph Lake . Potomac North Branch Potomac River Barnum 1981 130,900 952 FQRS 3,970 1,020 720 2,740 913 1,100 1,460 2,350 574 1,600 990 1,530 1,280 760 Earth & Rock 296 2, 130 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) MASSACHUSETTS Barre Falls Connecticut Ware River Birch Hill Connecticut Millers River Buffumville Thames Little River Charles River Natural Charles Charles River Valley Storage Conant Brook East Brimfield Hodges Village Knightville Littleville Tully v West Hill Westville Barre 1958 24,000 So. Roylaston 1941 49,900 Charlton 1958 12,700 Millis 1983 35,000 Connecticut Conant Brook Monson 1966 3,740 Connecticut Quinebaug River Fiskdale 1960 30,000 Connecticut French River Oxford 1959 12,800 Connecticut Westfield River Huntington 1941 49,000 Connecticut Middle Branch, Chester 1965 32,400 Westfield River Connnecticut Tully River Fryville 1949 22,000 Blackstone West River Uxbridge 1960 12,350 Thames Quinebaug River Sturbridge 1961 11,100 NPP NPP 200 NPP NPP 360 NPP NPP 275 300 NPP 23 MINNESOTA Big Stone Lake- Upper Minnesota River Whetstone River Mississippi Lac Qui Parle Upper Chippewa River Chippewa River Mississippi LacQui Parle Upper Minnesota River Mississippi Marsh Lake Upper Minnesota River Mississippi Orwell Red River Otter Tail River of the North Red Lake Red River Red Lake River of the North Ortonville 1973 45,000 Montevideo 1950 (2) Montevideo 1950 122,800 Montevideo 1953 14,100 Fergus Falls 1953 14,100 12,700 NPP 6,500 210 210 Red River 1951 3,270,000 279,000 FRW FRW FRW F F FRW FRW FRW FRWS FRW FRW FRW FRW Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Nonstructural Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth FRWX Earth & Rock FRWX Earth & Rock FARS FARS Earth & Rock Earth & Rock FARSX Earth & Rock 62 56 66 85 55 55 160 1,164 62 51 78 885 1,400 3,255 1,050 520 2,140 1,200 1,360 1,570 2,400 560 25 13,700 21 17,97 21 4,100 19.5 11,800 47 1,355 15.5 36,500 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) MISSISSIPPI Arkabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake Okatibbee Sardis Lake Lower Coldwater River Arkabutla Mississippi Lower Yocona River Enid Mississippi Lower Yalobusha River Grenada Mississippi Pascagoula Okatibbee Creek Meridian Lower Little Tallahatchie Sardis Mississippi River 1945 525,300 5,100 1952 660,000 6,100 1954 1,337,400 9,800 1969 142,400 1,280 1940 1,570,000 10,700 FQSR F Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock 81 11,500 99 8,400 102 13,900 67 117 6,543 15,300 MISSOURI Clearwater White Long Branch Grande Chariton Little Blue River Lakes Blue Springs Missouri Longview Missouri Pomme de Terre Missouri Smithville Missouri Wappapello Lower Mississippi NEBRASKA Black River Little Charlton Piedmont 1948 413,700 Macon 1980 65,000 Little Blue River Kansas City 1988 26,600 Little Blue River Kansas City 1986 46,900 Pomme de Terre Riv Hermitage 1961 650,000 Little Platte River Smithville 1982 246,500 St. Francis River Wappapello 1941 613,200 1,630 2,430 560 930 7,820 7,190 4,100 FRWX Earth & Rock FRSQW Earth FRW FRWQ FRWXA FSQRW FR Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Harlan County Papillion Creek and Tributaries Glenn Cunningham (Site I1) Missouri Republican Riv Republican 1952 850,000 13,600 City FIRWXA Earth 107 11,827 Omaha 1975 17910 391 FQEX 154 71 78 120 155 95 109 4,225 3,800 2,500 1,900 4,630 4,200 2,700 Missouri Knight Creek Earth 67 1,940 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) NEBRASKA (continued) Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) Missouri Trib of Big Papillion Creek Ed Zorinsky (Site 18) Missouri Boxelder Creek Wehrspann (Site 20) Missouri S. Pipillion Creek Salt Creek & Tributaries Olive Creek (Site 2) Missouri S. Trib. Olive Br. Creek Blue Stem (Site 4) Missouri N. Trib Olive Br. Creek Wagon Train (Site 8) Missouri N. Trib. Hickman Creek Stagecoach Site (9) Missouri S. Trib. Hickman Creek Yankee Hill (Site 10) Missouri Cardwell Creek Conestoga (Site 12) Missouri Holmes Creek Town Lake (Site 13) Missouri Middle Creek Pawnee (Site 14) Missouri N. Middle Creek Holmes ark Lake (Site 17) Missouri Antelope Creek Branched Oak Missouri Oak Creek (Site 18) Omaha Omaha Omaha Kramer Sprague Holland 1973 5,220 1991 1991 6,910 1,990 1964 5,470 1963 10,260 1963 9,280 Hickman 1964 6,640 Denton Denton Pleasantdale Emerald 1966 1964 1966 1965 7,560 10,640 8,080 29,520 137 418 203 174 316 303 196 208 230 255 728 Lincoln 1963 6,510 100 Raymond 1968 97,560 1,780 FRX FR FR FR FR FR FB FR FR FR FR FR FR Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 70 1,460 64 59 11,400 11,810 45 3,020 57 2,760 52 1,650 48 2,250 52 63 65 55 70 3,100 3,000 5,000 7,700 5,200 NEW IHAMPSHIRE Blackwater Edward MacDowell Merrimack Blackwater River Merrimack Nubanusit Brook Webster West Peterborough Franklin 1941 46,000 NPP 1950 12,800 NPP Franklin Falls Merrimack Pemigewasset Riv FRW FRW Earth Earth 75 67 1,150 1,030 1943 154,000 NPP FRW Earth 140 1,740 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) NEW HAMPSHIRE (continued) Hopkinton-Everett Otter Brook Surry Mountain NEVADA Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon NEW MEXICO o Abiquiu Cochiti Conchas Galisteo Jemez Canyon Santa Rosa Dam & Reservoir Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rocky Dam NEW YORK Almond Arkport Merrimack Contoocook River Merrimack Piscataquog Riv Connecticut Otter Brook Connecticut Ashuelot River Colorado Mathews Canyon Colorado Pine Canyon Rio Grande Rio Charma Rio Grande Rio Grande Arkansas Canadian River Rio Grrande Galisteo Creek Rio Grande Jemez River Pecos Pecos Rio Grande Rio Hondo Rio Grande Rocky Arroyoo Susquehanna Canacadea Crk Susquehanna Canisteo Crk West Hopkinton East Weare 1962 Keene 1958 Keene 1941 Caliente Caliente 1962 71,500 87,500 18,300 32,500 200 120 85 265 1957 6,271 NPP 1957 7,747 NPP Abiquio 1963 1,198,500 Pena Blanca 1975 589,159 Tucumcari 1939 513,900 Santa Fe 1970 89,468 Bernailillo 1953 100,485 Santa Rosa 1979 439,860 Roswell Hornell Arkport 1963 163,775 NPP 1,200 2,694 NPP NPP NPP NPP FRW FRW FRW FRW FX FX FXS FRWX FI FX FX FIX FX 1949 14,600 124 1940 7,900 NPP Earth 76 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 115 133 86 790 2,000 1,288 1,670 71 92 325 241 200 156 146.6 212 800 884 1,540 28,300 19,400 2,820 780 1,950 998 4,885 118 2,940 90 113 1,260 1,200 FRW F APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) NEW YORK (continued) East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point NORTII CAROLINA B. Everett Jordan Falls W. Kerr Scott Baldhill Bowman-Haley Homme Pipestem Susquehanna Genesee Susquehanna Cape Fear Neuse Yadkin- Pee Dee Red River of the North Missouri Red River of the North James River 01110 Alum Creek Berlin Caesar Creek Clarence J. Brown Deer Creek Delaware Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ouleout Crk Genesee River Otselic River New Hope Neuse Yadkin Sheyenne River North Fork, Grand River South Branch of Park River Pipestem Creek Alum Creek Mahoning Creek Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek Olen Tangy River Franklin 1950 33,550. 210 Mount Morris 1952 337,000 170 Whitney Point 1942 86,440 1,200 Durham Raleigh Wilkesboro 1982 753,500 1983 335,620 1963 153,000 Valley City 1950 70,000 Haley 14,300 11,300 1,470 325 1967 92,980 1,750 Park River 1951 3,660 Jamestown 1974 146,880 Africa 1975 134,800 Deerfield 1943 91,200 Wilmington Springfield New Holland Deleware 1978 1974 1968 1961 242,200 63,700 102,500 273,000 FRW FR FRW FQRSWX FQRSWX FARSX FARS Concrete & Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FSRWK Earth 51 FARS 885 FRWX 130 210 .95 112 92 148 2,010 1,028 4,900 1,330 1,915 1,740 61 1,650 79 5,730 Earth 67 Earth 348 FRSW Concrete & Earth 240 FARSWQ Concrete & Earth 13,300 FRSQW Earth & Rock 1,010, FQRW Earth & Rock 727 FRW Earth 1,325 FRWX Earth 865 108 4,000 93 10,000 96 5,750 165 72 93 118 2,750 6,620 3,880 1,400 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OHIO (continued) Dillon Michael J. Kirwan Mosquito Creek Muskingum River Reservoirs: Atwood Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Beach City Ohio Bolivar Ohio Charles Mill Ohio Clendening Ohio Dover Ohio Leesville Ohio Mohawk Ohio Mohicanville Ohio Piedmont Ohio Pleasant Hill Ohio Senecaville Ohio Tappan Ohio Wills Creek Ohio North Branch, Ohio Kookosing River Lake Paint Creek Ohio Tom Jenkins Ohio West Fork Mill Creek Ohio William H. Harsha Ohio Licking River West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Indian Fork Zanesville 1961 273,000 Newton Falls 1966 78,700 Cortland New 1944 104,100 1937 49,700 1,540 420 NPP 1,350 1,800 350 1,000 NPP NPP 2,270 850 3,550 2,350 900 98 710 394 200 18,760 Cumberland Sugar Creek Beach City 1937 71,700 Sandy Creek Bolivar 1938 149,600 Black Fork Mifflin 1936 88,000 Brushy Fork Tippecanoe 1937 54,000 Tuscarawas River Dover 1938 203,000 McGuire Creek Leesville 1937 37,400 Walhondoing Riv Nellie 1937 285,000 Lake Fork Mohicanville 1936 102,000 Stillwater Creek Piedmont 1937 65,000 Clear Fork Perrysville 1938 87,700 Seneca Fork Senecaville 1937 88,500 Little Stillwater Crk Tappan 1936 61,60-0 Wills Creek Conesville 1937 196,000 North Branch of Fredericktown 1973 14,900 Kokosing River Paint Creek New 1972 145,000 Petersburg East Branch, Gloucester 1951 26,900 Sunday Creek Mill Creek Mt Healthy 1952 11,380 Little Miami River Williamsburg 1978 284,500 1,325 FRWX Earth 580 FAQRSW Earth 700 FARSWQ Earth FRX FRX FR FRX FRX FRX FRX FR FR FRX FRX FRSX FRX FRX FRW Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FRSQW Earth & Rock FRSWX Concrete FRX Earth FRSQW Earth 118 83 1,400 9,900 47 5,650 65 3,700 64 87 48 64 83 74 111 46- 56 113 45 52 87 71 118 84 100 200 5,600 6,300 1,390 950 824 1,694 2,330 1,220 1,750 775 2,350 1,550 1,950 1,400 700 944 1,100 1,450 | M" APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OKLAHOMA Arcadia Birch Canton Copan Fort Supply Great Salt Plains Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaw Oologah w Optima Pine Creek. Sardis Skiatook Waurika Wister Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Red Arkansas Red Arkansas Deep Fork River Edmond 1986 92,010 1,820 Birch Creek Barnsdall 1977 59,000 1,145 North Canadian Riv Canton 1948 377,100 7,910 Little Caney River Copan 1983 227,700 4,850 Wolf Creek Fort Supply 1942 100,700 1,820 Salt Fork of the Cherokee 1941 271,400 8,690 Arkansas River Polecat Creek Sapulpa 1950 55,395 880 Kiamichi River Hugo 1974 955,200 13,140 Caney River Bartlesville 1951 289,000 3,570 Arkansas River Ponca City 1976 1,327,160 16,750 Verdigris River Oologah 1963 1,559,270 31,040 North Canadian Riv Hardesty 1978 229,500 5,340 Little River Wright City 1969 465,780 3,750 Jackfork Creek Clayton 1984 396,900 13,610 Hominy Creek Skiatook 1984 500,700 10,190 Beaver Creek Waurika 1977 325,680 10,100 Poteau River Wister 1949 427,480 5,760 FSR FSQRW FSI FSQRW FSX FRWX FRWXS FSQRW FSAX FSQRW FSNRW FSRW FSQWR FSRW FSQRW FISQWR FSAX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth OREGON Applegate Blue River Cottage Grove Dorena Rogue Applegate River Medford Columbia Blue River Columbia Coast Fork, Willamette River Columbia Row River 1981 82,000 988 Blue River 1968 85,000 975 Cottage Grv 1942 30,060 1,155 Cottage Grv 1949 70,500 1,885 AFIQRSW Gravel Embankment FINR Earth FINR Concrete & Earth FINR Concrete & Earth 102 97 68 73 85 68 89 101 94 125 137 120 124 101 143 106 99 5,250 3,190 15,140 7,730 11,865 6,010 2,920 10,200 5,200 9,466 4,000 15,200 7,712 14,138 3,590 16,600 5,700 1,300 1,329 2,110 3,352 242 319 114 145 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OREGON (continued) Columbia Middle Fork, Eugene Willamette River Columbia Long Tom River Eugene Columbia Willow Creek Heppne 1965 115,000 1,865 1941 110,000 10,305 r 1983 13,250 FI\R FILAR 96 FRN Rockfill Rockfill & Concrete Roller Compacted Concrete 193 5,100 49 6,624 160 1,780 PENNSYLVANIA Alvin R. Bush Susquehanna Kettle Creek Renovo 1962 75,000 , Aylesworth Creek Susquehanna Aylesworth Creek Archbald 1970 1,700 Beltzville Delaware Pohopco Creek Lehighton 1971 68,250 Blue Marsh Delaware Tulephoken Creek Reading 1978 50,010 Conemaugh Ohio Conemaugh River Saltsburg 1952 262,700 160 64 947 960 800 Cowanesque * Susquehanna Cowanesque River Lawrenceville 1980* 89,000 1085 Crooked Creek Ohio Crooked Creek Ford City 1940 93,900 350 Curwensville Susquehanna West Branch, Curwensville 1965 124,200 790 Susquehanna River East Branch, Ohio East Branch, Wilcox 1952 84,300 90 Clarion River Clarion River Foster Joseph Sayers Susquehanna Bald Eagle Creek Blanchard 1969 99,000 1,730 Francis E. Walter Delaware Lehigh River White Haven 1961 109,610 80 (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Delaware Dyberry Creek Honesdale 1960 24,500 NPP Hammond Lakes Susquehanna Crooked Creek Tioga 1978 63,000 680 Indian Rock Susquehanna Codorus Creek York 1942 28,000 NPP Kinzua Ohio Allegheny River Warren 1965 1,180,000 1,900 FRW Earth & Rock F Earth & Rock FQRSWA Earth & Rock FAQRSW Earth & Rock FW Concrete & Earth FRS Earth & Rock FRW Earth FR Earth FARQW Earth FRW FRW Earth Earth & Rock F Earth FR Earth & Rock FRW Earth PFAQRW Concrete & Earth 165 90 170 98 137 151 143 131 1,350 1,270 4,560 1,775 1,265 3,100 1,480 2,850 184 1,725 100 234 109 122 83 177 6,835 3,000 1,255 6,450 1,000 1,877 Fall Creek Fern Ridge Willow Creek APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) PENNSYLVANIA (continued) Loyalhanna Mahoning Creek Prompton Raystown Shenango Stillwater Tioga-Hammond Lakes Tionesta J' Union City Woodcock Creek Youghiogheny River Ohio Loyalhanna Creek Saltsburg 1942 95,300 Ohio Mahoning Crk New 1941 74,200 Bethlehem Delaware Lackawaxem River Honesdale 1960 52,000 Susquehanna Raystown Branch, Huntingdon 1973 762,000 Juniata River Ohio Shenango River Sharpsville 1966 191,400 Susquehanna Lackawanna River Uniondale 1960 12,000 Susquehanna Tioga River Tioga 1978 62,000 Ohio Tionesta Creek Tionesta 1940 133,400 Ohio French Creek Union City 1970 47,640 Ohio French Creek Meadville 1973 20,000 Ohio Youghiogheny Riv Confluence 1943 254,000 SOUTH DAKOTA Cold Brook Missouri Cottonwood Springs Missouri Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Creek Hot Springs 1953 Hot Springs 1970 Lake Traverse: Reservation Control Red River Bois de Sioux Riv Wheaton Dam of the North White Rock Red River Bois de Sioux Riv Wheaton of the North 7,200 8,385 1941 164,500 210 170 290 8,300 1,910 85 470 480 NPP 118 450 36 41 10,925 FRW FRW FRW FRW FAQRW FS FR FRW F FQRA FARWQ Concrete & Earth Concrete Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth. Earth FRWX Earth FRWX Earth FRX Earth 14 9,100 1941 85,500 6,500 FRX 114 162 140 225 68 77 140 154 88 90 184 127 123 960 926 1,200 1,700 720 1,700 2,710 1,050 1,420 4,650 1,610 925 1,190 Earth 16 14,400 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) TEXAS Addicks Aquilla Barker Belton Benbrook Canyon Cooper Lake and Channel Red Ferrells Bridge Dam- Red Lake O' the Plains o Granger Dam and Lake Brazos Grapevine Trinity Hords Creek Colorado Joe Pool Trrinity Lake Kemp Red Lavon Trinity Lewisville Navarro Mills North San Gabriel Dam, Lake Georgetown O.C. Fisher Pat Mayse Proctor Trinity Trinity Brazos Colorado Red Brazos San Jacinto South Mayde Crk Addicks 1948 204,500 NPP Brazos Aquilla Creek Hillsboro 1983 146,000 3,280 San Jacinto Buffalo Bayou Barker 1945 207,000 NPP Brazos Leon River Belton 1954 1,097,600 12,300 Trinity Clear Fork, Fort Worth 1952 258,600 3,770 Trinity River Guadalupe Guadallupe River New 1964 366,400 346,400 Braunfels Sulphur River Cypress Creek Cooper 1991 441,200 19,305 Jefferson 1959 842,100 18,700 San Gabriel River Granger 1980 244,200 4,400 Denton Creek Grapevine 1952 425,500 7,280 Hords Creek Coleman 1948 25,310 510 Mountain Creek Grand Prairie 1986 304,000 7,470 Wichita River Wichita Falls 1972 502,900 15,590 East Fork, Fort Worth 1953 748,200 21,400 Trinity River Elm Fork, Lewisville 1954 989,700 23,280 Trinity River Richland Creek Corsicana 1962 212,200 5,070 North Fork, Georgetown 1980 130,800 1,310 San Gabriel River North Concho Riv San Angelo 1952 396,400 5,440 Sanders Creek Paris 1967 182,940 5,940 Leon River Comanche 1963 374,200 4,610 FX FSX FX FIRSX FNRXA FRSX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FRSWX Earth FRS Earth FRSWX FNRSXA FARSX FRSX FX FRS W FRSX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FRSX Earth FRSWX Rock FRSX FRSW FRSX 49 104.5 27 192 130 224 79 97 115 137 91 109 115 81 61,166 11,890 72,844 5,524 9,130 4,410 28,070 10,600 16,320 12,850 6,800 22,360 8,890 19,483 125 32,888 82 164 Earth Earth Earth 6,700 6,700 128 40,885 96 7,080. 86 13,460 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) TEXAS (continued) Ray Roberts Somerville Stillhouse Hollow Waco Wright Patman UTAH Little Dell Lake VERMONT Ball Mountain North Hartland North Springfield Townshend Union Village Trinity Brazos Brazos Brazos Red Elm Fork Yegua Creek Lampasas River Bosque River Sulphur River Jordan River Dell Creek Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut West River Ottauguechee River Black River West River Ompompanoosuc River Denton Somerville Belton Waco Texarkana Salt Lake Cty Jamaica North Hartland Springfield Townshend Union Village 1987 1967 1968 1965 1957 1993 1961 1960 1960 1961 1950 1,064,600 507,500 630,400 726,400 2,654,300 29,350 11,460 6,430 7,270 20,300 20,500 1,000 54,600 71,420 51,067 33,700 38,000 75 220 290 100 NPP FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FS FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW VIRGINIA John W. Flannagan Ohio Pound River Haysi 1963 145,700 310 FAWR Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Earth 109 80 200 140 100 224 265 185 120 133 170 14,965 26,175 15,624 24,618 18,500 1,700 915 1,520 2,940 1,700 1,100 960 Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth 250 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) VIRGINIA (continued) Gathright Dam & Lake Moomaw North Fork of Pound River WASHINGTON Howard A. Hanson Mill Creek Mud Mountain WEST VIRGINIA Beech Fork Bluestone Burnsville East Lynn R. D. Bailey Stonewall Jackson Lake Summersville Lake Sutton Tygart River James Ohio Green Columbia Puyallup Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Jackson North Fork of Pound Green River Mill Creek White River Beech Fork New River Little Kanawha Twelve Pole Creek Guyandotte River West Fork Gauley River Elk River Tygart River Alleghany 1979 123,739 2,532 Pound Kanaskat Walla Walla Enumclaw Lavalette Hinton Burnsville East Lynn Justice Weston River Summersville Sutton Grafton 1968 11,300 1961 106,000 1942 8,300 1953 106,000 1977 1952 1977 1970 1979 1988 37,540 631,000 65,400 82,500 203,700 74,650 1965 413,800 1960 265,300 1938 287,700 FQR 349 FRSW 1,600 225 NPP 450 1,800 550 823 440 360 407 270 620 FAS FR FR FRW FRWX FQRW FQRW FQRW FAQAS FANR FNAR FNAR WISCONISIN Eau Galle Chippewa Eau Galle Spring Valley 1969 43,600 150 FR * Project became operable for water supply FY 1990 00 257 122 1,172 600 Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Rock Earth Rock Earth Concrete Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Concrete 235 125 427 86 180 89 122 310 95 390 220 230 122 500 3,200 810 1,080 2,048 1,400 650 1,397 620 2,280 1,921 1,921 Earth 1,800 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA Big Dry Creek Camanche 2 Cherry Valley 3 Del Valle Eaton Wash New Bullards Bar2 New Don Pedro3 New Exchequer2 Oroville 2 Tahchevah Creek San Joaquin San Joaquin Tuolumne Alameda Rio Hondo Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Sacramento Whitewater Big Dry Creek Mokelumne River Cherry Creek Arroyo Del Valle Eaton Wash Yuba River Tvolumne River Merced River Feather River Tahchevah Creek COLORADO Pinon Canyon CONNECTICUT East Branch Colorado Pinon Canyon Arroyo Housatonic East Branch, Trinidad 1954 4,350 NPP Torrington 1964 Naugatuck River Torrington 1962 4,350 NPP FW FR Earth Earth 92 92 700 100 Hall Meadow Brook Housatonic Hall Meadow Brook Fresno Clements Sonora Livermore Pasadena Marysville Modesto Merced Oroville Palm Springs 1948 1963 1956 1968 1937 1968 1970 1966 1964 1965 16,250 431,500 268,000 77,000 960 960,000 2,030,000 1,026,000 3,539,000 960 NPP NPP 475 200 NPP 1,910 3,520 1,900 5,838 NPP F FRS FS FRS F FIRPW FISP FIR FIRSW F Earth Earth & Rcck Earth & Rock Earth Earth Concrete Earth & Rock Rock Earth Earth 40 171 315 223 82 645 565 480 770 42 20,038 2,450 2,500 880 1,795 2,323 1,920 1,200 6,850 3,610 8,620 NPP F Earth & Rock 73 1,200 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CONNECTICUT (continueed) Mad River Sucker Brook HAWAII Kaneohe-Kailua Area IDAHO Ririe Connecticut Mad River Connecticut Sucker Brook Kaneohe Kaneohe Stream Upper Snake Willow Creek Winchester 1963 9,700 Winchester 1970 1,480 Kaneohe 1981 Idaho Falls 1975 3,800 10 FR NPP F 26 FR 100,500 364 FIR MARYLAND Savage River MISSOURI Bear Creek NEW YORK Potomac Savage Upper Mississippi Western Port Bear Creek 1952 Hannibal 1962 20,000 360 FRS 8,700 NPP F Earth & Rock Earth 184 1,050 65 1,450 Onondaga Creek Syracuse 1949 18,200 NPP F Earth Earth Earth 178 68 940 1,160 92 100 Earth 253 1,070 Onandaga Oswego Earth -- 67 1,782 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OKLAHOMA Altus 4 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Lake Hudson 5 Red Arkansas River Arkansas North Fork, of the Red Riv. Grand (Neosho) Grand (Neosho) River Altus Disney 1948 152,429 6,260 1941 2,197,000 46,5006 Locust Grove 1964 444,500 10,9006 FISR FRP FRP Concrete Concrete Concrete & Earth 98 1,112 147 6,565 90 4,494 UTAH 1,200 NPP F Earth 34 2,814 VERMONT East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville WASHINGTON Wynoochee Winooski Winooski Winooski Chehalis Jail Branch Waterbury North Branch, Wynoochee River East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville Montesano 1938 1938 1938 1972 12,050 37,000 20,300 NPP F 890 FRP 570 FR 70,000 1,150 FSARI Big Wash Beaver Big Wash Milford 1961 Earth Earth Earth Concrete 65 158 115 177 & Earth 1,460 1,800 1,525 1,700 w ;> APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS A - Low Flow Augmentation D - Debris Control F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Navigation P - Power Q - Water Quality Control R - Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S - Water Supply W - Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) X - Water Conservation and Sedimentation 1 Acres of water surface at top of permanent pool 2 Federal Government contributed for flood storage 3 Cherry Valley Reservoir: Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on interim basis. Second and final phase, New Don Pedro Reservoir: Federal Government contributed for flood protection. Construction and operation by City and County of San Francisco and Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts. 4 Construction by Bureau of Reclamation. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 5 Construction by Grand River Dam Authority. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 6 Top of power pool. APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Alton to Gale Levee System, Mississippi River, ILand MO......................... .......... Arcadia Lake, OK ............................................ Ascalmore-Tippo Items, MS ............................. Atchafalaya Basin, LA ...................................... B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC................. Badger Creek near Browning, Glacier County, MT (Sec 14) ........................ Baraga County, MI (Sec 14) ............................. Batesville Sewage Lagoon ................................ Bassett Creek, M N ........................................... Bayou Des Glaises, LA ..................................... Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK .......................... Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO........ (Sec 14) Black River, Hwy HH, Wayne Co., MO ........... Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA................ (Sec 205) Blue River Basin, Overland Park (Indian Creek), KS (Sec 205) ...................... Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO................. Bluffs Community Center, Swansea, MA .......... Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL............................ Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO .......................... Brush Creek, Ternette, PA (Sec 14) .................. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX .................. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX, Addicks and Barker, Dam Safety Assurance ................... Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA ....................... Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO ........................... 1983 1980 1984 1928 1967 1993 1991 1990 1987 1938 1992 1985 1988 1994 1992 1984 1994 1990 1991 1994 1956 1986 1990 1992 Indefinite 1986 Indefinite 3 1987 (2) 2010 1982 1995 1994 1991 1990 1993 1939 1985 1989 1994 1994 1994 1991 1988 1994 1991 1990 1994 1939 1992 6 1997 1986 1989 1994 1994 Being Determined 1994 1993 1995 1995 Indefinite 1993 1995 1999 Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection S Floodway and Levees Reservoir Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Interior Drainage Emergency Bank Stabilization Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shore Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Dam Safety Local Protection Local Protection APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Central and Southern, FL .................................. Century Park, Lorain, OH (Sec 103)................... Chadakoin River, Jamestown, NY (Sec 14) ....... Chagrin River, Solon Rd, Chagrin Falls, OH ..... (Sec 14) Charlevouix, East Jordan, MI (Sec 14) ............... Chaska, M N .................................... ................. Chauvin Bayou, LA (Sec 205) .......................... Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA ......................................... Chena River Lakes, AK .................................... Chub Runn, Franklin, PA (Sec 14) ................... Clallam Bay at Sekiu, Clallam County, WA ..... (Sec 14) Clark Fork River, MT (Sec 14) ......................... Clayton County Bridge Osterdock, IA (Sec 14) Clayton County Road CIX, IA (Sec 14) ............. Clayton County Road 1620, IA (Sec 14) ........... Clayton County Road 1712, AIA (Sec 14) ......... Clear Creek, TX ....................................... Clifton, AZ ...................................... ...... Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO .............. (Sec 205) Cooper Lake and Channels, TX ........................ Connecticut River, Middletown, CT................... Corte Madera Creek, CA .................................. County Road 44, Etowah County, AL ................ Cowanesque Lake, PA ...................................... Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (Sec 14)..................... Coyote and Berressa Creeks, CA ...................... Cuyahoga River, Brecksv ille, RD, UH ............. (Sec 14) Dade County, FL ....................................... 1950 1990 1991 1991 1987 1988 1991 1994 1973 1994 1994 1993 1991 1991 1991 1991 1988 1994 1994 1958 1993 1966 1994 1987 1992 1994 1992 1991 1991 1990 1993 1979 1993 1993 1993 1993 1991 1994 1990 1993 1999 1991 1995 1991 1990 1997 1994 1996 1989 1995 1995 1994 1993 1993 1993 1993 1997 1996 Indefinite 1995 1994 Indefinite 1994 1990 1994 1996 1993 Local Protection Shoreline Protection and Nourishment Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs and Levee Streambank Protection Shore Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir, channel improvement Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Water Supply Modification Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection 1975 2038 N Shore Protection APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Dauphin Island, Shoreline, AL ........................ 1993 Dearborn River near Wolf Creek Lewis & Clark County, MT (Sec 14)....... 1994 Demonstration Erosion Control, MS ........... . 1985 Des Moines Recreational River .................... 1989 and Greenbelt, IA Drayton Hall, Charleston County, SC (Sec 14) .. 1993 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel...... 1967 Dunbar (Sewage Facilities), WV (Sec 14) .......... 1986 East End Dauphin Island, AL .......................... 1993 East Nishnabotna River, Page County ............... 1992 Bridge, IA (Sec 14) East St. Louis and Vicnity, IL - ...................... 1988 Rehabilitation El Paso, TX ..................................... 1971 Elk Creek Lake, OR .................................... 1971 Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL(Sec 205) ................... 1988 Evansville, IN ..................................... 1939 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA ........................ 1985 Falls Lake, NC ..................................... 1973 Fair Haven, MI (Sec 14) .................................. 1987 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT ..................... 1994 Fisher Ferry Road, MS (Sec 14) ...................... 1987 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT (Sec 205) .... 1994 Fletcher Creek, Memphis, TN (Sec 14) .............. 1991 Four Rivers Basin, FL ...................................... 1966 Fourche Bayou, Vicinity of Little Rock, AR ...... 1987 Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort Section) ....... 1991 Gadsden-Water Treatment Plant, Gadsden, AL.. 1994 Gallatin River, (1-90), Gallatin County, MT ...... 1991 (Sec 14) Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN (Sec 205) ........... 1994 Great Bend,KS.............................. 1988 1994 1994 1983 1993 1994 Indefinite Indefinite 1993 1995 1987 1994 1994 1997 1973 Indefinite Indefinite 1995 1995 1995 1993 1993 1983 1995 1994 1994 1995 1990 1995 1991 1991 1986 1996 1991 1996 1994 1992 1992 1996 1994 Shore Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Recreation Streambank Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Shore Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Shorline Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Flood Warning System Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection w APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Greenwood Bendway, Site 3, MS ..................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 4, MS ..................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 5, MS ..................... Guadalupe River, CA ........................................ Guntersville Lake, Guntersville, AL ................. Halstead,KS...................... .................. Highway 119, Derry, LA (Sec 14) .................... Highway 495, Natchitoches,Parish, LA ............. (Sec 14) Hills Point Road, MD (Sec 14) ......................... Hinkson Creek, Columbia, MO Sewerline ........ (Sec 14) Hoopersville Road, MD (Sec 14) ...................... Horn Lake Creek, MS ....................................... Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA ......................... (Dam Safety Assurance) Humboldt, TN (Sec 205) ................................... Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City,MD (Sec 14) ...... James R. Olin Flood Control Project, VA .......... Joe Pool Lake, TX ............................................ Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, HI)............................. (Sec 205 Kahoma Stream, Maui, HI ................................ Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Leeve Dist., IL .... Kirbyville, TX (Sec 205) .................................. LaConner, WA ........................................ Lake Chicot Pumping Plant, AR ....................... Lake Elsinore, CA (Sec 205) ............................ Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY (Sec 14)..................... Lake Pontchartrain, LA ..................................... Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX ................... Larose to Golden Meadow, LA......................... 1986 1987 1987 1992 1988 1991 1994 1994 1989 1994 1993 1993 1994 1986 1989 1994 1975 1989 1986 1980 1989 1994 1981 1993 1992 1967 1987 1972 1988 1988 1988 Being Determined 1989 1995 1994 1994 1989 1994 1994 1988 1990 1986 1990 1990 1992 1989 1994 1994 1995 1996 1988 1991 1997 1993 1990 1990 1986 1992 1995 1992 1995 1992 2013 1995 2002 Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Seismic Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Bank Stabilization Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River & Cumberland River, KY, WV & VA.............. Little Calumet River, IN ................................... Little Dell Lake, UT.......................................... Little Kanawha River, Glenville, WV (Sec 14) .. Little Red River, Clinton, AR (Sec 205).............. Lock Haven, PA ....................................... Long Branch Lake, MO .................................... Loves Park, IL ........................................ Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, ........... OR and WA Lower San Joaquin River, CA ......................... (Snagging & Clearing) Machias River, Machiasport, ME ..................... Mahoning River, Warren, OH (Sec 14) .............. Maple Creek E. Fork, Howells, NE .................. (Sec 205) Masefau Bay, Tutuila Island, American ............. Samoa (Sec 14) Maumee Bay State Park, OH ............................ Mauvaise Terre, IL ........................................... Mayfield Creek, KY (SEC 205) ........................ McCreadys Point Road, MD (Sec 14) ................ McKinley Park, Milwaukee, WI (Sec 14)........... Merced County Streams, CA ............................ Middle Hooper Island, MD (Sec 14) ................. Mill Creek, OH ........................................ Mill Creek, Salem, OR (Sec 14) ....................... Millington, TN (Sec 205) .................................. Mill Run, Sinclairville, NY (Sec 14) ................. Miller Run, Cecil Twp, PA (Sec 14) .................. M ingo Creek, OK ............................................. Minnesota River at Belgrade, MN (Sec 14)........ 1981 1990 1985 1986 1985 1991 1973 1991 1961 1985 1994 1994 1994 1989 1990 1985 1992 1993 1986 1985 1993 1981 1990 1990 1992 1994 1988 1992 Indefinite 1996 1993 1995 1987 1986 1987 1994 1980 Indefinite 1997 Indefinite 1994 1992 1991 1993 1994 1993 1994 1994 1990 1991 Indefinite 1994 1995 1995 1992 1991 1987 1995 1994 1993 Indefinite 1994 Indefinite 1993 1995 1995 1995 1998 1994 Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Reservoirs Shoreline Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection t APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Mississippi River Channel Improvements (AR, IL, KY, LA,MI, MO & TN) ................ Mississippi River Levees ............................. Missouri River Levee System, ......................... IA, NE, KS, and MO Mound State Park, Moundville, AL .................. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA................ Muddy Creek Cascade, Vaughn, MT (Sec 14) ... Mudline to Pineville, MS .................................. Mud Mountain Dam, WA ................................ (Dam Safety Assurance) Murder Creek, Brewton, AL (Sec 205)............... Muskegon (Duck Lake), MI (Sec 14) ................ Muskegon, Memorial Drive, MI (Sec 14)........... Muskingham River Lakes, OH ......................... Muskingum River Lakes, OH (Dam Safety Assurance) ............................. Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME .................. Nelson Run, Ross Twp., PA (Sec 14) ................ New Orleans to Venice, LA .............................. Newark, OH ...................................... ..... NonconnanhCreek, TN & MS .......................... North Nashua River, Leominster, MA................ Oates Creek, GA ....................................... Oelwin, Fayette County, IA (Sec 205) ................ O'Hare Reservoir, IL......................................... Ohio River, Chester, WV (Sec 14) ................... One Hundred Two River, Nodaway Co., MO County Road and Bridge (Sec 14) ................ Otter Creek, Shannon Hills, AR (Sec 205) ......... Paintsville Lake, KY ........................................ Pajaro River, CA .............................................. 1928 1928 1948 1991 1986 1992 1984 1986 1986 1990 1986 1976 1982 1994 1993 1969 1976 1990 1994 1990 1993 1990 1994 1991 1984 1973 1987 2010 2021 2001 1993 Being Determined 1990 1995 1994 1985 1985 1995 1991 1994 1994 1992 1984 1983 1989 1994 1992 1994 1988 1995 1994 1995 2010 1992 1997 1995 1992 1995 1995 1995 1992 1986 1991 1989 Channel Improvement Main Line Levees Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Modernization of Dam Local Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Major Rehabilitation Modernization of Dams Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Panola-Quitman Item C, MS ............................. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE .......... Pataha Creek near Pomeroy, WA (Sec 14) ......... Paw Paw Lake, MI (Sec 205)............................ Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (Sec 205) ............... Pelucia Creek, Item 1, MS ................................ Pelucia Creek, Item I A, MS ............................. Pelucia Creek, Item 2, MS ................................ Pelucia Creek, Item 3, MS ................................ Pelucia Creek, Item 4, MS ................................ Perkins Street Bridge, TN .................................... (Sec 14) Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO ................ Petit Jean River, Hwy 309, AR ........................ (Sec 14) Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity ............................... (including New River) Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (Sec 14) ................ Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX ............................ Porter Bayou, MS (Sec 205) ............................. Portersville Bay, Mobile County, AL ............... Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR....................... Presque Isle Peninsula, PA (Permanent) ............. Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA ................................ (Sec 205) Pt. Leflore, MS ..................................... .. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV ..................................... Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections .......................... Ray Roberts Lake, TX ...................................... Redbank & Fancher Creeks, CA ....................... Red River Basin Chloride Control (Area X) OK and TX ............................................. 1984 1972 1993 1976 1993 1985 1987 1990 1990 1993 1977 1991 1980 1993 1966 1982 1992 1975 1990 1989 1985 1967 1965 1975 1987 1974 1987 1994 1986 1987 1993 1993 1993 1987 1985 1991 1984 1993 1993 1986 1980 1987 1993 1993 1995 1993 1987 1995 1987 1987 1993 1994 1994 1989 1985 1991 1994 1995 1995 1988 1994 1999 1993 1994 1986 1988 Indefinite 1996 1994 Local Protection Reservoirs Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection 1990 Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Breakwaters Local Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Local Protection Reservoir Reservoir 1991 Indefinite tz3 Chloride Control APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Red River Below Denison Dam ........................ Reno Beach, Howard Farms, OH ........................ Reserve Sewage Lagoon, NM (Sec 14) .............. Richmond, VA.................................. ...... Rillioto River, AZ ............................................ Riverdale, West Springfield, MA ..................... Roanoke River, Upper Basin, VA..................... Rochester, MN ....................................... Running Slough Ditch.................................. Sabana Grande, PR (Sec 205) ........................... Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA ............. Sacramento River, Chico Landing ................... to Red Bluff, CA Sacramento River Flood Control, CA ................. Sacramento Urban Area Levee ........................ Reconstruction, CA Saginaw River, MI ........................................... Salinas River, San Ardo, CA ............................ Sammamish River Restoration, WA (Sec 1135) San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX ........... San Luis Rey River, CA..................... ........... Sanders Creek, Boscobel, MN (Sec 205)............ Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR (Sec 14) ..... Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA ........................ San Vincente Arroyo, Silver Spring, NM ........... Savan Gut, VI (Sec 205) ................................... Saylersville, KY ....................................... Saylorville Lake, IA .......................................... Scotts Creek, Newberry, SC (Sec 205) ............... Sheyenne River, ND ........................................ Sicily Island, LA, Levee ................................... Sidney, NE (Sec 205) ........................................ 1948 1990 1986 1989 1994 1994 1990 1987 1990 1987 1963 1963 1918 1990 1965 1993 1994 1957 1988 1992 1993 1990 1988 1987 1991 1965 1986 1990 1983 1993 1992 1989 1990 1989 1995 1992 1987 1995 1997 1995 2000 1995 1990 1990 Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite 1996 1979 Indefinite 1993 1995 1996 1996 1995 1993 1994 Being Determined 1988 1988 1989 1990 1998 1977 1994 1988 1999 2000 1994 1994 Levee & Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Fish Restoration Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection do APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Silver Creek, Rome, GA (Sec 205)...................... Sims Bayou, TX ...................................... Sims Park, Euclid, OH (Sec 103) ...................... Snake River, Alvarado, MN (Sec 205) ............... Socastee Creek, Horry County, SC (Sec 205) .... Solomon Creek, Ashley, PA (Sec 14) ................. Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD (Sec 14) Solomons Island, MD (Sec 14) ......................... Souris River Basin, ND ..................................... South Shore Park, Milwaukee County, WI......... Southwestern Jefferson County, KY .................. Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS ........................ Spriilgbrook Creek, PA ..................................... State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texoma, ........ TX (Sec 14) Steele Bayou, M S ............................................. St. Francis Basin ..................... St. Hilaire, Riverside Cemetery, MN ................ (Sec 14) St. Joseph River, MI (Sec 14) ........................... St. Paul, MN ...................................... ..... Sterling Center, Maple River, MN (Sec 14) ....... Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV ........................... Swan Creek, Taney County, MO (Sec 14).......... Sweetwater River, CA....................... ............ Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS ............................ Tama, IA (Sec 205) ........................................... Taylors Bayou, TX ........................................... Taylorsville Lake, KY....................................... Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant, LA ............... Tensas Cocodrie, LA, Levee (5) ...................... Teton River near Choteau, Teton ..................... County, MT (Sec 14) 1989 1990 1992 1993 1992 1992 1992 1992 1985 1992 1974 1988 1989 1992 1966 1938 1994 1990 1991 1994 1977 1984 1972 1992 1991 1982 1974 1983 1974 1992 1991 1992 1993 1993 1993 1993 1983 1990 (4) 1994 1995 1986 1993 1993 1983 1987 1993 1992 2002 1992 1996 1993 1993 1993 1993 1994 1993 1993 1999 1990 1994 1999 1999 1994 1995 1994 1995 1988 1986 1993 1994 1995 1994 1990 1996 1992 5 1993 Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection and Nourishment Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Reservoir Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Tributary levees & channels Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Texas City and Vicinity, TX ............................ (1958 authorization) Threemile Creek, AL ........................................ Tombigbee River #6, Monroe County, MS ........ Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS ......... Tongue River, State Park, ................................ Ranchester, WY (Sec 14) Town Brook, Quincy;, MA ............................... Tulsa and West Tulsa, OK ................................ Tunkhannock Creek, PA ................................... Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS .............. Upper Scioto River, Marion .............................. County, OH (Sec 205) Upper Yazoo Projects, MS................................ U.S. Hwy 190, Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, LA (Sec 214) ............................ Village Creek, AL ............................................ Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX .................... Wabasha County Hwy 11, MN (Sec 14)............. Walnut Creek, CA ............................................ West Columbus, OH ........................................... West Des Moines, IA ........................................ West Fork Grand River, Worth County, MO, MO Hwy and Trans Dept, State Road 46A (Sec 14) ............................. West Ray, Marshall, PA (Sec 14) ..................... West River, New Haven, CT (Sec 205) .............. West Tennessee Tributaries ......................... Westwego to Harvey, LA.................................. Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX (Sec 205)......... White River, Batesville, AR (Sec 14)............... White River, Jacksonport, AR (Sec 205)............ White River, Newport, AR................................... 1962 1988 1994 1965 1993 1992 1943 1989 1993 1986 1976 1991 1989 1968 1993 1964 1993 1991 1994 1990 1991 1960 1991 1983 1984 1984 1988 1987 1992 1992 1994 1995 1990 Indefinite 1994 1994 1945 1990 1997 1993 6 1990 1995 1987 2013 1992 1989 1994 1994 1990 1993 1094 1986 1986 1989 1993 1994 1990 1994 1996 2002 1997 1994 1990 1993 Indefinite 1 2005 1984 1986 1986 1989 Local Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Channel Improvement Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Drainage and Flood Control Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection 2 APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project (Sec 14). White River, St. Paul, AR ................................. 1988 (Sec 208) W hiteman's Creek, AR ....................................... 1994 Wilamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR...... 1938 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA ................. 1980 Willd Rice River, Hendrum/Lee Townships Norman County, MN (Sec 205) .................... 1994 Wolf River at 2nd Street, Memphis, TN................1988 (Sec 14) Wrightsville Beach ..................................... 1994 Wyoming Valley, PA ....................................... 1983 Yalobusha River Mile 7.5, MS ........................... 1993 Yatesville Lake, KY .................................. ..... 1964 Yellowstone River, Livingston, MT (Sec 14) ..... 1992 Yonkers (Nepera Park), NY ............................. 1994 Zintel Canyon, Kennewick, WA ...................... 1992 1990 1990 1997 Indefinite 1996 1989 1994 1976 1993 1993 1994 1993 1995 1990 1994 1991 1993 1995 1993 1994 1993 Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Periodic Beach Renourishment Rehabilitation of levee system Streambank Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 1. Construction of further channel improvement was halted in 1987 due to the denial of water quality certification. Construction work currently underway includes the channel stabilization at bridge, utility and tributary crossings in the uncompleted portion of the project. 2. Project was in useful operation before Corps started working on it. Work consists primarily of improvements to existing channels, levees, pumping stations and other flood control structures. 3. Remaining recreation unscheduled. Lawsuit was resolved by a Consent Decree Feb 10, 1992. The Decree was for the City of Edmond and the Edmond Public Works Authority to reimburse the government $7,207,636 over a period of 40 years for the recreation contract and $16,253, 644 for the water supply contract over a period of 43 years. 4. Durham Prong Diversion local support problem. 5. Item 2A temporarily deferred. 6. Present work is for repair of the levee and pipes. APPENDIX B BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Atlantic Coast of Maryland 1990 1994 2043 Delaware Coast Protection, DE 1989 1990 2021 Cape May Inlet to Lower Tup, NJ 1990 1991 2031 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI 1994 1994 1994 Emeryville, Alameda, CA (Sec 103) 1993 1993 1993 Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY 1963 Indefinite Grand Isle, LA 1 Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ 1991 1992 2043 Homer Spit storm Damage Reduction, AK 1992 1994 1995 SLincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA 1994 1995 2 Manatee County, FL 1992 1993 Palm Beach County, FL (Delray Beach) 1992 1992 Pinellas County, FL (Indian Shores) 1992 1993 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT 1993 1994 1994 Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), NY 1994 1994 1995 Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, Sec 1 (Monmouth Beach), NJ 1994 1994 Indefinite Sarasota County, FL 1994 Southeast Lighthouse Block Island, RI 1993 1993 1993 Town of North Beach, MD 1993 1994 1994 Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) 1962 1962 1997 3 Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT 1962 1994 1994 1 Emergency Repairs due to Hurricane Andrew as per FY 92 Dire Emergency Act authorization. Original authorized project completed in 1991. 2 First of scheduled 5-year Re-nourishment. 3 Fiscal year 1994 is the first of 4 annual Re-nourishments. APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL Claiborne L&D Millers Ferry L&D Jones Bluff Lock Allegheny River, PA and NY L&D No.2 L&D No. 3 L&D No. 4 L&D No. 5 L&D No.6 L&D No. 7 L&D No. 8 L&D No.9 81.8 2 Claiborne, AL 142.3 2 Camden, AL 254.4 2 Benton, AL 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 14.5 Cheswick, PA 24.2 Natrona, PA 30.4 Freeport, PA 36.3 Clinton, PA 45,7 Kittanning, PA 52.6 Templeton, PA 62.2 Rimer, PA Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, GA, AL and FL Jim Woodruff L&D 107.64 Chattahoochee, FL 82 George W. Andrews L&D 182.85 Columbia, GA 82 Walter F. George L&D 182.85 Fort Gaines, GA 82 Atlantic Intracoastal Waerway Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal Route: Great Bridge Lock 11.56 Great Bridge, VA Dismal Swamp Canal Route Deep Creek Lock 10.66 Deep Creek, VA South Mills Lock 33.26 South Mills, NC 84 600 30 16 84 600 45 16 84 600 45 16 56 360 11 11 56 360 13 12 56 360 10 9 56 360 12 10 56 360 12 11 56 360 13 11 56 360 18 14 56 360 22 11 450 33 14 450 25 19 450 88 18 13 Movable 13 13 12 11 10 11 11 10 10 11 3,1603 Movable 9,9003 Movable 14,9623 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed 14 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 1,393 1,436 876 780 1,140 916 984 950 5,924 620 13,371 72 530 3 167 167 None 52 300 12 127 127 None 52 300 12 127 127 None 1973 1969 1974 193420 193420 1927 1927 1928 1930 1931 1938 1957 1963 1963 1932 1940 1941 60.5 9 .200 103.1 .9 200 88.0 9 200 7.8 9 200 9.7 9 200 6.2 9 200 5.9 9 200 9.4 9 200 6.9 9 200 9.6 9 200 9.8 9 200 46.7 6 100 28.5 6 100 85.0 6 100 12 90 6 50 6 50 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) 1.5 3 Berwick, LA 72.53 New Iberia, LA Black Rock Channel & Tonawonda Harbor, NY Black Rock Lock 0.0 Buffalo, NY Black Warrior, Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL Coffeeville (Jackson) L&D 116.6 o0 Coffeeville, AL Demopolis Lock 13.210 Demopolis, AL Armstead I. Selden L&D 261.1o0 Eutaw, AL Wm. Bacon Oliver L&D (Replmt) Holt Lock and Dam John Hollis Bankhead L&D (New Lock) Canaveral Harbor, FL Canaveral Lock Cape Fear River, NC L&D No. 1 L&D No. 2 William O. Huske L&D Central and Southern Florid S-61 Lock S-65 Lock S-65A Lock 45 307 79 97 36 162 9 9 97 9 68 625 5 21.6 21.6 110 600 33 13 110 600 40 13 110 600 22 13 110 600 28 18 110 600 64 19 110 600 68 13 327.7 10 Tuscaloose, AL 347.0 10 Holt, AL 365.1 Adger, AL 2.7 Cocoa, FL 67.0 Kings Bluff, NC 40 200 99.0 Browns Landing, NC 40 200 123.0 Tolars Landing, NC 40 300 0.0 St. Cloud, FL 56.0 Frostproof, FL 46.0 Avon Park, FL 30 30 30 90 90 90 13 13 None Fixed None Movable Fixed 13 Movable 18 13 Fixed Movable 13 Fixed 1950 175 1913 1,185 1,485 1,832 800 1,138 1,170 90 600 3 14 14 None 11 9 9 9 12 12 9 9 9 266 Fixed Fixed Fixed None None None 275 229 220 1914 1965 1962 1962 n/a 1969- 1975 1965 1915 1917 1935 1963 1964 1967 8 80 34.5 6 50 7.1 21 200 96.6 9 200 47.9 9 200 77.0 9 200 8.9 9 200 18.1 9 200 42.7 9 200 12 125 32.0 8 100 24.0 8 100 20.0 8 100 8 28.0 3 10.0 3 20 30 30 Bayou Teche, LA Berwick Lock Keystone Lock I APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type i (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Central and Southern Florida (continued) S-65B Lock 32.0 Sebring, FL S-65C Lock 25.0 Sebring, FL S-193 0.0 Okeechobee, FL S-65D Lock 16.0 Okeechobee, FL S-65E Lock 12.0 Okeechobee, FL S-308B 38.7 Port Mayaca, FL S-310 0.0 Clewiston, FL Chicago Harbor, IL Chicago Lock w. Colorado River East Lock West Lock Columbia River, OR and WA Bonneville L&D Dalles L&D John Day L&D McNary L&D Cumberland River, KY and T Barkley Dam Cheatham L&D Old Hickory L&D Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir Fox River, WI DePere Lock DePere Dam Little Kaukauna Lock 0.0 Chicago, IL 444.8 Matagorda, TX 444.8 Matagorda, TX 146.0 Bonneville, OR 190.0 The Dalles, OR 215.0 Rufus, OR 292.0 Umatilla, OR 'N 30.6 Kuttawa, KY 148.7 Ashland City, TN 16.2 Old Hickory, TN 313.5 Carthage, TN 7.1 DePere, WI 7.2 DePere, WI 13.0 DePere, WI 30 90 6 6 6 30 90 7 6 6 50 60 3.5 7.5 7.5 30 90 6 6 6 30 90 5 6 6 56 400 14 14 14 50 60 5 13 13 80 600 4 23 23 75 1,200 59 157 157 75 1,200 59 157 157 None None None None None Movable Movable None None None 86 675 66 20 24 Movable 86 675 88 15 15 Movable 86 675 110 15 15 Movable 86 675 75 15 20 Movable 110 800 57 11 13 110 800 26 14 12 84 400 60 14 10 84 400 59 14 13 36 146 9 10 12 36 146 7 8 10 Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable 2,680 8,735 5,900 7,365 9,959 801 3,605 1,138 986 1965 1965 1969 1964 1964 1977 1980 1939 1954 1954 1938 1957 1968 1954 1964 1959 1957 1973 1936 1929 1938 14.0 3 30 7.0 3 30 4.0 6 60 9.0 3 30 4.0 3 30 5.0 8 100 .5 6 50 .15 21 470 12 125 12 125 47.5 27 300 25,0 14 250 76.0 14 250 64.0 14 250 118.1 9 150 67.5 9 150 97.3 9 150 71.9 9 150 5.9 6 100 6.2 6 100 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Fox River, WI (continued) Little Kaukauna Dam Rapide Croche Lock Rapide Croche Dam Kaukauna 5th Lock Kaukauna 4th Lock Kaukauna 3rd Lock Kaukauna 2nd Lock Kaukauna 1st Lock Kaukauna Dam Kaukauna Guard Lock Little Chute C Combined Lock Lower Upper Little Chute 2nd Lock Little Chute 1st (Guard) Lock Little Chute Dam Cedars Lock Cedars Dam Appleton 4th Lock Appleton Lower Dam Appleton 3rd Lock Appleton 2nd Lock Appleton Ist Lock Appleton Upper Dam Menasha Lock Menasha Dam 13.1 DePere, WI 19.2 Wrightstown, WI 19.3 Wrightstown, WI 22.8 Kaukauna, WI 23.1 Kaukauna, WI 23.3 Kaukauna, WI 23.4 Kaukauna, WI 23.6 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 26.4 Little Chute, WI 26.5 Little Chute, WI 26.6 Little Chute, WI 27.3 Little Chute, WI 27.4 Little Chute, WI 30.7 Appleton, WI 30.9 Appleton, WI 31.3 Appleton, WI 31.6 Appleton, WI 31.9 Appleton, WI 32.2 Appleton, WI 37.8 Menasha, WI 37.8 Menasha, WI 36 146 8 9 10 36 144 37 144 31 144 35 144 35 144 40 35 147 36 144 35 144 9 10 10 10 11 11 11 14 7 7 7 67 688 9 6666 Movable Movable Movable 588 461 603 966 35 35 144 10 7 7 35 144 8 8 8 35 144 35 145 34 145 9 10 10 6 77 9 66 34 144 8 7 8 Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable 562 654 549 691 401 1926 1934 1930 1898 1879 1879 1903 1883 1931 1891 1879 1879 1881 1904 1932 1888 1933 1907 1934 1900 1901 1884 1940 1899 1937 3.6 6 100 0.3 6 0.2 6 0.1 6 0.2 6 0.4 6 100 100 100 100 100 1.4 6 100 66 1.0 6 100 100 100 0.7 6 100 3.4 6 100 0.6 6 100 0.3 6 0.3 6 5.1 6 100 100 100 28.3 6 100 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Freshwater Bayou, LA Freshwater Bayou Lock Green and Barren Rivers, KY Green River: L&D No. I L&D No. 2 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Inner Harbor Navigation Channel Lock Harvey Lock Algiers Lock Bayou Bouef Lock Bayou Sorrel Lock Port Allen Lock Calcasieu Lock Brazos River Floodgates Hudson River, NY Troy L&D Illinois Waterway, IL LaGrange L&D Peoria L&D Starved Rock L&D Marseilles Lock Marseilles Dam Dresden Island Lock and Dam 19.08 Intracoastal City, LA 9.1 Spottsville, KY 63.1 Calhoun, KY 92.612 New Orleans, LA 98.312 Harvey, LA 88.012 Algiers, LA 93.3 Morgan City, LA 131.0'3 Plaquemine, LA 228.512 Port Allen, LA 238.513 Lake Charles, LA 404.1 13 Freeport, TX 153.8 Troy, NY 80.2 Beardstown, IL 157.7 Peoria, IL 231.0 Uitca, IL 244.6 Marseilles, IL 247.0 Marseilles, IL 271.5 Morris, IL 84 600 16 84 600 12 12 84 600 14 15 75 640 99 317 75 425 109 127 75 797 109 137 75 1,158 69 137 56 800 109 147 84 1,198 45 147 75 1,205 69 137 75 16 None 11 12 317 127 137 137 147 147 137 Fixed Fixed None None None None None None None 482 519 157 157 None 45 493 17 16 110 600 10 16 110 600 11 16 110 600 19 17 110 600 24 19 13 Fixed 13 12 14 14 Movable Movable Movable Movable 110 600 22 17 12 Movable 1,495 1,066 536 1,280 819 1968 12 125 1956 54.0 9 200 1956 45.4 9 200 1923 1934 1956 1954 1952 1961 1950 1943 1917 1939 1939 1933 1933 1933 12 150 12 125 16 150 16 150 12 125 12 125 16 200 12 125 2.2 14 200 77.5 9 300 73.3 9 300 13.6 9. 300 26.9 9 300 24.6 1,616 1933 14.5 9 300 l1 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Illinois Waterway, IL (continued) Brandon Road L&D 286.0 Joliet, IL Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL Thomas J. O'Brien L&D 326.5 Chicago, IL Inland Route, MI Crooked River Lock and Weir Kanawha River, WV Winfield L&D " Marmet L&D London L&D Kaskaskia River, IL Kaskaskia L&D Kentucky River, KY L&D No. 1 L&D No. 2 L&D No. 3 L&D No. 4 L&D No. 5 L&D No. 624 L&D No. 7 24 L&D No. 8 24 L&D No. 924 L&D No. 1024 L&DNo. 1124 L&DNo. 1224 L&D No. 1324 L&D No. 1424 30.0 Alanson, MI 31.1 Winfield, WV 67.8 Marmet, WV 82.8 London, WV .8 Ellis Grove, IL 4.0 Carrolton, KY 31.0 Lockport, KY 42.0 Gest, KY 65.0 Frankfort, KY 82.2 Tyrone, KY 96.2 High Bridge, KY 117.0 High Bridge, KY 139.9 Camp Nelson, KY 157.5 Valley View, KY 176.4 Ford, KY 201.0 Irvine, KY 220.9 Ravenna, KY 239.9 Willow, KY 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 110 600 34 110 600 40 18 12 14 15 Movable None 110 1,000 2 14 14 Movable 17.8 66 1 6.9 7.9 SSP Weir 56 56 56 360 28 360 24 360 24 18 18 18 12 12 12 Movable Movable Movable 84 600 32 18 11 Movable 38 38 38 38 38 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 145 145 145 145 145 147 147 146 148 148 148 148 148 148 8 14 13 13 15 14 15 19 17 17 18 17 18 17 889 6 10 9 9 11 11 9 10 10 10 9 15 6 7 66 6 76 7 6 666 6 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed 2,373 257 1933 1933 1960 83 1.967 834 707 707 130 424 400 465 534 556 413 350 257 362 472 208 240 248 248 1937 1934 1934 1973 1839 1939 1844 1844 1844 1891 1897 1900 1907 1907 1906 1910 1915 1917 5.1 9 300 9 300 6.9 9 300 4.0 5 30 36.7 9 15.0 9 7.8 9 300 300 300 35.0 9 225 27.0 6 11.0 6 23.0 '6 17.2 6 14.0 6 20.8 6 22.9 6 17.6 6 18.9 6 24.6 6 19.9 6 19.0 6 9.1 6 9.6 6 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Lake Washington Ship Canal Hiram M. Chittenden Lock Large Lock Small Lock McClellan-Kerr Arkansas Norell L&D Wilbur D. Mills, Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 Joe Hardin L&D (No. 3) Emmett O. Sanders L&D (No. 4) . L&D No. 5 David D. Terry L&D Murray L&D Toad Suck Ferry L&D Arthur V. Ormond L&D No. 9 Dardanelle L&D Ozark-JetaTaylor Lock * James W. Trimble L&D N(o. 13) W. D. Mayo L&D Robert S. Kerr L&D and Reservoir Webbers Falls L&D Chouteau L&D Newt Graham L&D 1.3 Seattle, WA 1.3 Seattle, WA 80 28 ; River Navigation System, AR and OK 10.3 Arkansas Post, AR 110 13.3 Arkansas Post, AR 110 40.5 Arkansas Post, AR 50.2 Grady, AR 110 66.0 Pine Bluff, AR 110 86.3 Redfield, AR 110 108.1 Little Rock, AR 110 125.4 Little Rock, AR 110 155.9 Conway, AR 110 176.9 Morrilton, AR 110 205.5 Russellville, AR 110 256.8 Ozark, AR 110 292.8 Fort Smith, AR 110 319.6 Fort Smith, AR 110 336.2 Sallisaw, OK 110 366.6 Webbers Falls, OK 110 401.4 Muskogee, OK 110 421.7 Inola, OK 110 760 26 33.5 29 123 26 166 16 Movable Movable 600 30 16 15 Fixed 235 235 *4,577 600 20 18 14 Movable *42,073 600 20 18 14 Movable *6,1110 600 600 600 600 600 14 17 18 18 16 600 19 600 54 600 34 600 20 600 21 600 600 600 600 48 30 21 21 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 19 18 19 15 15 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 15 14 14 14 16 14 14 Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable *5,745 *7,455 *8,890 (3,930 *1,580 *1,505 **1,815 *12,480 *4,725 7,400 7,230 4,370 11,690 1,630 1916 1916 1967 1967 1968 1968 1968 1968 1968 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 1970 1970 1970 1970 1970 17.0 34 150 17.0 34 150 3.0 9 250 36.9 9 250 15.8 9 250 20.3 9 250 21.8 9 250 17.3 9 250 30.5 9 250 21.0 9 250 28.6 9 250 51.3 9 250 36.0 9 250 26.8 9 250 16.6 9 250 30.4 9 250 34.8 9 250 20.2 9 150 23.7 9 150 Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers L&D No. 27 185.114 Granite City, IL 110 1,200 21 16 15 Fixed 3,240 1953 17.8 9 200 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN L&D No. 26 26 202.9'5 Alton, IL 110 600 24 19 360 24 16 Melvin Price L&D L&D No. 25 L&D No. 24 L&D No.22 L&D No. 21 L&D No. 20 L&D No. 19 L&D No. 18 L&D No. 17 First Lock L&D No. 16 L&D No. 15 200.8 Alton, IL 241.4'5 Cap Au Gris, MO 273.4'5 Clarksville, MO 301.2's Saverton, MO 324.9 's Quincy, IL 343.2 5 Canton, MO 364.2 1s Keokuk, IA 410.5 '5 Burlington, IA 437.1 1s New Boston, IL 200.8 Alton, IL 457.2's Muscatine, IA 482.9's Rock Island, IL 493.1 5 LeClaire, IA 493.3 15 LeClaire, IA 522.5 '5 Clinton, IA 556.7 15 Bellevue, IA 583.015 Dubuque, IA 615. 1 'SGuttenberg, IA 647.9's Lynxville, IA 679.2 5 Genoa, WI 7 0 2 .5 15 Dresbach, MN 714.3's Trempealeau, WI 728.5'5 Winona, MN 738.115 Minneiska, MN 752.815 Alma, WI 796.9'5 Red Wing, MN 815.2 5S Hastings, MN 847.6 s Minneapolis,, MN St. Paul 110 1,200 24 23 110 600 15 19 110 600 15 19 110 600 10 18 110 600 10 17 110 600 10 15 110 1,200 38 15 110 600 10 17 100 600 8 16 110 600 24 23 110 600 9 17 110 600 16 27 110 360 16 27 80 320 11 18 110 600 11 21 110 600 11 19 110 600 9 17 110 600 11 19 110 600 8 15 110 600 9 16 110 600 11 22 110 600 8 18 110 600 7 17 110 600 6 18 110 600 9 18 110 600 7 17 110 600 8 17 110 600 12 22 56 400 38 13 10 10 18 12 12 14 12 12 13 14 13 18 12 11 II1 11 14 13 13 13 12 13 14 12 13 13 12 13 14 13 8 Movable Moveable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Fixed Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Fixed 1,725 1160 1,296 4,280 1,024 1,066 2,144 4,434 1,350 921 1,099 1,203 1,343 1,066 849 1,278 763 811 935 940 893 682 1,619 1,367 365 822 574 1938 1990 1939 1940 1938 1938 1936 1913 1937 1939 1937 1934 1922 1939 1939 1938 1937 1937 1937 1937 1937 1936 1936 1935 1935 1938 1930 1932 38.5 9 300 40.6 9 32.0 9 27.8 9 23.7 9 18.3 9 21.0 9 46.3 9 26.6 9 20.1 9 300 300 300 NS NS NS NS NS NS 25.7 9 NS 10.4 9 NS 29.2 9 34.2 9 26.3 9 32.1 9 32.8 9 31.3 9 23.3 9 11.8 9 14.2 9 9.6 9 14.7 9 44.1 9 18.3 9 32.4 9 5.7 9 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS L&D No. 14 L&D No. 13 L&D No. 12 L&D. 11 L&D No. 10 L&D No. 9 L&D No. 8 L&D No. 7 L&D No. 6 L&D No. 5A L&D No. 5 L&D No.4 L&D No. 3 L&D No. 2 L&D No. I APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) . (feet) St. Anthony Falls Lower L&D Upper L&D 853.3 Is Minneapolis, MN 853.9' Minneapolis, MN 56 400 25 14 56 400 49 16 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR and OK L&D No. 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 56 360 9 16 110 720 9 16 L&D No. 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 56 360 8 12 56 720 8 12 L&D No. 4 41.5 Monessen, PA 56 360 17 20 56 720 17 20 Maxwell L&D 61.2 Maxwell, PA 84 720 20 21 84 720 20 21 Grays Landing L&D 82.0 Grays Landing, PA 84 720 15 26 L&D No. 7 85.0 Greensboro, PA 56 360 15 11 Point Marion, Lock 8 Replacement Morgantown L&D Hildebrand L&D Opekiska L&D Ohio River L&D No. 53 L&D No. 52 Smithland L&D 90.8 Point Marion, PA 102.0 Morgantown, WV 108.0 Morgantown, WV 115.4 Morgantown, WV 18.4 Mound City, IL 42.1 Brookport, IL 35.3 Smithland, KY 84 720 19 16 84 600 17 18 84 600 21 14 84 600 22 18 110 600 12 15 110 1,200 12 15 110 600 12 15 110 1,200 12 15 110 1,200 22 34 1,200 22 34 10 14 16 16 12 12 11 11 15 15 18 10 16 15 15 14 10 10 11 11 12 12 Movable Fixed Fixed Fixed Movable Movable Fixed Fixed Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Temp Lock Movable Temp Lock Movable 188 3,584 1956 1963 748 1951 19532 670 1907 190721 535 1932 193221 460 1964 1964 576 1994 610 192521 560 410 530 366 3,978 1980 3,073 3,560 1 9 2 5 2122 1950 1959 1964 1929 1928 1969 1980 0.6 9 100 3.8 9 100 12.6 9 300 17.7 9 300 19.7 9 300 23.8 9 300 8.8 9 300 5.8 9 300 11.2 9 300 6.0 9 300 7.4 9 300 7.0 9 300 23.7 9 300 35.8 9 300 99.7 9 300 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Ohio River (continued) Uniontown L&D Newburgh L&D Cannelton L&D McAlpine L&D Markland L&D Cpt Anthony Meldahl L&D Greenup L&D Robert C. Byrd L&D Racine L&D Belleville L&D Willow Island L&D Hannibal L&D Pike Island L&D 135.0 Uniontown, KY 204.9 Newburgh, IN 260.3 Cannelton, IN 374.2 Louisville, KY 449.5 Markland, IN 544.8 Chilo, OH 640.0 Greenup, KY 701.8 Hogsett, WV 743.5 Letart Falls, OH 777.1 Reedsville, OH 819.3 Waverly, WV 854.6 New Martinsville , WV 896.7 Warwood, WV 110 1,200 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 56 360 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 22 34 22 34 16 32 16 32 25 38 25 38 37 49 37 19 37 19 35 50 35 50 30 45 30 45 30 45 30 45 23 18 23 18 22 37 22 37 22 37 22 37 20 35 20 35 21 38 21 38 21 17 21 17 12 12 16 16 13 13 12 11 I1 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 17 17 18 18 Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable 3,516 2,272 1,965 8,627 1,395 1,756 1,287 1,132 1,202 1,206 1,128 1,098 1,306 1975 1975 1972 1961 1921 1930 1963 1963 1962 1962 1962 1992 1970 1969 1973 1972 1965 69.9 9 300 55.4 9 300 116.3 9 400 75.3 9 300 95.3 9 300 9 300 95,2 9 300 61.8 9 300 41.7 9 300 33.6 9 300 36.4 9 300 35.3 9 1,000 36.0 9 300 29.9 9 300 0-, N APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Ohio River (continued) New Cumberland L&D Montgomery Island L&D Dashields L&D Emsworth L&D 926.6 Stratton, OH 949.3 Industry, PA 967.7 Glenwillard, PA 974.8 Emsworth, PA Okeechobee Waterway, FL St. Lucie L&D 15.1 Moore Haven Lock 78.0 Ortona L&D 93.6 W. P. Franklin Lock & Control Structure 121.4 Old River, LA Old River Lock 304.0 Ouachita and Black Rivers,AR & LA Jonesville L&D (Black River) 25.0 Columbia L&D (Ouachita River) 117.2 H. K. ThatcherLock (Ouachita River) 281.7 Felsenthal Lock (Ouachita River) 226.8 Stuart, FL Moore Haven, FL LaBelle, FL Fort Myers, FL Simmesport, LA Jonesville, LA Columbia, LA Calion, AR Felsenthal, AR 110 1,200 21 17 110 600 21 17 110 600 18 16 56 360 18 16 110 600 10 13 56 360 10 13 110 600 18 17. 56 360 18 16 50 250 13 14 50 250 2 10 50 250 11 12 56 400 3 14 75 1,200 35 11 84 600 30 18 84 600 18 18 84 600 12 18 84 600 13 18 15 15 15 15 18 18 13 13 12 11 11 14 Movable Movable Fixed Movable Movable None Movable Movable 11 None 14 13 13 13 Movable Fixed Movable Movable 1,315 1,379 1,585 1,717 170 104 1,150 22.7 9 18.4 9 7.1 9 6.2 9 15.1 8 15.6 8 15.6 8 7.9 8 300 300 300 300 80 90 90 90 1961 1936 1929 1921 1941 1953 1937 1965 1963 1972 1972 1984 1984 12 125 450 400 350 350 92.2 9 106.2 9 50.3 9 55.2 9 100 100 100 100 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Pearl River, MS and LA Lock I Lock 2 Lock 3 Red River Waterway Lindy Claiboine Boggs Lock John H. Overton Lock Lock 3 S Lock 4 Jow S. Qffonwe Sacramento River, CA Barge Canal Lock Snake River, WA Ice Harbor L&D Little Goose L&D Lower Granite L&D Lower Monumental L&D St. Mary's River, MI South Canal: MacArthur Lock Poe Lock 29.4 17 Pearl River, LA 40.7 7 Bush, LA 43.917 Sun, LA 43.8 Marksville, LA 86.5 Alexandria, LA 141.0 Colfax, LA 206 Coushatta, LA 247.5 Shreveport, LA 42.8 West Sacramento, CA 9.7 Pasco, WA 70.3 Starbuck, WA 107.5 Pomeroy, WA 41.6 Kahlotus, WA 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 65 310 26.7 10 65 310 15 10 65 310 11 10 84 685 36 22 84 685 24 23.5 84 685 31 25 84 5685 25 25 84 685 25 25 10 10 10 13 15 18 18 18 None None None Movable Movable Movable Movable Novable 550 300 360 349 349 86 600 4 13 13 None 86 675 100 15 86 675 101 15 86 675 100 15 86 675 98 15 80 800 22 31 110 1,200 22 32 20 20 20 Movable Movable Novable 20 Movable 31 None 32 None 1951 1951 1951 1984 1987 1991 1944 1994 1961 1961 1970 1975 1969 1943 1968 11.1 7 3.2 7 13.2 7 80 80 80 44.2 9 200 74.3 9 200 52.5 9 200 41.5 9 200 36.0 9 200 1.5 13 120 41.6 14 250 37.2 14 250 38.0 14 250 28.1 14 250 27 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) St. Mary's River, MI (continued) North Canal: Davis Lock 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI Sabin Lock 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 80 1,350 22 80 1,350 22 24 23 None 24 23 None Savannah, GA New Savannah Bluff L&D Tennessee River, TN, AL, MS, and KY 18 Kentucky L&D Pickwick Landing L&D Auxiliary Lock Main Lock 187.2 Augusta, GA 22.4 Gilbertsville, KY 206.7 Hamburg, TN 206.7 Hamburg, TN 56 360 15 110 600 56 110 600 55 110 1,000 55 Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, AL and MS Gainesville L&D 49.1 Gainesville, AL 110 600 36 Aliceville L&D 89.8 Aliceville, AL 110 600 27 Columbus L&D 117.6 Columbus, MS 110 600 27 Aberdeen L&D 140.4 Aberdeen, MS 110 600 27 Lock A & Spillway 154.1 Amory, MS 110 600 30 Lock B & Spillway 159.3 Smithville, AL 110 600 25 Lock C & Spillway 174.0 Fulton, MS 110 600 25 Lock D & Spillway 181.4 Fulton, MS 110 600 30 Lock E & Spillway 189.7 Belmont, MS 110 600 30 Bay Springs L&D 194.9 Tupelo, MS 110 600 84 14 12 Movable 11 13 Tainter 10 10 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 13 13 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 Bulkhead Bulkhead Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable None 360 7,976 7,385 7,385 15,460 14,790 10,040 10,640 10,640 1936 16.2 9 -90 1944 184.3 9 300 1937 1984 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 52.7 9 300 52.7 9 300 49.1 9 300 40.7 9 300 27.8 9 300 22.8 9 300 13.7 9 300 14.7 9 300 7.4 9 300 8.3 9 300 5.2 9 300 64.5 9 300 Cl 1914 1919 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Authorized Locks Dams Channel Lift Avail. at Miles Community Width Length Normal Depth on Sills Above in of for Pool Length Year Len Depth Width Project Mouth Vicinity Chamber Width Level Upper Lower Type ' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, AL and MS (continued) Wilson L&D Main Lock 259.4 Florence, AL 110 600 94 13 Auxiliary Lock 259.4 Florence, AL 60 292 94 11 General Joe Wheeler L&D Main Lock Auxiliary Lock Guntersville L&D Main Lock Auxiliary Lock Nickajack L&D Chickamauga L&D Watts Bar L&D Fort Loudon L&D Melton HilL&D (Clinch River) 274.9 Florence, AL 274.9 Florence, AL 349.0 Guntersville, AL 349.0 Guntersville, AL 424.7 Ghattanooga, TN 471.0 Chattanooga, TN 529.9 Breendenton, TN 602.3 Lenoir City, TN 23.1 Kingston, TN Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR Lock No. 1 26.0 Oregon City, OR Lock No. 2 26.0 Oregon City, OR Lock No. 3 26.0 Oregon City, OR Lock No. 4 26.0 Oregon City, OR Guard Lock 26.4 Oregon City, OR 110 600 48 13 60 400 48 15 110 600 39 13 60 400 39 13 110 600 39 13 60 360 49 10 60 360 58 12 60 360 72 12 75 400 54 13 13 11 13 13 13 12 11. 14 12 12 Bulkhead Bulkhead Bulkhead Bulkhead Tainter Tainter Tainter Tainter Tainter Tainter 13 Tainter 40 210 20 40 210 10 40 210 10 40 210 10 40 210 10 3,728 3,728 1959 1927' 5,738 1963 5,738 1962 3,837 3,837 3,763 5,654 2,646 3,687 1,072 None None None None None 1965 1939 1967 1940 1942 1943 1963 1872 1872 1872 1872 1872 15.5 9 300 15.5 9 300 74.1 9 300 74.1 9 300 75.7 9 300 75.7 9 300 46.3 9 300 58.9 9 300 72.4 9 300 49.8 9 300 38.2 9 30019 6 150 .4 23.6 6 CI l J APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 1 Fixed; crest without gates or other facility to control streamflow. Movable; includes any type of crest gates, tainter gates, wickets, or others to control streamflow. 2 Above mouth of Mobile River. 3 Includes length of earth dikes. 4 From mouth of Apalachicola River. 5 From mouth of Chattahoochee River. 6 Above Norfolk, VA. 7 With reference to mean low water, or low mean Gulf as case may be. 8 From Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. 9 Average high and low water conditions, lift varying widely, depending on tides and river stages. 10 From foot of Government Street, Mobile, AL. 11 From mouth of St. Johns River. 12 Above Head of Passes. 13 From New Orleans, LA. 14 Salt water barrier in down position. Will clear 15-foot vessels in normal position. 15 Above the Ohio River. 16 Channel completed to depth of 6.5 feet. 17 From mouth of West Pearl River. 18 Tennessee River locks operated by the Corps, dams operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority. 19 300-foot width from lock to mouth of Clinch River and 175-foot width upstream from lock to Clinton, TN. 20 Dates shown represent replacement structures. 21 Dates shown represent reconstruction for locks and dams Nos. 2-8 inclusive. 22 Dam was rebuilt in 1959. 23 Old 110' X 358' lock replaced in 1957. 24 Inoperable, caretaker status September 7, 1982. 251 noperable, caretaker status October 1, 1981. 26 Lock and Dam 26 has been removed and replaced by Melvin Price Locks and Dam * Includes length of left and right embankments ** Includes length of left embankment APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam (Sec 107) ....................... AIWW - Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC..... Aquadilla Harbor, PR (Sec 107) ....................................... Baltimore Harbor (50 foot), MD & VA ............................ Barnegat Inlet, NJ ....................................... ........ Bayou LaBatre, AL ....................................... ....... Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR & WA ......................... Brazos Island Harbor, TX ....................................... foot depth Canaveral Harbor Deepening, FL ..................................... Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) ................... Channel to Newport News, VA (1986 Mod.) ................... Charleston Harbor, SC .................... ...... Cleveland Harbor, OH (NCH/Pier 34).............................. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR ..................................... .... ......... Columbia River (DDA), Vancouver, WA........................... Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ..................................... Delaware River in the Vicinity of Camden, NJ (37' proj)) . Delaware River in the Vicinity of Camden, NJ (40' proj) .. Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, IN and KY ..................................... ........... Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VW............................... Freeport Harbor, TX ....................................... ...... Grays Harbor, WA ....................................... ..... Grays Landing Lock & Dam (Lock & Dam 7) M onongahela River, PA ............................................ Gulfport Harbor, MS ........................ ........ ...... Helena Harbor, AR ...................................... Hempstead Harbor, NY .................... ... Illinois W aterway Four Locks........................................ Josias River, ME (Sec 107) ..................... Kill Van Kull - Newark Bay, NJ and NY ......................... Kodiak Harbor, AK .................................... ...... 1987 1974 1993 1987 1987 1993 1985 1992 1993 1967 1987 1988 1992 1991 1994 1972 1987 1992 1984 1988 1987 1990 1986 1991 1989 1992 1993 1994 1986 1993 1989 1986 ' 1990 1968 1989 1994 1994 1990 1988 1992 1988 1994 1993 1994 1989 2000 1995 1993 1992 1997 1995 1994 1994 Indefinite Indefinite 1994 1993 Indefinite 1994 1994 1988 1993 1995 1988 1994 1998 1995 1995 1995 1994 1996 1994 1995 1996 Dredging and breakwater Replacement of existing bridges Breakwater Deepdraft channel deepening Jetty realignment and dredging Channel Dredging New larger lock Enlarging and Deepening Deep Draft Channel to 42 Navigation Channels Deferred anchorage construction Dredge 50 ft. Channel. Deepen to 55 feet Dredging and channel wideningand deepening Recreation Navigation Construction of support structure Anchorage Construction Dredging Dredging Dredging Protection of a National Natural Landmark Dredging Dredging, jetty construction, and recreation Navigation channel widening and deepening Construct new lock & dam to replace existing lock & dam 7 Deepen Channel New Slackwater Harbor Removal of derelect barges Major rehabilitation of locks and dams Deepening channel and anchorage Deepdraft channel - widening and deepening Breakwater and navigation channel widening APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI..................................... Lock and Dams 3, 5A, 6,7,8 and 9, MN, WI and IA .......... Lock and Dam 13, IL ..................................... ..... Lock and Dam 15, IL ..................................... ..... Lock and Dam 20, MO ...................................... .... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR.. Melvin Price Lock and Dam, MO ....................................... Miami Harbor Channel, FL ...................................... Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers IL and MO ................................................................... Mississippi River, Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA ...................................... ..... Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS and MO..................................... ... River Bank Stabliazation and Navigation Project Mouth of Colorado River, TX (Gulf Intracoastal W aterway) ....................................................... Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI ........................................... New York Harbor, NY and NJ ......................................... Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.) ...................... Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1986 Mod) ....................... Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel, VA .................. Oakland Harbor, CA ....................................... ...... Olmsted Locks and Dam, IL & KY .................................. Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA............................. Pascagoula Harbor, MS.................... ..... Point Marion, Lock & Dam 8 Monongahela River, PA ........................................ Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA........ and realignment Richmond Harbor, CA ........................................... Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, Ohio River .................... 1988 1989 1993 1993 1986 1963 1974 1991 1910 1987 1992 1984 1985 1976 1966 1987 1987 1987 1992 1964 1994 1986 1974 1985 1985 1988 1938 1934 1936 1970 1990 1987 2 1987 Incremental 1967 1989 1989 1984 19844 1992 1988 1999 1996 1996 1994 2000 1997 1995 2000 Breakwater Major rehabilitation of electrical/mechanical systems Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Major rehabilitatino of lock and dam Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam Locks and dams Replacement Navigation Channels & Turning Basin Regulating works Indefinite 3 Dredging 55-foot channel Being Mitigation of fish and wildlife Determined losses from construction and operation of Missouri 1994 1987 Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite 1997 2006 Indefinite 1996 1994 Breakwaters, dredging, and recreation Breakwater repair Collection and removal of drift Deferred anchorage const. Dredge 50 ft. channel and deepen to 55 feet Dredge outbound element and deepen to 55 feet Channel deepening and widening turning basin Navigation Replacement of six locks and dams, channel deepening to 9 feet and realignment Channel dredging and construction of a new turning basin Replaces existing 56x360' lock chamber with new 84'x720' chamber Indefinite5 Lock and dam construction. Channel improvement 1997 1999 Channel deepening and turning basin Replacement of existing locks and major rehabilitation of the dam APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1994 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Rudee Inlet, VA ........................................ ......... Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA ............. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA ............................ San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ..................................... Sanama Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project, CA ....................................... .......... Savannah Harbor Deepening, GA ................................. Savannah Harbor Widening, GA ...................................... Shinnecock Inlet, NY ....................................... Sitka Harbor, AK ..................................... ........ St. George Ch annel Extension, AK ................................. Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel).................................. Tenn River, Port of Florence......................................... Thimble Shoal Channel, VA .......................................... Toussant River, Caroll Twsp. , OH (Sec 107) .................... Ventura Harbor, CA ..................................... ....... Wallisville Lake, TX ...................................... ...... Westport-Puget Island, OR & WA ................................... Winfield Locks and Dam, Kanawha River, WV................. Wood Island Harbor, Biddeford, ME ............................... 1990 1986 1991 1971 1993 1993 1990 1990 1993 1994 1976 1994 1987 1991 1993 1967 1994 1990 1992 1991 1994 1989 1994 1991 Being Determined Indefinite Being Determined Being Determined 1994 1992 1995 1997 1996 1987 1995 Indefinite 1992 1994 1997 1994 1997 1993 Dredge 7 foot channel Deep draft channel, widening and deepening Dredging and breakwater Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging Restoration of Tidal Wetlands on a 348 acre site Channel deepening Widening channel Dredging and repair of jetties Navigation Channel Dredging Dredging Channel Improvements Dredge 50 ft outbound element and dredge to 55 feet Dredging Dredging; breakwater and groin construction Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreational) Channel Excavation Construction of new lock Improvement Dredging I Walter Jones, Joseph P. Knapp and Core Creek completed; Hobucken has been funded for construction; and Fairfield has been funded for design. 2 Phase I, forty-five foot channel to New Orleans, LA. Forty-five foot channel to Mile 181 (Donaldsonville, LA) placed in useful operation in 1988. Phase II, forty-five foot channel from mile 181 to Baton Rouge placed in useful operation in 1994. 3 Awaiting further PCA's to extend project to Baton Rouge, LA, and to go deeper than 45 feet. 4 Lock and Dam No. I placed in useful operation in 1984. Lock and Dam No. 2 in 1987. and Lock and Dam No. 3 in 1992. Lock and Dam Nos. 4 and 5 in 1994. 5 Schedule for completion of entire project is indefinite. Hower, the project opened to 9-foot navigation on 31 December 1994. APPENDIX E MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Flood Control and/or Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Capability in useful (ac re-feet) I Operation CY Initial Existing Ultimate Power Installation Installation Project Height Length in FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (feet) (feet) Albeni Falls, ID Pend Oreille Newport,WA Allatoona Lake,GA Etowah Cartersville,GA Barkley Dam & Cumberland Frand Rivers, Lake Barkley, KY KY & TN Beaver Lake, AR White Eureka Springs, Big Bend Dam (Lake Sharpel), SD Missouri Chamberlain,SD Blakely Mountain Ouachita Mt. Pine, AR Dam-Lake (L- Ouachita - Bonneville L&D Columbia Bonneville,O Lake Bonneville, OR & WA Broken Bow Lake, Mountain Fork Broken Bow, OK OK Buford Dam, Chattahoochee Buford, GA Lanier, GA Bull Shoals Lake White MountainHonr AR & MO AR Clarence Cannon Salt Perry, MO Dam Carters Dam, GA Coosawatte Carters, GA Center Hill Lake, Caney Fork Lancaster,TN TN 1,153,000 670,000 2,082,000 1,952,000 ) 1,883,000 2,768,000 R Cleatham L&D, TN Cumberland Ashland City, TN Chief Joseph Dam Columbia Bridgeport, WA (Rufus Woods Lake),WA Cooper River, Santee St. Stephen, SC Charleston Harbor, SC Cordell Hull L&D, Cumberland Carthage, TN TN Cougar Lake, OR S.Fork McKenzie Blue River, OR 537,000 1,368,230 2,554,000 5,408,000 1,428,000 472,756 2,092,000 104,000 593,000 2,560,000 310,900 1952 1950 1964 1963 1964 1953 1938 1968 1956 1952 1983 1975 1948 1952 1955 N/A 1973 1955 42,600 42,600 1950 74,000 74,000 1966 130,000 130,000 1965 112,000 112,000 NFPR C 90 1,055 FPRW C 190 1,250 NPFR CE 157 9,959 FPSR CE 228 2,575 1965 468,000 468,000 FPRIW E 95 10,570 1956 75,000 75,000 FPRW E 235 1,100 1938 1,145,700 1,145,700 NPR C 122 2,690 1970 100,000 100,000 FPWSR E 225 2,750 1957 86,000 86,000 NFPW E 192 5,400 1953 340,000 340,000 FPR C 258 2,256 1985 58,000 58,000 FNPRSW CE 138 1,700 1975 500,000 500,000 FPRW ER 450 1,950 1951 135,000 135,000 FPR CE 250 2,160 1958 36,000 36,000 1956 2,457,384 2,457,384 1985 84,000 84,000 1974 100,000 100,000 NPR C 75 801 PIR C 230 5,998 NPW CE 86 876 NPR CE 93 1,306 219,000 1963 1964 25,000 Project River Community in Vicinity ___ __ __ ~ __ _ _ ~_ ~_ ___ ~ ~ _~__ _~__~_ ie 64,600 NFPRI ER 445 1,738 APPENDIX E MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Flood Control and/or Nay. Feature Placed in useful Operation CY Initial Power in FY Existing Installation (KW) Ultimate Installation Project Height Length (KW) Functions Type 2 (feet) (feet) Dale Hollow Lake, TN & KY Dardanelle L&D, AR DeGray Lake, AR Denison Dam(Lake Texoma), TX & OK Detroit Lake, OR, including Big Cliff Lake, OR Dworshak Dam & Reservoir, ID Eufaula Lake, OK Fort Gibson Lake Fort Peck Lake, MT Fort Randal Dam (Lake Francis Case), SD Garrison Dam ( Lake Sakakawea), ND Gavins Point Dam (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NE Green Peter Lake,OR, including Foster Lake, OR Obey Arkansas Caddo Red North Santiam N. Fork, Clearwater Canadian Grand (Neosho) Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Middle Santiam Celina, TN Dardanelle, AR Arkadelphia, AR Denison, TX Mill City, OR Orofino, ID Eufaula, OK Ft. Gibson, OK Glasglow, MT Lake Andes, SD Riverdale, ND Yankton, SD Sweet Home, OR 1,706,000 486,200 831,900 5,194,163 461,000 3,453,000 3,825,400 1,284,400 18,909,000 5,574,000 24,137,000 504,000 491,000 1943 1969 1969 1944 1953 1972 1964 1949 1938 1953 1954 1956 1967 1949 1965 1972 1945 54,000 124,000 68,000 70,000 54,000 124,000 108,000 175,000 FPR NPR FNPRS FPRSN C C EE 200 68 243 165 1,717 2,683 3,400 17,200 1954 118,000 118,000 NFPRI C 382 1,528 1973 1964 1953 1944 1954 400,000 90,000 45,000 185,250 320,000 620,000 90,000 67,500 185,250 320,000 PNFR FNPS FP NFPRIW NFPRIW Co CE CE E E 1956 430,000 430,000 NFPRIW 717 114 110 251 165 3,300 3,200 2,990 21,026 10,700 E 210 11,300 1957 100,000 100,000 NFPRIW E 74 8,700 1967 100,000 100,000 PFNIR C 340 1,380 Project River Community in Vicinity Total Storage Capability (ac re-feet) I _~_ __ _ ___ ~HI__ _____ ~I__ F ~__ __ __ __ __ _~~ APPENDIX E MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Flood Control and/or Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Initial Existing Ultimate Capability in useful Power Installation Installation Project Height Length (ac re-feet) I Operation CY in FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (feet) (feet) Greers Ferry Little Red Heber Spings Lake, AR Harry S. Truman Osage Warsaw, MO Dam & Res. Hartwell Lake, Savannah Hartwell, GA GA & SC Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork Oakridge, OR OR Wilamette Ice Harbor L&D Snake Pasco, WA (Lake Sacajawea), WA W J. Percy Priest Stones Nashville, TN Dam & Reservoir, TN J. Strom Thurmond Savannah Augusta, GA Dam & Reservoir GA & SC Jim Woodruff Dam Appalachicola Chattahoochee, FL (Lake Seminole), FL, GA & AL John Day L&D Columbia Rufus, OR (Lake Umatilla), OR & WA John H. Kerr Roanoke Boydton, VA Dam & Reservoir, NC & VA Keystone Lake, Arkansas Tulsa, OK OK Lake Greeson, AR Little Missouri Murfreesboro,AR Laurel River, KY Laurel London, KY Libby Dam, Lake Kootenai Libby, MT Koocanusa, MT Little Goose L&D Snake Starbuck, WA (Lake Bryan), WA 2,844,000 5,202,000 2,842,700 356,000 417,000 652,000 2,900,000 367,300 2,500,000 2,750,300 1,672,613 407,900 435,600 5,809,000 565,000 1962 1964 96,000 1982 1982( 3 160,000 1961 1961 1962 1967 1952 1957 1968 1952 1964 1950 1973 1972 1970 1962 344,000 1962 30,000 1961 603,000 1970 28,000 1953 282,000 1957 30,000 96,000 FPRS C 243 1,704 160,000 FPRW CE 96 5,000 344,000 NFPRS CE 204 17,880 30,000 NFPRI GE 304 2,150 603,000 NPRI CG 130 2,790 28,000 FPRW CE 147 2,716 282,000 NFPRSW CE 200 5,680 30,000 NPRW CE 67 6,150 1969 2,160,000 2,700,000 NPRFI CE 161 5,900 1953 204,000 204,000 FPRW CE 144 22,285 1968 70,000 1950 25,500 1978 61,000 1975 525,000 1970 810,000 70,000 FNPWS E 121 4,600 25,500 FPRW C 183.5 941 61,000 FPRW R 282 1,420 840,000 FPR C 420 3,055 810,000 NPRI CG 165 2,655 Project River Community in Vicinity __ - -- -C---~------- ~-----~lC~-I -- ---- - ------ -- ---- --- APPENDIX E MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Ultimate Installation Project (KW) Functions Height Length Type 2 (feet) (feet) Lookout Point Lake including Dexter Lake, OR Lost Creek Lake, OR Lower Granite L&D, WA Lower Monumental L&D (Lake Herbert G. West), WA McNaryL&D OR & WA Millers Ferry" L&D, AL Mississippi Delta Region, LA (Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion) Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, FSM New Melones Lake, CA4 Narfork Lake, AR & MO Oahe Dam (Lake Oahe), SD & ND Old Hickory L&D, TN Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D, AR Philpott Lake, VA Middle Fork Willamette Rogue Snake Snake Columbia Alabama Mississippi Lowell, OR Trail, OR Pomeroy, WA Kahlotus, WA Umatilla, OR Camden, AL Braithwaite, LA 483,000 465,000 484,000 376,000 1,550,000 331,8090 Nanpil River Pohnpei, FSM Stanislaus North Fork Missouri Cumberland Arkansas Roanoke Oakdale, CA Norfolk, AR Pierre, SD Hendersonville, TN Ozark, AR Bassett, VA 2,400,000 1,983,000 23,337,000 545,000 148,400 318,500 1954 1977 1975 1969 1953 1969 1991 1987 1978 1943 1959 1954 1969 1951 1955 135,000 � 135,000 NFPRI CE 243 3,381 1977 1975 1969 49,000 810,000 810,000 1954 980,000 1979 75,000 1988 2,000 1979 1944 1962 1957 1973 1954 300,000 80,550 595,000 100,000 100,000 14,000 49,000 810,000 810,000 980,000 75,000 2,000 300,000 163,000 595,000 100,000 100,000 14,000 DFPISWR NPRIF NPRI NPRI NPRW W CE CO CG CG CE CE 345 146 135 181 90 38.5 P C 17 FIPRW ER 625 FPRS C 216 NFPRIW E 245 NPR CE 98 NPR C 58 FPR C 220 Project River Community in Vicinity Total Storage Capability (ac re-feet) I Flood Control and/or Nay. Feature Placed in useful Operation CY Initial Power in FY Existing Installation (KW) 3,600 3,200 3,800 7,365 11,380 371 70 1,560 2,624 9,300 3,605 2,480 892 ------ -- -- -- ------- ~~- __ -- -- ---~--~ -~~- -~-~- ~~--- -- ----- -- --- APPENDIX E MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Ultimate Installation Project Height Length (KW) Functions Type 2 (feet) (feet) Richard B. Russell Robert F. Henry L&D, AL Robert S. Kerr L&D and Reservoir, OK Sam Rayburn Dam & Reservoir, TX St. Mary's Riv, MI Snettisham, AK 5 Stockton Lake, MO Table Rock o Lake, AR & MO Tenkiller Lake, OK The Dalles L&D (Lake Celilo), WA & OR Walter F. George L&D, GA & FL Webbers Falls L&D, OK West Point Lake, AL & GA Whitney Lake, TX Wolf Creek Dam (Lake Cumberland), KY GA and SC Alabama Arkansas Angelina Great Lakes Speel Sac White Illinois Columbia Chattahooche Arkansas Chattahooche Brazos Cumberland Augusta, GA Benton, AL Sallisaw, OK Jasper, TX Sault Ste. Marie Juneau, AK Stockton, MO Branson, MO Gore, OK The Dalles, OR Fort Gaines, GA Wevbbers Falls, OK West Point, GA Whitney, TX Jamestown, KY Project River Community in Vicinity Total Storage Capability (ac re-feet) I Flood Control and/or Nay. Feature Placed in useful Operation CY Initial Power in FY Existing Installation (KW) 1,026,244 234,200 525,700 3,997,600 352,400 1,674,000 3,462,000 1,230,800 53,000 934,000 170,100 604,500 1,999,500 6,089,000 1984 1972 1970 1965 1855 1969 1958 1952 1957 1963 1970 1975 1953 1950 1984 1975 1971 1966 1952 1973 1973 1959 1953 1957 1963 1973 1975 1954 1952 CE 195 CE 101 E 75 CE 120 Control C6 18 CEG 128 CE 252 E 197 CR 300 434,417 68,000 110,000 52,000 18,400 73,700 45,200 200,000 40,000 1,806,800 130,000 60,000 73,375 30,000 270,000 685,000 68,000 110,000 52,000 18,400 73,700 45,200 200,000 40,000 1,806,800 130,000 60,000 108,375 30,000 270,000 NPR NPRW NPR FPWR NP P FPRWS FPR FP NPR NPRW NP FPRW FPR FPR 4,524 14,962 7,230 19,430 Gate 338 5,100 6,423 3,000 8,875 13,585 4,370 7,250 17,695 5,736 CE E CE CE CE 114 84 97 159 258 -~---- --------- ----- ---- - ----- - ------ - -- -- -- --~------- I~--- -- --- -II - - - ------ APPENDIX E MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS D - Debris Control P - Power F - Flood Control R - Public Recreation Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000 I - Irrigation S - Water Supply N - Navigation W - Fish & Wildlife (Federal or State) 1 Total of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool 2 G: gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth 3 Units 4 and 5 were declared commercially operable by Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA) on May 1, 1982. No other units have been declared commercially operable by SWPA. All six units have successfully generated power, but one or two units at a time will be out of service for repairs and modifications until late 1995. 4 Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Bureau of Reclamation x1 5 Being operated by the Alaska Power Administration 6 Formerly Clarks Hill Lake 7 Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized in 1990. APPENDIX F MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Nameplate Capacity Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Year For For Scheduled Ultimate Project Started Operation Completion Functions Installation Installation Bonneville Second Powerhouse, OR and WA............................ 1974 1981 1996 PR 558,200 558,200 Chief Joseph Additional Units, WA........................................ 1973 1994 1995 PIR 2,2373,160 2,525,000 4 Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO................................ 1966 1985 1997 FNPRSW 58,000 58,000 Cooper River, Charleston Hbr, SC 3 ................................... 1977 1985 2001 NWDP 84,000 84,000 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO................................... 1965 1982 1 19451 FRPWS 160,000 160,000 New Melones Lake, CA 2..................................................... 1966 1979 Indefinite DFIPRW 300,000 300,000 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah River, GA and SC...................................... 1975 1985 1996 FRP 600,000 600,000 Snettisham, AK .................................................... .............. 1967 1989 1993 P 73,700 27,000 KEY D - Redevelopment F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Navigation P - Power R - Recreation S - Water Supply W - Fish & Wildlife 1 Units 4 and 5 were declared commercially operable by Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA) on May 1, 1982. No other units have been declared commercially operable by SWPA. All six units have successfully generated power, but one or two units at a time will be out of service for repairs and modifications until late 1995. 2 New Melones Lake was turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation for operation on November 20, 1979. Corps retains responsibility for facilities along the lower Stanisalaus River. Remaining construction consists of unscheduled recreation facilities and minor feature closeouts. 3 Remaining construction consists of a two-lane bridge and highway facility which the SC HWY Dept has an option to initiate construction on until May 2001. 4 Limited by hydraulic factors. Units 1-27. DAMAGES PREVENTED 35 30 a : 25 iii-iiiii 20 10 - m 10 r- r- -r :- -r O--i TI "i T T T T "' FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FISCAL YEAR FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED IN THE UNITED STATES BY THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS POTENTIAL FLOOD DAMAGES IN THE U. S. ::.:.:.:.:.:::. .. ..... .... .... . � .:::;..:: :': S::: :: ::: :: :~S:::~j::..~ : '~: i:; :::; :::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: -! .. :::::::::::::::: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ;.:.:.:.....:..:....'................................... ' ...................................... : : ::': : ': : :: : :i:.::.:.jii:i::::':::::::::::::::::: :.:::: :::i:.:8:::'::.::::':-:-.:.:-~.~: .~ :~ .: -.~:. :-~;-. :~-:- :~.-: .~:- :.~,: '~:. :~- ~ ~~'' ......... ........... .................:.::.:.: ::.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.: :::::::::,.:..:..:..:..:..:.:..:..:.. .........................-..........-. .' ...''.ii. ''". .'.'. .......... .....:.::: . : ... :i!ii : -..i:::.:: : :::: :.: :: : : ". -." " .::'"."""/ G 'SUFFER-.":. ...: :: r::::: ::::::: :::: : ::::::: :::.:: : : ::. :.:.: :...::.:.:i: :.:.:... ::: : : : :i : : : : :':':':' .:: :: : ::. : :: .: i!:i::ii!~;i:iii!i!i!::i:i:~ ii~ ::::::::::::::::!:!:i:ii:i::ii:ii::i i:i::i!:i::i:i:i = : =:=:f=:i=::=:i=::=: =:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:= ========'=i='=i=:=i=:=!=:=i=i= ======= i:!::!!i:i: i: i:!Si: i i-:i!!i::: ii: : ::::::::::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::,:: ::::::: ,:.::= ::=::=::=..=''.=.'='.'= .:=.':=:'==================================::~:::::::::'::::;::::::: .. . . . . ... . . . ;: L:...-...' 5: ::::..~Z::::: ::::::::::::::: U) DAM 5:: .:;:; .' :::t ::..!: : % ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 15 - ::::: .: .....!:. . ....................... .:.::::; .:.: : .: ;. .. .. ::': 35 5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y8 ~ g Y9 F9 F9 F9 gFISCAL YEAR J .:::::::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::::::::::::::::: ::;;:;::::;::::::::;::::::::::: O 3 0 ::::::: .::::::: . :::..:::: ::::::::::::: 0 5 :::::::: . :::::::::::::: '''''''''' ; : . :::::::~::::' s...tr 5.. iiii~~i~iii..: ~ i:ii 25 :::: ' ''''. ::: ... ....... . O:::::::::::::;:::::: . . . .: - : .. . ;::::: ; m ..~. ...... ~~....:::::::::::::::::::: z , .:'': :::::::::: s:::I::::::~:::::: r:: ;;..:::::"i~~~~JZ:'I:~;; ; "'' ' " '~ ~ 5 ~ 20 ;.(. . ;;.. . :i::i:i:iii~iiif _______ ___________________________ ____ : J J 5: :::::::~::jI : .. .Z 5 ;:::::::::~:::::~~i:1:: ::~ ~ m . ... :': 1 0 :::::::::: : ''' 20: I ~::: : : ::::; : .:::::~ : j F Y 8 5 F Y 8 6 F Y 8 7 F Y 8 8 F Y 8 9 F Y 9 0 F Y 9 1 F Y 9 2 F Y 9 3 F Y 9 :::: : :. : Ii~i :::: """ X:: :. FISCAL YEAR55 ::: POTFNTIAI Fl OOD DAMAGES IN THE UNITED STATES, DAMAGES SUFFERED PLUS DAMAGES PREVENTED TOTAL DAMAGES SUFFERED IN FY 1994, BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) PERCENT AVERAGE DAMAGES DAMAGES DAMAGES SUFFERED DAMAGES POTENTIAL PREVENTED SUFFERED, LIVES LOST LIVES LOST LOCATION FY94 PREVENTED FY94 DAMAGES FY94 FY 94 FY85-94 FY 94 FY85-FY94 ALABAMA 112,696 0 112,696 0 25,243 2 24 ALASKA 74,000 8,750 82,750 11 10,785 0 2 ARIZONA 1,616 0 1,616 0 13,125 0 12 ARKANSAS 2,024 861,023 863,047 100 395,584 0 15 CALIFORNIA 1,792 138 1,930 7 75,892 2 41 COLORADO 1,242 509 1,751 29 1,354 0 O CONNECTICUT 1,316 25,746 27,062 95 1,751 0 1 DELAWARE 741 0 741 0 239 0 3 FLORIDA 182,605 5,342 187,947 3 31,750 0 4 GEORGIA 300,000 3,771 303,771 1 45,080 29 52 GUAM 28 28 100 3 0 0 HAWAII 3,700 6,700 10,400 64 8,444 1 11 IDAHO 9,844 9,844 100 511 0 ILLINOIS 32,606 94,914 127,520 74 303,172 2 19 INDIANA 2,852 128,040 130,892 98 30,809 1 10 IOWA 9,124 41,110 50,234 82 641,643 0 12 KANSAS 10,437 32,293 42,730 76 93,233 1 9 KENTUCKY 2,544 178,350 180,894 99 9,734 0 22 LOUISIANA 675 7,903,263 7,903,938 100 220,181 0 13 MAINE 9,323 0 9,323 0 10,037 0 5 MARYLAND AND DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 4,524 0 4,524 0 664 0 7 MASSACHUSETTS 26,276 26,276 100 7,908 0 8 MICHIGAN 6,236 0 6,236 0 50,035 0 10 MINNESOTA 1,867 10,980 12,847 85 101,995 0 9 MISSISSIPPI 1,352 121,003 122,355 99 39,409 1 7 MISSOURI 37,864 769,333 807,197 95 374,513 11 59 w TOTAL DAMAGES SUFFERED IN FY 1994, BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) PERCENT AVERAGE DAMAGES DAMAGES DAMAGES SUFFERED DAMAGES POTENTIAL PREVENTED SUFFERED, LIVES LOST LIVES LOST LOCATION FY94 PREVENTED FY94 DAMAGES FY94 FY 94 FY85-94 FY 94 FY85-FY94 MONTANA 3,392 6,542 9,934 66 6,488 0 7 NEBRASKA 2,710 36,715 39,425 93 47,875 0 8 NEVADA 160 0 160 0 2,253 0 4 NEW HAMPSHIRE 250 250 100 2,631 0 0 NEW JERSEY 3,520 8,355 11,875 70 3,872 2 6 NEW MEXICO 2,000 164,439 166,439 99 6,462 0 6 NEW YORK 25,707 56,334 82,041 69 27,848 3 26 N. CAROLINA 2,032 54,536 56,568 96 6,370 0 16 N. DAKOTA 58,552 35,802 94,354 38 49,344 0 1 OHIO 39,913 312,590 352,503 89 27,456 1 44 OKLAHOMA 166 87,545 87,711 100 94,159 0 25 OREGON 83,039 83,039 100 4,695 0 2 PENNSYLVANIA 16,194 46,304 62,498 74 10,641 1 15 PUERTO RICO AND VIRGIN ISLANDS 160 0 160 0 22,839 0 103 RHODE .ISLAND 0 0 100 79 0 0 S. CAROLINA 6,228 2,268 8,496 27 7,201 0 9 S. DAKOTA 20,399 651 21,050 3 79,991 0 5 TENNESSEE 51,039 35,528 86,567 41 12,092 3 34 TEXAS 1,721 5,707,236 5,708,957 100 179,631 0 160 UTAH 4,553 4,553 100 50,090 0 1 VERMONT 1,502 3,006 4,508 67 3,528 1 3 VIRGINIA 16,169 3,621 19,790 18 86,916 2 44 WASHINGTON 160 65,935 66,095 100 33,965 0 4 W. VIRGINIA 5,397 103,464 108,861 95 62,383 5 46, WISCONSIN 62,052 65 62,117 0 111,184 2 5 WYOMING 17 298 315 95 4,409 0 13 TOTALS 1,120,326 17,046,489 18,166,815 70 942 AVERAGES 94 3,412,252 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) DAMAGES PREVENTED DAMAGES PREVENTED * FY94 DAMAGES BY CORPS BY CORPS SUPPORTED TOTAL DAMAGE AVERAGE DAMAGES COMPARED TO CONTROLLED EMERGENCY PREVENTED BY PREVENTED BY CORPS AVERAGE DAMAGES LOCATION PROJECTS FY94 OPERATIONS FY94 CORPS FY94 FY85-94 (FY85-94) ALABAMA 0 0 0 0 LOW ALASKA 8,750 0 8,750 6,552 MEDIUM ARIZONA 0 0 0 13,125 LOW ARKANSAS 861,023 0 861,023 395,584 HIGH CALIFORNIA 138 0 138 1,537,358 LOW COLORADO 509 0 509 1,543 LOW CONNECTICUT 25,746 0 25,746 37,557 MEDIUM DELAWARE O 0 0 0 LOW FLORIDA 5,342 0 5,342 5,526 MEDIUM GEORGIA 3,771 0 3,771 5,698 MEDIUM GUAM 28 0 28 3 VERY HIGH HAWAII 6,700 0 6,700 2,251 HIGH IDAHO 9,844 0 9,844 16,066 MEDIUM ILLINOIS 92,414 2,500 94,914 353,849 LOW INDIANA 128040 0 128,040 71,730 MEDIUM IOWA 41,110 0 41,110 138,714 LOW KANSAS 32,293 0 32,293 674,872 LOW KENTUCKY 178,350 0 178,350 58,171 HIGH LOUISIANA 7,903,263 0 7,903,263 6,271,848 MEDIUM MAINE 0 0 0 761 LOW MARYLAND AND DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 0 0 0 28,220 LOW MASSACHUSETTS 26,276 0 26,276 28,210 MEDIUM MICHIGAN 0 0 0 7,291 LOW MINNESOTA 10,980 0 10,980 20,731 MEDIUM MISSISSIPPI 121,003 0 121,003 461,327 LOW MISSOURI 767,833 1,500 769,333 1,329,403 MEDIUM * LEDGEND: LOW = <1/2 AVG. MED = 1/2 AVG. TO 2 * AVG., HIGH = > 2 TO 5 * AVG., V. HIGH = >5 " AVG. It FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) DAMAGES PREVENTED DAMAGES PREVENTED * FY94 DAMAGES BY CORPS BY CORPS SUPPORTED TOTAL DAMAGE AVERAGE DAMAGES COMPARED TO CONTROLLED EMERGENCY PREVENTED BY PREVENTED BY CORPS AVERAGE DAMAGES LOCATION PROJECTS FY94 OPERATIONS FY94 CORPS FY94 FY85-94 (FY85-94 MONTANA 6,542 0 6,542 7,429 MEDIUM NEBRASKA 36,715 0 36,715 60,403 MEDIUM NEVADA 0 0 0 1,400 LOW NEW HAMPSHIRE 250 0 250 1,855 LOW NEW JERSEY 8,355 0 8,355 2,489 HIGH NEW MEXICO 164,439 0 164,439 76,423 HIGH NEW YORK 56,334 0 56,334 42,631 MEDIUM N. CAROLINA 54,536 0 54,536 25,844 HIGH N. DAKOTA 35,802 0 35,802 25,883 MEDIUM OHIO 312,584 6 312,590 124,426 HIGH OKLAHOMA 87,545 0 87,545 204,632 Low OREGON 83,039 0 83,039 355,101 LOW PENNSYLVANIA 46,304 0 46,304 59,786 MEDIUM PUERTO RICO AND VIRGIN ISLANDS 0 0 0 3,407 LOW RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 1,686 LOW S. CAROLINA 2,268 0 2,268 920 HIGH S. DAKOTA 651 0 651 1,057 MEDIUM TENNESSEE 35,428 100 35,528 38,587 LOW TEXAS 5,707,236 0 5,707,236 1,866,370 HIGH UTAH 4,553 0 4,553 4,658 MEDIUM VERMONT 3,006 0 3,006 2,284 MEDIUM VIRGINIA 3,621 0 3,621 39,087 LOW WASHINGTON 65,935 0 65,935 113,880 MEDIUM W. VIRGINIA 103,464 0 103,464 75,816 MEDIUM WISCONSIN 65 0 65 1,414 LOW WYOMING 298 0 298 4,236 LOW TOTALS 17,042,383 4,106 17,046,489 14,608,091 0 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS _ BY FISCAL YEAR (IN THGUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LOCATION FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 10YR. ALABAMA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALASKA 6,846 6,828 17,000 0 8,000 0 8,100 10,000 0 8,750 ARIZONA 14,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,945 113,000 0 ARKANSAS 265,510 466,429 397,794 240,694 401,796 635,569 478,008 65,947 143,070 861,023 3 CALIFORNIA 72,800 13,910,920 154,858 98 4,770 9,500 64,022 406,036 750,435 138 1,5 COLORADO .440 502 1,442 1,755 0 0 482 9,367 928 509 CONNECTICUT 250 25 224,314 0 1,892 53,180 100 4,228 65,839 25,746 DELAWARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FLORIDA 2,079 0 2,619 6,461 456 256 1,305 17,591 19,155 5,342 GEORGIA 811 0 4,220 0 850 37,618 1,689 1,474 6,549 3,771 GUAM 28 HAWAII 0 220 220 8,540 82 1,085 5,457 194 10 6,700 IDAHO 338 20,757 623 113 14,900 5,073 23,018 253 85,743 9,844 ILLONOIS 75,446 68,235 262,386 2,105 7,925 450,687 64,996 10,369 2,501,431 94,914 3 INDIANA 117,822 46,287 14,257 9,032 61,145 57,583 149,239 27,288 106,604 128,040 IOWA 17,060 106,878 376,965 476 76 128,746 77,099 14,662 624,071 41,110 1 KANSAS 26,722 114,694 284,377 16,712 105,716 78,201 30,816 298,933 5,760,259 32,293 KENTUCKY 9,976 16,110 20,768 7,718 96,757 25,868 159,089 35,464 31,614 178,350 LOUISIANA 8,463,296 8,478,185 113,053 1,001,845 5,007,949 9,623,200 13,670,272 1,005,357 7,452,058 7,903,263 6,2 MAINE 0 0 7,605 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MARYLAND AND DISTRICT OF CLOUMBIA 1,404 109,102 7,000 364 3 9 14 93,074 71,225 0 MASSACHUSETTS 304 437 203,457 230 237 6,975 9,472 574 34,133 26,276 MICHIGAN 15,197 10,411 31,352 8,477 3,654 3,405 0 412 0 0 MINNISOTA 2,861 22,083 5,888 411 21,995 1,485 5,400 2,929 133,273 10,980 MISSISSIPPI 1,072,098 360,552 226,975 198,604 549,885 626,709 1,196,409 155,364 105,666 121,003 4 MISSOURI 100,086 717,926 1,006,876 42,370 117,726 245,361 200,669 299,878 9,793,809 769,333 1,3 MONTANA 555 19,531 277 0 27 7,394 15,408 4,483 20,070 6,542 NEBRASKA 1,082 72,187 172,657 457 17,427 11,007 58,559 7,351 226,588 36,715 AVG 0 6,552 13,125 395,584 537,358 1,543 37,557 0 5,526 5,698 3 2,251 16,066 353,849 71,730 138,714 374,872 58,171 271,848 761 28,220 28,210 7,291 20,731 161,327 329,403 7,429 60,403 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BY FISCAL YEAR (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LOCATION FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 10 YR NEVADA 0 14,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 350 14,397 0 0 0 0 0 3,549 250 NEW JERSEY 135 121 94 4,907 3,336 4,991 1,247 445 1,258 8,355 NEW MEXICO 119,648 87,139 97,900 21,528 2,755 42,531 91,189 27,619 109,486 164,439 NEW YORK 15,158 80,610 34,739 5,656 39,507 12,879 17,566 6,120 157,744 56,334 N. CAROLINA 14,220 4,034 94,430 65 18,362 17,063 23,231 8,474 24,023 54,536 N. DAKOTA 53 4,324 53,497 0 47,131 6,429 1,591 942 109,062 35,802 OHIO 113,279 97,966 80,260 45,183 89,977 140,824 250,242 6,601 107,340 312,590 OKLAHOMA 56,900 61,857 758,329 109,979 123,272 220,136 19,116 52,838 556,345 87,545 OREGON 28,013 1,394,551 38,568 294,945 840,765 693,409 42,633 47,243 87,844 83,039 PENNSYLVANIA 24,387 224,267 9,971 15,290 27,845 16,424 40,498 3,046 189,825 46,304 PUERTO RICO AND VERGIN ISLANDS 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 4,665 4,400 0 RHODE ISLAND 175 0 9,975 0 0 2,940 1,620 0 2,145 0 S. CAROLINA 796 157 694 17 1,434 59 2,849 625 300 2,268 S. DAKOTA 511 811 536 457 457 460 572 4,140 1,978 651 TENNESSEE 43 10,749 5,253 4,864 9,651 7,588 310,926 496 768 35,528 TEXAS 46,346 208,333 192,464 6,245 537,403 4,122,558 13,860 5,197,449 2,631,802 5,707,236 1 UTAH 2,200 2,300 0 0 500 500 1,500 700 34,326 4,553 VERMONT 535 1,362 6,295 782 2,298 1,874 2,525 2,275 1,892 3,006 VIRGINIA 3,265 87,703 124,709 5,375 11,243 10,035 1,686 124,553 18,683 3,621 WASHINGTON 65,444 98,808 86,774 1,039 62,403 258,333 357,877 54,343 87,844 65,935 W. VIRGINA 9,088 354,265 49,269 458 18,592 7,406 76,882 40,152 98,580 103,464 WISCONSON 11 127 24 0 0 0 0 0 13,914 65 WYOMING 0 10,637 91 62 779 2,603 4,424 1,373 22,095 298 TOTALs 10,767,490 27,317,770 5,195,252 2,063,314 8,260,978 17,577,953 17,481,657 8,059,272 32,310,733 17,046,489 10 YR. U.S. AVG. = 14 AVG 1,400 1,855 2,489 76,423 42,631 25,844 25,883 124,426 204,632 355,101 59,786 3,407 1,686 920 1,057 38,587 ,866,370 4,658 2,284 39,087 113,880 75,816 1,414 4,236 ,608,091 TOTAL FLOOD DAMAGES SUFFERED, BY STATE FY 1985-1994 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LOCATION FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 FY88 FY 89 F 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY4 10 R. AVG LABAMA 1,700 0 755 1,721 178 120,000 15,055 320 0 112,696 25,243 ALASKA 50 0 20,000 500 6,000 0 0 7,302 0 74,000 10,785 RIZONA 1,350 3,000 7 71 33,636 3,220 258 5,189 228,900 1,616 27,725 ARKANSAS 19,823 2,240 15,045 12,612 2,320 143,056 12,006 909 2,680 2,024 21,272 CALIFORNIA 0 402,000 1,015 52,353 38,738 570 3,376 93,152 165,920 1,792 75,892 COLORADO 7,000 166 O 0 481 130 2,820 1,602 100 1,242 1,354 CONNECTICUT 0 0 5,000 0 800 10 16 10,366 O 1,316 1,751 DELAWARE 50 0 0 0 1,600 0 0 2 O 741 239 FLORIDA 30,000 7,275 645 50,350 2,109 500 0 41,938 2,080 182,605 31,750 EORGIA 0 2,000 1,470 230 1,792 30,658 106,158 1,156 7,340 300,000 45,080 GUAM 0 HAWAII 3,100 0 2,050 35,647 3,392 665 23,715 9,260 2,910 3,700 8,444 IDAHO 0 2,005 17 0 178 113 2,574 224 0 511 ILLONOIS 11,500 104,705 150,000 102 1,600 71,045 19,834 189 2,640,140 32,606 303,172 INDIANA 50,000 2,500 1,906 89 716 105,550 89,504 45,424 9,550 2,852 30,809 IOWA 50 45,307 16,755 0 7,286 351,401 195,703 50,800 5,740,000 9,124 641,643 KANSAS 5,000 181,700 152,000 0 3,394 2,048 16,551 10,127 551,070 10,437 93,233 KENTUCKY 460 25 68 250 27,445 5,664 9,034 46,870 4,980 2,544 9,734 LOUISIANA 8,050 1,515,250 1,175 8,708 322,118 115,901 221,720 4,191 4,020 675 220,181 MAINE 45 5,000 61,250 0 3,200 0 16,336 2,179 3,040 9,323 10,037 MARYLAND AND DISTRICT OF CLOUMBIA 50 0 51 0 1,600 23 48 339 O 4,524 664 MASSACHUSETTS 0 21,500 47,480 0 0 50 9,716 176 160 7,908 MICHIGAN 80,000 405,000 15 206 180 627 6,133 355 1,600 6,236 50,035 MINNISOTA 500 1,501 27,800 555 17,600 3,032 1,280 1,760 964,050 1,867 101,995 MISSISSIPPI 2,000 651 6,380 39,420 3,635 21,805 313,359 1,010 4,480 1,352 39,409 MISSOURI 100 155,000 100,550 69 16,067 1,842 1,960 2,044 3,429,630 37,864 374,513 MONTANA 0 38,674 0 0 2,194 1,758 10,743 1,403 6,720 3,392 6,488 NEBRASKA 500 28,482 25,890 61 29,772 36,536 53,615 6,683 294,500 2,710 47,875 TOTAL FLOOD DAMAGES SUFFERED, BY STATE FY 1985-1994 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LOCATION FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 FY88 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY94 10 YR. AVG NEVADA 0 20,650 13 12 23 51 2 1,621 0 160 2,253 NEW HAMPSHIRE 50 5,962 19,100 0 0 1,200 0 0 0 2,631 NEW JERSEY 0 0 17,050 50 1,600 1 16,002 500 0 3,520 3,872 NEW MEXICO 24,000 0 10 0 3,378 1,187 1,567 32,264 210 2,000 6,462 NEW YORK 24,700 30,820 75,275 230 38,271 6,530 19,603 1,862 55,480 25,707 27,848 N. CAROLINA 50 1,990 20,461 0 21,072 1,075 2,694 12,927 1,400 2,032 6,370 N. DAKOTA 0 315 4,943 0 16,000 0 32 0 413,600 58,552 49,344 OHIO 10,000 10,000 20,518 2 52,240 40,846 55,165 20,078 25,800 39,913 27,456 OKLAHOMA 15,030 802,250 22,250 3,437 2,121 40,650 90 10,871 44,720 166 94,159 OREGON 50 33,900 900 125 98 1,070 9,010 32 1,760 4,695 PENNSYLVANIA 100 71,540 28 62 7,106 792 8,342 1,805 440 16,194 10,641 PUERTO RICO AND VERGIN ISLANDS 52,500 67,369 1,850 11,001 0 65 16 90,127 5,300 160 22,839 RHODE ISLAND 0 0 550 0 0 50 174 16 0 79 S. CAROLINA 100 3,070 31,771 0 370 677 11,871 0 17,920 6,228 7,201 S. DAKOTA 55 6,665 3 0 16 3,000 2,934 3,460 763,380 20,399 79,991 TENNESSEE 1,550 15,150 95 5,165 11,482 18,059 13,109 204 5,070 51,039 12,092 TEXAS 38,650 34,100 546,515 2,226 341,098 386,886 188,766 199,356 56,990 1,721 179,631 UTAH 0 479,000 250 0 15,403 56 6,005 24 160 50,090 ERMONT 0 0 10,500 0 50 15,657 19 2 7,550 1,502 3,528 IRGINIA 290 800,000 1,510 0 39,363 3,472 984 7,371 0 16,169 86,916 ASHINGTON 0 20,351 30,150 11 320 58,770 227,634 176 2,080 160 33,965 .VIRGINA 1,050 600,000 125 1 1,010 8,930 908 5,791 620 5,397 62,383 ISCONSON 2,300 80,000 2,992 32 160 31,159 180 29,305 903,660 62,052 111,184 YOMING 40,000 250 16 0 1,602 44 2,160 0 0 17 4,409 TOTALS 431,803 6,007,363 1,444,199 225,298 1,080,814 1,636,431 1,698,781 762,762 16,370,010 1,120,326 3,077,779 I INDEX A Abbapoola Creek, SC (SAN) 7-22 Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD (MRO) 26-28 Aberdeen Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Aberdeen, OH (ORH) 17-22 Abescon Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Abilene, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Abiquiu Dam, NM (SWA) 32-5, 32-13, 32-18 Absecon Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Accotink Creek, VA (NAB) 4-35 Acequias Irrigation System, NM (SWA) 32-1, 32-12, 32-15 Ada County Unit (NPW) 39-16 Adams Creek, SC (SAN) 7-20 Adams, Hossic River Basin, MA (NAN) 2-30 Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX (SWG) 31-11 Addison, NY (NAB) 4-15, 4-26 Adena, OH (Short Creek) (ORP) 18-24 Adkin Branch, NC (SAW) 6-31, 6-34 Advance Engineering and Design Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-11 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-22 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-13 Detroit District (NCE) 21-52 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-13 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-25 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-12 Louisville District (ORL) 16-14 Mobile District (SAM) 10-29 Nashville District (ORN) 15-8 New England Division (NED) 1-30 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Portland District (NPP) 37-24 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 Seattle District (NPS) 38-14 St. Paul 24-19 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-13 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-9 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-19 Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Agana River, Guam (POD) 36-9 Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-7 Agat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-7 Agat Shoreline, Guam (POD) 36-11 AIWW - Mooring Basins (SAW) 6-31 AIWW - New River Onslow County, NC (SAW) 6-31 AIWW - Peltier Creek, 12-foot project (SAW) 6-31 AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut (SAW) 6-31 Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA (SAM) 10-3, 10-31 Alabama River at Montgomery, AL (SAM) 10-50 Alameda Creek (SPN) 34-14 Alameda Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Alamo Dam, AZ (SPL) 33-6, 33-16 Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ (SPL) 33-28 Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, NM (SWA) 32-18 Alamogordo, NM (SWA) 32-2, 32-12 Alamosa, CO (SWA) 32-2, 32-12, 32-15 Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal, VA (NAO) 5-15 Albemarle Sound, NC (SAW) 6-32 Albeni Falls Dam, ID (NPS) 38-12, 38-19, 38-24 Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM (SWA) 32-2, 32-12 Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5, 36-6 Alford, Green River, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-64 Algoma Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-2, 21-54, 21-79 Alhambra Creek, CA (SPK) 35-41 Aliso Creek Dam (SPL) 33-40 Allatoona Dam - Coosa River Basin, GA (SAM) 10-25, 10-36 Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP) 18-24 Allegheny River, open channel work (ORP) 18-21 Allegheny River, PA (ORP) 18-2, 18-13, 18-17 Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI (NED) 1-55 Allentown, Lehigh River, PA (NAP) 3-29 Allenville, AZ (SPL) 33-37 Alley Bay, Beals, ME (NED) 1-55 Allison Lake (Valdez Hydropower), AK (NPA) 40-16 Alloway Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27, 3-28 Alma Harbor, WI 25-7 Almond Lake, NY (NAB) 4-15, 4-26 Almond Village, NY (NAB) 4-39 I-1 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Aloha Rigolette, LA (LMK) 12-3, 12-10, 12-12 Alpena Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-3, 21-54, 21-79 Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL (NCR) 23-14 Alpine, TX (SWA) 32-18 Alsea River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers (SAS) 8-2, 8-13, 8-15 Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN) 11-13 Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir (NED) 1-58 Alton, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO (LSM) 14-3, 14-8, 14-11 Alum Creek Lake, OH (ORH) 17-2, 17-12, 17-17 Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-28 Amazon Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40, 37-43 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA (NPS) 38-27 American River, CA (SPK) 35-35, 35-39 Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA (NCR) 23-13 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-65 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA (LMN) 11-13 Amite River and Tributaries, LA (LMN) 11-15 Amsterdam, OH (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Amuchee Creek, GA (SAM) 10-50 Anacortes Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-1, 38-15, 38-21 Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA (NPS) 38-26 Anacostia River and Flats (NAB) 4-35 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation, Improvements, DC & MD (NAB) 4-12, 4-25, 4-33 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co. MD (NAB) 4-37 Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-36 Anahuac Channel, TX (SWG) 31-9 Anchorage Harbor (Uncompleted Portion), AK (NPA) 40-16 Anchorage Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-1, 40-9, 40-12 Anchorages, VA (NAO) 5-14 Anclote River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Andalusia Harbor, IL 25-7 Anderson, IN (White River) (ORL) 16-25 Anderson Park, Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-17 Andover Lake, CT (NED) 1-58 Andrews River, MA (NED) 1-3, 1-31, 1-42 Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO (LSM) 14-17 Annapolis Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-35 Annette Island, AK (NPA) 40-18 Ansonia-Derby, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-64 Antelope Creek, CA (SPK) 35-44 Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE (MRO) 26-28 Anthony Shoals, GA (SAS) 8-23 Apalachee Bay, FL to New Orleans, LA (SAM) 10-40, 10-42 Apalachicola Bay, FL (SAM) 10-4, 10-38, 10-54 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA (SAM) 10-4, 10-31, 10-48 Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK (NPA) 40-15 Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NPP) 37-12, 37-27, 37135, 37-44 Appomattox River, VA (NAO) 5-2, 5-9, 5-12, 5-16 Apponaug Cove, RI (NED) 1-50 Appoquinimink River, DE (NAP) 3-27 Aquatic Plant Control Charleston District (SAN) 7-1, 7-11, 7-20 Galveston District (SWG) 31-2, 31-19, 31-23 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-2, 9-27, 9-35, 9-51 Mobile District (SAM) 10-6, 10-31, 10-38 New England Division (NED) 1-3, 1-31, 1-42 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-13 New York District (NAN) 2-3, 2-16, 2-20 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-28 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-39 Savannah District (SAS) 8-2, 8-13, 8-15 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-2, 6-20, 6-28 Aquashicola Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-30 Aquia Creek, VA (NAB) 4-35 Aquilla Lake, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Ararat River, Mount Airy, NC (SAW) 6-30 Arcadia Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-3, 21-54, 21-79 Arcadia Lake, OK (SWT) 29-2, 29-14, 29-23 Arch Creek, Dade County, FL (SAJ) 9-52 Archers Creek, SC (SAN) 7-20 Archusa Creek, MS (SAM) 10-57 Ardsley, NY (NAN) 2-30 Area East of Albany, OR (NPP) 37-41 Area V, Estelline Springs, TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-14 Area VIII, TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-14 Arecibo Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-27, 9-35 Arkansas City (SWT) 29-30 I-2 Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, *KS, OK and TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-14, 29-23 Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK and KS (SWL) 28-2, 28-14, 28-18 Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK and KS: Navigation 28-24, 28-25, 28-26, 28-27 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS; Lakes (SWL) 28-28 Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR (SWL) 28-21 Arkansas River, Sand Springs, OK (SWT) 29-28 Arkport Dam, NY (NAB) 4-15, 4-26 Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR (NPP) 37-40 � Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 Arlington Lake, MO (MRK) 27-18 Arroyo Colorado, TX (SWG) 31-14, 31-37 Arthur Kill Channel (NAN) 2-28 Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9), AR (SWL) 28-2, 28-24 Asan Village, Guam (POD) 36-9 Ash, NC (SAW) 6-30 Asharoken Village, Northport, NY (NAN) 2-36 Ashland Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-4, 21-54, 21-79 Ashland, KY (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Ashley River, SC (SAN) 7-20 Ashtabula Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-2, 20-14, 20-23 Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID (NPW) 39-15 Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID & WA (NPW) 39-16 Asquiroga Bay, Guam (POD) 36-8 Astoria Turning Basin, OR (NPP) 37-38 Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA (LMN) 11-13 Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA (LMN) 11-13 Atchinson, KS (MRK) 27-17 Athalia, OH (ORH) 17-22 Athens, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Atkinson Creek, Green County, MS (SAM) 10-52 Atlantic Beach Channels, NC (SAW) 6-28 Atlantic City, NJ (NAP) 3-30 Atlantic Coast of Maryland (NAB) 4-11, 4-25, 4-33 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterw'ay Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (NAO) 5-2, 5-9, 5-12, 5-14 (SAW) 6-2, 6-20, 6-25 (SAN) 7-2, 7-11, 7-15 (SAS) 8-3, 8-13, 8-15 (SAJ) 9-2, 9-27, 9-35, 9-53 Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA (NAO) 5-16 Auasi Harbor American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Auburn, NY, Owasco Outlet (NCB) 20-44 Auburn Water Pump Facility, Auburn, NY (NCB) 20-44, 20-46 Auglaize River, Paulding County, OH (NCB) 20-46 Augusta, KY (ORH) 17-21 Augusta LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26 Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA (NED) 1-3, 1-31, 1-42, 1-60 Aunuu Harbor American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Aurora, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam, CO (MRO) 26-26 AuSable Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-4, 21-54, 21-79 Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects (NCE) 21-42 Avoca, NY (NAB) 4-15, 4-26 Avoca, WI (NCS) 24-32 Avon Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-32 Avon, OH (NCB) 20-45 Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA (NAB) 4-13, 4-25 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC (SAW) 6-10, 6-22 Bachelor Island, WA (NPP) 37-41 Back Creek, MD (NAB) 4-35 Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre, SD (MRO) 26-25 Badger Creek, Glacier City, MT (MRO) 26-31 Badger Creek - Hwy 89, Browning, MT (MRO) 26-25 Bagaduce River, ME (NED) 1-50, 1-55 Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Bailey Creek, Indianapolis, IN (ORL) 16-35 Bainbridge, NY (NAB) 4-37 Baker Brook, MA (NED) 1-58 Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-27, 9-35 Baldwin Creek, Leader, WY 26-25 Ball Mountain Lake, VT (NED) 1-15, 1-35, 1-47 I-3 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD (Ferry Bar and Spring Garden Channel) (NAB) 4-39 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA (NAB) 4-3, 4-23, 4-29 Baltimore Harbor, MD Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-4, 4-23, 4-30 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR (NPP) 37-38 Bank Stabilization & Channel Recertification (SWL) 28-3 Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Banning Levee-39n Gorgonio River, Riverside County (SPL) 33-33 Bar Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Bar Point Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Baraboo River, Rock Springs, WI (NCS) 24-30 Barataria Bay Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-13 Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Barbour Creek, Eufaula, AL (SAM) 10-49 Barbourville, KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Barcelona Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 Bardwell Lake, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Barkley Dam and Lake, Barkley, KY and TN (ORN) 15-14 Barnard, KS (MRK) 27-17 Barnegat Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-2, 3-17, 3-21 Barnegat Light, NJ (NAP) 3-30 Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River) (ORL) 16-28 Barre Falls Dam, MA (NED) 1-16, 1-35, 1-56 Barren River Lake, KY (ORL) 16-5, 16-15, 16-32 Barrow, AK (NPA) 40-17 Bartlett Pond, Plymouth, MA 1-60 Bartley, NE (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Bass Harbor Bar, ME (NED) 1-50 Bass Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 Bassett Creek, MN (NCS) 24-4, 24-20 Bastrop Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 Batavia and Vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, NY (NCB) 20-44 Bath, NY (NAB) 4-37, 4-44 Battle Creek, NE (MRO) 26-25, 26-26 Batts Chapel. Edgecome County, NC (SAW) 6-34 Baudette Harbor, MN (NCS) 24-25 Bay City Harbor, WI 25-7 Bay Ridge, Red Hook Channels, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 Bay River, NC (SAW) 6-28 Bay St. Louis Seawall, MS (SAM) 10-52 Bayard, WV (NAB) 4-37 Bayfield Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-95 Bayou Bartholomew, LA and MO (LMK) 12-16, 12-23 Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, AR and LA (LMK) 12-4, 12-10, 12-12, 12-19 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Bayou Bonfouca, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Choupique, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Coden, AL (SAM) 10-6, 10-31, 10-38, 10-54 Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Dupre, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou La Batre, AL (SAM) 10-7, 10-31, 10-38, 10-54 Bayou Lacombe, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA (LMK) 12-19 Bayou Pierre in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-19, 12-20, 12-21 Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Rapides, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Rigolette, LA (LMN) 11-11 Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Teche & Vermillion River, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Teche, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Terrebonne, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Vermillion, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA (LMK) 12-16 Bayport, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Bayport Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-4, 21-55, 21-79 Baytown, TX (SWG) 31-37 Bayview, MS (SAM) 10-52 Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) (NED) 1-13 Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction B8 Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization Baltimore District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-11 Charleston District (SAN) 7-8 Chicago District (NCC) 22-8 I-4 Detroit District (NCE) 21-43 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-21 New York District (NAN) 2-13 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-6, 5-9 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7 Beach Point, Truro, MA (NED) 1-60 Beal Slough, NE (MRO) 26-30 Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Beals Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 Bear Creek, County Road 485, Collin, TX (SWF) 30-23 Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Bear Creek, Flathead County Bridge, near Essex, MT (NPS) 38-27 Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID (NPW) 39-15 Bear Creek Lake, CO (MRO) 26-2, 26-13, 26-17 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-41 Bear Creek, Medford, OR (NPP) 37-40 Bear River, CA (SPK) 35-41 Bear Stream, CA (SPK) 35-43 Beards Brook Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-58 Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE (MRK) 27-18 Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-20, 6-26 Beaver Bay, MN (NCE) 21-95 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH (NED) 1-55, 1-63 Beaver Brook Lake, NH (NED) 1-58 Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA (SAM) 10-50 Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR (NPP) 37-40 Beaver Creek, Platte County, NE (MRO) 26-31 Beaver Lake, AR (SWL) 28-10, 28-16, 28-30 Beaver Slough, OR (NPP) 37-43 Beaverdam Creek, Clinton, NC (SAW) 6-34 Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA (MRK) 27-17 Beebe Lake, Frankfort, MN (NCS) 24-30 Beech Fork, Bardstown, KY (ORL) 16-35 Beech Fork Lake, WV (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Belfast Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 Belhaven Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-28 Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR (SWL) 28-22, 28-30 Bellaire, OH (ORP) 18-24 Bellamy River, NH (NED) 1-50 Belle Fourche. Belle Fourche River, SD (MRO) 26-25 Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD (MRO) 26-21 Belle River, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Bellevue, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Bellingham Harbor (I&J Street Waterway), WA (NPS) 38-26 Bellingham Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-2, 38-15, 38-21 Bellville Point, GA (SAS) 8-21 Belpre, OH (ORH) 17-22 Beltline Road, Cottonwood Creek, TX (SWF) 30-23 Belton Lake Modification, TX (SWF) 30-22 Belton Lake, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Beltzville Lake, PA (NAP) 3-13, 3-19, 3-25 Benbrook Lake, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-19 Bennett Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-27 Bennington Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-58 Bennington, VT (NAN) 2-32 Benwood, WV (ORP) 18-22 Beresford Creek, SC (SAN) 7-22 Berkeley Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-13 Berkeley Marina, CA (SPN) 34-13 Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP) 18-6, 18-13, 18-18, 18-28 Berrien County, MI (St. Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-97 Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River, AK (NPA) 40-16 Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-11, 40-14 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA (NAP) 3-29, 3-30 Bettendorf, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Betterton Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-39 Beverly Harbor, MA (NED) 1-50 Beverly Hills, McLennan County, TX (SWF) 30-23 Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH (NCB) 20-42 Big and Little Sallisaw Navigation Project (SWT) 29-25 Big Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-5, 21-55, 21-79 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-9, 26-15, 26-20, 26-24 Big Bend Wildlife Restoration (MRO) 26-28 Big Bend, WV (ORH) 17-23 Big Black River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Big Blue Lake, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-33 Big Blue River, Seward, NE (MRK) 27-17 Big Brown Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 I-5 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-21 Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR (LMM) 13-6 Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN (LMM) 13-5 Big Darby, OH (ORH) 17-23 Big Dry Creek Dam and Diversion, CA (SPK) 35-39 Big Fork River, MN (NCS) 24-32 Big Fossil Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges, MT (MRO) 26-20 Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin, MT (MRO) 26-25 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA (LMN) 11-13 Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24 Big Pine Lake, TX (SWT) 29-26 Big River Reservoir, RI (NED) 1-58 Big Run, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Big Sandy Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Big Sandy River, WV & KY (ORH) 17-20 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-21 Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau, SD (MRO) 26-25 Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh, SD (MRO) 26-26 Big Sioux River, Jefferson, SD (MRO) 26-26 Big Sioux River, North Sioux City, SD (MRO) 26-25 Big Sioux River, Plymouth County, IA (MRO) 26-27 Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau, SD (MRO) 26-25 Big Sioux River, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-27 Big Sioux River Sioux Falls, SD (MRO) 26-28 Big Sioux River, Union County, SD (MRO) 26-25 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN (ORN), 15-4, 15-9 Big Spring, TX (SWF) 30-22 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD (NCS) 24-5, 24-20, 24-31 Big Stranger Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17 Big Suamico Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-5, 21-55, 21-80 Big Sunflower River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Big Swan D&L District, Illinois River, IL (LSM) 14-17 Big Thompson River, Johnstown, CO (MRO) 26-26 Big Timber Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-33 Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT (SPK) 35-39 Big Wills Creek, AL (SAM) 10-57 Big Wood River, ID (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 Billings, MT (MRO) 26-23 Biloxi Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-7, 10-31, 10-39, 10-54 Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Binghamton, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 Birch Hill Dam, MA (NED) 1-16, 1-35, 1-56 Birch Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-14, 29-23 Birch, WV (ORH) 17-23 Bird Rock Area, La Jolla, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-36 Biscayne Bay, FL Hurricane Protection (SAJ) 9-52 Bitterroot River, Florence, MT (NPS) 38-27 Black Bayou Lake, LA (LMK) 12-20 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA (LMK) 12-21 Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Black Creek, Gadsden, AL (SAM) 10-50 Black Fork at Hendricks, WV (ORP) 18-23 Black River (Alcona County), MI (NCE) 21-95 Black River (North Bend), WI (NCS) 24-31 Black River (Port Huron), MI (NCE) 21-5, 21-55, 21-80 Black River, Amsterdam Road, WI (NCS) 24-32 Black River, AR and MO (SWL) 28-21 Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (SWL) 28-22 Black River Falls, WI (NCS) 24-29 Black River Harbor, Alcona County, MI Authorized Dec. 17, 1979 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act (NCE) 21-97 Black River Harbor, MI (1936 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 Black River Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-6, 21-56, 21-80 Black River Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 Black River Lake, WI (NCS) 24-28 Black River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-30 Black River Obstruction Removal, Butler County, AR (SWL) 28-5, 28-14 Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR (SWL) 28-22 Black River, WI (NCS) 24-25, 24-28, 24-29, 24-30 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY, 1935 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-2, 20-14, 20-24 I-6 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY, 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Black Rock Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Black Rock Lake, CT (NED) 1-20, 1-37, 1-64 Black Walnut Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-35 Black Walnut Point, MD (NAB) 4-37 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL (SAM) 10-8, 10-32, 10-39, 10-50 Black Warrior River, North Port, AL (SAM) 10-52 Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL (SAM) 10-50 Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA (SAW) 6-10, 6-22 Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE (MRO) 26-21 Blackboy Creek, Tulsa County, OK (SWT) 29-28 Blackfoot Reservoir, ID (NPW) 39-16 Blackfoot River, ID (NPW) 39-17 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT (NPS) 38-27 Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI (NED) 1-13 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA (NED) 1-55 Blackstone River, Warwick, MA (NED) 1-62 Blackwater, Concord, NH (NED) 1-65 Blackwater Dam, NH (NED) 1-22, 1-38 Blackwater River, Milton, FL (SAM) 10-49, 10-54 Blackwater River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-16 Blaine Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Blue Marsh Lake, PA (NAP) 3-13, 3-20, 3-25 Blue Mountain Lake, AR (SWL) 28-5, 28-14, 28-28 Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO (MRK) 27-2, 27-10, 27-13 Blue River Lake, OR (NPP) 37-12, 37-28, 37-35, 37-44 Blue River, Salem, IN (ORL) 16-24 Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Bluff Creek, MS (SAM) 10-49 Bluffs Community Center, Swansea, MA (NED) 1-14, 1-35, 1-47 Bodega Bay, CA (SPN) 34-7 Bodie Island, NC (SAW) 6-31 Boeuf River, LA (LMK) 12-16 Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA (NPS) 38-27 Bogachiel River, Undie Road, near Forks, WA (NPS) 38-27 Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL (SAM) 10-17, 10-34, 10-46 Boggy Creek, Bryan County, OK (SWT) 29-29 Boggy Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Boise River, ID (NPW) 39-15 Boise Valley, ID (NPW) 39-16 Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL (SAM) 10-50 Bolivar, NY (ORP) 18-29 Bolles Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-6, 21-56, 21-80 Bon Secour River, AL (SAM) 10-10, 10-32, 10-41, 10-54 Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and WA (NPP) 37-17, 37-29, 37-36 Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (NPP) 37-2, 37-25, 37-32 Bonneville, OR (NPP) 37-41 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Bonum Creek, VA (NAB), 4-35 Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28 Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-32 Boothbay Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) (NED) 1-58 Boston Harbor, MA (NED) 1-3, 1-31, 142 Boswell Lake, OK (SWT) 29-26 Boulder, CO (MRO) 26-23 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA (NED) 1-55 Bowman-Haley Lake, ND (MRO) 26-2, 26-13, 26-17 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA (ORP) 18-24 Bradenton Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Bradford, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Bradford, TN (LMM) 13-5 Bradley Lake, AK (NPA) 40-16 Brake Branch, Montgomery County, VA (SAW) 6-30 Bramwell, WV (ORH) 17-24 Branch Creek, Del City, OK (SWT) 29-28 Branford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA (NAB) 4-35 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA (NED) 1-58 Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 I-7 Brays Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Brazos Island Harbor, (SWG) 31-2, 31-19, 31-23, 31-38, 31-39, 31-44 Brazos River, Velasco to Old Washington, TX (SWG) 31-37 Breton Bay, MD (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 Brevard County, FL (SAJ) 9-16, 9-32, 9-46 Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-32 Bridge, Mary Creek, TX (SWF) 30-23 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-61 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) (NPP) 37-38 Bridgewater, VA (NAB) 4-37, 4-45 Brigantine Island (NAP) 3-29 Brilliant, OH (ORP) 18-24 Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI (NED) 1-50 Broad Creek, Beaufort, NC (SAW) 6-30 Broad Creek, MD (NAB) 4-4, 4-23, 4-30 Broad Creek River, DE (NAB) 4-35 Broad Creek, VA (NAO) 5-2, 5-5, 5-12, 5-16 Broadkill River, DE (NAP) 3-27 Broadwater Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Broadway Street, Pecan Creek, Gainsville, TX (SWF) 30-23 Brockway Lake, VT (NED) 1-58 Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 Broken Bow Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-20, 29-25 Broken Bow, Mud Creek, NE (MRO) 26-26 Bromley, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Bronx River, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27, 2-32 Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 Brookgreen Gardens, SC (SAN) 7-20 Brooklyn, WV (ORH) 17-22 Brookport, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 Brookville Lake, KY (ORL) 16-6, 16-15 Brookville, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project (SAJ) 9-16, 9-32, 9-46 Browder Creek, Springton, TX (SWF) 30-23 Browns Creek (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 Browns Creek, Nashville, TN (ORN) 15-18 Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-22 Brunswick County Beaches (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line), NC (SAW) 6-30 Brunswick County Beaches - Long Beach Portion - Berm, NC .(SAW) 6-31 Brunswick Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-3, 8-13, 8-16 Brush Creek, Jeanette, PA (planning and design analysis) (ORP) 18-30 Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-13 Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA (SPK) 35-5, 35-28 Buck Creek, NC & SC (SAN) 7-21 Buck Ditch, Ft. Recovery (ORL) 16-35 Buckhannon River, WV (ORP) 18-21 Buckhannon, WV (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Buckhorn Lake, KY (ORL) 16-6, 16-15, 16-30 Buckland, AK (NPA) 40-18 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME (NED) 1-50 Bucksport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 Buena Vista, OH (ORH) 17-22 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 31-11, 31-20, 31-35 Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point Village, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21 Buffalo Creek, Freeport, PA (planning and design analysis) (ORP) 18-30 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, Scranton, ND (MRO) 26-21 Buffalo Harbor Drift Removal, NY (NCB) 20-47 Buffalo Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-2, 20-14, 20-25 Buffalo, Johnson County, Diversion Channel, WY (MRO) 26-23 Buffalo River, MS (LMK) 12-23 Buffalo Ship Channel, Buffalo, NY (NCB) 20-47 Buffalo Small Boat Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-3, 20-14, 20-26 Buffumville Lake, MA (NED) 1-26, 1-39, 1-66 Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA (SAM) 10-25, 10-36 Bull Run, PA (NAB) 4-37 Bull Shoals Lake, AR (SWL) 28-10, 28-17, 28-30 Bullard Bend Chute Restoration, NE (MRO) 26-32 Bullocks Point Cove, RI (NED) 1-50 Bunker Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 Burch Creek, Weber County, UT (SPK) 35-39 Burgettstown, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT (NED) 1-54 I-8 Burketts Creek, Amory, MS (SAM) 10-50 Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND (NCS) 24-26 Burlington Harbor, VT (NAN) 2-27 Burlington, IA (NCR) 23-14 Burney Crek, Shasta County, CA (SPK) 35-45 Burns Stream, CA (SPK) 35-43 Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-2, 22-13, 22-17, 22-21 Burns Waterway SBH, IN (NCC) 22-2, 22-13, 22-17, 22-21 Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Burnt River, OR (NWP) 39-17 Burt-Washington Counties, NE (MRO) 26-28 Butler County Drainage District 3, MO (SWL) 28-22 Butler, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA (NED) 1-50 Buttermilk Channel, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 Bypass Levees, CA (SPK) 35-44 Byram River at Pemberwick, CN (NAN) 2-30 C Cabrillo Beach (SPL) 33-30 Cache Creek Basin, (Cache Creek Settling Basin), CA (SPK) 35-6, 35-28 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant), CO (MRO) 26-26 Cache La Poudre River, Greely, CO (MRO) 26-30 Cache La Poudre River, Windsor, CO (MRO) 26-26 Cache River Diversion, IL (LSM) 14-15 Cache River Levee, IL (ORL) 16-32 Cache River, Upper Basin, IL (ORL) 16-24 Caddo Lake Dam, LA (LMK) 12-21 Caddo Lake, LA (LMK) 12-19 Cadet Bayou, MS (SAM) 10-49, 10-54 Cadle Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Caesar Creek Lake, OH (ORL) 16-6, 16-15, 16-32 Cagles Mill Lake, IN (ORL) 16-6, 16-15, 16-32 Cahaba River, AL (SAM) 10-49 Cairo, WV (ORH) 17-24 Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II, Illinois Waterway, IL and IN (NCR) 23-13 Calapooya River, OR (NPP) 37-41 Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA (SPK) 35-6, 35-28 Calcasieu River and Pass, LA (LMN) 11-13 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA (LMN) 11-13 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA (LMN) 11-13 Calcasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA (LMN) 11-13 Caledonia, Genesee River, NY 1950 FC Act (NCB) 20-47 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT (NED) 1-54 Calhoun County (SAM) 10-57 Caliente Creek, CA (SPK) 35-35 .Caliente Wash, AZ (SPL) 33-31 California (Cincinnati), OH (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 California Bend, NE (MRO) 26-32 Calion, AR (H.K. Thatcher) (LMK) 12-15, 12-18 Calispell Creek, WA (NPS) 38-30 Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF) 30-22 Calloway Branch, Richland Hills, TX (SWF) 30-23 Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (NCC) 22-2, 22-13, 22-17, 22-21, 22-23 Calumet River Bridges (NCC) 22-22 Camas Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 Cambridge Harbor, MD (1948 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-39 Cambridge Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-35 Cambridgeport Lake, VT (NED) 1-58 Camden Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 Camp Ellis Beach, Saco, ME (NED) 1-60 Camp Facility, Red River, Telephone TX (SWT) 29-28 Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-24 Campbells Island, Mississippi River, IL (NCR) 23-13 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY (NCB) 20-46 Canal 43, AR (LMK) 12-5, 12-10, 12-12 Canapitsit Channel, MA (NED) 1-50 Canaseraga Creek, Dansville, NY (NCB) 20-46 Canaveral Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-27, 9-35 Candy Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-15, 29-23 Cane River, LA (LMN) 11-13 Caney Creek, MS (LMK) 12-12 Caney Fork River, Carthage, TN (ORN) 15-18 Caney Fork River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Canisteo, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-27 Cannelton, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 Cannon River at Fairbault, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Cannon River near Welch, MN (NCS) 24-32 Cannonball River, Sheilds, ND (MRO) 26-31 Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Canton (Nimishillen), OH (ORH) 17-24 I-9 Canton Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Canton Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-15, 29-23, 29-27 Canton, MA (NED) 1-55 Canton, MO (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Canyon County Unit (NPW) 39-16 Canyon Lake, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Cape Charles, VA (NAO) 5-16 Cape Cod Canal, MA (NED) 1-4, 1-31, 1-43 Cape Fear River, Above Wilmington, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-20 Cape Fear River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-10, 6-33 Cape Florida State park, FL (SAJ) 9-52 Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO (LSM) 14-3, 14-8, 14-11 Cape Girardeau, MO No. 2, MO (LSM) 14-15 Cape Girardeau, MO Reaches Nos. 1, 3 and 4 (LSM) 14-17 Cape Lookout, NC (SAW) 6-31 Cape May City, NJ (NAP) 3-30 Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (NAP) 3-11, 3-19, 3-25 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Carlson Bottoms Wetland Restoration (MRO) 26-32 Carlyle Lake, IL (LSM) 14-15 Carneros Creek, CA (SPL) 33-12, 33-20 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC (SAW) 6-11, 6-22 Carpenters Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Carr Fork Lake, KY (ORL) 16-7, 16-15, 16-32 Carrabelle Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-49, 10-54 Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-13 Carrollton, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Carters Creek, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-16 Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA (SAM) 10-26, 10-36 Caruthersville Harbor, MO (LMM) 13-4 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME (NED) 1-50 Cascadia Lake, OR (NPP) 37-41 Caseville Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-7, 21-56, 21-80 Caseyville, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Cashie River, NC (SAW) 6-28 Casino Beach, IL (NCC) 22-6, 22-14, 22-19 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA (NPP) 37-40 Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO (MRO) 26-23 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 Catching Inlet Drainage District, Coos River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Cathance River, ME (NED) 1-50 Catherine Creek Lake, OR (NPW) 39-12, 39-16 Catherine Creek, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 Cathlamet, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cattaraugus Creek, NY (NCB) 20-42 Cattaraugus Creek, Village of Arcade, NY (NCB) 20-46 Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-3, 20-15, 20-26 Cattlesburg, KY (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Cave-in-Rock, IL (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Cave Run Lake, KY (ORL) 16-7, 16-15, 16-32 Cave Springs, GA (SAM) 10-57 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY (NCB) 20-44 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN (ORL) 16-7, 16-15, 16-32 Cedar Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD (MRO) 26-21 Cedar Creek, Sussex City, DE (NAP) 3-27 Cedar Falls, Cedar River, IA (NCR) 23-15 Cedar Island, Keaton Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Cedar Key Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Cedar Point, GA (SAS) 8-21 Cedar Point Lake, KS (SWT) 29-27 Cedar River Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95 Cedar River, Kenton, WA (NPS) 38-27, 38-31 Cedar River, King County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Celina Dam, KY (ORN) 15-14 Center Hill Dam Safety Program (ORN) 15-7 Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-17 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-21, 9-33, 9-48 Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA (NCR) 23-13 Century Park, Lorain, OH (NCB) 20-20, 20-40 Ceredo-Kenova, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Chacon Creek, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Chadakoin River, Jamestown, NY (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Chagrin River, East Branch, Route 84, OH (NCB) 20-46 Chambersburg, OH (ORH) 17-22 Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT (NAN) 2-27 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 I-10 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, NC (SAW) 6-28 Channel Connecting York River, VA Back Creek to Slaights Wharf (NAO) 5-16 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-20 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-3, 9-27, 9-35 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, NC (SAW) 6-28 Charinel from Phoebus, VA to deepwater in Hampton Roads (NAO) 5-16 Channel Islands Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-14, 33-21 Channel to Liberty, TX (SWG) 31-9 Channel to Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-9, 5-12, 5-16 Channel to Port Bolivar, TX(SWG) 31-2, 31-19, 31-24, 31-38 Channels in Straits of Mackinac, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY (ORL) 16-23 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act) (MRK) 27-17 Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork Units only (MRK) 27-18 Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) (MRK) 27-17 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA (NED) 1-14, 1-35, 1-47 Charles River Dam, MA (NED) 1-55 Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR (NPP) 37-38 Charleston Harbor (Anchorage Basin), SC (SAN) 7-22 Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC (SAN) 7-3, 7-11, 7-16 Charleston Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-2, 7-11, 7-15 Charlestown, NH (NED) 1-55, 1-63 Charlevoix Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-7, 21-56, 21-80 Charlotte County, FL (SAJ) 9-47 Charlotte Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-3, 9-27, 9-35, 9-53 Chartiers Creek, PA (ORP) 18-4, 18-13, 18-29 Chaska, MN (NCS) 24-5, 24-20 Chatfield Lake, CO (MRO) 26-3, 26-13, 26-17 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (NED) 1-4, 1-31, 1-43 Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL (SAM) 10-50 Chattooga Units, GA (SAS) 8-23 Chauvin Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-5, 12-11, 12-13 Cheat River, WV (ORP) 18-21 Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 Cheboygan Harbor, Isle Royale, MI (NCE) 21-95 Cheesequake Creek (NAN) 2-26, 2-27, 2-32 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA (LMN) 11-13 Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA (NPS) 38-8, 38-17, 38-23 Chehalis River, City of Chehalis, Raw Water Pumphouse, WA (NPS) 38-27 Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Chehalis River, Montesano, WA (NPS) 38-27 Chena River Stabilization, AK (NPA) 40-7, 40-11, 40-14 Cherokee County, GA (SAM) 10-57 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Cherry Creek Lake, CO (MRO) 26-3, 26-13, 26-17, 26-24 Cherryfield, ME (NED) 1-55 Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE, (NAP) 3-2, 3-17, 3-21 Chesapeake Bay at Hoopersville Road, MD (NAB) 4-37 Chesapeake, OH (ORH) 17-22 Chesconessex Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Chesire, OH (ORH) 17-22 Chester, CA (SPK) 35-39 Chester River, MD (1873 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-39 Chester River, MD (NAB) 4-4, 4-23, 4-30 Chetco River, OR (NPP) 37-2, 37-25, 37-32 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR (NPP) 37-40 Chicago Harbor, IL (NCC) 22-3, 22-13, 22-17, 22-21 Chicago River, IL (NCC) 22-4, 22-13, 22-18, 22-21 Chicago River, IL (North Branch) (NCC) 22-8, 22-15 Chicago Shoreline, IL (NCC) 22-6, 22-14 Chickasaw Bouge Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL (SAM) 10-50 Chickasawhay River, MS (SAM) 10-57 Chickasha, OK (SWT) 29-28, 29-30 Chico Landing, CA (SPK) 35-41 Chicopee Falls, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-63 Chicopee, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-63 Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA (NPS) 38-12, 38-19, 38-24 Chillicothe, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Chilo, OH (ORH) 17-22 Chincoteague Bay, VA (NAO) 5-16 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA (NAO) 5-16 I-11 Chincoteague Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-9, 5-12 Chino Canyon Improvements, Palm Springs, CA SPL) 33-39 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royal, MI (NCE) 21-95 Chippewa River, Montevideo, MN (NCS) 24-30 Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944.R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Choctawatchee Bay to Pensacola, FL (SAM) 10-42 Choctawatchee Bay to West Bay, FL (SAM) 10-41 Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, FL and AL (SAM) 10-52 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL (SAM) 10-49 Choptank River, MD (NAB) 4-35 Choteau Lock and Dam (No. 17) (SWL) 28-26 Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK (SWT) 29-27 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage District and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-15 Chowan River, NC (NAO) 5-16 Chowan River, NC (SAW) 6-28 Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-51 Chubb Run, Franklin, PA (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Church Run, Titusville, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Cibolo Creek, TX (SWA) 32-18 Cincinnati, OH (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 City Creek Levee, San Bernardino County, CA (SPL) 33-37 City Dam, Little Caney River, KS (SWT) 29-29 City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO (MRO) 26-21 City of Isleton, CA (SPK) 35-45 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR (NPP) 37-40 Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-3, 10-31 Clairborne County Port, MS (LMK) 12-16 Clairborne Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-35 Clallam Bay at Sekiu, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-23, 38-27 Clallam River, Highway 112, WA (NPS) 38-27 Clanton, AL (SAM) 10-50 Claremont Lake, NH (NED) 1-58 Claremore, OK (SWT) 29-30 Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Salt River, MO (LSM) 14-7, 14-9, 14-13 Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, OH (ORL) 16-8, 16-16 Clarendon to Laconia Circle White River Basin, AR (LMM) 13-6 Clarington, OH (ORP) 18-24 Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT (NPS) 38-27 Clark Fort River, Drummond, MT (NPS) 38-27 Clark Fort River, Superior, MT (NPS) 38-27 Clark Fort River, Vicinity of Plains, MT (NPS) 38-27 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA (NED) 1-54 Clark Spring Branch, Decatur, AL (ORN) 15-8 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek, NE (MRO) 26-21 Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek (MRO) 26-21, 26-26 Clarksville, AR (SWL) 28-22 Clatskanie Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-41 Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-41 Clatskanie River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR (NPP) 37-41 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR (NPP) 37-41 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR (NPP) 37-41 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-41 Clayton County, AL (SAM) 10-57 Clayton County Bridge, Osterdock, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton County, Elkport, Osterdock, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton County Road Creek, Site 2, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton, IA (NCS) 24-32 Clear & Burnt River, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX (SWG) 31-37 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-17 Clear Creek, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21, 31-35 Clear River, Burrilville, RI (NED) 1-55, 1-62 Clearwater Lake, MO (SWL) 28-5, 28-15, 28-30 Clearwater Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Clearwater River, ID (NPW) 39-17 Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA (NPS) 38-27 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-27 Cleveland Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-3, 20-15, 20-26 Cleves, OH (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI (NED) 1-11, 1-34, 1-46 Clifton, AZ (SPL) 33-6, 33-16, 33-28 Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ (SPL) 33-37 Clifton, WV (ORH) 17-22 Clifty Creek Lake, IN (ORL) 16-26 Clinch River, TN and VA (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Clinton Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 Clinton Harbor, IA 25-7 Clinton, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 1-12 Clinton, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-13 Clinton River, MI (NCE) 21-8, 21-57, 21-80 Clinton River Spillway, MI (NCE) 21-43, 21-76, 21-93 Cloverport, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Clyde Park, Shields River (MRO) 26-24 Clyde, RI (NED) 1-58 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN (ORN) 15-13 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Coal Grove, OH (ORH) 17-22 Coal River, WV (ORH) 17-21 Coan River, VA (NAB) 4-39 Coast of California, Point Mugu, to San Pedro Breakwater, CA (SPL) 33-36 Coasters Island Harbor, RI (NED) 1-50 � Cobscook Bay, ME (NED) 1-50 Cocheco River, NH (NED) 1-50, 1-55 Cochiti Lake, NM (SWA) 32-5, 32-13, 32-17 Cochiti Wetfields, NM (SWA) 32-2, 32-12, 32-15 Cochrane, Mississippi River, WI (NCS) 24-29 Cockrells Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID (NPS) 38-27 Coeur d'Alene, Springston, ID (NPS) 38-27 Coffee County, AL (SAM) 10-57 Coffee Creek, WA (NPS) 38-27 Cohansey River, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Cohasset Harbor, MA (NED) 1-50 Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory 43-1 Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-17, 3-21 Coldwater Creek, MO (LSM) 14-4, 14-11 Colebrook River Lake, CT (NED) 1-16, 1-35 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Colfax, Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 Collection and Study of Basic Data Alaska District (NPA) 40-8 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-11 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-22 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-12 Chicago District (NCC) 22-12 Detroit District (NCE) 21-53 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-13 Galveston District (SWG) 31-18 Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-25 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-13 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-12 Louisville District (ORL) 16-14 Mobile District (SAM) 10-29 Nashville District (ORN) 15-8 New England Division (NED) 1-29 New York District (NAN) 2-15 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-8, 5-11 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Portland District (NPP) 37-24 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 Seattle District (NPS) 38-14 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-19 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-13 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-9 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-19 Colliers, WV (ORP) 18-29 Collinsville, AL (SAM) 10-50 Collinsville, CA (SPK) 35-41 Colonial Beach, VA (NAB) 4-11, 4-25, 4-33 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO (SPK) 35-7, 35-29, 35-45 Colorado River at Riverside, CO (SPK) 35-45 Colorado River, Matagorda, TX (SWG) 31-37 Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, CO (Templeton Gap Floodway) (SWA) 32-18 Colquitt County, GA (SAM) 10-57 Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (NPP) 37-2, 37-25, 37-32, 37-42 Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Dredging, OR and WA (NPP) 37-18, 37-29, 37-37 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL (LSM) 14-15 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR (NPP) 37-41 Columbia, LA (LMK) 12-15, 12-18 Columbia River above The Dalles, OR & WA (NPP) 27-42 Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA (NPW) 39-15 Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA (NPP) 37-4, 37-25, 37-33 I-13 Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA (NPP) 37-4, 37-25, 37-33 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NPW) 39-1, 39-12 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA (NPS) 38-27, 38-30 Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island (NPP) 37-4, 37-25, 37-33 Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR (NPP) 37-5, 37-25, 37-33 Columbia River, Chinook, WA (NPP) 37-42 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA (NPP) 37-38 Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (The Dalles, Project), OR and WA (NPP) 37-19, 37-29, 37-37 Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (Walla Walla District) (NPW) 39-4, 39-10, 39-13 Columbia River, Kalama, WA OR (NPP) 37-41 Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR (NPP) 37-5, 37-25, 37-33 Columbia River Treaty Fishing Sites, OR and WA (NPP) 37-19, 37-29, 37-37 Columbia River, Vancouver Deep Draft Anchorage, WA (NPP) 37-5, 37-25, 37-33 Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA (NPS) 38-26 Columbia Slough, OR (NPP) 37-41 Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-27 Columbus, IN (ORL) 16-24 Columbus, Loup River, NE (MRO) 26-26 Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-57 Columbus, OH (ORH) 17-22 Colusa, CA (SPK) 35-41 Comite River, LA (Diversion) (LMN) 11-3, 11-8, 11-11 Communities, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-22 Compo Beach, Westport, CT (NED) 1-54 Conant Brook Dam, MA (NED) 1-16, 1-36 Conchas Lake, NM (SWA) 32-3, 32-12 Concordia, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-6, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Conetoe Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 Coney Island Channel (NAN) 2-27 Coney Island Creek (NAN) 2-32 Congaree River, SC (SAN) 7-22 Conklin-Kirkwood, NY (NAB) 4-37, 4-44 Conneaut Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-4, 20-15, 20-29 Conneaut Lake, PA (planning and design analysis) (ORP) 18-30 Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT (NED) 1-58 Connecticut River Basin Fish Passage Facilities for Townshend and Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT (NED) 1-14 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (NED) 1-4, 1-31, 1-42 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT (NED) 1-16, 1-36, 1-47, 1-63 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH (NED) 1-55, 1-61 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH (NED) 1-55 Connell, WA (NPW) 39-15 Connellsville, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Conoho Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-39 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory 42-1 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORL) 16-2 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORH) 17-2 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORD) 19-1, 19-5, 19-6 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORP) 18-2 Contentnea Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-30, 6-31 Continuation of Planning and Engineering Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-25 Mobile District (SAM) 10-32 Conway County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Conway County Levee District Nos. 1, 2 and 8, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Cook Inlet Shoals, AK (NPA) 40-15 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-3, 7-11, 7-16 Cooper River, NJ (NAP) 3-27 1-14 Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC (SAN) 7-22 Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC (SAN) 7-21 Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR (NPP) 37-38 Coos Bay, OR (NPP) 37-6, 37-26, 37-33 Coos Bay Western Snowy Plover (NPP) 37-43 Coosa River, GA (SAM) 10-49, 10-57 Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL (SAM) 10-4, 10-31 Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay Rivers, Vicinity of Ellijay, GA (SAM) 10-57 Copan Lake, OK (SWT) 29-5, 29-15 Copes Corner Lakes, NY (NAB) 4-39 Coquille River, OR (NPP) 37-7, 37-26, 37-34, 37-41 Coralville Lake, IA (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 Coraopolis, PA (ORP) 18-24 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 Cordova, AK (NPA) 40-15 Cordova Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15, 40-17 Core Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME (NED) 1-50 Corning-Monkey Run, NY (NAB) 4-44 Corning, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-27 Cornucopia Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-8, 21-57, 21-81 Corporation Gulch, Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-25 Corpus Christi Beach (Restoration Project), TX (SWG) 31-10, 31-20, 31-35 Corpus Christi, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal, TX (SWG) 31-37 Corpus Christi Channel, TX (SWG) 31-3, 31-19, 31-24, 31-38, 31-39, 31-44 Corsica River, MD (NAB) 4-35 Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-20 Corte Madera Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Corte Madre Creek, CA (SPK) 35-8, 35-29, 35-36 Cortland, NY (NAB) 4-37, 4-44 Cottage Grove Lake, OR (NPP) 37-13, 37-28, 37-36, 37-44 Cottonwood Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, ID (NWP) 39-15 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID (NPW) 39-16 Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL (LMM) 13-5 Cotuit Harbor, MA (NED) 1-58 Cougar Lake, OR (NPP) 37-19, 37-29, 37-37, 37-44 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) (MRO) 26-21 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) (MRO) 26-21 Council Bluffs, IA (MRO) 26-24, 26-27 Council Grove Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-23 County Bridge, Elk River, Elk City, KS (SWT) 29-29 County Bridge, Washita River, Arkansas City, KS (SWT) 29-29 County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba County, MS (SAM) 10-50 County Road 55, Etowah County, AL (SAM) 10-18, 10-55, 10-46 County Road, Neosho River, KS (SWT) 29-29 Courtnay Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Cove Island, Stamford, CT (NED) 1-54 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-64 Covington County, MS (SAM) 10-57 Covington, KY (ORL) 16-23 Cow Castle Creek, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-24 Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS (SWT) 29-27 Cowanesque Lake, PA (NAB) 4-19, 4-28 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR (NPP) 37-41 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA (NPP) 37-39 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA (NPP) 37-39 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA (NPP) 37-39 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA (NPP) 37-39 Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA (NPP) 37-39 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA (NPP) 37-41 Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA (NPP) 37-39 Cowlitz River, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cowpens Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-21 Cowskin Creek, Haysville, KS (SWT) 29-28 Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (completed) (ORP) 18-30 Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA (SPL) 33-37 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-41 Coyote Creek (Known as Coyote and Berryessa Creeks), CA (SPK) 35-35, 35-39 Coyote Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) Channel Improvement below Dam on Lower 98 miles of Russian River, CA (SPK) 35-43, 35-44 Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA (NPS) 38-30 Crabtree Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-21 Craig, AK (NPA) 40-17 I-15 Craig Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Cranes Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Crawford County Levee District, AR (SWL) 28-22 Creede, Willow Creek, CO (Floodway) (SWA) 32-18 Crescent City Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-7 Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL (SAM) 10-18, 10-34, 10-46 Criehaven Harbor, ME (NED) 1-5, 1-32, 1-43 Crisfield Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-35 Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN (ORL) 16-35 Crooked Creek, J. Paul Park, Madison, IN (ORL) 16-35 Crooked Creek Lake and Levee, AR (SWL) 28-23 Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Crooked Creek, Union County, NC (SAW) 6-30 Crookston, MN (NCS) 24-32 Cross Creek, Fayetteville, NC (SAW) 6-30 Cross Florida Barge Canal, (SAJ) 9-4, 9-28, 9-36 Cross Lake, NY (NCB) 20-45 Cross Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA (NED) 1-50 Cross Village, MI (NCE) 21-95 Crow River, Rockford, MN (NCS) 24-32 Crows Nest Channel, NC (SAW) 6-32 Crutcho Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26 Crystal River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Cuckold Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Cuivre River, MO (LSM) 14-14 Cumberland, KY (ORN) 15-9, 15-17 Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV (NAB) 4-12, 4-25, 4-33 Cumberland River above Nashville, TN (ORN) 15-11 Cumberland River below Nasvhille, TN (ORN) 15-11 Cumberland River, Gholson Road, Montgomery County, TN (ORN) 15-18 Cumberland River Metro Nashville Landfill (ORN) 15-18 Cumberland River Ted Rhodes Golf Course (ORN) 15-18 Cumberland River, TN and KY (ORN) 15-2, 15-9 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT (NED) 1-54 Cunninghill Cove, MD (NAB) 4-39 Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Current River, AR and MO (SWL) 28-21 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA (SAS) 8-22 Curwensville Lake, PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-28, 4-39 Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR (NPP) 37-38 Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (NED) 1-5, 1-32, 1-44 Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Road, OH (NCB) 20-46 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA (LMN) 11-13 Cypress Bayou and Waterway Between Jefferson, TX and Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-16 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY (ORL) 16-32, 16-33 Cypress Creek, MD (NAB) 4-35 Cypress Creek, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21, 31-35 Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-63 D Dade County, FL (SAJ) 9-22, 9-33, 9-47 Dade County, North of Haulover Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-23, 9-33, 9-47 Dale County, AL (SAM) 10-57 Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY (ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-17 Dallas Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 Dam "A" Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Dam and Bridge, Neosho River, KS (SWT) 29-29 Damariscotta River, ME (NED) 1-50 Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plan, NC (SAW) 6-30 Dana Point, Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-35 Danbury, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-64 Dansville and Vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, NY (NCB) 20-45 Danville, VA (SAW) 6-34 Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), AR (SWL) 28-11, 28-17, 28-25 Darien Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-21 Dauphin Island, AL (SAM) 10-10, 10-32, 10-41, 10-54 Dauphin Island Shoreline (SAM) 10-18, 10-34 Davenport Center Lake, NY (NAB) 4-39 Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) 25-7 Davenport, IA (NCR) 23-13 1-16 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), AR (SWL) 28-3, 28-24 Davids Creek Lake, IA (MRO) 26-23 Davis Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Davis, NC (SAW) 6-31 Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) (NPP) 37-40 Dayton, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 Dayton, Touchet River, WA (NPW) 39-15 Dayton, WY (MRO) 26-23 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD (MRO) 26-21, 26-26 Deadman's Run, NE (MRO) 26-30 Dearborn River - Hwy 287, Wolf Creek, MT (MRO) 26-25 Dearborn River, Lewis-Clark County, MT (MRO) 26-31 Deauthorization Projects New England Division (NED) 1-27 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Dearmenville and Golden Springs, AL (SAM) 10-57 Deep Creek, Accomack County, VA (NAO) 5-16 Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, NC (SAW) 6-30 Deep Creek, Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-16 Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA (NPP) 37-39 Deep River, WA (NPP) 37-38 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Deer Island Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-41 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME (NED) 1-50 Deering, AK (NPA) 40-18 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL (LSM) 14-15 DeGray Lake, AR (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 DeKalb, IL (NCR) 23-14 Delaware Bay to Millville, Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project (NAP) 3-27 Delaware Coast Protection, DE (NAP) 3-12, 3-19, 3-25 Delaware County (NAP) 3-30 Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-4, 17-12, 17-17 Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-17, 3-21 Delaware River, Mouth of Neversink (NAP) 3-30 Delaware River, PA, NJ and DE Philadelphia to the Sea (NAP) 3-3, 3-17, 3-21 Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing (NAP) 3-27 Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ (NAP) 3-4, 3-17, 3-22 Delphi, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 Dennis Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-28 Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR (NPP) 37-40 Depoe Bay, OR (NPP) 37-7, 37-26, 37-34, 37-38, 37-42 Depot Slough, OR (NPP) 37-42 DeQueen Lake, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15, 28-29 Derby, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-64 Derby, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 Des Moines River, Wapello, IA (NCR) 23-15 Des Plains River Wetlands Demonstration (NCC) 22-23 Deschutes River, Bend, OR (NPP) 37-40 Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge, near Tumwater, WA (NPS) 38-27 Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA (NPS) 38-27 Detour Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR (NPP) 37-20, 37-29, 37-37, 37-44 Detroit River, MI (NCE) 21-9, 21-57, 21-81, 21-99 Detroit River, Trenton Channel, MI (1968 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 Detroit River, Trenton Channel, MI (1950 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 Devils Lake, ND (NCS) 24-26 Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORH) 17-4, 17-13, 17-17 Dice Grove, Lampasas River, Bell County, TX (SWF) 30-23 Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, ME (NED) 1-58 Dickinson Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 Dierks Lake, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15, 28-29 Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-39 I-17 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-39 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA (NPP) 37-39 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Diking District 5, Catsop County, (NPP) 37-39 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, WA (NPP) 37-39 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-39 Dillingham Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12 Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-4, 17-13, 17-17 Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) (ORP) 18-24 Disaster Preparedness (MRK) 27-8 Dismal Swamp Canal (Canal Creek), VA (NAO) 5-15 Dismal Swamp Canal (South Mills), NC (NAO) 5-15 Ditto Landing, Huntsville, AL (ORN) 15-18 Dively Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-15 Dixie Creek, GA (SAM) 10-57 Dodge City, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (SAM) 10-11, 10-32, 10-41 Doheny Beach State Park, CA (SPL) 33-36 Domonakas Library, Sheffield, OH (NCB) 20-46 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (NED) 1-50 Dorena Lake, OR (NPP) 37-13, 37-28, 37-36, 37-44 Double Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 Double Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Dover, KY (ORH) 17-22 Downyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-33 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Drayton Hall, SC (SAN) 7-8, 7-13, 7-18 Drinkwater Sewer, MO (LMM) 13-5 Drum Inlet, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-20 Drury Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 Dry Creek (SPN) 34-14 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channe'l Improvements, CA (SPK) 35-31, 35-43, 35-44 Dry Creek, Goodlettsbille, TN (ORN) 15-18 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA (MRO) 26-21, 26-27 Dry Creek, WA (NPW) 39-15 Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO (MRK) 27-18 Dry Pass, AK (NPA) 40-15 Dry Run, IA (NCS) 24-26 DuBois, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Dubuque Harbor, IA 25-7 Dubuque, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-22 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN (ORL) 16-35 Duck Creek, Garland, TX (SWF) 30-23 Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA (SPK) 35-39 Duck Island Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 Duck Point Cove, MD (NAB) 4-35 Duck River, TN (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Dudley Branch, Hebron Parkway, Carrollton, TX (SWF) 30-23 Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI (NCE) 21-9, 21-57, 21-82 Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, MN (1960 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 Duncan Creek, Bloomer, WI (NCS) 24-32 Dungeness River, Area #5, WA (NPS) 38-27 Dungeness River, Area #8, WA (NPS) 38-27 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA (NPS) 38-27 Dunkirk Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-5, 20-15, 20-30 Dunkirk Harbor, NY WRDA 1986 (NCB) 20-47 Dunlap Creek, Redstone Township, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden (SAS) 8-22 Duval County, FL (SAJ) 9-16, 9-32, 9-47 Duxbury Harbor, MA (NED) 1-50 Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (NPW) 39-5, 39-10, 39-13, 39-18 Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID (NPW) 39-17 Dyersburg, TN (LMM) 13-5 Dymers Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 E Eagle, AK (NPA) 40-18 Eagle Creek Lake, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH (ORP) 18-24 Eagle Creek, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-24 Eagle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, VT (NAN) 2-30 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX (SWG) 31-37 1-18 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA (NPS) 38-26 East Boothbay Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 East Bow Creek, Whynot, NE (MRO) 26-27, 26-31 East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, (ORP) 18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 East Branch Dam, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-64 East Brimfield Lake, MA (NED) 1-26, 1-39, 1-66 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-17 East Chester Creek, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27, 2-32 East End Dauphin Island, FL (SAM) 10-18, 10-34 East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail, IA (MRO) 26-27 East Fork, TX (SWF) 30-22 East Fork White River, Brownstown (Jackson County), IN (ORL) 16-33 East Gallatin, Near Bozeman, MT (MRO) 26-25 East Hartford, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 East Moline, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR (NPP) 37-41 East Muddy Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA (MRO) 26-27 East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold, IA (MRO) 26-27 East Nishnabotna River, Page Bny Brdg., IA (MRO) 26-31 East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex, IA (MRO) 26-27 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, IA (MRO) 26-23 East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL (SAM) 10-11, 10-32, 10-41 East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 East Peoria, IL (NCR) 23-15 East Peoria Sanitary District, IL (NCR) 23-14 East Point, LA (LMK) 12-21 East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO (SWL) 28-22 East Rainelle, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 East River (NAN) 2-27, 2-29, East Rockaway Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-16, 2-20, 2-26, 2-32 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY 2-29, 2-32 East Sidney Lake, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-27 East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (LSM) 14-4, 14-8, 14-11 East Weaver Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 East Weaver Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act (NCB) 20-47 Eastpoint Channel, FL (SAM) 10-48 Eastport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-58 Eau Galle River, WI (NCS) 24-5, 24-20, 24-31 Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-28, 9-36 Echo Bay Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 Edenton Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-28 Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Edisto River, North Fork, SC (SAN) 7-21 Edisto River, SC (SAN) 7-20, 7-21 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC (SAN) 7-21 Ediz Hook, WA (NPS) 38-2, 38-15, 38-21 Edmonds Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 Edward MacDowell Lake, NH (NED) 1-22, 1-38, 1-65 Eel River at Sandy Prairie, CA (SPN) 34-14 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN (ORL) 16-33 Eel River, CA (SPK) 35-41 Egegik River, AK (NPA) 40-15 Eight Mile Creek, Richland County, SC (SAN) 7-24 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY (ORL) 16-33 Eighteenmile Creek, Boston, NY (NCB) 20-46 El Dorado Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-23 El Dorado, West Branch, Walnut River, KS (SWT) 29-27 El Paso, TX (SWA) 32-3, 32-12, 32-15 El Turque Beach, Ponce, PR (SAJ) 9-52 Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-11 Eldred, IL (LSM) 14-17 Eldred, PA (ORP) 18-29 Elfin Cove, AK (NPA) 40-15 Elizabeth, NJ (NAN) 2-30, 2-32 Elizabethtown, IL (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD (NAB) 4-35 Elk City Lake (Table Mound), KS (SWL) 28-28 1-19 Elk City Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-27 Elk Creek, Clyde, KS (MRK) 27-17 Elk Creek Harbor, PA 1966 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Elk Creek, Jackson, NE (MRO) 26-27 Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NPP) 37-13, 37-28, 37-36 Elk Creek, Nutter Fort, WV (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Elk Creek, Willis, NE (MRO) 26-27 Elk River, AL and TN (ORN) 15-13 Elk River, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31, 24-32 Elk River, WV (ORH) 17-20 Elkhorn River Bridge, Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-27 Elkhorn River, Ewing, Holt County, NE (MRO) 26-27, 26-31 Elkhorn River, Ewing Sewage Lagoon, NE (MRO) 26-31 Elkhorn River, Logan Creek, NE (MRO) 26-30 Elkhorn River, Near Beemer, NE (MRO) 26-27 Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna, NE (MRO) 26-26 Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-26 Elkins, WV (ORP) 18-4, 18-13, 18-18, 18-22 Elkland, PA (NAB) 4-37 Elkport, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, NC (SAW) 6-30 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, NC (SAW) 6-30 Elm Creek, Burt County, NE (MRO) 26-27 � Elm Creek, Decatur, NE (MRO) 26-26 Elm Fork Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 Elmira, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-27 Elochoman Slough, WA (NPP) 37-38 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY (LMM) 13-4 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA (NPS) 38-27 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Embarrass River, St. Marie, IN (ORL) 16-35 Emergency Bank Protection (NAP) 3-13 Emergency Bank Protection for Certain Highway and Railroad Facilities at Price Landing, MO (LSM) 14-15 Emergency Flood Control Activities Norfolk District (NAO) 5-8, 5-11 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11 Emergency Protection for Illinois Approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge, IL (LSM) 14-15 Emergency Repairs to Levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (LSM) 14-15 Emergency Shore Protection (NCE) 21-42 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization Charleston District (SAN) 7-10 Galveston District (SWG) 31-16 New York District (NAN) 2-15 Savannah District (SAS) 8-8 Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) (SWL) 28-3, 28-24 Emmonak, AK (NPA) 40-18 Emory River, Harriman, TN (ORN) 15-18 Empire-Stratton, OH (ORP) 18-24 Enderlin, Maple River, ND (NCS) 24-26 Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY (NAB) 4-37, 4-39 Engineer Topographic Laboratories 45-1 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 English, IN (Little Blue River) (ORL) 16-23, Enid Diversion Channel, OK (SWT) 29-28 Enid LPP, OK (SWT) 29-26 Entiat River, Chelan County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Entiat River, WA (NPS) 38-27, 38-30 Environmental Service Partner (MRO) 26-28 Erie Harbor, PA (NCB) 20-5, 20-16, 20-30 Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Escambia Bay, FL (SAM) 10-54 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL (SAM) 10-49 Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL (SAM) 10-19, 10-34, 10-46 Esquatel Coulee, Mesa, WA (NWP) 39-15 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA (NPW) 39-15 Essex River, MA (NED) 1-50,1-61 Etna, PA (ORP) 18-29 Eufaula Lake, OK, (SWL) 28-28 Eufaula Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-20, 29-23, 29-25 Evansdale, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Evanston, IL (NCC) 22-22 Evansville, IN (ORL) 16-3, 16-14, 16-28, 16-32 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (NPS) 38-3, 38-15, 38-21, 38-30 Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Exeter River, NH (NED) 1-50 I-20 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA (LMK) 12-18 F Fabius River Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK (NPA) 40-16 Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE (MRK) 27-17 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (SPK) 35-8, 35-29 Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Fairport Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-5, 20-16, 20-31 Fajardo Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-51 Falfurrias, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21, 31-35 Fall Brook Lake, PA (NAB) 4-39 Fall Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-14, 37-28, 37-36, 37-44 Fall River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-3, 26-13, 26-17 Fall River Harbor, MA (NED) 1-50 Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Fall River Lake, KS, (SWL) 28-28 Fall River Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-16, 29-23, 29-27 Falls Lake, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-22 Falmouth Harbor, MA (NED) 1-50 Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-32 Fancy Bluff Creek, GA (SAS) 8-21 Far Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 Farm Creek, IL (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX (SWF) 30-23 Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL (NCR) 23-13 Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT (NED) 1-17, 1-36, 1-47 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Fayette County, GA (SAM) 10-57 Feather River, CA (SPK) 35-38 Felsenthal, AR (LMK) 12-15 Ferguson Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-41 Fern Ridge Lake, Lake Marsh Renovation, OR (NPP) 37-43 Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-43 Fern Ridge Lake, OR (NPP) 37-14, 37-28, 37-36, 37-43, 37-44 Fernandina Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-28, 9-36 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O'The Pines, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-15, 30-19 Filberts Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA (NAO) 5-16 Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY (NAN) 2-11, 1-18, 1-24, 1-26 Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-16, 2-20, 2-29 Fish River, Baldwin County, AL (SAM) 10-52 Fisherman's Wharf Areas, San Francisco Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-7 Fishing Bay, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-44 Fishing Creek, MD (NAB) 4-35 Fishing Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV (ORH) 17-24 Fishpond Drain and Tributaries, GA (SAM) 10-57 Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) (NED) 1-55 Fivemile River Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Flat Branch, Gulfport, MS (SAM) 10-49 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-41 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, Tulsa, OK (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT (NPS) 38-27 Flathead River, MT (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-23 Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT (NPS) 38-27 Flatrock River, Rush County, IN (ORL) 16-35 Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Fletcher Creek at Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-3 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 Flood Control Projects Under Construction B-1 Flood Control Reservoirs Operable A-1 I-21 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Alaska District (NPA) 40-7 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-11 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-22 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-11 Charleston District (SAN) 7-10 Chicago District (NCC) 22-12 Detroit District (NCE) 21-47 Galveston District (SWG) 31-17' Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-8 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-6 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-12 Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 Memphis District (LMM) 13-2 Mobile District (SAM) 10-24 Nashville District (ORN) 15-6 New England Division (NED) 1-29 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-7 New York District (NAN) 2-15 Omaha District (MRO) 26-8 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-13 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Portland District (NPP) 37-15 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-23 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-8 Seattle District (NPS) 38-9 St. Louis District (LSM) 14-6 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11 Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-9 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-16 Flood Control Reservoir Operations New England Division (NED) 1-28 Flood Damages Sustained and Prevented G-1 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR (NPP) 37-41 Florence LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT (NPS) 38-27 Floyd County, GA (SAM) 10-57 Floyd River, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-21 Flushing Bay and Creek, NY (NAN) 2-27 Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL (SAM) 10-11, 10-32, 10-41, 10-54 Follansbee, WV (ORP) 18-24 Folly Beach, SC (SAN) 7-7, 7-13, 7-18 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 Folly River, SC (SAN) 7-4, 7-11, 7-16 Folsom Lake, American River, CA (SPK) 35-39 Forest Heights, MD (NAB) 4-37 Forestville Harbor, MI (1968 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 Forsyth, MT (MRO) 26-21, 26-25 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL (LSM) 14-17 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL (LSM) 14-15 Fort Fisher and Vicinity, NC (SAW) 6-29 Fort Gibson Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Fort Gibson Lake, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-25, 29-27 Fort Kent, ME (NED) 1-55 Fort Leavenworth Bridge Removal (MRK) 27-16 Fort Lupton, CO (Lagoon) (MRO) 26-25 Fort Macon Park, NC (SAW) 6-29 Fort Macon State Park, NC Remaining Work (SAW) 6-31 Fort Madison Harbor, IA 25-7 Fort Myers Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-28, 9-37 Fort Niagara State Park, NY Sec. 201 1965 FC Act (NCB) 20-47 Fort Peck Lake, MT (MRO) 26-9, 26-16, 26-20, 26-24 Fort Pierce Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-32, 9-47 Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-28, 9-37 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-10, 26-16, 26-20, 26-24 Fort Scott Lake Marmaton River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Fort Supply Lake, OK (SWT) 29-5, 29-16 Fort Toulouse, Wetumpka, AL (SAM) 10-19, 10-34, 10-46 Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN (NCE) 21-44, 21-76, 21-93 Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX (SWF) 30-22 Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX (SWF) 30-22 Fortuna Bay, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-63 Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Foster Creek, West Fork, WA (NPS) 38-27 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-28 Foster Lake, OR (NPP) 37-44 I-22 Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO (SWA) 32-18 Four River Basins, FL (SAJ) 9-23, 9-33, 9-49 Four-Mile Creek, Cass County, NE (MRO) 26-31 Fource Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR (SWL) 28-22 Fourmile Creek, Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-15 Fourmile Run, VA (NAB) 4-37 Fourpole Creek, WV (ORH) 17-24 Fowl River, AL (SAM) 10-54 Fox Point Barrier, RI (NED) 1-55 Fox River, Bridge Site #7, Davis County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Fox River Locks and Dams (NCE) 21-100 Fox River, Route J40 Bridge, Davis County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Fox River, WI (NCE) 21-10, 21-58, 21-82 Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (NAP) 3-14, 3-20, 3-25 Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS (MRK) 27-17 Frankfort Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-11, 21-58, 21-82 Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek)(Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-29 Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort)(Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort)(Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-4, 16-14, 16-21, 16-28 Franklin Falls Dam, NH (NED) 1-22, 1-38, 1-65 Frazer-Wolf Point, MT (MRO) 26-21 Frazeysburg, OH (ORH) 17-23 Frazier Creek, Beemer, NE (MRO) 26-30 Freeport and Vicinity, Hurricane Flood Protection, TX (SWG) 31-37 Freeport Harbor, TX (SWG) 31-3, 31-19, 31-26, 31-38, 31-39, 31-44 Freeport, IL (NCR) 23-13 Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 Fremont, OH, Sandusky River (NCB) 20-44 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN (ORN) 15-13 French Creek, Wattsburg, PA (planning and design analysis) (ORP) 18-30 French Lake Township, MN (NCS) 24-32 French River Restoration, MA (NED) 1-61 Frenchboro Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 Freshwater Bayou, LA (LMN) 11-13 Friday Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-3, 38-15, 38-21 Friendly, WV (ORH) 17-22 Friendsville, MD (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 From North Little Rock to Gillett (Above Plum Bayou), AR (SWL) 28-22 Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, 29-23, 29-30 Ft. Collins, CO (MRO) 26-28 Fullerton, KY (ORH) 17-22 Fulton County, GA (SAM) 10-57 Fulton, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Furneaux Creek, Carrollton, TX (SWF) 30-23 G Gadsden-Water Treatment Plant, Gadsden, AL (SAM) 10-19, 10-34, 10-46 Galax, VA (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Galena, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Galile Salt Marsh, RI (NED) 1-61 Galisteo Dam, NM (SWA) 32-6, 32-13, 32-17 Gallatin River, Gallatin County, MT (MRO) 26-25, 26-31 Gallipolis, OH (ORH) 17-22 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (SWG) 31-4, 31-19, 31-26, 31-38, 31-40, 31-44 Ganargua Creek, Plasermill Road, NY (NCB) 20-46 Gapway Swamp, NC and SC (SAW) 6-30 Gapway Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-21 Garapan Beach Road, CNMI (POD) 36-11 Gardner, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-63 Gardners Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 Garland City, AR (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18, 27-20 Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND (MRO) 26-10, 26-16, 26-20, 26-24 Garvin Brook, Stockton, MN (NCS) 24-32 Gasconade River, MO (MRK) 27-16 Gastineau Channel, AK (NPA) 40-15 Gate Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-41 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (NAO) 5-7, 5-11, 5-14 Gauley River, WV (ORH) 17-20 Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD (MRO) 26-10, 26-16, 26-20, 26-22, 26-24 Gaysville Lake, VT (NED) 1-58 Genegantslet Lake, NY (NAB) 4-39 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-14, 3-20, 3-25 I-23 Genesee River, Back River 'Road, Amity, NY (NCB) 20-46 Genesee River, Caneadea, NY (NCB) 20-46 Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH (NCB) 20-42 Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, NC (SAW) 6-30 George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 10-5, 10-31, 10-48 Georges River, ME (NED) 1-50 Georgetown Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-4, 7-11, 7-16 Gering Valley, Gering Drain and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-26 Gila and Salt Rivers Levee and Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-37 Gila River Basin, AZ (SPL) 33-37 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE (MRO) 26-23 Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-32 Gillham Lake, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15, 28-29 Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN (NCS) 24-6, 24-20 Girty's Run, Millvale, PA (ORP) 18-22 Glade Creek, Roanoke County and Vinton, VA (SAW) 6-34 Glasgow, MT (MRO) 26-21, 26-24 Gleason Creek, NV (SPK) 35-41 Glen Cove Creek, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 Glen Cove Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-32 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA (NED) 1-50 Gloucester Harbor, MA (NED) 1-60 Goat Island, GA & SC (SAS) 8-23 Golconda, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 Gold Creek, AK (NPA) 40-16 Goldsboro, Neuse River, NC (SAW) 6-30 Goleta, CA and Vicinity (SPL) 33-37 Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Gooding Area, ID(NPW) 39-15 Goodsby Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Goose Creek, MD (NAB) 4-35 Gordon's Landing, VT (NAN) 2-27 Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-50 Goshen Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-28 Governors Run, MD (NAB) 4-39 Gowanas Creek Channel, NY (NAN) 2-27 Grafton, ND (NCS) 24-28, 24-31 Grafton Pumping Station, ND (NCS) 24-26 Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL (LSM) 14-17 Grahn, KY (ORH) 17-24 Grand Bayou Pass, LA (LMN) 11-13 Grand Forks (NCS) 24-32 Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI (NCE) 21-12, 21-58, 21-83 Grand Haven Harbor, MI (1945 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (LMN) 11-4, 11-8, 11-11 Grand Lake 0' the Cherokees (SWT) 29-27 Grand Marais Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-13, 21-59, 21-83 Grand Marais Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-13, 21-59, 21-83 Grand Marais, MI (NCE) 21-95 Grand Mound-State Historic Site, MN (NCS) 24-31, 24-30 Grand Prairie (Landfill), TX (SWF) 30-22 Grand Prairie (Meyers Road), TX (SWF) 30-22 Grand Rapids, WI (NCS) 24-32 Grand River at Grandville, MI (1965 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-97 Grand Ronde Valley, OR (NPW) 39-17 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-15 Grande Ronde Lake, OR (NPW) 39-17 Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Grandview, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Grant Parish, Below Colfax, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Granville, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Grapevine Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 Grasse River (Massena), NY (NCB) 20-42 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IL (Muscatatuck River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Graves Creek, ID (NPW) 39-15 Gravesend Bay, NY (NAN) 2-28 Grays Creek Canal, Shelby County, TN (LMM) 13-5 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River (Uncompleted portion), WA (1968 R&H ACT) (NPS) 38-30 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (NPS) 38-3, 38-16, 38-21, 38-30 Grays Reef Passage, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Grays River, WA (NPP) 37-38 Grayson Lake, KY (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 Grayville, IL (ORL) 16-24 Great Bend, KS (SWT) 29-6, 29-16 Great Chazy River, NY (NAN) 2-27 Great Coharie Creek, NC (SAW) 6-34 I-24 Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-12, 3-19, 3-25 Great Falls, MT (MRO) 26-21 Great Kills Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI (R&H Acts of 1946 and 1956) (NCE) 21-97 Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, NY (NAN) 2-27 Great Miami River, Brookville Lake, IN (ORL) 16-32 Great Miami River, Port Jefferson, OH (ORL) 16-33 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH (ORL) 16-31, 16-33 Great Pee Dee River, SC (SAN) 7-20 Great Salt Plains Lake, OK (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, 29-23 Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-50 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1941 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Great Sodus Bay, NY (NCB) 20-42 Great South Bay, NY (NAN) 2-27 Green and Barren Rivers, KY (ORL) 16-2, 16-14, 16-19, 16-27 Green Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-14, 21-59, 21-83 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA (NCR) 23-8, 23-10, 23-14 Green Bayou Bridges (SWG) 31-5, 31-19, 31-28 Green Brook (Regional Center), NJ (NAN) 2-36 Green Harbor, MA (NED) 1-6, 1-32, 1-44, 1-61 Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA (NCR) 23-13 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR (NPP) 37-20, 37-29, 37-37, 37-44 Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA (NPS) 38-27 Green River, Calhoun, KY (ORL) 16-31, 16-34, 16-35 Green River Lake, KY (ORL) 16-8, 16-16, 16-32 Green River, State Highway 181, WA (NPS) 38-27 Green Swamp, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-24 Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA (SPK) 35-39 Greene County, AL (SAM) 10-57 Greene, NY (NAB) 4-38, 4-44 Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-29 Greenport Harbor (NAN) 2-27 Greens Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Greens Creek, Petal, MS (SAM) 10-49 Greentree Subdivision, Midland, TX (SWF) 30-23 Greenup, KY (ORH) 17-22 Greenvale Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Greenville, TX (SWF) 30-22 Greenwich Bay, RI (NED) 1-50 Greenwich Cove, Greenwich, CT (NED) 1-60 Greenwich Harbor, CT (NED) 1-50 Greenwich Point Beach, CT (NED) 1-58 Greers Ferry Lake, AR (SWL) 28-11, 28-17, 28-30 Gregory Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Greilickville Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-60, 21-84 Greybull, WY (MRO) 26-25, 26-20 Griffithville-Yawkey, WV (ORH) 17-24 Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), TX (SWG) 31-37 Guadalupe River, CA (SPK) 35-29 Guayanes Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-51 Guilford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-6, 1-32, 1-44 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT (NED) 1-54 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-54 Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa County, FL (SAM) 10-50 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL & Mexican Border (SAM) 10-11, 10-33, 10-41 (LMN) 11-13 (SWG) 31-5, 31-19, 31-28, 31-38, 31-42, 31-43 Gulf Street, Milford, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 Gulfport Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-12, 10-33, 10-42 Guttenberg, IA (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Guyandotte River, WV (ORH) 17-20 Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17 H Haaula Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO (MRK) 27-18 Haikey Creek, OK (SWT) 29-28 Haines Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Halfway Branch, Spartenburg, SC (SAN) 7-24 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-64 Halls Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Halstad, MN (NCS) 24-29 Halstead, KS (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, .29-23 Hamlet City Lake, NC (SAW) 6-13, 6-22 I-25 Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Hamlin Beach State Park, NY (NCB) 20-43 . Hammersley Inlet (Uncompleted Portion), WA (NPS) 38-30 Hammersley Inlet, WA (NPS) 38-26 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT (NED) 1-54 Hammond Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-15, 21-60, 21-84 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR (NPP) 37-38 Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 EC Act (NCB) 20-47 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH (NED) 1-54 Hampton Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Hampton Harbor, NH (NED) 1-50 Hampton Institute, VA (NAO) 5-17 Hampton Roads and Elizabeth River (NAO) 5-13 Hampton Roads and Elizabeth River (NAO) 5-12 Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) (NAO) 5-3, 5-9, 5-12 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-9 Hanahan Water Treatment Plan, Charleston County, SC (SAN) 7-24 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-9 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-9 Hanapepe River, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-9 Hancock Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-20, 1-37, 1-64 Hancock County, Seawall, MS (SAM) 10-52 Hanging Rock, OH (ORH) 17-22 Hannibal Harbor, MO 25-8 Hannibal, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Hannibal SBH, MO (NCR) 23-11 Hanover, Hennepin County, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Hansen Dam, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-17, 33-28, 33-37 Harbor Beach Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-15, 21-60, 21-84 Harbor of Refuge (NAP) 3-27 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (Uncompleted Portion) (NED) 1-58 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-6, 1-27, 1-32, 1-44 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (NED) Harbor of Refuge, NC (SAW) 6-31 Harbor Office at Morrow Bay, CA SPL) 33-35 Harbors of Washington Island, WI (R&H Act of 1937) (NCE) 21-97 Harkers Island, Carteret County, NC (SAW) 6-32 Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-13, 27-20 Harlem River, NY (NAN) 2-27 Harpers Ferry, WV (NAB) 4-39 Harraseeket River, ME (NED) 1-50 Harrisburg, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 Harrison County, MS Shore Protection (SAM) 10-49 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, IL (LSM) 14-15 Harrisville Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-16, 21-60, 21-84 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) (ORL) 16-33 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) (MRK) 27-17 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO (MRK) 27-7 27-12, 27-16 Hartford, CT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 Hartford, White River, VT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 Hartford, WV (ORH) 17-22 Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-11 Hartwell Lake, GA and SC (SAS) 8-10, 8-14, 8-20, 8-23 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA (LMN) 11-15 Hastings Harbor, MN 25-7 Hatchie River, Alcorn County, MS (LMM) 13-5 Haverhill, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-65 Havre, MT (MRO) 26-21, 26-24 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam (MRO) 26-24 Hawesville, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY (NED) 1-50 Hay Creek, Belle Fource, SD (MRO) 26-25 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA (NAP) 3-29 Hays, Big Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Haysi, VA (ORH) 17-21 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA (NED) 1-55 Hazard, KY (ORL) 16-20, 16-24 Heart River, Morton County, Mandan, SD (MRO) 26-31 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID (NPW) 39-15 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Helena Harbor, AR (LMM) 13-4 Hellens Creek, MD (NAB) 4-40 Helm Lake, IL (ORL) 16-26, 16-33 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Hempstead Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-32 Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA (NPS) 38-27 1-26 Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL (NCR) 23-12 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Henderson Creek, Warren County, IL (NCR) 23-16 Henderson Harbor Cut, NY (NCB) 20-44 Henderson River, IL (NCR) 23-13 Henderson,. WV (ORH) 17-22 Hendrick's Harbor, ME (NED) 1-50 Hennepin County, County Highway 116, MN (NCS) 24-32 Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Henrys Fork Unit (NPW) 39-17 Hereford Inlet (NAP) 3-30 Herget Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-14 Herkimer, NY (NAN) 2-30 Herreid, Spring Creek, SD (MRO) 26-21, 26-25 Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-23, 4-30 Herring Creek, MD (NAB) 4-35 Hesperia, CA (SPL) 33-31 Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, 29-23 Hickman Run, Little Tyrone Township, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Hickman Wash, Ft. Defiance, AZ (SPL) 33-31 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (SPK) 35-10, 35-29 Hidden Lake Restoration, NE (MRO) 26-32 Higginsport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Highland Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 Highway 12, CO (SWA) 32-18 Highway 23/14, Jackson County, MN (NCC) 23-16 Highway 23/8, Jackson County, MN (NCC) 23-16 Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, FL (SAM) 10-50 Hills Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-21, 37-30, 37-37, 37-44 Hills Creek, Warren County, TN (ORN) 15-18 Hills Point Road, Dorchester County, MD (NAB) 4-38 Hillsboro Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Hillsborough Bay, FL (SAJ) 9-52 Hillsborough River, FL (SAJ) 9-44 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-14,'27-20 Hillside Drainage, Myrtle Beach, SC (SAN) 7-24 Hillview Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-11 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Hingham Harbor, MA (NED) 1-50 Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Hiwassee River, Polk and Bradley Counties, TN (ORN) 15-14 Hockingport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-40 Hodges Village Dam, MA (NED) 1-26, 1-39, 1-66 Hoh River, County Road 216, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hoh River, near Forks, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hokah, MN (NCS) 24-29 Hoko River, Sekiu, WA (NPS) 38-27 Holbrook, AZ (SPL) 33-7, 33-17, 33-28 Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio (Great Miami River) (ORL) 16-24 Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI (1954 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 Holland Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-16, 21-61, 21-84 Holland Patent, NY - Thompson Creek (NAN) 2-16 Holley Lake, OR (NPP) 37-41 Holly, CO (SWA) 32-18 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-22 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME (NED) 1-55 Holmes Creek, FL (SAM) 10-49 Holston River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Holyoke, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-63 Homasassa River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Homer Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 Homer Spit Erosion, AK (NPA) 40-7, 40-11, 40-14 Hominy Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-31, 6-34 Homme Lake and Dam, ND (NCS) 24-7, 24-20, 24-33 Homochitto River, MS (LMK) 12-16, 12-21 Honey Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Honey Hill Lake, NH (NED) 1-58 Honga River and Tar Bay, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-23, 4-30 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hoonah Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 Hooper, Elkhorn River, NE (MRO) 26-26 Hooper, NE (MRO) 26-21 I-27 Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, NY (NAN) 2-30 Hop Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-20, 1-37, 1-64 Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH (NED) 1-23, 1-38, 1-65 Hoquiam, Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WA (NPS) 38-30 Hoquiam River, WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Hords Creek Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 Horn Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-16 Hornell, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-27 Horseshoe Bend, WA (NPS) 38-31 Horseshoe Cove, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 Hoskins Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel, SD (MRO) 26-25 Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS (SAM) 10-50 Houma Navigation Canal, LA (LMN) 11-13 Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA (NED) 1-20, 1-58 Housatonic River, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-61 Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA (NED) 1-55 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT (NED) 1-55 Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA (NED) 1-55 Houston County, AL (SAM) 10-57 Houston, MN (NCS) 24-7, 24-20 Houston School Road Bridge, Itawamba County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Houston Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 31-7, 31-20, 31-30, 31-38, 31-40, 31-44 Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-23 Howards Mill Lake, NC (SAW) 6-30 Hudson Harbor, WI (NCS) 24-28 Hudson River Channel, NY & N.J. (NAN) 2-5, 2-16, 2-21, 2-26 Hudson River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Hudson River, NY (NAN) 2-4, 2-16, 2-20 Hudson River, NYC to Albany (NAN) 2-32 Hugo Lake, OK (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-24 Hulah Lake, OK (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-24 Hull Branch, MS (SAM) 10-57 Humarock Beach, Scituate, MA (NED) 1-60 Humboldt Bay (Buhne Point), CA (SPN) 34-13 Humboldt Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-9, 40-12 Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA (SPN) 34-7 Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV (SPK) 35-41 Humboldt, TN (LMM) 13-5 Humbug Creek, Pilger, NE (MRO) 26-30 Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Hunting Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Hunting Island Beach, SC (SAN) 7-20 Huntingdon, TN (LMM) 13-6 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA (NPP) 37-39 Huntington Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27, 2-32 Huntington Lake, IN (ORL) 16-9, 16-16 Huntington, MA (NED). 1-55, 1-63 Huntington, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Huot, MN (NCS) 24-29 Huron Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-6, 20-16, 20-32 Hurricane Barrier Operations New England Division (NED) 1-29 Hurricane Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Hutchins, KY (ORH) 17-24 Hutchinson LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Hutto Creek, Austin, IN (ORL) 16-38 Hutton Bridge, Reach H. Stream, TX (SWF) 30-23 Hyannis Harbor, MA (NED) 1-51, 1-60 Hydaburg, AK (NPA) 40-17 Hyde County Dike, NC (SAW) 6-31 I I-38 Lake, MO (LSM) 14-17 Iao Stream, Maui, HI (POD) 36-9 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA (NAP) 3-28 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE (NAP) 3-28 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam - Lake Sacajawea, WA (NPW) 39-5, 39-10, 39-13, 39-18, 39-21 Ida Grove, IA (MRO) 26-21 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek, IA (MRO) 26-27 Iliuliuk Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, (NCR) IL 23-2, 23-7 Illinois Beach State Park, IL (NCC) 22-7, 22-14, 22-19 Illinois River, Liverpool, IL (NCR) 23-15 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-23 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL (NCC) 22-22 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL (NCC) 22-23 Illinois Waterway Existing Locks and Dams (NCR) 23-17 1-28 Illinois Waterway, IL (LSM) 14-2 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Additional Features (NCR) 23-18, .23-19 Illinois Waterway, IL and. IN (NCR) 23-2, 23-7, 23-8, 23-19, 23-20 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks (NCR) 23-13 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Lock and Dam Construction (NCR) 23-17, 23-18 Illinois Waterway, Marseilles Canal, IL (NCR) 23-14 Illinois Waterway, Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) (NCR) 23-13 Imperial Beach, CA (SPL) 33-36 Inarajan Shoreline, Guam (POD) 36-11 Indian Bend Wash (SPL) 33-37 Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, IL (LSM) 14-17 Indian Creek at Emerson, IA (MRO) 26-21, 26-27 Indian Creek, Burton Road, Morgan County, IN (ORL) 16-34 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Indian Creek, Fort Worth, TX (SWF) 30-23 Indian Creek, Hastings, IA (MRO) 26-25 Indian Creek Lake, IA (MRO) 26-23 Indian Grave Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Indian Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-18 Indian River County, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-32, 9-47 Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (NAP) 3-5, 3-17, 3-22 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, IN (NCC) 22-7, 22-14, 22-19 Indiana Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-4, 22-13, 22-18, 22-21 Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN (NCC) 22-7, 22-15, 22-20 Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section)(White River) (ORL) 16-23 Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section)(White River) (ORL) 16-24 Indianola, NE (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Industry,' PA (ORP) 18-24 Inex, KY (ORH) 17-24 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay (NAP) 3-27 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, MD, (NAP) 3-5, 3-18, 3-22 Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA (LMN) 11-13 � Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE (NAP) 3-6, 3-18, 3-23 Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects (NED) 1-13 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Alaska District (NPA) 40-7 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-9 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-21 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-11 Charleston District (SAN) 7-9 Detroit District (NCE) 21-47 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-11 Galveston District (SWG) 31-16 Huntington District (ORH) 17-10 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-7, 27-12 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-7 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 Memphis District (LMM) 13-2 Mobile District (SAM) 10-24 Nashville District (ORN) 15-5 New England Division (NED) 1-28 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-7 New York District (NAN) 2-15 Omaha District (MRO) 26-8 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-14 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-11 Portland District (NPP) 37-15 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-22 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-8, 8-14 Seattle District (NPS) 38-10 St. Louis District (LSM) 14-6 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11 Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-8 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-15 Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works (NPW) 39-2 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-27 International Boundary Waters Board 48-1 Interstate 59 Bridges, Foster, AL (SAM) 10-50 Interstate Bridge, Colubmia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver, WA (Alteration) (NPP) 37-38 Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), OR (NPP) 37-38 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (SAJ) 9-6, 9-28, 9-37 I-29 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA (LMN) 11-13 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL (SAJ) 9-6, 9-28, 9-37 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act 49-1 Iola LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Iowa River, Chelsea, IA (NCR) 23-16 Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Ipswich River, MA (NED) 1-51 Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Irondale Lake, MO (LSM) 14-17 Irondequoit Bay, NY (NCB) 20-6, 20-16, 20-33 Ironton, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Irving Township at Nichols Road, Jackson County, WI (NCS) 24-26 Irving Township, Jackson County, WI (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Irvington Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-32 Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (SPK) 35-11, 35-29 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA (NED) 1-55 Island Creek, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-23, 4-30 Island End River, Chelsea, MA (NED) 1-51 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-29 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME (NED) 1-51 Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH (NED) 1-51 Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD (NAB) 4-38 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME (NED) 1-55 Isreal River, Lancaster, NH (NED) 1-63 Ithaca, Cayuga Inlet, NY (NCB) 20-44 Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-47 Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-47 J J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-17 J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) (SAS) 8-9, 8-14, 8-20, 8-23 Jack's Defeat Creek, IN (ORL) 16-35 Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA (NPS) 38-27 Jackson Brand, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 Jackson County Levee District No. 2, White River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Jackson Creek, Richland County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Jackson Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY (NPW) 39-15 Jackson Hole, WY (NPW) 39-2, 39-10 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL (SAM) 10-9, 10-32, 10-40 Jackson Township, Butler County, PA (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV (ORH) 17-24 Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL (SAJ) 9-7, 9-29, 9-38 Jacksonville Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-7, 9-29 Jamaica Bay, NY (NAN) 2-5, 2-16, 2-21 James Hose Ditch, Linden, IN (ORL) 16-35 James R. Olin Flood Control Project (NAO) 5-7, 5-11, 5-14 James River Environmental, SD (MRO) 26-28 James River Sewage Lagoon, Brown County, NE (MRO) 26-31 James River, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-9, 5-12 James River, Yankton, SD (MRO) 26-26 James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) (SWL) 28-3, 28-25, 28-26 Jamestown Reservoir, ND (MRO) 26-21 Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI (NCR) 23-13 Jarvis Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Jasper County, IL (ORL) 16-35 Jefferson County, AL (SAM) 10-57 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-32 Jeffries Creek, Darlington County, SC (SAN) 7-24 Jemez Canyon Dam, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-13, 32-17 Jenks LPP, OK (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-54 Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV (NAB) 4-12, 4-25, 4-33 Jeremy Creek, SC (SAN) 7-5, 7-12, 7-17 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA (SAM) 10-26, 10-36, 10-48 Joe Creek LPP, OK (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No. 3), AR (SWL) 28-4, 28-24 Joe Pool Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 I-30 John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA (NPP) 37-21, 37-30, 37-37, 37-44 John Day River (West), OR (NPP) 37-40 John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 John Day River, OR (NPP) 37-41 John Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-41 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, VA and NC (SAW) 6-16, 6-22, 6-20 John Martin Reservoir, CO (SWA) 32-4, 32-12 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-24 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 John's Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-29, 9-38 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME (NED) 1-55 Johnson Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 Johnson Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 Johnsonburg, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Johnstown, PA (ORP) 18-5, 18-13, 18-18, 18-22 Jones Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-6, 2-16, 2-21 Jonesport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 Jonesville, LA (LMK) 12-15 Josias River, ME (NED) 1-7, 1-32, 1-44 Joyce Creek, Camden County, NC (SAW) 6-30 Julian, Rock Creek, NE (MRO) 26-26 Juneau Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 K Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Kaaawa Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kahoma Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, HI (POD) 36-7 Kahului Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-7 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-9 Kake Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-41 Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA (NPP) 37-38 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek), MI (NCE) 21-96 Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI (1954 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-9.7 Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI (1958 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-97 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-7 Kanawha River, WV (ORH) 17-2, 17-12, 17-17 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kankakee River Ice Management, IL (NCC) 22-8, 22-15 Kankakee River, IL and IN Levee Between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge, IN (NCC) 22-23 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS (MRK) 27-4, 27-11, 27-14, 27-20 Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod.) (MRK) 27-17 Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS (MRK) 27-17 Kansas River and Minor Tributaries (MRK) 27-20 Kansas River Navigation (MRK) 27-18 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-10 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Kasilof Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-5, 14-8, 14-11, 14-15 Kaskaskia River, IL (LSM) 14-10, 14-15 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-10 Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-10 Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-9 Kaw Lake, OK (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-24 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-1, 36-5, 36-6 Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5 Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (SPK) 35-12, 35-30 Kawkawlin River, MI (NCE) 21-96 Kays Creek, UT (SPK) 35-39 Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-17 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Keene, NH (NED) 1-55, 1-63 Keg Creek, Minden, IA (MRO) 26-27 Kehoe Lake, KY (ORH) 17-21 Keithsburg Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-14 Kekaha Beach, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-8 Kelleys Island, OH (NCB) 20-42 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID (NPW) 39-18 Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA (NPS) 38-31 1-31 Kennebec River, ME (NED) 1-51, 1-61 Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Kennebunk River, ME (NED) 1-51 Kenosha Harbor, WI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 Kenosha Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-17, 21-62, 21-84 Kentucky River, Frankfort, KY (ORL) 16-35 Kentucky River, KY (ORL) 16-2, 16-14, 16-27, 16-31 Kentucky River, National Recreation Area (ORL) 16-24 Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA (SPK) 35-39 Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Ketchikan, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 Ketchikan Harbor (West Breakwater), AK (NPA) 40-16 Keuka Lake, NY (NCB) 20-21, 20-40 Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-10 Kewaunee River, WI (1960 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-97 Kewaunee, WI (NCE) 21-18, 21-62, 21-85 Keweenaw Waterway, MI (NCE) 21-18, 21-62, 21-85 Key West Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Keyport Harbor (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA (NPS) 38-26 Keystone Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Keystone Lake, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-25, 29-27 Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Kihei Beach, Maui, HI (POD) 36-8 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-7, 2-17, 2-22 Kindred Lake, ND (NCS) 24-28 King (Water Plant), NC (SAW) 6-13, 6-22 King Cove Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-17 Kings Creek, MS (SAM) 10-52 Kings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Kingston-Edwardsville, PA (NAB) 4-38 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA (NED) 1-51 Kingston Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 Kingston, NY (NAN) 2-16 Kingston Township, MN (NCS) 24-32 Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-24 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, SC (SAN) 7-24 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY, (ORP) 18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Kiowa Tribe Housing Development, Andarko, OK (SWT) 29-29 Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL (NCR) 23-12 Kishwaukee River, Belvidere, IL (NCC) 23-16 Kissimmee River Restoration, FL (SAJ) 9-26, 9-34, 9-50, 9-51 Kittanning, PA Part I (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Kittanning, PA Part II (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 Kitzmiller, MD (NAB) 4-38 Klamath River, CA (SPK) 35-39 Klamath River, CA (SPN) 34-14 Klawock, AK (NPA) 40-17 Klutina River, Cooper Center, AK (NPA) 40-16 Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Knapps Narrows, MD (NAB) 4-35 Knife River Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA (SPN) 34-13 Knightville Dam, MA (NED) 1-17, 1-36 Knobb's Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 Kodiak Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID (NPS) 38-28 Kootenai River, ID and MT (NPS) 38-26 Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID (NPS) 38-28 Koyuk, AK (NPA) 40-17 Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 L La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA (NPS) 38-10, 38-18, 38-23, 38-28 La Crosse, WI (NCS) 24-28, 24-32 La Farge Lake and Channel Improvemnet, WI (NCS) 24-8, 24-21 La Trappe, MD (NAB) 4-35 Lac La Belle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-19, 21-63, 21-85 Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN (NCS) 24-7, 24-21 Lac qui Parle, MN (NCS) 24-30 Lacakawanna, NY, Smokes Creek (NCB) 20-44 Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12 Lackawanna River Basin, PA (NAB) 4-13, 4-33 I-32 Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24 Lago de Portuges, PR (SAJ) 9-50 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA (NED) 1-51 LaGrange Bayou, FL (SAM) 10-49, 10-54- Laguna Madre Seagrass Restoration, TX (SWG) 31-16, 31-21 Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-10 Lake Andursia, Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND (NCS) 24-8, 24-21 Lake Brownwood Modification, TX (SWF) 30-22 Lake Camanchie, CA (SPK) 35-39 Lake Cavanaugh, WA (NPS) 38-31 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA (LMN) 11-13 Lake Charles, LA (LMN) 11-10 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY (ORP) 18-24 Lake City Harbor, MN 25-7 Lake Creek, Round Rock, TX (SWF) 30-23 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Lake Crockett, WA (NPS) 38-4, 38-16, 38-22 Lake Darling Dam, ND (NCS) 24-26 Lake Douglas, Decatur, GA (SAM) 10-50 Lake Elsinore, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-17, 33-28 Lake Erie, Cooley Canal, Lucas, OH (NCB) 20-45 Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY (NCB) 20-46 Lake Erie, Geneva Park, OH (NCB) 20-46 Lake Erie, Hamburg, NY (NCB) 20-46 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act (ORP) 18-24 Lake Erie Sturgeon Point, NY (NCB) 20-20 . Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX (SWF) 30-22 Lake George, Hobart, IN (NCC) 22-8, 22-15, 22-20 Lake Guntersville, AL (ORN) 15-18 Lake Herman (Dredging), SD (MRO) 26-23 Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) (SWT) 29-27 Lake Kemp, TX (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-24 Lake Michigan Diversion (NCC) 22-5, 22-14, 22-18 Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-22 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL (NCC) 22-22 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL (NCC) 22-22 Lake Montauk (NAN) 2-26 Lake Montauk Harbor (NAN) 2-27 Lake Ogleton, MD (NAB) 4-40 Lake Ontario, Shoals Point, Wayne County, NY (NCB) 20-46 Lake Oroville, CA (SPK) 35-39 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane protection) (LMN) 11-4, 11-8, 11-11 Lake Pontchartrain, North Shore, LA (LMN) 11-12 Lake Providence Harbor, LA (LMK) 12-16 Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-32 Lake River Delta Area, WA (NPP) 37-41 Lake River, WA (NPP) 37-38 Lake Sawyer, Camp Miakonda, Toledo, OH (NCB) 20-46 Lake Shelbyville, IL (LSM) 14-15 Lake Sidney Lanier, GA (SAM) 10-48 Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels in (NCE) 21-20, 21-85 Lake Texoma (Denison Dam) OK and TX (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-24, 29-28 Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN (NCS) 24-9, 24-21 Lake Traverse, MN and SD (NCS) 24-25 Lake Washington Ship Channel, WA (NPS) 38-5, 38-16, 38-22 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (SWT) 29-7, 29-18, 29-24 Lakeport Lake, CA (SPK) 35-41 Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, OH (NCB) 20-20, 20-40 Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH (NCB) 20-43 Lamoille River, VT (NAN) 2-30, 2-32 Lamprey River, NH (NED) 1-51 Lancassange Creek, Clark County, IN (ORL) 16-35 Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY (NCB) 20-44 Lancaster, Israel River, NH (NED) 1-17, 1-36, 1-47 Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Lansing (Grand River), MI (1958 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-97 Lansing Harbor, IA 25-7 LaPoint Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-19, 21-63, 21-85 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID (NPW) 39-15 Larchmont Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 Largo Sound Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Lamed LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane protection) (LMN) 11-5, 11-8, 11-12 Larsen Bay, AK (NPA) 40-17 Las Animas, CO (SWA) 32-18 Las Cruces, NM (SWA) 32-18 Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-36 I-33 Las Vegas Wash Tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV (SPL) 33-40 LaSueur, MN (NCS) 24-29 Latrobe, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Latta Brook Road, NY (NAB) 4-38 Lauderdale County, MS (SAM) 10-57 Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa (POD) 36-11 Launiupoko, Maui, HI (POD) 36-11 Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORN) 15-7, 15-9, 15-17 Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID (NPW) 39-15 Lavaca-Navidad River, TX (SWG) 31-37 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-19 Lavon Lake, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 Lawrence, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Lawrenceburg, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-28 Lazer Creek Lake, GA (SAM) 10-51 Lead Bayou, MS (LMK) 12-13, 12-21 Leading Creek, WV (ORH) 17-23 Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-50 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, MS (SAM) 10-49 Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS (SAM) 10-50 Leaf River, MS (SAM) 10-52 Leavenworth, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-32 Lee County, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-32, 9-47, 9-52 Lee, Housatonic River, MA (NED) 1-55 Leesville, VA (SAW) 6-30 Leetonia, OH (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Leetsdale, PA (ORP) 18-24 Leipsic River, DE (NAP) 3-28 Leith's Creek, SC (SAN) 7-21 Leith's Creek, Scotland County, NC (SAW) 6-30 Leland Bowman Lock, LA (LMN) 11-13 Leland Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-20, 21-63, 21-86 Lemon Creek, NY (NAN) 2-32 Lepua Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Letart Falls, OH (ORH) 17-22 Letart, WV (ORH) 17-22 Levee Districts Between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 2, 5, 6, and 7 (LSM) 14-17 Levee Districts Between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10 and 13 (LSM) 14-17 Levee Districts Between Cowdon and Vandalia, IL (LSM) 14-17 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Levee Unit 10, White River, IN (ORL) 16-25 Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN (ORL) 16-25 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN (ORL) 16-25 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-25 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Levee Unit 9, White River, IN (ORL) 16-25 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN (ORL) 16-14, 16-23, 16-33 Levee Unit No. 8, White River, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18, 17-20 Lewis & Clark, NE & Lake Sakakawea, ND (MRO) 26-28 Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Lewis River Area, WA (NPP) 37-41 Lewis River, WA (NPP) 37-38 Lewisport, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-28 Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and WA (NPW) 39-14 Lewisville Dam, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 Lexington Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-21, 21-64, 21-86 Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT (NPS) 38-12, 38-19, 38-24 Liberal, KS (SWT) 29-28 Liberty Local Protection Project, TX (SWG) 31-37 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, NJ (NAN) 2-30 Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County) (ORL) 16-33 Lick Run, Roanoke, VA (SAW) 6-30 1-34 Licking River, KY (ORL) 16-22, 16-24, 16-31, 16-34 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT (NED) 1-54 Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY (NCB) 20-45 Lincoln Lake, IL (ORL) 16-26 Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA (NPS) 38-8, 38-17 Lincoln, Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-26 Linton, ND (MRO) 26-21 Linville River, Avery County, NC (SAW) 6-34 Linwood Park, Vermillion, OH (NCB) 20-46 Lisle, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-27 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95 Little Bay, TX (SWG) 31-37 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Little Blue River Lakes, MO (MRK) 27-4, 27-11, 27-14 Little Blue River, Shelby County, IN (ORL) 16-35 Little Caillou Bayou, LA (LMN) 11-13 Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN (NCC) 22-9, 22-15, 22-20 Little Calumet River, IL and IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN (NCC) 22-23 Little Calumet River, IN (NCC) 22-9, 22-15, 22-20, 22-22 Little Chena River Dam, AK (NPA) 40-16 Little Colorado River at Holbrook Levee, AZ (SPL) 33-37 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL (SAM) 10-50 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD (NAB) 4-35, 4-44 Little Dell Lake, UT, CA (SPK) 35-13, 35-30 Little Diomede, AK (NPA) 40-17 Little Egg Harbor, NJ (NAP) 3-28 Little Falls, MN (NCS) 24-32 Little Goose Lock and Dam - Lake Bryan, WA (NPW) 39-6, 39-10, 39-13, 39-19, 39-21 Little Harbor, NH (NED) 1-7, 1-32, 1-44 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA (NED) 1-51. Little Kanawha River, WV (ORH) 17-20 Little Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-21, 21-64, 21-86 Little Limestone Creek, TN (ORN) 15-18 Little Machipongo River, VA (NAO) 5-16 Little Manatee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH (ORL) 16-31 Little Miami River, OH (ORL) 16-32 Little Missouri River, AR (LMK) 12-16 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR (LMK) 12-18 Little Neck Bay, NY (NAN) 2-27 Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE (MRO) 26-23 Little Nemaha River, Tangeman, NE (MRO) 26-26 Little Papillion Creek, NE (MRO) 26-21 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek, NE (MRO) 26-26 Little Pee Dee River, SC (SAN) 7-22 Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15 Little Red River, District 1, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little River (Creek), VA (NAO) 5-16 Little River, AR (LMK) 12-16 Little River at Cayuga Island, NY (NCB) 20-42 Little River Basin, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15, 28-29 Little River, Belfast, ME (NED) 1-55 Little River, Cameron, TX (SWF) 30-23 Little River, DE (NAP) 3-27 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (SAN) 7-5, 7-12, 7-17 Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Fourche Bayou, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, NC (SAW) 6-30, 6-34 Little Scooba Creek, MS (SAM) 10-57 Little Sioux River, Anthon, IA (MRO) 26-27 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-6, 20-17, 20-33 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, NC (SAW) 6-30 Little Tallahatchie River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Little Tennessee River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT (SPK) 35-41 Little Wabash River, Carmi, IL (ORL) 16-38 Little Walnut Creek, Austin, TX (SWF) 30-23 Little White Oak Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Little Wicomoco River (NAB) 4-5, 4-23, 4-30, Little Wood River, ID (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 Little Yankee Creek, Hubbard, OH (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Littleville Lake, MA (NED) 1-18, 1-36 Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Lock and Dam No. 11 (SWL) 28-25 Lock and Dam No. 5, AR (SWL) 28-4, 28-24 Lock Haven, PA (NAB) 4-13, 4-16, 4-34 I-35 Lock No. 2 and Wilber D. Mills Dam (No. 2), AR (SWL) 28-3 Locklies Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Lockwoods Folly River, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-20 Lodgepole Creek, Arvada, CO (MRO) 26-30 Lodgepole Creek, Sidney, NE (MRO) 26-27 Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft, NE (MRO) 26-26, 26-27 Logan Creek, Pender, NE (MRO) 26-30 Logan, OH (ORH) 17-23 Lone Rock, Buffalo River, AR (SWL) 28-23 Long Beach Island (NAP) 3-29, 3-30 Long Branch, Greenville, TX (SWF) 30-23 Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO (MRK) 27-4, 27-11, 27-14 Long Island Intracoastal W/W, NY (NAN) 2-7, 2-17, 2-22 Long Lake Area, Helena, AR (LMM) 13-6 Long Lake Dam, AK (NPA) 40-16 Long Road F.C. District, Chehalis River, WA (NPS) 38-31 Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Longboat Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-29, 9-38 Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR (NPP) 37-22, 37-30, 37-37, 37-44 Lorain Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-6, 20-17, 20-33 Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act modified by 1930 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-14, 33-21, 33-35 Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-17, 33-28 Los Angeles River, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-18 Lost Creek at Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-4, 26-13, 26-30 Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River, OR (NPP) 37-22, 37-30, 37-37, 37-44 Lost River, MN (NCS) 24-26 Louisville, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-24, 16-28, 16-33 Louisville, KY (Partial) (ORL) 16-25 Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24 Louisville Point Park, Blount County, KY (ORN) 15-18 Loup River, Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-21 Loves Park, IL (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 Lowell Creek, AK (NPA) 40-16 Lowell, MA (NED) 1-55, 1-65 Lower Auchumpkee Creek (SAM) 10-51 Lower Branch Rush River, ND (NCS) 24-26 Lower Butte Basin, CA (SPK) 35-44 Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA (NPP) 37-15, 37-28, 37-36 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Lower Creek, Lenoir, NC (SAW) 6-13, 6-22 Lower Decatur Bend, NE (MRO) 26-32 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA (NPW) 39-15 Lower Fox River, WI (1925 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 Lower Gila River Levee and Channel Improvements (Gila River and Tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) (SPL) 33-37 Lower Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (NPW) 39-6, 39-10, 39-13, 39-19, 39-21 Lower Green River, King County, WA (NPS) 38-28 Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-22 Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND (MRO) 26-21 Lower Heart River, ND (MRO) 26-21 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA (NAB) 4-35 Lower Mission Creek, Santa Barbara, CA (SPL) 33-40 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. West, WA (NPW) 39-7, 39-11, 39-14, 39-20, 39-21 Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX (SWG) 31-14, 31-21, 31-35 Lower San Francisco Bay, CA (SPN) 34-13 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA (SPK) 35-39 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, CA (SPK) 35-32 Lower Santa Cruz, AZ (SPL) 33-12, 33-20 Lower Savannah River (SAS) 8-9 Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR and ID (NPW) 39-8, 39-11, 39-14 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD (NAB) 4-35 Lower Walla Walla River, WA (NPW) 39-17 Lower Woonsocket, RI (NED) 1-55, 1-62 Lowes Wharf, MD (NAB) 4-35 Lowndes County, MS (SAM) 10-57 Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-8, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Lubec Channel, ME (NED) 1-51 Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet, ID (NPW) 39-17 I-36 Lucky Peak Lake, ID (NPW) 39-3, 39-10, 39-13 Ludington Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-21, 21-64, 21-86 Ludlow, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-28 Ludlow Lake, VT (NED) 1-58 Lukfata Lake, OK (SWT) 29-26 Lumber River, SC (SAN) 7-22 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL (ORL) 16-34 Lutsen Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-95 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Lyman Creek, ID (NPW) 39-15 Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC (SAN) 7-20 Lynn Harbor, MA (NED) 1-51 Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA (NED) 1-54 Lynnhaven Inlet VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-9, 5-12, 5-16 M Maalaea Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5, 36-6 Machias River, Machias, ME (NED) 1-55 Machias River, Machiasport, ME (NED) 1-21, 1-38, 1-48 Machias River, ME (NED) 1-51, 1-61 Mackay Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-31 Mackinac City Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Mackinac Island Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95 Macy, Blackbird Creek, NE (MRO) 26-26 Mad River at Blue Lake, CA (SPN) 34-14 Mad River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-41 Mad River Lake, CT (NED) 1-55 Mad River, Waterbury, (Woodtick Area) CT (NED), 1-21, 1-37, 1-47, 1-64 Madison Bay, MD (NAB) 4-36 Madison, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks (MRO) 26-26 Madison River, Quake Lake, MT (MRO) 26-25 Madisons Parish Port, LA (LMK) 12-16 Magby Creek, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-50 Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-45 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Magruder Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-41 Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-8, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Mahoning River, Warren County, OH (planning and design analysis) (ORP) 18-30 Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-31 Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (completed) (ORP) 18-30 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, AR (SWL) 28-4 Malden River, MA (NED) 1-51 Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR (NPW) 39-15 Malheur Lake Project, OR (NPW) 39-15 Malheur River, OR (NPW) 39-17 Malheur River, OR Vale Unit (NPW) 39-17 Maline Creek, MO (LSM) 14-5, 14-11 Mamaroneck Harbor (NAN) 2-27 Manasquan River, NJ (NAP) 3-7, 3-18, 3-23 Manatee County, FL (SAJ) 9-18, 9-32, 9-47 Manatee Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-29, 9-38 Manatee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 Manchester Harbor, MA (NED) 1-58 Manchester, OH (ORH) 17-22 Mandan, Heart River, ND (MRO) 26-21, 26-25 Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, HI (POD) 36-7 Manhasset Bay, NJ (NAN) 2-32 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Maniece Bayou, AR (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 Manistee Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-22, 21-65, 21-86 Manistique Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-23, 21-65, 21-86 Manitowoc Harbor, WI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 Manitowoc Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-23, 21-65, 21-86 Mankato and North Mankato, MN (NCS) 24-9, 24-21 Mankato, North Mankato, and Lettillier, MN (NCS) 24-31 Mankato Township, MN (NCS) 24-32 Mann's Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-31 Manokin River, MD (NAB) 4-36 Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT (NED) 1-26, 1-40, 1-66 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, NC (SAW) 6-6, 6-21 Mantua Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Manvel, ND (NCS) 24-32 Maple Creek, Dodge City, Site 1, NE (MRO) 26-31 Maple Creek, Dodge City, Site 2, NE (MRO) 26-31 Maple Creek, East Fork, Howells, NE (MRO) 26-30 Maple River, ND (NCS) 24-28, 24-29 Mapleshade, OH (ORH) 17-22 Marblehead Harbor, MA (NED) 1-58, 1-60 Marengo County, AL (SAM) 10-57 Marengo, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME (NED) 1-55 Marietta, OH (ORH) 17-22 Marina Del Rey, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-14, 33-24 Marion County Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 I-37 Marion, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-33 Marion, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Marion Reservoir, KS (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 29-24 Mariposa, CA (SPK) 35-43 Markham Ferry Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Marmarth, ND (MRO) 26-21, 26-25 Marne Creek, Yankton, SD (MRO) 26-26 Marquette Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-24, 21-66, 21-87 Marsh Creek Bridge, Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA (NAB) 4-40 Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY (NCB) 20-44 Marshall, MN (NCS) 24-9, 24-21 Marshalltown, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Martin County, FL (SAJ) 9-47 Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Martin, KY (ORH) 17-21 Martins Ferry, OH (ORP) 18-24 Martins Fork Lake, KY (ORN) 15-4, 15-9, 15-17 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA (SPK) 35-14, 35-30 Mary's Creek, Fort Worth and Benbrook, TX (SWF) 30-23 Marysville, KS (MRK) 27-18 Marysville Lake, CA (SPK) 35-39 Masefau Bay, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Mason J. Niblack Levee, (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 Mason, WV (ORH) 17-22 Massillon, OH, (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 31-7, 3.1-20, 31-31, 31-40, 31-44 Matawan Creek (NAN) 2-32 Matinicus Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 Mats Mats Bay, WA (NPS) 38-26 Mattapoiset Harbor, MA (NED) 1-58 Mattaponi River, VA (NAO) 5-16 Mattituck Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 Mauckport, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Maumee Bay State Park, OH (NCB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-39 Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act (NCB) 20-47 Maumee River, Toledo, OH (NCB) 20-46 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-10 Maurice River, NJ (NAP) 3-7, 3-18, 3-2, 3-27 Maurice River, NJ-Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth 3-28 Maurice River, NJ, Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project (NAP) 3-30 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-12, 14-15 Maxwell Creek, Parker County, TX (SWF) 30-23 Mayaguez Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-9, 9-29, 9-39 Mayfield Creek, KY (LMM) 13-1, 13-3 Maysville, KY (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Mazon River, Goose Creek, Grundy County, IL (NCC) 23-16 Mazon River, Goose Lake, Grundy County, IL McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Recertification, AR (SWL) 28-14, (SWT) 29-27 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation Locks & Dams, AR (SWL) 28-14 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK (SWT) 29-2 29-14, 29-23 McCook and Thorton Reservoirs, IL (NCC) 22-10, 22-15, 22-20 McCook Lake, SD (MRO) 26-21 McCready's Point Road, MD (NAB) 4-38 McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR (NPP) 37-40 McGarth Creek, Wichita Falls, TX (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 29-24 McGary Hollow Run, Weston, WV (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-12, 14-15 McGinnis Levee, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 McGregor Park, Montgomery County, TN (ORN) 15-18 McKees Rocks, PA (ORP) 18-24 McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR (NPP) 37-40 McKinney Bayou, AR (LMK) 12-19 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR (LMK) 12-23 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 McNary Lock and Dam - Lake Wallula, OR and WA (NPW) 39-8, 39-11, 39-14, 39-20 I-38 McNary Second Powerhouse, OR & WA (NPW) 39-17 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek, NE (MRO) 26-26 Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain, WY (MRO) 26-25 Medomak River, ME (NED) 1-51 Meherrin River, VA (NAO) 5-16 Mekorykuk, AK (NPA) 40-15 Melbourne Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-9, 9-29, 9-39 Melrose, WI (NCS) 24-32 Melvern Lake and Pamona Lake (Road Improvements), KS (1974 Act) (MRK) 27-18, 27-20 Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS (MRK) 27-5, 27-11, 27-20 Melvin Price Locks & Dam (Formerly Lock and Dam No. 26 (Replacement)) (LSM) 14-10 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM) 13-5 Menemsha Creek, MA (NED) 1-51 Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI (NCE) 21-66, 21-87 Meramec Park Lake, MO (LSM) 14-17 Meramec River Basin Valley Park, MO (LSM) 14-5, 14-8, 14-12 Merced County Stream Group, CA (SPK) 35-15, 35-30, 35-43 Merced County Streams, CA (SPK) 35-14, 35-30 Merced River, CA (SPK) 35-39 Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-12, 14-15 Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA (LMN) 11-13 Mermentau River, LA (LMN) 11-13 Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME (NED) 1-55 Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA (NED) 1-22 Merrimack River, MA (NED) 1-51 Metamora Lake, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-32 Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA (NPS) 38-28 Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA (NPS) 38-28 Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA (NPS) 38-28 Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA (NPS) 38-28 Methow River, WA (NPS) 38-28, 38-30 Metlakatla Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-10, 40-13, 40-18 Metropolis, IL (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Miami Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-9, 9-30, 9-39, 9-53 Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH (ORL) 16-20, 16-24 Miami River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Mianus River, CT (NED) 1-51 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP), 18-8, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Michigan City Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-5, 22-14, 22-19, 22-21 Middle Beach, CT (NED) 1-54 Middle Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Middle Gila River Channel Improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) (SPL) 33-37 Middle Hooper Island, MD (NAB) 4-38 Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder, NE (MRO) 26-27 Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-13, 32-16 Middle River and Connecting Channel, CA (SPK) 35-38 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 Middle River at Argyle, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (completed) (ORP) 18-30 Middleport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Middlesboro (Diversion Canal) KY (ORN) 15-18 Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-14, 15-18 Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY (ORN) 15-5, 15-9 Middleton Shoals, GA & SC (SAS) 8-23 Midland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Midland/Jal Draw, Midland, TX (SWF) 30-23 Milan, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Miles City, MT (MRO) 26-21 Milford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-51 Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Milford Lake, Republican River, KS (MRK) 27-5, 27-11, 27-14, 27-20 Milk River, Havre, MT (MRO) 26-23 Milk River, Malta, MT (MRO) 26-25, 26-30 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT (NED) 1-55, 1-63 I-39 Mill Creek, Bennington Lake, WA (NPW) 39-3, 39-10, 39-13 Mill Creek, Catawaba River, Old Fort, NC (SAN) 6-30 Mill Creek, Dalton, GA (SAM) 10-50, 10-52 Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-31, 16-33 Mill Creek Levees (SPL) 33-37 Mill Creek, Mcgee, MS (SAM) 10-52 Mill Creek, MD (NAB) 4-40 Mill Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31, 6-34 Mill Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 Mill Creek, OH (ORL) 16-4, 16-14 Mill Creek, Salem, OR (NPP) 37-40, 37-43 Mill Creek, Sinclairville, NY (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS (SAM) 10-19, 10-35, 10-46 Mill Creek, TX (SWG) 31-37 Mill Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Mill Creek, WA (NPW) 39-17 Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Mill Lake, Blue River, MO (MRK) 27-18 Millbranch Stream, Fairmont, NC (SAW) 6-30 Miller, OH (ORH) 17-22 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL (LSM) 14-15 Miller Run, Cecil Township, PA (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-26, 10-36 Millersburg, OH (ORH) 17-23 Millford Haven, VA (NAO) 5-16 Millican, TX (SWF) 30-22 Millington, TN (LMM) 13-2, 13-3 Millwood Lake, AR (SWL) 28-8, 28-16, 28-29 Millwood, WV (ORH) 17-22 Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR (NWP) 39-15 Milton Harbor (NAN) 2-27, 2-24 Milton, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Milwaukee Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-25, 21-67, 21-87 Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA (NPS) 38-28 Mingo Creek, OK (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 29-24, 29-28, 29-30 Mingo Creek, SC (SAN) 7-20 Mingo Junction, OH (ORP) 18-24 Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-32 Minnesota River at Henderson, MN (NCS) 24-10, 24-21 Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN (NCS) 24-10, 24-21 Minnesota River, MN (NCS) 24-2, 24-20, 24-24, 24-26, 24-31 Minot, ND (NCS) 24-26 Miscellaneous Work Under Special Authorization Fort Worth District (SWF) 30-11 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-26 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Seattle District (NPS) 38-13 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 Mispillion River, DE (NAP) 3-8, 3-18, 3-23 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI (NED) 1-54, 1-60 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID (NPW) 39-15 Mission Beach, CA (SPL) 33-30 Mission Zanja, CA (SPL) 33-31 Missisquoi River at Richford, VT (NAN) 2-30 Mississinewa Lake, IN (ORL) 16-9, 16-16 Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO (LSM) 14-15 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO (LSM) 14-17 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO (LSM) 14-15 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL (underseepage measures) (LSM) 14-15 Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor (LSM) 14-17 Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO (LSM) 14-15 Mississippi River Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA (LMN) 11-10, 11-14 Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL (LSM) 14-2, 14-8, 14-10 Mississippi River Between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MN (NCS) 24-25 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (Includes Melvin Price Locks & DAM) (LSM) 14-2 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (NCR) 23-3 (NCS) 24-2 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN 25-1, 25-4, 25-10 Mississippi River Commission 41-1 I-40 Mississippi River, Fridley, MN (NCS) 24-30 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (LMN) 11-2, 11-8, 11-10 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA (LMN) 11-14 Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA (LMN) 11-14 Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA (LMN) 11-2, 11-8, 11-10 Missoula (Sewage Treatment Plant), MT (NPS) 38-28 Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD (MRO) 26-4, 26-14, 26-17 Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 Act) (MRK) 27-17 Missouri River, Aten, NE (MRO) 26-21 Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood, SD (MRO) 26-25 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization and Navigation, NE (MRO) 26-9, 26-15, 26-31 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton, MT (MRO) 26-25 Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam, MT and Gavins Point Dam, SD & NE (MRO) 26-4, 26-14, 26-18 Missouri River Dike Lowering, NE (MRO) 26-32 Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, and ND (MRO) 26-5, 26-14, 26-18 Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS and MO (MRK) 27-2, 27-14, 27-13 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND (MRO) 26-24 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-5, 26-14, 26-18 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO (MRO) 26-22, 26-24 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-5, 27-11, 27-14, 27-18, 27-19, 27-20 Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA, to Rule, NE, (MRO) 26-24, Missouri River Levee Unit L536 Derion Bend, MO (MRO) 26-32 Missouri River Main Stem (MRK) 27-20 Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-27 Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update (MRO) 26-11, 26-16, 26-20 Missouri River, Niobrara, NE (MRO) 26-22 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE (MRO) 26-2, 26-13, 26-17 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (MRK) 27-2, 27-11, 27-13 Mitigation of Shore Damages Detroit District (NCE) 21-43 New England Division (NED) 1-13 Mixon Creek, McGee, MS (SAM) 10-49 Mobile Bay to New Orleans, LA (SAM) 10-42 Mobile Harbor, AL (SAM) 10-13, 10-33, 10-43 Mocassin Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-31 Moccasin Springs, MO (LSM) 14-14 Moclips River, Moclips, WA (NPS) 38-28 Mohave Floodwarning, CA (SPL) 33-31 Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-8, 33-18, 33-30 Mokelumne River, CA (SPK) 35-38 Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR (NPP) 37-40 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR (NPP) 37-40 Moline Harbor, IL 25-7 Moline, IL (NCR) 23-13 Molly Ann's Brook, NJ(NAP) 3-15, 3-20, 3-25 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County, IA (MRO) 26-27 Monongahela River, PA and WV (ORP) 18-2, 18-13, 18-17, 18-26, 18-27, 18-28 Monoosnoc Brook, MA (NED) 1-58 Monoosnoc Lake, MA (NED) 1-58 Monroe and West Monroe Parish, LA and Ouachita Parish, LA (LMK) 12-13 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA (NAB) 4-6, 4-23, 4-30 Monroe County, AL (SAM) 10-57 Monroe County, FL (SAJ) 9-48 Monroe County, MS (SAM) 10-57 Monroe Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-26, 21-67, 21-88 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 Monroe Lake, IN (ORL) 16-9, 16-16, 16-32 Montcalm, WV (ORH) 17-24 Monterey Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-13 Montgomery County, AL (SAM) 10-57 Montour Falls, Oswega River Basin, NY (NCB) 20-44 Moore, OK (SWT) 29-30 Moorefield, WV (NAB) 4-13, 4-26, 4-34, 4-40 Moores Ferry, VA (ORH) 17-23 Moorhead, MN (NCS) 24-28 Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR (NPP) 37-38 I-41 Moosabec Bar, ME (NED) 1-51 Morais River, ND (NCS) 24-32 Moravian Creek, Wilksboro, NC (SAW) 6-34 Morehead City Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-21, 6-34 Morehead City Harbor, NC Jetties at Beaufort Inlet (SAW) 6-31 Morehead Harbor, West. Turning Basin Expansion, NC (SAW) 6-32 Morgan City and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane protection) (LMN) 11-12, 11-15 Moriches Bay, NY (NAN) 2-28 Moriches Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-26, 2-27 Mormon Slough, CA (SPK) 35-39 Morrison, Bear Creek, CO (MRO) 26-23 Morristown Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 Morro Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-14, 33-24 Moscow, OH (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP) 18-9, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Moss Landing Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-7 Moss Street, Pecan Creek, Gainsville, TX (SWF) 30-23 Mott, ND (MRO) 26-22 Mound State Park, Moundville, AL (SAM) 10-20, 10-35, 10-40 Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL (LMM) 13-5 Moundsville, WV (ORP) 18-24 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MI (NCE) 21-86 Mount Morris Lake, NY Genesee River (NCB) 20-11, 20-21, 20-40 Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, WA (NPP) 37-16, 37-28, 37-36 Mount Vernon, IN (ORL) 16-24 Mountain Brook Dam, NH (NED) 1-58 Mountain Point, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-10, 40-13 Mouth of Yazoo River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Moycock Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31, 6-32 MS Riverview St, Bellview, IA IL (NCR) 23-16 Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN (NCC) 22-22 Mt. Holly, NJ (NAP) 3-29 Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (NPP) 37-16, 37-28, 37-36 Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA (MRO) 26-27 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR (NPP) 37-41 Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE (MRO) 26-22 Mud Lake Area, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-17 Mud Mountain Dam, WA (NPS) 38-10, 38-18, 38-23 Mud River, WV (ORH) 17-23 Muddy Creek Dam, PA (ORP) 18-24 Muddy Creek, Int Hwy 15 Frontage Road, Vaughn, MT (MRO) 26-25 Muddy Creek Near Syracuse, NE (MRO) 26-26 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, MD (NAB) 4-36 Mulberry Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction F-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power in Operation E-1 Multiple Purpose Projects, Including St. Marys River, MI (NCE) 21-96 Multnomah Channel, OR (NPP) 37-38 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-40 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-39 Muncie, IN (White River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Munday, TX (SWF) 30-22 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL (SAM) 10-50 Murder Creek, Brewton, AL (SAM) 10-20, 10-35, 10-46 Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL (SAM) 10-50 Murderkill River, DE (NAP) 3-8, 3-18, 3-23 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake (LMK) 12-21 Murray County, GA (SAM) 10-57 Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), AR (SWL) 28-4, 28-25 Murrells Inlet, SC (SAN) 7-5, 7-12, 7-17 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN (ORL) 16-33 Muscatine Harbor, IA 25-7 Muscatine Harbor, IA IL (NCR) 23-11 Muscatine Island, IA (NCR) 23-8 Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine-Louisa County Drainage District, No. 13, IA (NCC) 23-10, 23-12, 23-15 Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA (NCR) 23-12 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL (NCR) 23-11 Muskegon Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-27, 21-67, 21-88 Muskingum River Lakes, OH (ORH) 17-7, 17-14, 17-18 Muskingum River, OH (ORH) 17-20 1-42 Mustinka River, MN (NCS) 24-30 Myers Chuck Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-16 Myrtle Beach (Anchorage Basin), SC (SAN) 7-22 Mystic River, CT (NED) 1-51, 1-58 Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Mystic River, MA (NED) 1-51 N N.C. Aquarium, Dare County, NC (SAW) 6-34 Naches River, Naches, WA (NPS) 38-28 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-27 Nahunta Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-31 Naknek River, AK (NPA) 40-15 Nameless Creek, County Road 850 N, IN (ORL) 16-35 Namo River, Guam (POD) 36-9 Nan Cove, MD (NAB) 4-36 Nandua Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia (POD) 36-3, 36-5, 36-6 Nansemond River, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-9, 5-13, 5-16 Nantasket Beach, MA (NED) 1-58 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD (NAB) 4-36 Nanticoke River, DE AND MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-24, 4-31 Nanticoke River, MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-23, 4-31 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA (NED) 1-51 Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-58 Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-58 Napa River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-39 Napa River, CA (SPN) 34-7 Narragansett Pier, RI (NED) 1-59 Narraguagus River, ME (NED) 1-51 Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME (NED) 1-24, 1-38, 1-48 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 Narrows of Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-7, 2-17, 2-22 Nashua, NH (NED) 1-55, 1-65 Nassau County, FL (SAJ) 9-18, 9-32 Natches Port Area, MS (LMK) 12-21 Natchitoches Parish, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 National Emergency Preparedness Buffalo District (NCB) 20-11 Chicago District (NCC) 22-6 Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-7, 27-12 Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 Omaha District (MRO) 26-12 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-15 St. Paul 24-18 Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery Activities 51-1 Navajo Reservoir, NM (SPK) 35-38 Navarro Mills Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX (SWF) 30-22 Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) (NED) 1-11 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction D-1 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Baltimore District (NAB) 4-10 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-9 Charleston District (SAN) 7-7 Detroit District (NCE) 21-42 Galveston District (SWG) 31-10 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-15 Louisville District (ORL) 16-3 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-4 Memphis District (LMM) 13-1 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17 Nashville District (ORN) 15-4 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-3 New York District (NAN) 2-11 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-6, 5-10 Omaha District (MRO) 26-2 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-15 Portland District (NPP) 37-7 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 Seattle District (NPS) 38-5 St. Louis District (LSM) 14-3 Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-3 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-1 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-28 Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-10 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Neabsco Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 Neabsco Creek, VA (1811 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-40 I-43 Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-28 Neah Bay, WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-31 Neale Sound, MD (NAB) 4-36, 4-44 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL (NCR) 23-12 Neavitt Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-36 Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier to Beaumont, TX (SWG) 31-37 Needs, San Bernardino, CA SPL) 33-37 Nehalem Bay, OR (NPP) 37-38 Nehalem River, Sunset Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-43 Nelson Run, Ross Township, PA (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Neodesha Lake, KS (SWL) 28-28 Neodesha Lake, KS (SWT) 29-27 Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA (NAP) 3-27 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR (NPP) 37-40 Nestucca River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR (NPP) 37-40 Neuse River, 300-foot wide channel in front of New Bern, NC (SAW) 6-31. Neuse River Barrier, NC (SAW) 6-31 Neuse River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-33 Neuse River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-31 Neuse River, Oriental, NC (SAW) 6-30 Neva and Olga Straits, AK (NPA) 40-15 Neville Island, PA (ORP) 18-24 New Albany, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 New Amsterdam, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (NED) 1-51 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (NED) 1-24, 1-39, 1-48 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (NED) 1-21, 1-34, 1-42 New Buffalo Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-27, 21-68, 21-88 New Bullards Bar, CA (SPK) 35-39 New Cumberland, WV (ORP) 18-24 New Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-26, 16-28, 16-29 New Harmony, IN (ORL) 16-25, 16-29 New Haven Breakwater, CT (NED) 1-51 New Haven Harbor, CT (NED) 1-7, 1-33, 1-44 New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-8, 3-18, 3-23 New Jersey Pierhead Channel (NAN) 2-28 New Kensington and Parnassus, PA (ORP) 18-24 New London, CT (NED) 1-55 New London Harbor, CT (NED) 1-51 New Madrid Harbor, MO (LMM) 13-4 New Martinsville, WV (ORH) 17-22 New Matamoras, OH (ORH) 17-22 New Melones Lake, CA (SPK) 35-23 New Orleans to Venice, LA (Hurricane protection) (LMN) 11-5, 11-9, 11-12 New Pass, Sarasota, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-30, 9-40, 9-53 New Richmond, OH (ORL) 16-16, 16-29 New River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 New River, NC (SAW) 6-30 New River, Onslow County, NC (SAW) 6-30 New River, WV and VA (ORH) 17-20 New Rochelle Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 New York and New Jersey Channels (NAN) 2-27, 2-32 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN) 2-8, 2-17, 2-22 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas (NAN) 2-8, 2-17, 2-22 Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, NJ (NAN) 2-27, 2-32 Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) (ORH) 17-21 Newark, OH (ORH) 17-7, 17-14, 17-18, 17-24 Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA (NPS) 38-28 Newbegun Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 Newburgh, IN (Ohio River) (ORL) 16-23 Newburyport Harbor, MA (NED) 1-8, 1-33, 1-44 Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Newmarket Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Newport Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-14, 33-25, 33-35 Newport Harbor, RI (NED) 1-51 Newport, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 Newport News Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Newport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Newport, OR (NPP) 37-41 I-44 Newport, White River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Newport-Wilder, KY (ORL) 16-26 Newry-Old Pickens, SC (SAS) 8-23 Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No. 18) (SWL) 28-26 Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK (SWT) 29-27 Newtown Creek (NAN) 2-27 Niagara Remedial Works, NY (NCB) 20-42 Niagara River, Compensating Works, 1930 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Niagara River, NY (NCB) 20-42 Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT (NED) 1-51 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY (ORL) 16-33 Nichols, NY (NAB) 4-38, 4-44 Nimrod Lake, AR (SWL) 28-8, 28-16, 28-28 Nine Mile Drain, Scottsbluff, NE (MRO) 26-31 Ninilchik Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-10, 40-13 Niobrara River (Cams Bridge), NE (MRO) 26-31 Niobrara River, Bassett, NE (MRO) 26-27 Niobrara River-Carns Bridge, Bassett, NE (MRO) 26-27 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-22, 26-27 Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-30 Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA (NPS) 38-28 Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA (NPS) 38-28 Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA (NPS) 38-28 Nixon Creek, TN (LMM) 13-5 Noatak, AK (NPA) 40-18 Nogales Wash, AZ (SPL) 33-13, 33-20, 33-37 Nolin Lake, KY (ORL) 16-10, 16-16, 16-32 Nome, AK (NPA) 40-17 Nome Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-10, 40-13 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA (NAB) 4-36 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM) 13-3, 13-5 Nonconnah Creek at Perkins, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-5 Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-5 Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT (NED) 1-55 Nookagee Lake, MA (NED) 1-59 Noosack River, above Highway 1Z Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-28 Noosack River, Acme, WA (NPS) 38-28 Noosack River, Everson, WA (NPS) 38-31 Noosack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA (NPS) 38-28 Noosack River, Middle Fork, Deming, WA (NPS) 38-28 Noosack River, WA (NPS) 38-28 Noosack River, Whatcom County, WA (NPS) 38-31 Norco Bluff, CA (SPL) 33-31 Norfolk Floodwall, VA (NAO) 5-17 Norfolk Harbor, Eastern Branch, VA (NAO) 5-13 Norfolk Harbor, Southern Branch, VA (NAO) 5-13 Norfolk Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-10, 5-13 Norfolk Harbor, Western Branch, VA (NAO) 5-13 Norfolk Lake, AR (SWL) 28-12, 28-17, 28-30 Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-22 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River, NE (MRO) 26-26 Normal, KY (ORH) 17-22 Noroton Bay, Darien, CT (NED) 1-60 Norrel Lock and Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, AR (SWL) 28-4, 28-24 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, MA (NAN) 2-30 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-15 North Andover and Lawrence, MA (NED) 1-59 North Branch, Chicago River, IL (NCC) 22-10, 22-15, 22-20 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-18 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-64 North Canadian above Lake Overholser (SWT) 29-29 North Canadian River, Okfuskee County, OK (SWT) 29-29 North Canadian River Wastewater Plant, Oklahoma City, OK (SWT) 29-28 North Ellenville, NY (NAN) 2-13, 2-18, 2-24, 2-26 North Fork, Kentucky River, Jackson, KY (ORL) 16-35 North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-19 North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA (SPK) 35-39 North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH (NED) 1-59 North Hartland Lake, VT (NED) 1-18, 1-36, 1-56 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA (NED) 1-54 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA (NED) 1-56 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA (NED) 1-56 North Nashua River, Leominster, (Sewer Line) MA (NED) 1-4, 1-38, 1-48, 1-65 I-45 North Nashua River, Leominster, MA (NED) 1-23, 1-4, 1-38, 1-48, 1-65 North Platte River at Casper,. MY (MRO) 26-31 North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare, NE (MRO) 26-26 North River Dike, NC (SAW) 6-31 North Scituate.Beach, Scituate, MA (NED) 1-54 North Second Street at Wolf River, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-5 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County,.NY (NAN) 2-32 North Shore, Santa Rosa Island, FL (SAM) 10-52 North Springfield Lake, VT (NED) 1-18, 1-36 North Stratford, NH (NED) 1-63 North Turkey Creek, Jefferson, County, CO (MRO) 26-31 Northeast Cape Fear River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-30 Northeast Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 Northeast River, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-24, 4-31 Northfield Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-21, 1-38, 1-64 Northhampton, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 Northport Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 Northport Harbor, WI (1975 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-98 Northport Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-95 Norwalk, Ct (NED) 1-56 Norwalk Harbor, CT (NED) 1-51 Norwalk-Wilton, CT (NED) 1-59 Norwich, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-66 Norwich, NY (NAB) 4-38, 4-44 Nottoway River, VA (NAO) 5-16 Noxubee River, MS (SAM) 10-49, 10-51 Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS (SAM) 10-50 Noyo River and Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-5, 34-7 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-12, 14-16 O.0 O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 O'Hare Reservoir, IL (NCC) 22-11, 22-16, 22-20 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND (MRO) 26-11, 26-16, 26-20, 26-22, 26-24 Oahe Wildlife Restoration (MRO) 26-28 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA (NED) 1-54 Oak Creek at Wakpala, SD (MRO) 26-30 Oak St. Bridge, Midland, TX (SWF) 30-23 Oakdale, PA (ORP) 18-23 Oakford Special Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI (NED) 1-54 Oakland Harbor (Deepen Tidal Canal), CA (SPN) 34-13 Oakland Harbor (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge), CA (SPN) 34-13 Oakland Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-1, 34-7, 34-11 Oates Creek, Richmond County, GA (SAS) 8-8, 8-13, 8-19, 8-22 Obey River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Obion River, TN (LMM) 13-4 Occohannock Creek, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-16 Occoquan Creek, VA (NAB) 4-36 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-36 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-24, 4-31 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-40 Ocean City, NJ (NAP) 3-30 Ocean Springs Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-51 Oceana, WV (ORH) 17-21 Oceanside Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-15, 33-25, 33-37 Oceanside, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-36 Oceanside, Sand By-pass, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-15 Ochlockonee Bay, Wakulla County, FL (SAM) 10-51 Ochlockonee River, FL (SAM) 10-49 Oconto Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-28, 21-68, 21-88 Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, NC (SAW) 6-31 Ocracoke Island, NC (SAW) 6-31 Oelwein, Fayette County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Ofu Airstrip (West End), American Samoa (POD) 36-11 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) (ORH) 17-8, 17-14 Ohio River Basin (Louisville District) (ORL) 16-10, 16-16, 16-19 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) (ORN) 15-5, 15-12 I-46 Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) (ORP) 18-9, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY (ORL) 16-34, 16-35 Ohio River, Carollton, KY (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Chester, WV (planning and design analysis) (ORP) 18-30 Ohio River, City Park, West Point, KY (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY (ORL) 16-34, 16-35 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Madison, IN (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Moscow, OH (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, New Richmond, KY (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Ohio County, IN (ORL) 16-38 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority,.KY (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Rockport/Rockport Landing, IN (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Switzerland County, IN (ORL) 16-38 Ohio River, Troy, IN (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY (ORL) 16-34 Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN (ORL) 16-34 Oil Branch Creek, Coffeyville, KS (SWT) 29-28 Oil City Ice Control Structures, PA (ORP) 18-22 Oil City, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-30 Oil Creek, Oil City, Venango County, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN (NCR) 23-12 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA (NPS) 38-26 Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA (NPS) 38-28 Okanogan River, Omak, WA (NPS) 38-28 Okanogan River, Oroville, WA (NPS) 38-28 Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, WA (NPS) 38-28 Okanogan River, WA (NPS) 38-28, 38-30 Okatibbee Lake, MS (SAM) 10-20, 10-35, 10-46 Okeechobee Waterway, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-30, 9-40 Oklahoma City, Floodway, OK (SWT) 29-28 Oklahoma City LPP, OK (SWT) 29-26 Oklawaha River, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-30, 9-40, 9-53 Oktassi Creek, AL (SAM) 10-54 Olcott Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-7, 20-17, 20-36 Old Field Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-30 Old Harbot, Kodiak Island, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-10, 40-13 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-50 Old Kingstree Canal, Williamsburg County, SC (SAN) 7-24 Old River, CA (SPK) 35-38 Old Town Creek (SAM) 10-49 Oldmans Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27, 3-30 Olean, NY (ORP) 18-22 Oliver Hill, KY (ORH) 17-24 Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL (SAM) 10-9, 10-32, 10-40 Olympia Harbor (1945 R&H Act), WA (NPS) 38-30 Olympia Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-5, 38-16, 38-22 Omaha, NE (MRO) 26-22, 26-24, 26-26 Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Onancock River, VA (NAO) 5-16, 5-17 Onandaga Storm Water Discharge (NCB) 20-12, 20-21 Oneida Creek, NY (NCB) 20-45 Oneonta, NY (NAB) 4-44 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY (NCB) 20-44 Onondaga Lake, NY (NCB) 20-35 Ontonagon Harbor, MI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 Ontonagon Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-28, 21-68, 21-88 Oologah Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Oologah Lake, OK (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 29-24, 29-27 Oostanaula River, GA (SAM) 10-49, 10-51 Open-channel work, Ohio River (ORP) 18-3 Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY (ORL) 16-2, 16-14 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORL) 16-3 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORH) 17-2 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORD) 19-3, 19-5, 19-6 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing (NPW) 39-21 Open River Pasco to Lewiston (NPW) 39-21 Optima Lake, OK (SWT) 29-9, 29-18, 29-24 Oracoke Inlet, NC (SAW) 6-28 I-47 Orange River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), OR (NPP) 37-38 Oriental (South Avenue), NC (SAW) 6-14, 6-22 Orleans, IN (ORL) 16-26 Oro Grande Wash Channel Improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-37 Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID (NPW) 39-15 Orowoc Creek, NY (NAN) 2-32 Orwell Lake, MN (NCS) 24-32, 24-33 Orwell River (Otter Tail River), MN 24-30 Osage River, KS and MO (MRK) 27-20 Osage River, MO lock and dam (MRK) 27-16i Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Osborne Park Inlets, Willoughby, OH (NCB) 20-46 Osceola Harbor, AR (LMM) 13-4 Oslo, MN (NCS) 24-29 Oswego Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-7, 20-17, 20-36 Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Ottawa, IL (NCR) 23-16 Ottawa, OH (NCB) 20-44 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Otter Brook Lake, NH (NED) 1-18, 1-36 Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR (SWL) 28-22 Otter Creek, N. Terre Haute, IN (ORL) 16-35 Otter Creek, VT (NAN) 2-32 Ottumwa, IA (NCR) 23-12 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (LMK) 12-2, 12-10, 12-12 Ouachita River and Tributaries, AR and LA (LMK) 12-5, 12-13, 12-16 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (LMK) 12-18 Ouachita River Levees, LA (LMK) 12-5, 12-11 Ouzinkie, AK (NPA) 40-17 Overton-Red River Waterway, LA (LMK) 12-16 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, NY (NCB) 20-44 Owens, CA (SPK) 35-43 Owensboro, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Owl Creek, West Carrolton, OH (ORL) 16-35 Owl's Head Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 Owyhee River, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-16 Oxford, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-27 Oyster Channel, VA (NAO) 5-16 Oyster Creek, TX (SWG) 31-37 Ozan Creek, AR (LMK) 12-18 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 13), AR (SWL) 28-12, 28-17, 28-25 Ozona, FL channel and turning basin (SAJ) 9-51 P Paauau Stream, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-9 Paducah, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 Pagan River, VA (NAO) 5-5, 5-10, 5-14, 5-16 Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH (ORH) 17-24 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH (ORH) 17-24 Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-19 Painted Post, NY (NAB) 4-38 Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ (SPL) 33-8, 33-18, 33-30 Paintsville Lake, KY (ORH) 17-8, 17-15, 17-19 Pajaro River, CA (SPK) 35-16, 35-30 Pajaro River, CA (SPN) 34-14 Palm Beach County, FL (SAJ) 9-19, 9-32, 9-48 Palm Beach County, FL, from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet (SAJ) 9-48, 9-52 Palm Beach, FL side channel and basin (SAJ) 9-51 Palm Beach Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-30, 9-41, 9-53 Palm Beach Island, FL (SAJ) 9-19, 9-33 Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-17 Pamunkey River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-16 Panacea Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-49, 10-50 Panama City Beaches, FL (SAM) 10-44 Panama City Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-13, 10-33, 10-44 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 Panther Creek, KY (Green River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, IL (NCR) 23-16 Panther Creek, WV (ORH) 17-23 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE (MRO) 26-5, 26-14, Parish Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 Park City, KS (SWT) 29-28 Park River, Hartford, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-63 I-48 Park Row Bridge, Arlington, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 Parker Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Parker Lake, OK (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 29-24 Parkersburg, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Parrots Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Pascagoula Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-14, 10-33, 10-44 Pascagoula River, MS (SAM) 10-49 Pasquotank River, NC (SAW) 6-30 Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 Pass Christian Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-49 Pass Manchac, LA (LMN) 11-14 Passaic River Basin, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-14, 2-18, 2-24 Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME (NED) 1-57 Pat Mayse Lake, TX (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 29-24 Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA (NPW) 39-16 Patchogue River, CT (NED) 1-51, 1-61 Patoka Lake, IN (ORL) 16-10, 16-16, 16-32 Patoka River, Jasper, IN (ORL) 16-34 Patoka River, Winslow, IN (ORL) 16-34 Patriot, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO I-35 Highway Relocation Town Relocation (MRK) 27-18 Patuxent River, MD (NAB) 4-36 Paw Paw Lake, MI (NCE) 21-96 Pawcatuck, CT (NED) 1-56 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI & CT (NED) 1-59 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT (NED) 1-51 Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Pawtucket, RI (NED) 1-59 Pawtuxet Cove, RI (NED) 1-51 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI (NED) 1-56, 1-62 Pax, WV (ORH) 17-24 Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA (NAB) 4-14, 4-26, 4-34 Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID (NPW) 39-16 Payette Valley, ID (NPW) 39-17 Peachtree Creek, Basin, Atlanta, GA (SAM) 10-52 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA (SAS) 8-22 Pearl River Basin, MS and LA (LMK) 12-6, 12-11, 12-13 Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS (LMK) 12-21 Pearl River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA (LMK) 12-7, 12-11, 12-14 Pearson-Skubitz Bill Hill Lake, KS (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 29-24 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (MRO) 26-6, 26-14, 26-27, 26-30 Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI (NCR) 23-14 Peconic River (NAN) 2-27 Pecos, TX (SWA) 32-18 Peekskill Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Pelican Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Pelican Lake, Frankfort, MN (NCS) 24-30 Pembina, ND (NCS) 24-29 Pembina River Lake, ND (NCS) 24-28 Pembina River, ND (NCS) 24-26 Pembroke Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR (NPP) 37-41 Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR (NPP) 37-39, 37-41, 37-43 Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR (NPP) 37-40 Penitentiary Jones Run, KY (ORL) 16-35 Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCC) 23-15 Penny Slough, Rock River, IL (NCR) 23-12 Penobscot River, ME (NED) 1-51, 1-56 Pensacola Bay, FL to Mobile Bay, AL (SAM) 10-42 Pensacola Beach, FL (SAM) 10-52 Pensacola Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-15, 10-33, 10-45, 10-51 Pensacola Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Pensaukee Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-29, 21-69, 21-88 Pentwater Harbor, MI (1892 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 Pentwater Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-29, 21-69, 21-89 Peoria, IL (NCR) 23-13 Pepin Harbor, WI 25-7 Pepper Creek, DE (NAP) 3-27 Pepperell Cove, ME (NED) 1-51 Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Percosin Creek and Tributaries, GA (SAM) 10-57 Perdido Pass Channel, AL (SAM) 10-15, 10-33, 10-45 Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (NED) 1-24, 1-39, 1-48 Perley, MN (NCS) 24-32 Permenant International Association of Navigation Congresses 47-1 I-49 Perquimans River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-30 Perry County Drainage and Levee District Nos. 1, 2 and 3, MO (LSM) 14-16 Perry Creek, IA (MRO) 26-6, 26-14, 26-18, 26-30 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS (MRK) 27-5, 27-11, 27-14 Perry Road, Hutton Br., Carroll, TX (SWF) 30-23 Perryville, KY (ORL) 16-28 Perth Amboy, NJ (NAN) 2-32 Petaluma River, CA (SPN) 34-8 Petersburg Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Petersburg, WV (NAB) 4-14, 4-26, 4-34 Petit Jean River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA (LMN) 11-14 Petoskey Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Peyton Creek, TX (SWG) 31-37 Phillippi Creek Basin, FL (SAJ) 9-52 Phillips Lake, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-65 Philpott Lake, VA (SAW) 6-16, 6-22 Phoenix, AZ and Vicinity (Including New River)(Stage 2 and Remaining Work) (SPL) 33-8, 33-18, 33-31 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-6, 27-14 Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha District) (MRO), 26-6, 26-18 Pickens County, AL (SAM) 10-57 Pierce, NE (MRO) 26-22, 26-26 Pig Island Gut, ME (NED) 1-51 Pilchuck River, Everett, WA (NPS) 38-28 Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA (NPS) 38-28 Pilchuck River, WA (NPS) 38-28 Pillar Point Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-8 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR (NPP) 37-41 Pinal Creek Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-37 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV (SPL) 33-8, 33-18, 33-31 Pine Bluff,. AR, local protection (LMK) 12-18 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN (NCS) 24-25 Pine Creek, AZ (SPL) 33-32 Pine Creek Lake, TX (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 29-24 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (SPK) 35-16, 35-30 Pine Ford Lake, MO (LSM) 14-6, 14-8 Pine Mountain Lake, AR (SWL) 28-22 Pine River, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Pinellas County, FL (SAJ) 9-20, 9-33, 9-48 Pineville, KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Pineville, Red River, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Pinole Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Pinole Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, CO (Sec. 212) (SWA) 32-18 Pinopolis Dam, SC (SAN) 7-9, 7-13, 7-18 Pioneer Lake, KS (MRK) 27-18 Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN (ORL) 16-35 Pipestem Lake, ND (MRO) 26-6, 26-14, 26-19 Pipestone Creek at Pipestone, MN (MRO) 26-30 Pithlachascotee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Pittsburgh Harbor, PA (ORP) 18-21 Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) (ORP) 18-24 Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) (ORP) 18-24 Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) (ORP) 18-24 Pittsfield, MA (NED) 1-64 Placer Creek, ID (NPS) 38-28 Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN (LMM) 13-5 Planning, Engineering and Design (NED) 1-30 Plants Creek, Seymour, TX (SWF) 30-23 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE (MRO) 26-22 Platte River and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-22 Platte River, Ashland, NE (MRO) 26-27 Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville, NE (MRO) 26-26 Platte River, Brady, NE (MRO) 26-26 Platte River, Ginger Cove Near Valley, NE (MRO) 26-27 Platte River, Hansen-Chris Lakes, Bellevue, NE (MRO) 26-26 Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island, NE (MRO) 26-26 Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement (MRK) 27-17 Platte River near Schuyler, NE (MRO) 26-22 Platte River, Near North Bend, NE (MRO) 26-27 Plattsburgh Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27 Pleasant Bay, MA (NED) 1-59 Pleasant Creek, Greenwood, IN (ORL) 16-35 Pleasant Point, Perry, ME (NED) 1-56 Pleasant River, ME (NED) 1-51 Pleasanton, TX (SWF) 30-22 I-50 Plum Creek at New Haven Township, MN (NCS) 24-29 Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora, CO (MRO) 26-26 Plum Creek, Johnston, NE (MRO) 26-27 Plum Creek, Norden Dam Access Road, NE (MRO) 26-25 Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY (ORL) 16-33 Plum Island, MA (NED) 1-54 Plum Island Waste Treatment Plant, SC (SAW) 7-24 Plymouth Harbor, MA (NED) 1-51 Plymouth, PA (NAB) 4-38 Poca, WV (ORH) 17-23 Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-40 Pocomoke River, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-40 Pocomoke River, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-24, 4-30 Pocotaligo River, Manning, SC (SAN) 7-24 Pogues Run, Indianapolis, IN (ORL) 16-35 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Point Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-61 Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI (NED) 1-8, 1-33, 1-45, 1-61 Point Judith, RI (NED) 1-59 Point Lookout Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-30, 21-69, 21-89 Point Place, Toledo, OH (NCB) 20-44 Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA (NED) 1-24, 1-39, 1-48 Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX (SWF) 30-23 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA (NED) 1-51 Poloa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Poison Bay, Flathead Lake, MT (NPS) 38-26 Pomeroy, OH (ORH) 17-22 Pomme de Terre Lake (Power Addition), MO (MRK) 27-19 Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO (MRK) 27-6, 27-11, 27-15, 27-20 Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS (MRK) 27-6, 27-11, 27-15 Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, (MRK) 27-20 Pompion Hill, SC (SAN) 7-21 Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-30, 9-41, 9-53 Ponce Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-11, 9-30, 9-41 Ponce, PR (SAJ) 9-50 Pond Creek, Cheatham County, TN (ORN) 15-18 Pontiac Diversion, RI (NED) 1-59 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT (NED) 1-56 Port Alexander (Inner Harbor), AK (NPA) 40-16 Port Alexander, AK (NPA) 40-15 Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Port Angeles Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 Port Arthur and Vicinity (Hurricane Flood Protection), TX (SWG) 31-14, 31-21, 31-36 Port Austin Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Port Bay, NY 1950 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Port Chester Harbor (NAN) 2-26, 2-27, 2-32 Port Clinton Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-7, 20-18, 20-37 Port Dickerson, NY (NAB) 4-44 Port Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-12, 9-31, 9-41 Port Gamble Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 Port Hueneme, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-15, 33-25 Port Jefferson Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-27, 2-32 Port Lions, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-10, 40-13 Port of Gold Beach, OR (NPP) 37-41 Port of Kalama, WA (NPP) 37-39 Port Ontario Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-7, 20-18, 20-37 Port Orchard Bay, WA (NPS) 38-26 Port Orford, OR (NPP) 37-7, 37-26, 37-34 Port Royal Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-6, 7-12, 7-18 Port San Luis, CA (SPL) 33-35 Port Sanilac Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-30, 21-69, 21-89 Port St. Joe, FL (SAM) 10-49 Port Townsend, WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-31 Port Washington Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-30, 21-70, 21-89 Port Wing Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-31, 21-70, 21-89 Portage Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-31, 21-71, 21-89 Portage, PA (ORP) 18-22 Portage, WI (NCS) 24-11, 24-21 Porter Bayou, MS (LMK) 12-7, 12-11, 12-14 Portersville Bay-East, Mobile County, AL (SAM) 10-21, 10-35, 10-46 Portersville Bay-West, Mobile County, AL (SAM) 10-21, 10-35, 10-46 Portland Harbor, ME (NED) 1-51 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Portland, OH (ORH) 17-22 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit (NPW) 39-17 Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID (NPW) 39-17 1-5 1 Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond Ordinance Depot, (NAO) 5-16 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (SAJ) 9-24, 9-33, 9-50 Portville, NY (ORP) 18-22 Post Oak Creek, Corsicana, TX (SWF) 30-23 Posten Bayou, AR and LA (LMK) 12-19, 12-22 Poteau River Navigation Project, OK and AR (SWT) 29-25 Poteet, TX (SWF) 30-22 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-8, 4-24, 4-31 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut (NAB) 4-36 Potomac River - Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC (NAB) 4-8, 4-24, 4-31 Potomac River at Alexandria, VA (NAB) 4-8, 4-24, 4-32 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD (NAB) 4-36 Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA (NAB) 4-36 Potomac River at North Side of Washington Channel, DC (NAB) 4-36 Potomac River Below Washington, DC (NAB) 4-36 Potowomut River, RI (NED) 1-51 Pottstown, PA (NAP) 3-29 Poverty Point, LA (LMK) 12-22 Powder Horn Branch, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-24 Powder River, Arvada, WY (MRO) 26-20 Powder River, Broadus, MT (MRO) 26-30 Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT (NPS) 38-28 Power Plant Road, Guam (POD) 36-11 Powhaten Point, OH (ORP) 18-24 Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI 25-7 Prairie du Chien, WI (NCS) 24-26 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL (LSM) 14-16 Prairie du Pont Rocher and Vicinity, IL (LSM) 14-16 Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL (SAM) 10-50 Preconstruction Engineering and Design - See Advance Engineering and Design Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-41 Presque Isle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-32, 21-71, 21-89 Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (NCB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-40 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME (NED) 1-56 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-16, 14-17 Prestonsburg, KY (ORH) 17-24 Prestonville, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-8, 4-24, 4-32 Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA (NPS) 38-29 Princeton, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR (NPP) 37-41 Pringle Creek, OR (NPP) 37-43 Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA (SAM) 10-21, 10-35, 10-46 Proctor Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Proctor, WV (ORP) 18-24 Proctorville, OH (ORH) 17-22 Project Condition Surveys Alaska District (NPA) 40-5 Portland District (NPP) 37-8 Seattle District (NPS) 38-6 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (SAS) 8-8 (SWG) 31-16 Projects Specifically Authorized Under the Former California Debris Commission 35-lA Prompton Lake, PA (NAP) 3-15, 3-20, 3-26 Prospect Beach, West Haven CT (NED) 1-11, 1-34, 1-46 Prosperity Lake, MO (SWL) 28-23 Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA (NPS) 38-26 Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Providence River and Harbor, RI (NED) 1-51 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA (NED) 1-59 Provincetown Harbor, MA (NED) 1-51, 1-60 Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Pt. Pleasant, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Pudding River, OR (NPP) 37-41 Pueblo, Arkansas River, CO (Floodway levee extension) (SWA) 32-18 Puerco River, Gallup, NM (SWA) 32-18 Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-22 Pullman, Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-17 Pultneyville Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-42 Pumpkinville Creek, Emerson, GA (SAM) 10-50 Punaluu Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 1-52 Pungo Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 Pungo River, NC (SAW) 6-30 Punxsatawney, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-5, 18-13, 18-18 Punxsutawney, PA (ORP) 18-22 Put in Bay, OH (NCB) 20-42 Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-28 Pysht River, Sekiu, WA (NPS) 38-28 Q Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino, CA (SPL) 33-37 Queens Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Queenstown Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-36 Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA (NPS) 38-28 Quillayute River (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-30 Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-28 Quillayute River, WA (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-22 Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-28 Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA (NPS) 38-28 Quinby Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Quince Road Bridge, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-3, 13-5 Quincy Harbor, IL 25-8 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel (NCR) 23-11 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy MA (NED) 1-54 Quonset Point, Davisville, RI (NED) 1-25, 1-39, 1-48 R R.B. West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern, IA (MRO) 26-27 R.D. Bailey Lake, WV (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA (SAM) 10-21, 10-35, 10-46 Raccoon Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Raccoon Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-9, 3-19, 3-24 Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-16 Racine Harbor, WI (1945 R&H Act and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 Racine, OH (ORH) 17-22 Rahway, NJ (NAN) 2-30 Rahway River, NJ (NAN) 2-32 Rainmaker Hotel, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Ralston & Leydon Creeks. CO (MRO) 26-28 Ramapo River, Monroe Rancocas River, NJ (NAP) 3-30 Randleman Lake, NC (SAW) 6-11, 6-22 Ranier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-39, 37-40 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon.Dam, SD (MRO) 26-25 Rapid Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD (MRO) 26-22, 26-25 Rapidan River, Orange, VA (NAO) 5-17 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, VA (NAO) 5-16 Rappahannock River, VA (NAO) 5-16 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, NJ (NAN) 2-30 Raritan River (NAN) 2-26, 2-27, 2-32 Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-Off Channel, NJ (NAN) 2-27 Rathburn Lake, Chariton River, IA (MRK) 27-6, 27-12, 27-15 Rathburn Lake Fish Hatchery (MRK) 27-17 Ray Roberts Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-17, 30-20 Raymondville Drain, TX (SWG) 31-14 Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA (NAB) 4-14, 4-26, 4-34 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Baltimore District (NAB) 4-10 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-9 Charleston District (SAN) 7-7 Chicago District (NCC) 22-6 Detroit District (NCE) 21-42 Galveston District (SWG) 31-10 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17 New England Division (NED) 1-11, 1-61 New York District (NAN) 2-11 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-17 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-28 Red Arroyo, San Angelo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Red Bluff, CA (SPK) 35-41 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA (NED) 1-52 Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act (NCB) 20-47 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN (NCS) 24-25 Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Red Lake River at Hout, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 I-53 Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater River, MN (NCS) 24-11, 24-21 Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN (NCS) 24-32 Red River at East Grand Forks (NCS) 24-30 Red River at Grand Forks (NCS) 24-30 Red River Bank Stabilization below Denison, OK and TX (SWT) 29-26 Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX and OK (SWT) 29-4 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabiliation (Vicksburg District) (LMK) 12-8, 12-11, 12-19 Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) (LMK) 12-7, 12-14 Red River below Denison Dam including Little River Basin, OK and AR (SWL) 28-19 Red River below Fulton, AR (LMK) 12-16 Red River, Clay City, KY (ORL) 16-38 Red River Emergency Bank Protection (LMK) 12-2, 12-10, 12-12 Red River from Fulton, AR to Mouth of Washita River (SWT) 29-25 Red River, Hwy 71, Little River County, AR (SWL) 28-9, 28-16 Red River, Hwy. 31, Little River County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Red River, 130, Little River County, AR (SWL) 28-9, 28-16, 28-19 Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-22 Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-32 Red River of the North, MN and ND (NCS) 24-25 Red River of the North at Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN (NCS) 24-26 Red River of the North at Pembina, ND (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN (NCS) 24-26 Red River of the North, Oxbow, ND (NCS) 24-32 Red River of the North, Grand Marais Outlet, MN (NCS) 24-32 Red River of the North at Oslo, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Red River of the North at Argusville, ND (NCS) 24-26 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND (NCS) 24-11, 24-22 Red River of the North at Halstad, MN (NCS) 24-26 Red River of the North, Grand Forks, ND (NCS) 24-31, 24-32 Red River Parish, LA (LMK) 12-22 Red River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Red River Waterway, LA (LMK) 12-14 Red River Waterway, LA, AR, OK and TX (LMK) 12-16 Red River-Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-2, 12-10, 12-12 Red River-Waterway-Shreveport, LA to Index, AR (LMK) 12-8, 12-11, 12-14 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX (LMK) 12-16 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA (NCR) 23-5, 23-7, 23-10 Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI (1970 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-98 Red Wing Harbor, MN 25-7 Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-17, 35-31 Redbank Creek Lake, PA (ORP) 18-24 Redbird Creek, O'Neill, NE (MRO) 26-27 Reddick Run, Essex Township, IA (NCR) 23-16 Reddies River Lake, NC (SAW) 6-30 (SAN) 7-21 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-15, 33-25, 33-35 Redstone Creek, Redstone, PA (ORP) 18-30 Redwater River and Hay Creek, Belle Fourche, SD (MRO) 26-23 Redwood City Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-8 Redwood Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Redwood River below Marshall, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Redwook Creek, Humboldt County, CA (SPK) 35-39 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-10 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR (NPP) 37-39 Reedy River, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-22 Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV (SPK) 35-39 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 Regulatory Functions Program Mobile District (SAM) 10-29 Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 I-54 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal & National Emergency Preparedness 50-1 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, DE (NAP) 3-30 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida, (SAJ) 9-12, 9-31, 9-42 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA (LMN) 11-14 Removal of Sunken Vessels (SPN) 34-8 Removing of snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMK) 12-16 Removing of snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMM) 13-4 Removing Water Hyacinths (SAM) 10-49 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL (LSM) 14-12, 14-16 Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, OH (NCB) 20-11, 20-21, 20-40 Republican River, NE and KS (MRK) 27-20 Research and Development Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-2, 24-20, 24-24, 24-29, 24-33 Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, OR (NPP) 37-41 Revere Beach, MA (NED) 1-12, 1-34, 1-40 Rexhame Dunes, Marshfield, MA 1-60 Reynoldsville, PA (ORP) 18-22 Rheem Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Rheem Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-24, 4-32 Rice Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA arid SC) (SAS) 8-10, 8-14, 8-20 Richland Creek, IL (LSM) 14-17 Richland Creek, Morgantown, TN (ORN) 15-18 Richland Lake, MO (MRK) 27-19 Richmond Filtration Plant, VA (NAO) 5-8, 5-11 Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA (SPN) 34-2, 34-8, 34-11 Richmond Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 Richmond Local Flood Protection, VA (NAO) 5-7, 5-11, 5-14 Richmond's Island Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 Richwood and Fenwick, WV (ORH) 17-24 Ridgecrest, Kern County, CA SPL) 33-37 Ridgeley, WV (NAB) 4-45 Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River) (ORP) 18-23 Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) (ORP) 18-22 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY (ORH) 17-24 Rillito River, AZ (SPL) 33-9, 33-31 Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Coamo, Parcelas Velezquez, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio De La Plata, PR (SAJ) 9-50 Rio Grande Basin, NM (SWA) 32-4 32-13, 32-16, 32-17 Rio Grande de Loiza, PR (SAJ) 9-50 Rio Grande Floodway, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-13, 32-16, 32-17 Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM (SWA) 32-8, 32-13, 32-16 Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR (SAJ) 9-24, 9-33, 9-50 Ripley, OH (ORH) 17-22, 17-24 Ririe Lake, ID (NPW) 39-16 Rising Sun, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 River des Peres, MO (LSM) 14-6, 14-12 River Rouge, MI (NCE) 21-86 Riverdale, West Springfield, MA (NED) 1-18, 1-37, 1-47, 1-63 Riverland Levee District, MO (LSM) 14-17 Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds (SAM) 10-30 Riverside Area, Pasco, WA (NPW) 39-16 Riverside Levees (SPL) 33-37 Riverview, WV (ORH) 17-22 Roanoak Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Roanoke Island, Dare County, NC (SAW) 6-34 Roanoke River, 50-mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon (SAW) 6-31 Roanoke River Basin, VA and NC (SAW) 6-16, 6-33 Roanoke River, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-21 Roanoke River Upper Basin, VA Headwaters Area (SAW) 6-14, 6-22 Roaring River Lake, NC (SAW) 6-30 Roaring River, Wilkes County, NC (SAN) 7-21 Roaring Springs Road, Bridge, TX (SWF) 30-23 Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-20 Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-27, 10-36 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (SWL) 28-26 I-55 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-25 Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 Rochester Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-8, 20-18, 20-37, 20-45 Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA (NCR) 23-14 Rochester, MN (NCS) 24-12, 24-22 Rochester, PA- (ORP) 18-24 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rock Creek Road, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rock Creek, Unicoi County, TN (ORN) 15-18 Rock Hall Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-36 Rock Island Harbor, IL 25-7 Rock Island, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL (NCR) 23-13 Rock River at Rock Rapids, MT (MRO) 26-30 Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island) NY (NAN) 2-12, 2-18, 2-23 Rockfish Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31 Rockford, IL (NCR) 23-12 Rockland Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Rockland Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, MA (NED) 1-52 Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA (NED) 1-52 Rockport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 Rockport, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS (SAM) 10-57 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12 Rocky Pass, AK (NPA) 40-15 Rocky River, OH (NCB) 20-8, 20-18, 20-38 Rocy Fork, OH (ORH) 17-23 Rodeo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Rodeo Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Rogers City Harbor, MI (1910 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 Rogue River Fisheries Habitat, OR (NPP) 37-43 Rogue River, Grants Pass, OR (NPP) 37-43 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR (NPP) 37-8, 37-26, 37-34 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Rolling Fork, Lebanon Junction, KY (ORL) 16-35 Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Rollison Channel, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-21 Rome, Coosa River, GA (SAM) 10-50 Rome, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Rome Mohawk River, NY (NAN) 2-32 Rondout Harbor (NAN) 2-27 Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (ORP) 18-22 Root River at Hokah, MN (NCS) 24-26 Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, CA (SPL) 33-37 Roseau River, MN (NCS) 24-12, 24-22, 24-32 Rosedale Harbor, MS (LMK) 12-16 Rosendale, NY (NAN) 2-30 Roseville, OH (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19, 17-24 Rosiclaire, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Rossview Lake, TN and KY (ORN) 15-14 Rota Harbor, CNMI (POD) 36-7 Rouge River, MI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 Rouge River, MI (1958 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 Rouge River, MI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 Rouge River, MI (NCE) 21-32, 21-71, 21-89 Rough River, KY (ORL) 16-22, 16-28, 16-33 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY (ORL) 16-11, 16-17 Roughans Point, Revere, MA (NED) 1-25, 1-39, 1-48 Roundhouse Bridge, Amory, MS (SAM) 10-52 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-28 Rouseville, PA (ORP) 18-23 Route 418, Lyon County, KS (SWT) 29-29 Route 531, Lake Erie, Ashtabula City, OH (NCB) 20-46 Rowlesburg Lake, WV (ORP) 18-23 Royal River, ME (NED) 1-52 Rudee Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-5, 5-10, 5-14 Ruffy Brook, MN (NCS) 24-28 Rush Creek, Arlington, TX (SWF) 30-23 Rush River (NCS) 24-30 Rushford, MN (NCS) 24-26 Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-28 Russell Creek, SC (SAN) 7-22 Russell, KY (ORH) 17-21 Russian River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-18, 35-31, 35-36, 35-43 Russian River, CA (SPN) 34-14 Russian River Channel Improvements (East Fork) (SPK) 35-44 I-56 Rutland Otter Creek, VT (NAN) 2-32 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX (SWF) 30-22 Rye Creek, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rye Harbor, NH (NED) 1-52 S Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (SWG) 31-7, 31-20, 31-31, 31-38, 31-40, 31-45 Sabine River and Tributaries (Echo to Morgan Bluff), TX (SWG) 31-37 Sabula, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Sackets Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-42, 20-47 Saco, MT (MRO) 26-22, 26-24 Saco River, ME (NED) 1-9, 1-33, 1-45 Saco River ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Sacramento River and Tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, CA (SPK) 35-19, 35-31, 35-37, 35-44, 35-45 Sacramento River, CA (SPK) 35-2, 35-28 Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA (SPK) 35-3, 35-28 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD (MRO) 26-22, 26-25 Sag Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-28, 2-32 Sagamore Marsh, Cape Cod Canal, MA (NED) 1-61 Saginaw River, MI (NCE) 21-33, 21-45, 21-71, 21-76, 21-90, 21-93 Saipan Beach Road, CNMI (POD) 36-8 Saipan Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-10 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI (POD) 36-7 Sakonnet Harbor, RI (NED) 1-9, 1-33, 1-45 Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Sakonnet River, RI (NED) 1-52 Salamanca, NY (ORP) 18-22 Salamonie Lake, IN (ORL) 16-11, 16-17 Salamonie River, Wells County, IN (ORL) 16-33 Salem Harbor, MA (NED) 1-52, 1-61 Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Salem River, NJ (NAP) 3-9, 3-19, 3-24 Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Salinas River, CA (SPK) 35-36, 35-39 Saline Point, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-22 Saline River & Tributaries, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Saline River, AR (LMK) 12-16 Salisbury, CT (NED) 1-58 Salkahatchie River, SC (SAN) 7-20 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR (NPP) 37-40 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA (NPP) 37-40 Salmon River, AK (NPA) 40-16 Salmon River, Colchester, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-63 Salmon River, ID (NWP) 39-17 Salmon River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Salt Bayou, McFadden Range, TX (SWG) 31-17, 31-21 Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-7, 26-15, 26-19 Salt Creek Levees, Lincoln, NE (MRO) 26-30 Salt Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln, NE (MRO) 26-27 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT (SPK) 35-39 Saluda River, SC (SAN) 7-21 Salyersville, KY (ORL) 16-4, 16-14, 16-20, 16-28 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-20 Sam Rayburn Spillway (Dam Safety Assurance), TX (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-20 Sammamish River Restoration, WA (NPS) 38-10, 38-18, 38-23, 38-28 San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-9, 30-17, 30-20 San Antonio Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA (SPL) 33-36 San Diego Creek, Alice, TX (SWG) 31-37 San Diego Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-25 San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-37 San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-16, 33-27 San Francisco Bay-Delta Model Structure, CA (SPN) 34-4 34-8 San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA (SPN) 34-4, 34-8 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPN) 34-3, 34-8 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels), CA (SPK) 35-3, 35-28 San Francisco Harboor (SPN) 34-8 San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Francisco Harbor and Bay (Removal of Drift) (SPN) 34-8 I-57 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-36 San Gabriel River, TX (SWF) 30-9, 30-17, 30-20 San Jacinto River Levee & Bautista Creek Channel (SPL) 33-37 San Joaquin River, CA (SPK) 35-5, 35-28, 35-42 San Juan Dam (SPL) 33-40 San Juan Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-14, 9-31, 9-43, 9-53 San Juan, PR (SAJ) 9-52 San Leandro Creek (SPN) 34-14 San Leandro Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA (SPN) 34-9, 34-13 San Leandro River, CA (SPK) 34-35 San Lorenzo Creek (Upper Portion), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Lorenzo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 San Lorenzo River, CA (SPK) 35-39 San Lorenzo River, CA (SPN) 34-14 San Luis Rey River, CA (SPL) 33-10, 33-19, 33-24, 33-33 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (SPN) 34-9 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Pablo Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 San Rafael Canal, CA (SPN) 34-9 San Rafael Creek, CA (SPN) 34-9 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME (NED) 1-56 Sand Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI (NED) 1-54 Sand Hill River (NCS) 24-30 Sand Island, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Sand Lake, OK (SWT) 29-26 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, NY (NAN) 2-30 Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI (NCS) 24-13, 24-22 Sandusky Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-38 Sandusky River, OH (NCB) 20-42 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA (NED) 1-52 Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Sandy Creek, Jackson, TN (LMM) 13-5 Sandy Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo (NAN) 2-28 Sandy Hook Bay, NJ (NAN) 2-28 Sandy Hook Channel (NAN) 2-26 Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (NAN) 2-13, 2-18, 2-24, 2-29 Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR (NPP) 37-40 Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR (NPP) 37-16, 37-29, 37-36, 37-43 Sangamon River (Mouth), IL (NCR) 23-12 Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL (NCR) 23-15 Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK (SWT) 29-27 Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-19, 33-31 Santa Ana River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-37, 33-40 Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-19, 33-31 Santa Barbara Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-16 Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-37 Santa Cruz, AZ (SPL) 33-32 Santa Cruz County, CA (SPN) 34-13 Santa Cruz Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-9 Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, NM (SWA) 32-18 Santa Maria Valley Levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-37 Santa Paula Creek, CA (SPL) 33-10, 33-19, 33-33 Santa Paula Creek Channel and Debris Basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-38 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM (SWA) 32-8, 32-15 Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) (SPL) 33-37 Santee Dam, SC (SAN) 7-9, 7-13, 7-19 Santee River, NC & SC (SAN) 7-20 Sapelo Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-21 Sarasota County, FL (SAJ) 9-20, 9-33, 9-48 Sardis Lake, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-19, 29-24 Sardis, OH (ORH) 17-22 Sasanoa River, ME (NED) 1-52 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-54 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI (NCE) 21-37, 21-73, 21-92 Saugerties Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-28 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA (NED) 1-60 Saugus River and Tributaries, MA (NED) 1-25, 1-39, 1-48 Sauk River, Skagit County, WA (NPS) 38-28 Sausalito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA (SPN) 34-13 1-58 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 Savage River Dam, MD (NAB) 4-38 Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-50 Savanna Harbor, IL 25-7 Savannah City Park, TN (ORN) 15-18 Savannah Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-4, 8-13, 8-17 Savannah River above Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-21 Savannah River at Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-21, Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes (SAS) 8-23 Savannah River Basin, GA and SC (SAS) 8-9 Savannah River Below Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-6, 8-13, 8-19 Saw Mill Run, PA (ORP) 18-22 Saw Mill Run Road, Salamanca, NY (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Sawmill Branch, SC (SAN) 7-21 Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh, NY (NAN) 2-30 Saxis Island, VA (NAO) 5-17 Saxon Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-37, 21-73, 21-9"2 Saxonville, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-65 Saylorville Lake, IA (NCR) 23-5, 23-7, 23-10 Scajaquada Creek, NY (NCB) 20-44, 20-45 Scammon Bay, AK (NPA) 40-16 Scappoose Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-39 Scappoose, OR (NPP) 37-42 Scarboro River, ME (NED) 1-52, 1-61 Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-10 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-21 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-11 Kansas City District (MRK) 27-7, 27-12 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11 Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 Omaha District (MRO) 26-8 Portland District (NPP) 37-17 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-23 Seattle District (NPS) 38-11 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-3 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-17 Schuyler, Lost Creek and Platte River, NE (MRO) 26-26 Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA (NAP) 3-27 Schuylkill River, PA (NAP) 3-10, 3-19, 3-24 Scioto River at Portsmith, OH (ORH) 17-20 Sciotovile, OH (ORH) 17-22 Scituate Harbor, MA (NED) 1-52 Scott County D&L District, Illinois River, IL (LSM) 14-17 Scotts Creek, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-24 Scotts Creek, VA (NAO) 5-13 Scottsville, VA (NAO) 5-17 Scranton, Buffalo, ND (MRO) 26-25 Scranton, PA (NAB) 4-38 Scuppernong River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-31, 6-32 Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT (NED) 1-12, 1-34, 1-46 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Searsport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 Seaside Park, CT (NED) 1-54 Seattle Harbor (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-30 Seattle Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-6, 38-17, 38-22 Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME (NED) 1-56 Sebewaing Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-38 Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI (NCE) 21-46, 21-73, 21-77, 21-92 Seekonk River, RI (NED) 1-9, 1-33, 1-45, 1-52 Seldovia Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, NY (NCB) 20-43, 20-47 Seneca Falls, NY (NCB) 20-46 Sepulva Dam, CA (SPL) 33-10, 33-19, 33-30, 33-33 Sequatchie River, Marion County, TN (ORN) 15-18 Sequoyah Hills Park, Knoxville, TN (ORN) 15-18 Sequoyah Hills Park, Phase II, Knoxville, TN (ORN) 15-18 Sergius Whitestone, AK (NPA) 40-15 Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA (SPL) 33-38 Sesuit Harbor, MA (NED) 1-10, 1-33, 1-45 Seveir River near Redmond, UT (SPK) 35-39. Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR (NPW) 39-16 Sewage Lagoons, Minnehaha Creek, Canton, OK (SWT) 29-29 Sewage Lagoons, North Canadian River (SWT) 29-29 Sewage Lagoons, Washita River, OK (SWT) 29-29 Seward Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 Seward Marine Industrial Center AK (NPA) 40-17 Seward, NE (MRK) 27-17 Sewerline Protection Valley, AL (SAM) 10-50 I-59 Seymour Creek, Seymour, TX (SWF) 30-23 Shad Landing State Park, MD (NAB) 4-36 Shallotte River, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-21 Shallow Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 Shark River, NJ (NAN) 2-28 Shawnee, OK (SWT) 29-30 Shawneetown, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-26, 16-30, 16-33 Sheboygan Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-38, 21-74, 21-92 Sheburne, NY (NAB) 4-44 Sheepshead Bay (NAN) 2-28 Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 Sheffield, MA (NED) 1-64 Sheffield Water Intake, AL (ORN) 15-18 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH (NED) 1-56 Shelby Township, MN (NCS) 24-32 Shell Creek, County Road Near Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-27 Shell Creek, NE (MRO) 26-23 Shelley Area, Snake River, ID (NPW) 39-17 Shelton Creek, WA (NPS) 38-28 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, OR (NPP) 37-41 Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH (ORP) 18-9, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks, WY (MRO) 26-25 Sheridan, OR (NPP) 37-42 Sheridan, WY (MRO) 26-22 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT (NED) 1-54 Shetucket River, Sprague, CT (NED) 1-61 Sheyenne River, ND (NCS) 24-13, 24-22, 24-28 Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND (NCS) 24-26 Shidler Lake, OK (SWT) 29-26 Shields River, near Clyde Park, MT (MRO) 26-22 Shields River, near Livingston (Hwy 89) (MRO) 26-25 Shields River, Park County, MT (US 89) (MRO) 26-31 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA (NPS) 38-26 Shinnecock Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-9, 2-17, 2-23, 2-26 Shipyard River, SC (SAN) 7-6, 7-12, 7-18 Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-28 Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) (ORL) 16-26 Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR (NWP) 39-16 Shooters Island, NJ & NY (NAN) 2-32 Short Beach, CT (NED) 1-54 Short Creek, Connorville, OH (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell, WY (MRO) 26-25 Shoshone River, Byron, MW (MRO) 26-25 Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (NAN) 2-28, 2-32 Shufflebarger Levee, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Shupe Run. Mt. Pleasant, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Siasconset Beach, Nantucket, MA (NED) 1-60 Sid Simpson Project, IL (NCR) 23-12 Sierra Madre Wash Channel, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (SPL) 33-40 Silver Bay Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-39, 21-74, 21-92 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (NED) 1-54, 1-59, 1-60 Silver Creek, Rome, GA (SAM) 10-50 Silver Lake Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-21, 6-26 Simmons Bay, NC (SAW) 6-30 Simms Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-145, 31-21, 31-36 Simpson Creek, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-21 Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX (SWF) 30-23 Sinking Creek, Lebanon, TN (ORN) 15-18 Sioux City, Floyd River, IA (MRO) 26-27 Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River, SD (MRO) 26-25 Sioux Falls, SD (MRO) 26-22 Sipsey River Sisterville, OH (ORH) 17-22 Sitka Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-10, 40-13, 40-15 Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR (NPP) 37-40 Siuslaw River, OR (NPP) 37-8, 37-26, 37-34 Six Bridge Lake, MD & PA (NAB) 4-40 Six Runs Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31, 6-34 Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR (SWL) 28-23 Skagit and Samish Rivers, WA (NPS) 38-31 Skagit River (Avon Pass), WA (NPS) 38-30 Skagit River (Levee and Channel Improvements), WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-30 Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (NPS) 38-28, 38-29 Skagit River, WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-30 Skagit River, West Mt. Vernon, WA (NPS) 38-31 1-60 Skagway Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 Skagway River, AK (NPA) 40-16 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA (NPP) 37-41 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County., WA (NPP) 37-39 Skamokawa Creek, WA (NPP) 37-38, 37-42 Skiatook Lake, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-19, 29-24 Skiatook, OK (SWT) 29-30 Skipanon Channel, OR (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-34 Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA (NPS) 38-29 Slaughter Creek, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-14, 4-32 Slovan, PA (ORP) 18-22 Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL (LSM) 14-17 Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL (LSM) 14-17 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA (NED) 1-56 Smith Creek, COO (SWA) 32-18 Smith Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 Smith Ferry, PA (ORP) 18-24 Smith River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), NC (SAW) 6-28 Smithfield, WV (ORH) 17-24 Smithland, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Smithneck Creek, Loyalton, CA (SPK) 35-45 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), NC (SAW) 6-28 Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO (MRK) 27-6, 27-12, 27-15 Smoky Hill, Saline, and Soloman Rivers (MRK) 27-20 Smyrna River, DE (NAP) 3-27 Snake River, Alvarado, MN (NCS) 24-14, 24-22 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-17 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID (NPW) 39-8, 39-11, 39-14, 39-23 Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID (NPW) 39-16 Snake River, OR (NWP) 39-17 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID (NPW) 39-16 Snake River, Vega/Sandsville, MN (NCS) 24-33 Snake River, WA (NWP) 39-17 Snake River, Warren, MN (NCS) 24-33 Snettisham, AK (NPA) 40-7, 40-11, 40-14 Snohomish County, Index to Monroe, WA (NPS) 38-31 Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA (NPS) 38-29 Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA (NPS) 38-29 Snoqualmie River, WA (NPS) 38-31 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA (NPS) 38-29 Sny Basin, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Soap Creek, WA (NPP) 37-41 Socastee Creek, SC (SAN) 7-8, 7-13, 7-18 Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries or Rio Grande, NM (SWA) 32-18 Sogn, MN (NCS) 24-32 Soldier River, Near Ute, IA (MRO) 26-27 Soleduck River Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-29 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-29 Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne County, PA (NAB) 4-38 Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD (NAB) 4-38 Somerville Lake, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-20. Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project (SPN) 34-3, 34-9, 34-12 Sonomo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Sope Creek, Marietta, GA (SAM) 10-50 Souris River Basin, ND (NCS) 24-15, 24-22 Souris River, Velva, ND (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 South Agat (Route 2) Shoreline, Guam (POD) 36-11 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, NY (NAN) 2-30 South Bank, Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), AR (SWL) 28-23 South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, AR Tucker Lakes (SWL) 28-23 South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL, (NCR) 23-13 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 South Beloit, IL (NCR) 23-14 South Bristol Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 South Central PA Environmental Restoration (ORP) 18-5, 18-13 South Central Pennsylvania Environmental Restoration (NAB) 4-14, 4-26, 4-34 South Channel, Government Island, OR (NPP) 37-38 South Coventry Lake, CT (NED) 1-59 South Creek, Martinburg, NE (MRO) 26-27 South Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 South Deer Creek, OK (SWT) 29-28 South Ellenville, NY (NAN) 2-30 I-61 South Fork, Boise River, ID (NPW) 39-16 South Fork, Clearwater River, ID (NPW) 39-17 South Fork, Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID (NPW) 39-16 South Fork, Elkhorn River, Ewing, NE (MRO) 26-25 South Fork of Cumberland River, KY (ORN) 15-13 South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA (SPL) 33-38 South Fork of Wildcat Creek, County Road 7 East, Tippecanoe County, IN (ORL) 16-34, 16-39 South Haven Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-39, 21-74, 21-92 South Holston River, Kingsport, TN (ORN) 15-18 South Llano River, Junction, TX (SWF) 30-23 South Main Channel, TX (SWG) 31-14 South Milwaukee Harbor, WI (1836 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-98 South Orange, NJ (NAN) 2-30 South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington Street, Water and Sanitary District, CO (MRO) 26-26 South Platte River Basin, CO (MRO) 26-7, 26-19 South Platte River, Fort Lupton Hwy 85 (MRO) 26-26 South Platte River, Iliff, CO (MRO) 26-26 South Platte River, Kersey, CO (MRO) 26-26 South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, CO (MRO) 26-17 South Platte River, Logan County Bridges 175A and 173, NE (MRO) 26-26, 26-31 South Platte River, Merino, CO (MRO) 26-26 South Platte River, Platteville, CO (MRO) 26-26 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 61, CO (MRO) 26-31 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 28, CO (MRO) 26-31 South Plymouth Lake, NY (NAB) 4-40 South Point, OH (ORH) 17-22 South Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX (SWF) 30-23 South Portsmouth, KY (ORH) 17-22 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 South Raccoon River, Dexter, IA (NCR) 23-16 South River, Conway, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 South River Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 South River, NC (SAW) 6-28 South Slough (Charleston), OR (NPP) 37-38 South Turnbridge Lake, VT (NED) 1-59 South Two River, MN (NCS) 24-33 South Williamson, KY (ORH) 17-24 Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-12, 1-34, 1-46 Southeast Missouri Port, MO (LSM) 14-10, 14-14 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 4-15, 4-34 Southport Beach, CT (NED) 1-54 Southport Harbor, CT (NED) 1-52 Southwest Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 Southwest Ohio Urban Waterfront Development (ORL) 16-24 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY (ORL) 16-5, 16-14, 16-28, 16-33 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS (SAM) 10-21, 10-35, 10-47, 10-50 Spanish Fork River, UT (SPK) 35-41 Spokane River, Spokane, WA (NPS) 38-29, 38-30 Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA (NAB) 4-38 Spring City, KY (ORN) 15-18 Spring Creek, Rockaway, OR (NPP) 37-43 Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Spring Street, Tupelo, MS (SAM) 10-52 Springdale, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 Springers Branch, MS (SAM) 10-57 Springfield, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 Springfield, SD Water Intake (MRO) 26-22 Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA (NPS) 38-26 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-64 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL (NCR) 23-11 St Catherines Sound, MD (NAB) 4-36 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-28 St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam 25-9 St. Anthony Falls Upper Lock 25-5 St. Augustine Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-31, 9-42, 9-53 St. Clair County, AL (SAM) 10-57 St. Clair, MN (NCS) 24-32 St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI (1930 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 St. Clair River, MI (NCE) 21-33, 21-72, 21-90, 21-99 St. Croix River, ME (NED) 1-52 St. Croix River, MN and WI (NCS) 24-25 St. Croix River, Stillwater, MN (NCS) 24-4, 24-20 St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR (LMM) 13-5 St. George, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-11, 40-13 1-62 St. Georges Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36, 4-40 St. Hilaire, MN (NCS) 24-16, 24-22 St. James, Beaver Island, MI (NCE) 21-95 St. Jeromes Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 St. John River Basin, ME (NED) 1-56 St. Johns County, FL (SAJ) 9-48 St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-31, 9-42 St. Jones River, DE, Delaware Bay to Lebanon Jetties and new entrance at mouth (NAP) 3-27, 3-28 St. Joseph Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-34, 21-72, 21-90 St. Joseph River, MI (NCE) 21-95 St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO (LSM) 14-17 St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL (LSM) 14-2, 14-10 St. Lucie Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-31, 9-43 St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID (NPS) 38-28 St. Marks River, FL (SAM) 10-49 St. Mary's, AK (NPA) 40-17 St. Mary's, WV (ORH) 17-22 St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI (1942 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 St. Marys River, MI (NCE) 21-35, 21-72, 21-91 St. Michaels Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-36 St. Patricks Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-26, 24-31 St. Paul Harbor, MN 25-7 St. Paul Island Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-11, 40-13 St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-17, 24-22 St. Peters Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 St. Petersburg Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT (NPS) 38-28 St. Regis River, MT (NPS) 38-28, 38-30 St. Thomas Harbor, VI (SAJ) 9-51 Stamford, CT (NED) 1-26, 1-39, 1-49 Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) (NED) 1-59 Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) (NED) 1-59 Stamford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-52 Star Valley, AZ (SPL) 33-32 Starlings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA (NPS) 38-29 State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texana, TX (SWG) 31-15, 31-21 State Highway 156, Kay County, OK (SWT) 29-28 State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA (NPP) 37-39 State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI (NCS) 24-15, 24-22, 24-26 Staten Island, NY (NAN) 2-30 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur Kill, NY (NAN) 2-28 Ste. Genevieve Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO (LSM) 14-17 Ste. Genevieve, MO (LSM) 14-12 Steinhatchee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 Sterling Center, MN (NCS) 24-15, 24-22 Sterling, KS (SWT) 29-30 Stevens Creek, Village of Forsyth, IL (NCR) 23-16 Stewart Canyon Debris Basin and Channel (SPL) 33-38 Stikine River, AK (NPA) 40-15 Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA (NPS) 38-29 Stillaguamish River, WA (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-23, 38-30 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-21 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT (NPS) 38-29 Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA (NAB) 4-18, 4-27, 4-34 Stillwater River, MT (NPS) 38-29 Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR (NPP) 37-40 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA (SPK) 35-38 Stockton Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO (MRK) 27-8, 27-12, 27-16, 27-20 Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson County, KS (MRK) 27-17 Stoner Creek, North Middleton, KY (ORL) 16-34 Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORP) 18-9, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Stoney Branch, Rock Hill, SC (SAN) 7-24 Stoney Creek, Branford, CT (NED) 1-10, 1-34, 1-45 Stoney Creek, Goldsboro, NC (SAW) 6-34 Stonington Harbor, CT (NED) 1-52 Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Stonington Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52, 1-59 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH (NED) 1-56 Stonycreek River, Johnstown, PA (reconnaisance) (ORP) 18-30 Stratford, CT (NED) 1-59 I-63 Stream 5B13, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL (LSM) 14-16 Strong Creek, Hope, ID (NPS) 38-29 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID (NPW) 39-17 Stuart, VA (SAW) 6-30 Stumpy Point Bay, NC (SAW) 6-28 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI (NCE) 21-40, 21-75, 21-92 Sturgeon Point, Evans, NY (NCB) 20-39 Sturgis, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 Styrons Creek, Carteret County, NC (SAW) 6-32 Subdistrict No.. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Sucker Brook Dam, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-56 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH (ORL) 16-35 Sugar Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Sugar Creek, Watermelon Hollow Road, Montgomery County, IN (ORL) 16-35 Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-59 Suisun Bay Channel, CA (SPK) 35-38 Suisun Bay Channel, CA (SPN) 34-9 Suisun Channel, CA (SPK) 35-38 Suisun Channel, CA (SPN) 34-9 Suisun Point Channel, CA (SPK) 35-38 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX (SWF) 30-23 Sulphur River, AR and TX (LMN) 11-14 Sulphur RW Red River, Franklin City, TX (SWF) 30-23 Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-28 Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Sun River, Great Falls, MT (MRO) 26-25 Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) (ORN) 15-18 Sunbury, PA (NAB) 4-38, 4-45 Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), CA SPL) 33-35 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-10, 2-18 Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) (NAO) 5-5, 5-10 Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-16 Surry Mountain Lake, NH (NED) 1-19, 1-37, 1-56 Surveillance of Northern Waters and International Water Studies (NCE) 21-47, 21-77 Surveys Alaska District (NPA) 40-8 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-11 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-22 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-12 Chicago District (NCC) 22-12 Detroit District (NCE) 21-51 Fort .Worth District, (SWF) 30-13 Galveston District (SWG) 31-17 Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-25 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-13 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-12 Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 Mobile District (SAM) 10-29 Nashville District (ORN) 15-7 New England Division (NED) 1-29 New York District (NAN) 2-15 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-8, 5-11 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Portland District (NPP) 37-24 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 Seattle District (NPS) 38-13 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-19 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-13 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-9 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-19 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD (NAB) 4-36 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA (NAB) 4-36 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA (NAB) 4-19, 4-34 Susquehanna River, Sunbury Closure Structure, PA (NAB) 4-40 Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 Suwannee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 Swan Creek Bank Stabilization, Taney County, AR (SWL) 28-23 Swan Creek, OH (NCB) 20-45 Swanton Harbor, VT (NAN) 2-32 Sweetwater Creek, Austell, GA (SAM) 10-52 Sweetwater Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31 I-64 Sweetwater River, CA (SPL) 33-10, 33-19, 33-33 Swift Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-34 Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, NC (SAW) 6-30 Swinomish Channel, WA (NPS) 38-7, 38-17, 38-23 Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA (NAB) 4-38 Sykesville, PA (ORP) 18-22 Syracuse, OH (ORH) 17-22 Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, NY (NCB) 20-44 T Table Rock Lake, MO (SWL) 28-12, 28-17, 28-30 Tacoma Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-26 Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-24 Tacoma, WA (NPS) 38-31 Tahchevah Creek Detention Basin and Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-39 Tahola, WA (NPS) 38-29 Tahquitz Creek (SPL) 33-39 Talkeetna River, AK (NPA) 40-16 Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS (SAM) 10-22, 10-35, 10-47, 10-50 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS (LMK) 12-16 Tallapoosa River, AL (SAM) 10-49 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam (POD) 36-10 Tama, IA (NCR) 23-16 Tamaqua, PA (NAP) 3-29 Tampa and Hillsborough Bays, FL (SAJ) 9-44 Tampa Harbor (Port Sutton), FL (SAJ) 9-32 Tampa Harbor Branch Channels, FL (SAJ) 9-46 Tampa Harbor East Bay Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-31, 9-46 Tampa Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-15, 9-31, 9-44 Tangier Channels, VA (NAO) 5-16 Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA (NAO) 5-17 Tangipahoa River, LA (LMN) 11-14 Tar River and Tributaries, NC (SAW) 6-30 Tar River, NC (SAW) 6-30 Tar River, Princeville, NC (SAW) 6-30 Tarentum, PA (ORP) 18-22 Tarrytown Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-10, 2-17, 2-23 Taskinas Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Tatitlek, AK (NPA) 40-17 Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-59 Taunton River, MA (NED) 1-52 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-40, 21-75, 21-93 Taylors Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-15, 31-21, 31-36, 31-45 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 Taylorsville Lake, KY (ORL) 16-12, 16-17 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA (SPL) 33-38 Tell City, IN.(ORL) 16-23, 16-25, 16-28, 16-33 Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX (SWF) 30-23 Ten Mile River, Chesire, CT (NED) 1-61 Tenants Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-25, 29-27 Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA (ORP) 18-22 Tennessee River, Chattanooga, TN (ORN) 15-18 Tennessee River, Clinton, TN (ORN) 15-18 Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY (ORN) 15-3, 15-9, 15-11, 15-16, 15-17 Tennessee River UT Experiment Station (ORN) 15-18 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS (SAM) 10-15, 10-34, (ORN) 15-3, 15-9, 15-12 Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL and MS (SAM) 10-16, 10-34, 10-46 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA (LMK) 12-16 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Terre Haute, IN (ORL) 16-26 Teton River, Hwy Bridge 223, Chateau, MT (MRO) 26-31 Teton River, Hwy Bridge 89, Chateau, MT (MRO) 26-31 Teton River, ID (NPW) 39-17 Teton River, Near Choteau (Hwy 89) M25 (MRO) 26-24 Teton RV/Chateau/Teton County, MT (MRO) 26-25 Texas City and Vicinity (Hurricane Flood Protection), TX (SWG) 31-27 Texas City Channel, TX (SWG) 31-8, 31-20, 31-33, 31-38 Thames River Basin, CT, RI and MA (NED) 1-26 Thames River, CT (NED) 1-52 Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 I-65 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR (NPP) 37-38 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, OR and WA (NPP) 37-38 The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lacke Celilo, WA and OR (NPP) 37-23, 37-30, 37-37, 37-45 The Inland Route, MI (NCE) 21-17, 21-61, 21-84 The Island Lake, VT (NED) 1-59 Thimble Shoals Channel, VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-10, 5-14, 5-16 Thomas Creek, CA (SPK) 35-44 Thomaston Dam, CT (NED) 1-21, 1-38 Thomasville (Walnut Street), NC (SAW) 6-34 Thoroughfare Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-31 Three Forks, Lower Madison River (MRO) 26-25 Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN) 15-14 Three Rivers, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 Three Rivers, TX (SWG) 31-37 Threemile Creek, Mobile, LA (SAM) 10-22, 10-35, 10-47 Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA (NED) 1-59 Thurman to Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-7, 26-15, 26-19, 26-28 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA (LMN) 11-14 Ticonderoga River, NY (NAN) 2-32 Tijuana River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-38 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-36 Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR (NPP) 37-9, 37-27, 37-34 Tillamook, OR (NPP) 37-42 Tillamook River, OR (NPP) 37-43 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA (NAB) 4-19, 4-28 Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-10, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), AR (SWL) 28-4, 28-25 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only), PA (NAP) 3-31 Todd Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-21 Toledo Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-38 Tolovana River (Snagging), AK (NPA) 40-16 Tolu, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-19 Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID (NPW) 39-16 Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL (SAM) 10-22, 10-36, 10-47 Tombigbee River & Tributaries, MS & AL (SAM) 10-23, 10-36, 10-47 Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS (SAM) 10-49 Tombigbee River Bridge #6, Monroe County, MS (SAM) 10-35, 10-47 Tombigbee River, Demopolis, AL (SAM) 10-51 Tonawanda Creek, Block Church Road, Niagara County, NY (NCB) 20-46 Tonawanda Creek Road, Erie County, NY (NCB) 20-46 Tonawanda Creek Road, Minnick, NY (NCB) 20-46 Tongue Point, OR (NPP) 37-38 Tongue River Lake, ND (NCS) 24-28 Tongue River, WY (MRO) 26-31 Topeka, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Topsail Bay and Surf City, NC (SAW) 6-31 Toronto Lake, KS (SWL) 28-28 Toronto Lake, KS (SWT) 29-10, 29-19, 29-24, 29-27 Torrington, East Branch, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-64 Torrington, West Branch, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-64 Totuskey Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA (NPW) 39-16, 39-17 Towanda Lake, KS (SWT) 29-27 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-58 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (NED) 1-54 Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX (SWF) 30-12, 30-18, 30-21 Town Branch Creek, Lockhart, TX (SWF) 30-23 Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (NED) 1-27, 1-40, 1-49 Town Creek, Americus, GA (SAM) 10-50 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY (ORL) 16-23 Town Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 Town Creek, SC (SAN) 7-7, 7-13, 7-18 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA (NED) 1-59 Town of North Beach, MD (NAB) 4-11, 4-25, 4-33 Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-29 Townshend Lake, VT (NED) 1-19, 1-36, 1-47 Trabuco Dam (SPL) 33-40 Tradewater River, KY (ORL) 16-22 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, TX (SWG) 31-37 Tranters Creek, NC (SAW) 6-31 Trask River, Tillamook County, OR (NPP) 37-40 Treasure Island, MO (LMM) 13-5 Tred Avon River, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-25, 4-32 Tremplealeau River, Arcadia, WI (NCS) 24-29 I-66 Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, NC (SAW) 6-31 Trent River, NC (SAW) 6-28, 6-30, 6-34 Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Trexler Lake, PA (NAP) 3-31 Tri Pond Levee, IL (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Tributary to Dudley Branch (SWF) 30-23 Trim Cane Creek, Okitbbeha County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO (MRK) 27-17 Trinidad Lake, CO (SWA) 32-8, 32-15 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 31-9, 31-20, 31-34, 31-38, 31-45 Trinity River Project, TX (SWF) 30-2, 30-15, 30-21 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-33 Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV (SPL) 33-13, 33-20 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY (ORL) 16-33 Troy, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Truckee Meadows, NV (SPK) 35-35 Truckee River and Tributaries, CA and NV (SPK) 35-39 Trumbull Lake, CT (NED) 1-56 Trussville, AL (SAM) 10-50 Truth or Consequences Unit, NM (SWA) 32-8, 32-15, 32-17 Tualatin, OR (NPP) 37-40 Tucannon River, Wooten, WA (NPW) 39-16 Tuckahoe River, MD (NAB) 4-36 Tuckerton Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY (ORN) 15-5, 15-9 Tully Lake, MA (NED) 1-19, 1-37 Tulsa and West Tulsa, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-20, 29-24, 29-26 Tulsa/West Tulsa Levees, OK (SWT) 29-20 Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA (NAB) 4-38 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-21, 7-24 Turkey River, Elgin Sewage Treatment, IA (NCC) 23-16 Turkey River, Fayette County Road B64, IA (NCC) 23-16 Turner Creek, Corinth, MS (LMM) 13-5 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR (NPP) 37-41 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-50 Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK (SWT) 29-26 Turtle Creek, PA (ORP) 18-6, 18-13, 18-22 Tuscon Diversion Channel (Recreation Development) (SPL) 33-11, 33-20, 33-33 Tuskahoma Lake, OK (SWT) 29-26 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-7, 27-12, 27-16, 27-20 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road Improvement - 1974 Mod.) (MRK) 27-19, 27-20 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS Road and Bridge (1976 Act) (MRK) 27-19, 27-20 Twelvemile Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-22 Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS (SAM) 10-50 Twin Valley Lake, MN (NCS) 24-26 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD (NAB) 4-36 Two Harbors, MN (NCE) 21-40, 21-75, 21-93 Two Rivers Dam, NM (SWA) 32-9, 32-15 Two Rivers Harbor, WI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-98 Two Rivers Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-41, 21-75, 21-93 Tyaskin Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 Tybee Island, GA (SAS) 8-7, 8-13, 8-19 Tygart Lake, WV (ORP) 18-3, 18-13, 18-18 Tylers Beach Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-16 Tyrone, PA (NAB) 4-38, 4-45 U U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, TX (SWG) 31-37 Umatac Shoreline, Guam (POD) 36-11 Umatilla Harbor, OR (NPP) 37-38 Umatilla River (Echo), OR (NPP) 37-41 Umatilla River, OR (NPW) 39-16 Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR (NPP) 37-40 Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR (NPP) 37-40 Umatilla River Water District, OR (NPP) 37-43 Umpqua River, OR (NPP) 37-9, 37-27, 37-35 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR (NPP) 37-41 Unadilla, NY (NAB) 4-38 Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-10, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Union Creek/Stanton Bridge, NE (MRO) 26-25 Union Lake, MO (LSM) 14-17 Union River, ME (NED) 1-52 Union Township Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-13 Union Village Dam, VT (NED) 1-20, 1-37 I-67 Uniontown, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 Uniontown, PA (ORP) 18-24 University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA (SPL) 33-40 Unnamed Creek, Tioga, ND (MRO) 26-24 Upper Cedar River, WA (NPS) 38-31 Upper Chipola River, FL from Marianna to its Mouth (SAM) 10-49 Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-23, 10-36, 10-47 Upper Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Upper Grays River Area, WA (NPP) 37-39 Upper Iowa River, IA (NCS) 24-26 Upper Jordan River, CA (SPK) 35-35 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA (NAB) 4-36 Upper Marlboro, MD (NAB) 4-38, 4-44 Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program (LSM) 14-7 Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study (NCR) 23-3, 23-7 Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI (NCR) 23-3, 23-7 Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP)(NCS) 24-3 Upper Missouri River, SD Streambank Erosion Control Project (MRO) 26-23 Upper Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-29 Upper Thorofare, MD (NAB) 4-36 Upper White Oak Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-37 Upper White River, AR (SWL) 28-21 Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Urban Areas of Alton, IL (LSM) 14-16 Urbanna Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 US Highway 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM) 13-5 Utica, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Utica, OH (ORH) 17-23, 17-24 Uvas Creek (SPN) 34-14 V Valdez Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 Valley, AL (SAM) 10-52 Valley City Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-16 Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Valley View Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF) 30-23 Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO (MRO) 26-30 Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-23 Van Meter, IA (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Vanceburg, KY (ORH) 17-21 Vancouver Lake Area, WA (NPP) 37-40 Vatia Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Vaughn, MT, Sun River, Great Falls (MRO) 26-22, 26-25 Velva (Bonnes Coulee), ND (NCS) 24-29 Velva, ND (NCS) 24-27, 24-31 Ventura Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-16, 33-38 Ventura-Pierpoint Area, CA (SPL) 33-36 Ventura River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-38 Ventura River Levee (SPL) 33-38 Verdigris River City Basin, KS (SWT) 29-28 Vermilion Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-9, 20-19, 20-39 Vermillion River and Tributaries, SD (MRO) 26-23 Vermillion River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-28 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN (NCS) 24-27, 24-31 Vermillion River, Vermillion, SD (MRO) 26-25 Vernon Branch, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-49 Verona (Mouth of Feather River), CA (SPK) 35-41 Verona Lake, VA (NAB) 4-38 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN (NCS) 24-27, 24-31 .Vevay, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Vicinity of-Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Victoria Beach, East Haven, CT (NED) 1-60 Victory Lake, VT (NED) 1-59 Villa Park Dam (SPL) 33-40 Village Creek, Birmingham, AL (SAM) 10-24, 10-36 Village Creek, Jackson and Lawerence Counties, AR (SWL) 28-23 Village Creek, SC (SAN) 7-20 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, AR (SWL) 28-23 Village of New Athens, IL (LSM) 14-16 Village of Saxtons, VT (NED) 1-56 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX (SWG) 31-37 Vincennes, IN (Partial) (ORL) 16-26 Vincennes, IN (Uncompleted Portion) (ORL) 16-30 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 Vineyard Haven Harbor, MA (NED) 1-60 Vineyard Haven, MA (NED) 1-52 Virginia Beach Canal No. 2, VA (NAO) 5-17 Virginia Beach, VA (Hurricane Protection) (NAO) 5-6, 5-10, 5-14 1-68 Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) (NAO) 5-7, 5-10, 5-14 Volga, IA (NCR) 23-15 W W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY (LMM) 13-5 W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, NC (SAW) 6-15, 6-22 W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14) (SWL) 28-26 W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK (SWT) 29-27 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL (LSM) 14-14 Wabash River, Adams County, IN (ORL) 16-31, 16-33 Wabash River Basin (ORL) 16-12, 16-20 Wabash River, near Merom, IN (ORL) 16-34 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN (ORL) 16-34, 16-35 Wabash River, Terre Haute, IN (ORL) 16-35 Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West (ORL) 16-34 Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road (ORL) 16-34, 16-35 Wabash River, York Township, Clark County, IL (ORL) 16-24 Wabasha County, County Hwy 11, MN (NCS) 24-17, 24-22, 24-31 Wabasha Harbor, MN 25-7 Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-27 Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, NC & SC (SAW) 6-30 Waccamaw River, NC & SC (SAN) 7-20 Waco Creek, Waco, TX (SWF) 30-23 Waco Lake, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-18, 30-21, 30-23 Wagoner County, CO (SWT) 29-30 Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, WA (NPP) 37-40 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Waikiki Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-9 Waimea Beach, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-10 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island (POD) 36-10 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR (NPP) 37-41 Wallabout Channel, NY (NAN) 2-28 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, NC (SAW) 6-28 Wallace Lake, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-22 Wallace, WV (ORP) 18-23 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH (NED) 1-54 Wallisville Lake, TX (SWG) 31-9 Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, OR (NPW) 39-16 Walluski River Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Walnut Bottom Run, Beaver Falls, PA (detalied project report) (ORP) 18-30 Walnut Creek, CA (SPK) 35-21, 35-31 Walnut Creek, Mansfield, TX (SWF) 30-23 Walnut Creek; Seguin, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 Walnut Creek, Springtown, TX (SWF) 30-23 Walnut River, Cowley County, KS (SWT) 29-29 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 10-27, 10-37, 10-48 Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, NY (NAN) 2-30 Wappinger Creek, NY (NAN) 2-28 Ware, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-59 Wareham Harbor, MA (NED) 1-52 Wareham-Marion, MA (NED) 1-59 Warner Road at Sibley Street, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS), 24-27, 24-31 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-27, 24-31 Warren River, RI (NED) 1-52 Warrenton Diking District 1, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Warroad Harbor and River, MN (NCS) 24-3, 24-20, 24-24, 24-28 Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN (NCS) 24-28 Warsaw Harbor, IL 25-8 Warsaw, NY, Oatka Creek (NCB) 20-44 Warwick Cove, RI (NED) 1-52 Warwick River (NAB) 4-36 Warwood, WV (ORP) 18-24 Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-21 Washington Canal and South River, NJ (NAN) 2-28 Washington DC and Vicinity (NAB) 4-38 Washington Harbor, DC (NAB) 4-9, 4-25, 4-32 Washington Island, WI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Washington on Brazos State Park, TX (SWF) 30-23 Washington, PA (ORP) 18-22 Washington Street Bridge, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR (NPP) 37-40 Water Resources Support Center 46-1 I-69 Water Valley, Eleven Point River, AR & MO (SWL) 28-23 Water Works, Park and Pool, Wellsburg, WV (completed) (ORP) 18-30 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, VT (NAN) 2-30 Waterbury, VT (NAN) 2-32 Waterbury-Watertown, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-64 Wateree River, SC (SAN) 7-20 Waterford, NY (NAN) 2-32 Waterloo, IA (Bridges) (NCR) 23-13 Waterloo, IA (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Waterloo, NE (MRO) 26-22, 26-26 Waterman Creek, Near Sutherland, IA (MRO) 26-27 Watertown and Vicinity, SD (MRO) 26-28 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-21, 6-27 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA (NPS) 38-26 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, NC (SAW) 6-28 Waterway from Empire, LA to Gulf of Mexico (LMN) 11-14 Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE (NAP) 3-27 - Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA (LMN) 11-11, 11-14 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD (NAB) 4-40 Waterway - Norfolk, VA to Sounds of NC (SAW) 6-28 Waterway on the Coast of VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-10, 5-14 Waterways Experiment Station 44-1 Watkins Glen, NY 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-47 Waukegan Harbor, IL (NCC) 22-5, 22-14, 22-19, 22-21 Waurika Lake, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-20, 29-24 Waveland, MS (SAM) 10-52 Waverley, WV (ORH) 17-22 Waycake Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-32 Webb District Improvement Co, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Webber Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK (SWT) 29-28 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No. 16) (SWL) 28-26 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-22, 29-25 Weber River and Tributaries, UT (SPK) 35-41 Weeks Bay, AL (SAM) 10-48 Weiser River, Cambridge-Midvale (NPW) 39-17 Weiser River, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-17 Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID (NPW) 39-17 Welles Harbor, Midway Island (POD) 36-7 Wellfleet Harbor, MA (NED) 1-10, 1-34, 1-46 Wells and Drake Island, Wells, ME (NED) 1-60 Wells Harbor, ME (NED) 1-61 Wellsburg, WV (ORP) 18-24 Wellsville, NY Genesee River (NCB) 20-44 Wellsville, OH, Section I (ORP) 18-22 Wellsville, OH, Section II (ORP) 18-22 Wenatchie River, WA (NPS) 38-30 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA (NED) 1-54 West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA (LMN) 11-12 West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 West Branch Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY (NCB) 20-45 West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA (NAB) 4-20 West Branch, Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE (MRO) 26-27 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA (NED) 1-56 West Bridgewater, PA (ORP) 18-24 West Brookfield Reservoir, MA (NED) 1-59 West Canaan Lake, NH (NED) 1-59 West Columbus, OH (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 West Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-5, 23-8, 23-10 West Fork, Blue River, Salem, IN (ORL) 16-39 West Fork, Des Moines River, MN (NCR) 23-16 West Fork, Drakes Creek, TN & KY (ORL) 16-24 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH (ORL) 16-12, 16-17, 16-24, 16-32 West Fork, WV (ORH) 17-23 West Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-9, 20-19, 20-39 West Hill Dam, MA (NED) 1-14, 1-35 West Hill, Worcester, MA (NED) 1-61 West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (ORP) 18-22 West Makinster Road, Wilson River, OR (NPP) 37-40 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR (NPP) 37-41 West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern, IA (MRO) 26-27 West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Hastings, IA (MRO) 26-27 I-70 West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock, IA (MRO) 26-27 West Nishnabotna River, Near Oakland, IA (MRO) 26-27, 26-31 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-23 West Oneonta Lake, NY (NAB) 4-40 West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA (SAM) 10-50 West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA (SAM) 10-11, 10-28, 10-37, 10-48 West Point, NE (MRO) 26-22, 26-26 West River, New Haven, CT (NED) 1-27, 1-40, 1-49, 1-66 West River Road Near Wabun, Roanoke County, VA (SAW) 6-34 West Roanoke County, VA (SAW) 6-34 West Sacramento, CA (SPK) 35-35 West Springfield, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-28, 16-33 West Thompson Lake, CT (NED) 1-27, 1-40, 1-66 West Union, Middle Island, WV (ORH) 17-24 West Warren, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-63 Westchester Creek, NY (NAN) 2-28, 2-32 Westcott Cove, CT (NED) 1-52 Westerly Creek, CO (MRO) 26-7, 26-15, 26-20 Westerly, RI (NED) 1-59 Westfield, MA (NED) 1-59 Westfork, MS (SAM) 10-51 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA (NPS) 38-26 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Weston Mills, Olean, NY (ORP) 18-23 Weston Mills, Portville, NY (ORP) 18-23 Weston, VT (NED) 1-50, 1-63 Westpoint, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-30 Westport, CT (NED) 1-59 Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR (NPP) 37-39 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (NED) 1-52 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Westport, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Westport, OR- Puget Island, WA (NPP) 37-10, 37-27, 37-35 Westport River, MA (NED) 1-59 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) (NPP) 37-40 Westport Slough, OR (NPP) 37-38 Westville Lake, MA (NED) 1-27, 1-40, 1-66 Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (Hurricane protection) (LMN) 11-6, 11-9 Weymouth Back River, CT (NED) 1-52 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivers, MA (NED) 1-52, 1-61 Whalehead Club, Corolla, NC (SAW) 6-32, 6-34 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge (NAP) 3-27, 3-30 Wheeler Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling) (ORP) 18-24 Wheeling, WV (ORP) 18-24 Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island) (ORP) 18-24 Whelton Ditch, OR (NPP) 37-40 White City Park, OH 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-47 White Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-41, 21-76, 21-93 White Oak Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, NC (SAW) 6-30 White River, AR (above Peach Orchard Bluff) (SWL) 28-21 White River, AR (below Newport) (LMM) 13-4 White River, at Hwy. 14, 1/4 mile east of Oil Trough, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River Bank Stabilization, Batesville, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River Basin (Little Rock District, AR & MO) (SWL) 28-9, 28-16, 28-19, 28-30 White River, Batesville, AR (SWL) 28-10, 28-16 White River, Blue Bluff Road, Morgan, IN (ORL) 16-35 White River, Brookville, IN (ORL) 16-35 White River, Franklin County, IN (ORL) 16-35 White River, IN (ORL) 16-22 White River, Jacksonport, AR (SWL) 28-21, 28-23 White River, Newport, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN (ORL) 16-34 White River, Petersburg, IN (ORL) 16-34, 16-35 White River, St. Paul, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River, Tripp County Road, SD (MRO) 26-24 White River, Winner, SD (MRO) 26-26 Whitebird Creek, ID (NPW) 39-17 Whitefish Point Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-95, 21-101 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork, Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-33 I-71 Whitewater River and Tributaries, IN & OH (ORL) 16-24 Whitewater River Basin Floodwarning System, San Bernardino, CA (SPL) 33-11, 33-20, 33-34 Whitewater River, CA (SPL) 33-39 Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN (ORL) 16-34 Whitewater Treatment Plant, Great Miami River, Ross, OH (ORL) 16-34 Whitings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-10, 5-14, 5-17 Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ (SPL) 33-11, 33-20, 33-34 Whitmanville Lake, MA (NED) 1-56, 1-65 Whitney Lake, TX (SWF) 30-12, 30-18, 30-21 Whitney Point Lake, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-27 Whitney Point Village, NY (NAB) 4-18 Whittier, AK (NPA) 40-17 Whorton's Bend Road, Etowah County, AL (SAM) 10-50 Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-28 Wichita Falls, TX, Plum Creek (SWT) 29-28 Wichita, KS (SWT) 29-30 Wickford Harbor, RI (NED) 1-52, 1-61 Wicomico River, MD (NAB) 4-10, 4-25, 4-33 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO (LSM) 14-17 Wiggle Creek, Homer, NE (MRO) 26-26 Wilbur D. Mills Lock and Dam (No. 2) (SWL) 28-24 Wilcox, PA (ORP) 18-24 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers (NCS) 24-30, 24-32 Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee, MN (NCS) 24-17, 24-22 Wild Rice River, Lake Ida, MN (NCS) 24-32 Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN (NCS) 24-27 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA, CA (SPK) 35-22, 35-31 Wildcat Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Wildcat Creek, Howard County, IN (ORL) 16-35 Wildcat Creek, Kokomo, IN (ORL) 16-35 Wilders, KY (ORL) 16-30 Wiley Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-41 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA (NAB) 4-38 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR (NPP) 37-41 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portion) (NPP) 37-41 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR (NPP) 37-10, 37-27, 37-35, 37-41, 37-43 Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR (NPP) 37-17, 37-29, 37-36 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging (NPP) 37-40 Willamette River, OR (NPP) 37-42 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (NPS) 38-7, 38-17, 38-23 Willapa River at Raymond, WA (NPS) 38-29 William H. Harsha Lake, OH (ORL) 16-13, 16-17, 16-32 William L. Springer Lake, Decatur, IL (NCR) 23-14 Williams Delight Basin, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-63 Williamson, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Williamsport, AK (NPA) 40-17 Williamsport, PA (NAB) 4-38 Williamstown, WV (ORH) 17-22 Williamsville Reservoir, VT (NED) 1-59 Williston, ND Water Intake (MRO) 26-22 Willoughby Channel, VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-10, 5-14, 5-17 Willow Creek, CA (SPK) 35-44 Willow Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR (NPP) 37-17, 37-29, 37-36 Willow Creek Lake, OR (NPW) 39-16 Willow Creek Unit (NPW) 39-17 Wilmington Harbor, DE (NAP) 3-10, 3-19, 3-24 Wilmington Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-22 Wilmington Harbor, NC, Passing Lane (SAW) 6-32 Wilmington Harbor, NC, Turns and Bends (SAW) 6-32 Wilmington Harbor Widening and Deepening, NC (SAW) 6-31 Wilmington Ice Control Demonstration (NCC) 22-23 Wilmore, PA (ORP) 18-22 Wilson Branch, SC (SAN) 7-24 Wilson Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS (MRK) 27-7, 27-12, 27-16, 27-20 Wilson Point Harbor, CT (NED) 1-52 Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR (NPP) 37-40 Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Winfield L&D (ORH) 17-12 Winfield LPP, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-30 I-72 Winnipesaukee Lake, NH (NED) 1-52 Winona Harbors, MN 25-7 Winona, MN (NCS) 24-27 Winooski River, VT (NAN) 2-30 Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ (SPL) 33-34 Winsor Park, Las Vegas, NV (SPL) 33-33 Winsted, CT (NED) 1-56, 1-63 Winter Harbor ME (NED) 1-52 Winter Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-17 Winthrop Beach, MA (NED) 1-54 Winthrop Beach, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-59 Winthrop Harbor, MA (NED) 1-52, 1-60 Wisconsin River, WI (NCS) 24-25 Wishart Point Channel, VA (NAO) 5-17 Wister Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Wister Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-20, 29-24, 29-27 Withlacoochee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS (SAM) 10-49, 10-54 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-19 Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORN) 15-7, 15-10 Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Wolf Creek, LaPorte City, IA (NCR) 23-16 Wolf Creek, Lawton, OK (SWT) 29-28 Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN (LMM) 13-4 Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, ME (NED) 1-10, 1-34, 1-46 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-12, 14-16 Wood River, Grand Island, NE (MRO) 26-23 Woodbridge Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-28 Woodbury Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-11, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Woodlands, WV (ORP) 18-24 Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-13, 1-35, 1-46 Woods Hole Channel, MA (NED) 1-52 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Woodson Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 Woonsocket, RI (NED) 1-56, 1-62 Worcester Diversion, MA (NED) 1-56 Worcester, MA (NED) 1-62 Worthington, MN (NCR) 23-15 Wrangell Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-11, 40-14 Wrangell Narrows, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-15 Wrangell Narrows Channel, AK (NPA) 40-17 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-11, 30-18, 30-21 Wrights Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 Wrightsville Beach, NC (SAW) 6-15, 6-23 Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, VT (NAN) 2-30 Wynoochee Lake, WA (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-24 Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA (NPS) 38-29 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (NPS) 38-29 Wyoming Valley, PA (NAB) 4-38 Y Yadkin River Basin, NC and SC (SAW) 6-15, 6-33 Yakima (Yakima River), WA (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA (NPS) 38-30 Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River, West Richland, WA (NPW) 39-16 Yakima River, West Richland, WA (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River, Yakima, WA (NPS) 38-29 Yalobusha River, MS (LMK) 12-17 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR (NPP) 37-11, 37-27, 37-35 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, OR (NPP) 37-38 Yaquina River, OR (NPP) 37-11, 37-27, 37-35 Yaquina River, Port of Toledo, OR (NPP) 37-38 Yatesville Lake, KY (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 Yazoo River, MS (LMK) 12-17 Yellow Bend Port, AR (LMK) 12-17 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA (SAM) 10-50 Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings, MT (MRO) 26-25 Yellowstone River, Glendive (MRO) 26-25 Yellowstone River, Highway 89 Bridge, MT (MRO) 26-31 Yellowstone River, Livingston, MT (MRO) 26-25 Yellowstone River, MT (MRO) 26-31 Yellowstone River, Route 11, Livingstone, MT (MRO) 26-31 I-73 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT (MRO) 26-22, 26-25 Yellowstone River Water Plant, Livingston (MRO) 26-25 Yonkers, NY (NAN) 2-30 York Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 York, Indian Rock Dam, PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-28 York River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-17 York Spit Channel (NAO) 5-3, 5-11 Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD (ORP) 18-11, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization) (ORP) 18-24 Youngs and Claskine River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Youngs Bay and Youngs River,' OR (NPP) 37-38 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR (N'PP) 37-39 Youngstown, OH (ORP) 18-22 Z Zacate Creek Channel, TX (SWF) 30-22 Zacate Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Zanesville, OH (ORH) 17-22 Zintel Canyon Dam, WA (NWP) 39-4, 39-10, 39-13, 39-16 Zippel Bay Harbor, MN (NCS) 24-25 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN (NCS) 24-25 Zumbro River at Genoa, MN (NCS) 24-27 Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN (NCS) 24-27, 24-31 Zumbro River, MN (NCS) 24-27 1-74 HUMPHREYS ENGINEER CENTER I'I b-_ ., .